Archives

Primary Disorders of Phosphate Metabolism

ABSTRACT

 

Phosphorus is critical to many functions in human biology. Deprivation of phosphorus may manifest as disorders of the musculoskeletal system, reflecting its important role in energy metabolism and skeletal mineralization. Phosphorus excess can promote heterotopic mineralization and is associated with mortality, particularly in the setting of chronic kidney disease. Inorganic phosphorus, primarily occurring as phosphate (PO4), is highly regulated by transport systems in intestine and kidney, and is essential for the formation of a mineralized skeleton. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) are major hormonal regulators of phosphate homeostasis and membrane abundance of PO4 transporters. Tissue distribution of alpha-klotho permits a primary renal specificity for FGF23 actions. Disorders of phosphate metabolism that are encountered in clinical practice are described in this Endotext chapter, with an emphasis on pathophysiologic processes, diagnostic measures, and treatment. The identification of FGF23 as an important mediator of phosphate homeostasis has brought to light the underlying disease processes in many of these conditions, along with the possibility of novel, physiologic-based therapies.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Phosphorus plays an important role in growth, development, bone formation, acid-base regulation, and cellular metabolism. Inorganic phosphorus exists primarily as the critical structural ion, phosphate (PO4), which serves as a constituent of hydroxyapatite, the mineral basis of the vertebrate skeleton, and at the molecular level, providing the molecular backbone of DNA. Its chemical properties allow its use as a biological energy store as adenosine triphosphate. Additionally, phosphorus influences a variety of enzymatic reactions (e.g., glycolysis) and protein functions (e.g., the oxygen-carrying capacity of hemoglobin by regulation of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate synthesis). Finally, phosphorus is an important signaling moiety, as phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of protein structures serves as an activation signal. Indeed, phosphorus is one of the most abundant components of all tissues, and disturbances in its homeostasis can affect almost any organ system. Most phosphorus within the body is in bone (600-700 g), while the remainder is largely distributed in soft tissue (100-200 g). The plasma contains 11-12 mg/dL of total phosphorus (in both organic and inorganic states) in adults. Inorganic phosphorus (Pi) primarily exists as phosphate (PO4), and is the commonly measured fraction, found in plasma at concentrations averaging 3-4 mg/dl in older children and adults. Plasma Pi concentrations values in children are higher, not infrequently as high as 8 mg/dl in small infants, and gradually declining steeply throughout the first year of life, and further in later childhood to adult values. The organic phosphorus component is primarily found in phospholipids. Although this fraction is not routinely assessed clinically, it comprises approximately two-thirds of the total plasma phosphorus (1). Thus, the term “plasma phosphorus” generally is used when referring to plasma inorganic Pi concentrations, and because plasma inorganic Pi is nearly all in the form of the PO4 ion, the terms phosphorus and phosphate are often interchangeably used in the clinical chemistry laboratory. It should be noted that this terminology can be confusing when using mass units (i.e., mg/dl) as the weight of the phosphorus content of the phosphate is reported, yet “serum phosphate” is often used in the clinic setting.  When using molar units the concentration of the phosphate and of the phosphorus are equivalent, and less confusion may arise.

 

Elaborate mechanisms have evolved to maintain phosphate balance, reflecting the critical role that phosphorus plays in cell and organism physiology. Adaptive changes are manifest by a variety of measurable responses, as modified by metabolic Pi need and exogenous Pi supply. Such regulation maintains the plasma and extracellular fluid phosphorus within a relatively narrow range and depends primarily upon gastrointestinal absorption and renal excretion as adjustable mechanisms to effect homeostasis. Although investigators have recognized a variety of hormones and transporter proteins which influence these various processes, in concert with associated changes in other metabolic pathways, the sensory system, the messenger and the mechanisms underlying discriminant regulation of Pi balance remain incompletely understood.

 

While long-term changes in Pi balance depend on these variables, short-term changes in Pi concentrations can occur due to redistribution between the extracellular fluid and either bone or cell constituents. Such redistribution results secondary to various mechanisms including: elevated levels of insulin and/or glucose; increased concentrations of circulating catecholamines; respiratory alkalosis; enhanced cell production or anabolism; and rapid bone remineralization.

 

REGULATION OF PHOSPHORUS HOMEOSTASIS

 

The majority of ingested phosphorus is absorbed in the small intestine. Active transport is mediated by sodium dependent transporter protein(s), and sodium-independent P-transport also occurs. Hormonal mechanisms regulating Pi homeostasis in the kidney are established in more detail. Indeed, the kidney has long been considered the dominant site of regulation of Pi balance, as renal tubular reclamation of filtered Pi occurs in response to complex regulatory mechanisms. Although the fate of Pi has generally been considered a matter of renal elimination, incorporation into organic forms in proliferating cells, or deposition into the mineral phase of bone as hydroxyapatite, the role of intestinal phosphate transport warrants further study. Indeed, it appears that presentation of Pi to the intestine can affect systemic phosphate handling before changes in serum Pi concentration are evident. Moreover, in the setting of severe phosphorus deprivation, the phosphate contained in bone mineral provides a source of phosphorus for the metabolic needs of the organism. The specific roles that the intestine and kidney play in this complex process are discussed below.

 

Gastrointestinal Absorption Of Phosphorus

 

Studies of Pi absorption in the intestine have yielded variable results, in part due to confounding influences of nutritional status, the effects of anesthesia on gut transit, species differences, and potential effects of studying whole organisms as opposed to isolated bowel segments. The small intestine is the dominant site of Pi absorption; in mice Pi is absorbed along the entire length of small bowel, but at the highest rate in the ileum. In rats, duodenum and jejunum provide the primary sites of Pi absorption, whereas very little occurs in ileum. This is felt to be more consistent with the pattern of Pi absorption in humans, however studies are subject to the confounding issues noted above. In normal adults net Pi absorption is a linear function of dietary Pi intake. For a dietary Pi range of 4 to 30 mg/kg/day, the net Pi absorption averages 60 to 65% of the intake (2). Intestinal Pi absorption occurs via two routes (Figure 1), a cellularly mediated sodium-dependent active transport mechanism, and sodium independent transport, which is not well characterized.  Mechanisms for the latter have been attributed in part to paracellular pathways (3), however recent findings suggest that for glucose, this pathway only accounts for 1-2% of passive glucose uptake in the intestine, far less that once speculated. Finally, the relative roles of these processes appear to be age dependent (4). Animal models suggest that weanling mice have both greater intestinal P transport (and greater expression of NaPi-IIb) than at other ages, presumably to support skeletal growth.

 

Controversy exists as to what proportion of intestinal Pi absorption is absorbed via sodium-dependent mechanisms and what proportion is sodium-independent. In this regard, the major Na+-dependent phosphate cotransporter identified in intestinal brush border membranes is NPT2b, a member of the SLC34 solute carrier family, also referred to as type II sodium-phosphate cotransporters (5). Earlier studies suggested that approximately 50% of intestinal P transport occurs by sodium-dependent mechanisms, and that most of this activity can be accounted for by the sodium-dependent transporter NPT2b. A lesser contribution to sodium-independent transport has been attributed to either type III transporters (PiT1 and PiT2, see below), and other unknown mechanisms. NPT2b is also expressed in lung, colon, testis/epididymis, liver, and in mammary and salivary glands, with most abundant expression in mammary glands (4). NPT2b is electrogenic, maintains a 3:1 stoichiometry of Na: Pi, prefers the divalent P species, and has a high affinity for Pi binding (6-10). Depending upon species and bowel segment, NPT2b transporters can be regulated by 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (­), FGF23 (¯), low Pi diet (­), and acute phosphate loading (­). Energy for the electrochemical uphill process is provided by the sodium gradient, which is maintained by sodium-potassium ATPase. The phosphate incorporated into intestinal cells by this mechanism is ferried from the apical pole to the basolateral pole likely through restricted channels such as the microtubules. Exit of Pi from the enterocyte across the basolateral membrane and into the circulation is a poorly understood process. More recently widely-expressed members of the SLC20 solute carrier family, the type III sodium-phosphate cotransporters PiT1 and PiT2, have been found to be variably expressed in the intestine (11), and PiT2 primarily in ileum.  Pit1 and Pit2 prefer to transport the monovalent Pi species (HPO4 -), and maintain a 2 Na: 1 P stoichiometry. These transporters may play a greater role in adaptive responses to intestinal Pi transport than previously recognized. PiT1 upregulates in response to phosphate deprivation, but in a relatively slow time frame, whereas expression of PiT2 and NPT2b upregulate within 24 hrs (12). In NPT2b-/- mice there is approximately 10% sodium-dependent Pi transport activity, suggesting that the type III transporters are of limited significance in the intestine in murine models. The process is further complicated by significant effects of alkaline pH as inhibitory to intestinal Pi transport, Moreover, the adaptation to P deprivation occurs with greater rates of transport occurring at more acidic pH (12) Given the variable nature and segment-specific regulation of NPT2b, the ultimate impact on overall phosphate homeostasis appears to be less well understood at the intestine than at the kidney. The presence of different classes of transporters in the intestine provide for Pi transport under a variety of different conditions such as variable pH, species of PO4 substrate, and Pi supply.  Indeed, recent work leads to speculation that much of the adaptive response to intestinal phosphate transport likely occurs by yet unrecognized transporters or transport processes (12).

Figure 1. Model of inorganic phosphate (HPO4=) transport in the intestine. At the luminal surface of the enterocyte the brush border membrane harbors sodium-dependent phosphate transporters of the NPT2b type. NPT2b transporters are electrogenic, have high affinity for Pi, and a stoichiometry of 3 Na ions: 1 phosphate. Energy for this transport process is provided by an inward downhill sodium gradient, maintained by transport of Na+ from the cell via a Na+/K+ ATPase cotransporter at the basolateral membrane. The HPO4= incorporated into the enterocytes by this mechanism is transferred to the circulation by poorly understood mechanisms. Type III sodium-dependent transporters are also expressed on the intestinal luminal surface (PiT1 and PiT2) and contribute to this process. Considerable HPO4= absorption occurs via a sodium-independent process(es) such diffusional absorption across the intercellular spaces in the intestine. Other processes have also been hypothesized.

As most diets contain an abundance of Pi, the quantity absorbed nearly always exceeds the need. Factors which may adversely influence the non-regulable, sodium-independent process are the formation of nonabsorbable calcium, aluminum or magnesium phosphate salts in the intestine and age, which reduces Pi absorption by as much as 50%.

 

Renal Excretion Of Phosphorus

 

The kidney responds rapidly to changes in serum Pi levels or to dietary Pi intake. The balance between the rates of glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption (13) determines net renal handling of Pi. Pi concentration in the glomerular ultrafiltrate is approximately 90% of that in plasma, as not all of the plasma Pi is ultrafilterable (14). Since the product of the serum Pi concentration and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) approximates the filtered load of Pi, a change in the GFR may influence Pi homeostasis if uncompensated by commensurate changes in tubular reabsorption.

 

The major site of phosphate reabsorption is the proximal convoluted tubule, at which 60% to 70% of reabsorption occurs (Figure 2). Along the proximal convoluted tubule, the transport is heterogeneous, with greatest activity in the S1 segment. Further, increasing, but not conclusive, data supports the existence of a Pi reabsorptive mechanism in the distal tubule. Currently, however, conclusive proof for tubular secretion of Pi in humans is lacking (15).

Figure 2. Distribution of Pi reabsorption and hormone-dependent adenylate cyclase activity throughout the renal tubule. The renal tubules consist of a proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), composed of an S1, S2 and S3 segment, a proximal straight tubule (PST), also known as the S3 segment, the loop of Henle, the medullary ascending limb (MAL), the cortical ascending limb (CAL), the distal convoluted tubule (DCT) and three segments of the collecting tubule: the cortical collecting tubule (CCT); the outer medullary collecting tubule (OMCT); and the inner medullary collecting tubule (IMCT). Pi reabsorption occurs primarily in the PCT but is present is the PST and DCT, sites at which parathyroid hormone (PTH) dependent adenylate cyclase is localized. In contrast, calcitonin alters Pi transport at sites devoid of calcitonin dependent adenylate cyclase, suggesting that Pi reabsorption in response to this stimulus occurs by a distinctly different mechanism.

At all three sites of Pi reabsorption, the proximal convoluted tubule, proximal straight tubule and distal tubule, PTH has been shown to decrease Pi reabsorption either by a cAMP-dependent process, or in some cases a cAMP-independent signaling mechanism. In contrast, calcitonin-sensitive adenylate cyclase maps to the medullary and cortical thick ascending limbs and the distal tubule (Figure 2) (16). Although calcitonin has been shown to inhibit Pi reabsorption in proximal convoluted and straight tubules by a cAMP-independent mechanism, the physiologic importance of this action is likely limited. It appears that the major regulators of renal tubular phosphate retention are PTH and the endocrine fibroblast growth factor, FGF23 (see below).

 

MECHANISM OF PHOSPHATE TRANSPORT

 

Investigations of the cellular events involved in Pi movement from the renal tubule luminal fluid to the peritubular capillary blood indicate that Pi reabsorption occurs principally by a unidirectional process that proceeds transcellularly. Entry of Pi into the tubular cell across the luminal membrane proceeds by way of a saturable active transport system that is sodium-dependent (analogous to the sodium-dependent co-transport in the intestine) (Figure 3). The rate of Pi transport is dependent on the abundance of transporters functioning in the membrane, and the magnitude of the Na+gradient maintained across the luminal membrane. This gradient depends on the Na+/ATPase or sodium pump on the basolateral membrane. The rate limiting step in transcellular transport is likely the Na+-dependent entry of Pi across the luminal membrane, a process with a low Km for luminal phosphate (~0.43M) which permits highly efficient transport.

Figure 3. Model of inorganic phosphate transcellular transport in the proximal tubule. At the brush border a Na+/H+ exchanger and NPT2 co-transporters operate. Nearly all proximal tubular reabsorption can be accounted for by the SLC34 (type II) family of sodium-dependent Pi transporters. In mice, NPT2a appears to be the more abundant transporter; it is electrogenic with a 3:1 (Na: PO4) stoichiometry, preferentially transporting the divalent phosphate anion. The lesser abundant NPT2c transporter is electroneutral with a 2:1 (Na: PO4) stoichiometry, but also prefers the divalent phosphate species. In humans NP2c appears to have a more significant role than in mice. The HPO4- that enters the cell across the luminal surface mixes with the intracellular pool of Pi and is transported across the basolateral membrane. This process is poorly understood, but anion exchange mechanisms have been suggested. A Na+/K+ ATPase located on the basolateral membrane pumps Na+ out of the cell maintaining the inward downhill Na gradient, which serves as the driving force for luminal entry of Na+.

The phosphate that enters the tubule cell plays a major role in governing various aspects of cell metabolism and function and is in rapid exchange with intracellular phosphate. Under these conditions the relatively stable free Pi concentration in the cytosol implies that Pi entry into the cell across the brush border membrane must be tightly coupled with either subcellular compartmentalization, organification, or exit across the basolateral membrane (Figure 3). The transport of phosphate across the basolateral membrane is poorly understood, however, several P transport pathways have been postulated, including Na+-Pi cotransport via type III Na-Pi cotransporters, passive diffusion, and anion exchange. The XPR1 transporter has been implicated in transport of phosphate out of cells but the significance of its role in total body P homeostasis is uncertain in humans (17). One animal study provides reasonable evidence for a critical role for this transporter in generalized tubular function (18). In any case, the basolateral Pi transport serves at least two functions: 1) complete transcellular Pi reabsorption when luminal Pi entry exceeds the cellular Pi requirements; and 2) basolateral Pi influx if apical Pi entry is insufficient to satisfy cellular requirements (19).

Pi entry into renal epithelium is primarily performed by the type II class of Na-Pi cotransporters (SLC34 family members), although recently the finding of type III transporters (SLC20 family members, PiT1 and PiT2) in kidney have raised the possibility of a potential role for this class as well (20).These two families of Na-Pi cotransporters share no significant homology in their primary amino acid sequence and as noted above, exhibit substantial variability in substrate affinity, pH dependence and tissue expression. The NPT2 class of transporters account for the bulk of regulated phosphate transport in kidney, and disruption of this regulation may result in significant disease, documenting their physiological importance (21, 22). As with intestinal Pi transport, physiologic differences between these families of Pi transporters provides for functional diversity allowing the body to transfer Pi between compartments in a variety of situations. Of the class II transporters NPT2a and NPT2c transporters are the predominant actors in the proximal renal tubule. NPT2a, the more abundant species in mice, is electrogenic with a 3:1 (Na: PO4) stoichiometry, preferentially transporting the divalent phosphate anion, and has a high affinity for Pi (all features of the NPT2b member of this family, the predominant intestinal sodium-dependent Pi transporter, see above). NPT2c differs from its type 2a/b family members in that is electroneutral with a 2:1 (Na: PO4) stoichiometry, but also prefers the divalent phosphate species. It has a much lower affinity for Pi, but is an efficient transporter due to its electroneutrality. An aspartic acid residue (Asp 224 in human NaPi-IIa) in a sodium binding site within a conserved amino acid cluster in the electrogenic transporters NPT2a and NPT2b, appears to be critical for electrogenicity. It is replaced with a glycine residue (Gly 196 in human NPT2c) in the electroneutral type IIc transporter (23).

Initial attention focused on NPT2a, as it was determined to be the most abundant Na-Pi cotransporter in kidney. Molecular and/or genetic suppression of NPT2a supports its role in mediating brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport. Intravenous injection of specific antisense oligonucleotides reduces brush-border membrane Na-Pi cotransport activity in accord with a decrease in NPT2a protein (24). In addition, disruption of the gene encoding NPT2a in mice (Slc34a1) leads to a 70% reduction in brush-border Na-Pi cotransport rate and complete loss of the protein (25, 26). However, the NPT2c transporter may have a relatively more important role for Pi transport in humans as compared to rodents, and appears to have a more widespread tissue distribution. The identification of a unique form of hypophosphatemia, Hereditary Hypophosphatemic Rickets with Hypercalciuria (HHRH) as a loss-of-function mutation in NPT2c has demonstrated an important physiologic role in humans for this transporter (27).

The roles of type III transporters in this process are not established at this time, and the previously described class of type I sodium-dependent phosphate transporters (of the SLC17 family) are not specific Pi transporters and do not appear to be central to the regulation of phosphate homeostasis.

REGULATION OF RENAL TUBULAR PHOSPHATE HANDLING

Several hormones and metabolic perturbations are able to modulate phosphate reabsorption by the kidney. Among these FGF23, PTH, PTHrP, calcitonin, atrial natriuretic peptide, acidosis, TGFb, glucocorticoids, hypercalcemia, and phosphate loading inhibit renal phosphate reclamation (for review, see reference 28). In contrast, IGF-1, growth hormone, insulin, thyroid hormone, EGF, alkalosis, hypocalcemia, and phosphate deprivation (depletion) stimulate renal phosphate reabsorption. The central role of FGF23 in this regard, revealed by the study of clinical disorders of renal phosphate wasting. Indeed, PTH and FGF23 are likely the two most important regulators of renal tubular phosphate handling, and are discussed in greater detail below. The common target for regulation by these factors is the renal proximal tubular cell. Effects of 1,25(OH)2D are less clearly delineated, and such effects in vivo may be mediated by PTH or FGF23.

PTH

Investigations of classical PTH effects on proximal tubule phosphate transport indicate that both the cAMP-protein kinase A (PKA) and the phospholipase C-protein kinase C (PKC) signal transduction pathways are able to modulate this process. The PTH mediated inhibition of phosphate reabsorption operates through the PKC system at low hormone concentrations (10-8 to 10-10 M) and via PKA at higher concentrations. The PKA pathway is the more important mediator of PTH’s role on P handling at the kidney. PTH, after interaction with its receptor, PTHR1, effects a rapid and irreversible endocytosis of NaPi-IIa transporters to the lysosomal compartment, where subsequent proteolytic degradation occurs (29). Stabilization of NPT2a is mediated by NHERF1 which is phosphorylated by PTH’s activation of the PKA and PKC pathways. NHERF3 also binds to NPT2a, but it does not appear to be necessary for apical retention of the transporter.

In contrast to NPT2a, NPT2c transporters are not targeted to lysosomes and their removal from the apical membrane may not be entirely irreversible (30, 31). Although recovery of NPT2a cotransport activity following PTH inhibition requires protein synthesis, this may not be the case for NPT2c. In addition, the abundance of NPT2a-specific mRNA is not changed by parathyroidectomy but is minimally decreased in response to PTH administration. These data implicate PTH as a regulator of renal Na-Pi cotransport in an acute time frame, and that the regulation is determined by changes in the abundance of NaPi-II proteins in the renal brush border membrane (32). Certain aspects of Pi homeostasis at the renal level, however, are not explained by actions of PTH. For instance, even in the setting where parathyroid glands have been removed, regulation of renal P transport by dietary P content still exists, implying that other mediators of this process are at work.

FGF23

FGF23 is the most recently identified important physiologic regulator of renal Pi excretion (33). This novel member of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family is produced by osteocytes and osteoblasts, thereby serving as a mechanism by which skeletal mineral demands can be communicated to the kidney, and influencing phosphate economy of the entire organism. In rodents and humans, after days of dietary phosphate loading, circulating FGF23 levels increase, and similarly, with dietary Pi deprivation, FGF23 levels decrease (34). FGF23 activates FGF receptors on the basolateral membrane of renal tubules resulting in removal of type II sodium-dependent Pi transporters from the apical surface of the tubular cell by a NHERF1 dependent process, similar to the mechanism described for PTH above. However, in contrast to PTH, FGF23 actions are mediated activation of ERK1/2 rather than the PTH driven PKA dependent pathway. Evidence also exists for decreased expression of type II sodium-dependent Pi via genomic mechanisms. FGF23 interacts with its receptor via a mechanism now identified as characteristic of the endocrine FGFs. FGF23 recognizes its cognate FGFR only in the presence of the co-receptor, alpha-klotho (35). Activation of this complex results in downstream ERK phosphorylation, and subsequently reduced expression of NaPi-IIa and NaPi-IIc, and CYP27B1 (1-hydroxylase), with an increase in expression of CYP24A1 (24-hydroxylase). This mechanism of signaling is apparent for the endocrine FGFs, FGF19 and FGF21, which require a separate member of the klotho family (beta-klotho) for specific tissue specific activation of FGFRs (for detailed review, see reference 36).

FGF23 contains a unique C-terminal domain, thought to be the site of the interaction with klotho. The FGF-like domain, N-terminal to a furin protease recognition site, is the basis for the interaction of FGF23 with FGFR. Alpha-klotho appears to be able to associate with “c” isoforms of FGFR1 and FGFR3, and also FGFR4 (35). Renal signaling is thought to occur via FGFR1c, thereby rendering the reduced expression of the apical membrane NaPi-II transporters. FGF23 also may play a role movement of transporters from the apical membrane; PTH may play a modulatory or necessary role for this effect (37). The physiologic importance of this system has been demonstrated in several ways. First, mice overexpressing FGF23 demonstrate increased renal Pi clearance and concomitant hypophosphatemia (38). Secondly, FGF23 null mice retain P at the kidney and are hyperphosphatemic (39). Thirdly, administration to mice of an FGF23 neutralizing antibody increases serum Pi (40).

Nevertheless, gaps in our understanding of this pathway remain. Alpha-klotho appears to be more abundantly expressed in distal renal tubules as compared to proximal tubular sites. Thus, the mechanism by which this pathway effects the transporters in the proximal tubule is unclear. Most recently klotho alone has been shown to increase expression of FGF23, and appears to be able to reduce renal tubular phosphate reabsorption, independent of FGF23 (41). These findings are consistent with a unique case of hypophosphatemia associated with a mutation in the klotho region resulting in overexpression of the protein and an abundance of circulating klotho (42). Finally, recent evidence indicating that it certain tissues (heart) FGF signaling may occur in the absence of alpha-klotho, although the physiologic significance of this finding is not certain (43).

The actions of FGF23 and other related proteins as mediators of disease are discussed in detail in the section on Pathophysiology of XLH (see below). Other potential regulators of renal Pi handling have been suggested. These include fragments of matrix extracellular glycoprotein (MEPE), secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4), stanniocalcin, and other FGFs, including FGF2, and FGF7 (44-47).

The Osteocyte As A Coordinating Center For Phosphate Homeostasis

Osteocytes are distributed throughout lamellar bone in an organized array with interconnections occurring through small tunneling caniculi (for review, see reference 48). Cellular processes extending from the cell body of the osteocyte pass through these caniculi and serve as a means of communication with other cells and to bony surfaces. Interestingly, many of the proteins involved in phosphate regulation are secreted by the osteocyte, including: 1) PHEX, which regulates FGF23 secretion, with loss-of-function resulting in elevated circulating FGF23; 2) DMP1, a SIBLING protein, in which loss-of-function also results in elevated circulating FGF23; 3) FGF23 itself, and 4) FGFR1 which appears to be activated in osteocytes resulting in elevated FGF23 expression. These observations have led to the consideration that the osteocyte may directly respond to phosphate nutritional status, and the osteocytic network throughout the skeleton may relay the mineral demands for bone maintenance to the kidney, where phosphate conservation is regulated. The osteocyte’s response to phosphate status does not appear to be an acute process, as that observed with the extracellular calcium sensing receptor system that regulates PTH secretion in PT glands. The coordination of certain specific matrix proteins may play a role in the local regulation of phosphate supply and mineralization. For instance, skeletal pyrophosphate (PPi) has been identified in increased abundance in the perilacunar bone of Hyp mice, suggesting a potential role of this potent inhibitor of mineralization in the skeletal pathophysiology of the disease (49). Others have demonstrated aberrations in osteopontin in skeletal matrix (50). It follows that genetic disruption of this pathway may result in the profound systemic disturbances observed in the diseases discussed herein.

In sum, repeated observations have confirmed that the balance between urinary excretion and dietary input of Pi is maintained in normal humans, in patients with hyper- and hypoparathyroidism, and under man conditions. This is predominantly due to the ability of the renal tubule to adjust Pi reabsorption rate according to the body’s Pi supply and demand. Thus, Pi reabsorption is increased under conditions of greater need, such as rapid growth, pregnancy, lactation and dietary restriction. Conversely, in times of surfeit, such as slow growth, chronic renal failure or dietary excess, renal Pi reabsorption is curtailed. Such changes in response to chronic changes in Pi availability are characterized by parallel changes in Na-phosphate cotransporter activity, the NPT2 mRNA level and NPT2 protein abundance. These changes are likely mediated by FGF23, as well as other possible factors. Removal of NPT2 cotransporters from the apical membrane of renal tubular cells is an acute process, mediated by PTH. The interaction of these two agents on the overall process may also be important. Indeed, ablation of PTH in a murine model of excess FGF23 abrogates hypophosphatemia. Likewise, suppression of PTH may reduce phosphate losses even with persistence of high FGF23 (51, 52), suggesting an interaction between the two pathways at the renal tubule (53).

CLINICAL DISORDERS OF PHOSPHATE METABOLISM

Primary disorders of phosphate homeostasis are listed in Table 1. Phosphate abnormalities may also occur in the setting of chronic kidney disease, as effects of therapeutic agents, and nutritional or intestinal absorption problems. Not surprisingly, since the kidney is the primary regulatory site for phosphate homeostasis, aberrant phosphate metabolism results most commonly from altered renal Pi handling. Moreover, the majority of the primary diseases are phosphate-losing disorders in which renal Pi wasting and hypophosphatemia predominate and osteomalacia and rickets are characteristic. Osteomalacia and rickets are disorders of calcification characterized by defects of bone mineralization in adults and bone and cartilage mineralization during growth. In osteomalacia, there is a failure to normally mineralize the newly formed organic matrix (osteoid) of bone. In rickets, a disease of children, there is not only abnormal mineralization of bone but defective cartilage growth plate calcification at the epiphyses as well. Apoptosis of chondrocytes in the hypertrophic zone is reduced, typically resulting in an expanded hypertrophic zone, delayed mineralization and vascularization of the calcification front, with an overall appearance of a widened and disorganized growth plate (54).

The remainder of this chapter reviews the pathophysiology of hypophosphatemic rachitic and osteomalacic disorders, and provides a systematic approach to the diagnosis and management of these diseases. The discussion will focus on disorders in which primary disturbances in phosphate homeostasis occur, emphasizing X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia (XLH). Other FGF23-mediated disorders including autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR, ADHR, ARHR1, ARHR2, ARHR3), and tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) will be discussed. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria (HHRH) and Dent's disease will be described as examples of FGF23-independent hypophosphatemia.

Table 1. Primary Disorders of Phosphate Homeostasis

 

Gene

Mutation

FGF23-mediated                                                                                 Hypophosphatemia (XLH)                             

Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR)       

Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets 1 (ARHR1)    

Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets 2 (ARHR2)    

Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets 2/Raine

       syndrome related hypophosphatemia (ARHR3)                    

McCune-Albright syndrome/fibrous dysplasia                           

Osteoglophonic dysplasia                                                         

Jansen metaphyseal chondrodysplasia                                    

Klotho overexpression                                                                         

Epidermal nevus syndrome (ENS)/Cutaneous Skeletal

        Hypophosphatemia Syndrome (CSHS)                     

Opsismodysplasia                                                                   

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO)

 

PHEX

FGF23

DMP1

ENPP1

FAM20C

 

GNAS1

FGFR1

PTH1R

9;13 translocation

HRAS, NRAS

 

INPPL1  

 

LOF*

GOF*

LOF

LOF

LOF

 

GOF (somatic)

GOF

GOF

GOF

GOF (somatic)

 

LOF

FGF23-Independent

Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria (HHRH) (NaPi-IIc deficiency)                                                   

Dent’s disease (X-linked recessive hypophosphatemic)                                                                          

NPT2a deficient Fanconi syndrome                                      

Fanconi-Bickel syndrome.                                                     

Hypophosphatemia with osteoporosis and nephrolithiasis   

 

SLC34A3

 

CLCNS

SLC34A1

SLC2A2

SLC34A1/SLC9A3R1

 

LOF

 

LOF

LOF

LOF

LOF

Hyperphosphatemia

Hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis          

 

GALNT3, FGF23, KLOTHO

 

LOF

 

Mineralization Of Bone And Cartilage

Mineralization of bone is a complex process in which a calcium-phosphate mineral phase is deposited in a highly ordered fashion within the organic matrix (55). Apart from the availability of calcium and phosphorus, requirements for normal mineralization include: 1) adequate metabolic and transport function of chondrocytes and osteoblasts to regulate the concentration of calcium, phosphorus and other ions at the calcification sites; 2) the presence of collagen with unique type, number and distribution of cross-links, distinct patterns of hydroxylation and glycosylation and abundant phosphate content, which collectively facilitate deposition of mineral at gaps (or "hole zones") between the distal ends of collagen molecules; 3) a low concentration of mineralization inhibitors (such as pyrophosphates and proteoglycans) in bone matrix; and 4) maintenance of an appropriate pH of approximately 7.6 for deposition of calcium-phosphate complexes.

The abnormal mineralization in the hypophosphatemic disorders, is due most likely to the limited availability of phosphorus at calcification sites and, in some cases, paracrine inhibitory factors, which result in accumulation of unmineralized osteoid, a sine qua non for the diagnosis of osteomalacia. Since the resultant abundant osteoid is not unique to osteomalacia, establishing the diagnosis of osteomalacia requires dynamic histopathologic demonstration that abnormal mineralization, and not increased production, underlies the observed excess accumulation of osteoid (56, 57). Static histomorphometrical parameters seen in osteomalacia include an increase in osteoid volume and thickness, an increase in bone forming surface covered by incompletely mineralized osteoid, and a decrease in the mineralization front (the percentage of osteoid-covered bone-forming surface undergoing calcification). The critical dynamic parameter used to confirm that osteoid accumulation is due to osteomalacia is the mineral apposition rate.

Inadequate growth plate cartilage mineralization in rickets is primarily observed in the hypertrophic zone of chondrocytes. Irregular alignment and more extensive disorganization of the growth plate may be evident with increasing severity of disease. Calcification in the interstitial regions of this hypertrophic zone is defective. Grossly, these changes result in increased thickness of the epiphyseal plate, and an increase in transverse diameter that often extends beyond the ends of the bone and causes characteristic cupping or flaring.

Clinical Disorders: FGF23-mediated Hypophosphatemia

X-LINKED HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS/OSTEOMALACIA

X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia (XLH) was initially recognized in the 1930s as a form of “vitamin D resistant" and only later, as disorder of renal phosphate wasting. The disorder is inherited in X-linked dominant fashion and is manifest biochemically by a low renal threshold maximum for renal tubular phosphate reabsorption, consequent hypophosphatemia, and low, or inappropriate circulating levels of 1,25(OH)2D. Known biochemical characteristics of XLH and other hypophosphatemic disorders are shown in Table 2. Characteristic features of the disease include growth retardation, osteomalacia and rickets in growing children. The clinical expression of the disease is widely variable, ranging from mild skeletal abnormalities to severe bone disease. Most would agree that a wide spectrum of phenotypic severity occurs in both males (with a mutated gene on their only X chromosome) and females (who are heterozygous for the defective X-linked gene), although clinical experience suggests that females, particularly with certain mutations may express less severe disease (58). Bowing of the lower extremities is usually the first physical sign of the disorder, but is not often evident until 1-2 yrs of age, after the child is standing or walking (59). Biochemical evidence of disease can be detected shortly after birth, however may not become apparent until several weeks to months of age. Short stature generally becomes evident after the first year of life, as well (60), coincident with the timing of bow deformities. Growth abnormalities and limb deformities are both more evident in the lower extremities, since they represent the fastest growing body segment before puberty.


XLH, X-linked hypophosphatemia; ADHR, Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets; ARHR, Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets; TIO, Tumor-induced osteomalacia; XLHR, X-linked recessive hypophosphatemia (Dent's Disease); HHRH, Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria. N, normal; , decreased; , increased, ( ), decreased relative to the serum phosphorus concentration; ?, unknown.

The majority of affected children exhibit clinical evidence of rickets (Figure 4), varying from enlargement of the wrists and/or knees to severe malalignment defects such as bowing or knock-knee deformities. (Figure 4). Such defects may result in waddling gait and leg length abnormalities (61). X-ray examination reveals expanded areas of non-mineralized cartilage in epiphyseal regions and lateral curvature of the femora and/or tibia. Strikingly absent are features observed in vitamin D deficiency rickets attributable to hypocalcemia, such as, tetany and convulsions. Muscle weakness and pain are not usually presentations of XLH in early childhood, but emerge later in life.

Figure 4. Radiograph of the lower extremities in a patient with X-linked hypophosphatemia. Bowing of the femurs is evident bilaterally. The distal femoral metaphysis is cupped, frayed and widened, radiographic features of an expanded and disorganized growth plate.

Additional signs of the disease may include delayed dentition and dental abscesses (62, 63), which are usually manifest clinically by pain and a gingival papule at the site of involvement. Radiographically there is an enlarged air compartment seen around the root of the affected tooth and an enlarged pulp chamber. Other dental findings that may play a role in the process include impaired mineralization of the dentine compartment of the tooth, and diminished cementum. Craniofacial structural anomalies may also result in crowding of teeth, requiring orthodontic management. Indeed, suture fusion of the cranial bones is aberrant, and craniosynostosis to some degree occurs frequently, and in severe cases require neurosurgical intervention.

 

Adults with XLH manifest a broad spectrum of disease. They may be asymptomatic or present with severe bone pain. On clinical examination they often display evidence of post-rachitic deformities, such as bowed legs or short stature. However, overt biochemical changes such as elevated serum alkaline phosphatase activity or other biomarkers of bone turnover may not be evident. Adult patients frequently demonstrate features of "active" osteomalacia, characterized radiographically by pseudofractures, coarsened trabeculation, rarified areas and/or non-union fractures, and although variably present, may have elevated serum alkaline phosphatase activity. Symptoms at presentation may reflect the end-result of chronic changes, and may not correlate with apparent current activity of the disease. In spite of marked variability in the clinical presentation of the disease, bone biopsy in affected children and adults nearly always reveals osteomalacia without osteopenia (Figure 5). Histomorphometry of biopsy samples usually demonstrates a reduced rate of formation, diffuse patchy hypomineralization, a decrease in mineralizing surfaces and characteristic areas of hypomineralization of the periosteocytic lacunae (64). Of note, as noted above, increased skeletal PPi identified in the perilacunar bone of Hyp mice, the syngeneic animal model of XLH, may serve to inhibit mineralization locally as well (49).

Figure 5. Section from an undecalcified bone biopsy in an untreated patient with X-linked hypophosphatemia. The Goldner stain reveals mineralized bone (blue/green) and an abundance of unmineralized osteoid (red) covering a substantial portion of the surfaces. The width of the osteoid seams is substantially increased.

Osteophytes and other findings of a mineralizing enthesopathy (65) occur frequently and may result in the most severe clinical symptomatology in adulthood. A great deal of the morbidity of XLH in adults arises from the high incidence of arthritis, calcified entheses, and osteophytes. Enthesopathy generally is first detectable radiographically by late in the second decade, or early in the third decade. Older subjects have more sites of involvement, and generally increasing involvement with age; the frequency of involvement appears to be greater in males. With progressive enthesopathy and bony overgrowth, excruciating pain may occur, particularly with fusion of the sacroiliac joint(s) and spinal stenosis (66). These manifestations do not appear to be affected for the better or worse with respect to exposure to currently available therapies (67).  It is peculiar that XLH represents a deficiency of mineralization at many skeletal sites, and pathologic ectopic mineralization elsewhere. This paradoxical situation raises the possibility that aberrant humoral factors, in addition to the ambient hypophosphatemia, may play a role in the discordant mineralization abnormalities observed.

 

Clinical Biochemistry

 

As previously noted, the primary biochemical abnormality of XLH is hypophosphatemia due to increased urinary phosphate excretion. Moreover, mild gastrointestinal phosphate malabsorption is present in the majority of patients, which may contribute to the evolution of the hypophosphatemia (Table 2) (68, 69).

 

In contrast, the serum calcium concentration in affected subjects is normal despite gastrointestinal malabsorption of calcium. However, as a consequence of this defect, urinary calcium is often decreased. The severe secondary hyperparathyroidism that occurs in vitamin D deficiency is not present as the degree of calcium malabsorption is not a severe in that condition. However, mildly elevated circulating levels of PTH occur in many patients naive to therapy, and thought to represent the inadequate production of 1,25(OH)2D. Other non-specific but typical findings include elevated serum alkaline phosphatase activity. Serum alkaline phosphatase activity, although usually elevated to 2-3 times the upper limit of normal in childhood, is generally less than the levels observed in nutritional rickets.  As noted above, circulating PTH levels may be normal to modestly elevated in naïve patients, but treatment with phosphate salts often aggravate this tendency such that persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism may occur. Because of variability in adulthood, this measure is not a reliable marker of disease involvement in the older age group. Prior to the initiation of therapy, serum 25-OHD levels are normal, and serum 1,25(OH)2D levels are in the low normal range (70, 71). The paradoxical occurrence of hypophosphatemia and normal serum calcitriol levels in affected subjects is consistent with aberrant regulation of both synthesis and clearance of this metabolite (due to increased 25-OHD-24-hydroxylase activity) (72, 73). Circulating levels of FGF23 are generally elevated in individuals with XLH, although overlap may occur. Thus, caution should be applied when using this measure as a strict diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of XLH, as some subjects have been shown to have circulating FGF23 levels within the normal range, and commercially available assays (which recognize “intact” species or both intact and C-terminal species) do not always provide concordant results.

 

Genetics

 

With the recognition that hypophosphatemia is the definitive marker for XLH, Winters et al (74) and Burnett et al (75) discovered that this disease is transmitted as an X-linked dominant disorder. Analysis of data from 13 multigenerational pedigrees identified PHEX (for phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases located on the X chromosome) as the gene disrupted in XLH (76). PHEX is located on chromosome Xp22.1, and encodes a 749-amino acid protein with three putative domains: 1) a small amino-terminal intracellular tail; 2) a single, short transmembrane domain; and 3) a large carboxyterminal extracellular domain, containing ten conserved cysteine residues and a HEXXH pentapeptide motif, which characterizes many zinc metalloproteases. Further studies have revealed that PHEX is homologous to the M13 family of membrane-bound metalloproteases, or neutral endopeptidases. M13 family members, including neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP), endothelin-converting enzymes 1 and 2 (ECE-1 and ECE-2), the Kell blood group antigen (KELL), neprilysin-like peptide (NL1), and endothelin converting enzyme-like 1 (ECEL1), degrade or activate a variety of peptide hormones. In addition, like other neutral endopeptidases, immunofluorescent studies have revealed a cell-surface location for PHEX in an orientation consistent with a type II integral membrane glycoprotein (77). It has been demonstrated that certain missense variants in PHEX that substitute a highly conserved cysteine residue will interfere with normal trafficking of the molecule to the plasma membrane (78). Thus, it appears that one mechanism associated with the pathophysiology of XLH is to prevent PHEX from locating to the cell membrane. Other missense variants have been shown in in vitro studies to disrupt enzymatic function of the protein, alter its conformation, or disrupt cellular processing in other ways (79, 80).

 

Studies in rodents have demonstrated that Phex is predominantly expressed in bones (in osteoblasts/osteocytes) and teeth (in odontoblasts/ameloblasts) (81-84); mRNA, protein or both have also been found in lung, brain, muscle, gonads, skin and parathyroid glands. Subcellular locations appear to be the plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi organelle. Immunohistochemistry studies suggest that Phex is most abundant on the cell surface of the osteocyte. In sum, the ontogeny of Phex expression suggests a possible role in mineralization in vivo.

 

Recently combined efforts of many investigators and genetic sequencing laboratories have documented over 850 pathogenic PHEX variants (85). Most of these (>70%) are predicted to generate a truncated PHEX protein. Overall, frameshift, splicing, copy-number, nonsense, and missense variants have been described, and are predicted to cause loss of function of the PHEX protein.  A recently updated on-line database of PHEX variants can be accessed at: https://www.rarediseasegenes.com/

 

The location of Phex expression in bone cells have led to the hypothesis that diminished PHEX/Phex expression in bone initiates the cascade of events responsible for the pathogenesis of XLH. In order to confirm this possibility, several investigators have used targeted over-expression of Phex in attempts to normalize osteoblast mineralization, in vitro, and rescue the Hyp phenotype in vivo (86-88). Results from these studies have not resulted in a complete skeletal rescue, raising questions as to the role of early developmental expression of PHEX, or at least the success of expression when targeted with osteocalcin or type I collagen promoters. Nevertheless, partial rescue of the mineralization defect in Hyp mice occurs, suggesting that local effects of the PHEX mutation may play some role in the mineralization process, but cannot completely restore the skeleton to normality. Of note, this partial rescue occurs in concert with a reduction in FGF23 levels, although not lowered to a truly normal range (88).

 

In sum, although a physiologic substrate for PHEX has not been identified, the consequence of loss-of-function of PHEX is an elevation in the circulating FGF23 level. Failure of targeted osteoblastic PHEX overexpression to completely rescue Hyp mice may reflect that critical sites (or developmental timing) for PHEX expression are not effectively generated with these models to effectively rescue the skeletal phenotype; this effect may be dependent upon the resultant capacity in these transgenic models of normal PHEX to reduce FGF23 production in mutant cells. ASARM peptides, fragments of SIBLING (small integrin binding ligand N-glycated) proteins, have been shown to inhibit mineralization and potentially play a role in modulation of renal P transport; these peptides have also been shown to be degraded by PHEX (89).  Other evidence has suggested that expression of osteopontin expression may be altered in the context of PHEX loss of function as well, (50).

 

Pathophysiology

 

Hypophosphatemia in XLH results from the impaired renal proximal tubule function of Pi reabsorption. For some time, XLH was thought to be a primary disorder of the renal tubule, however the consideration that humoral mediation of phosphate wasting in XLH was suggested by two novel clinical findings. First, the persistence of renal phosphate wasting after renal transplantation in a man with XLH indicated a new donor kidney continued to manifest the defect (90). Second, the clinical course of a similar phosphate-wasting syndrome, Tumor Induced Osteomalacia (also referred to as Oncogenic Osteomalacia), resolved upon removal of a tumor, suggesting that the tumor was the source of a mediating factor. Further evidence for humoral mediation was provided by classical parabiosis experiments, suggested that a cross-circulating factor could mediate renal phosphate wasting (91), and by renal cross-transplantation between Hyp and normal mice. These experiments demonstrated continued normal renal phosphate handling after transplantation of Hyp kidney to a normal host, as well as the failure to correct the mutant phenotype upon introduction of a normal kidney to a Hyp host (92). These findings, most consistent with humoral mediation of the Pi wasting in the disease, led to the search for candidate mediators of renal phosphate handling, and eventually to the discovery that FGF23 is an important regulator of renal phosphate homeostasis.  Subsequently mean circulating FGF23 concentrations were found to be greater in XLH patients than in unaffected control subjects, providing evidence for the role of this endocrine FGF in XLH.

 

Renal tubular wasting occurs on the basis of a decreased abundance of NPT2 transporters in the proximal convoluted tubule cells (93-95), and in turn, this reduction in NPT2 abundance is mediated by increased circulating levels of FGF23 (see above, Regulation of Renal Tubular Phosphate Handling). Increased FGF23 occurs in the context of disruption of PHEX, which, like FGF23, is primarily expressed in osteocytes, and FGF23 appears to be produced in a phosphate-sensitive manner.

 

It remains unclear as to how the loss-of-function of PHEX results in elevated FGF23 levels. The hypothesis that PHEX (a member of the M13 family of zinc-dependent type II cell surface membrane metalloproteinases) could serve as a processor of a phosphaturic hormone such as FGF23 has not been borne out, and the role PHEX plays in this pathway is not clear. Several other phosphate wasting disorders have been described (see below) in which elevated FGF23 occurs in the setting of (presumably) normal PHEX.  Such conditions include TIO, where overproduction of FGF23 results in a comparable Pi wasting phenotype. In Autosomal Dominant Hypophosphatemic Rickets (ADHR) specific mutations in FGF23 result in gain of function of the protein (96, 97). The specific mutations disrupt an RXXR protease recognition site, and thereby protect FGF23 from proteolysis, resulting in reduced clearance and elevating circulating levels of this protein, with coincident renal Pi wasting. In yet another genetic disorder, Autosomal Recessive Hypophosphatemic Rickets type I (98), due to homozygous loss of function mutations in dentin matrix protein-1 (DMP1), renal tubular Pi wasting occurs in the setting of increased FGF23 levels. DMP1 is a matrix protein of the SIBLING (small integrin binding ligand N-glycated) family, and, like PHEX and FGF23, has been primarily identified in osteocytes.

 

In Autosomal Recessive Hypophosphatemic Rickets type II, due to mutations in ENPP1, elevated FGF23 concentrations occur (99, 100). ENPP1 encodes a phosphatase with a critical local role in mineralization, serving to generate the mineralization inhibitor, pyrophosphate (PPi); loss of function of ENPP1 may result in Generalized Arterial Calcification of Infancy (GACI), a fatal disease of infants in which rampant vascular mineralization occurs (101). These findings have suggested the hypothesis that loss of the mineralization inhibitor PPi prompts a signal to compensate for the severe excess vascular mineralization, and increasing FGF23 levels results in an attempt to induce renal phosphate excretion and to limit further excessive mineralization. Nearly all patients who have survived GACI develop renal phosphate wasting and often consequent rickets (102).

 

Furthermore, FGF23 levels are elevated in mice with biallelic disruptions of DMP1 and with biallelic loss of ENPP1. Transgenic mice which overexpress FGF23, exhibit retarded growth, hypophosphatemia, decreased (or inappropriately normal) serum 1,25(OH)2D levels and rickets/osteomalacia, all features of XLH.   Indeed, murine models of all of these disorders (XLH, ADHR, TIO, and ARHR) similarly demonstrate elevated circulating FGF23 levels with concomitant renal phosphate wasting

 

In sum, enhanced FGF23 activity is common to several phosphate-wasting disorders. In particular, those disorders that share the combined defects of inappropriately low circulating levels of 1,25(OH)2D and renal tubular Pi wasting are associated with increased FGF23 levels. This coincidence of findings holds for XLH, ADHR, ARHR (types I, II, and III), and TIO, and are consistent with the notion that FGF23 is a both a direct regulator of Pi homeostasis at the renal level, a down-regulator of 1a-hydroxylase activity, responsible for the catalysis of 25-OH vitamin D to its active form, and stimulus for its clearance via the 24-hydroxylation pathway. The teleological appeal to this argument stems from the provision of 2 major Pi regulating hormones in the body: firstly, PTH (primarily responsive to serum Ca levels), which also serves to increase Ca levels via an increase in circulating 1,25(OH)2D, and secondly, FGF23 (primarily responsive to Pi), which counters PTH’s calcemic effect by reducing 1,25(OH)2D levels (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Scheme for the speculated pathophysiology of XLH, ARHR, TIO, and ADHR. Upper panel, osteocytes, comprising a network of connected cells embedded in mineralized bone are the cellular source of PHEX (which is mutated in XLH), DMP1 (which is mutated in ARHR), and FGF23 (which is found in high concentrations in all four of these hypophosphatemic disorders). It follows that loss of PHEX or DMP1 results in increased FGF23 production/secretion by mechanisms that are not currently understood. Circulating FGF23 concentrations may also occur secondary to the increased production associated with various tumors. Lower panel, circulating FGF23 interacts with an FGF receptor (presumably FGFR1) on the basolateral surface of the proximal renal tubular cell. Klotho, produced by the distal renal tubule in both membrane bound and secretory forms, is necessary for the FGF23/FGFR interaction. Signaling through this pathway results in a decrease in NPT2 mRNAs, thereby reducing the abundance of Pi cotransporters on the apical membrane as well as a more rapid action of translocating the transporter off of the apical membrane. Thus, impairment of renal tubular Pi reabsorption results. Likewise, synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D is impaired, while its clearance is augmented. In XLH and ARHR, increased production of FGF23 occurs in the skeleton; in TIO, increased production of FGF23 occurs in tumors; in ADHR, enhanced activity of FGF23 occurs as a result of the specific mutations that retard its metabolic clearance.

Other recent findings have provided support for the role of klotho in the FGF23-mediated hypophosphatemia pathway. An unusual patient with renal tubular Pi wasting and abnormally increased serum klotho has been described (42). Investigation revealed a translocation breakpoint disrupting the region upstream of that encoding klotho. Indeed, mice with disruption of the klotho gene manifest hyperphosphatemia and elevated circulating 1,25(OH)2D levels (103). The proof that klotho is distal to PHEX in this regulatory pathway was shown by crossing the klotho disrupted mice with Hyp (PHEX-deletion) mice. The double mutant (Hyp/Kl-/-) mice were hyperphosphatemic, with elevated 1,25(OH)2D levels, despite having extremely elevated circulating FGF23 levels due to PHEX loss-of-function (104).  The unexpected finding that overexpression of klotho can upregulate FGF23 production has also been reported (105).

 

Indeed, further evidence for the central role of FGF23 in the Pi-regulating process comes from the investigation of another group of rare disorders of Pi homeostasis in which renal Pi conservation is excessive in the setting of increased circulating Pi levels. This group of disorders, known as hyperphosphatemic tumoral calcinosis (HTC), is manifest clinically by precipitation of amorphous calcium-phosphate crystals in soft tissues. This phenomenon is thought to result from an increase in the ambient Ca x Pi solubility product, and occurs as a direct result of enhanced renal tubular reabsorption of Pi (106). In addition, circulating 1,25(OH)2D levels are inappropriately in the high-normal to high range. Thus, the precise converse of primary metabolic derangements occurs, as compared to the XLH-related group of diseases. Initially, HTC was been shown to directly result from loss of function mutations in GALNT3, a glycosylating enzyme important for appropriate O-glycosylation of proteins. This modification appears to be necessary for efficient Golgi secretion of full length FGF23 (107). Interestingly patients with HTC due to GALNT3 mutations have increased circulating levels of the inactive C-terminal fragment of FGF23, but low circulating levels of intact active form of FGF23 (108). Recent evidence implicates that variant post-translational modification of FGF23 can also be modulated by FAM20C: mutations in this gene can result in elevated FGF23 levels, renal phosphate wasting and hypophosphatemia, and referred to as Autosomal Recessive Hypophosphatemic Rickets, type III (ARHR3) and may have clinical features described as Raine syndrome (see table 1) (109, 110).

 

HTC may also occur in the setting of loss-of-function mutations of FGF23 (111). As with GALNT3-related HTC, these patients have low intact FGF23 level. Loss of function of klotho has also been described in a case of HTC, despite the finding of elevated FGF23 levels, thus rendering the FGF23 inactive at the renal proximal tubule (112). As with hypophosphatemia syndromes, animal models have confirmed the physiologic implications of these clinical scenarios:  FGF23 null mice develop a hyperphosphatemic, calcifying phenotype with elevated 1,25(OH)2D levels (39), similar to mice with disruption of the klotho gene (103, 113). As noted above, the klotho protein is now known to be an essential co-factor in FGFR1c activation when FGF23 serves as the activating ligand (35).

 

The overall physiologic importance of this regulating system requires further study. It is not clear how PHEX or DMP1 result in elevated FGF23 levels. The intriguing aspect of the osteocyte as a potential central cell in this pathway also bears further study.

 

Treatment

 

Decades ago, physicians employed pharmacological doses of vitamin D as the cornerstone for treatment of XLH. However, long-term observations indicate that this therapy fails to cure the disease and poses the serious problem of recurrent vitamin D intoxication and renal damage. Indeed, such treatment results only in incomplete healing of the rachitic abnormality, while hypophosphatemia and impaired growth remain. Similar unresponsiveness is typical with use of 25(OH)D.

 

With the recognition that phosphate depletion is an important contributor to impaired skeletal mineralization, physicians began to devise treatment strategies that employed oral phosphate supplementation to compensate for the renal phosphate wasting and thereby increasing the available Pi to the mineralizing skeleton. This strategy was somewhat successful in terms of improving skeletal lesions, although it was soon realized that pharmacologic amounts of vitamin D were necessary in combination with phosphate supplements to counter the exacerbation of hyperparathyroidism observed in this setting. Such combination therapy was found to be more effective than either administering vitamin D or phosphate alone. With the recognition that circulating 1,25(OH)2D levels are not appropriately regulated in XLH, the use of this metabolite in combination with phosphate was subsequently used to treat the disease (67, 114-116). The current treatment strategy directly addresses the combined calcitriol and phosphorus deficiency characteristic of the disorder. Although this combination therapy has become the conventional therapy for XLH, complete healing of the skeletal lesions is usually not the case, and late complications of the disease are persistent and often debilitating.

 

In children the goal of therapy is to improve growth velocity, normalize any lower extremity defects, and heal the attendant bone disease. Generally, the treatment regimen includes a period of titration to achieve a maximum dose of 1,25(OH)2D3 (Rocaltrol® or calcitriol), 20-50 ng/kg/day in two divided doses, and phosphorus, (20-50 mg/kg/day, to a maximum of 1-2 gms/day) in 3-5 divided doses.

 

Use of 1,25(OH)2D3/phosphorus combination therapy involves a significant risk of toxicity. Hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, renal calcinosis, and hyperparathyroidism can be sequelae of unmonitored therapy. Detrimental effects on renal function were particularly common prior to the frequent monitoring now generally employed with this therapy. Indeed, hypercalcemia, severe nephrocalcinosis and/or diminished creatinine clearance necessitates appropriate dose adjustment, and in some cases discontinuation of therapy. Throughout the treatment course careful attention to renal function, as well as serum and urine calcium is extremely important. Nevertheless, the improved outcome of this therapeutic intervention compared to that achieved by previous regimens, justifies its use, albeit requires an aggressive clinical monitoring schedule.

 

While such combined therapy often improves growth velocity, refractoriness to the growth-promoting effects of treatment can be encountered in children who present with markedly short stature prior to 4 years of age. For that reason the use of recombinant growth hormone as additional treatment has been suggested (117), however this approach has not been universally recommended in view of the lack of definitive benefits in controlled studies, and a risk of resultant worsening of the disproportional stature (118), although others have not identified significant concerns in this regard (119).  A recent meta-analysis concluded there as insufficient evidence to support recommendation of its use (120)

 

Indications for therapy in adults with XLH are less clear. The occurrence of intractable bone pain and refractory non-union fractures often respond to treatment with calcitriol and phosphorus (121). However, data remain unclear regarding the effects of treatment on fracture incidence (which may not be increased in untreated patients). There does not appear to be any effect of this therapy on enthesopathy, however superior dentition appears to occur in the setting of higher medication exposure through adulthood as well as the entire life span (64). Muscle weakness and general well-being may occur with therapy in some adults. In sum, the decision to treat affected adults must be individualized. In general, it is beneficial to offer adults with significant symptomatology a trial of this therapy, but only if routine biochemical monitoring can be performed. Several detailed strategies for the management of children and adults with XLH are available (122-124).

 

A more recent development has been a more directed approach to the etiology of the renal phosphate loss. After demonstration of the efficacy of this strategy in the Hyp mouse model of XLH (40), trials of an antibody to the human FGF23 protein, burosumab (KRN23) have been conducted in children and adults (125-131) leading to its approval for use in both North America, several S. American countries, Europe, and other regions. The initial study using burosumab to treat in children with XLH resulted in improvement of radiographic features of rickets in concert with correction of abnormal biochemical indices after previous treated with conventional phosphate and active vitamin D therapy (127). Steady and stable correction of hypophosphatemia was attained with administration of the antibody every 2 weeks and a favorable safety profile was evident. The improved musculoskeletal status has been demonstrated to persist as seen in follow up extension studies for a total of 3 years (132). Moreover, one study has provided evidence that burosumab was superior to conventional therapy with calcitriol and phosphate in terms of skeletal improvement and growth (133).

 

AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS (ADHR)

 

Several studies have documented autosomal dominant inheritance of a hypophosphatemic disorder similar to XLH (134, 135). The phenotypic manifestations of this disorder include the expected hypophosphatemia due to renal phosphate wasting, lower extremity deformities, and rickets/osteomalacia. Affected patients also demonstrate normal serum 25(OH)D levels, while maintaining inappropriately normal serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D, in the presence of hypophosphatemia, all hallmarks of XLH (Table 2). PTH levels are normal. Long-term studies indicate that a few of the affected female patients demonstrate delayed penetrance of clinically apparent disease and an increased tendency for bone fracture, uncommon occurrences in XLH. In addition, among patients with the expected biochemical features documented in childhood, rare individuals lose the renal phosphate-wasting defect after puberty. As noted above, specific mutations in FGF23 in the 176-179 amino acid residue sequence are present in patients with ADHR (97). These mutations disrupt an RXXR furin protease recognition site, and the resultant mutant molecule is thereby protected from proteolysis, and resultant elevated circulating levels of FGF23 are the likely cause of the renal Pi wasting. Interestingly, circulating FGF23 levels can vary and reflect the activity of disease status (136).

 

Exploration of the waxing/waning severity of disease in ADHR has identified that iron may play a significant role in the regulation of circulating FGF23 (137).  Iron deficiency appears to upregulate FGF23 expression, and in normal individuals, processing of the intact protein to its inactive N- and C-terminal fragments is efficient, thereby compensating for the increased intact FGF23 production seen with iron deficiency. Thus. in normal individuals who become iron deficient normal circulating levels of intact FGF23 are maintained despite the increase in production. However, in ADHR, inefficient processing of FGF23, due to the lack of protease recognition at the usual amino acid 179/180 cleavage site, may not be able to compensate for increased FGF23 synthesis during periods of iron deficiency. Thus, the waxing and waning clinical severity observed in some cases of ADHR may be amenable to iron supplementation, and provide a straightforward approach to therapy. A recently reported case demonstrates that correction of serum iron levels to high normal levels allowed for discontinuation of conventional rickets medications (138)

 

An apparent forme fruste of ADHR (autosomal dominant) hypophosphatemic bone disease has many of the characteristics of XLH and ADHR, but recent reports indicate that affected children display no evidence of rachitic disease. Because this syndrome is described in only a few small kindreds, and radiographically evident rickets is not universal in children with familial hypophosphatemia, these families may have ADHR. Further observations are necessary to discriminate this possibility.

 

AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS (ARHR)

 

Families with phosphate wasting rickets inherited in an autosomal recessive manner have been described and demonstrate the same constellation of progressive rachitic deformities seen in both XLH and ADHR (98, 139).  Moreover, the biochemical phenotype is manifest by the same measures of hypophosphatemia, excess urinary Pi losses, and aberrant vitamin D metabolism (normal circulating 25-OHD and 1,25(OH)2D levels, despite ambient hypophosphatemia) as observed in both XLH and ADHR. In addition to the expected phenotypic features, and in contrast to XLH, spinal radiographs of patients with ARHR reveal noticeably sclerotic vertebral bodies. In addition to the enlarged pulp chamber characteristic of teeth in individuals with XLH, enamel hypoplasia can be evident in heterozygotes. Of particular interest is the identification of elevated levels of FGF23 in the affected individuals. Experience with long-term follow-up is not widespread in ARHR and therapeutic response or guidelines have not been definitively established.

 

The identification of a progressive mineralization defect associated with hypophosphatemia in DMP1 knockout mice led to the consideration of homozygous loss of function in this candidate gene as a cause of ARHR. Indeed, this was proven to be the case for the first families identified with the disorder. Thus, the role of the osteocyte product, DMP1, appears as either part of the PHEX-FGF23 pathway, or at least can affect circulating FGF23 levels, perhaps independently of PHEX. These observations reinforce the central role that the osteocyte plays in mineral homeostasis.

 

Moreover, hypophosphatemic rickets in association with renal Pi wasting has been recently described in the setting of the extremely rare disorder, generalized arterial calcification of infancy (GACI) (99-101). This disorder occurs with homozygous loss-of-function mutations of ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase-1 (ENPP1). Loss-of-function of ENPP1 results in the inability to generate the mineralization inhibitor, pyrophosphate, thereby disrupting the restriction of heterotopic (e.g., vascular) mineralization. GACI is often fatal, but hypophosphatemia, identified in the setting of elevated FGF23 levels in an adult with a homozygous ENPP1 mutation raised this consideration of rickets in survivors of GACI (140). Moreover, the patient’s son was affected with both GACI and hypophosphatemia. The mechanism by which this enzyme influences renal tubular phosphate wasting is not evident, and further study is necessary to understand this intriguing problem. One speculated mechanism may reflect a bone cell response to a relatively hypermineralized (or high-phosphate/low pyrophosphate) milieu which results in a compensatory, prolonged secretion of FGF23. Such a mechanism may effectively signal the kidney to reduce the body’s mineral load, but apparently cannot be down-regulated to protect against excessive Pi losses. Although there has been concern that the treatment of rickets in patients affected with GACI patients may promote worsening of vascular calcification, no evidence to sustain this concern has emerged and one long term observational report suggests that treatment does not worsen this finding (141). A recent phenotyping study with long-term observations in this regard corroborates this initial impression (102).

 

TUMOR-INDUCED OSTEOMALACIA

 

Rickets and/or osteomalacia have been associated with various types of tumors (96). In many cases, the metabolic disturbances improved or completely disappeared upon removal of the tumor, indicating a causal role of the tumor. Affected patients generally present with bone and muscle pain, muscle weakness, rickets/osteomalacia, and occasionally recurrent fractures of long bones. Biochemistries include hypophosphatemia secondary to renal phosphate wasting and normal serum levels of calcium and 25(OH)D. Serum 1,25(OH)2D is often overtly low or is otherwise inappropriately normal in the setting of hypophosphatemia (Table 2). Aminoaciduria and/or glucosuria may be present. Radiographic abnormalities include generalized osteopenia, pseudofractures and coarsened trabeculae, as well as widened epiphyseal plates in children. The histologic appearance of trabecular bone in affected subjects most often reflects the presence of a low turnover osteomalacia.

 

The large majority of patients with this syndrome harbor tumors of mesenchymal origin, including primitive-appearing, mixed connective tissue lesions. These tumors are often classified as osteoblastomas, osteochondromas, non-ossifying fibromas and ossifying fibromas. In addition, tumors of epidermal and endodermal derivation have been implicated as causal of the disease. Indeed, the observation of tumor-induced osteomalacia concurrent with breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma oat cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia have been reported.

 

Although this syndrome is relatively rare compared to XLH, investigation of causative tumors eventually led to the identification and isolation of FGF23 (38, 142), the mediator of many heritable hypophosphatemic disorders, and the recognition that this protein is the central factor in a major regulatory system affecting Pi homeostasis. Moreover, the discovery represented the first disorder related to the endocrine subfamily of FGFs, acting at distant sites with specificity of site activity conferred by the family of klotho co-receptors. 

 

Regardless of the tumor cell type, the lesions at fault for the syndrome are often small, difficult to locate and present in obscure areas which include the nasopharynx, jaw, sinuses, the popliteal region and the suprapatellar area. In any case, a careful and thorough examination is necessary to document/exclude the presence of such a tumor. Indeed, CT and/or MRI scan of a clinically suspicious area should be undertaken. Recently newer imaging techniques such as octreotide scintigraphy or PET scans have been used to successfully identify tumors that remained unidentified by other means of localization. Newer agents with greater specificity for somatostatin receptors type 2 and type 5 appear to increase the sensitivity of PET scanning (143, 144), and co-registry with high resolution anatomic imaging has considerably advanced detection of small tumors.

 

Selective venous sampling has been suggested as a complementary approach to diagnosis. This technique may provide confirmation of local FGF23 secretion in suspicious areas identified by imaging (as to avoid unnecessary operations from false-positive imaging studies). The technique may serve to direct local imaging to anatomic regions defined by step-ups in FGF23 concentrations, but is limited by the relatively long half-life of FGF23, which may be misleading if the sampling is not in very close proximity to the offending tumor. Although useful in the settings mentioned above, the technique is not thought to be an optimal first-line approach in identification of TIO causing tumors (145).

 

Pathophysiology

 

TIO is a result of Pi wasting secondary to circulating factor(s) secreted by causal tumors. FGF23 has proven to be the primary factor identified in most patients where examination of serum levels or tumor material has occurred. Nevertheless, a variety of other factors have been considered as a potential part of the cascade that can lead to renal Pi wasting including: 1) FRP4 (frizzled related protein 4) (45), a secreted protein with phosphaturic properties, 2) FGF7, a paracrine FGF identified in TIO tumors that has been shown to directly inhibit renal Pi transport (47), 3) the SIBLING protein, MEPE (matrix extracellular phosphglycoprotein), which has been reported to generate fragments (ASARM peptide) with potential Pi wasting activity (44), 4) the SIBLING protein, DMP1, which has now been implicated in ARHR, and has been shown to be in particularly high abundance in TIO tumors (38, 98, 140, 146), and 5) the high molecular weight isoform of FGF2 (another paracrine FGF), which when expressed transgenically in mice, results in hypophosphatemic rickets (147). It is also possible that these or other tumor products may have direct effects on the mineralization function of the skeleton.

 

A novel genetic mechanism by which TIO tumors may develop autonomous FGF23 production involves a somatic chromosomal rearrangement which has been identified in a high proportion of TIO tumors (142). The rearrangement sequence predicts a fusion protein consisting of the N-terminal portion of fibronectin and the FGFR1 receptor. The extracellular fibronectin domain is proposed to promote dimerization and activation of the complex leading to downstream signaling resulting in FGF23 secretion. FGF23 itself is further proposed as an additive stimulus, amplifying FGF23 production as part of a feed-forward loop resulting in the substantial FGF23 production characteristic of TIO (148). More recently another rearrangement generating a fibronectin/FGF1 fusion protein has been described (149).

 

In contrast to these observations, other rare patients with TIO secondary to hematogenous malignancy manifest abnormalities that would suggest a different pathophysiologic mechanism. In these subjects a nephropathy induced with light chain proteinuria or other immunoglobulin derivatives appears to result in decreased renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate. Thus, light-chain nephropathy has been considered a possible mechanism for the TIO syndrome.

 

Treatment

 

The first and foremost treatment of TIO is complete resection of the tumor. However, recurrence of mesenchymal tumors, such as giant cell tumors of bone, or inability to resect completely certain malignancies, such as prostatic carcinoma, has resulted in development of alternative therapeutic intervention for the syndrome. In this regard, administration of 1,25(OH)2D alone or in combination with phosphorus supplementation has served as effective therapy for TIO. Doses of calcitriol required range from 1.5-3.0 µg/d, while those of phosphorus are 2-4 g/d. Although little information is available regarding the long-term consequences of such treatment, the high doses of medicine required raise the possibility that nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis, and hypercalcemia may frequently complicate the therapeutic course. Indeed, hypercalcemia secondary to parathyroid hyperfunction has been documented in several subjects. Generally, these patients receive phosphorus as part of a combination regimen, exacerbating the path to parathyroid autonomy. Thus, as with treatment of XLH, careful assessment of parathyroid function, serum and urinary calcium, and renal function are essential to ensure safe and efficacious therapy.  Recent studies using burosumab, the antiFGF23 antibody, have demonstrated improvement in both biochemical indices and biopsy parameters of osteomalacia in inoperable TIO (150). 

 

OTHER FGF23 MEDIATED FORMS OF HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA

 

In widespread fibrous dysplasia of bone (due to mosaic activating mutations in GNAS), neurofibromatosis and cutaneous skeletal hypophosphatemic syndrome (associated with somatic mutations in HRAS and NRAS) (151), hypophosphatemic osteomalacia/rickets can result as a result of elevated circulating FGF23 levels (152). Indeed, variable degrees of decreased renal tubular phosphate reabsorption, as assessed by TMP/GFR assessments, occur in patients with fibrous dysplasia of bone. Other primary skeletal disorders in which elevated FGF23 levels have been reported include osteoglophonic dysplasia (due to mutations in the FGFR1 receptor) (153), Jansen metaphyseal chondrodysplasia, (due to activating mutations of the PTH1 receptor) (154), opsismodysplasia (155), and in FAM20C mutations (110). The mechanism(s) by which elevations in FGF23 occur in these settings is not certain at this time.

 

Clinical Disorders: FGF23-independent Hypophosphatemia

 

HEREDITARY HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS WITH HYPERCALCIURIA (HHRH)

 

This rare autosomal recessive disease is marked by hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria (156). Initial symptoms of the disorder generally manifest between 6 months to 7 years of age and usually consist of bone pain and/or deformities of the lower extremities. Such deformities may include genu varum or genu valgum or anterior bowing of the femur and coxa vara. Additional disease features include short stature, and radiographic signs of rickets or osteopenia. In contrast to XLH, muscle weakness may be elicited as a presenting symptom.

 

Many of the distinguishing characteristics of HHRH stem from the fact that HHRH is not a disorder of FGF23-mediated hypophosphatemia. In fact, levels are often decreased compared to the normal population. Consequently, in contrast to the previously described disorders in which renal phosphate transport is limited, patients with HHRH exhibit increased 1,25(OH)2D production. The resultant elevated serum calcitriol levels enhance gastrointestinal calcium absorption, which in turn increases the filtered renal calcium load and inhibits PTH secretion. Collectively these events produce the hypercalciuria observed in affected patients (Table 2). Although initially not thought to be part of the syndrome, the propensity for kidney stones to occur has been reported in several patients.

 

In general, the severity of the bone mineralization defect correlates inversely with the prevailing serum Pi concentration. Relatives of patients with evident HHRH may exhibit an additional mode of disease expression (157). These subjects manifest hypercalciuria and hypophosphatemia, but the abnormalities are less marked and occur in the absence of discernible bone disease, which would suggest a mild phenotype in the heterozygous state with certain mutations.

 

After mutations in the candidate NaPi-IIa gene were excluded as causal to HHRH, the genetic defect was identified in NaPi-IIc (27, 158), previously thought to be of less importance than the type IIa transporter. As would be predicted by the isolated loss of function of a Pi transporter, reduced serum Pi and increased renal Pi losses occur, independent of FGF23 status. However, unlike the findings in XLH, Pi wasting does not coexist with limitations in 1,25(OH)2D production, and the system retains its capacity to increase 1,25(OH)2D levels in response to the ambient hypophosphatemia. Recently it has been suggested that specific mutations in NaPi-IIc may be associated with sodium wasting and potentially the tendency to form urinary tract stones (159).

 

Patients with HHRH have been treated successfully with high-dose phosphorus (1 to 2.5 g/day in five divided doses) alone. In response to therapy, bone pain disappears and muscular strength improves substantially. Moreover, the majority of treated subjects exhibit accelerated linear growth, and radiologic signs of rickets are completely absent within several months. Despite this favorable response, limited studies indicate that such treatment does not completely heal the associated osteomalacia. Indeed, there is no collective experience with long-term follow-up of this rare disorder, and the necessity and/or complications of long-term therapy are not well-established. Curiously an accompanying osteoporosis appears to occur in concert, a finding that is also quite different from the usual picture in XLH.

 

AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS WITH FANCONI SYNDROME AND PHOSPHATURIA ASSOCIATED WITH INFANTILE HYPERCALEMIA OF INFANCY

 

Although SLC34A3 (Na-Pi2c) mutations were identified as the mutated gene in the specific disorder of HHRH, homozygous loss-of-function mutations in SLC34A1 (Na-Pi2a) occur in yet another syndrome of autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets accompanied by a generalized renal tubular disorder consistent with Fanconi syndrome (160). This disorder appears to occur with less frequency than HHRH, however in a recent search for genetic causes of idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia (IIH), loss-of-function mutations in SLC34A1 have been identified (161). Rickets is not a prominent feature of this disorder, but rather hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, nephrocalcinosis and renal phosphate wasting. Resultant elevations in circulating 1,25(OH)2D levels lead to the hypercalcemia. It is important to distinguish this cause of IIH from those attributable to defects in CYP24A1 (vitamin D 24-hydroxylase) as therapy in cases attributable to NaPi2a deficiency should respond to phosphate supplementation whereas restriction of dietary calcium and vitamin D are recommended in cases due to CYP24A1 mutations.

 

DENT'S DISEASE (X-LINKED RECESSIVE HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA; XLRH)

 

The initial description of X-linked recessive hypophosphatemic rickets involved a family in which males presented with rickets or osteomalacia, hypophosphatemia, and a reduced renal threshold for phosphate reabsorption. In contrast to patients with XLH, affected subjects exhibited hypercalciuria, elevated serum 1,25(OH)2D levels (Table 1), and proteinuria of up to 3 g/day. Patients also developed nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis with progressive renal failure in early adulthood. Female carriers in the family were not hypophosphatemic and lacked any biochemical abnormalities other than hypercalciuria. Three related syndromes have been reported independently: X-linked recessive nephrolithiasis with renal failure, Dent's disease, and low-molecular-weight proteinuria with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis. These syndromes differ in degree from each other, but common themes include proximal tubular reabsorptive failure, nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis, progressive renal insufficiency, and, in some cases, rickets or osteomalacia. Identification of mutations in the voltage-gated chloride-channel gene CLCN5 in all four syndromes has established that they are phenotypic variants of a single disease and are not separate entities (162,163). However, the varied manifestations that may be associated with mutations in this gene, particularly the presence of hypophosphatemia and rickets/osteomalacia, underscore that environmental differences, diet, and/or modifying genetic backgrounds may influence phenotypic expression of the disease.

 

INTESTINAL MALABSORPTION OF PHOSPHATE

 

Although primary disorders of intestinal phosphate absorption have not been considered of clinical significance, we have encountered a curious phenomenon of phosphate malabsorption in children with complex disorders associated with intestinal compromise, when fed amino-acid based elemental formula (164,165). Associated tube-feeding and use of antacid medications appear to be risk factors, and the phenomenon does not appear to occur when used for the labeled indication of milk protein allergy in children who are otherwise healthy (166). We have recommended that serum phosphorus levels be monitored periodically with the use of such formulas.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Yanagawa N, Nakhoul F, Kurokawa K, Lee DBN. Physiology of phosphorus metabolism. In: Narins RG, ed. Clinical disorders of fluid and electrolyte metabolism. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill,1994; 307-371.
  2. Lee DBN, Walling MW, Brautbar N . Intestinal phosphate absorption: Influence of vitamin D and non-vitamin D factors. Am J Physiol. 1986; 250: G369-G373.
  3. Cross HS, Debiec H, Peterlik M. Mechanism and regulation of intestinal phosphate absorption. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1990;16:115-124.
  4. Marks J, Debnam ES, Unwin RJ. The role of the gastrointestinal tract in phosphate homeostasis in health and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013; 22:481-487.
  5. Sabbagh Y, O’Brien SP, Song W, Boulanger JH, Stockmann A, Arbeeny C, Schiavi SCIntestinal npt2b plays a major role in phosphate absorption homeostasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20:2348–2358.
  6. Debiec H, Lorenc R. Identification of Na+,Pi-binding protein in kidney and intestinal brush-border membranes. Biochem J. 1988; 225:185-191.
  7. Katai K, Miyamoto K, Kishida S, Segawa H, Nii T, Tankaka H, Tani Y, Arai H, Tatsumi S, Morita K, Taketani Y, Takeda E. Regulation of intestinal Na+-dependent phosphate co-transporters by a low phosphate diet and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Biochem J. 1999; 3:705-712.
  8. Hilfiker H, Hattenhauer O, Traebert M, Forster I, Murer H, Biber J. Characterization of a murine type II sodium-phosphate cotransporter expressed in mammalian small intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95:14564-14569.
  9. Bai L, Collins JF, Ghishan FK. Cloning and characterization of a type III Na-dependent phosphate cotransporter from mouse intestine. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000; 279:C1135-C1143.
  10. Xu H, Bai L, Collins JF, Ghishan FK. Age-dependent regulation of rat intestinal type IIb sodium-phosphate cotransporter by 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002; 282:C487-C493.
  11. Marks J, Debnam ES, Unwin RJ. Phosphate homeostasis and the renal-gastrointestinal axis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009; 299:F285-F296.
  12. Candeal E, Caldas YA, Guillén N, Levi M, Sorribas V. Intestinal phosphate absorption is mediated by multiple transport systems in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017; 312(4): G355-G366.
  13. Mizgala CL, Quamme GA. Renal handling of phosphate. Physiol Rev. 1985; 65:431-466.
  14. Harris CA, Sutton RA, Dirks JH. Effects of hypercalcemia on tubular calcium and phosphate ultrafilterability and tubular reabsorption in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1977; 233:F201-F206.
  15. Knox FG, Haramati A. Renal regulation of phosphate excretion. In: Seldin DW, Giebisch G, eds. The Kidney: Physiology and Pathophysiology. New York: Raven Press; 1981; 1381.
  16. Berndt TJ, Knox FG. Proximal tubule site of inhibition of phosphate reabsorption by calcitonin. Am J Physiol. 1984; 246:F927-F930.
  17. Legati A, Giovannini D, Nicolas G, Lopez-Sanchez U, Quintans B, Oliveira JR, Sears RL, Ramos EM, Spiteri E, Sobrido MJ, Carracedo A, Castro-Fernandez C, Cubizolle S, Fogel BL, Goizet C, Jen JC, Kirdlarp S, Lang AE, Miedzybrodzka Z, Mitarnun W, Paucar M, Paulson H, Pariente J, Richard AC, Salins NS, Simpson SA, Striano P, Svenningsson P, Tison F, Unni VK, Vanakker O, Wessels MW, Wetchaphanphesat S, Yang M, Boller F, Campion D, Hannequin D, Sitbon M, Geschwind DH, Battini JL, Coppola G. Mutations in XPR1 cause primary familial brain calcification associated with altered phosphate export. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(6):579–581.
  18. Ansermet C, Moor MB, Centeno G, Auberson M, Hu DZ, Baron R, Nikolaeva S, Haenzi B, Katanaeva N, Gautschi I, Katanaev V, Rotman S, Koesters R, Schild L, Pradervand S, Bonny O, Firsov D. Renal fanconi syndrome and hypophosphatemic rickets in the absence of xenotropic and polytropic retroviral receptor in the nephron. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28(4):1073-1078.
  19. Schwab SJ, Klahr S, Hammerman MR.Na+ gradient-dependent Pi uptake in basolateral membrane vesicles from dog kidney. Am J Physiol. 1984; 246: F633-F639.
  20. Villa-Bellosta R, Ravera S, Sorribas V, Stange G, Levi M, Murer H, Biber J, Forster IC. The Na+-Pi cotransporter PiT-2 (SLC20A2) is expressed in the apical membrane of rat renal proximal tubules and regulated by dietary Pi. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009; 296(4): F691-F699.
  21. Murer H, Forster I, Hernando N, Lambert G, Traebert M, Biber J. Post-transcriptional regulation of the proximal tubule Na+-phosphate transporter type II in response to PTH and dietary phosphate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 1999; 277: F676-F684.
  22. Murer H, Forster I, Hilfiker H, Pfister M, Kaissling B, Lotscher M, Biber J. Cellular/molecular control of renal Na+/Pi cotransport. Kidney Int. 1988; 65:S2-S10.
  23. Bacconi A, Virkki LV, Biber J, Murer H, Forster IC. Renouncing electroneutrality is not free of charge: switching on electrogenicity in a Na+-coupled phosphate cotransporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102(35):12606-12611.
  24. Oberbauer R, Schreiner GF, Biber J, Murer H, Meyer TW.In vivo suppression of the renal Na+/Pi cotransporter by antisense oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93:4903-4906.
  25. Beck I, Karaplis AC, Amizuka N, Hewson AS, Ozawa H, Tenenhouse HS. Targeted inactivation of Npt 2 in mice leads to severe renal phosphate wasting, hypercalciuria and skeletal annomalies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95:5372-5377.
  26. Hoag HH, Gauthier C, Martel I, Tenenhouse HS. Effects of Npt2 gene ablation and low Pi-diet on renal Na+-phosphate cotransport and cotransporter gene expression. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104:679-686.
  27. Bergwitz C, Roslin NM, Tieder M, Loredo-Osti JC, Bastepe M, Abu-Zahra H, Frappier D, Burkett K, Carpenter TO, Anderson D, Garabedian M, Sermet I, Fujiwara TM, Morgan KN, Tenenhouse HS, Jüppner H. SLC34A3 mutations in patients with hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria predict a key role for the sodium-phosphate cotransporter NaPi-IIc in maintaining phosphate homeostasis. Am J Hum Gen. 2006; 78:179-192.
  28. Biber J, Hernando N, Forster I. Phosphate transporters and their function. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013; 75:535-550.
  29. Lötscher M, Scarpetta Y, Levi M, Halaihel N, Wang H, Zajicek HK, Biber J, Murer H, Kaissling B. Rapid downregulation of rat renal Na/P(i) cotransporter in response to parathyroid hormone involves microtubule rearrangement. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104(4):483-494.
  30. Wagner CA, Hernando N, Forster IC, Biber J. The SLC34 family of sodium-dependent phosphate transporters. Pflugers Arch. 2014; 466:139-153.
  31. Segawa H, Yamanaka S, Ito M, Kuwahata M, Shono M, Yamamoto T, Miyamoto K. Internalization of renal type IIc Na-Pi cotransporter in response to a high-phosphate diet. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005; 288:F587-F596.
  32. Foster IC, Hernando N, Biber J, Murer H. Proximal tubular handling of phosphate: a molecular perspective. Kidney Int. 2006; 70:1548-1559.
  33. Farrow EG, White KE. Recent advances in renal phosphate handling. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010; 6(4):207-217.
  34. Antoniucci DM, Yamashita T, Portale AA. Dietary phosphorus regulates serum fibroblast growth factor-23 concentrations in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91:3144-3149.
  35. Urakawa I, Yamazaki Y, Shimada T, Iijima K, Hasegawa H, Okawa K, Fujita T, Fukumoto S, Yamashita T. Klotho converts canonical FGF receptor into a specific receptor for FGF23. Nature. 2006; 444:770-774.
  36. Belov AA, Mohammadi M. Molecular mechanisms of fibroblast growth factor signaling in physiology and pathology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013; 5:6.
  37. Andrukhova O, Zeitz U, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Lanske B, Erben RG. FGF23 acts directly on renal proximal tubules to induce phosphaturia through activation of the ERK1/2-SGK1 signaling pathway. Bone. 2012; 51:621-628.
  38. Shimada T, Mizutani S, Muto T, Yoneya T, Hino R, Takeda S, Takeuchi Y, Fujita T, Fukumoto S, Yamashita T . Cloning and characterization of FGF-23 as a causative factor of tumor-induced osteomalacia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98:6500-6505.
  39. Razzaque MS, Sitara D, Taguchi T, St-Arnaud R, Lanske B. Premature aging-like phenotype in fibroblast growth factor 23 null mice is a vitamin D-mediated process. FASEB J. 2006; 6:720-722.
  40. Aono Y, Yamazaki Y, Yasutake J, Kawata T, Hasegawa H, Urakawa I, Fujita T, Wada M, Yamashita T, Fukumoto S, Shimada T. Therapeutic effects of anti-FGF23 antibodies in hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Nov;24(11):1879-88.
  41. Hu MC, Shi M, Zhang J, Pastor J, Nakatani T, Lanske B, Shawkat Razzaque M, Rosenblatt KP, Baum MG, Kuro-O M, Moe OW. Klotho: a novel phosphaturic substance acting as an autocrine enzyme in the renal proximal tubule. FASEB J. 2010; 24(9):3438-3450.
  42. Brownstein CA, Adler F, Nelson-Williams C, Iijma J, Imura A, Nabehsima Y, Carpenter TO, Lifton RP. A translocation causing increased α–Klotho level results in hypophosphatemic rickets and hyperparathyroidism. PNAS USA. 2008; 105:3455-3460.
  43. Grabner A, Amaral AP, Schramm K, Singh S, Sloan A, Yanucil C, Li J, Shehadeh LA, Hare JM, David V, Martin A, Fornoni A, Di Marco GS, Kentrup D, Reuter S, Mayer AB, Pavenstädt H, Stypmann J, Kuhn C, Hille S, Frey N, Leifheit-Nestler M, Richter B, Haffner D, Abraham R, Bange J, Sperl B, Ullrich A, Brand M, Wolf M, Faul C. Activation of cardiac fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 causes left ventricular hypertrophy. Cell Metab. 2015; 22(6):1020-32.
  44. Rowe PS, de Zoysa PA, Dong R, Wang HR, White KE, Econs MH, Oudet CL. MEPE, a new gene expressed in bone marrow and tumors causing osteomalacia. Genomics. 2000; 67:54-68.
  45. Berndt T, Craig TA, Howe AE, Vassiliadis J, Reczek D, Finnegan R, Jan de Beur SM, Schiavi SC, Kumar R.Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 is a potent tumor-derived phosphaturic agent. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112:785-794.
  46. Wagner GF, Dimattia GE. The stanniocalcin family of proteins. J Exp Zoolog, A Comp Exp Biol. 2006; 305:769-780.
  47. Carpenter TO, Ellis BK, Insogna KL, Philbrick WM, Sterpka J, Shimkets R. FGF7: an inhibitor of phosphate transport derived from oncogenic osteomalacia-causing tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90:1012-1020.
  48. Dallas SL, Prideaux M, Bonewald LF.The osteocyte: an endocrine cell ... and more. Endocr Rev. 2013; 34:658-690.
  49. Murali SK, Andrukhova O, Clinkenbeard EL, White KE, Erben RG. Excessive osteocytic Fgf23 secretion contributes to pyrophosphate accumulation and mineralization defect in Hyp mice. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(4):e1002427.
  50. Hoac B, Østergaard M, Wittig NK, Boukpessi T, Buss DJ, Chaussain C, Birkedal H, Murshed M, McKee MD. Genetic ablation of osteopontin in osteomalacic Hyp mice partially rescues the deficient mineralization without correcting hypophosphatemia. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(10):2032-2048.
  51. Bai X, Miao D, Goltzman D, Karaplis AC. Early lethality in hyp mice with targeted deletion of Pth gene.Endocrinology. 2007; 148(10):4974-83.
  52. Carpenter TO, Olear EA, Zhang JH, Ellis BK, Simpson CA, Cheng D, Gundberg CM, Insogna KL. Effect of paricalcitol on circulating parathyroid hormone in X-linked hypophosphatemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(9):3103-11.
  53. Lanske B, Razzaque MS. Molecular interactions of FGF23 and PTH in phosphate regulation. Kidney Int. 2014; 86(6):1072-4.
  54. Sabbagh Y, Carpenter TO, Demay M. Hypophosphatemia leads to rickets by impairing caspase-mediated apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2005; 102:9637-9642.
  55. Glimcher MJ .In: Aurbach GD ed. Handbook of physiology: endocrinology, parathyroid gland, sect 7, vol 7. Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society. 1996; 21-32.
  56. Bordier PJ, Tun Chot S. Quantitative histology of metabolic bone disease. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972; 1:197-215.
  57. Frame B, Parfitt AM. Osteomalacia: current concepts. Ann Intern Med. 1978; 89:966-982.
  58. Mumm S, Huskey M, Cajic A, Wollberg V, Zhang F, Madson KL, Wenkert D, McAlister WH, Gottesman GS, Whyte MP. PHEX 3'-UTR c.*231A>G near the polyadenylation signal is a relatively common, mild, American mutation that masquerades as sporadic or X-linked recessive hypophosphatemic rickets. J Bone Miner Res. 2015; 30(1):137-43.
  59. Harrison HE, Harrison HC, Lifshitz F, Johnson AD. Growth disturbance in hereditary hypophosphatemia. Am J Dis Child. 1996; 112:290-297.
  60. Mao M, Carpenter TO, Whyte MP, Skrinar A, Chen CY, San Martin J, Rogol AD. Growth curves for children with X-linked Hypophosphatemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105: 32439, 2020.
  61. Williams TF, Winters RW. Familial (hereditary) vitamin D-resistant rickets with hypophosphatemia. In: Stanbury JB, Wyngaarden JB, Fredrickson DS, eds. The metabolic basis of inherited disease. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1983; 1465-1485.
  62. Tracey WE, Campbell RA. Dentofacial development in children with vitamin D resistant rickets. J Am Dent Assoc. 1968; 76:1026-1031.
  63. Shields ED, Scriver CR, Reade T, Fujiwara TM, Morgan K, Ciampi A, Schwartz S. X-linked hypophosphatemia: the mutant gene is expressed in teeth as well as in kidney. Am J Human Gen. 1990; 46:434-442.
  64. Marie PJ, Glorieux FH. Relation between hypomineralized periosteocytic lesions and bone mineralization in vitamin D-resistant rickets. Calcif Tissue Int. 1983; 35:443-448.
  65. Polisson RP, Martinex S, Khoury M, Harrell RM, Lyles KW, Friedman N, Harrelson JM, Reisner E, Drezner MK. Calcificantion of entheses associated with X-linked hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. N Engl J Med. 1985; 313:1-6.
  66. Pierce DS, Wallace WM, Herndon CH. Long term treatment of vitamin D-resistant rickets. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964; 46:978-997.
  67. Connor J, Olear EA, Insogna KL, Katz L, Baker SD, Kaur RD, Simpson CA, Sterpka J, Dubrow R, Zhang JH, Carpenter TO. Conventional therapy in adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia: effects on enthesopathy and dental disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100:3625-3632.
  68. Steindijk R. On the pathogenesis of vitamin D resistant rickets and primary vitamin D resistant rickets. Helv Paediatr Acta. 1962; 17:65-85.
  69. Stickler GB External calcium and phosphorus balances in vitamin D-resistant rickets. J Pediatr. 1963; 63:942-948.
  70. Drezner MK, Lyles KW, Haussler MR, Harrelson JM. Evaluation of a role for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the pathogenesis and treatment of X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets and osteomalacia. J Clin Invest. 1980; 66:1020-1032.
  71. Haddad JG, Chyu KJ, Hahn TJ, Stamp TCB. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in sex linked hypophosphatemic vitamin D-resistant rickets. J Lab Clin Med. 1973; 81:22-27.
  72. Tenenhouse HS. Abnormal renal mitochondrial 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1-hydroxylase activity in the vitamin D and calcium deficient X-linked Hyp mouse. Endocrinology. 1983; 113:816-818.
  73. Roy S, Martel J, Ma S, Tenenhouse HS. Increased renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-24-hydroxylase messenger ribonucleic acid and immunoreactive protein in phosphate-deprived Hyp mice: a mechanism for accelerated 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 catabolism in X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Endocrinology. 1994; 134:1761-1767.
  74. Winters RW, Graham JB, Williams TF, McFalls VW, Burnett CH. A genetic study of familial hypophosphatemia and vitamin D-resistant rickets with a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1958; 37:97-142.
  75. Burnett CH, Dent CE, Harper C, Warland BJ Vitamin D resistant rickets: analysis of 24 pedigrees and hereditary and sporadic cases. Am J Med. 1964; 36:222-232.
  76. Francis F, Henning S, Korn B, Reinhardt R, de Jong P, Poustka A, Lehrach H, Rowe PSN, Goulding JN, Summerfield T, Mountford R, Read AP, Popowska E, Pronicka E, Davies KE, O’Riordan JLH, Econs MJ, Nesbitt T, Drezner MK, Oudet C, Hanauer A, Strom TM, Meindl A, Lorenz B, Cagnoli M, Mohnike KL, Murken J, Meitinger T. A gene (PEX) with homologies to endopeptidases is mutated in patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. Nat Genet. 1995; 11:130-136.
  77. Lipman ML, Dibyendu P, Hugh PJ, Bennett JE, Henderson ES, Yingnian S, Goltzman D, Daraplis AC. Cloning of human Pex cDNA: expression subcellular localization and endopeptidase activity. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273:13729-13737.
  78. Thompson DL, Roche PC, Drezner MK, Salisbury JL, Sabbagh Y, Tenenhouse HS, Grande JP, Poeschlia EM, Kumar R.Ontogeny of PHEX/PEX expression in the mouse embryo and studies on the subcellular localization of PHEX/PEX in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17:311-320.
  79. Sabbagh, Y., Boileau, G., Campos, M., Carmona, A. K., & Tenenhouse, H. S. (2003). Structure and function of disease-causing missense mutations in the PHEX gene. TheJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 88(5), 2213– 2222.
  80. Sabbagh, Y., Boileau, G., DesGroseillers, L., & Tenenhouse, H. S. (2001). Disease-causing missense mutations in the PHEX gene interfere with membrane targeting of the recombinant protein. Human Molecular Genetics, 10(15), 1539–1546.
  81. Beck L, Soumounou Y, Martel J, Krishnamurthy G, Gauthier C, Goodyer CG, Tenenhouse HS. Pex/PEX tissue distribution and evidence for a deletion in the 3' region of the Pex gene in X-linked hypophosphatemic mice. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99:1200-1209.
  82. Zoidis E, Zapf J, Schmid C. Phex cDNA cloning from rat bone and studies on phex mRNA expression: tissue-specificity, age-dependency, and regulation by insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I in vivo. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000; 168:41-51.
  83. Ruchon AF, Tenenhouse HS, Marcinkiewicz M, Siegfried G, Aubin JE, DesGroseillers L, Crine P, Boileau G. Developmental expression and tissue distribution of Phex protein: effect of the Hyp mutation and relationship to bone markers. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15:1440-1450.
  84. Ruchon AF, Marcinkiewicz M, Siegfried G, Tenenhouse HS, DesGroseillers L, Crine P, Boileau G. Pex mRNA is localized in developing mouse osteoblasts and odontoblasts. J Histochem Cytochem. 1998; 46:459-468.
  85. Sarafrazi S, Daugherty SC, Miller N, Boada P, Carpenter TO, Chunn L, Dill K, Econs MJ, Eisenbeis S, Imel EA, Johnson B, Kiel MJ, Krolczk S, Ramesan P, Truty R, Sabbagh Y. Novel PHEX gene locus-specific database: Comprehensive characterization of vast number of variants associated with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH). HumanMutation 43(2):143-157, 2022.
  86. Liu S, Guo R, Tu Q, Quarles LD. Overexpression of phex in osteoblasts fails to rescue the hyp-mouse phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277:3686-3697.
  87. Bai X, Miao D, Panda D, Grady S, McKee MD, Goltzman D, Karaplis AC. Partial rescue of the hyp phenotype by osteoblast-targeted PHEX (phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome) expression. Mol Endocrinol. 2002; 16:2913-2925.
  88. Boskey A, Frank A, Fujimoto Y, Spevak L, Verdelis K, Ellis B, Philbrick W, Carpenter T. The PHEX transgene corrects mineralization defects in 9-month-old hypophosphatemic mice. Calcif Tiss Int. 2009; 84:126-137.
  89. David V, Martin A, Hedge AM, Drezner MK, Rowe PS. ASARM peptides: PHEX-dependent and -independent regulation of serum phosphate. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011; 300(3):F783-91.
  90. Morgan JM, Hawley WL, Chenoweth AI, Retan WJ, Diethelm AG. Renal transplantation in hypophosphatemia with vitamin D-resistant rickets. Arch Intern Med. 1974; 134(3):549-52
  91. Meyer RA Jr, Meyer MH, Gray RW . Parabiosis suggests a humoral factor is involved in X-linked hypophosphatemia in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 1989; 4:493-500.
  92. Nesbitt T, Coffman TM, Griffiths R, Drezner MK. Cross transplantation of kidneys in normal and hyp-mice: evidence that the hyp-mouse phenotype is unrelated to an intrinsic renal defect. J Clin Invest. 1992; 89:1453-1459.
  93. Tenenhouse HS, Beck L. Renal Na+-P cotransporter gene expression in X-linked Hyp and Gy mice. Kidney Int. 1996; 49:1027-1032.
  94. Tenenhouse HS, Martel J, Biber J, Murer H. Effect of P(i) restriction on renal Na(+)-P(i) cotransporter mRNA and immunoreactive protein in X-linked Hyp mice. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268: F1062-F1069.
  95. Tenenhouse HS, Martel J, Gauthier C, Segawa H, Miyamoto K. Differential effects of Npt2a gene ablation and X-linked Hyp mutation on renal expression of Npt2c. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003; 285(6):F1271-F1278.
  96. White KE, Jonsson KB, Carn G, Hampson G, Spector TD, Mannstadt M, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Miyauchi A, Yang IM, Ljunggren O, Meitinger T, Strom TM, Jüppner H, Econs MJ. The autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR) gene is a secreted polypeptide overexpressed by tumors that cause phosphate wasting. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86:497-500.
  97. The ADHR Consortium. Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets is associated with mutations in FGF-23. Nat Genet. 2000; 26:345-348.
  98. Feng JQ, Ward LM, Liu S, Lu Y, Xie Y, Yuan B, Yu X, Rauch F, Davis SI, Zhang S, Rios H, Drezner MK, Quarles LD, Bonewald LF, White KE. Loss of DMP1 causes rickets and osteomalacia and identifies a role for osteocytes in mineral metabolism. Nat Genet. 2006; 38:1310-1315.
  99. Levy-Litan V, Hershkovitz E, Avizov L, et al. Autosomal-recessive hypophosphatemic rickets is associated with an inactivation mutation in the ENPP1 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(2):273-278..
  100. Lorenz-Depiereux B, Schnabel D, Tiosano D, Hausler G, Strom TM. Loss-of-function ENPP1 mutations cause both generalized arterial calcification of infancy and autosomal-recessive hypophosphatemic rickets. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(2):267-272.
  101. Rutsch F, Ruf N, Vaingankar S, Toliat MR, Suk A, Höhne W, Schauer G, Lehmann M, Roscioli T, Schnabel D, Epplen JT, Knisely A, Superti-Furga A, McGill J, Filippone M, Sinaiko AR, Vallance H, Hinrichs B, Smith W, Ferre M, Terkeltaub R, Nürnberg P. Mutations in ENPP1 are associated with ‘idiopathic’ infantile arterial calcification. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(4):379-381.
  102. Ferreira CR, Hackbarth ME, Ziegler SG, Pan KS, Roberts MS, Rosing DR, Whelpley MS, Bryant JC, Macnamara EF, Wang S, Müller K, Hartley IR, Chew EY, Corden TE, Jacobsen CM, Holm IA, Rutsch F, Dikoglu E, Chen MY, Mughal MZ, Levine MA, Gafni RI, Gahl WA. Prospective phenotyping of long-term survivors of generalized arterial calcification of infancy (GACI). Genet Med. 2021; 23(2):396-407.
  103. Yoskida T, Fujimori T, Nabeshima Y. Mediation of unusually high concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in homozygous klotho mutant mice by increased expression of renal 1 -hydroxylase gene. Endocrinology. 2002; 143:683-689.
  104. Brownstein C, Zhang J, Stillman A, Ellis B, Troiano N, Adams DJ, Gundberg CM, Lifton RP, Carpenter TO. Increased bone volume and correction of HYP mouse hypophosphatemia in the Klotho/HYP mouse. Endocrinology. 2010; 151: 492-501.
  105. Smith RC, O'Bryan LM, Farrow EG, Summers LJ, Clinkenbeard EL, Roberts JL, Cass TA, Saha J, Broderick C, Ma YL, Zeng QQ, Kharitonenkov A, Wilson JM, Guo Q, Sun H, Allen MR, Burr DB, Breyer MD, White KE. Circulating αKlotho influences phosphate handling by controlling FGF23 production. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122:4710-4715.
  106. Ichikawa S, Sorenson AH, Austin AM, Mackenzie DS, Fritz TA, Moh A, Hui SL, Econs MJ. Ablation of the Galnt3 gene leads to low-circulating intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (Fgf23) concentrations and hyperphosphatemia despite increased Fgf23 expression. Endocrinology. 2009; 150(6):2543-2550.
  107. Topaz O, Shurman DL, Bergman R, Indelman M, Ratajczak P, Mizrachi M, Khamaysi Z, Behar D, Petronius D, Friedman V, Zelikovic I, Raimer S, Metzker A, Richard G, Sprecher E. Mutations in GALNT3, encoding a protein involved in O-linked glycosylation, cause familial tumoral calcinosis. Nat Genet. 2004; 36:579-81.
  108. Ichikawa S, Baujat G, Seyahi A, Garoufali AG, Imel EA, Padgett LR, Austin AM, Sorenson AH, Pejin Z, Topouchian V, Quartier P, Cormier-Daire V, Dechaux M, Malandrinou FCh, Singhellakis PN, Le Merrer M, Econs MJ.Clinical variability of familial tumoral calcinosis caused by novel GALNT3 mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A:896-903.
  109. Tagliabracci VS, Engel JL, Wiley SE, Xiao J, Gonzalez DJ, Nidumanda Appaiah H, Koller A, Nizet V, White KE, Dixon JE. Dynamic regulation of FGF23 by Fam20C phosphorylation, GalNAc-T3 glycosylation, and furin proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111:5520-5525.
  110. Rafaelsen SH, Raeder H, Fagerheim AK, Knappskog P, Carpenter TO, Johansson S, Bjerknes R. Exome sequencing reveals FAM20c mutations associated with fibroblast growth factor 23-related hypophosphatemia, dental anomalies, and ectopic calcification. J Bone Miner Res. 2013; 28:1378-1385.
  111. Larsson T, Yu X, Davis SI, Draman MS, Mooney SD, Cullen MJ, White KE. A novel recessive mutation in fibroblast growth factor-23 causes familial tumoral calcinosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90:2424-2427.
  112. Ichikawa S, Imel EA, Kreiter ML, Yu X, Mackenzie DS, Sorenson AH, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, White KE, Econs MJ. A homozygous missense mutation in human KLOTHO causes severe tumoral calcinosis. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117(9):2684-2691.
  113. Kuro-o M, Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Kawaguchi H, Suga T, Utsugi T, Ohyama Y, Kurabayashi M, Kaname T, Kume E, Iwasaki H, Iida A, Shiraki-Iida T, Nishikawa S, Nagai R, Nabeshima YI.Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature. 1997; 390:45-51.
  114. Glorieux FH, Marie PJ, Pettifor JM, Delvin EE. Bone response to phosphate salts, ergocalciferol, and calcitriol in hypophosphatemic vitamin D-resistant rickets. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303:1223-1231.
  115. Costa T, Marie P, Scriver CR, Cole DEC, Reade TM, Norgrady B, Glorieux FH, Delvin EE. X-linked hypophosphatemia: effect of calcitriol on renal handling of phosphate, serum phosphate and bone mineralization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981; 52:463-477.
  116. Harrell RM, Lyles KW, Harrelson JM, Freedman NE, Drezner MK . Healing of bone disease in X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia: induction and maintenance with phosphorus and calcitriol. J Clin Invest. 1985; 75:1858-1864.
  117. Baroncelli GI, Bertelloni S, Ceccarelli C, Saggese G 2001 Effect of growth hormone treatment on final height, phosphate metabolism, and bone mineral density in children with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. J Pediatr. 1985; 138:236-243.
  118. Haffner D, Wuhl E, Blum WF, Schaefer F, Mehls O. Disproportionate growth following long-term growth hormone treatment in short children with X-linked hypophosphataemia. Eur J Pediatr. 1995; 154:610-613.
  119. Zivicnjak M, Schnabel D, Staude H, et al. Three-Year Growth Hormone Treatment in Short Children with X-Linked Hypophosphatemic Rickets: Effects on Linear Growth and Body Disproportion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2011; 96(12):E2097-E2105.
  120. Smith S, Remmington T.Recombinant growth hormone therapy for X-linked hypophosphatemia in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 7;10(10):CD004447.
  121. Sullivan W, Carpenter TO, Glorieux F, Travers R, Insogna K. A prospective trial of phosphate and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 therapy on symptomatic adults with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992; 75:879-885.
  122. Carpenter TO, Imel EA, Holm IA, Jan de Beur SM, Insogna KL. A clinician's guide to X-linked hypophosphatemia. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26(7):1381-1388.
  123. Haffner D, Emma F, Eastwood DM, Duplan MB, Bacchetta J, Schnabel D, Wicart P, Bockenhauer D, Santos F, Levtchenko E, Harvengt P, Kirchhoff M, Di Rocco F, Chaussain C, Brandi ML, Savendahl L, Briot K, Kamenicky P, Rejnmark L, Linglart A. Clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of X-linked hypophosphataemia. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Jul;15(7):435-455.
  124. Laurent MR, De Schepper J, Trouet D, Godefroid N, Boros E, Heinrichs C, Bravenboer B, Velkeniers B, Lammens J, Harvengt P, Cavalier E, Kaux JF, Lombet J, De Waele K, Verroken C, van Hoeck K, Mortier GR, Levtchenko E, Vande Walle J. Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of X-Linked Hypophosphatemia in Belgium. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 19;12:641543. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.641543. eCollection 2021.
  125. Carpenter TO, Imel EA, Ruppe MD, Weber TJ, Klausner MA, Wooddell MM, Kawakami T, Ito T, Zhang X, Humphrey J, Insogna KL, Peacock M.Randomized trial of the anti-FGF23 antibody KRN23 in X-linked hypophosphatemia. J Clin Invest. 2014; 124:1587-1597.
  126. Imel EA, Zhang X, Ruppe MD, Weber TJ, Klausner MA, Ito T, Vergeire M, Humphrey JS, Glorieux FH, Portale AA, Insogna K, Peacock M, Carpenter TO. Prolonged correction of serum phosphorus in adults with X-linked hypophosphatemia using monthly doses of KRN23. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100, 2565-2573.
  127. Carpenter TO, Whyte MP, Imel EA, Boot AM, Högler W, Linglart A, Padidela R, Van't Hoff W, Mao M, Chen CY, Skrinar A, Kakkis E, San Martin J, Portale AA. Burosumab Therapy in Children with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 24;378(21):1987-1998.
  128. Whyte MP, Carpenter TO, Gottesman GS, Mao M, Skrinar A, San Martin J, Imel EA. Efficacy and safety of burosumab in children aged 1-4 years with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Mar;7(3):189-199.
  129. Imel EA, Glorieux FH, Whyte MP, Munns CF, Ward LM, Nilsson O, Simmons JH, Padidela R, Namba N, Cheong HI, Pitukcheewanont P, Sochett E, Högler W, Muroya K, Tanaka H, Gottesman GS, Biggin A, Perwad F, Mao M, Chen CY, Skrinar A, San Martin J, Portale AA.Burosumab versus conventional therapy in children with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2416-2427.
  130. Insogna KL, Briot K, Imel EA, Kamenický P, Ruppe MD, Portale AA, Weber T, Pitukcheewanont P, Cheong HI, Jan de Beur S, Imanishi Y, Ito N, Lachmann RH, Tanaka H, Perwad F, Zhang L, Chen CY, Theodore-Oklota C, Mealiffe M, San Martin J, Carpenter TO; AXLES 1 Investigators. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Burosumab, an Anti-FGF23 Antibody, in Adults With X-Linked Hypophosphatemia: Week 24 Primary Analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Aug;33(8):1383-1393.
  131. Insogna KL, Rauch F, Kamenický P, Ito N, Kubota T, Nakamura A, Zhang L, Mealiffe M, San Martin J, Portale AA. Burosumab Improved Histomorphometric Measures of Osteomalacia in Adults with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia: A Phase 3, Single-Arm, International Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Dec;34(12):2183-2191.
  132. Linglart A, Imel EA, Whyte MP, Portale AA, Högler W, Boot AM, Padidela R, Van't Hoff W, Gottesman GS, Chen A, Skrinar A, Scott Roberts M, Carpenter TO. Sustained Efficacy and Safety of Burosumab, a Monoclonal Antibody to FGF23, in Children With X-Linked Hypophosphatemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Feb 17;107(3):813-824.
  133. Imel EA, Glorieux FH, Whyte MP, Munns CF, Ward LM, Nilsson O, Simmons JH, Padidela R, Namba N, Cheong HI, Pitukcheewanont P, Sochett E, Högler W, Muroya K, Tanaka H, Gottesman GS, Biggin A, Perwad F, Mao M, Chen CY, Skrinar A, San Martin J, Portale AA. Burosumab versus conventional therapy in children with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2416-2427.
  134. Harrison HE, Harrison HC. Rickets and osteomalacia. In: disorders of calcium and phosphate metabolism in childhood and adolescence. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1979; 141-256.
  135. Econs M, McEnery P. Autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets/osteomalacia: clinical characterization of a novel renal phosphate wasting disorder. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82:674-681.
  136. Imel EA, Hui SL, Econs MJ. FGF23 concentrations vary with disease status in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22(4):520-526.
  137. Imel EA, Peacock M, Gray AK, Padgett LR, Hui SL, Econs MJ. Iron modifies plasma FGF23 differently in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets and healthy humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 3541-3549.
  138. Kapelari K, Köhle J, Kotzot D, Högler W. Iron supplementation associated with loss of phenotype in autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100(9):3388-92.
  139. Lorenz-Depiereux B, Bastepe M, Benet-Pages A, Amyere M, Wagenstaller J, Muller-Barth U, Badenhoop K, Kaiser SM, Rittmaster RS, Shlossberg AH, Olivares JL, Loris C, Ramos FJ, Glorieux F, Vikkula M, Jüppner H, Strom TM. DMP1 mutations in autosomal recessive hypophosphatemia implicate a bone matrix protein in the regulation of phosphate homeostasis. Nat Genet. 2006; 38:1248-1250..
  140. Rutsch F, Böyer P, Nitschke Y, Ruf N, Lorenz-Depierieux B, Wittkampf T, Weissen-Plenz G, Fischer RJ, Mughal Z, Gregory JW, Davies JH, Loirat C, Strom TM, Schnabel D, Nürnberg P, Terkeltaub R; GACI study group hypophosphatemia, hyperphosphaturia, and bisphosphonate treatment are associated with survival beyond infancy in generalized arterial calcification of infancy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2008; 1(2):133-140.
  141. Ferreira CR, Ziegler SG, Gupta A, Groden C, Hsu KS. Treatment of hypophosphatemic rickets in generalized arterial calcification of infancy (GACI) without worsening of vascular calcification. Am J Med Genet A. 2016; 170A(5):1308-11.
  142. Bowe AE, Finnegan R, Jan de Beur SM, Cho J, Levine MA, Kumar R, Schiavi SC. FGF-23 inhibits renal tubular P transport and is a PHEX substrate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001; 284:977-981.
  143. Breer S, Brunkhorst T, Beil FT, Peldschus K, Heiland M, Klutmann S, Barvencik F, Zustin J, Gratz KF, Amling M. 68Ga DOTA-TATE PET/CT allows tumor localization in patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia but negative 111In-octreotide SPECT/CT. Bone. 2014; 64:222-227.
  144. El-Maouche D, Sadowski SM, Papadakis GZ, Guthrie L, Cottle-Delisle C, Merkel R, Millo C, Chen CC, Kebebew E, Collins MT. 68Ga-DOTATATE for Tumor Localization in Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 ;101(10):3575-3581.
  145. Andreopoulou P, Dumitrescu CE, Kelly MH, Brillante BA, Cutler Peck CM, Wodajo FM, Chang R, Collins MT. Selective venous catheterization for the localization of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26:1295-1302.
  146. Jan De Beur SM, Finnegan RB, Vassiliadis J, Cook B, Barberio D, Estes S, Manavalan P, Petroziello J, Madden SL, Cho JY, Kumar R, Levine MA, Schiavi SC. Tumors associated with oncogenic osteomalacia express genes important in bone and mineral metabolism. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17:1102-1110.
  147. Xiao L, Naganawa T, Lorenzo J, Carpenter TO, CoffinJD, Hurley MM. Nuclear isoforms of fibroblast growth factor 2 are novel inducers of hypophosphatemia via modulation of FGF23 and Klotho. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285:2843-2846.
  148. Lee JC, Jeng YM, Su SY, Wu CT, Tsai KS, Lee CH, Lin CY, Carter JM, Huang JW, Chen SH, Shih SR, Mariño-Enríquez A, Chen CC, Folpe AL, Chang YL, Liang CW. Identification of a novel FN1-FGFR1 genetic fusion as a frequent event in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumour. J Pathol. 2015; 235:539-545.
  149. Lee JC, Su SY, Changou CA, Yang RS, Tsai KS, Collins MT, Orwoll ES, Lin CY, Chen SH, Shih SR, Lee CH, Oda Y, Billings SD, Li CF, Nielsen GP, Konishi E, Petersson F, Carpenter TO, Sittampalam K, Huang HY, Folpe AL. Characterization of FN1-FGFR1 and novel FN1-FGF1 fusion genes in a large series of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Mod Pathol. 2016; 29:1335-1346.
  150. Jan de Beur SM, Miller PD, Weber TJ, Peacock M, Insogna K, Kumar R, Rauch F, Luca D, Cimms T, Roberts MS, San Martin J, Carpenter TO. Burosumab for the Treatment of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(4):627-635.
  151. de Castro LF, Ovejero D, Boyce AM. Eur J Endocrinol. DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Mosaic disorders of FGF23 excess: Fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome and cutaneous skeletal hypophosphatemia syndrome. 2020 May;182(5):R83-R99. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0969
  152. Lim YH, Ovejero D, Sugarman JS, Deklotz CM, Maruri A, Eichenfield LF, Kelley PK, Jüppner H, Gottschalk M, Tifft CJ, Gafni RI, Boyce AM, Cowen EW, Bhattacharyya N, Guthrie LC, Gahl WA, Golas G, Loring EC, Overton JD, Mane SM, Lifton RP, Levy ML, Collins MT, Choate KA. Multilineage somatic activating mutations in HRAS and NRAS cause mosaic cutaneous and skeletal lesions, elevated FGF23 and hypophosphatemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23:397-407.
  153. White KE, Cabral JM, Davis SI, Fishburn T, Evans WE, Ichikawa S, Fields J, Yu X, Shaw NJ, McLellan NJ, McKeown C, Fitzpatrick D, Yu K, Ornitz DM, Econs MJ. Mutations that cause osteoglophonic dysplasia define novel roles for FGFR1 in bone elongation. Am J Hum Genet. 2005; 76(2):361-367.
  154. Brown WW, Jüppner H, Langman CB, Price H, Farrow EG, White KE, McCormick KLHypophosphatemia with elevations in serum fibroblast growth factor 23 in a child with Jansen’s metaphyseal chondrodysplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(1):17-20.
  155. Fradet A, Fitzgerald J. INPPL1 gene mutations in opsismodysplasia. J Hum Genet. 2017;62(2):135-140.
  156. Tieder M, Modai D, Samuel R, et al. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312:611-617.
  157. Tieder M, Modai D, Shaked U, et al. Idiopathic hypercalciuria and hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets. Two phenotypical expressions of a common genetic defect. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316:125-129.
  158. Lorenz-Depiereux B, Benet-Pages A, Eckstein G, Tenenbaum-Rakover Y, Wagenstaller J, Tiosano D, Gershoni-Baruch R, Albers N, Lichtner P, Schnabel D, Hochberg Z, Strom TM. Hereditary hypophosphatemic rickets with hypercalciuria is caused by mutations in the sodium-phosphate cotransporter gene SLC34A3. Am J Hum Genet. 2006; 78:193-201.
  159. Jaureguiberry G, Carpenter TO, Forman S, Jüppner H, Bergwitz C. A novel missense mutation in SLC34A3 that causes HHRH identifies threonine 137 as an important determinant of sodium-phosphate cotransport in NaPi-IIc. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008; 295: F371-F379.
  160. Magen D, Berger L, Coady MJ, Ilivitzki A, Militianu D, Tieder M, Selig S, Lapointe JY, Zelikovic I, Skorecki K: A loss-of-function mutation in NaPi-IIa and renal fanconi's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1102-1109.
  161. Schlingmann KP, Ruminska J, Kaufmann M, Dursun I, Patti M, Kranz B, Pronicka E, Ciara E, Akcay T, Bulus D, Cornelissen EA, Gawlik A, Sikora P, Patzer L, Galiano M, Boyadzhiev V, Dumic M, Vivante A, Kleta R, Dekel B, Levtchenko E, Bindels RJ, Rust S, Forster IC, Hernando N, Jones G, Wagner CA, Konrad M. Autosomal-recessive mutations in SLC34A1 encoding sodium-phosphate cotransporter 2A cause idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27(2):604-14.
  162. Scheinman SJ, Pook MA, Wooding C, Pang JT, Frymoyer PA, Thakker RV. Mapping the gene causing X-linked recessive nephrolithiasis to Xp11.22 by linkage studies. J Clin Invest. 1997; 91:2351-2357.
  163. Scheinman SJ. X-linked hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis: clinical syndromes and chloride channel mutations. Kidney Int. 1998; 53:3-17.
  164. Gonzalez Ballesteros LF, Ma NS, Gordon RJ, Ward L, Backeljauw P, Wasserman H, Weber DR, DiMeglio LA, Gagne J, Stein R, Cody D, Simmons K, Zimakas P, Topor LS, Agrawal S, Calabria A, Tebben P, Faircloth R, Imel EA, Casey L, Carpenter TO. Unexpected widespread hypophosphatemia and bone disease associated with elemental formula use in infants and children. Bone. 2017; 97, 287-292.
  165. Eswarakumar AS, Ma NS, Ward LM, Backeljauw P, Wasserman H, Weber DR, DiMeglio LA, Imel EA, Gagne J, Cody D, Zimakas P, Topor LS, Agrawal S, Calabria A, Tebben P, Faircloth RS, Gordon R, Casey L, Carpenter TO. Long-Term Follow-up of Hypophosphatemic Bone Disease Associated With Elemental Formula Use: Sustained Correction of Bone Disease After Formula Change or Phosphate Supplementation. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020;59(12):1080-1085.
  166. Harvey BM, Eussen SRBM, Harthoorn LF, Burks AW. Mineral Intake and Status of Cow's Milk Allergic Infants Consuming an Amino Acid-based Formula. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017; 65(3):346-349.

Severe Hypothyroidism in the Elderly

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Elderly patients with severe hypothyroidism often present with variable symptoms that may be masked or potentiated by co-morbid conditions. Characteristic symptoms may include fatigue, weight gain, cold intolerance, hoarseness, constipation, and myalgias. Neurologic symptoms may include ataxia, depression, and mental status changes ranging from mild confusion to overt dementia. Clinical findings that may raise suspicion of thyroid hormone deficiency include hypothermia, bradycardia, goitrous enlargement of the thyroid, cool dry skin, myxedema, delayed relaxation of deep tendon reflexes, a pericardial or abdominal effusion, hyponatremia, and hypercholesterolemia.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL

 

Autoimmune (Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis with destruction of functioning tissue is the most common endogenous cause of hypothyroidism in elderly patients. Checkpoint inhibitors that are used to treat a variety of malignancies can induce a rapidly progressing form of autoimmune thyroiditis. Unrecognized or untreated cases can progress to a state of pronounced thyroid hormone deficiency over weeks to months. Administration of radioactive iodine to treat hyperthyroidism ascribed to Graves’ disease usually causes permanent hypothyroidism. Surgery performed to remove thyroid cancer or an enlarged multinodular goiter inevitably leads to overt hypothyroidism. External beam radiation used to treat lymphoid malignancies and head and neck cancer can lead to rapid or delayed development of hypothyroidism. Pituitary dysfunction that inhibits secretion of TSH may be caused by growth of a mass in the sella turcica or may develop as a complication of surgery performed to remove a tumor. 

 

Table 1: Causes of Hypothyroidism in the Elderly

Primary hypothyroidism

Autoimmune (Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis

Amiodarone induced hypothyroidism

Lithium induced hypothyroidism

Post-ablative hypothyroidism

Post-surgical hypothyroidism

Radiation-induced hypothyroidism
Thyroiditis induced by checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, interferon alpha, or CAMPATH

Central hypothyroidism

Pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction

Decreased absorption of levothyroxine

Celiac disease

Drugs: iron sulfate, bile acid resins, sucralfate, calcium

Accelerated metabolism of thyroid hormone

Increased deiodinase activity (consumptive hypothyroidism)

Drugs: phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, rifampin

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS NEEDED AND SUGGESTED

 

Laboratory tests that demonstrate an elevated TSH level in tandem with a low free or total T4 level confirm a diagnosis of primary hypothyroidism. Commonly used drugs including ASA and phenytoin lower total T4 levels and may cause interference with FT4 assays. Anti-thyroid peroxidase and anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels may be checked to confirm the presence of autoimmune thyroiditis, but this usually isn’t necessary as it is the presumptive diagnosis in patients who haven’t been treated with other predisposing therapies. A low free or total T4 level detected in tandem with a low or inappropriately normal TSH level may raise suspicion of central hypothyroidism. This may prompt further biochemical evaluation of other pituitary hormones and anatomic imaging of the pituitary and hypothalamus. Serious illness in the elderly is often accompanied by the non-thyroidal illness (euthyroid sick) syndrome that presents with a normal or low total T4 level, a low total T3 level, and an inappropriately low or normal TSH level. Recognition of this syndrome requires exclusion of other causes of hypothyroidism or pituitary dysfunction. Appropriate treatment of this condition is controversial. Subclinical hypothyroidism, with a normal range freeT4 level and elevated TSH level is not infrequent in elderly patients, and if due to autoimmune thyroiditis, often progresses to overt hypothyroidism.

 

THERAPY

 

Levothyroxine (T4) is the principal thyroid hormone preparation used to treat hypothyroidism. Regimens that include liothyronine (T3) have not been shown to be any more efficacious and run the risk of triggering atrial arrhythmias in susceptible individuals. Most adults require a full replacement dose of 1.6 mcg per kilogram of body weight. The major concern in elderly patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease is to avoid exacerbating underlying conditions. In these circumstances levothyroxine should be started at a low dose of 12.5-25 mcg daily. If this dose does not provoke ischemic symptoms or an atrial arrhythmia, it can be increased in 25 mcg increment at 4-week intervals. Patients who develop hypothyroidism after treatment of hyperthyroidism can be treated with full replacement doses from the outset. Agents that may block absorption of levothyroxine include iron sulfate, bile acid resins, sucralfate, and supplemental forms of calcium. Doses should be separated from ingestion of these agents by at least 4 hours. Higher than anticipated doses may be required in patients treated with other agents that increase metabolism of levothyroxine including phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and rifampin.

Appropriate treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism is open to debate. Some clinicians feel that treatment is indicated with any confirmed and unexplained elevation of TSH above normal but most clinicians do not initiate replacement therapy in elderly patients until the TSH level is > 10uU/ml on several occasions.

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

When treating primary hypothyroidism, a TSH level should be checked 6 weeks after starting a dose or 4 weeks after changing a dose of levothyroxine. Doses should be adjusted to maintain a TSH level within the reference range. Maintenance of a slightly elevated TSH level may be acceptable in cases where treatment to a full replacement dose triggers ischemic symptoms or atrial arrhythmias. When treating central hypothyroidism, doses should be adjusted to maintain a free T4 level in the upper half of the reference range. The TSH level is unreliable in this setting and should not be used to guide treatment.

 

GUIDELINES

 

Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, Cooper DS, Kim BW, Peeters RP, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM; American Thyroid Association Task Force on Thyroid Hormone Replacement. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the american thyroid association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid. 2014 Dec;24(12):1670-751

 

Jeffrey R. Garber, Rhoda H. Cobin, Hossein Gharib, James V. Hennessey, Irwin Klein, Jeffrey I. Mechanick, Rachel Pessah-Pollack, Peter A. Singer, and Kenneth A. Woeber. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypothyroidism in Adults: Cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):988-1028.

 

REFERENCES

 

Kim MI. Hypothyroidism in Older Adults. 2020 Jul 14. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Feldt-Rasmussen U. Treatment of hypothyroidism in elderly patients and in patients with cardiac disease. Thyroid. 2007 Jul;17(7):619-24.

 

Wiersinga WM. Adult Hypothyroidism.2014 Mar 28. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–

 

Akamizu T, Amino N. Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. 2017 Jul 17. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Myxedema and Coma (Severe Hypothyroidism)

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Myxedema coma is a rare life-threatening clinical condition in patients with longstanding severe untreated hypothyroidism, in whom adaptive mechanisms fail to maintain homeostasis. Most patients, however, are not comatose, and the entity rather represents a form of very severe, decompensated hypothyroidism. 

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Usually a precipitating event disrupts homeostasis which is maintained in hypothyroid patients by a number of neurovascular adaptations. These adaptations include chronic peripheral vasoconstriction, diastolic hypertension, and diminished blood volume, in an attempt to preserve a normal body core temperature. Homeostasis might no longer be maintained in severely hypothyroid patients if blood volume is reduced any further (e.g., by gastrointestinal bleeding or the use of diuretics), if respiration already compromised by a reduced ventilatory drive is further hampered by intercurrent pulmonary infection, of if CNS regulatory mechanisms are impaired by stroke, the use of sedatives, or hyponatremia.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL

 

The three key features of myxedema coma are: 

  1. Altered mental status. Usually somnolence and lethargy have been present for months. Lethargy may develop via stupor into a comatose state. There may have been transient episodes of reduced consciousness before a more complete comatose state develops.
  2. Defective thermoregulation: hypothermia. The lower the temperature, the worse the prognosis. Please check the ability of the thermometer to accurately measure decreased temperatures (automatic thermometers may not register frank hypothermia). Fever may be absent despite infections. With cold weather the body temperature may drop sharply. Myxedema coma commonly develops during winter months.
  3. Precipitating event. Look for cold exposure, infection, drugs (diuretics, tranquillizers, sedatives, analgesics), trauma, stroke, heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding. The typical patient often has a history of hypothyroidism, neck surgery or radioactive iodine treatment.

Physical examination may reveal hypothermia, hypoventilation, hypotension, bradycardia, dry coarse skin, macroglossia, and delayed deep-tendon reflexes. Absence of mild diastolic hypertension in severely hypothyroid patients is a warning sign of impending myxedema coma. 

Laboratory examination may reveal anemia, hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and high serum creatine kinase concentrations. Most patients have low serum FT4 and high serum TSH. Serum TSH can be low or normal, however, due to the presence of central hypothyroidism or the nonthyroidal illness syndrome. 

 

THERAPY

 

Myxedema coma is a medical emergency. Early diagnosis, rapid administration of thyroid hormones and adequate supportive measures (Table) are essential for a successful outcome. The prognosis, however, remains poor with a reported mortality between 20% and 50%. In-hospital mortality was 29.5% among 149 patients with myxedema coma identified between 2010-2013 through a national inpatient database in Japan (Ono et al. 2017).

 

MANAGEMENT OF MYXEDEMA COMA

1.Hypothyroidism       

large initial iv dose of 300-500 μg T4, if no response add T3;

1a

Alternative- initial iv dose of 200-300 μg T4 plus 10-25 μg T3

2.Hypocortisolemia    

iv hydrocortisone 200-400 mg daily

3. Hypoventilation       

don’t delay intubation and mechanical ventilation too long

4. Hypothermia

blankets, no active rewarming

5. Hyponatremia          

mild fluid restriction

6. Hypotension

cautious volume expansion with crystalloid or whole blood

7. Hypoglycemia

glucose administration

8. Precipitating event  

identification and elimination by specific treatment, liberal use of antibiotics

 

Note 1. Administration of thyroid hormone is essential, but opinions differ about the dose and the preparation (T4 or T3). A high dose carries the risk of precipitating fatal tachycardia or myocardial infarction, but a low dose may be unable to reverse a downhill course. Treatment with T4 may be less effective due to impaired conversion of T4 into T3 (associated with severe illness and inadequate caloric intake), but treatment with T3 may expose tissues to relatively high levels of thyroid hormone. In the absence of RCT’s, the available case series suggest higher mortality with initial T4 doses larger than 500 μg and with T3 doses larger than 75 μg daily. Treatment should be started intravenously because gastrointestinal absorption may be impaired. Typically, a large initial intravenous loading dose of 300-500 μg T4 may be given, followed by daily doses of 1.6 μg/kg (initially intravenously, and orally when feasible). If there is no improvement in clinical abnormalities within 24 hours, addition of T3 is recommended. An alternative scheme is an initial intravenous dose of 200-300 μg T4 plus 10-25 μg T3, followed by 2.5-10 μg T3 every 8 hours depending on the patient’s age and presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Upon clinical improvement, T3 is discontinued and a daily oral T4 replacement dose is maintained.

 

Note 2. Pituitary-adrenal function is impaired in severe hypothyroidism. Restoration of a normal metabolic rate with exogenous thyroid hormones may precipitate adrenal insufficiency. It is therefore prudent to administer glucocorticoids in stress doses (e.g., hydrocortisone 100 mg intravenously every 8 hours).

 

Note 3. Mechanical ventilation may be needed, particularly when obesity and myxedema coexist.

 

Note 4. The cutaneous blood flow is markedly reduced in severe hypothyroidism in order to conserve body heat. Warming blankets will defeat this mechanism. Thus, central warming may be attempted, but peripheral warming should not, since it may lead to vasodilatation and shock.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

 

Note 5. Fluid restriction and the use of isotonic sodium chloride will usually restore normal serum sodium. Normal saline should not be administered in patients with suspicious hyponatremic encephalopathy. In cases with severe symptomatic hyponatremia, 100 ml of 3% NaCl should be administered (Liamis et al. 2017). The new vasopressin antagonist conivaptan might be potentially useful in hyponatremia as high vasopressin levels have been observed in myxedema coma; however, no cases of myxedema coma have been reported in which this drug was administered.                                                                                                                                      

 

Note 6. Volume expansion is usually required in case of hypotension since patients are maximally vasoconstricted. Dopamine should be added if fluid therapy does not restore efficient circulation.                                                                                                                                                                                                         

 

Note 7. Serum glucose should be monitored. Supplemental glucose may be necessary, especially if adrenal insufficiency is present.                                                                                                                                                                              

 

Note 8. A vigorous search for precipitating events is mandatory. Signs of infection (like fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis) may be absent. Prophylactic antibiotics are indicated until infection can be ruled out.

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

In case treatment was initiated with intravenous T4 but after 24 hours the patient is still comatose or vital functions have not improved, iv administration of T3 should be considered. T3 should be discontinued and replaced by T4 once circulation and respiration have been stabilized. Intravenous administration of thyroid hormones is replaced by oral administration when the patient is fully awake.

 

GUIDELINES  

 

Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, Cooper DS, Kim BW, Peeters RP, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism. Prepared by the American Thyroid Association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid 2014; 24: 1670-1751.

 

Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, Pessah-Pollack R, Singer PA, Woeber KA; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Thyroid Association Taskforce on Hypothyroidism in Adults. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):988-1028.

 

REFERENCES

 

Chen YJ, Hou SK, How CK, et al. Diagnosis of unrecognized primary overt hypothyroidism in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2010;28:866-870. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 20887907

Dutta P, Bhansali A, Masoodi SR, et al. Predictors of outcome in myxoedema coma: a study from a tertiary care centre. Crit Care 2008;12: R1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18173846

 

Gwiezdzinska J, Wartofsky L. Thyroid emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2012; 96: 385-403

Liamis G, Filippatos TD, Liontos A, Elisaf MS. Hypothyroidism-associated hyponatremia: mechanisms, implications and treatment. Eur J Endocrinol 2017; 176: R15-R20.

 

Ono Y, Ono S, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Tanaka Y. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of myxedema coma: analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan. J Epidemiol 2017; 27: 117-122

 

Reinhardt W, Mann K. Incidence, clinical picture, and treatment of hypothyroid coma: results of a survey. Med Klin1997; 92: 521-524. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9411198

 

Wiersinga WM. Adult Hypothyroidism. 2014 Mar 28. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

Severe Thyrotoxicosis in the Elderly

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Thyrotoxicosis in the elderly may elude detection by manifesting only fatigue, weakness, and relative apathy. More commonly it presents with any of a range of symptoms including fatigue, weight loss, heat intolerance, palpitations, weakness, insomnia, irritability, confusion, and agitation. Clinical findings that may raise suspicion include tachycardia, proptosis, goitrous enlargement of the thyroid, palpable thyroid nodules, warm moist skin, brisk deep tendon reflexes, and a resting tremor. A newly detected atrial arrhythmia may be the first manifestation identified.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

 

Endogenous thyrotoxicosis may be caused by disorders that increase thyroid hormone production in functional thyroid tissue, or by disorders associated with inflammation of the thyroid that cause leakage of preformed thyroid hormone. The distinction between these classifications helps to dictate treatment. Increased thyroid hormone production may be caused by autoimmune stimulation of the thyroid, or by the growth of autonomously functioning nodules or neoplasms. Checkpoint inhibitors that are used to treat a range of malignancies can induce a rapidly progressing form of autoimmune thyroiditis associated with transient thyrotoxicosis. In patients treated with thyroid hormone preparations, ingestion of excessive doses may lead to severe thyrotoxicosis. Rarely thyrotoxicosis is induced during therapeutic administration of interferon alpha or CAMPATH. Finally, tyrosine kinase inhibitors can also induce hyperthyroidism.

 

Table 1. Causes of Thyrotoxicosis in Elderly

Increased thyroid hormone production

Graves’ disease

Toxic multinodular goiter

Toxic adenoma

Type 1 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

Metastatic thyroid cancer

Inflammation with leakage of thyroid hormone

Subacute thyroiditis

Autoimmune (Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis

Type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

Ingestion of exogenous thyroid hormone

Iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis

TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS NEEDED AND SUGGESTED

 

Suspected thyrotoxicosis may be confirmed when lab tests reveal a suppressed TSH level in tandem with an elevated free or total T4 level. A total T3 level should also be checked, as it is often disproportionately elevated in cases of untreated Graves’ disease. In patients who aren’t taking amiodarone and haven’t been recently exposed to iodinated contrast, a thyroid uptake study can distinguish increased production of thyroid hormone (marked by increased uptake), from inflammation with leakage of thyroid hormone (marked by decreased uptake). Thyroid scan images that reveal the distribution of increased uptake can help to distinguish Graves’ disease from toxic nodular disorders. In cases that demonstrate decreased uptake, an elevated ESR or CRP may reflect subacute thyroiditis, while elevated anti-thyroid peroxidase or anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels may reflect autoimmune thyroiditis. The absence of either of these findings may raise suspicion of iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis.

 

A suppressed TSH level with “normal” T4 and T3 levels indicates subclinical hyperthyroidism. This problem is common in elderly individuals with multinodular goiter or “hot” nodules. Long standing subclinical hyperthyroidism is associated with atrial arrhythmias, and for this reason, if confirmed and persistent, is often treated in the same manner as overt hyperthyroidism.

 

THERAPY

 

Severe thyrotoxicosis may induce or exacerbate atrial arrhythmias, ischemia, congestive heart failure or diabetes mellitus, problems requiring urgent diagnosis and therapy. Coincident anemia should be recognized. If tolerated, and in the absence of CHF, beta blockers may help to ameliorate some symptoms in patients presenting with thyrotoxicosis. Since administration of beta-blockers to patients with severe thyrotoxicosis has rarely been associated with vascular collapse, a reduced dose may be administered initially. In cases of severe hyperthyroidism ascribed to Graves’ disease, a toxic multinodular goiter, or a toxic adenoma, antithyroid drugs are usually administered as first line treatment. Methimazole is the usual agent of choice. Relatively high doses (20-40 mg daily) may be needed at the outset. Once adequate control of hyperthyroidism has been achieved, definitive therapy with radioactive iodine ablation or thyroid surgery may be considered. Patients who demonstrate an allergy or adverse side effects when taking antithyroid drugs may need to proceed directly to treatment with radioactive iodine ablation. Consideration should be given to the possibility of triggering increased thyrotoxicosis as a result of radioactive iodine treatment with adverse effects on cardiovascular disease. Pre-treatment with antithyroid drugs, repeated partial dose radioactive iodine therapy, or post-treatment with beta blockers or saturated solution of potassium iodide (at least 10 mg daily) may be considered. Thyroid surgery may be indicated in cases where substernal enlargement of a toxic multinodular goiter has caused significant compressive symptoms, and in cases with any suggestion of a thyroid malignancy. Temporizing treatment with high doses of NSAIDs or prednisone may help to relieve discomfort associated with the onset of subacute thyroiditis.

 

Table 2. Treatment

Beta blockers

Propranolol: 10-30 mg tid-qid, or 60-120 mg ER daily

Atenolol: 25-100 mg daily

Metoprolol: 25-50 mg bid, or 50-100 mg ER daily

Antithyroid drugs

Methimazole: 10-60 mg daily

Propylthiouracil: 50-150 mg bid-tid

Radioactive iodine

Thyroid surgery

Iodide

Saturated solution of potassium iodide: 1 drop bid

Antinflammatory agents

Ibuprofen 400-800 mg tid

Prednisone 10-40 mg daily

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

Serial profiles of thyroid function tests including TSH, free or total T4, and total T3 levels should be followed at regular 2-4 week intervals when treating and monitoring thyrotoxic disorders. In cases of treated hyperthyroidism, suppression of the TSH level may persist for several weeks after thyroid hormone levels have been brought under control. Treatment of post-ablative or post-surgical hypothyroidism with levothyroxine should be considered once T4 and T3 levels drop to low normal or subnormal ranges.

 

GUIDELINES

 

2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Walter MA.

Thyroid. 2016 Oct;26(10):1343-1421.

 

REFERENCES

 

Samuels MH. Hyperthyroidism in Aging. 2021 Aug 9. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

DeGroot LJ. Diagnosis and Treatment of Graves’ Disease. 2016 Nov 2. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Bartalena L. Graves’ Disease: Complications. 2018 Feb 20. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Kopp P. Thyrotoxicosis of other Etiologies. 2010 Dec 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Macchia PE, Feingold KR. Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis. 2018 Dec 24. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Patients treated with amiodarone for a cardiac arrhythmia may develop amiodarone Induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT). The risk of AIT is increased in iodine-deficient regions. The incidence of AIT varies greatly (between 0.003% and 10%). AIT occurs in 3% of patients treated with amiodarone in North America, but is much more frequent (up to 10%) in countries with a low iodine dietary intake. In contrast to the other forms of hyperthyroidism, AIT is more frequent in males than in females (M/F = 3/1).

 

AIT manifests with clinical signs indistinguishable from spontaneous hyperthyroidism, however symptoms and signs of thyrotoxicosis are not apparent in all patients, and may be obscured by an underlying cardiac condition. The reappearance or exacerbation of an underlying cardiac disorder after amiodarone is started, in a patient previously stable, should prompt an investigation into thyroid function for suspected development of AIT. Sometimes worsening of a cardiac arrhythmia with recurrence of atrial fibrillation and palpitations is the only clinical evidence of AIT. The development of angina may also occur. Similarly, unexplained changes in warfarin sensitivity, requiring a reduction in the dosage of this drug, can be the consequence of increased thyroid hormone levels, since hyperthyroidism increases warfarin effects.

 

AIT may develop early during amiodarone treatment, after many months of treatment, and has even been reported to occur several months after amiodarone withdrawal, since amiodarone and its metabolites have a long half-life due to accumulation in several tissues, especially fat.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

There are two different forms of AIT, and differential diagnosis between the two forms is important, since treatments are different. However, it is often not possible to clearly distinguish AIT1 and AIT2.

 

Type 1 AIT usually occurs in an abnormal thyroid gland (latent Graves’ disease, multinodular gland) and is the consequence of increased thyroid hormone biosynthesis due to iodine excess in patients with a preexisting thyroid disorder (Amiodarone contains 37% iodine by weight). Type 1 AIT is more common in iodine deficient regions. Type 2 AIT is a destructive process of the thyroid gland leading to the release of pre-formed hormone. This thyroiditis is an intrinsic toxic effect of amiodarone. Type 2 AIT usually persists for one to three months until thyroid hormone stores are depleted. In most countries Type 2 AIT is more common than Type 1 AIT. Differences between Type 1 and Type 2 AIT are described in table 1. Differentiating between AIT Type 1 and 2 is often very difficult.

 

Table 1 Differences between Type 1 and 2 Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis

 

Type 1

Type 2

Underlying thyroid disease

Yes (Multinodular goiter, Grave’s)

No

Time after starting amiodarone

Short (median 3 months)

Long (median 30 months)

24-hour iodine uptake

Low-Normal (may rarely be high in iodine deficient regions)

Low to Suppressed

Thyroid Ultrasound

Diffuse or Nodular Goiter may be present

Normal or small gland

Vascularity on Echo-color Doppler ultrasound

Increased

Absent

T4/T3 ratio

Usually <4

Usually >4

TgAb / TPOAb/ TSI

May be present

Usually absent

Circulating interleukin-6

Normal to high

Sometimes markedly elevated but usually doesn’t differentiate from AIT1

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

 

To confirm the diagnosis of AIT it is necessary to demonstrate a suppressed serum TSH associated with an increase in serum FT3 and FT4 levels in a patient currently or previously treated with amiodarone. T3 levels may not be as elevated as expected as amiodarone inhibits the conversion of T4 to T3 and severe non-thyroidal illness may be present blocking the increase in T3. The presence of a preexisting thyroid disorder is suggestive for Type 1 AIT. Frequently in patients with Type 2 AIT an increased T4/T3 ratio is present as a feature of destructive thyroiditis. Thyroid antibodies may be present in Type 1 AIT depending upon the underlying thyroid disorder. High levels of thyroglobulin antibodies and TPO antibodies have also been reported in 8% of Type 2 AIT patients. Type 2 AIT develops as an inflammatory process in a normal thyroid and therefore the levels of IL-6 may be markedly elevated but typically the IL-6 levels do not distinguish AIT2 from AIT1.

 

Color flow Doppler ultrasonography is useful to differentiate between Type 1 and Type 2 AIT. Intra-thyroidal vascular flow is increased in Type 1 AIT (pattern II-III) and reduced or absent in Type 2 (pattern 0).

In many patients with Type 1 AIT the 24-hr iodine uptake is low.  In rare patients with Type 1 AIT, despite the very high iodine load, a normal or inappropriately elevated 24-hr iodine uptake may be observed, especially if the patients live in an iodine deficient area. Patients with Type 2 AIT typically have a radioactive iodine uptake < 1%.

 

While the distinction between Type 1 and Type 2 may sometimes be clear, in many patients neither the clinical findings nor the response to treatment clearly indicate whether the patient has Type 1 or Type 2 AIT. Some patients may have a mixed form of AIT.

 

TREATMENT

 

AIT may lead to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in older patients with impaired left ventricular function. Thus, in most patients, prompt restoration and stable maintenance of euthyroidism should be achieved as rapidly as possible.

 

Mild AIT may spontaneously resolve in about 20% of the cases. Type 1 AIT should be treated with high doses of methimazole (20-60 mg/day) or propylthiouracil (400-600 mg/day) to block the synthesis of thyroid hormones (Figure 1). The response to methimazole or propylthiouracil is often modest due to the high iodine levels in patients taking amiodarone. In selected patients, potassium perchlorate when available can also be used to increase sensitivity of the gland to methimazole or propylthiouracil by blocking iodine uptake in the thyroid. KClO4 should be used for no more than 30 days at a daily dose < 1 g/day, since this drug, especially in higher doses, is associated with aplastic anemia or agranulocytosis. Once thyroid hormone levels are back to normal, definitive treatment of the hyperthyroidism should be considered. If thyroid uptake is sufficient (>10%) radioactive iodine can be used. Thyroid surgery is a good alternative. If thyrotoxicosis worsens after initial control, a mixed form Type1-Type 2 should be considered, and treatment for Type 2 AIT should be started.

 

Type 2 AIT can be treated with prednisone, starting with an initial dose of 0.5-0.7 mg/kg body weight per day and the treatment is generally continued for three months. If a worsening of the toxicosis occurs during the taper, the prednisone dose should be increased. Methimazole and propylthiouracil are generally not useful in Type 2 AIT.

 

Because the distinction between AIT Type 1 and 2 is difficult and not always clear, and because some patients have mixed forms of AIT, these therapies for AIT Type 1 and 2 are often combined.

 

For patients with persistent hyperthyroidism surgery is the optimal choice.  Propylthiouracil can be used to inhibit T4 to T3 conversion. Beta blockers will be helpful in preparation for surgery.

 

Figure 1. Management of Patients with Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis

FOLLOW-UP

It is still debatable whether amiodarone should be discontinued once the diagnosis of AIT is made. Because of the long half-life, there is no immediate benefit in stopping the drug. However, some forms of Type 2 AIT may remit with amiodarone withdrawal. If feasible from the cardiological point of view, it is probably safer to withdraw amiodarone and use a different anti-arrhythmic drug, but no controlled trials have been published on this question. A good alternative to amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter can be dronedarone, but this drug is contraindicated in patients with NYHA Class IV heart failure, or NYHA Class II–III heart failure with a recent decompensation. Some patients with Type 2 AIT may develop hypothyroidism due to thyroid gland destruction.

GUIDELINES

Bartalena L, Bogazzi F, Chiovato L, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Links TP, Vanderpump M. 2018 European Thyroid Association (ETA) Guidelines for the Management of Amiodarone-Associated Thyroid Dysfunction. Eur Thyroid J. 2018 Mar;7(2):55-66

 

Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Walter MA. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016 Oct;26(10):1343-1421.

 

REFERENCES

Kopp P. Thyrotoxicosis of other Etiologies. 2010 Dec 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Bogazzi F, Tomisti L, Bartalena L., Aghini-Lombardi F, Martino E. Amiodarone and the thyroid: a 2012 update. J Endocrinol. Invest. 2012; 35:340-48.

 

Bogazzi F, Bartalena L, Martino E. Approach to the patient with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:2529-35.

 

Cohen-Lehman J, Dahl P, Danzi S, Klein I. Effects of amiodarone therapy on thyroid function. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010; 6:34-41.

 

Trohman RG, Sharma PS, McAninch EA, Bianco AC. Amiodarone and the thyroid physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Sep 20. pii: S1050-1738(18)30195-6.

 

Ylli D, Wartofsky L, Burman KD. Evaluation and Treatment of Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):226-236.

 

Subacute Thyroiditis

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Subacute thyroiditis (SAT) is an inflammatory condition of the thyroid with characteristic presentations and clinical course. Patients with the classic, painful (DeQuervain’s; Granulomatous) thyroiditis, (PFSAT) typically present with painful swelling of the thyroid. Transient vocal cord paresis may occur. At times, the pain begins and may be confined to the one lobe, but usually spreads rapidly to involve the rest of the gland ("creeping thyroiditis"). Pain may radiate to the jaw or the ears. Malaise, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia are common. A mild to moderate fever is expected, and at times a high fever of 104°F (40.0°C) may occur. The disease process may reach its peak within 3 to 4 days and subside and disappear within a week, but more typically, onset extends over 1 to 2 weeks and continues with fluctuating intensity for 3 to 6 weeks. The thyroid gland is typically enlarged, smooth, firm and tender to palpation, sometimes exquisitely so. Approximately one-half of the patients present during the first weeks of the illness, with symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. Subsequently patients often experience hypothyroidism before returning to normal (see figure 1). This painful condition lasts for a week to a few months, usually demonstrates a very high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), elevated C- reactive protein (CRP) levels, and has a tendency to recur.

 

Painless (silent, autoimmune) subacute thyroiditis (PLSAT) occurs spontaneously or following pregnancy when it is referred to as postpartum thyroiditis [PPT]). Autoimmune thyroiditis is histologically similar to Hashimoto's thyroiditis and occurs following 3.9-10% of pregnancies. The combination of thyroid enlargement usually without discomfort and positive anti-thyroid antibodies, associated with typical thyroid function test abnormalities (see figure 1), over a 9-12 month course should alert the clinician to the presence of PLSAT.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

A tendency for the painful form of the disease to follow upper respiratory tract infections or sore throats has suggested a viral infection. An autoimmune reaction is possible as patients with PFSAT often manifest HLA-Bw35 and those with PLSAT are frequently TPO or TG-ab positive. In both forms, clinical thyroid symptoms result from either the initial release of thyroid hormone from the inflamed tissue during the thyrotoxic phase or the lack of circulating thyroid hormones in the hypothyroid phase (See figure 1). Medications associated with SAT are summarized in table 4.

Figure 1. Time Course of Subacute Thyroiditis

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

 

Subacute thyroiditis is a diagnosis made clinically. Anterior neck pain, preceded by an upper respiratory inflammation, alerts the clinician to the classic PFSAT. Differential diagnostic considerations include acute (suppurative, thyroid abscess) thyroiditis (see table 1), which is usually a painful nodular enlargement of the thyroid or unusual presentations of Graves’ or nodular thyroid disease (see table 2 below) with pain generated by capsular stretching.

 

Thyroid function tests (see table 3) during the painful (initial) phase of SAT often reveal a suppressed TSH and elevation of total T4 and T3 levels consistent with the thyrotoxic state. T3 (ng/dl) to T4 (ug/dl) ratio is less than 20 in all forms of SAT. ESR is almost always greater than 50 and WBC counts and CRP levels are usually elevated in PFSAT. PLSAT (including PPT) is typically associated with the presence of anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO-ab) and thyroglobulin (Tg-ab) antibodies, both of which are usually absent or present only in low titers in PFSAT. Thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) are usually positive in Graves' disease and absent or low level in patients with PFSAT as well as PPT.

 

Radioactive iodine uptake and scan typically reveals a low RAIU and poor visualization of the thyroid in PFSAT and PLSAT whereas significant uptake is expected in Graves’ disease (GD) or toxic nodular goiters (TNG). PLSAT must be differentiated from other forms of low uptake thyrotoxicosis (see Table 2). Iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis (factitious [l-thyroxine (LT4), l-triiodothyronine (LT3) or T4/T3 combination] results in a suppressed thyroglobulin (TG) level. Ectopic thyroid hormone production in a Struma Ovarii or functional metastatic thyroid cancer can be detected with total body scanning. Iodine contamination after a contrast enhanced CT, obliterates the RAIU and obscures the presence of the more frequently encountered Graves’ disease or a toxic multinodular goiter. A recent CT scan will frequently alert the clinician to this artifact. Urine iodine measurement can quantify the degree of iodine contamination present.

 

Thyroid ultrasound typically shows a heterogeneously hypoechoic pattern and has a suppressed vascular pattern in SAT while patients with Graves’ disease demonstrate hyper-vascularity. The presence of thyroid nodules supports the presence of a toxic nodular goiter. Localized PFSAT, can be suggestive of thyroid cancer. Usually the pain, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and leukocytosis, and clinical remission or spread to other parts of the gland make clinical differentiation possible but may require a fine needle aspiration for definitive diagnosis.

 

Table 1. Features Useful in Differentiating Acute Suppurative Thyroiditis (AST) and Subacute Thyroiditis (SAT)

Characteristic

AST

SAT

Prior URI

88%

17%

Fever

100%

54%

Symptoms of Hyperthyroidism

Uncommon

47%

Sore throat

90%

36%

Painful thyroid swelling

100%

77%

Left side affected

85%

not specific

Migrating tenderness

Possible

27%

Erythema of skin

83%

not usually

Elevated WBC count

57%

25-50%

Elevated ESR

100%

85%

Abnormal TFTs

5-10%

60%

Enzymes- Alk-phos., AST/ALT 

Rare

common

FNA Purulent, bacteria or fungi present

~100%

0

Lymphocytes, macrophages, PNMs, giant cells

0

~100%

123I uptake low

Rarely

~100%

Abnormal thyroid scan

92%

Scan / US helpful in D/D

75%

Non-specific

Gallium scan positive

~100%

~100%

Barium swallow = fistula

Common

0

CT scan useful

Rarely

not useful

Clinical response to glucocorticoid treatment

Transient

100%

Incision/drainage required

85%

No

Recurrence following operative drainage

16%

No

Pyriform sinus fistula discovered

96%

No

URI= Upper Respiratory Infection, WBC= white blood cell count, ESR= Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, TFT’s= Thyroid function tests, Alk-Phos= Alkaline Phosphatase, AST= Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALT= Alanine Aminotransferase, FNA= Fine needle aspiration, US= Ultrasound examination, ↑= elevated

 

Table 2. Differential Diagnosis of Thyrotoxic Patients Based on Radioactive Iodine Uptake (RAIU)

Normal to ↑ 123-I RAIU

Near absent 123-I RAIU

Graves’ disease

Painless (silent) thyroiditis

Toxic multinodular goiter

Amiodarone-induced thyroiditis

Toxic solitary nodule

Subacute (painful) thyroiditis

Trophoblastic (hCG mediated) disease

Iatrogenic or factitious thyrotoxicosis

TSH-producing pituitary tumor

Ectopic tissue (Struma Ovarii, functional cancer)

Thyroid hormone resistance

Acute thyroiditis

 

Table 3. Differential Diagnostic Considerations in the Thyrotoxic Patient (Typical findings in each disease)

 

PFSAT

PLSAT

PPT

Graves’

Neck Pain

Yes

No

No

No

Recent URI

Yes

No

No

No

Systemic symptoms

Yes

No

No

No

Recent Pregnancy

No

No

Yes

No

Thyroid symptoms

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

ESR

Elevated

Normal

Normal

Normal

CRP

Elevated

Normal

Normal

Normal

TSH

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

Suppressed

FT4

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

Nl/↑

TT3

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

Nl/ ↑

T3/T4

< 20

< 20

< 20

> 20

Thyroglobulin

Elevated

Elevated

Elevated

Elevated

TPO-ab

Negative

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

Tg-ab

Negative

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

TSHR-ab

Negative

Neg

Neg

Pos

RAIU/Scan

Low/ Not visible

Low/ Not visible

Low/ Not visible

High/ diffuse

US Echogenicity

Hypo-
echoic

Hypo-
echoic

Hypo-
echoic

Hypo-
echoic

Vascularity

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Increased

PFSAT= painful subacute thyroiditis; PLSAT= painless subacute thyroiditis; PPT= postpartum thyroiditis

 

Table 4. Causes of Drug Associated Thyrotoxicosis

Drug

Mechanism

Timing

Therapy

Amiodarone

Iodine (AIT 1)

months to years

Supportive, ATDs, Perchlorate, Surgery

Amiodarone

Thyroiditis (AIT 2)

Often > 1 year

Supportive care, Surgery, Prednisone

Lithium

Thyroiditis

Often > 1 year

ATDs, Supportive

Interferon-α

Thyroiditis or Graves’

Months

Supportive, ATDs, and /or 131-I (Graves’ only)

Interleukin-2

Thyroiditis or Graves’

Months

Supportive, ATDs, and /or 131-I (Graves’ only)

Contrast (I)

Thyroid autonomy

Weeks to months

ATDs

131-I Ablation

Destructive thyroiditis

1-4 weeks

Supportive, prednisone

131-I Rx of TMNG

Graves’ disease

3-6 months

131-I, surgery, ATDs

Check Point Inhibitors

Thyroiditis or autoimmune

Weeks to months

Supportive, 131-I, surgery, ATDs

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Thyroiditis

Weeks to months

Supportive

ATD= Anti thyroid drugs, TMNG= Toxic Multinodular Goiter

 

THERAPY

 

In some patients, no treatment is required. For many, analgesic therapy for relief of pain can be achieved with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. If this fails, prednisone administration should be employed with daily doses of 20-40 mg prednisone. After one to 2 weeks of this treatment, the dosage is tapered over a period of 6 weeks. Most patients have no recrudescence of symptoms, but occasionally this does occur and the dose must be increased again. The recurrence rate of painful subacute thyroiditis after cessation of prednisone therapy is about 20%. Beta blocking agents are usually administered for relief of thyrotoxic symptoms in the initial stage of SAT. Antithyroid drugs have no role in the management of established SAT as the excess thyroid hormone levels result from release of preformed thyroxine and triiodothyronine from inflamed tissue. Levothyroxine administration may be useful, at least transiently, if the patient enters a phase of hypothyroidism. Surgical intervention is not the primary treatment for subacute thyroiditis but is safe and with low morbidity, if necessary, because of the possibility of associated papillary cancer based on cytological examination.

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

In 90% or more of patients with classic painful subacute thyroiditis, there is a complete and spontaneous recovery and a return to normal thyroid function. However, the thyroid glands of patients with subacute thyroiditis may exhibit irregular scarring between islands of residual

functioning parenchyma. Up to 10% of the patients may become hypothyroid and require permanent replacement with levothyroxine. Rates of permanent hypothyroidism after antibody positive PLSAT and especially PPT are significantly higher.

 

GUIDELINES

 

Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Waiter MA. American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid 2016;26(10):1343–1421. 

 

REFERENCES

 

Shrestha RT, Hennessey J. Acute and Subacute, and Riedel’s Thyroiditis. 2015 Dec 8. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905408

 

Kopp P. Thyrotoxicosis of other Etiologies. 2010 Dec 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905417

 

Inaba H, Akamizu T. Postpartum Thyroiditis. 2018 May 8. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905230

 

Thyroid Storm

CLINICAL RECOGNITION


Thyroid (or thyrotoxic) storm is an acute, life-threatening syndrome due to an exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis. It is now an infrequent condition because of earlier diagnosis and treatment of thyrotoxicosis and better pre- and postoperative medical management. In the United States the incidence of thyroid storm ranged between 0.57 and 0.76 cases/100,000 persons per year. Thyroid storm may be precipitated by a number of factors including intercurrent illness, especially infections (Table 1). Pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, enteric infections, or any other infection can precipitate thyroid storm. Thyroid storm in the past most frequently occurred after surgery, but this is now unusual. Occasionally it occurs as a manifestation of untreated or partially treated thyrotoxicosis without another apparent precipitating factor. In the Japanese experience approximately 20% of patients developed thyroid storm before they received anti-thyroid drug treatment. Finally, if patients are not compliant with anti-thyroid medications thyroid storm may occur and this is a relatively common cause. Thyroid storm is typically associated with Graves' disease, but it may occur in patients with toxic nodular goiter or any other cause of thyrotoxicosis.

 

Table 1. Factors That May Precipitate Thyroid Storm

Infections

Acute Illness such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, trauma, etc.

Non-thyroid surgery in a hyperthyroid patient

Thyroid surgery in a patient poorly prepared for surgery

Discontinuation of anti-thyroid medications

Radioiodine therapy

Recent use of iodinated contrast

Pregnancy particularly during labor and delivery

 

Classic features of thyroid storm include fever, marked tachycardia, heart failure, tremor, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, restlessness, extreme agitation, delirium or coma (Table 2). Fever is typical and may be higher than 105.8 F (41 C). Patients may present with a true psychosis or a marked deterioration of previously abnormal behavior. Rarely thyroid storm takes a strikingly different form, called apathetic storm, with extreme weakness, emotional apathy, confusion, and absent or low fever.

 

Signs and symptoms of decompensation in organ systems may be present. Delirium is one example. Congestive heart failure may also occur, with peripheral edema, congestive hepatomegaly, and respiratory distress. Marked sinus tachycardia or tachyarrhythmia, such as atrial fibrillation, are common. Liver damage and jaundice may result from congestive heart failure or the direct action of thyroid hormone on the liver. Fever and vomiting may produce dehydration and prerenal azotemia. Abdominal pain may be a prominent feature. The clinical picture may be masked by a secondary infection such as pneumonia, a viral infection, or infection of the upper respiratory tract.

 

Table 2. Clinical Manifestations of Thyroid Storm

History of thyroid disease

Goiter/thyroid eye disease

High fever

Marked tachycardia, occasionally atrial fibrillation

Heart Failure

Tremor

Sweating

Nausea and vomiting

Agitation/psychosis

Delirium/coma

Jaundice

Abdominal pain

 

Death from thyroid storm is not as common as in the past if it is promptly recognized and aggressively treated in an intensive care unit, but is still approximately 10-25%. In recent nationwide studies from Japan the mortality rate was >10%. Death may be from cardiac failure, shock, hyperthermia, multiple organ failure, or other complications. Additionally, even when patients survive, some have irreversible damage including brain damage, disuse atrophy, cerebrovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and psychosis. 

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Thyroid storm classically began a few hours after thyroidectomy performed on a patient prepared for surgery by potassium iodide alone. Many such patients were not euthyroid and would not be considered appropriately prepared for surgery by current standards. Exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis is still seen in patients sent to surgery before adequate preparation, but it is unusual in the anti-thyroid drug-controlled patient. Thyroid storm occasionally occurs in patients operated on for some other illness while severely thyrotoxic. Severe exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis is rarely seen following 131-I therapy for hyperthyroidism; but some of these exacerbations may be defined as thyroid storm.

Thyroid storm appears most commonly following infection, which seems to induce an escape from control of thyrotoxicosis. Pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, enteric infections, or any other infection can cause this condition. Interestingly, serum free T4 concentrations were higher in patients with thyroid storm than in those with uncomplicated thyrotoxicosis, while serum total T4 levels did not differ in the two groups, suggesting that events like infections may decrease serum binding of T4 and cause a greater increase in free T4 responsible for storm occurrence. Another common cause of thyroid storm is a hyperthyroid patient suddenly stopping their anti-thyroid drugs.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL

Diagnosis of thyroid storm is made on clinical grounds and involves the usual diagnostic measures for thyrotoxicosis. A history of hyperthyroidism or physical findings of an enlarged thyroid or hyperthyroid eye findings is helpful in suggesting the diagnosis. The central features are thyrotoxicosis, abnormal CNS function, fever, tachycardia (usually above 130bpm), GI tract symptoms, and evidence of impending or present CHF. There are no distinctive laboratory abnormalities. Free T4 and, if possible, free T3 should be measured. Note that T3 levels may be markedly reduced in relation to the severity of the illness, as part of the associated “non-thyroidal illness syndrome”. As expected, TSH levels are suppressed. Electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), blood sugar, liver function tests, and plasma cortisol should be monitored. While the diagnosis of thyroid storm remains largely a matter of clinical judgment, there are two scales for assessing the severity of hyperthyroidism and determining the likelihood of thyroid storm (Figures 1 and 2). Recognize that these scoring systems are just guidelines and clinical judgement is still crucial. Data comparing these two diagnostic systems suggest an overall agreement, but a tendency toward underdiagnosis using the Japanese criteria. Unfortunately, there are no unique laboratory abnormalities that facilitate the diagnosis of thyroid storm.

Figure 1. Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Storm

Figure 2. Japanese Thyroid Association Criteria for Thyroid Storm

THERAPY

Thyroid storm is a medical emergency that has to be recognized and treated immediately (Table 3). Admission to an intensive care unit is usually required. Besides treatment for thyroid storm, it is essential to treat precipitating factors such as infections. As would be expected given the rare occurrence of thyroid storm there are very few randomized controlled treatment trials and therefore much of what is recommended is based on expert opinion.

 

Table 3. Treatment of Thyroid Storm

Supportive Measures
1. Rest
2. Mild sedation
3. Fluid and electrolyte replacement
4. Nutritional support and vitamins as needed
5. Oxygen therapy
6. Nonspecific therapy as indicated
7. Antibiotics
8. Cardio-support as indicated
9. Cooling, aided by cooling blankets and acetaminophen
Specific therapy
1. Beta-blocking agents. Propranolol (60 to 80 mg orally every 4 hours, or 1 to 3 mg intravenously every 4 to 6 hours), Start with low doses. Esmolol in ICU setting (loading dose of 250 mcg/kg to 500 mcg/kg followed by 50 mcg/kg to 100 mcg/kg/minute).
2. Antithyroid drugs (PTU 500–1000mg load, then 250mg every 4 hours or Methimazole 60-80mg/day), then taper as condition improves
3. Potassium iodide (one hour after first dose of antithyroid drugs):
 250mg orally every 6 hours
4. Hydrocortisone 300mg intravenous load, then 100mg every 8 hours.
Second Line Therapy
1. Plasmapheresis
2. Oral T4 and T3 binding resins- colestipol or cholestyramine
3. Dialysis

4. Lithium in patients who cannot take iodine

5. Thyroid surgery

 

It should be noted that if any possibility is present that orally given drugs will not be appropriately absorbed (e.g., due to stomach distention, vomiting, diarrhea or severe heart failure), the intravenous route should be used. If the thyrotoxic patient is untreated, an antithyroid drug should be given. PTU, 500–1000mg load, then 250mg every 4 hours, should be used if possible, rather than methimazole, since PTU also prevents peripheral conversion of T4 to T3, thus it may more rapidly reduce circulating T3 levels. Methimazole (60–80mg/day) can be given orally, or if necessary, the pure compound can be made up in a 10 mg/ml solution for parenteral administration. Methimazole is also absorbed when given rectally in a suppository. After initial stabilization, one should taper the dose and treat with Methimazole if PTU was started at the beginning as the safety profile of Methimazole is superior. If the thyroid storm is due to thyroiditis neither PTU not Methimazole will be effective and should not be used.

 

An hour after PTU or Methimazole has been given, iodide should be administered. A dosage of 250 mg every 6 hours is more than sufficient. The iodine is given after PTU or Methimazole because the iodine could stimulate thyroid hormone synthesis. Unless congestive heart failure contraindicates it, propranolol or other beta-blocking agents should be given at once, orally or parenterally, depending on the patient's clinical status. Beta-blocking agents control tachycardia, restlessness, and other symptoms. Additionally, propranolol inhibits type 1 deiodinase decreasing the conversion of T4 to T3. Probably lower doses should be administered initially, since administration of beta-blockers to patients with severe thyrotoxicosis has been associated with vascular collapse. Esmolol, a short-acting beta blocker, at a loading dose of 250 mcg/kg to 500 mcg/kg followed by 50 mcg/kg to 100 mcg/kg/minute can be used in an ICU setting.  For patients with reactive airway disease, a cardioselective beta blocker like atenolol or metoprolol can be employed.

 

Permanent correction of the thyrotoxicosis by either 131-I or thyroidectomy should be deferred until euthyroidism is restored. Other supporting measures should fully be exploited, including sedation, oxygen, treatment for tachycardia or congestive heart failure, rehydration, multivitamins, occasionally supportive transfusions, and cooling the patient to lower body temperature down. Antibiotics may be given on the presumption of infection while results of cultures are awaited.

 

The adrenal gland may be limited in its ability to increase steroid production during thyrotoxicosis. Therefore, hydrocortisone (100-300 mg/day) or dexamethasone (2mg every 6 hours) or its equivalent should be given. The dose can rapidly be reduced when the acute process subsides. Pharmacological doses of glucocorticoids (2 mg dexamethasone every 6 h) acutely depress serum T3 levels by reducing T4 to T3 conversion. This effect of glucocorticoids is beneficial in thyroid storm and supports their routine use in this clinical setting.

 

Usually rehydration, repletion of electrolytes, treatment of concomitant disease, such as infection, and specific agents (antithyroid drugs, iodine, propranolol, and corticosteroids) produce a marked improvement within 24 hours. A variety of additional approaches have been reported and may be used if the response to standard treatments is not sufficient. For example, plasmapheresis can remove circulating thyroid hormone and rapidly decrease thyroid hormone levels. Orally administered bile acid sequestrants (20-30g/day Colestipol-HCl or Cholestyramine) can trap thyroid hormone in the intestine and prevent recirculation. In most cases these therapies are not required but in the occasion patient that does not respond rapidly to initial therapy these modalities can be effective. Finally, in rare situations where medical therapy is ineffective or the patient develops side effects and contraindications to the available therapies’ thyroid surgery may be necessary.

 

FOLLOW-UP

Antithyroid treatment should be continued until euthyroidism is achieved, when a decision regarding definitive treatment of the hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs, surgery, or 131-I therapy can be made. Rarely urgent thyroidectomy is performed with antithyroid drugs, iodide, and beta blocker preparation.

 

Prevention of thyroid storm is key and involves recognizing and actively avoiding common precipitants, educating patients about avoiding abrupt discontinuation of anti-thyroid drugs, and ensuring that patients are euthyroid prior to elective surgery and labor and delivery.

 

GUIDELINES

Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Walter MA. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016 Oct;26(10):1343-1421.

 

Satoh T, Isozaki O, Suzuki A, Wakino S, Iburi T, Tsuboi K, Kanamoto N, Otani H, Furukawa Y, Teramukai S, Akamizu T. 2016 Guidelines for the management of thyroid storm from The Japan Thyroid Association and Japan Endocrine Society (First edition). Endocr J. 2016 Dec 30;63(12):1025-1064

 

REFERENCES

Bartalena L. Graves’ Disease: Complications. 2018 Feb 20. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–

 

Akamizu T1, Satoh T, Isozaki O, Suzuki A, Wakino S, Iburi T, Tsuboi K, Monden T, Kouki T, Otani H, Teramukai S, Uehara R, Nakamura Y, Nagai M, Mori M Diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and incidence of thyroid storm based on nationwide surveys. Thyroid. 2012 Jul;22(7):661-79.

Swee du S, Chng CL, Lim A. Clinical characteristics and outcome of thyroid storm: a case series and review of neuropsychiatric derangements in thyrotoxicosis. Endocr Pract. 2015 Feb;21(2):182-9.

Angell TE, Lechner MG, Nguyen CT, Salvato VL, Nicoloff JT, LoPresti JS. Clinical features and hospital outcomes in thyroid storm: a retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):451-9.

 

Chiha M, Samarasinghe S, Kabaker AS. Thyroid storm: an updated review. J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):131-40

 

Akamizu T. Thyroid Storm: A Japanese Perspective. Thyroid. 2018 Jan;28(1):32-40

 

Galindo RJ, Hurtado CR, Pasquel FJ, García Tome R, Peng L, Umpierrez GE. National Trends in Incidence, Mortality, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for Thyrotoxicosis With and Without Thyroid Storm in the United States, 2004-2013. Thyroid. 2019 Jan;29(1):36-43.

 

Hypoglycemia

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Hypoglycemia is uncommon in people who are not being treated for diabetes mellitus. Low blood glucose concentrations lead to adrenergic activation and neuroglycopenia (Table 1). Symptomatic hypoglycemia is diagnosed clinically using Whipple’s triad: symptoms of hypoglycemia, plasma glucose concentration<55 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/l), and resolution of those symptoms after the plasma glucose concentration is raised. Capillary blood glucose measurements should not be used in the evaluation of hypoglycemia due to poor accuracy.

 

Table 1. Symptoms of Hypoglycemia

Adrenergic

Neuroglycopenic

Sweating
Warmth
Anxiety
Tremor
Nausea
Palpitations
Tachycardia
Hunger

Behavioral changes
Changes in vision or speech
Confusion
Dizziness
Lethargy
Seizure
Loss of consciousness
Coma

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

 

Hypoglycemia in diabetes is typically the result of treatments that raise insulin levels and thus lower plasma glucose concentrations (Table 2). In adults not taking glucose-lowering drugs to treat diabetes mellitus, critical illnesses, hormone deficiencies, and islet and non-islet cell tumors should be considered.

 

Table 2. Causes of Adult-Onset Hypoglycemia

Drugs - see Table 3

Hepatic, renal or cardiac failure

Sepsis, trauma, burns

Malnutrition

Hormonal deficiencies (cortisol, glucagon, epinephrine)

Non-islet cell tumors (IGF-II secreting tumors)

Insulinoma (insulin-secreting tumors)

Non-insulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia (NIPHS)

Post gastric bypass surgery

Post total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation

Dumping syndrome or rapid gastric emptying

Insulin antibodies

Insulin receptor antibodies

Accidental, surreptitious or malicious including Munchausen syndrome by proxy

Adapted from: Cryer, PE, et al. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009.

 

Table 3. Drugs Reported to Cause Hypoglycemia

Insulin

Insulin secretagogues (especially sulfonylureas, meglitinides)

Alcohol

Cibenzoline

Glucagon (during endoscopy)

Indomethacin

Pentamidine

Sulfonamides

Quinine

Hydroxychloroquine

Artesunate/artemisin/artemether

Chloroquineoxaline

IGF-1

Lithium

Propoxyphene/dextropropoxyphene

Salicylates

The following are supported by very low-quality evidence:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin receptor antagonists

Nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonists

Fluoroquinolones

Gabapentin

Mifepristone

Disopyramide

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Heparin

6-Mercaptopurine

Adapted from: Cryer, PE, et al. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Glucose is an obligate fuel for the brain under physiologic conditions. In order to maintain proper brain function, plasma glucose must be maintained within a relatively narrow range. Redundant counter-regulatory mechanisms are in place to prevent or correct hypoglycemia. As glucose levels decline, major defenses include: 1) a decrease in insulin secretion; 2) an increase in glucagon secretion; 3) an increase in epinephrine secretion. Increased cortisol and growth hormone secretion also occur. If these defenses fail, plasma glucose levels will continue to fall. Symptoms, prompting food ingestion, typically develop at a plasma glucose of 55 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/liter). At glucose levels of 55 mg/dl and lower, insulin secretion is normally almost completely suppressed.

 

In longstanding type 1 and type 2 diabetes these counter-regulatory responses to hypoglycemia are impaired. This increases the risk of hypoglycemia and also contributes to hypoglycemia unawareness.

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

 

If the cause of the hypoglycemia is not evident, measure plasma glucose, insulin, c-peptide, proinsulin, and beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations and screen for oral hypoglycemic agents (sulfonylurea and meglitinide drugs) during an episode of spontaneous hypoglycemia. Glucagon, 1 mg IV, should then be administered, with a rise in glucose >25 mg/dl (1.4 mmol/L) suggesting hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. The diagnosis of insulinoma is supported if insulin, c-peptide and proinsulin levels are elevated, beta-hydroxybutyrate is <2.7 mmol/l, and sulfonylurea/meglitinide levels are undetectable during the hypoglycemic episode.

 

If testing cannot be performed during a spontaneous episode of hypoglycemia, a 72 hour fast or a mixed meal test, performed in a monitored setting, followed by administration of glucagon is the most useful diagnostic strategy.

 

During a 72 hour fast, patients are allowed no food but can consume non-caloric caffeine-free beverages. Insulin, c-peptide and glucose samples are obtained at the beginning of the fast and every 4-6 hours. When the plasma glucose falls to <60 mg/dl, specimens should be taken every 1-2 hours under close supervision. Patients should continue activity when they are awake. The fast continues until the plasma glucose falls below 45 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l) [plasma glucose <55 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/l) is recommended in the Endocrine Society guidelines] and symptoms of neuroglucopenia develop, at which time insulin, glucose, c-peptide, oral insulin secretagogue, proinsulin, and beta-hydroxybutyrate levels are obtained and the fast is terminated. Additional samples for insulin antibodies, anti-insulin receptor antibodies, IGF-1/IGF-2, and plasma cortisol, glucagon or growth hormone can also be obtained at this time if a non-islet cell tumor, autoimmune etiology, or hormone deficiency is suspected. Patients are fed at the conclusion of the fast.

 

For patients with hypoglycemic symptoms several hours after meals, a mixed meal test may be performed. This test has not been well standardized. Patients eat a meal similar to one that provokes their symptoms, or a commercial mixed meal. Samples for plasma glucose, insulin, c-peptide, and proinsulin are collected prior to the meal and every 30 minutes thereafter for 5 hours. If symptoms occur prior to the end of the test then additional samples for the above are collected prior to administration of carbohydrates. If Whipple’s triad is demonstrated, testing for oral hypoglycemic drugs and testing for insulin antibodies should be done. Interpretation of test results is the same as for the 72-hour fast or spontaneous hypoglycemia (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Distinguishing Causes of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia After a Prolonged Fast

Insulin (µU/ml)

C-peptide (nmol/L)

Proinsulin (pmol/L)

Oral hypoglycemic

Interpretation

»3

<0.2

<5

No

Exogenous insulin

≥3

≥0.2

≥5

No

Endogenous insulina

≥3

≥0.2

≥5

Yes

Oral hypoglycemic drug

a- Insulinoma, non-insulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia (NIPHS), post gastric bypass surgery.

Adapted from: Cryer, PE, et al. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009

 

In a patient with documented hypoglycemia with laboratory findings consistent with endogenous hyperinsulinism localizing studies should be done to evaluate for insulinoma. These may include computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging, transabdominal and endoscopic ultrasonography, and, where available, new nuclear medicine scans (GLP-1 receptor imaging), somatostatin receptor imaging SPECT / PET, and 6-[fluoride-18] fluoro-levodopa-PET-CT. If the diagnosis remains unclear, selective pancreatic arterial calcium injections with measurements of hepatic venous insulin levels can be performed.

 

TREATMENT

 

Immediate treatment should be focused on reversing the hypoglycemia. If the patient is able to ingest carbohydrates 15 to 20 grams of glucose should be given every 15 minutes until the hypoglycemia has resolved. If the patient is unable to ingest carbohydrates, or if the hypoglycemic episode is severe then parenteral glucose should be administered. In a healthcare setting intravenous dextrose is used. Twenty-five-gram boluses of 50% dextrose are given until the hypoglycemia has resolved. If needed, an infusion of 10% or 20% dextrose can be used to sustain euglycemia in patients with recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia. In the outpatient setting, glucagon is used to correct hypoglycemia. Glucose gel and other forms of oral glucose should be used in impaired patients with caution and only in circumstances where no alternative is available, as they pose an aspiration risk.

 

Long-term treatment should be tailored to the specific hypoglycemic disorder, taking into account the burden of hypoglycemia on well-being and patient preferences. Offending medications should be discontinued and underlying illnesses treated, whenever possible.

 

Surgical resection can be curative for insulinomas, and can alleviate hypoglycemia in non-islet cell tumors, even if the malignancy cannot be cured. Partial pancreatectomy can be considered in patients with β-cell disorders. Medical treatment with frequent feedings, α-glucosidase inhibitors, diazoxide, or octreotide can be used if resection is not possible, or as a temporizing measure. New drugs that may be helpful include long-acting somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, and GLP-1 antagonists. Autoimmune hypoglycemic conditions may be treated with either glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants, but these disorders may be self-limited.

For adults taking insulin or insulin secretagogues for diabetes mellitus risk factors for hypoglycemia, such as advanced age and renal insufficiency, should be considered. The treatment regimen and glycemic goals should be reviewed and adjusted if needed. Patients should be instructed on how to manage hypoglycemia, either by the ingestion of carbohydrates if possible, or by parenteral glucagon or glucose. If the patient has hypoglycemia unawareness, a 2-to 3-week period of strict avoidance of hypoglycemia should be maintained, as hypoglycemia awareness will return in many patients. For individuals with type 1 diabetes and a history of serious hypoglycemia, the use of a personal continuous glucose monitoring device, sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy, or a hybrid closed loop system should be considered.

 

GUIDELINES

 

Cryer, PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, Heller SR, Montori VM, Seaquist ER, Service FJ. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009.

 

REFERENCES

 

Bansal N, Weinstock RS. Non-Diabetic Hypoglycemia. 2020 May 20. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 27099902

 

de Herder WW, Zandee WT, Hofland J. Insulinoma. 2020 Oct 25. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905215

 

Davis HA, Spanakis EK, Cryer PE, Davis SN. Hypoglycemia During Therapy of Diabetes. 2021 Jun 29. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905325

 

Inpatient Diabetes Management

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

Background

Appropriate inpatient glycemic management limits the risks of severe hypo- and hyperglycemia. Preventing and treating hyperglycemia reduces infections and minimizes fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. Specific glucose goals remain fluid. Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are associated with poor outcomes but the few prospective randomized studies have failed to demonstrate consistent improvements. For example, intensive glycemic control in the ICU increased mortality in one large trial. At this point, glucose goals should be thoughtful and tailored to the institution and its resources. To successfully manage inpatient diabetes, institutional infrastructure must be in place with institution specific guidelines and protocols for which all nursing staff, pharmacy staff, physicians, and others must be educated. The general guidelines below are appropriate at most institutions.

 

Check A1c level in all patients with diabetes and individuals with glucose levels greater than 140mg/dL if not performed in the prior 3 months to evaluate prior glycemic control.

 

Insulin therapy should be initiated if glucose levels are persistently ≥180 mg/dL. Once insulin therapy is started, a target glucose range of 140–180 mg/dL is recommended for most hospitalized patients but in selected patients (e.g., critically ill postsurgical patients or patients with cardiac surgery) glucose levels between 110–140 mg/dL may be targeted if they can be achieved without significant hypoglycemia. Glucose levels between 180-250 mg/dL may be acceptable in patients with severe comorbidities and in hospitals where frequent glucose monitoring or close nursing supervision is not possibility. In terminally ill patients with a short life expectancy glucose level >250 mg/dL with less aggressive insulin regimens to minimize glucosuria, dehydration, and electrolyte disturbances may be appropriate. 

Physiologic Insulin Regimen

All patients have “basal, nutritional, and correctional” requirements which they must meet with endogenous or exogenous insulin.

 

  • Basal: insulin needed even when patient is not eating (to control gluconeogenesis). Use long-acting insulins such as glargine (usually once daily in AM or at bedtime) or detemir (once daily or q 12 hours). If there are financial limitations NPH at bedtime or AM and bedtime may be used. Additionally, a continuous insulin infusion can provide basal insulin and is often employed in ICU settings.
  • Nutritional: insulin to cover carbohydrate intake from food, dextrose in IV fluid, tube feeds, TPN. Use rapid-acting insulin (aspart, lispro, or glulisine) or if financial limitations short-acting insulin (regular).
  • Correctional: insulin given to bring a high blood glucose level down to target range (with target usually below 150 mg/dL pre-meal, and below 200mg/dL at bedtime or 2am). Use rapid-acting insulin (aspart, lispro, or glulisine) or short-acting insulin (regular).

General Rules

  • A PATIENT WITH TYPE 1 DM WILL ALWAYS NEED EXOGENOUS BASAL INSULIN, EVEN IF NPO. FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH A PATIENT INSULIN WILL LEAD TO DKA.
  • Arbitrary sliding scale insulin should be avoided as it is not only ineffective but also potentially dangerous.
  • Ad hoc insulin orders should not be used. Comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) order sets, or pre-printed order forms should only be used to order subcutaneous insulin and insulin infusions. This standardization will decrease the risks of insulin dosing and administration errors.
  • Check blood glucose (BG) before meals and at bedtime. Check BG q 4 or q 6 hours in a patient who is NPO or is receiving continuous tube feeds or TPN. Continuous glucose monitoring may be used in certain patients (for example it was used in patients with COVID-19 infections to minimize patient contact).
  • Involve the diabetes educator or nurse specialist if available.
  • On admission, begin planning discharge, especially if the discharge plan will require new outpatient insulin use. Identify whether the patient will need a new glucose meter. Prescribe insulin, insulin pens with pen needles, syringes/needles, lancets, glucose strips, glucose tablets, and glucagon kit in the discharge prescription if needed. 

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents

In general, oral diabetes medications and injectables other than insulin (e.g., GLP agonists) are inappropriate for initial management of the hyperglycemia patient. Hospitalized patients often have the potential for renal impairment, tissue hypoxia, or need IV contrast, and these are all contraindications for using metformin. Sulfonylureas should be held on admission because of current or potential NPO status resulting in a high risk of hypoglycemia. As a patient’s status improves, however, it may be appropriate to restart oral medications. DPP4 inhibitors may be useful for patients who have minimally elevated glucoses as there is a minimal risk for hypoglycemia. 

Miscellaneous Guidelines

  • Nutritional coverage: Regular insulin is given 30 min before each meal.  Lispro, aspart, or glulisine are given with each meal or immediately after eating (can base on amount eaten).
  • Infection and glucocorticoids increase insulin needs; renal insufficiency decreases insulin needs.
  • Total daily dose of insulin needed: Type 1 patients require approximately 0.4 units/kg/day; type 2 patients vary in their insulin resistance and may require from 0.5 to 2 units/kg/day.

THERAPY

Insulin Regimens

The guidelines below assist with initial determination and subsequent adjustment of insulin doses. Insulin doses must be reevaluated on a daily basis and orders should be rewritten in order to achieve goals and to adapt to the patients’ changing clinical situation.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT CONTROLLED WITH DIET AT HOME BUT NEEDING INSULIN IN HOSPITAL

Day 1:  Order a correctional sliding scale for before meals and bedtime (with lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on BMI – see Table 1.

Day 2:  If BG pre-meals are >150 mg/dL, add nutritional insulin (with lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on appetite).  Also, if AM fasting BG is >150 mg/dL, add bedtime basal insulin (with glargine, detemir, or NPH) dosed 0.1-0.2 unit/kg.

Day 3:  Adjust insulin doses based on BG pattern: Increase or decrease basal insulin based on AM fasting BG, and adjust nutritional insulin based on pre-meal BG levels (see below for details).

 

Table 1. Correctional Insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular)

BG

(mg/dL)

Pre-meal:

Sensitive (BMI <25 or <50 units/d)

Pre-meal:

Average (BMI 25-30 or 50-90 units/d)

Pre-meal:

Resistant (BMI >30 or >90 units/d)

Bedtime

and 2 a.m.

131-150

 0 units

1 unit

2 units

0 units

151-200

1 unit

2 units

3 units

0 units

201-250

2 units

4 units

6 units

1 unit

251-300

3 units

6 units

9 units

2 units

301-350

4 units

8 units

12 units

3 units

351-400

5 units

10 units

15 units

3 units

>400

6 units

12 units

18 units

3 units

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT ON ORAL AGENT(S) BUT REQUIRING INSULIN IN HOSPITAL BECAUSE OF HYPERGLYCEMIA OR CONTRAINDICATIONS TO THE ORAL AGENT(S)

Day 1:  Start nutritional insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on appetite – generally about 0.1-0.2 units per kg, divided between the three meals for the day.  Also, order a correctional sliding scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on BMI – see Table 1.

Day 2:  If AM fasting BG is >150 mg/dL, add bedtime basal (glargine, detemir or NPH) dose of 0.1-0.2 units/kg.

Day 3:  Adjust insulin doses based on BG pattern: Increase or decrease basal insulin based on AM fasting BG, and adjust nutritional insulin based on pre-meal BG levels (see below for details).

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT ON INSULIN AT HOME

  • If possible, consider home BG control, appetite, renal function, and risk for hypoglycemia.
  • All three components of insulin replacement must be addressed: basal, nutritional and correctional.
  • Basal requirements: Continue home regimen if patient has been well-controlled at home, but consider decreasing the total dose by 20-30% to reduce the risk of in-hospital hypoglycemia. Alternatively, start bedtime glargine, detemir or NPH at a dose of 0.2 units/kg
  • Nutritional requirements: Order nutritional insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on appetite, or consider pre-meal dosing of 0.2 units/kg divided by 3 for the dose at each meal.
  • Correctional need: Order a correctional sliding scale based on total insulin dose or BMI – see Table 1.

INSULIN REGIMEN WHEN A PATIENT IS MADE NPO FOR A PROCEDURE

A patient will always require his or her basal insulin, even while NPO, and should not become hypoglycemic if that basal insulin is dosed appropriately.  For safety purposes, however:

 

  • The night before, give the usual dose of bedtime NPH, if applicable, or decrease the usual dose of bedtime glargine/detemir by 25%.
  • The morning of, if applicable, decrease the usual dose of morning NPH by 50%, or decrease the usual dose of morning glargine by 25%.
  • Do not give nutritional insulin (as patient is not eating), but continue the usual correctional insulin.
  • (An online resource to determine patient specific instructions when preparing for an NPO episode is athttp://ucsf.logicnets.com)

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR AN ICU OR SURGICAL PATIENT WHO IS NPO

 Consider insulin infusion therapy.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT STARTING CONTNUOUS TUBE FEEDING

  • Consider insulin infusion therapy.
  • If moving from IV to SQ see below.
  • Basal need: The daily basal dose (glargine, detemir or total bid NPH dose) is the estimated total daily dose divided by 2.
  • Nutritional need: Divide the estimated total daily dose by 10 for the total nutritional (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) dose, to be given q 4 hours while tube feeding is active.
  • Correctional need: Order a correctional scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on total insulin dose or BMI (Table 1)
  • If not using IV insulin to start:
  • Estimate the tube feed formula’s 24-hour carbohydrate load.
  • Estimate the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, starting with 1 unit insulin for every 10 grams carbohydrate.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT RECEIVING TPN

  • Standard TPN often contains 25% glucose, which, if 100 ml/hour, yields 25 g glucose/hour.
  • Basal and nutritional needs: Adding insulin to the TPN is safest, as the unexpected discontinuation of TPN will also mean the discontinuation of the insulin.  Start with 0.1 unit per gram glucose. If patient previously needed high doses of basal insulin, divide that total daily dose by the number of TPN bottles to be administered daily, and add that to the prior calculation.
  • Correctional: Order a correctional sliding scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on BMI (Table 1).

INSULIN REGIMEN TO TRANSITION FROM AN INSULIN INFUSION TO SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN

  • Calculate the patient’s total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, based on the most recent insulin infusion rate. For safety purposes, take 80% of that dose.
  • Basal need: Divide the 80% of the TDD by 2 and give half for the daily glargine, detemir, or total NPH dose.
  • Nutritional need: If the patient is eating, divide the 80% of the TDD by 6 for the pre-meal lispro, aspart, glulisine, or regular dose.  If the patient is receiving tube feeds, divide the 80% of the TDD by 10 for the nutritional (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) dose, to be given q 4 hours.  If the patient is not receiving nutrition, do not order nutritional insulin.
  • Correctional need: Order a q4h correctional scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine, or regular) based on total insulin dose or BMI (Table 1).
  • Give the first basal insulin SQ injection 1-2 hours before the infusion is discontinued. If the transition is being made in the morning, consider using a one-time AM NPH injection or ½ of daily glargine or detemir dose to bridge until bedtime glargine, detemir or NPH begins.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT RECEIVING GLUCOCORTICOIDS

  • Glucocorticoids may dramatically increase postprandial BG levels but have little effect on gluconeogenesis (fasting glucose levels). Often, BG levels are very high during the day, then lower overnight.
  • Anticipate post-prandial hyperglycemia by increasing the nutritional insulin doses.
  • The insulin dose will typically increase by 50% from before glucocorticoid use and the total amount may be 0.5 to significantly >1 Unit/kg

DAILY INSULIN ADJUSTMENTS

There are no validated formulas for making these adjustments, but the following rules generally work well.

 

  • Basal Insulin: Generally, the basal insulin dose is adjusted based on fasting glucose levels.  For example, if FBS <140, no change.  If FBS 141-160, increase basal dose by 2-3 units.  If FBS 160-180, increase basal dose by 4-5 units. If FBS 180-200, increase basal dose by 6-7 units.  If FBS >200, increase basal dose by 8 units.  With this approach, the basal insulin can be titrated up to the patient’s actual requirement relatively quickly.
  • Nutritional Insulin: The adequacy of the nutritional insulin dose is based on the glucose level prior to the next meal. For example, the glucose level just before lunch will indicate whether the insulin given at breakfast was appropriate.  The glucose level at bedtime will indicate whether the insulin given at dinner was appropriate.  A simple approach is as follows: If there was no significant change in the glucose level from before breakfast to before lunch, then the total dose of insulin the patient received at breakfast (nutritional plus correctional) should be used as the nutritional dose for breakfast the next day.  If there was a significant increase in the glucose level from before breakfast to before lunch, then the total dose of insulin the patient received at breakfast (nutritional plus correctional) should be increased and should become the nutritional dose for breakfast the next day.  If the glucose level before breakfast was high, and the glucose level at lunch was at goal, then no change in the nutritional dose will be required for the next day.  Finally, no matter what the glucose level was at breakfast, if the glucose level after breakfast or before lunch was low, then the breakfast nutritional dose should be decreased for the next day.

Hypoglycemic Protocols      

  • BG <70 mg/dL: If patient taking po, give 20 grams of oral fast-acting carbohydrate either as glucose tablets or 6 oz. fruit juice.  If patient cannot take po, give 25 mL D50 IV push.
  • Check BG every 15 minutes and repeat above treatment until BG is ≥100 mg/dL.

Insulin Infusions

  • Use your hospital’s pre-printed order form or protocol in EMR and hospital-specific protocol for insulin infusions. Using an insulin infusion without a standardized protocol and trained providers can be unsafe.
  • Continuous glucose intake (in IV fluid or continuous TPN or tube feeds) is required during the infusion. Remember to manually adjust the infusion rate and/or the algorithm if there are changes in nutrition (e.g., if tube feeding or TPN is held) or other rapid changes in medical status.
  • When converting to SQ insulin, give the basal SQ dose 1-2 hours before discontinuing the insulin infusion.

GUIDELINE

Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diabetes Care December 2021, Vol.45, S244-S253.

 

Umpierrez GE, Hellman R, Korytkowski MT, Kosiborod M, Maynard GA, Montori VM, Seley JJ, Van den Berghe G; Endocrine Society. Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):16-38.

REFERENCES

 

Society for Hospital Medicine Diabetes Resource Room:  http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/ResourceRoomRedesign/GlycemicControl.cfm

Dhatariya K, Corsino L, Umpierrez GE. Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients. 2020 Dec 30. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

PMID: 25905318

 

Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Cholesterol

ABSTRACT

 

The cholesterol hypothesis holds that high blood cholesterol is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and lowering cholesterol levels will reduce risk for ASCVD. This hypothesis is based on epidemiological evidence that both within and between populations higher cholesterol levels raise the risk for ASCVD; and conversely, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) show that lowering cholesterol levels will reduce risk. Cholesterol in the circulation is embedded in lipoproteins. The major atherogenic lipoproteins are low density lipoproteins (LDL), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), and remnants. Together they constitute non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL).  Clinically these lipoproteins are identified by their cholesterol (C) content, i.e., LDL-C, VLDL-C, and non-HDL-C.  Atherogenic lipoproteins can be reduced by both lifestyle intervention and cholesterol-lowering drugs. The efficacy of lifestyle intervention is best demonstrated in epidemiological studies, whereas efficacy of drugs is revealed through RCTs. Currently available cholesterol-lowering drugs are statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, bile acid sequestrants, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, niacin, fibrates, and n-3 fatty acids (e.g., icosapent ethyl). The latter three generally are reserved for patients with hypertriglyceridemia; here they can be combined with statins that together lower non-HDL-C. Highest priority for cholesterol-lowering therapy goes to patients with established ASCVD (secondary prevention).  RCTs in such patients show that “lower is better” for cholesterol reduction. The greatest risk reductions are attained by reducing LDL-C concentrations by at least 50% with a high intensity statin; and if necessary, to achieve LDL-C < 55-70 mg/dL, combining a statin with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitor. For primary prevention, a decision to initiate statin therapy is made on multiple factors (i.e., presence of diabetes or severe hypercholesterolemia, estimated 10-year risk or lifetime risk for ASCVD, presence of risk enhancing factors (e.g., metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease); and if in doubt, detection of subclinical atherosclerosis (e.g., coronary artery calcium [CAC]).  A reasonable goal for primary prevention using moderate-intensity statin therapy is an LDL-C in the range of 70-99 mg/dL. Both population epidemiology and genetic epidemiology show that low serum cholesterol throughout life will minimize lifetime risk of ASCVD.  For this reason, cholesterol-lowering intervention, preferably through lifestyle change, should be carried out as early as possible. If cholesterol concentrations are very high in younger adults, it sometimes may be judicious to introduce a cholesterol-lowering drug. 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the foremost cause of death among chronic diseases. Its prevalence is increasing in many countries. This increase results from aging of the population combined with atherogenic lifestyles. Even so, mortality from ASCVD has been declining in most developed countries. This decline comes from improvements in preventive measures and better clinical interventions. One of the most important advances in the cardiovascular field resulted from identifying risk factors for ASCVD.  Risk factors directly or indirectly promote atherosclerosis, or they otherwise predispose to vascular events. The major risk factors are cigarette smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and advancing age. Dyslipidemia consists of elevations of atherogenic lipoproteins (LDL, VLDL, Lp(a), and remnants) and low levels of HDL. Advancing age counts as a risk factor because it reflects the impact of all risk factors over the lifespan. Several other factors, called risk enhancing factors, associate with higher risk for ASCVD (1). Lifestyle factors (for example, overnutrition and physical inactivity) contribute importantly to both major and enhancing risk factors. Hereditary factors undoubtedly contribute to the identifiable risk factors; but genetic influences also affect ASCVD risk through other ways not yet understood (2).

 

HISTORY OF THE CHOLESTEROL HYPOTHESIS AND CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPY

 

The first evidence for a connection between serum cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis came from laboratory animals (3). Feeding cholesterol to various animal species raises serum cholesterol and causes deposition of cholesterol in the arterial wall (3). The latter recapitulates early stages of human atherosclerosis. Subsequently, in humans, severe hereditary hypercholesterolemia was observed to cause premature atherosclerosis and ASCVD (3).  Later, population surveys uncovered a positive association between serum cholesterol levels and ASCVD (4,5).  Finally, clinical trials with cholesterol-lowering agents documented that lowering of serum cholesterol levels reduces the risk for ASCVD (6). These findings have convinced most investigators that the cholesterol hypothesis is proven. Moreover, the relationship between cholesterol levels and ASCVD risk is bidirectional; raising cholesterol levels increases risk, whereas reducing levels decreases risk (Figure 1).

Figure 1. The Cholesterol Hypothesis. Between the years 1955 and 1985, many epidemiologic studies showed a positive relation between cholesterol levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Over the next 30 years, a host of randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that lowering cholesterol levels will reduce the risk for ASCVD. This bidirectional relationship between cholesterol levels and ASCVD provides ample support for the cholesterol hypothesis.

 

Epidemiological Evidence

 

A relationship between cholesterol levels and ASCVD risk is observed in both developing and developed countries (4,5). Populations with the lowest cholesterol levels and LDL-C levels have the lowest rates of ASCVD. Within populations, individuals with the lowest serum cholesterol or LDL-C levels carry the least risk. In other words, “the lower, the better” for cholesterol levels holds, both between populations and for individuals within populations.

 

Pre-Statin Clinical Trial Evidence

 

Another line of evidence supporting the cholesterol hypothesis comes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cholesterol-lowering therapies. Several earlier RCTs tested efficacy by reducing cholesterol through diet, bile acid sequestrants, or ileal exclusion operation (Table 1) (4). When taken individually, results from some of the smaller trials were not definitive; but meta-analysis, which combines data from all RCTs, demonstrated significant risk reduction due to cholesterol lowering. In addition, before the discovery of statins, several secondary-prevention RCTs were performed with various cholesterol-lowering drugs. Although some of these trials showed significant risk reduction, others gave equivocal results. But again when taken together, meta-analysis demonstrated ASCVD risk reduction from cholesterol reduction (7).

 

Table 1. Summary of Pre-Statin Clinical Trials of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy

Intervention

No. trials

No. treated

Person-years

Mean cholesterol reduction (%)

CHD incidence

(% change)

CHD Mortality

(%change)

Surgery

1

421

4,084

22

-43

-30

Sequestrants

3

1,992

14,491

9

-21

-32

Diet

6

1,200

6,356

11

-24

-21

This table is derived from National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (4)

 

Statins and Clinical Trial Evidence

 

Statins were discovered in the 1970s by Endo of Japan (8). These drugs lower cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis in the liver. They block HMG CoA reductase, a key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. This inhibition enhances the liver’s synthesis of LDL receptors. The latter, discovered by Brown and Goldstein (9), remove LDL and VLDL from the bloodstream, which lowers serum cholesterol levels.  Statin have proven to be highly efficacious with few side effects. The development of statins as a cholesterol-lowering drug has been actively pursued by the pharmaceutical industry. Seven statins have been approved for use in clinical practice by the FDA (for a detailed discussion of statins see (10)). Over the past three decades, a series of RCTs have been carried out that documents the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. In these RCTs, statin therapy has been shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality from ASCVD. Although individual RCTs produced significant results, the strongest evidence of benefit comes from meta-analysis. i.e., by combining data from all the trials (6). 

 Meta-analysis has shown that for every mmol/L (39 mg/dl) reduction in LDL-C with statin therapy there is an approximate 22% reduction in ASCVD events (6,11-14). Another report (15) showed that an almost identical relationship holds when several different kinds of LDL-lowering therapy were analyzed together. This response appears to be consistent throughout all levels of LDL-C.  Individual statins vary in their intensity of cholesterol-lowering therapy at a given dose (1,10) (Table 2).  For example, per mg per day, rosuvastatin is twice as efficacious as atorvastatin, which in turn is twice as efficacious as simvastatin.   Statins are best classified according to percentage reductions in LDL-C.  As shown in Table 2, moderate- intensity statins reduce LDL-C by 30-49 %, whereas high-intensity statins reduce LDL-C by > 50%.  On average, a 35% LDL-C reduction by moderate-intensity statin reduces risk by approximately one third, whereas high-intensity statins lower risk by about one-half.  But, in fact, absolute reductions vary depending on baseline levels of LDL-C. For example, for a baseline LDL-C of 200 mg/dL, a 50% reduction in LDL-C equates to a 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) decline; this translates into a 59% reduction in 10-year risk for ASCVD events. In contrast, in a patient with a baseline LDL-C a 100 mg per dL, a 50% reduction in LDL-C equates to a 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) decline, which will reduce ASCVD risk by about 30%.  Thus, at lower and lower levels of LDL-C, progressive reductions of LDL-C produce diminishing benefit from cholesterol-lowering therapy. This modifies the aphorism "lower is better".  Whereas the statement is true, it must be kept in mind that there are diminishing benefits from intensifying cholesterol-lowering therapy when LDL-C levels are already low. One needs to balance the benefits of further reducing LDL-C levels with the risks and costs of additional therapy. 

Table 2.  Categories of Intensities of Statins

Drug

Low-Intensity

20-25% LDL-C

Moderate-Intensity

30-49% LDL-C

High Intensity

>50% LDL-C

Lovastatin

10-20 mg

40-80 mg

 

Pravastatin

10-20 mg

40-80 mg

 

Simvastatin

10 mg

20-40 mg

 

Fluvastatin

20-40 mg

80 mg

 

Pitavastatin

 

1-4 mg

 

Atorvastatin

5 mg

10-20 mg

40-80 mg

Rosuvastatin

 

5-10 mg

20-40 mg

 

Non-Statin Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs

 

Beyond statins, other agents are currently available or loom on the horizon (Table 3). Bile acid sequestrants inhibit intestinal absorption of bile acids, which like statins raise hepatic LDL receptors (10). They are moderately efficacious for reducing LDL-C concentrations. A large RCT showed that bile acid sequestrants significantly reduce risk for CHD in patients with baseline elevations in LDL-C (16). Theoretically, bile acid sequestrants could enhance risk reduction in patients with ASCVD who are treated with statins.

 

Ezetimibe blocks cholesterol absorption in the intestine and also raises hepatic LDL receptor activity (10). It moderately lowers LDL-C (15-25%). The combination of statin + ezetimibe is additive for LDL-C lowering (17).  A clinical trial (18) demonstrated that adding ezetimibe to moderate intensity statins in very high-risk patients with ASCVD is beneficial showing that combination therapy reduced risk of cardiovascular events more than a statin alone (18). In this trial, the higher the risk, the greater was risk reduction (19). Ezetimibe is a generic drug and relatively inexpensive.

 

Bempedoic acid is an adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor and thereby inhibits cholesterol synthesis leading to an increase in LDL receptor activity (20). Bempedoic acid is a pro-drug and conversion to its CoA-derivative is required for activity and this occurs primarily in the liver. Bempedoic acid typically lowers LDL-C by 15-25% (10,20). The effect of bempedoic acid on cardiovascular disease is currently being evaluated in a large clinical trial.

 

Niacin and fibrates, which are primarily triglyceride-lowering drugs, have been used for many years. They modestly reduce cholesterol levels as well. Their effects on ASCVD risk vary.  Niacin used alone appears to attenuate risk, but when used in combination with high-intensity statin, any incremental benefit is minimal (21).  Like niacin, fibrates moderately reduce risk for CHD when used alone in patients with hypertriglyceridemia; risk reduction is less in those who do not have elevated triglycerides (22).  When fibrates are used in combination with statins, risk for severe myopathy is greater than for statins alone. Fenofibrate is the preferred fibrate in combination with statins because it carries the lowest risk of myopathy (23). For a detailed discussion of niacin and fibrates see the Endotext chapter on Triglyceride Lowering Drugs (24). Omega-3 fatty acids also lower serum triglyceride (24). In one notable RCT, treatment of high-risk, hypertriglyceridemic patients with statin + 2 g of the omega-3 fatty acid icosapent ethyl twice daily, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the risk of ischemic events, including cardiovascular death (25). In contrast, a recent RCT that randomized high risk hypertriglyceridemic patients on statin therapy to an omega-3 carboxylic acid formulation 4 grams per day did not observe any benefits on ASCVD (26). In both trials the reduction in triglyceride levels was similar and the explanation for the different results in these trials is uncertain. For a detailed discussion of omega-3 fatty acidssee the Endotext chapter on Triglyceride Lowering Drugs (24).   Other LDL-lowering drugs include microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitors (27) and RNA antisense drugs that block hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein B (no longer available) (28). Both of these drugs inhibit secretion of atherogenic lipoproteins into the circulation.  At present their use is restricted to patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. Evinacumab is a human monoclonal antibody against angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) that is approved for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (29). Evinacumab decreases LDL-C levels by approximately 50% independent of LDL receptor activity by accelerating the clearance of VLDL thereby reducing the production of LDL (30). Another class of drugs inhibits cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP); these agents lower LDL-C levels as well as raising HDL-C (31,32).  RCTs show their benefit is small, if any, so the pharmaceutical industry shows little interest in further development and CETP inhibitors are not FDA approved.  Finally, a class of drugs inhibits a circulating protein called proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9); the PCSK9 protein promotes degradation of LDL receptors and raises LDL-C levels (10).  Inhibition of PCSK9 markedly lowers LDL-C concentrations (10,33).  Recent reports indicate that PCSK9 inhibitors reduce risk in ASCVD patients at very high risk when combined with statins (34,35).  PCSK9 inhibitors are useful for patients who are statin intolerant, those with very high baseline LDL-C, such as familial hypercholesterolemia, or patients at very high risk for additional ASCVD events.  For additional information on cholesterol and triglyceride lowering drugs see the chapters in Endotext that address these topics (10,24).  

Table 3. Non-Statin Cholesterol Lowering Drugs

Drug Class

Mechanism of Action

Effects on Plasma Lipids

LDL-C lowering

Side effects

Bile acid sequestrants

Impairs reabsorption of bile acids

Raise LDL receptor activity

Reduces LDL

Raises VLDL

Minimal effect on HDL

15-25%, depending on dose

Constipation

GI distress

Increases TG

 

Ezetimibe

Impairs absorption of cholesterol

Raises LDL receptor activity

Reduces LDL

Reduces VLDL

Minimal effect on HDL

15-25%

Rare

Bempedoic acid

Inhibitor of ATP-citrate lyase leading to decreased cholesterol synthesis and an increase in LDL receptor activity

Reduces LDL

 

15-25%

Increases uric acid leading to gout

Tendon rupture has been reported

Niacin

Reduces hepatic secretion of VLDL

 

Reduces VLDL

Reduces LDL

Raises HDL

5-20%

Flushing, rash, raise plasma glucose, hepatic dysfunction, others

Fibrates

Reduces secretion of VLDL

Enhances degradation of VLDL

Reduces VLDL

(lowers TG 25-35%)

Small effect on LDL

Raises HDL

5-15%

Myopathy (in combination with statins)

Gallstones

Uncommonly various others

MTP inhibitors

Approved for treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Reduces hepatic secretion of VLDL

Reduces VLDL and LDL

50+%

Fatty liver

Mipomersen

(RNA antisense)

No longer available

Reduces hepatic secretion of VLDL

Reduces VLDL and LDL

50+%

Fatty liver

CETP inhibitors

Not approved by FDA

 

Blocks transfer of cholesterol from HDL to VLDL&LDL

Raises HDL

Lowers LDL

20-30%

 

 

PCSK9 inhibitors

Recommended for ASCVD patients at high risk

Blocks effects of PCSK9 to destroy LDL receptors

Lowers LDL

45-60%

 

Evinacumab

Approved for treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Blocks angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3)

Lowers LDL

Lowers TG (~50%)

Lowers HDL (~30%)

Approx. 50%

 

 

HISTORY OF U.S. GUIDELINES FOR CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT

 

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)

 

The most influential guidelines for cholesterol management in the United States have been those developed by the NECP. This program was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and included many health-related organizations in the United States (36).  Between 1987 and 2004, three major Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) reports (4,37,38) and one update were published (39) (Table 4).

 

Table 4. National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) Reports

Guideline

ATP I

ATP II

ATP III

ATP III Update

Year

1987

1994

2001

2004

Thrust

Primary prevention

Secondary prevention

High-risk primary prevention

Very high risk

Drugs

Bile acid resins Nicotinic acid Fibrates

Same as ATPI   +Statins

Same as ATP II

 

Same as ATP III

Major Targets

LDL-C; HDL-C

LDL-C; HDL-C

LDL-C;                Non-HDL-C

LDL-C;         Non-HDL-C

LDL-C goal

     (mg/dL)

Low risk <190 Moderate risk <160              High risk < 130

Low risk   <160 Moderate risk <130             High risk <100

Low risk <160 Moderate risk <130          Moderately high risk <130    

High risk < 100

Low risk <160 Moderate risk <130

Moderately high    risk <130      High risk < 100   Very high risk < 70

 

ATP reports identified LDL-C as the major target of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The intensity of LDL-lowering therapy was based on aggregate knowledge from multiple sources in the cholesterol field. Priority was given to the clinical trial evidence when available. ATP I (1987) emphasized lifestyle therapy for primary prevention. Use of cholesterol-lowering drugs was down-played in ATP I.  ATP II (1993) placed more emphasis on secondary prevention; this was because a large meta-analysis of RCTs using cholesterol-lowering drugs confirmed CHD risk reduction. ATP III (2001) added more emphasis on high-risk primary prevention.  At each successive ATP report, the intensity of LDL lowering therapy was increased with lower LDL-C goals.

 

The NCEP put highest priority for cholesterol management for patients with clinical forms of atherosclerotic disease. The latter included coronary heart disease, clinical carotid artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. ASCVD is the inclusive term for these conditions. The 10-year risk for future cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD is usually > 20%.  In ATP III, the presence of ASCVD of any type warranted an LDL-C goal of < 100 mg/dL.  For high-risk patients with hypertriglyceridemia, a non-HDL-C goal of < 130 mg/dL was recommended.

 

For primary prevention, ATP III identified four levels of risk for increasing intensity of LDL-C lowering. Different LDL-C goals were set for different levels of risk (Table 4). Risk for CHD was calculated using Framingham risk scoring. Framingham risk factors included cigarette smoking, hypertension, elevated total cholesterol, low HDL-C, and advancing age. A 10-year risk > 20% for CHD was called high risk. Moderately high risk was defined as a 10-year risk of 10-19%; at this level of risk, cholesterol-lowering drugs were considered to be cost-effective.  A 10-year risk of < 10% was divided into moderate risk and low risk depending on the presence or absence of major risk factors. Moderate risk corresponds to a 10-year risk for CHD of approximately 5-9%.   Generally speaking, cholesterol-lowering drugs were not recommended for low- to- moderate risk individuals except when LDL-C levels are high.

 

In 2004, ATP III underwent an update and set an optional LDL-C goal of < 70 mg/dL for patients deemed to be at very high risk for future CHD events. This option included CHD plus other atherosclerotic conditions and/or multiple major risk factors. This progression of treatment intensity was made possible by the results of several clinical trials with statin therapy.

 

Transfer of NHLBI Guidelines to American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC)

 

In 2013, NHLBI made the decision to remove treatment guidelines from its agenda. This was done even though it had almost finished writing prevention guidelines. These included guidelines for high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity, and nutrition. Late in this process, the guideline process was transferred to the (American Heart Association) AHA and American College of Cardiology (ACC). Then in 2013 the NHLBI guidelines for high blood cholesterol were modified to fit the criteria for guideline development required by AHA/ACC. The 2013 cholesterol guidelines (40) adhered closely to the Institute of Medicine (National Academy of Medicine) recommendations for evidence-based guidelines (41). These recommendations advocated priority to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the foundation of evidence-based medicine. The NHLBI cholesterol committee carried out an extensive review of the literature and limited recommendations based largely to RCTs. Most acceptable RCTs had utilized statin therapy in middle-aged persons. Therefore, the 2013 report committee did not include detailed recommendations for younger or older adults.  Recommendations were largely limited to the age range 40-75 years. High-intensity statin therapy was recommended for patients with established ASCVD. For primary prevention, risk was stratified by use of a pool cohort equation (PCE), which are derived from five large population studies in the United States (42). The PCE was an extension of the Framingham Heart Study risk equations. 10-year risk for ASCVD was based on the following risk factors: age, gender, cigarette smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and presence or absence of diabetes.  Although the PCE was validated in another large study (43), it has been criticized by some investigators as being imprecise for many individuals or specific groups (44-48).

 

For primary prevention, an effort was made to determine what level 10-year risk is associated with efficacy of reduction of ASCVD from statin RCTs.  It was determined that statins are effective for risk reduction when 10-year risk for ASCVD is > 7.5%.  Most primary prevention trials employed moderate intensity statins, so these were recommended for most patients; but in one RCT (49), a high-intensity statin appeared to produce greater risk reduction than found with moderate-intensity statins. So high-intensity statins were considered a favorable option in patients at higher 10-year risk. Notably LDL-C goals were not emphasized. It was recognized that these recommendations may not be optimal for all patients; therefore, consideration should be given to any extenuating circumstances that could modify the translation of RCTs directly into clinical care. A clinician patient risk discussion thus was advocated for all patients to consider the pros and cons of statin therapy.

 

2018 AHA/ACC/MULTI-SOCIETY REPORT

 

2018 cholesterol guidelines were revised by AHA/ACC in collaboration with multiple other societies concerned with preventive medicine (1).  These guidelines extended those published in 2013. They expanded recommendations to include children, adolescents, young adults (20-39 years), and older patients (> 75 years). Although RCTs may be lacking in these categories, epidemiology and clinical studies indicate that high blood cholesterol is an important risk factor for future ASCVD in these age ranges. From the evidence acquired over many years related to the cholesterol hypothesis, it is reasonable to craft recommendations based on the totality of the evidence. In the following, 2018 guidelines will be highlighted in relation to general areas of cholesterol management as identified by all the previous national and international guidelines. These guidelines proposed a top-10 list of recommendations to highlight the key points. These key points will be examined.

 

Lifestyle Intervention

 

1. IN ALL INDIVIDUALS, EMPHASIZE HEART-HEALTHY LIFESTYLE ACROSS THE LIFE-COURSE.

 

There is widespread agreement in the cardiovascular field that lifestyle factors contribute to the risk for ASCVD. These factors include cigarette smoking, sedentary life habits, obesity, and an unhealthy eating pattern. The ACC/AHA strongly recommends that a healthy lifestyle be adopted throughout life. These recommendations are strongly supported by 2018 cholesterol guidelines. They are the foundation for cardiovascular prevention and should receive appropriate attention in clinical practice (50). For a detailed discussion of the effect of diet on lipid levels and atherosclerosis see the Endotext chapter The Effect of Diet on Cardiovascular Disease and Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels (51).

 

Secondary Prevention

 

2. IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL ASCVD, REDUCE LDL-C WITH HIGH-INTENSITY STATINS OR MAXIMALLY TOLERATED STATINS TO DECREASE ASCVD RISK. THE GOAL OF THERAPY IS TO REDUCE LDL-C BY > 50%. IF NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL, CONSIDER ADDING EZETIMIBE TO MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY.

 

The strongest evidence for efficacy of statin therapy is a meta-analysis of RTCs carried out in patients with established ASCVD.  As previously mentioned, the best fit line comparing percent ASCVD versus LDL-C in secondary prevention studies demonstrates that for every mmol/L (39mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C the risk for ASCVD is decreased by approximately 22% (11). High intensity statins typically reduce LDL-C by 50% or more; this percentage reduction occurs regardless of baseline levels of LDL-C. This explains why the guidelines set a goal for LDL-C secondary prevention to be a > 50% reduction in levels.  There are two options to achieve such reductions. RCTs give priority to use of high-intensity statins. But second, if high-intensity statins are not tolerated, similar LDL-C lowering can be attained by combining a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (18). An approach to lowering LDL-C in patients with ASCVD is shown in Figure 2.

 

Figure 2. Secondary Prevention in Patients with Clinical ASCVD (1)

 

3. IN VERY HIGH-RISK PATIENTS WITH ASCVD, FIRST USE A MAXIMALLY TOLERATED STATIN + EZETIMIBE TO ACHIEVE AN LDL-C GOAL OF < 70 MG/DL (<1.8 MMOL/L). IF THIS GOAL IS NOT ACHIEVED, CONSIDER ADDING A PCSK9 INHIBITOR.

 

2018 guidelines defined very high risk of future ASCVD events as a history of multiple ASCVD events or one major event plus multiple high-risk conditions (Table 5). This definition is based in large part on subgroup analysis of the IMPROVE-IT trial (18,19).

 

Table 5. Very High Risk of Future ASCVD Events (1)

Major ASCVD Events

Recent ACS (within the past 12 months)

History of MI (other than recent acute coronary syndrome event listed above)

History of ischemic stroke

Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (history of claudication with ABI <0.85, or previous revascularization or amputation)

High Risk Conditions

Age ≥65 y

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

History of prior coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention outside of the major ASCVD event(s)

Diabetes mellitus

Hypertension 

CKD (eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m2)

Current smoking

Persistently elevated LDL-C (LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL [≥2.6 mmol/L]) despite maximally tolerated statin therapy and ezetimibe

History of congestive heart failure

ABI indicates ankle-brachial index; CKD indicates chronic kidney disease

 

Recent RCTs have demonstrated that addition of non-statins to statin therapy can enhance risk reduction. These RCTs (and their add-on drugs) were IMPROVE-IT (ezetimibe) (18), FOURIER (evolocumab) (34), and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (alirocumab) (35).  All RCTs were carried out in patients at very high-risk.  For IMPROVE-IT, addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy produced an additional 6% reduction in ASCVD events. In this trial, baseline LDL-C on moderate-intensity statin alone averaged about 70 mg/dL; in spite of this low level, further LDL lowering with addition of ezetimibe enhanced risk reduction. RCTs with the two PCSK9 inhibitors (evolocumab and alirocumab) restricted recruitment to patients having LDL-C > 70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated statin+ ezetimibe. In these RCTs, duration of therapy was only about 3 years. A marked additional LDL lowering was achieved. In both trials, risk for ASCVD events was reduced by 15%.

 

2018 guidelines allow consideration of PCSK9 inhibitor as an add-on drug if patients are at very high risk for future ASCVD events and have an LDL-C > 70 mg/dL during treatment with maximally tolerated statin plus ezetimibe (Figure 3). This latter threshold LDL-C was chosen because it was a recruitment criteria for PCSK9 inhibitor therapy in reported RTCs (34,35)

 

An important question about use of PCSK9 inhibitors is whether they are cost-effective   When they first became available, they were marketed at a very high cost, which was widely considered to be excessive. More recently, the cost of these drugs has declined considerably.   An analysis of cost-effectiveness has shown that at current prices in very high-risk patients PCSK9 inhibitors can be cost-effective (52).  Another analysis (53) of approximately 1 million patients with ASCVD in the Veterans Affairs system indicate that approximately 10% of patients will be classified as very high risk and having LDL-C > 70 mg/dL while taking maximal statin therapy plus ezetimibe. These later patients are potential candidates for PCSK9 inhibitors. 

 

Figure 3. Secondary Prevention in Patients with Very High-Risk ASCVD (1)

 

 Primary Prevention

 

4. IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA (LDL-C ≥190 MG/DL (≥4.9 MMOL/L)), WITHOUT CONCOMITANT ASCVD, BEGIN HIGH-INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY (OR MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN + EZETIMIBE) TO ACHIEVE IN LDL-C GOAL OF < 100 MG/DL; IF THIS GOAL IS NOT ACHIEVED, CONSIDER ADDING PCSK9 INHIBITOR IN SELECTED PATIENTS AT HIGHER RISK. MEASUREMENT OF 10-YEAR RISK FOR ASCVD IS NOT NECESSARY.

 

Patients with severe hypercholesterolemia are known to be at relatively high risk for developing ASCVD (54,55). In view of massive evidence that elevated LDL-C promotes atherosclerosis and predisposes to ASCVD, it stands to reason that such patients deserve intensive treatment with LDL-lowering drugs. RCTs with cholesterol-lowering drugs demonstrate benefit of statin therapy in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia (56,57). It is not necessary to calculate 10-year risk in such patients. Moreover, patients who have extreme elevations of LDL-C (e.g., heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) may be candidates for PCSK9 inhibitors if LDL-C cannot be lowered sufficiently with maximal statin therapy plus ezetimibe.

 

5. IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS AGED 40 TO 75 YEARS WITH AN LDL-C ≥70 MG/DL (≥1.8 MMOL/L), WITHOUT CONCOMITANT ASCVD, BEGIN MODERATE-INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY. FOR OLDER PATIENTS (>50 YEARS), CONSIDER USING HIGH-INTENSITY STATIN (OR MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN PLUS EZETIMIBE) TO ACHIEVE A REDUCTION IN LDL-C OF > 50%. MEASUREMENT OF 10-YEAR RISK FOR ASCVD IS NOT NECESSARY.

 

Middle-aged patients with diabetes have an elevated lifetime risk for ASCVD (58). The trajectory of risk is steeper in patients with diabetes than in those without. For this reason, estimation of 10-year risk for ASCVD with pooled cohort equation (PCE) is not a reliable indicator of lifetime risk.  Meta-analysis of RCTs in middle-aged patients with diabetes treated with moderate intensity statins therapy shows significant risk reduction (14). Hence, most middle-aged patients with diabetes deserve statin therapy. It is not necessary to measure 10-year risk before initiation of statin therapy in these patients. With progression of age and accumulation of, multiple risk factors, increasing the intensity of statin therapy or adding ezetimibe seems prudent (Tables 6 and 7).

 

Table 6. Diabetes Specific Risk Enhancers That Are Independent of Other Risk Factors in Diabetes (1)

Long duration (≥10 years for type 2 diabetes mellitus or ≥20 years for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Albuminuria ≥30 mcg of albumin/mg creatinine

eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2

Retinopathy

Neuropathy

ABI <0.9

ABI indicates ankle-brachial index

 

Table 7. ASCVD Risk Enhancers (1)

Family history of premature ASCVD

Persistently elevated LDL > 160mg/dl (>4.1mmol/L

Chronic kidney disease

Metabolic syndrome

History of preeclampsia

History of premature menopause

Inflammatory disease (especially rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, HIV)

Ethnicity (e.g., South Asian ancestry)

Persistently elevated triglycerides > 175mg/dl (>2.0mmol/L)

Hs-CRP > 2mg/L

Lp(a) > 50mg/dl or >125nmol/L

Apo B > 130mg/dl

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) < 0.9

 

6. INITIATION OF PRIMARY PREVENTION SHOULD BEGIN WITH A CLINICIAN-PATIENT RISK DISCUSSION.

 

This discussion is necessary to put a patient’s total risk status in perspective. The risk discussion should always begin with a review of the critical importance of lifestyle intervention. This is true for all age groups. Beyond the issue of lifestyle, the discussion can further consider the potential benefit of a cholesterol-lowering drug, especially statin therapy. When the latter may be beneficial, the provider should next review major risk factors and estimated 10-year risk for ASCVD derived from the pooled cohort equation (PCE) risk calculator (59) (https://www.acc.org/guidelines/hubs/blood-cholesterol). Estimation of lifetime risk is also useful, particularly in younger individuals. All major risk factors (e.g., cigarette smoking, elevated blood pressure, LDL-C, hemoglobin A1C [if indicated], should be discussed. In patients 40-75 years, the 10-year risk estimate is most useful. In these patients, four categories of 10-year risk for ASCVD are recognized: low risk (<5%); borderline risk (5-7.4%); intermediate risk (7.5-19.9 %), and high risk (> 20%). Estimates of lifetime risk for patients 20-39 years also are available (https://www.acc.org/guidelines/hubs/blood-cholesterol  or        https://qrisk.org/lifetime/index.php).  Three other components of the risk discussion are: risk enhancing factors (see #8), possible measurement of coronary artery calcium (CAC) (see #9), and a review of extenuating life circumstances (issues of cost and safety considerations, as well as patient motivation and preferences). The decision to initiate statin therapy should be shared between clinician and patient. All of these factors deserve a full discussion in view of the fact that statin therapy represents a lifetime commitment to taking a cholesterol-lowering drug.

 

Patients should also recognize that atherosclerosis begins early in life and progresses overtime before manifesting as clinical disease. The cumulative LDL-C levels (“LDL-C years”) strongly influence the timing of clinical manifestation (figure 4). In patients with high cholesterol levels (homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) ASCVD can occur early in life whereas in patients with loss of function mutations in PCSK9 and low cholesterol level have a reduced occurrence of ASCVD.

 

Figure 4. Relationship between cumulative LDL-C exposure, age, and the development of the clinical manifestations of ASCVD. Figure from reference (60).

 

Additionally, patients should be appraised of comparisons of the reduction in ASCVD events in individuals with genetic variations resulting in life-long reductions in LDL-C levels vs. individuals treated with statins to lower LDL-C later in life. Variants in the HMG-CoA reductase, NPC1L1, PCSK9, ATP citrate lyase, and LDL receptor genes result in a lifelong decrease in LDL-C and a 10mg/dL decrease in LDL-C with any of these genetic variants was associated with a 16-18% decrease in ASCVD events (61). As noted above a 39mg/dL decrease in LDL-C in the statin trials resulted in a 22% decrease in ASCVD events. Thus, a life-long decrease in LDL-C levels results in a decrease in ASCVD events that is three to four times as great as that seen with short-term LDL-C lowering with drugs later in life suggesting that the sooner the LDL-C level is lowered the better the prevention of cardiovascular events.

 

7. IN ADULTS 40 TO 75 YEARS OF AGE WITHOUT DIABETES AND LDL-C ≥70 MG/DL (≥1.8 MMOL/L), RTC'S SHOW THAT MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY IS EFFICACIOUS WHEN 10-YEAR RISK FOR DEVELOPING ASCVD IS > 7.5%. THEREFORE, INITIATING STATIN THERAPY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE RISK DISCUSSION.

 

A 10-year risk > 7.5% does not mandate statin therapy but indicates that moderate-intensity statins can reduce risk by 30-40% with a minimum of side effects (62). This fact alone can justify moderate intensity statin therapy, but only if other considerations noted above (#6) are taken into account in the risk discussion. An approach to lipid lowering in primary prevention patients is shown in figure 5.

 

Figure 5. Approach to Primary Prevention in Patients without LDL-C >190mg/dl or Diabetes (1)

 

8. DETERMINE PRESENCE OF RISK-ENHANCING FACTORS IN ADULTS 40 TO 75 YEARS OF AGE TO INFORM THE DECISION REGARDING INITIATION OF STATIN THERAPY.

 

If risk assessment based on PCE is equivocal or ambiguous, the presence of risk enhancing factors in patients at intermediate risk (10-year risk 7.5 to 19.9%), can tip the balance in favor of statin therapy. Risk enhancing factors are shown in Table 7.

 

9. IF A DECISION ABOUT STATIN THERAPY IS UNCERTAIN IN ADULTS 40 TO 75 YEARS OF AGE WITHOUT DIABETES MELLITUS, WITH LDL-C LEVELS ≥ 70 MG/DL, AND WITH A 10 YEAR ASCVD RISK OF ≥ 7.5% TO 19.9% (INTERMEDIATE RISK) CONSIDER MEASURING CAC.

 

CAC measurements are a safe and inexpensive method to assess severity of coronary atherosclerosis. CAC scores generally reflect lifetime exposure to coronary risk factors and therefore in young individuals (men < 40 years of age; women < 50 years of age) the long-term predictive value is limited because the CAC score is often 0. Studies show that CAC accumulation is a strong predictor of probability of ASCVD events (63). A CAC core of zero generally is accompanied by few if any ASCVD events over the subsequent decade. A CAC score of 1-100 Agatston units is associated with relatively low rates of ASCVD, both in middle-aged and older patients. In contrast, a CAC >100 Agatston units carries a risk well into the statin-benefit zone.  Data such as these led to the following recommendation of 2018 guidelines for patients at intermediate risk by PCE.

 

  1. If CAC is zero, treatment with statin therapy may be withheld or delayed, except in cigarette smokers, those with diabetes mellitus, those with a strong family history of premature ASCVD, and possibly chronic inflammatory conditions such as HIV.
  2. A CAC score of 1 to 99 Agatston units favors statin therapy in intermediate-risk patients ≥55 years of age, whereas benefit in 40-54 years is marginal (note these focuses on 10-year risk and a CAC score in this range in a younger individual is predictive of long-term risk (64)).
  3. A CAC score ≥100 Agatston units (or ≥75th percentile), strongly favors statin therapy, unless otherwise countermanded by clinician–patient risk discussion.

 

Monitoring

 

10. ASSESS ADHERENCE AND PERCENTAGE RESPONSE TO LDL-C LOWERING MEDICATIONS AND/OR LIFESTYLE CHANGES WITH REPEAT LIPID MEASUREMENT 4 TO 12 WEEKS AFTER STATIN INITIATION OR DOSE ADJUSTMENT AND EVERY 3-12 MONTHS AS NEEDED.

 

Remember that the LDL-C goal for patients with ASCVD or severe hypercholesterolemia is a > 50% reduction in LDL-C. For most such patients, this goal can be achieved by high-intensity statin therapy + ezetimibe. In ASCVD patients at very high risk, the goal is an LDL-C lowering >50% and LDL-C < 70 mg/dL. To achieve these goals, it may be necessary to combine a PCSK9 inhibitor with maximal statin therapy + ezetimibe.  For statin therapy in primary prevention, the goal is a lowering of > 35%. This goal can be achieved in most patients with a moderate intensity statin + ezetimibe

 

 2018 guidelines did not set a precise on-treatment LDL-C target of therapy, but instead, offer percent reductions as goals of therapy. Baseline levels of LDL-C can be obtained either by chart review or withholding statin therapy for about two weeks. In addition, on-treatment LDL-C can provide useful information about efficacy of treatment (Figure 6). This figure shows expected LDL-C levels for 50% or 35% reductions at different baseline levels of LDL-C.  For example, in secondary prevention, an on-treatment LDL-C of <70 mg/dL can be considered adequate treatment regardless of baseline LDL-C. On-treatment levels in the range of 70-100 mg/dL are adequate if baseline-LDL C is known to be in the range of 140- 200 mg/dL; if there is uncertainty about baseline levels, reevaluation of statin adherence and reinforcement of treatment regimen is needed. For optimal treatment, on-treatment levels in this range warrant consideration of adding ezetimibe to maximal statin therapy. If on treatment LDL-C is > 100 mg/dL, the treatment regimen is probably inadequate, and intensification of therapy is needed. For primary prevention, the LDL-C goal is a reduction > 35%, and a similar scheme for evaluating efficacy of therapy can be used.

 

Figure 6. Predicted on-treatment LDL-C compared to baseline LDL-C and suggested actions for each category of on-treatment LDL-C in secondary and primary prevention.

 

Other Issues

 

OTHER AGE GROUPS

 

2018 guidelines offered suggestions for management of high blood cholesterol in children, adolescents, young adults (20-39 years), and elderly patients > 75 years. There is no strong RCT evidence to underline cholesterol management in these populations. Instead, treatment suggestions depend largely on epidemiologic data. Lifestyle intervention is a primary method for cholesterol treatment in these age groups. However, under certain circumstances LDL-lowering drugs may be indicated. This is particularly the case for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or similar forms of very high LDL-C. In young adults, particularly those with other risk factors, LDL lowering drug therapy (statin or ezetimibe) may be reasonable when LDL-C levels are in the range of 160-189 mg/dL or if the lifetime risk is high. Older adults having concomitant risk factors are potential candidates for initiation of statins or continuation of existing statin therapy. In all cases, clinical estimation of risk status is critical in a decision to initiate statins.

 

For details on the approach to treating hypercholesterolemia in older adults see the Endotext chapter entitled “Management of Dyslipidemia in the Elderly” (65). For details on the approach to treating hypercholesterolemia children and adolescence see the Endotext section on Pediatric Lipidology.

 

STATIN NON-ADHERENCE   

 

 In spite of proven benefit of statin therapy in high-risk patients, there is a relatively high prevalence of nonadherence to the prescribed drug (66). Some studies suggest that up to 50% of patients discontinue use of prescribed statins over the long run (67-70). This finding creates a major challenge to the health care system for prevention of ASCVD. Table 8 lists several factors that may contribute to a high prevalence of nonadherence.  

Table 8. Factors Associated with Statin Nonadherence

Healthcare system factors

Accompanying medical care costs

Lack of medical oversight and follow-up (provider therapeutic inertia)

Provider concern for side effects

Patient factors

Uncertainty of benefit

Lack of health consciousness

Lack of motivation

Lack of perceived benefit

Perceived side effects

Nocebo effects

Myalgias

Myopathy

“Brain fog”

Misattributed symptoms or syndromes (arthritis, spondylosis, neuropathy, insomnia, mental confusion and memory loss, fibromyalgia, gastrointestinal symptoms, liver dysfunction, cataract; cancer).

 When a decision is made to initiate statin therapy, the presumption is that statins are a lifetime treatment. Their use is similar to other medications, such as antihypertensive drugs, which are expected to be taken for the rest of one’s life. Such treatments imply indefinite participation in the healthcare system. This means regular ongoing visits to a prescribing clinic. Even for those with medical insurance there are usually co-pays both for the visit and for medication, not to mention cost of transportation to and from the clinic. All of these cost-related issues can be an impediment to long-term statin usage. Provider therapeutic inertia (66) can result from lack of provider education, excessive workload, and concerns about statin side effects. From the patient’s point of view, common issues are lack of understanding of the potential benefits of therapy and lack of health consciousness and motivation. A related problem is expectation of side effects because of preconditioning by information received from the news media, package inserts, Internet, family, and friends. This expectation can discourage individuals from continuation of statin therapy (nocebo effect) (71). The most common symptoms attributed to statin therapy are muscle pain and tenderness (myalgias) (10).  A complaint of statin intolerance is registered in about 5-15% of patients. If myalgias attributed to statins are due to actual pathological changes, the character of the changes is yet to be determined. In almost all cases, serum creatine kinase (CK) levels are not increased. There is no evidence for long-term muscle damage. A few reports nonetheless suggest that statins can produce a low-grade myopathy (72); such an effect has not been widely accepted. The literature is replete with case reports of other symptoms attributed to statins (66). In fact, much of the symptomology reported by patients are unrelated to statin treatment but are in fact the symptoms of other conditions. Statin therapy has been given to large numbers of people for many years without evidence of long-term muscle dysfunction. 

Still, in rare cases, especially when blood levels of statins are raised, severe myopathy (rhabdomyolysis) can occur. This proves that statins can be myotoxic. Table 9 lists conditions associated with statin-induced severe myopathy (73,74). In most such cases, severe myopathy is reversible. If the cause can be identified and eliminated, a statin can be cautiously reinstituted. Alternatively, a non-statin LDL-lowering drug (e.g., ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, or PCSK9 inhibitor) can be substituted for the offending statin (10,75).

 

Table 9. Factors Associated with Statin - Induced Rhabdomyolysis

Advanced age (>80 y)Small body frame and fragilityFemale sexAsian ethnicityPre-existing neuromuscular conditionKnown history of myopathy or family history of myopathy syndromePre-existing liver disease, kidney disease, hypothyroidismCertain rare genetic polymorphismsHigh-dose statin (?)Postoperative periodsExcessive alcohol intakeDrug interactions (gemfibrozil, antipsychotics, amiodarone, verapamil, cyclosporine, macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals, protease inhibitors)

 

These considerations indicate that statin therapy is a much greater investment in time and effort than commonly recognized. Since statins have the potential to prevent many ASCVD events, they offer great potential in clinical management of patients at risk. Nonetheless, to achieve this benefit, the health care system must be adjusted to the requirements of statin therapy as well as other risk-reducing therapies. Unless these adjustments are made, much of the potential benefit of statin treatment will be lost. It will be necessary to address all the components of healthcare and patient factors to improve long-term adherence of statin therapy.

 

EUROPEAN GUIDELINES FOR CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT

 

The most influential of European guidelines for management of cholesterol and dyslipidemia are those developed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS), and representatives from other European organizations (76). A task force appointed by these organizations have published an update on dyslipidemia management (77). The recommendations of this report resemble in many ways those of the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines (1). But notable differences can be identified for specific recommendations. A review of these differences may help to identify gaps in knowledge needed to format best recommendations. In the following, recommendations proposed by AHA/ACC and by ESC/EAS will be compared. These comparisons should illuminate areas of uncertainty where more information is needed for definitive recommendations. At the same time, it is important to emphasize that in many critical areas the two sets of guidelines are in strong agreement. These will be noted first.

 

Agreement Between AHA/ACC and ESC/EAS Guidelines

 

There is agreement that elevated LDL is the major atherogenic lipoprotein and that LDL-C is the primary target of treatment. Likewise, both guidelines agree that the intensity of LDL-C lowering therapy should depend on absolute risk to patients. In other words, patients who have highest risk should receive the most intensive cholesterol reduction. Both guidelines emphasize therapeutic lifestyle intervention as the foundation of risk reduction, both for elevated cholesterol and for other risk factors. The highest risk patients are those with atherosclerotic disease and are potential candidates for combined drug therapy for cholesterol-lowering. For primary prevention, the intensity of treatment depends on absolute risk as determined by population-based algorithms.  For drug therapy, statins are first-line treatment, but in highest risk patients, consideration can be given to adding non-statin drugs (e.g., ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors).   Beyond population-based algorithms for primary prevention, measurement of other dyslipidemia markers or other higher risk conditions can be used as risk- enhancing factors to modify intensity of lipid-lowering therapy.  

 

Differences Between AHA/ACC and ESC/EAS Guidelines

 

DEFINITION OF VERY HIGH RISK  

 

This definition is important because it sets the stage for considering combined drug therapy for LDL-C lowering. AHA/ACC defines very high risk as a history of multiple ASCVD events or of one event + multiple high-risk conditions.  This limits the definition of very high risk to the highest risk patients among those with ASCVD. In contrast, ESC/EAS considers all patients with clinical ASCVD or ASCVD on imaging as very high risk. Additionally, ESC/EAS allows extension of the definition to highest risk patients in primary prevention, that is, to patients with multiple risk factors and/or subclinical atherosclerosis (table 10). Overall, more patients will be identified as being at very high risk by ESC/EAS guidelines. This could enlarge the usage of PCSK9 inhibitors. AHA/ACC limits the use of PCSK9 inhibitors to patients at highest risk, because of their high cost. One recent study (53) showed that only about 10% of patients with established ASCVD will be eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors by AHA/ACC recommendations.

 

Table 10. ESC/EAS Cardiovascular Risk Categories

Very High-Risk

Ø  ASCVD, either clinical or unequivocal on imaging

Ø  DM with target organ damage or at least three major risk factors or T1DM of long duration (>20 years)

Ø  Severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)

Ø  A calculated SCORE >10% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD.

Ø  FH with ASCVD or with another major risk factor

High-Risk

Ø  Markedly elevated single risk factors, in particular Total Cholesterol >8 mmol/L (>310mg/dL), LDL-C >4.9 mmol/L (>190 mg/dL), or BP >180/110 mmHg.

Ø  Patients with FH without other major risk factors.

Ø  Patients with DM without target organ damage, with DM duration > 10 years or another additional risk factor.

Ø  Moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Ø  A calculated SCORE >5% and <10% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD.

Moderate Risk

Ø  Young patients (T1DM <35 years; T2DM <50 years) with DM duration <10 years, without other risk factors.

Ø  Calculated SCORE >1 % and <5% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD.

Low Risk

Ø  Calculated SCORE <1% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD

 

GOALS FOR LDL-C   

 

In 2013, the AHA/ACC eliminated specific numerical goals for LDL-C in both primary and secondary prevention.  Recommendations for LDL-C lowering therapy were based exclusively on RCTs of statin therapy. These recommendations have been criticized for lacking a means to evaluate efficacy of statin therapy. In 2018, AHA/ACC identified 2 goals for LDL-C lowering, namely, > 50% LDL-C reduction in secondary prevention and > 35% reduction in primary prevention. These values are based on the expected reductions achieved by high-intensity statins for secondary prevention and by moderate-intensity statins for primary prevention.  Again, no numerical targets are identified. The only exception was the recognition of an LDL-C threshold goal of 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) for consideration of PCSK9 inhibitors in very high-risk patients on maximal statin therapy + ezetimibe.

 

ESC/EAS supports the 50% reduction of LDL-C in high-risk patients but also includes a goal of <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). This goal applies to all high-risk patients, whether in primary or secondary prevention. For very high-risk patients, the goal is an LDL-C of < 1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL). For moderate-risk patients in primary prevention, the goal is LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). The guideline task force presumably believed that having defined LDL-C goals facilitates cholesterol-lowering therapy in clinical practice. Additionally, following the ESC/EAS LDL-C goals will most likely result in lower LDL-C levels in many patients.  

 

Table 11. ESC/EAS LDL Cholesterol Goals

Very High Risk

LDL-C reduction of >50% from baseline and an LDL-C goal of <1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) is recommended

High Risk

LDL-C reduction of >50% from baseline and an LDL-C goal of <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) is recommended

Moderate Risk

LDL-C goal of <2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) should be considered

Low Risk

LDL-C goal <3.0 mmol/L (<116 mg/dL) may be considered.

 

RISK ESTIMATION FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION

 

AHA/ACC employed a pooled cohort equation (PCE) developed from five large population groups in the USA to estimate 10-year risk (and lifetime risk) for ASCVD events. ESC/EAS for several years has employed a SCORE algorithm based on risk for ASCVD mortality in European populations. Both PCE and SCORE are used to define “statin eligibility” for primary prevention. A study suggests that more people are “eligible” for statin therapy using PCE compared to SCORE (78). If this finding can be confirmed, it suggests that ESC/EAS guidelines are less aggressive for reducing LDL-C in lower risk individuals (compared to AHA/ACC guidelines). In contrast, ESC/EAS appears to be more aggressive in use of non-statins for LDL lowering in higher risk patients than is AHA/ACC.

 

RISK ENHANCING FACTORS   

 

AHA/ACC proposed that several risk enhancing factors favor the decision to use statin therapy in patients at intermediate risk. Although European guidelines did not specify a list of such factors, most were considered to justify more intensive therapy. Notable among risk enhancing factors were apolipoprotein B (apoB) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]). ESC/EAS seemingly placed more emphasis on these two factors for adjusting intensity of therapy; this report’s recommendations can be taken to mean that apoB and Lp(a) should be measured more frequently in risk assessment than stated by AHA/ACC.  In fact, neither guideline was highly specific as to when to exercise the option of their measurements. This option depends largely on clinical judgment.

 

SUBCLINICAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS  

 

AHA/ACC propose that CAC measurement can assist in deciding whether to use statin therapy in patients at intermediate risk. AHA/ACC in particular noted that the absence of CAC justifies delaying statin therapy. No other modalities of measurement of subclinical atherosclerosis were advocated by AHA/ACC. In contrast, ESC/EAS supported use of different modes of cardiovascular imaging to assist in decisions about intensity of LDL-C lowering therapy. Beyond this, however, recommendations for cardiovascular imaging were not highly specific.  Nonetheless, these guidelines suggest that the finding of substantial subclinical atherosclerosis in any arterial bed elevates a patient’s risk to the category of established ASCVD and can justify adding non-statin therapy to statins in such patients.

 

GUIDELINE SPECIFICITY

 

AHA/ACC guidelines place great emphasis on data from RCTs to justify its recommendations.  However, RTC’s related to specific questions typically are limited in number. AHA/ACC recommendations are highly codified and kept to a minimum. ESC/EAS in contrast bases its recommendations both on clinical trials and other types of evidence. It explores available evidence in greater detail, and many of its recommendations are more nuanced. This approach to guideline development has its advantages and disadvantages. For example, it gives the reader a broader base of information to assist in clinical decisions. On the other hand, many of its recommendations are made outside of an RCT-evidence base. Without doubt, cholesterol management in all age and gender groups with various risk factor profiles is complex. The ESC/EAS attempts to provide a rationale for management of this complexity. The AHA/ACC, on the other hand, simplifies management as much as possible; it is written specifically for the practitioner, and leaves the complexities of management to a lipid specialist. ESC/EAS delves into the complexities in more detail so that its recommendations are applicable to both practitioner and specialist.

 

KEY PRINCIPLES  

 

There are certain key principles that clinicians should remember when deciding who to treat and how aggressively to treat hypercholesterolemia.

 

  • The Sooner the Better- atherosclerosis begins early in life and progresses overtime with LDL-C levels playing a major role in the rate of development. Lowering LDL-C levels by lifestyle changes early in life will have long-term benefits. Additionally, in selected individuals initiating drug therapy sooner rather than latter will reduce ASCVD events later in life.
  • The Lower the Better- studies have clearly demonstrated that the lower the LDL-C levels the greater the decrease in ASCVD events. Clinicians need to balance the benefits of more aggressively lowering LDL-C levels with the risks and costs of high dose or additional drug therapy. It should be recognized that statins and ezetimibe are generic drugs and very inexpensive. In contrast, PCSK9 inhibitors and bempedoic acid are expensive. In many patients using high-intensity statin therapy in combination with ezetimibe can lead to marked reductions in LDL-C levels with minimal risk and at low cost.
  • The Higher the LDL-C the Greater the Benefit- if the baseline LDL-C is high the magnitude of the reduction in LDL-C will be greater leading to a larger decrease in ASCVD events. Clinicians should be more aggressive in patients with high LDL-C levels.
  • The Greater the Risk of ASCVD the Greater the Absolute Reduction in ASCVD- clinicians should identify patients at higher risk for ASCVD and more aggressively treat these patients.

 

Following these general principles will help clinicians make informed decisions in deciding on their approach to lowering LDL-C levels and will facilitate discussions with patients on the benefits and risks of treatment. For an in-depth discussion of these key principles see the following references (79,80).    

 

SUMMARY

 

Advances in the drug therapy of elevated cholesterol levels offer great potential for reducing both new-onset ASCVD and recurrent ASCVD events in those with established disease. This benefit can be enhanced by judicious use of lifestyle intervention. But among drugs, statins are first-line therapy. They are generally safe and inexpensive. They have been shown to reduce ASCVD events in both secondary and primary prevention. Ezetimibe has about half the LDL-lowering efficacy of statins; it too is generally safe, and is a generic relatively inexpensive drug. Ezetimibe can be used as an add-on drug to moderate intensity statins, especially for those who do not tolerate a high-intensity statin. PCSK9 inhibitors are powerful LDL-lowering drugs, and they appear to be largely safe. The major drawback is cost. If the cost of these inhibitors can be reduced, they too have the potential for wide usage, especially in patients who are “statin intolerant”. The major challenge for use of cholesterol-lowering drugs is the problem of long-term non-adherence. Improving adherence will require fundamental changes in the current healthcare system in which patient monitoring and follow-up is often not a high priority.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139:e1082-e1143
  2. Aragam KG, Natarajan P. Polygenic Scores to Assess Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Clinical Perspectives and Basic Implications. Circ Res 2020; 126:1159-1177
  3. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. A century of cholesterol and coronaries: from plaques to genes to statins. Cell 2015; 161:161-172
  4. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation 2002; 106:3143-3421
  5. Law MR, Wald NJ, Thompson SG. By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease? BMJ 1994; 308:367-372
  6. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Keech A, Simes J, Barnes EH, Voysey M, Gray A, Collins R, Baigent C. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012; 380:581-590
  7. Rossouw JE, Lewis B, Rifkind BM. The Value of Lowering Cholesterol after Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 323:1112-1119
  8. Endo A. The discovery and development of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Journal of Lipid Research 1992; 33:1569-1582
  9. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A Receptor-Mediated Pathway for Cholesterol Homeostasis. Science 1986; 232:34-47
  10. Feingold KR. Cholesterol Lowering Drugs. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  11. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators, Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Mihaylova B, Simes J, Collins R, Kirby A, Colhoun H, Braunwald E, La Rosa J, Pedersen TR, Tonkin A, Davis B, Sleight P, Franzosi MG, Baigent C, Keech A. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 385:1397-1405
  12. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaborators, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010; 376:1670-1681
  13. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2019; 393:407-415
  14. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, Keech A, Simes J, Peto R, Armitage J, Baigent C. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 371:117-125
  15. Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, Wiviott SD, Giugliano RP, Grundy SM, Braunwald E, Sabatine MS. Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions. JAMA 2016; 316:1289-1297
  16. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial Results. JAMA 1984; 251:351-364
  17. Lakoski SG, Xu F, Vega GL, Grundy SM, Chandalia M, Lam C, Lowe RS, Stepanavage ME, Musliner TA, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Indices of cholesterol metabolism and relative responsiveness to ezetimibe and simvastatin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:800-809
  18. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, De Ferrari GM, Ruzyllo W, De Lucca P, Im K, Bohula EA, Reist C, Wiviott SD, Tershakovec AM, Musliner TA, Braunwald E, Califf RM. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. New England Journal of Medicine 2015; 372:2387-2397
  19. Bohula EA, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA, He P, Park J-G, Murphy SA, White JA, Kesaniemi YA, Pedersen TR, Brady AJ, Mitchel Y, Cannon CP, Braunwald E. Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and Ezetimibe for Secondary Prevention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017; 69:911-921
  20. Burke AC, Telford DE, Huff MW. Bempedoic acid: effects on lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 2019; 30:1-9
  21. HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group, Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, Parish S, Aung T, Tomson J, Wallendszus K, Craig M, Jiang L, Collins R, Armitage J. Effects of Extended-Release Niacin with Laropiprant in High-Risk Patients. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 371:203-212
  22. Lee M, Saver JL, Towfighi A, Chow J, Ovbiagele B. Efficacy of fibrates for cardiovascular risk reduction in persons with atherogenic dyslipidemia: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2011; 217:492-498
  23. Guo J, Meng F, Ma N, Li C, Ding Z, Wang H, Hou R, Qin Y. Meta-Analysis of Safety of the Coadministration of Statin With Fenofibrate in Patients With Combined Hyperlipidemia. The American Journal of Cardiology 2012; 110:1296-1301
  24. Feingold KR. Triglyceride Lowering Drugs. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  25. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, Doyle RT, Juliano RA, Jiao L, Granowitz C, Tardif J-C, Ballantyne CM. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2019; 380:11-22
  26. Nicholls SJ, Lincoff AM, Garcia M, Bash D, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Davidson MH, Kastelein JJP, Koenig W, McGuire DK, Mozaffarian D, Ridker PM, Ray KK, Katona BG, Himmelmann A, Loss LE, Rensfeldt M, Lundstrom T, Agrawal R, Menon V, Wolski K, Nissen SE. Effect of High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Corn Oil on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The STRENGTH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 324:2268-2280
  27. Cuchel M, Bloedon LT, Szapary PO, Kolansky DM, Wolfe ML, Sarkis A, Millar JS, Ikewaki K, Siegelman ES, Gregg RE, Rader DJ. Inhibition of Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein in Familial Hypercholesterolemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 356:148-156
  28. Stein EA, Dufour R, Gagne C, Gaudet D, East C, Donovan JM, Chin W, Tribble DL, McGowan M. Apolipoprotein B Synthesis Inhibition With Mipomersen in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 2012; 126:2283-2292
  29. Raal FJ, Rosenson RS, Reeskamp LF, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJP, Rubba P, Ali S, Banerjee P, Chan KC, Gipe DA, Khilla N, Pordy R, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Zhang Y, Gaudet D, Elipse HoFH Investigators. Evinacumab for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:711-720
  30. Adam RC, Mintah IJ, Alexa-Braun CA, Shihanian LM, Lee JS, Banerjee P, Hamon SC, Kim HI, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH, Van Hout C, Gromada J, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Sleeman MW, Gusarova V. Angiopoietin-like protein 3 governs LDL-cholesterol levels through endothelial lipase-dependent VLDL clearance. J Lipid Res2020; 61:1271-1286
  31. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Brumm J, Chaitman BR, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJV, Mundl H, Nicholls SJ, Shah PK, Tardif J-C, Wright RS. Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 367:2089-2099
  32. HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group, Bowman L, Hopewell JC, Chen F, Wallendszus K, Stevens W, Collins R, Wiviott SD, Cannon CP, Braunwald E, Sammons E, Landray MJ. Effects of Anacetrapib in Patients with Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 377:1217-1227
  33. Lo Surdo P, Bottomley MJ, Calzetta A, Settembre EC, Cirillo A, Pandit S, Ni YG, Hubbard B, Sitlani A, Carfí A. Mechanistic implications for LDL receptor degradation from the PCSK9/LDLR structure at neutral pH. EMBO Rep 2011; 12:1300-1305
  34. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 376:1713-1722
  35. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Lecorps G, Mahaffey KW, Moryusef A, Pordy R, Quintero K, Roe MT, Sasiela WJ, Tamby J-F, Tricoci P, White HD, Zeiher AM. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2018; 379:2097-2107
  36. Cleeman JI, Lenfant C. New guidelines for the treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults from the National Cholesterol Education Program. From controversy to consensus. Circulation 1987; 76:960-962
  37. Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. The Expert Panel. Archives of Internal Medicine 1988; 148:36-69
  38. National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Circulation 1994; 89:1333-1445
  39. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Bairey Merz CN, Brewer HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Stone NJ. Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004; 44:720-732
  40. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Watson K, Wilson PWF. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014; 63:2889-2934
  41. Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice G. In: Graham R MM, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Press; 2011.
  42. Goff DC, Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Jr., Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PWF. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014; 63:2935-2959
  43. Muntner P, Colantonio LD, Cushman M, Goff DC, Jr., Howard G, Howard VJ, Kissela B, Levitan EB, Lloyd-Jones DM, Safford MM. Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations. JAMA 2014; 311:1406-1415
  44. Ridker PM, Cook NR. Statins: new American guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular disease. The Lancet2013; 382:1762-1765
  45. Kavousi M, Leening MJG, Nanchen D, Greenland P, Graham IM, Steyerberg EW, Ikram MA, Stricker BH, Hofman A, Franco OH. Comparison of Application of the ACC/AHA Guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in a European Cohort. JAMA 2014; 311:1416-1423
  46. DeFilippis AP, Young R, Carrubba CJ, McEvoy JW, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS, Kronmal RA, McClelland RL, Nasir K, Blaha MJ. An analysis of calibration and discrimination among multiple cardiovascular risk scores in a modern multiethnic cohort. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:266-275
  47. Damen JA, Pajouheshnia R, Heus P, Moons KGM, Reitsma JB, Scholten RJPM, Hooft L, Debray TPA. Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019; 17:109-109
  48. Rana JS, Tabada GH, Solomon MD, Lo JC, Jaffe MG, Sung SH, Ballantyne CM, Go AS. Accuracy of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Equation in a Large Contemporary, Multiethnic Population. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016; 67:2118-2130
  49. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, Genest J, Gotto AM, Kastelein JJP, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Glynn RJ. Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 359:2195-2207
  50. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, Michos ED, Miedema MD, Muñoz D, Smith SC, Jr., Virani SS, Williams KA, Sr., Yeboah J, Ziaeian B. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 140:e596-e646
  51. Feingold KR. The Effect of Diet on Cardiovascular Disease and Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  52. Fonarow GC, Keech AC, Pedersen TR, Giugliano RP, Sever PS, Lindgren P, van Hout B, Villa G, Qian Y, Somaratne R, Sabatine MS. Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab Therapy for Reducing Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2:1069-1078
  53. Virani SS, Akeroyd JM, Smith SC, Al-Mallah M, Maddox TM, Morris PB, Petersen LA, Ballantyne CM, Grundy SM, Stone NJ. Very High-Risk ASCVD and Eligibility for Nonstatin Therapies Based on the 2018 AHA/ACC Cholesterol Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019; 74:712-714
  54. Khera AV, Won H-H, Peloso GM, Lawson KS, Bartz TM, Deng X, van Leeuwen EM, Natarajan P, Emdin CA, Bick AG, Morrison AC, Brody JA, Gupta N, Nomura A, Kessler T, Duga S, Bis JC, van Duijn CM, Cupples LA, Psaty B, Rader DJ, Danesh J, Schunkert H, McPherson R, Farrall M, Watkins H, Lander E, Wilson JG, Correa A, Boerwinkle E, Merlini PA, Ardissino D, Saleheen D, Gabriel S, Kathiresan S. Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility of Sequencing Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genes in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016; 67:2578-2589
  55. Warden BA, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Genes and Beyond. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  56. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). The Lancet 1994; 344:1383-1389
  57. Kashef MA, Giugliano G. Legacy effect of statins: 20-year follow up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS). Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2016; 2016:e201635-e201635
  58. Feingold KR. Role of Glucose and Lipids in the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of Patients with Diabetes. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2020.
  59. Lloyd-Jones DM, Braun LT, Ndumele CE, Smith SC, Sperling LS, Virani SS, Blumenthal RS. Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2019; 139:e1162-1177
  60. Horton JD, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. PCSK9: a convertase that coordinates LDL catabolism. J Lipid Res 2009; 50 Suppl:S172-177
  61. Ference BA, Ray KK, Catapano AL, Ference TB, Burgess S, Neff DR, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Kastelein JJP, Nicholls SJ. Mendelian Randomization Study of ACLY and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1033-1042
  62. Yebyo HG, Aschmann HE, Kaufmann M, Puhan MA. Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants. American Heart Journal 2019; 210:18-28
  63. Tota-Maharaj R, Blaha MJ, Blankstein R, Silverman MG, Eng J, Shaw LJ, Blumenthal RS, Budoff MJ, Nasir K. Association of coronary artery calcium and coronary heart disease events in young and elderly participants in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: a secondary analysis of a prospective, population-based cohort. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89:1350-1359
  64. Stone NJ, Smith SC, Jr., Orringer CE, Rigotti NA, Navar AM, Khan SS, Jones DW, Goldberg R, Mora S, Blaha M, Pencina MJ, Grundy SM. Managing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Young Adults: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:819-836
  65. Streja E, Streja DA. Management of Dyslipidemia in the Elderly. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  66. Banach M, Stulc T, Dent R, Toth PP. Statin non-adherence and residual cardiovascular risk: There is need for substantial improvement. International Journal of Cardiology 2016; 225:184-196
  67. Avorn J, Monette J, Lacour A, Bohn RL, Monane M, Mogun H, LeLorier J. Persistence of Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications. JAMA 1998; 279:1458
  68. Simons LA, Levis G, Simons J. Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs. Medical Journal of Australia 1996; 164:208-211
  69. Gamboa CM, Safford MM, Levitan EB, Mann DM, Yun H, Glasser SP, Woolley JM, Rosenson R, Farkouh M, Muntner P. Statin underuse and low prevalence of LDL-C control among U.S. adults at high risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Med Sci 2014; 348:108-114
  70. Blackburn DF, Dobson RT, Blackburn JL, Wilson TW, Stang MR, Semchuk WM. Adherence to statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following a first cardiovascular event: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Cardiol 2005; 21:485-488
  71. Tobert JA, Newman CB. The nocebo effect in the context of statin intolerance. Journal of Clinical Lipidology2016; 10:739-747
  72. Golomb BA, Evans MA. Statin Adverse Effects: a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 2008; 8:373-418
  73. Fitchett DH, Hegele RA, Verma S. Statin Intolerance. Circulation 2015; 131:e389-391
  74. Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Jr., Bairey-Merz CN, Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Lenfant C, American College of C, American Heart A, National Heart L, Blood I. ACC/AHA/NHLBI Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Circulation 2002; 106:1024-1028
  75. Nissen SE, Stroes E, Dent-Acosta RE, Rosenson RS, Lehman SJ, Sattar N, Preiss D, Bruckert E, Ceška R, Lepor N, Ballantyne CM, Gouni-Berthold I, Elliott M, Brennan DM, Wasserman SM, Somaratne R, Scott R, Stein EA. Efficacy and Tolerability of Evolocumab vs Ezetimibe in Patients With Muscle-Related Statin Intolerance. JAMA 2016; 315:1580-1590
  76. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, Hoes AW, Jennings CS, Landmesser U, Pedersen TR, Reiner Ž, Riccardi G, Taskinen M-R, Tokgozoglu L, Verschuren WMM, Vlachopoulos C, Wood DA, Zamorano JL. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. European Heart Journal 2016; 37:2999-3058
  77. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O, Group ESCSD. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020; 41:111-188
  78. Lee JC, Zdrojewski T, Pencina MJ, Wyszomirski A, Lachacz M, Opolski G, Bandosz P, Rutkowski M, Gaciong Z, Wyrzykowski B, Navar AM. Population Effect of Differences in Cholesterol Guidelines in Eastern Europe and the United States. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1:700-707
  79. Feingold KR, Chait A. Approach to patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022:101658
  80. Feingold KR. Maximizing the benefits of cholesterol-lowering drugs. Curr Opin Lipidol 2019; 30:388-394