Archives

Calcium & Phosphate Metabolism and Related Disorders During Pregnancy and Lactation

ABSTRACT

 

Pregnancy and lactation require women to provide calcium to the fetus and neonate in amounts that may exceed their normal daily intake. Specific adaptations are invoked within each time period to meet the fetal, neonatal, and maternal calcium requirements. During pregnancy, intestinal calcium and phosphate absorption more than double, and this appears to be the main adaptation to meet the fetal demand for mineral. During lactation, intestinal calcium absorption is normal. Instead, the maternal skeleton is resorbed through the processes of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and osteocytic osteolysis, in order to provide most of the calcium content of breast milk. In women this lactational loss of bone mass and strength is not suppressed by higher dietary intakes of calcium. After weaning, the skeleton appears to be restored to its prior bone density and strength, together with concomitant increases in bone volumes and cross-sectional diameters that may offset any effect of failure to completely restore the trabecular microarchitecture. These maternal adaptations during pregnancy and lactation also influence the presentation, diagnosis, and management of disorders of calcium, phosphorus, and bone metabolism such as primary hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, and phosphate disorders. Pregnancy and lactation can also cause pseudohyperparathyroidism, a form of hypercalcemia that is mediated by parathyroid hormone-related protein, produced in the breasts or placenta during pregnancy, and by the breasts alone during lactation. Although rarely women may experience fragility fractures during pregnancy or lactation, for most women parity and lactation do not affect the long-term risks of low bone density, osteoporosis, or fracture.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

By the end of full-term gestation, the average fetus accretes about 30 g of calcium, 20 g of phosphorus, and 0.8 g of magnesium to mineralize its skeleton and maintain normal physiological processes. The suckling neonate obtains more than this amount of calcium in breast milk during six months of exclusive lactation. The adaptations through which women meet these calcium demands differ between pregnancy and lactation (Figure 1). Although providing this extra calcium to the offspring could conceivably jeopardize the ability of the mother to maintain her own calcium homeostasis and skeletal mineralization, as this review will make clear, pregnancy and lactation normally do not cause any adverse long-term consequences to the maternal skeleton. The reader is referred to several comprehensive reviews for more details and extensive reference lists for the material covered in this chapter (1-7).

Figure 1. Schematic illustration contrasting calcium homeostasis in human pregnancy and lactation, as compared to normal. The thickness of arrows indicates a relative increase or decrease with respect to the normal and non-pregnant state. Although not illustrated, the serum (total) calcium is decreased during pregnancy, while the ionized calcium remains normal during both pregnancy and lactation. Adapted from ref. (8), © 1997, The Endocrine Society.

 

MINERAL PHYSIOLOGY DURING PREGNANCY

 

Calcium provided from the maternal decidua aids in fertilization of the egg and implantation of the blastocyst; from that point onward the rate of transfer from mother to offspring increases substantially. About 80% of the calcium and phosphate present in the fetal skeleton at the end of gestation crossed the placenta during the third trimester and is mostly derived from the maternal diet during pregnancy. Intestinal calcium and phosphate absorption doubles during pregnancy, driven by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) and other factors, and this appears to be the main adaptation through which women meet the mineral demands of pregnancy.

 

Mineral Ions

 

There are several characteristic changes in maternal serum chemistries and calciotropic hormones during pregnancy (Figure 2), which can easily be mistaken as indicating the presence of a disorder of calcium and bone metabolism, especially since it is not common for clinicians to measure calcium, phosphate, and calciotropic hormones during pregnancy (1). The serum albumin and hemoglobin fall during pregnancy due to hemodilution; the albumin remains low until parturition. In turn that fall in albumin causes the total serum calcium to decline to values that can be well below the normal range. The total calcium includes albumin-bound, bicarbonate-and-citrate-complexed, and ionized or free fractions of calcium. The ionized calcium, the physiologically important fraction, remains constant during pregnancy, which confirms that the fall in total calcium is but an artifact that can usually be ignored. However, that artifactual decline in total calcium means that the serum calcium cannot be relied upon to detect hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia. The ionized calcium should be measured or the albumin-corrected total calcium should be calculated to resolve any uncertainty about what the true serum calcium level is in a pregnant woman. Serum phosphate and magnesium concentrations remain normal during pregnancy.

 

Figure 2. Schematic depiction of longitudinal changes in calcium, phosphorus, and calciotropic hormone levels during human pregnancy. Shaded regions depict the approximate normal ranges. PTH does not decline in women with low calcium or high phytate intakes and may even rise above normal. Calcidiol (25OHD) values are not depicted; most longitudinal studies indicate that the levels are unchanged by pregnancy but may vary due to seasonal variation in sunlight exposure and changes in vitamin D intake. FGF23 values cannot be plotted due to paucity of data. Reproduced with permission from (1).

 

Parathyroid Hormone

 

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was first measured with assays that reported high circulating levels during pregnancy. The finding of a low total serum calcium and an apparently elevated PTH led to the concept of “physiological secondary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy.” This erroneous concept persists in some textbooks even today. Those early-generation PTH assays measured many biologically inactive fragments of PTH. When measured with 2-site “intact” assays or the more recent “bio-intact” PTH assays, PTH falls during pregnancy to the low-normal range (i.e. 0-30% of the mean non-pregnant value) during the first trimester and may increase back to the mid-normal range by term. Most of these recent studies of PTH during pregnancy have examined women from North America and Europe who also consumed calcium-replete diets. In contrast, in women from Asia and Gambia who have very low dietary calcium intakes (and often high intakes of phytate that blocks dietary calcium absorption), the PTH level does not suppress during pregnancy and in some cases it has been found to increase above normal (1).

 

Vitamin D Metabolites

 

25-hydroxyvitamin D or calcifediol (25OHD) readily crosses the rodent hemochorial placenta (9) and appears to cross hemochorial human placentas just as easily because cord blood 25OHD levels generally range from 75% to near 100% of the maternal value (1,5). A common concern is that the placenta and fetus might deplete maternal 25OHD stores, but this does not appear to be the case. Even in severely vitamin D deficient women there was no significant change in maternal 25OHD levels during pregnancy (1,4,10,11).

 

Total calcitriol levels increase two to five-fold early in pregnancy and stay elevated until parturition, whereas measured free calcitriol levels were reported to be increased only in the third trimester (12). However, when the 20-40% increase in vitamin D binding protein and the decline in serum albumin during pregnancy are considered, the calculated free calcitriol should be increased in all three trimesters (11,13-16).There are several unusual aspects about this situation. PTH is normally the main stimulator of the renal 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1); consequently, elevated calcitriol values are usually driven by high PTH concentrations. An exception to this is the ectopic expression of an autonomously functioning 1α-hydroxylase by such conditions as sarcoidosis and other granulomatous diseases. Another exception is pregnancy because the rise in calcitriol occurs when PTH levels are typically falling or quite low. Moreover, this increase in calcitriol occurs despite the ability of high levels of fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) to suppress the synthesis and increase the catabolism of calcitriol, as shown in animal models of X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (17-19). Evidence from additional animal models suggest that it is not PTH but other factors, such as PTH-related protein (PTHrP), estradiol, prolactin, and placental lactogen, which drive the 1α-hydroxylase to synthesize calcitriol (1).

 

The placenta expresses 1α-hydroxylase and it is often assumed that autonomous placental production of calcitriol explains why the maternal calcitriol level doubles; other sources such as maternal decidua and the fetus itself could conceivably contribute to the maternal value. However, it appears that any contributions of placenta and other extra-renal sources to the maternal calcitriol level are trivial. Animal studies indicate that the maternal renal 1α-hydroxylase is markedly upregulated during pregnancy (20,21) and that placental expression of 1α-hydroxylase is many-fold less than in the maternal kidneys (17). Clinical studies have revealed that anephric women on dialysis have very low circulating calcitriol levels before and during pregnancy (1,22), confirming that maternal kidneys must be the main source of the normal 2 to 5-fold increase in calcitriol during normal pregnancy. Rodent studies, including pregnancies in mice that lack the 1α-hydroxylase, have confirmed that there is a small contribution of fetal or placental calcitriol to the maternal circulation (1,23,24). However, it is not enough to account for the marked increase in maternal calcitriol that normally occurs during pregnancy.

 

Calcitonin

 

Serum calcitonin levels are increased during pregnancy and may derive from maternal thyroid, breast, decidua, and placenta. The importance of these extrathyroidal sites of calcitonin synthesis has been shown by serum calcitonin levels rising from undetectable to normal values in totally thyroidectomized women who become pregnant (25). Whether calcitonin plays an important role in the physiological responses to the calcium demands of pregnancy is unknown. It has been proposed to protect the maternal skeleton against excessive resorption during times of increased calcium demand; however, there are no clinical studies that have addressed this question. Study of pregnant women who lack the gene for calcitonin or the calcitonin receptor would be informative, but no such women have been identified. On the other hand, mice that lack the gene for calcitonin have normal calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy (26,27).

 

 

PTHrP concentrations steadily increase in the maternal circulation, reaching the highest levels in the third trimester (1,11). The assays most commonly used in these studies detected PTHrP peptides encompassing amino acids 1-86, but PTHrP is a prohormone. It is cleaved into multiple N-terminal, mid-molecule, and C-terminal peptides, which differ in their biological activities and specificities. None of these peptides have been systematically measured during pregnancy. The commonly available PTHrP1-86 assays do not measure PTHrP1-34, which is likely the most abundant of the active, PTH-like, N-terminal forms of this protein. Moreover, in many clinical studies and case reports it is evident that inappropriate blood samples were used for assaying PTHrP. Special collection and handling are required because PTHrP is rapidly cleaved and degraded in serum. Blood samples should be collected in tubes containing EDTA and aprotinin (a protease inhibitor), kept chilled, and then centrifuged, separated, and frozen within 15 minutes of sample collection. Even with these rigorous standards, PTHrP has been found to begin degrading by 15 minutes after sample collection (28). Many studies did not use this method of sample collection and preparation but instead used sera that had been allowed to clot at room temperature for up to 60 minutes. This likely explains why such studies found undetectable serum concentrations of PTHrP, as compared to those that studied the plasma concentration of PTHrP during pregnancy. Individual case reports are also fraught with this problem, since standard blood collection protocols for hospital laboratories do not use the special handling described above.

 

PTHrP is produced by many tissues in the fetus and mother; consequently, it is uncertain which source(s) account for the rise in PTHrP in the maternal circulation. However, the placenta and breasts are likely the major sources of PTHrP. Whether circulating PTHrP has a role in maternal physiology during pregnancy is unclear, but its rise may stimulate the renal 1α-hydroxylase and contribute to the increase in calcitriol and, indirectly, the suppression of PTH. However, PTHrP appears less potent than PTH in stimulating the 1α-hydroxylase (29,30), which is why its contribution to the rise in calcitriol during pregnancy is uncertain. On the other hand, several case reports have clearly implicated breast- and placental-derived PTHrP as a cause of maternal hypercalcemia with elevated PTHrP and undetectable PTH, a condition called pseudohyperparathyroidism of pregnancy (see below). Since breasts and placenta were sources of excess PTHrP in these cases, those two tissues seem likely to be dominant sources of PTHrP during normal pregnancy. Moreover, since excess PTHrP impacted maternal calcium homeostasis to cause hypercalcemia in these cases, it is possible that the more modest elevations in circulating PTHrP seen during normal pregnancy also affect maternal calcium homeostasis.

 

A carboxyl-terminal form of PTHrP (so-called “osteostatin”) has been shown to inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption in vitro, and thus the notion arises that PTHrP may play a role in protecting the maternal skeleton from excessive resorption during pregnancy (31). Animal studies have shown that PTHrP has other roles during gestation such as regulating placental calcium transport in the fetus (1,32). Maternally produced PTHrP is not likely to regulate placental calcium transport since the protein should not be able to cross the placenta (1,5); instead, it is PTHrP produced within the fetus and placenta that is responsible for regulating placental calcium transport.

 

Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 (FGF23)

 

Intact FGF23 doubles its concentration in the mother’s circulation during rodent pregnancies (17-19), but whether it increases during human pregnancy is not clear. A small longitudinal study of 12 women found that intact FGF23 doubled in the third trimester over values in the first and second trimesters (33), whereas a larger longitudinal study of 81 women found no difference in intact FGF23 values at 36 weeks of gestation and 3-6 months post-weaning (34). Within 24 hours after delivery in another study, mean intact FGF23 did not differ between postpartum women and non-pregnant women (35).

 

Other Hormones

 

This section has focused on changes in static concentrations of minerals and the known calciotropic hormones; there are no studies testing hormonal reserves or response to challenges such as hypocalcemia or hypophosphatemia. Pregnancy also induces significant changes in other hormones known to affect calcium and bone metabolism, including sex steroids, prolactin, placental lactogen, oxytocin, leptin, and IGF-1. Each of these – and possibly other hormones not normally associated with mineral and bone metabolism – may have direct or indirect effects on mineral homeostasis during pregnancy. However, this aspect of the physiology of pregnancy has been largely unexplored to date.

 

Estradiol increases to about 100-fold the levels obtained during normal menstrual cycles and may be influencing bone metabolism. As noted earlier, estradiol has been postulated to be one of the stimulators of the 1α-hydroxylase, which synthesizes high levels of calcitriol during normal pregnancy, and even in the absence of PTH (1).

 

Prolactin and placental lactogen both increase during pregnancy and activate prolactin receptors. Osteoblasts express prolactin receptors, and prolactin receptor deficient mice show decreased bone formation (36). Suppressing the prolactin level with bromocriptine blunted a pregnancy-related gain in bone mineral content in rats (37). These data are consistent with the notion that prolactin or placental lactogen regulate skeletal metabolism during pregnancy. Furthermore, prolactin can indirectly affect skeletal metabolism by stimulating PTHrP synthesis and release from the breasts (38-40).

 

Circulating oxytocin levels also rise during pregnancy (41), and the oxytocin receptor is expressed by osteoclasts and osteoblasts (42). Male and female mice lacking oxytocin or its receptor have an osteoporotic phenotype with low bone formation (43). Oxytocin has been shown to stimulate osteoblast differentiation and function, stimulate osteoclast formation, but inhibit osteoclast function and skeletal resorption (43,44). Taken together, these data predict that oxytocin may regulate bone metabolism during pregnancy, but this has not been directly studied in vivo.

 

Intestinal Calcium and Phosphate Absorption

 

Intestinal absorption of calcium doubles as early as 12 weeks of human pregnancy, as shown by clinical studies that used stable isotopes of calcium, and by other calcium balance studies (1). This increase in calcium absorption appears to be the major maternal adaptation to meet the fetal need for calcium. It has been generally believed that the doubling or tripling of calcitriol levels explains the increased intestinal calcium absorption and concurrent increases in the intestinal expression of calbindin9k-D (S100G), TRPV6, Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA1), and other genes and proteins involved in calcium transport. However, intestinal calcium absorption doubles in the first trimester, well before the rise in free calcitriol levels during the third trimester. Animal studies have indicated that placental lactogen, prolactin, and other factors may stimulate intestinal calcium absorption (1) and that calcitriol or the vitamin D receptor are not required for intestinal calcium absorption to increase during pregnancy (1,23,45-48). 

 

The peak fetal demand for calcium does not occur until the third trimester, and so it is unclear why intestinal calcium absorption should be upregulated in the first trimester. It may allow the maternal skeleton to store calcium in advance of the peak demands for calcium that occur later in pregnancy and lactation; some studies in rodents have shown this to be the case with the bone mineral content rising significantly before term (17,26,47). Women have also been found to be in a positive calcium balance by mid-pregnancy (49), likely due to the effect of increased intestinal calcium absorption on skeletal mineralization.

 

Intestinal phosphate absorption also undergoes a doubling during rodent and other mammalian pregnancies (1), and presumably human pregnancy as well. However, no clinical studies have studied this.

 

Renal Handling of Calcium

 

The doubling of intestinal calcium absorption in the first trimester means that the extra calcium must be passed to the fetus, deposited in the maternal skeleton, or excreted in the urine. Renal calcium excretion is increased as early as the 12th week of gestation, and 24-hour urine values (corrected for creatinine excretion) often exceed the normal range. Conversely, fasting urine calcium values are normal or low, confirming that this hypercalciuria is a consequence of the enhanced intestinal calcium absorption (1). This is absorptive hypercalciuria and will not be reliably detected by spot or fasting urine samples that have been corrected for creatinine concentration. Absorptive hypercalciuria contributes to the increased risk of kidney stones during pregnancy. That women commonly develop hypercalciuria in pregnancy is an indication that they normally absorb more calcium than needed by the fetus, provided that their calcium intake is not low, or that the gastrointestinal absorption of calcium is not impaired by high phytate consumption or malabsorptive disorders.

 

This absorptive hypercalciuria also renders nomograms of fractional calcium excretion invalid for the diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia during pregnancy (50,51).

 

Pharmacological doses of calcitonin promote renal calcium excretion, but whether the physiologically elevated levels of calcitonin during pregnancy promote renal calcium excretion is unknown.

 

Hypocalciuria during pregnancy has been associated with pre-eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and low (equal to non-pregnant values) serum calcitriol (52-55). These changes appear largely secondary to disturbed renal function and reduced creatinine clearance, rather than being causes of the hypertension. However, calcium supplementation reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia in women within the lowest quintile of calcium intake (see section J. Low and High Calcium Intake, below), and so there is a pathophysiological link between calcium metabolism and pregnancy-induced hypertension (1).

 

Skeletal Calcium Metabolism and Bone Density/Bone Marker Changes

 

As mentioned earlier, some studies in rodents indicate that bone mineral content increases during pregnancy, and other studies have shown that histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover are increased at this time. Systematic studies of bone histomorphometry from pregnant women have not been done. However, one study of 15 women who electively terminated a pregnancy at 8-10 weeks found bone biopsy evidence of increased bone resorption, including increased resorption surface and increased numbers of resorption cavities (56). These findings were not present in biopsies obtained from 13 women at term, or in the non-pregnant controls. This study bears repeating but it does suggest that early pregnancy induces skeletal resorption.

 

Bone turnover markers – by-products of bone formation and resorption that can be measured in the serum or urine – have been systematically studied during pregnancy in multiple studies (1). In the non-pregnant adult with osteoporosis these bone markers are fraught with significant intra- and inter-individual variability which limit their utility on an individual basis. There are additional problems with the use of bone markers during pregnancy, including lack of pre-pregnancy baseline values; hemodilution; increased GFR; altered creatinine excretion; placental, uterine and fetal contributions; degradation and clearance by the placenta; and lack of diurnally timed or fasted specimens. Bone resorption has been assessed using urinary (deoxypyridinoline, pyridinoline, and hydroxyproline) and serum (C-telopeptide) markers, and the consistent finding is that bone resorption appears increased from early or mid-pregnancy (1). Conversely, bone formation has been assessed by serum markers (osteocalcin, procollagen I N-terminal propeptide, and bone specific alkaline phosphatase) that were generally not corrected for hemodilution or increased GFR. These bone formation markers are decreased in early or mid-pregnancy from pre-pregnancy or non-pregnant values and rise to normal or above before term (1). The lack of correction for hemodilution and increased GFR means that the apparent decline in bone formation markers may not indicate a true decline in bone formation; it could mask no change or even an increase in bone formation. It should be noted that total alkaline phosphatase rises early in pregnancy due to the placental fraction and is not a useful marker of bone formation during pregnancy.

 

Overall, the scant bone biopsy data and the results of bone turnover markers suggest that bone resorption is increased from as early as the 10th week of pregnancy, whereas bone formation may be suppressed (if the bone formation marker results are correct) or normal (if the bone formation markers are artifactually suppressed due to the aforementioned confounding factors) (1). Notably there is little maternal-fetal calcium transfer occurring in the first trimester, nor is there a marked increase in turnover markers during the third trimester when maternal-fetal calcium transfer is at a peak. These findings may simply underscore that resorption of the maternal skeleton is a minor contributor to calcium homeostasis during pregnancy, whereas the upregulation of intestinal calcium absorption is the main mechanism through which the fetal demand for calcium is met.

 

Another way of assessing whether the maternal skeleton contributes to calcium regulation during pregnancy is to measure bone mineral content or density. A few sequential areal bone density (aBMD) studies have been done using older techniques (single and/or dual-photon absorptiometry, i.e., SPA and DPA), and none with newer techniques (DXA or qCT) due to concerns about fetal radiation exposure. Studies of aBMD are known to be confounded by changes in body composition, weight and skeletal volumes, and all three of these factors change during normal pregnancy. The longitudinal studies used SPA or DPA and found no significant change in cortical or trabecular aBMD during pregnancy (1). Most recent studies examined 16 or fewer subjects with DXA prior to planned pregnancy (range 1-18 months prior, but not always stated) and after delivery (range 1-6 weeks postpartum) [studies reviewed in detail in (57)]. One study found no change in lumbar spine aBMD measurements obtained pre-conception and within 1-2 weeks post-delivery, whereas the other studies reported 4-5% decreases in lumbar aBMD with the postpartum measurement taken between 1-6 weeks post-delivery. A larger study from Denmark obtained DXA measurements of hip, spine, and radius at baseline (up to 8 months before pregnancy) and again within 15 days of delivery in 73 women (58). DXA of the radius was also obtained once each trimester. aBMD decreased between pre-pregnancy and post-pregnancy by 1.8% at the lumbar spine, 3.2% at the total hip, 2.4% at the whole body, 4% at the ultradistal forearm, and 1% at the total forearm, whereas it increased by 0.5% at the proximal 1/3 forearm (58). All women went on to breastfeed, which means that the final aBMD values were confounded by lactation-induced bone loss (see lactation section). These changes in aBMD were statistically significant when compared to 57 non-pregnant controls who also had serial measurements done, but the magnitudes of change were small, and would not be considered statistically significant for an individual woman.

 

Ultrasound measurements of the os calcis and fingers have been examined in other longitudinal studies, which reported a progressive decrease in indices that correlate with volumetric BMD (1,57). Whether observed changes in the os calcis accurately indicate a true or clinically meaningful decrease in volumetric BMD or imply that losses of BMD are occurring in the spine or hip during pregnancy, is not known. The reliability or relevance of data obtained from ultrasound is questionable since this technique failed to detect any change in volumetric BMD at the os calcis during lactation (59), even though substantial bone loss occurs at the spine and hip during lactation (see lactation section).

 

Overall, the existing studies have insufficient power to allow a firm conclusion as to the extent of bone loss that might occur during pregnancy, but it seems likely (especially when data from the Danish study are considered) that modest bone loss occurs, which would be difficult to discern on an individual basis. In the long term, pregnancy does not impair skeletal strength or lead to reduced bone density. Several dozen epidemiological studies of osteoporotic and osteopenic women have failed to find a significant association of parity with bone density or fracture risk (1,60), and many have shown a protective effect of parity (61-78).

 

DISORDERS OF CALCIUM AND BONE METABOLISM DURING PREGNANCY

 

Osteoporosis in Pregnancy (and Especially Lactation)

 

In much of the following, the discussion encompasses osteoporosis that may present in pregnancy, the puerperium, or during lactation, so called pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO). There can be a continuum of changes in bone metabolism from pre-pregnancy, during pregnancy, in the puerperium, and into the breastfeeding and post-weaning intervals. Most (80-90%) of fractures occur in women during lactation, which indicates that the changes during lactation can be more critical than those that happen during pregnancy. For simplicity, most of the discussion occurs in this section, with a shorter discussion in the lactation section of this chapter. This is also necessary because much of the literature does not distinguish between osteoporosis of pregnancy versus lactation, and because osteoporosis presenting in lactation may have been caused in part by bone loss that occurred during pregnancy.

 

Rarely woman will present with a fragility fracture (most commonly a vertebral fracture, but appendicular fractures also occur) during the third trimester or puerperium, and especially during lactation. Low bone mineral density is usually then confirmed on a subsequent DXA (79). In most cases an aBMD value prior to pregnancy is not available because it was never indicated to be done in women who were until then thought to be healthy. Therefore, the extent of bone loss that occurred during pregnancy or lactation is unknown in most cases, and it is not possible to exclude that low bone density or skeletal fragility preceded pregnancy. In favor of a genetic predisposition is the report that among 35 women who presented with pregnancy associated osteoporosis, there was a higher than expected prevalence of fragility fractures in their mothers (80). A positive family history of osteoporosis has been found in about one-third of patients presenting with vertebral fractures in association with pregnancy or lactation (81-83). Whole genome screening has been done in other case series with pathogenic mutations found in 25-30% of women with PLO and involving such genes as COL1A1, LRP5, and WNT (79,84). Women with genetic mutations tended to have a more severe PLO, as indicated by lower aBMD or a higher number of fractures (82).

 

It is conceivable that pregnancy may induce significant skeletal losses in some women and, thereby, predispose to fracture. The normal pregnancy-induced changes in mineral metabolism may cause excessive resorption of the skeleton in selected cases, and other factors such as low dietary calcium intake and vitamin D insufficiency may contribute to skeletal losses (79). If calcium intake is very low or a malabsorptive disorder is present, skeletal resorption must occur to maintain the calcium supply to the fetus and placenta. A high rate of bone turnover is an independent risk factor for fragility fractures outside of pregnancy, and so the apparently increased bone resorption observed during pregnancy may increase fracture risk. In favor of pregnancy inducing fragility through excess skeletal losses is an observational study of 13 women with pregnancy-associated osteoporosis who were followed for up to eight years. Since the bone mineral density at the spine and hip increased significantly during follow-up in these women, the investigators concluded that significant bone loss must have occurred during the pregnancy (85). Other case series have documented spontaneous 10-20% increases in bone density in women after they fractured during pregnancy or the puerperium (1,86). Taken together, fragility fractures in pregnancy or the puerperium may result from the combination of abnormal skeletal microarchitecture or fragility preceding pregnancy, and increased bone resorption that occurred during pregnancy. In other words, the woman may have entered pregnancy with a normal skeleton that then experienced excessive resorption. Alternatively, she may have had lower bone density and bone strength prior to pregnancy, and her skeleton could not tolerate the increased weight bearing, lumbar lordosis, and physiological changes in bone metabolism that occur during pregnancy.

 

Osteoporosis in association with pregnancy or lactation is likely under-recognized and under-reported. Approximately 75% of vertebral compression fractures in older women are clinically silent and discovered only through radiological surveys; the same is likely true for reproductive age women. Back pain may signal a vertebral fracture, but it may be readily dismissed as a common symptom of normal pregnancy. Consistent with this, an online survey found that women who suffered compression fractures during pregnancy or lactation experienced a mean delay of 3 months before a diagnostic radiograph was done (87). The medical literature is biased toward reports of women who suffered a frightening cascade of multiple compression fractures in association with pregnancy (79,83), whereas how commonly a single vertebral compression fracture might occur and be detected during pregnancy is unknown. Although the literature has focused on vertebral compression fractures occurring with pregnancy, one report suggested that ankle and other lower limb fractures are more common (88).

 

Osteoporosis usually presents in association with a first pregnancy (especially during lactation) with many but not all reports suggesting that there is a low risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, and no risk conferred by higher parity (79,80,85,89-92).  This may indicate that reversible factors such as nutrition were corrected after the first pregnancy, or that all structurally compromised vertebrae collapsed under the load of the first pregnancy. About 60% of patients present with lower thoracic or lumbar pain that may be quite debilitating due to vertebral collapse (85,91,92). Most cases show normal serum chemistries and calciotropic hormone levels, but in a few, secondary causes of bone loss may be identified, including low calcium intake, anorexia nervosa, celiac disease, hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, inactivating mutations in LRP5, premature ovarian failure, and corticosteroid or heparin therapy (79,80,86,91-95). For example, a woman’s habitual calcium intake of only 229 mg daily was not enough to meet maternal and fetal demands for calcium, and likely contributed to a cascade of vertebral compression fractures occurring late in pregnancy and the puerperium (79). Bone biopsies have only occasionally been done in women having fractures associated with pregnancy or lactation. Most have confirmed osteoporosis and the absence of osteomalacia, while DXA as shown aBMD Z-scores are often in the low bone mass or osteoporotic ranges (85,91,92).

 

Pain from vertebral compression fractures resolves spontaneously over several weeks in most cases while the bone density has been reported to substantially improve in most women following pregnancy, including those who fractured. Fractures tend not to recur in subsequent pregnancies. Thus, although myriad medical treatments (bisphosphonates, estrogen, testosterone, calcitonin, teriparatide, denosumab) and surgical interventions (kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, spinal fusion) have been used in individual cases of pregnancy-associated osteoporosis (79), the tendency for this condition to spontaneously improve may make pharmacological treatment unjustified except for the severest cases. At the least, it may be prudent to wait 12-18 months to determine the extent to which the aBMD recovers on its own after a pregnancy-associated vertebral fracture (79,86).

 

A recent study examined women with self-reported PLO that resulted in fractures occurring in pregnancy or, more commonly, during lactation (96). They were compared cross-sectionally to two groups of historical controls, healthy premenopausal women and women with known idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) (96). Women with PLO had lower aBMD and reduced HR-pQCT parameters of cortical and trabecular bone than in healthy women and women with IOP (96). However, women with PLO who were assessed >12 months postpartum (“distant”) had higher aBMD than women who were assessed <12 months postpartum (“early”), which implies that recovery had occurred in the “distant” group (96). Moreover, the aBMD of women in the “distant” group was no different than that of women with IOP (96), which suggests that (at least in this cohort) many women with PLO have low bone mass and strength that precedes pregnancy.

 

A distinct condition is focal, transient osteoporosis of the hip (79). This is rare, self-limited, and probably not a manifestation of altered calciotropic hormone levels or mineral balance during pregnancy. Instead, it may be a consequence of local factors. A variety of theories have been offered to explain this condition, including femoral venous stasis due to pressure from the pregnant uterus, Sudeck’s atrophy or reflex sympathetic dystrophy (causalgia), ischemia, trauma, viral infections, marrow hypertrophy, immobilization, and fetal pressure on the obturator nerve. These patients present with unilateral or bilateral hip pain, limp and/or hip fracture in the third trimester or puerperium (79,97-99). Radiographs and DXA indicate radiolucency and reduced bone density of the symptomatic femoral head and neck, while MRI demonstrates increased water content of the femoral head and the marrow cavity; a joint effusion may also be present. The differential diagnosis of this condition includes inflammatory joint disorders, avascular necrosis of the hip, bone marrow edema, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. It is a self-limiting condition with both symptoms and radiological appearance resolving within two to six months post-partum; conservative measures including bed rest are usually all that is required during the symptomatic phase (79). Of course, fractures of an involved femur require urgent arthroplasty or hip replacement. The condition recurs in about 40% of cases (not necessarily during pregnancy), unlike osteoporosis involving the spine, and this has prompted prophylactic hip arthroplasty to be done in a few cases where the opposite hip appears to be affected.

 

Vertebral compression fractures and transient osteoporosis of the hip are not always distinct entities; both have occurred in a few women in association with pregnancy (100-103).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

For fragility fractures occurring in association with pregnancy, treatment should include optimization of calcium and vitamin D intake, encouraging judicious weight-bearing physical activity, correction of nutritional deficiencies, and treatment of any reversible causes of bone loss or fragility. A supportive corset may provide short-term pain relief. Breastfeeding is not contraindicated but its relative safety should be discussed, since it will lead to progressive loss in aBMD and a transient further increase in fracture risk (see lactation section, below). The potential to rush in with pharmacotherapy should be tempered by the realization that aBMD normally increases 20-70% during the subsequent six to twelve months in women who fractured but received no interventions (1,79,80,85,86,104-112). Therefore, it seems prudent to delay any use of pharmacotherapy for 12-18 months until the extent of spontaneous recovery has been assessed. The extent of spontaneous recovery of lumbar spine aBMD at 12–18 months should be assessed by DXA. HR-pQCT will underestimate the extent of recovery unless the parameters are adjusted to detect and to capture the newly formed bone (osteoid and under-mineralized bone) (86).

 

Documented pharmacotherapies for PLO have included calcitonin, bisphosphonates, denosumab, strontium ranelate, and teriparatide, using the same regimens as for post-menopausal osteoporosis but with treatment durations from 6 months to as much as 10 years (1,79,83,93,113-117). These reports are observational and lacked controls to determine whether any improvements in aBMD exceeded what would have been observed with spontaneous recovery (i.e., use of calcium and vitamin D replacement only). A recent systematic review found that teriparatide increased aBMD by 8-37% and bisphosphonates by 3 to 43% (118). Notably, these ranges overlap with the bone density increases of 20-70% achieved by women in other reports who did not receive pharmacotherapy. In the few case series where pharmacologically treated women were compared to women who received calcium and vitamin D supplementation only, the final aBMD did not differ between groups (83,109,119,120). Of greater concern is that in the largest of these studies (107 women), recurrent fractures occurred twice as often in women who received teriparatide or alendronate (or both), as compared to those who received only calcium and vitamin D supplementation (109). That finding suggests that pharmacotherapy might be harmful, but better controlled studies are needed to be certain of the benefits vs. risks of pharmacotherapy in this setting.

 

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have also been used to treat painful vertebral fractures post-partum, but their overall efficacy is uncertain, given that blinded randomized trials have found no superiority over sham surgery or medical approaches in older subjects (121).

 

For transient osteoporosis of the hip that has not yet resulted in a fracture, the main consideration is whether to prophylactically rod the affected femur(s), or to observe the patient with the expectation that full spontaneous recovery will occur.

 

Primary Hyperparathyroidism

 

This is an uncommon condition but there are no firm data available on its prevalence. Hypercalcemia has been found in 0.03% of routinely screened reproductive age women, while two case series indicated that 1% of all parathyroidectomies were done during pregnancy (122,123). There are at least several hundred cases in the medical literature. The diagnosis will be obscured by the normal pregnancy-induced changes that lower the total serum calcium and suppress PTH; however, finding the ionized or albumin-corrected calcium to be increased, and PTH to be detectable, should indicate primary hyperparathyroidism in most cases (note the exception of FHH in the next section).

 

Physiological changes of pregnancy described earlier increase intestinal calcium absorption and bone resorption, and cause hypercalciuria. In turn these developments can worsen primary hyperparathyroidism and may lead to more severe hypercalcemia, pancreatitis, and kidney stones. The potential for worsening of hypercalcemia is also offset in part by active transfer of calcium across the placenta into the developing fetus.

 

Primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy has been reported to cause a variety of symptoms that are not specific to hypercalcemia and cannot be distinguished from those occurring in normal pregnancy (nausea, vomiting, renal colic, malaise, muscle aches and pains, etc.). Conversely the literature has associated primary hyperparathyroidism with an alarming rate of adverse outcomes in the fetus and neonate, including a 10-30% rate for each of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, and perinatal death, and 30-50% incidence of neonatal tetany (123-127). These high rates were reported in older literature; more recent case series suggest that the rates of stillbirth and neonatal death are each about 2%, while neonatal tetany occurred in 15% (124). The adverse postnatal outcomes are thought to result from suppression of the fetal and neonatal parathyroid glands; this suppression may be prolonged after birth for 3-5 months (124) and in some cases it has been permanent (124,126,128).

 

To prevent these adverse outcomes, surgical correction of primary hyperparathyroidism during the second trimester has been almost universally recommended. Several case series have found elective surgery to be well tolerated, and to dramatically reduce the rate of adverse events when compared to the earlier cases reported in the literature. In a series of 109 mothers with hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy who were treated medically (N=70) or surgically (N=39), there was a 53% incidence of neonatal complications and 16% incidence of neonatal deaths among medically treated mothers, as opposed to a 12.5% neonatal complications and 2.5% neonatal deaths in mothers who underwent parathyroidectomy (123). A systematic review of 382 cases found that neonatal deaths and infant morbidity were lower in surgically treated vs. medically treated mothers (9.1 vs. 38.9%) (129). Furthermore, among surgically treated mothers, neonatal death and infant morbidity significant reduced with surgery done in the second versus third trimesters (4.5 vs. 21.1%) (129). Choosing the second trimester allows organogenesis to be complete in the fetus and to avoid the poorer surgical outcomes and risk of preterm birth associated with surgery during the third trimester (124,127,130,131).

 

Many women in the earliest published cases had a more severe form of primary hyperparathyroidism that is not often seen today (symptomatic, with nephrocalcinosis and renal insufficiency). While mild, asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy has been followed conservatively with successful outcomes, complications continue to occur, so that, in the absence of definitive data, surgery during the second trimester remains the most common recommendation (132). An analysis of 1,057 reproductive-aged women with primary hyperparathyroidism found that the rate of C-sections was doubled but there was no difference in the incidence of spontaneous abortions; no data were available on other pregnancy outcomes or neonatal complications (133). In another study of 134 pregnancies in women with primary hyperparathyroidism compared to 431 pregnancies in normocalcemic women, there were no differences in pregnancy-related complications or spontaneous abortions, but neonatal complications were not reported (134). Other recent cases are consistent with lower rates of still birth, neonatal death, and neonatal tetany as compared to the older literature. Therefore, it is reasonable that milder cases diagnosed during the third trimester may be observed until delivery; however, rapid and severe postpartum worsening of the hypercalcemia can occur (131,135-138). This postpartum “parathyroid crisis” occurs because the placental calcium outflow has been lost, while surging PTHrP production in the breasts means an additional factor stimulating bone resorption.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

The main consideration is whether to operate electively in the second trimester or observe the patient in the hope that surgical intervention can be delayed until after delivery.

 

Of the five international consensus conferences on the management of primary hyperparathyroidism, only the most recent one commented on pregnancy (139). There are no definitive medical management guidelines for hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy apart from ensuring adequate hydration and correction of electrolyte abnormalities (132). There is some consensus that surgery is indicated for a persistent serum calcium above 2.80 mmol/L (11.1 mg/dL), or an ionized calcium above 1.4 mmol/L (5.6 mg/dL) (140,141). However, another review suggested a higher level 3.00 mmol/L (12.0 mg/dL) (142).  If surgery is undertaken, a bilateral approach is often warranted because of the lack of preoperative imaging to localize the adenoma.

 

Pharmacologic agents to treat hypercalcemia have not been adequately studied in pregnancy, and follow-up on the babies has been brief (if at all).  Calcitonin does not cross the placenta and has been used safely (132). Oral phosphate has also been used but is limited by diarrhea, hypokalemia, and risk of soft tissue calcifications. Bisphosphonates are relatively contraindicated because of their potential adverse effects on fetal endochondral bone development, although a review of 78 cases of bisphosphonate use in pregnancy found no obvious problems in most cases (112). Denosumab crosses the placenta and has been shown to cause an osteopetrotic-like phenotype in fetal cynomolgus monkeys and rats (143,144), and so it should be avoided in human pregnancy. High-dose magnesium has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative which should decreases serum PTH and calcium levels by activating the calcium sensing-receptor, but it has not been adequately studied for this purpose (145,146). The calcium receptor agonist cinacalcet, which is used to suppress PTH and calcium in nonpregnant subjects with primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism and parathyroid carcinoma, has also been tried in pregnancy (147-150). However, since the calcium receptor is expressed in the placenta and regulates fetal-placental calcium transfer (151), the possibility of adverse effects of cinacalcet on the fetus and neonate remain a concern. In 6 case reports, use of calcimimetics resulted in neonatal hypocalcemia in half of them (142). Heparin-free hemodialysis can lower the serum calcium before surgery (152). The recent consensus conference on management of primary hyperparathyroidism advised against the use of bisphosphonates and denosumab and cautioned that data on use of cinacalcet are very limited (139). Nevertheless, these agents have been used when there is a hypercalcemic crisis and surgery isn’t possible; the author is aware of cases treated pharmacologically that have not been reported in the literature.

 

In any case that was followed medically, parathyroidectomy is recommended to be done postpartum, with monitoring in place to detect a postpartum hypercalcemic crisis. Since these women are presenting young with primary hyperparathyroidism, genetic testing may be indicated to rule out inherited causes.

 

Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia (FHH)

 

Inactivating mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor cause this autosomal dominant condition which presents with hypercalcemia and hypocalciuria (153).  During pregnancy there will be persistent hypercalcemia with non-suppressed PTH, and the serum calcium may progressively rise across the trimesters. As noted above, fractional excretion of calcium is not reduced during pregnancy in this condition, because it is overridden by the physiological increase in intestinal calcium absorption that in turn causes hypercalciuria (50,51,154). Consequently, FHH presenting during pregnancy can be easily mistaken for primary hyperparathyroidism. Unfortunately, at least one pregnant woman with FHH was mistaken to have primary hyperparathyroidism because of worsening hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria and underwent a three-and-a-half gland parathyroidectomy during the second trimester. FHH was only recognized when her hypercalcemia persisted and her neonate was found to be hypercalcemic too (50).

 

Pregnancy in women with familial hypocalciuric hypocalcemia should be uneventful for the mother, but the maternal hypercalcemia has caused fetal and neonatal parathyroid suppression with subsequent tetany in both normal and hemizygous children (5,155,156). A hemizygous neonate will later develop benign hypercalcemia, but if the baby has two inactivating mutations of the calcium receptor (most commonly from both parents being hemizygous for FHH), then the neonate may suffer a life-threatening hypercalcemic crisis (5).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Hypercalcemia is a normal state of affairs for women with FHH and it should not be treated or mistaken for primary hyperparathyroidism. Instead, the newborn should be watched for postnatal hypocalcemia and for the later development of hypercalcemia as a sign that it inherited the mutation.

 

Hypoparathyroidism

 

Hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy usually presents as a pre-existing condition that the clinician is challenged to manage. The natural history of hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy is confusing due to seemingly conflicting case reports in the literature [reviewed in (1,3,157,158)].  Early in pregnancy, some hypoparathyroid women have fewer hypocalcemic symptoms and require less supplemental calcium. This is consistent with a limited role for PTH in the pregnant woman and suggests that an increase in calcitriol and/or increased intestinal calcium absorption occurs in the absence of PTH. However, other case reports clearly indicate that some pregnant hypoparathyroid women required increased calcitriol replacement in order to avoid worsening hypocalcemia. Adding to the confusion is that in some case reports, it appears that the normal, artifactual decrease in total serum calcium during pregnancy was the parameter that led to treatment with increased calcium and calcitriol supplementation; fewer cases reported that dose increments in calcitriol and calcium were made because of maternal symptoms of hypocalcemia or tetany, or objective evidence of true hypocalcemia (low ionized or albumin-corrected calcium).

 

In a well-documented case, calcitriol was stopped and the woman required only supplemental calcium during the third trimester; she developed hypocalcemia within 48 hours of delivery, which implicates loss of placental PTHrP as contributing to her normalization during pregnancy (159). In a series of ten cases of hypoparathyroidism, the ionized calcium remained normal during pregnancy with no need for calcitriol (160).

 

Among these and other recent cases, it is clear that hypoparathyroidism may improve, stay the same, or even worsen during pregnancy (159,161-163). It is not possible to know in advance who will improve and who will worsen during pregnancy; the task is to maintain the albumin-corrected serum calcium or ionized calcium in the normal range for the duration of pregnancy. Maternal hypocalcemia due to hypoparathyroidism must be avoided because it has been associated with intrauterine fetal hyperparathyroidism and fetal death. Conversely, overtreatment must be avoided because maternal hypercalcemia is associated with the fetal and neonatal complications described above under Primary Hyperparathyroidism. Calcitriol and 1α-calcidiol are recommended due to their shorter half-lives, lower risk of toxicity, and the clinical experience with these agents.

 

Late in pregnancy, hypercalcemia may occur in hypoparathyroid women unless the calcitriol dosage and supplemental calcium are substantially reduced or discontinued. This effect appears to be mediated by the increasing levels of PTHrP in the maternal circulation in late pregnancy. Conversely, one case report of hypoparathyroidism in pregnancy found that there was a transient interval of increased requirement for calcitriol immediately after delivery and before lactation was fully underway (159). This may be the result of loss of placental sources of PTHrP followed by a surge in production of PTHrP by the lactating breast (see lactation section, below).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

The albumin-corrected serum calcium should be maintained in the mid-normal range in order to insure adequate delivery of calcium to the fetus. This short-term recommendation differs from the common recommendation for non-pregnant adults of maintaining the albumin-corrected serum calcium near or just below the lower end of normal, which reduces the renal filtered load and may slow the progression of nephrocalcinosis over the long term. As discussed above, management during pregnancy may not require any change in pre-existing doses of calcium and calcitriol or 1α-calcidiol, or it may require increases or decreases in both the calcium and the active vitamin D analog.

 

Pseudohypoparathyroidism

 

Pseudohypoparathyroidism is a genetic disorder causing resistance to PTH and manifest by hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, and high PTH levels. The two main subtypes include type I, which has blunted PTH-induced phosphaturia and renal production of cyclic AMP, while type II has blunting of PTH-induced phosphaturia only. They are managed similarly to hypoparathyroidism.

 

The published experience with pseudohypoparathyroidism during pregnancy is similar to that of hypoparathyroidism, with a mix of cases that improved, worsened, or had no change. Type I pseudohypoparathyroidism improved during four pregnancies as shown by fewer hypocalcemic symptoms, achievement of normocalcemia, lowering of PTH to near-normal, calcitriol increasing several-fold, urinary calcium excretion normalizing, and supplemental vitamin D, calcitriol, or analogs no longer required (164). These findings are consistent with PTH-independent increases in intestinal calcium absorption and calcitriol synthesis occurring during pregnancy that in turn improve calcium homeostasis; endogenous serum calcitriol did double mid-pregnancy in two women in whom supplemental calcitriol had been discontinued. However, in seven other pregnancies in women with types I and II pseudohypoparathyroidism there was subjective worsening of hypocalcemia-like symptoms, or the apparent need to increase the doses of calcium, calcitriol, or 1α-calcidiol (1,165-168). Another case reported that no change in calcium or calcitriol dosages were required during pregnancy (169). Lastly, a more recent series of 5 patients reported variability of improved, worsened, or no change in the condition during pregnancy (170).

 

If maternal hypocalcemia persists during pregnancy, pseudohypoparathyroidism can lead to the same adverse fetal outcomes that have been associated with maternal hypoparathyroidism, including parathyroid hyperplasia, skeletal demineralization, and fractures (171,172). The maternal calcium concentration must be maintained in the normal range to avoid these fetal outcomes.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Maintain the albumin-corrected serum calcium in the mid-normal range. As with hypoparathyroidism, this may not require any change in pre-existing doses of calcium and calcitriol or 1α-calcidiol, or it may require increases or decreases in both the calcium and active vitamin D analog.

 

Pseudohyperparathyroidism

 

As mentioned above, pseudohyperparathyroidism is hypercalcemia that is caused by physiological release of PTHrP driving increased skeletal resorption, akin to how PTHrP also causes hypercalcemia of malignancy. In several cases the breasts were the confirmed source of PTHrP because the hypercalcemia and elevated PTHrP did not abate until a bilateral reduction mammoplasty was carried out (173-175). The condition has occurred in women who simply have large breasts (175-177). In another case the hypercalcemia, elevated PTHrP, and suppressed PTH reversed within a few hours of an urgent C-section, thereby confirming the placenta as the source (178). In all cases of pseudohyperparathyroidism, it should be anticipated that the cord blood calcium will also be increased, and that the baby is at risk for fetal and neonatal hypoparathyroidism with hypocalcemic tetany.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

The diagnosis may not be clear until after delivery, when the serum calcium rapidly normalizes (indicating placental PTHrP was the cause) or stays elevated (indicating production of PTHrP by the breasts is the cause). Prior to delivery, medical management is similar to that for primary hyperparathyroidism.

 

Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency

 

There are no comprehensive studies of the effects of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency on human pregnancy, but the available data from small clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation, observational studies, and case reports suggest that, consistent with animal studies, vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency is not associated with any worsening of maternal calcium homeostasis (this topic is reviewed in detail in (1,4,7). Maternal hypocalcemia is milder with vitamin D deficiency due to the effects of secondary hyperparathyroidism to increase skeletal resorption and renal calcium reabsorption. Consequently, hypocalcemia due to vitamin D deficiency has not been clearly associated with the same adverse fetal outcomes that maternal hypoparathyroidism causes (reviewed in detail in (5,179)). The fetal effects of vitamin D deficiency, inability to form calcitriol, and absence of the vitamin D receptor have been examined across several animal species and all have indicated that the fetus will have a normal serum calcium and fully mineralized skeleton at term (reviewed in detail in (5,179)). Neonatal hypocalcemia and rickets can occur in infants born of mothers with severe vitamin D deficiency, but it is usually in the weeks to months after birth that this presents, after intestinal calcium absorption becomes dependent on calcitriol.

 

There has been much interest in studies that have inconsistently associated third-trimester measurements of 25OHD, or estimated vitamin D intakes during pregnancy or the first year after birth, with possible extraskeletal benefits in the mother (reduced bacterial vaginosis, pre-eclampsia, pre-term delivery) or in the offspring (lower incidence of type 1 diabetes, greater skeletal mineralization, etc.). These associational studies won’t be discussed in detail (some are cited in: (1,5,180)) because they are confounded by factors which contribute to lower 25OHD levels (maternal overweight/obesity, lower socioeconomic status, poor nutrition, lack of exercise, etc.). It is necessary to test these associations in randomized clinical trials that compare higher versus lower intakes of vitamin D during pregnancy. At present the results of the associational studies are insufficient to warrant prescribing higher intakes of vitamin D during pregnancy to prevent these postulated outcomes.

 

Among many clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation that have been carried out (1), only a few have included over a 100 study participants who were vitamin D deficient at entry, while other recent studies that gained press attention did not include many vitamin D deficient subjects at all.

 

Among the trials with over 100 participants (14,181-189), the two largest were from Bangladesh and UK with over 1,000 participants (187,188). Baseline maternal 25OHD levels were lowest (20-29 nmol/L) in trials from Bangladesh, UK, Iran, and UAE, and in the 40-60 nmol/L range in the remainder. Interventions consisted of placebo/no treatment versus low dose (400 IU/day) or high dose (1,000-5,000 IU/day) vitamin D supplementation, initiated before mid-pregnancy, and maintained until delivery. For most trials the primary outcomes were simply maternal and neonatal-cord blood 25OHD and calcium. The most recent and largest study was from Bangladesh, and the primary outcome was pre-specified as infant length-for-age z-scores at 1 year of age (188). Offspring anthropometric parameters and/or bone mineral content were pre-specified only in a few of the remaining studies (184,186,187).

 

In all studies vitamin D supplementation increased maternal serum and cord blood 25OHD, but there was no overall effect on maternal or cord blood calcium, except one trial that showed a small but significant difference in maternal calcium at delivery (181). The largest achieved difference in maternal 25OHD was over 160 nmol/L (60 ng/mL) in a single study: 16 nmol/L (6.4 ng/mL) in untreated and 168 nmol/L (67 ng/mL) in vitamin D-supplemented mothers at term; however, there was no obstetrical or fetal benefit (181). In that study, the incidence of neonatal hypocalcemia was reduced in offspring of vitamin D treated mothers, reflecting the role of calcitriol to stimulate postnatal intestinal calcium absorption (181). Three trials (mean baseline 25OHD of 20-56 nmol/L) showed a significantly higher maternal PTH level in the low dose vitamin D/placebo arms compared to the high dose arms (182-184), while another trial (mean baseline 25OHD 58-60 nmol/L) did not show any effect of vitamin D supplementation on maternal PTH (14). Vitamin D supplementation also had no effect on maternal aBMD parameters in the post-partum period (14,186,190). Four trials assessed obstetrical outcomes (gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, infection, post-partum hemorrhage, preterm labor and others), and found no effect of vitamin D supplementation (183,187-189). However, one trial from Iran that showed a 54% risk reduction in gestational diabetes when vitamin D was taken at a dose of 50,000 IU every 2 weeks and compared to 400 IU per day (189).

 

In the large Bangladesh study, there were no significant differences in infant anthropometrics or any other fetal, neonatal or maternal outcomes (188). In one US-based study there was no benefit on mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, and preterm birth (14), while in another there was no benefit on mode of delivery, C-section rates, adverse events, hypertension, infection, gestational diabetes, still birth, gestational age at delivery, or combinations of these outcomes (183). The UK MAVIDOS trial reported no obstetrical benefit, and no benefit to any of the primary (neonatal bone area, BMC, and aBMD within the first 10-14 days after birth) or secondary outcomes (anthropometric and body composition parameters within 48 hours of birth). However, it received much publicity for a demonstrated increase in BMC and aBMD in winter-born neonates of vitamin D-supplemented vs. placebo-treated mothers (187). Because the neonatal skeleton accretes 100 mg/day of mineral content after birth, this result may reflect improved intestinal mineral delivery over 14 days after birth, rather than a prenatal effect on skeletal mineralization (1,191,192). Curiously, autumn-born neonates of vitamin D-supplemented vs. placebo-treated mothers showed an adverse trend of similar magnitude on BMC and aBMD, which suggests possible harm from vitamin D supplementation, or chance findings due to small numbers within the sub-groups (192). These sub-group analyses of treatment by season interaction were not specified outcomes in the trial registries (ISRCTN 82927713 and EUDRACT 2007-001716-23). In the UK study that achieved the greatest difference in 25OHD levels between untreated and vitamin D-treated mothers and babies, there was a trend for more small for gestational age babies born to mothers who did not receive antenatal vitamin D supplementation (28% vs. 15%, p<0.1), but the study was not powered for this outcome (181). In studies from the UAE, and Iran there was also no benefit on obstetrical outcomes (variably, mode of delivery, C-section rates, adverse events, stillbirths, gestational age at delivery) or neonatal anthropometric measurements and bone mass measurements (182,184,186).

 

The lack of any beneficial effect on maternal, immediate fetal/neonatal and neonatal outcomes (anthropometrics and cord blood calcium), even in studies that included mothers with some of the lowest 25OHD levels (181,184,186,188), suggests that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy confers no benefit to the neonate.  The most recent study was well-powered to demonstrate a beneficial effect on infant length and other fetal/neonatal outcomes, but did not yield any significant results, despite low vitamin D levels in the mothers at study entry (188).

 

Multiple systematic reviews have assessed the effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on maternal outcomes (193-198). The reviews differed significantly in their methodology, eligibility criteria, intervention (vitamin D alone or combined with calcium), and inclusion of trials. The Cochrane systematic review showed no significant effect of vitamin D supplementation alone on obstetrical outcomes, but there was a significant reduction in preterm birth and low birth weight (194). Conversely, the combination of vitamin D with calcium was found to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, but at the cost of a potential increase in preterm births (194). The other reviews yield variable and inconsistent results among them (193,195-198).

 

An update to the Cochrane systematic review compared vitamin D regimens during pregnancy (≤600 IU versus >600 IU per day; <4000 IU versus ≥ 4000 IU per day) (199). There was no significant effect on pre-eclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight (low/very low quality of the evidence) (199). The risk of gestational diabetes was reduced with vitamin D supplementation in only one comparison (moderate quality evidence), favoring a dose >600 IU/d (RR 0.54 (0.34 to 0.86). The reviewers noted a concern that safety data were often not reported in the trials that included high doses of vitamin D (199).

 

In summary, the few large RCTs reported to date do not provide evidence for a beneficial effect of high dose vitamin D supplementation (1,000-5,000 IU/day), on maternal and neonatal outcomes. A recent large trial makes it unlikely that vitamin D supplementation in deficient women would yield any beneficial effect on infant length (188). Other studies had low power, baseline maternal serum 25OHD levels that were often not low, and lack of pre-specification of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. A potential protective effect of vitamin D on neonatal BMC observed in the MAVIDOS trial (187)makes physiological sense because the intestines become the route of calcium delivery after birth, and the finding is consistent with the benefit observed in some RCTs of prenatal vitamin D supplementation reducing the incidence of neonatal hypocalcemia.

 

Overall, available data are insufficient from the individual clinical trials or these systematic reviews to conclude that vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy confers any proven obstetrical benefits, especially with respect to calcium and bone metabolism. However, much interest remains in determining whether vitamin D prevents adverse non-skeletal events in mother and baby. In the meantime, one should always ensure that any pregnant woman is vitamin D sufficient prior to pregnancy, or soon after her pregnancy is confirmed. This ensures that the baby is born with adequate 25OHD so that calcitriol can be upregulated postnatally to stimulate calcium and phosphate absorption in the neonatal intestines.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Vitamin D supplementation is not harmful to the nonpregnant adult unless excessive doses are administered that cause hypervitaminosis D (typically in excess of 10,000 IU daily); however, the maximal level of maternal intake that is safe for the developing fetus has not been established. Clinical trials in pregnant women have safely administered doses ranging from 400 to 5,000 IU of vitamin D daily without obvious adverse effects to mother or offspring. All pregnant women should have their vitamin D intake optimized. This should prevent any non-skeletal outcomes that may be caused by vitamin D deficiency and will also ensure that the newborn has sufficient vitamin D stores to be able to normalize mineral homeostasis in the hours to days after birth, when it switches from being dependent upon the placenta for mineral delivery to relying on its maturing intestines to absorb that mineral from milk.

 

Genetic Vitamin D Resistance Syndromes

 

Case reports and series have provided insight into the effect of pregnancy on genetic disorders of vitamin physiology. Pregnancies have generally been unremarkable in women with vitamin D-dependent rickets type 1 (VDDR-I) which is due to absence of Cyp27b1, and in women with VDDR-II that is due to absence of functional VDRs (200-202). In one such uneventful VDR-II pregnancy, the pre-pregnancy intake of supplemental calcium (800 mg) and high-dose calcitriol were maintained until her clinicians increased the dose of calcitriol later in pregnancy “because of the knowledge that the circulating 1,25-(OH)2D concentration normally rises during pregnancy,” and not because of any change in albumin-adjusted serum calcium (201). Consequently, it’s unclear whether any change was needed. However, it is reasonable to increase the dose of calcitriol to mirror the increase that happens during normal pregnancy. In women with VDDR-I, the dose of calcitriol was unchanged in one-third of pregnancies but increased 1.5 to 2-fold in others (200).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Maintain a normal albumin-corrected serum calcium with adjustments to oral calcium and calcitriol dosing as needed based on serial monitoring of blood chemistries.

 

24-Hydroxylase Deficiency

 

Genetic loss of the catabolic effects of 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1) causes high calcitriol, mild hypercalcemia, and nephrolithiasis in non-pregnant adults, which may be asymptomatic (203). But during pregnancy in affected individuals, the physiological 2 to 5-fold increase in calcitriol is unopposed by catabolism, which causes an exaggerated increase in calcitriol, followed by severe and potentially life-threatening hypercalcemia. This has been confirmed by study of a mouse model of Cyp24a1 ablation that mimics the human condition (204). In affected women, hypercalcemia can be quite marked, with suppressed or undetectable PTH, and calcitriol concentrations that exceed what is expected for pregnancy (205-207). Pregnant patients may also present with nephrolithiasis or acute pancreatitis (207,208).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Treatment of hypercalcemia is difficult because the agents that could be used are not approved for pregnancy. Increased intestinal calcium absorption is the direct cause, and so use of increased hydration and a modestly restricted calcium diet, combined with phosphate supplementation to bind dietary calcium, are relatively safe management approaches. If PTH increases above normal, then dietary calcium restriction should be lessened to prevent maternal bone resorption and fetal secondary hyperparathyroidism. Other pharmacologic therapy should be reserved for the most severe cases and used with caution. This includes oral glucocorticoids to suppress intestinal calcium absorption, loop diuretics, calcitonin, and bisphosphonates; denosumab should not be used because of teratogenic effects observed in cynomolgus monkeys and mice (143,144). Cinacalcet will not be useful because PTH will already be suppressed due to the combined effects of pregnancy and hypercalcemia.

 

More targeted treatments include ketoconazole or other azoles to inhibit calcitriol synthesis (209), or rifampin to stimulate catabolism of calcitriol via the 23-hydroxylase pathway (209,210). These drugs have been used in pregnancy to treat other conditions, and so there are data to support their relative safety. However, no case reports have yet involved use of these drugs to treat 24-hydroxylase deficiency in pregnancy.

 

Low or High Calcium Intake

 

Through the doubling of intestinal calcium absorption during pregnancy, women have the ability to adapt to wide ranges of calcium intakes and still meet the fetal demand for calcium. It is conceivable that extremely low maternal calcium intakes could impair maternal calcium homeostasis and fetal mineral accretion, but there are scant clinical data examining this possibility (211). One prospective study found that a dietary calcium intake of less than 800 mg daily during the third trimester was associated with significantly lower aBMD at 5 years post-pregnancy (212). Among women with low dietary calcium intake, there are differing results as to whether or not calcium supplementation during pregnancy improved maternal or neonatal bone density (213). There is short term evidence that bone turnover markers were reduced when 1.2 gm of supplemental calcium was given for 20 days to 31 Mexican woman at 25-30 weeks of gestation; their mean dietary calcium intake was 1 gm (214). In a double-blind study conducted in 256 pregnant women, 2 gm of calcium supplementation improved bone mineral content only in the infants of supplemented mothers who were in the lowest quintile of calcium intake (215). Among cases of fragility fractures presenting during pregnancy, some women had very low calcium intakes (<300 mg per day), and in such cases substantial maternal skeletal resorption must be invoked in order to meet the fetal calcium requirement and maintain the maternal serum calcium concentration (79).

 

Overall the physiological changes in calcium and bone metabolism that usually occur during pregnancy and lactation are likely to be sufficient for fetal bone growth and breast-milk production in women with reasonably sufficient calcium intake (216). However, the use of calcium supplementation for pregnant women with low calcium intake can be defended by the links between low calcium intake and both preeclampsia and hypertension in the offspring (211). Clinical trials and meta-analyses have also demonstrated the supplemental calcium will reduce the risk of preeclampsia in women with low dietary calcium intakes, but not in those with adequate intake (217-220).

 

High calcium intake, similar to primary hyperparathyroidism, can cause increased intestinal calcium absorption, maternal hypercalcemia, increased transplacental flow of calcium, and suppression of the fetal parathyroids. Cases of neonatal hypoparathyroidism have been reported wherein women consumed 3 to 6 grams of elemental calcium daily as antacids or antinauseants (1).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Very low calcium intake must be avoided because it increases the risk of pre-eclampsia, maternal skeletal resorption, and inadequate mineralization of the fetal skeleton. Conversely, high calcium intake must be avoided because it increases the risk of maternal hypercalcemia and suppression of the fetal parathyroids. The Institute of Medicine advises that pregnant women require the same calcium intake as non-pregnant women, a value that ranges from 1,000 to 1,200 mg daily, depending on age (221).

 

Hypercalcemia of Malignancy

 

Hypercalcemia of malignancy is usually a terminal condition. When it has been diagnosed during pregnancy, in some cases the baby has been spared from chemotherapy, whereas in other cases the pregnancy was terminated (or ignored) so that chemotherapy could be administered in an attempt to prolong the woman’s life. Half of published case reports haven’t even mentioned the baby’s outcome. A baby born of a mother with humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy may have a high concentration of calcium in cord blood and is at high risk for fetal and neonatal hypoparathyroidism with hypocalcemic tetany.

 

FGF-23 Disorders

 

X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) is caused by inactivating mutations in the PHEX gene, which lead to high circulating levels of FGF23. In turn this causes hypophosphatemia with rickets or osteomalacia. Pregnancies were normal in a mouse model of XLH. In particular, despite very high circulating levels of FGF23, which normally downregulate calcitriol synthesis and increase its catabolism, maternal serum calcitriol increased to the high levels normally seen during pregnancy (19,222). This rise in calcitriol should contribute to increased intestinal calcium and phosphate absorption. Several case reports documented persistent hypophosphatemia during pregnancy in women with XLH, but no adverse outcomes (223,224). Nevertheless, it is generally recommended to supplement with calcitriol and phosphate to keep the serum phosphate near normal during pregnancy.

 

Hyperphosphatemic disorders due to loss of FGF23 action have not been studied during human pregnancy, and animal data are also lacking because these conditions are lethal before sexual maturity. Renal insufficiency or failure causes hyperphosphatemia, and both animal and human data indicate that such renal disorders increase the risks of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and maternal mortality. However, the extent to which hyperphosphatemia contributes to these risks is unknown.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

For XLH and other FGF-23 mediated disorders that lead to hypophosphatemia, the serum phosphate should be kept near normal with the use of phosphate supplements and calcitriol if needed. Burosumab is a new anti-FGF23 antibody that corrects hypophosphatemia in XLH and tumor-induced hypophosphatemia (oncogenic osteomalacia). It should not be used in pregnancy because preclinical studies have shown that it crosses the placenta and causes toxicity in cynomolgus monkeys (placental mineralization, late fetal loss, shortened gestation, and preterm births) (225).

 

For hyperphosphatemic disorders due to inadequate FGF23 action, there are no data to guide potential treatment guidelines. However, judicious use of phosphate binders may be of value, with avoidance of any that may be harmful to the fetus.

 

MINERAL PHYSIOLOGY DURING LACTATION AND POST-WEANING

 

As lactation begins the mother is faced with another demand for calcium in order to make milk. The average daily loss of calcium into breast milk is 210 mg, although daily losses as great as 1000 mg calcium have been reported is some women nursing twins (1). Although women meet the calcium demands of pregnancy by upregulating intestinal calcium absorption and serum concentrations of calcitriol, a different adaptation occurs during lactation. A temporary resorption and demineralization of the maternal skeleton appears to be the main mechanism by which breastfeeding women meet these calcium requirements. This adaptation does not appear to require PTH or calcitriol but is regulated by the combined effects of increased circulating concentrations of PTHrP and low estradiol levels. Characteristic changes in serum minerals are calciotropic hormones are depicted in Figure 3.

 

Figure 3. Schematic depiction of longitudinal changes in calcium, phosphorus, and calciotropic hormone levels during lactation and post-weaning skeletal recovery in women. Normal adult values are indicated by the shaded areas. PTH does not decline in women with low calcium or high phytate intakes and may even rise above normal. Calcidiol (25OHD) values are not depicted; most longitudinal studies indicate that the levels are unchanged by lactation but may vary due to seasonal variation in sunlight exposure and changes in vitamin D intake. PTHrP and prolactin surge with each suckling episode, and this is represented by upward spikes. FGF23 values cannot be plotted due to lack of data. Very limited data suggest that calcitriol and PTH may increase during post-weaning, and the lines are dashed to reflect the uncertainty. Reproduced with permission from (1).

 

Mineral Ions

 

The albumin-corrected serum calcium and ionized calcium are both normal during lactation, but longitudinal studies have shown that both are increased slightly over the non-pregnant values. Serum phosphate levels are also higher and may exceed the normal range. Since reabsorption of phosphate by the kidneys appears to be increased, the increased serum phosphate levels may, therefore, reflect the combined effects of increased flux of phosphate into the blood from diet and from skeletal resorption, in the setting of decreased renal phosphate excretion.

 

Parathyroid Hormone

 

PTH, as measured by 2-site “intact” or newer “bio-intact” assays, may be undetectable or in the lower quarter of the normal range during the first several months of lactation in women from North America and Europe who consume adequate calcium. PTH rises to normal by the time of weaning, and in two case series was found to rise above normal post-weaning. In contrast, and similar to findings during pregnancy, PTH did not suppress in several studies of women from Asia and Gambia who consumed diets that were low in calcium or high in phytate. The low PTH concentrations are an indication that PTH isn’t required for mineral homeostasis during lactation, and this is confirmed by hypoparathyroid and aparthyroid women in whom mineral and skeletal homeostasis normalize while they continue to breastfeed (see Hypoparathyroidism, below). The same is true of mice that lack the gene for parathyroid hormone. They are hypocalcemic and hyperphosphatemic when non-pregnant but maintain normal serum calcium and phosphate concentrations while lactating and for a time during post-weaning (17).

 

Vitamin D Metabolites

 

A common concern has been that the suckling neonate will deplete maternal 25OHD stores, but this is not the case. 25OHD should not decline because it does not enter breast milk; conversely, although vitamin D can enter milk, it is present at very low concentrations because appreciable amounts exist in the maternal circulation for only a short postprandial interval. In observational studies and in the placebo arms of several clinical trials, there was either no change or at most a nonsignificant decline in maternal 25OHD levels during lactation, even in severely vitamin D deficient women (4). Calcitriol levels were twice normal during pregnancy but both free and bound calcitriol levels fall to normal within days of parturition and remain there in breastfeeding women (a single study found that women breastfeeding twins had higher calcitriol concentrations than women nursing singletons) (226). Animal studies show that severely vitamin D deficient rodents and mice lacking the vitamin D receptor are able to lactate and provide normal milk (4,47), thereby indicating that vitamin D and calcitriol are not required for lactation to proceed normally (at least in rodents). However, a more recent study found that mice lacking calcitriol produced milk with a lower calcium content (23).

 

Calcitonin

 

Calcitonin levels fall to normal during the first six weeks postpartum in women. Mice lacking the gene that encodes calcitonin lose twice the normal amount of bone mineral content during lactation, which indicates that physiological levels of calcitonin may protect the maternal skeleton from excessive resorption during this time period (26). Whether calcitonin plays a similar role in human physiology is unknown. Totally thyroidectomized women are not calcitonin deficient during lactation due to substantial production of calcitonin by the breasts, which in turn leads to systemic calcitonin concentrations that are the same as in women with intact thyroids (25). Consequently, study of totally thyroidectomized women is not the equivalent of studying a calcitonin-null state when they are breastfeeding.

 

PTHrP

 

Plasma PTHrP concentrations are significantly higher in lactating women than in non-pregnant controls. The source of PTHrP appears to be the breast, which secretes PTHrP into breast milk at concentrations that are 1,000 to 10,000 times the level found in the blood of patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy or in normal human controls. The circulating PTHrP concentration also increases after suckling (227,228). Additional evidence that the breasts are the source of PTHrP include that ablation of the PTHrP gene selectively from mammary tissue resulted in reduced circulating levels of PTHrP in lactating mice (229). PTHrP also has an intimate association with breast tissue: in animals it has been shown to regulate mammary development and blood flow, and the calcium and water content of milk in rodents, whereas in humans it is commonly expressed by breast cancers.

 

Furthermore, as described in more detail below, during lactation PTHrP reaches the maternal circulation from the lactating breast to cause resorption of calcium from the maternal skeleton, renal tubular reabsorption of calcium, and (indirectly) suppression of PTH. In support of this hypothesis, deletion of the PTHrP gene from mammary tissue at the onset of lactation resulted in more modest losses of bone mineral content during lactation in mice (229). In humans, PTHrP correlates with the amount of bone mineral density lost, negatively with serum PTH, and positively with the ionized calcium of lactating women (227,230,231). Lastly, clinical observations in hypoparathyroid and aparathyroid women demonstrate the physiological importance of PTHrP to regulate calcium and skeletal homeostasis during lactation (see Hypoparathyroidism, below).

 

Prolactin

 

Prolactin is persistently elevated during early lactation and spikes further upward with suckling. Later during lactation basal prolactin levels are normal but continue to spike with suckling. Prolactin is important for initiating and maintaining milk production (232), but it also alters bone metabolism by stimulating PTHrP production in lactating mammary tissue, inhibiting GnRH and ovarian function, and possibly (as noted earlier) through direct actions in osteoblasts that express the prolactin receptor.

 

Oxytocin

 

Oxytocin induces milk ejection by contracting myoepithelial cells within mammary tissue. If milk is not ejected, the pressure of milk stasis causes apoptosis of mammary cells, and lactation ceases. Oxytocin spikes in the maternal circulation within 10 minutes after the start of suckling (233). As noted earlier, the oxytocin receptor is expressed in osteoblasts and osteoclasts. But whether oxytocin plays a role in bone metabolism during lactation has proven difficult to determine because oxytocin null mice cannot lactate due to the lack of milk ejection (234).

 

Estradiol

 

In lactating women, estradiol levels fall to menopausal levels or below. This stimulates RANKL and inhibits osteoprotegerin production by osteoblasts, thereby stimulating osteoclast proliferation, function, and bone resorption. Studies in mice have shown that increasing the serum estradiol concentration to 7 times the virgin level blunts the magnitude of bone loss during lactation (235), which confirms that estradiol deficiency plays a role in the skeletal resorption that occurs during lactation.

 

FGF23

 

A single longitudinal study found that intact FGF23 approximately doubled between late pregnancy and weeks 14 and 26 of lactation (34). An increase in FGF23 may occur in response to the increased bone resorption during lactation, which leads to a higher serum phosphorus (1).

 

Other Hormones

 

Serotonin appears to be involved in regulating PTHrP and its effect to resorb the maternal skeleton (236,237). Lactation induces changes in myriad other hormones, such as luteinizing and follicle stimulating hormone, progesterone, testosterone, inhibins, and activins. Whether these play roles in regulating skeletal metabolism during lactation has not been investigated.

 

Intestinal Absorption of Calcium and Phosphate

 

Although intestinal calcium absorption was upregulated during pregnancy, it quickly decreases post-partum to the non-pregnant rate. This also corresponds to the fall in calcitriol levels to normal. This differs from rodents which maintain increased intestinal calcium absorption during lactation; their large litters sizes mandate the need to provide some of the calcium for milk production through this route.

 

Intestinal phosphate absorption has not been measured during human lactation, whereas in rodents it remains increased (1).

 

Renal Handling of Calcium and Phosphate

 

Renal excretion of calcium is typically reduced to about 50 mg per 24 hours or lower, and the glomerular filtration rate is also decreased. These findings suggest that the tubular reabsorption of calcium must be increased to conserve calcium, perhaps through the actions of PTHrP.

 

Renal tubular phosphate reabsorption is increased during lactation. Despite this, urine phosphate excretion may be increased, likely due to the large efflux of phosphate from resorbed bone, which exceeds what is needed for milk production.

 

Skeletal Calcium Metabolism and Bone Density/Bone Marker Changes

 

Histomorphometric data from lactating animals have consistently shown increased bone turnover, and losses of 35% or more of bone mineral are achieved during 2-3 weeks of normal lactation in rodents [reviewed in (1)]. There are no histomorphometric data from lactating women; instead, biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption have been assessed in numerous cross-sectional and prospective studies. Confounding factors discussed earlier for pregnancy need to be considered when assessing bone turnover markers in lactating women; in particular, opposing changes from pregnancy include that the glomerular filtration rate is reduced and the intravascular volume is now contracted. Serum and urinary (24-hr collection) markers of bone resorption are elevated 2-3-fold during lactation and are higher than the levels attained in the third trimester. Serum markers of bone formation (not adjusted for hemoconcentration or reduced GFR) are generally high during lactation and increased over the levels attained during the third trimester. The most marked increase is in the bone resorption markers, suggesting that bone turnover becomes negatively uncoupled, with bone resorption markedly exceeding bone formation, and thereby causing net bone loss. Total alkaline phosphatase falls immediately postpartum due to loss of the placental fraction but may still remain above normal due to elevation of the bone-specific fraction. Overall, these bone marker results are compatible with a significantly increased bone resorption occurring during lactation.

 

Serial measurements of aBMD during lactation (by SPA, DPA or DXA) have shown that bone mineral content falls 3 to 10.0% in women after two to six months of lactation at trabecular sites (lumbar spine, hip, femur and distal radius), with smaller losses at cortical sites and whole body (1,60). These aBMD changes are in accord with studies in rats, mice, and primates in which the skeletal resorption has been shown to occur largely at trabecular surfaces and to a lesser degree in cortical bone, and as much as 25-30% of bone mass or aBMD is lost during three weeks of lactation in normal rodents. The loss in women occurs at a peak rate of 1-3% per month, far exceeding the 1-3% per year that can occur in postmenopausal women who are considered to be losing bone rapidly. This bone resorption is an obligate consequence of lactation and cannot be prevented by increasing the calcium intake in women. Several randomized trials and other studies have shown that calcium supplementation does not significantly reduce the amount of bone lost during lactation (238-241). Not surprisingly, the lactational decrease in bone mineral density correlates with the amount of calcium lost in the breast milk (242).

 

The skeletal losses are due in part to the low estradiol levels during lactation which stimulate osteoclast number and activity. However, low estradiol is not the sole cause of the accelerated bone resorption or other changes in calcium homeostasis that occur during lactation. It is worth noting what happens to reproductive-age women who have marked estrogen deficiency induced by GnRH agonist therapy in order to treat endometriosis, fibroids, or severe acne. Six months of GnRH-induced estrogen deficiency caused 1-4% losses in trabecular (but not cortical) aBMD, increased urinary calcium excretion, and suppression of calcitriol and PTH (Figure 4) [reviewed in (1,8)]. In contrast, during lactation women are not as estrogen deficient but lose more aBMD (at both trabecular and cortical sites), have normal (as opposed to low) calcitriol levels, and have reduced (as opposed to increased) urinary calcium excretion (Figure 4). The difference between isolated GnRH-induced estrogen deficiency and lactation appears to be explained by PTHrP. It stimulates osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and stimulates renal calcium reabsorption; by so doing, it complements the effects of low estradiol during lactation. Stimulated in part by suckling and high prolactin levels, PTHrP and estrogen deficiency combine to cause marked skeletal resorption during lactation (Figure 5).

 

Figure 4. Comparison of the effects of acute estrogen deficiency vs. lactation on calcium and bone metabolism. Acute estrogen deficiency (e.g. GnRH analog therapy) increases skeletal resorption and raises the blood calcium; in turn, PTH is suppressed and renal calcium losses are increased. During lactation, the combined effects of PTHrP (secreted by the breast) and estrogen deficiency increase skeletal resorption, reduce renal calcium losses, and raise the blood calcium, but calcium is directed into breast milk. Reprinted from ref. (8), © 1997, The Endocrine Society.

Figure 5. Brain-Breast-Bone Circuit. The breast is a central regulator of skeletal demineralization during lactation. Suckling and prolactin both inhibit the hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse center, which in turn suppresses the gonadotropins (luteinizing hormone [LH] and follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]), leading to low levels of the ovarian sex steroids (estradiol and progesterone). PTHrP production and release from the breast is controlled by several factors, including suckling, prolactin, and the calcium receptor. PTHrP enters the bloodstream and combines with systemically low estradiol levels to markedly upregulate bone resorption. Increased bone resorption releases calcium and phosphate into the blood stream, which then reaches the breast ducts and is actively pumped into the breast milk. PTHrP also passes into milk at high concentrations, but whether swallowed PTHrP plays a role in regulating calcium physiology of the neonate is unknown. Calcitonin (CT) may inhibit skeletal responsiveness to PTHrP and low estradiol. Not depicted are that direct effects of oxytocin and prolactin on bone cells are also possible. Adapted from ref. (26) © 2006, The Endocrine Society.

 

The mechanism through which the skeleton is resorbed has been shown in rodents to involve two processes, both osteoclast-mediated bone resorption (1) and osteocytic osteolysis, in which osteocytes function like osteoclasts to resorb the bone matrix that surrounds them (243). Both of these processes are dependent upon PTHrP. Conditional deletion of the PTHrP gene from mammary tissue reduced the amount of bone resorbed during lactation, whereas conditional deletion of the PTH/PTHrP receptor from osteocytes appeared to eliminate osteocytic osteolysis (244). Moreover, osteocyte-specific deletion of the PTH/PTHrP receptor resulted in a 50% blunting of the amount of aBMD lost during lactation (244), which may indicate that osteocytic osteolysis and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption each contribute about half of the net bone loss achieved during lactation. To date no studies have examined whether osteocytic osteolysis occurs in lactating women.

 

The lactational bone density losses in women are substantially and completely reversed during six to twelve months following weaning (1,60,239). This corresponds to a gain in bone density of 0.5 to 2% per month in a woman who has weaned her infant. The mechanism for this restoration of bone density is unknown, but studies in mice have shown that it is not dependent upon calcitriol, calcitonin, PTH, or PTHrP (17,23,26,47,245,246); nor is it fully explained by restoration of estradiol levels to normal (1). The remarkable ability of the skeleton to recover is exemplified by mice lacking the gene that encodes calcitonin. They lose up to 55% of trabecular mineral content from the spine during lactation but completely restore it within 18 days after weaning (26).

 

Although aBMD appears to be completely restored after weaning in women and all animals that have been studied, more detailed examination of microarchitecture by µCT has shown variable completeness of recovery of microarchitecture by skeletal site. In rodents, the vertebrae recover completely while persistent loss of trabeculae is evident in the long bones (247). Studies in women have similarly shown that the trabecular content of the long bones also appears to be incompletely restored (1,60,239,248,249). However, in both women (77,249,250) and rodents (26,251,252) the cross-sectional diameters and volumes of the long bones may be significantly increased after post-weaning. Such structural changes potentially compensate for any reduction in strength that loss of trabecular microarchitecture might induce, because an increased cross-sectional diameter increases the ability of a hollow shaft to resist bending (cross-sectional moment of inertia) and torsional stress (polar moment of inertia). This is supported by the finding that the breaking strength of rodent bones returns to pre-pregnant values after weaning (1,245), and limited clinical studies that correlated the increased bone volumes achieved after reproductive cycles with increased bone strength (77,250). In women, the vast majority of several dozen epidemiologic studies of pre- and postmenopausal women have found no adverse effect of a history of lactation on peak bone mass, bone density, or hip fracture risk (1,7,57,60). In fact, multiple studies have suggested a protective effect of lactation on the future risk of low aBMD or fragility fractures. Consequently, although lactational bone loss can transiently increase risk of fracture (see next section), it is likely unimportant in the long run for most women, in whom the skeleton is restored to its prior mineral content and strength.

 

DISORDERS OF CALCIUM AND BONE METABOLISM DURING LACTATION

 

Osteoporosis of Lactation

 

On occasion a woman will suffer one or more fragility fractures during lactation, and osteoporotic bone density will be found by DXA (79). As with osteoporosis presenting during pregnancy, this may represent a coincidental, unrelated disease; the woman may have had low bone density and abnormal skeletal microarchitecture prior to pregnancy, such that the normal bone loss incurred by lactation could not be tolerated. Alternatively, it is likely that some cases represent an exacerbation of the normal degree of skeletal demineralization that occurs during lactation, and a continuum from the changes in bone density and bone turnover that occurred during pregnancy. For example, the skeleton may have been normal pre-pregnancy, lost mineral content during pregnancy due to low calcium intake, and experienced the expected further loss during lactation (79). It may be somewhat artificial, therefore, to separate “osteoporosis of lactation” from “osteoporosis of pregnancy.” But since lactation normally causes a significant net loss of bone whereas pregnancy does not, it seems more likely for lactation to cause a subset of women to develop low-trauma fractures. For example, excessive PTHrP release from the lactating breast into the maternal circulation could conceivably cause excessive bone resorption, osteoporosis, and fractures. PTHrP levels were high in one case of lactational osteoporosis, and remained elevated for months after weaning (253).

 

The literature can be confusing because “pregnancy-associated osteoporosis” is the term often used for bone loss and fractures that present during or after pregnancy, despite such fractures being more likely to have resulted from the bone loss during lactation. In fact, multiple case series have demonstrated that about 80-90% of the fragility fractures associated with reproductive cycles occur during lactation, with the remaining 10-20% occurring either during pregnancy or in the puerperium for women who do not breastfeed. Therefore, the term “pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis” (PLO) is a more suitable one to use.

 

The earlier, longer discussion about osteoporosis of pregnancy should be reviewed for more details since everything in that section applies to osteoporosis presenting during lactation. The skeleton may be normal or abnormal prior to pregnancy, bone loss may have occurred during pregnancy, and bone loss will certainly occur during lactation. The magnitude of bone loss during lactation correlates with the volume of breast milk produced, which in turn correlates with the duration of near-exclusive or exclusive breast feeding (i.e., that most or all of the baby’s nutrition comes from breast milk).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

The diagnostic and treatment considerations described earlier for osteoporosis of pregnancy also apply to women who are lactating (79). Case series have revealed that a spontaneous 20-70% increase in bone density occurs in women who fractured while breastfeeding (1,79,80,85,86,104-112). Therefore, pharmacological therapy may be best avoided for 12 to 18 months to determine the extent of spontaneous recovery, and then decide if additional treatment is necessary (79,86). The extent of spontaneous recovery of lumbar spine aBMD at 12–18 months should be assessed by DXA. As noted in the pregnancy section, HR-pQCT will underestimate the extent of recovery at this early stage unless the parameters are adjusted to detect under-mineralized bone and osteoid.

 

The mechanism through which post-weaning recovery occurs is not established, but a theoretical concern is that anti-remodeling agents such as bisphosphonates or denosumab might blunt spontaneous recovery since they suppress bone formation. Furthermore, none of the available pharmacotherapies are indicated for use in premenopausal women, and especially not in women who continue to breastfeed. As noted in the earlier section on osteoporosis associated with pregnancy, individual case reports and series have described marked increases in bone mass in association with pharmacotherapy use after lactation, but in each of these cases the magnitude of increases were in keeping with that achieved through spontaneous recovery (86). A few reports compared to women treated with vitamin D and calcium alone, and there was no difference in the final aBMD achieved with pharmacotherapy (usually teriparatide or bisphosphonates) vs. spontaneous recovery (83,109,119,120). One large case series of 107 women found that subsequent fractures were twice as likely to occur in women who had received pharmacotherapy, which suggests that pharmacotherapy may lead to weaker bone (109). Consequently, it is unclear whether early use of pharmacotherapy after lactation-induced bone loss achieved any added benefit.

 

Primary Hyperparathyroidism

 

When surgical correction of primary hyperparathyroidism is not possible or advisable during pregnancy, it is normally carried out in the postpartum interval. A hypercalcemic crisis is possible soon after delivery due in part to loss of the placental calcium infusion, which represented a drain on the serum calcium. If a woman with untreated primary hyperparathyroidism chooses to breastfeed, the serum calcium should be monitored closely for significant worsening due to the effects of secretion of PTHrP from the breasts being added to the high concentrations of PTH already in the circulation. The potential impact of this is even more evident in women with hypoparathyroidism, as discussed below.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

The albumin-corrected serum calcium may subside after pregnancy due to intestinal calcium absorption returning to normal after the pregnancy-induced increase. Consequently, there may be no urgency for parathyroidectomy to be done unless a parathyroid crisis occurs. If future pregnancies are planned, then it will be prudent for a neck exploration to be done to correct the condition in advance of another pregnancy. Breastfeeding may require that surgery and required localization procedures be delayed.

 

Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia

 

The calcium-sensing receptor is expressed in mammary epithelial ducts, and it modulates the production of PTHrP and calcium transport into milk during lactation in mice (254,255). Inactivating calcium-sensing receptor mutations increased mammary tissue production of PTHrP but decreased the calcium content of milk (255). These opposing changes meant that there was a further increase in bone resorption during lactation as compared to normal mice, and the serum calcium also became higher because of reduced output of calcium into milk. Conversely, a calcimimetic drug (similar to cinacalcet) caused increased milk calcium content (255). These data predict that women with FHH will have more marked skeletal resorption during lactation, lower milk calcium content, higher serum calcium, and a greater loss of aBMD during lactation as compared to normal women. However, the effect of breastfeeding on mineral and skeletal homeostasis in women with FHH has not yet been described.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Women with FHH can be expected to breastfeed normally and do not require any treatment. It would be of interest for observational studies to be done to clarify if they experience excess bone loss and produce milk with lower calcium content, as compared to women without FHH.

 

Hypoparathyroidism

 

As noted earlier, in the first day or two after parturition the requirement for supplemental calcium and calcitriol may transiently increase in hypoparathyroid women before secretion of PTHrP surges in the breast tissue (159). The onset of lactation induces an important change in skeletal metabolism because the breasts produce PTHrP at high levels, some of which escapes into the maternal circulation to stimulate bone resorption and raise the serum calcium level. In women who lack parathyroid glands, the release of PTHrP into the circulation during lactation can temporarily restore calcium and bone homeostasis to normal. Levels of calcitriol and calcium supplementation required for treatment of hypoparathyroid women fall early and markedly after the onset of lactation, and hypercalcemia can occur if the calcitriol dosage and calcium intake are not substantially reduced (256-259). This decreased need for calcium and calcitriol occurs at a time when circulating PTHrP levels are high in the maternal circulation (256,259,260). As illustrated in one case, this is consistent with PTHrP reaching the maternal circulation in amounts sufficient to allow stimulation of calcitriol synthesis, and maintenance of normal (or slightly increased) maternal serum calcium (260).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Management of hypoparathyroidism during lactation requires monitoring the albumin-corrected calcium or ionized calcium, reducing or stopping the calcitriol and calcium as indicated, and planning to reinstitute both supplements in escalating doses as lactation wanes. However, production of PTHrP doesn’t necessarily promptly cease around the time of weaning. The author is aware of a woman with hypoparathyroidism who required no supplemental calcium or calcitriol at all for about a year after her baby had been weaned. She thought that her hypoparathyroidism had been permanently cured by breastfeeding, until the abrupt recurrence of symptomatic hypocalcemia, and the need for pre-pregnancy doses of calcium and calcitriol, signaled the end of PTHrP production by her breasts. In another woman, lactation appeared to permanently cure her hypoparathyroidism (261), likely because of persistent production of PTHrP by her breasts.

 

Pseudohypoparathyroidism

 

The management of pseudohypoparathyroidism during lactation has been less well documented. Since these patients are likely resistant to the renal actions of PTHrP, and the placental sources of calcitriol are lost at parturition, the calcitriol requirements might well increase and may require further adjustments during lactation. Conversely, these patients do not have skeletal resistance to PTH, and so it is possible that calcium and calcitriol requirements may decrease secondary to enhanced skeletal resorption caused by the combined effects of high PTH levels, PTHrP release from the breast, and lactation-induced estrogen deficiency. Thus, women with pseudohypoparathyroidism might lose more bone density than normal during lactation, but this has not been studied.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

In the absence of data, it would be best to monitor the albumin-corrected serum calcium to determine if any adjustments are needed in the doses of oral calcium and calcitriol.

 

Pseudohyperparathyroidism

 

Severe, PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia during lactation was first noted to occur in women with large breasts, but it has also developed in women with average-sized breasts in whom milk let-down took place but the baby’s illness prevented breastfeeding (176). This represents an exaggeration of normal lactational physiology, which benefits hypoparathyroid women, but in some normal women can overwhelm the normal regulatory pathways and cause potentially severe hypercalcemia.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Cessation of lactation should reverse the condition, aided by use of breast-binders, and bromocriptine or cabergoline to suppress prolactin. However, a reduction mammoplasty or mastectomy has proved necessary for recalcitrant hypercalcemia in some cases.

 

Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency, and Genetic Vitamin D Disorders

 

The mother andata from small clinical trials, observational studies and case reports indicate that lactation proceeds normally regardless of vitamin D status, and breast milk calcium content is unaffected by vitamin D deficiency or supplementation in doses as high as 6,400 IU per day given to the mother, which achieved maternal 25OHD blood levels of 168 nmol/L (topic reviewed in detail in (1,4,5,7,179)). This is likely because maternal calcium homeostasis is dominated by skeletal resorption induced by estrogen deficiency and PTHrP, with vitamin D/calcitriol playing no substantial role in lactational mineral homeostasis. It is the neonate who will suffer the consequences of being born of a vitamin D deficient mother. This is especially true if the infant is exclusively breast fed, since both vitamin D and 25-hyroxyvitamin D are normally present at very low concentrations in breast milk.

 

The high-dose (6,400 IU) vitamin D supplementation strategy raises the maternal vitamin D concentration substantially for hours and, in turn, this increases the penetration of vitamin D into milk. Consequently, breastfed babies whose mothers consumed 6,400 IU per day achieved the same 25OHD level as babies who received a 300 IU dose of vitamin D directly (262). The potential advantage of this approach is that all of the neonate’s nutrition can then come from breast milk, rather than requiring that breastfed babies receive a vitamin D supplement. Further study is needed regarding the safety of this approach for the mothers and their babies. A Cochrane review also concluded there is no established benefit from high-dose supplementation of breastfeeding women, as compared to the normal route of giving a lower dose of vitamin D directly to a breastfed baby (263).

 

A misconception about vitamin D and milk often arises because marketed forms of cow’s and goat’s milk contain approximately 100 IU of vitamin D per standard serving, but that is a synthetic vitamin D supplement which is added to the milk after the pasteurization stage. It is not put there by the cow or goat.

 

Given that vitamin D deficiency does not affect breast milk content in humans, it is likely that genetic absence of VDR or calcitriol also does not affect milk calcium, but this has not been studied.

 

Whether vitamin D deficiency impairs the ability of the maternal skeleton to recover post-weaning has not been examined in any clinical study. However, studies in mice lacking the vitamin D receptor or Cyp27b1 to synthesize calcitriol, indicate that these mice are able to fully remineralize their skeletons after lactation (23,47).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Breastfeeding women have the same vitamin D intake requirements as non-pregnant and pregnant women (221). Therefore, no change in dose of any oral supplements is needed. Penetrance of vitamin D into breast milk is poor, and so breastfed babies need oral vitamin D supplementation to prevent vitamin D deficiency, until such time as vitamin D-supplemented infant nutrition is taken.

 

24-Hydroxylase Deficiency

 

Hereditary absence of Cyp24a1 reduces calcitriol catabolism, which can lead to very high calcitriol concentrations and marked maternal hypercalcemia during pregnancy. But calcitriol production falls to non-pregnant levels during normal lactation, and the same should be true in women with 24-hydroxylase deficiency. Consistent with this, in one affected woman who breastfed, calcitriol was normal and hypercalcemia was milder compared to pregnancy (205).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

Breastfeeding appears unlikely to require any intervention in women with 24-hydroxylase deficiency.

 

Low and High Calcium Intakes

 

The calcium content of milk appears to be largely derived from skeletal resorption during lactation, a process that cannot be suppressed in women by consuming greater amounts of calcium (however, it can be suppressed in rodents by high calcium intakes). It shouldn’t be surprising, therefore, that low calcium intake does not impair breast milk quality, nor does it accentuate maternal bone loss (216). Even in women with very low calcium intakes, the same amount of mineral was lost during lactation from the skeleton as compared to women who had supplemented calcium intakes, and the breast milk calcium content was unaffected by calcium intake or vitamin D status (264-266).  Conversely, since randomized trials and cohort studies have shown that high calcium intakes do not affect the degree of skeletal demineralization that occurs during lactation (238-241), it is unlikely that increasing calcium supplementation well above normal would affect skeletal demineralization either.

 

There is a lingering concern that adolescent mothers with low calcium intakes may not achieve normal peak bone mass as a consequence of lactation-induced bone loss. In fact the adolescent skeleton appears to recover fully from lactation (267), and adolescent women who breastfed have higher aBMD than those who did not breastfeed or had not been pregnant as adolescents (268). However, it remains reasonable to give a calcium supplement to adolescents who lactate in order to ensure that the needs of adolescent growth are met and that peak bone mass is achieved (216,267).

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

A normal calcium intake of 1,000-1,200 mg daily, as suggested by the Institute of Medicine (221), is recommended for breastfeeding women. Low and high calcium intake should be avoided. It is well established that breastfeeding women do not require increased calcium intake.

 

FGF23 Disorders

 

There is very limited information available about the effect of FGF23-related disorders on mineral homeostasis during lactation, and milk production. Lactation normally causes the serum phosphorus to rise due to the increased release of phosphate from the resorbing skeleton. Indeed in one case report, serum phosphorus increased into the normal range in a breastfeeding woman with XLH (223).  Curiously, the phosphate content of expressed milk was reduced to 50% of normal in two cases of XLH (223,224), which differs from findings in animal models of XLH in which milk phosphate content was normal (269).  Use of oral phosphate supplementation normalized the milk phosphate content in one case where this intervention was studied (223).

 

Milk phosphate content has not been studied in disorders in which FGF23 activity is reduced; however, given the findings with XLH, it is conceivable that milk phosphate content will be increased.

 

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

 

The mineral content of milk is not normally analyzed. Given the limited findings from two cases of XLH, it may be prudent to recommend that oral phosphate supplementation be maintained while breastfeeding, even if the serum phosphorus has spontaneously normalized. If the baby develops hypophosphatemia, this may indicate inadequate milk phosphate content or that the baby inherited XLH. Use of burosumab has not been described in breastfeeding women, but this large protein should have low penetrance into milk and is likely to be destroyed in the infant’s gastrointestinal tract (270).

 

IMPLICATIONS

 

During pregnancy and lactation, novel regulatory systems specific to these settings complement the usual regulators of mineral homeostasis. Intestinal calcium absorption more than doubles from early in pregnancy in order to meet the fetal demand for calcium. In comparison, skeletal calcium resorption is a dominant mechanism by which calcium is supplied to the breast milk, while renal calcium conservation is also apparent. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy will result in a woman absorbing more calcium, but it is clear from clinical trials and observational studies that calcium supplements have little or no impact on the amount of bone lost during lactation.

 

The skeleton appears to recover promptly from lactation to achieve the pre-pregnancy bone mass through mechanisms that remain unclear. The transient loss of bone mass during lactation can at least temporarily compromise skeletal strength and rarely lead to fragility fractures. Furthermore, full recovery of mineral content and bone strength may not always be achieved after weaning. But the majority of women can be assured that the changes in calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy and lactation are normal, healthy, temporary, and without adverse consequences in the long-term.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Kovacs CS. Maternal Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Post-Weaning Recovery. Physiol Rev 2016; 96:449-547
  2. Wysolmerski JJ. Conversations between breast and bone: physiological bone loss during lactation as evolutionary template for osteolysis in breast cancer and pathological bone loss after menopause. BoneKEy 2007; 4:209-225
  3. Kovacs CS. Calcium and bone metabolism disorders during pregnancy and lactation. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2011; 40:795-826
  4. Kovacs CS. The role of vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: insights from animal models and clinical studies. Annu Rev Nutr 2012; 32:97-123
  5. Kovacs CS. Bone development and mineral homeostasis in the fetus and neonate: roles of the calciotropic and phosphotropic hormones. Physiol Rev 2014; 94:1143-1218
  6. Kovacs CS. Physiology of Calcium, Phosphorus, and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Postweaning. In: Kovacs CS, Deal CL, eds. Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2020:61-73.
  7. Kovacs CS, Chakhtoura M, El-Hajj Fuleihan G. Disorders of Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy and Lactation. In: Kovacs CS, Deal CL, eds. Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2020:329-370.
  8. Kovacs CS, Kronenberg HM. Maternal-fetal calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy, puerperium, and lactation. Endocr Rev 1997; 18:832-872
  9. Haddad JG, Jr., Boisseau V, Avioli LV. Placental transfer of vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in the rat. J Lab Clin Med 1971; 77:908-915
  10. Hillman LS, Slatopolsky E, Haddad JG. Perinatal vitamin D metabolism. IV. Maternal and cord serum 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1978; 47:1073-1077
  11. Ardawi MS, Nasrat HA, HS BAA. Calcium-regulating hormones and parathyroid hormone-related peptide in normal human pregnancy and postpartum: a longitudinal study. Eur J Endocrinol 1997; 137:402-409
  12. Bikle DD, Gee E, Halloran B, Haddad JG. Free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels in serum from normal subjects, pregnant subjects, and subjects with liver disease. J Clin Invest 1984; 74:1966-1971
  13. Zhang JY, Lucey AJ, Horgan R, Kenny LC, Kiely M. Impact of pregnancy on vitamin D status: a longitudinal study. Br J Nutr 2014; 112:1081-1087
  14. Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26:2341-2357
  15. Markestad T, Ulstein M, Aksnes L, Aarskog D. Serum concentrations of vitamin D metabolites in vitamin D supplemented pregnant women. A longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65:63-67
  16. Ritchie LD, Fung EB, Halloran BP, Turnlund JR, Van Loan MD, Cann CE, King JC. A longitudinal study of calcium homeostasis during human pregnancy and lactation and after resumption of menses. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67:693-701
  17. Kirby BJ, Ma Y, Martin HM, Buckle Favaro KL, Karaplis AC, Kovacs CS. Upregulation of calcitriol during pregnancy and skeletal recovery after lactation do not require parathyroid hormone. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28:1987-2000
  18. Cooke-Hubley S, Kirby BJ, Suppiah S, Simmonds CS, Karaplis AC, Kovacs CS. Circulating FGF23 is regulated by PTH and calcitriol during fetal development but low FGF23 does not significantly alter fetal phosphorus metabolism. IBMS BoneKEy 2013; 10:S95
  19. Ma Y, Samaraweera M, Cooke-Hubley S, Kirby BJ, Karaplis AC, Lanske B, Kovacs CS. Neither absence nor excess of FGF23 disturbs murine fetal-placental phosphorus homeostasis or prenatal skeletal development and mineralization. Endocrinology 2014; 155:1596-1605
  20. Fenton E, Britton HG. 25-hydroxycholecalciferol 1 alpha-hydroxylase activity in the kidney of the fetal, neonatal and adult guinea pig. Biol Neonate 1980; 37:254-256
  21. Kubota M, Ohno J, Shiina Y, Suda T. Vitamin D metabolism in pregnant rabbits: differences between the maternal and fetal response to administration of large amounts of vitamin D3. Endocrinology 1982; 110:1950-1956
  22. Turner M, Barre PE, Benjamin A, Goltzman D, Gascon-Barre M. Does the maternal kidney contribute to the increased circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations during pregnancy? Miner Electrolyte Metab 1988; 14:246-252
  23. Gillies BR, Ryan BA, Tonkin BA, Poulton IJ, Ma Y, Kirby BJ, St-Arnaud R, Sims NA, Kovacs CS. Absence of Calcitriol Causes Increased Lactational Bone Loss and Lower Milk Calcium but Does Not Impair Post-lactation Bone Recovery in Cyp27b1 Null Mice. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:16-26
  24. Ryan BA, Alhani K, Sellars KB, Kirby BJ, St-Arnaud R, Kaufmann M, Jones G, Kovacs CS. Mineral Homeostasis in Murine Fetuses Is Sensitive to Maternal Calcitriol but Not to Absence of Fetal Calcitriol. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34:669-680
  25. Bucht E, Telenius-Berg M, Lundell G, Sjoberg HE. Immunoextracted calcitonin in milk and plasma from totally thyroidectomized women. Evidence of monomeric calcitonin in plasma during pregnancy and lactation. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1986; 113:529-535
  26. Woodrow JP, Sharpe CJ, Fudge NJ, Hoff AO, Gagel RF, Kovacs CS. Calcitonin plays a critical role in regulating skeletal mineral metabolism during lactation. Endocrinology 2006; 147:4010-4021
  27. Woodrow JP. Calcitonin modulates skeletal mineral loss during lactation through interactions in mammary tissue and directly though osteoclasts in bone [PhD thesis] [PhD]. St. John's, Newfoundland: Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland; 2009.
  28. Hutchesson AC, Hughes SV, Bowden SJ, Ratcliffe WA. In vitro stability of endogenous parathyroid hormone-related protein in blood and plasma. Ann Clin Biochem 1994; 31 ( Pt 1):35-39
  29. Horwitz MJ, Tedesco MB, Sereika SM, Hollis BW, Garcia-Ocana A, Stewart AF. Direct comparison of sustained infusion of human parathyroid hormone-related protein-(1-36). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:1603-1609
  30. Horwitz MJ, Tedesco MB, Sereika SM, Syed MA, Garcia-Ocana A, Bisello A, Hollis BW, Rosen CJ, Wysolmerski JJ, Dann P, Gundberg C, Stewart AF. Continuous PTH and PTHrP infusion causes suppression of bone formation and discordant effects on 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20:1792-1803
  31. Cornish J, Callon KE, Nicholson GC, Reid IR. Parathyroid hormone-related protein-(107-139) inhibits bone resorption in vivo. Endocrinology 1997; 138:1299-1304
  32. Kovacs CS, Lanske B, Hunzelman JL, Guo J, Karaplis AC, Kronenberg HM. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) regulates fetal-placental calcium transport through a receptor distinct from the PTH/PTHrP receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:15233-15238
  33. Zhao S, Zhou J, Chen R, Zhou W, Geng H, Huang Y, Shi S, Yuan L, Wang Z, Wang D. Decreased FGF23 inhibits placental angiogenesis via the ERK1/2-EGR-1 signaling pathway in preeclampsia. Cytokine 2024; 176:156508
  34. Nabwire F, Hamill MM, Fowler MG, Byamugisha J, Kekitiinwa A, Prentice A. Biochemical Markers of Calcium and Bone Metabolism during and after Lactation in Ugandan Women with HIV on Universal Maternal Antiretroviral Therapy. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38:1296-1311
  35. Ohata Y, Arahori H, Namba N, Kitaoka T, Hirai H, Wada K, Nakayama M, Michigami T, Imura A, Nabeshima Y, Yamazaki Y, Ozono K. Circulating levels of soluble alpha-Klotho are markedly elevated in human umbilical cord blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:E943-947
  36. Clement-Lacroix P, Ormandy C, Lepescheux L, Ammann P, Damotte D, Goffin V, Bouchard B, Amling M, Gaillard-Kelly M, Binart N, Baron R, Kelly PA. Osteoblasts are a new target for prolactin: analysis of bone formation in prolactin receptor knockout mice. Endocrinology 1999; 140:96-105
  37. Suntornsaratoon P, Wongdee K, Goswami S, Krishnamra N, Charoenphandhu N. Bone modeling in bromocriptine-treated pregnant and lactating rats: possible osteoregulatory role of prolactin in lactation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 299:E426-436
  38. Thiede MA. The mRNA encoding a parathyroid hormone-like peptide is produced in mammary tissue in response to elevations in serum prolactin. Mol Endocrinol 1989; 3:1443-1447
  39. Ratcliffe WA, Thompson GE, Care AD, Peaker M. Production of parathyroid hormone-related protein by the mammary gland of the goat. J Endocrinol 1992; 133:87-93
  40. Stiegler C, Leb G, Kleinert R, Warnkross H, Ramschak-Schwarzer S, Lipp R, Clarici G, Krejs GJ, Dobnig H. Plasma levels of parathyroid hormone-related peptide are elevated in hyperprolactinemia and correlated to bone density status. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10:751-759
  41. Dawood MY, Ylikorkala O, Trivedi D, Fuchs F. Oxytocin in maternal circulation and amniotic fluid during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979; 49:429-434
  42. Colucci S, Colaianni G, Mori G, Grano M, Zallone A. Human osteoclasts express oxytocin receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002; 297:442-445
  43. Tamma R, Colaianni G, Zhu LL, DiBenedetto A, Greco G, Montemurro G, Patano N, Strippoli M, Vergari R, Mancini L, Colucci S, Grano M, Faccio R, Liu X, Li J, Usmani S, Bachar M, Bab I, Nishimori K, Young LJ, Buettner C, Iqbal J, Sun L, Zaidi M, Zallone A. Oxytocin is an anabolic bone hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:7149-7154
  44. Liu X, Shimono K, Zhu LL, Li J, Peng Y, Imam A, Iqbal J, Moonga S, Colaianni G, Su C, Lu Z, Iwamoto M, Pacifici M, Zallone A, Sun L, Zaidi M. Oxytocin deficiency impairs maternal skeletal remodeling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 388:161-166
  45. Halloran BP, DeLuca HF. Calcium transport in small intestine during pregnancy and lactation. Am J Physiol 1980; 239:E64-68
  46. Brommage R, Baxter DC, Gierke LW. Vitamin D-independent intestinal calcium and phosphorus absorption during reproduction. Am J Physiol 1990; 259:G631-638
  47. Fudge NJ, Kovacs CS. Pregnancy up-regulates intestinal calcium absorption and skeletal mineralization independently of the vitamin D receptor. Endocrinology 2010; 151:886-895
  48. Ryan BA, McGregor NE, Kirby BJ, Al-Tilissi A, Poulton IJ, Sims NA, Kovacs CS. Calcitriol-Dependent and -Independent Regulation of Intestinal Calcium Absorption, Osteoblast Function, and Skeletal Mineralization during Lactation and Recovery in Mice. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2483-2497
  49. Heaney RP, Skillman TG. Calcium metabolism in normal human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1971; 33:661-670
  50. Walker A, Fraile JJ, Hubbard JG. "Parathyroidectomy in pregnancy"-a single centre experience with review of evidence and proposal for treatment algorithim. Gland Surg 2014; 3:158-164
  51. Morton A. Altered calcium homeostasis during pregnancy may affect biochemical differentiation of hypercalcaemia. Intern Med J 2004; 34:655-656; author reply 656-657
  52. Pedersen EB, Johannesen P, Kristensen S, Rasmussen AB, Emmertsen K, Moller J, Lauritsen JG, Wohlert M. Calcium, parathyroid hormone and calcitonin in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1984; 18:156-164
  53. Frenkel Y, Barkai G, Mashiach S, Dolev E, Zimlichman R, Weiss M. Hypocalciuria of preeclampsia is independent of parathyroid hormone level. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:689-691
  54. Seely EW, Wood RJ, Brown EM, Graves SW. Lower serum ionized calcium and abnormal calciotropic hormone levels in preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992; 74:1436-1440
  55. Lalau JD, Jans I, el Esper N, Bouillon R, Fournier A. Calcium metabolism, plasma parathyroid hormone, and calcitriol in transient hypertension of pregnancy. Am J Hypertens 1993; 6:522-527
  56. Purdie DW, Aaron JE, Selby PL. Bone histology and mineral homeostasis in human pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95:849-854
  57. Kovacs CS, El-Hajj Fuleihan G. Calcium and bone disorders during pregnancy and lactation. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2006; 35:21-51, v
  58. Moller UK, Vieth Streym S, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during pregnancy and postpartum. A controlled cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23:1213-1223
  59. To WW, Wong MW. Changes in bone mineral density of the os calcis as measured by quantitative ultrasound during pregnancy and 24 months after delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51:166-171
  60. Sowers M. Pregnancy and lactation as risk factors for subsequent bone loss and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res1996; 11:1052-1060
  61. Kreiger N, Kelsey JL, Holford TR, O'Connor T. An epidemiologic study of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 116:141-148
  62. Aloia JF, Vaswani AN, Yeh JK, Ross P, Ellis K, Cohn SH. Determinants of bone mass in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143:1700-1704
  63. Aloia JF, Cohn SH, Vaswani A, Yeh JK, Yuen K, Ellis K. Risk factors for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Am J Med1985; 78:95-100
  64. Hreshchyshyn MM, Hopkins A, Zylstra S, Anbar M. Associations of parity, breast-feeding, and birth control pills with lumbar spine and femoral neck bone densities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:318-322
  65. Dequeker J, Tobing L, Rutten V, Geusens P. Relative risk factors for osteoporotic fracture: a pilot study of the MEDOS questionnaire. Clin Rheumatol 1991; 10:49-53
  66. Feldblum PJ, Zhang J, Rich LE, Fortney JA, Talmage RV. Lactation history and bone mineral density among perimenopausal women. Epidemiology 1992; 3:527-531
  67. Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ. Breastfeeding and other reproductive factors and the risk of hip fractures in elderly women. Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22:684-691
  68. Berning B, van Kuijk C, Schutte HE, Kuiper JW, Drogendijk AC, Fauser BC. Determinants of lumbar bone mineral density in normal weight, non-smoking women soon after menopause. A study using clinical data and quantitative computed tomography. Bone Miner 1993; 21:129-139
  69. Cure CC, Ramirez PC, Lopez-Jaramillo P. Osteoporosis, pregnancy, and lactation. Lancet 1998; 352:1227-1228
  70. Cure-Cure C, Cure-Ramirez P, Teran E, Lopez-Jaramillo P. Bone-mass peak in multiparity and reduced risk of bone-fractures in menopause. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 76:285-291
  71. Bjornerem A, Ahmed LA, Jorgensen L, Stormer J, Joakimsen RM. Breastfeeding protects against hip fracture in postmenopausal women: the Tromso study. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26:2843-2850
  72. Chapman DJ. Longer cumulative breastfeeding duration associated with improved bone strength. Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association 2012; 28:18-19
  73. Canal-Macias ML, Roncero-Martin R, Moran JM, Lavado-Garcia JM, Costa-Fernandez Mdel C, Pedrera-Zamorano JD. Increased bone mineral density is associated with breastfeeding history in premenopausal Spanish women. Archives of medical science : AMS 2013; 9:703-708
  74. Heidari B, Heidari P, Nourooddini HG, Hajian-Tilaki KO. Relationship between parity and bone mass in postmenopausal women according to number of parities and age. J Reprod Med 2013; 58:389-394
  75. Schnatz PF, Marakovits KA, O'Sullivan DM. Assessment of postmenopausal women and significant risk factors for osteoporosis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010; 65:591-596
  76. Schnatz PF, Barker KG, Marakovits KA, O'Sullivan DM. Effects of age at first pregnancy and breast-feeding on the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Menopause (New York, NY) 2010; 17:1161-1166
  77. Specker B, Binkley T. High parity is associated with increased bone size and strength. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16:1969-1974
  78. Crandall CJ, Liu J, Cauley J, Newcomb PA, Manson JE, Vitolins MZ, Jacobson LT, Rykman KK, Stefanick ML. Associations of Parity, Breastfeeding, and Fractures in the Women's Health Observational Study. Obstet Gynecol2017; 130:171-180
  79. Kovacs CS, Ralston SH. Presentation and management of osteoporosis presenting in association with pregnancy or lactation. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26:2223-2241
  80. Dunne F, Walters B, Marshall T, Heath DA. Pregnancy associated osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1993; 39:487-490
  81. Gehlen M, Lazarescu AD, Hinz C, Schwarz-Eywill M, Pfeifer M, Balasingam S, Maier A. Long-term outcome of patients with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) with a particular focus on quality of life. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38:3575-3583
  82. Butscheidt S, Tsourdi E, Rolvien T, Delsmann A, Sturznickel J, Barvencik F, Jakob F, Hofbauer LC, Mundlos S, Kornak U, Seefried L, Oheim R. Relevant genetic variants are common in women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) and predispose to more severe clinical manifestations. Bone 2021; 147:115911
  83. Laroche M, Talibart M, Cormier C, Roux C, Guggenbuhl P, Degboe Y. Pregnancy-related fractures: a retrospective study of a French cohort of 52 patients and review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:3135-3142
  84. Butscheidt S, Delsmann A, Rolvien T, Barvencik F, Al-Bughaili M, Mundlos S, Schinke T, Amling M, Kornak U, Oheim R. Mutational analysis uncovers monogenic bone disorders in women with pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: three novel mutations in LRP5, COL1A1, and COL1A2. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:1643-1651
  85. Phillips AJ, Ostlere SJ, Smith R. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: does the skeleton recover? Osteoporos Int2000; 11:449-454
  86. Kovacs CS. Complex clinical encounter series: osteoporosis presenting during pregnancy and lactation: wait and reassess. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:197-201
  87. Kondapalli AV, Kamanda-Kosseh M, Williams JM, Shiau S, Bucovsky M, Colon I, Shane E, Cohen A. Clinical characteristics of pregnancy and lactation associated osteoporosis: An online survey study. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:1477-1489
  88. Herath M, Wong P, Trinh A, Allan CA, Wallace EM, Ebeling PR, Fuller PJ, Milat F. Minimal-trauma ankle fractures predominate during pregnancy: a 17-year retrospective study. Archives of osteoporosis 2017; 12:86
  89. Dent CE, Friedman M. Pregnancy and idiopathic osteoporosis. Q J Med 1965; 34:341-357
  90. Nordin BE, Roper A. Post-pregnancy osteoporosis; a syndrome? Lancet 1955; 268:431-434
  91. Khovidhunkit W, Epstein S. Osteoporosis in pregnancy. Osteoporos Int 1996; 6:345-354
  92. Smith R, Athanasou NA, Ostlere SJ, Vipond SE. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 1995; 88:865-878
  93. Campos-Obando N, Oei L, Hoefsloot LH, Kiewiet RM, Klaver CC, Simon ME, Zillikens MC. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures during pregnancy: be aware of a potential underlying genetic cause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99:1107-1111
  94. Cook FJ, Mumm S, Whyte MP, Wenkert D. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis with a heterozygous deactivating LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) mutation and a homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29:922-928
  95. Khastgir G, Studd JW, King H, Abdalla H, Jones J, Carter G, Alaghband-Zadeh J. Changes in bone density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103:716-718
  96. Agarwal S, El-Najjar D, Kondapalli AV, Kil N, Kamanda-Kosseh M, Bucovsky M, Colon I, Lappe JM, Stubby J, Recker RR, Guo XE, Shane E, Cohen A. HR-pQCT Reveals Marked Trabecular and Cortical Structural Deficits in Women with Pregnancy and Lactation associated Osteoporosis (PLO). J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:zjae167
  97. Lakhanpal S, Ginsburg WW, Luthra HS, Hunder GG. Transient regional osteoporosis. A study of 56 cases and review of the literature. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106:444-450
  98. Arayssi TK, Tawbi HA, Usta IM, Hourani MH. Calcitonin in the treatment of transient osteoporosis of the hip. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003; 32:388-397
  99. Curtiss PH, Jr., Kincaid WE. Transitory demineralization of the hip in pregnancy. A report of three cases. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1959; 41-A:1327-1333
  100. Baki ME, Uygun H, Ari B, Aydin H. Bilateral femoral neck insufficiency fractures in pregnancy. Eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = Joint diseases & related surgery 2014; 25:60-62
  101. Aynaci O, Kerimoglu S, Ozturk C, Saracoglu M. Bilateral non-traumatic acetabular and femoral neck fractures due to pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128:313-316
  102. Bonacker J, Janousek M, Krober M. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis with eight fractures in the vertebral column treated with kyphoplasty and bracing: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134:173-179
  103. Pallavi P, Padma S, Vanitha Anna Selvi D. Transient osteoporosis of hip and lumbar spine in pregnancy. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India 2012; 62:8-9
  104. Iwamoto J, Sato Y, Uzawa M, Matsumoto H. Five-year follow-up of a woman with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. Therapeutics and clinical risk management 2012; 8:195-199
  105. Anai T, Tomiyasu T, Arima K, Miyakawa I. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis with elevated levels of circulating parathyroid hormone-related protein: a report of two cases. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research1999; 25:63-67
  106. Tran HA, Petrovsky N. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis with hypercalcaemia. Intern Med J 2002; 32:481-485
  107. Segal E, Hochberg I, Weisman Y, Ish-Shalom S. Severe postpartum osteoporosis with increased PTHrP during lactation in a patient after total thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22:2907-2911
  108. Liel Y, Atar D, Ohana N. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: preliminary densitometric evidence of extremely rapid recovery of bone mineral density. South Med J 1998; 91:33-35
  109. Kyvernitakis I, Reuter TC, Hellmeyer L, Hars O, Hadji P. Subsequent fracture risk of women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis after a median of 6 years of follow-up. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:135-142
  110. Kyvernitakis I, Reuter TC, Hellmeyer L, Hars O, Hadji P. Correction to: Subsequent fracture risk of women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis after a median of 6 years of follow-up. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:2143-2144
  111. Ferrari S, Bianchi ML, Eisman JA, Foldes AJ, Adami S, Wahl DA, Stepan JJ, de Vernejoul MC, Kaufman JM. Osteoporosis in young adults: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23:2735-2748
  112. Stathopoulos IP, Liakou CG, Katsalira A, Trovas G, Lyritis GG, Papaioannou NA, Tournis S. The use of bisphosphonates in women prior to or during pregnancy and lactation. Hormones (Athens, Greece) 2011; 10:280-291
  113. Ijuin A, Yoshikata H, Asano R, Tsuburai T, Kikuchi R, Sakakibara H. Teriparatide and denosumab treatment for pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis with multiple vertebral fractures: A case study. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2017; 56:863-866
  114. Hong N, Kim JE, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Rhee Y. Changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers during treatment with teriparatide in pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018; 88:652-658
  115. Grizzo FM, da Silva Martins J, Pinheiro MM, Jorgetti V, Carvalho MD, Pelloso SM. Pregnancy and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis: Bone Histomorphometric Analysis and Response to Treatment with Zoledronic Acid. Calcif Tissue Int 2015; 97:421-425
  116. Chan B, Zacharin M. Maternal and infant outcome after pamidronate treatment of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia and osteogenesis imperfecta before conception: a report of four cases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:2017-2020
  117. Tanriover MD, Oz SG, Sozen T. Ten-year follow-up in pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis: sequential therapy with strontium ranelate and ibandronate. Spine J 2015; 15:1164-1165
  118. Anagnostis P, Lampropoulou-Adamidou K, Bosdou JK, Trovas G, Galanis P, Chronopoulos E, Goulis DG, Tournis S. Comparative Effectiveness of Therapeutic Interventions in Pregnancy and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024; 109:879-901
  119. Orhadje E, Berg K, Hauser B, Ralston SH. Clinical Features, Incidence and Treatment Outcome in Pregnancy-Associated Osteoporosis: A Single-Centre Experience over Two Decades. Calcif Tissue Int 2023; 113:591-596
  120. Lampropoulou-Adamidou K, Trovas G, Triantafyllopoulos IK, Yavropoulou MP, Anastasilakis AD, Anagnostis P, Toulis KA, Makris K, Gazi S, Balanika A, Tournis S. Teriparatide Treatment in Patients with Pregnancy- and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 2021; 109:554-562
  121. Rodriguez AJ, Fink HA, Mirigian L, Guanabens N, Eastell R, Akesson K, Bauer DC, Ebeling PR. Pain, Quality of Life, and Safety Outcomes of Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32:1935-1944
  122. Kort KC, Schiller HJ, Numann PJ. Hyperparathyroidism and pregnancy. Am J Surg 1999; 177:66-68
  123. Kelly TR. Primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy. Surgery 1991; 110:1028-1033; discussion 1033-1034
  124. Shangold MM, Dor N, Welt SI, Fleischman AR, Crenshaw MC, Jr. Hyperparathyroidism and pregnancy: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1982; 37:217-228
  125. Wagner G, Transhol L, Melchior JC. Hyperparathyroidism and pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1964; 47:549-564
  126. Ludwig GD. Hyperparathyroidism in relation to pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1962; 267:637-642
  127. Delmonico FL, Neer RM, Cosimi AB, Barnes AB, Russell PS. Hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy. Am J Surg1976; 131:328-337
  128. Bruce J, Strong JA. Maternal hyperparathyroidism and parathyroid deficiency in the child, with account of effect of parathyroidectomy on renal function, and of attempt to transplant part of tumor. Q J Med 1955; 24:307-319
  129. Sandler ML, Ho R, Xing MH, Gidumal S, Spitzer H, Levy JC, Chai RL. Primary Hyperparathyroidism During Pregnancy Treated With Parathyroidectomy: A Systematic Review. The Laryngoscope 2021; 131:1915-1921
  130. Kristoffersson A, Dahlgren S, Lithner F, Jarhult J. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy. Surgery 1985; 97:326-330
  131. Carella MJ, Gossain VV. Hyperparathyroidism and pregnancy: case report and review. J Gen Intern Med 1992; 7:448-453
  132. Schnatz PF, Curry SL. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy: evidence-based management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002; 57:365-376
  133. Abood A, Vestergaard P. Pregnancy outcomes in women with primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol2014; 171:69-76
  134. Hirsch D, Kopel V, Nadler V, Levy S, Toledano Y, Tsvetov G. Pregnancy outcomes in women with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:2115-2122
  135. Matthias GS, Helliwell TR, Williams A. Postpartum hyperparathyroid crisis. Case report. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1987; 94:807-810
  136. Clark D, Seeds JW, Cefalo RC. Hyperparathyroid crisis and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140:840-842
  137. Salem R, Taylor S. Hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy. Br J Surg 1979; 66:648-650
  138. Nilsson IL, Adner N, Reihner E, Palme-Kilander C, Edstrom G, Degerblad M. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010; 19:1117-1121
  139. Bilezikian JP, Khan AA, Silverberg SJ, Fuleihan GE, Marcocci C, Minisola S, Perrier N, Sitges-Serra A, Thakker RV, Guyatt G, Mannstadt M, Potts JT, Clarke BL, Brandi ML. Evaluation and Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Summary Statement and Guidelines from the Fifth International Workshop. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2293-2314
  140. Han ES, Fritton K, Bacon P, Slodzinski MK, Argani C. Preterm Parturient with Polyhydramnios and Pancreatitis: Primary Presentation of Hyperparathyroidism. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology 2018; 2018:2091082
  141. Herrera-Martinez AD, Bahamondes-Opazo R, Palomares-Ortega R, Munoz-Jimenez C, Galvez-Moreno MA, Quesada Gomez JM. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy: a two-case report and literature review. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology 2015; 2015:171828
  142. Ali DS, Dandurand K, Khan AA. Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Pregnancy: Literature Review of the Diagnosis and Management. Journal of clinical medicine 2021; 10
  143. Boyce RW, Varela A, Chouinard L, Bussiere JL, Chellman GJ, Ominsky MS, Pyrah IT. Infant cynomolgus monkeys exposed to denosumab in utero exhibit an osteoclast-poor osteopetrotic-like skeletal phenotype at birth and in the early postnatal period. Bone 2014; 64:314-325
  144. Okamatsu N, Sakai N, Karakawa A, Kouyama N, Sato Y, Inagaki K, Kiuchi Y, Oguchi K, Negishi-Koga T, Takami M. Biological effects of anti-RANKL antibody administration in pregnant mice and their newborns. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2017; 491:614-621
  145. Rajala B, Abbasi RA, Hutchinson HT, Taylor T. Acute pancreatitis and primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy: treatment of hypercalcemia with magnesium sulfate. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70:460-462
  146. Dahan M, Chang RJ. Pancreatitis secondary to hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98:923-925
  147. Horjus C, Groot I, Telting D, van Setten P, van Sorge A, Kovacs CS, Hermus A, de Boer H. Cinacalcet for hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy and puerperium. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2009; 22:741-749
  148. Gonzalo Garcia I, Robles Fradejas M, Martin Macias MLA, Biain Ciganda A, Bustinza Beaskoetxea Z, Ruiz Perez E, Fernandez Matia G, Martinez Guisasola J. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy treated with cinacalcet: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 38:132-134
  149. Vera L, Oddo S, Di Iorgi N, Bentivoglio G, Giusti M. Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy treated with cinacalcet: a case report and review of the literature. Journal of medical case reports 2016; 10:361
  150. Nadarasa K, Bailey M, Chahal H, Raja O, Bhat R, Gayle C, Grossman AB, Druce MR. The use of cinacalcet in pregnancy to treat a complex case of parathyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep 2014; 2014:140056
  151. Kovacs CS, Ho-Pao CL, Hunzelman JL, Lanske B, Fox J, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Kronenberg HM. Regulation of murine fetal-placental calcium metabolism by the calcium-sensing receptor. J Clin Invest 1998; 101:2812-2820
  152. Zeng H, Li Z, Zhang X, Wang N, Tian Y, Wang J. Anesthetic management of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e9390
  153. Brown EM, Pollak M, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Chou YH, Riccardi D, Hebert SC. Calcium-ion-sensing cell-surface receptors. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:234-240
  154. Jones AR, Hare MJ, Brown J, Yang J, Meyer C, Milat F, Allan CA. Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Pitfalls. JBMR Plus 2020; 4:e10362
  155. Powell BR, Buist NR. Late presenting, prolonged hypocalcemia in an infant of a woman with hypocalciuric hypercalcemia. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1990; 29:241-243
  156. Thomas BR, Bennett JD. Symptomatic hypocalcemia and hypoparathyroidism in two infants of mothers with hyperparathyroidism and familial benign hypercalcemia. J Perinatol 1995; 15:23-26
  157. Kovacs CS. Hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy, lactation, and fetal/neonatal development. In: Brandi ML, Brown EM, eds. Hypoparathyroidism. Milan: Springer; 2015:249-269.
  158. Khan AA, Clarke B, Rejnmark L, Brandi ML. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Hypoparathyroidism in pregnancy: review and evidence-based recommendations for management. Eur J Endocrinol 2019; 180:R37-R44
  159. Sweeney LL, Malabanan AO, Rosen H. Decreased calcitriol requirement during pregnancy and lactation with a window of increased requirement immediately post partum. Endocr Pract 2010; 16:459-462
  160. Graham WP, III., Gordon CS, Loken HF, Blum A, Halden A. Effect of pregnancy and of the menstrual cycle on hypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1964; 24:512-516
  161. Hatswell BL, Allan CA, Teng J, Wong P, Ebeling PR, Wallace EM, Fuller PJ, Milat F. Management of hypoparathyroidism in pregnancy and lactation - A report of 10 cases. Bone Rep 2015; 3:15-19
  162. Hartogsohn EAR, Khan AA, Kjaersulf LU, Sikjaer T, Hussain S, Rejnmark L. Changes in treatment needs of hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy and lactation: A case series. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2020; 93:261-268
  163. Wang JJ, Wang O, Wang YB, Yang J, Song A, Jiang Y, Li M, Xia WB, Xing XP. Changes in serum calcium and treatment of hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy and lactation: A single-center case series. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;
  164. Breslau NA, Zerwekh JE. Relationship of estrogen and pregnancy to calcium homeostasis in pseudohypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986; 62:45-51
  165. O'Donnell D, Costa J, Meyers AM. Management of pseudohypoparathyroidism in pregnancy. Case report. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92:639-641
  166. Saito H, Saito M, Saito K, Terauchi A, Kobayashi T, Tominaga T, Hosoi E, Senoo M, Saito T. Subclinical pseudohypoparathyroidism type II: evidence for failure of physiologic adjustment in calcium metabolism during pregnancy. Am J Med Sci 1989; 297:247-250
  167. Seki K, Osada H, Yasuda T, Sekiya S. Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest1999; 47:278-280
  168. Ochiai D, Uchino H, Ikeda T, Yakubo K, Fukuiya T. Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 33:900
  169. Guedes Ramallo P, Boix Carreno E. Management of pseudohypoparathyroidism in pregnancy: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 37:519-520
  170. Wang JJ, Yang Y, Wang YB, Song A, Jiang Y, Li M, Xia WB, Liu YP, Wang O, Xing XP. Pseudohypoparathyroidism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A case series of five patients. Frontiers in endocrinology 2022; 13:1050305
  171. Glass EJ, Barr DG. Transient neonatal hyperparathyroidism secondary to maternal pseudohypoparathyroidism. Arch Dis Child 1981; 56:565-568
  172. Vidailhet M, Monin P, Andre M, Suty Y, Marchal C, Vert P. [Neonatal hyperparathyroidism secondary to maternal hypoparathyroidism]. Arch Fr Pediatr 1980; 37:305-312
  173. Khosla S, van Heerden JA, Gharib H, Jackson IT, Danks J, Hayman JA, Martin TJ. Parathyroid hormone-related protein and hypercalcemia secondary to massive mammary hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1157
  174. Jackson IT, Saleh J, van Heerden JA. Gigantic mammary hyperplasia in pregnancy associated with pseudohyperparathyroidism. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1989; 84:806-810
  175. Jodeh W, Sparks PJ, Higgins JM, Tom A, Anilovich N, Moit H, Korff L, Hadad I, Wang X, Imel EA, Donegan DM. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide induced hypercalcemia of pregnancy due to mammary hyperplasia. JBMR Plus 2024; 8:ziae083
  176. Sato K. Hypercalcemia during pregnancy, puerperium, and lactation: review and a case report of hypercalcemic crisis after delivery due to excessive production of PTH-related protein (PTHrP) without malignancy (humoral hypercalcemia of pregnancy). Endocr J 2008; 55:959-966
  177. Marx SJ, Zusman RM, Umiker WO. Benign breast dysplasia causing hypercalcemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab1977; 45:1049-1052
  178. Eller-Vainicher C, Ossola MW, Beck-Peccoz P, Chiodini I. PTHrP-associated hypercalcemia of pregnancy resolved after delivery: a case report. Eur J Endocrinol 2012; 166:753-756
  179. Kovacs CS, Ward LM. Disorders of Calcium, Phosphorus, and Bone Metabolism During Fetal and Neonatal Development. In: Kovacs CS, Deal CL, eds. Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2020:755-782.
  180. Rosen CJ, Adams JS, Bikle DD, Black DM, Demay MB, Manson JE, Murad MH, Kovacs CS. The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev 2012; 33:456-492
  181. Brooke OG, Brown IR, Bone CD, Carter ND, Cleeve HJ, Maxwell JD, Robinson VP, Winder SM. Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. Br Med J 1980; 280:751-754
  182. Roth DE, Al Mahmud A, Raqib R, Akhtar E, Perumal N, Pezzack B, Baqui AH. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of high-dose prenatal third-trimester vitamin D3 supplementation in Bangladesh: the AViDD trial. Nutrition journal 2013; 12:47
  183. Wagner CL, McNeil R, Hamilton SA, Winkler J, Rodriguez Cook C, Warner G, Bivens B, Davis DJ, Smith PG, Murphy M, Shary JR, Hollis BW. A randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation in 2 community health center networks in South Carolina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:137 e131-113
  184. Dawodu A, Saadi HF, Bekdache G, Javed Y, Altaye M, Hollis BW. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy in a population with endemic vitamin D deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98:2337-2346
  185. Grant CC, Stewart AW, Scragg R, Milne T, Rowden J, Ekeroma A, Wall C, Mitchell EA, Crengle S, Trenholme A, Crane J, Camargo CA, Jr. Vitamin D during pregnancy and infancy and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Pediatrics 2014; 133:e143-153
  186. Vaziri F, Dabbaghmanesh MH, Samsami A, Nasiri S, Shirazi PT. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on infant anthropometric measurements and bone mass of mother-infant pairs: A randomized placebo clinical trial. Early Hum Dev 2016; 103:61-68
  187. Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, Schoenmakers I, Fraser R, Gandhi SV, Carr A, D'Angelo S, Crozier SR, Moon RJ, Arden NK, Dennison EM, Godfrey KM, Inskip HM, Prentice A, Mughal MZ, Eastell R, Reid DM, Javaid MK, Group MS. Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2016; 4:393-402
  188. Roth DE, Morris SK, Zlotkin S, Gernand AD, Ahmed T, Shanta SS, Papp E, Korsiak J, Shi J, Islam MM, Jahan I, Keya FK, Willan AR, Weksberg R, Mohsin M, Rahman QS, Shah PS, Murphy KE, Stimec J, Pell LG, Qamar H, Al Mahmud A. Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy and Lactation and Infant Growth. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:535-546
  189. Mojibian M, Soheilykhah S, Fallah Zadeh MA, Jannati Moghadam M. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on maternal and neonatal outcome: A randomized clinical trial. Iranian journal of reproductive medicine 2015; 13:687-696
  190. Wei W, Shary JR, Garrett-Mayer E, Anderson B, Forestieri NE, Hollis BW, Wagner CL. Bone mineral density during pregnancy in women participating in a randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 106:1422-1430
  191. Kovacs CS, Ward LM. Physiology of Calcium, Phosphorus, and Bone Metabolism During Fetal and Neonatal Development. In: Kovacs CS, Deal CL, eds. Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2020:573-586.
  192. Kovacs CS. Analysis of the MAVIDOS trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2017; 5:328
  193. Khaing W, Vallibhakara SA, Tantrakul V, Vallibhakara O, Rattanasiri S, McEvoy M, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation for Prevention of Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2017; 9
  194. De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Lombardo LK, Pena-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 1:CD008873
  195. Hypponen E, Cavadino A, Williams D, Fraser A, Vereczkey A, Fraser WD, Banhidy F, Lawlor D, Czeizel AE. Vitamin D and pre-eclampsia: original data, systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of nutrition & metabolism2013; 63:331-340
  196. Thorne-Lyman A, Fawzi WW. Vitamin D during pregnancy and maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology 2012; 26 Suppl 1:75-90
  197. Roth DE, Leung M, Mesfin E, Qamar H, Watterworth J, Papp E. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: state of the evidence from a systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ 2017; 359:j5237
  198. Harvey NC, Holroyd C, Ntani G, Javaid K, Cooper P, Moon R, Cole Z, Tinati T, Godfrey K, Dennison E, Bishop NJ, Baird J, Cooper C. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18:1-190
  199. Palacios C, Kostiuk LK, Pena-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:Cd008873
  200. Edouard T, Alos N, Chabot G, Roughley P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. Short- and long-term outcome of patients with pseudo-vitamin D deficiency rickets treated with calcitriol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:82-89
  201. Marx SJ, Swart EG, Jr., Hamstra AJ, DeLuca HF. Normal intrauterine development of the fetus of a woman receiving extraordinarily high doses of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980; 51:1138-1142
  202. Malloy PJ, Tiosano D, Feldman D. Hereditary 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin-D-Resistant Rickets. In: Feldman D, Pike JW, Adams JS, eds. Vitamin D, Third Edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2011:1197-1232.
  203. Carpenter TO. CYP24A1 loss of function: Clinical phenotype of monoallelic and biallelic mutations. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017; 173:337-340
  204. Maekawa AS, Walker EC, Bennin D, Hartery SA, Kirby BJ, St-Arnaud R, Sims NA, Kovacs CS. Maternal loss of 24-hydroxylase causes increased intestinal calcium absorption and hypercalcemia during pregnancy but reduced skeletal resorption during lactation in mice. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:zjae166
  205. Shah AD, Hsiao EC, O'Donnell B, Salmeen K, Nussbaum R, Krebs M, Baumgartner-Parzer S, Kaufmann M, Jones G, Bikle DD, Wang Y, Mathew AS, Shoback D, Block-Kurbisch I. Maternal Hypercalcemia Due to Failure of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin-D3 Catabolism in a Patient With CYP24A1 Mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:2832-2836
  206. Dinour D, Davidovits M, Aviner S, Ganon L, Michael L, Modan-Moses D, Vered I, Bibi H, Frishberg Y, Holtzman EJ. Maternal and infantile hypercalcemia caused by vitamin-D-hydroxylase mutations and vitamin D intake. Pediatr Nephrol 2015; 30:145-152
  207. Woods GN, Saitman A, Gao H, Clarke NJ, Fitzgerald RL, Chi NW. A Young Woman With Recurrent Gestational Hypercalcemia and Acute Pancreatitis Caused by CYP24A1 Deficiency. J Bone Miner Res 2016; 31:1841-1844
  208. Kwong WT, Fehmi SM. Hypercalcemic Pancreatitis Triggered by Pregnancy With a CYP24A1 Mutation. Pancreas2016; 45:e31-32
  209. Brancatella A, Cappellani D, Kaufmann M, Semeraro A, Borsari S, Sardella C, Baldinotti F, Caligo MA, Jones G, Marcocci C, Cetani F. Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Rifampin in the Treatment of a Patient Carrying a CYP24A1 Loss-of-Function Variant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:e3159-e3166
  210. Hawkes CP, Li D, Hakonarson H, Meyers KE, Thummel KE, Levine MA. CYP3A4 Induction by Rifampin: An Alternative Pathway for Vitamin D Inactivation in Patients With CYP24A1 Mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:1440-1446
  211. Prentice A. Micronutrients and the bone mineral content of the mother, fetus and newborn. J Nutr 2003; 133:1693S-1699S
  212. O'Brien EC, Geraghty AA, Kilbane MT, McKenna MJ, McAuliffe FM. Bone resorption and dietary calcium in pregnancy-a window to future maternal bone health. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1803-1814
  213. Prentice A. Pregnancy and lactation. In: Glorieux FH, Petifor JM, Jüppner H, eds. Pediatric bone: biology & diseases. New York: Academic Press; 2003:249-269.
  214. Janakiraman V, Ettinger A, Mercado-Garcia A, Hu H, Hernandez-Avila M. Calcium supplements and bone resorption in pregnancy: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24:260-264
  215. Koo WW, Walters JC, Esterlitz J, Levine RJ, Bush AJ, Sibai B. Maternal calcium supplementation and fetal bone mineralization. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:577-582
  216. Prentice A. Calcium in pregnancy and lactation. Annu Rev Nutr 2000; 20:249-272
  217. Hofmeyr GJ, Atallah AN, Duley L. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 3:CD001059
  218. Kumar A, Devi SG, Batra S, Singh C, Shukla DK. Calcium supplementation for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 104:32-36
  219. Hiller JE, Crowther CA, Moore VA, Willson K, Robinson JS. Calcium supplementation in pregnancy and its impact on blood pressure in children and women: follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol2007; 47:115-121
  220. Villar J, Abdel-Aleem H, Merialdi M, Mathai M, Ali MM, Zavaleta N, Purwar M, Hofmeyr J, Nguyen TN, Campodonico L, Landoulsi S, Carroli G, Lindheimer M. World Health Organization randomized trial of calcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:639-649
  221. Ross AC, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Manson JE, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D.Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2011.
  222. Ohata Y, Yamazaki M, Kawai M, Tsugawa N, Tachikawa K, Koinuma T, Miyagawa K, Kimoto A, Nakayama M, Namba N, Yamamoto H, Okano T, Ozono K, Michigami T. Elevated fibroblast growth factor 23 exerts its effects on placenta and regulates vitamin D metabolism in pregnancy of Hyp mice. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29:1627-1638
  223. Jonas AJ, Dominguez B. Low breast milk phosphorus concentration in familial hypophosphatemia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1989; 8:541-543
  224. Reade TM, Scriver CR. Hypophosphatemic rickets and breast milk. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1397
  225. European Medicines Agency. Crysvita: Annex I: Summary of Product Characteristics. 2022; https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/crysvita-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 22 October 2023.
  226. Greer FR, Lane J, Ho M. Elevated serum parathyroid hormone, calcitonin, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in lactating women nursing twins. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 40:562-568
  227. Dobnig H, Kainer F, Stepan V, Winter R, Lipp R, Schaffer M, Kahr A, Nocnik S, Patterer G, Leb G. Elevated parathyroid hormone-related peptide levels after human gestation: relationship to changes in bone and mineral metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80:3699-3707
  228. Yamamoto M, Duong LT, Fisher JE, Thiede MA, Caulfield MP, Rosenblatt M. Suckling-mediated increases in urinary phosphate and 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate excretion in lactating rats: possible systemic effects of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Endocrinology 1991; 129:2614-2622
  229. VanHouten JN, Dann P, Stewart AF, Watson CJ, Pollak M, Karaplis AC, Wysolmerski JJ. Mammary-specific deletion of parathyroid hormone-related protein preserves bone mass during lactation. J Clin Invest 2003; 112:1429-1436
  230. Kovacs CS, Chik CL. Hyperprolactinemia caused by lactation and pituitary adenomas is associated with altered serum calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and PTH-related peptide levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab1995; 80:3036-3042
  231. Sowers MF, Hollis BW, Shapiro B, Randolph J, Janney CA, Zhang D, Schork A, Crutchfield M, Stanczyk F, Russell-Aulet M. Elevated parathyroid hormone-related peptide associated with lactation and bone density loss. JAMA 1996; 276:549-554
  232. Kelly PA, Bachelot A, Kedzia C, Hennighausen L, Ormandy CJ, Kopchick JJ, Binart N. The role of prolactin and growth hormone in mammary gland development. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002; 197:127-131
  233. Dawood MY, Khan-Dawood FS, Wahi RS, Fuchs F. Oxytocin release and plasma anterior pituitary and gonadal hormones in women during lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981; 52:678-683
  234. Nishimori K, Young LJ, Guo Q, Wang Z, Insel TR, Matzuk MM. Oxytocin is required for nursing but is not essential for parturition or reproductive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:11699-11704
  235. VanHouten JN, Wysolmerski JJ. Low estrogen and high parathyroid hormone-related peptide levels contribute to accelerated bone resorption and bone loss in lactating mice. Endocrinology 2003; 144:5521-5529
  236. Hernandez LL, Gregerson KA, Horseman ND. Mammary gland serotonin regulates parathyroid hormone-related protein and other bone-related signals. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2012; 302:E1009-1015
  237. Horseman ND, Hernandez LL. New concepts of breast cell communication to bone. Trends Endocrinol Metab2014; 25:34-41
  238. Kolthoff N, Eiken P, Kristensen B, Nielsen SP. Bone mineral changes during pregnancy and lactation: a longitudinal cohort study. Clin Sci (Lond) 1998; 94:405-412
  239. Polatti F, Capuzzo E, Viazzo F, Colleoni R, Klersy C. Bone mineral changes during and after lactation. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:52-56
  240. Kalkwarf HJ, Specker BL, Bianchi DC, Ranz J, Ho M. The effect of calcium supplementation on bone density during lactation and after weaning. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:523-528
  241. Cross NA, Hillman LS, Allen SH, Krause GF. Changes in bone mineral density and markers of bone remodeling during lactation and postweaning in women consuming high amounts of calcium. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10:1312-1320
  242. Laskey MA, Prentice A, Hanratty LA, Jarjou LM, Dibba B, Beavan SR, Cole TJ. Bone changes after 3 mo of lactation: influence of calcium intake, breast-milk output, and vitamin D-receptor genotype. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67:685-692
  243. Teti A, Zallone A. Do osteocytes contribute to bone mineral homeostasis? Osteocytic osteolysis revisited. Bone2009; 44:11-16
  244. Qing H, Ardeshirpour L, Pajevic PD, Dusevich V, Jahn K, Kato S, Wysolmerski J, Bonewald LF. Demonstration of osteocytic perilacunar/canalicular remodeling in mice during lactation. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27:1018-1029
  245. Kirby BJ, Ardeshirpour L, Woodrow JP, Wysolmerski JJ, Sims NA, Karaplis AC, Kovacs CS. Skeletal recovery after weaning does not require PTHrP. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26:1242-1251
  246. Collins JN, Kirby BJ, Woodrow JP, Gagel RF, Rosen CJ, Sims NA, Kovacs CS. Lactating Ctcgrp nulls lose twice the normal bone mineral content due to fewer osteoblasts and more osteoclasts, whereas bone mass is fully restored after weaning in association with up-regulation of Wnt signaling and other novel genes. Endocrinology2013; 154:1400-1413
  247. Liu XS, Ardeshirpour L, VanHouten JN, Shane E, Wysolmerski JJ. Site-specific changes in bone microarchitecture, mineralization, and stiffness during lactation and after weaning in mice. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27:865-875
  248. Bjornerem A, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Wang X, Bui M, Walker SP, Zebaze R, Seeman E. Irreversible Deterioration of Cortical and Trabecular Microstructure Associated With Breastfeeding. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32:681-687
  249. Brembeck P, Lorentzon M, Ohlsson C, Winkvist A, Augustin H. Changes in cortical volumetric bone mineral density and thickness, and trabecular thickness in lactating women postpartum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:535-543
  250. Wiklund PK, Xu L, Wang Q, Mikkola T, Lyytikainen A, Volgyi E, Munukka E, Cheng SM, Alen M, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Cheng S. Lactation is associated with greater maternal bone size and bone strength later in life. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23:1939-1945
  251. Bowman BM, Miller SC. Skeletal adaptations during mammalian reproduction. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact2001; 1:347-355
  252. Vajda EG, Bowman BM, Miller SC. Cancellous and cortical bone mechanical properties and tissue dynamics during pregnancy, lactation, and postlactation in the rat. Biol Reprod 2001; 65:689-695
  253. Reid IR, Wattie DJ, Evans MC, Budayr AA. Post-pregnancy osteoporosis associated with hypercalcaemia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1992; 37:298-303
  254. VanHouten J, Dann P, McGeoch G, Brown EM, Krapcho K, Neville M, Wysolmerski JJ. The calcium-sensing receptor regulates mammary gland parathyroid hormone-related protein production and calcium transport. J Clin Invest 2004; 113:598-608
  255. Ardeshirpour L, Dann P, Pollak M, Wysolmerski J, VanHouten J. The calcium-sensing receptor regulates PTHrP production and calcium transport in the lactating mammary gland. Bone 2006; 38:787-793
  256. Caplan RH, Beguin EA. Hypercalcemia in a calcitriol-treated hypoparathyroid woman during lactation. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:485-489
  257. Salle BL, Berthezene F, Glorieux FH, Delvin EE, Berland M, David L, Varenne JP, Putet G. Hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy: treatment with calcitriol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981; 52:810-813
  258. Sadeghi-Nejad A, Wolfsdorf JI, Senior B. Hypoparathyroidism and pregnancy. Treatment with calcitriol. JAMA1980; 243:254-255
  259. Shomali ME, Ross DS. Hypercalcemia in a woman with hypoparathyroidism associated with increased parathyroid hormone-related protein during lactation. Endocr Pract 1999; 5:198-200
  260. Mather KJ, Chik CL, Corenblum B. Maintenance of serum calcium by parathyroid hormone-related peptide during lactation in a hypoparathyroid patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84:424-427
  261. Rideout KL. When endocrine disorders disrupt pregnancy: perspectives of affected mothers. In: Kovacs CS, Deal CL, eds. Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management. San Diego: Academic Press; 2019:xxxvii-xli.
  262. Wagner CL, Hulsey TC, Fanning D, Ebeling M, Hollis BW. High-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in a cohort of breastfeeding mothers and their infants: a 6-month follow-up pilot study. Breastfeed Med 2006; 1:59-70
  263. Tan ML, Abrams SA, Osborn DA. Vitamin D supplementation for term breastfed infants to prevent vitamin D deficiency and improve bone health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 12:Cd013046
  264. Prentice A, Jarjou LM, Cole TJ, Stirling DM, Dibba B, Fairweather-Tait S. Calcium requirements of lactating Gambian mothers: effects of a calcium supplement on breast-milk calcium concentration, maternal bone mineral content, and urinary calcium excretion. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62:58-67
  265. Prentice A, Jarjou LM, Stirling DM, Buffenstein R, Fairweather-Tait S. Biochemical markers of calcium and bone metabolism during 18 months of lactation in Gambian women accustomed to a low calcium intake and in those consuming a calcium supplement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:1059-1066
  266. Prentice A, Yan L, Jarjou LM, Dibba B, Laskey MA, Stirling DM, Fairweather-Tait S. Vitamin D status does not influence the breast-milk calcium concentration of lactating mothers accustomed to a low calcium intake. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86:1006-1008
  267. Bezerra FF, Mendonca LM, Lobato EC, O'Brien KO, Donangelo CM. Bone mass is recovered from lactation to postweaning in adolescent mothers with low calcium intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80:1322-1326
  268. Chantry CJ, Auinger P, Byrd RS. Lactation among adolescent mothers and subsequent bone mineral density. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158:650-656
  269. Delzer PR, Meyer RA, Jr. Normal milk composition in lactating X-linked hypophosphatemic mice despite continued hypophosphatemia. Calcif Tissue Int 1983; 35:750-754
  270. Burosumab. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2006.

Empty Sella

ABSTRACT

 

Empty sella is a radiological finding of a flattened pituitary in a sellar space filled with cerebrospinal fluid. It may be primary or secondary consequent to various processes causing injury and shrinkage of the pituitary gland (postpartum hemorrhage, pituitary surgery, irradiation, apoplexy, infection, head trauma, hypophysitis, etc.). The mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of the so called “primary empty sella” may range from continuously or intermittently increased intracranial pressure due to idiopathic benign intracranial hypertension, obesity, arterial hypertension, or multiple pregnancies in female patients with accompanying insufficiency of the sellar diaphragm and changes in pituitary gland volume (hyperplasia during pregnancy, lactation, menopause etc.). Primary empty sella can be an incidental radiological finding in an asymptomatic patient with preserved pituitary function. In symptomatic patients with the so called “empty sella syndrome” (headache, visual disturbances, and hormonal dysfunction), the radiological finding of an empty sella is important in the differential diagnosis of other sellar lesions. Hypopituitarism, partial or complete, and hyperprolactinemia are not uncommon in these patients. The treatment of hypopituitarism and hyperprolactinemia is advocated in all patients with confirmatory results. In patients with the secondary empty sella, hypopituitarism is more common and more readily recognized due to damage caused by surgery, radiation therapy, or various pathological causes. Rarely, an empty sella can be associated with hormonal hypersecretion from an “invisible” micro adenoma producing prolactin, growth hormone (acromegaly), or ACTH (Cushing’s disease). A wide range of radiological findings in patients with secondary and primary empty sella coupled with clinical data (important hints from the history and data on endocrine function) are presented for further illustration of this topic.

 

HISTORY

 

The term ‘empty sella’ was first used by Bush in 1951 (1) to describe a peculiar anatomical condition, observed in 40 of 788 human cadavers, particularly females, characterized by a sella turcica with an incomplete diaphragm sellae that forms only a small peripheral rim, with a pituitary gland not absent, but flattened in such a manner as to form a thin layer of tissue at the bottom of the sella turcica. Kaufman (2), in 1968, speculated that ‘…empty sella is a distinct anatomical and radiographic entity, function of an incompleteness of the diaphragma sellae and of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, normal or elevated’. The role of the normal fluctuations of CSF pressures and the effect of a superimposed prolonged increase in CSF pressure were related to the anatomic changes involving the bony wall of the empty sella.

 

DEFINITION, ETIOLOGY, AND PREVALENCE OF EMPTY SELLA

 

Empty sella is defined as herniation of subarachnoid space into the sella turcica (arachnoidocele). It is a term for the radiological finding of “empty sellar space” on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) with a flattened pituitary and elongated stalk. It can be partial if less than 50% of sellar space is filled with cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), or complete if CSF fills more than 50% of space in the sella and gland thickness is less than 2mm (3,4).

 

Regarding its etiology, it can be primary if there is no pathological process in the sellar region preceding the pituitary damage or secondary if it is consequent to a specific pathological process. Primary empty sella (PES) can be an incidental finding or may arise during imaging for headache, endocrine disorders, neurological symptoms, visual disturbances, abnormal sella turcica radiograph, and other reasons.

 

Primary empty sella (PES) can be caused by intracranial hypertension and/or insufficiency of the sellar diaphragm in subjects with no previous history of pituitary disease. Insufficiency of the sellar diaphragm, a deflection of dura matter separating the suprasellar cistern from the pituitary fossa, allows unobstructed pulsatile movements of CSF from chiasmatic cistern causing flattening of the pituitary to the sellar floor. In extreme cases bone erosion of the sellar floor and CSF leak (rhinorrhea) may occur, increasing the risk of meningitis. Partial or complete absence of the sellar diaphragm has been demonstrated in patients with PES.

 

Intracranial pressure can be intermittently increased due to obesity, sleep apnea, arterial hypertension, pregnancy, and labor. Intracranial hypertension may be idiopathic or associated with other intracranial processes such as tumors, venous thrombosis, infections, or malformations. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) or “pseudo-tumor cerebri” is a rare condition affecting 1 in 100,000 persons. It can be due to impaired CSF absorption, increased CSF secretion, and/or increased capillary permeability (5). Impaired CSF dynamics and absorption have been found in up to 77% and 84% of patients with PES, respectively (6), The prevalence of PES is very high in patients with IIH ranging from 70-94% (4).

 

Changes in the pituitary gland volume may also be involved in the pathogenesis of empty sella syndrome including hyperplasia during pregnancy and lactation and pituitary involution after menopause accounting for the significantly higher prevalence of this condition in female patients (female to male ratio 5:1).

 

Factors involved in the pathogenesis of primary empty sella are shown in Figure 1.

 

Secondary empty sella is more common and is related to various pathological processes of the sellar region. Among many causes, pituitary tumor shrinkage occurring after medical treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, and apoplexy of a pituitary adenoma are frequent causes of secondary empty sella. Likewise, postpartum pituitary necrosis, pituitary infection, hypophysitis, and traumatic brain injury may lead to pituitary atrophy. The diagnosis of secondary empty sella is more difficult if there is no known underlying pathology involving the pituitary gland. In these cases, the sella is normal in size, and the function of the flattened pituitary gland may or may not be compromised. Such is the case in congenital causes of hypopituitarism both acquired and genetic, presenting with a hypoplastic pituitary gland and ectopic posterior lobe (7). Large intracranial tumors such as slow-growing meningiomas can also cause increased intracranial pressure and secondary empty sella in a significant number of patients. Pituitary MRI images of patients with secondary and primary empty sella are presented in the section dedicated to radiological appearance of an empty sella (Fig. 2-6). Associated risk factors for primary and secondary empty sella are shown in Table 1.

 

The reported prevalence of empty sella depends on techniques used for detection. In autopsy studies empty sella has been found in up to 5.5-12% cases (1,2), On imaging the overall incidence has been estimated at 12% (4). The prevalence of PES is very high in patients with IIH (8)

 

Table 1. Associated Risk Factors for Primary and Secondary Empty Sella

Primary Empty Sella (PES)

Secondary Empty Sella (SES)

Female sex

Multiple pregnancies

Obesity and sleep apnea

Arterial hypertension

Benign intracranial hypertension

 

Medical therapy

Pituitary surgery

Irradiation

Pituitary apoplexy

Sheehan’s syndrome

Traumatic brain injury

Congenital hypopituitarism

 

Figure 1. Factors involved in pathogenesis of primary empty sella include the upper-sellar factors, incompetence or incomplete formation of the sellar diaphragm, and pituitary factors associated with the variation in the pituitary volume. Modified from Bioscientifica Ltd., Chiloiro S et al, European Journal of Endocrinology (2017) 177, R275–R285

 

RADIOLOGICAL APPEARANCE OF EMPTY SELLA

 

Very commonly an empty sella is incidentally discovered during MRI or CT imaging or during evaluation for headache, endocrine, neurological or visual disturbances. Less commonly it is observed after additional imaging for abnormal sella turcica radiographs. Chronic intracranial hypertension can lead to sellar remodeling and enlargement with thinning of the sellar floor and rarely rhinorrhea.

 

On typical presentation CSF filling is in continuity with overlying subarachnoid spaces and the residual pituitary gland is flattened against the sellar floor of an enlarged bony sella with pituitary volume usually less than 611.21 mm3 (9). The differential diagnosis with cystic lesions and congenital pituitary abnormalities may pose a challenge. The stalk is usually thinned and located in the midline. Asymmetry is a frequent sign of the secondary empty sella. In rare cases the chiasm can herniate into the sella in cases of both primary and secondary etiology. Indirect signs of intracranial hypertension may also be present such as flattening of the posterior sclera, prominent subarachnoid spaces along the optic nerves, vertical tortuosity of the optic nerve sheath complex, and increased width of the optic nerve sheaths (10).

 

Sagittal and coronal T1-weighted (T1W) contrast enhanced images and coronal T2-weighted (T2W) images are strongly indicated for MR studies because they show CSF within the sella. On FLAIR sequences the intrasellar fluid completely suppresses and it presents without restriction in DWI sequences. After contrast T1W images show normal enhancement of residual pituitary gland and the stalk in PES in contrast to scaring and distortion in SES.

 

In patients with congenital hypopituitarism an ectopic posterior pituitary, stalk duplication or absence may be present in combination with other midline defects (agenesis of corpus callosum, supraoptic dysplasia, etc.) (7).

 

Figures 2, 3, 4, 5 represent various MRI findings of patients with secondary empty sella due to postpartum hemorrhage (Sheehan’s syndrome Fig. 2), lymphocytic hypophysitis (Fig. 3), shrinkage of a macroprolactinoma after successful treatment with cabergoline (Fig.4), and congenital hypopituitarism with empty sella (Fig.5)

 

Figure 2. Sagittal T1W images of two patients with empty sella and Sheehan’s syndrome
Left Panel (sagittal T1W image without contrast) and Right (sagittal T1W image after contrast enhancement) represent the MRI appearance of empty sella in two patients with Sheehan’s syndrome. Both patients presented with hyponatremic coma due to unrecognized panhypopituitarism and infection 3 and 20 years after delivery complicated by postpartum hemorrhage.

Figure 3. Contrast enhanced coronal and sagittal T1W images of lymphocytic hypophysitis spontaneous evolution from the presentation (panel A, B), after 4 (panel C) and 10 years (panel D) of follow-up resulting in secondary empty sella.

Figure 4. Coronal T1W images demonstrating a pituitary tumor (macroprolactinoma) shrinkage in a patient treated with the dopamine agonist cabergoline for 10 years. The patient presented with hyperprolactinemia causing galactorrhea-amenorrhea, secondary adrenal insufficiency and central hypothyroidism. Hyperprolactinemia and adrenal insufficiency completely recovered during follow up.

Figure 5. Sagittal T1W showing small pituitary gland found at the bottom of sella, thin stalk and ectopic posterior lobe in a young adult with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (congenital).

Figure 6. Sagittal T1W images of pituitary stalk pressed against the dorsum sellae causing mild hyperprolactinemia in a patient with primary empty sella.

 

PRIMARY EMPTY SELLA (PES) AND EMPTY SELLA SYNDROME

 

Epidemiologically, this is associated with female sex (female to male ratio 5:1), multiple pregnancies, obesity, arterial hypertension, and middle age. It may present with headaches, endocrine dysfunction, and visual disturbances due to pressure on the neighboring structures.

A typical clinical picture consists of headache and obesity. Women in the reproductive age may be affected by menstrual irregularities, galactorrhea, and sterility. Man can develop gynecomastia and sexual disturbances. Primary empty sella due to the syndrome of increased intracranial pressure can also be associated with symptoms of intracranial hypertension.

 

Pathogenesis of Primary Empty Sella (PES)

 

Pregnancy may trigger the onset of PES. It is associated with pituitary hyperplasia and CSF hypertension especially in multiple pregnancies. PES has also been associated with CSF hypertension related to obesity and arterial hypertension. In the largest study with 175 patients, multiple pregnancies were reported in 58.3% women with PES, while obesity and arterial hypertension were recorded in 49.5% and 27.3% of patients (10). In patients with benign intracranial hypertension, empty sella is a common finding (8, 11).

 

Endocrine Dysfunction in PES

 

Hyperprolactinemia, usually mild (less than 50 ng/ml), is present in approximately 10% of patients (10). It is often due to increased pressure of the CSF on the pituitary stalk and diminished dopamine inhibitory effect. Prolactin dynamics in PES may be influenced by gonadal status, intracranial pressure, neurotransmitters, and stalk integrity. Rarely, pituitary microadenomas causing acromegaly and Cushing’s disease may be associated with empty sella. In the recent study by Himes et al. empty sella was associated with an increased rate of MRI negative Cushing’s disease (12). Pituitary compression causing a relative reduction in the volume of the pituitary for imaging is a plausible cause for not detecting the tumor mass with MRI (12). The presence of ES was associated with lower preoperative prolactin and nadir GH responses to OGTT in patients with acromegaly (13) Functional imaging, if available may identify occult pituitary tumors as therapeutic targets in such settings.

 

The prevalence of hypopituitarism in patients with PES is variable. In a study by Guitelman et al. it was found in 28% of patients (11). Panhypopituitarism was present in 40% of these patients, while partial or isolated hormone deficiencies were diagnosed in 60% of hypopituitary patients (11). The most prevalent pituitary deficiency was growth hormone deficiency.

 

In a pooled meta-analysis, which included four studies, the frequency of hypopituitarism was 52% (14). Multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies were present in 30%, isolated in 21% of patients with PES. Growth hormone and gonadotropins were the most common isolated insufficiencies (14). Significant correlation was reported between IGF-1 values and pituitary volume measurements (15).

 

In a retrospective single-center study of 765 patients by Ekhzaimy et al. 79% of PES was diagnosed incidentally on MRI. The majority of patients were evaluated by general practitioners with suboptimal hormonal evaluation while only 20 % were referred to endocrinologists for hormonal evaluation (16).

 

A multicenter retrospective study from Italy, detected hormonal alterations in 29% of incidental PES suggesting the need for careful initial evaluation since on follow-up hormonal deterioration was uncommon (3%) (17). Hypopituitarism was associated with male sex (17, 18) and radiological finding of complete PES (18).

 

Hormonal assessment is advocated in all patients with ES. In case of borderline results or suspected isolated or partial insufficiency stimulatory tests are recommended if clinically relevant for hormone replacement.

 

Other symptoms in patients with ES include headache and visual and neurological disturbances. In patients with intracranial hypertension these symptoms are more common.

 

Neurological and Ophthalmic Dysfunction in PES

 

Headache is present in approximately 80% (3,6). In 20% of patients it may be accompanied by visual disturbances, even papilledema in intracranial hypertension (3,6).

 

Visual disturbances including worsening of visual acuity, blurred vision, diplopia, defects of oculomotor nerve, and optical neuritis were also reported in patients with PES. In case of benign intracranial hypertension ophthalmic echography and computerized visual field with evoked potentials should be performed in consultation with ophthalmologists. Study by Yilmaz et al. evaluated retinal optic nerve fiber thickness by optic coherence tomography in asymptomatic patients with empty sella and healthy controls (19). Reduced values in asymptomatic patients provide valuable data for monitoring of these patients (19). In case of chiasmal herniation into the empty sella with acute visual deterioration, new neurosurgical techniques of chiasmal transsphenoidal elevation are available (20).

 

Neurological disturbances including dizziness, syncope, cranial nerve disorders, convulsions, and depression were reported in approximately 40% of patients with PES (3, 6). Rhinorrhea increases the risk of meningitis and surgery involving osseous remodeling techniques (21).

An association of PES with periventricular white matter hyperintensities, and enlarged perivascular spaces, common features of cerebral small vessel disease, were reported confirming the previous clinical observation and possible common underlying mechanism (22).

 

TREATMENT

 

In patients with increased idiopathic intracranial pressure osmotic diuretics or acetazolamide (Diamox) are advocated. Weight loss may be helpful in obese and overweight patients especially if accompanied by sleep apnea. Neurosurgical techniques may be indicated for rhinorrhea and some symptomatic secondary causes of empty sella syndrome with increased intracranial pressure and acute visual disturbances. If hypopituitarism is present it should be treated following the current recommendations (23) and hyperprolactinemia treated with dopamine agonists.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Primary empty sella can be heterogeneous in origin and presentations range from an asymptomatic incidental radiological finding to endocrine and neuro-ophthalmological manifestations. Female sex, multiple pregnancies, obesity, and arterial hypertension are associated risk factors as well as the syndrome of benign intracranial hypertension. Secondary empty sella is caused by various pathological processes resulting in shrinkage of the pituitary gland. Routine hormonal status assessment and regular follow-up are indicated in all patients since the prevalence of pituitary dysfunction is significant.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Busch W. Die Morphologie der Sella turcica und ihre Beziehungen zur Hypophyse. Virchows Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medizin 1951; 320: 437–458.
  2. Kaufman B. The ‘empty’ sella turcica-a manifestation of the intrasellar subarachnoid space. Radiology 1968; 90: 931–941.
  3. De Marinis L, Bonadonna S, Bianchi A, Giulio M, Gustina A. Extensive clinical experience: primary empty sella. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005:5471-5477.
  4. Chiloiro S, Giampietro A. Bianchi A, Tartaglione T, Capobianco A, Anile C, De Marinis L. Primary empty sella: a comprehensive review. European Journal of Endocrinology 2017; 177:6; R275-R285.
  5. Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology2002; 59: 1492–1495.
  6. Maira G, Anile C, Mangiola A. Primary empty sella syndrome in a series of 142 patients. Journal of Neurosurery 2005; 103: 831–836.
  7. Besci Ö ,Yaşar E, Mert Erbaş I, Yüksek Acınıklı K, Korcan Demir K, Böber E, Abacı A. Clinical course of primary empty sella in children: a single center experience. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2022; 64: 900-908
  8. Bhawna S, Naveen S, Vikas S, Ashok P, Goel Clinical and Radiological Profile of 122 Cases of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in a Tertiary Care Centre of India. Neurology India 2022; 70(2):704-709.
  9. Hoffmann J, Schmidt C, Kunte H, Klingebiel R, Harms L, Huppertz HJ, Lüdemann L & Wiener E. Volumetric assessment of optic nerve sheath and hypophysis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014;35: 513–518.
  10. Degnan AJ, Levy LM. Pseudotumor cerebri: brief review of clinical syndrome and imaging findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012; doi 10.3174/ajnrA2.404
  11. Guitelman M, Basalvibaso NG, Vitale M, Chervin A, Katz D, Miragaya K, Herrera J, Cornalo D, Servido M, Boero L, Manavela M, Danilowicz K, Alfieri A, Stalldecker G, Glerean M, Fainstein Day P, Ballarino C, Mallea Gil MS, Rogozinski A. Primary empty sella (PES): a review of 175 cases. Pituitary 2013, 16:270-274.
  12. Himes BT, Bhargav AG, Brown DA, Kaufmann TJ, Bancos I, Van Gompel JJ. Does pituitary compression/empty sella syndrome contribute to MRI-negative Cushing's disease? A single-institution experience. Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Jun;48(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2020.3.FOCUS2084. PMID: 32480375
  13. Urhan E, Hacioglu A, Okcesiz I, Karaca Z,  Kara CS, Unluhizarci The coexistence of newly diagnosed acromegaly with primary empty sella: More frequent than expected? Growth Horm IGF Res 2023 Feb:68:101521.doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2022.101521. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
  14. Auer MK, MR Stieg, Crispin A, Sievers C, Stalla GK, Kopczak A. Primary empty sella syndrome and the prevalence of hormonal dysregulation. Deutsches Artzteblatt International 2018; 115: 99-105.
  15. Akkus G, Sözütok S , Odabaş F, Onan B, Evran M, Karagun B, Sert M, Tetiker T. Volume in Patients with Primary Empty Sella and Clinical Relevance to Pituitary Hormone Secretion Current Medical Imaging, 2021, 17, 1018-1024.
  16. Ekhzaimy AA, Mujammami M, Tharkar S, Alansary MA, Al Otaibi D. Clinical presentation, evaluation and case management of primary empty sella syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 10-year single-center patient data. BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00621-5. PMID: 32943019; PMCID: PMC7495892.
  17. Carosi G, Brunetti A, Mangone A, Baldelli R , Tresoldi A, Del Sindaco G, Lavezzi E , Sala E, Mungari R , Fatti LM, Galazzi E, Ferrante E, Indirli R, Biamonte E, Arosio M, Cozzi R, Lania A, Mazziotti G, Mantovani G. A Multicenter Cohort Study in Patients With Primary Empty Sella: Hormonal and Neuroradiological Features Over a Long Follow-Up. Frontiers in Endocrinology doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.925378
  18. Lu M, Ye J, Gao F. Analysis of clinical features of primary empty sella. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2023 Apr;84(2):249-253.
  19. Yilmaz A, Gok M, Altas H, Yildirim T, Kaygisiz S, Isik HS. Retinal nerve fibre and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer analysis by optical coherence tomography in asymptomatic empty sella patients. Int J Neurosci. 2020 Jan;130(1):45-51. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2019.1660328. Epub 2019 Sep 13. PMID:31462116.
  20. Barzaghi LR, Donofrio CA, Panni P, Losa M, Mortini P. Treatment of empty sella associated with visual impairment: a systematic review of chiasmapexy techniques. Pituitary. 2018 Feb;21(1):98-106. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0842-6. Review
  21. Guinto G, Nettel B, Hernández E, Gallardo D, Aréchiga N, Mercado M. Osseous Remodeling Technique of the Sella Turcica: A New Surgical Option for Primary Empty Sella Syndrome. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e953-e958. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.195. Epub 2019 Mar 12. PMID: 30877013.
  22. Chen T, Li G, Wu D, Xie B , Feng Y, Xiao S, Li J, Liu Y, Yang J, Li X. Primary empty sella: The risk factors and associations with the cerebral small vessel diseases: An observational study. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. Volume 203, April 2021, 106586
  23. Flesseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, Melmed S, Murad MH, Salvatori R, Samuels MH: Hormonal replacement in hypoituitarism in adults: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and metabolism 2016; 101:3888-3921.

Adrenal Insufficiency In Children

ABSTRACT 

 

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition related to impaired secretion of cortisol by the adrenal gland. In general, this condition can be divided into primary (adrenal failure) and central (hypothalamic/pituitary) causes. In this chapter, we categorize the causes of adrenal insufficiency and systematically review the etiologies and associations to guide the laboratory evaluation and treatment, specifically as it pertains to the pediatric patient. Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent the development of adrenal crisis – prompt recognition can be lifesaving. Understanding the manifestation of unique types of adrenal insufficiency can guide management with glucocorticoid +/- mineralocorticoids and guide further investigation for associated disorders. We discuss the treatment of adrenal insufficiency, reviewing both the acute (crisis) and chronic management.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) refers to impaired cortisol secretion by the adrenal gland. If untreated, AI can be life-threatening, especially when it is compounded by a physiological stress, such as an acute illness, severe trauma, or surgical procedure (1,2).

 

Cortisol secretion is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) (Figure 1) (1,2). In brief, Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) secreted by the paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus stimulates adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) production and release by the pituitary, leading to cortisol synthesis and secretion by the adrenal gland. Cortisol then negatively feeds back to inhibit both CRH and ACTH release. Clinical manifestations of this feedback mechanism occur frequently as illustrated in clinical practice after chronic treatment with exogenous glucocorticoids, which may suppress CRH and ACTH secretion and consequently result in adrenal atrophy and AI. In addition, a high day (light) and low night (dark) diurnal cycle of ACTH release is entrained, permitting optimal times for assessing the status of spontaneous cortisol secretion (early morning) or its optimal suppression (around midnight).

 

The fetal adrenal gland markedly differs in structure and function from that of the adult (3,4). During both early and late gestation, the adrenal cortex consists primarily of the fetal zone, which produces predominantly androgens that are critical for the sexual maturation of fetal external genitalia. Early cortisol production is indirect via placental conversion of progesterone synthesized in the fetal adrenal to cortisol, whereas, toward the end of the 2nd trimester, direct cortisol synthesis occurs in the definitive zone of the fetal adrenal (5). Aldosterone synthesis remains low until the end of gestation at which time CYP11B2 expression begins. After birth, the fetal zone undergoes atrophy via apoptosis, while the zona glomerulosa and zona fasciculata differentiate from the definitive zone to secrete aldosterone and cortisol respectively, whereas the zona reticularis starts its development postnatally and does not complete development until just before adrenarche (3,4).This process is fully described in the Endotext.org chapter, “Adrenal Cortex: Embryonic Development, Anatomy, Histology and Physiology” (6). The distinctive function of fetal zone and the transition from fetal to adult adrenal function have clinical applications in the very preterm infants who may have transient signs of relative AI after birth (7-9). Furthermore, babies who have a defect in steroidogenesis can present with both adrenal insufficiency and genital atypia (10). The most classic example in this category involves 46,XX babies with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency who present with virilization and adrenal crisis (11). In this chapter, we discuss CAH in the context of AI. Additional information on CAH can be found in the Endotext.org chapter: Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (12) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278953/. Mineralocorticoid deficiency will be reviewed in the context of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI), but in-depth coverage of mineralocorticoid deficiency will be included elsewhere as a separate chapter.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY & CLASSIFICATION

 

Adrenal insufficiency is classified into primary and central origin (Figure 1) (10,13,14).

 

Primary AI

 

Primary AI (PAI) refers to the destruction or dysfunction of the adrenal cortex, often resulting in combined cortisol and aldosterone deficiencies due to injury to both the zona fasciculata and zona glomerulosa (15,16). In cases of destruction, clinical presentation occurs when most of the cortex, >90%, is destroyed. Initial stages may be indolent and may often be followed by an acute stressor leading to clinical presentation and adrenal crisis. In contrast, in cases of dysfunction (i.e. steroidogenesis defects like 21-hydroxylase deficiency causing classical CAH), crisis can occur in the first few weeks of life if the steroidogenic defect is not detected promptly and in the absence of an acute stressor (17). In all cases, decreased glucocorticoid production and decreased negative feedback to the hypothalamus and pituitary result in increased production of ACTH and its pro-hormone pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) (1). The increase in melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) is responsible for the well-recognized hyperpigmentation present in PAI and often the clinical clue to evolving AI.

 

Central AI

 

Central AI involves disorders of the hypothalamic-pituitary region that impair CRH and/or ACTH secretion, and therefore, cortisol production. Aldosterone secretion in the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex is primarily regulated by the renin-angiotensin system rather than ACTH and, thus, remains intact in central AI. Despite the intact mineralocorticoid secretion, hyponatremia may occur due to absence of the glucocorticoid regulated tonic suppression of ADH resulting in volume expansion, a clinical picture similar to the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADH) (18).  

 

SYMPTOMS

 

Acquired AI can have an insidious onset. Children may present with slowly progressive or nonspecific symptoms, such as anorexia, weight loss, morning nausea or vomiting, and fatigue, which may lead to diagnostic challenges and delayed diagnosis. One cross-sectional, retrospective adult study reported that only 15% of cases were correctly diagnosed at the initial presentation and nearly half had experienced symptoms for more than 1 year before establishing their diagnosis (19). Congenital AI usually presents early in life with signs of adrenal crisis or hypoglycemic seizures. Newborns with central AI may be completely asymptomatic until physical stress elicits an adrenal crisis.

 

In the pediatric population particularly, specific signs and symptoms should alert the clinician to the possibility of AI. In central AI, central nervous system (CNS) or midline defects may be present. Furthermore, in the neonate, cholestasis may occur due to immature bile acid synthesis and transport (20,21). Virilization and non-palpable gonads associated with the hyperandrogenemia in 46,XX individuals point to classical CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency at birth (22). 46,XY babies with CAH, however, would not present with ambiguity and, thus, may escape medical attention to present with salt-wasting crises between the first and second weeks of life. The inclusion of 17-hydroxyprogesterone measurement in newborn screening programs has enabled detection of these babies prior to the onset of crisis. While the majority of individuals with classical CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency are identified by newborn screening, false negative results and therefore missed diagnosis have been reported (23-26). Moreover, other certain rare enzyme deficiencies are not included in the newborn screen. Thus, a keen clinical index of suspicion remains crucial in cases of CAH who have escaped the newborn screening as experts continue to consider methods to enhance the testing accuracy (27,28). Other associations are discussed in detail under the heading of etiology and are reviewed in Table 1.

 

In acquired PAI, patients may experience salt craving (i.e., a sign of mineralocorticoid deficiency) and orthostasis and may be noted on examination to have bronze hyperpigmentation, especially in non-sun-exposed areas with prominence in the palmar creases, oral mucosa, skin folds, and areola.

 

In the case of adrenal crisis, glucocorticoid deficiency may progress to vomiting, muscle weakness, lethargy, hypoglycemia, and ultimately hemodynamic instability. Mineralocorticoid deficiency causes hyponatremia and hyperkalemia and, thus, symptoms may include headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and ultimately severe dehydration and hypotension. Early detection is critical given the high morbidity and mortality associated with adrenal crisis (29).

 

ETIOLOGY

 

Both primary and central AI can arise neonatally due to congenital causes or later in childhood, adolescence and beyond due to acquired causes. In contrast to adults, genetic defects are more likely to be prevalent in infants and children. In recent years, knowledge and understanding of the genetic causes of AI have significantly increased and include every step of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsible for cortisol and aldosterone synthesis and action (Figure 1 and Table 1).

 

Figure 1. Genetic defects in various steps along the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis can result in either central or primary adrenal insufficiency depending on the location in the pathway. This figure displays the HPA axis and the location operative in the genetic defect, guiding the assessment of central or primary insufficiency. Genetic causes of central AI can include several genes involved in the development of the pituitary gland (e.g., PROP1, POU1F1 (formerly PIT1), GLI2, HESX1, LHX3, LHX4, SOX3, SOX2, OTX2), and result in multiple combined pituitary deficiencies. Central AI can result from an isolated ACTH deficiency caused by defects in the synthesis of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) or its cleavage. Defects of the melanocortin 2 receptor (MC2R) or its accessory protein MRAP result in ACTH-resistance (a.k.a. as Familial Glucocorticoid Deficiency). There are multiple genetic causes leading to primary AI (PAI). They range from genes that are involved in the development of the adrenal gland resulting in adrenal hypoplasia, defects in cortisol synthesis itself, or metabolic and autoimmune diseases (e.g. adrenoleukodystrophy, sphingolipidosis or autoimmune polyglandular syndrome), that result in destruction of the adrenal gland over time. Defects in steroidogenesis involve multiple genes along the pathway of cortisol synthesis and are the most frequent cause of PAI. Finally, PAI can be part of certain syndromes, such as Triple A Syndrome (AAAS) or disorders associated with oxidative stress.

 

Causes of Primary AI

 

CONGENITAL CAUSES

 

Disorders of Steroidogenesis

 

Disorders of steroidogenesis include 1) defects in the cholesterol biochemistry including Smith-Lemli-Opitz (DHCR7) (30), 2) early steroidogenesis defects such as congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (STAR) and CYP11A1 mutations (31,32), and 3) defects within the adrenal gland causing CAH, the most common being CYP21A2 (21-hydroxylase deficiency) and rare forms including CYP11B1 (11β-hydroxylase deficiency), 3HSD2 (3β-hydroxylase deficiency), CYP17A1 (17α-hydroxylase deficiency), and POR (Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase deficiency) (12) (See Fig 2 for depiction of adrenal steroidogenesis, Table 1 for further information on clinical presentations and associations and refer to the Endotext chapter on CAH for further details.)

 

Figure 2. The classical and backdoor pathways of adrenal steroidogenesis: The classical pathway is highlighted in blue, and the backdoor pathway is highlighted in orange. In the classical pathway, five enzymatic steps are necessary for cortisol production. In the first step of adrenal steroidogenesis, cholesterol enters mitochondria via a carrier protein called steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). ACTH stimulates cholesterol cleavage, the first and rate limiting step of adrenal steroidogenesis. The five enzymes required for cortisol production are cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme (SCC), 17α-hydroxylase, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3βHSD2), 21-hydroxylase, and 11β-hydroxylase. The backdoor pathway is an alternative pathway producing dihydrotestosterone. The enzymes include 5α-reductase 1, aldo keto reductases, retinol dehydrogenase RoDH, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, 17α-hydroxylase. (Figure from CAH Endotext Chapter).

Adrenal Hypoplasia

 

Underdevelopment of the adrenal glands may occur as an X-linked genetic disorder (DAX1/NROB1 – X-linked AHC) and results in both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid deficiency (33,34). X-linked AHC is associated with hypogonadism and in some cases, muscular dystrophy. Adrenal hypoplasia can be seen as part of syndromic undergrowth disorders including IMAGe and MIRAGE (35), or in association with gonadal dysgenesis and sex reversal such as NR5A1 (formerly SF1) (34) and SeRKAL syndrome (WNT4) (36) (see Table 1).

 

ACTH Resistance-Like Conditions

 

ACTH-resistance, known as Familial Glucocorticoid Deficiency (FGD), is another childhood cause of PAI. It is caused by defects of the melanocortin 2 receptor (MC2R) or its accessory protein at the adrenal gland rendering it unresponsive to ACTH action (Figure 1 and Table 1). Given the specific operative nature of ACTH resistance, concerns for mineralocorticoid insufficiency are rare (37). In FGD type 1, the MC2R receptor is dysfunctional. Patients may present with hyperpigmentation, jaundice, hypoglycemia, and early adrenal crisis or later in life with hyperpigmentation and fatigue (38). In FGD type 2, the MC2R receptor is absent. These cases are due to deficiency of the MRAP (melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein) which assists in trafficking of the MC2R receptor to the cell surface.

 

Other disorders associated with ACTH resistance include those associated with oxidative stress (most commonly defects in nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase [NNT] but also described in thioredoxin reductase 2 [TNXRD2]), Triple A Syndrome (Allgrove syndrome due to disruption of the Aladin protein [AAAS] ACTH resistance/Addison disease, alacrima (absence or deficiency of ocular tears), and achalasia of the esophagus)(37,38), and disruption of mini-chromosome maintenance 4 (MCM4)(37-39).

 

Metabolic Conditions

 

Metabolic conditions associated with PAI include mitochondrial diseases – large gene deletions such as Kearns-Sayre and Pearson as well as single gene disorders (MK-TK, MRPS7, QRSL1, NDUFAF5, GFER), lysosomal storage disorder (Wolman), sphingolipidosis (SGPL1 deficiency), and adrenoleukodystrophy(40-42). Descriptions and associations can be found in Table 1. In adrenoleukodystrophy, neurologic features can prompt identification. However, neurologic manifestations are absent in adrenal only forms of the disease. Adrenoleukodystrophy is included in the newborn screening programs in some states in the US. However, screening is not yet universal in the US and is rare in other countries. Consequently, a high index of suspicion should be maintained for all boys with unknown cause of PAI, and very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) should be measured. Prompt diagnosis aids in therapeutic decision- making including hematopoietic stem cell transplant as well as more recent approval for gene therapy (43,44).

 

Zellweger Spectrum disorders consist of a group of peroxisomal related gene disorders that result in neurological dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, renal cysts and PAI. Screening for PAI is recommended after the first year of life(45).  

 

AQUIRED CAUSES

Autoimmune Conditions

 

Addison’s disease (autoimmune adrenal insufficiency) is the most common cause of AI in adolescents and adults with a median age of presentation at 11 years (15). While less common in young children, it can be seen in association with other endocrine dysfunctions (poly-endocrinopathy). The best described monogenic cause is related to a defect in the AIRE gene and results in Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndrome type 1 (APS1). Presenting features often include mucocutaneous candidiasis and hypocalcemia related to hypoparathyroidism. In contrast, APS2 is typically of polygenic inheritance and is associated with autoimmune thyroiditis and diabetes mellitus with abnormalities in the DQ and DR genes. Adrenal insufficiency related to APS2 has a later age of onset of about 35 years of age, although pediatric cases do occur (15).

 

Other Causes of Primary AI

 

Other acquired causes include hemorrhagic, infectious, and infiltrative conditions. Adrenal hemorrhage should only result in adrenal insufficiency if both glands are affected extensively, as 10% of remaining function is sufficient to retain adrenal activity (46). Unilateral hemorrhage should not cause adrenal insufficiency as the single remaining gland is able to compensate. While adrenal hemorrhage occurs fairly often in traumatic birth delivery, few require treatment and of those that do, most resolve within 3-9 months (47). Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome is bilateral adrenal hemorrhage of infectious etiology and described with N. meningitides, streptococcus pneumoniae, and other bacterial infections (48). This adrenal insufficiency may also be reversible upon treatment of the primary infection supplemented with cortisol as needed. In contrast, tuberculous adrenal disease results in necrosis of the gland and is often irreversible unless discovered very early in the course of tuberculosis (49).

 

Several drugs increase cortisol clearance and may precipitate adrenal crisis or require a dose increase in patients with AI on daily glucocorticoid replacement. These include CYP3A4 inducers such as rifampin, mitotane, carbamazepine, and St. John’s wort. Initiation of growth hormone and T4 replacement may also increase cortisol metabolism (50). Medications used for treating excessive glucocorticoid secretion (Cushing’s disease) that directly block steroidogenesis (ketoconazole, etomidate, metyrapone, osilodrostat) and the glucocorticoid receptor (mifepristone) can induce adrenal insufficiency (51).

 

Central AI

 

CONGENITAL CAUSES

 

Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiency

 

Many genetic causes of hypopituitarism (consisting of loss of ACTH with other anterior pituitary hormones such as GH, TSH, LH/FSH) have been elucidated including PROP1, POU1F1 (formerly PIT1), GH1, GLI2, HESX1, LHX3, LHX4, SOX3, SOX2, OTX2 and others (20,21,52). These can result in hypopituitarism on its own (non-syndromic) or in a constellation of other associated phenotypic features (syndromic), commonly involving midline defects. Despite a genetic etiology, some conditions including PROP1 and GH1 may manifest with ACTH insufficiency later in life. As such, close monitoring of the HPA axis in the setting of other pituitary deficiency is crucial (53).

 

Isolated ACTH Deficiency

 

Isolated ACTH deficiency can occur due to disruption of TBX-19 (formerly known as TPIT, required for pro-opiomelanocortin protein transcription), due to defects in pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) or pro-hormone convertase-1 (PC-1/PCSK1) (20). The classic findings of red hair and pale skin and hyperphagic obesity in POMC mutations are related to the inability to produce pigmentation and regulate hunger in the absence of α melanocyte stimulating hormones. Another syndromic description involving ACTH deficiency includes DAVID (deficit in anterior pituitary function and variable immunodeficiency) syndrome which occurs in 2/3 of NFKB2 mutations.

 

AQUIRED CAUSES

 

Brain Lesion or Injury, Infiltrative Disease

 

Traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, infiltrative (histiocytosis, iron overload), and inflammatory (hypophysitis) disorders can result in pituitary dysfunction and impaired ACTH secretion; additional pituitary hormone deficiencies can also occur frequently with these conditions. Diagnosis of AI in these settings should therefore prompt a complete pituitary workup, including evaluation for central hypothyroidism, growth hormone deficiency, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (if in a pubertal child). Pituitary surgery may result in central AI post-operatively and during recovery. In contrast, in cases of brain radiation or developmental differences of the pituitary gland, AI may occur over time, and longitudinal assessment is suggested for affected individuals. Traumatic brain injury has been associated with central adrenal insufficiency in up to 14% of individuals with moderate to severe TBI and 6% of athletes with history of concussion with data coming from the adult population (54,55). Data in children have shown central AI in up to 47% of individuals at 3 months and recovery by 12 months after injury (56). 

 

Transient (Hypothalamic Suppression)

 

Glucocorticoid induced - Oral glucocorticoid administration above physiologic doses (i.e. Hydrocortisone 8-10mg/m2/day or equivalent) is associated with HPA axis suppression and subsequent adrenal atrophy after 2-4 weeks of daily use (57,58). Although there is significant interindividual variability, risk factors for AI include dose, frequency, and potency of the used glucocorticoid (59). Adrenal suppression can also be seen with inhaled or intranasal glucocorticoids, especially if their use is combined with intermittent use of oral formulations. Screening for AI has been suggested for children taking high doses of inhaled glucocorticoids (>500µg/day of Fluticasone or equivalent) for more than 6 months (60). Particular attention should be paid to the combination of glucocorticoid therapy and CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as grapefruit juice, as the latter can reduce glucocorticoid clearance, and therefore, augment their efficacy.

 

Adrenal function recovers once glucocorticoids are discontinued. Time to recovery is variable from 1 to many months, and can be affected by length of exposure, dose, frequency, and glucocorticoid potency (61-63). As such, recovery should be monitored, and stress dosing instructions provided until adrenal recovery.

 

Through a similar mechanism, successful treatment of Cushing’s syndrome and Cushing’s disease by resection of the pituitary or adrenal lesion results in a temporary adrenal insufficiency, necessitating replacement until recovery is demonstrated.

 

Other medications - Various medications have been shown to suppress the HPA axis. This is more frequently seen with long term opiate use (Opiate induced adrenal insufficiency - OIAI) due to tonic inhibition of the HPA axis – in which studies have shown 9 to 29% of individuals with adrenal suppression, potentially with high risk associated with younger age (64). There have also been cases of adrenal suppression with short term opiate use (65). Other medications responsible for adrenal suppression include somatostatin analogues, antipsychotics, and antidepressants.

 

Critical illness- such as sepsis or severe trauma, elicit a “fight-or-flight” or “stress” response that involves multiple physiological processes, including release of catecholamines and activation of the HPA axis. HPA axis activation results in a rapid rise in circulating ACTH and cortisol. The concept of “relative” AI during critical illness was introduced in the early 2000’s based on adult data of patients with septic shock who demonstrated an inadequate cortisol response to endocrine testing. The term “relative AI” was later replaced by “critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI)” as these patients typically have “inappropriately” low ACTH and cortisol levels in response to stress.

 

Changes in adrenal function during critical illness are not fully understood (66). However, current research indicates that there is an initial brief HPA axis activation in response to a critical illness followed by a series of adaptive events that include a reduction in cortisol-binding globulin (CBG)/albumin leading to an increase in free cortisol, prolonged cortisol half-life due to suppressed metabolism in liver and kidneys, and tissue-specific changes in glucocorticoid receptor action (66). These peripheral adjustments increase systemic cortisol availability, and with prolonged illness, may result in central HPA suppression. From the clinical standpoint, endocrine testing (i.e. measurement of serum cortisol at baseline or after ACTH stimulation) can be challenging due to reductions in CBG, with one study noting this reduction lasting 7-8 days in adult patients (67). In terms of treatment, randomized controlled trials of stress dose hydrocortisone in critically ill adults showed inconsistent results on long term mortality (68). Hydrocortisone administration was found to have a positive effect on blood pressure, which can be related the pharmacologic effects of high dose glucocorticoids rather than treatment of CIRCI (66).

 

Pediatric data on CIRCI are limited. Current pediatric guidelines do not recommend hydrocortisone treatment for children with sepsis who are hemodynamically stable after fluid resuscitation but can be considered in those with fluid-refractory, inotrope-resistant shock (69).

 

Relative AI of the newborn - Very preterm infants may experience refractory hypotension that is unresponsive to fluid resuscitation and inotropic support but responds to treatment with glucocorticoids (7-9). No other apparent cause, like sepsis, is identified in these cases and electrolyte abnormalities indicative of a mineralocorticoid defect can be observed. It has been suggested that these infants have an attenuated cortical response to stress or relative AI. The term transient adrenocortical insufficiency of prematurity (TAP) has also been used as this phenomenon resolves within the first couple weeks of life (8). Immaturity of the HPA axis both at the level of hypothalamus, pituitary, and the adrenal gland itself have been implicated as the underlying pathophysiology. A late-onset GC -responsive circulatory collapse that occurs within the first 2 weeks of life and responds to therapy with glucocorticoids has also been described (70).

 

Formal diagnosis is challenging given studies failing to show association of low cortisol concentrations with adverse outcomes (71) while others identifying an association between high cortisol values with both morbidity (intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral palsy) and mortality (72,73).

 

Neither baseline nor stimulated values of cortisol have shown diagnostic benefit.

 

Cortisol secretion markedly increases during parturition to assist with lung maturation and transition to life after birth. There are data to suggest that very preterm infants who develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) often have relative AI after birth. To address this concern, early low-dose hydrocortisone therapy as prophylaxis for AI was found to be beneficial for survival without BPD, although the treatment was associated with increased risk for spontaneous gastrointestinal perforation (74). 

 

TABLE 1. CAUSES OF ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY IN CHILDREN

Congenital - Central

Combined pituitary deficiencies

Non syndromic (PROP1, POU1F1)

Variable presentations associated with single or multiple pituitary defects including ACTH deficiency. May include hypoglycemia and/or microphallus

Syndromic

·    Associated syndromes include optic cell hypoplasia / septo-optic dysplasia, microphthalmia (HESX1, SOX2, OTX2) and various CNS malformations (i.e., holoprosencephaly) with midline defects.

·    Syndromes with hypothalamic dysfunction (e.g., ROHHAD syndrome, Prader- Willi syndrome) can rarely be associated with ACTH deficiency.

Isolated ACTH deficiency

Defects in TBX19, POMC or PCSK1

·    Can present in the newborn with hypoglycemic seizures and jaundice.

·    Associated features (POMC): red hair, hyperphagia/obesity. MC4R agonists can be leveraged to treat obesity.

·    Associated features (PCSK1): malabsorptive diarrhea, obesity, and hypogonadism

Acquired - Central

Brain lesion or injury

Examples: Tumor, hemorrhage, irradiation

·    Usually associated with additional pituitary defects

·    Immune checkpoint inhibitors can be associated with hyper-autoimmunity and cause hypophysitis and hypopituitarism.

Infiltrative disease

Examples: iron overload (due to transfusions in thalassemias, hemochromatosis), sarcoidosis, Langerhans cell histiocytosis

·    Usually associated with additional pituitary defects.

·    Symptoms specific to the underlying causative disorder.

Transient (hypothalamic suppression)

Glucocorticoid therapy

·    The most frequent cause of adrenal insufficiency.

·    Adrenal function recovers with discontinuation of daily glucocorticoids.

Medications

·    Opiates, somatostatin analogues, antipsychotics and antidepressants

Treatment of Cushing

·    Permanent: hypophysectomy

·    Transient: post operative for unilateral adrenalectomy, or pituitary lesion

Critical illness -related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI)

Characterized by a series of adaptions of the HPA axis in response to critical illness, which are still not clearly understood.  The beneficial effects of glucocorticoids in sepsis are likely related their anti-inflammatory and blood -pressure support effects rather than treatment of adrenal insufficiency.

Congenital - primary

ACTH resistance

Familial Glucocorticoid Deficiency

Type 1 (MC2R): Presents first weeks of life with severe hypoglycemia, prolonged jaundice

Type 2 (MRAP): Presents first few months of life with AI

Syndromic

Triple A (Allgrove) syndrome (AAAS): Associated with alacrimand achalasia of the esophagus presenting in childhood or 2nd decade of life

Disorders associated with oxidative stress (NNT, TNXRD2)

Congenital Adrenal Hypoplasia

X- linked Adrenal Hypoplasia (DAX-1/NR0B1)

·    Can present with salt losing early on or may present later in childhood

·    Additional features: hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

·    Associated with a larger Xp21 contiguous gene deletion that can result in Duchene Muscular Dystrophy and Glycerol Kinase deficiency

·    Growth hormone insufficiency in a small subset

Syndromic

IMAGe syndrome (gain of function CDKN1C, POLE1): Additional features: IUGR, metaphyseal dysplasia, GU anomalies

MIRAGE syndrome (gain of function SAMD9): Additional features: Myelodysplasia, infections, restriction of growth, GU variations, enteropathy

NR5A1 mutation and SeRKAL syndrome (WNT4):  Associated with gonadal dysgenesis and sex reversal in 46XX individuals

Rare reports: Pena-Shokeir syndrome type 1 (DOK7, RAPSN), pseudotrisomy 13, Galloway-Mowat (WDR73), Pallister Hall (GLI3) and Meckel-Gruber(MKS1)

Disorders of steroidogenesis

Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)

Due to defects in 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2)

·    The most common cause of PAI in neonates. 

·    Presents with salt wasting adrenal during 1st month of life crisis and genital virilization in 46XX individuals.

·    Biomarker: elevated 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels. Included in the state newborn screening in US

Due to defects in 11β-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (3HSD2), 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1), P450 oxidoreductase (POR):

·    Variable phenotype depending on the defect. Salt wasting and genital atypia can be present.

·    Biomarker: steroid precursor that accumulates above the specific enzymatic defect

Defects in cholesterol biochemistry

·    Smith-Lemli-Opitz (DHCR7). Additional features: Microcephaly, cleft palate, syndactyly, polydactyly, congenital heart, atypical genitalia with undescended testis.

·    Biomarker: elevated 7-dehydrocholesterol. AI is rare

·    Wolman disease (LIPA). Additional features: lysosomal storage disorder, hepatosplenomegaly, adrenal calcifications, failure to thrive

Early steroidogenic defect

Congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia (STAR), P450 Side Chain Cleavage (CYP11A1) mutations:

·    Associated with salt wasting and under-virilization of 46XY individuals.

·    Operative in adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis

Salt wasting crisis in severe P450scc deficiency presents at 7-10 days while in STAR deficiency, the onset is more insidious, after 3-4 weeks of age

Partial enzyme defect may have less severe presentation

Metabolic disorders

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Lyase (SGPL1) deficiency

·    Results from impaired breakdown of sphingosine 1-phosphate.

·    Additional features: adrenal calcifications, nephrotic syndrome. Ichthyosis, neurologic dysfunction.

Adrenoleukodystrophy

 

·    X- linked (ABCD1). Usually presents in childhood. Associated with progressive neurologic deterioration.

·    Zellweger Spectrum disorders (PEX). Associated with neonatal adrenoleukodystrophy, hepatomegaly, chondrodysplasia punctuate, hypotonia, seizures.

·    Biomarker: Elevated Very Long Chain Fatty Acids.

Wolman

·    LIPA mutation – lysosomal storage disorder with foamy lipid droplet accumulation, adrenal calcification and malabsorption

Mitochondrial Disorders

Variable Presenting features.

Acquired – Primary

Autoimmunity

Addison disease

·    The most common cause of acquired PAI. Presents in childhood.

·    Biomarker: 21-hydroxylase antibodies

·    Can be part of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS) type I (AIRE) or type II (polygenic)

o   APS 1: other associations include: hypoparathyroidism, chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, ectodermal dystrophy, autoimmune hepatitis, hypogonadism, pernicious anemia.

o   APS2: other associations include autoimmune thyroiditis, diabetes mellitus

 

Adrenal damage

Hemorrhage, Infectious, Infiltration (Tuberculosis, HIV, CMV)

Infectious: Tuberculosis, HIV, CMV

Infiltration: neuroblastoma

 

Transient

Relative adrenal insufficiency of the newborn

Described primarily in preterm sick infants within 2 weeks of life with signs of refractory hypotension in the absence of apparent cause and associated with electrolyte abnormalities (hyponatremia, hyperkalemia). May be related to immature adrenals in the very preterm infants.

 

 

Treatment of Cushing

·    Permanent: Bilateral adrenalectomy

·    Medication induced: ketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, etomidate, mifepristone

 

 

Medication induced

CYP3A4 inducers: rifampin, mitotane, carbamazepine and St. John’s wort

 

Mimickers of Adrenal Insufficiency

 

In the introduction to this chapter, we discussed the risk of delayed diagnosis of AI given the potential overlapping symptoms of glucocorticoid deficiency with other illnesses. In the same vein, other critical illnesses including sepsis and cardiovascular disease may be mistaken for adrenal crisis, especially in the setting of hydrocortisone responsiveness. In this case, hydrocortisone’s inotropic properties may lead to symptomatic improvement but may not be diagnostic of underlying AI.

 

Further, salt wasting adrenal crisis has findings overlapping with other salt-losing crises in infants including those due to kidney inflammation, infection, and obstruction – presenting with vomiting, hyponatremia, and hyperkalemia due to aldosterone resistance (a transient pseudo hypoaldosteronism) (75,76).

 

EPIDEMIOLOGY

 

Primary Adrenal Insufficiency (PAI)

 

PAI is a rare disease. Its incidence in children is not well established. An epidemiologic study from Finland observed a cumulative incidence of 10/100,000 at 15 years and 13/100,000 at 20 years (15). Studies from Europe that include both children and adults describe a similar prevalence (71).

 

In adults, the most common cause of PAI is autoimmune disease. In contrast, genetic defects are more prevalent in children. CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency occurs in about 1/15,000 births and is the most frequent cause of PAI in children accounting for 50 to 86% of cases (15,77). As such, the age-related incidence of PAI in childhood is higher in the first year of life and decreases afterwards (15). Autoimmune disease is reported as the second most common cause, either as an isolated disease or as a manifestation of a poly endocrinopathy (i.e. APS 1 or 2) (77,78). Whereas most CAH cases are identified in the newborn period, autoimmune disease typically presents after the first couple years of life. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (XALD) is another cause of PAI during childhood with a prevalence in newborn males of about 1/20,000, approximately 80% of whom will develop PAI (79).

 

In recent years, the number of recognized genetic causes of PAI have significantly increased(Figure 1) (13). Genetic testing for PAI has a high diagnosis rate as illustrated by recent studies of children with PAI of unknown etiology, where genetic analysis established the diagnosis in most of the patients (80,81). The most frequent genes involved in these series were MC2R, NR0B/DAX and CYP11A1.

 

Central AI

 

Central AI is also quite rare with most epidemiologic data available in adult populations. The reported occurrence is about 14-28/100,000 individuals, with greater than 50% occurring because of a pituitary tumor (82-84). A Finnish epidemiologic study reporting single center data over a period of 30 years is one of the only studies of incidence in pediatrics. The study looked specifically at combined pituitary hormone deficiencies, without clearly distinguishing AI, and observed similar proportions in pediatric in comparison with previous adult studies, with 61% of hypopituitarism being acquired and the other 39% congenital (85). Craniopharyngiomas comprise the bulk of pediatric pituitary tumors, and similarly account for one quarter of acquired hypopituitarism, with gliomas following at just over 10% (85).  Up to 30% of patients with craniopharyngiomas will present with AI due to the lesion itself prior to surgical manipulation while 77-90% will have post-surgical AI (86,87).

 

Glucocorticoid induced AI is the most common cause of AI in both children and adults. Glucocorticoids are extensively used in clinical practice for treatment of various disorders, such as asthma, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and cancer (88). In US, approximately 1% of the adult population is on oral glucocorticoids and rates increase in the elderly population (89), while similar rates in children are not well established. In adults, AI has been observed around 48% with oral administration and 7.8% with inhalation (57). Rates of AI in children on inhaled glucocorticoids have been reported around 10%, but results may vary depending on the study (90,91). Adrenal crisis and related deaths have been described in children treated with inhaled glucocorticoids(92,93).

 

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO A PATIENT WITH SUSPECTED AI

 

Our diagnostic and differential approach to a child with suspected AI is summarized in Figure 2. Clinical signs and symptoms of AI are non-specific and require a high index of suspicion; when present, the suspected diagnosis needs to be confirmed with appropriate laboratory evaluation. Evaluation typically starts with measurement of serum ACTH, cortisol, and electrolytes. In the case of an emergency, such as suspected adrenal crisis, laboratory evaluation can only be interpreted if obtained prior to administration of glucocorticoids as therapy can influence test results.

 

The goals of the initial laboratory assessment are to confirm the diagnosis of AI, and then, understand if AI is primary or central. Most cases of PAI, but not all, involve combined glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid deficiencies. In the case of PAI, therefore, mineralocorticoid function must be assessed with measurements of serum electrolytes, aldosterone, and renin (Figure 2). Details on laboratory assessment and additional dynamic testing are included in the LABORATORY EVALUATION section of this chapter.

 

The next step is to pinpoint the specific etiology so that management can be individualized. Clinical presentation and symptoms can suggest an underlying etiology and guide additional laboratory assessment. For example, salt wasting adrenal crisis in a newborn should prompt measurement of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone concentrations to rule out CAH. Vitiligo in a child with PAI suggests an autoimmune process, and the underlying etiology can be confirmed with measurement of 21-hydroxylase antibody titers. AI in a boy with neurological manifestations points to adrenoleukodystrophy and calls for measurements of VLCFA. In many instances, however, the specific etiology cannot be identified. In such cases, genetic testing may be very helpful.

Figure 3. A proposed approach in the diagnosis and differential of AI in children
GC: glucocorticoid. MR: mineralocorticoid. Na: sodium. K: potassium.

LABORATORY EVALUATION

 

Assessment of Glucocorticoid Function

 

BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF CORTISOL AND ACTH CONCENTRATIONS

 

The diagnosis of PAI can be made by measurement of morning ACTH and cortisol concentrations and by demonstrating an inappropriate high ACTH concentration for the cortisol value (Figure 2). Typically, a cortisol value of <5mcg/dL (140nmol/L) associated with an ACTH level > x2 above upper normal range indicates PAI (16). A low morning cortisol value associated with an inappropriately normal ACTH concentration may indicate central AI (94). It is suggested that an 8am cortisol values of <3 mcg/dL (82.8 nmol/ L) in the absence of an elevated ACTH concentration is indicative of central AI (94). Establishing the diagnosis of central AI can be challenging because ACTH concentrations are frequently in the low normal/normal range. The presence of additional pituitary defects increases the risk for AI and needs to be considered when evaluating a child with possible central AI.

 

Assessment of adrenal function, such as in individuals at risk for glucocorticoid-induced AI, can also start with a measurement of morning cortisol (58,95). Adult studies suggest that an 8am cortisol value of >12mcg/dL can predict normal adrenal function (96,97). It is recognized, however, that various guideline and practice recommendations point to slightly different cut-offs (58,94). Further, the suggested cut-offs need to be interpreted by taking into account the cortisol assay that is used. Of note, the listed cut-offs also do not apply for patients on oral contraceptives and/or estrogen replacement as these medications  increase CBG concentrations, and therefore, cortisol values (98).

 

Morning cortisol values may be unreliable in the newborn as the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion may take few months to become established (99). Baseline cortisol values have been extensively studied in the sick preterm infant and were not found to be predictive of AI or adverse outcomes (71-73). Furthermore, high cortisol values during first week of life were associated with intracranial hemorrhage and cerebral palsy later in life (73).

 

DYNAMIC OR STIMULATION TESTS

 

Stimulations tests are typically performed when the diagnosis of AI needs confirmation. The ACTH (a.k.a. corticotropin or Cosyntropin or Synacthen) stimulation test is the primary test performed in children. Historically, the insulin tolerance test (ITT) has been considered the gold standard test for the diagnosis of AI, but its use has been abandoned as it is associated with severe hypoglycemia (1,16,95). The overnight metyrapone test, an alternative to ITT, is also not routinely performed in children because of potential significant adverse effects (16,95). The CRH (corticotropin releasing hormone) stimulation test has been used in the diagnosis of central AI but there is no evidence that it has greater diagnostic accuracy than ACTH testing in pediatrics and CRH is no longer commercially available (100).

 

The ACTH test involves the intramuscular or intravenous administration of cosyntropin, a synthetic fragment of ACTH with full biologic activity, along with cortisol measurements at baseline and after cosyntropin administration. Although differences in practice protocols have been described, a common protocol entails cosyntropin doses of 15mcg/kg in infants, 125mcg in children <2years and 250mcg in children older than 2 years (16). Cortisol concentrations are usually measured at 30- and 60-minutes post stimulation, although again, practice variations have been described with the use of the “short” ACTH test that includes cortisol measurement at baseline and only at 30 min after stimulation(101).

 

The standard dose (250mcg) ACTH test has been validated against the ITT; it has good diagnostic accuracy for PAI but only moderate for central AI (102,103). The low dose ACTH test that involves administration of 1mcg of cosyntropin was developed as an alternative that may offer greater sensitivity in the diagnosis of central AI. Like adult data, however, meta-analysis of pediatric studies indicates that both standard- and low- dose ACTH tests have similar diagnostic accuracy with high specificity but only moderate sensitivity for the diagnosis of central AI (102). These findings suggest that the clinical picture needs to be considered when interpreting ACTH test results. Furthermore, the low dose ACTH test bears technical challenges related to potentially erroneously low administered dose because it requires dilution and cosyntropin is known to adhere to plastic tubing used in intravenous tests (103).

 

Regardless of the standard- or low- dose ACTH test used, the diagnosis of AI is based on peak cortisol concentrations of 18mcg/dL at either 30 or 60 minutes after cosyntropin (16). The cortisol cut-off of 18mcg/dL was established using cortisol assays of previous methodology that are no longer in use, and therefore, is not applicable in today’s clinical practice. Cortisol measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is currently considered the gold standard, yet cortisol immunoassays remain widely used in most facilities. Although there no official guidelines or consensus statements at the moment, adult data support revised cortisol cut-offs at 30 min post cosyntropin of around 15mcg/dL using LC-MS/MS and second-generation immunoassays such as Elescys II (Roche Diagnostics) and Access (Beckman Coulter) (101,104,105) . Collectively, the adult data call for revised cortisol cut-offs specific to the assay that is used to avoid overdiagnosis of AI. Limited pediatric data show similar findings as in adults (106).

 

Literature deriving primarily from critical care medicine uses a cortisol rise of >9mcg/dL during ACTH stimulation to define AI. This criterion is greatly influenced by the baseline cortisol value and has been abandoned (66,95). The ACTH test may miss the diagnosis of AI in newborns with a central defect in ACTH secretion (e.g.,  septo-optic dysplasia or congenital panhypopituitarism) if it is performed within 1-2 weeks after birth. These babies have normal fetal adrenal function driven by placental CRH stimulation, and therefore, normal response to ACTH stimulation shortly after birth(107). However, they develop adrenal atrophy and insufficiency within the first 2 months of life. Similarly, the ACTH test can be falsely negative if the testing is done during the early stages of AI due to exogenous glucocorticoids or a pituitary/CNS insult and before the atrophy of the adrenals has occurred (95).  A high index of suspicion and repeat testing may be needed in such cases. The ACTH test results can be significantly influenced by CBG concentrations. Estrogens are well known to increase CBG concentrations, and estrogen containing oral contraceptives can increase the cortisol cut-off after ACTH stimulation by approximately 10mcg/dL (98,108). Conversely, disease states such as acute illness, cirrhosis, and nephrotic syndrome lead to decreased CBG concentrations and potential overdiagnosis of AI (98). Rare genetic syndromes, such as congenital CBG deficiency or familial glucocorticoid resistance, can also affect baseline as well as stimulated cortisol measurements.

 

The standard-dose ACTH test is also performed when a disorder of steroid biosynthesis, such as CAH, is suspected. In addition to cortisol, adrenal steroids are measured at baseline and 60-minute post stimulation. Specific nomograms based on 17-hydroxyprogesterone values have been developed for the diagnosis of CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (12).

 

Assessment of Mineralocorticoid Function

 

Electrolytes abnormalities that include hyponatremia in combination with hyperkalemia and acidosis should raise suspicion for a mineralocorticoid defect. The simultaneous measurement of plasma aldosterone and renin is important for the diagnosis of a mineralocorticoid defect. An inappropriate low aldosterone concentration in the presence elevated renin levels indicates mineralocorticoid deficiency. In such instances, the treating physician needs to carefully assess the glucocorticoid function of the child to determine whether the child has combined deficiencies, such as seen in CAH, or an isolated mineralocorticoid defect, such as seen with aldosterone synthase deficiency. Conversely, markedly elevated aldosterone and renin levels in a child with hyponatremia and hyperkalemia suggest mineralocorticoid resistance, such as pseudo-hypoaldosteronism(109).

 

Aldosterone and renin concentrations are higher in the newborn and can be affected by prematurity (110-112). Newborns at term have a state of partial aldosterone resistance and hence concurrent high aldosterone values in their blood, that resolve in the first few months of life, whereas babies with severe prematurity have an initial defect in aldosterone secretion followed later by the appearance of physiologic aldosterone resistance (110-112). These physiologic changes need to be considered when assessing mineralocorticoid function in the first few months of life. Lastly, some children with PAI, like those with adrenoleukodystrophy, develop glucocorticoid deficiency initially, while they retain mineralocorticoid activity (79); ongoing monitoring with measurements of serum electrolytes, plasma aldosterone and renin concentrations are required to determine the need for starting mineralocorticoid replacement.

 

Supporting/Miscellaneous Testing

 

Once AI is documented, additional testing based on patients’ history and symptomatology can pinpoint the specific cause. For example, presence of genital atypia suggests a disorder of steroidogenesis, and elevated concentrations of specific steroid precursors can determine the enzymatic defect (e.g. 17-hydroxyprogesterone in 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-deoxycorticosterone in 11β-hydroxylase deficiency) (12). Elevated VLCFA can establish the diagnosis of adrenal leukodystrophy in a boy with AI and neurological manifestations. Positive antibody titers for 21-hydroxylase indicates autoimmune Addison disease. Nonetheless, the underlying cause can be frequently tentative. To this end, genetic testing has become increasingly important. Testing can be tailored according to clinical suspicion and varies from single candidate gene analysis to targeted “panels” or whole exome sequencing (WES). In general, genetic testing for AI has a high diagnostic success rate and can be very helpful in complex cases where diagnosis remains otherwise uncertain (80).

 

TREATMENT

 

Hormone Replacement

 

The goals of daily replacement therapy are to avoid symptoms of adrenal insufficiency while securing optimal growth and weight gain, and appropriate puberal progression.

 

GLUCOCORTICOID REPLACEMENT

 

The glucocorticoid of choice for children is hydrocortisone, typically given three time daily (16). The physiologic daily cortisol secretion is approximately 5-8mg/m2/day (113). In practice, typical replacement doses are 8-10mg/m2/day, except in CAH which frequently requires supraphysiologic doses to suppress adrenal androgen secretion. The dose distribution during the day usually mimics the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion with the largest dose given upon awakening, the second dose around noon and the last dose at early evening to avoid overnight hypercortisolemia, which may lead to sleep disturbances, stunted growth, or insulin resistance. A reverse circadian hydrocortisone administration has been used in CAH to suppress the overnight rise in ACTH. This regimen has been criticized as non-physiologic. Individuals with central AI can also be treated with a twice a day regimen (94), with the first larger dose given upon awakening and the second smaller dose in late afternoon. It is our practice to place children with central AI on a twice a day glucocorticoid replacement regimen, acknowledging that this procedure is based on adult recommendations, while pertinent pediatric data or guidelines are lacking. Specific to children with glucocorticoid-induced AI, hydrocortisone replacement twice a day with the second dose administered in late afternoon can be beneficial and facilitate recovery of the adrenal axis as it avoids nighttime hypercortisolemia and suppression of ACTH secretion.

 

Challenges with daily hydrocortisone replacement include its short half-life of 60-90min and significant variability in clearance among patients, which result in alternating periods of hypo- and hyper-cortisolemia while on treatment. A modified release hydrocortisone (Plenadren by Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG Ireland) was designed as a more physiologic and convenient alternative (114). Plenadren provides hydrocortisone released in two phases (i.e., an initial phase of immediate release followed by a phase of extended release) and is given as a once-a day dose upon awakening. It is available in Europe but not in the USA. An additional concern with hydrocortisone administration in young children involves difficulties in dose titration as hydrocortisone is not available in tablets less than 5 mg. To overcome this barrier, hydrocortisone microgranules that provide doses as low as 0.5 mg have been introduced in the market (115). Hydrocortisone microgranules have 1:1 bio equivalency with the standard immediate release hydrocortisone. Finally, it should be  kept in mind that certain drugs, like carbamazepine or phenytoin, can induce CYP3A4 in the liver and increase hepatic hydrocortisone clearance requiring higher hydrocortisone replacement doses (11).

Prednisone administered orally once to twice daily can be used as an alternative to hydrocortisone when growth is complete. Use of dexamethasone is not recommended because of difficulties with dose titration and high risk for cushingoid side effects (94).

 

MINERALOCORTICOID REPLACEMENT   

 

Mineralocorticoid replacement with fludrocortisone at doses 0.05-0.2 mg daily is recommended in patients with PAI and confirmed aldosterone deficiency (16). Higher doses (i.e., 0.1-0.2mg daily) are typically required during the first year of life as newborns have lower mineralocorticoid sensitivity. In addition, infants typically require salt supplementation with sodium chloride, at doses of 1-2 grams daily given in 3-4 divided doses. Treatment with sodium chloride is gradually reduced during the first couple of years of life and replaced with unrestricted salt supplementation with food as the child transitions to regular diet. Extra fluids with electrolytes are recommended when excessive sweating is anticipated, such as during vigorous exercise or hot weather.

 

MONITORING DURING THERAPY

 

Monitoring of Glucocorticoid Replacement

 

There is no good biomarker to assess glucocorticoid replacement. Morning ACTH concentrations are frequently elevated and attempts to normalize ACTH levels may result in overtreatment (16). Measurements of serum cortisol concentrations after hydrocortisone administration is not routinely done. Monitoring of therapy, therefore, relies primarily on clinical assessment. Morning nausea with poor appetite and weight loss can all be signs of inadequate treatment. Children should be questioned about their daily activities and energy during the day (i.e., need for napping after school), and the information should be considered when titrating medication doses. Growth velocity and weight gain are also sensitive clinical indicators. Specifically, overtreatment with glucocorticoids is associated with poor linear growth and an increase in BMI. Appropriate progression through puberty is reassuring.

 

Monitoring of Mineralocorticoid Replacement

 

As with glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoid replacement is also assessed clinically starting with questions related to salt craving and measurements of standing blood pressure and heart rate (16). Fatigue and poor growth can also be signs of inadequate mineralocorticoid replacement (95).

 

Measurements of serum potassium and plasma renin (level or activity) can be used for titration of fludrocortisone dose and sodium chloride supplementation (1,2,16,94). Goals are to maintain serum potassium concentrations in the normal range and plasma renin in the upper range of normal. Orthostatic hypotension, high renin and hyperkalemia indicate undertreatment. On the contrary, low or suppressed plasma renin along with a low serum potassium concentration are signs of mineralocorticoid overtreatment. In such cases, blood pressure needs to be assessed to ensure that the child does not experience hypertension, and fludrocortisone and sodium chloride doses adjusted. In the case of hypertension, one must also remember that hydrocortisone has mineralocorticoid activity and high replacement doses can contribute to blood pressure elevations. Thus, hydrocortisone doses need to be assessed and titrated as needed.

 

Sick Day Management and Stress Dosing   

 

Endogenous cortisol secretion increases during acute illness, anesthesia, surgery, or trauma. Hence, individuals with AI require an increase in their glucocorticoid doses during times of physiological stress to avoid adrenal crisis.

 

The stress dose regimens for children are largely empirical or consensus driven and may vary across practices. With lack of good quality evidence, many pediatric recommendations are adopted from adult literature (116). As an overarching principle, stress dose management errs on the side of overtreatment to avoid a potentially life-threatening adrenal crisis.

 

For management purposes, the stressor is frequently referred to as “moderate” or “severe”. Severe stress refers to major illness (e.g., sepsis), that requires hospitalization, major surgical procedures that require general anesthesia (e.g., abdominal surgery), or severe trauma. Moderate stress refers to an acute illness that can be managed at home or with minor surgery (e.g., a dental procedure) (table 2).

 

Table 2.  Summary of Stress Dose Management of a Child with Adrenal Insufficiency: Indications and Doses

 

Indications

Hydrocortisone dose

Comments

Adrenal Crisis

Vomiting, lethargy, hemodynamic instability

Age 0-24 months

25mg

♦      IVF resuscitation with 0.9% sodium chloride/5% glucose

♦      Continue with severe stress dose coverage.

Age 2yrs - 10 yrs

50mg

Age >10 years

100mg

IM/SQ

Severe stress

Surgery, sepsis, major trauma, lethargy, repeated vomiting

100mg/m2/day divided 6 hours IV/IM

Max 50mg every 6 hours

 

♦      Wean according to clinical status/improvement.

♦      Switch to moderate stress dosing usually when able to tolerate po.

Moderate stress

Fever >38.3oC (101oF)

Significant trauma (i.e., broken bone), Minor surgery requiring anesthesia (e.g., dental procedures), seizures, intense exercise (i.e., marathon)

30-50 mg/m2/day divided 8 hours orally

♦      Continue stress dose coverage for up to 24 hours after stress resolves.

Prednisone can be used as an alternative if hydrocortisone is not available. Dexamethasone is the least preferable option.

Additional indications: Minor cold, school exams = no need for stress dosing. Medical procedure with local anesthesia = moderate stress dose orally once prior to procedure. 

 

MANAGEMENT OF ADRENAL CRISIS

 

Adrenal crisis is characterized by hypotension and volume depletion. Hypoglycemia is frequent in children. In cases of combined glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid defects, there is additional urinary sodium loss resulting in electrolyte abnormalities (i.e., hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, acidosis, and elevated serum urea). The cornerstones of therapy are glucocorticoid replacement and fluid resuscitation.

 

Children with suspected adrenal crisis should immediately receive a bolus dose of hydrocortisone IM or IV (Table 2). For emergencies, a dose based on age can be used, such as 25mg, 50mg and 100mg for children <2 years, 1-10 years, and older than 10 years, respectively. The child should then continue receiving stress dose coverage with parenteral hydrocortisone at doses of 100mg/m2/day given every 6 hours (maximum dose 50mg every 6 hours) until their condition improves. If hydrocortisone is not available, prednisone (20mg/m2/day) can be used as an alternative, while dexamethasone (4mg/m2/day) is the least preferable glucocorticoid option, related to its metabolic consequences as well as lack of mineralocorticoid properties. 

 

Fluid resuscitation can start with a bolus of 0.9% sodium chloride at 10 mL/kg. In the case of hypoglycemia, normal saline with 5% glucose can be used. Fluids should continue based on patient’s needs. Hyperkalemia can be severe at the onset of adrenal crisis but improves rapidly with parenteral glucocorticoid and fluid management. Additional therapies to lower serum potassium concentrations can be considered (i.e., IV insulin and glucose, IV calcium gluconate or cation exchange resins) if severe hyperkalemia persists.

 

MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE STRESS

 

It entails parenteral administration of hydrocortisone at 100mg/m2/day given every 6 hours (maximum dose 50mg every 6 hours) (116) (Table 2) Doses can be tapered rapidly and based on clinical improvement to the established daily glucocorticoid regimen. For children recovering from surgery, hydrocortisone can usually be changed to oral sick-day doses once they are stable and can tolerate oral fluids and diet. Children with PAI do not require fludrocortisone during severe stress coverage, as hydrocortisone also has mineralocorticoid activity. Fludrocortisone must be added back to their treatment plan as hydrocortisone is weaned down to approximately 50-60mg/m2/day.

 

MANAGEMENT OF MODERATE STRESS OR HOME SICK DAY RULES 

 

Families are advised to increase their child’s daily glucocorticoid dose if they experience an intercurrent illness, such as fever or diarrhea (Table 2). Hydrocortisone doses that provide stress dose coverage for such situations (i.e. moderate stress) are in the range of 30-50mg/m2/day given every 6 or 8 hours (116). A frequent instruction to patients and families is to double or triple the daily hydrocortisone dose. This approach may lead to undertreatment if the daily dose is small. Calculation of a specific moderate stress dose based on the child’s body surface area (BSA) is preferable as it provides a more precise dosing.

 

Stress dose coverage is not recommended for minor upper respiratory viral infections, increased schoolwork, emotional stress, or intense exercise of brief duration. Although there is no specific guideline, some medical providers recommend using stress doses during prolonged intense training, such as a marathon.

 

Patients and families should undergo in-depth training around stress dose management. Instructions should include indications for moderate stress glucocorticoid administration and appropriate doses and training on using hydrocortisone as an emergency injection IM in case of vomiting, severe trauma, or impending adrenal crisis. They should be provided with a medical letter or card that documents stress dose instructions and contact information of medical providers and caregivers. Children should wear a medical alert bracelet and carry emergency supplies of oral glucocorticoids and emergency injectable hydrocortisone.

 

Glucocorticoid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency: Wean and Recovery of Adrenal Function

 

GLUCOCORTICOID TAPERING

 

 There is no evidence to support a specific approach to GC taper. For individuals on chronic glucocorticoid treatment (i.e., >3-4 weeks) at supraphysiologic doses for an underlying disease (e.g. inflammatory or immune disorder), glucocorticoid taper should be done at a rate dictated by the underlying condition in order to maintain disease remission (58).  

 

Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome has been described primarily in adults during tapering of supraphysiologic doses or after successful treatment of Cushing (117). The syndrome can mimic signs of adrenal insufficiency (i.e.,  fatigue, muscle aches, nausea, abdominal discomfort, weight loss, mood swings, irritability) but is not related to untreated adrenal insufficiency, as the glucocorticoid daily dose is still supraphysiologic (117).  The underlying mechanism is incompletely understood and likely involves cytokine and prostaglandin upregulation as cortisol concentrations decline. Should glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome be suspected tapering down to physiologic doses can be done at a slower pace (58).

 

Once physiologic glucocorticoid doses have been achieved, a slower taper below physiologic doses have been suggested (58). The tapering aims to alleviate symptoms of adrenal insufficiency while allowing for HPA axis recovery. For those on long-acting glucocorticoids (e.g., dexamethasone), it is suggested to switch to hydrocortisone to ease with titration at small doses and faster recovery of the adrenal axis. Weaning below physiologic doses is done mostly empirically since there is no evidence about the best practice protocol. It is our practice to wean from physiologic replacement to off glucocorticoids in four-to- five steps by reducing the dose by 20-25% (Table 3). We follow a twice daily hydrocortisone/ prednisone regimen and cut down initially the evening dose to allow for faster HPA axis recovery. Children should remain on a stress dose plan until there is evidence of recovery of adrenal function.

 

Table 3. Glucocorticoid Induced Adrenal Insufficiency: Proposed Wean From Physiologic Replacement Doses to Off Glucocorticoids

Length of GC exposure

<4 weeks

4-12 weeks

>12 weeks

Hydrocortisone

(given twice daily)

No wean

10mg/m2/day x 4 days

10mg/m2/day x 7 days

8mg/m2/day x 4 days

8mg/m2/day x 7 days

6mg/m2/day x 4 days

6mg/m2/day x 7 days

4mg/m2/day x 4 days

4mg/m2/day x 7 days

stop

stop

Prednisone

(Given twice daily)

No wean

4mg/m2/day x 4 days

4mg/m2/day x 7 days

3mg/m2/day x 4 days

3mg/m2/day x 7 days

2mg/m2/day x 4 days

2mg/m2/day x 7 days

1mg/m2/day x 4 days

1mg/m2/day x 7 days

Stop

Stop

 

ASSESSMENT AND RECOVERY OF ADRENAL FUNCTION

 

Adrenal function recovers once supraphysiologic doses of glucocorticoids are discontinued. The time to recovery, however, is variable and dependent on length and potency of the glucocorticoid that was used (58).  Assessment of adrenal function can be done with the measurement of morning cortisol concentrations. Because hydrocortisone interferes in cortisol measurements, testing should be at least 18–24 hours after the last dose. Adult data support a morning cortisol value above 12 mcg/dL as indicative of normal adrenal function, while values less than 5 mcg/dL suggest suppression of the HPA axis. These cortisol cut-offs are dependent on the cortisol assay that is used. An ACTH stimulation test can be considered for intermediate cortisol values (i.e. 5-12mcg/dL). An alternative approach can be to continue stress dose steroid coverage and repeat a measurement of morning cortisol after few weeks and until recovery of the axis is documented.

 

USEFUL LINKS/GUIDELINES

 

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26760044/
  • European Society of Endocrinology and Endocrine Society Joint Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Therapy of Glucocorticoid-induced Adrenal Insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 PMC11180513.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38724043/
  • Hormonal Replacement in Hypopituitarism in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27736313/
  • Emergency and perioperative management of adrenal insufficiency in children and young people: British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes consensus guidance. Arch Dis Child. 2023 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37045585/

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Hahner S, Ross RJ, Arlt W, et al. Adrenal insufficiency. Nat Rev Dis Primers. Mar 11 2021;7(1):19. doi:10.1038/s41572-021-00252-7
  2. Husebye ES, Pearce SH, Krone NP, Kämpe O. Adrenal insufficiency. Lancet. Feb 13 2021;397(10274):613-629. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00136-7
  3. Pignatti E, du Toit T, Flück CE. Development and function of the fetal adrenal. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Feb 2023;24(1):5-21. doi:10.1007/s11154-022-09756-3
  4. Kim JH, Choi MH. Embryonic Development and Adult Regeneration of the Adrenal Gland. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). Dec 2020;35(4):765-773. doi:10.3803/EnM.2020.403
  5. Johnston ZC, Bellingham M, Filis P, et al. The human fetal adrenal produces cortisol but no detectable aldosterone throughout the second trimester. BMC Med. Feb 12 2018;16(1):23. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1009-7
  6. Nicolaides NC, Willenberg HS, Bornstein SR, Chrousos GP. Adrenal Cortex: Embryonic Development, Anatomy, Histology and Physiology. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. 2000.
  7. Holmstrom LE, Jnah AJ. Relative Adrenal Insufficiency: Crisis Averted? Neonatal Netw. Nov 01 2021;40(6):369-376. doi:10.1891/11-T-703
  8. Ng PC. Adrenocortical insufficiency and refractory hypotension in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. Nov 2016;101(6):F571-F576. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-311289
  9. Gutierrez CE, De Beritto T. Relative Adrenal Insufficiency in the Preterm Infant. Neoreviews. May 01 2022;23(5):e328-e334. doi:10.1542/neo.23-5-e328
  10. Buonocore F, McGlacken-Byrne SM, Del Valle I, Achermann JC. Current Insights Into Adrenal Insufficiency in the Newborn and Young Infant. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:619041. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.619041
  11. Yau M, Rao N, Nimkarn S, Vogiatzi M. Effect of ethosuximide on cortisol metabolism in the treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. May 2014;27(5-6):549-54. doi:10.1515/jpem-2013-0147
  12. Yau M, Khattab A, Yuen T, New M. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. 2000.
  13. Buonocore F, Achermann JC. Primary adrenal insufficiency: New genetic causes and their long-term consequences. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Jan 2020;92(1):11-20. doi:10.1111/cen.14109
  14. Hasenmajer V, Ferrigno R, Minnetti M, et al. Rare forms of genetic paediatric adrenal insufficiency: Excluding congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Apr 2023;24(2):345-363. doi:10.1007/s11154-023-09784-7
  15. Borchers J, Pukkala E, Mäkitie O, Laakso S. Epidemiology and Causes of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency in Children: A Population-Based Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Oct 18 2023;108(11):2879-2885. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad283
  16. Bornstein SR, Allolio B, Arlt W, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Feb 2016;101(2):364-89. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1710
  17. Sharma R, Seth A. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: issues in diagnosis and treatment in children. Indian J Pediatr. Feb 2014;81(2):178-85. doi:10.1007/s12098-013-1280-8
  18. Martel-Duguech L, Poirier J, Bourdeau I, Lacroix A. Diagnosis and management of secondary adrenal crisis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Jun 2024;25(3):619-637. doi:10.1007/s11154-024-09877-x
  19. Bleicken B, Hahner S, Ventz M, Quinkler M. Delayed diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency is common: a cross-sectional study in 216 patients. Am J Med Sci. Jun 2010;339(6):525-31. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181db6b7a
  20. Patti G, Guzzeti C, Di Iorgi N, et al. Central adrenal insufficiency in children and adolescents. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 2018;32(4):425-444. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2018.03.012
  21. Alatzoglou KS, Dattani MT. Genetic forms of hypopituitarism and their manifestation in the neonatal period. Early Hum Dev. Nov 2009;85(11):705-12. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.057
  22. Yau M, Gujral J, New MI. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Diagnosis and Emergency Treatment. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. 2000.
  23. Sarafoglou K, Banks K, Gaviglio A, Hietala A, McCann M, Thomas W. Comparison of one-tier and two-tier newborn screening metrics for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Pediatrics. Nov 2012;130(5):e1261-8. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1219
  24. Saroufim R, Nebesio TD, Eugster EA. Characteristics of patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia missed on the newborn screen. Horm Res Paediatr. Nov 22 2023;doi:10.1159/000535405
  25. Chan CL, McFann K, Taylor L, Wright D, Zeitler PS, Barker JM. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia and the second newborn screen. J Pediatr. Jul 2013;163(1):109-13 e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.01.002
  26. Varness TS, Allen DB, Hoffman GL. Newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia has reduced sensitivity in girls. J Pediatr. Oct 2005;147(4):493-8. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.04.035
  27. Sarafoglou K, Gaviglio A, Wolf C, et al. Can incorporating molecular testing improve the accuracy of newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. May 3 2024;doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae297
  28. Lasarev MR, Bialk ER, Allen DB, Held PK. Application of Principal Component Analysis to Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 1 2020;105(8)doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa371
  29. Alexandraki KI, Grossman A. Diagnosis and Management of Adrenal Insufficiency. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. 2000.
  30. Bianconi SE, Conley SK, Keil MF, et al. Adrenal function in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. Nov 2011;155A(11):2732-8. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.34271
  31. Bose HS, Sugawara T, Strauss JF, 3rd, Miller WL, International Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia C. The pathophysiology and genetics of congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. Dec 19 1996;335(25):1870-8. doi:10.1056/NEJM199612193352503
  32. Miller WL. Disorders in the initial steps of steroid hormone synthesis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. Jan 2017;165(Pt A):18-37. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.03.009
  33. Muscatelli F, Strom TM, Walker AP, et al. Mutations in the DAX-1 gene give rise to both X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Nature. Dec 15 1994;372(6507):672-6. doi:10.1038/372672a0
  34. Suntharalingham JP, Buonocore F, Duncan AJ, Achermann JC. DAX-1 (NR0B1) and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, NR5A1) in human disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 2015;29(4):607-19. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2015.07.004
  35. Cabrera-Salcedo C, Kumar P, Hwa V, Dauber A. IMAGe and Related Undergrowth Syndromes: The Complex Spectrum of Gain-of-Function CDKN1C Mutations. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. Mar 2017;14(3):289-297. doi:10.17458/per.vol14.2017.SKHD.imageandrelatedundergrowth
  36. Mandel H, Shemer R, Borochowitz ZU, et al. SERKAL syndrome: an autosomal-recessive disorder caused by a loss-of-function mutation in WNT4. Am J Hum Genet. Jan 2008;82(1):39-47. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.08.005
  37. Clark AJ, Weber A. Adrenocorticotropin insensitivity syndromes. Endocr Rev. Dec 1998;19(6):828-43. doi:10.1210/edrv.19.6.0351
  38. Elias LL, Clark AL. The molecular basis of adrenocorticotrophin resistance syndrome. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2009;88:155-71. doi:10.1016/S1877-1173(09)88005-8
  39. Meimaridou E, Hughes CR, Kowalczyk J, Chan LF, Clark AJ, Metherell LA. ACTH resistance: genes and mechanisms. Endocr Dev. 2013;24:57-66. doi:10.1159/000342504
  40. Fitoussi G, Negre-Salvayre A, Pieraggi MT, Salvayre R. New pathogenetic hypothesis for Wolman disease: possible role of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in adrenal necrosis and calcification. Biochem J. Jul 1 1994;301 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):267-73. doi:10.1042/bj3010267
  41. Turk BR, Theda C, Fatemi A, Moser AB. X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: Pathology, pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, newborn screening and therapies. Int J Dev Neurosci. Feb 2020;80(1):52-72. doi:10.1002/jdn.10003
  42. Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA. An overview of inborn errors of metabolism manifesting with primary adrenal insufficiency. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Mar 2018;19(1):53-67. doi:10.1007/s11154-018-9447-2
  43. Prinzi J, Pasquali M, Hobert JA, et al. Diagnosing X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy after Implementation of Newborn Screening: A Reference Laboratory Perspective. Int J Neonatal Screen. Nov 2 2023;9(4)doi:10.3390/ijns9040064
  44. Singh S, Ojodu J, Kemper AR, Lam WKK, Grosse SD. Implementation of Newborn Screening for Conditions in the United States First Recommended during 2010-2018. Int J Neonatal Screen. Apr 6 2023;9(2)doi:10.3390/ijns9020020
  45. Braverman NE, Raymond GV, Rizzo WB, et al. Peroxisome biogenesis disorders in the Zellweger spectrum: An overview of current diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and treatment guidelines. Mol Genet Metab. Mar 2016;117(3):313-21. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.12.009
  46. Ruffini E, De Petris L, Zorzi G, Paoletti P, Mambelli G, Carlucci A. Two cases of neonatal adrenal hemorrhage presenting with persistent jaundice. Pediatr Med Chir. Nov-Dec 2013;35(6):285-7. doi:10.4081/pmc.2013.26
  47. Demirel N, Bas AY, Zenciroglu A, Tasci-Yildiz Y. Adrenal bleeding in neonates: report of 37 cases. Turk J Pediatr. Jan-Feb 2011;53(1):43-7.
  48. Mizuno S, Yokoyama K, Nukada T, Hara S. Waterhouse-Friderichsen Syndrome and Central Diabetes Insipidus Due to Escherichia coli Meningitis. JCEM Case Rep. Jan 2023;1(1):luac031. doi:10.1210/jcemcr/luac031
  49. Sharma S, Joshi R, Kalelkar R, Agrawal P. Tuberculous Adrenal Abscess Presenting as Adrenal Insufficiency in a 4-Year-Old Boy. J Trop Pediatr. Jun 1 2019;65(3):301-304. doi:10.1093/tropej/fmy046
  50. Fonseca V, Brown R, Hochhauser D, Ginsburg J, Havard CW. Acute adrenal crisis precipitated by thyroxine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). May 3 1986;292(6529):1185-6. doi:10.1136/bmj.292.6529.1185
  51. Fleseriu M, Petersenn S. Medical therapy for Cushing's disease: adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor blockers. Pituitary. Apr 2015;18(2):245-52. doi:10.1007/s11102-014-0627-0
  52. Kelberman D, Rizzoti K, Lovell-Badge R, Robinson IC, Dattani MT. Genetic regulation of pituitary gland development in human and mouse. Endocr Rev. Dec 2009;30(7):790-829. doi:10.1210/er.2009-0008
  53. Cerbone M, Dattani MT. Progression from isolated growth hormone deficiency to combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Growth Horm IGF Res. Dec 2017;37:19-25. doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2017.10.005
  54. Rai A, Rajasekar G, Sahoo J, Kumari MM, Anbazhagan S. Anterior Pituitary Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study. World Neurosurg. Jul 31 2024;doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.186
  55. Claessen LOE, Kristjansdottir H, Jonsdottir MK, Lund SH, Kristensen ISU, Sigurjonsdottir HA. Screening for possible hypopituitarism following mild traumatic brain injury: The first all-female study. Who do we need to evaluate further? NeuroRehabilitation. 2023;52(2):259-271. doi:10.3233/NRE-220194
  56. Casano-Sancho P. Pituitary dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: are there definitive data in children? Arch Dis Child. Jun 2017;102(6):572-577. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-311609
  57. Broersen LH, Pereira AM, Jørgensen JO, Dekkers OM. Adrenal Insufficiency in Corticosteroids Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jun 2015;100(6):2171-80. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1218
  58. Beuschlein F, Else T, Bancos I, et al. European Society of Endocrinology and Endocrine Society Joint Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Therapy of Glucocorticoid-induced Adrenal Insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jun 17 2024;109(7):1657-1683. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae250
  59. Borresen SW, Klose M, Glintborg D, Watt T, Andersen MS, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Approach to the Patient With Glucocorticoid-induced Adrenal Insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jun 16 2022;107(7):2065-2076. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac151
  60. Issa-El-Khoury K, Kim H, Chan ES, Vander Leek T, Noya F. CSACI position statement: systemic effect of inhaled corticosteroids on adrenal suppression in the management of pediatric asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015;11(1):9. doi:10.1186/s13223-015-0075-z
  61. Einaudi S, Bertorello N, Masera N, et al. Adrenal axis function after high-dose steroid therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Mar 2008;50(3):537-41. doi:10.1002/pbc.21339
  62. Rix M, Birkebaek NH, Rosthoj S, Clausen N. Clinical impact of corticosteroid-induced adrenal suppression during treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: a prospective observational study using the low-dose adrenocorticotropin test. J Pediatr. Nov 2005;147(5):645-50. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.06.006
  63. Ahmet A, Rowan-Legg A, Pancer L. Adrenal suppression from exogenous glucocorticoids: Recognizing risk factors and preventing morbidity. Paediatr Child Health. Jul 2021;26(4):242-254. doi:10.1093/pch/pxab015
  64. Donegan D, Bancos I. Opioid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency. Mayo Clin Proc. Jul 2018;93(7):937-944. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.04.010
  65. Policola C, Stokes V, Karavitaki N, Grossman A. Adrenal insufficiency in acute oral opiate therapy. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2014;2014:130071. doi:10.1530/EDM-13-0071
  66. Langouche L, Téblick A, Gunst J, Van den Berghe G. The Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical Response to Critical Illness: A Concept in Need of Revision. Endocr Rev. Nov 09 2023;44(6):1096-1106. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnad021
  67. Beishuizen A, Thijs LG, Vermes I. Patterns of corticosteroid-binding globulin and the free cortisol index during septic shock and multitrauma. Intensive Care Med. Oct 2001;27(10):1584-91. doi:10.1007/s001340101073
  68. Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, et al. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Dec 06 2019;12(12):CD002243. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002243.pub4
  69. Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. Feb 2020;21(2):e52-e106. doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198
  70. Iijima S. Late-onset glucocorticoid-responsive circulatory collapse in premature infants. Pediatr Neonatol. Dec 2019;60(6):603-610. doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.09.005
  71. Sari FN, Dizdar EA, Oguz SS, et al. Baseline and stimulated cortisol levels in preterm infants: is there any clinical relevance? Horm Res Paediatr. 2012;77(1):12-8. doi:10.1159/000332157
  72. Aucott SW, Watterberg KL, Shaffer ML, Donohue PK, group Ps. Early cortisol values and long-term outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. Jul 2010;30(7):484-8. doi:10.1038/jp.2009.191
  73. Aucott SW, Watterberg KL, Shaffer ML, Donohue PK, Group PS. Do cortisol concentrations predict short-term outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants? Pediatrics. Oct 2008;122(4):775-81. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2252
  74. Shaffer ML, Baud O, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Peltoniemi OM, Bonsante F, Watterberg KL. Effect of Prophylaxis for Early Adrenal Insufficiency Using Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Very Preterm Infants: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Pediatr. Apr 2019;207:136-142.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.10.004
  75. Sousa AG, Cabral JV, El-Feghaly WB, de Sousa LS, Nunes AB. Hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism and diabetes mellitus: Pathophysiology assumptions, clinical aspects and implications for management. World J Diabetes. Mar 10 2016;7(5):101-11. doi:10.4239/wjd.v7.i5.101
  76. Pai B, Shaw N, Hogler W. Salt-losing crisis in infants-not always of adrenal origin. Eur J Pediatr. Feb 2012;171(2):317-21. doi:10.1007/s00431-011-1541-3
  77. Capalbo D, Moracas C, Cappa M, et al. Primary Adrenal Insufficiency in Childhood: Data From a Large Nationwide Cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Mar 08 2021;106(3):762-773. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa881
  78. Perry R, Kecha O, Paquette J, Huot C, Van Vliet G, Deal C. Primary adrenal insufficiency in children: twenty years experience at the Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jun 2005;90(6):3243-50. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0016
  79. Huffnagel IC, Laheji FK, Aziz-Bose R, et al. The Natural History of Adrenal Insufficiency in X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy: An International Collaboration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jan 01 2019;104(1):118-126. doi:10.1210/jc.2018-01307
  80. Buonocore F, Maharaj A, Qamar Y, et al. Genetic Analysis of Pediatric Primary Adrenal Insufficiency of Unknown Etiology: 25 Years' Experience in the UK. J Endocr Soc. Aug 01 2021;5(8):bvab086. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab086
  81. Guran T, Buonocore F, Saka N, et al. Rare Causes of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: Genetic and Clinical Characterization of a Large Nationwide Cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jan 2016;101(1):284-92. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-3250
  82. Arlt W, Allolio B. Adrenal insufficiency. Lancet. May 31 2003;361(9372):1881-93. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13492-7
  83. Regal M, Paramo C, Sierra SM, Garcia-Mayor RV. Prevalence and incidence of hypopituitarism in an adult Caucasian population in northwestern Spain. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Dec 2001;55(6):735-40. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01406.x
  84. Tomlinson JW, Holden N, Hills RK, et al. Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. West Midlands Prospective Hypopituitary Study Group. Lancet. Feb 10 2001;357(9254):425-31. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04006-x
  85. Hietamaki J, Karkinen J, Iivonen AP, et al. Presentation and diagnosis of childhood-onset combined pituitary hormone deficiency: A single center experience from over 30 years. EClinicalMedicine. Sep 2022;51:101556. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101556
  86. Miao Y, Fan K, Peng X, et al. Postoperative hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction and long-term hormone replacement in patients with childhood-onset craniopharyngioma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1241145. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1241145
  87. Harsha GS, Dabadghao P, Sudhanshu S. Long-Term Outcomes of Paediatric-Onset Craniopharyngioma: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Centre in North India. Neurol India. Mar-Apr 2022;70(2):600-605. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.344661
  88. Monge Chacón AG, Wang C, Waqar D, Syeda SA, Kumar R, Meghana DR. Long-Term Usage of Oral Glucocorticoids Leading to Adrenal Insufficiency: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Cureus. May 2023;15(5):e38948. doi:10.7759/cureus.38948
  89. Overman RA, Yeh JY, Deal CL. Prevalence of oral glucocorticoid usage in the United States: a general population perspective. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). Feb 2013;65(2):294-8. doi:10.1002/acr.21796
  90. Zöllner EW, Lombard CJ, Galal U, Hough FS, Irusen EM, Weinberg E. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in asthmatic school children. Pediatrics. Dec 2012;130(6):e1512-9. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-1147
  91. Smith RW, Downey K, Gordon M, et al. Prevalence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in children treated for asthma with inhaled corticosteroid. Paediatr Child Health. May 2012;17(5):e34-9. doi:10.1093/pch/17.5.e34
  92. Todd GR, Acerini CL, Ross-Russell R, Zahra S, Warner JT, McCance D. Survey of adrenal crisis associated with inhaled corticosteroids in the United Kingdom. Arch Dis Child. Dec 2002;87(6):457-61. doi:10.1136/adc.87.6.457
  93. Goldbloom EB, Mokashi A, Cummings EA, et al. Symptomatic adrenal suppression among children in Canada. Arch Dis Child. Apr 2017;102(4):338-339. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-311223
  94. Fleseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, et al. Hormonal Replacement in Hypopituitarism in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Nov 2016;101(11):3888-3921. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2118
  95. Charoensri S, Auchus RJ. A Contemporary Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Adrenal Insufficiency. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). Feb 2024;39(1):73-82. doi:10.3803/EnM.2024.1894
  96. Sbardella E, Isidori AM, Woods CP, et al. Baseline morning cortisol level as a predictor of pituitary-adrenal reserve: a comparison across three assays. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). Feb 2017;86(2):177-184. doi:10.1111/cen.13232
  97. Debono M, Elder CJ, Lewis J, et al. Home Waking Salivary Cortisone to Screen for Adrenal Insufficiency. NEJM Evid. Feb 2023;2(2):EVIDoa2200182. doi:10.1056/EVIDoa2200182
  98. Choi MH. Clinical and Technical Aspects in Free Cortisol Measurement. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). Aug 2022;37(4):599-607. doi:10.3803/EnM.2022.1549
  99. Stoye DQ, Boardman JP, Osmond C, et al. Preterm birth and infant diurnal cortisol regulation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. Sep 2022;107(5):565-567. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2021-323296
  100. Brar PC. Clinical utility of stimulation tests in infants with suspected adrenal insufficiency (AI). J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. May 27 2019;32(5):529-531. doi:10.1515/jpem-2019-0025
  101. Javorsky BR, Raff H, Carroll TB, et al. New Cutoffs for the Biochemical Diagnosis of Adrenal Insufficiency after ACTH Stimulation using Specific Cortisol Assays. J Endocr Soc. Apr 01 2021;5(4):bvab022. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvab022
  102. Ospina NS, Al Nofal A, Bancos I, et al. ACTH Stimulation Tests for the Diagnosis of Adrenal Insufficiency: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Feb 2016;101(2):427-34. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1700
  103. Burgos N, Ghayee HK, Singh-Ospina N. Pitfalls in the interpretation of the cosyntropin stimulation test for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. Jun 2019;26(3):139-145. doi:10.1097/MED.0000000000000473
  104. Ueland G, Methlie P, Øksnes M, et al. The Short Cosyntropin Test Revisited: New Normal Reference Range Using LC-MS/MS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Apr 01 2018;103(4):1696-1703. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02602
  105. Birtolo MF, Antonini S, Saladino A, et al. ACTH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: Light and Shadow. Biomedicines. Mar 15 2023;11(3)doi:10.3390/biomedicines11030904
  106. Cortez S, Arbeláez AM, Wallendorf M, McNerney K. Peak Serum Cortisol Cutoffs to Diagnose Adrenal Insufficiency Across Different Cortisol Assays in Children. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. Nov 22 2023;15(4):375-379. doi:10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2023.2023-2-3
  107. Coshway LK, Indyk JA, Bowden SA. Repeating ACTH Stimulation Test Is Necessary to Diagnose ACTH Deficiency in Neonatal Hypopituitarism With Initial False Negative Result. Glob Pediatr Health. 2014;1:2333794X14563385. doi:10.1177/2333794X14563385
  108. El-Farhan N, Tennant S, Rees SE, Evans C, Rees DA. Salivary Cortisol Response to ACTH Stimulation Is a Reliable Alternative to Serum Cortisol in Evaluating Hypoadrenalism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jan 18 2024;109(2):e579-e588. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgad576
  109. Arai K, Papadopoulou-Marketou N, Chrousos GP. Aldosterone Deficiency and Resistance. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. 2000.
  110. Travers S, Martinerie L, Boileau P, Lombès M, Pussard E. Alterations of adrenal steroidomic profiles in preterm infants at birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. Mar 2018;103(2):F143-F151. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-312457
  111. Martinerie L, Pussard E, Foix-L'Hélias L, et al. Physiological partial aldosterone resistance in human newborns. Pediatr Res. Sep 2009;66(3):323-8. doi:10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181b1bbec
  112. Viengchareun S, Pussard E, Castanet M, et al. The invention of aldosterone, how the past resurfaces in pediatric endocrinology. Mol Cell Endocrinol. Sep 15 2021;535:111375. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2021.111375
  113. Linder BL, Esteban NV, Yergey AL, Winterer JC, Loriaux DL, Cassorla F. Cortisol production rate in childhood and adolescence. J Pediatr. Dec 1990;117(6):892-6. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80128-3
  114. Johannsson G, Nilsson AG, Bergthorsdottir R, et al. Improved cortisol exposure-time profile and outcome in patients with adrenal insufficiency: a prospective randomized trial of a novel hydrocortisone dual-release formulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Feb 2012;97(2):473-81. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-1926
  115. Neumann U, Braune K, Whitaker MJ, et al. A Prospective Study of Children Aged 0-8 Years with CAH and Adrenal Insufficiency Treated with Hydrocortisone Granules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Mar 08 2021;106(3):e1433-e1440. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa626
  116. Mushtaq T, Ali SR, Boulos N, et al. Emergency and perioperative management of adrenal insufficiency in children and young people: British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes consensus guidance. Arch Dis Child. Nov 2023;108(11):871-878. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2022-325156
  117. Zhang CD, Ioachimescu AG. Challenges in the postsurgical recovery of cushing syndrome: glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1353543. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1353543

 

Infections Of The Hypothalamic-Pituitary Region

ABSTRACT

 

Infections of the hypothalamic-pituitary region are rare lesions, accounting for less than 1% of all pituitary lesions. The clinical diagnosis of these infections can be difficult due to the nonspecific nature of the disease (in many patients without symptoms of infection) and may be misdiagnosed as other pituitary lesions. The risk factors for infections of the hypothalamic-pituitary region are meningitis, paranasal sinusitis, head surgery, and immunocompromised host (diabetes mellitus, Cushing’s syndrome, HIV infections, solid organ transplantation, malignancy). Infections can develop in a normal pituitary gland or in pre-existing pituitary lesions (adenoma, Rathke´s cleft cyst, craniopharyngioma). There are several modes of dissemination of the infection to the hypothalamic-pituitary region: hematogenous, iatrogenic (after neurosurgical procedures), and spread from paranasal or nasal cavity (through venous channels of the sphenoid bone). Hypothalamic-pituitary infections most commonly present with visual disturbances and headache, in some cases with fever and leukocytosis. A significant proportion of patients develop hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction during the acute phase of the disease or months and years after successful antimicrobial therapy. Diagnosis can be challenging and the hypothalamic-pituitary infection with formation of abscess or granuloma may be misdiagnosed as a pituitary tumor. Transsphenoidal drainage followed by antibiotics, antimycotics, or anti-tuberculous drugs are usually efficient in successful treatment of these patients.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Infections of the hypothalamic-pituitary region are rare and commonly described in case reports or small case series. These infections include bacterial infections (pituitary abscess), tuberculosis, fungal, viral, and parasitic infections (Table 1). An infection in the hypothalamic-pituitary region may present as a sella/suprasellar mass and may be misinterpreted as a pituitary tumor. Also, these infections may cause hypopituitarism and be misdiagnosed as post-encephalitic syndrome (1-4).

 

Table 1. Infectious Agents which Cause Hypothalamic-Pituitary infections

BACTERIA

·       Gram-positive cocci (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus)

·       Gram-negative cocci (Neisseria, Esherichia coli , Pseudomonas, Brucella)

·       Spirochete (Treponema pallidum, Leptospira Interrogans)

·       Mycobacteria (M. Tuberculosis)

VIRUS

·       Herpes simplex virus

·       Varicella zoster virus

·       Cytomegalovirus

·       Tick-borne

·       Hantaan (Hantan) virus

·       Enterovirus

·       Neuroborreliosis

·       SARS-CoV-2 virus

FUNGI

·       Candida

·       Aspergillus

PARASITES

·       Toxoplasma gondii, Echinococcus, Taenia solium

 

Infections of the hypothalamic-pituitary region may be primary (without an identifiable source) or secondary in origin (3, 5). The more common is a primary pituitary infection, which occurs in previously healthy normal pituitary glands. Secondary pituitary infections occur in patients with a pre-existing lesion in the pituitary region (pituitary adenoma, Rathke´s cleft cyst, craniopharyngioma, or prior pituitary surgery).

 

There are several sources of infections in the hypothalamic-pituitary region (Table 2). Dissemination from the sphenoid sinus to the pituitary is possible by direct contact and through shared venous drainage.

 

Table 2. Sources of Infections Spreading to the Hypothalamic-Pituitary Region

Spread

Comments

·       Hematogenous spread

In immunocompromised host

·       Direct extension from adjacent anatomical sites

Meningeal infection, sphenoid sinus, cavernous sinus, skull

·       Previous infectious diseases of the CNS

 

·       Iatrogenic

Surgical intervention in sellar and suprasellar region, tooth extraction

 

Infections in the hypothalamic-pituitary region are rare and several predisposing factors have been identified (2) (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Predisposing Factors for Hypothalamic-Pituitary Infections

·       Diabetes mellitus

·       Tuberculosis

·       Solid organ transplantation (renal, liver, etc.)

·       Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection

·       Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

·       Chemotherapy

·       Cushing´s syndrome

·       Previous pituitary surgery

·       Immunosuppressive therapy

 

Infections of the hypothalamic-pituitary region may present with neurological signs and symptoms and signs of neuroendocrine dysfunction (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Clinical Features of Hypothalamic-Pituitary Infections

NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS

ENDOCRINE DYSFUNCTION

Headache

Hyponatremia

Visual disturbances

Hypopituitarism

Cranial neuropathy (III, IV, VI)

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

 

Isolated ACTH deficiency

 

Hyperprolactinemia

 

Central diabetes insipidus

 

HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY BACTERIAL INFECTIONS

 

Pituitary Abscess

 

Pituitary abscesses are rare pituitary lesions accounting for less than 1% of all pituitary lesions (6, 7). The first case of a pituitary abscess was described in 1848 and since then it has been mostly described in case reports or small series. In two-thirds of patients, pituitary abscesses occur in previously healthy normal glands (primary pituitary abscess) (8). In other patients, there is a preexisting lesion in the pituitary region, such as a pituitary adenoma, Rathke´s cleft cyst, granulomatous hypophysitis, or craniopharyngioma or prior pituitary surgery (secondary pituitary abscess) (5, 9-12). The infection can be caused by hematogenous dissemination or by direct extension from surrounding structures (meningitis, sphenoid sinusitis, cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis) (Table 2). Pituitary surgery and immunocompromised condition are also risk factors for pituitary abscesses (Table 3).

 

According to the clinical presentation and duration of the disease, pituitary abscesses can be acute, subacute (the disease course less than 1 month), or chronic (disease course longer than 1 month) (13). Infective manifestations (fever, leukocytosis, meningism) have been reported in patients with acute and subacute pituitary abscesses, while chronic pituitary abscesses have a more indolent course.

 

Many patients with pituitary abscess were misdiagnosed as having a pituitary adenoma, pituitary adenoma with apoplexy, or Rathke´s cleft cyst prior to surgery (14). The diagnosis of this potentially life-threatening disease is based on intraoperative detection of pus and postoperative histopathological analysis. Clinically, pituitary abscesses usually present with neurological signs and symptoms (headache, visual disturbances), signs of neuroendocrine dysfunction (anterior hypopituitarism, AVP deficiency) and signs and symptoms related to infections (fever, leukocytosis) (5, 8, 14). The largest series of primary pituitary abscesses (84 patients) during a 20-year period reported asthenia as the most common clinical presentation (75%), followed with visual impairment (71%), and headache (50%) (6).

 

Compared to patients with a pituitary adenoma who rarely have neuroendocrine dysfunction, most patients with pituitary abscesses have hypopituitarism (8, 9, 13). The large case series of 66 pituitary abscesses reported anterior pituitary hypopituitarism in 81.8% of patients, while AVP deficiency was diagnosed in 47.9% of patients (8). Nine percent of patients (9.3%) had isolated hypogonadism, 3.7% had isolated ACTH deficiency, 1.8% had isolated hypothyroidism, and 1.8% had combined hypogonadism and ACTH deficiency (8). The possible source of the pituitary infection was found in 14 out of 66 patients (sepsis, sinusitis, pulmonary tuberculosis) (8). Recently published the largest series of 84 patients with primary pituitary abscesses confirmed the high incidence (73%) of preoperative neuroendocrine dysfunction in patients with pituitary abscess: panhypopituitarism in 46%, isolated corticotropic insufficiency in 13%, isolated thyrotropic insufficiency in 10%, isolated gonadotropic insufficiency in 8%, and combined two pituitary axes insufficiencies in 22% (6).

 

On MRI, pituitary abscesses present as a sella masses, hypointense or isointense on T1-weighted imaging, hyperintense or isointense on T2-weighed imaging, with typical rim enhancement after gadolinium injection, mimicking apoplexy of the pituitary adenoma or other cystic sella lesions (7-9, 13, 15-17; Fig. 1). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences of pituitary abscesses often demonstrate high signal intensity with a reduction in the apparent diffusion coefficient, different from necrotic brain tumors (18).

Figure. 1. Pituitary abscess: gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scan (sagittal view) shows sellar and suprasellar mass with peripheral contrast enhancement.

 

Neuroimaging with nuclear medicine investigations (18-FDG PET scan, labelled leukocyte scintigraphy) could increase the preoperative diagnostic rate in challenging patients with pituitary abscess (6).

 

The majority of patients are treated with transsphenoidal surgery, rarely with a transcranial approach (8). Intraoperatively, pus is found in the sella (19, 20). In patients with secondary pituitary abscesses, the sphenoid sinus is the most common site of extrasellar invasion (5).

On histopathological analysis, there is evidence of acute or chronic inflammation, while Gram staining and bacterial cultures in some cases may identify the infecting pathogen. In most cases, the etiological agents cannot be isolated (6, 12). In the two largest studies on pituitary abscesses, positive results on gram staining or bacterial cultures were found in only 19.7% and 25% of patients, respectively (6, 8). The most prevalent organisms are Gram-positive cocci (Staphylococcus Aureus and Streptococcus species), but also Gram-negative bacteria (Neisseria, Esherichia coli, Pseudomonas, Brucella) (5, 6, 9, 21).

 

Patients with bacterial pituitary abscesses are treated with intravenous and oral antibiotics for three to six weeks to prevent the recurrence of the pituitary abscesses, but in some cases, reoperation was required. In rare cases, AVP deficiency and hypopituitarism are reversible, occasionally followed by secondary empty sella (22). In most cases, neuroendocrine dysfunction and AVP deficiency are irreversible findings (6, 13). The preoperative diagnosis of pituitary abscess represented a protective factor for pituitary function recovery (in 23% of patients) (6).

 

Although pituitary abscesses are more indolent than other intracranial abscesses, secondary pituitary abscesses in patients with pituitary adenomas (not in Rathke´s cleft cyst) is associated with high mortality rate (26%) due to the dissemination of the infection or meningitis (5). In patients with infected Rathke´s cleft cyst, clinical manifestations are commonly subacute, without septic symptoms (9, 11).

 

Recently published the largest systematic review of 488 cases of pituitary abscess examined presentation, radiological findings, endocrinological abnormalities, treatment, and mortality of these patients (23). The most common symptoms were headache (76%) and visual field loss. The median time from onset of symptoms to presentation was 120 days. Symptoms and biochemical markers of infection were absent in 57% of cases. The appearance of hypointensity on T1 weighted images and hyperintensity on T2 weighted images, as well as peripheral contrast enhancement of the pituitary on MRI were the most common radiological findings. Fifty-five percent of patients had negative culture results. Endocrinological abnormalities were present in 84.5% of cases (panhypopituitarism in 41%, AVP deficiency in 25%) and persisted in over half of cases. The mortality rate was 5.1%, with delayed presentation increasing risk of mortality (23).

 

Hypopituitarism Caused by Treponema Pallidum Infection (Syphilis)

 

Syphilis is a sexually transmitted chronic bacterial infection caused by Treponema Pallidum which progresses over years through a series of clinical stages. Syphilis is a well-recognized cause of hypopituitarism, with granulomatous hypophysitis (noncaseating giant cell granuloma), syphilitic gumma in sella region, or congenital syphilis causing hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. The first cases of hypopituitarism caused by syphilis were described almost 70 years ago, mostly in postmortem cases (24). The use of penicillin caused a decline in syphilis presentations and late complications, including congenital syphilis. Nowadays, the incidence of syphilis has been rising again and this sexually transmitted disease should be considered again in the differential diagnosis of neurological, psychiatric, and endocrine cases in high-income countries in risk groups (HIV positive patients, men-men relationships, crack cocaine users, and among intravenous drug users) (25, 26). Spirochete Treponema Pallidum is also described as a cause of hypophysitis and pituitary gland enlargement with hypopituitarism, mostly in immunocompromised patients (HIV-infected patients) with syphilitic meningitis (27). Syphilis may cause a sella mass with suprasellar extension mimicking a pituitary tumor and causing severe headache and hypopituitarism (28). The diagnosis is confirmed by positive treponemal antibody or by detection of Treponema Pallidum by immunohistochemistry or PCR on the resected pituitary. This disorder is treated with antibiotics.

 

Hypopituitarism Caused by Leptospira Interrogans Infection (Sy Weil)

 

Leptospirosis is a common tropical febrile, zoonotic infectious disease caused by spirochete Leptospira Interrogans. The bacteria are spread through the urine of infected animals (cattle, pigs, horses, dogs, rodents, wild animals). Humans can become infected through contact with urine or other body fluids from infected animals or through contact with water, soil, or food contaminated with the urine of infected animals. This disease presents with hepatorenal syndrome and systemic hemorrhagic manifestations. The first case of pituitary apoplexy and panhypopituitarism caused by leptospirosis in a 56-year-old male with type 2 diabetes mellitus was recently published (29). The patient developed fever, nausea, vomiting and acute kidney injury. Leptospirosis was diagnosed by positive leptospira antibody test, and he started treatment with antibiotics. After five days of admission, he developed signs and symptoms of pituitary apoplexy. A brain MRI scan was consistent with apoplexy in a pituitary adenoma (the mass showed T2W hyper intensity and TIW isointensity with hypo intense areas which suggested hemorrhage). The patient developed hypopituitarism and was replaced with glucocorticoids and thyroid hormones. The follow-up MRI scan showed resolution of the hemorrhagic focus and regression of the pituitary adenoma. The proposed mechanism of pituitary apoplexy is platelet dysfunction (caused by uremia and directly by leptospira) and non-inflammatory vasculopathy (increased vascular permeability due to disruption of endothelial cell-cell junctions, cell retraction and opening of intercellular gaps) (29). Leptospirosis clinically presents very similar to another zoonosis, hantavirus infection, is more common worldwide and serology and PCR are necessary to distinguish between these two diseases (30).

 

Hypothalamic-Pituitary Dysfunction Following Bacterial CNS Infections

 

Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction is a well-recognized complication of acute infectious diseases of the central nervous system (meningitis and encephalitis) and may occur in the acute phase or in the late stage of these diseases (1, 4, 31, 32). The clinical spectrum of neuroendocrine dysfunction may range from an isolated pituitary hormone deficiency to panhypopituitarism. Endocrine dysfunction in the acute phase of meningitis may return to normal after the acute period or be irreversible (32). The most common deficit is isolated GH deficiency diagnosed 6-48 months after the infection, reported at a rate of 28.6% (31).

 

Hypopituitarism following acute viral or bacterial meningitis in children is not as common as in adulthood (33, 34). The GH neurosecretory dysfunction (low IGF1 with normal GH response in clonidine test) was found in 3 out of 37 children tested at least 6 months following the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis (34). There are rare case reports on hypopituitarism during acute meningitis caused by Streptococcus Group B or sepsis caused by Salmonella enteritidis in a neonatal period (35, 36).

 

The pathophysiological mechanism responsible for hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction following acute meningitis is not fully understood. In some patients, anti-pituitary and anti-hypothalamus antibodies are detected (37). It is proposed that acute infection provokes an autoimmune process and may cause axonal injury with consequent neuroendocrine dysfunction (38).

 

Idiopathic Granulomatous Inflammation of the Cavernous Sinus - the Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome      

 

Tolosa-Hunt syndrome is defined as an idiopathic granulomatous inflammation of the cavernous sinus, therefore not infectious in origin, with variable extension into the superior orbital fissure/orbital apex, usually unilateral. The diagnosis is made by exclusion of other more common causes of cavernous sinus lesions (thrombosis, tumors, fungal infections, systemic granulomatous diseases-sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, Wegener´s granulomatosis) (39). In less than 5% of cases it can be bilateral, mimicking a pituitary adenoma in imaging studies (40). The etiology of Tolosa-Hunt syndrome is not fully understood. The disease is characterized by nonspecific granulomatous inflammation with infiltration of lymphocytes and plasmocytes. The patient presents with severe unilateral orbital pain and ipsilateral ocular motor neuropathy. The paralysis of one or more cranial nerves passing through the cavernous sinus (III, IV, VI) develops with orbital pain after less than 2 weeks. The signs of infection (fever, leukocytosis) are usually present. Granulomatous inflammation develops within the cavernous sinus causing acute throbbing orbital pain and disordered eye movement. Brain MRI scan demonstrate the inflammation in the cavernous sinus, orbital apex, and rarely in the sella. MR venography of the brain is important to exclude cavernous sinus thrombosis. Treatment consists of high dose corticosteroids and antibiotics. Refractory and steroid-intolerant cases may be treated with immunosuppressants (Methotrexate or Azathioprine) and gamma knife radiotherapy (41). Periorbital pain intensity is rapidly decreasing and resolving within 72h, while the resolution of ophthalmoplegia improves gradually and takes a longer time to resolve (several weeks) (42). If the patient is not responding to standard therapy, biopsy of the lesion is necessary to exclude other diseases, such as lymphoma.

 

Hypothalamic-Pituitary Tuberculosis

 

The incidence of tuberculosis is rising not only in developing countries, but also in developed countries, especially given the increasing population migration. Mortality has begun to increase after years of decline and since 2018 more than 7 million people have died of tuberculosis (43). Extrapulmonary tuberculosis may affect the brain causing tuberculous meningitis and tuberculoma of the central nervous cases. Tuberculous meningitis has a tendency to affect basal parts of the brain from where it can spread to the sella region. In rare cases, CNS tuberculosis may present as tuberculous hypophysitis or sella/suprasellar tuberculoma mimicking a pituitary adenoma or pituitary apoplexy (44-48). It may occur in the absence of systemic tuberculosis, but the majority of patients have a past history of pulmonary tuberculosis or tuberculosis of other organs (spine). Tuberculosis may affect the hypothalamus, pituitary, paranasal sinuses (sphenoid sinus), or tuberculoma may be located only in the pituitary stalk. Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction and AVP deficiency during the acute phase or years after recovery from acute tuberculous meningitis suggests a more destructive and more extensive hypothalamic and pituitary damage compared to other causes of acute viral and bacterial meningitis.

 

A significant proportion of patients with sella tuberculoma or tuberculous meningitis develop hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. In 18 cases of histologically proved sella tuberculoma (5 of them with past history of tuberculosis), 5 patients had hypopituitarism and 3 had hyperprolactinemia due to pituitary stalk compression (44).

 

In patients with tuberculous meningitis half of them developed neuroendocrine dysfunction: hyperprolactinemia (23-50% of patients), hypocortisolism (13-43%), hypothyroidism (17-31%), hypogonadism (34%), SIADH (10%) (4, 49, 50) during the acute phase. Multiple hormonal axes were affected in 23.5% of patients (49, 50). In young adult patients who survived tuberculous meningitis in childhood and were tested several years after recovery, hypopituitarism was diagnosed in 20% of patients (51). This is a consequence of fibrosis, gliosis, and calcification in the hypothalamus and pituitary after recovery of active tuberculous brain infection. In rare cases, pituitary function recovered after successful treatment with anti-tuberculous drugs (52).

 

The diagnosis of sella tuberculoma is a challenge, especially in cases without systemic tuberculosis. The signs and symptoms are nonspecific: fever, neurological abnormalities (headache, visual disturbances), and neuroendocrine dysfunction (44, 53). Sellar tuberculoma on MRI scans presents as thickening of the pituitary stalk or abnormal enhancement pattern of the sella lesion (54) (Fig. 2).

 

Figure 2. Tubercular hypophysitis: sellar MRI scan (coronal view) shows stalk thickening.

 

If the correct diagnosis is established, anti-tuberculosis drugs are effective and surgery is not indicated for tuberculous hypophysitis. With surgery the histological examination shows granulomas with central caseous necrosis surrounded by giant Langhans cells. In cases in whom Ziehl-Nielsen staining for acid fast bacilli and the culture on Lowenstein-Jensen media are negative, PCR for detection of mycobacterial DNA in tissue or CSF may help.

 

HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY FUNGAL INFECTIONS

 

Hypothalamic-pituitary fungal infections are extremely rare and occur usually in immunocompromised patients (diabetes mellitus, granulocytopenia, solid organ transplantation). There are only few case reports of Candida and Aspergillus sella abscesses and reviews of fungal sellar abscesses (55-61). Aspergillus is a ubiquitous saprophitic fungus found in the nasal mucosa of healthy people and patients with chronic sinusitis. This fungus may cause CNS infection, such as meningitis, encephalitis, brain abscess, subdural abscess, pituitary abscess, and mycotic arteritis with thrombosis and aneurysm (61-63). Fungal sella abscesses have a nonspecific presentation, with neurological signs and symptoms (headache, visual disturbances) and hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. Sella MRI images are nonspecific, with a T1W hypointense or isointense mass with rim enhancement and may be misdiagnosed as a pituitary adenoma (Fig. 3). It is proposed that a low signal on T2W images due to iron deposition may be a more specific sign of fungal abscess (58, 64; Fig. 4). Diagnosis of fungal pituitary abscess is made by histopathological finding (Grocott–Gömöri's methenamine silver stain demonstrates septate fungal hyphae), cultivation, or PCR identification of fungus DNA. A combination of transsphenoidal drainage and antifungal therapy (liposomal Amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin) can result in a good prognosis (55, 59, 60, 65). Endocrinopathies caused by fungal abscess have a low rate of recovery (59).

 

Figure 3. Fungal pituitary abscess spreading from fungal sinusitis: sellar MRI scan (coronal and sagittal views) shows a large sellar mass pushing the pituitary upwards.

Figure 4. Fungal infections in the sella: a) CT scan of the sinuses (axial view) shows a large sellar mass, erosion in sellar floor, propagation of the pathological process and opacification of the sinuses, and B) sellar MRI scan (coronal view) shows a giant hypointense lesion in the sellar region.

 

An unusual form of allergic fungal sinusitis which expands from the sphenoid sinus through a bone erosion to the sella in immunocompetent patient has been described (64) (Fig. 4). This patient had hyperprolactinemia (in the setting with no pituitary stalk compression), which resolved after successful transsphenoidal operation followed by anti-mycotics and corticosteroids (64). It is speculated that fungal glucans may directly stimulate glucan-specific receptors on somatomammotroph cells to stimulate prolactin secretion (66).

 

HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY VIRAL INFECTIONS

 

Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction (hypopituitarism and cranial diabetes insipidus) may develop in the acute phase of viral infections of the CNS (meningitis and encephalitis) or in the late stage of these diseases (1, 31, 32). Infectious agents which cause CNS viral infections are listed in Table 5.

 

Table 5 – Infectious Agents Which Cause CNS Viral Infections

MENINGITIS

ENCEPHALITIS

Herpes virus

Tick-borne

Varicella

Herpes simplex

Enterovirus

Cytomegalovirus

 

Neuroborreliosis

SARS-CoV-2 virus

SARS-CoV-2 virus

 

The investigation of hypothalamic-pituitary function at least 6 months after recovery from mild-to-moderate meningitis/encephalitis showed that 21% patients developed isolated corticotroph deficiency, while other neuroendocrine abnormalities or AVP deficiency were not found (1).

 

Hantavirus

 

Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), caused by Hantaviruses in the Bunyaviridae family, is an endemic zoonotic disease transmitted by rodents. There are several serotypes of these RNA viruses causing systemic infection, milder form called nephropathia endemica (Puumala) or severe form (Dobrava, Belgrade). The disease is endemic in Europe (Balkans, Finland, Germany) and Asia (Korea), where several outbreaks have been recorded. Farmers and solders are exposed to the virus by inhalation of infected rodent urine, feces, or saliva. Hantavirus infiltrates the vascular system causing increased capillary permeability, renal failure, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage, fever, hypotension, and shock. The mortality rate is 6.6%. Autopsy findings reported a slightly enlarged pituitary with ischemia/infarction, hemorrhage, and necrosis (67-69). Direct viral invasion was confirmed in the pituitary causing viral hypophysitis (69). Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction has been reported during the acute phase of the disease or after long-term follow-up (70-79). A milder form of HFRS infection caused by Puumala virus (nephropathia epidemica) is associated with a lower incidence of hypopituitarism (80). It is speculated that in some patients with no signs of hemorrhage in the sella, hantavirus may cause autoimmune hypophysitis and hypopituitarism (81). Sellar MRI imaging in hypopituitary patients reveals an edematous pituitary gland or increased signal intensity in the pituitary due to hemorrhage during the acute phase, while pituitary atrophy and secondary empty sella develops months and years after acute infection (76, 79-81) (Fig 5). A retrospective study of 60 adults who had recovered from HFRS reported that 18% of patients developed hypopituitarism (82). Ten percent of patients had a single pituitary deficit (three GH, two gonadal, and one adrenal), and 8.3% had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (82). In rare cases, HFRS may cause injury of the pituitary stalk or acute/subacute hemorrhage in the pituitary gland and AVP deficiency with panhypopituitarism (30, 77).

 

Figure. 5. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: sellar MRI scan (sagittal view) shows pituitary atrophy and secondary empty sella.

 

SARS-CoV-2

 

The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was identified as a cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This virus is responsible for a variety of clinical manifestations, ranging from an asymptomatic stage to severe pulmonary disease (respiratory distress syndrome) and various extrapulmonary manifestations, including endocrine axes (83-85).

 

SARS-CoV-2 is a neuroinvasive virus which enters the brain through the nasopharyngeal epithelium via the olfactory nerve, passes through the blood-brain barrier, or enters the brain through the median eminence where this barrier is absent (86). Neurons, glial cells, and cerebrovascular endothelia cells, as well as hypothalamus and pituitary cells express an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor responsible for the entry of the virus into these cells which induce neuroinflammation (86-88). SARS-CoV-2 virus is also detected in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with encephalitis caused by COVID-19 and in pituitary tissues from patients who died from SARS (89, 90). SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a variety of neurological complications, including headache, anosmia, confusion, ataxia, neuropathic pain, seizures, and delirium (89).

 

There are also indirect systemic effects of COVID-19 virus: an altered immune response (cytokine storm), infection-induced thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, coagulopathy (hypercoagulable state), endothelitis, and endothelial dysfunction (91). All these direct and indirect systemic effects of COVID-19 virus may be responsible for ischemic and hemorrhagic vascular syndromes, affecting also the hypothalamo-pituitary region. Another possible indirect effect of COVID-19 may be mediated by cytokines that can trigger hypothalamo-pituitary inflammation with consequent neuroendocrine dysfunction (92). Also, it has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 express an amino-acid sequence that mimics human ACTH and induces the production of autoantibodies against ACTH causing cortisol insufficiency and inadequate adrenal response to the stress (83).

 

SARS-CoV-2 infection may involve the hypothalamo-pituitary axis causing pituitary apoplexy, hypophysitis, and hyponatremia (83, 85, 91, 93-97).

 

There are nine case reports of pituitary adenoma (6 males/3 females, between 27 and 56 years of age, eight with pituitary macroadenoma) and two series of three patients with pituitary adenomas, complicated by apoplexy during COVID-19 infection (93-102). In one patient this occurred during the third trimester of pregnancy. Four patients had transsphenoidal surgery and recovered, one patient had transcranial resection, three patients were conservatively managed, and one patient died 12 hours after admission. There is also a report of a 65-year-old woman with no underlying pituitary disease who developed acute pituitary apoplexy one month after the initial diagnosis of COVID-19 (103). She developed anterior hypopituitarism with no evidence of AVP deficiency. An MRI pituitary scan showed the resolution of intrapituitary hemorrhage, with normal size of the pituitary gland after six months of follow-up. A small case series reported three patients with previously unknown pituitary adenoma complicated by apoplexy during COVID-19 infection: a 54-year-old female with null cell adenoma, a 52-year-old and a 56-year-old men, both obese with hypertension, both with a lactotroph pituitary adenoma (94). In another series of three patients with pituitary macroadenoma complicated with apoplexy following a symptomatic COVID-19 infection, two of these patients’ developed symptoms of pituitary apoplexy days following the viral infection, whereas the third patient developed pituitary apoplexy after a 2-month period (96).

 

In some patients COVID-19 caused an acute lymphocytic hypophysitis with temporal evolution of symptoms, suggesting an immune-mediated parainfectious pattern of disease (104, 105). An 18-year-old previously healthy girl with a history of symptomatic COVID-19 three weeks prior to the acute onset of headache and dizziness, presented with diffuse thickening and enlargement of the infundibulum with homogenous contrast enhancement of the pituitary (104). She was treated with glucocorticoids with a significant clinical improvement on day 3 and complete resolution of MRI finding on day 5. A similar case is a  16-year-old girl who presented with headaches, polyuria/polydipsic syndrome, and impaired visual acuity three weeks after COVID-19 infection (105). She had pituitary enlargement on MRI, was treated with methylprednisolone and improved on day 5. Such a rapid headache resolution after steroid treatment suggests a transitory acute hypophysitis, an immune-mediated process, triggered by viral infection. It has been hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 may induce hypothalamo-pituitary autoimmunity, with positive anti-hypothalamus (AHA) and anti-pituitary (APA) antibodies (106). The current results in the literature about antigens which are targets of AHA and APA are still contradictory (83). It is possible that patients at high-risk for such a complication are carriers of specific HLA alleles. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex has a central role in the recognition and presentation of viral antigens to immune system. HLA class I molecules mediates innate defense strategies against viral infection. HLA-c 04:01, DRB1 08, DQB1 06 carriers have an increased risk of a severe clinical course of COVID-19 and generate a robust response and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases (107-110).

 

Even these two acute pituitary disorders (pituitary apoplexy with transition to acute hypophysitis) can occur in patients with COVID-19 and preexisting unknown pituitary adenoma (97).

 

Several cases of AVP deficiency as a late complication of COVID-19 infection were published (111-114). All patients (2 males/2 females, 28-60 years of age) suddenly developed polyuria, nocturia, and polydipsia four to eight weeks after the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. In one of the published cases, a sellar MRI scan showed an enlarged pituitary with an absent posterior pituitary bright spot on T1W images associated with thickening of the pituitary stalk of 3.5 mm suggesting infundibulo-neurohypophysitis (113). Other pituitary hormone evaluations were normal. They were treated with oral desmopressin.

 

A case of a young woman with hypothalamic amenorrhea following COVID-19, with normal appearance of the sella turcica and regular dimensions of the pituitary was reported (95). This case suggests clinicians need to follow patients for possible delayed neuroendocrine dysfunctions after COVID-19 infection.

 

Hyponatremia was reported in 30-60% of patients with SARS-CoV-1 infection and was associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality (115). The syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) was the most common reason for hyponatremia, followed by adrenal insufficiency (116).

 

There are also data on the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the subsequent development of pituitary diseases (85, 117-120). A recently published systematic review analyzed 23 case reports of post COVID-19 vaccination pituitary diseases: hypophysitis in 9 patients, pituitary apoplexy in 6 patients, SIADH in 5 patients, and isolated ACTH deficiency in two patients (119). Symptoms of pituitary disease typically occurred shortly (several days) after vaccine administration and the pathogenetic mechanisms potentially include molecular mimicry, vaccine adjuvants, and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (83, 119). The presence of ACE2 receptors in the hypothalamo-pituitary system contributes to these post vaccinal pituitary diseases. Isolated infundibulo-neurohypophysitis and AVP deficiency or isolated ACTH deficiency may also develop several days after immunization with BNT 162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (117, 121). In some cases of panhypopituitarism and AVP deficiency due to hypophysitis after COVID-19 vaccination, hormonal secretion partially improved during follow-up (120).

 

Other Viruses

 

Cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, varicella zoster, and enterovirus have also been described in very rare cases of central diabetes insipidus, mainly in immunocompromised patients with encephalitis (such as HIV infection, Cushing´s syndrome, lymphoma or immunosuppressive therapy) (122-126). Direct cytomegalovirus invasion and reduction in the number of AVP and oxytocin cells was confirmed in the hypothalamus (123).

 

HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY PARASITIC INFECTIONS

 

Parasitic infections of the pituitary are rare and infections in the sellar region caused by Toxoplasma gondii, Echinococcus species, and Taenia solium have been reported anecdotally (4).

 

Toxoplasmosis is a worldwide zoonosis, caused by the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. This is one of the most common parasitic infections of warm-blooded animals and humans. Approximately one-third of humans have been exposed to T. gondii, mostly with no serious diseases, except in immunocompromised patients (HIV) and congenital toxoplasmosis. Two cases of prolactinomas with T. gondii cysts among tumor cells were reported (127). Toxoplasmosis is the most common CNS infection in immunocompromised patients (patients with HIV infection) and may cause hypopituitarism, accompanied by focal neurological deficits, headache, and fever (128, 129). The brain MRI shows lesions with significant enhancement of T2W images and peri-lesional edema, which may be misdiagnosed as intracranial metastasis. The diagnosis is based on brain biopsy with confirmed presence of T. gondii by PCR. Infection with T. gondii is treated with antimicrobial therapy and with hormone replacement therapy as needed.

 

The most common parasitic infestation of the brain is neurocysticercosis, caused by Taenia solium. A systematic review of 23 patients with intrasellar cysticercosis reported endocrine abnormalities (panhypopituitarism, hyperprolactinemia, AVP deficiency, and isolated hypothyroidism) in 56% of the affected population (130). These infections present with a cystic mass in the sella with hypopituitarism caused by compression, subarachnoid cysts, obstructive hydrocephalus, or neuroinflammation (ventriculitis, focal arachnoiditis) (4, 131). Neurocysticercosis may involve the pituitary stalk too (132). Transsphenoidal or transcranial operation is required for the definitive histopathological diagnosis and cure, because medical therapy with praziquantel is usually ineffective (130).

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

 

This study was supported by The Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia, Grant No: 7754282 — Prediction, prevention and patient’s participation in diagnosis of selected fungal infections (FI): an implementation of a novel method for obtaining tissue specimens, “FungalCaseFinder”.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Schaefer S, Boegershausen N, Meyer S, Ivan D, Schepelmann K, Kann PH. Hypothalamic-pituitary insufficiency following infectious diseases of the central nervous system. Eur J Endocrinol 2008; 158: 3-9.
  2. Pekic S, Popovic V. Alternative causes of hypopituitarism: traumatic brain injury, cranialirradiation, and infections.Handb Clin Neurol 2014; 124: 271-290
  3. Pekic S, Popovic V. Diagnosis of endocrine disease: Expanding the cause of hypopituitarism. Eur J Endocrinol2017; 176: R269-R282
  4. Das L, Dutta P. Approach to the patient: a case with an unusual cause of hypopituitarism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108: 1488-1504. 
  5. Awad AJ, Rowland NC, Mian M, Hiniker A, Tate M, Aghi MK. Etiology, prognosis, and management of secondary pituitary abscesses forming in underlying pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol 2014; 117: 469–476
  6. Mallereau CH, Todeschi J, Ganau M, Cebula H, Bozzi MT, Romano A, Le Van T, Ollivier I, Zaed I, Spatola G, Nannavecchia B, Mahoudeau P, Djennaoui I, Debry C, Signorelli F, Ligarotti GKI, Pop R, Baloglu S, Fasciglione E, Goichot B, Bund C, Gaudias J, Proust F, Chibbaro S. Pituitary abscess: a challenging preoperative diagnosis-a multicenter study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59: 565.
  7. Naser PV, Papadopoulou P, Teuber J, Kopf S, Jesser J, Unterberg AW, Beynon C. Characteristics of inflammatory and infectious diseases of the pituitary gland in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2023; 26: 451-460. 
  8. GaoL, Guo X, Tian R, Wang Q, Feng M, Bao X, Deng K, Yao Y, Lian W, Wang R, Xing B. Pituitary abscess: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of 66 cases from a large pituitary center over 23 years. Pituitary 2017; 20: 189-194
  9. Aranda F, Garcia R, Guarda FJ, Nilo F, Cruz JP, Callejas C, Balcells ME, Gonzales G, Rojas R, Villanueva P. Rathke´s cleft cyst infections and pituitary absesses: case series and review of the literature. Pituitary 2021; 24: 374-383
  10. Warmbier J, Lüdecke DK, Flitsch J, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Knappe UJ, Kreutzer J, Buslei R, Bergmann M, Heppner F, Glatzel M, Saeger W. Typing of inflammatory lesions of the pituitary. Pituitary 2022; 25: 131-142.
  11. Rabiei MM, Ebrahimzadeh K, Davoudi Z, Bidari Zerehpoosh F, Javandoust Gharehbagh F, Sedaghati R, Lotfollahi L, Kalhor F, Alavi Darazam I. A case of pituitary gland abscess associated with granulomatous hypophysitis. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:11.
  12. Inoue E, Kesumayadi I, Fujio S, Makino R, Hanada T, Masuda K, Higa N, Kawade S, Niihara Y, Takagi H, Kitazono I, Takahashi Y, Hanaya R. Secondary hypophysitis associated with Rathke's cleft cyst resembling a pituitary abscess. Surg Neurol Int 2024; 15: 69.
  13. LiuF, Li G, Yao Y, Yang Y, Ma W, Li Y, Chen G, Wang R. Diagnosis and management of pituitary abscess: experiences from 33 cases. Clin Endocrinol 2011; 74: 79-88
  14. Xue Q, Shi X, Fu X, Yin Y, Zhou H, Liu S, Sun Q, Meng J, Bian L, Tan H, He H. Pituitary abscess: a descriptive analysis of a series of 19 patients-a multi-center experience. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29: 262.
  15. Vates GE, Berger MS, Wilson CB. Diagnosis and management of pituitary abscess: a review of twenty-four cases. J Neurosurg 2001; 95: 233-241
  16. Ciappetta P, Calace A, D'Urso PI, De Candia N. Endoscopic treatment of pituitary abscess: two case reports and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31: 237-246
  17. Dalan R, Leow MK. Pituitary abscess: our experience with a case and a review of the literature. Pituitary 2008; 11: 299-306
  18. Takao H, Doi I, Watanabe T. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pituitary abscess. J Comp Assist Tomogr 2006; 30: 514–516
  19. Zhang X, Sun J, Shen M, Shou X, Qiu H, Qiao N, Zhang N, Li S, Wang Y, Zhao Y. Diagnosis and minimally invasive surgery for the pituitary abscess: A review of twenty nine cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114: 957-961
  20. Al Salman JM, Al Agha RAMB, Helmy M. Pituitary abscess. BMJ Case Rep 2017; 2017
  21. De la Peña-Sosa G, Cabello-Hernández AI, Gómez-Ruíz RP, Gómez-Sámano MA, Gómez-Pérez FJ. Pituitary abscess causing panhypopituitarism in a patient with neurobrucellosis: case report. AACE Clin Case Rep 2023; 10: 10-13.  
  22. Pepene CE, Ilie I, Mihu D, Stan H, Albu S, Duncea I. Primary pituitary abscess followed by empty sella syndrome in an adolescent girl. Pituitary 2010; 13: 385-389
  23. Stringer F, Foong YC, Tan A, Hayman S, Zajac JD, Grossmann M, Zane JNY, Zhu J, Ayyappan S. Pituitary abscess: a case report and systematic review of 488 cases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18: 165.
  24. Oelbaum M. Hypopituitarism in male subjects due to syphilis with a discussion of androgen treatment. Q J Med 1952; 83: 249–264
  25. Noblett JRoberts E. The importance of not jumping to conclusions: syphilisas an organic cause of neurological, psychiatric and endocrine presentations. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015.
  26. Hook EW 3rd. Syphilis. Lancet 2017; 389: 1550-1557.
  27. Spinner CD, Noe S, Schwerdtfeger C, Todorova A, Gaa J, Schmid RM, Busch DH, Neuenhahn M. Acute hypophysitis and hypopituitarism in early syphilitic meningitis in a HIV-infected patient: a case report. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13: 481-484
  28. Bricaire L, Van Haecke C, Laurent-Roussel S, Jrad G, Bertherat J, Bernier M, Gaillard S, Groussin L, Dupin N. The great imitator in endocrinology: a painful hypophysitis mimicking a pituitarytumor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: 2837-2840
  29. Gohil J, Gowda A, George T, Easwer HV, George A, Nair P. Pituitary apoplexy and panhypopituitarism following acute leptospirosis. Pituitary 2021 May 21; 1-5.
  30. Schwab S, Lissmann S, Schafer N, Isaak A, Klingmuller D, Attenberger U, Eis-Hubinger AM, Hofmann J, Strassburg C, Lutz P. When polyuria does not stop: a case report on an unusual complication of hantairus infection. BMC Infectious Diseases 2020; 20: 713
  31. Tanriverdi F, Alp E, Demiraslan H, Dokmetas HS, Unluhizarci K, Doganay M, Casanueva FF, Kelestimur F. Investigation of pituitary functions in patients with acute meningitis: a pilot study. J Endocrinol Invest 2008; 31: 489-491
  32. Tsiakalos A, Xynos ID, Sipsas NV, Kaltsas G. Pituitary insufficiency after infectious meningitis: a prospective study.J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 957: 3277-3281
  33. Giavoli C, Tagliabue C, Profka E, Senatore L, Bergamaschi S, Rodari G, Spada A, Beck-Peccoz P, Esposito S. Evaluation of pituitary function after infectious meningitis in childhood. BMC Endocr Disord2014; 14: 80-84
  34. Karadag-Oncel E, Cakir M, Kara A, Gonc N, Cengiz AB, Ozon A, Ciftci E, Alikasifoglu A, Ceyhan M, Kandemir N. Evaluation of hypothalamic-pituitary function in children following acute bacterial meningitis. Pituitary 2015; 18: 1-7
  35. Saranac L, Bjelakovic B, Djordjevic D, Novak M, Stankovic T. Hypopituitarism occurring in neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2012; 25: 847-848
  36. Ferreira AS, Fernandes AL, Guaragna-Filho G. Hypopituitarism as consequence of late neonatal infection by Group B streptococcus: a case report. Pan Afr Med J2015; 20: 308
  37. Tanriverdi F, De Bellis A, Teksahin H, Alp E, Bizzarro A, Sinisi AA, Bellastella G, Paglionico VA, Bellastella A, Unluhizarci K, Doganay M, Kelestimur F. Prospective investigation of pituitary functions in patients with acute infectious meningitis: is acute meningitis induced pituitary dysfunction associated with autoimmunity? Pituitary 2012; 5: 579–588
  38. Gerber J, Seitz RC, Bunkowski S, Bruck W, Nau R. Evidence for frequent focal and diffuse acute axonal injury in human bacterial meningitis. Clin Neuropathol 2009; 28:33–39
  39. BhatkarS, Goyal MK, Takkar A, Mukherjee KK, Singh P, Singh R, Lal V. Cavernous sinus syndrome: A prospective study of 73 cases at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 155: 63-69
  40. Swiątkowska-Stodulska R, Stodulski D, Babinska A, Piskunowicz M, Sworczak K. Bilateral Tolosa-Hunt syndrome mimicking pituitary adenoma. Endocrine 2017; 58: 582-586
  41. LeeJMPark JSKoh EJ. Gamma Knife radiosurgery in steroid-intolerant Tolosa-Hunt syndrome: case report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 143-145
  42. Arshad ANabi SPanhwar MSRahil A.Tolosa-Huntsyndrome: an arcane pathology of cavernous venous sinus. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015.
  43. Reid M, Agbassi YJP, Arinaminpathy N, Bercasio A, Bhargava A, Bhargava M, Bloom A,Cattamanchi A, Chaisson R, Chin D, Churchyard G, Cox H, Denkinger CM, Ditiu L, Dowdy D, Dybul M, Fauci A, Fedaku E, Gidado M, Harrington M, Hauser J, Heitkamp P, Herbert N, Herna Sari A, Hopewell P, Kendall E, Khan A, Kim A, Koek I, Kondratyuk S, Krishnan N, Ku CC, Lessem E, McConnell EV, Nahid P, Oliver M, Pai M, Raviglione M, Ryckman T, Schäferhoff M, Silva S, Small P, Stallworthy G, Temesgen Z, van Weezenbeek K, Vassall A, Velásquez GE, Venkatesan N, Yamey G, Zimmerman A, Jamison D, Swaminathan S, Goosby E. Scientific advances and the end of tuberculosis: a report from the Lancet Commission on Tuberculosis. Lancet 2023; 402: 1473-1498.
  44. Sharma MC, Arora R, Mahapatra AK, Sarat-Chandra P, Gaikwad SB, Sarkar C. Intrasellar tuberculoma--an enigmatic pituitary infection: a series of 18 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2000; 102: 72-77
  45. Arunkumar MJ, Rajshekhar V. Intrasellar tuberculoma presenting as pituitary apoplexy. Neurol India 2001, 49: 407-410
  46. Husain N, Husain M, Rao P. Pituitary tuberculosis mimicking idiopathic granulomatous hypophysitis. Pituitary 2008; 11: 313-315
  47. Aziz Khan A, Ahuja S, Malik S, Naaz S, Zaheer S. Pituitary tuberculoma with panhypopituitarism masquerading as a pituitary adenoma. Neuropathology 2023; 43: 496-499.
  48. Elfarissi MA, Dahamou M, Dehneh Y, Lhamlili M, Khoulali M, Oulali N, Moufid F. Pediatric sellar-suprasellar tuberculosis: A case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2023; 14: 379. 
  49. Dhanwal DK, Vyas A, Sharma A, Saxena A. Hypothalamic pituitary abnormalities in tubercular meningitis at the time of diagnosis. Pituitary 2010; 13: 304-310
  50. More A, Verma R, Garg RK, Malhotra HS, Sharma PK, Uniyal R, Pandey S, Mittal M. A study of neuroendocrine dysfunction in patients of tuberculous meningitis. J Neurol Sci2017; 379: 198-206
  51. Lam KS, Sham MM, Tam SC, Ng MM, Ma HT. Hypopituitarism after tuberculous meningitis in childhood. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 701-706
  52. Tanimoto K, Imbe A, Shishikura K, Imbe H, Hiraiwa T, Miyata T, Ikeda N, Kuroiwa T, Terasaki J, Hanafusa T. Reversible hypopituitarism with pituitarytuberculoma. Intern Med 2015; 54: 1247-1251
  53. Jain A, Dhanwal DK, Kumar J. A rare case of pituitarytuberculoma-diagnosed and managed conservatively.Pituitary 2015; 18: 579-580
  54. Bonifacio-Delgadillo D, Aburto-Murrieta Y, Salinas-Lara C, Sotelo J, Montes-Mojarro I, Garcia-Marquez A. Clinical presentation and magnetic resonance findings in sellar tuberculomas. Case Rep Med2014; 2014: 961913. 
  55. Liu W, Chen H, Cai B, Li G, You C, Li H. Successful treatment of sellar aspergillus abscess. J Clin Neurosci 2010; 17: 1587-1589
  56. Vijayvargiya PJaved IMoreno JMynt MAKotapka MZaki ROrtiz J. Pituitaryaspergillosis in a kidney transplant recipient and review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis 2013; 15(5): E196-200
  57. Hong WLiu YChen MLin KLiao ZHuang S. Secondary headache due to aspergillus sellar abscesssimulating a pituitaryneoplasm: case report and review of literature. Springerplus 2015; 4: 550
  58. Lim JC, Rogers TW, King J, Gaillard F. Successful treatment of pituitarysella Aspergillus abscess in a renal transplant recipient. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 45: 138-140
  59. Strickland BA, Pham M, Bakhsheshian J, Carmichael J, Weiss M, Zada G. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal drainage of a spontaneous candidaglabrata pituitary abscess. World Neurosurg 2018; 109: 467-470
  60. Saffarian A, Derakhshan N, Taghipour M, Eghbal K, Roshanfarzad M, Dehghanian A. Sphenoid Aspergilloma with headache and acute vision loss. World Neurosurg 2018; 115: 159-161
  61. Funakoshi S, Nishiyama M, Komori M, Hyodo M, Kawanishi Y, Ueba T, Fujimoto S, Terada Y. Hypopituitarism due to CNS Aspergillus infection. Intern Med 2024 Mar 11. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3390-23.
  62. Iplikcioglu AC, Bek S, Bikmaz K,Ceylan DGökduman CA. Aspergillus pituitary abscess. Acta Neurochir 2004; 146: 521-524
  63. Hao L, Jing C, Bowen C, Min H, Chao Y. Aspergillus sellar abscess: case report and review of the literature. Neurol India 2008; 56: 186-188
  64. Pekic S, Arsenijevic VA, Gazibara MS, Milojevic T, Pendjer I, Stojanovic M, Popovic V. What lurks in the sellar?Lancet 2010; 375: 432
  65. Ouyang TZhang NWang LJiao JZhao YLi ZChen J. Primary Aspergillus sellar abscesssimulating pituitary tumor in immunocompetent patient. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: e86-88
  66. Breuel KF, Kougias P, Rice PJ, Wei D, De Ponti K, Wang J, Laffan JJ, Li C, Kalbfleisch J, Williams DL. Anterior pituitary cells express pattern recognition receptors for fungal glucans: implications for neuroendocrine immune involvement in response to fungal infections. Neuroimmunomodulation 2004; 11: 1–9
  67. Klebanov IuA. Analysis of fatal outcome in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Klin Med 1990; 68: 64-67
  68. Valtonen M, Kauppila M, Kotilainen P, Lähdevirta J, Svartbäck CM, Kosunen O, Nurminen J, Sarkkinen H, Brummer-Korvenkontio M. Four fatal cases of nephropathia epidemica. Scand J Infect Dis 1995; 27: 515-517
  69. Hautala T, Sironen T, Vapalahti O, Pääkkö ESärkioja TSalmela PIVaheri APlyusnin AKauma H. Hypophyseal hemorrhage and panhypopituitarism during Puumala Virus Infection: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and detection of viral antigen in the hypophysis. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 96-101
  70. Lim TH, Chang KH, Han MC, Chang YB, Lim SM, Yu YS, Chun YH, Lee JS. Pituitary atrophy in Korean (epidemic) hemorrhagic fever: CT correlation with pituitary function and visual field. Am J Neuroradiol 1986; 7: 633-637
  71. Forslund T, Saltevo J, Anttinen J, Auvinen S, Brummer-Korvenkontio M, Korhonen A, Poutiainen M. Complications of nephropathia epidemica: three cases. J Intern Med 1992; 232: 87-90
  72. Settergren B, Boman J, Linderholm M, Wiström J, Hägg E, Arvidsson PA. A case of nephropathia epidemica associated with panhypopituitarism and nephrotic syndrome. Nephron 1992; 61: 234-235
  73. Suh DC, Park JS, Park SK, Lee HK, Chang KH. Pituitary hemorrhage as a complication of hantaviral disease. Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 175-178
  74. Park JE, Pyo HJ. Delayed onset of diuresis in a patient with acute renal failure due to hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome who also developed anterior hypopituitarism. Clin Nephrol 1996; 46: 141-145
  75. Kim NH, Cho JG, Ahn YK, Lee SU, Kim KH, Cho JH, Kim HG, Kim W, Jeong MH, Park JC, Kang JC. A case of torsade de pointes associated with hypopituitarism due to hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. J Korean Med Sci 2001; 16: 355-359
  76. Pekic S, Cvijovic G, Stojanovic M, Kendereski A, Micic D, Popovic V. Hypopituitarism as a late complication of hemorrhagic fever. Endocrine 2005; 26: 79-82
  77. Ahn HJChung JHKim DMYoon NRKim CM. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome accompanied by panhypopituitarism and central diabetes insipidus: a case report. J Neurovirol  2018; 24: 382-387
  78. Bhoelan S, Langerak T, Noack D, van Schinkel L, van Nood E, van Gorp ECM, Rockx B, Goeijenbier M. Hypopituitarism after Orthohantavirus infection: what is currently known? Viruses 2019; 11: 340
  79. Shi S, Zhang A, Zhang J, Xu S. Partial hypopituitarism with ACTH deficiency as the main manifestation as a complication of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. BMC Endocr Disord 2024; 24: 61.
  80. Partanen T, Koivikko M, Leisti P, Salmela P, Pääkkö E, Karttunen A, Sintonen H, Risteli L, Hautala N, Vapalahti O, Vaheri A, Kauma H, Hautala T. Long-term hormonal follow-up after human Puumala hantavirus infection. Clin Endocrinol2016; 84: 85-91
  81. Tarvainen MMäkelä SMustonen JJaatinen P. Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy and hypophysitis after Puumalahantavirus infection. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep 2016; 2016
  82. Stojanovic M, Pekic S, Cvijovic G, Miljic D, Doknic M, Nikolic-Djurovic M, Micic D, Hrvacevic R, Nesic V, Popovic V.High risk of hypopituitarism in patients who recovered from hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 2722-2728
  83. Bellastella G, Cirillo P, Carbone C, Scappaticcio L, Maio A, Botta G, Tomasuolo M, Longo M, Pontillo A, Bellastella A, Esposito K, De Bellis A. Neuroimmunoendocrinology of SARS-CoV 2 Infection. Biomedicines 2022; 10: 2855. 
  84. Clarke SA, Abbara A, Dhillo WS. Impact of COVID-19 on the endocrine system: a mini-review. Endocrinology 2022; 163: bqab203. 
  85. Capatina C, Poiana C, Fleseriu M. Pituitary and SARS CoV-2: An unremitting conundrum. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 37: 101752
  86. Chigr F, Merzouki M, Najimi M Autonomic brain centers and pathophysiology of COVID-19. ACS Chem Neurosci 2020; 11: 1520–1522
  87. Conde Cardona G, Quintana Pajaro LD, Quintero Marzola ID, Ramos Villegas Y, Moscote Salazar LR. Neurotropism of SARS-CoV 2: mechanisms and manifestations. J Neurol Sci 2020; 412: 116824
  88. Han T, Kang J, Li G, Ge J, Gu J. Analysis of 2019-nCoV receptor ACE2 expression in different tissues and its significance study. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8: 1077
  89. Abdel-Mannan O, Eyre M, Lobel U, Bamford A, Eltze C, Hameed B, Hemingway C, Hacohen Y. Neurologic and radiographic findings associated with COVID-19 infection in children. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77: 1440-1445
  90. Ding Y, He L, Zhang Q, Huang Z, Che X, Hou J, Wang H, Shen H, Qiu L, Li Z, Geng J, Cai J, Han H, Li X, Kang W, Weng D, Liang P, Jiang S. Organ distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in SARS patients: implications for pathogenesis and virus transmission pathways. J Pathol 2004; 203: 622–630
  91. Frara S, Allora A, Castellino L, di Filippo L, Loli P, Giustina A. COVID-19 and the pituitary. Pituitary, 2021; 24: 465-481
  92. Puig-Domingo M, Marazuela M, Yildiz BO, Giustina A. COVID-19 and endocrine and metabolic diseases. An updated statement from the European Society of Endocrinology. Endocrine 2021; 72: 301-316.
  93. Ghosh R, Roy D, Roy D, Mandal A, Dutta A, Naga D, Benito-Leon J. A rare case of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with pituitary apoplexy without comorbidities. J Endocr Soc 2021; 5: bvaa203.
  94. Martinez-Perez R, Kortz MW, Carroll BW, Duran D, Neill JS, Luzardo GD, Zachariah MA. Coronavirus disease 2019 and pituitary apoplexy: a single-center case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2021; 152: e678-e687.
  95. Facondo P, Maltese V, Delbarba A, Pirola I, Rotondi M, Ferlin A, Cappelli C. Case report: hypothalamic amenorrhea following COVID-19 infection and review of literatures. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 840749.
  96. Hazzi C, Villemure-Poliquin N, Nadeau S, Champagne PO. SARS-CoV-2 infection, a risk factor for pituitary apoplexy? A case series and literature review. Ear Nose Throat J 2024; 103: 153S-161S.  
  97. Racca G, D'Agnano S, Fasano N, Gianotti L. Pituitary apoplexy with transition to acute hypophysitis in a patient with Sars-CoV-2 pneumonia. JCEM Case Rep 2022; 1: luac010.
  98. Bray DP, Solares CA, Oyesiku NM. Rare case of a disappearing pituitary adenoma during the COVID-19 pandemic. World Neurosurg 2020; 146: 148-149
  99. Chan JL, Gregory KD, Smithson SS, Naqvi M, Mamelak AN. Pituitary apoplexy associated with acute COVID-19 infection and pregnancy. Pituitary 2020; 23: 716-720
  100. Santos CDSE, Filho LMDCL, Santos CAT, Neill JS, Vale HF, Kurnutala LN. Pituitary tumor resection in a patient with SARSCoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. A case report and suggested airway management guidelines. Braz J Anesthesiol 2020; 70: 165-170
  101. Solorio-Pineda S, Almendarez-Sanchez CA, Tafur-Grandett AA, Ramos-Martinez GA, Huato-Reyes R, Ruiz-Flores MI, Sosa-Najera A. Pituitary macroadenoma apoplexy in a severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2-positive testing: causal or casual? Surg Neurol Int 2020; 11: 304
  102. LaRoy M & McGuire M. Pituitary apoplexy in the setting of COVID-19 infection: a case report. Am J Emerg Med 2021; S0735-6757(21)00153-4
  103. Bordes SJ, Phang-Lyn S, Najera E, Borghei-Razavi H, Adada B. Pituitary apoplexy attributed to COVID-19 infection in the absence of an underlying macroadenoma or other identifiable cause. Cureus 2021; 13: e13315
  104. Joshi M, Gunawardena S, Goenka A, Ey E, Kumar G. Post COVID-19 Lymphocytic hypophysitis: a rare presentation. Child Neurol Open 2022; 9: 2329048X221103051
  105. Zerrouki D, Assarrar I, Rami I, Rouf S, Latrech H. Coronavirus as a trigger of lymphocytic hypophysitis in an adolescent girl: An exceptional case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2024; 115: 109218.
  106. Gonen MS, De Bellis A, Durcan E, Bellastella G, Cirillo P, Scappaticcio L, Longo M, Bircan BE, Sahin S, Sulu C, Ozkaya HM, Konukoglu D, Kartufan FF, Kelestimur F. Assessment of neuroendocrine changes and hypothalamo-pituitary autoimmunity in patients with COVID-19. Horm Metab Res 2022; 54: 153-161. 
  107. Littera R, Campagna M, Deidda S, Angioni G, Cipri S, Melis M, Firinu D, Santus S, Lai A, Porcella R, Lai S, Rassu S, Scioscia R, Meloni F, Schirru D, Cordeddu W, Kowalik MA, Serra M, Ragatzu P, Carta MG, Del Giacco S, Restivo A, Deidda S, Orrù S, Palimodde A, Perra R, Orrù G, Conti M, Balestrieri C, Serra G, Onali S, Marongiu F, Perra A, Chessa L. Human leukocyte antigen complex and other immunogenetic and clinical factors influence susceptibility or protection to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of the disease course. The Sardinian experience. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 605688. 
  108. Weiner J, Suwalski P, Holtgrewe M, Rakitko A, Thibeault C, Müller M, Patriki D, Quedenau C, Krüger U, Ilinsky V, Popov I, Balnis J, Jaitovich A, Helbig ET, Lippert LJ, Stubbemann P, Real LM, Macías J, Pineda JA, Fernandez-Fuertes M, Wang X, Karadeniz Z, Saccomanno J, Doehn JM, Hübner RH, Hinzmann B, Salvo M, Blueher A, Siemann S, Jurisic S, Beer JH, Rutishauser J, Wiggli B, Schmid H, Danninger K, Binder R, Corman VM, Mühlemann B, Arjun Arkal R, Fragiadakis GK, Mick E, Comet C, Calfee CS, Erle DJ, Hendrickson CM, Kangelaris KN, Krummel MF, Woodruff PG, Langelier CR, Venkataramani U, García F, Zyla J, Drosten C, Alice B, Jones TC, Suttorp N, Witzenrath M, Hippenstiel S, Zemojtel T, Skurk C, Poller W, Borodina T, Pa-Covid SG, Ripke S, Sander LE, Beule D, Landmesser U, Guettouche T, Kurth F, Heidecker B. Increased risk of severe clinical course of COVID-19 in carriers of HLA-C*04:01. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 40: 101099.
  109. Hovhannisyan A, Madelian V, Avagyan S, Nazaretyan M, Hyussyan A, Sirunyan A, Arakelyan R, Manukyan Z, Yepiskoposyan L, Mayilyan KR, Jordan F. HLA-C*04:01 affects HLA class I heterozygosity and predicted affinity to SARS-CoV-2 peptides, and in combination with age and sex of armenian patients contributes to COVID-19 severity. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 769900.
  110. Yasuda S, Suzuki S, Yanagisawa S, Morita H, Haisa A, Satomura A, Nakajima R, Oikawa Y, Inoue I, Shimada A. HLA typing of patients who developed subacute thyroiditis and Graves' disease after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a case report. BMC Endocr Disord 2023; 23: 54.
  111. Rajevac H, Bachan M, Khan Z. Diabetes insipidus as a symptom of covid-19 infection: case report. Chest 2020, 158: A2576
  112. Sheikh AB, Javed N, Sheikh AA, Upadhyay S, Shekhar R. Diabetes insipidus and concomitant myocarditis: a late sequelae of COVID-19 infection. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2021, 9: 1–4
  113. Misgar RA, Rasool A, Wani AI, Bashir MI. Central diabetes insipidus (infudibuloneuro hypophysitis): a late complication of COVID-19 infection. J Endocrinol Invest 2021 Jul 3; 1-2
  114. Yavari A, Sharifan Z, Larijani B, Mosadegh Khah A. Central diabetes insipidus secondary to COVID-19 infection: a case report. BMC Endocr Disord 2022; 22: 134.
  115. Berni A, Malandrino D, Corona G, Maggi M, Parenti G, Fibbi B, Poggesi L, Bartoloni A, Lavorini F, Fanelli A, Scocchera G, Nozzoli C, Peris A, Pieralli F, Pini R, Ungar A, Peri A. Serum sodium alterations in SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: impact on patient outcome. Eur J Endocrinol 2021; 185: 137-144. 
  116. Khidir RJY, Ibrahim BAY, Adam MHM, Hassan RME, Fedail ASS, Abdulhamid RO, Mohamed SOO. Prevalence and outcomes of hyponatremia among COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2022; 16: 69-84.
  117. Morita S, Tsuji T, Kishimoto S, Uraki S, Takeshima K, Iwakura H, Furuta H, Nishi M, Inaba H, Matsuoka TA. Isolated ACTH deficiency following immunization with the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a case report. BMC Endocr Disord 2022; 22:185.
  118. Panos LD, Bargiotas P, Hadjigeorgiou G, Panos GD. Neurovascular adverse effects of Sars-Cov-2 vaccination. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18: 1891-1905.
  119. Verrienti M, Marino Picciola V, Ambrosio MR, Zatelli MC. Pituitary and COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review. Pituitary 2024 May 18. doi: 10.1007/s11102-024-01402-2.
  120. Watanabe S, Tamura Y, Oba K, Kitayama S, Sato M, Kodera R, Toyoshima K, Chiba Y, Araki A. Hypopituitarism with secondary adrenocortical insufficiency and arginine vasopressin deficiency due to hypophysitis after COVID-19 vaccination: a case report. BMC Endocr Disord 2024; 24(1): 71.
  121. Bouça B, Roldão M, Bogalho P, Cerqueira L, Silva-Nunes J. Central diabetes insipidus following immunization with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a case report. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 889074.
  122. Torres AM, Kazee AM, Simon H, Knudson PE, Weinstock RS. Central diabetes insipidus due to herpes simplex in a patient immunosuppressed by Cushing's syndrome. Endocr Pract 2000; 6: 26-28
  123. Moses AM, Thomas DG, Canfield MC, Collins GH. Central diabetes insipidus due to cytomegalovirus infection of the hypothalamus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical case study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 51-54.
  124. Scheinpflug K, Schalk E, Reschke K, Franke A, Mogren M. Diabetes insipidus due to herpes encephalitis in a patient with diffuse large cell lymphoma. A case report. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006; 114: 31-34
  125. Jones GMuriello MPatel ALogan L. Enteroviral meningoencephalitis complicated by central diabetes insipidusin a neonate: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2015; 4: 155-158.
  126. Tsuji HYoshifuji HFujii T, Matsuo TNakashima RImura YYukawa NOhmura KSumiyoshi SMimori T. Visceral disseminated varicella zoster virus infection after rituximab treatment for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Mod Rheumatol  2017; 27: 155-161
  127. Zhang X, Li Q, Hu P, Cheng H, Huang G. Two case reports of pituitary adenoma associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 965-966
  128. Milligan SA, Katz MS, Craven PC, Strandberg DARussell IJBecker RA. Toxoplasmosis presenting as panhypopituitarism in a patient with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Med 1984; 77: 760-764
  129. Hamdeh S, Abbas A, Fraker J, Lambrecht JE. Intracranial toxoplasmosis presenting as panhypopituitarism in an immunocompromised patient. Am J Emerg Med2015; 33: 1848.e1-2
  130. Del Brutto OH, Del Brutto VJ. Intrasellar cysticercosis: a systematic review. Acta Neurol Belg 2013; 113: 225-227.
  131. Dutta D, Kumar M, Ghosh S, Mukhopadhyay S, Chowdhury S. Pituitary hormone deficiency due to racemose neurocysticercosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013; 1: e13.
  132. Cheong JH, Kim JM, Kim CH. Neurocysticercosis involving the pituitary stalk: case report and literature review. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48: 91-93

Development And Microscopic Anatomy Of The Pituitary Gland

ABSTRACT

 

The pituitary gland is an organ of dual origin. The anterior part (adenohypophysis) arises from embryonic buccal mucosa, whereas the posterior part (neurohypophysis) derives from neural ectoderm. Precise spatial and temporal co-ordination of transcription factor expression in both structures is critical for pituitary gland formation and the differentiation of hormone-producing cells. Disruption of this regulation, for instance by transcription factor mutation, can lead to numerous developmental disorders and disturbances in endocrine function and regulation. We provide an overview of the molecular drivers of pituitary organogenesis and illustrate the anatomy and histology of the mature pituitary gland, comprising adenohypophysis (anterior lobe), neurohypophysis (posterior lobe), pars intermedia (intermediate lobe), and infundibulum (pituitary stalk).

 

PITUITARY ORGANOGENESIS

 

The pituitary is an organ of dual origin. The anterior part (adenohypophysis) is derived from oral ectoderm and is epithelial in origin, whereas the posterior part (neurohypophysis) derives from neural ectoderm. The mixed embryological derivation of the pituitary gland requires that developmental signals from both the neural and oral ectoderm must interact temporally and spatially to control maturation of the pituitary gland and the cellular differentiation of the various hormone-producing cell types within the adenohypophysis. The expression of transcription factors that control cell lineage commitment in the developing adenohypophysis must be regulated precisely to ensure correct differentiation of hormone-producing cell types; the iterative and cumulative nature of this regulation renders it extremely sensitive to perturbation. Disruption of this process, for instance by mutation, can lead to numerous developmental disorders from congenital forms of hypopituitarism to pituitary tumors (1) (2).

 

Pituitary organogenesis begins during week 4 of fetal development. A thickening of cells in the oral ectoderm forms the hypophyseal placode which gives rise to Rathke’s pouch; an upward evagination of the buccal ectoderm that extends towards the neural ectoderm.  At the same time, a downward extension of the ventral diencephalon forms the posterior lobe, and the two nascent lobes connect to form the bilobed structure of the adult pituitary gland.  Rathke’s pouch constricts at its base and eventually separates altogether from the oral epithelium during gestational week 6-8. The cells of the anterior wall of Rathke’s pouch undergo extensive proliferation to form the anterior lobe. In humans, the posterior wall proliferates more slowly to form the vestigial intermediate lobe (3). Cell patterning and terminal differentiation occurs within the anterior lobe to form the five principal specialized endocrine cell types of the pituitary gland; the somatotrophs, adrenocorticotrophs, gonadotrophs, thyrotrophs, and lactotrophs.

 

TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL OF PITUITARY ORGANOGENESIS

 

Development of the pituitary occurs broadly in three stages:

 

  1. Initiation of pituitary organogenesis and formation of Rathke’s pouch (Blue in Table 1).
  2. Evagination of Rathke’s pouch and cell proliferation (Green in Table 1).
  3. Lineage determination and cellular differentiation (Yellow in Table 1).

 

Table 1. Signalling Molecules Controlling Pituitary Organogenesis and Associated Dysfunction

Developmental Stage

Factor

Function

Dysfunction

Comments

Reference

Initiation of pituitary organogenesis and formation of Rathke’s pouch

SIX homeo-domain proteins

Six1-Six6

Family of six transcriptional activators/ inhibitors

Functional role difficult to determine due to redundancy and severity of mutations

 

Expression persists in adult pituitary; may mediate plasticity

(52) (53)

Paired-like homeobox proteins

Hesx1

Transcriptional repressor

Early marker of Rathke’s pouch

Downregulation essential for endocrine cell differentiation

Mutations in patients with hypopituitarism including septo-optic dysplasia, combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) and isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD)

Expression activated by LIM homeodomain proteins

(54)

Otx2

Transcription factor that regulates  Hesx1

Mutations found in patients with ocular disorders (e.g. anophthalmia, microphthalmia) with or without hypopituitarism. In mice, deficiency results in craniofacial

defects and pituitary gland dysmorphology, but normal pituitary cell specification

 

(55) (56)

Pitx1/2/3

Interacts with various other factors to determine cell lineage

Mutations in Pitx2 (R91P) found in patients with Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. Blocks expression of LH β and FSHβ

 

Expressed throughout oral ectoderm and Rathke’s pouch.

 

Some functional redundancy, but all required for proper development

 

Expression maintained in the adult gland

 (57)

LIM homeodomain transcription factors

Isl1

Involved in cell lineage specification

 

 

No human mutations identified. Null mice do not develop Rathke’s pouch

First LIM protein to be expressed

 

Expressed in cells destined to become thyrotrophs

Reviewed in (6)

Lhx3

Expression gradient required for differentiation of endocrine cell types

Heritable mutation in patients with CPHD with short, stiff neck and sensorineural hearing loss

Broad temporal and spatial expression pattern with many target genes

(58) (59)

Lhx4

Expression gradient required for differentiation of endocrine cell types

Heterozygous mutations in patients with CPHD. Associated with pituitary hypoplasia, small sella and Arnold-Chiari malformation

Not critical for endocrine cell differentiation

(60) (61)(59)

SOX2

 

Expressed throughout developing Rathke’s pouch

 

Downregulation essential for endocrine cell differentiation

Mutations found in patients with an- or microphthalmia, hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, and growth hormone deficiency (GHD)

 

Both duplications and loss of function mutations associated with hypopituitarism

Some expression retained in adult pituitary, confined to pituitary progenitor/stem cells

(62) (6)

β-catenin

 

Signalling activates Pitx2 expression promoting pituitary precursor proliferation. Required for Pit1 lineage determination and anterior pituitary formation

Premature activation of β-catenin results in Hesx1 repression and pituitary gland agenesis in mouse

Activating mutation of β-catenin leads to pituitary progenitor proliferation, loss of Pit1 lineage cells and adamantinomatous cranyiopharyngioma

High degree of interaction with other signalling pathways e.g. Notch. Not required for cell lineage determination

(63) (7)

Notch

 

 

Mediates lateral inhibition and cell lineage determination

 

Activates Hes1 expression

Dysregulaiton of the pathway associated with premature corticotroph differentiation and pituitary hypoplasia in mice

Expression in the adult gland co-localises with SOX2

(64)

Migration of Rathke’s pouch cells and proliferation

 

Bone morphogenic proteins

BMP4

Expressed in ventral diencephalon

 

Required for hypophyseal placode formation

Downregulation results in arrested development of Rathke’s pouch in mice

 

Reviewed in (5)

BMP2

Induces Isl1 expression

 

Downregulation required for cell differentiation

Prolonged expression results in hyperplastic pituitary and lack of terminal differentiation

 

(65)

Fibroblast growth factors

FGF 8, 10, 18

Expressed in the posterior pituitary

 

Required for Lhx3 and Lhx4 expression and cell differentiation

In humans, mutations of FGF8 and its receptor are associated with Kallmann syndrome, resulting in isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism

 

(66) (67)(68)

Shh

 

Expressed in oral ectoderm and ventral diencephalon

 

Induces Lhx3 expression

Antagonism in mouse oral ectoderm results in hypoplastic Rathke’s pouch

 

(69)

Lineage determination and cellular differentiation

Prop1

 

Transcriptional activator and suppressor depending on context

 

Activates POU1F1 expression and switches developmental process from proliferation to differentiation

Mutations are most common cause of CPHD in humans

 

Reviewed in (6) and (70) (71)(72) (73)(74)

POU1F1 (Pit1)

 

Expressed in cells committed to somatotroph, lactotroph and thyrotroph lineage

 

Inhibits GATA2 and prevents gonadotroph cell fate

Mutations in humans associated with GH PRL, TSH deficiency and small anterior pituitary. Mutations rarely present in sporadic CPHD and more common in familial CPHD

Required for GH PRL, TSHβ expression

(73) (75)(76) (77)

GATA2

 

Specifies gonadotroph and thyrotroph lineages

 

Induces expression of Nr5a1

In mice, overexpression associated with gonadotroph and thyrotroph hypoplasia.

Expression persists in adult gland

(75)

Nr5a1 (SF1)

 

Expressed throughout adrenal and reproductive axes

 

Regulates expression of GnRHR, LH, FSH and αGSU.

 

Expression necessary for gonadotroph differentiation

 

Mutations associated with 46XY sex reversal with adrenal failure, 46XY gonadal dysgenesis and 46XX ovarian insufficiency and premature ovarian failure in humans

 

(18) (78)

Tbx19 (TPIT)

 

Activates POMC expression in association with PITX1

Mutations are commonest cause of  isolated ACTH deficiency in humans

Antagonists to Nr5a1 can prevent gonadotroph cell fate

(79) (80)

 

Much of our understanding of the process of pituitary organogenesis comes from mouse studies (4) (5), but the phenotypes associated with human disorders often share aspects with mouse models of defective pituitary development. Various transcription factors that are involved are presented in Figure 1 and summarized in Table 1 (6), (7), (8) & (9).

 

Figure 1. Signaling molecules and transcription factors control pituitary development. Arrows represent regulation of expression in the direction indicated (See Table 1). The clinically used transcription factors are in blue.

 

Transcriptional Control of Pituitary Organogenesis: Lineage Determination and Cellular Differentiation

 

Significant advances have been made in recent years in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the commitment and differentiation of Rathke’s pouch progenitors and the role of endocrine stem cells in the adenohypophysis (8) (10).  Many factors are involved in pituitary differentiation, but a few later acting transcription factors have pituitary-specific effects and have become clinically relevant (11).  In clinical terms, cells of the adenohypophysis can be divided into those of the Pit-1 lineage (somatotrophs, lactotrophs, somatomammotrophs, and thyrotrophs), those of t-PIT lineage (corticotrophs and melanotrophs), and those of SF-1 lineage (Gonadotrophs).

 

PIT-1 (POU1F1)

 

PIT-1 was first identified as a trans-activating factor of the growth hormone and prolactin genes. It is a member of the POU homeodomain family of transcription factors (5). Inactivating mutations produce recessive hypopituitarism characterized by a congenital lack of growth hormone, prolactin and TSH (12).  Two naturally occurring recessive mouse mutants have Pit-1 defects; the Snell Dwarf (dw) mouse and the Jackson dwarf (dwJ).  Homozygous recessive variants of these mice both exhibit post-natal, but not embryonic, anterior pituitary hypoplasia with GH, PRL and TSH deficiencies. 

 

T-PIT

 

t-PIT (TBX19) is a member of the T-Box family of transcription factors.  The T-Box represents the DNA binding domain of these factors.  T-Pit is expressed in the developing pituitary and expression generally persists into the adult gland.  T-Pit depletion in mice induces severe ACTH and glucocorticoid deficiencies in addition to adrenal hypoplasia and pigmentation defects.  The phenotype of t-Pit -/- mice suggests that T-PIT promotes the development of corticotrophs but can also actively repress gonadotroph formation (13). 

 

STEROIDOGENIC FACTOR (SF-1)

 

SF-1 is a nuclear receptor encoded by the gene Nr5a1 or steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1).    It is an orphan nuclear receptor involved as a transactivating factor in steroid biosynthesis.  SF-1 is expressed throughout the adrenal and reproductive axes during development and postnatal life (14) (15).  Mutations of SF-1 in humans are associated with 46XY sex reversal with adrenal failure, 46XY gonadal dysgenesis and 46XX ovarian insufficiency and premature ovarian failure (16) (17).

 

In some cases, transcription factor deficiency does not result in the complete absence of a cell type.  SF-1 deficient mice do not spontaneously produce gonadotrophins but hyperstimulation with GnRH can induce hormone production suggesting that SF-1 is not essential for gonadotroph differentiation (18).  Similarly, t-Pit expression is not essential for corticotroph development, but POMC synthesis is delayed if they are deficient (19). The failure to promote differentiation along a particular lineage can be permissive for other pathways and the idea that single transcription factors direct cell differentiation is overly simplistic.  Nevertheless, these differentiation markers (colored blue in Figure 1) have proven to be extremely useful in diagnostic pituitary pathology, particularly in demonstrating the cell lineage of silent or non-expressing pituitary adenomas, and their expression can be detected in histological samples of pituitary tissue removed at trans-sphenoidal adenohypophysectomy by immunohistochemistry (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2. Pituitary transcription factor expression in the normal pituitary gland.

 

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY OF THE MATURE PITUITARY GLAND

 

Hypophysis Cerebri

 

The mature pituitary gland, or hypophysis cerebri, is a small, oval body weighing approximately 0.5g. The adenohypophysis of the pituitary is generally smaller in men than women and, within the female population, the gland in nulliparous women is generally smaller than that seen in multiparous women (20) (21).  Indeed, during pregnancy, the gland may increase by approximately 30% due to a combination of lactotroph hyperplasia and vascular engorgement. The hypophysis is connected to the brain via the infundibulum, a tubular structure arising from the tuber cinereum and median eminence of the hypothalamus. The gland rests in the sella turcica (pituitary fossa) of the sphenoid bone and is covered superiorly by the diaphragma sellae (a thin film of dura), laterally by the walls of the cavernous sinus, and antero-inferiorly by the posterior wall of the sphenoid sinus; the latter used as the standard route for pituitary surgery or transsphenoidal adenectomy (Figure 3).  Antero-superiorly, the pituitary lies in close proximity to the optic chiasm and bilateral, inferomedial compression of the chiasm by the expanding gland explains why space-occupying lesions of the pituitary commonly present with bitemporal hemianopia. Inferiorly, the adenohypophysis is separated from the floor of the sella turcica by a large, loculated venous sinus that communicates with the circular sinus. 

 

Figure 3. High resolution 3D imaging reconstruction of the sella turcica in a volunteer (courtesy of Prof Mark Gurnell, Cambridge, UK). These detailed scans are proving invaluable in planning the surgical approach for transsphenoidal adenectomy, especially where vascular anomalies are expected.
A) Section across the roof of the sella with the optic nerves and chiasm (green) in situ revealing the intimate relationship between the chiasm and the pituitary gland (turquoise).
B) A similar level with the optic nerve and chiasm removed.
C) Detail of the sella region showing the relationship between the pituitary gland and stalk (turquoise), base of hypothalamus (orange), and internal carotid arteries (red).

 

The Hypothalamus

 

The structure of the hypothalamus and its complex connections are well known and have been described in detail elsewhere (22) (23) (24). The hypothalamic nuclei that give rise to the neurohypophysis arise from the preoptic, supraoptic, lateral, tuberal and mamillary regions (3) and hypothalamic regulatory neurons have their cell bodies in the supraoptic, paraventricular, infundibular and ventromedial nuclei of the hypothalamus.  These hypothalamic nuclei have projections that terminate throughout the median eminence, infundibulum, and the posterior lobe (Figure 4).  Neurons derived from hypothalamic nuclei produce peptidergic “releasing hormones” that are transported along axons and released into the portal system from where they are carried to the dense capillary plexus of the adenohypophysis to influence hormone synthesis and release.  The parvocellular neurosecretory pathway of the tuberoinfundibular tract is proposed as the main route for the synthesis of releasing hormones and of transmission to portal blood.   The major trophic factors originating in the hypothalamic nuclei include growth hormone releasing factor (GRF), corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF), thyrotropin releasing factor (TRF), gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) and other peptides such as somatostatin (SS).  Other trophic and inhibitory factors are also released in this region including dopaminergic compounds. 

 

Figure 4. Sagittal T1-weighted image of the pituitary fossa demonstrates normal pituitary anatomy. The T1-weighted study is particularly helpful in identifying the posterior pituitary bright spot (white arrow)- a focus of T1 signal hyperintensity posteriorly in the sella, which corresponds with the neurohypophysis. The intrinsic T1 signal shortening through the posterior pituitary is thought to be due to the presence of vasopressin. The zoomed image of the pituitary gland, consisting of the anterior (A) and posterior (P) lobes, sits within the sella turcica, a “saddle”-shaped depression in the sphenoid bone, with the tuberculum sellae anteriorly, and the dorsum sellae posteriorly. Superior to the pituitary gland is CSF within the hypophyseal and suprasellar cisterns. The pituitary stalk (S), also known as the infundibulum or infundibular stalk, extends through the suprasellar cistern, extending between the hypothalamus and the superior surface of the pituitary gland. The optic chiasm (C) can be seen in the suprasellar space more superiorly. Anteroinferior to the pituitary gland is the sphenoid sinus (SS). (B)- brainstem, (M)- mammillary bodies, (3V)- third ventricle.

 

In addition to nerve fibers, the long and short portal blood vessels (distributed between sinusoids in the median eminence, infundibulum, and the adenohypophysis) are also of major importance to this region. The adenohypophysis receives no major nerve supply and almost all of its blood comes from hypothalamic-hypophysial portal vessels. The predominant direction of blood flow is from the tufts of sinusoids in the median eminence and infundibulum via the portal vessels to sinusoids between glandular cells in the anterior lobe.  This neurovascular arrangement is of vital importance to understand the mechanism by which the hypothalamus regulates the neuroendocrine function of the gland. 

 

Neurosecretion is the physiological process involved in the production and release of posterior lobe oxytocin and vasopressin and their related proteins: including the precursor neurophysins.  In terms of these magnocellular neurosecretory pathways, both the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei are involved in the production both of vasopressin and oxytocin, however, vasopressin originates predominantly from the supraoptic nucleus and oxytocin originates predominantly from the paraventricular nucleus. 

 

Infundibulum (Pituitary Stalk)

 

The infundibular stalk is a tubular, funnel-shaped structure divided into the anterior pars tuberalis and posterior pars infundibularis. The pars tuberalis is considered to be part of the adenohypophysis (see below) and contains a few scattered gonadotroph or corticotroph cells. Anteriorly and superficially, it surrounds the pars infundibularis (infundibular stem), which contains the unmyelinated axons of the magnocellular supraoptic and paraventricular neurons.  The neurons contain large intra-axonal accumulations of oxytocin and vasopressin that may be seen as eosinophilic ovoid granular swellings along the trajectory of these axons in the infundibular stem. These ovoid swellings are known as “Herring bodies” named after Percy Theodore Herring who first described them (figure 4).  It also contains the neural connections of the hypophysis that are continuous with the median eminence of the tuber cinereum. 

 

The Adenohypophysis

 

The adenohypophysis comprises the vast majority of the pituitary gland by volume and is composed of three parts: the pars distalis, the pars intermedia and the pars tuberalis.  The pars distalis forms the majority of the adenohypophysis, the pars intermedia is rudimentary in the human but represents the vestigial posterior limb of Rathke’s pouch and the pars tuberalis is an upward extension of the adenohypophysis that surrounds the lower regions of the hypophysial stalk.  The anatomy of this region is shown in figure 5.

 

Figure 5. Coronal T2-weighted image demonstrates normal sellar and parasellar anatomy and delineates the local anatomical boundaries of the pituitary fossa. The pituitary gland (P) is sited within the sella turcica, with the sphenoid sinus (SS) demonstrated inferiorly. The pituitary stalk (S) is seen extending vertically through the suprasellar space in the midline. Superior to this is the optic chiasm (C). The lateral borders of the pituitary fossa are formed by the cavernous sinuses. On this coronal image, the T2 flow voids through the cavernous segments of the ICAs occupy the cavernous sinuses.

 

Pars Distalis

 

The pars distalis of the adenohypophysis is a highly vascular structure, consisting of epithelial cells of varying size and shape arranged in cords, irregular masses or follicles, separated by thin-walled vascular sinusoids and supported by a complex network of reticular tissue best appreciated in reticulin preparations (Figure 6).  This region of the adenohypophysis contains several cell types, generally divided into acidophils and basophils (depending on their staining properties with mixed acidic and basic dyes such as Orange-G/aldehyde fuchsin, (figure 7).  These cells release trophic hormones including growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH).  The regulation and production of these trophic hormones is complex and is thought to be the result of a combination of the release of hypothalamic releasing factors into the median eminence, the regulation of portal blood flow by vascular systems, feedback by systemic hormones, autocrine interactions and complex paracrine interactions within the gland (25) (26)(27). 

 

Figure 6. Section of adenohypophysis stained with reticulin showing nested acini of adenohypophysial cells.

Figure 7. Section of adenohypophysis stained with PAS/Orange G showing the distribution of acidophils (Orange) and basophils (Purple).

 

The cellular heterogeneity within acini may be demonstrated tinctorially in PAS-OG preparations (Figures 7, 8) which were widely used before the adoption of antibody-based stains (Figure 9). Corticotroph cells are generally strongly basophilic (PAS-positive), somatotroph and lactotroph cells mostly acidophilic (orangeophilic), whilst gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs may be basophilic or chromophobic (reacting with neither acid nor basic stains). There is no perfect match of hormone-expression and type or degree of chromophilia; some chromophobe cells may represent degranulated chromophil cells or precursor cells. In a normal adult adenohypophysis, approximately 10% of endocrine cells are basophils, 40% acidophils and 50% chromophobes.

 

Figure 8. The axial section of the adenohypophysis of the human pituitary gland at the level indicated by the dashed blue line in the diagram. Although there is a mixture of different hormone producing cells in most pituitary acini, the distribution of cells is not random: this is most pronounced in the ‘lateral wings’, which contain mostly somatotroph cells and the central ‘mucoid wedge’, which contains the majority of the corticotrophs. This is easily appreciated in periodic acid-Schiff / orange-G (PAS-OG) histochemistry, which stains somatotrophs yellow-orange (OG-positive) and corticotrophs purple (PAS-positive).

 

The PAS-OG stain is still a useful supplementary method in the differential diagnosis of some pituitary lesions (hyperplasia, corticotroph microadenoma, Crooke’s cell changes or adenoma) but these tinctorial stains have all largely been replaced by immunohistochemical methods (Figure 9).   Although most acini contain a mixture of different hormone-producing cells, there is evidence of zonation (Figure 8). The lateral wings of the gland mostly contain somatotrophs and lactotrophs, whilst corticotrophs are concentrated in the median mucoid wedge, which at its anterior border (the rostral tip) harbors clusters of thyrotrophs. Gonadotroph (LH/FSH) cells are diffusely scattered throughout the gland.

  

 

Figure 9. Examples of immunohistochemistry. It can be seen that although growth hormone (GH) is generally enriched in the wings, the distribution is more diffuse. Corticotrophs (ACTH) are more obviously restricted to the central “mucoid wedge”. Compare this with tinctorial stains in Figures 7 & 8.

 

Cell Types of the Adenohypophysis

 

SOMATOTROPHS

 

Somatotrophs represent about 50% of cells in the adenohypophysis and are located predominantly, but not exclusively, in the lateral wings.  They are readily identified by the expression of growth hormone.  A subset of somatotrophs also express the common glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit.  They are the second cell type to form during fetal development and are detected by 8 weeks of gestation. 

 

LACTOTROPHS

 

Lactotrophs express prolactin.  The number of prolactin-secreting cells varies widely between the sexes and with parity.  The Golgi apparatus is well developed in lactotrophs and contains immature, pleomorphic secretory granules.  Granule extrusions are common in lactotrophs, not only at the basal cell surface, but also on the lateral cell borders; the latter is a distinctive feature of lactotrophs seen on electron microscopy and is known as “misplaced exocytosis”. Lactotrophs appear to arise from mammosomatotroph cells and pure lactotrophs appear late in gestation (24 weeks).  The expansion and secretion of lactotrophs is controlled by exogenous hormones including estrogen, paracrine effects from adjacent adenohypophysial cells and inhibitory substances from the hypothalamus. 

 

MAMMOSOMATOTROPHS

 

These bihormonal cells contain both growth hormone and prolactin.  Mammosomatotrophs are the precursors of lactotrophs and, as in lactotrophs, misplaced exocytosis can be seen on electron microscopy (figure 10). These cells are thought to be the source of lactotroph increases during pregnancy (28)

 

Figure 10. Electron micrograph of a mammosomatotroph adenoma displaying misplaced exocytosis. This feature is seen as the extrusion of secretory granules into the extracellular spaces or from intercellular extensions of the basement membrane.

 

CORTICOTROPHS

 

Corticotrophs synthesis the molecule pro-opiomelanocrortin (POMC) which is cleaved post-transcriptionally to produce bioactive peptides including adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), melanotrophin (MSH) lipotrophic hormone (LPH) and endorphins (29).  These cells comprise about 15-20% of the cell component of the adenohypophysis and the cells are concentrated in the central mucoid wedge.  They are best identified histologically by using antibodies raised against ACTH.  Corticotrophs are the first cell type to differentiate in the fetal pituitary gland at 6 weeks of gestation and ACTH can be detected at 7 weeks. Exposure to glucocorticoid access, either by exogenous corticosteroid administration or any cause of endogenous glucocorticoid hypersecretion, including ectopic secretion of ACTH, causes corticotrophs to undergo a distinctive, but reversible, morphological alteration known as Crooke hyaline change (30).

 

THYROTROPHS

 

These are the most infrequent cell type within the adenohypophysis and are detected by the expression of the glycoprotein hormone common alpha-subunit and the beta-subunit of TSH.  This can be demonstrated by immunohistochemical double labelling for both subunits.  Thyrotrophs are detectable at about 12 weeks of gestation.

 

GONADOTROPHS

 

Gonadotrophs produce both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and both hormone specific beta-subunits and the common alpha-subunit can be detected in these cells.  Gonadotrophs are scattered throughout the pars distalis and are the major constituent of the pars tuberalis.  Gonadotrophs are intimately associated with lactotrophs and electron microscopy reveals gap junctions between them.  The synthesis and release of the gonadotrophins is differentially regulated by the hormonal milieu, paracrine interactions and the pulsatile frequency of GnRH (31) (26,32). 

 

There is growing evidence that the precise control of pituitary gland secretion also involves a contribution from cells with the capacity to demonstrate plasticity with self-renewal and it is likely that the pituitary contains a pool of stem cells (33)(34) (35) (36).  It is possible that these stem cells, possibly expressing Nestin, Lhx3 and Sox2, may exhibit self-renewal properties and have the ability to differentiate into different hormone-producing cell types in response to differing physiological demands (36) (37) (38).

 

FOLLICULOSTELLATE CELLS  

 

Folliculostellate (FS) cells are (in the adult human pituitary) an agranular (non-hormone-producing) parenchymal component of the pars anterior. It has been postulated that they represent a stem cell capable of trans-differentiation into endocrine cells (39), but whether this is true in humans is not certain. FS cells are small, chromophobe, with slender processes that extend between the endocrine cells. They form small follicles at the center of acini, comprised of apical tips of multiple FS cells. They may be visualized with antibodies raised against the S100 protein and GFAP, but their expression pattern is not always overlapping and may reflect different stages of maturation or function. In our hands, annexin-1 immunohistochemistry is a robust marker of FS cells (Figure 11).  Annexin 1 (ANXA1) is a member of the annexin family of phospholipid- and calcium-binding proteins. ANXA1-positive FS cells may modulate glucocorticoid feedback loops in the anterior gland (40) or act as antigen-presenting cells.  FS cells are also postulated to play a role in paracrine regulation (26,41).

 

Figure 11. Non-endocrine cells of the anterior lobe include small folliculo-stellate (FS) cells with delicately branching processes that invest endocrine cells (left, annexin-1 staining) and (on the right) very rare cells that are postulated to represent adult pituitary stem cells (PSC, nestin staining).

 

Pars Tuberalis

 

The pars tuberalis is characterized by a large number of traversing vessels.  Between these are cords or balls of undifferentiated cells admixed with acidophilic and basophilic cells.  The secretion of adenohypophyseal hormones into the circulation appears to occur by exocytosis of the vesicular contents into the perivascular spaces of the sinusoids, the latter being lined with a fenestrated endothelium which facilitates diffusion into the bloodstream. The signal for secretion is the liberation of chemical releasing factors from neurons in the median eminence, and other hypothalamic centers, into the portal system of veins by which they are carried and distributed within the adenohypophysis. 

 

Pars Intermedia

 

In contrast to rodents, the pars intermedia is rudimentary in adult humans (Figure 12). It represents a narrow zone between the adeno- and neurohypophysis often containing microscopic remnants of Rathke’s cleft. This zone may also contain scattered intensely PAS-positive corticotrophs, which may extend from the mucoid wedge of the adenohypophysis into the neurohypophysis. This so-called “basophil invasion” must not be confused with corticotroph microadenomas; it is believed to increase with age, and it has been suggested that these basophil cells are functionally distinct from classical ACTH-producing cells of the adenohypophysis and do not respond with hyaline degeneration (“Crooke’s cell change”) in the setting of systemic hypercortisolemia.  Secretory cells of the pars intermedia have granules containing either alpha- or beta-endorphin; these cells have been shown to contain various peptide hormones including ACTH and alpha-MSH (melanocyte stimulating hormone). 

 

Figure 12. The axial section of the human pituitary gland at the level of the vestigial intermediate lobe (approximately representing the boxed area in the diagram). Note the cluster of remnants of Rathke’s pouch / cleft (RC). The arcs indicate the posterior (center) and postero-medial (left and right) edges of the mucoid wedge (with scattered basophils) and pituitary wings (with scattered somatotrophs), respectively. The asterisk indicates basophil corticotrophs ‘spilling’ into the neurohypophysis (‘basophil invasion’, see figure 13).

Figure 13. ‘Basophil invasion’ of corticotrophs from the vestigial pars intermedia into the neurohypophysis (pars posterior of the pituitary gland). The dashed line represents the border between pars intermedia and pars posterior.

 

Neurohypophysis

 

The neurohypophysis does not contain neuroendocrine epithelial cells. Instead, it is composed of the axons arising from groups of hypothalamic neurons, most prominently those originating from magnocellular neurons of the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei (Figure 14). Some of these axons are short and terminate in the median eminence and infundibular stem among the superior capillary beds of the venous portal circulation.  Longer axons pass into the main neurohypophysis thereby forming the neurosecretory hypothalamo-hypophyseal tract with their terminals ending near the sinusoids of the posterior lobe. These neurosecretory granules mostly contain oxytocin or vasopressin and form axonal beads close to their termini. Whilst it is believed that normal astrocytes may populate (at least partially) the infundibulum, the axon terminals in the neurohypophysis are supported by so-called pituicytes, which are characterized by the expression of the TTF-1 transcription factor (absent in classic GFAP-positive astrocytes) (42) (43) (44). These cells show elongated processes often running in parallel with axons and demonstrate only patchy GFAP and S100 expression.

 

Figure 14. The cytoarchitecture of the neurophypophysis (right) is strikingly different from the adenohypophysis, which contains the nested (inset, left) collections of neuroendocrine cells (left). The neurohypophysis does not contain neurosecretory cell bodies; instead, it is composed of specialized glial cells (pituicytes) that – unique in the human brain – express the TTF-1 (thyroid transcription factor 1) protein in their nuclei (inset, top right). The neurohypophysis contains nerve endings of the oxytocin and vasopressin producing cells of the hypothalamus. Their large, distended nerve endings can be identified on routine stains as so-called Herring-bodies (arrow), named after Percy Theodore Herring (University of Edinburgh) who described them in 1908 as the ‘physiologically active principle’ of the posterior gland.

 

The Vessels of the Hypophysis & Hypothalamic-Hypophysial Portal System

 

The vessels of the hypophysis cerebri have been extensively described and reviewed (45) (46) (47) (48).  The arteries of the hypophysis arise from the internal carotids via a single inferior and multiple superior hypophysial arteries. The arteries of the median eminence and infundibulum end in sprays of capillaries. In the median eminence, these form the external (mantle) plexus and the internal (deep) plexus that are both drained by the long portal vessels some of which terminate in the adenohypophysis.  Short portal vessels run from the lower infundibulum to the pars anterior. Both types of portal vessel open into the vascular sinusoids lying between the secretory cords in the adenohypophysis, providing most of the blood; there is no direct arterial supply to this region (49) (50). The portal system is considered to carry hormone-secreting factors from the hypothalamus (46) (45) (49).  Another notable feature of the rostral portion of the stalk are tortuous capillary loops surrounding a central capillary, termed gomitoli (51). These structures are composed of a central muscular artery surrounded by a spiral of capillaries.  Although their function is unknown, the complexity of these gomitoli suggests that they may regulate the rate of blood flow to the adenohypophysis thereby regulating the flow of trophic factors.

 

The venous drainage of the neurohypophysis is by three possible routes: to the adenohypophysis via the long and short portal vessels, via the large inferior hypophyseal veins into the dural venous sinuses or to the hypothalamus via capillaries passing to the median eminence.  The venous drainage carries hypophysial hormones from the gland to their target tissues and also facilitates feedback of secretions.  In contrast, the venous drainage of the adenohypophysis appears restricted.  It is possible that flow in the short postal vessels could be reversed explaining the postulated “short feedback loop”.  These models of hypophysial blood flow are of importance to the mechanism of hormone secretion.  It is not certain whether the median eminence represents the final common pathway for neural control of the adenohypophysis or the entire neurohypophysis may be involved; its capillary bed may selectively determine the destination of both hypothalamic and pituitary secretions, conveying some to the glandular pituitary, others to distant target organs and yet others to the brain (48). 

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Davis SW, Potok MA, Brinkmeier ML, Carninci P, Lyons RH, MacDonald JW, Fleming MT, Mortensen AH, Egashira N, Ghosh D, Steel KP, Osamura RY, Hayashizaki Y, Camper SA. Genetics, gene expression and bioinformatics of the pituitary gland. Horm Res 2009;71 Suppl 2:101–15.
  2. Srirangam Nadhamuni V, Korbonits M. Novel Insights into Pituitary Tumorigenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms. Endocr Rev 2020 12 01;41(6):bnaa006.
  3. Asa SL Kovacs. Functional morphology of the human fetal pituitary. Pathol. Ann. 1984;19(Pt.1):275–315.
  4. Rizzoti K. Genetic regulation of murine pituitary development. J Mol Endocrinol 2015;54(2):R55-73.
  5. Kelberman D, Rizzoti K, Lovell-Badge R, Robinson IC, Dattani MT. Genetic regulation of pituitary gland development in human and mouse. Endocr Rev 2009;30(7):790–829.
  6. Kelberman D, Rizzoti K, Avilion A, Bitner-Glindzicz M, Cianfarani S, Collins J, Chong WK, Kirk JM, Achermann JC, Ross R, Carmignac D, Lovell-Badge R, Robinson IC, Dattani MT. Mutations within Sox2/SOX2 are associated with abnormalities in the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in mice and humans. J Clin Invest 2006;116(9):2442–55.
  7. Gaston-Massuet C, Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Sajedi E, Bird S, Turner JM, Martinez-Barbera JP. Genetic interaction between the homeobox transcription factors HESX1 and SIX3 is required for normal pituitary development. Dev Biol 2008;324(2):322–33.
  8. Davis SW, Castinetti F, Carvalho LR, Ellsworth BS, Potok MA, Lyons RH, Brinkmeier ML, Raetzman LT, Carninci P, Mortensen AH, Hayashizaki Y, Arnhold IJ, Mendonça BB, Brue T, Camper SA. Molecular mechanisms of pituitary organogenesis: In search of novel regulatory genes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010;323(1):4–19.
  9. Zhu X, Gleiberman AS, Rosenfeld MG. Molecular physiology of pituitary development: signaling and transcriptional networks. Physiol Rev 2007;87(3):933–63.
  10. Drouin J, Bilodeau S, Roussel-Gervais A. Stem cells, differentiation and cell cycle control in pituitary. Front Horm Res 2010;38:15–24.
  11. Davis SW, Ellsworth BS, Peréz Millan MI, Gergics P, Schade V, Foyouzi N, Brinkmeier ML, Mortensen AH, Camper SA. Pituitary gland development and disease: from stem cell to hormone production. Curr Top Dev Biol 2013;106:1–47.
  12. Li S, Crenshaw EB, Rawson EJ, Simmons DM, Swanson LW, Rosenfeld MG. Dwarf locus mutants lacking three pituitary cell types result from mutations in the POU-domain gene pit-1. Nature 1990;347(6293):528–33.
  13. Pulichino AM, Vallette-Kasic S, Tsai JP, Couture C, Gauthier Y, Drouin J. Tpit determines alternate fates during pituitary cell differentiation. Genes Dev 2003;17(6):738–47.
  14. Barnhart KM, Mellon PL. The orphan nuclear receptor, steroidogenic factor-1, regulates the glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit gene in pituitary gonadotropes. Mol Endocrinol 1994;8(7):878–85.
  15. Ngan ES, Cheng PK, Leung PC, Chow BK. Steroidogenic factor-1 interacts with a gonadotrope-specific element within the first exon of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene to mediate gonadotrope-specific expression. Endocrinology 1999;140(6):2452–62.
  16. Lin L, Achermann JC. Steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, Ad4BP, NR5A1) and disorders of testis development. Sex Dev 2008;2(4–5):200–9.
  17. Lourenço D, Brauner R, Lin L, De Perdigo A, Weryha G, Muresan M, Boudjenah R, Guerra-Junior G, Maciel-Guerra AT, Achermann JC, McElreavey K, Bashamboo A. Mutations in NR5A1 associated with ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med 2009;360(12):1200–10.
  18. Ingraham HA, Lala DS, Ikeda Y, Luo X, Shen WH, Nachtigal MW, Abbud R, Nilson JH, Parker KL. The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 acts at multiple levels of the reproductive axis. Genes Dev 1994;8(19):2302–12.
  19. Lamolet B, Poulin G, Chu K, Guillemot F, Tsai MJ, Drouin J. Tpit-independent function of NeuroD1(BETA2) in pituitary corticotroph differentiation. Mol Endocrinol 2004;18(4):995–1003.
  20. Elster AD Sanders. Size and shape of the pituitary gland during pregnancy and post-partum: measurement with MR imaging.. Radiology 1991;181:531–535.
  21. Bergland RM Ray. Anatomical variations in the pituitary gland and adjacent structures in 225 human autopsy cases. J. Neurosurg. 1968;28:93–99.
  22. LeGros Clark W. The topography and homologies of the hypothalamic nuclei in man. J. Anat. 1936;70:203–214.
  23. Harris GW. Neural control of the pituitary gland. London: Arnold; 1955.
  24. Watts AG. 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: The structure of the neuroendocrine hypothalamus: the neuroanatomical legacy of Geoffrey Harris. J Endocrinol 2015;226(2):T25-39.
  25. Stojilkovic SS, Tabak J, Bertram R. Ion channels and signaling in the pituitary gland. Endocr Rev 2010;31(6):845–915.
  26. Denef C. Paracrinicity: the story of 30 years of cellular pituitary crosstalk. J Neuroendocrinol 2008;20(1):1–70.
  27. Santiago-Andres Y, Golan M, Fiordelisio T. Functional Pituitary Networks in Vertebrates. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:619352.
  28. Stefaneanu L, Kovacs K, Lloyd RV, Scheithauer BW, Young WF, Sano T, Jin L. Pituitary lactotrophs and somatotrophs in pregnancy: a correlative in situ hybridization and immunocytochemical study. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1992;62(5):291–6.
  29. Smith AI Funder. Proopiomelanocortin processing in the pituitary, central nervous system, and peripheral tissues. Endocr. Reviews 1988;9:159–179.
  30. Crooke AC. A change in the basophil cells of the pituitary gland common to conditions which exhibit the syndrome attributed to basophil adenoma. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1935;41:339–349.
  31. Charlton HM, Halpin DM, Iddon C, Rosie R, Levy G, McDowell IF, Megson A, Morris JF, Bramwell A, Speight A, Ward BJ, Broadhead J, Davey-Smith G, Fink G. The effects of daily administration of single and multiple injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on pituitary and gonadal function in the hypogonadal (hpg) mouse. Endocrinology 1983;113(2):535–44.
  32. Scott IS, Bennett MK, Porter-Goff AE, Harrison CJ, Cox BS, Grocock CA, O’Shaughnessy PJ, Clayton RN, Craven R, Furr BJ. Effects of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist “Zoladex” upon pituitary and gonadal function in hypogonadal (hpg) male mice: a comparison with normal male and testicular feminized (tfm) mice. J Mol Endocrinol 1992;8(3):249–58.
  33. Childs GV, MacNicol AM, MacNicol MC. Molecular Mechanisms of Pituitary Cell Plasticity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:656.
  34. Laporte E, Vennekens A, Vankelecom H. Pituitary Remodeling Throughout Life: Are Resident Stem Cells Involved? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:604519.
  35. Camilletti MA, Martinez Mayer J, Vishnopolska SA, Perez-Millan MI. From Pituitary Stem Cell Differentiation to Regenerative Medicine. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020;11:614999.
  36. Perez-Castro C, Renner U, Haedo MR, Stalla GK, Arzt E. Cellular and molecular specificity of pituitary gland physiology. Physiol Rev 2012;92(1):1–38.
  37. Florio T. Adult pituitary stem cells: from pituitary plasticity to adenoma development. Neuroendocrinology 2011;94(4):265–77.
  38. Gleiberman AS, Michurina T, Encinas JM, Roig JL, Krasnov P, Balordi F, Fishell G, Rosenfeld MG, Enikolopov G. Genetic approaches identify adult pituitary stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(17):6332–7.
  39. Horvath E, Kovacs K. Folliculo-stellate cells of the human pituitary: a type of adult stem cell. Ultrastruct Pathol 2002;26(4):219–28.
  40. John CD, Theogaraj E, Christian HC, Morris JF, Smith SF, Buckingham JC. Time-specific effects of perinatal glucocorticoid treatment on anterior pituitary morphology, annexin 1 expression and adrenocorticotrophic hormone secretion in the adult female rat. J Neuroendocrinol 2006;18(12):949–59.
  41. Baes M Allaerts. Evidence for functional communication between folliculostellate cells and hormone-secreting cells in perfused anterior pituitary aggregates. Endocrinology 1987;120:685–691.
  42. Roncaroli F, Chatterjee D, Giannini C, Pereira M, La Rosa S, Brouland JP, Gnanalingham K, Galli C, Fernandes B, Lania A, Radotra B. Primary papillary epithelial tumour of the sella: expanding the spectrum of TTF-1-positive sellar lesions. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2020;46(5):493–505.
  43. Lee EB, Tihan T, Scheithauer BW, Zhang PJ, Gonatas NK. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression in sellar tumors: a histogenetic marker? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2009;68(5):482–8.
  44. Hagel C, Buslei R, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Bergmann M, Giese A, Flitsch J, Lüdecke DK, Glatzel M, Saeger W. Immunoprofiling of glial tumours of the neurohypophysis suggests a common pituicytic origin of neoplastic cells. Pituitary 2017;20(2):211–217.
  45. Popa GT; F U. A portal circulation from the pituitary to the hypothalamic region. J. Anat. 1930;65:88–91.
  46. Harris GW. Blood vessels of rabbit’s pituitary gland, and significance of pars and zona tuberalis. J. Anat.1947;81:343–351.
  47. Green JD; H GW. Observations of hypophysioportal vessels of living rat. J. Physiol.1949;108:359–361.
  48. Page RB; B RM. Pituitary Vasculature. In: Allen MB; M VB, ed. The Pituitary: a current review. New York: Academic Press; 1977:9–17.
  49. Bergland RM Page RB. Pituitary-brain vascular relations: a new paradigm. Science 1979;204:18–24.
  50. Bergland RM Page. Can the pituitary secrete directly to the brain? Endocrinology 1978;102:1325–1338.
  51. Coates PJ. The distribution of immunoreactive corticotrophin-releasing factor in the human pituitary stalk. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1985;109(4):433–9.
  52. Gaston-Massuet C, Andoniadou CL, Signore M, Jayakody SA, Charolidi N, Kyeyune R, Vernay B, Jacques TS, Taketo MM, Le Tissier P, Dattani MT, Martinez-Barbera JP. Increased Wingless (Wnt) signaling in pituitary progenitor/stem cells gives rise to pituitary tumors in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(28):11482–7.
  53. Aijaz S, Clark BJ, Williamson K, van Heyningen V, Morrison D, Fitzpatrick D, Collin R, Ragge N, Christoforou A, Brown A, Hanson I. Absence of SIX6 mutations in microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(11):3871–6.
  54. Durmaz B, Cogulu O, Dizdarer C, Stobbe H, Pfaeffle R, Ozkinay F. A novel homozygous HESX1 mutation causes panhypopituitarism without midline defects and optic nerve anomalies. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2011;24(9–10):779–82.
  55. Mortensen AH, Schade V, Lamonerie T, Camper SA. Deletion of OTX2 in neural ectoderm delays anterior pituitary development. Hum Mol Genet 2015;24(4):939–53.
  56. Tajima T, Ishizu K, Nakamura A. Molecular and Clinical Findings in Patients with LHX4 and OTX2 Mutations. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2013;22(2):15–23.
  57. Suh H, Gage PJ, Drouin J, Camper SA. Pitx2 is required at multiple stages of pituitary organogenesis: pituitary primordium formation and cell specification. Development 2002;129(2):329–37.
  58. Pfaeffle RW, Savage JJ, Hunter CS, Palme C, Ahlmann M, Kumar P, Bellone J, Schoenau E, Korsch E, Brämswig JH, Stobbe HM, Blum WF, Rhodes SJ. Four novel mutations of the LHX3 gene cause combined pituitary hormone deficiencies with or without limited neck rotation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92(5):1909–19.
  59. Mullen RD, Colvin SC, Hunter CS, Savage JJ, Walvoord EC, Bhangoo AP, Ten S, Weigel J, Pfäffle RW, Rhodes SJ. Roles of the LHX3 and LHX4 LIM-homeodomain factors in pituitary development. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2007;265–266:190–5.
  60. Machinis K, Pantel J, Netchine I, Léger J, Camand OJ, Sobrier ML, Dastot-Le Moal F, Duquesnoy P, Abitbol M, Czernichow P, Amselem S. Syndromic short stature in patients with a germline mutation in the LIM homeobox LHX4. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69(5):961–8.
  61. Pfaeffle RW, Hunter CS, Savage JJ, Duran-Prado M, Mullen RD, Neeb ZP, Eiholzer U, Hesse V, Haddad NG, Stobbe HM, Blum WF, Weigel JF, Rhodes SJ. Three novel missense mutations within the LHX4 gene are associated with variable pituitary hormone deficiencies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(3):1062–71.
  62. Kelberman D, de Castro SC, Huang S, Crolla JA, Palmer R, Gregory JW, Taylor D, Cavallo L, Faienza MF, Fischetto R, Achermann JC, Martinez-Barbera JP, Rizzoti K, Lovell-Badge R, Robinson IC, Gerrelli D, Dattani MT. SOX2 plays a critical role in the pituitary, forebrain, and eye during human embryonic development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(5):1865–73.
  63. Kioussi C, Briata P, Baek SH, Rose DW, Hamblet NS, Herman T, Ohgi KA, Lin C, Gleiberman A, Wang J, Brault V, Ruiz-Lozano P, Nguyen HD, Kemler R, Glass CK, Wynshaw-Boris A, Rosenfeld MG. Identification of a Wnt/Dvl/beta-Catenin --> Pitx2 pathway mediating cell-type-specific proliferation during development. Cell 2002;111(5):673–85.
  64. Kita A, Imayoshi I, Hojo M, Kitagawa M, Kokubu H, Ohsawa R, Ohtsuka T, Kageyama R, Hashimoto N. Hes1 and Hes5 control the progenitor pool, intermediate lobe specification, and posterior lobe formation in the pituitary development. Mol Endocrinol 2007;21(6):1458–66.
  65. Treier M, Gleiberman AS, O’Connell SM, Szeto DP, McMahon JA, McMahon AP, Rosenfeld MG. Multistep signaling requirements for pituitary organogenesis in vivo. Genes Dev 1998;12(11):1691–704.
  66. Falardeau J, Chung WC, Beenken A, Raivio T, Plummer L, Sidis Y, Jacobson-Dickman EE, Eliseenkova AV, Ma J, Dwyer A, Quinton R, Na S, Hall JE, Huot C, Alois N, Pearce SH, Cole LW, Hughes V, Mohammadi M, Tsai P, Pitteloud N. Decreased FGF8 signaling causes deficiency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in humans and mice. J Clin Invest 2008;118(8):2822–31.
  67. McCabe MJ, Gaston-Massuet C, Tziaferi V, Gregory LC, Alatzoglou KS, Signore M, Puelles E, Gerrelli D, Farooqi IS, Raza J, Walker J, Kavanaugh SI, Tsai PS, Pitteloud N, Martinez-Barbera JP, Dattani MT. Novel FGF8 mutations associated with recessive holoprosencephaly, craniofacial defects, and hypothalamo-pituitary dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96(10):E1709-18.
  68. Dodé C, Levilliers J, Dupont JM, De Paepe A, Le Dû N, Soussi-Yanicostas N, Coimbra RS, Delmaghani S, Compain-Nouaille S, Baverel F, Pêcheux C, Le Tessier D, Cruaud C, Delpech M, Speleman F, Vermeulen S, Amalfitano A, Bachelot Y, Bouchard P, Cabrol S, Carel JC, Delemarre-van de Waal H, Goulet-Salmon B, Kottler ML, Richard O, Sanchez-Franco F, Saura R, Young J, Petit C, Hardelin JP. Loss-of-function mutations in FGFR1 cause autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome. Nat Genet 2003;33(4):463–5.
  69. Treier M, O’Connell S, Gleiberman A, Price J, Szeto DP, Burgess R, Chuang PT, McMahon AP, Rosenfeld MG. Hedgehog signaling is required for pituitary gland development. Development 2001;128(3):377–86.
  70. Kelberman D, Dattani MT. Role of transcription factors in midline central nervous system and pituitary defects. Endocr Dev 2009;14:67–82.
  71. Cogan JD, Wu W, Phillips JA, Arnhold IJ, Agapito A, Fofanova OV, Osorio MG, Bircan I, Moreno A, Mendonca BB. The PROP1 2-base pair deletion is a common cause of combined pituitary hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83(9):3346–9.
  72. Deladoëy J, Flück C, Büyükgebiz A, Kuhlmann BV, Eblé A, Hindmarsh PC, Wu W, Mullis PE. “Hot spot” in the PROP1 gene responsible for combined pituitary hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84(5):1645–50.
  73. Turton JP, Mehta A, Raza J, Woods KS, Tiulpakov A, Cassar J, Chong K, Thomas PQ, Eunice M, Ammini AC, Bouloux PM, Starzyk J, Hindmarsh PC, Dattani MT. Mutations within the transcription factor PROP1 are rare in a cohort of patients with sporadic combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;63(1):10–8.
  74. Vieira TC, Boldarine VT, Abucham J. Molecular analysis of PROP1, PIT1, HESX1, LHX3, and LHX4 shows high frequency of PROP1 mutations in patients with familial forms of combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2007;51(7):1097–103.
  75. Dasen JS, O’Connell SM, Flynn SE, Treier M, Gleiberman AS, Szeto DP, Hooshmand F, Aggarwal AK, Rosenfeld MG. Reciprocal interactions of Pit1 and GATA2 mediate signaling gradient-induced determination of pituitary cell types. Cell 1999;97(5):587–98.
  76. McLennan K, Jeske Y, Cotterill A, Cowley D, Penfold J, Jones T, Howard N, Thomsett M, Choong C. Combined pituitary hormone deficiency in Australian children: clinical and genetic correlates. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2003;58(6):785–94.
  77. Snabboon T, Plengpanich W, Buranasupkajorn P, Khwanjaipanich R, Vasinanukorn P, Suwanwalaikorn S, Khovidhunkit W, Shotelersuk V. A novel germline mutation, IVS4+1G>A, of the POU1F1 gene underlying combined pituitary hormone deficiency. Horm Res 2008;69(1):60–4.
  78. Shinoda K, Lei H, Yoshii H, Nomura M, Nagano M, Shiba H, Sasaki H, Osawa Y, Ninomiya Y, Niwa O. Developmental defects of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus and pituitary gonadotroph in the Ftz-F1 disrupted mice. Dev Dyn 1995;204(1):22–9.
  79. Pulichino AM, Vallette-Kasic S, Couture C, Gauthier Y, Brue T, David M, Malpuech G, Deal C, Van Vliet G, De Vroede M, Riepe FG, Partsch CJ, Sippell WG, Berberoglu M, Atasay B, Drouin J. Human and mouse TPIT gene mutations cause early onset pituitary ACTH deficiency. Genes Dev 2003;17(6):711–6.
  80. Vallette-Kasic S, Brue T, Pulichino AM, Gueydan M, Barlier A, David M, Nicolino M, Malpuech G, Déchelotte P, Deal C, Van Vliet G, De Vroede M, Riepe FG, Partsch CJ, Sippell WG, Berberoglu M, Atasay B, de Zegher F, Beckers D, Kyllo J, Donohoue P, Fassnacht M, Hahner S, Allolio B, Noordam C, Dunkel L, Hero M, Pigeon B, Weill J, Yigit S, Brauner R, Heinrich JJ, Cummings E, Riddell C, Enjalbert A, Drouin J. Congenital isolated adrenocorticotropin deficiency: an underestimated cause of neonatal death, explained by TPIT gene mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90(3):1323–31.

Graves’ Disease and the Manifestations of Thyrotoxicosis

ABSTRACT

 

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by hyperthyroidism and various systemic manifestations, including thyroid eye disease (TED) and, less commonly, dermopathy. This chapter provides an in-depth review of GD, covering its history, epidemiology, risk factors, and the molecular mechanisms underlying autoimmune hyperthyroidism. Emphasis is placed on emerging insights into the genetic, environmental, and immunological factors contributing to GD's multifactorial pathogenesis. The chapter also explores the pathogenic role of TSH receptor antibodies and their significance in diagnosis and treatment, alongside key clinical features of thyrotoxicosis.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune form of hyperthyroidism characterized by multisystemic manifestations of thyrotoxicosis and, in some cases, extrathyroidal manifestations of thyroid autoimmunity including, frequently, thyroid eye disease (TED) and rarely pretibial dermopathy. There are therefore diverse phenotypic presentations of thyroid autoimmunity, and patients do not necessarily present with thyrotoxicosis as the main manifestation of their autoimmune phenomena. Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) typically includes two major categories of manifestations. Those specific to GD, and caused by the autoimmunity per se, including goiter, TED, and dermatopathy (TED and dermopathy are discussed in the chapter “Graves’ disease: Complications”). The second set of problems is caused by the excess thyroid hormone and its widespread disturbance in metabolism. These thyrotoxic manifestations do not differ from those induced by any other cause of excess of thyroid hormone. Alternative etiologies of thyrotoxicosis are described in other chapters.

 

HISTORY

 

The triad of goiter, tachycardia, and ophthalmopathy was independently described by Caleb Parry (1755-1822) and Karl A. Von Basedow (1799 - 1854), but it is the description by the Irish physician Robert James Graves (1796 - 1853) (Figure 1) (1) that is the source of the acronym in the English literature, Graves' disease (GD). However, in many countries, the term Morbus Basedow is widely used to describe autoimmune hyperthyroidism. The autoimmunity reflected in GD is related to antibodies directed against the TSH receptor (TSH-R) expressed at the basolateral membrane of thyroid follicular cells. Initially, serum factors that were thought to be a modified TSH molecule and produced exophthalmos in experimental animal models were given the eponym exophthalmos producing substance (2, 3). Later, Adams et al. identified a factor in human serum that could stimulate the release of thyroid hormone in guinea pigs and a human subject (Figure 2) (4, 5). Because of the time course of its action being longer than TSH, this material was named Long-Acting Thyroid Stimulator, or LATS. Subsequent studies better characterized this substance as an immune gamma globulin that acts on a thyroid antigen, and mimics the action of the natural thyroid stimulator, TSH. Nearly three decades later, the antigen to which this antibody was directed was identified as the TSH-R (6, 7). Over the past four decades, there has been improved understanding of the accurate identification, quantitation, and pathophysiologic importance of the thyroid receptor antibodies (8-10), as will be further detailed throughout this chapter.

 

Figure 1. Robert James Graves, Statue. Marble statue of Robert James Graves, former president (1843–1849) of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. The statue was commissioned by John Henry Foley who died before completing it. Graves Hall, the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, No. 6, Kildare Street, Dublin, Ireland. Photographer: Osama Shukir Muhammed Amin FRCP(Glasgow). Copyrighted work available under Creative Commons Attribution only license CC BY 4.0.

Figure 2. Stimulation of thyroid hormone secretion by LATS-P. The subject's thyroid iodine was labeled by administration of I131, and serial observations were made on the appearance of I131-labeled hormone in blood (Y axis) over one month (X axis). An infusion of 280 ml control plasma had no effect, but 280 ml plasma from a patient with Graves' disease caused a marked stimulation of secretion of hormone from the thyroid. (Adapted from: D.D. Adams et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 39:826, 1974).

 

EPIDEMIIOLOGY

 

GD has an estimated incidence of 30 to 80 cases per 100.000 persons per year and occurs more frequently in the white population while it appears to be less frequent in the Asian and Sub-Saharan African populations (3.8 to 5, and 0.7 to 51 cases per 1000.000 persons per year, respectively) (11-13). Female (lifetime risk 3%, eight-folds greater than in men) and middle-aged individuals (30 to 50 years of age) are at higher risk. The manifestations of disease tend to be more pronounced in patients younger than 65 years, while older patients tend to have an abbreviated presentation, with mainly cardiac manifestations (14, 15). Around 50% of patients with GD have a family history of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Aside from the infrequent occurrence of postnatal thyrotoxicosis due to maternal antibodies, the incidence of spontaneous GD in children before the age of ten is unusual, but the incidence climbs with each decade until about age 60 (16-20).

 

RISK FACTORS

 

GD is a consequence of autoimmunity against the TSH-R. The next question revolves around the trigger for this specific autoimmunity. Contemporary understanding is that a multi-factorial process allows thyroid self-reactivity to occur. While our immune system is designed to prevent self-reactivity, to some extent, exceptionally low levels of self-reactivity are normally present (21). Sex, environmental, immunologic, and genetic factors interact to augment this immune response to a degree that predisposes to clinically manifest autoimmunity (Figure 3). Several such factors have been identified with some certainty, and others have been suggested.

 

Figure 3. Risk factors for Graves’ disease. MHC: Major histocompatibility complex; HLA: Human leukocyte antigen; CTLA: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein; RNA: Ribonucleic acid. (Created with Biorender.com)

 

Sex

 

The clearest association with any autoimmune condition is female sex, which carries a 10-20-fold risk compared to men (22). Although, the mechanism behind the increased incidence of autoimmune conditions in female is not fully understood, several factors leading to greater autoreactivity towards the thyroid have been proposed. Polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor genes might be at least partially responsive for the increased susceptibility of female to developing GD (23). In addition, marked fluctuations in leptin and other hormonal secretion patterns throughout the different endocrine states during the female lifespan (Including puberty, pregnancy, and menopause) have been linked with changes in the regulation of the innate and adaptive immune systems, and disbalance between pro and anti-inflammatory states, which altogether increase the risk of developing autoimmune diseases (22, 24).

 

The post-partum period is associated with a higher risk of developing GD. This relates to the transition from a skewed T helper 2 (Th2) cell response that suppresses the immune response and antibody production (Including TSH-R antibodies) during pregnancy, to a post-partum state in which the proinflammatory Th1 cell response returns to normal (25). Furthermore, it has been shown that fetal cells from male infants can persist in the maternal circulation for up to 20 years (fetal micro chimerism). These cells have been found in frozen thyroid tissue specimens from patients with GD and thyroid nodules, and it is hypothesized that they could modulate AITD by induction of immune response or development of a graft-versus-host immune response to the mother (26).

 

Environmental Factors

 

Considerable information has accumulated about factors in the environment that can induce GD. Cigarette smoking increases the risk of GD and complicates its extra thyroidal manifestations through direct cell damage, downregulation of the innate immune system, and induction of epigenetic changes (27-31). Conversely, moderate alcohol use and obesity seem to decrease the risk of developing the disease (32), while physical activity seems neutral in that respect (33). Other factors include:

 

INFECTIONS AND MOLECULAR MIMICRY

 

A persistent theory on the etiology of autoimmune diseases is that exposure to a particular peptide epitope in an environmental antigen might lead to immune reactivity to an amino acid sequence identical to that present in a human antigen such as the TSH-R, thyroperoxidase (TPO), or thyroglobulin (Tg). Through this molecular mimicry, exposure to a virus or bacteria could produce heightened immune reactivity towards these autoantigens. This sequence is believed to play a role in rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis. There is some evidence that proteins present in a common intestinal parasite, Yersinia enterocolitica, may induce antibody reactivity to the TSH-R (34-36). While a clear association has not been established, a higher proportion of patients with GD have been infected with this bacteria than people without the disease (34) and exposure to the bacteria can induce TSH-R antibodies (TRAb) (35).

 

There is also evidence that autoimmunity to the thyroid can be induced by infection with the human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), which causes lymphocytic leukemia (37). Whether this is due to molecular mimicry of the virus, viral damage to the thyroid, or stimulation through another mechanism such as cytokine secretion, remains uncertain. In addition, it has been suggested that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antigens may be involved in the development of AITD, and one study reported that up to 85% of patients with autoimmune atrophic thyroiditis have H. pylori infections (38). While molecular mimicry remains a tantalizing explanation, the factual evidence for its role in the pathogenesis of GD is minimal.

 

THYROID INJURY AND ANTIGEN RELEASE

 

It is accepted that certain types of injury to the thyroid are followed by the development of thyroid autoimmunity, including GD. In fact, this is one of the few proven causes of GD. The release of thyroid antigens following destruction of thyroid tissue may add a significant stimulation to a latent low level of thyroid autoimmunity, causing the development of GD. Radiation to the thyroid has been associated with a subsequent higher incidence of positive thyroid antibody tests (39), and an increased risk of GD, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and TED (40, 41). Around 1% of patients with autonomous thyroid nodules who undergo radioactive iodide treatment or ethanol injection can subsequently develop GD (42, 43), with a tenfold higher risk if anti-TPO antibodies are present (44). Whether viral injury, as in the case of HTLV-1 and SARS-CoV (45, 46), plays a similar role in human AITD is uncertain. However, Covid-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV has been associated with higher risk of developing subacute thyroiditis, GD, and TED.

 

IMMUNE THERAPIES

 

Administration of cytokines such as INF-α, IL-2, and GM-CSF can augment AITD, or in some cases appear to induce it de novo (47-49). Alemtuzumab therapy, used for depletion of circulating lymphocytes in the therapy of multiple sclerosis is followed by development of GD in a third of such treated patient within 6 months of recovery from T cell depletion (50). This and other immunosuppressive treatments may deviate the immune system from a Th1 to a Th2 type of response, reducing the number of regulatory T cells or altering the balance between T helper 17 (Th17) cells and regulatory T cells, and leading to overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-17, IL-22, IL-23R, and IL-32 that are commonly seen in patients with AIDT (51-55). In addition, treatment with INF-α for chronic hepatitis or INF-β for multiple sclerosis has also been suggested to cause AITD and destructive thyroiditis, especially in females (RR: 4.4) and people with pre-existing anti-TPO antibodies (RR: 3.9) (56); however, a definitive association has not been established (57). In addition, while immune check point inhibitors can commonly induce hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis due to destructive thyroiditis (58), in rare instances they can also induce GD (59, 60).

 

EXCESS IODINE

 

Excess iodide can induce hyperthyroidism in patients with multinodular goiter (61, 62), a phenomenon known as “Jod Basedow”. Presumably, autonomous nodules in the goiter are in a subclinical state and unable to produce an excess of thyroid hormones as their synthesis is limited by iodide supply; yet, when the iodine supply is high, the autonomous nodules produce an excess of hormone. Well studied epidemics of iodide-induced thyrotoxicosis occurred for example in Tasmania, Denmark, and India after the introduction of salt iodization and were clearly associated with multinodular goiters rather than typical GD (63-66). In addition, increased iodine intake can actually augment thyroid autoimmunity through other mechanisms such as heavy iodination of Tg which appears to increase immunogenicity in animal studies (67), or hypothetical induction of follicular thyroid cell injury with secondary liberation of thyroid related antigens (68, 69). On the other hand, the addition of 2 - 6 mg per day of iodide to the intake of most patients with GD causes a dramatic, but probably temporary, reduction in hormone release, a phenomenon referred to as Plummer effect (70-73). Overall, whether an excess of iodine can induce true GD and autoimmunity remains unknown.

STRESS

 

The incidence of GD increased in Denmark during World War II (74), and in Serbia during the civil war in the former Yugoslavia (75). In general, studies have shown mixed results; however, meta-analysis suggests physical trauma and psychologic stress are possible environmental triggers of GD (76). Some authors indicated that patients with GD had suffered on average more stressful episodes than control subjects, but other similar studies failed to show this relationship (77-80). Stress induces a variety of physiologic responses including anxiety, tachycardia, and restlessness, among others, which are not unlike symptoms of GD. Its role remains enigmatic in causation of GD to this date. Theoretically, stress might cause activation of the adrenal cortex or the sympathetic nervous system which might cause stimulation of thyroid secretion, as has been shown in experimental animals (81). Other specific stressors have been reported. Aggressive weight loss programs that involve using exogenous thyroid hormone have been reported to induce GD (82).

 

Immunologic Factors

 

THYMIC SELECTION OF LYMPHOCYTES

 

Lymphocytes develop from precursors present in the bone marrow that undergo progressive maturation and selection in the thymus. Lymphocytes which fail to recognize endogenous human leukocyte antigens (HLA) undergo negative selection, as do those which strongly react with endogenous epitopes presented by HLA molecules (83, 84). In this process, more than 95% of all lymphocytes undergo apoptosis. As with other human molecules, thyroid molecules like the sodium iodine symporter (NIS), TSH-R, TPO, and Tg-RNAs are presented as immunoreactive peptides in the human thymus as part of the lymphocyte selection process (85, 86). Pre-T lymphocytes are thus educated in the thymus to recognize thyroid-related epitopes, and to generate self-tolerance against them. Expression of these thyroid antigens in the fetal thymus is under control of the AIRE gene, and absence of this gene leads to polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type 1 whose hallmarks are adrenal insufficiency, hypoparathyroidism and muco-candidiasis. In Down’s syndrome, despite having 3 copies of the AIRE gene, expression of thyroid antigens in the thymus is reduced, and this is thought to cause the elevated incidence of autoimmunity in these patients (87). Clearly the thymic selection process is imperfect, in a developmental process designed to provide the maximum repertoire of lymphocytes, some lymphocytes which weakly recognize autologous thyroid antigens do persist in the circulation, and can be found in normal patients and those with AITD (Table 1) (85).

 

REGULATORY T CELL ABNORMALITIES

 

Every T cell-mediated response is tempered by the interaction of effector and regulatory cells (88). Thus, a disproportionately low number or diminished function of regulatory T cells is, in part, responsible for the development of autoimmunity (89, 90). Several studies have demonstrated abnormalities in T cell regulation in GD with conflicting results. Some groups have proposed that patients with GD have a lower proportion of regulatory T cells (91-95), while others report a normal or high number of T regulatory cells but with impaired immune suppressive function (91, 96-100). In addition, Marazuela et al. reported a high proportion of defective intrathyroidal regulatory T cells in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis (101). Gangi et al. found that administration of GM-CSF induced development of regulatory T cells capable of suppressing immunity to Tg in mice (102). Molteni et al. reported that CD8 T cells can induce anergy in TSH-R specific CD4 T cell clones to prevent thyroid related auto reactivity (103) and, ultimately, Vaidya et al. reported higher numbers of naïve activated T cells and lower memory T cells in patients with TED (104). Overall, while there remains some uncertainty, decreased T regulation due to low cell counts or impaired function is involved in the development of GD.

 

EXPRESSION OF MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX (MHC) CLASS II

 

Exposure of thyroid epithelial cells to interferon, presumably secreted from infiltrating lymphocytes or other immune cells, can lead to the expression of MHC class II molecules on the thyroid cell surface (105, 106). Expression of these molecules allows the thyroid epithelial cell to function as a weak antigen presenting cell (APC) (107, 108). Culture of human thyroid cells from patients with GD in vitro shows that the expression of MHC class II molecules expression disappears (109), as it does when the cells are transplanted into nude mice (110). This is a compelling argument indicating that MHC class II expression on GD thyroid cells is secondary rather than primary event.

 

Table 1. Possible Factors in the Immunological Etiology of Graves' Disease

-       Persistence of some autoreactive T cells and B cells (failure of negative selection)

-       Genetic polymorphisms

-       Re-exposure to antigens secondary to thyroid cell damage

-       Reduced or dysfunctional regulatory T cells

-       Cross-reacting epitopes on environmental and thyroid antigens

-       Inappropriate HLA-DR expression

-       Mutated T or B cell clones

-       Activation of T cells by polyclonal stimuli

-       Stimulation of the thyroid by cytokines

HLA: Human leukocyte antigen; CTLA: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein

 

Genetic Factors

 

The increased incidence of GD in certain families and in identical twins has for decades indicated a powerful genetic influence on disease development (111-113). Studies of large samples of pairs of twins suggest that the genetic factors account for 73-79% of the liability to have positive TSH-R antibodies and to develop GD, whereas environmental factors account presumably for the remainder (113, 114). Adjusting for covariates (age, TSH and others), the estimate for genetic influence on serum anti-TPO and anti TG antibodies was also found to be between 60 – 80%. This inheritance turns out to be polygenic. Rather than inheriting one gene which, in a dominant fashion, would induce GD, individuals inherit many different genetic polymorphisms which are conducive to the development of AITD (115-117).

 

HUMAN LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN (HLA) MOLECULES

 

HLA molecules are expressed in different isotypes. There are between 50 and 100 different HLA-DR molecules, and a much smaller number of HLA-DQ and HLA-DP molecules, all coded on chromosome 6, in the human genome (118). Of these, the HLA-DR are most abundantly expressed and most important. These molecules exist as dimers on the surface of antigen presenting cells. In the initiation of an immune response, the antigen presenting cell displays a specific epitope complexed in an HLA-DR. Recognition of this bi-molecular complex by the T cell receptor leads to stimulation of T cells. The amino acid sequences of the HLA-DR molecule determine the shape and affinity to the antigen presenting cleft (119). Thus, certain HLA-DR molecules are more efficient to present certain epitopes during the lymphocyte selection and maturation process in the thymus (84). Therefore, the inheritance of certain HLA genes, and the matching of the HLA-DR molecules with the structure of the TSH-R epitopes, or other thyroid related epitopes, plays a significant role in determining the development of AITD.

 

The first genetic factor to be associated with GD was HLA-B8 (120), a class I major histocompatibility component (MHC). Subsequently, this relation was found to be more specifically significant with an MHC class II molecule, HLA-DR3 (117). Inheritance of this gene, expressed on the surface of antigen presenting cells, was found to confer up to 5.7-fold increased risk of developing GD (121-123). Additional data demonstrated that the HLA molecules DQA1*0501, DRB1*0301, DQB1*0202, DQB1*0603, DQB1*0609, DQB1*0302, DQB1*0303 were also closely associated with higher risk of developing GD (124-128). In contrast, inheritance of HLA-DR beta 1*07, DQB1*0201, DQB1*0502, and DQB1*0602 appear to be protective (128, 129).

 

CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN (CTLA)

 

When an immune reaction begins, the “first signal” is the recognition by the T cell receptor of an HLA molecule. If only one signal occurs, the T cell tends to be turned off or “anergized.” In order for a progressive immune response to occur, there must be a "second signal" provided by one of several adhesion molecules which exist on the antigen presenting cells (APCs) and T cells, and which tend to augment the affinity of the interaction (130). Of these, one of the most important is "B7", which exists in two forms, B7.1 and B7.2, present on the surface of APCs. These molecules interact with their cognate receptors on the T cell, CD28 for B7.1 and CTLA-4 for B7.2. In many situations interaction between B7.1 and CD28 give a positive stimulus to growth of the T cell, whereas interaction of B7.1 with CTLA-4 provides a negative signal, suppressing autoimmunity (131). CTLA-4 exists as a gene with several isoforms, and the inheritance of some of them is associated with a higher incidence of GD (132-137), and increased production of anti-TPO and anti-Tg antibodies (138).

 

Interestingly, the HLA association suggests a relationship to GD specifically, since it has to do with the presentation of specific antigen epitopes, whereas the CTLA-4 polymorphism appears to be a general phenomenon, allowing one population group to have augmented lymphocyte proliferation, but is not specifically related to thyroid disease. These observations also fit with the concept that development of GD is mediated by a set of genes rather than one specific gene.

 

NON-CODING RNAs

 

The RNA transcripts that regulate genetic transcription and protein translation, but do not encode a specific protein themselves, are denominated non-coding RNAs (139). These regulators play a key role in immune activation, cellular proliferation, and cytokine production. Thus, their abnormal expression can halt the normal immune response, leading to autoimmunity. In the case of AITD, the understanding of non-coding RNAs associated with development of disease is still limited. Several transcripts have been proposed to play a role in the development of GD but their exact mechanism of action, and their utility for clinical care are unclear (140-142). Ongoing and future efforts aim to clarify the role of non-coding RNAs as well as their potential use as diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets (143).

 

EXOSOMES

 

Exosomes are cell-secreted extracellular vesicles that function as biological carriers, and contain a series of molecules (i.e., cytokines, transduction factors, nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids) involved in processes of cellular communication such as antigen presentation and immune response activation. As in other autoimmune conditions, exosomes are presumed to play a role in AITD but research on their pathophysiologic role is still in the early stages (144, 145). Some authors have previously reported the presence of thyroid follicular cell derived exosomes containing TSH-R which are involved in the development of GD (146, 147). In addition, exosomes from patients with GD have been found to stimulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α (148). Furthermore, exosomes containing metalloproteinases and non-coding RNAs have been found in high proportions in patients with AITD and TED (149, 150).

 

OTHER FACTORS

 

Numerous other gene polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with GD. It is highly likely that these individual variants contribute a real but small increment in the risk of developing the disease. The initial genetic studies on the TSH-R showed mixed results on a potential association between specific polymorphisms and susceptibility to GD (151, 152). However, more recent studies have endorsed this association (153, 154). Certain genetic variants in TPO and Tg have also been associated with TED and AITD but their role in the development of disease is unclear (155-159). In addition, a vitamin D receptor polymorphisms have been associated with GD and other autoimmune conditions (160). Inheritance of specific genes coding for immunoglobulins may carry the same kind of risk. Additionally, several possible genes linked to GD or AITD have been found by linkage studies, including one recently described at a locus on chromosome 18q21 that is also associated with type 1 diabetes (161).

 

Other gene polymorphisms can lead to increased susceptibility to GD including CD40, CD25, and ZFAT (required for the correct functioning of B cells and other immune cells) (117, 162-164), CYP27B1 (involved in the activation of vitamin D) (165), IL-6 (166), IL-13 (167), IL-1 (168), IL-23R (169), TNF-α (170), protein tyrosine phosphatase-22 (PTPN22) (involved in inhibition of T cell activation) (171-174), Fc receptor-like protein 3 (FCRL3)(175-177), transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1) (178), interferon inducible helicase 1 (IFIH-1)(179). Other proposed genes associated with AITD include FOXP3, TBX21, HLX, BTNL2, NOTCH4, and CXCR4 (158, 180).

 

In conclusion, there are several genes harboring polymorphisms that appear to augment the possibility of developing immunity to thyroid gland protein components. These genetic alterations are likely to interplay with epigenetic aspects of DNA methylation and histone modifications (a phenomenon referred to as epistasis), along with environmental interventions, leading to the overall individual susceptibility to GD.

 

PATHOGENESIS

 

GD and Hashimoto's thyroiditis are strongly associated and, in fact, overlapping syndromes. They share immunological abnormalities, histological thyroid changes, and genetic predisposition. Patients can switch from one category to the other, depending upon the stage of their illness. For example, an individual might first present with hypothyroidism, thyroid enlargement and positive anti-thyroperoxidase (TPO) antibodies, and thus qualify as having Hashimoto's thyroiditis. At a later stage, this individual might become hyperthyroid with positive TSH-R autoantibodies and fit in the category of GD. Conversely, a patient with hyperthyroidism might have progressive destruction of the thyroid, or develop blocking antibodies to the TSH-R, and become hypothyroid. The aspects explaining the autoimmunity and pathologic changes at the thyroid level are explained in this section. Additional thyroidal pathophysiologic changes are explained later in the chapter.

 

The common feature of AITD is the immune reactivity, both humoral and cell-mediated, to specific thyroid antigens such as the TSH-R, TPO, and Tg (21, 181). Antibodies also exist, among others, to megalin (the thyroid cell Tg receptor) (182), to the thyroidal iodide symporter (183), and to components of eye muscle and fibroblasts in patients with thyroid eye disease (184) (Table 2). Up to 90% of patients with GD have anti-TPO antibodies, and up to 50% have anti-Tg antibodies (185-189). Rarely patients have antibodies directed against T4 or T3 (187). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (190), thyroid lymphocytes (191), and lymph node lymphocytes demonstrated cell-mediated immunity to TPO, Tg and TSH-R (192, 193), and to specific epitopes of these molecules (194-199). Anti-TPO antibodies are not known to play a role in GD, but they could cause a certain degree of cytotoxicity, as noted in couple in vitro studies using serum from AITD patients (200, 201). The functional consequence of having anti-Tg antibodies is uncertain, but they do not appear to cause thyroid cell destruction. Tg and anti-Tg antibody immune complexes are rarely deposited in the kidney basement membrane of the glomeruli and can, in extremely rare circumstances, produce nephritis (200, 202, 203).

 

Table 2. Antibodies in Graves' Disease

Antibody

Graves’ disease

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis

Healthy controls

TSH-receptor antibodies (TRab) (204-209)

Thyroid stimulating antibodies (TSAb)

TSH- blocking antibody (TBAb)

Neutral antibodies

99%

 

10%

2%

Anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies (Anti-TPOAb) (204, 205)

80%

90-95%

10-15%

Anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (Anti-TgAb) (205, 210, 211)

30-60%

60-80%

8-11.5%

 

In addition, patients with AITD often develop other organ-specific antibodies, and have higher risk of developing associated conditions such as Addison's disease, premature ovarian failure, chronic hepatitis, celiac disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, pernicious anemia, type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, vitiligo, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematous, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, urticaria, alopecia, and angioedema (212-220). The most frequent extrathyroidal antibodies include antibodies directed to gastric parietal cells, found in 50% of patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (221), to adrenal steroidogenic enzymes, ovarian steroidogenic enzymes, components of the pituitary gland (222), DNA (223), liver mitochondria GD(224), and to cardiolipin (225). Further evidence of ongoing inflammation in GD is the elevation of ICAM-1, IL-6 and IL-8 cytokines seen in hyperthyroid patients (217, 226).

 

TSH Receptor Antibodies

 

These antibodies can be classified into three major categories:

 

  1. Thyroid stimulating antibodies (TSab) interact with the TSH-R and stimulate adenyl cyclase and the protein kinase A pathway, as well as the phospholipase C pathway, thereby triggering thyroid hormone synthesis and cell proliferation (227-229). Functionally, this is identical to the effects induced by TSH itself. When TSab reaches a certain level of function, they cause an increase in thyroid hormone synthesis and secretion, as well as growth of the gland, and cause hyperthyroidism.
  2. Thyroid blocking antibodies (TBAb) interact with the TSH-R by binding to different epitopes on the receptor, and they can block the binding of TSH to the receptor without stimulating function themselves (230-233).
  3. Thyroid neutral antibodies (TNab) bind mostly to the hinge region of the TSH-R. While these antibodies neither stimulate nor inhibit its function, they appear to be involved in signaling activity leading to apoptosis of the thyroid follicular cells (234-236).

 

All these antibodies are commonly recognized by assays which detect their ability to interfere with the binding of TSH to the receptor and are identified as thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb), or Thyrotropin binding inhibiting immunoglobulins (TBII) (231). Probably all patients with GD have a mixture of all these three subtypes of antibodies.

 

TRAb/TBII can be measured with enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) that measure the ability of the patient’s serum antibodies to inhibit binding of labeled TSH-R ligands (human monoclonal thyroid antibodies) to the TSH-R (209). In addition, TSab can be identified by a bioassay which quantifies the ability of the antibodies to stimulate the adenyl cyclase function of the TSH-R. Either thyroid cells or thyroid cell membranes can be used, and the cyclic AMP produced by this stimulation is quantitated by a luciferase-based assay (209, 227). A cyclic AMP responsive luciferase construct introduced into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, allows a sensitive luminescent assay for thyroid stimulating antibodies with the capability of high throughput suitable for use in general laboratories (228).

 

The TSH-R is initially formed as a single polypeptide inserted into the thyroid cell membrane. After processing, it becomes a two-peptide structure, one extracellular and one transmembrane, with the chains held together by disulfide bonds. Subsequently, reduction of the disulfide bonds by a disulfide isomerase may separate the two molecules and lead to shedding of the “alpha” subunit, which can be augmented by TSH stimulation of thyroid cells (237). The amino-terminal ectodomain of the human TSH-R has been expressed on the surface of CHO cells as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored molecule. This material can be released from the cells and is biologically active by binding immunoglobulins from serum of patients with GD, and displaying saturable binding of TSH (8), indicating that all of the "immunologic information" related to production of antibodies resides in the extracellular portion of TSH-R.

 

The initial bioassay developed by Adams et al. (5), and then by McKenzie (238), could quantitate TSAb (or LATS as it was then known) in up to 60% of patients with active GD. Newer assays measuring cyclic-AMP formation can detect TSab in over 99% of patients with GD and thyrotoxicosis (239), with a sensitivity of 97% to identify patients with GD, and 93% for patients with TED (240). The presence of TSab is characteristic of active GD, and if the thyroid can respond (e.g., has not been ablated with RAI), hyperthyroidism ensues. If untreated, the thyroid may be destroyed by the ongoing immune process, or blocking antibodies can develop, and the patient may become hypothyroid. In addition, the coexistence of TSab and TBab can cause a pull-push effect leading to shifting between hypo- and hyperthyroidism (241, 242).

 

During antithyroid therapy, TSab tends to decline. If their titer becomes undetectable there is a high likelihood of disease remission. However, if present in significant concentration, remission is very unlikely, explaining the failure of safely discontinuing antithyroid drug therapy (ATD) in more than 50% of patients after 12-18 months of treatment (243, 244). Similarly, TSab tends to decline after thyroidectomy (245). After radioactive iodide therapy, TSab titer increases for up to a year, probably because of the release of thyroidal antigens (246-248). Antibody levels gradually decrease during the subsequent years, reaching pretherapy values around the third year. During ATD, it is speculated that some immune modulation might occur, and the predominant TSab are replaced by TNab or Tbab.

 

The specific epitopes to which the TSab bind are in the amino terminal portion of the extracellular domain of the TSR-R and have been better characterized (249, 250). This has led to therapeutic efforts to induce tolerance to these epitopes (251, 252). The blocking antibodies tend to bind to sequences at the carboxy terminal portion of the receptor, closer to the plasma membrane, probably preventing the activation of the receptor through inhibition of signal-transmission required conformational changes (253). Details of these actions are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy analysis of the full-length TSH-R structure complexed with the inhibitory antibody K1-70™. This approach revealed key interactions between the receptor's transmembrane and extracellular domains, suggesting that K1-70™ inhibits TSHR by binding without activating it, while the stimulatory autoantibody M22™ likely induces activation through conformational changes in the hinge region (254).

 

The Role of Cellular Immunity

 

Lymphocytes of patients with GD are reactive to the TSH-R (Figure 4), TPO, and synthetic TPO-derived peptides (190, 199, 200, 255). The interaction between antigen presenting cells (APCs) and T cells triggers a multimodal cellular and humoral response. T helper 1 (Th1) cell derived cytokines such as interferon gamma (INF-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) 1β, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-11 play a dominant role in the early phase of AITD (256). Later, there is a predominant T helper 2 (Th2) cell response with its derived IL-4, IL-10, IL-17, and IL-23 (257-260). TSH-R peptides that have aspartic or glutamic acid in the fourth position of their binding motif are particularly susceptible at inducing immune responses in GD and animal T cells (190, 261). Immunoreactivity towards the TSH-R has been reported in samples of orbital fat and preadipocytes, and differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes with high TSH-R reactivity has been induced by TSH stimulation (262-264). In addition, immunity to the TSH-R plays a direct role in the development of TED, through the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by T cells.

 

Figure 4. The role of cellular immunity. Schematic representation of TSH-R endocytosis by antigen presenting cells (APC), subsequent proteolysis and presentation to T cells, and stimulation of thyroid stimulating antibody production by B cells. (Created with Biorender.com).

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Thyroid Function

 

In GD, the thyroid gland is functioning at an accelerated rate. Serum TSab stimulate the TSH-R, as evidenced by the higher activity of the cell membrane adenyl cyclase activity in the thyroid tissue of patients with GD, compared to normal thyroids (265). The plasma iodine clearance, a reflection of the thyroid iodine uptake, is increased from the normal rate of 10-20 ml/min to 40-2000 ml/minute. For this reason, the percentage of a tracer dose of radioactive iodine (RAI, I123) found in the thyroid gland at 12 hours is elevated and distributed in a homogeneous fashion (266). Thyroid hormones, Tg, and iodotyrosine - normally secreted in minute amounts - are released into the blood rapidly and at increased rates (73, 267, 268). Furthermore, the rate of turnover of plasma thyroid hormones is also increased. Accelerated degradation is probably secondary to hypermetabolism and is not a primary event (269), although it has been reported that accelerated T4 turnover can persist after treatment of thyrotoxicosis (270). Finally, after anti-thyroid drugs (ATD) the thyroid hormones tend to fall and that response, along with the required dose of ATD drug required to achieve that response, can be used as predictors of GD remission (271).

 

An interesting historical observation regarding thyroid function during GD is that the uptake of RAI by the thyroid is not suppressed by the administration of exogenous T4 or T3 (272, 273), even if large amounts of hormone were given (old studies performed before the autoimmune basis for GD was fully understood). Non-suppressibility is caused by stimulation of the thyroid by TSab, and independence of feedback control via TSH.

 

Iodine Effect on the Thyrotoxic Gland

 

Iodine affects the metabolism of the diffusely hyperplastic thyrotoxic gland in a way radically different from its action on the normal gland. Years ago, Plummer demonstrated that GD can be temporarily or permanently controlled by the administration of iodide (70). Administration of large doses of iodine to laboratory animals causes a temporary inhibition of iodine organification, the Wolff-Chaikoff effect (274). The same phenomenon occurs in humans, and thyrotoxic patients are especially sensitive to this effect. The thyroid uptake of I131 is acutely depressed in thyrotoxic patients by administration of 2 mg potassium iodine, whereas more than 5 mg is needed to depress uptake in normal subjects. Concentrations of serum iodine above 5 µg/dl block iodine uptake and binding in the thyrotoxic gland (70, 71, 73, 272, 275). The Wolff-Chaikoff effect is transient. With continuous iodine administration, I131 uptake and binding recommences. The adaptation to excess iodine in animals involves a reduction of iodine transport into the thyroid which lowers intrathyroidal iodine content and escape from the Wolff-Chaikoff block. This adaptation occurs independently of TSH action.

 

The biochemical mechanism of the Wolff-Chaikoff effect has not been fully elucidated, but it is partially mediated by the downregulation of the sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) (276). Iodine does not prevent TSH or TSab from binding to the TSH-R but inhibits both the TSH-stimulated adenyl cyclase production of cAMP and its derived actions. In addition, iodine also causes a marked reduction in the release of previously formed hormones from the thyrotoxic gland but does not completely prevent further hormone synthesis. This phenomenon has been repeatedly observed and helps explain the beneficial therapeutic effect of iodide in GD (73). Ochi et al. demonstrated that chronic administration of iodine in GD blocks the stimulating effect on hormone release from both TSH and TSab (277). The block of hormone release that occurs in the thyroid of GD can be observed, although not uniformly, in the normal gland and in the normal gland made hyperactive by repeated administration of exogenous TSH. While early laboratory studies on the effect of iodine on the thyroid gland suggested that methimazole can inhibit somewhat the Wolff-Chaikoff effect (278-280), more recent clinical data indicates their ultimate impact on systemic thyroid hormone levels to be additive (281, 282). Clinical practice therefore favors this combination for treatment of severe cases of hyperthyroidism (278-280).

 

Extrathyroidal Processes

 

The pathogenesis of extrathyroidal complications of GD such as TED and dermopathy is described in detail in another chapter. Recent evidence demonstrates that stimulation of the TSab on the TSH-R in the orbital fibroblasts can lead to a crosstalk of this receptor with the insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) which stimulates hyaluronan accumulation in the orbital muscles and transformation of orbital fibroblasts into adipocytes (283, 284). This mechanism is believed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of TED and is the basis for emergent therapeutic alternatives in patients with TED and, maybe, dermopathy. Antibodies binding to and directly stimulating the IGF-1R have also been proposed to play a role in this process. However, IGF-1R antibodies exist in sera from about 10% of normal subjects, and in a similar percentage of GD patients, and are stable over time, strongly suggesting they have no unique role in GD (285).

 

PATHOLOGY

 

The ophthalmic and dermatologic changes seen in TED and dermopathy are described in the chapter on the Complications of GD. The thyroid gland changes seen in GD and changes in extrathyroidal organs that can be seen with any case of thyrotoxicosis are described below.

 

Thyroid Gland

 

The essential lesion of GD is parenchymatous hypertrophy and hyperplasia (Figure 5). The central features are increased height of the epithelium from cuboidal to columnar, and varying sizes and shapes of the follicles with reduced colloid content (286, 287). Papillary infoldings, cytologic evidence of increased activity, hypertrophy of the Golgi apparatus, increased number of mitochondria, and increased vacuolization of colloid are also seen. In addition, between the follicles, there is a large array of capillaries, together with a characteristic lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltrate. This infiltrate may be mild and diffuse throughout the gland, but more typically occurs as aggregates of mononuclear cells and even lymphoid germinal centers, referred to as focal thyroiditis. Occasionally the histologic pattern completely overlaps that of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. All pathological changes tend to regress when euthyroidism is achieved.

 

Figure 5. Histology of a thyroid gland of a patient with Graves’ disease. Columnar epithelium, vacuolization of colloid, and significant lymphocytic infiltrate are present in the setting of diffuse parenchymal hypertrophy.

 

Extrathyroidal Changes

 

MUSCLE

 

Patients with Graves’s disease can have diffuse degenerative atrophy, fatty infiltration, loss of striation, vacuolization, and proliferation or degeneration of nuclei in striated muscles (288-290). Skeletal muscles can also experience interstitial myositis characterized by plasma cells, tissue macrophages, and atrophy of fibers (291). This partly explains the sense of persistent weakness that patients describe after the normalization of thyroid hormone levels. While cardiac and smooth muscles tend to be spared in most patients, myocardial degenerative lesions have been reported in thyrotoxicosis, with foci of cell necrosis, mononuclear infiltrates, and mucopolysaccharide deposits similar to those described in extraocular and skeletal muscles (290).

 

The extraocular muscle changes are specific for TED, whereas the remainder of the abnormalities may reflect the action of excess hormone.

 

PITUITARY

 

The anterior pituitary demonstrates a dramatic decrease in identifiable thyrotropin containing cells, based on data from patients who died from thyroid storm (292, 293). This is entirely reversed in patients who achieve euthyroidism after treatment.

 

LIVER

 

Initial studies based on autopsies of patients with GD suggested focal and even diffuse liver cell necrosis, atrophy, and cirrhosis (269). In more contemporary series of liver biopsy specimens obtained from thyrotoxic persons, the deviations from normal were minimal (294, 295). Moderate decrease in glycogen content and increase in fat and round cell infiltrates were noted. The differences among these studies could be explained by a lesser severity and duration of the disease in more recent series with patients diagnosed earlier and treated effectively, as the disease has now an extremely low mortality rate (296). Recent studies have documented that thyroid hormone analogs specific for the thyroid hormone receptor b such as resmetirom may be a novel therapeutic approach for the therapy of metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (297).

 

BONE

 

Prolonged hyperthyroidism is known to produce the histologic picture of osteoporosis (298), but osteitis fibrosa also occurs (299). Histomorphometry studies show unmistakable evidence of excess bone formation and resorption.

 

NATURAL COURSE OF GD AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THYROTOXICOSIS

 

In the classic presentation, the most common onset is the simultaneous and gradual development, over a period of weeks or months, of thyrotoxicosis-related signs and symptoms, goiter, and exophthalmos. However, GD displays an array of possible clinical patterns. It is possible for GD to develop in a patient with preceding nontoxic multinodular goiter, toxic multinodular goiter (Marine-Lenhart syndrome), to experience thyrotoxicosis without TED, or to have TED preceding the development of thyrotoxicosis. Due to the coexistence of TSab and TBAb some patients can first develop hypothyroidism and later thyrotoxicosis, or vice versa (232). In addition, during pregnancy GD tends to be partially suppressed, only to have a rapid recurrence in the post-partum period (300). Sometimes, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) induced thyrotoxicosis, seen in the first part of pregnancy, can also coexist with GD and mask its presentation (301).

 

Before the general availability of current therapies, hyperthyroidism tended to evolve through periods of exacerbation and remission. In the mild forms, the active disease was self-limited to one year or more, and the patients returned spontaneously to a euthyroid state. In untreated moderate to severe forms, mortality could be observed in 11% of patients (302, 303). Mortality was most frequently attributed to cardiovascular complications (such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or heart failure), or infections, and occurred within the first 4 years after diagnosis. Fortunately, death due to hyperthyroidism is now rare with an excess mortality of 1.2% compared to controls (296). Nowadays, after a period of anti-thyroid drug therapy (ATD) therapy there is re-establishment of normal thyroid homeostasis and over time a sizable proportion of patients can achieve disease remission, allowing them to discontinue ATD and remain euthyroid off therapy.

 

The most common presenting symptoms are weight loss, weakness, dyspnea, palpitations, increased thirst or appetite, diarrhea, irritability, profuse diaphoresis, heat intolerance and increased tolerance to cold, or tremor. Occasionally, exophthalmos or diplopia is the index symptom, but goiter may antedate all other manifestations. The nutritional state varies greatly. In the past, patients were severely emaciated, but these days, on average, the weight loss is 5 - 20 lbs. (2.3 – 9 kg). Facial expressions of flushing, fright, or extreme anxiousness are common. Notably, in elderly patients the disease can manifest as apathetic thyrotoxicosis, in which there is absence of hyperkinetic neuromuscular symptoms, and predominance of cardiac (e.g. arrhythmia), psychiatric (e.g. apathy, depression) and nutritional (e.g.., weight loss) symptoms (304).

 

In patients with GD, the ocular changes of TED, lymphoid hyperplasia, localized abnormalities of skin and connective tissue (e.g., dermopathy and acropachy) and the goiter itself are direct results of the autoimmune processes of GD. The remainder of the changes are entirely attributable to an excess of thyroid hormone.

 

The natural course and manifestations of thyroid storm, TED, and dermopathy are primarily discussed in the chapter on Complications of GD. The clinical manifestations of thyrotoxicosis are described below.

 

Thyroid

 

The diffuse toxic goiter is usually more or less symmetric. The size is related, but not closely, to the severity of the disease. It varies from the barely palpable normal (10- 15 g) to a three-to-six times enlargement (45-100 g) or, rarely, even more. The gland might not be palpable in 1% of cases, either because the thyroid is smaller than usual at baseline or because it is beneath the manubrium. The thyroid may be smooth, lobulated, or rarely nodular. In thyrotoxicosis associated with nodular goiters, the hyperfunctioning tissue may reside between the nodules (305). Usually, the consistency is firm but elastic, or very firm if iodide has been given. The borders are easily demarcated by palpation. Thrills and bruits, usually denote the hypervascularity associated with increased function. Bruits may be continuous or systolic and are usually audible over the entire thyroid. Local pressure symptoms, including dysphagia and the sensation of a lump in the neck, are produced by the enlarged goiter. Vocal cord palsy is only rarely seen in GD (306). In addition, the supraclavicular lymph nodes could become enlarged and, rarely, tender (307). Most thyroid related manifestations tend to regress or disappear with restoration of euthyroidism.

 

Skin

 

Cutaneous manifestations are nearly always present when vasomotor overactivity is significant. Heat intolerance and profuse diaphoresis occur under circumstances that would provoke no response in normal people. On palpation, hands are usually erythematous, hot, and moist (hyperhidrosis). There may be continuous erythema of the face and neck, with superimposed transient blushing after palpation of the thyroid. Occasionally diffuse pruritus or urticaria occur (308). Patchy vitiligo is an associated manifestation of autoimmunity directed toward melanocytes that can be found in 7% of patients with GD.

 

Fingernails can experience onycholysis characterized by ragged appearance, thinning and posterior erosion of the hyponychium. The free margin of the nail leaves the nail bed, producing a concave or wavy margin at the line of contact. Temporary thinning of the hair is common, but alopecia is rare. Hair loss can occur due to marked changes in metabolism throughout the course of the disease.

 

Myxedema can be seen in 0.5-4.3% of patients with GD, and 13% of patients with TED (309, 310). The clinical characteristics of thyroid dermopathy are described in the chapter on Complications of GD.

 

Nervous System

 

Neural and mental findings are diverse. Nervousness, irritability, anxiety, and restlessness are common (Table 3) (311). The behavioral reactions to all sorts of stimuli are typically exaggerated. When asked to sit up, the patient might jump into an upright position. They may simply wish to cooperate but appear to overdo it. Often emotional instability is combined with this pattern, to the point of a notable change in personality. In some patients, the emotional pattern is that of mania or euphoria. In others, hyperactivity produces a state of exhaustion, and profound fatigue or asthenia. The mind is often highly active, and the patient is troubled with insomnia. Rarely, patients develop visual or auditory hallucinations or a frank psychosis. The latter is probably the result on an exacerbation of a baseline psychiatric condition rather than a de novo process (312). Furthermore, impairment of intellectual function has been found in patients with untreated hyperthyroidism. A recent study has documented that in patients over 65 years, a low TSH level from either endogenous or exogenous thyrotoxicosis is associated with higher risk of incident cognitive disorders (313).

 

A fine, rapid tremor of the outstretched fingers is classically found, and a generalized tremulousness, also involving the tongue, may be evident. The speed of muscle contraction and relaxation is increased, tendon reflexes tend to be brisk, and the reflex relaxation time is shortened (314). The tremor of Parkinsonism is intensified during thyrotoxicosis, and manifestations of cerebellar disease or pyramidal tract lesions can be seen (315, 316). Muscle fibrillations are not a usual part of the syndrome, but they may occur in chronic thyrotoxic myopathy. Polyneuropathy has also been reported (317). Rarely, patients manifest disorientation, aphasia, grimacing, choreoathetoid movements, symptoms suggestive of encephalitis, episodes of hemiparesis or bulbar paralysis (318). These symptoms clear up completely after restoration of an euthyroid state.

 

Other possible, although rare, severe neurologic manifestation consist of the new onset, exacerbation, or refractoriness of seizure disorders (319). Electroencephalography reveals increased fast wave activity, and occasionally bursts of tall spike waves. In addition, several reports describe a severe, steroid-responsive encephalopathy in some patients with GD (320).

 

Table 3. Neurologic Manifestations in Graves' Disease

Common:

·       Nervousness

·       Irritability

·       Restlessness

·       Anxiety

·       Emotional lability including hypomania or euphoria, and fatigue or asthenia).

·       Insomnia

·       Tremors

·       Brisk tendon reflexes with short relaxation time

 

Uncommon:

·       Visual or auditory hallucinations

·       Psychosis

·       Impairment of intellectual function

·       Disorientation

·       Aphasia

·       Choreoathetoid movements

·       Hemiparesis or bulbar paralysis

·       Seizures

·       Encephalopathy

·       Neuropathy

 

Muscular System

 

The muscular symptoms vary from mild myasthenia to profound muscular weakness and atrophy, especially of the proximal muscle groups. Wasting of the temporals and interossei used to be noted in a considerable number of patients while a few had generalized muscle wasting in the decades prior to current diagnostic and therapeutic abilities. Occasionally the myopathy may shade into the picture of polymyositis. Muscle cell necrosis and lymphocyte infiltration may be visible histologically, but usually are not found even when the symptoms of weakness are severe (321, 322). The electromyogram is normal in most instances but may occasionally resemble that of muscular dystrophy (323).

 

Work efficiency, measured in terms of the calories of heat produced while performing a given amount of work, has been reported to be either normal or decreased (324, 325). The muscles have decreased ability to incorporate creatine from the blood (326, 327). Creatinine excretion is initially increased by the general catabolism of hyperthyroidism, but as muscle mass diminishes, creatinine excretion in the urine decreases.

 

Myasthenia gravis may simulate thyrotoxicosis, and vice versa (328). The close relationship between these two diseases is apparent in the observation that thyrotoxicosis occurs in 3% of patients with myasthenia gravis. The pathogenic anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies that occur in myasthenia gravis are clearly comparable to the TSH-R antibodies found in GD.

 

Periodic paralysis is precipitated and worsened by thyrotoxicosis (329). It has been more commonly reported in Southeast Asian males who have a higher frequency of certain genetic susceptibilities associated with higher risk of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis (330-333). Paralysis is usually associated with hypokalemia. Inactivating mutations in the inwardly rectifying potassium channel 2.6 encoded by the KCNJ18 gene (in about 30%) have, among other candidates, been associated with susceptibility for developing thyrotoxic periodic paralysis (334, 335). Beta adrenergic stimulation mediated by thyrotoxicosis augments sodium-potassium ATPase activity in the skeletal muscle leading to increased potassium uptake into the cells (336). The episodes of paralysis tend to be infrequent and sporadic, but most commonly occur after a meal, following exercise, or during sleep, and can be induced by administration of glucose and insulin. Episodes last from minutes to hours, usually involving peripheral muscles, but can cause paralysis of the diaphragm and affect the heart. Serious episodes can be associated with extensive muscle cell damage and necrosis, and electrocardiographic (EKG) abnormalities associated with hypokalemia, such as ST and T wave changes, premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), first degree heart block, prolonged QT intervals, and even ventricular fibrillation (337).

 

Pulmonary System

 

Except for dyspnea on exertion, symptoms deriving from the lungs are not prominent. Nevertheless, pulmonary function tests can show some reduction in vital capacity, expiratory reserve volume, pulmonary compliance, and airway resistance (338, 339). Minute volume response to exercise is excessive for the amount of oxygen consumed (340).

 

Cardiovascular System

 

The first and most common manifestations deriving from the cardiovascular system are palpitations and tachycardia (341, 342). The pulse on palpation is rapid and bounding. When present, it can be effectively controlled with beta- adrenergic blockers (343, 344). PVCs, paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and shorter P wave duration occur in 6-12% of patients (345-347). When present, atrial fibrillation should be treated with anticoagulation to prevent risk of thromboembolic complications. The systolic blood pressure is frequently elevated. The diastolic blood pressure is characteristically decreased, making the pulse pressure elevated to between 50-80 mm Hg (348). A systolic murmur can sometimes be heard over the precordium due to development of mitral valve prolapse following papillary muscle dysfunction during thyrotoxicosis (349). However, mitral valve insufficiency is usually not clinically relevant and can revert to normal with treatment of thyrotoxicosis.

 

In thyrotoxicosis, the heart rate, stroke volume, left ventricular mass index, and cardiac output are all increased. The pre-ejection period is shortened, and the left ventricular ejection time remains relatively normal. The interval from initiation of the QRS complex to arrival of the arterial pulse in the brachial artery is reduced (350). Circulation time is decreased. There is dilatation of superficial capillaries and decline in systemic vascular resistance (351). Coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption in each stroke are increased. Circulating plasma volume is increased (352). Long-term mild excess of thyroid hormone causes impaired cardiac reserve and exercise capacity (353). Cardiac enlargement and heart failure may occur with or without prior heart disease (354). These effects tend to normalize when euthyroidism is restored (355).

 

Patients with coronary artery disease often develop angina during thyrotoxicosis. However, angina could also develop de novo in patients with normal coronary arteries, especially young females. This condition has been ascribed to an imbalance between increased cardiac work and blood supply, even with a patent vessel (356). Severe coronary vasospasm has been observed during angiography in patients with GD (357). Myocardial damage can occur in thyrotoxic patients with congestive heart failure (358), even when coronary vessels are normal at baseline (359).

 

It has been suggested that the changes in the cardiovascular system are secondary to increased demand for metabolites and to increased heat production. Dilatation of superficial capillaries for the dissipation of heat does cause increased blood flow and cardiac output (360). However, the direct action of thyroid hormone on the heart is also increased, since the sinus node has higher intrinsic activity, the isolated thyrotoxic heart beats faster than normal, and isolated papillary muscle from a thyrotoxic heart has a shortened contraction time (361-363).

 

Historically, the cardiovascular effects of triiodothyronine have primarily been attributed to its modulatory influence on nuclear adrenergic receptor genes, among others (364, 365). However, more recent evidence has demonstrated a significant physiological role for the non-genomic effects of thyroid hormone, particularly in energy homeostasis (366-368). Cardiac muscle contractility is enhanced by a reduction in alpha-adrenergic and cholinergic receptors within the heart. This effect is coupled with an increase in beta-adrenergic receptors, heightened adenosine transport, and enhanced phosphorylation within myocardial cells. Additionally, there is an augmentation in cardiac Na+-K+ activated membrane ATPase activity, as well as an elevation in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca++-activated ATPase activity. Finally, the increased synthesis of alpha-myosin heavy chains with increased ATPase activity also contributes to this heightened contractility (363, 369-371).

 

Fatourechi and Edwards used myocardial biopsy to investigate the presence of an autoimmune process in eleven cases of GD with low output cardiac dysfunction. Two patients had lymphocytic infiltrates suggestive of an autoimmune process, whereas the others did not, indicating that myocardial autoimmunity may occur but would not be the usual cause of cardiac dysfunction in thyrotoxicosis (372).

 

Table 4. Cardiovascular Manifestations in Graves' Disease

Common:

·       Palpitations

·       Tachycardia

·       Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia

·       Atrial fibrillation

·       Increased stroke volume and cardiac output.

·       Increased coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption

·       Decreased exercise capacity

 

Uncommon:

·       Impaired cardiac reserve

·       Heart failure

·       Myocardial infarction

 

Hematologic and Lymphatic Systems

 

In most patients the hemoglobin and hematocrit are in the normal or low-normal range (373). The glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity of red cells is increased in thyrotoxicosis (374), while blood volume and the red cell mass are also increased in some patients. In the past, severe thyrotoxicosis used to be associated with normocytic anemia with hemoglobin concentrations as low as 8 g/dl, likely related to iron deficiency and malnutrition (375, 376). However, the presence of anemia in a thyrotoxic patient these days requires a search for an additional explanation, other than thyrotoxicosis.

 

The reticuloendothelial and lymphocytic systems undergo hyperplasia. There may be generalized lymphadenopathy, and the thymus may be enlarged (377). The thymus enlargement should be considered when mediastinal abnormalities are noted on chest imaging; thymus enlargement resolves with resolution of thyrotoxicosis and that should inform the decision about possible biopsy (378). Relative lymphocytosis and neutropenia with a normal or slightly low total white cell count, constitute the characteristic blood findings of GD (379). A relative and an absolute increase in the number of monocytes has also been reported (380). Significant pancytopenia with leukocyte counts under 3x109/l and neutrophiles under 2x109/l rarely occur, and if unrelated to drug therapy, tend to recover with restoration of euthyroidism (381).

 

GD is often associated with mild thrombocytopenia, and occasionally with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (382). This co-occurrence is thought to reflect the autoimmune pathogenesis of both diseases. Fourteen percent of patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura are reported to have coincident GD. Mild thrombocytopenia may disappear spontaneously or with treatment of hyperthyroidism, or if severe, may respond to glucocorticoid therapy (383). Bone marrow examination may show normal or increased megakaryocytes. In addition, platelet life span can be shortened due to a more rapid clearing by the activated reticulo-endothelial system.

 

Usually, thyrotoxicosis results in a mild hypercoagulable state. Although rare, cerebral venous thrombosis has been reported in association with thyrotoxicosis, suggesting that occasionally the propensity for coagulation can lead to profound consequences (384). Mild prolongation of the prothrombin time and elevation of several coagulation factors (Factors VIII, XIII, IX, XI, Von Willebrand, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, among others) are often seen with thyrotoxicosis, and return to normal with treatment. In addition, recent studies emphasize the role of thyroid hormones in promoting coagulation through non-genomic mechanisms involving platelet activation with subsequent endothelial interactions (385).  

 

Gastrointestinal System

 

The appetite and the gastrointestinal track absorption are characteristically increased to try to offset nutritional requirements from the increase in catabolism seen in patients with thyrotoxicosis. Despite this, weight loss is usually predominant. In severe thyrotoxicosis, nausea, emesis, and abdominal pain can be present while intestinal transit time is decreased, and occasionally diarrhea occurs (386). Steatorrhea can be seen if fat intake is excessive. Achlorhydria can be as prevalent as 40% (387, 388). Gastric enzymes production is decreased, and a mild gastritis can be present (389). Fasting serum gastrin levels, and their responses to arginine, are increased (390).

 

Around 55% of patients with thyrotoxicosis can experience at least one abnormality in their liver blood tests. Alkaline phosphatase elevation is the most common, but other common abnormalities include hypoalbuminemia, mild prothrombin time elevation, elevated aminotransferases, hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (391). Mild to severe liver disease may be found, and the liver is frequently palpable regardless of the coexistence of heart failure (392). Jaundice is possible but often seen when there is significant cholestasis from severe thyrotoxicosis (393, 394). The cause of hepatic disease has been thought to be multifactorial in the setting of congestive hepatopathy from heart failure, malnutrition, previous or concomitant liver disease (i.e., infectious or autoimmune disease), and drug related liver injury, and possible liver ischemia from a mismatch between oxygen consumption and oxygen delivery to the liver (395-399). All gastrointestinal manifestations tend to improve with restauration of the euthyroid state.

 

Renal System

 

Polyuria and occasionally glucosuria are seen in uncomplicated thyrotoxicosis. Polyuria does not indicate insensitivity to vasopressin, for the kidney responds normally to vasopressin with an increase in concentration of urine (400). Glucosuria may reflect accelerated absorption of sugar from the intestine and glucose intolerance. The glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow are on average increased, probably secondary to increased cardiac output and a direct effect of thyroid hormone on renal function (401). Hyperuricemia with hypercalcemia can be seen in severe thyrotoxicosis, but it rarely injures the kidneys. In addition, occasionally hyposthenuria and uremia occur (402, 403).

 

Female Reproductive System

 

Menstruation is characteristically decreased in volume, and rarely amenorrhea with a proliferative endometrium can happen. The menstrual cycle may be either shortened or prolonged. The relative importance of a primary action of excess thyroid hormone on the gonadotroph function is unclear. However, an alteration in pituitary LH production and subsequent ovulation is suggested (404). Hyperprolactinemia is more common in patients with hyperthyroidism than in healthy controls (405). Premature ovarian failure can occur in association with GD in patients with polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type 3 (222).

 

Fertility is decreased, but pregnancy can develop. The incidence of miscarriage, premature delivery, pre-eclampsia, and gestational heart failure are increased by maternal thyrotoxicosis (406-408). Reduced fertility and increased miscarriage rates are associated with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) and positive antibodies. High maternal thyroid hormone levels and/or high titer of TSab (by crossing the placenta in the 3rd trimester) can lead to fetal thyrotoxicosis with suppressed fetal TSH, lower fetal weight, and fetal death (409). However, pregnancy often ameliorates the biochemistry and the symptoms of thyrotoxicosis due to GD. Unfortunately, relapse is prone to occur in the 3-4 months following delivery.

 

Male Reproductive System

 

Peripheral conversion of testosterone and androstenedione to estrone and estradiol is increased in both sexes during hyperthyroidism (293, 410). Thus, men can have elevated circulating levels of free estradiol (411, 412), and some might experience gynecomastia with ductal elongation and epithelial hyperplasia (413, 414). In addition, the slightly elevated LH in men with gynecomastia suggests hypothalamic insensitivity to feedback control and some peripheral unresponsiveness to LH (411).

 

 

Both Leydig cell and spermatogenic abnormalities may be present. Previous small series have described a 71% rate of loss of libido, 56% rate of erectile dysfunction, and 80% rate of low sperm counts (<40 millions) in thyrotoxic men (415, 416). In these patients, the total testosterone level was elevated, but because the sex hormone binding globulin level was also high, the free testosterone level was reduced and the response to hCG was blunted. The abnormalities normalize when the patients become euthyroid (417). In addition, RAI therapy can cause transient reductions in both sperm count and motility but do not seem to cause permanent effects with ordinary treatment doses (under 14 mCi, equivalent to around 500 MBq) (417).

 

Adrenal Function

 

There are no obvious clinical signs or symptoms of altered adrenal cortical function in thyrotoxicosis, but distinct biochemical changes have been detected. In thyrotoxicosis the adrenal cortex is often hyperplastic and exogenous glucocorticoids are cleared from the plasma and metabolized at an accelerated rate (418). Since plasma glucocorticoid levels are normal and their rate of metabolism is increased, total daily metabolism and excretion of 17-ketosteroids and 17 hydroxy-corticoids are usually increased (419, 420). Furthermore, there is a relatively increased excretion of 11-oxycorticoid metabolites (421), which are biologically inactive compounds. There is increased secretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by the pituitary, and subsequently increased production of steroids by the adrenal gland in order to maintain a normal concentration of active steroids in the peripheral blood and in the tissues (422, 423). However, a reduced response to exogenous ACTH suggests that adrenal reserve is reduced (424), and it has been hypothesized that in severe thyrotoxicosis and in thyroid storm there may be an element of adrenal insufficiency.

 

An increase in the 5-alpha metabolite of testosterone (androsterone) and a relative decrease in the 5-beta metabolite (etiocholanolone) are seen in the urine of thyrotoxic patients (425, 426). Because administration of substantial amounts of androsterone depresses the level of serum lipids, Hellman et al. have hypothesized that this change in steroid metabolism may be a way in which thyroid hormone affects lipid metabolism.

 

Skeletal System

 

Patients with mild thyrotoxicosis can experience some degree of bone mass loss and increased fracture risk, irrespective of age or sex (427-429). Those with thyrotoxicosis extending over several years may develop severe osteoporosis (430, 431). Skeletal mass is augmented after restauration of euthyroidism (428, 429).

 

The thyroid hormone receptors α1 (TRα1), TRβ1, and TRβ2 are expressed in human osteoblasts and bone marrow stromal cells. Histomorphometry evaluations with tetracycline labelling demonstrates accelerated turnover of bone, calcium, and collagen, both in spontaneous hyperthyroidism and in female treated with excess thyroid hormone (298, 432, 433). Serum osteocalcin, carboxy-terminal-1-telopeptide, and alkaline phosphatase may increase in parallel with hormone levels (434-437). These tend to normalize with restauration of euthyroidism.

 

The serum calcium level is usually normal but may be sufficiently elevated to produce nausea and emesis (402), and rarely, renal injury (403, 438). Fecal and urinary calcium excretion is greatly augmented, but kidney stones are infrequent since there is a concomitant polyuria with increase in excretion of colloids that stabilize the calcium (433). Intestinal absorption of calcium is usually reduced (439). The hypercalcemia appears to be a direct manifestation of thyroid hormone action on bone metabolism and can lead to secondary hypoparathyroidism with reduced 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (440, 441), and elevated serum phosphorus secondary to increased renal resorption (438, 442). It has been proposed that the hypercalcemia can usually be corrected partially or totally by the administration of glucocorticoids, but data is inconclusive (442, 443). Treatment of thyrotoxicosis is certainly able to normalize these abnormalities (444).

 

Metabolism

 

METABOLIC RATE

 

The basal oxygen consumption in thyrotoxicosis, as measured by the basal metabolic rate (BMR), is elevated compared to a euthyroid person. In extreme thyrotoxicosis, the BMR may be double the standard (445-447). In addition, the total metabolic rate, which is the BMR plus the increments from work, food, or stress, is elevated.

 

Observations regarding energy expenditure are mixed. An increased cost of muscular work with less efficient coupling of oxidation and energy use in patients with thyrotoxicosis was reported many years ago by Plummer and Boothby (448)and Briard et al. (449) among others. However, recent studies suggest that the increase in energy expenditure caused by work is not altered in thyrotoxicosis (450).

 

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM

 

Intestinal carbohydrate absorption is accelerated, as is its removal from the plasma. After a standard oral glucose load is given, the thyrotoxic patient characteristically has an early and rapid rise in blood glucose concentration in 30 - 60 minutes followed by a rapid fall, so that by two hours the concentration is normal (451-453). In non-diabetic thyrotoxic patients there is increased insulin demand and there could be some resistance to the action of insulin. Fasting blood glucose levels are associated with double the normal insulin concentration (454), and insulin resistance has been found in vitro utilizing adipocytes from patients with untreated hyperthyroidism (455).

 

Diabetes may develop (in patients with prediabetes) or worsen with the development of thyrotoxicosis and is ameliorated or may disappear when thyrotoxicosis is treated (456). In these patients, there is increased basal hepatic glucose production and reduced ability of insulin and glucose to suppress hepatic glucose production, another marker of insulin resistance (457, 458).

 

LIPID METABOLISM

 

Hypocholesterolemia is associated with thyrotoxicosis. It may be produced without a distinct decrease in total body or liver cholesterol. Part of the cholesterol-lowering action of thyroid hormone relates to malnutrition and weight loss, and part may be simply a manifestation of hypermetabolism. There is an increase both in synthesis and degradation of cholesterol, but the balance results in lower steady-state concentrations in the serum (459-469). Thyroid hormone directly enhances conversion of cholesterol to bile acids and their excretion in the bile, disposing of 70-90% of the cholesterol formed in the body (462). They may also affect cholesterol metabolism by directly increasing the number of membrane surface low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors (463). Furthermore, hepatic lipogenesis is also strikingly increased, both by direct action of thyroid hormones and in response to increased insulin levels. Overall, the levels of LDL, HDL, and apolipoproteins are lowered (461, 465-470). Triglyceride levels tend to be normal or slightly elevated (464), and the clearance rate of infused triglycerides might be elevated (461, 465-470). Plasma leptin levels are normal (468), and non-esterified fatty acids are elevated (471).

 

PROTEIN METABOLISM

 

In thyrotoxicosis, protein formation and breakdown are both accelerated. Despite the increased protein turnover, there is an overall protein deficit (472, 473). Nitrogen excretion is increased, and nitrogen balance may be normal or negative, depending on whether intake meets the demands of increased catabolism. Catabolism of collagen is increased, and urinary hydroxyproline excretion is characteristically increased (474). While the exact mechanism behind the effect of thyroid hormone on protein metabolism is not fully elucidated, it is believed to be mediated by a combination of mitochondria-dependent cytoplasmic mechanisms, and modulation of nuclear genetic transcription of genes involved in protein metabolism (475-477).

 

VITAMIN METABOLISM

 

The absorption of vitamin A is increased and conversion of carotene to vitamin A is accelerated in thyrotoxicosis (478). The requirements of the body are likewise increased, and low blood concentrations of vitamin A may be found. In addition, requirements for thiamine and vitamin B6 are increased (479).

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

Sincere gratitude is extended to Dr. Leslie DeGroot, the author of the previous version, for laying the foundation of this chapter and his enduring influence on the subject.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Graves RJ. Clinical Lectures: Newly Observed Affection of the Thyroid Gland in Females. London Medical and Surgical Journal. 1835;7.
  2. der KP, Houtstra-Lanz M, Schwarz F. Exophthalmos-producing substance in human serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1960;20:712-8.
  3. Dobyns BM, Steelman SL. The thyroid-stimulating hormone of the anterior pituitary as distinct from the exophthalmos-producing substance. Endocrinology. 1953;52(6):705-11.
  4. Adams DD. The presence of an abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone in the serum of some thyrotoxic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1958;18(7):699-712.
  5. Adams DD, Fastier FN, Howie JB, Kennedy TH, Kilpatrick JA, Stewart RD. Stimulation of the human thyroid by infusions of plasma containing LATS protector. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;39(5):826-32.
  6. Smith BR, Hall R. Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins in Graves' disease. Lancet. 1974;2(7878):427-31.
  7. Huber GK, Safirstein R, Neufeld D, Davies TF. Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies induce human thyroid cell growth and c-fos activation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(5):1142-7.
  8. Cornelis S, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Panneels V, Vassart G, Costagliola S. Purification and characterization of a soluble bioactive amino-terminal extracellular domain of the human thyrotropin receptor. Biochemistry. 2001;40(33):9860-9.
  9. Rees Smith B, McLachlan SM, Furmaniak J. Autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor. Endocr Rev. 1988;9(1):106-21.
  10. Ludgate ME, Vassart G. The thyrotropin receptor as a model to illustrate receptor and receptor antibody diseases. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;9(1):95-113.
  11. Shapira Y, Agmon-Levin N, Shoenfeld Y. Defining and analyzing geoepidemiology and human autoimmunity. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2010;34(3):J168-J77.
  12. McGrogan A, Seaman HE, Wright JW, De Vries CS. The incidence of autoimmune thyroid disease: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical Endocrinology. 2008;69(5):687-96.
  13. Taylor PN, Albrecht D, Scholz A, Gutierrez-Buey G, Lazarus JH, Dayan CM, et al. Global epidemiology of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(5):301-16.
  14. Vos XG, Smit N, Endert E, Brosschot JF, Tijssen JG, Wiersinga WM. Age and stress as determinants of the severity of hyperthyroidism caused by Graves' disease in newly diagnosed patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(2):193-9.
  15. Boelaert K, Torlinska B, Holder RL, Franklyn JA. Older Subjects with Hyperthyroidism Present with a Paucity of Symptoms and Signs: A Large Cross-Sectional Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2010;95(6):2715-26.
  16. Smith TJ, Hegedüs L. Graves’ Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(16):1552-65.
  17. Furszyfer J, Kurland LT, McConahey WM, Elveback LR. Graves' disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935 through 1967. Mayo Clin Proc. 1970;45(9):636-44.
  18. Tunbridge WM, Evered DC, Hall R, Appleton D, Brewis M, Clark F, et al. The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1977;7(6):481-93.
  19. Vanderpump MP, Tunbridge WM, French JM, Appleton D, Bates D, Clark F, et al. The incidence of thyroid disorders in the community: a twenty-year follow-up of the Whickham Survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;43(1):55-68.
  20. Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD, Hannon WH, Gunter EW, Spencer CA, et al. Serum TSH, T4, and Thyroid Antibodies in the United States Population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002;87(2):489-99.
  21. Degroot LJ, Quintans J. The Causes of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease*. Endocrine Reviews. 1989;10(4):537-62.
  22. Desai MK, Brinton RD. Autoimmune Disease in Women: Endocrine Transition and Risk Across the Lifespan. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10.
  23. Kisiel B, Bednarczuk T, Kostrzewa G, Kosińska J, Miśkiewicz P, Płazińska MT, et al. Polymorphism of the oestrogen receptor beta gene (ESR2) is associated with susceptibility to Graves' disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;68(3):429-34.
  24. Merrill SJ, Mu Y. Thyroid autoimmunity as a window to autoimmunity: An explanation for sex differences in the prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity. J Theor Biol. 2015;375:95-100.
  25. Struja T, Kutz A, Fischli S, Meier C, Mueller B, Recher M, et al. Is Graves' disease a primary immunodeficiency? New immunological perspectives on an endocrine disease. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):174.
  26. Ando T, Imaizumi M, Graves PN, Unger P, Davies TF. Intrathyroidal fetal microchimerism in Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3315-20.
  27. Vestergaard P. Smoking and thyroid disorders--a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146(2):153-61.
  28. Wiersinga WM. Smoking and thyroid. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79(2):145-51.
  29. Prummel MF, Strieder T, Wiersinga WM. The environment and autoimmune thyroid diseases. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(5):605-18.
  30. Rodríguez-Paredes M, Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat Med. 2011;17(3):330-9.
  31. Wang H, Liao H, Ochani M, Justiniani M, Lin X, Yang L, et al. Cholinergic agonists inhibit HMGB1 release and improve survival in experimental sepsis. Nat Med. 2004;10(11):1216-21.
  32. Effraimidis G, Wiersinga WM. Mechanisms in endocrinology: autoimmune thyroid disease: old and new players. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(6):R241-52.
  33. Holm IA, Manson JE, Michels KB, Alexander EK, Willett WC, Utiger RD. Smoking and other lifestyle factors and the risk of Graves' hyperthyroidism. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(14):1606-11.
  34. Wenzel BE, Franke TF, Heufelder AE, Heesemann J. Autoimmune thyroid diseases and enteropathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Autoimmunity. 1990;7(4):295-303.
  35. Wolf MW, Misaki T, Bech K, Tvede M, Silva JE, Ingbar SH. Immunoglobulins of patients recovering from Yersinia enterocolitica infections exhibit Graves' disease-like activity in human thyroid membranes. Thyroid. 1991;1(4):315-20.
  36. Wenzel BE, Heesemann J, Wenzel KW, Scriba PC. Antibodies to plasmid-encoded proteins of enteropathogenic Yersinia in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Lancet. 1988;1(8575-6):56.
  37. Akamine H, Takasu N, Komiya I, Ishikawa K, Shinjyo T, Nakachi K, et al. Association of HTLV-I with autoimmune thyroiditis in patients with adult T-cell leukaemia (ATL) and in HTLV-I carriers. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;45(4):461-6.
  38. de Luis DA, Varela C, de La Calle H, Cantón R, de Argila CM, San Roman AL, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is markedly increased in patients with autoimmune atrophic thyroiditis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;26(4):259-63.
  39. Rochman H, deGroot LJ, Rieger CH, Varnavides LA, Refetoff S, Joung JI, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen and humoral antibody response in patients with thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1975;35(10):2689-92.
  40. Hancock SL, Cox RS, McDougall IR. Thyroid diseases after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(9):599-605.
  41. Vermiglio F, Castagna MG, Volnova E, Lo Presti VP, Moleti M, Violi MA, et al. Post-Chernobyl increased prevalence of humoral thyroid autoimmunity in children and adolescents from a moderately iodine-deficient area in Russia. Thyroid. 1999;9(8):781-6.
  42. Monzani F, Del Guerra P, Caraccio N, Casolaro A, Lippolis PV, Goletti O. Appearance of Graves' disease after percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of hyperfunctioning thyroid adenoma. J Endocrinol Invest. 1997;20(5):294-8.
  43. Nygaard B, Knudsen JH, Hegedüs L, Scient AV, Hansen JE. Thyrotropin receptor antibodies and Graves' disease, a side-effect of 131I treatment in patients with nontoxic goiter. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(9):2926-30.
  44. Schmidt M, Gorbauch E, Dietlein M, Faust M, Stützer H, Eschner W, et al. Incidence of postradioiodine immunogenic hyperthyroidism/Graves' disease in relation to a temporary increase in thyrotropin receptor antibodies after radioiodine therapy for autonomous thyroid disease. Thyroid. 2006;16(3):281-8.
  45. Peng K, Li X, Yang D, Chan SCW, Zhou J, Wan EYF, et al. Risk of autoimmune diseases following COVID-19 and the potential protective effect from vaccination: a population-based cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;63:102154.
  46. Muller I, Consonni D, Crivicich E, Di Marco F, Currò N, Salvi M. Increased risk of Thyroid Eye Disease following Covid-19 Vaccination. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023.
  47. Rönnblom LE, Alm GV, Oberg KE. Autoimmunity after alpha-interferon therapy for malignant carcinoid tumors. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(3):178-83.
  48. Berthaud P, Schlumberger M, Comoy E, Avril MF, Le Chevalier T, Spielmann M, et al. Hypothyroidism and goiter during interleukin-2 therapy. J Endocrinol Invest. 1990;13(8):689-90.
  49. Hoekman K, von Blomberg-van der Flier BM, Wagstaff J, Drexhage HA, Pinedo HM. Reversible thyroid dysfunction during treatment with GM-CSF. Lancet. 1991;338(8766):541-2.
  50. Pariani N, Willis M, Muller I, Healy S, Nasser T, McGowan A, et al. Alemtuzumab-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Exhibits Distinctive Clinical and Immunological Features. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2018;103(8):3010-8.
  51. Brix TH, Christensen K, Holm NV, Harvald B, Hegedüs L. A population-based study of Graves' disease in Danish twins. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48(4):397-400.
  52. Coles AJ, Wing M, Smith S, Coraddu F, Greer S, Taylor C, et al. Pulsed monoclonal antibody treatment and autoimmune thyroid disease in multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 1999;354(9191):1691-5.
  53. Figueroa-Vega N, Alfonso-Pérez M, Benedicto I, Sánchez-Madrid F, González-Amaro R, Marazuela M. Increased circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and Th17 lymphocytes in Hashimoto's thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(2):953-62.
  54. Chen Q. The expression of interleukin-15 and interleukin-17 in tears and orbital tissues of Graves ophthalmopathy patients. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2019;120(4):6299-303.
  55. Yao Q, Wang B, Jia X, Li Q, Yao W, Zhang J-a. Increased Human Interleukin-32 Expression Is Related to Disease Activity of Graves' Disease. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10.
  56. Prummel MF, Laurberg P. Interferon-alpha and autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid. 2003;13(6):547-51.
  57. Durelli L, Ferrero B, Oggero A, Verdun E, Ghezzi A, Montanari E, et al. Thyroid function and autoimmunity during interferon beta-1b treatment: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(8):3525-32.
  58. Kristan MM, Toro-Tobon D, Francis N, Desale S, Bikas A, Jonklaas J, et al. Immunotherapy-Associated Hypothyroidism: Comparison of the Pre-Existing With De-Novo Hypothyroidism. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022;13.
  59. Borodic G, Hinkle DM, Cia Y. Drug-induced graves disease from CTLA-4 receptor suppression. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(4):e87-8.
  60. Ryder M, Callahan M, Postow MA, Wolchok J, Fagin JA. Endocrine-related adverse events following ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: a comprehensive retrospective review from a single institution. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21(2):371-81.
  61. Vagenakis AG, Wang CA, Burger A, Maloof F, Braverman LE, Ingbar SH. Iodide-induced thyrotoxicosis in Boston. N Engl J Med. 1972;287(11):523-7.
  62. Stanbury JB, Ermans AE, Bourdoux P, Todd C, Oken E, Tonglet R, et al. Iodine-induced hyperthyroidism: occurrence and epidemiology. Thyroid. 1998;8(1):83-100.
  63. Vidor GI, Stewart JC, Wall JR, Wangel A, Hetzel BS. Pathogenesis of iodine-induced thyrotoxicosis: studies in northern Tasmania. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1973;37(6):901-9.
  64. Stewart JC, Vidor GI, Buttifield IH, Hetzel BS. Epidemic thyrotoxicosis in northern Tasmania: studies of clinical features and iodine nutrition. Aust N Z J Med. 1971;1(3):203-11.
  65. Chandrasekaran M, Ramadevi K. Thyromegaly and iodine nutritional status in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(2):260-4.
  66. Laurberg P, Jørgensen T, Perrild H, Ovesen L, Knudsen N, Pedersen IB, et al. The Danish investigation on iodine intake and thyroid disease, DanThyr: status and perspectives. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155(2):219-28.
  67. Boukis MA, Koutras DA, Souvatzoglou A, Evangelopoulou A, Vrontakis M, Moulopoulos SD. Thyroid hormone and immunological studies in endemic goiter. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(4):859-62.
  68. Rasooly L, Burek CL, Rose NR. Iodine-induced autoimmune thyroiditis in NOD-H-2h4 mice. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1996;81(3):287-92.
  69. Allen EM, Appel MC, Braverman LE. The effect of iodide ingestion on the development of spontaneous lymphocytic thyroiditis in the diabetes-prone BB/W rat. Endocrinology. 1986;118(5):1977-81.
  70. Kopp PA. Iodine in the Therapy of Graves' Disease: A Century After Henry S. Plummer. Thyroid. 2023;33(3):273-5.
  71. Feinberg WD, Hoffman DL, Owen CAJ. THE EFFECTS OF VARYING AMOUNTS OF STABLE IODIDE ON THE FUNCTION OF THE HUMAN THYROID*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1959;19(5):567-82.
  72. Degroot LJ, Greer MA. The effect of stable iodide on thyroid secretion in man. Metabolism. 1956;5(6 Part 1):682-96.
  73. Buhler UK, DeGroot LJ. Effect of stable iodine on thyroid iodine release. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1969;29(12):1546-52.
  74. Carlé A, Pedersen IB, Knudsen N, Perrild H, Ovesen L, Rasmussen LB, et al. Epidemiology of subtypes of hyperthyroidism in Denmark: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(5):801-9.
  75. Paunkovic N, Paunkovic J, Pavlovic O, Paunovic Z. The significant increase in incidence of Graves' disease in eastern Serbia during the civil war in the former Yugoslavia (1992 to 1995). Thyroid. 1998;8(1):37-41.
  76. Wang J, Chen Z, Carru C, Capobianco G, Sedda S, Li Z. What is the impact of stress on the onset and anti-thyroid drug therapy in patients with graves' disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023;23(1):194.
  77. Chiovato L, Pinchera A. Stressful life events and Graves' disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996;134(6):680-2.
  78. Radosavljević VR, Janković SM, Marinković JM. Stressful life events in the pathogenesis of Graves' disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 1996;134(6):699-701.
  79. Winsa B, Adami HO, Bergström R, Gamstedt A, Dahlberg PA, Adamson U, et al. Stressful life events and Graves' disease. Lancet. 1991;338(8781):1475-9.
  80. Matos-Santos A, Nobre EL, Costa JG, Nogueira PJ, Macedo A, Galvão-Teles A, et al. Relationship between the number and impact of stressful life events and the onset of Graves' disease and toxic nodular goitre. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;55(1):15-9.
  81. Landsberg L. Catecholamines and hyperthyroidism. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1977;6(3):697-718.
  82. Bruun E. Exophthalmic goiter developing after treatment with thyroid preparations. Acta Med Scand. 1945;122:13-29.
  83. Takaba H, Takayanagi H. The Mechanisms of T Cell Selection in the Thymus. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(11):805-16.
  84. Strominger JL. Developmental biology of T cell receptors. Science. 1989;244(4907):943-50.
  85. Spitzweg C, Joba W, Heufelder AE. Expression of thyroid-related genes in human thymus. Thyroid. 1999;9(2):133-41.
  86. Sospedra M, Ferrer-Francesch X, Domínguez O, Juan M, Foz-Sala M, Pujol-Borrell R. Transcription of a broad range of self-antigens in human thymus suggests a role for central mechanisms in tolerance toward peripheral antigens. J Immunol. 1998;161(11):5918-29.
  87. Giménez-Barcons M, Casteràs A, Armengol Mdel P, Porta E, Correa PA, Marín A, et al. Autoimmune predisposition in Down syndrome may result from a partial central tolerance failure due to insufficient intrathymic expression of AIRE and peripheral antigens. J Immunol. 2014;193(8):3872-9.
  88. Miyara M, Sakaguchi S. Natural regulatory T cells: mechanisms of suppression. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13(3):108-16.
  89. Lahl K, Loddenkemper C, Drouin C, Freyer J, Arnason J, Eberl G, et al. Selective depletion of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induces a scurfy-like disease. J Exp Med. 2007;204(1):57-63.
  90. Li Q, Wang B, Mu K, Zhang JA. The pathogenesis of thyroid autoimmune diseases: New T lymphocytes - Cytokines circuits beyond the Th1-Th2 paradigm. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(3):2204-16.
  91. Nakano A, Watanabe M, Iida T, Kuroda S, Matsuzuka F, Miyauchi A, et al. Apoptosis-induced decrease of intrathyroidal CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in autoimmune thyroid diseases. Thyroid. 2007;17(1):25-31.
  92. Klatka M, Grywalska E, Partyka M, Charytanowicz M, Kiszczak-Bochynska E, Rolinski J. Th17 and Treg cells in adolescents with Graves' disease. Impact of treatment with methimazole on these cell subsets. Autoimmunity. 2014;47(3):201-11.
  93. Mao C, Wang S, Xiao Y, Xu J, Jiang Q, Jin M, et al. Impairment of regulatory capacity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells mediated by dendritic cell polarization and hyperthyroidism in Graves' disease. J Immunol. 2011;186(8):4734-43.
  94. Sridama V, Pacini F, DeGroot LJ. Decreased suppressor T-lymphocytes in autoimmune thyroid diseases detected by monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;54(2):316-9.
  95. Wang Y, Fang S, Zhou H. Pathogenic role of Th17 cells in autoimmune thyroid disease and their underlying mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;37(2):101743.
  96. Glick AB, Wodzinski A, Fu P, Levine AD, Wald DN. Impairment of regulatory T-cell function in autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid. 2013;23(7):871-8.
  97. Pan D, Shin YH, Gopalakrishnan G, Hennessey J, De Groot LJ. Regulatory T cells in Graves' disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71(4):587-93.
  98. Pacini F, DeGroot LJ. Studies of immunoglobulin synthesis in cultures of peripheral T and B lymphocytes: reduced T-suppressor cell activity in Graves' disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1983;18(3):219-32.
  99. Topliss DJ, Okita N, Lewis M, Row VV, Volpé R. Allosuppressor T lymphocytes abolish migration inhibition factor production in autoimmune thyroid disease: evidence from radiosensitivity experiments. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1981;15(4):335-41.
  100. Topliss D, How J, Lewis M, Row V, Volpé R. Evidence for cell-mediated immunity and specific suppressor T lymphocyte dysfunction in Graves' disease and diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(4):700-5.
  101. Marazuela M, García-López MA, Figueroa-Vega N, de la Fuente H, Alvarado-Sánchez B, Monsiváis-Urenda A, et al. Regulatory T cells in human autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(9):3639-46.
  102. Gangi E, Vasu C, Cheatem D, Prabhakar BS. IL-10-producing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells play a critical role in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-induced suppression of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis. J Immunol. 2005;174(11):7006-13.
  103. Molteni M, Rossetti C, Scrofani S, Bonara P, Scorza R, Kohn LD. Regulatory CD8+ T cells control thyrotropin receptor-specific CD4+ clones in healthy subjects. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(3):167-74.
  104. Vaidya B, Shenton BK, Stamp S, Miller M, Baister E, Andrews CD, et al. Analysis of peripheral blood T-cell subsets in active thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: absence of effect of octreotide-LAR on T-cell subsets in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 2005;15(9):1073-8.
  105. Migita K, Eguchi K, Tezuka H, Otsubo T, Kawakami A, Nakao H, et al. Cytotoxic activity of interleukin-2 (IL-2) activated killer cells toward thyroid epithelial cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 1989;77(2):196-201.
  106. Piccinini LA, Mackenzie WA, Platzer M, Davies TF. Lymphokine regulation of HLA-DR gene expression in human thyroid cell monolayers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64(3):543-8.
  107. Eguchi K, Otsubo T, Kawabe Y, Shimomura C, Ueki Y, Nakao H, et al. Synergy in antigen presentation by thyroid epithelial cells and monocytes from patients with Graves' disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 1988;72(1):84-90.
  108. Bottazzo GF, Pujol-Borrell R, Hanafusa T, Feldmann M. Role of aberrant HLA-DR expression and antigen presentation in induction of endocrine autoimmunity. Lancet. 1983;2(8359):1115-9.
  109. Mukuta T, Arreaza G, Nishikawa M, Resetkova E, Jamieson C, Tamai H, et al. Thyroid xenografts from patients with Graves' disease in severe combined immunodeficient mice and NIH-beige-nude-xid mice. Clin Invest Med. 1997;20(1):5-15.
  110. Leclere J, Bene MC, Duprez A, Faure G, Thomas JL, Vignaud JM, et al. Behaviour of thyroid tissue from patients with Graves' disease in nude mice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;59(1):175-7.
  111. Martin L. The hereditary and familial aspects of exophthalmic goitre and nodular goitre. Q J Med. 1945;14:207-19.
  112. Harvald B, Hauge M. A catamnestic investigation of Danish twins; a preliminary report. Dan Med Bull. 1956;3(5):150-8.
  113. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Hegedüs L. Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves' disease: a population-based study of two Danish twin cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):930-4.
  114. Hansen PS, Brix TH, Iachine I, Kyvik KO, Hegedüs L. The relative importance of genetic and environmental effects for the early stages of thyroid autoimmunity: a study of healthy Danish twins. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(1):29-38.
  115. Berisso GA, van Lint MT, Bacigalupo A, Marmont AM. Adoptive autoimmune hyperthyroidism following allogeneic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling with Graves' disease. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;23(10):1091-2.
  116. Taylor JC, Gough SC, Hunt PJ, Brix TH, Chatterjee K, Connell JM, et al. A genome-wide screen in 1119 relative pairs with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):646-53.
  117. Lee HJ, Stefan-Lifshitz M, Li CW, Tomer Y. Genetics and epigenetics of autoimmune thyroid diseases: Translational implications. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;37(2):101661.
  118. Campbell RD, Trowsdale J. Map of the human MHC. Immunol Today. 1993;14(7):349-52.
  119. Geluk A, Van Meijgaarden KE, Janson AA, Drijfhout JW, Meloen RH, De Vries RR, et al. Functional analysis of DR17(DR3)-restricted mycobacterial T cell epitopes reveals DR17-binding motif and enables the design of allele-specific competitor peptides. J Immunol. 1992;149(9):2864-71.
  120. Grumet FC, Payne RO, Konishi J, Kriss JP. HL-A antigens as markers for disease susceptibility and autoimmunity in Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;39(6):1115-9.
  121. Farid NR, Stone E, Johnson G. Graves' disease and HLA: clinical and epidemiologic associations. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1980;13(6):535-44.
  122. Mangklabruks A, Cox N, DeGroot LJ. Genetic factors in autoimmune thyroid disease analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms of candidate genes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73(2):236-44.
  123. Pichurin P, Chen CR, Pichurina O, David C, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM. Thyrotropin receptor-DNA vaccination of transgenic mice expressing HLA-DR3 or HLA-DQ6b. Thyroid. 2003;13(10):911-7.
  124. Yanagawa T, Mangklabruks A, Chang YB, Okamoto Y, Fisfalen ME, Curran PG, et al. Human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DQA1*0501 allele associated with genetic susceptibility to Graves' disease in a Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76(6):1569-74.
  125. Yanagawa T, Mangklabruks A, DeGroot LJ. Strong association between HLA-DQA1*0501 and Graves' disease in a male Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(1):227-9.
  126. Sawai Y, DeGroot LJ. Binding of human thyrotropin receptor peptides to a Graves' disease-predisposing human leukocyte antigen class II molecule. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(3):1176-9.
  127. Kong YC, Lomo LC, Motte RW, Giraldo AA, Baisch J, Strauss G, et al. HLA-DRB1 polymorphism determines susceptibility to autoimmune thyroiditis in transgenic mice: definitive association with HLA-DRB1*0301 (DR3) gene. J Exp Med. 1996;184(3):1167-72.
  128. Ramgopal S, Rathika C, Padma MR, Murali V, Arun K, Kamaludeen MN, et al. Interaction of HLA-DRB1* alleles and CTLA4 (+49 AG) gene polymorphism in Autoimmune Thyroid Disease. Gene. 2018;642:430-8.
  129. Chen QY, Huang W, She JX, Baxter F, Volpe R, Maclaren NK. HLA-DRB1*08, DRB1*03/DRB3*0101, and DRB3*0202 are susceptibility genes for Graves' disease in North American Caucasians, whereas DRB1*07 is protective. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(9):3182-6.
  130. Thompson CB. Distinct roles for the costimulatory ligands B7-1 and B7-2 in T helper cell differentiation? Cell. 1995;81(7):979-82.
  131. Karandikar NJ, Vanderlugt CL, Walunas TL, Miller SD, Bluestone JA. CTLA-4: a negative regulator of autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 1996;184(2):783-8.
  132. Donner H, Rau H, Walfish PG, Braun J, Siegmund T, Finke R, et al. CTLA4 alanine-17 confers genetic susceptibility to Graves' disease and to type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(1):143-6.
  133. Yanagawa T, Hidaka Y, Guimaraes V, Soliman M, DeGroot LJ. CTLA-4 gene polymorphism associated with Graves' disease in a Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(1):41-5.
  134. Yanagawa T, Taniyama M, Enomoto S, Gomi K, Maruyama H, Ban Y, et al. CTLA4 gene polymorphism confers susceptibility to Graves' disease in Japanese. Thyroid. 1997;7(6):843-6.
  135. Heward JM, Allahabadia A, Armitage M, Hattersley A, Dodson PM, Macleod K, et al. The development of Graves' disease and the CTLA-4 gene on chromosome 2q33. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(7):2398-401.
  136. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Young ET, Kelly WF, Carr D, et al. The Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen-4 is a Major Graves' Disease Locus. Human Molecular Genetics. 1999;8(7):1195-9.
  137. Kouki T, Sawai Y, Gardine CA, Fisfalen ME, Alegre ML, DeGroot LJ. CTLA-4 gene polymorphism at position 49 in exon 1 reduces the inhibitory function of CTLA-4 and contributes to the pathogenesis of Graves' disease. J Immunol. 2000;165(11):6606-11.
  138. Zaletel K, Krhin B, Gaberscek S, Pirnat E, Hojker S. The influence of the exon 1 polymorphism of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 gene on thyroid antibody production in patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease. Thyroid. 2002;12(5):373-6.
  139. Adams BD, Parsons C, Walker L, Zhang WC, Slack FJ. Targeting noncoding RNAs in disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(3):761-71.
  140. Chen X, Huang F, Qi Y, Zhou M, Yin Q, Peng Y, et al. Serum and thyroid tissue level of let-7b and their correlation with TRAb in Graves’ disease. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2018;16(1):188.
  141. Al-Heety RA, Al-Hadithi HS, Turki KM. Correlation of circulating miRNA-146a-5p and let-7b expression with thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody in patients with graves disease. Gene Reports. 2020;19:100608.
  142. Martínez-Hernández R, Sampedro-Núñez M, Serrano-Somavilla A, Ramos-Leví AM, de la Fuente H, Triviño JC, et al. A MicroRNA Signature for Evaluation of Risk and Severity of Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2018;103(3):1139-50.
  143. Yin L, Zeng C, Yao J, Shen J. Emerging Roles for Noncoding RNAs in Autoimmune Thyroid Disease. Endocrinology. 2020;161(8).
  144. Zou J, Peng H, Liu Y. The Roles of Exosomes in Immunoregulation and Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;12:757674.
  145. Wang Y, Xu F, Zhong JY, Lin X, Shan SK, Guo B, et al. Exosomes as Mediators of Cell-to-Cell Communication in Thyroid Disease. Int J Endocrinol. 2020;2020:4378345.
  146. Rossi M, Taddei AR, Fasciani I, Maggio R, Giorgi F. The cell biology of the thyroid-disrupting mechanism of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT). J Endocrinol Invest. 2018;41(1):67-73.
  147. Edo N, Kawakami K, Fujita Y, Morita K, Uno K, Tsukamoto K, et al. Exosomes Expressing Thyrotropin Receptor Attenuate Autoantibody-Mediated Stimulation of Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Production. Thyroid. 2019;29(7):1012-7.
  148. Hiratsuka I, Yamada H, Munetsuna E, Hashimoto S, Itoh M. Circulating MicroRNAs in Graves' Disease in Relation to Clinical Activity. Thyroid. 2016;26(10):1431-40.
  149. Hodgson NM, Rajaii F. Current Understanding of the Progression and Management of Thyroid Associated Orbitopathy: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9(1):21-33.
  150. Han J-S, Kim SE, Jin J-Q, Park NR, Lee J-Y, Kim HL, et al. Tear-Derived Exosome Proteins Are Increased in Patients with Thyroid Eye Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(3):1115.
  151. Cuddihy RM, Dutton CM, Bahn RS. A polymorphism in the extracellular domain of the thyrotropin receptor is highly associated with autoimmune thyroid disease in females. Thyroid. 1995;5(2):89-95.
  152. Kotsa KD, Watson PF, Weetman AP. No association between a thyrotropin receptor gene polymorphism and Graves' disease in the female population. Thyroid. 1997;7(1):31-3.
  153. Tomer Y. Genetic susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disease: past, present, and future. Thyroid. 2010;20(7):715-25.
  154. Hiratani H, Bowden DW, Ikegami S, Shirasawa S, Shimizu A, Iwatani Y, et al. Multiple SNPs in intron 7 of thyrotropin receptor are associated with Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):2898-903.
  155. Kuś A, Szymański K, Jurecka-Lubieniecka B, Pawlak-Adamska E, Kula D, Miśkiewicz P, et al. Gender-dependent and age-of-onset-specific association of the rs11675434 single-nucleotide polymorphism near TPO with susceptibility to Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Journal of Human Genetics. 2017;62(3):373-7.
  156. Huang C-J, Jap T-S. A systematic review of genetic studies of thyroid disorders in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2015;78(3).
  157. Begum MN, Islam MT, Hossain SR, Bhuyan GS, Halim MA, Shahriar I, et al. Mutation Spectrum in TPO Gene of Bangladeshi Patients with Thyroid Dyshormonogenesis and Analysis of the Effects of Different Mutations on the Structural Features and Functions of TPO Protein through<i> In Silico</i> Approach. BioMed Research International. 2019;2019:9218903.
  158. Razmara E, Salehi M, Aslani S, Bitaraf A, Yousefi H, Colón JR, et al. Graves' disease: introducing new genetic and epigenetic contributors. J Mol Endocrinol. 2021;66(2):R33-r55.
  159. Citterio CE, Rivolta CM, Targovnik HM. Structure and genetic variants of thyroglobulin: Pathophysiological implications. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2021;528:111227.
  160. Ban Y, Taniyama M, Ban Y. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism is associated with Graves' disease in the Japanese population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(12):4639-43.
  161. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Young ET, Kelly WF, Carr D, et al. Evidence for a new Graves disease susceptibility locus at chromosome 18q21. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(5):1710-4.
  162. Tomer Y, Concepcion E, Greenberg DA. A C/T single-nucleotide polymorphism in the region of the CD40 gene is associated with Graves' disease. Thyroid. 2002;12(12):1129-35.
  163. Kurylowicz A, Kula D, Ploski R, Skorka A, Jurecka-Lubieniecka B, Zebracka J, et al. Association of CD40 gene polymorphism (C-1T) with susceptibility and phenotype of Graves' disease. Thyroid. 2005;15(10):1119-24.
  164. Shirasawa S, Harada H, Furugaki K, Akamizu T, Ishikawa N, Ito K, et al. SNPs in the promoter of a B cell-specific antisense transcript, SAS-ZFAT, determine susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(19):2221-31.
  165. Lopez ER, Zwermann O, Segni M, Meyer G, Reincke M, Seissler J, et al. A promoter polymorphism of the CYP27B1 gene is associated with Addison's disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Graves' disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus in Germans. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(2):193-7.
  166. Imani D, Rezaei R, Razi B, Alizadeh S, Mahmoudi M. Association Between IL6-174 G/C Polymorphism and Graves' Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Med Iran. 2017;55(11):665-71.
  167. Hiromatsu Y, Fukutani T, Ichimura M, Mukai T, Kaku H, Nakayama H, et al. Interleukin-13 gene polymorphisms confer the susceptibility of Japanese populations to Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(1):296-301.
  168. Liu N, Li X, Liu C, Zhao Y, Cui B, Ning G. The association of interleukin-1alpha and interleukin-1beta polymorphisms with the risk of Graves' disease in a case-control study and meta-analysis. Hum Immunol. 2010;71(4):397-401.
  169. Zeitlin AA, Simmonds MJ, Gough SC. Genetic developments in autoimmune thyroid disease: an evolutionary process. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;68(5):671-82.
  170. Tu Y, Fan G, Zeng T, Cai X, Kong W. Association of TNF-α promoter polymorphism and Graves' disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(2).
  171. Ban Y, Tozaki T, Taniyama M, Tomita M, Ban Y. The codon 620 single nucleotide polymorphism of the protein tyrosine phosphatase-22 gene does not contribute to autoimmune thyroid disease susceptibility in the Japanese. Thyroid. 2005;15(10):1115-8.
  172. Zhang Q, Liu S, Guan Y, Chen Q, Zhang Q, Min X. RNASET2, GPR174, and PTPN22 gene polymorphisms are related to the risk of liver damage associated with the hyperthyroidism in patients with Graves’ disease. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2018;32(2):e22258.
  173. Wawrusiewicz-Kurylonek N, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM, Gościk J, Myśliwiec J, Pawłowski P, Krętowski AJ. Association of PTPN22 polymorphism and its correlation with Graves' disease susceptibility in Polish adult population—A preliminary study. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 2019;7(6):e661.
  174. Valta M, Gazali AM, Viisanen T, Ihantola E-L, Ekman I, Toppari J, et al. Type 1 diabetes linked PTPN22 gene polymorphism is associated with the frequency of circulating regulatory T cells. European Journal of Immunology. 2020;50(4):581-8.
  175. Yuan M, Wei L, Zhou R, Bai Q, Wei Y, Zhang W, et al. Four FCRL3 Gene Polymorphisms (FCRL3_3, _5, _6, _8) Confer Susceptibility to Multiple Sclerosis: Results from a Case-Control Study. Molecular Neurobiology. 2016;53(3):2029-35.
  176. Fang Y, Li Y, Zeng J, Wang J, Liu R, Cao C. Genetic association of Fc receptor-like glycoprotein with susceptibility to Graves' disease in a Chinese Han population. Immunobiology. 2016;221(1):56-62.
  177. Schoenmakers EFPM, Wanschura S, Mols R, Bullerdiek J, Van den Berghe H, Van de Ven WJM. Recurrent rearrangements in the high mobility group protein gene, HMGI-C, in benign mesenchymal tumours. Nature Genetics. 1995;10(4):436-44.
  178. Yamada H, Watanabe M, Nanba T, Akamizu T, Iwatani Y. The +869T/C polymorphism in the transforming growth factor-beta1 gene is associated with the severity and intractability of autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151(3):379-82.
  179. Sutherland A, Davies J, Owen CJ, Vaikkakara S, Walker C, Cheetham TD, et al. Genomic polymorphism at the interferon-induced helicase (IFIH1) locus contributes to Graves' disease susceptibility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):3338-41.
  180. Vejrazkova D, Vcelak J, Vaclavikova E, Vankova M, Zajickova K, Duskova M, et al. Genetic predictors of the development and recurrence of Graves' disease. Physiol Res. 2018;67(Suppl 3):S431-s9.
  181. Calder EA, Penhale WJ, Barnes EW, Irvine WJ. Evidence for circulating immune complexes in thyroid disease. Br Med J. 1974;2(5909):30-1.
  182. Marinò M, Chiovato L, Friedlander JA, Latrofa F, Pinchera A, McCluskey RT. Serum antibodies against megalin (GP330) in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(7):2468-74.
  183. Morris JC, Bergert ER, Bryant WP. Binding of immunoglobulin G from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease to rat sodium-iodide symporter peptides: evidence for the iodide transporter as an autoantigen. Thyroid. 1997;7(4):527-34.
  184. Kubota S, Gunji K, Stolarski C, Kennerdell JS, Wall J. Reevaluation of the prevalences of serum autoantibodies reactive with "64-kd eye muscle proteins" in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Thyroid. 1998;8(2):175-9.
  185. Mori T, Kriss JP. Measurements by competitive binding radioassay of serum anti-microsomal and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies in Graves' disease and other thyroid disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1971;33(4):688-98.
  186. Wang PW, Huang MJ, Liu RT, Chen CD. Triiodothyronine autoantibodies in Graves' disease: their changes after antithyroid therapy and relationship with the thyroglobulin antibodies. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1990;122(1):22-8.
  187. Nakamura S, Sakata S, Shima H, Komaki T, Kojima N, Kamikubo K, et al. Thyroid hormone autoantibodies (THAA) in two cases of Graves' disease: effects of antithyroid drugs, prednisolone, and subtotal thyroidectomy. Endocrinol Jpn. 1986;33(6):751-9.
  188. Kasagi K, Kousaka T, Higuchi K, Iida Y, Misaki T, Alam MS, et al. Clinical significance of measurements of antithyroid antibodies in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis: comparison with histological findings. Thyroid. 1996;6(5):445-50.
  189. Amino N, Hagen SR, Yamada N, Refetoff S. Measurement of circulating thyroid microsomal antibodies by the tanned red cell haemagglutination technique: its usefulness in the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid diseases. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1976;5(2):115-25.
  190. Mullins RJ, Cohen SB, Webb LM, Chernajovsky Y, Dayan CM, Londei M, et al. Identification of thyroid stimulating hormone receptor-specific T cells in Graves' disease thyroid using autoantigen-transfected Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cell lines. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(1):30-7.
  191. Weetman AP, Gunn C, Hall R, McGregor AM. Thyroid autoantigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation in Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1985;17(1):1-6.
  192. Fisfalen ME, DeGroot LJ, Quintans J, Franklin WA, Soltani K. Microsomal antigen-reactive lymphocyte lines and clones derived from thyroid tissue of patients with Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;66(4):776-84.
  193. Soliman M, Kaplan E, Fisfalen ME, Okamoto Y, DeGroot LJ. T-cell reactivity to recombinant human thyrotropin receptor extracellular domain and thyroglobulin in patients with autoimmune and nonautoimmune thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(1):206-13.
  194. Aoki N, DeGroot J. Lymphocyte blastogenic response to human thyroglobulin in Graves' disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and metastatic thyroid cancer. Clin Exp Immunol. 1979;38(3):523-30.
  195. Inaba H, De Groot LJ, Akamizu T. Thyrotropin Receptor Epitope and Human Leukocyte Antigen in Graves' Disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016;7:120.
  196. Soliman M, Kaplan E, Yanagawa T, Hidaka Y, Fisfalen ME, DeGroot LJ. T-cells recognize multiple epitopes in the human thyrotropin receptor extracellular domain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(3):905-14.
  197. Kula D, Bednarczuk T, Jurecka-Lubieniecka B, Polanska J, Hasse-Lazar K, Jarzab M, et al. Interaction of HLA-DRB1 alleles with CTLA-4 in the predisposition to Graves' disease: the impact of DRB1*07. Thyroid. 2006;16(5):447-53.
  198. Tandon N, Freeman M, Weetman AP. T cell responses to synthetic thyroid peroxidase peptides in autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;86(1):56-60.
  199. Fisfalen ME, Soliman M, Okamoto Y, Soltani K, DeGroot LJ. Proliferative responses of T-cells to thyroid antigens and synthetic thyroid peroxidase peptides in autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(5):1597-604.
  200. Chiovato L, Bassi P, Santini F, Mammoli C, Lapi P, Carayon P, et al. Antibodies producing complement-mediated thyroid cytotoxicity in patients with atrophic or goitrous autoimmune thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77(6):1700-5.
  201. Rebuffat SA, Nguyen B, Robert B, Castex F, Peraldi-Roux S. Antithyroperoxidase antibody-dependent cytotoxicity in autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(3):929-34.
  202. Ploth DW, Fitz A, Schnetzler D, Seidenfeld J, Wilson CB. Thyroglobulin-anti-thyroglobulin immune complex glomerulonephritis complicating radioiodine therapy. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1978;9(3):327-34.
  203. Matsuura M, Kikkawa Y, Akashi K, Kitagawa T, Inage Z, Iwamori M, et al. Thyroid antigen-antibody nephritis: possible involvement of fucosyl-GM1 as the antigen. Endocrinol Jpn. 1987;34(4):587-93.
  204. Carvalho GAd, Perez CLS, Ward LS. Utilização dos testes de função tireoidiana na prática clínica. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia. 2013;57.
  205. Fröhlich E, Wahl R. Thyroid Autoimmunity: Role of Anti-thyroid Antibodies in Thyroid and Extra-Thyroidal Diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8:521.
  206. Tada H, Izumi Y, Watanabe Y, Takano T, Fukata S, Kuma K, et al. Blocking Type Anti-TSH Receptor Antibodies Detected by Radioreceptor Assay in Graves' Disease. Endocrine Journal. 2001;48(6):703-10.
  207. Kim WB, Chung HK, Park YJ, Park DJ, Tahara K, Kohn LD, et al. The Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Blocking Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies in Untreated Hyperthyroid Graves' Disease. Thyroid®. 2000;10(7):579-86.
  208. Roti E, Braverman LE, DeGroot LJ. TSH Receptor Antibody Measurement in the Diagnosis and Management of Graves’ Disease Is Rarely Necessaryb. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1998;83(11):3781-4.
  209. Kotwal A, Stan M. Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies-An Overview. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34(4S Suppl 1):S20-s7.
  210. Cárdenas Roldán J, Amaya-Amaya J, Castellanos-de la Hoz J, Giraldo-Villamil J, Montoya-Ortiz G, Cruz-Tapias P, et al. Autoimmune thyroid disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective. Arthritis. 2012;2012:864907.
  211. Yavasoglu I, Senturk T, Coskun A, Bolaman Z. Rheumatoid arthritis and anti-thyroid antibodies. Autoimmunity. 2009;42(2):168-9.
  212. Jenkins RC, Weetman AP. Disease associations with autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid. 2002;12(11):977-88.
  213. Ochi Y, DeGroot LJ. Vitiligo in Graves' disease. Ann Intern Med. 1969;71(5):935-40.
  214. Welti H. [Skin manifestations associated with severe forms of Basedow's disease]. Bull Schweiz Akad Med Wiss. 1968;23(5):476-82.
  215. Amoroso A, Garzia P, Pasquarelli C, Sportelli G, Afeltra A. Hashimoto's thyroiditis associated with urticaria and angio-oedema: disappearance of cutaneous and mucosal manifestations after thyroidectomy. J Clin Pathol. 1997;50(3):254-6.
  216. Marinó M, Ricciardi R, Pinchera A, Barbesino G, Manetti L, Chiovato L, et al. Mild clinical expression of myasthenia gravis associated with autoimmune thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(2):438-43.
  217. Sonnet E, Massart C, Gibassier J, Allannic H, Maugendre D. Longitudinal study of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in sera of patients with Graves' disease. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22(6):430-5.
  218. Marshall JS, Weisberger AS, Levy RP, Breckenridge RT. Coexistent Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hyperthyroidism. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1967;67(2):411-4.
  219. White RG, Bass BH, Williams E. Lymphadenoid goitre and the syndrome of systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 1961;1(7173):368-73.
  220. Tektonidou MG, Anapliotou M, Vlachoyiannopoulos P, Moutsopoulos HM. Presence of systemic autoimmune disorders in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(9):1159-61.
  221. Irvine WJ, Davies SH, Teitelbaum S, Delamore IW, Williams AW. The clinical and pathological significance of gastric parietal cell antibody. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965;124(2):657-91.
  222. Dittmar M, Kahaly GJ. Polyglandular Autoimmune Syndromes: Immunogenetics and Long-Term Follow-Up. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2003;88(7):2983-92.
  223. Katakura M, Yamada T, Aizawa T, Hiramatsu K, Yukimura Y, Ishihara M, et al. Presence of antideoxyribonucleic acid antibody in patients with hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64(3):405-8.
  224. Cowling DC, Mackay IR, Taft LI. Lupoid hepatitis. Lancet. 1956;271(6957):1323-6.
  225. Paggi A, Caccavo D, Ferri GM, Di Prima MA, Amoroso A, Vaccaro F, et al. Anti-cardiolipin antibodies in autoimmune thyroid diseases. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(3):329-33.
  226. Siddiqi A, Monson JP, Wood DF, Besser GM, Burrin JM. Serum cytokines in thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):435-9.
  227. Orgiazzi J, Williams DE, Chopra IJ, Solomon DH. Human thyroid adenyl cyclase-stimulating activity in immunoglobulin G of patients with Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42(2):341-54.
  228. Evans C, Morgenthaler NG, Lee S, Llewellyn DH, Clifton-Bligh R, John R, et al. Development of a luminescent bioassay for thyroid stimulating antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(1):374-7.
  229. Di Cerbo A, Di Paola R, Menzaghi C, De Filippis V, Tahara K, Corda D, et al. Graves' immunoglobulins activate phospholipase A2 by recognizing specific epitopes on thyrotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(9):3283-92.
  230. Smyth PP, McMullan NM, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, O'Donovan DK. Thyroid growth-stimulating immunoglobulins in goitrous disease: relationship to thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1986;111(3):321-30.
  231. Endo K, Kasagi K, Konishi J, Ikekubo K, Okuno T, Takeda Y, et al. Detection and properties of TSH-binding inhibitor immunoglobulins in patients with Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1978;46(5):734-9.
  232. Irvine WJ, Lamberg BA, Cullen DR, Gordin R. Primary hypothyroidism preceding thyrotoxicosis: a report of 2 cases and a review of the literature. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1979;2(4):349-52.
  233. Eckstein AK, Plicht M, Lax H, Neuhäuser M, Mann K, Lederbogen S, et al. Thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies are independent risk factors for Graves' ophthalmopathy and help to predict severity and outcome of the disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(9):3464-70.
  234. Morshed SA, Davies TF. Graves' Disease Mechanisms: The Role of Stimulating, Blocking, and Cleavage Region TSH Receptor Antibodies. Horm Metab Res. 2015;47(10):727-34.
  235. Morshed SA, Ando T, Latif R, Davies TF. Neutral Antibodies to the TSH Receptor Are Present in Graves’ Disease and Regulate Selective Signaling Cascades. Endocrinology. 2010;151(11):5537-49.
  236. Ando T, Latif R, Daniel S, Eguchi K, Davies TF. Dissecting linear and conformational epitopes on the native thyrotropin receptor. Endocrinology. 2004;145(11):5185-93.
  237. Misrahi M, Milgrom E. Cleavage and shedding of the TSH receptor. Eur J Endocrinol. 1997;137(6):599-602.
  238. McKenzie JM. FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR A THYROID ACTIVATOR IN HYPERTHYROIDISM*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1960;20(3):380-8.
  239. Takasu N, Oshiro C, Akamine H, Komiya I, Nagata A, Sato Y, et al. Thyroid-stimulating antibody and TSH-binding inhibitor immunoglobulin in 277 Graves' patients and in 686 normal subjects. J Endocrinol Invest. 1997;20(8):452-61.
  240. Stan MN, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Murthy V, Thapa P, Araki N. Diagnostic Utility of a New Assay for Thyroid Stimulating Immunoglobulins in Graves' Disease and Thyroid Eye Disease. Thyroid®. 2021;32(2):170-6.
  241. McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. Thyrotropin-blocking autoantibodies and thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies: potential mechanisms involved in the pendulum swinging from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism or vice versa. Thyroid. 2013;23(1):14-24.
  242. Ahmad E, Hafeez K, Arshad MF, Isuga J, Vrettos A. Hypothyroidism conversion to hyperthyroidism: it's never too late. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2018;2018.
  243. Kuzuya N, Chiu SC, Ikeda H, Uchimura H, Ito K, Nagataki S. Correlation between thyroid stimulators and 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine suppressibility in patients during treatment for hyperthyroidism with thionamide drugs: comparison of assays by thyroid-stimulating and thyrotropin-displacing activities. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979;48(4):706-11.
  244. Visscher SL, Naessens JM, Yawn BP, Reinalda MS, Anderson SS, Borah BJ. Developing a standardized healthcare cost data warehouse. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):396.
  245. Soliman M, Kaplan E, Abdel-Latif A, Scherberg N, DeGroot LJ. Does thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine therapy, or antithyroid drug treatment alter reactivity of patients' T cells to epitopes of thyrotropin receptor in autoimmune thyroid diseases? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(8):2312-21.
  246. Fenzi G, Hashizume K, Roudebush CP, DeGroot LJ. Changes in thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins during antithyroid therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979;48(4):572-6.
  247. Mukhtar ED, Smith BR, Pyle GA, Hall R, Vice P. Relation of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins to thyroid function and effects of surgery, radioiodine, and antithyroid drugs. Lancet. 1975;1(7909):713-5.
  248. Nygaard B, Metcalfe RA, Phipps J, Weetman AP, Hegedüs L. Graves' disease and thyroid associated ophthalmopathy triggered by 131I treatment of non-toxic goiter. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22(6):481-5.
  249. Pichurin P, Pham N, David CS, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM. HLA-DR3 transgenic mice immunized with adenovirus encoding the thyrotropin receptor: T cell epitopes and functional analysis of the CD40 Graves' polymorphism. Thyroid. 2006;16(12):1221-7.
  250. Inaba H, Pan D, Shin YH, Martin W, Buchman G, De Groot LJ. Immune response of mice transgenic for human histocompatibility leukocyte Antigen-DR to human thyrotropin receptor-extracellular domain. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1271-80.
  251. Pearce SHS, Dayan C, Wraith DC, Barrell K, Olive N, Jansson L, et al. Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy with Thyrotropin Receptor Peptides in Graves' Hyperthyroidism: A Phase I Study. Thyroid. 2019;29(7):1003-11.
  252. Jansson L, Vrolix K, Jahraus A, Martin KF, Wraith DC. Immunotherapy With Apitopes Blocks the Immune Response to TSH Receptor in HLA-DR Transgenic Mice. Endocrinology. 2018;159(9):3446-57.
  253. Diana T, Olivo PD, Kahaly GJ. Thyrotropin Receptor Blocking Antibodies. Horm Metab Res. 2018;50(12):853-62.
  254. Núñez Miguel R, Sanders P, Allen L, Evans M, Holly M, Johnson W, et al. Structure of full-length TSH receptor in complex with antibody K1-70™. J Mol Endocrinol. 2023;70(1).
  255. Fisfalen ME, Palmer EM, Van Seventer GA, Soltani K, Sawai Y, Kaplan E, et al. Thyrotropin-receptor and thyroid peroxidase-specific T cell clones and their cytokine profile in autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(11):3655-63.
  256. Ferrari SM, Paparo SR, Ragusa F, Elia G, Mazzi V, Patrizio A, et al. Chemokines in thyroid autoimmunity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;37(2):101773.
  257. Hiromatsu Y, Yang D, Bednarczuk T, Miyake I, Nonaka K, Inoue Y. Cytokine Profiles in Eye Muscle Tissue and Orbital Fat Tissue from Patients with Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2000;85(3):1194-9.
  258. Wakelkamp IM, Gerding MN, Van Der Meer JW, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM. Both Th1- and Th2-derived cytokines in serum are elevated in Graves' ophthalmopathy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2000;121(3):453-7.
  259. Zheng L, Ye P, Liu C. The role of the IL-23/IL-17 axis in the pathogenesis of Graves' disease. Endocr J. 2013;60(5):591-7.
  260. Kościuszko M, Popławska-Kita A, Pawłowski P, Lipińska D, Hryniewicka J, Jankowska D, et al. Clinical relevance of estimating circulating interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 during methylprednisolone therapy in Graves’ orbitopathy: A preliminary study. Advances in Medical Sciences. 2021;66(2):315-20.
  261. Inaba H, Martin W, Ardito M, De Groot AS, De Groot LJ. The role of glutamic or aspartic acid in position four of the epitope binding motif and thyrotropin receptor-extracellular domain epitope selection in Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2909-16.
  262. Crisp M, Starkey KJ, Lane C, Ham J, Ludgate M. Adipogenesis in thyroid eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(11):3249-55.
  263. Bell A, Gagnon A, Grunder L, Parikh SJ, Smith TJ, Sorisky A. Functional TSH receptor in human abdominal preadipocytes and orbital fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279(2):C335-40.
  264. Haraguchi K, Shimura H, Kawaguchi A, Ikeda M, Endo T, Onaya T. Effects of thyrotropin on the proliferation and differentiation of cultured rat preadipocytes. Thyroid. 1999;9(6):613-9.
  265. Kasagi K, Konishi J, Endo K, Mori T, Nagahara K, Makimoto K, et al. Adenylate cyclase activity in thyroid tissue from patients with untreated Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(3):492-9.
  266. Intenzo CM, dePapp AE, Jabbour S, Miller JL, Kim SM, Capuzzi DM. Scintigraphic manifestations of thyrotoxicosis. Radiographics. 2003;23(4):857-69.
  267. Acland JD. The interpretation of the serum protein-bound iodine: A review. J Clin Pathol. 1971;24(3):187-218.
  268. Farran HE, Shalom ES. Effect of L-tyrosine upon the protein bound iodine in thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1966;26(8):918-20.
  269. Sterling K, Chodos RB. Radiothyroxine turnover studies in myxedema, thyrotoxicosis, and hypermetabolism without endocrine disease. J Clin Invest. 1956;35(7):806-13.
  270. Ingbar SH, Freinkel N. Studies of thyroid function and the peripheral metabolism of I 131-labeled thyroxine in patients with treated Graves disease. J Clin Invest. 1958;37(11):1603-14.
  271. Uller RP, Van Herle AJ. Effect of therapy on serum thyroglobulin levels in patients with Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1978;46(5):747-55.
  272. Greer MA, Smith GE. Method for increasing the accuracy of the radioiodine uptake as a test for thyroid function by the use of desiccated thyroid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1954;14(11):1374-84.
  273. Werner SC, Spooner M. A new and simple test for hyperthyroidism employing L-triiodothyronine and the twenty-four hour I-131 uptake method. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1955;31(2):137-45.
  274. Raben MS. The paradoxical effects of thiocyanate and of thyrotropin on the organic binding of iodine by the thyroid in the presence of large amounts of iodide. Endocrinology. 1949;45(3):296-304.
  275. Suzuki H, Mashimo K. Significance of the iodide-perchlorate discharge test in patients with 131 I-treated and untreated hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972;34(2):332-8.
  276. Uchida T, Shimamura M, Taka H, Kaga N, Miura Y, Nishida Y, et al. The Effect of Long-Term Inorganic Iodine on Intrathyroidal Iodothyronine Content and Gene Expression in Mice with Graves' Hyperthyroidism. Thyroid. 2023;33(3):330-7.
  277. Ochi Y, DeGroot LJ. TSH- or LATS-stimulated thyroid hormone release is inhibited by iodide. Endocrinology. 1969;84(6):1305-9.
  278. Grollman EF, Smolar A, Ommaya A, Tombaccini D, Santisteban P. Iodine Suppression of Iodide Uptake in FRTL-5 Thyroid Cells. Endocrinology. 1986;118(6):2477-82.
  279. Granner DK, Scranton JR, Curtis SJ. Kinetic analysis of thyroidal iodide concentration in hypophysectomized rats fed high or low iodine diets. Endocrinology. 1963;72:503-4.
  280. Sherwin JR, Tong W. The actions of iodide and TSH on thyroid cells showing a dual control system for the iodide pump. Endocrinology. 1974;94(5):1465-74.
  281. Sato S, Noh JY, Sato S, Suzuki M, Yasuda S, Matsumoto M, et al. Comparison of efficacy and adverse effects between methimazole 15 mg+inorganic iodine 38 mg/day and methimazole 30 mg/day as initial therapy for Graves' disease patients with moderate to severe hyperthyroidism. Thyroid. 2015;25(1):43-50.
  282. Takata K, Amino N, Kubota S, Sasaki I, Nishihara E, Kudo T, et al. Benefit of short-term iodide supplementation to antithyroid drug treatment of thyrotoxicosis due to Graves' disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(6):845-50.
  283. Krieger CC, Neumann S, Place RF, Marcus-Samuels B, Gershengorn MC. Bidirectional TSH and IGF-1 receptor cross talk mediates stimulation of hyaluronan secretion by Graves' disease immunoglobins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(3):1071-7.
  284. Neumann S, Krieger Christine C, Gershengorn Marvin C. Targeting TSH and IGF-1 Receptors to Treat Thyroid Eye Disease. European Thyroid Journal. 2020;9(Suppl. 1):59-65.
  285. Minich WB, Dehina N, Welsink T, Schwiebert C, Morgenthaler NG, Köhrle J, et al. Autoantibodies to the IGF1 receptor in Graves' orbitopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(2):752-60.
  286. Heimann P. ULTRASTRUCTURE OF HUMAN THYROID. Acta Endocrinologica (Norway). 1966;53(2_Supplement):S6-S102.
  287. LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. The Pathology of Hyperthyroidism. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2018;9.
  288. Bostrom H, Hed R. Thyrotoxic myopathy and polymyositis in elderly patients; differential-diagnostic viewpoints. Acta Med Scand. 1958;162(3):225-30.
  289. McEachern D, Ross WD. CHRONIC THYROTOXIC MYOPATHY1: A REPORT OF THREE CASES WITH A REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY REPORTED CASES. Brain. 1942;65(2):181-92.
  290. Rundle FF, Finlay-Jones LR, Noad KB. MALIGNANT EXOPHTHALMOS: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ORBITAL TISSUES. Australasian Annals of Medicine. 1953;2(2):128-35.
  291. Dudgeon LS, Urquhart AL. LYMPHORRHAGES IN THE MUSCLES IN EXOPHTHALMIC GOITRE. Brain. 1926;49(2):182-6.
  292. Ezrin C, Swanson HE, Humphrey JG, Dawson JW, Hill FM. THE CELLS OF THE HUMAN ADENOHYPOPHYSIS IN THYROID DISORDERS*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1959;19(8):958-66.
  293. Scheithauer BW, Kovacs KT, Young WF, Jr., Randall RV. The pituitary gland in hyperthyroidism. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67(1):22-6.
  294. Movitt ER, Gerstl B, Davis AE. NEEDLE LIVER BIOPSY IN THYROTOXICOSIS. AMA Archives of Internal Medicine. 1953;91(6):729-39.
  295. Piper J, Poulsen E. Liver biopsy in thyrotoxicosis. Acta Med Scand. 1947;127(4):439-47.
  296. Okosieme OE, Taylor PN, Evans C, Thayer D, Chai A, Khan I, et al. Primary therapy of Graves' disease and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: a linked-record cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(4):278-87.
  297. Harrison SA, Bedossa P, Guy CD, Schattenberg JM, Loomba R, Taub R, et al. A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Resmetirom in NASH with Liver Fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(6):497-509.
  298. Fallon MD, Perry HM, 3rd, Bergfeld M, Droke D, Teitelbaum SL, Avioli LV. Exogenous hyperthyroidism with osteoporosis. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(3):442-4.
  299. Follis RH, Jr. Skeletal changes associated with hyperthyroidism. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1953;92(6):405-21.
  300. Hershman JM. Human chorionic gonadotropin and the thyroid: hyperemesis gravidarum and trophoblastic tumors. Thyroid. 1999;9(7):653-7.
  301. Nguyen CT, Sasso EB, Barton L, Mestman JH. Graves' hyperthyroidism in pregnancy: a clinical review. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;4:4.
  302. White WH. On the Prognosis of Secondary Symptoms and Conditions of Exophthalmic Goitre. Br Med J. 1886;2(1334):151-3.
  303. Sattler H. Basedow's disease. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1952.
  304. Arnold BM, Casal G, Higgins HP. Apathetic thyrotoxicosis. Can Med Assoc J. 1974;111(9):957-8.
  305. Leblond CP, Fertman MB, et al. Radio-iodine autography in studies of human goitrous thyroid glands. Arch Pathol (Chic). 1946;41:510-5.
  306. Collazo-Clavell ML, Gharib H, Maragos NE. Relationship between vocal cord paralysis and benign thyroid disease. Head Neck. 1995;17(1):24-30.
  307. Mahaux JE, Chamla-Soumenkoff J, Delcourt R, Levin S. Painful enlargement of left subtrapezoid lymph nodes in Graves's disease. Br Med J. 1971;1(5745):384.
  308. Rumbyrt JS, Schocket AL. Chronic urticaria and thyroid disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2004;24(2):215-23, vi.
  309. Fatourechi V, Garrity JA, Bartley GB, Bergstralh EJ, Gorman CA. Orbital decompression in Graves' ophthalmopathy associated with pretibial myxedema. J Endocrinol Invest. 1993;16(6):433-7.
  310. Bartley GB, Fatourechi V, Kadrmas EF, Jacobsen SJ, Ilstrup DM, Garrity JA, et al. The incidence of Graves' ophthalmopathy in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(4):511-7.
  311. Swanson JW, Kelly JJ, Jr., McConahey WM. Neurologic aspects of thyroid dysfunction. Mayo Clin Proc. 1981;56(8):504-12.
  312. Brownlie BE, Rae AM, Walshe JW, Wells JE. Psychoses associated with thyrotoxicosis - 'thyrotoxic psychosis.' A report of 18 cases, with statistical analysis of incidence. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;142(5):438-44.
  313. Adams R, Oh ES, Yasar S, Lyketsos CG, Mammen JS. Endogenous and Exogenous Thyrotoxicosis and Risk of Incident Cognitive Disorders in Older Adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(12):1324-31.
  314. Gold HK, Spann JF, Jr., Braunwald E. Effect of alterations in the thyroid state on the intrinsic contractile properties of isolated rat skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest. 1970;49(4):849-54.
  315. Woodbury DM, Hurley RE, Lewis NG, McArthur MW, Copeland WW, Kirschvink JF, et al. Effect of thyroxin, thyroidectomy and 6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil on brain function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1952;106(3):331-40.
  316. Ravera JJ, Cervino JM, Fernandez G, Ferrari Forcade A, Malosetti H, Muxi F, et al. Two cases of Graves' disease with signs of a pyramidal lesion. Improvement in neurologic signs during treatment with antithyroid drugs. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1960;20:876-80.
  317. Feibel JH, Campa JF. Thyrotoxic neuropathy (Basedow's paraplegia). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39(5):491-7.
  318. WaldenstrÖM JAN. Acute Thyrotoxic Encephalo- or Myopathy, its cause and treatment. Acta Medica Scandinavica. 1945;121(2-3):251-94.
  319. Condon JV, Becka DR, Gibbs FA. Electroencephalographic abnormalities in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1954;14(12):1511-8.
  320. Cantón A, de Fàbregas O, Tintoré M, Mesa J, Codina A, Simó R. Encephalopathy associated to autoimmune thyroid disease: a more appropriate term for an underestimated condition? J Neurol Sci. 2000;176(1):65-9.
  321. Priest WM. Chronic thyrotoxic myopathy. Br Med J. 1967;4(5574):295-6.
  322. Whitfield AGW, Hudson WA. CHRONIC THYROTOXIC MYOPATHY. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 1961;30(3):257-67.
  323. Sanderson KV, Adey WR. Electromyographic and endocrine studies in chronic thyrotoxic myopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1952;15(3):200-5.
  324. Zürcher RM, Horber FF, Grünig BE, Frey FJ. Effect of thyroid dysfunction on thigh muscle efficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(5):1082-6.
  325. Erkintalo M, Bendahan D, Mattéi JP, Fabreguettes C, Vague P, Cozzone PJ. Reduced metabolic efficiency of skeletal muscle energetics in hyperthyroid patients evidenced quantitatively by in vivo phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Metabolism. 1998;47(7):769-76.
  326. Fitch CD, Coker R, Dinning JS. Metabolism of creatine-1-C14 by vitamin E-deficient and hyperthyroid rats. Am J Physiol. 1960;198:1232-4.
  327. Thorn GW. CREATINE STUDIES IN THYROID DISORDERS. Endocrinology. 1936;20:628-34.
  328. Drachman DB. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1797-810.
  329. Engel AG. Thyroid function and periodic paralysis. Am J Med. 1961;30:327-33.
  330. Ober KP. Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis in the United States. Report of 7 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 1992;71(3):109-20.
  331. Kelley DE, Gharib H, Kennedy FP, Duda RJ, Jr., McManis PG. Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. Report of 10 cases and review of electromyographic findings. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(11):2597-600.
  332. Hsieh MJ, Lyu RK, Chang WN, Chang KH, Chen CM, Chang HS, et al. Hypokalemic thyrotoxic periodic paralysis: clinical characteristics and predictors of recurrent paralytic attacks. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15(6):559-64.
  333. Lin SH, Huang CL. Mechanism of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(6):985-8.
  334. Gbefon CY, Sobral CPS, Caldas A, Rocha VCC, Azulay RSS, Nascimento GC, et al. Genetic Screening of Patients with Thyrotoxic Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in the Northeast of Brazil. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2021;21(12):2231-7.
  335. Brugnoni R, Canioni E, Filosto M, Pini A, Tonin P, Rossi T, et al. Mutations associated with hypokalemic periodic paralysis: from hotspot regions to complete analysis of CACNA1S and SCN4A genes. Neurogenetics. 2022;23(1):19-25.
  336. Rhee EP, Scott JA, Dighe AS. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 4-2012. A 37-year-old man with muscle pain, weakness, and weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(6):553-60.
  337. Fisher J. Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis with ventricular fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142(7):1362-4.
  338. Siafakas NM, Milona I, Salesiotou V, Filaditaki V, Tzanakis N, Bouros D. Respiratory muscle strength in hyperthyroidism before and after treatment. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146(4):1025-9.
  339. Stein M, Kimbel P, Johnson RL. PULMONARY FUNCTION IN HYPERTHYROIDISM. J Clin Invest. 1961;40(2):348-63.
  340. Massey DG, Becklake MR, McKenzie JM, Bates DV. Circulatory and ventilatory response to exercise in thyrotoxicosis. N Engl J Med. 1967;276(20):1104-12.
  341. Sandler G, Wilson GM. The nature and prognosis of heart disease in thyrotoxicosis. A review of 150 patients treated with 131 I. Q J Med. 1959;28:347-69.
  342. McDevitt DG, Shanks RG, Hadden DR, Montgomery DA, Weaver JA. The role of the thyroid in the control of heart-rate. Lancet. 1968;1(7550):998-1000.
  343. Pietras RJ, Real MA, Poticha GS, Bronsky D, Waldstein SS. Cardiovascular response in hyperthyroidism. The influence of adrenergic-receptor blockade. Arch Intern Med. 1972;129(3):426-9.
  344. DeGroot W, Leonard J, Paley H, Johnson J, Warren J. The importance of autonomic integrity in maintaining the hyperkinetic circulatory dynamics of human hyperthyroidism. J Clin Invest. 1961;40(June):1033.
  345. Auer J, Scheibner P, Mische T, Langsteger W, Eber O, Eber B. Subclinical hyperthyroidism as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2001;142(5):838-42.
  346. Blizzard JJ, Rupp JJ. Prolongation of the P-R interval as a manifestation of thyrotoxicosis. Jama. 1960;173:1845.
  347. Tayal B, Graff C, Selmer C, Kragholm KH, Kihlstrom M, Nielsen JB, et al. Thyroid dysfunction and electrocardiographic changes in subjects without arrhythmias: a cross-sectional study of primary healthcare subjects from Copenhagen. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e023854.
  348. Buccino RA, Spann JFJ, Sonnenblick EH, Braunwald E. Effect of Thyroid State on Myocardial Contractility. Endocrinology. 1968;82(1):191-2.
  349. Reynolds JL, Woody HB. Thyrotoxic mitral regurgitation: a probable form of intrinsic papillary muscle dysfunction. Am J Dis Child. 1971;122(6):544-8.
  350. Rodbard D, Fujita T, Rodbard S. Estimation of thyroid function by timing the arterial sounds. Jama. 1967;201(11):884-7.
  351. Klein I, Danzi S. Thyroid disease and the heart. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1725-35.
  352. Rowe GG, Huston JH, Weinstein AB, Tuchman H, Brown JF, Crumpton CW. The hemodynamics of thyrotoxicosis in man with special reference to coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen metabolism. J Clin Invest. 1956;35(3):272-6.
  353. Biondi B, Fazio S, Cuocolo A, Sabatini D, Nicolai E, Lombardi G, et al. Impaired cardiac reserve and exercise capacity in patients receiving long-term thyrotropin suppressive therapy with levothyroxine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(12):4224-8.
  354. Graettinger JS, Muenster JJ, Selverstone LA, Campbell JA. A correlation of clinical and hemodynamic studies in patients with hyperthyroidism with and without congestive heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1959;38(8):1316-27.
  355. Smit JW, Eustatia-Rutten CF, Corssmit EP, Pereira AM, Frölich M, Bleeker GB, et al. Reversible diastolic dysfunction after long-term exogenous subclinical hyperthyroidism: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(11):6041-7.
  356. Resnekov L, Falicov RE. Thyrotoxicosis and lactate-producing angina pectoris with normal coronary arteries. Br Heart J. 1977;39(10):1051-7.
  357. Choi YH, Chung JH, Bae SW, Lee WH, Jeong EM, Kang MG, et al. Severe coronary artery spasm can be associated with hyperthyroidism. Coron Artery Dis. 2005;16(3):135-9.
  358. Martí V, Ballester M, Rigla M, Narula J, Bernà L, Pons-Lladó G, et al. Myocardial damage does not occur in untreated hyperthyroidism unless associated with congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 1997;134(6):1133-7.
  359. Kotler MN, Michaelides KM, Bouchard RJ, Warbasse JR. Myocardial infarction associated with thyrotoxicosis. Arch Intern Med. 1973;132(5):723-8.
  360. Levey GS, Klein I. Catecholamine-thyroid hormone interactions and the cardiovascular manifestations of hyperthyroidism. Am J Med. 1990;88(6):642-6.
  361. Mintz G, Pizzarello R, Klein I. Enhanced left ventricular diastolic function in hyperthyroidism: noninvasive assessment and response to treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73(1):146-50.
  362. Valcavi R, Menozzi C, Roti E, Zini M, Lolli G, Roti S, et al. Sinus node function in hyperthyroid patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(1):239-42.
  363. Smolenski RT, Yacoub MH, Seymour A-ML. Hyperthyroidism increases adenosine transport and metabolism in the rat heart. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 1995;143(2):143-9.
  364. Brent GA. The molecular basis of thyroid hormone action. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(13):847-53.
  365. Klein I, Ojamaa K. Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(7):501-9.
  366. Schmidt BM, Martin N, Georgens AC, Tillmann HC, Feuring M, Christ M, et al. Nongenomic cardiovascular effects of triiodothyronine in euthyroid male volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1681-6.
  367. Davis PJ, Davis FB. Nongenomic actions of thyroid hormone on the heart. Thyroid. 2002;12(6):459-66.
  368. Hönes GS, Rakov H, Logan J, Liao XH, Werbenko E, Pollard AS, et al. Noncanonical thyroid hormone signaling mediates cardiometabolic effects in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(52):E11323-e32.
  369. Dillmann WH. Biochemical basis of thyroid hormone action in the heart. Am J Med. 1990;88(6):626-30.
  370. Tse J, Wrenn RW, Kuo JF. Thyroxine-induced changes in characteristics and activities of beta-adrenergic receptors and adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate and guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate systems in the heart may be related to reputed catecholamine supersensitivity in hyperthyroidism. Endocrinology. 1980;107(1):6-16.
  371. Williams LT, Lefkowitz RJ, Watanabe AM, Hathaway DR, Besch HR, Jr. Thyroid hormone regulation of beta-adrenergic receptor number. J Biol Chem. 1977;252(8):2787-9.
  372. Fatourechi V, Edwards WD. Graves' disease and low-output cardiac dysfunction: implications for autoimmune disease in endomyocardial biopsy tissue from eleven patients. Thyroid. 2000;10(7):601-5.
  373. Nightingale S, Vitek PJ, Himsworth RL. The haematology of hyperthyroidism. Q J Med. 1978;47(185):35-47.
  374. Viherkoski M, Lamberg BA. The Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity (G-6-PD) of the Red Blood Cells in Hyperthyroidism and Hypothyroidism. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 1970;25(2):137-43.
  375. Popovic WJ, Brown JE, Adamson JW. The influence of thyroid hormones on in vitro erythropoiesis. Mediation by a receptor with beta adrenergic properties. J Clin Invest. 1977;60(4):907-13.
  376. Rivlin RS, Wagner HN, Jr. Anemia in hyperthyroidism. Ann Intern Med. 1969;70(3):507-16.
  377. Bergman TA, Mariash CN, Oppenheimer JH. Anterior mediastinal mass in a patient with Graves' disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;55(3):587-8.
  378. Huang W, Molitch ME. Enlarged thymus in a patient with dyspnea and weight loss. Jama. 2015;313(21):2174-5.
  379. Irvine WJ, Wu FC, Urbaniak SJ, Toolis F. Peripheral blood leucocytes in thyrotoxicosis (Graves' disease) as studied by conventional light microscopy. Clin Exp Immunol. 1977;27(2):216-21.
  380. Hertz S, Lerman J. THE BLOOD PICTURE IN EXOPHTHALMIC GOITRE AND ITS CHANGES RESULTING FROM IODINE AND OPERATION. A STUDY BY MEANS OF THE SUPRAVITAL TECHNIQUE. J Clin Invest. 1932;11(6):1179-96.
  381. Lima CS, Zantut Wittmann DE, Castro V, Tambascia MA, Lorand-Metze I, Saad ST, et al. Pancytopenia in untreated patients with Graves' disease. Thyroid. 2006;16(4):403-9.
  382. Lamberg BA, Kivikangas V, Pelkonen R, Vuopio P. Thrombocytopenia and decreased life-span of thrombocytes in hyperthyroidism. Ann Clin Res. 1971;3(2):98-102.
  383. Adrouny A, Sandler RM, Carmel R. Variable presentation of thrombocytopenia in Graves' disease. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142(8):1460-4.
  384. Verberne HJ, Fliers E, Prummel MF, Stam J, Brandjes DP, Wiersinga WM. Thyrotoxicosis as a predisposing factor for cerebral venous thrombosis. Thyroid. 2000;10(7):607-10.
  385. Davis PJ, Mousa SA, Schechter GP. New Interfaces of Thyroid Hormone Actions With Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2018;24(7):1014-9.
  386. Wegener M, Wedmann B, Langhoff T, Schaffstein J, Adamek R. Effect of hyperthyroidism on the transit of a caloric solid-liquid meal through the stomach, the small intestine, and the colon in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(3):745-9.
  387. Lerman J, Means JH. THE GASTRIC SECRETION IN EXOPHTHALMIC GOITRE AND MYXOEDEMA. J Clin Invest. 1932;11(1):167-82.
  388. Berryhill WR, Williams HA. A STUDY OF THE GASTRIC SECRETION IN HYPERTHYROIDISM BEFORE AND AFTER OPERATION. J Clin Invest. 1932;11(4):753-60.
  389. Siurala M, Lamberg BA. Stomach in thyrotoxicosis. Acta Med Scand. 1959;165:181-8.
  390. Seino Y, Matsukura S, Miyamoto Y, Goto Y, Taminato T, Imura H. Hypergastrinemia in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;43(4):852-5.
  391. Scappaticcio L, Longo M, Maiorino MI, Pernice V, Caruso P, Esposito K, et al. Abnormal Liver Blood Tests in Patients with Hyperthyroidism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thyroid. 2021;31(6):884-94.
  392. Lamberg BA, Gordin R. Liver Function in Thyrotoxicosis: Studies on the Cholesterol and Prothrombin Level in the Blood During the Treatment of Thyrotoxicosis. Acta Endocrinologica (Norway). 1954;15(1):82-96.
  393. Thompson P, Jr., Strum D, Boehm T, Wartofsky L. Abnormalities of liver function tests in tyrotoxicosis. Mil Med. 1978;143(8):548-51.
  394. Greenberger NJ, Milligan FD, Degroot LJ, Isselbacher KJ. JAUNDICE AND THYROTOXICOSIS IN THE ABSENCE OF CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE. A STUDY OF FOUR CASES. Am J Med. 1964;36:840-6.
  395. Kubota S, Amino N, Matsumoto Y, Ikeda N, Morita S, Kudo T, et al. Serial changes in liver function tests in patients with thyrotoxicosis induced by Graves' disease and painless thyroiditis. Thyroid. 2008;18(3):283-7.
  396. Yorke E. Hyperthyroidism and Liver Dysfunction: A Review of a Common Comorbidity. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022;15:11795514221074672.
  397. de Campos Mazo DF, de Vasconcelos GB, Pereira MA, de Mello ES, Bacchella T, Carrilho FJ, et al. Clinical spectrum and therapeutic approach to hepatocellular injury in patients with hyperthyroidism. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2013;6:9-17.
  398. Youssef WI, Mullen KD. The liver in other (nondiabetic) endocrine disorders. Clin Liver Dis. 2002;6(4):879-89, vii.
  399. Piantanida E, Ippolito S, Gallo D, Masiello E, Premoli P, Cusini C, et al. The interplay between thyroid and liver: implications for clinical practice. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43(7):885-99.
  400. Epstein FH, Rivera MJ. Renal concentrating ability in thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1958;18(10):1135-7.
  401. Ford RV, Owens JC, Curd GW, Jr., Moyer JH, Spurr CL. Kidney function in various thyroid states. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961;21:548-53.
  402. Sataline LR, Powell C, Hamwi GJ. Suppression of the hypercalcemia of thyrotoxicosis by corticosteroids. N Engl J Med. 1962;267:646-50.
  403. Sallin O. Hypercalcemic Nephropathy in Thyrotoxicosis. Acta Endocrinologica (Norway). 1958;29(3):425-34.
  404. Goldsmith RE, Sturgis SH, Lerman J, Stanbury JB. The menstrual pattern in thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1952;12(7):846-55.
  405. Sanjari M, Safi Z, Tahroodi KM. HYPERTHYROIDISM AND HYPERPROLACTINEMIA: IS THERE ANY ASSOCIATION? Endocr Pract. 2016;22(12):1377-82.
  406. Freedberg IM, Hamolsky MW, Freedberg AS. The thyroid gland in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1957;256(11):505-10; contd.
  407. De Groot L, Abalovich M, Alexander EK, Amino N, Barbour L, Cobin RH, et al. Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(8):2543-65.
  408. Polak M, Le Gac I, Vuillard E, Guibourdenche J, Leger J, Toubert ME, et al. Fetal and neonatal thyroid function in relation to maternal Graves' disease. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;18(2):289-302.
  409. Anselmo J, Cao D, Karrison T, Weiss RE, Refetoff S. Fetal loss associated with excess thyroid hormone exposure. Jama. 2004;292(6):691-5.
  410. Southren AL, Olivo J, Gordon GG, Vittek J, Brener J, Rafii F. The conversion of androgens to estrogens in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;38(2):207-14.
  411. Chopra IJ, Tulchinsky DAN. Status of Estrogen-Androgen Balance in Hyperthyroid Men with Graves' Disease. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1974;38(2):269-77.
  412. Chopra IJ, Abraham GE, Chopra U, Solomon DH, Odell WD. Alterations in circulating estradiol-17-beta in male patients with Graves's disease. N Engl J Med. 1972;286(3):124-9.
  413. Becker KL, Winnacker JL, Matthews MJ, Higgins GA, Jr. Gynecomastia and hyperthyroidism. An endocrine and histological investigation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1968;28(2):277-85.
  414. Bercovici JP, Mauvais-Jarvis P. Hyperthyroidism and gynecomastia: metabolic studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972;35(5):671-7.
  415. Kidd GS, Glass AR, Vigersky RA. The hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis in thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979;48(5):798-802.
  416. Abalovich M, Levalle O, Hermes R, Scaglia H, Aranda C, Zylbersztein C, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and seminal parameters in hyperthyroid males. Thyroid. 1999;9(9):857-63.
  417. Krassas GE, Perros P. Thyroid disease and male reproductive function. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(4):372-80.
  418. Peterson RE. The influence of the thyroid on adrenal cortical function. J Clin Invest. 1958;37(5):736-43.
  419. Kenny FM, Iturzaeta N, Preeyasombat C, Taylor FH, Migeon CJ, Richards C. Cortisol Production Rate. VII. Hypothyroidism and Hyperthyroidism in Infants and Children. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1967;27(11):1616-22.
  420. Toro-Tobon D, Bancos I, Brito JP. Abstract #1408256: In Search of New Biomarkers of Thyroid Function: The Association Between Thyroid Dysfunction and 11-beta Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase 2 Activity. Endocrine Practice. 2023;29(5):S116.
  421. Hellman L, Bradlow HL, Zumoff B, Gallagher TF. The influence of thyroid hormone on hydrocortisone production and metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961;21:1231-47.
  422. Gallagher TF, Hellman L, Finkelstein J, Yoshida K, Weitzman ED, Roffwarg HD, et al. Hyperthyroidism and cortisol secretion in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972;34(6):919-27.
  423. Hilton JG, Black WC, Athos W, Mc HB, Westermann CD. Increased ACTH-like activity in plasma of patients with thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1962;22:900-5.
  424. Felber J-P, Reddy WJ, Selenkow HA, Thorn GW. ADRENOCORTICAL RESPONSE TO THE 48-HOUR ACTH TEST IN MYXEDEMA AND HYPERTHYROIDISM*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1959;19(8):895-906.
  425. Hellman L, Bradlow HL, Zumoff B, Fukushima DK, Gallagher TF. Thyroid-androgen interrelations and the hypocholesteremic effect of androsterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1959;19:936-48.
  426. Hoshiro M, Ohno Y, Masaki H, Iwase H, Aoki N. Comprehensive study of urinary cortisol metabolites in hyperthyroid and hypothyroid patients. Clinical Endocrinology. 2006;64(1):37-45.
  427. Fraser SA, Anderson JB, Smith DA, Wilson GM. Osteoporosis and fractures following thyrotoxicosis. Lancet. 1971;1(7707):981-3.
  428. Rosen CJ, Adler RA. Longitudinal changes in lumbar bone density among thyrotoxic patients after attainment of euthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(6):1531-4.
  429. Langdahl BL, Loft AG, Eriksen EF, Mosekilde L, Charles P. Bone mass, bone turnover, body composition, and calcium homeostasis in former hyperthyroid patients treated by combined medical therapy. Thyroid. 1996;6(3):161-8.
  430. Jódar E, Martínez-Díaz-Guerra G, Azriel S, Hawkins F. Bone mineral density in male patients with L-thyroxine suppressive therapy and Graves disease. Calcif Tissue Int. 2001;69(2):84-7.
  431. Uzzan B, Campos J, Cucherat M, Nony P, Boissel JP, Perret GY. Effects on bone mass of long term treatment with thyroid hormones: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(12):4278-89.
  432. Krane SM, Brownell GL, Stanbury JB, Corrigan H. The effect of thyroid disease on calcium metabolism in man. J Clin Invest. 1956;35(8):874-87.
  433. Harvey RD, McHardy KC, Reid IW, Paterson F, Bewsher PD, Duncan A, et al. Measurement of bone collagen degradation in hyperthyroidism and during thyroxine replacement therapy using pyridinium cross-links as specific urinary markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(6):1189-94.
  434. Lukert BP, Higgins JC, Stoskopf MM. Serum osteocalcin is increased in patients with hyperthyroidism and decreased in patients receiving glucocorticoids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62(5):1056-8.
  435. Cooper DS, Kaplan MM, Ridgway EC, Maloof F, Daniels GH. Alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme patterns in hyperthyroidism. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90(2):164-8.
  436. Siddiqi A, Burrin JM, Noonan K, James I, Wood DF, Price CP, et al. A longitudinal study of markers of bone turnover in Graves' disease and their value in predicting bone mineral density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(3):753-9.
  437. Garrel DR, Delmas PD, Malaval L, Tourniaire J. Serum bone Gla protein: a marker of bone turnover in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;62(5):1052-5.
  438. Epstein FH, Freedman LR, Levitin H. Hypercalcemia, nephrocalcinosis and reversible renal insufficiency associated with hyperthyroidism. N Engl J Med. 1958;258(16):782-5.
  439. Peerenboom H, Keck E, Krüskemper HL, Strohmeyer G. The defect of intestinal calcium transport in hyperthyroidism and its response to therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;59(5):936-40.
  440. Bouillon R, De Moor P. Parathyroid function in patients with hyper- or hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;38(6):999-1004.
  441. Bouillon R, Muls E, De Moor P. Influence of thyroid function on the serum concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(4):793-7.
  442. Bortz W, Eisenberg E, Bowers CY, Pont M. DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN THYROID AND PARATHYROID CAUSES OF HYPERCALCEMIA. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1961;54(4):610-9.
  443. David NJ, Verner JV, Engel FL. The diagnostic spectrum of hypercalcemia. Case reports and discussion. Am J Med. 1962;33:88-110.
  444. Kleeman CR, Tuttle S, Bassett SH. METABOLIC OBSERVATIONS IN A CASE OF THYROTOXICOSIS WITH HYPERCALCEMIA*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1958;18(5):477-91.
  445. Danforth E, Jr., Burger A. The role of thyroid hormones in the control of energy expenditure. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;13(3):581-95.
  446. Silva JE. The thermogenic effect of thyroid hormone and its clinical implications. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(3):205-13.
  447. Yavuz S, Salgado Nunez del Prado S, Celi FS. Thyroid Hormone Action and Energy Expenditure. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2019;3(7):1345-56.
  448. Plummer H, Boothby W. The cost of work in exophthalmic goiter. Am J Physiol. 1923;63(406):1922-3.
  449. Briard SP, McClintock JT, Baldridge CW. COST OF WORK IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERMETABOLISM DUE TO LEUKEMIA AND TO EXOPHTHALMIC GOITER. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1935;56(1):30-7.
  450. Acheson K, Jéquier E, Burger A, Danforth E, Jr. Thyroid hormones and thermogenesis: the metabolic cost of food and exercise. Metabolism. 1984;33(3):262-5.
  451. Potenza M, Via MA, Yanagisawa RT. Excess Thyroid Hormone and Carbohydrate Metabolism. Endocrine Practice. 2009;15(3):254-62.
  452. Eom YS, Wilson JR, Bernet VJ. Links between Thyroid Disorders and Glucose Homeostasis. Diabetes Metab J. 2022;46(2):239-56.
  453. Mitrou P, Raptis SA, Dimitriadis G. Insulin Action in Hyperthyroidism: A Focus on Muscle and Adipose Tissue. Endocrine Reviews. 2010;31(5):663-79.
  454. Kabadi UM, Eisenstein AB. Impaired pancreatic alpha-cell response in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(3):478-82.
  455. Wennlund A, Arner P, Ostman J. Changes in the effects of insulin on human adipose tissue metabolism in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;53(3):631-5.
  456. Houssay BA. THYROID AND METATHYROID DIABETES. Endocrinology. 1944;35(3):158-72.
  457. Bratusch-Marrain PR, Komjati M, Waldhäusl WK. Glucose metabolism in noninsulin-dependent diabetic patients with experimental hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;60(6):1063-8.
  458. Elrick H, Hlad CJ, Jr., Arai Y. Influence of thyroid function on carbohydrate metabolism and a new method for assessing response to insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961;21:387-400.
  459. Kritchevsky D. Influence of thyroid hormones and related compounds on cholesterol biosynthesis and degradation: a review. Metabolism. 1960;9:984-94.
  460. Siperstein MD, Murray AW. Cholesterol metabolism in man. J Clin Invest. 1955;34(9):1449-53.
  461. O'Brien T, Katz K, Hodge D, Nguyen TT, Kottke BA, Hay ID. The effect of the treatment of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism on plasma lipids and apolipoproteins AI, AII and E. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997;46(1):17-20.
  462. Chait A, Bierman EL, Albers JJ. Regulatory role of triiodothyronine in the degradation of low density lipoprotein by cultured human skin fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1979;48(5):887-9.
  463. Tulloch BR, Vydelingum N, Lewis B, Fraser R. Triglyceride metabolism in thyroid disease. Clin Sci. 1973;44(2):6P passim.
  464. Cachefo A, Boucher P, Vidon C, Dusserre E, Diraison F, Beylot M. Hepatic lipogenesis and cholesterol synthesis in hyperthyroid patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5353-7.
  465. Arons DL, Schreibman PH, Downs P, Braverman LE, Arky RA. Decreased post-heparin lipases in Graves's disease. N Engl J Med. 1972;286(5):233-7.
  466. Sachs BA, Danielson E, Isaacs MC, Weston RE. Effect of triiodothyronine on the serum lipids and lipoproteins of euthyroid and hyperthyroid subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1958;18(5):506-15.
  467. Kung AW, Pang RW, Lauder I, Lam KS, Janus ED. Changes in serum lipoprotein(a) and lipids during treatment of hyperthyroidism. Clin Chem. 1995;41(2):226-31.
  468. Ozata M, Uckaya G, Bolu E, Corapcioglu D, Bingol N, Ozdemir IC. Plasma leptin concentrations in patients with Graves' disease with or without ophthalmopathy. Med Sci Monit. 2001;7(4):696-700.
  469. Strisower B, Elmlinger P, Gofman JW, Delalla O. The effect of 1-thyroxine on serum lipoprotein and cholesterol concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1959;19(1):117-26.
  470. Postel S. Total free tocopherols in the serum of patients with thyroid disease. J Clin Invest. 1956;35(12):1345-56.
  471. Rich C, Bierman EL, Schwartz IL. Plasma nonesterified fatty acids in hyperthyroid states. J Clin Invest. 1959;38(2):275-8.
  472. Riis AL, Jørgensen JO, Ivarsen P, Frystyk J, Weeke J, Møller N. Increased protein turnover and proteolysis is an early and primary feature of short-term experimental hyperthyroidism in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(10):3999-4005.
  473. Lewallen CG, Rall JE, Berman M. Studies of iodoalbumin metabolism. II. The effects of thyroid hormone. J Clin Invest. 1959;38(1, Part 1):88-101.
  474. Kivirikko KI, Laitinen O, Aer J, Halme J. Metabolism of collagen in experimental hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism in the rat. Endocrinology. 1967;80(6):1051-61.
  475. Crispell KR, Parson W, Hollifield G. A study of the rate of protein synthesis before and during the administration of L-triiodothyronine to patients with myxedema and healthy volunteers using N-15 glycine. J Clin Invest. 1956;35(2):164-9.
  476. Sokoloff L, Kaufman S. Effects of thyroxin on amino acid incorporation into protein. Science. 1959;129(3348):569-70.
  477. Sokoloff L, Roberts PA, Januska MM, Kline JE. Mechanisms of stimulation of protein synthesis by thyroid hormones in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968;60(2):652-9.
  478. Aktuna D, Buchinger W, Langsteger W, Meister E, Sternad H, Lorenz O, et al. [Beta-carotene, vitamin A and carrier proteins in thyroid diseases]. Acta Med Austriaca. 1993;20(1-2):17-20.
  479. Wohl MG, Levy HA, Szutka A, Maldia G. Pyridoxine deficiency in hyperthyroidism. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1960;105:523-7.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Genes and Beyond

ABSTRACT

 

Genetic disorders resulting in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) include autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH), polygenic hypercholesterolemia, as well as other rare conditions such as autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH). All of these disorders cause elevations in low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C) and, as a result, greatly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Genetic loci involved in ADH include the LDLR, which codes for the LDL receptor (LDLR), APOB, which codes for apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100), the major protein component of LDL, PCSK9, which codes for Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9), the low abundance circulatory protein that terminates the lifecycle of the LDLR, and apolipoprotein E (APOE), which is an important constituent of triglyceride rich lipoproteins. Importantly, a large percentage of people with the severe hypercholesterolemic phenotype do not possess a readily identifiable gene defect and many likely have polygenic hypercholesterolemia. Thus, identification of a specific genetic pathologic variant is not a necessary condition for the diagnosis of a genetic hypercholesterolemia. Several formal diagnostic criteria exist for FH and include lipid levels, family history, personal history, physical exam findings, and genetic testing. As all individuals with severe hypercholesterolemia are at high risk for CVD, treatment is centered on dietary and lifestyle modifications and early institution of lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy. Treatment should initially be statin-based, but most patients require adjunctive medications such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 blocking monoclonal antibodies. Three large cardiovascular outcome trials have shown a reduction in atherosclerotic CVD when ezetimibe or PCSK9 blocking monoclonal antibodies were added to a background of statin therapy and consequently have assisted in shaping international guidelines and consensus recommendations. Novel therapeutics recently developed, include: inclisiran – a small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA)-based gene-silencing technology that inhibits PCSK9 production, bempedoic acid –  an inhibitor of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-citrate lyase with a large cardiovascular outcome trial demonstrating a reduction in CVD in patients with statin intolerance and is now FDA approved for a wide range of patients including heterozygous FH and patients with prior CVD (secondary prevention) or those at high-risk for CVD (primary prevention) and elevated LDL-C, and evinacumab – a fully human monoclonal antibody inhibiting angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) (FDA approved for homozygous FH only). Patients with extreme and unresponsive elevations in LDL-C will require more aggressive therapies such as lipoprotein apheresis and agents for the treatment of severe hypercholesterolemia such as microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitors and evinacumab.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Genetic disorders resulting in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) consist of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH), autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH), and polygenic hypercholesterolemia. The genetic architecture of FH is more complex than previously recognized and in fact is now believed to be associated with at least nine different genes with thousands of variants, the details of which are beyond the scope of this chapter. But briefly, the term “autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia” refers to those patients with dominantly inherited severe hypercholesterolemia – low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C) greater than 190 mg/dL, who likely harbor mutations in genes regulating serum LDL levels. Historically, the more common causes of ADH include “classic” FH, which is a codominant disorder involving aberrations in the LDL receptor (LDLR), as well as other codominant forms of “nonclassical” FH, which involve defects in two other genes that regulate plasma clearance of LDL, apolipoprotein B (APOB), which is the main protein of LDL (a ligand for the LDLR), and Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9), which synthesizes a low abundance circulatory protein that limits the LDLR lifespan (1,2). Autosomal dominant forms of ADH include mutations in apolipoprotein E (APOE), which synthesizes the main protein of triglyceride rich lipoproteins and signal transducing adaptor family member 1 (STAP1), whose function in cholesterol homeostasis remains largely unknown (2,3). However, recent data have determined that mutations in STAP1 are not a causative factor in FH (4-7). An autosomal recessive form of FH, ARH, is very rare and results from pathogenic variants in LDLR accessory protein 1 (LDL-RAP1). Other forms may be due to defects in lysosomal acid lipase (LIPA), ATP- binding cassette sub-family G member 5 and 8 (ABCG5/8), and cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) (2,8). Finally, a common form of FH is attributable to multiple variations in several genes each with minor effects on cholesterol regulation (more than 50 loci identified, as opposed to a single large effect as seen in the textbook version of FH). Polygenic causes are relatively common and likely explain many of the patients who are genotype negative. In fact, up to 50% of patients referred to lipid clinics for possible or probable HeFH have a polygenic basis (2). Additionally, only approximately 2% of patients with an LDL >190 mg/dL and no additional clinical or family history compatible with FH have a pathogenic variant in one of the FH genes (9,10). Thus, having an elevated LDL-C does not necessarily indicate that the patient has ADH due to a pathogenic variation in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or APOE genes. All forms of FH result in very high levels of LDL-C and increase the risk of early and accelerated coronary artery disease (CAD) (8). Yet, FH remains vastly underdiagnosed and thus, undertreated, representing an extraordinary missed opportunity for maintenance of cardiovascular health and prevention of cardiovascular events. It has been estimated that less than 10% of the patients in the US with FH have been diagnosed (11,12). This chapter will largely focus on the canonical forms of FH involving the traditional genetic loci described above.

 

GENETICS

 

The LDLR is an 893-amino acid cell surface glycoprotein that binds and internalizes LDL particles, primarily in the liver. Mutations in LDLR (i.e., “classic” FH) give rise to nearly 90% of cases of clinical ADH (13). Over 2000 such mutations in LDLR have been identified, including deletions, insertions, missense, copy number variants, and nonsense mutations (2). FH patients can be homozygous (traditionally with a prevalence thought to be 1 in 1,000,000 but based on contemporary genetic studies, the prevalence is thought to be closer to 1 in 300,000), carrying mutations in both alleles encoding for LDLR, or heterozygous (traditionally with a prevalence thought to be 1 in 500, with newer data suggesting as frequent as 1 in 200), possessing mutations in only one allele (2,14). Homozygous FH (HoFH) should be suspected when LDL-C exceeds 400 mg/dL, whereas heterozygous FH (HeFH) should be suspected when LDL-C is greater than 190 mg/dL in adults and 160 mg/dL in children (8). Patients with HoFH can be true FH homozygotes, with two identical mutations in each allele, versus compound heterozygotes, with a different mutation in each allele. In addition, FH can result in elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) through an unclear mechanism, not necessarily linked to the dysfunctional LDLR pathway (15-19). Elevated Lp(a), which historically was thought composed of 30-45% cholesterol by mass and reported as part of the LDL-C laboratory measurement, amplifies the already increased risk of incident CAD seen in those with FH (19). A more contemporary study suggests this range of cholesterol content contributed by Lp(a) to be more heterogenous with a range of 9-57% with a median value of approximately 15-20% in individuals with elevated Lp(a) (20). A recent evaluation of Lp(a) levels in a Danish Lipid Clinic found that elevated Lp(a) levels were common, with approximately 27% of individuals fulfilling a clinical diagnosis of FH due in part to elevated Lp(a)(21). This data suggests the LPA gene should be considered in the realm of possible causes for phenotypic FH and emphasize the importantance of Lp(a) testing. It is also important to be aware of “founder effects” in some populations. Founder effects influencing the type and frequency of mutations causing FH are seen among Afrikaners, French Canadians, Ashkenazi Jews, Christian Lebanese, and some Tunisian groups. Slimane et al. estimated the prevalence of individuals with HoFH and HeFH in Tunisia to be 1:125,000 and 1:165, respectively (22).

 

“Nonclassical” FH, which phenotypically resembles classic FH in presentation and severity, involves dominantly inherited gene defects in APOB, PCSK9, and APOE, which code for proteins that modulate ligand-LDL/LDL-like receptor interaction (2,23,24). ApoB is the major protein constituent of LDL and acts as a ligand for LDLR. Mutations in ApoB (most commonly a single base change at a position near amino-acid 3,500) block the binding of LDL containing the apoB-100 to LDLR, resulting in severely elevated levels of LDL-C. This condition was originally defined as “familial defective APOB-100” or FDAB (25). PCSK9, on the other hand, is a circulating protein that terminates the lifecycle of LDLR by binding to it and targeting it to lysosomal degradation. Gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in PCSK9 lead to a FH phenotype, whereas loss-of-function (LOF) mutations lead to lower LDL-C and protection from coronary atherosclerotic events (26,27). Absence of circulating PCSK9 has been reported in a few subjects, who were reportedly healthy and had LDL levels around 20 mg/dL (28,29). Collectively, these observations spurred a frenzy of targeted research that led to the development and FDA approval of therapeutic antibodies against PCSK9 to reduce LDL levels in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or in FH. Mutations in ApoE (an in-frame three base-pair deletion at position 167 in exon 4) block the binding of triglyceride rich lipoproteins (i.e., chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, very low-density lipoprotein [VLDL-C], intermediate-density lipoprotein [IDL-C]) to the E receptor (belongs to the LDLR superfamily), and limits clearance of these particles from plasma (30). The prevalence of ADH resulting from mutations in APOB, PCSK9, and APOE has been difficult to estimate, but it is agreed that these are 5-10%, <1%, and <<1% respectively (2).

 

Finally, an additional ultra-rare recessive genetic disorder causing hypercholesterolemia bears mentioning. It involves a homozygous deletion mutation in the gene CYP7A1. This gene codes for the enzyme cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase, which catalyzes the initial step in cholesterol catabolism and bile acid synthesis. The mutation results in loss of enzymatic function and high levels of LDL-C, and was first identified in three homozygotes within a single kindred of English and Celtic descent (31). There are a number of other rare recessive genetic disorders that are associated with hypercholesterolemia, see table 1 below and other Endotext chapters on these rare genetic disorders (32,33).

 

TABLE 1. RARE GENETIC DISORDERS THAT CAN BE CONFUSED WITH ADH

Disorder

Description

Sitosterolemia

Autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in ABCG5/8. Manifestations include hypercholesterolemia, marked elevations of plasma plant sterols, tendon and tuberous xanthomas, and premature ASCVD

Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency

Autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in LIPA, which codes for lysosomal acid lipase. Manifestations include moderate hypercholesterolemia with depressed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), accelerated atherosclerosis, and progressive liver disease.

Deficiency of LDL receptor adapter protein 1

Autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in LDL-RAP1. Typically presents with very high LDL cholesterol levels.

Deficiency of cholesterol 7-alpha hydroxylase

Autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in CYP7A1, which codes for the enzyme that catalyzes the first step in bile acid synthesis, resulting in high intrahepatic cholesterol and reduced surface expression of LDLR.

 

An important practical point is that 30-50% of people with the FH phenotype have no readily identifiable defects in any of the genes that have been mentioned here; thus, diagnosing an individual with the FH phenotype does not necessarily mean the presence of a monogenic defect in the LDLR pathway (34). The genetic confirmation for FH-causing mutations in ADH varies considerably (2,10). The rate of positive genetics is related to clinical criteria - in patients with definite FH based on clinical criteria 60-80% are positive whereas in patients with possible FH based on clinical criteria only 21-44% are positive (35). Additionally, the LDL-C level is crucial. When LDL-C is very high (i.e., >310 mg/dL), the frequency of monogenic pathogenic variants is as high as 92% (36). In patients without an identifiable pathologic genetic variant the etiology may be due to an as-yet-unidentified genetic error or to polygenic, epigenetic, or non-genetic factors, including co-morbid and environmental modifiers. For those without a mutation, an elevated LDL-C still confers elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (37). However, for any given LDL-C strata, those with a causal mutation compared to those without have higher risk for CVD, likely due to lifelong exposure to high LDL-C (10,38). In addition, unintended consequences of genetic testing (i.e., genetic discrimination for life or long-term care insurance and increased expense) must be taken into account. For these reasons, genetic testing should not be mandated, but should involve a shared-decision making model between patient and provider, encompassing benefits and risks of genetic testing, as well as patient values and preferences (39). On the other hand, others advocate for routine genetic testing citing as the rationale 1) facilitate a definitive diagnosis; 2) identify pathogenic variants with higher cardiovascular risk and therefore needing more aggressive treatment; 3) increase initiation of and adherence to therapy; 4) facilitate insurance approval for novel lipid-lowering therapies; and 5) cascade testing of first-degree relatives (25). Cascade screening on the basis of LDL-C alone (i.e., ≥190 mg/dL) has low sensitivity and specificity, however, identification of a pathogenic variant with genetic testing followed by cascade screening results in very high sensitivity and specificity. This is likely due to missed diagnoses of FH with reduced penetrance where LDL-C is <190 mg/dL (35). Nonetheless, the reduced costs and more widespread availability of genetic testing warrant performance of this test to obtain information that can help the physician familiarize with genotype-phenotype correlations and identify subjects that can be studied for the discovery of novel pathways leading to severe hypercholesterolemia. It must be noted that the FDA does not mention genetic testing as a measure to define FH (either heterozygous or homozygous).

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Most circulating LDL particles end up in the liver. The LDLR pathway is the predominant method for LDL uptake (40,41).  ApoB binds to a specific binding site on LDLR and the receptor-ligand complex is subsequently internalized from clathrin-coated pits on the cell membrane. The receptor-ligand complex undergoes endocytosis and is targeted to the lysosome, where LDL is released for degradation while the LDLR is recycled back to the cell surface approximately 100-150 times in its 24 hour life cycle (2). PCSK9 terminates LDLR lifespan by disallowing its recycling, thus providing a physiologic mechanism of protein removal much different from, and stronger than, that caused by inducible degrader of LDL, an E3 ubiquitin ligase (26,42). There are other nonspecific and constitutively active pathways of LDL-C clearance as well (40,43). In HeFH, though transport through the LDLR pathway is reduced by 50%, LDL-C clearance is doubled through these other, non-LDLR pathways. The same holds true for HoFH, where despite a near-absolute reduction in LDLR transport, total LDL-C clearance via non-specific pathways is increased by 4-fold (44). Excess LDL-C, which accumulates in liver cells, is then re-exported via the apoB system back into the plasma, secreted into bile unchanged, or transformed into bile acids. This increased production of LDL adds to inefficient clearance via LDLR to cause elevated serum LDL levels typical of the FH phenotype (45).

 

ADH can thus be further classified into subtypes 1, 2, and 3, based on which protein of the LDLR pathway is causative (Figure 1). ADH-1 comprises mutations within LDLR, the canonical form of FH. There are six major classes of ADH-1 (see table 2 below), based on the type of mutation. These include those that: inhibit synthesis of LDLR; impede exit of mature LDLR from the endoplasmic reticulum; affect the binding site of LDLR to apoB-100; prevent the ligand-receptor interaction; prevent endocytosis of the LDLR-apoB-100 complex; or inhibit recycling of LDLR to the cell surface for further rounds of lipid uptake (not shown). ADH-2 comprises mutations of APOB that block the association of apoB-100 to LDLR. ADH-3 is due to GOF mutations of PCSK9, which reduce LDLR recycling and accelerate its lysosomal degradation (12). Some authors have suggested that mutations that affect binding of apoB-100 to LDLR carry a less severe phenotype than those that affect LDLR directly (46-50).

 

FIGURE 1 (24): ADH-1 comprises mutations within LDLR. There are six major classes of ADH-1, affecting: a) synthesis of LDLR; b) exit of mature LDLR from the endoplasmic reticulum; c) binding site of LDLR to apoB-100; d) endocytosis of LDLR-apoB-100 complex; and recycling of LDLR to the cell surface (not shown). ADH-2 comprises mutations in apoB that block the association of apoB-100 to LDLR. ADH-3 is due to GOF mutations of PCSK9, which reduce LDLR recycling and accelerate its lysosomal degradation. Adapted from Calandra et al. J. Lipid Research 2011; 52: 1885-926.

 

 

TABLE 2. THE SIX CLASSES OF LDLR MUTATIONS (51)

Class 1: synthesis of receptor or precursor protein is absent

The so-called null allele is a prevalent class of mutations and is generally associated with very high LDL-C levels. The molecular basis of this type of mutation shows a wide variety: point mutations introducing a stop codon, mutations in the promoter region completely blocking transcription, mutations giving rise to incorrect excision of mRNA, and finally, large deletions preventing the assembly of a normal receptor.

Class 2: absent or impaired formation of receptor protein

This class comprises mutations in which the normal routing through the cell is not complete or is only very slowly completed. Usually, there is a complete blockade of transport, and LDL receptors are unable to leave the ER. The Golgi apparatus is not reached, and the increase of 40,000 Da in molecular weight does not take place. Truncated proteins, as a result of a premature stop codon, and misfolded proteins, as a result of mutations in cysteine-rich regions leading to free or unpaired cysteine residues, are retained in the ER. However, quality control by the ER is not perfect, given the observation that sometimes misfolded proteins leave the ER but are processed more slowly. Such mutations give rise to class 2B mutations, in contrast to class 2A mutations that cause complete retaining in the ER.

Class 3: normal synthesis of receptor protein, abnormal LDL binding

Receptors characterized by this class of alleles show the normal rate of synthesis, exhibit normal conversion into receptor protein, and are transported to the cell surface, but binding to LDL is impaired. It is obvious that mutations in the binding domain underlie this class of receptors.

Class 4: clustering in coated pits, internalization of the receptor complex does not take place

The receptors in this class lack the property to cluster in coated pits (class 4A). This phenomenon, which makes interaction of receptors with the fuzzy coat impossible, is caused by mutations in the carboxyterminal part of the receptor protein. These mutated receptors are synthesized normally, folding and transport are normal, but clustering in coated pits is impossible, and sometimes the receptors are secreted even after they have reached the cell surface (class 4B).

Class 5: receptors are not recycled and are rapidly degraded

All mutations in this class are localized in the EGF-precursor homologous domain of the LDL receptor protein. This domain seems to be involved in the acid-dependent dissociation of the receptor-ligand complex in endosomes, after which the receptor can be recycled. When the entire EGF-precursor homologous domain is deleted by site-directed mutagenesis or when such a deletion occurs naturally in a homozygous FH patient, the receptor is trapped in the endosomes, and rapid degradation subsequently is observed.

Class 6: receptors fail to be targeted to the basolateral membrane

 

The class of mutations was recently discovered and is caused by alterations in the cytoplasmic tail of the protein. Such receptors do not reach the liver cell membrane and are probably rapidly degraded.

*Adapted from Gidding SS, et al. Circulation 2015;132:2167-92.

 

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

 

Lipid Abnormalities in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

 

LDL-C levels are frequently greater than the 90th percentile for age and gender. The magnitude of the LDL-C elevation is affected by the specific mutations causing FH with mutations in the LDLR leading to greater elevations in LDL-C levels than mutations in ApoB or PCSK9 (36,46-49,52). Null mutations in the LDLR are more severe than non-null mutations (53). Additionally, other genes that regulate LDL-C and environmental factors, such as diet, also influence the magnitude of the elevation in LDL-C (54,55). It should be recognized that a significant number of patients with genetically diagnosed FH have LDL-C <190 mg/dL. In some studies, approximately 50% of patients with genetically diagnosed FH have LDL-C levels <190 mg/dL (9,10). HDL-C and triglyceride levels are usually normal or only modestly altered (56-63). Elevated triglycerides and/or low HDL-C do not rule out the diagnosis of FH. Lp(a) levels are frequently elevated in patients with FH and may contribute to the increased risk of ASCVD (15-19). One should exclude secondary causes of marked elevations in LDL-C particularly hypothyroidism, renal disease, autoimmunity, and iatrogenic conditions (see chapter on Approach to the Patient with Dyslipidemia) (64). Another pertinent secondary cause that should be evaluated, particularly given escalating global rates of adiposity and the myriad treatment approaches at curtailing these trends, include dietary interventions that may induce a hyperlipidemic state.  One such contemporary dietary fad that has garnered traction in the weight loss community is the ketogenic diet, which includes low level of carbohydrates (sufficient enough to induce the formation of ketones), moderate protein intake and high fat intake.  It is well-documented that the ketogenic diet results in modest LDL-C elevations in most, but for some, can induce marked elevations in LDL-C, to the degree of mimicking a FH phenotype (65).

 

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

 

Patients with FH have a 3-13-fold higher risk of ASCVD, and a 20-fold higher risk for early onset ischemic heart disease (66,67). Untreated males with FH have a 50% risk for a fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction by 50 years of age whereas untreated females have a 30% chance by age 60 (68,69). However, it should be recognized that there is heterogeneity of ASCVD risk and much of this risk is potentially modulated by variance in genetic factors (70,71). Other cardiovascular risk factors, such as male sex, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, low HDL-C levels, and Lp(a) levels modulate the risk of ASCVD (66). Patients with FH who have corneal arcus or xanthomas are more likely to have ASCVD (72-74). Of particular note, patients with mutations that result in FH have a greater ASCVD risk than patients with equivalent LDL-C levels (10,38). This is likely due to the LDL-C elevations being present from birth (lifelong exposure to elevated LDL-C). This concept is termed "cholesterol-years", which tabulates the cumulative exposure, both degree of cholesterol elevation and duration of cholesterol elevation, as a measure of area under the cholesterol curve. Those with a greater exposure (higher cholesterol for longer) of cholesterol, will go on to develop atherosclerosis at a much more aggressive rate (75,76). This concept also highlights an important framework for early FH detection and treatment as vital interventions for optimal ASCVD risk reduction (76).

 

Other Manifestations

 

Early onset corneal arcus (age < 45) and tendinous xanthomas, particularly the Achilles tendon and dorsum of hands, are classical abnormalities that occur in patients with FH. Xanthelasma (xanthomas in eyelids) and tuberous xanthoma may also be seen. However, it should be recognized that in the modern era with the increased treatment of elevated LDL-C levels these abnormalities are no longer frequently seen (only 5-35% of patients have xanthoma or corneal arcus currently) (77,78).

 

Homozygous Familiar Hypercholesterolemia

 

This is a rare disorder with untreated LDL-C levels that vary but are markedly elevated (usually > 300 mg/dL but often > 500 mg/dL) (79). Patients who are LDLR negative have higher LDL-C and a poorer clinical prognosis than LDLR defective patients (79). Lp(a) levels tend to be higher than observed in patients with HeFH (16). Additionally, HDL-C levels tend to be decreased in HoFH (79). Tendinous xanthoma, tuberous xanthomas, and arcus cornea may appear in childhood (79). If untreated >50% of patient with HoFH develop clinically significant ACVD by age of 30 and cardiovascular events can occur before age 10 in some patients (80). Almost 90% of patients with HoFH suffered a cardiovascular event by age 40 (80). Cholesterol and calcium deposits can lead to aortic stenosis and occasionally to mitral regurgitation (79,81-83).

 

DIAGNOSIS

 

FH, despite its different underlying gene abnormalities, leads to severe hypercholesterolemia and a distinct FH phenotype with markedly increased risk of developing CAD. In general, there are five major clinical criteria for diagnosing FH (see table 3): a family history of early CAD (less than age 55 in a first-degree relative in men, and less than age 65 in women), early CAD in the index case, elevated LDL-C (greater than 190 mg/dL), tendon xanthomas (especially in the Achilles and finger extensor tendons), and corneal arcus (which is highly specific in younger patients, but overall an insensitive finding). Mutations in any of the aforementioned genes of the LDLR pathway, when they are identified, are diagnostic.

 

TABLE 3. MAJOR CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSING FH

When to Suspect FH

1)    If LDL-C levels are > 190 mg/dL (4.92 mMol/L) or non-HDL-C levels are >220 mg/dL (5.70mMol/L)

2)    Patients with premature ASCVD (<55 years of age in male and <65 years of age in females)

3)    Family history of hypercholesterolemia

4)    When there is a positive family history of premature ASCVD (<55 years of age in male and <65 years of age in females)

5)    When tendon xanthomas or corneal arcus (< age 45) are present on physical exam

 

As has been mentioned in other chapters of this text, when evaluating a patient suspected of having FH, it is critical to rule out secondary causes of hypercholesterolemia, such as hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome, and liver disease. Another extremely rare cause of non-FH has been described, involving autoantibodies to LDLR that inhibit receptor-mediated binding and catabolism of LDL-C (84).

 

There are three sets of statistically validated criteria that are most commonly used in the diagnosis of FH: the Dutch Lipid Network criteria, Simon Broome Register criteria, and Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) criteria (85,86). These are summarized in Table 4, below (87).

 

TABLE 4. SCORING SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSING FH

MEDPED Criteria (USA)

 

FH diagnostic if total cholesterol (LDL-C) levels exceed these cut points in mg/dL

Age

1st degree relative

2nd degree relative

3rd degree relative

General population

< 18

220 (155)

230 (165)

240 (170)

270 (200)

20

240 (170)

250 (180)

260 (185)

290 (220)

30

270 (190)

280 (200)

290 (210)

340 (240)

> 40

290 (205)

300 (215)

310 (225)

360 (260)

Simon Broome Criteria (UK)

Total cholesterol (LDL-C) 290 (190) mg/dL in adults, or 260 (155) mg/dL in children

AND

DNA mutation                                                  Definite FH   

Tendon xanthomas in patient or 1st or 2nd       Probable FH degree relative

 

Family history of MI at age < 50 in 2nd              Possible FH degree relative or < 60 in 1st degree relative

OR

Family history of total cholesterol > 290

mg/dL in 1st or 2nd degree relative

                                                Dutch Criteria (Netherlands)

1 point

1st degree relative with premature CVD or LDL-C > 95thpercentile, OR

Personal history of premature peripheral or cerebrovascular disease, OR

LDL-C 155-189 mg/dL

Definite FH

(8 points or more)

 

 

Probable FH (6-7 points)

 

 

 

Possible FH

(3-5 points)

 

2 points

1st degree relative with tendon xanthoma or corneal arcus, OR

1st degree relative child (< 18 years) with LDL-C > 95thpercentile, OR

Personal history of CAD

3 points

LDL-C 190-249 mg/dL

4 points

Presence of corneal arcus in patient < 45 years old

5 points

LDL-C 250-329 mg/dL

6 points

Presence of a tendon xanthoma

8 points

LDL-C > 330 mg/dL, OR

Functional mutation of the LDLR gene

             

Adapted from Fahed et al., Nutrition & Metabolism 2011;8:23.

 

Unlike MEDPED criteria, which use only lipid levels, the Simon Broome and Dutch criteria also use family history, personal history, physical exam findings, and genetic testing to establish an FH diagnosis. Again, however, it should be emphasized that FH should be diagnosed phenotypically, as opposed to genetically—most FH patients are genotype-negative and do not possess a clear genetic substrate for their hyperlipidemic phenotype, but they clearly warrant aggressive intervention.

 

It is important to note that in the modern era of earlier recognition, wide-spread statin use and possibly improved dietary messages, it is often difficult to make a definitive or probable diagnosis of FH using clinical criteria (i.e., treatment reduces the development of xanthomas and corneal arcus and reduces or delays the occurrence of ASCVD events in patients and relatives). Similarly, it is often very difficult to know the before treatment LDL-C levels (35).

 

While genetic screening is not required for clinical management, lipid screening in family members should be undertaken in all individuals by age 20, starting as early as age 2 (42). Cascade screening—i.e., lipid screening of first-degree relatives of the proband—is infrequently employed but is recommended as the most economical method of identifying new cases of FH (43). It is the responsibility of the examining clinician to attempt identification of other cases when making the diagnosis of FH in any given patient.

 

A potential novel solution to the underdiagnosis and undertreatment issues that plague the FH community lies in leveraging health information technology. The FIND FH study demonstrated the use of a machine learning algorithm can successfully utilize medical profiles within the electronic health record to consistently identify individuals with probable FH (88). This new approach possesses the promise of identifying FH patients on a national scale and will hopefully lead to increased initiation of effective preventive therapies and at an earlier time-point as well.

 

TREATMENT

 

Goals of Therapy

 

In genetic disorders causing hypercholesterolemia, aggressive lipid-lowering through lifestyle modification, pharmacologic treatment, and invasive treatments such as apheresis has been shown to decrease angiographically-apparent CAD and reduce cardiovascular events (80,89,90). However, traditional risk assessment tools like the Framingham risk score or pooled cohort equation do not apply to FH patients. Recent guidelines suggest that drug therapy should be initiated when LDL-C is greater than 190 mg/dL in all patients, including children over the age of eight (91,92). Most recommend at least a 50% reduction in LDL-C with initiation of high-intensity statin therapy as a starting goal, with some advocating for targeting LDL-C less than 100 mg/dL without ASCVD, less than 70 mg/dL with ASCVD, and even less than 55 mg/dL with ASCVD and at very high-risk (92-95).  Additionally, consideration of non-statin options (ezetimibe, bile-acid sequestrants, bempedoic acid, and PCSK9 inhibiting [PCSK9i] therapeutics – including both monoclonal antibodies preferentially but also small interfering RNA should these thresholds not be met (92-94). The European Atherosclerosis Society suggests LDL-C goals of less than 135 mg/dL in pediatric patients, less than 100 mg/dL in adults, and less than 70 mg/dL in adults with known CAD or diabetes mellitus(11).

 

TABLE 5. GUIDELINE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREATING FH

 

NLA Expert panel on pediatric FH(91)

AHA/ACC 2018 cholesterol guideline(92)and ACC non-statin ECDP(94)

NLA Expert panel on adult FH(93)

EAS guideline on FH(11)

Age to initiate treatment

≥ 8 years (earlier in special cases i.e., HoFH)

≥ 20 years

Not specified – “After a confirmatory diagnosis of FH …adult FH patients

should receive initial treatment”

≥ 8 years

Agent recommended

Statins are preferred

 

Non-statin options (ezetimibe, BAS, fibrates, niacin) are discussed but not routinely recommended due to lack of FDA approval or adverse drug events

Statins are preferred

 

Non-statin options (ezetimibe, BAS, bempedoic acid, PCSK9i therapeutics) are also recommended as add on therapy

Statins are preferred

 

Non-statin options (ezetimibe, BAS, niacin) or LDL apheresis are also recommended as add on therapy or in statin intolerant patients

Statins are preferred

 

Non-statin options (ezetimibe, BAS) or LDL apheresis are also recommended as add on therapy or in statin intolerant patients

Goal of therapy

≥ 50% reduction in LDL-C or LDL-C < 130 mg/dL

≥ 50% reduction in LDL-C or LDL-C < 100 mg/dL in those without ASCVD, < 70 mg/dL with ASCVD, and < 55 mg/dL with ASCVD and at very high-risk

≥ 50% reduction in LDL-C

LDL-C < 135 mg/dL in pediatrics, < 100 mg/dL in adults, < 70 mg/dL in adults with CAD or diabetes

AHA / ACC: American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology; EAS: European Atherosclerosis Society; ECDP: Expert Consensus Decision Pathway; NLA: National Lipid Association; BAS: bile-acid sequestrants.

 

In our view in FH patients without clinical ASCVD one should aim for an LDL-C level <100 mg/dL (2.59 mMol/L). In FH patients with clinical ASCVD the goal, at a minimum should be an LDL-C level <70 mg/dL (1.81 mMol/L) with many experts recommending LDL-C levels <55 mg/dL (1.4 2mMol/L), particularly when patients have additional risk factors (acute coronary syndrome, diabetes, polyvascular disease, etc.) (96,97). In patients without ASCVD but who are at high risk due to other risk factors such as diabetes, Lp(a) >50 mg/dL, smokers, a strong family history of premature ASCVD, etc. many experts would recommend an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL (1.81 mMol/L). While LDL-C goals continue to decline, attainment of these goals is increasing more difficult and seldom attained in most FH patients.

 

Treatment of Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

 

As with almost all metabolic disorders we should encourage the patient to follow a lifestyle that will reduce disease manifestations. However, lifestyle changes are very rarely sufficient to lower LDL-C levels to the desired range in patients with FH and therefore cholesterol lowering drugs will be required (see figure 2 and tables 6 and 7) (for detailed information on cholesterol lowering drugs see the chapter on cholesterol lowering drugs (98). In patients with HeFH, statins are a mainstay of treatment, despite the dearth of randomized clinical trials of statin efficacy focused on this special population. Statins are FDA approved for use in pediatric FH patients beginning at age 8-10 years for HeFH and in the first year of life or at initial diagnosis for HoFH (51,79,96,99-103). Data from longitudinal observational studies suggest statin initiation in childhood is both safe and effective, reducing LDL-C burden and corresponding atherosclerosis rates over follow-up of up to 20 years (51,104). The major early statin trials (4S and WOSCOPS) likely had study populations that were enriched with FH patients, given that mean baseline LDL-C ranged from 189 to 216 mg/dL (105,106). Patients should be treated with atorvastatin 40-80 mg per day or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg per day (i.e., high-intensity statin therapy). As monotherapy, statins can reduce LDL-C by up to 60% in HeFH patients but typically display a blunted response (10-25%) in HoFH patients depending on LDLR functionality (79,95,107). Updated guidance on statin therapy during pregnancy was issued by the FDA during a drug safety communication in 2021, removing the strongest warning against using statins during pregnancy (108).  Though statins should still be avoided in most women attempting contraception during pregnancy, particular during the first trimester, the available evidence suggest that statins are likely not teratogenic.  The updated guidance allows for more flexibility for treating pregnant women as part of a shared decision-making process, particular those at the highest ASCVD risk, including those with FH (109).

 

The vast majority of patients, however, require additional pharmacotherapy. When intensive statin therapy does not result in an LDL-C level in the desired range additional therapy should be added. Given that ezetimibe is generic, relatively inexpensive, well tolerated, and has evidence for ASCVD risk reduction in a large cardiovascular outcome trial, this is frequently the next drug used (110). One can anticipate that ezetimibe 10 mg per day added to intensive statin therapy will result in an approximate 20% further reduction in LDL-C. If this is not sufficient one can then use a PCSK9i monoclonal antibody to achieve the desired cholesterol goal. Adding a PCSK9i monoclonal antibody will result in a further 50-60% decrease in LDL-C levels and in most patients will result in LDL-C levels in the desired range. In some instances, if the LDL-C level is far from goal (>25%) on intensive statin therapy one can skip treating with ezetimibe and proceed directly to adding a PCSK9i monoclonal antibody. Bempedoic acid (discussed in more detail below) is an acceptable third- or fourth-line add-on agent if additional LDL-C lowering is needed. It is worth noting that bempedoic acid also comes as a combination product with ezetimibe providing approximately 40% LDL-C reduction in one tablet.  This may be pertinent for patients with FH for whom pill burden is a real concern. In certain instances, bile resin binders may be useful in the treatment of FH (for example pregnant and lactating patients).

 

FIGURE 2. Approach to the Pharmacologic Treatment of Patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

 

PCSK9 inhibitors consist of two therapeutic modalities, 1) monoclonal antibodies (alirocumab and evolocumab) that work extracellularly to sequester the PCSK9 protein, and 2) inclisiran, a novel, small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA)-based gene-silencing technology that inhibits mRNA translation and intracellular production of PCSK9 by the liver (111).

 

The effect of PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies in patients with HeFH has been extensively studied and consistently demonstrate potent LDL-C lowering on the order of 50-60% (63,112-126). An analysis of the ODYSSEY trials (FH I, FH II, LONG TERM, and HIGH FH) evaluated alirocumab use (75 or 150 mg subcutaneously every 14 days) in 1,257 HeFH patients. The primary endpoint was LDL-C at 24 weeks; alirocumab resulted in a more than 55% reduction in LDL-C compared with placebo (122). In another trial, alirocumab 150 mg every 14 days in 62 apheresis patients reduced the primary endpoint, rate of apheresis treatments over 12 weeks, by 75%, with 63.4% of patients completely discontinuing apheresis treatments due to well controlled LDL-C values (121). The RUTHERFORD-2 trial evaluated more than 300 patients with HeFH randomized to evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks or 420 mg subcutaneously monthly) versus placebo. At both dosing regimens, evolocumab resulted in significantly reduced LDL-C at 12 weeks compared with placebo (>60%) (63). In all trials, PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies were well tolerated, with most demonstrating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) similar to placebo. Clinically, the most common adverse events include: injection site reactions, mild cold or flu-like symptoms, nasopharyngitis, and myalgias (127). Thus, PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies are very effective at lowering LDL cholesterol levels and safe in HeFH patients.

 

Additionally, there are two cardiovascular outcomes trials that evaluated the FDA approved monoclonal antibodies targeting PCSK9. The FOURIER trial evaluated almost 28,000 subjects with stable vascular disease (CAD, stroke, peripheral arterial disease) on optimized statin therapy and randomized them to either placebo or evolocumab. Evolocumab therapy was associated with a 60% reduction in LDL-C and a 15% reduction in the primary 5-point major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate (128). The FOURIER had an open-label extension trial (FOURIER-OLE) which followed 6,635 patients from the parent trial and allocated all patients (those originally assigned placebo or evolocumab) to evolocumab and followed over a median and maximal exposure of 7.1 years and 8.4 years respectively. Those originally assigned evolocumab in the parents study continued to display significant reductions in ASCVD events and even cardiovascular death as compared to those assigned placebo - establishing the important notion of a legacy effect with PCSK9i, where earlier initiation of therapy provides cardiovascular prevention that cannot be achieved when delayed. This study represents the longest follow-up to date of PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies and confirms that attainment of low LDL (30 mg/dL) is both safe and effective for preventing cardiovascular events (129).

 

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES enrolled approximately 18,000 subjects with recent acute coronary syndrome (1-12 months prior to enrollment in the trial) who were on high-intensity statin therapy at baseline and randomized them to placebo or alirocumab. Alirocumab was also associated with a 15% reduction in the primary outcome, in this case a 4-point composite of MACE (130). Major guidelines, consensus documents, and expert recommendations suggest consideration of a PCSK9 inhibitor (in addition to background statin +/- ezetimibe therapy) in high-risk patients with established ASCVD and/or in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia when LDL-C values exceed 55/70 or 100 mg/dL respectively (92,94,96,97,131-134). Both monoclonal antibodies have an FDA labeled indication for ASCVD risk reduction in patients with established ASCVD. Despite potent LDL-C lowering, a good safety profile, and robust clinical data demonstrating cardiovascular benefit, PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies are significantly underutilized among both patients with established ASCVD and those with FH, with reports suggesting only 1% to 2% of eligible patients currently prescribe PCSK9 inhibitors (135,136).

 

Inclisiran has been thoroughly studied in the ORION clinical development program, a series of phase 1 to 3 trials designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of inclisiran in specific populations (111). ORION-9 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating use of inclisiran 300 mg given subcutaneously on days 1, 90, 270, and 540, in 482 HeFH patients with baseline LDL-C of ≥100 mg/dL(137). Treatment with inclisiran produced a placebo-corrected LDL-C reduction of 47.9% (P<0.001) at day 510. Response based on genotype was as expected, with LDL-C reductions of 41.2% to 59.2% for all except PCSK9GOF variants which were associated with dramatic LDL-C reduction of 89.7%. Pre-specified exploratory cardiovascular event (CV death, cardiac arrest, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke) rates were comparable in both treatment groups (4.1% inclisiran vs. 4.2% placebo). Inclisiran was tolerated well during the trial with adverse events similar between treatment groups, with most adverse reactions mild to moderate in nature. The most common adverse event was injection site reactions, which was 10-fold higher in the inclisiran group (17%) compared to placebo (1.7%), however, 90% of these were graded as mild severity. Future studies will evaluate inclisiran in an adolescent HeFH population in the ORION-16 trial (138). Inclisiran was FDA approved in December 2021 as an adjunct to diet and statin therapy for the treatment of adults with primary hyperlipidemia, including HeFH, to reduce LDL-C(139).Pooled analyses of ORION-9 (patients with HeFH), ORION-10 (patients with ASCVD), and ORION-11 (patients with ASCVD or ASCVD risk equivalents) demonstrated durable LDL-C reduction of approximately 50% with a good safety profile with only injection site reactions, predominantly mild, and bronchitis as potentially drug-induced adverse effects (140,141).  Additionally, prespecified exploratory analysis of MACE which was a non-adjudicated outcome and a safety event, and which should be regarded as hypothesis generating only, hinted at a reduction in atherosclerotic events with inclisiran (141).  The question of whether inclisiran reduces cardiovascular events will be definitively determined with two large cardiovascular outcome trials – ORION-4 and VICTORIAN 2P, with estimated completion dates in 2026 and 2027 respectively (111). Though PCSK9 inhibition by monoclonal antibodies and inclisiran are comparable in LDL-C reducing capacity, there are important differences to acknowledge 1) inclisiran has a long biological half-life allowing for twice yearly dosing and possible medication adherence advantages, 2) PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies are administered by patients in their home and inclisiran is to be administered by a healthcare professional in a healthcare setting, and 3) while PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies have robust data proving reduction in ASCVD events, clinical outcome trials with inclisiran are still in progress. Additional considerations with the in-clinic administration of inclisiran include a new medication use process which includes procurement, storage, administration, and billing, which is a new workflow to the cardiovascular community and may take time to acclimate to. There are also the financial implications from the patient perspective as inclisiran is billed under medical insurance, not pharmacy benefits, which has the potential for reduced out-of-pocket expense for Medicare recipients specifically (142,143).

 

Novel approaches to inhibit PCSK9 action, termed third-generation PCSK9 inhibitors, are currently in various stages of clinical development. These include once orally administered macrocyclic peptide agents (i.e., MK-0616), monthly subcutaneous injection fusion protein binders (i.e., Lerodalcibep), CRISPR-based gene editing (i.e., VERVE-101), and PCSK9 vaccines (144). New PCSK9 modalities offer potential advantages such as oral administration, storage at room temp, and less frequent administration. The magnitude of LDL-C reduction with these technologies is similar to currently existing PCSK9 therapeutics, approximately 40%-60% lowering, except for vaccination, which appears less robust with approximately 10%-30% LDL-C reduction. Time will tell if and how these newer therapies position themselves among the ever-changing lipid-lowering landscape.

 

Bempedoic acid, a novel inhibitor of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-citrate lyase (ACL), an enzyme upstream from 3–hydroxy–3–methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG–CoA) in the cholesterol synthesis pathway, is the newest orally administered lipid-lowering therapy (145). Bempedoic acid is a prodrug, that is converted into its active form (bempedoyl-CoA) by very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1 (ACSVL1), which is expressed in hepatocytes but is undetectable in muscle. Development of this agent was designed to circumvent the myotoxicity commonly associated with historical lipid-lowering therapies, primarily statins. Bempedoic acid was FDA approved on February 21, 2020 for use in patients with established ASCVD and/or HeFH who require additional LDL-C lowering as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated statin therapy (146). Bempedoic acid was evaluated in over 3,600 patients in the phase 3 CLEAR program trials, of which, only 3.7% were HeFH patients (145). A pooled analysis from two phase 3 trials, CLEAR Harmony and CLEAR Wisdom, demonstrated a similarly modest placebo-corrected LDL-C reduction at 12 weeks of bempedoic acid treatment in the HeFH cohort (22.3%) as compared to the overall population (18.3%) (147). Overall bempedoic acid was well tolerated in the phase 3 trials but occurrence of TEAEs was higher in the HeFH cohort compared to those without HeFH but was not increased with bempedoic acid versus placebo. Similar reports of efficacy and safety were seen in an updated analysis of phase 3 data in HeFH as well (148). In a real-world analysis of bempedoic acid, which was enriched in patients with HeFH (64%) and statin intolerance (74%), the drug was associated with clinically meaningful LDL-C lowering (mean reductions 20.3% to 36.7%), but high rates of TEAEs (50%) and drug discontinuations (35.9%)(149).  Bempedoic acid completed a large cardiovascular outcome trial in 2023 with publication of the CLEAR OUTCOMES (150).  The trial enrolled 13,970 patients with established cardiovascular disease (70%) or at high risk for cardiovascular disease (30%) who were deemed statin intolerant.  Over a median follow-up of 40.6 months, the mean baseline LDL-C was reduced from 139 mg/dL to a timed-averaged, placebo-adjusted reduction of 22 mg/dL in the bempedoic acid group.  Is important to note there was a larger drop in LDL-C levels in the placebo arm than usually observed in clinical trials, which may have diluted the difference in LDL-C reduction between the 2 groups.  Nevertheless, the primary endpoint which consists of a 4-point MACE including death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or coronary vascularization was reduced from 11.7% in the placebo group vs.13.3% in the bempedoic acid group, HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), with statistically significant reductions seen the non-mortality outcome measures. Interestingly, the greatest relative risk reduction was seen in the primary prevention cohort (32%) as compared to the secondary prevention cohort (9%), however the clinical significance of this remains to be seen.  Bempedoic acid was well-tolerated with small increases in biomarkers such as serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, aminotransaminases, and uric acid, and rates of gout (3.2% vs 2.2%), and cholelithiasis (2.2% vs 1.2%) (151). In response to the CLEAR OUTCOMES data, the FDA updated the label for bempedoic acid which now includes “to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization in adults who are unable to take recommend statin therapy, including those not taking a statin, with established ASCVD or at high risk for ASCVD” (146).

 

Treatment of Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

 

The initial therapy in patients with HoFH is identical to the treatment of patients with HeFH. However, statins and ezetimibe may prove relatively ineffective in the treatment of HoFH because the mode of action of these drugs largely depends on the upregulation of functional LDLR in the liver. In HoFH, measurable activity of both copies of the LDLR is absent or greatly reduced (80). Drug-induced LDL-C lowering is diminished by more than 50% comparing HeFH to HoFH – high intensity statins lower LDL-C 50-60% vs 10-25% and ezetimibe lowers LDL-C by 15-25% vs <10%, respectively (see table 6) (95,152).

 

In patients with HoFH, response to PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies varies depending on the specific gene defect. In the TESLA-B trial, 49 patients with HoFH were treated with evolocumab or placebo every four weeks for 12 weeks. LDL-C in the evolocumab treatment arm was significantly reduced by almost 31% compared with placebo. In addition to overall reduction in LDL-C, the trial investigators examined the treatment effect by LDLR mutation status. They found that the response to evolocumab aligns with the genetic cause of HoFH, with a greater reduction in LDL-C observed in subjects with two LDL receptor-defective mutations (i.e., abnormal receptor functionality in both alleles) when compared with those patients with even just one LDL receptor-negative mutation (i.e., nonexistent receptor functionality in one allele). Evolocumab was well tolerated among the HoFH patients (153). Similar results were seen in other HoFH trials examining the PCSK9i monoclonal antibody (alirocumab) and over longer follow up durations, providing confirmation of durable LDL-C efficacy and safety with this therapeutic class (154-156).

 

Inclisiran, dosed as 300 mg subcutaneously on days 1 and 90 (or 104 if PCSK9 level was suppressed by >70%), was evaluated in 4 HoFH patients enrolled in the ORION-2 trial (157). Patients were ages 50, 46, 23, and 29 years, 50% female, and had baseline LDL-C 540 mg/dL, 547 mg/dL, 614 mg/dL, and 189 mg/dL, respectively. All had biallelic causative genetic variants in LDLR, and all were on high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Inclisiran-induced LDL-C reductions ranged 11.7% to 33.1% at day 90, and 17.5% to 37.0% at day 180 in three of the four patients, similar to results in prior trials of PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies in HoFH patients with residual LDLR function. One patient (LDLR c.681C/G [defective]) who had a history of hypo-responsiveness to both PCSK9i monoclonal antibodies (<20% lowering), also exhibited no change in LDL-C with inclisiran treatment. No adverse events were recorded over a 10 month follow up. A second, larger study of inclisiran use within the HoFH population was evaluated in a 2-part, phase 3 ORION-5 trial (158).  Part 1 is a double-blind randomized study where patients were randomized in a 2-1 fashion to inclisiran and placebo respectively at days 1 and 90.  Part 2 consisted of an 18-month open label single-arm extension trial in which all patients received inclisiran at day 180 and every 6 months thereafter until end of study at day 720. The study included 56 HoFH adults on stable lipid-lowering therapies including high-intensity statin 100%, ezetimibe 66.1%, and apheresis 35.7%. The median age was 42.7 years, 60.7% were women, and 67.9% had established ASCVD. The baseline mean LDL–C was 315.3 mg/dL with a higher value in the placebo group (356.7 mg/dL) as compared to the inclisiran group (294 mg/dL).  Notably, more patients in the inclisiran group displayed the null/null LDLR genotypes which are known to produce blunted response to PCSK9 inhibition (27% versus 15.8%) – an important difference that may have confounded the treatment results. The primary endpoint, placebo–corrected percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 150 was not statistically significant (-1.68%; P=0.90). The absolute placebo–corrected change in LDL-C level from baseline to day 150 was 6.47 mg/dL (P=0.87). The lack of statistically significant change in LDL values occurred despite a 60.6% reduction in plasma PCSK9 levels with inclisiran use. There were wide fluctuations in LDL-C reduction based on genotype: +26.6% with homozygous LDLR, -26.6% with compound heterozygous LDLR, and -22.5% with other genetic types. A post-hoc sensitivity analysis excluding patients with LDLR null/null genotypes and undergoing lipoprotein apheresis revealed greater reduction in LDL-C from 12.9% to 30%, indicating that inclsiran requires sufficient residual LDLR function to be effective within this population. There were no statistically significant changes in other proteins including apoB, non-HDL C, lipoprotein (a) and total cholesterol.  Similar to prior evaluations of inclisiran, the medication was well-tolerated. The lack of positive treatment results from the ORION-5 cannot exclude a small sample size compared to those enrolled in the PCSK9i monoclonal antibody trials, an imbalance in genotypes in the present study, or differing mechanisms for PCSK9 intubation (159). The upcoming study of inclisiran in adolescent (ORION-13) HoFH patients, Which is estimated to be completed by December 2024, will shed further light on the use inclisiran in HoFH. (160).

 

Standard triple drug therapy (statin, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitor) often does not result in a sufficient lowering of LDL-C due to the combination of the very high baseline LDL-C and the relative resistance of patients with HoFH to drug therapy. Currently, there are no published reports of bempedoic acid use within the HoFH population. Novel agents approved specifically for the treatment of severe hypercholesterolemia include microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitors and apoB-100 antisense oligonucleotides (ASO). MTP is involved in the transfer of lipid droplets to apoB as well as assembly and secretion of apoB-containing lipoproteins in the liver and gut. MTP inhibition thus reduces production and secretion of chylomicrons and VLDL-C. In one study, 29 patients with HoFH were treated with the MTP inhibitor lomitapide for 26 weeks and were followed until week 78. Average LDL-C reductions were 50% (to 166 mg/dl) at week 26, 44% (to 197 mg/dL) at week 52, and 38% (to 208 mg/dL) at week 78 (161). Real-world observational data of lomitapide from the LOWER registry suggest slightly less robust LDL-C lowering (33%) and LDL-C goal attainment (65.4% attaining LDL-C <100 mg/dL, 41.1% attaining LDL-C <70 mg/dL), likely a result of inadequate dose titration (mean dose 10 mg/d, range 5-40 mg/d) due to a high burden of adverse effects with nearly quarter of patients discontinuing treatment due to side effects (162). Though lomitapide displays potent LDL-C lowering capacity, use is limited as a result of a significant side effect profile consisting of severe gastrointestinal complications and hepatotoxicity risk, as well as high medication cost.

 

Anti-sense oligonucleotide (ASO) molecules bind to specific mRNAs and target them for degradation, reducing protein synthesis in the process. Mipomersen, which was removed from the market in June 2018, is an ASO that binds to apoB-100 mRNA and thus prevents the formation of apoB-100. Mipomersen results in decreased synthesis of apoB-containing lipoproteins, mostly VLDL-C, eventually leading to a drastic reduction of LDL-C levels in plasma. In one trial, 51 patients with either genetically defined HoFH, untreated LDL-C levels of >500 mg/dL plus xanthomas, or evidence of HeFH in both parents were randomized to placebo versus mipomersen for a treatment duration of 26 weeks. In the placebo group, baseline LDL-C was 402 mg/dL and declined to 390 mg/dL; in the treatment group, baseline LDL-C dropped from 440 mg/dl to 324 mg/dL (163).

 

Evinacumab is the newest addition to the lipid-lowering treatment armamentarium, receiving FDA approval in February 2021 as an adjunct to other LDL-lowering therapies for treatment of adults and pediatric patients originally ≥12 years of age with HoFH, with the age being reduced to ≥5 years of age in March 2023 (152). Evinacumab is a fully human IgG4 isotype monoclonal antibody targeting a novel, non-LDLR pathway for LDL-C lowering by inhibiting angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) (164). ANGPTL3 inhibition overrides the inhibitory effect on lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL) increasing the activity of these enzymes, producing a panlipid-lowering effect of apo-B containing lipoproteins (with the exception Lp[a]), reducing lipoproteins by approximately 50% from baseline (152). Specifically, evinacumab promotes LDL-C lowering through EL-dependent VLDL-C processing and clearance by LDLR independent pathways, thereby decreasing formation of LDL-C from VLDL-C.(165) The magnitude of LDL-C lowering was seen in both HoFH and HeFH populations and was similar regardless of genotype. Serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) evaluations of two HoFH patients enrolled in the ELIPSE HoFH trial demonstrated reductions in coronary total plaque volume (TPV) of 76% to 85% over 10 months of treatment with evinacumab (166). Evinacumab is dosed at 15 mg/kg of body weight given over a 60 minute intravenous infusion (152). The drug is well tolerated with adverse effects being infrequent, mild, and transient, consisting primarily of injection site reactions, flu/cold-like symptoms, pain, and fatigue. The long-term safety of evinacumab remains unknown. A recent real-world analysis of evinacumab use across six US academic medical centers, demonstrated good tolerability, potent LDL-C lowering (50.8%), and LDL-C goal attainment (30.4% achieving LDL-C goals of <70 mg/dL) among 24 patients followed for up to 63 weeks (167). Additionally, a real-world analysis demonstrated that evinacumab can be a complementary therapy to apheresis.  A single center US academic medical institution described the use of two patients undergoing apheresis for whom evinacumab was added achieving LDL-C lowering of 42% to 58%, and LDL-C goal attainment of <55 mg/dL in one patient. The study concluded that evinacumab presents a major advancement in the treatment of HoFH and will allow for improved LDL-C goal attainment. Evinacumab will be complementary to ongoing lipoprotein apheresis in many, but for those with less severe residual LDL-C elevation, may allow for reduced apheresis frequency or potentially replace its use altogether (168). The most recent study of evinacumab was published January 2024 and included an open-label 3-part series evaluating evinacumab use in pediatric patients age 5 to 11 years of age with HoFH (169). Part A was a pharmacokinetic study of 6 patients which determined that the 15 mg/kg intravenously administered dose utilized within the adult patient population was appropriate for pediatric patients. Part B was a phase 3, single-arm, 24-week open-label study assessing the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of evinacumab in 14 patients. Part C is an ongoing, phase 3, 48-week open-label extension study with a 24-week follow-up designed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of evinacumab and will include all 20 patients from parts A and B. The mean age for patients in the part B trial was 9.1 years, 57.1% of which were females with 71% of patients having biallelic different LDLR variance, with 5 patient's carrying null/null alleles. Additionally, 11 of the 14 of patients already had aortic stenosis at this young age.  Baseline LDL-C was 263.7 mg/dL, 85.7% were on any statin, 50% were on high-intensity statin, 100% were taking non-statins (none on PCSK9 inhibitor), 14.3% were taking lomitapide, and 50% were on apheresis. The primary endpoint, mean LDL-C percent change from baseline was reduced by 48.3% with an absolute LDL-C lowering of 131.9 mg/dL at week 24.  LDL-C reduction was seen as early as week 1 with near full response witnessed by week 2.  Response was independent of age, sex, ethnicity, LDLR genotype, or baseline apheresis use.  Evaluation of other lipoprotein parameters included reductions of 41.3% in apoB, 48.9% in non-HDL-C, 49.1% in total cholesterol, and 37.3% in Lp(a).  Similar to that seen in the adult population, evinacumab was well-tolerated with no treatment-related serious or severe TEAEs noted and no drug discontinuations due to adverse effects.  Immunogenicity potential was minimal with only 1 patient developing treatment emergent antidrug antibodies but no neutralized antibodies. Evinacumab is poised to play a significant role in HoFH management as it offers one of the most potent LDL-C lowering capabilities among existing treatments. Use in HoFH will likely be as an add-on therapy after high-intensity statin, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibition. However, potential barriers to use may include high cost, intravenous administration, and requirement for administration in a healthcare or home infusion setting. Future use of evinacumab may extend beyond HoFH and could entail use in other therapeutic areas such as HeFH and severe hypertriglyceridemia.

 

In patients in which drug therapy is either not successful at lowering LDL-C or not well tolerated one can consider lipoprotein apheresis or potentially even liver transplantation (170). The FDA has approved lipoprotein apheresis for subjects with CVD and LDL-C >200 mg/dL or without CVD and LDL-C >300 mg/dL (171). This threshold has been moved to 160 mg/dL, and more recently to 100 mg/dL with FH and ASCVD, thus increasing the target population for cholesterol dialysis at a time when arrival of stronger medications is curtailing patient entry into this therapeutic program. The process, which involves removing apoB-containing lipoproteins from plasma, is usually performed every two weeks and results in a 60-70% reduction of LDL-C and Lp(a) in the immediate post-procedure period, with time-averaged reductions of 20-50%. Levels tend to revert to baseline within two weeks. For more detailed information on lipoprotein apheresis see the Endotext chapter on this topic (172).

 

TABLE 6. COMMON LIPID-LOWERING TREATMENTS FOR FH

Agent

Niacin

BAS

Fibrate

Statin

Ezetimibe

FDA approval date

1997*

1973

1981†

1993

1987

2002

Administration

PO

PO

PO

PO

PO

Dosing

Daily

Daily

Daily

Daily

Daily

LDL-C lowering

(HeFH)

10%-25%

15%-30%

10%-20%

20%-60%

15%-25%

LDL-C lowering

(HoFH)

<10%

<10%

<10%

10%-25%

<10%

Lp(a) lowering

20-30%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Relative cost

+/++

++

+

+

+

Safety concerns

Flushing, moderate GI intolerance (abd pain, nausea, vomiting, peptic ulcer), hyperglycemia, gout, hepatotoxicity

Moderate GI symptoms (abd pain, constipation, bloating, nausea), hypertriglyceridemia, fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies

Myalgia, mild GI symptoms (abd pain, diarrhea), cholelithiasis, increased LFT

LFT elevation, myalgia, DM risk

Mild GI symptoms (loose stool, diarrhea, cramping), myalgia, increased LFT

Other consider-ations

 

High pill burden, separate from other meds (binding)

Primarily used for triglyceride lowering, renal dose adjustments

Usually well tolerated

 

Adapted from Warden BA, et al. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021;1-13.

*Approval date is for niacin extended-release. Niacin has been used clinically for hypercholesterolemia since the 1950’s.

†Gemfibrozil FDA approved in 1981, fenofibrate in 1993.

 

TABLE 7. ADVANCED LIPID-LOWERING TREATMENTS FOR FH

Agent

Lipoprotein

apheresis

Lomitapide

PCSK9i*

Bempedoic acid

Evinacumab

FDA approval date

1996

2012

2015

2020

2021

Administration

IV

PO

SQ

PO

IV

Dosing

2-4x monthly

Daily

1-2x monthly

Daily

Monthly

LDL-C lowering

(HeFH)

50-85% (acute)

23-50%

(time-average)

N/A

50%-60%

15%-25%

49%

 

LDL-C lowering

(HoFH)

50-85% (acute)

23-50%

(time-average)

20%-50%

zero-30%†

Unknown

49%

Lp(a) lowering

50-75% (acute)

20-40%

(time-average)

zero-30%

20-30%

N/A

N/A

Relative cost

++++

++++

+++

++/+++

+++++

Safety concerns

IV access issues, hypotension, vasovagal episodes, fatigue, bleeding, hypocalcemia, anemia

Severe GI intolerance (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abd pain, cramping), fat malabsorption, hepatic steatosis,

hepatotoxicity (REMS)

ISR, flu/cold-like symptoms

Mild GI symptoms (diarrhea, abd discomfort), gout, tendon injury, transient lab changes (SCr, BUN, LFT, Hgb, HCT, uric acid)

Nasopharyngitis, ISR, flu-like symptoms, fatigue, pain, headache, rare hypersensitivity reaction

Other consider-ations

Lengthy and frequent treatments, need for patient travel, DDI (heparin, ACEi)

Significant DDI, renal dose adjustments

Access and cost issues

Improves glycaemia, option for patients with SAMS

Reduces all non-Lp(a) apoB-containing lipoproteins

Adapted from Warden BA, et al. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021;1-13.

*PCSK9i: represent PCSK9 blocking monoclonal antibodies and inclisiran, a novel small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA)-based medication.

†Response aligns with genetic cause of HoFH with no reduction was seen in those with null-null LDLR mutations.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science (New York, NY). 1986;232(4746):34-47.
  2. Berberich AJ, Hegele RA. The complex molecular genetics of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2019;16(1):9-20.
  3. Fouchier SW, Dallinga-Thie GM, Meijers JC, Zelcer N, Kastelein JJ, Defesche JC, Hovingh GK. Mutations in STAP1 are associated with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Circulation research. 2014;115(6):552-555.
  4. Kanuri B, Fong V, Haller A, Hui DY, Patel SB. Mice lacking global Stap1 expression do not manifest hypercholesterolemia. BMC Med Genet. 2020;21(1):234.
  5. Mohebi R, Chen Q, Hegele RA, Rosenson RS. Failure of cosegregation between a rare STAP1 missense variant and hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(5):636-638.
  6. Loaiza N, Hartgers ML, Reeskamp LF, Balder JW, Rimbert A, Bazioti V, Wolters JC, Winkelmeijer M, Jansen HPG, Dallinga-Thie GM, Volta A, Huijkman N, Smit M, Kloosterhuis N, Koster M, Svendsen AF, van de Sluis B, Hovingh GK, Grefhorst A, Kuivenhoven JA. Taking One Step Back in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: STAP1 Does Not Alter Plasma LDL (Low-Density Lipoprotein) Cholesterol in Mice and Humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40(4):973-985.
  7. Lamiquiz-Moneo I, Restrepo-Córdoba MA, Mateo-Gallego R, Bea AM, Del Pino Alberiche-Ruano M, García-Pavía P, Cenarro A, Martín C, Civeira F, Sánchez-Hernández RM. Predicted pathogenic mutations in STAP1 are not associated with clinically defined familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2020;292:143-151.
  8. Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ. Familial hypercholesterolemias: prevalence, genetics, diagnosis and screening recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2011;5(3 Suppl):S9-17.
  9. Abul-Husn NS, Manickam K, Jones LK, Wright EA, Hartzel DN, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, O'Dushlaine C, Leader JB, Lester Kirchner H, Lindbuchler DM, Barr ML, Giovanni MA, Ritchie MD, Overton JD, Reid JG, Metpally RP, Wardeh AH, Borecki IB, Yancopoulos GD, Baras A, Shuldiner AR, Gottesman O, Ledbetter DH, Carey DJ, Dewey FE, Murray MF. Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system. Science (New York, NY). 2016;354(6319).
  10. Khera AV, Won HH, Peloso GM, Lawson KS, Bartz TM, Deng X, van Leeuwen EM, Natarajan P, Emdin CA, Bick AG, Morrison AC, Brody JA, Gupta N, Nomura A, Kessler T, Duga S, Bis JC, van Duijn CM, Cupples LA, Psaty B, Rader DJ, Danesh J, Schunkert H, McPherson R, Farrall M, Watkins H, Lander E, Wilson JG, Correa A, Boerwinkle E, Merlini PA, Ardissino D, Saleheen D, Gabriel S, Kathiresan S. Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility of Sequencing Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genes in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;67(22):2578-2589.
  11. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS, Wiklund O, Hegele RA, Raal FJ, Defesche JC, Wiegman A, Santos RD, Watts GF, Parhofer KG, Hovingh GK, Kovanen PT, Boileau C, Averna M, Boren J, Bruckert E, Catapano AL, Kuivenhoven JA, Pajukanta P, Ray K, Stalenhoef AF, Stroes E, Taskinen MR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. European heart journal. 2013;34(45):3478-3490a.
  12. Knowles JW, Rader DJ, Khoury MJ. Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Use of Genetic Testing. JAMA. 2017;318(4):381-382.
  13. Haase A, Goldberg AC. Identification of people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Current opinion in lipidology. 2012;23(4):282-289.
  14. Sniderman AD, Tsimikas S, Fazio S. The severe hypercholesterolemia phenotype: clinical diagnosis, management, and emerging therapies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;63(19):1935-1947.
  15. Tsimikas S, Hall JL. Lipoprotein(a) as a potential causal genetic risk factor of cardiovascular disease: a rationale for increased efforts to understand its pathophysiology and develop targeted therapies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(8):716-721.
  16. Kraft HG, Lingenhel A, Raal FJ, Hohenegger M, Utermann G. Lipoprotein(a) in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2000;20(2):522-528.
  17. Rader DJ, Mann WA, Cain W, Kraft HG, Usher D, Zech LA, Hoeg JM, Davignon J, Lupien P, Grossman M, et al. The low density lipoprotein receptor is not required for normal catabolism of Lp(a) in humans. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1995;95(3):1403-1408.
  18. Cain WJ, Millar JS, Himebauch AS, Tietge UJ, Maugeais C, Usher D, Rader DJ. Lipoprotein [a] is cleared from the plasma primarily by the liver in a process mediated by apolipoprotein [a]. Journal of lipid research. 2005;46(12):2681-2691.
  19. Tsimikas S, Fazio S, Ferdinand KC, Ginsberg HN, Koschinsky ML, Marcovina SM, Moriarty PM, Rader DJ, Remaley AT, Reyes-Soffer G, Santos RD, Thanassoulis G, Witztum JL, Danthi S, Olive M, Liu L. NHLBI Working Group Recommendations to Reduce Lipoprotein(a)-Mediated Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Aortic Stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71(2):177-192.
  20. Yeang C, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S. Novel method for quantification of lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol: implications for improving accuracy of LDL-C measurements. Journal of lipid research. 2021;62:100053.
  21. Hedegaard BS, Nordestgaard BG, Kanstrup HL, Thomsen KK, Bech J, Bang LE, Henriksen FL, Andersen LJ, Gohr T, Larsen LH, Soja AMB, Elpert FP, Jakobsen TJ, Sjøl A, Joensen AM, Klausen IC, Schmidt EB, Bork CS. High Lipoprotein(a) May Explain One-Quarter of Clinical Familial Hypercholesterolemia Diagnoses in Danish Lipid Clinics. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2024;109(3):659-667.
  22. Slimane MN, Pousse H, Maatoug F, Hammami M, Ben Farhat MH. Phenotypic expression of familial hypercholesterolaemia in central and southern Tunisia. Atherosclerosis. 1993;104(1-2):153-158.
  23. Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ, Robinson JG, Daniels SR, Gidding SS, de Ferranti SD, Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM, Cromwell WC, Ross JL, Ziajka PE. Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2011;5(3 Suppl):S1-8.
  24. Calandra S, Tarugi P, Speedy HE, Dean AF, Bertolini S, Shoulders CC. Mechanisms and genetic determinants regulating sterol absorption, circulating LDL levels, and sterol elimination: implications for classification and disease risk. Journal of lipid research. 2011;52(11):1885-1926.
  25. Innerarity TL, Mahley RW, Weisgraber KH, Bersot TP, Krauss RM, Vega GL, Grundy SM, Friedl W, Davignon J, McCarthy BJ. Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: a mutation of apolipoprotein B that causes hypercholesterolemia. Journal of lipid research. 1990;31(8):1337-1349.
  26. Lambert G, Sjouke B, Choque B, Kastelein JJ, Hovingh GK. The PCSK9 decade. Journal of lipid research. 2012;53(12):2515-2524.
  27. Cohen JC, Boerwinkle E, Mosley TH, Jr., Hobbs HH. Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;354(12):1264-1272.
  28. Zhao Z, Tuakli-Wosornu Y, Lagace TA, Kinch L, Grishin NV, Horton JD, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Molecular characterization of loss-of-function mutations in PCSK9 and identification of a compound heterozygote. American journal of human genetics. 2006;79(3):514-523.
  29. Hooper AJ, Marais AD, Tanyanyiwa DM, Burnett JR. The C679X mutation in PCSK9 is present and lowers blood cholesterol in a Southern African population. Atherosclerosis. 2007;193(2):445-448.
  30. Awan Z, Choi HY, Stitziel N, Ruel I, Bamimore MA, Husa R, Gagnon MH, Wang RH, Peloso GM, Hegele RA, Seidah NG, Kathiresan S, Genest J. APOE p.Leu167del mutation in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2013;231(2):218-222.
  31. Pullinger CR, Eng C, Salen G, Shefer S, Batta AK, Erickson SK, Verhagen A, Rivera CR, Mulvihill SJ, Malloy MJ, Kane JP. Human cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) deficiency has a hypercholesterolemic phenotype. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2002;110(1):109-117.
  32. Liebeskind A, Peterson AL, Wilson D. Sitosterolemia. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2024, MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
  33. Wilson DP, Patni N. Lysosomal Acid Lipase Deficiency. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2024, MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
  34. Ahmad Z, Adams-Huet B, Chen C, Garg A. Low prevalence of mutations in known loci for autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in a multiethnic patient cohort. Circulation Cardiovascular genetics. 2012;5(6):666-675.
  35. Sturm AC, Knowles JW, Gidding SS, Ahmad ZS, Ahmed CD, Ballantyne CM, Baum SJ, Bourbon M, Carrie A, Cuchel M, de Ferranti SD, Defesche JC, Freiberger T, Hershberger RE, Hovingh GK, Karayan L, Kastelein JJP, Kindt I, Lane SR, Leigh SE, Linton MF, Mata P, Neal WA, Nordestgaard BG, Santos RD, Harada-Shiba M, Sijbrands EJ, Stitziel NO, Yamashita S, Wilemon KA, Ledbetter DH, Rader DJ. Clinical Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72(6):662-680.
  36. Wang J, Dron JS, Ban MR, Robinson JF, McIntyre AD, Alazzam M, Zhao PJ, Dilliott AA, Cao H, Huff MW, Rhainds D, Low-Kam C, Dube MP, Lettre G, Tardif JC, Hegele RA. Polygenic Versus Monogenic Causes of Hypercholesterolemia Ascertained Clinically. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2016;36(12):2439-2445.
  37. Zhang Y, Dron JS, Bellows BK, Khera AV, Liu J, Balte PP, Oelsner EC, Amr SS, Lebo MS, Nagy A, Peloso GM, Natarajan P, Rotter JI, Willer C, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne CM, Lutsey PL, Fornage M, Lloyd-Jones DM, Hou L, Psaty BM, Bis JC, Floyd JS, Vasan RS, Heard-Costa NL, Carson AP, Hall ME, Rich SS, Guo X, Kazi DS, de Ferranti SD, Moran AE. Association of Severe Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genotype With Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation. 2023;147(20):1556-1559.
  38. Stein EA, Raal FJ. Polygenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: does it matter? Lancet (London, England). 2013;381(9874):1255-1257.
  39. Brown EE, Sturm AC, Cuchel M, Braun LT, Duell PB, Underberg JA, Jacobson TA, Hegele RA. Genetic testing in dyslipidemia: A scientific statement from the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(4):398-413.
  40. Harders-Spengel K, Wood CB, Thompson GR, Myant NB, Soutar AK. Difference in saturable binding of low density lipoprotein to liver membranes from normocholesterolemic subjects and patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1982;79(20):6355-6359.
  41. Havekes LM, Verboom H, de Wit E, Yap SH, Princen HM. Regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor activity in primary cultures of human hepatocytes by serum lipoproteins. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 1986;6(6):1356-1360.
  42. Zelcer N, Hong C, Boyadjian R, Tontonoz P. LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor. Science (New York, NY). 2009;325(5936):100-104.
  43. Goldstein JL, Schrott HG, Hazzard WR, Bierman EL, Motulsky AG. Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease. II. Genetic analysis of lipid levels in 176 families and delineation of a new inherited disorder, combined hyperlipidemia. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1973;52(7):1544-1568.
  44. Bilheimer DW, Stone NJ, Grundy SM. Metabolic studies in familial hypercholesterolemia. Evidence for a gene-dosage effect in vivo. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1979;64(2):524-533.
  45. Kesaniemi YA, Grundy SM. Significance of low density lipoprotein production in the regulations of plasma cholesterol level in man. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1982;70(1):13-22.
  46. Real JT, Chaves FJ, Ejarque I, Garcia-Garcia AB, Valldecabres C, Ascaso JF, Armengod ME, Carmena R. Influence of LDL receptor gene mutations and the R3500Q mutation of the apoB gene on lipoprotein phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemic patients from a South European population. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2003;11(12):959-965.
  47. Ejarque I, Real JT, Martinez-Hervas S, Chaves FJ, Blesa S, Garcia-Garcia AB, Millan E, Ascaso JF, Carmena R. Evaluation of clinical diagnosis criteria of familial ligand defective apoB 100 and lipoprotein phenotype comparison between LDL receptor gene mutations affecting ligand-binding domain and the R3500Q mutation of the apoB gene in patients from a South European population. Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 2008;151(3):162-167.
  48. Pimstone SN, Defesche JC, Clee SM, Bakker HD, Hayden MR, Kastelein JJ. Differences in the phenotype between children with familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 and familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 1997;17(5):826-833.
  49. Miserez AR, Keller U. Differences in the phenotypic characteristics of subjects with familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 and familial hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 1995;15(10):1719-1729.
  50. Defesche JC, Pricker KL, Hayden MR, van der Ende BE, Kastelein JJ. Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 is clinically indistinguishable from familial hypercholesterolemia. Archives of internal medicine. 1993;153(20):2349-2356.
  51. Gidding SS, Champagne MA, de Ferranti SD, Defesche J, Ito MK, Knowles JW, McCrindle B, Raal F, Rader D, Santos RD, Lopes-Virella M, Watts GF, Wierzbicki AS. The Agenda for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(22):2167-2192.
  52. Garcia-Alvarez I, Castillo S, Mozas P, Tejedor D, Reyes G, Artieda M, Cenarro A, Alonso R, Mata P, Pocovi M, Civeira F. [Differences in clinical presentation between subjects with a phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia determined by defects in the LDL-receptor and defects in Apo B-100]. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2003;56(8):769-774.
  53. Bourbon M, Alves AC, Alonso R, Mata N, Aguiar P, Padro T, Mata P. Mutational analysis and genotype-phenotype relation in familial hypercholesterolemia: The SAFEHEART registry. Atherosclerosis. 2017;262:8-13.
  54. Talmud PJ, Shah S, Whittall R, Futema M, Howard P, Cooper JA, Harrison SC, Li K, Drenos F, Karpe F, Neil HA, Descamps OS, Langenberg C, Lench N, Kivimaki M, Whittaker J, Hingorani AD, Kumari M, Humphries SE. Use of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol gene score to distinguish patients with polygenic and monogenic familial hypercholesterolaemia: a case-control study. Lancet (London, England). 2013;381(9874):1293-1301.
  55. Ghaleb Y, Elbitar S, El Khoury P, Bruckert E, Carreau V, Carrie A, Moulin P, Di-Filippo M, Charriere S, Iliozer H, Farnier M, Luc G, Rabes JP, Boileau C, Abifadel M, Varret M. Usefulness of the genetic risk score to identify phenocopies in families with familial hypercholesterolemia? European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2018;26(4):570-578.
  56. Kastelein JJ, van Leuven SI, Burgess L, Evans GW, Kuivenhoven JA, Barter PJ, Revkin JH, Grobbee DE, Riley WA, Shear CL, Duggan WT, Bots ML. Effect of torcetrapib on carotid atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;356(16):1620-1630.
  57. Kane JP, Malloy MJ, Tun P, Phillips NR, Freedman DD, Williams ML, Rowe JS, Havel RJ. Normalization of low-density-lipoprotein levels in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with a combined drug regimen. The New England journal of medicine. 1981;304(5):251-258.
  58. Kastelein JJ, Akdim F, Stroes ES, Zwinderman AH, Bots ML, Stalenhoef AF, Visseren FL, Sijbrands EJ, Trip MD, Stein EA, Gaudet D, Duivenvoorden R, Veltri EP, Marais AD, de Groot E. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;358(14):1431-1443.
  59. Stein EA, Illingworth DR, Kwiterovich PO, Jr., Liacouras CA, Siimes MA, Jacobson MS, Brewster TG, Hopkins P, Davidson M, Graham K, Arensman F, Knopp RH, DuJovne C, Williams CL, Isaacsohn JL, Jacobsen CA, Laskarzewski PM, Ames S, Gormley GJ. Efficacy and safety of lovastatin in adolescent males with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 1999;281(2):137-144.
  60. Pang J, David Marais A, Blom DJ, Brice BC, Silva PR, Jannes CE, Pereira AC, Hooper AJ, Ray KK, Santos RD, Watts GF. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in specialist centres in South Africa, Australia and Brazil: Importance of early detection and lifestyle advice. Atherosclerosis. 2018;277:470-476.
  61. Ridker PM, Rose LM, Kastelein JJP, Santos RD, Wei C, Revkin J, Yunis C, Tardif JC, Shear CL. Cardiovascular event reduction with PCSK9 inhibition among 1578 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: Results from the SPIRE randomized trials of bococizumab. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2018;12(4):958-965.
  62. Kastelein JJ, Ginsberg HN, Langslet G, Hovingh GK, Ceska R, Dufour R, Blom D, Civeira F, Krempf M, Lorenzato C, Zhao J, Pordy R, Baccara-Dinet MT, Gipe DA, Geiger MJ, Farnier M. ODYSSEY FH I and FH II: 78 week results with alirocumab treatment in 735 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. European heart journal. 2015;36(43):2996-3003.
  63. Raal FJ, Stein EA, Dufour R, Turner T, Civeira F, Burgess L, Langslet G, Scott R, Olsson AG, Sullivan D, Hovingh GK, Cariou B, Gouni-Berthold I, Somaratne R, Bridges I, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Gaudet D. PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab (AMG 145) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (RUTHERFORD-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2015;385(9965):331-340.
  64. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Approach to the Patient with Dyslipidemia. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Feingold KR, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
  65. Feingold KR. The Effect of Diet on Cardiovascular Disease and Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc. Copyright © 2000-2024, MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
  66. Santos RD. Phenotype vs. genotype in severe familial hypercholesterolemia: what matters most for the clinician? Current opinion in lipidology. 2017;28(2):130-135.
  67. Beheshti SO, Madsen CM, Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Worldwide Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Meta-Analyses of 11 Million Subjects. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;75(20):2553-2566.
  68. Slack J. Risks of ischaemic heart-disease in familial hyperlipoproteinaemic states. Lancet (London, England). 1969;2(7635):1380-1382.
  69. Stone NJ, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS, Verter J. Coronary artery disease in 116 kindred with familial type II hyperlipoproteinemia. Circulation. 1974;49(3):476-488.
  70. Reeskamp LF, Shim I, Dron JS, Ibrahim S, Tromp TR, Fahed AC, Patel AP, Hutten BA, Stroes ESG, Hovingh GK, Khera AV. Polygenic Background Modifies Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Among Individuals With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. JACC Adv. 2023;2(9):100662.
  71. Trinder M, Cermakova L, Ruel I, Baass A, Paquette M, Wang J, Kennedy BA, Hegele RA, Genest J, Brunham LR. Influence of Polygenic Background on the Clinical Presentation of Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2024;44(7):1683-1693.
  72. Civeira F, Castillo S, Alonso R, Merino-Ibarra E, Cenarro A, Artied M, Martin-Fuentes P, Ros E, Pocovi M, Mata P. Tendon xanthomas in familial hypercholesterolemia are associated with cardiovascular risk independently of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene mutation. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2005;25(9):1960-1965.
  73. Oosterveer DM, Versmissen J, Yazdanpanah M, Hamza TH, Sijbrands EJ. Differences in characteristics and risk of cardiovascular disease in familial hypercholesterolemia patients with and without tendon xanthomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207(2):311-317.
  74. Silva PR, Jannes CE, Marsiglia JD, Krieger JE, Santos RD, Pereira AC. Predictors of cardiovascular events after one year of molecular screening for Familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2016;250:144-150.
  75. Domanski MJ, Tian X, Wu CO, Reis JP, Dey AK, Gu Y, Zhao L, Bae S, Liu K, Hasan AA, Zimrin D, Farkouh ME, Hong CC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Fuster V. Time Course of LDL Cholesterol Exposure and Cardiovascular Disease Event Risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;76(13):1507-1516.
  76. Shapiro MD, Bhatt DL. "Cholesterol-Years" for ASCVD Risk Prediction and Treatment. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;76(13):1517-1520.
  77. Perez de Isla L, Alonso R, Mata N, Fernandez-Perez C, Muniz O, Diaz-Diaz JL, Saltijeral A, Fuentes-Jimenez F, de Andres R, Zambon D, Piedecausa M, Cepeda JM, Mauri M, Galiana J, Brea A, Sanchez Munoz-Torrero JF, Padro T, Argueso R, Miramontes-Gonzalez JP, Badimon L, Santos RD, Watts GF, Mata P. Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The SAFEHEART Registry (Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolemia Cohort Study). Circulation. 2017;135(22):2133-2144.
  78. Ahmad ZS, Andersen RL, Andersen LH, O'Brien EC, Kindt I, Shrader P, Vasandani C, Newman CB, deGoma EM, Baum SJ, Hemphill LC, Hudgins LC, Ahmed CD, Kullo IJ, Gidding SS, Duffy D, Neal W, Wilemon K, Roe MT, Rader DJ, Ballantyne CM, Linton MF, Duell PB, Shapiro MD, Moriarty PM, Knowles JW. US physician practices for diagnosing familial hypercholesterolemia: data from the CASCADE-FH registry. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2016;10(5):1223-1229.
  79. Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, Kuivenhoven JA, Nordestgaard BG, Descamps OS, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Watts GF, Averna M, Boileau C, Boren J, Catapano AL, Defesche JC, Hovingh GK, Humphries SE, Kovanen PT, Masana L, Pajukanta P, Parhofer KG, Ray KK, Stalenhoef AF, Stroes E, Taskinen MR, Wiegman A, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. European heart journal. 2014;35(32):2146-2157.
  80. Raal FJ, Pilcher GJ, Panz VR, van Deventer HE, Brice BC, Blom DJ, Marais AD. Reduction in mortality in subjects with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia associated with advances in lipid-lowering therapy. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2202-2207.
  81. Raal FJ, Santos RD. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: current perspectives on diagnosis and treatment. Atherosclerosis. 2012;223(2):262-268.
  82. Sprecher DL, Schaefer EJ, Kent KM, Gregg RE, Zech LA, Hoeg JM, McManus B, Roberts WC, Brewer HB, Jr. Cardiovascular features of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: analysis of 16 patients. The American journal of cardiology. 1984;54(1):20-30.
  83. Allen JM, Thompson GR, Myant NB, Steiner R, Oakley CM. Cadiovascular complications of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. British heart journal. 1980;44(4):361-368.
  84. Corsini A, Roma P, Sommariva D, Fumagalli R, Catapano AL. Autoantibodies to the low density lipoprotein receptor in a subject affected by severe hypercholesterolemia. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1986;78(4):940-946.
  85. van Aalst-Cohen ES, Jansen AC, Tanck MW, Defesche JC, Trip MD, Lansberg PJ, Stalenhoef AF, Kastelein JJ. Diagnosing familial hypercholesterolaemia: the relevance of genetic testing. European heart journal. 2006;27(18):2240-2246.
  86. Risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1991;303(6807):893-896.
  87. Fahed AC, Nemer GM. Familial hypercholesterolemia: the lipids or the genes? Nutrition & metabolism. 2011;8(1):23.
  88. Myers KD, Knowles JW, Staszak D, Shapiro MD, Howard W, Yadava M, Zuzick D, Williamson L, Shah NH, Banda JM, Leader J, Cromwell WC, Trautman E, Murray MF, Baum SJ, Myers S, Gidding SS, Wilemon K, Rader DJ. Precision screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a machine learning study applied to electronic health encounter data. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(8):e393-e402.
  89. Kane JP, Malloy MJ, Ports TA, Phillips NR, Diehl JC, Havel RJ. Regression of coronary atherosclerosis during treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia with combined drug regimens. Jama. 1990;264(23):3007-3012.
  90. Neil A, Cooper J, Betteridge J, Capps N, McDowell I, Durrington P, Seed M, Humphries SE. Reductions in all-cause, cancer, and coronary mortality in statin-treated patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a prospective registry study. European heart journal. 2008;29(21):2625-2633.
  91. Daniels SR, Gidding SS, de Ferranti SD. Pediatric aspects of familial hypercholesterolemias: recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2011;5(3 Suppl):S30-37.
  92. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC, Jr., Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018.
  93. Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM. Management of familial hypercholesterolemias in adult patients: recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2011;5(3 Suppl):S38-45.
  94. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, Birtcher KK, Covington AM, DePalma SM, Minissian MB, Orringer CE, Smith SC, Jr., Waring AA, Wilkins JT. 2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Nonstatin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;80(14):1366-1418.
  95. Cuchel M, Raal FJ, Hegele RA, Al-Rasadi K, Arca M, Averna M, Bruckert E, Freiberger T, Gaudet D, Harada-Shiba M, Hudgins LC, Kayikcioglu M, Masana L, Parhofer KG, Roeters van Lennep JE, Santos RD, Stroes ESG, Watts GF, Wiegman A, Stock JK, Tokgözoğlu LS, Catapano AL, Ray KK. 2023 Update on European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement on Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: new treatments and clinical guidance. European heart journal. 2023;44(25):2277-2291.
  96. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188.
  97. Handelsman Y, Jellinger PS, Guerin CK, Bloomgarden ZT, Brinton EA, Budoff MJ, Davidson MH, Einhorn D, Fazio S, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, Grunberger G, Krauss RM, Mechanick JI, Rosenblit PD, Smith DA, Wyne KL. Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Algorithm - 2020 Executive Summary. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(10):1196-1224.
  98. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Cholesterol Lowering Drugs. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Feingold KR, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
  99. Kusters DM, Wiegman A, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA. Carotid intima-media thickness in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Circ Res. 2014;114(2):307-310.
  100. Kusters DM, Avis HJ, de Groot E, Wijburg FA, Kastelein JJ, Wiegman A, Hutten BA. Ten-year follow-up after initiation of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. JAMA. 2014;312(10):1055-1057.
  101. Vuorio A, Kuoppala J, Kovanen PT, Humphries SE, Tonstad S, Wiegman A, Drogari E, Ramaswami U. Statins for children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):Cd006401.
  102. Braamskamp M, Langslet G, McCrindle BW, Cassiman D, Francis GA, Gagne C, Gaudet D, Morrison KM, Wiegman A, Turner T, Miller E, Kusters DM, Raichlen JS, Martin PD, Stein EA, Kastelein JJP, Hutten BA. Effect of Rosuvastatin on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Children With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The CHARON Study (Hypercholesterolemia in Children and Adolescents Taking Rosuvastatin Open Label). Circulation. 2017;136(4):359-366.
  103. Luirink IK, Wiegman A, Kusters DM, Hof MH, Groothoff JW, de Groot E, Kastelein JJP, Hutten BA. 20-Year Follow-up of Statins in Children with Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1547-1556.
  104. Wiegman A, Hutten BA, de Groot E, Rodenburg J, Bakker HD, Büller HR, Sijbrands EJ, Kastelein JJ. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292(3):331-337.
  105. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet (London, England). 1994;344(8934):1383-1389.
  106. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. The New England journal of medicine. 1995;333(20):1301-1307.
  107. Stein EA, Strutt K, Southworth H, Diggle PJ, Miller E. Comparison of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The American journal of cardiology. 2003;92(11):1287-1293.
  108. FDA requests removal of strongest warning against using cholesterol-lowering statins during pregnancy; still advises most pregnant patients should stop taking statins. FDA Drug Safety Podcast. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-drug-safety-podcasts/fda-requests-removal-strongest-warning-against-using-cholesterol-lowering-statins-during-pregnancy#:~:text=On%20July%2020%2C%202021%2C%20FDA,they%20learn%20they%20are%20pregnant. Accessed August 15 2040.
  109. Agarwala A, Dixon DL, Gianos E, Kirkpatrick CF, Michos ED, Satish P, Birtcher KK, Braun LT, Pillai P, Watson K, Wild R, Mehta LS. Dyslipidemia management in women of reproductive potential: An expert clinical consensus from the national lipid association. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2024.
  110. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, De Ferrari GM, Ruzyllo W, De Lucca P, Im K, Bohula EA, Reist C, Wiviott SD, Tershakovec AM, Musliner TA, Braunwald E, Califf RM. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(25):2387-2397.
  111. Warden BA, Duell PB. Inclisiran: A Novel Agent for Lowering Apolipoprotein B-Containing Lipoproteins. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021.
  112. Stein EA, Mellis S, Yancopoulos GD, Stahl N, Logan D, Smith WB, Lisbon E, Gutierrez M, Webb C, Wu R, Du Y, Kranz T, Gasparino E, Swergold GD. Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 on LDL cholesterol. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;366(12):1108-1118.
  113. Roth EM, McKenney JM, Hanotin C, Asset G, Stein EA. Atorvastatin with or without an antibody to PCSK9 in primary hypercholesterolemia. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;367(20):1891-1900.
  114. McKenney JM, Koren MJ, Kereiakes DJ, Hanotin C, Ferrand AC, Stein EA. Safety and efficacy of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease, SAR236553/REGN727, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia receiving ongoing stable atorvastatin therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;59(25):2344-2353.
  115. Stein EA, Gipe D, Bergeron J, Gaudet D, Weiss R, Dufour R, Wu R, Pordy R. Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, REGN727/SAR236553, to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia on stable statin dose with or without ezetimibe therapy: a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2012;380(9836):29-36.
  116. Koren MJ, Scott R, Kim JB, Knusel B, Liu T, Lei L, Bolognese M, Wasserman SM. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 as monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolaemia (MENDEL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet (London, England). 2012;380(9858):1995-2006.
  117. Dias CS, Shaywitz AJ, Wasserman SM, Smith BP, Gao B, Stolman DS, Crispino CP, Smirnakis KV, Emery MG, Colbert A, Gibbs JP, Retter MW, Cooke BP, Uy ST, Matson M, Stein EA. Effects of AMG 145 on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: results from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers and hypercholesterolemic subjects on statins. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(19):1888-1898.
  118. Raal F, Scott R, Somaratne R, Bridges I, Li G, Wasserman SM, Stein EA. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects of AMG 145, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: the Reduction of LDL-C with PCSK9 Inhibition in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Disorder (RUTHERFORD) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012;126(20):2408-2417.
  119. Giugliano RP, Desai NR, Kohli P, Rogers WJ, Somaratne R, Huang F, Liu T, Mohanavelu S, Hoffman EB, McDonald ST, Abrahamsen TE, Wasserman SM, Scott R, Sabatine MS. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 in combination with a statin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia (LAPLACE-TIMI 57): a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 study. Lancet (London, England). 2012;380(9858):2007-2017.
  120. Sullivan D, Olsson AG, Scott R, Kim JB, Xue A, Gebski V, Wasserman SM, Stein EA. Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in statin-intolerant patients: the GAUSS randomized trial. Jama. 2012;308(23):2497-2506.
  121. Moriarty PM, Parhofer KG, Babirak SP, Cornier MA, Duell PB, Hohenstein B, Leebmann J, Ramlow W, Schettler V, Simha V, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Thompson PD, Vogt A, von Stritzky B, Du Y, Manvelian G. Alirocumab in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia undergoing lipoprotein apheresis: the ODYSSEY ESCAPE trial. European heart journal. 2016;37(48):3588-3595.
  122. Kastelein JJ, Hovingh GK, Langslet G, Baccara-Dinet MT, Gipe DA, Chaudhari U, Zhao J, Minini P, Farnier M. Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibody alirocumab vs placebo in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2017;11(1):195-203.e194.
  123. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, Bergeron J, Luc G, Averna M, Stroes ES, Langslet G, Raal FJ, El Shahawy M, Koren MJ, Lepor NE, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, Chaudhari U, Kastelein JJ. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(16):1489-1499.
  124. Daniels S, Caprio S, Chaudhari U, Manvelian G, Baccara-Dinet MT, Brunet A, Scemama M, Loizeau V, Bruckert E. PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab in pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: The ODYSSEY KIDS study. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(3):322-330.e325.
  125. Santos RD, Ruzza A, Hovingh GK, Wiegman A, Mach F, Kurtz CE, Hamer A, Bridges I, Bartuli A, Bergeron J, Szamosi T, Santra S, Stefanutti C, Descamps OS, Greber-Platzer S, Luirink I, Kastelein JJP, Gaudet D. Evolocumab in Pediatric Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1317-1327.
  126. Alonso R, Muñiz-Grijalvo O, Díaz-Díaz JL, Zambón D, de Andrés R, Arroyo-Olivares R, Fuentes-Jimenez F, Muñoz-Torrero JS, Cepeda J, Aguado R, Alvarez-Baños P, Casañas M, Dieguez M, Mañas MD, Rubio P, Argueso R, Arrieta F, Gonzalez-Bustos P, Perez-Isla L, Mata P. Efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors in the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A clinical practice experience. J Clin Lipidol. 2021.
  127. Kaufman TM, Warden BA, Minnier J, Miles JR, Duell PB, Purnell JQ, Wojcik C, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. Application of PCSK9 Inhibitors in Practice. Circulation research. 2019;124(1):32-37.
  128. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2017;376(18):1713-1722.
  129. O'Donoghue ML, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, Atar D, Keech A, Kuder JF, Im K, Murphy SA, Flores-Arredondo JH, López JAG, Elliott-Davey M, Wang B, Monsalvo ML, Abbasi S, Sabatine MS. Long-Term Evolocumab in Patients With Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2022;146(15):1109-1119.
  130. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Lecorps G, Mahaffey KW, Moryusef A, Pordy R, Quintero K, Roe MT, Sasiela WJ, Tamby JF, Tricoci P, White HD, Zeiher AM. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. The New England journal of medicine. 2018;379(22):2097-2107.
  131. Orringer CE, Jacobson TA, Saseen JJ, Brown AS, Gotto AM, Ross JL, Underberg JA. Update on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in adults: Recommendations from an Expert Panel of the National Lipid Association. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2017;11(4):880-890.
  132. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, Birtcher KK, Daly DD, Jr., DePalma SM, Minissian MB, Orringer CE, Smith SC, Jr. 2017 Focused Update of the 2016 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;70(14):1785-1822.
  133. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, Hoes AW, Jennings CS, Landmesser U, Pedersen TR, Reiner Z, Riccardi G, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Verschuren WMM, Vlachopoulos C, Wood DA, Zamorano JL, Cooney MT. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. European heart journal. 2016;37(39):2999-3058.
  134. Rosenson RS, Hegele RA, Fazio S, Cannon CP. The Evolving Future of PCSK9 Inhibitors. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;72(3):314-329.
  135. Navar AM, Kolkailah AA, Gupta A, Gillard KK, Israel MK, Wang Y, Peterson ED. Gaps in Guideline-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Secondary Prevention in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 322 153 Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023;16(8):533-543.
  136. Jackson CL, Deng Y, Yao X, Van Houten H, Shah ND, Kopecky S. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor utilization and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol control in familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2021;15(2):339-346.
  137. Raal FJ, Kallend D, Ray KK, Turner T, Koenig W, Wright RS, Wijngaard PLJ, Curcio D, Jaros MJ, Leiter LA, Kastelein JJP. Inclisiran for the Treatment of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1520-1530.
  138. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Inclisiran in Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (ORION-16) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04652726]. National Institutes of Health. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04652726?cond=inclisiran&draw=2&rank=10. Accessed 16 Jan 2021.
  139. Prescribing information. Leqvio (inclisiran). East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. 2021.
  140. Wright RS, Ray KK, Raal FJ, Kallend DG, Jaros M, Koenig W, Leiter LA, Landmesser U, Schwartz GG, Friedman A, Wijngaard PLJ, Garcia Conde L, Kastelein JJP. Pooled Patient-Level Analysis of Inclisiran Trials in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Atherosclerosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021;77(9):1182-1193.
  141. Ray KK, Raal FJ, Kallend DG, Jaros MJ, Koenig W, Leiter LA, Landmesser U, Schwartz GG, Lawrence D, Friedman A, Garcia Conde L, Wright RS. Inclisiran and cardiovascular events: a patient-level analysis of phase III trials. European heart journal. 2023;44(2):129-138.
  142. Warden BA, Duell PB. Inclisiran: A Novel Agent for Lowering Apolipoprotein B-containing Lipoproteins. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021;78(2):e157-e174.
  143. Desai NR, Farbaniec M, Karalis DG. Nonadherence to lipid-lowering therapy and strategies to improve adherence in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Clinical cardiology. 2023;46(1):13-21.
  144. Katzmann JL, Laufs U. PCSK9-directed therapies: an update. Current opinion in lipidology. 2024;35(3):117-125.
  145. Ballantyne CM, Bays H, Catapano AL, Goldberg A, Ray KK, Saseen JJ. Role of Bempedoic Acid in Clinical Practice. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021;35(4):853-864.
  146. Prescribing information. Nexletol (Bempedoic acid). Ann Arbor, MI: Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. 2020.
  147. Duell PB, Banach M, Catapano AL, Laufs U, Mancini GBJ, Ray KK, Bloedon LT, Ye Z and Goldberg AC. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Analysis of pooled patient-level data from phase 3 clinical trials. Atherosclerosis. 2020;315:e12-e13 [abstract].
  148. Duell PB, Banach M, Catapano AL, Laufs U, Mancini GBJ, Ray KK, Broestl C, Zhang Y, Lei L, Goldberg AC. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: analysis of pooled patient-level data from phase 3 clinical trials. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2024;18(2):e153-e165.
  149. Warden BA, Cardiology BA, Purnell JQ, Duell PB, Fazio S. Real-world utilization of bempedoic acid in an academic preventive cardiology practice. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2022;16(1):94-103.
  150. Nissen SE, Lincoff AM, Brennan D, Ray KK, Mason D, Kastelein JJP, Thompson PD, Libby P, Cho L, Plutzky J, Bays HE, Moriarty PM, Menon V, Grobbee DE, Louie MJ, Chen CF, Li N, Bloedon L, Robinson P, Horner M, Sasiela WJ, McCluskey J, Davey D, Fajardo-Campos P, Petrovic P, Fedacko J, Zmuda W, Lukyanov Y, Nicholls SJ. Bempedoic Acid and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients. The New England journal of medicine. 2023;388(15):1353-1364.
  151. Bays HE, Bloedon LT, Lin G, Powell HA, Louie MJ, Nicholls SJ, Lincoff AM, Nissen SE. Safety of bempedoic acid in patients at high cardiovascular risk and with statin intolerance. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2024;18(1):e59-e69.
  152. Warden BA, Duell PB. Evinacumab for treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021:1-13.
  153. Raal FJ, Honarpour N, Blom DJ, Hovingh GK, Xu F, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Stein EA. Inhibition of PCSK9 with evolocumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (TESLA Part B): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2015;385(9965):341-350.
  154. Stein EA, Honarpour N, Wasserman SM, Xu F, Scott R, Raal FJ. Effect of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 monoclonal antibody, AMG 145, in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2013;128(19):2113-2120.
  155. Blom DJ, Harada-Shiba M, Rubba P, Gaudet D, Kastelein JJP, Charng MJ, Pordy R, Donahue S, Ali S, Dong Y, Khilla N, Banerjee P, Baccara-Dinet M, Rosenson RS. Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Adults With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The ODYSSEY HoFH Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(2):131-142.
  156. Santos RD, Stein EA, Hovingh GK, Blom DJ, Soran H, Watts GF, López JAG, Bray S, Kurtz CE, Hamer AW, Raal FJ. Long-Term Evolocumab in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(6):565-574.
  157. Hovingh GK, Lepor NE, Kallend D, Stoekenbroek RM, Wijngaard PLJ, Raal FJ. Inclisiran Durably Lowers Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Expression in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The ORION-2 Pilot Study. Circulation. 2020;141(22):1829-1831.
  158. Raal F, Durst R, Bi R, Talloczy Z, Maheux P, Lesogor A, Kastelein JJP. Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Inclisiran in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Results From the ORION-5 Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2024;149(5):354-362.
  159. Santos RD, Cuchel M. LDL-C-Lowering Therapies for Adults and Children With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Challenges and Successes. Circulation. 2024;149(5):363-366.
  160. Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Inclisiran in Adolescents With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (ORION-13) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04659863]. National Institutes of Health. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04659863?cond=inclisiran&draw=2&rank=9. Accessed 16 Jan 2021.
  161. Cuchel M, Meagher EA, du Toit Theron H, Blom DJ, Marais AD, Hegele RA, Averna MR, Sirtori CR, Shah PK, Gaudet D, Stefanutti C, Vigna GB, Du Plessis AM, Propert KJ, Sasiela WJ, Bloedon LT, Rader DJ. Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (London, England). 2013;381(9860):40-46.
  162. Underberg JA, Cannon CP, Larrey D, Makris L, Blom D, Phillips H. Long-term safety and efficacy of lomitapide in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Five-year data from the Lomitapide Observational Worldwide Evaluation Registry (LOWER). Journal of clinical lipidology. 2020;14(6):807-817.
  163. Raal FJ, Santos RD, Blom DJ, Marais AD, Charng MJ, Cromwell WC, Lachmann RH, Gaudet D, Tan JL, Chasan-Taber S, Tribble DL, Flaim JD, Crooke ST. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375(9719):998-1006.
  164. warden BA, Duell, P.B. Evinacumab: Anti-ANGPTL3 (angiopoietin-like protein 3) monoclonal antibody Treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia Treatment of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. Drugs of the Future. 2020;45(9):619-631.
  165. Adam RC, Mintah IJ, Alexa-Braun CA, Shihanian LM, Lee JS, Banerjee P, Hamon SC, Kim HI, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH, Van Hout C, Gromada J, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Sleeman MW, Gusarova V. Angiopoietin-like protein 3 governs LDL-cholesterol levels through endothelial lipase-dependent VLDL clearance. J Lipid Res. 2020;61(9):1271-1286.
  166. Reeskamp LF, Nurmohamed NS, Bom MJ, Planken RN, Driessen RS, van Diemen PA, Luirink IK, Groothoff JW, Kuipers IM, Knaapen P, Stroes ESG, Wiegman A, Hovingh GK. Marked plaque regression in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2021;327:13-17.
  167. Wilkinson MJ, Bijlani P, Davidson MH, Duell PB, Horan M, Malloy MJ, Newfield R, Pradeep P, Sam C, Shah PK, Stock EO, Warden B, Ito MK. Abstract 13950: Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Evinacumab in Pediatric and Adult Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Multi-Site US Perspective. Circulation. 2023;148(Suppl_1):A13950-A13950.
  168. Duell PB, Warden BA. Complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Ther Apher Dial. 2022;26 Suppl 1:12-17.
  169. Wiegman A, Greber-Platzer S, Ali S, Reijman MD, Brinton EA, Charng MJ, Srinivasan S, Baker-Smith C, Baum S, Brothers JA, Hartz J, Moriarty PM, Mendell J, Bihorel S, Banerjee P, George RT, Hirshberg B, Pordy R. Evinacumab for Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2024;149(5):343-353.
  170. Page MM, Hardikar W, Alex G, Bates S, Srinivasan S, Stormon M, Hall K, Evans HM, Johnston P, Chen J, Wigg A, John L, Ekinci EI, O'Brien RC, Jones R, Watts GF. Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation for homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in Australia and New Zealand. Atherosclerosis. 2023;387:117305.
  171. McGowan MP. Emerging low-density lipoprotein (LDL) therapies: Management of severely elevated LDL cholesterol--the role of LDL-apheresis. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2013;7(3 Suppl):S21-26.
  172. Feingold K, Grunfeld C. Lipoprotein Apheresis. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Feingold KR, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, New M, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.

Fibrocalculous Pancreatic Diabetes

ABSTRACT

 

In tropical countries like India, there are several reports of a unique form of diabetes called fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD). In majority of the cases, FCPD occurs in young, lean individuals with diabetes, abdominal pain, and steatorrhea. Diabetes is typically ketosis resistant. Recent studies have shown that a proportion of the cases may have genetic factors and gene mutations that confer the risk of developing the disease. Recent studies have suggested a changing profile of the disease which could also be present in older individuals having a normal body mass index and better survival perhaps attributable to better exocrine and endocrine (diabetes) care being offered to people with FCPD. The management of exocrine insufficiency is by the same standards as in any other cause of chronic pancreatitis, and the same is true for diabetes management except for the need of insulin therapy in most cases. The most distinguishing and worrying feature of FCPD is the higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer for which vigilance is paramount.  

 

INTRODUCTION

 

It is well known that diabetes in tropical and developing countries is different from that seen in the Western World. For example, people with diabetes in India are leaner, develop diabetes earlier than their counterparts, making the distinction between insulin deficient type 1 and insulin resistant type 2 diabetes challenging (1,2).  In addition, some people with lean type diabetes in India could have a latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult (3). In earlier times, the leanness was attributable to factors like malnutrition (4), which has become less frequent over the years with increasing improvement in nutritional status in the Indian population, though not uniform (5). Type 2 diabetes in India has become associated with the “thin-fat” Indian concept, which describes the presence of visceral adiposity in thinly built persons, although not all lean diabetes in India conforms to this phenotype (2, 6,).

 

Another distinct subtype of diabetes seen with leanness in this population was eventually termed fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD) (7). It is included in the current WHO classification of Diabetes Mellitus of 2019 as a subtype within ‘other specific types of Diabetes’ (8). This form of diabetes typically occurs in young people, in people with a low body mass index (BMI), and with clinical features of malnutrition. It is unique because of structural changes identified in the pancreas described below and the associated pancreatic dysfunction. Before the onset of diabetes, there is a pre-diabetic phase of pancreatic damage referred to as tropical chronic pancreatitis, a term indicating its geographical association with tropical countries such as India.

 

This article will discuss the unique nature of FCPD, its pathogenesis, the changing clinical spectrum and aspects of managing the condition.

 

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HISTORICAL ASPECTS

 

In 1959, Zudeima reported a series of patients, particularly in the lower socioeconomic groups, with features of undernutrition and presence of pancreatic calculi (9). However, it was the disease-characterization work of Dr Geevarghese a decade later that the disease became known worldwide as such (10), with several Indian states adding to the description over subsequent decades (11,12,13). India, Brazil, Thailand, and other tropical countries published observations similar to those reported by Zudeima over the next four decades (14,15).

 

Early reports indicated FCPD to be an important cause of diabetes in young, lean individuals with features of malnutrition. In 2008, a national prospective study involving 32

Centers across various regions of India established a comprehensive database of patients with chronic pancreatitis which yielded significant insight into the clinical profile FCPD at the time (16). The disease profile of FCPD appeared to overlap with idiopathic pancreatitis, and that leanness and malnutrition were not integral to chronic pancreatitis, perhaps reflecting improved treatment of the condition. These changes were substantiated in subsequent reports (17, 18). More recent reports indicate that FCPD accounts for only a small proportion of people with young-onset diabetes (19).

 

The life expectancy of people with chronic pancreatitis has increased compared to that in the past, though not yet returned to normal (20). It is universal knowledge that longer duration of, particularly uncontrolled, hyperglycemia leads to microvascular complications. Hence, with improved overall care, diabetes complications have been known to occur in patients with FCPD (21), though macrovascular complications are thought to be rare.

 

PATHOGENESIS

 

The exact pathogenesis of FCPD is unclear with oxidative stress, micronutrient deficiency, dietary toxins, and autoimmunity implicated inconclusively.

 

A disbalance between the oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in the body has been postulated in FCPD based on reduced levels of antioxidant markers found with heightened oxidative stress markers (22). The consumption of cassava being linked pathogenetically to FCPD (23) was later proved to be of doubtful significance (24). While malnutrition is associated with FCPD, later reports indicate it to be a consequence rather than cause of FCPD (13).

 

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) associations as part of genetic susceptibility studies were inconclusive. Altered expression of genes such as serum protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1), anionic trypsinogen (PRSS2), and chymotrypsinogen C have been noted in FCPD and in the Indian population, the N34S variant of the SPINK gene appears to confer susceptibility in 33% (25). Two hit model with the first step being alteration of genes leading to supertrypsin formation in the acinar cells of pancreas, followed by a second hit involving unidentified genes leading to gross structural changes within the gland and/or manifestation of disease was proposed as a more plausible phenomenon over a decade ago (26).

 

In summary, a multitude of pathogenetic mechanisms for FCPD has been proposed based mostly on earlier evidence from a time when the disease was reportedly more prevalent, neither one of which alone may play a singular role and that a complex interaction, most likely of gene-environment, underlies disease evolution.

 

TABLE 1. PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS POSTULATED IN THE ETIO-PATHOGENESIS OF FCPD

Genes Identified In FCPD

·       Serum protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1)- especially N34S mutation

·       Cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1)

·       Anionic trypsinogen (PRSS2)

·       Chymotrypsinogen C

 

Factors Implicated With Inconclusive Evidence

·       Toxins e.g. Cassava consumption

·       Imbalance of oxidative stress and antioxidants

·       Malnutrition

Proposed Two-Hit Model

·       First hit: genetic mutation leading to alteration in pancreatic acinar cells                    

·       Second hit: unidentified genes leading to disease manifestation

 

PATHOLOGY OF DIABETES IN FCPD

 

While early evidence supported reduced mass and insulin secretion by beta cells, insulin resistance has been recognized to play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetes in FCPD.

 

Both basal insulin secretion and stimulated insulin levels in response to a glucose tolerance test are reduced in people with FCPD compared to controls (11,13). Preservation of some beta cell function is supported clinically by the relatively rare instances of ketoacidosis following withdrawal of insulin (27). Ketoacidosis may be less common due to not only some residual insulin secretory activity but also due to reduced glucagon reserve secondary to alpha cell destruction and reduced availability of non-esterified fatty acid substrate for ketogenesis due to lack of visceral fat (28). Studies have also suggested that exocrine function could correlate with endocrine dysfunction. While it is simple and logical to presume that any pancreatic pathology would reduce insulin production, the situation is more complex than meets the eye.

 

There is evidence of insulin resistance (IR) in people with FCPD when measured by mean glucose disposal rates and homeostasis model assessment-IR, independent of BMI (13,29). Deficiency of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) has been postulated to underlie IR in FCPD, particularly at the level of the liver where defects in the internalization of liver glucose transporter-2 as well as altered bioavailability/ function of hepatic insulin receptor have been observed. The role of glucagon and thereby preservation or otherwise of alpha cells is debatable. Reduced fat store in people with FCPD may lead to the storage of triglyceride in the liver, which could predispose to insulin resistance.

 

This century has seen groundbreaking work in understanding the pathophysiology of endocrine dysfunction following non-necrotizing pancreatitis, including prediabetes and diabetes (29). New mediators and their associations include increased interleukin-6 driving insulin resistance and reduced pro-glucagon gut peptides oxyntomodulin [capable of signaling through glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucagon receptors] and glicentin with the former showing potential as a biomarker to distinguish post-pancreatic diabetes from T2DM. These pathways may well be implicated in FCPD, at least in part.

 

CLINICAL FEATURES AND NATURAL HISTORY OF FCPD

 

The first symptom is abdominal pain, noted in the upper abdomen radiating to the back and relieved by stooping forward or lying in a prone position, typical of pancreatitis pain. The pain abates, both in frequency and severity, which is followed by development of oily and frothy stool due to fat malabsorption indicating exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, as in pancreatic involvement from other chronic pathologies. Rise in blood glucose and eventually diabetes results usually one to two decades after the onset of abdominal pain. Tropical chronic pancreatitis is the pre-diabetes phase of the disease, whereas FCPD is the term used once diabetes has been diagnosed by universal diagnostic criteria.

 

FCPD has been classically described in young, lean, malnourished people of low socioeconomic background residing in tropical countries. The onset of pancreatic disease is in childhood with diabetes developing between 15 and 35 years of age, requiring treatment with large doses of insulin for moderate to severe hyperglycemia, and usually no ketosis despite insulin withdrawal (7).

 

The clinical profile of FCPD and previously described criteria may no longer be strictly applicable as reported in a nationwide study of pancreatitis conducted in 32 centers in different regions of India, including a total of 1033 patients (16). According to that survey, which used original criteria including a low BMI, the disease-affected people had normal BMI and presentation was later in life, contrary to the original descriptions of this entity. In this study, tropical pancreatitis accounted for only 3.8% of chronic pancreatitis, suggesting a downward trend in its incidence or at least the diagnosis. Classical signs such as cyanotic hue, distended abdomen, and parotid gland swelling may also no longer be seen (12).

 

With appropriate diabetes care and good pancreatic enzyme supplementation, malnutrition is rare, as is death due to diabetes in adolescence (30). As is true in patients with chronic pancreatitis, people with FCPD are also now likely to have a relatively ‘normal’ BMI and not necessarily be ‘lean’ as per the original description of this entity. Severity of diabetes appears to be higher in lean individuals. Thus, in addition to the typical, young and malnourished patient with FCPD, it may be important to consider an “extended spectrum” of FCPD, with people being older, higher BMI, and at risk of diabetes vascular complications also being considered in the spectrum.

 

More research is needed to characterize FCPD beyond simple clinical criteria. These criteria alone may yield a disproportionately large number of these cases, and those that are limited to a geographical region. Hence, we call for development of newer criteria for FCPD, perhaps including a biological approach.

 

The natural history of FCPD begins with abdominal pain and progresses through a subclinical e.g. pancreatic calcification phase followed by exocrine and later endocrine pancreatic insufficiency. This has undergone a shift from earlier days of abdominal pain in childhood, diabetes in adolescence and death in early adulthood. Unlike the reports of early mortality in the past, it is well known that people with FCPD now live longer, with 80% living beyond 35 years since the onset of abdominal pain (21).

 

People with FCPD appear to be at risk of microvascular diabetes-related complications like retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy as in other patients with diabetes, perhaps secondary to the longer life span that these patients enjoy (11).  Macrovascular complications like stroke and peripheral vascular diseases are however relatively rare likely due to relative youth, lower cholesterol levels, and leanness at least in the majority of patients (3,12).

 

Modifiable mortality attributable to the standard vascular and non-vascular complications in FCPD remains the same as in T2DM and T1DM. The risk of death from pancreatic cancer is disproportionately high, particularly for women (31).

 

DIAGNOSIS AND WORK UP OF FCPD

 

As per the currently established criteria, FCPD should be suspected in young, lean people from tropical countries who have a history of abdominal pain and steatorrhea, particularly if they have features suggesting malnutrition along with diabetes and especially if the diabetes is ketosis resistant (30). Conventionally, the disease is thought to occur only in tropical countries, however currently, there is no evidence to link any geographical factor with the etiology of the disease. The absence of a single detectable secondary cause of chronic pancreatitis is important. Also, given the changing profile of the disease discussed above, it is not limited to people with a lower BMI and in an adolescent age group. FCPD is an important but increasingly less frequent cause of diabetes in the young (32).

 

The diagnosis of FCPD is made when diabetes mellitus is associated with characteristic abnormalities in the pancreas including large intraductal calculi, fibrosis, or ductal changes. The presence of large and discrete pancreatic stones is a classical feature of the diagnosis of FCPD (15). Computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may be required to clinch the diagnosis if typical calculi are absent on standard modalities such as x ray or ultrasound.   

 

Thorough diagnostic workup should include a gastroenterological and an endocrinological consultation, with the latter ensuring standard tests in the management of all types of diabetes, including regular measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin, renal function, lipid profile, urine albumin creatinine ratio, foot neurovascular assessment, retinal screening, and when indicated, screening for cardiovascular disease.

 

Endocrine tests, like the measurement of C-peptide, may help clinical management, when a low C-peptide level would signal the need for insulin therapy, but they have no specific role in the diagnosis of FCPD. However, CA-19.9 for the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer assumes a more important role from the point of view of long-term prognosis. Exocrine pancreatic dysfunction may be assessed by several tests of which low fecal elastase-1 assay is of practical significance, as well as low fecal chymotrypsin. The secretin pancreozymin test, which is a more dynamic assessment of pancreatic secretory function in response to the hormone secretin, is more cumbersome involving an endoscope.

 

TABLE 2. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR FCPD

1.     Occurrence in a tropical country

2.     Diabetes as per standard diagnostic criteria

3.     Evidence of chronic pancreatitis:

a.     Pancreatic calculi on X-ray or

b.     At least 3 of the following:

i.     Abnormal pancreatic morphology by imaging

ii.     Chronic abdominal pain since childhood

iii.     Steatorrhea

c.     Abnormal pancreatic function test

4.     Absence of other causes of pancreatitis like alcoholism, hyperparathyroidism, marked hypertriglyceridemia, hepatobiliary disease etc.

Figure 1. X-ray abdomen showing multiple tiny opacities in epigastric region, suggestive of pancreatic calcification.

Figure 2. Ultrasound of abdomen showing atrophic pancreas, with dilated main pancreatic duct and multiple calculi in main pancreatic duct.

Figure 3. CT scan of abdomen showing atrophic pancreas with few parenchymal foci of calcification. Main pancreatic duct is dilated along with hyper dense calculi.

Figure 4. MRI scan of abdomen (axial -T2 weight HASTE sequence) showing atrophic pancreas with dilated main pancreatic duct and few filling defects within, suggestive of calculi.

Figure 5. MRI scan of abdomen (coronal - T2 weight HASTE sequence): Atrophic pancreas with dilated main pancreatic duct and few filling defects within, suggestive of calculi.

Figure 6. Maximum Intensity Projection Image showing irregular dilatation of main pancreatic duct with calculi within.

 

MANAGEMENT

 

The management of FCPD includes management of diabetes, with special consideration for aspects of chronic pancreatitis. While diabetes can be managed with lifestyle changes and oral drugs in a few cases, insulin is required in many cases. 

 

Nutritional Management

 

As in other form of diabetes, medical nutrition therapy is the cornerstone of FCPD management. As most FCPD patients are lean, calorie restriction should be avoided. A balanced diet with adequate carbohydrates, fat, and proteins must be ensured. A low-fat diet helps in the management of steatorrhea (33). A gastrointestinal consultation to assess correlation of steatorrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms with various foods should help in planning appropriate meals. Foods with potential for toxic effect on the pancreas, such as cassava (tapioca) should be avoided, though no conclusive link between the two has been proven and the damage to the pancreas is advanced. Fat soluble vitamins should be replaced as their absorption may be limited in FCPD. If available, sublingual or parenteral formulations of vitamin D may be preferred, to guard against pancreatic osteodystrophy. Smoking and alcohol must be avoided altogether. 

 

Pain Management

 

Pain is a common symptom of FCPD and can occur due to acute inflammation of the pancreas, increased pressure within the parenchyma and the ductal system, ischemia of the gland, microvascular complications such as neuritis, and due to the space-occupying effect of pseudocysts. Abdominal pain is ideally managed by non-opioid analgesic, though in later stages their judicious use may be necessary (34). Subcutaneous octreotide, a synthetic somatostatin analogue, has been used to reduce the pain of chronic pancreatitis. It inhibits pancreatic secretion and increases the contractility of the sphincter of oddi.

 

Multiple antioxidants have proven benefit in pain reduction when used together, also in combination with micronutrients (34). Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT – discussed in detail in the next section), while important from the exocrine therapy perspective, may benefit pain only if high protease containing (>25,000 USP units per tablet) preparation, in an uncoated formulation, is prescribed multiple times a day. PERT degrades cholecystokinin-releasing peptide in the duodenum and facilitates inhibition of endogenous pancreatic activity and thus may help with pain reduction. Endoscopic interventions to remove stones and lithotripsy may be helpful (35). Severe pain may require surgical procedures such as ductal decompression, drainage procedures like pancreatojejunostomy, and ablative procedures like subtotal pancreatectomy in refractory cases. Coeliac blockage has also been tried as a pain-relieving intervention.

 

Management of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency

 

Steatorrhea responds to pancreatic enzyme supplements, which also helps improve glucose control. PERT is necessary to ensure adequate nutrient absorption and prevent down- stream effects such as protein-energy and vitamin malnutrition. It is important to prescribe an optimal dose of PERT, at the right time. Enteric coated PERT is the preferred option, unless being used also for pain relief, as it prevents the contents from being denatured by the acidic medium of the stomach prior to reaching the duodenum (34). Standard approach includes initial doses of 500-1000 lipase units/kg of body weight with each meal, up to maximum of 2,500 lipase units/kg per meal. While doses may vary with meal content and portion, in practice, 10,000-20,000IU for a small meal with 40,000 to 50,000 for a main meal often suffice in persons with diabetes who may need lower doses when following low-fat diet (36).

 

Ideally, patients should take half the dose with first bite of a meal, and the remaining half in the middle or at the end. However, as most patients prefer a reduced pill burden, the entire dose can be taken with the first bite of food to ensure adherence and convenience. Patients should be advised to avoid copious quantities of water with the tablet to prevent rapid transit through the upper gut.

 

The adequacy of PERT replacement is determined clinically by enquiring about stool consistency, presence or absence of oily droplets in the stool, weight gain, muscle mass, and bone health. Fecal fat and breath tests to evaluate response to PERT are reserved for use in a research setting. Fecal elastase-1 is not impacted by PERT and cannot be used as a monitoring tool. PERT can be combined with proton pump inhibitors and/or histamine-2 blockers, as these increase the responsiveness to PERT by reducing acidic degradation of the formulations.

 

Diabetes Management

 

A balanced and healthy diet with whole grains and adequate micro-and macronutrient intake is important, with due care given to the quantity of carbohydrate intake in the presence of diabetes. Restriction of simple carbohydrates remains a key recommendation. Adequate protein intake is important. In the presence of steatorrhea, a low-fat diet is important. Adequate physical activity, like brisk walking, and stress reduction are beneficial lifestyle measures advisable for all patients (36).

 

Insulin levels have been noted to be lower in majority of FCPD patients and so insulin remains the drug of choice. Long-acting basal insulin and multiple doses of rapid acting insulin at mealtime is the ideal insulin regime in FCPD (Figure 7). Glycemic targets to be attained with anti-diabetes therapy are similar to those recommended for all types of diabetes. Cardio-metabolic risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, should be approached in a standard manner. Very high triglyceride levels > 500 mg/dl put people with FCPD at risk of pancreatitis, and therefore may need medications such as fibrates (33).

 

FIGURE 7: Representative Ambulatory Glucose Profile of a patient with FCPD well controlled on basal-bolus insulin therapy (Time in range 87%; time above range 10% and time below range 3%; glucose management indicator 6.4%).

 

Oral anti-diabetes agents are useful only in a minority of patients with FCPD, as insulin is the medication of choice (36). Among secretagogues, short acting drugs like repaglinide, which stimulate insulin secretion may be considered. Metformin has the benefit of glucose control without hypoglycemia and may be beneficial in countering insulin resistance in some patients. In addition, there is evidence that metformin could protect against pancreatic cancer (37). However, metformin may worsen gastrointestinal symptoms and lead to diarrhea and undesirable weight loss, and hence cautious use is advised.

 

Oral antidiabetic agents that seem less favorable in FCPD include alpha glucosidase inhibitors due to gastrointestinal symptoms, thiazolidinediones due to the link with osteoporosis, and oral sodium glucose co-transporters due to the associated weight loss until more research indicating benefit becomes available. Incretin based drugs, including GLP-1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors should not be prescribed in FCPD, given the link between incretin-based therapies and pancreatitis. In fact, there is data from India that GLP-1 increases two-fold in people with FCPD compared to people with type 2 diabetes and controls (38). Gastric inhibitory peptide receptor antagonist and oxyntomodulin antagonism are emerging concepts in the management of post-pancreatic diabetes, and may well apply to FCPD (39).

 

SUMMARY

 

FCPD, a subtype of type 3c diabetes of pancreatic origin, that is unique to tropical regions of the world. There is a need for further research into etiology. The clinical phenotype is changing, and is not limited to the classical young, malnourished subject to an “extended spectrum” including older people with higher BMI without malnutrition and predilection to both exocrine and endocrine (diabetes-related) complications. Approach to its management includes standard care for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and for diabetes, with a preference for insulin therapy for most patients. Judicious use of oral anti-diabetes agents may be appropriate for a few due to the presence of insulin resistance independent of intra-abdominal adipose tissue, a fascinating area of future research. A critical aspect of managing FCPD is early detection of pancreatic cancer, for which no specific guidance is available to date other than vigilance towards it. Future research on the genetic and environmental aspects of FCPD causation will help uncover new therapeutic approaches that may hold promise for further improving lives of people with FCPD.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

 

We thank Dr. Abhishek B. Yashod, MD (Radio-Diagnosis), Chellaram Hospital: Diabetes Care & Multispecialty, Pune, for providing the CT scan and MRI images.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Unnikrishnan R, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Diabetes mellitus and its complications in India. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;12(6):357-70.
  2. Lontchi-Yimagou E, Dasgupta R, Anoop S, Kehlenbrink S, Koppaka S, Goyal A, Venkatesan P, Livingstone R, Ye K, Chapla A, Carey M, Jose A, Rebekah G, Wickramanayake A, Joseph M, Mathias P, Manavalan A, Kurian ME, Inbakumari M, Christina F, Stein D, Thomas N, Hawkins M. An Atypical Form of Diabetes Among Individuals With Low BMI. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jun 2;45(6):1428-1437.
  3. Unnikrishnan AG, Singh SK, Sanjeevi CB. Prevalence of GAD65 Antibodies in Lean Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004; 1037: 118–121.
  4. Samal KC, Kanungo A, Sanjeevi CB. Clinicoepidemiological and Biochemical Profile of Malnutrition-Modulated Diabetes Mellitus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2006; 958: 131–137.
  5. Nguyen PH, Scott S, Headey D, Singh N, Tran LM, Menon P, Ruel MT. The double burden of malnutrition in India: Trends and inequalities (2006-2016). PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247856.
  6. Wells JC, Pomeroy E, Walimbe SR, Popkin BM, Yajnik CS. The Elevated Susceptibility to Diabetes in India: An Evolutionary Perspective. Front Public Health. 2016 Jul 7;4:145.
  7. Bajaj, J.S. (1987). Malnutrition-Related Diabetes. In: Miehlke, K. (eds) Kongreß. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin, vol 93. J.F. Bergmann-Verlag.
  8. Classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
  9. Zuidema PJ. Cirrhosis and disseminated calcification of the pancreas in patients with malnutrition. Trop Geogr Med 1959; 11: 70–74.
  10. Geevarghese PJ, Pitchumoni CS, Nair SR. Is protein malnutrition an initiating cause of pancreatic calcification? J Assoc Physicians India 1969; 17: 417–419.
  11. Jyotsna VP, Singh SK, Gopal D, Unnikrishnan AG, Agrawal NK, Singh SK et al. Clinical and biochemical profiles of young diabetics in North-Eastern India. J Assoc Physicians India 2002; 50: 1130–1134.
  12. Unnikrishnan R, Mohan V. Fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD). Acta Diabetol 2015; 52: 1–9.
  13. Dasgupta R, Naik D, Thomas N. Emerging concepts in the pathogenesis of diabetes in fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes: J Diabetes 2015; 7: 754–761.
  14. Dani R, Penna FJ, Nogueira CED. Etiology of chronic calcifying pancreatitis in Brazil: a report of 329 consecutive cases. International Journal of Pancreatology 1986; 1: 399–406.
  15. Barman KK, Premalatha G, Mohan V. Tropical chronic pancreatitis. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2003; 79: 606–615.
  16. Balakrishnan V, Unnikrishnan AG, Thomas V, Choudhuri G, Veeraraju P, Singh SP et al. Chronic pancreatitis. A prospective nationwide study of 1,086 subjects from India. JOP 2008; 9: 593–600.
  17. Papita R, Nazir A, Anbalagan VP, Anjana RM, Pitchumoni C, Chari S et al. Secular trends of fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes and diabetes secondary to alcoholic chronic pancreatitis at a tertiary care diabetes centre in South India. JOP 2012; 13: 205–209.
  18. Garg PK, Narayana D. Changing phenotype and disease behaviour of chronic pancreatitis in India: evidence for gene-environment interactions. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2016 Oct 18;1:e17.
  19. Unnikrishnan R, Mohan V. Fibrocalculous Pancreatic Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2020 Apr 11;20(6):19.
  20. Beyer, Georg et al. Chronic pancreatitis. The Lancet, Volume 396, Issue 10249, 499 – 512.
  21. Mohan V, Premalatha G, Padma A, Chari ST, Pitchumoni CS. Fibrocalculous Pancreatic Diabetes: Long-term survival analysis. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 1274–1278.
  22. Rossi L, Pfützer RH, Parvin S, Ali L, Sattar S, Kahn AKA et al. SPINK1/PSTI Mutations Are Associated with Tropical Pancreatitis in Bangladesh. Pancreatology 2001; 1: 242–245.
  23. McMillan DE, Geevarghese PJ. Dietary cyanide and tropical malnutrition diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1979;2:202–8.
  24. Mathangi DC, Deepa R, Mohan V, Govindarajan M, Namasivayam A. Long-Term Ingestion of Cassava (Tapioca) Does Not Produce Diabetes or Pancreatitis in the Rat Model. IJGC 2000; 27: 203–208.
  25. Hassan Z, Mohan V, Ali L, Allotey R, Barakat K, Faruque MO et al. SPINK1 is a susceptibility gene for fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes in subjects from the Indian subcontinent. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 964–968.
  26. Mahurkar S, Reddy DN, Rao GV, Chandak GR. Genetic mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of tropical calcific pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15 (3):264-269.
  27. Melki G, Laham L, Karim G, Komal F, Kumar V, Barham S et al. Chronic Pancreatitis Leading to Pancreatogenic Diabetes Presenting in Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Rare Entity. Gastroenterology Res 2019; 12: 208–210.
  28. Shivaprasad C, Gautham K, Palani P, Gupta S, Shah K. Intra-abdominal fat estimation by bio-electrical impedance analysis in patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes compared with BMI matched type 2 diabetic subjects and healthy controls. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14 (5):789-795.
  29. Petrov, Maxim S.. Panorama of mediators in postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 2020 September; 36(5):443-451.
  30. Praveen, G., Mohan, V. Fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes—current scenario in developing countries. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2018; 38: 131–132. 
  31. Cho, J., Pandol, S.J. & Petrov, M.S. Risk of cause-specific death, its sex and age differences, and life expectancy in post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 2021; 58: 797–807.
  32. Unnikrishnan AG, Bhatia E, Bhatia V, Bhadada SK, Sahay RK, Kannan A, Kumaravel V, Sarma D, Ganapathy B, Thomas N, John M, Jayakumar RV, Kumar H, Nair V, Sanjeevi CB. Type 1 diabetes versus type 2 diabetes with onset in persons younger than 20 years of age. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1150:239-44.
  33. Kumaran S, Unnikrishnan AG. Fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Jan;35(1):107627. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107627. Epub 2020 May 22.
  34. Drewes AM, Bouwense SAW, Campbell CM, Ceyhan GO, Delhaye M, Demir IE, Garg PK, van Goor H, Halloran C, Isaji S, Neoptolemos JP, Olesen SS, Palermo T, Pasricha PJ, Sheel A, Shimosegawa T, Szigethy E, Whitcomb DC, Yadav D; Working group for the International (IAP – APA – JPS – EPC) Consensus Guidelines for Chronic Pancreatitis. Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(5):720-731. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
  35. Kitano M, Gress TM, Garg PK, Itoi T, Irisawa A, Isayama H, Kanno A, Takase K, Levy M, Yasuda I, Lévy P, Isaji S, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Drewes AM, Sheel ARG, Neoptolemos JP, Shimosegawa T, Boermeester M, Wilcox CM, Whitcomb DC. International consensus guidelines on interventional endoscopy in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology. 2020 Sep; 20(6): 1045-1055.
  36. Johnston PC, Thompson J, Mckee A, Hamill C, Wallace I. Diabetes and Chronic Pancreatitis: Considerations in the Holistic Management of an Often Neglected Disease. J Diabetes Res. 2019 Oct 7;2019:2487804
  37. Dong YW, Shi YQ, He LW, Cui XY, Su PZ. Effects of metformin on survival outcomes of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 May 26; 8(33): 55478-55488.
  38. Ghosh I, Mukhopadhyay P, Das K, Anne M B, Ali Mondal S, Basu M, Nargis T, Pandit K, Chakrabarti P, Ghosh S. Incretins in fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes: A unique subtype of pancreatogenic diabetes. J Diabetes. 2021 Jun;13(6):506-511. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13139. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
  39. Petrov MS. Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus: investigational drugs in preclinical and clinical development and therapeutic implications. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2021 Jul; 30(7): 737-747.

 

Oral and Injectable (Non-Insulin) Pharmacological Agents for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

ABSTRACT

 

While lifestyle changes such as dietary modification and increased physical activity can be very effective in improving glycemic control, over the long-term most individuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) will require medications to achieve and maintain glycemic control. The purpose of this chapter is to provide the healthcare practitioner with an overview of the existing oral and injectable (non-insulin) pharmacological options available for the treatment of patients with T2DM. Currently, there are ten classes of orally available pharmacological agents to treat T2DM: 1) sulfonylureas, 2) meglitinides, 3) metformin (a biguanide), 4) thiazolidinediones (TZDs), 5) alpha glucosidase inhibitors, 6) dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors, 7) bile acid sequestrants, 8) dopamine agonists, 9) sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and 10) oral glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. In addition, glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dual GLP-1 receptor and GIP receptor agonists, and pramlintide can be administered by injection. Medications from these distinct classes of pharmaceutical agents may be used as treatment by themselves (monotherapy) or in a combination of 2 or more drugs from multiple classes with different mechanisms of action. A variety of fixed combinations of 2 agents are available in the US and in many other countries. In this chapter we discuss the administration, mechanism of action, effect on glycemic control, other benefits, side effects, and the contraindications of the use of these glucose lowering drugs.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

While lifestyle changes such as dietary modification and increased physical activity can be very effective in improving glycemic control, over the long-term most individuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM ) will require medications to achieve and maintain glycemic control (1). The purpose of this chapter is to provide the healthcare practitioner with detailed information on the existing oral and injectable (non-insulin) pharmacological options available for the treatment of patients with T2DM. The use of these drugs to treat diabetes during pregnancy, in children and adolescents, and for the prevention of diabetes are discussed in other Endotext chapters (2-4). For information on the management of T2DM and selecting amongst the available pharmacological agents see the chapter by Emily Schroeder in Endotext (5). 

 

Currently, there are ten classes of orally available pharmacological agents to treat T2DM: 1) sulfonylureas, 2) meglitinides, 3) metformin (a biguanide), 4) thiazolidinediones (TZDs), 5) alpha glucosidase inhibitors, 6) dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors, 7) bile acid sequestrants, 8) dopamine agonists, 9) sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and 10) oral glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (Table 1) (6-8). In addition, glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dual GLP-1 receptor and GIP receptor agonists, and pramlintide can be administered by injection (Table 2) (6-8).  

 

Table 1. Currently Available (USA) Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs to Treat Type 2 Diabetes

General Class

Compound/Brand Name

Generic Available

Dose Range

Cost

1st Generation Sulfonylureas

Chlorpropamide/ Diabinese

Yes

100-750mg qd

Low

Tolazamide/ Tolinase

Yes

100mg qd to 500mg bid

Low

Tolbutamide/ Orinase

Yes

500mg qd to 1000mg tid with meals

Low

Acetohexamide/ Dymelor 

Yes

250mg qd to 750mg bid

Low

2nd Generation Sulfonylureas

Glyburide (Glibenclamide)/ Diabeta, Glynase

Yes

2.5mg qd to 10mg bid

Low

Glipizide/ Glucotrol, Glucotrol XL

Yes

2.5mg qd to 20mg bid

Low

Glimepiride/ Amaryl

Yes

0.5mg to 8mg qd

Low

Gliclazide/ Diamicron

Yes

40mg qd to 160mg bid

Low

Meglitinides

Repaglinide/ Prandin

Yes

0.5mg to 4 mg with meals. Max 16mg/day

Low

Nateglinide/ Starlix

Yes

60-120mg tid with meals

Low

Biguanide

Metformin/ Glucophage, Glucophage XR

Yes

500-2500mg qd or tid depending upon preparation

Low

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs)

Rosiglitazone/ Avandia

Yes

4-8mg qd

High

Pioglitazone/ Actos

Yes

15-45mg qd

Low

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors

Acarbose/ Precose

Yes

25-100mg tid with meals

Low

Miglitol/ Glyset

Yes

25-100mg tid with meals

High

Voglibose/ Basen, Voglib

Yes

0.2mg tid with meals

 

Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitors

Alogliptin/ Nesina

Yes

25mg qd

High

Linagliptin/ Tradjenta

No

5mg qd

High

Sitagliptin/ Januvia

No

25-100mg qd

High

Saxagliptin/ Onglyza

No

2.5-5mg qd

High

Vildagliptin/ Galvus

No

50mg qd

 

Bile Acid Sequestrant

Colesevelam/ Welchol

No

1875mg bid or 3.75-gram packet or bar qd

High

Dopamine Agonist

Bromocriptine/ Cycloset

No

0.8 - 4.8mg qAM

High

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors

Canagliflozin/ Invokana

No

100-300mg qd

High

Dapagliflozin/ Farxiga

No

5-10mg qd

High

Empagliflozin/ Jardiance

No

10-25mg qd

High

Ertugliflozin/ Stelgatro

No

5-15mg qd

High

Oral glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists

Semaglutide/ Rybelsus

No

7-14mg qd

High

 

Table 2. Currently Available (USA) Injectable Hypoglycemic Drugs to Treat Type 2 Diabetes

General Class

Compound/Brand Name

Generic Available

Dose Range

Cost

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Exenatide/ Byetta

No

5-10mcg bid

High

Exenatide/ Bydureon

No

2mg once weekly

High

Liraglutide/ Victoza

No

0.6-1.8mg qd**

High

Albiglutide/ Tanzeum*

No

30-50mg once weekly

High

Dulaglutide/ Trulicity

No

0.75-4.5mg once weekly

High

Lixisenatide/ Adlyxin

No

10-20mcg qd

High

Semaglutide/ Ozempic

No

0.25-2.0mg once weekly

High

Dual GLP-1 Receptor/GIP Receptor Agonists

Tirzepatide/ Mounjaro

No

5mg-15mg once weekly

High

Amylin Mimetic

Pramlintide/ Symlin

No

15-120mcg tid with meals

High

*Withdrawn from market

 

Medications from these distinct classes of pharmaceutical agents may be used as treatment by themselves (monotherapy) or in a combination of 2 or more drugs from multiple classes with different mechanisms of action (6-8). A variety of fixed combination of 2 agents are available in the US and in many other countries (examples shown in Table 3). There are even combinations that contains 3 drugs (Qternmet XR which contains dapagliflozin, saxagliptin, and metformin and Trijardy XR which contains empagliflozin, linagliptin, and metformin). Additionally, there are combinations of GLP-1 receptor agonists and insulin (Table 3). These combination products may be useful and attractive to the patient, as they provide multiple drugs in a single tablet or injection, offering convenience and increased compliance. In the US, they also enable patients to receive two medications for a single medical insurance co-payment. Most importantly, the addition of a second drug results in an additive improvement in glycemic control. When a patient is on drug A if drug B is added to drug A, there is an improvement in glycemic control. This concept can be extended by the addition of a third drug C, and even a fourth drug D (Figure 1).

 

 

Table 3. Oral Pharmacological Fixed Combination Therapies to Treat Type 2 Diabetes

Drug 1

Drug 2

Brand Name

Generic

Glyburide

Metformin

Glucovance (discontinued by manufacturer: generic available)

Yes

Glipizide

Metformin

Metaglip (discontinued by manufacturer; generic available)

Yes

Glimepiride

Pioglitazone

Duetact

Yes

Glimepiride

Rosiglitazone

Avandaryl

Yes

Sitagliptin

Metformin

Janumet

No

Saxagliptin

Metformin

Kombiglyze XR

No

Pioglitazone

Metformin

ACTOSplus Met; ACTOSplus Met XR

Yes

Repaglinide

Metformin

PrandiMet

Yes

Rosiglitazone

Metformin

Avandamet

Yes

Linagliptin

Metformin

Jentadueto

No

Alogliptin

Metformin

Kazano

Yes

Alogliptin

Pioglitazone

Oseni

No

Canagliflozin

Metformin

Invokamet

No

Dapagliflozin

Metformin

Xigduo XR

No

Dapagliflozin

Saxagliptin

Qtern

No

Empagliflozin

Linagliptin

Glyxambi

No

Empagliflozin

Metformin

Synjardy

No

Ertugliflozin

Metformin

Segluromet

No

Ertugliflozin

Sitagliptin

Steglujan

No

Lixisenatide

Glargine Insulin

Soliqua

No

Liraglutide

Degludec Insulin

Xultophy

No

Figure 1. Efficacy When Oral Agents are Used as Add-On Therapy. When a patient is on drug A and they are changed to drug B, C, or D, often no improvement in glucose control will be seen. However, if drug B is added to drug A, there is an improvement. This concept can often be extended by the addition of a third drug (C), or even a fourth drug (D). There is decreasing benefit for each additional drug as the baseline A1c level decreases. Note that there is limited data on the use of 4 drug combinations.

 

OVERVIEW OF DRUGS

 

There are a number of different abnormalities that contribute to the hyperglycemia that occurs in patients with T2DM (9). Therefore, the drugs used to treat patients with T2DM can have a number of different mechanisms by which they lower glucose levels. Figure 2 shows the various sites of action of the pharmacological therapies for the treatment of T2DM.

 

Figure 2. Sites of Action of Pharmacological Therapies for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.

 

A broad overview of the most commonly used drugs to treat T2DM is shown in Table 4 and the effect of drugs on blood lipid levels is shown in Table 5.

 

Table 4. Benefits and Side Effects of Commonly Used Drugs

Drugs

Ability to Lower Glucose

Risk of Hypoglycemia

Weight Change

Effect on ASCVD

Effect on Heart Failure

Effect on Renal Disease

2ndGeneration SU

High

Yes

Increase

Neutral

Neutral

Neutral

Metformin

High

No

Neutral- modest weight loss

Potential Benefit

Neutral

Neutral

TZDs

High

No

Increase

Potential Benefit (Pioglitazone)

Increased

Neutral

DPP-4 inhibitors

Intermediate

No

Neutral

Neutral

Potential Increase (saxagliptin and alogliptin)

Neutral

SGLT2 inhibitors

Immediate

No

Decrease

Potential Benefit

Benefit

Benefit-

Reduced progression of renal failure

GLP-1 receptor agonists

High

No

Decrease

Benefit

Benefit

Benefit- Reduced progression of renal failure

 

 

Table 5. Effect of Glucose Lowering Drugs on Lipid Levels*

Metformin

Modestly decrease triglycerides and LDL-C

Sulfonylureas

No effect

DPP4 inhibitors

Decrease postprandial triglycerides

GLP1 analogues

Decrease fasting and postprandial triglycerides

Acarbose

Decrease postprandial triglycerides

Pioglitazone

Rosiglitazone

Decrease triglycerides and increase HDL-C. Small increase LDL-C but a decrease in small dense LDL

SGLT2 inhibitors

Small increase in LDL-C and HDL-C

Colesevelam

Decrease LDL-C. May increase triglycerides

Bromocriptine-QR

Decrease triglycerides

Insulin

No effect

*These effects are beyond benefits of glucose lowering

 

Bloomgarden et al reported results from a meta-regression analysis of 61 clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of the five major classes of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents (10). The results demonstrated that there is a strong direct correlation between baseline A1c level and the magnitude of the decrease in fasting glucose and A1c induced by these drugs (i.e., significantly greater reductions in both fasting plasma glucose and A1c were observed in groups with higher baseline A1c levels). Thus, expectations for the overall magnitude of effect from a given agent might be modest when treating patients whose baseline A1c is <7.5-8.0% while in patients with elevated A1c levels the effect of drug therapy may be more robust (figure 3). A separate meta-analysis of 59 clinical studies reached similar conclusions (11). These results indicate that comparing efficacies among different anti-diabetic medications is challenging, when the baseline HbA1c is different in the studies being compared.

 

Additionally, the population of patients studied can impact the efficacy of a particular class of drug. For example, patients with limited beta cell function will have a decreased response to sulfonylurea drugs as these agents work via stimulating insulin secretion by the beta cells while TZDs are most effective in patients with insulin resistance. Another example would be the decrease in efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors lowering A1c levels in patients with decreased renal function. A recent trial demonstrated that in individuals with a BMI > 30 pioglitazone reduced HbA1c levels better than sitagliptin while in individuals with a BMI < 30 sitagliptin was more effective (12). In individuals with an eGFR > 90 canagliflozin lowered HbA1c better than sitagliptin while in individuals with an eGFR between 60-90 sitagliptin was more effective (12). These results demonstrate that certain patient characteristics will influence the response to treatment with specific drugs indicating the ability to target drug therapy for the specific patient. Additionally, the variation in response of patients makes it difficult to compare the glucose lowering effects of different hypoglycemic drugs except in direct head-to-head comparison studies.

 

Figure 3. Relationship between baseline A1c level and the observed reduction in A1c with oral anti-hyperglycemic medications. Irrespective of drug class, the baseline glycemic control markedly influences the overall magnitude of efficacy. Data from Bloomgarden et al, Table 1 (10).

 

A recent model-based meta-analysis was used to compare glycemic control between a large number of drugs adjusted for important differences between studies, including duration of treatment, baseline A1c, and drug dosages (13). In this analysis 229 studies with 121,914 patients were utilized. Table 6 shows the estimated decrease in A1c levels for different drugs in patients that are drug naïve with an A1c of 8% and a weight of 90kg after 26 weeks of treatment. If one averages the effect on A1c of the highest doses for each drug in a specific drug class the reductions in A1c for each class of drug are metformin 1.09%, sulfonylureas 1.0%, TZDs 0.95%, DPP-4 inhibitors 0.66%, SGLT2 inhibitors 0.83%, and GLP-1 receptor agonists 1.24%. These data and the individual data for each drug in table 6 provides a rough estimate of the efficacy of various drugs and drug classes in lowering A1c levels. One should note that within a drug class there may be differences in the ability of different drugs to lower A1c levels. This is particularly true with the GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs. For additional information there is a website that provides updated comparisons of various agents to treat patients with T2DM (https://www.comparediabetesdrugs.com/). This website shows the effect of glucose lowering drugs on A1c levels, change in weight, and hypoglycemia.

 

Table 6. Estimated Efficacy of Hypoglycemic Drugs Available in US (13)

Drug

A1c % Decrease

Drug

A1c % Decrease

Metformin 2000mg

1.01

Dulaglutide 0.75

1.18

Metformin 2550mg

1.09

Dulaglutide 1.5mg

1.36

Glipizide 5-20mg

0.86

Exenatide 10ug BID

0.86

Glyburide 1.25-20mg

1.17

Exenatide 2mg QW

1.16

Glimepiride 1-8mg

0.97

Exenatide 2mg QWS

1.14

Pioglitazone 15mg

0.62

Liraglutide 0.6mg

0.88

Pioglitazone 30mg

0.85

Liraglutide 1.2mg

1.13

Pioglitazone 45mg

0.98

Liraglutide 1.8mg

1.25

Rosiglitazone 4mg

0.67

Lixisenatide 10ug

0.44

Rosiglitazone 8mg

0.91

Lixisenatide 20ug

0.66

Canagliflozin 100mg

0.84

Semaglutide 0.5mg

1.43

Canagliflozin 300mg

1.01

Semaglutide 1.0mg

1.77

Dapagliflozin 5mg

0.65

Alogliptin 12.5mg

0.58

Dapagliflozin 10mg

0.73

Alogliptin 25mg

0.66

Empagliflozin 10mg

0.69

Linagliptin 5mg

0.59

Empagliflozin 25mg

0.77

Saxagliptin 2.5mg

0.59

Ertugliflozin 5mg

0.73

Saxagliptin 5mg

0.67

Ertugliflozin 15mg

0.81

Sitagliptin 100mg

0.72

The decreases in A1c are modeled for drug naïve patients with an A1c of 8% and a weight of 90kg after 26 weeks of treatment.

 

The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) Study randomized approximately 5,000 patients with relatively recent onset of T2DM (4.2 years) on metformin therapy to sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or insulin (14). The primary outcome was the time to primary failure defined as an A1c ≥ 7% over an anticipated mean observation period of 5 years The results as expected demonstrated that the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide was more effective than the sulfonylurea glimepiride and the DPP4 inhibitor sitagliptin in maintaining the A1c < 7% (GLP1 receptor agonist better than sulfonylurea better than DPP-4 inhibitor) (15). Liraglutide and glargine insulin were similarly effective in lowering A1c levels (15). Significantly the majority of patients regardless of drug assignment did not have an A1c level less than 7% (Glargine 67.4%, Glimepiride 72.4%, Liraglutide 68.2%, Sitagliptin 77.4%) demonstrating the progressive nature of diabetes and the difficulty in maintaining good glycemic control. It should be noted that the SGLT2 inhibitors and TZD drugs were not included in this study. The incidences of microvascular complications (renal disease and neuropathy) and death were not different among the four treatment groups (16). There was a suggestion of a decrease in cardiovascular disease in the liraglutide treated group (16,17).

 

SULFONYLUREAS

 

Introduction

 

Sulfonylureas were developed in the 1950s and have been widely used in the treatment of patients with T2DM (18,19). First generation sulfonylureas (acetohexamide, chlorpropamide, tolazamide, and tolbutamide) possess a lower binding affinity for the ATP-sensitive potassium channel, their molecular target (vide infra), and thus require higher doses to achieve efficacy (see table 1) (18,19). These first-generation sulfonylureas are currently rarely used. Subsequently, in the 1980s 2nd generation sulfonylureas including glyburide (glibenclamide), glipizide, gliclazide, and glimepiride were developed and are now widely used (18). The 2nd generation sulfonylureas are much more potent compounds (~100-fold). Sulfonylureas can be used as monotherapy or in combination with any other class of oral diabetic medications except meglitinides because they lower glucose levels by a similar mechanism of action (18,20).

 

Key characteristics of the different sulfonylureas are shown in Table 7 (18). Of clinical importance is the duration of action, which varies with the rate of hepatic metabolism and the hypoglycemic activity of drug metabolites. Drugs with a long duration of action are more likely to cause severe and prolonged hypoglycemia whereas short acting drugs need to be given multiple times per day (18). Additionally, drugs that are metabolized to active agents (for example glyburide) are also more likely to cause hypoglycemia (18). Most sulfonylureas are metabolized in the liver and are to some extent excreted by the kidney; therefore, hepatic and/or renal impairment increases the risk of hypoglycemia (18).

 

Table 7. Key Characteristics of Sulfonylureas

Drug

Duration of action

Metabolites

Excretion

Tolbutamide

6–12 h

Inactive

Kidney

Chlorpropamide

60 h

Active or unchanged

Kidney

Tolazamide

12–24 h

Inactive

Kidney

Glipizide

12–24 h

Inactive

Kidney 80%

Feces 20%

Glipizide ER

>24 h

Inactive

Kidney 80%

Feces 20%

Glyburide

16–24 h

Inactive or weakly active

Kidney 50%

Micronized glyburide

12-24 h

Inactive or weakly active

Kidney 50%

Feces 50%

Glimepiride

24 h

Inactive or weakly active

Kidney 60%

Feces 40%

 

Administration

 

Sulfonylureas should be taken 30 minutes before meals starting with a low dose with an increase in dosage until desired glycemic control has been achieved. In patients with a high risk of severe hypoglycemia a very low-dose can be the initial therapy while in patients with very high A1c levels one can initiate therapy at a higher dose.

 

The recommended starting dose of glipizide is 5 mg approximately 30 minutes before breakfast. Geriatric patients or those with liver or renal disease or other risk factors for severe hypoglycemia can be started on 2.5 mg. Patients with very high A1c levels may be started on a higher dose. Based on the glucose response the dose can be increased weekly by 2.5-5 mg. If a once-a-day dose is not satisfactory or the patient requires more than 15 mg per day one can give the drug before breakfast and dinner. The maximum daily dose is 40 mg per day.

 

The usual starting dose of extended-release glipizide is 5 mg per day with breakfast. Those patients who are at high risk of hypoglycemia may be started at a lower dose. The dose can be increased based on glucose or A1c measurements. The maximum dose is 20 mg per day.

 

The usual starting dose of glyburide is 2.5 to 5 mg daily with breakfast or the first main meal. Patients at high risk for hypoglycemia should be started on 1.25 mg per day. The dose should be increased weekly by 2.5 mg based on the glucose response. The maximum dose per day is 20 mg.

 

The usual starting dose of micronized glyburide is 1.5 to 3 mg daily with breakfast or the first main meal. Patients at high risk for hypoglycemia should be started on 0.75 mg per day. The dose should be increased weekly by 1.5 mg based on the glucose response. The maximum dose per day is 12 mg.

 

The recommended starting dose of glimepiride is 1 or 2 mg once daily. Patients at increased risk for hypoglycemia should be started on 1 mg once daily. The dose should be increased every 1-2 weeks in increments of 1 or 2 mg based upon the patient’s glycemic response. The maximum dose is 8 mg per day.

 

The recommended starting dose of gliclazide is 40 - 80mg once daily. Patients at increased risk for hypoglycemia should be started on 40 mg once daily. The dose should be increased every 1-2 weeks in increments of 40 or 80 mg based upon the patient’s glycemic response. The maximum dose is 160mg twice a day.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Sulfonylureas are insulin secretagogues and lower blood glucose levels by directly stimulating glucose independent insulin secretion by the pancreatic beta cells (18,20). Through the concerted efforts of GLUT2 (the high Km glucose transporter), glucokinase (the enzyme that phosphorylates glucose), and glucose metabolism, pancreatic beta cells sense blood glucose levels and secrete the appropriate amount of insulin in response (21,22). Glucose metabolism leads to ATP generation and increases the intracellular ratio of ATP/ADP, which results in the closure of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel on the plasma membrane (18,21,23). Closure of this channel depolarizes the membrane and triggers the opening of voltage-sensitive calcium channels, leading to the rapid influx of calcium (18,24). Increased intracellular calcium causes an alteration in the cytoskeleton and stimulates translocation of insulin-containing secretory granules to the plasma membrane and the secretion of insulin (Figure 4) (18).

 

Figure 4. Mechanism by which glucose, sulfonylureas, and meglitinides stimulate insulin secretion by the beta cells.

 

The KATP channel is comprised of two subunits, both of which are required for the channel to be functional (24). One subunit contains the cytoplasmic binding sites for both sulfonylureas and ATP, and is designated as the sulfonylurea receptor type 1 (SUR1). The other subunit is the potassium channel, which acts as the pore-forming subunit (24). Either an increase in the ATP/ADP ratio or ligand binding by sulfonylureas or meglitinides to SUR1 results in the closure of the KATP channel and insulin secretion (19,24). Studies comparing sulfonylureas and non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues have identified several distinct binding sites on the SUR1 that cause channel closure. Some sites exhibit high affinity for sulfonylureas, while other sites exhibit high affinity for meglitinides.

 

In addition to binding to SUR1, sulfonylureas also bind to Epac2, a protein activated by cAMP (18). Sulfonylurea-stimulated insulin secretion was reduced both in vitro and in vivo in mice lacking Epac2, indicating that Epac2 also plays a role in sulfonylurea induced insulin secretion (25).

 

In addition to inducing insulin secretion sulfonylureas have other effects that could play a role in lowering blood glucose levels (18). Specifically, sulfonylureas have been shown to decrease hepatic insulin clearance, inhibit glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha-cells (this may be secondary to increasing insulin secretion), and enhance insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues (this may be partially due to lowering glucose levels and reducing glucotoxicity) (18). The contribution and importance of these additional effects in mediating the glucose lowering effects of sulfonylureas is uncertain.

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

When used at maximally effective doses, results from well-controlled clinical trials have not indicated a marked superiority of one 2nd generation sulfonylurea over another in improving glycemic control (26). Similarly, 2nd generation sulfonylureas exhibit similar clinical efficacy compared to the 1st generation agents (26). Sulfonylureas do not have a linear dose-response relationship and the majority of the A1C reduction occurs at half maximum dosage. The effect of sulfonylureas as monotherapy or when added to metformin therapy on A1c levels varies but typically results in reductions in A1c of approximately 0.50-1.5% (13,19,20,27,28). If A1c levels are very high decreases in the range of 1.5- 2.0% may be seen (19,20,26). Patients with a short duration of diabetes with residual beta cell function (high C-peptide levels) are likely to be most responsive to sulfonylurea therapy (26). Overtime many patients on sulfonylureas require additional therapies (secondary failure). In the ADOPT study, after 5 years 34% of the patients on glyburide monotherapy had fasting glucose levels > 180 mg/dl (i.e., secondary failure) (29). Similarly, in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), only 34% of patients attained an A1c <7 % at 6 years treated with sulfonylureas (glyburide or chlorpropamide) and this number declined to 24 % at 9 years (18). This lack of durability of sulfonylurea therapy is likely to due to beta cell exhaustion. In addition, the weight gain induced by sulfonylurea therapy may also adversely affect glycemic control.

 

The results of the GRADE study, which compared glargine insulin, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin added to metformin, were discussed earlier in the section entitled “OVERVIEW OF DRUGS”.

 

Other Effects

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

Based on the University Group Diabetes Project (UGDP) sulfonylureas carry a “black box” warning regarding cardiovascular disease (30,31). However, the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group (UKPDS) studied a large number of newly diagnosed patients with T2DM at risk for cardiovascular disease. In this study improved glycemic control with sulfonylureas reduced cardiovascular disease by approximately 16%, which just missed being statistically significant (p=0.052) (32). In the UKPDS, A1c was reduced by approximately 0.9% and the 16% reduction in cardiovascular disease was in the range predicted based on epidemiological studies. Thus, the reduction in cardiovascular events was likely due to improvements in glycemic control and not a direct benefit of sulfonylurea treatment. In support of this conjecture is that in the UKPDS, insulin treatment resulted in a similar decrease in A1c levels and reduction in cardiovascular events (32). Additionally, a large randomized cardiovascular outcome study (Carolina Study) reported that linagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, and glimepiride, a sulfonylurea, had similar effects on cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.98) (33). Taken together these results suggest that sulfonylureas have a neutral effect on cardiovascular disease.  

 

Side Effects

 

HYPOGLYCEMIA

 

The major side effect of sulfonylurea treatment is hypoglycemia, which is more likely to occur and is more severe with long- acting sulfonylureas (18,19). In the UKPDS severe hypoglycemia, defined by need for third-party assistance, occurred each year in 0.4–0.6/100 patients treated with a sulfonylurea while non-severe hypoglycemia was seen in 7.9/100 persons treated with a sulfonylurea (34). Other studies have found even higher rates of severe hypoglycemia with 20–40% of patients receiving sulfonylureas having hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia (requiring third-party assistance) occurring in 1–7% of patients (20,34). With continuous glucose monitoring 30% of well controlled patients with T2DM had episodes of hypoglycemia that were often asymptomatic and nocturnal (35). Of great concern these hypoglycemic events were associated with EKG changes, particularly QTc prolongation (35). Other studies have also observed a very high rate of hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM treated with sulfonylureas when monitored using continuous glucose monitoring (36).

 

Hypoglycemia typically occurs after periods of fasting or exercise. In light of this hypoglycemic risk, initiation of treatment with sulfonylureas should be at the lowest recommended dose and the dose slowly increased in patients with modestly elevated A1c levels. Older patients (> age 65) and patients with hepatic or renal disease are more likely to experience frequent and severe hypoglycemic reactions, particularly if the goals of therapy aim for inappropriately tight glycemic control (18). Many clinicians avoid the use of long acting sulfonylureas (glyburide) in these high-risk patients as glyburide has a higher risk of hypoglycemia compared to other sulfonylureas (37).

 

WEIGHT GAIN

 

In the UKPDS, sulfonylurea treatment caused a net weight gain of approximately 3 kg, which occurred during the first 3-4 years of treatment and then stabilized (19,32). Other studies have similarly observed weight gain with sulfonylurea treatment (26).

 

FIRST GENERATION SIDE EFFECTS

 

Chlorpropamide can induce hyponatremia and water retention due to inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (ADH) (18). In addition, tolbutamide and chlorpropamide, in certain susceptible individuals, is associated with alcohol-induced flushing (18). Because of an increased risk of side effects 1st generation sulfonylureas are seldom used.

 

RARE SIDE EFFECTS

 

Intrahepatic cholestasis and allergic skin reactions, including photosensitivity and erythroderma may rarely occur (Package insert).

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Sulfonylureas are best avoided in patients with a sulfa allergy who experienced prior severe allergic reactions (Package insert). Otherwise, cross-reactivity between antibacterial and nonantibacterial sulfonamide agents is rare.

 

In renal failure, the dose of the sulfonylurea agent will require adjustment based on glucose monitoring to avoid hypoglycemia (18). Because it is metabolized primarily in the liver without the formation of active metabolites, glipizide is the preferred sulfonylurea in patients with renal disease (38).

 

In the elderly, long acting sulfonylureas, such as glyburide, glimepiride and chlorpropamide are not recommended (39).

 

Sulfonylureas can cause hemolytic anemia in patients with glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency and therefore should be used with caution in such patients (Package insert).

 

Certain drugs may enhance the glucose-lowering effects of sulfonylureas by inhibition of their hepatic metabolism (antifungals and monoamine oxidase inhibitors), displacing them from binding to plasma proteins (coumarins, NSAIDs, and sulfonamides), or inhibiting their excretion (probenecid) (20).

 

Summary

 

While the ability of sulfonylureas to improve glycemic control is robust, the risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain reduce the desirability of this drug class. Additionally, the shorter durability of effectiveness is also a limiting factor. In patients at high risk for the occurrence of severe hypoglycemic reactions or in patients who are obese, using drugs other than sulfonylureas to treat T2DM is indicated if possible. Similarly, in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or at high risk for cardiovascular disease or renal disease other hypoglycemic drugs have important advantages. Nevertheless, because sulfonylureas are generic drugs and very inexpensive, they continue to be used and play a role in the management of patients with T2DM.

 

Table 8. Summary of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Sulfonylureas

Advantages

Disadvantages

Inexpensive

Hypoglycemia

Rapid acting

Weight gain

Once a day administration possible

Limited durability

Long history of use

Need to titrate dose

 

MEGLINATIDES

 

Introduction

 

The meglitinides are non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues characterized by a very rapid onset and abbreviated duration of action (20,40). Repaglinide (Prandin), a benzoic acid derivative introduced in 1998, was the first member of the meglitinide class. Nateglinide (Starlix) is a derivative of the amino acid D-phenylalanine and was introduced to the market in 2001. Unlike sulfonylureas, repaglinide and nateglinide stimulation of insulin secretion is dependent on the presence of glucose (40,41). As glucose levels decrease, insulin secretion decreases, which reduces the risk of hypoglycemia compared with sulfonylureas.

 

Meglitinides are rapidly absorbed with maximum serum concentrations generally attained within 1 hour and then quickly metabolized by the liver cytochrome CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 pathways, producing inactive metabolites, resulting in a plasma half-life of around 1 h (20). This rapid onset and short duration of action results in the ability of this class of drugs to predominantly reduce postprandial glucose levels (40). Because of the rapid onset and short duration of action meglitinides are given 1-30 minutes prior to meals. The drug should not be administered if the patient is going to skip the meal. 

 

The pharmacokinetics of meglitinides differ with nateglinide having a faster onset and shorter duration of action than repaglinide (41). Nateglinide stimulates early insulin release faster and to a greater extent than repaglinide with insulin levels returning to baseline levels more rapidly (40,41).

 

Administration

 

The recommended starting dose of nateglinide is 120 mg three times per day before meals (1-30 minutes). In patients who are near their glycemic goal when treatment is initiated the recommended starting dose of nateglinide is 60 mg three times per day before meals. The maximum dose of nateglinide is 120 mg three times per day before meals.

 

The recommended starting dose of repaglinide for patients whose A1c is less than 8% is 0.5 mg before each meal (1-30 minutes). For patients whose A1c is 8% or greater the starting dose is 1 or 2 mg orally before each meal. The patient’s dose should be doubled up to 4mg with each meal until satisfactory glycemic control is achieved (should wait one week between increasing dose). The maximum daily dose is 16 mg per day.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Meglitinides bind to a different site on SUR1 in β cells that is separate from the sulfonylurea binding site (Figure 4) (20,40). The effect of meglitinide binding is similar to the effect of sulfonylureas with binding resulting in the closure of the KATP channel leading to cell depolarization and calcium influx resulting in insulin secretion (20,40,41). However, the relatively rapid onset and short duration of action of meglitinides suits their use as prandial glucose-lowering agents (20,40).

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

Studies have shown that A1c reductions are similar to, or slightly less, than those observed with sulfonylurea or metformin treatment when meglitinides are used as monotherapy (20,40). In studies comparing repaglinide monotherapy with sulfonylurea or metformin therapy the decrease in A1c was similar (40,42). In contrast, a study comparing nateglinide with metformin demonstrated that metformin was more effective in lowering A1c levels (43). In a randomized trial comparing repaglinide and nateglinide in patients with T2DM previously treated with diet and exercise, repaglinide was more effective in lowering A1c levels (1.57% vs. 1.04%) (44). While postprandial glucose levels were similar repaglinide was more effective in reducing fasting glucose levels, probably due to its longer duration of action. These clinical findings can be incorporated into clinical decision making.  For example, if the main issue for the patient is postprandial hyperglycemia, and fasting glucoses are near normal, an agent, such as nateglinide, that has a limited effect on the fasting glucose would be ideal. However, if one needs reductions in both fasting and postprandial glucose levels a longer acting agent such as repaglinide is a better choice.

 

Other Effects

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

The Navigator study was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial in 9,306 individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and either cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors who received nateglinide (up to 60 mg three times daily) or placebo (45). After 5 years, nateglinide administration did not alter the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes suggesting that meglitinides do not have adverse or beneficial cardiovascular effects. The effect of meglitinides on cardiovascular disease has not been studies in patients with T2DM.

 

Side Effects

 

Similar to sulfonylureas, meglitinides can cause hypoglycemia but the risk of severe hypoglycemia is less (20,40,42). The incidence of hypoglycemia is lower with nateglinide than for repaglinide and nateglinide is less likely to cause severe hypoglycemia (20). In one study, the occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was 2% for nateglinide and 7% for repaglinide (41). Weight gain is also a common side effect of meglitinides (approximately 1-3 kg) with nateglinide leading to less weight gain than repaglinide (20,41).

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Because meglitinides are metabolized by the liver these drugs should be used cautiously in patients with impaired liver function (Package insert).

 

Drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 (for example ketoconazole, itraconazole and erythromycin) or CYP2C8 (for example trimethoprim, gemfibrozil and montelukast) can result in the increased activity of meglitinides enhancing the risk of hypoglycemia and should be avoided if possible (42).

 

Summary

 

Meglitinides can be useful drugs when there is a need to specifically lower postprandial glucose levels (i.e., patients with fasting glucose in desired range but elevated post meal glucose levels). Additionally, because of their short duration of action meglitinides can be useful in patients who eat erratically as this class of drugs can be given only before meals and the duration of action will match the postprandial increase in glucose. The risk of severe hypoglycemia and weight gain is less than sulfonylureas but still must be considered in patients treated with meglitinides. The development of drugs that do not cause weight gain or severe hypoglycemia and lower postprandial glucose levels have resulted in the limited use of meglitinides.

 

Table 9. Summary of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Meglitinides

Advantages

Disadvantages

Decrease postprandial glucose

Hypoglycemia

Flexible dosing

Weight gain

Relatively inexpensive

Frequent dosing

Short action allowing for missing meals

Need to titrate dose

 

METFORMIN

 

Introduction

 

Metformin (Glucophage) is a synthetic analog of the natural product guanidine (20). Since its initial clinical use over 50 years ago, metformin has surpassed the sulfonylureas as the most widely prescribed oral agent for T2DM throughout the world because of its proven efficacy on glycemic control as monotherapy and in combination with many other available agents (20). The widespread acceptance of metformin evolved after the realization that lactic acidosis was not a major problem in individuals with normal renal function. Phenformin, a structural analog of metformin, was previously withdrawn from the market in many countries due its propensity to induce lactic acidosis (20).

 

Administration

 

The usual starting dose of metformin is 500 mg twice a day with meals. After 1-2 weeks the dose can be increased to 1500 mg per day (750 mg twice a day or 500 mg in AM and 1000 mg in PM). After another 1-2 weeks the dose can be increased to 1000 mg twice a day. The slow increase in dosage is to reduce GI side effects and the dose should not be increased if GI side effects are occurring. The maximum dose is 2550 mg per day which can be given as 850 mg three times per day with meals but most patients are treated with 1000 mg twice a day with breakfast and dinner.

 

The usual starting dose of metformin extended release is 500 mg with the evening meal (largest meal). The dose can be increased by 500 mg weekly depending upon tolerability. The maximum dose is 2000 mg with the evening meal.

 

Note the dose of metformin may need to be adjusted based on renal function (discussed below).

 

Metformin should be temporarily discontinued when patients are unable to eat or drink. Metformin is seldom used in hospitalized patients.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production and improves hepatic insulin sensitivity but has only a modest impact on peripheral insulin-mediated glucose uptake (i.e., insulin resistance), which is likely due to a reduction in hyperglycemia, triglycerides, and free fatty acid levels (46,47). Hyperinsulinemia is reduced and the decrease in hepatic glucose production results in a decrease in fasting glucose levels (20). In addition, metformin also increases intestinal glucose utilization and stimulates GLP-1 secretion (46,47). Insulin secretion is not increased (20). The cellular and molecular mechanisms that account for these changes are not definitively understood.

 

LIVER

 

There are several lines of evidence indicating that the liver plays an important role in metformin’s ability to improve glycemic control (46). In humans and rodents, metformin is concentrated in the liver and blocking the uptake of metformin into the liver in mice prevents the ability of metformin to lower blood glucose levels (46,47). As noted above tracer studies in humans show that metformin lowers hepatic glucose production and increases hepatic insulin sensitivity (46). There are a number of proposed mechanisms by which metformin alters hepatic metabolism (46).

 

  • Metformin inhibits mitochondrial ATP production by inhibition of Complex I of the respiratory chain and/or inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase, which is required to carry reducing equivalents from the cytoplasm into the mitochondria for re-oxidation (46,47). The decrease in ATP production could decrease hepatic gluconeogenesis (47). This also leads to an increase in AMP.
  • Metformin increases hepatic AMP levels and AMP is a potent allosteric inhibitor of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase, a key enzyme in gluconeogenesis (47). In addition, high AMP levels inhibit adenylate cyclase reducing cyclic AMP formation in response to glucagon, which also decreases glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis (i.e., decreases glucagon activity) (47). The increase in AMP also activates AMP-activated protein kinase.
  • Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase, which activates catabolic pathways leading to decreased gluconeogenesis, decreased fatty acid synthesis, and increased fatty acid oxidation (46,47). The changes in fatty acid metabolism are thought to account for the improvement in hepatic insulin sensitivity and the decrease in serum triglyceride levels (46).
  • Metformin inhibits glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase increasing the cytosolic redox state resulting in a decreased conversion of glycerol and lactate to glucose (48).

 

INTESTINE

 

Several lines of evidence indicate that the intestine plays an important role in explaining metformin’s ability to lower blood glucose levels. First, a decrease in hepatic glucose production can only partially account for the decrease in blood glucose (46). Second, in humans with loss-of-function variants in SLC22A1, which decrease the uptake of metformin into the liver, the ability of metformin to lower A1c levels is not impaired (46). Finally, a delayed-release metformin that is retained in the gut, with minimal systemic absorption, is as effective at lowering blood glucose as the standard metformin formulation in patients with T2DM (46,49). There are a number of proposed mechanisms for how the intestine accounts for the beneficial effects of metformin.

 

  • Metformin increases anaerobic glucose metabolism in the intestine resulting in increased intestinal glucose utilization and decreased glucose uptake into the circulation (46). This is likely due to the inhibition of mitochondrial ATP production described above. The increased utilization of glucose by anaerobic metabolism could contribute to metformin induced weight loss.
  • Metformin increases GLP-1 secretion, which could increase insulin secretion and decrease glucagon secretion (46). The increase in GLP-1 could also contribute to the weight loss or weight neutral effects of metformin.
  • Metformin alters the intestinal microbiome, which could alter glucose metabolism (46,50).

 

It is clear that there are multiple potential mechanisms by which metformin can improve glucose metabolism and further studies are required to elucidate the relative importance and contribution of these proposed mechanisms and others yet to be identified. 

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

Metformin is often used as the initial therapy in patients with diabetes in conjunction with lifestyle changes (6,7). The typical reduction in A1c with metformin therapy is in the range of 1 to 2.0% (20,51). The decrease in A1c induced by metformin is independent of age, weight, and diabetes duration as long as some residual β-cell function remains (20). One retrospective study has reported that African-Americans have a greater decrease in A1c with metformin compared to Caucasians (52). The effect of immediate release and extended release metformin on A1c levels is similar (53). In head-to-head trials, metformin has been shown to produce equivalent reductions in A1c as sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones but is more potent than DPP-4 inhibitors (51).

 

The durability of glycemic control with metformin is more prolonged than with sulfonylureas but shorter than with TZDs (29). After 5 years of monotherapy, 15% of individuals on rosiglitazone therapy, 21% of individuals on metformin therapy, and 34% of individuals on glyburide (glibenclamide) therapy had fasting glucose levels above the acceptable range (29). The ability to maintain an A1c <7% was 57 months with rosiglitazone, 45 months with metformin, and 33 months with glyburide (glibenclamide) (29).

 

In addition to the ability to improve glycemic control in monotherapy, metformin in combination with sulfonylureas, meglinitides, TZDs, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, insulin, and GLP-1 receptor agonists lowers A1c levels and often allows for patients to achieve their A1c goals (51). As shown in Table 3 there are a large number of combination tablets that include metformin with other glucose lowering drugs.

 

Hypoglycemia does not occur with metformin monotherapy (51). Hypoglycemia may occur with metformin during concomitant use with other glucose-lowering agents such as sulfonylureas and insulin.

 

Other Effects

 

WEIGHT

 

Metformin is weight neutral or can sometimes result in a modest weight loss (up to 4 kg) (51). When used in combination with sulfonylureas or insulin it blunts the weight gain induced by these agents.

 

LIPIDS

 

Metformin decreases serum triglyceride levels and LDL-C levels without altering HDL-C (54,55). In a meta-analysis of 37 trials with 2,891 patients, metformin decreased triglycerides by 11.4mg/dl when compared with control treatment (p=0.003) (54). In an analysis of 24 trials with 1,867 patients, metformin decreased LDL-C by 8.4mg/dl compared to control treatment (p<0.001) (54). In contrast, metformin did not significantly alter HDL-C levels (54). It should be noted that in the Diabetes Prevention Program 3,234 individuals with impaired glucose metabolism were randomized to placebo, intensive lifestyle, or metformin therapy (56). In the metformin therapy group no significant changes were noted in triglyceride, LDL-C, or HDL-C levels compared to the placebo group. Thus, metformin may have small effects on lipid levels.     

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

In the UKPDS, metformin, while producing a similar improvement in glycemic control as insulin or sulfonylureas, markedly reduced cardiovascular disease by approximately 40% (57). In the ten-year follow-up the patients randomized to metformin in the UKPDS continued to show a reduction in MI and all-cause mortality (58). Two other small randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated cardiovascular benefits with metformin therapy. A study by Kooy et al compared the effect of adding metformin or placebo in overweight or obese patients already on insulin therapy (59). After a mean follow-up of 4.3 years this study observed a reduction in macrovascular events (HR 0.61 CI- 0.40-0.94, p=0.02), which was partially accounted for by metformin’s beneficial effects on weight. In this study the difference in A1c between the metformin and placebo group was only 0.3%. Hong et al randomized non-obese patients with coronary artery disease to glipizide vs. metformin therapy for three years (60). A1c levels were similar, but there was a marked reduction in cardiovascular events in the metformin treated group (HR 0.54 CI 0.30- 0.90, p=0.026). These results suggest that metformin may reduce cardiovascular disease and that this effect is not due to improving glucose control. Metformin decreases weight or prevents weight gain and lowers lipid levels and these or other non-glucose effects may account for the beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease. Larger cardiovascular outcome studies are required to definitively demonstrate a beneficial effect of metformin on cardiovascular disease.

 

POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME (PCOS)

 

In patients with PCOS metformin lowers serum androgen levels, increases ovulations, and improves menstrual frequency (61). Metformin may also be associated with weight loss in some women with PCOS (61). Metformin combined with clomiphene may be the best combination in obese women with PCOS to improve fertility (61). For a detailed discussion of the treatment of PCOS see the chapter on polycystic ovary syndrome in Endotext (61). 

 

CANCER

 

Multiple epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between metformin treatment and a reduced cancer incidence and mortality (62,63). Treatment with metformin has been associated with a decreased risk of breast, colon, liver, pancreas, prostate, endometrium and lung cancer and marked reductions in cancer-specific mortality for colon, lung and early-stage prostate cancer and improvements in survival for breast, colon, endometrial, ovarian, liver, lung, prostate and pancreatic cancer (62,63). A wide variety of different mechanisms have been proposed that could account for metformin’s anti-tumor effects providing biological plausibility (63). However, data from large randomized controlled trials have not yet definitively demonstrated whether metformin can prevent the development of cancer or is useful in the treatment of cancer (62-65). Further studies are required to elucidate the potential role of metformin in oncology.

 

Side Effects

 

GASTROINTESTINAL

 

The most common side effects of metformin are diarrhea, nausea, and/or abdominal discomfort, which can occur in up to 50% of patients (20,51). These side effects are usually mild and disappear with continued drug administration. The GI side effects are dose-related and slow titration to allow for tolerance can reduce the occurrence of these symptoms (51). Administrating metformin three times a day with meals instead of twice a day may also reduce GI side effects. A small number of patients cannot tolerate the drug, even at low doses (51). Extended-release metformin [metformin XR]) causes fewer GI symptoms and can be used in patients who do not tolerate immediate release metformin (51).

 

Studies have shown that reduced function of plasma membrane monoamine transporter or organic cation transporter 1 leads to an increase in metformin GI side effects (66,67). Use of drugs that inhibit organic cation transporter 1 activity (including tricyclic antidepressants, citalopram, proton-pump inhibitors, verapamil, diltiazem, doxazosin, spironolactone, clopidogrel, rosiglitazone, quinine, tramadol and codeine) increased intolerance to metformin (66).

 

LACTIC ACIDOSIS

 

A very rare complication of metformin therapy is lactic acidosis (51). This complication was much more common with phenformin therapy, the initial biguanide, and the risk with metformin is estimated to be 20 times less (51). The estimated incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is 3–10 per 100,000 person-years (51). This is a potentially lethal complication of metformin therapy that typically occurs when renal dysfunction results in very high blood metformin levels, which inhibit mitochondrial function resulting in the overproduction of lactate (51). In addition to renal disorders other risk factors for metformin associated lactic acidosis include sepsis, cardiogenic shock, hepatic impairment, congestive heart failure, and alcoholism (51). In some circumstances the lactic acidosis observed in patients treated with metformin may not be due to metformin but rather to underlying clinical disorders such as severe sepsis.

 

VITAMIN B12 DEFICIENCY

 

Studies have demonstrated that vitamin B12 malabsorption is a side effect of metformin therapy (51). A randomized controlled trial showed that metformin 850 mg three times per day for over 4 years resulted in a 19% decrease in B12 levels compared to placebo (68). Moreover, 9.9% of patients treated with metformin developed vitamin B12 deficiency (<150 pmol/l) vs. only 2.7% in the placebo group (68). The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study also demonstrated an increased risk of B12 deficiency with long term metformin use (69). It is now recommended that periodic testing of vitamin B12 levels should be considered in patients on long-term metformin therapy, particularly in the setting of anemia or neuropathy (70). 

 

OVULATION AND PREGNANCY

 

As discussed above in the polycystic ovary section, treatment of premenopausal women with PCOS with metformin may induce ovulation and thereby result in unplanned pregnancies. In premenopausal anovulatory women started on metformin one needs to discuss the need for contraception.

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Metformin is contraindicated in patients with advanced kidney or liver disease, acute unstable congestive heart failure, conditions marked by decreased perfusion or hemodynamic instability, major alcohol abuse, or conditions characterized by acidosis (51). Metformin therapy should be suspended during serious illness or surgical procedures. Metformin is seldom used in hospitalized patients.

 

RENAL DISEASE

 

A major contraindication to the use of metformin is renal disease (51). Metformin is not metabolized and is excreted intact by the kidneys and therefore kidney function is a major determinant of blood metformin levels. eGFR should be obtained prior to initiating therapy. In patients with renal dysfunction or at risk for developing renal dysfunction eGFR should be obtained more frequently. In patients with a eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 metformin therapy is contraindicated (51). In patients with an eGFR between 30-60mL/min/1.73 m2 metformin can be used but one should consider using lower doses (51). In patients with eGFR < 45mL/min/1.73 m2 the author typically uses ½ the maximal dose of metformin. In patients with labile renal disease, especially if frequent deteriorations in kidney function occur, metformin is best avoided.

 

IODINATED CONTRAST STUDIES

 

FDA guidelines indicate that metformin use should be withheld before iodinated contrast procedures if a) the eGFR is 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2, b) in the setting of liver disease, alcoholism, or heart failure, or c) if intra-arterial contrast is used. The eGFR should be checked 48 hours later and metformin restarted if renal function remains stable.

 

DRUG INTERACTIONS

 

Carbonic   anhydrase   inhibitors, such as topiramate or acetazolamide, can decrease serum bicarbonate levels and induce a non-anion gap, hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Concomitant use of these drugs with metformin may increase the risk for lactic acidosis (Package Insert).

 

Certain drugs, such as ranolazine, vandetanib, dolutegravir, and cimetidine, may interfere with common renal tubular transport systems that are involved in the renal elimination of metformin and therefore can increase systemic exposure to metformin and may increase the risk for lactic acidosis (Package Insert).

 

Summary

 

Metformin is a commonly used as the first drug for the treatment of diabetes because of excellent efficacy, an outstanding safety profile, low cost, and a long history of use without significant problems. 

 

Table 10. Summary of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Metformin

Advantages

Disadvantages

Inexpensive

GI side effects

No hypoglycemia

B12 deficiency

Once a day administration possible

Lactic acidosis (very rare)

Long history of use

Need to monitor renal function

No weight gain and maybe weight loss

 

May decrease cardiovascular disease

 

 

THIAZOLIDINEDIONES (TZDS)

 

Introduction

 

Troglitazone (Rezulin), pioglitazone (Actos), and rosiglitazone (Avandia) are members of the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of insulin sensitizing compounds that activate PPAR gamma (20,71). Troglitazone was withdrawn from the US, European, and Japanese markets in 2000 due to an idiosyncratic hepatic reaction leading to hepatic failure and death in some patients (20,71). This idiosyncratic hepatic reaction has not occurred with pioglitazone or rosiglitazone (71). TZDs decrease insulin resistance and thereby enhance the biological response to endogenously produced insulin, as well as exogenous insulin (71).

 

Administration

 

Initiate pioglitazone at 15 mg or 30 mg once a day with or without food. Use 15 mg in patients where there is concern of fluid retention. If there is inadequate glycemic control, the dose can be increased in 15 mg increments up to a maximum of 45 mg once daily.

 

Initiate rosiglitazone at 4 mg once a day with or without food. If there is inadequate glycemic control, the dose can be increased to a maximum of 8 mg once daily.

 

Because the maximum effect of TZDs on glycemic control may take 10-14 weeks one should wait 12 weeks before deciding whether to increase the dose of TZDs.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

The primary effect of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone is the reduction of insulin resistance resulting in an improvement of insulin sensitivity (20,71,72). Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are selective agonists for the PPAR gamma receptor, a member of the super-family of nuclear hormone receptors that function as ligand-activated transcription factors (71,72). In the absence of ligand, PPARs bind as hetero-dimers with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (RXR) and a multi-component co-repressor complex to a specific response element (PPRE) within the promoter region of their target genes (71,72). Once PPAR gamma is activated by ligand, the co-repressor complex dissociates allowing the PPAR-RXR heterodimer to associate with a multi-component co-activator complex resulting in an increased rate of gene transcription (71,72). Additionally, PPAR gamma can repress target gene expression by negative feedback on other signal transduction pathways, such as the nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) signaling pathway, in a DNA binding independent manner (71). The target genes of PPAR gamma include those involved in the regulation of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and inflammation (71,72).

 

PPAR gamma is highly expressed in adipose tissue while its expression in skeletal muscle is low (71,72). In the liver PPAR gamma expression is low but increases in obesity and thus in obese individuals it is possible that TZDs directly affect the liver (73). It is likely that the primary effects of TZDs are on adipose tissue, followed by secondary benefits on other target tissues of insulin (71). TZDs promote fatty acid uptake and storage in adipose tissue resulting in a decrease in circulating fatty acids and a decrease in fat accumulation in liver, muscle, and pancreas leading to the protection of these tissues from the harmful metabolic effects of higher levels of fatty acids (20,71). This decrease in fat accumulation in liver and muscle leads to an improvement in insulin action and the decrease in the pancreas may improve insulin secretion. Additionally, PPAR gamma agonists increase the expression and circulating levels of adiponectin, an adipocyte-derived protein with insulin sensitizing activity (71). A decrease in the gene expression of other adipokines involved in induction of insulin resistance, such as TNF-alpha, resistin, etc. are likely to also contribute to the improvement in insulin resistance that occurs with TZDs (71). Finally, the activation of PPAR gamma in other tissues may contribute to the beneficial effects of TZDs.

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone decrease A1c levels to a similar degree as metformin and sulfonylurea therapy (typically a 1.0-1.5% decrease in A1c) (20,71). The decreases in fasting plasma glucose were observed as early as the second week of therapy but maximal decreases occurred after 10-14 weeks (20,74). This differs from other hypoglycemic drugs where the maximal effect occurs more rapidly. TZDs lower both fasting and postprandial glucose levels (71). TZDs are more effective in improving glycemic control in patients with marked insulin resistance (75).

 

TZDs are effective in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs including insulin (20,41,74). TZDs do not cause hypoglycemia when used as monotherapy or in combination with metformin (20,41). In combination with insulin or insulin secretagogues, TZDs can potentiate hypoglycemia. If hypoglycemia occurs one needs to adjust the dose of insulin or insulin secretagogues.

 

The durability of glycemic control with TZDs is more prolonged than with either sulfonylureas or metformin (18). After 5 years of monotherapy, 15% of individuals on rosiglitazone, 21% of individuals on metformin, and 34% of individuals on glyburide (glibenclamide) had fasting glucose levels above the acceptable range (18). The ability to maintain an A1c <7% was 57 months with rosiglitazone, 45 months with metformin, and 33 months with glyburide (glibenclamide) (18). Similar results were observed when pioglitazone therapy was compared to sulfonylurea therapy (76). After 2-years of therapy 47.8% of pioglitazone-treated patients and only 37.0% of sulfonylurea-treated patients maintained an A1c <8%. Studies have shown that TZDs improve and preserve beta cell function, which may account for their better durability (77-79).

 

Other Beneficial Effects

 

PROTEINURIA

 

A meta-analysis of 15 studies (5 with rosiglitazone and 10 with pioglitazone) involving 2,860 patients demonstrated that TZDs decreased urinary albumin excretion in patients without albuminuria, in patients with microalbuminuria, and in patients with proteinuria (80).

 

BLOOD PRESSURE

 

TZDs modestly lower BP. In a review of 37 studies TZDs lowered systolic BP by 4.70 mm Hg and diastolic BP by 3.79 mm Hg (81).  

 

LIPIDS

 

The effect of TZDs on lipids depends on which agent is used. Rosiglitazone increases serum LDL cholesterol levels, increases HDL cholesterol levels, and only decreases serum triglycerides if the baseline triglyceride levels are high [66]. In contrast, pioglitazone has less impact on LDL cholesterol levels, but increases HDL cholesterol levels, and decreases serum triglyceride levels (82). In the PROactive study, a large randomized cardiovascular outcome study, pioglitazone decreased triglyceride levels by approximately 10%, increased HDL-C levels by approximately 10%, and increased LDL-C by 1-4% (83). It should be noted that reductions in the small dense LDL subfraction and an increase in the large buoyant LDL subfraction are seen with both TZDs (82). Treatment with pioglitazone for 12 weeks resulted in a significant increase in the ability of HDL to facilitate the efflux of cholesterol from cells (84).

 

In a randomized head-to-head trial, it was shown that pioglitazone decreased serum triglyceride levels and increased serum HDL cholesterol levels to a greater degree than rosiglitazone treatment (85,86). Additionally, pioglitazone increased LDL cholesterol levels less than rosiglitazone. In contrast to the differences in lipid parameters, both rosiglitazone and pioglitazone decreased A1c and C-reactive protein to a similar extent. The mechanism by which pioglitazone induces more favorable changes in lipid levels than rosiglitazone is unclear, but differential actions of ligands for nuclear hormone receptors are well described.

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

Studies with pioglitazone have suggested a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease. The PROactive study was a randomized controlled trial that examined the effect of pioglitazone vs. placebo over a 3-year period in patients with T2DM and pre-existing macrovascular disease (87). With regard to the primary endpoint (a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction including silent MI, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, endovascular or surgical intervention in the coronary or leg arteries, and amputation above the ankle), there was a 10% reduction in events in the pioglitazone group but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.095). It should be noted that both leg revascularization and leg amputations are not typical primary end points in cardiovascular disease trials and these could be affected by pioglitazone induced edema. When one focuses on standard cardiovascular disease endpoints, the pioglitazone treated group did demonstrate a 16% reduction in the main secondary endpoint (composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke) that was statistically significant (p=0.027). In the pioglitazone treated group, blood pressure, A1c, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol levels were all improved compared to the placebo group making it very likely that the mechanism by which pioglitazone decreased vascular events was multifactorial.

 

The IRIS trial was a multicenter, double-blind trial that randomly assigned 3,876 patients with insulin resistance but without diabetes and a recent ischemic stroke or TIA to treatment with either pioglitazone or placebo (88). After 4.8 years, the primary outcome of fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction occurred in 9.0% of the pioglitazone group and 11.8% of the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.76; P=0.007). All components of the primary outcome were reduced in the pioglitazone treated group. Additionally, in the subgroup of patients with “prediabetes” pioglitazone therapy also reduced cardiovascular events (89). Fasting glucose, fasting triglycerides, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lower while HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels were higher in the pioglitazone group than in the placebo group. Although this study excluded patients with diabetes the results are consistent with and support the results of a protective effect of pioglitazone observed in the PROactive study.

 

In contrast to the above results, a study compared the effect of pioglitazone vs. sulfonylurea on cardiovascular disease and did not observe a reduction in events with pioglitazone treatment (TOSCA.IT) (90). Patients with T2DM (n= 3,028), inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (2-3 g per day), were randomized to pioglitazone or sulfonylurea and followed for a median of 57 months. Only 11% of the participants had a previous cardiovascular event. The primary outcome was a composite of first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularization and occurred in 6.8% of the patients treated with pioglitazone and 7.2% of the patients treated with a sulfonylurea (HR 0.96; NS). Limitations of this study are the small number of events likely due to low-risk population studied and the relatively small number of participants. Additionally, 28% of the subjects randomized to pioglitazone prematurely discontinued the medication. Thus, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, it should be noted that when patients in this study were analyzed based on the risk of developing cardiovascular disease those at high risk had a marked reduction in events when treated with pioglitazone compared to the sulfonylurea (91).

 

Further support for the beneficial effects of pioglitazone on atherosclerosis is provided by studies that have examined the effect of pioglitazone on carotid intima-medial thickness. Both the Chicago and Pioneer studies demonstrated favorable effects on carotid intima-medial thickness in patients treated with pioglitazone compared to patients treated with sulfonylureas (92,93). Additionally, in patients with “prediabetes” pioglitazone also slowed the progression of carotid intima-medial thickness (94). Similarly, Periscope, a study that measured atheroma volume by intravascular ultrasonography, also demonstrated less atherosclerosis in the pioglitazone treated group compared to patients treated with sulfonylureas (95).

 

There are a large number of potential mechanisms by which pioglitazone might reduce cardiovascular disease (Table 11) (79). In addition to altering risk factors pioglitazone has direct anti-atherogenic effects on the arterial wall that could reduce cardiovascular disease (79).

 

Table 11. Effect of Pioglitazone on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Cardiovascular Risk Factor

Effect of Pioglitazone

Visceral Obesity

Decreases

Hypertension

Lowers BP

High Triglycerides

Lower TG

Low HDL cholesterol

Increases HDL cholesterol

Small dense LDL

Converts small LDL to large LDL

Endothelial dysfunction

Improves

Hyperglycemia

Lowers A1c

Inflammation

Lowers CRP

PAI-1

Lower PAI-1

Insulin resistance

Reduces

Hyperinsulinemia

Lowers insulin levels

 

While the data from a variety of different types of studies strongly suggests that pioglitazone is anti-atherogenic, the results with rosiglitazone are different. Several meta-analyses of small and short-duration rosiglitazone trials suggested that rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (96,97). However, the final results of the RECORD study, a randomized trial that was specifically designed to compare the effect of rosiglitazone vs. either metformin or sulfonylurea therapy as a second oral drug in those receiving either metformin or a sulfonylurea on cardiovascular events, have been published and did not reveal a difference in cardiovascular disease death, myocardial infarctions, or stroke (98,99). Similarly, an analysis of patients on rosiglitazone in the BARI 2D trial also did not suggest an increase or decrease in cardiovascular events in the patients treated with rosiglitazone (100).

 

Thus, while the available data indicate that pioglitazone is anti-atherogenic, the data for rosiglitazone suggests a neutral effect. Whether these differences between pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are accounted for by their differential effects on lipid levels or other factors is unknown.

 

METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE (MASLD) AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED STEATOHEPATITIS (MASH)

 

Studies have shown that pioglitazone has beneficial effects on MASLD and MASH (101). In an early study 55 patients with impaired glucose tolerance or T2DM and liver biopsy-confirmed MASH were randomized to pioglitazone 45 mg/day or placebo (102). After 6 months of therapy liver enzymes improved and hepatic fat decreased, measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Moreover, histologic findings improved including steatosis (P=0.003), ballooning necrosis (P=0.02), and inflammation (P=0.008). However, fibrosis was unchanged. A more recent study randomized 101 patients with prediabetes or T2DM and biopsy-proven MASH to pioglitazone 45 mg/day or placebo for 18 months (103). The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 2 points in the MASLD activity score in 2 histologic categories without worsening of fibrosis. Pioglitazone treatment resulted in 58% of patients achieving the primary outcome vs. only 17% of the placebo group (p<0.001) and 51% had resolution of MASH compared to 19% of the placebo group (p<0.001). Moreover, pioglitazone treatment improved the fibrosis score. 

 

A meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (5 using pioglitazone and 3 using rosiglitazone) with 516 patients with biopsy-proven MASH reported that TZD treatment was associated with improved advanced fibrosis (OR, 3.15; P = .01), fibrosis of any stage (OR, 1.66;  P = .01), and MASH resolution (OR, 3.22; P < .001) (104). Similar results were observed in patients with and without diabetes. Pioglitazone was more effective in improving MASH than rosiglitazone.

 

These studies demonstrate that pioglitazone has beneficial effects on MASLD and MASH. Whether this will result in improved clinical outcomes will require additional studies. TZDs are not FDA approved for the treatment of MASLD or MASH.

 

POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME

 

TZDs by improving insulin sensitivity decrease circulating androgen levels, improve ovulation rates, and improve glucose tolerance in patients with PCOS (61). Small trials have shown some benefit of TZDs for the treatment of infertility, usually in conjunction with clomiphene (61). Concerns regarding toxicity have limited the use of TZDs for the treatment of PCOS but if a patient has diabetes and TZDs are chosen for treating the diabetes one can anticipate beneficial effects on the PCOS. 

 

Side Effects

 

WEIGHT GAIN

 

TZDs lead to an increase in body weight of 2 to 3 kg for every 1 percent decrease in A1c levels (71). In some studies patients gained over 4 kg during a 26-week study (71). Weight gain to a similar degree occurred in monotherapy studies and in studies where TZDs were added to metformin, sulfonylureas, or insulin (71). However, in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist the weight gain was blunted or prevented (105,106). In the ADOPT trial weight gain was greater with TZD therapy than with glyburide therapy (2.5 kg over 5 years) (29). The weight gain induced by TZDs is dose related and can be minimized by using low doses (107).

 

The TZD induced increase in body weight is due to an expansion of the subcutaneous fat depot whereas the mass of visceral fat remains unchanged or even decreases (71). While weight increases, waist circumference typically remains stable. Stimulation of PPAR gamma in subcutaneous adipocytes stimulates lipid accumulation (72). Fluid retention as discussed below may also contribute to the increase in weight.

 

FLUID RETENTION

 

Edema has been reported in 3.0 to 7.5% of patients treated with the TZDs compared with 1.0 to 2.5% in patients on placebo or treated with other oral antidiabetic therapy (108). The increase in fluid retention is dose related. The risk of developing edema is greatest when a TZD is used in combination with insulin (108). The occurrence of edema is reduced when a TZD is used in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor (105).

 

TZD induced edema responds poorly to treatment with thiazide and loop diuretics but responds to diuretics that effect the distal tubules such as spironolactone, triamterene, and amiloride (107). Additionally, edema improves when TZD treatment is discontinued (108). The increased fluid retention can lead to an increase in plasma volume resulting in a modest decrease in hemoglobin levels (2-4%) (107).

 

The increase in fluid retention is likely due to TZDs activating PPAR gamma in the renal tubules leading to the increased expression of the epithelial Na(+) channel resulting in the increased resorption of sodium (109). TZDs have been shown to decrease urine sodium excretion and to increase plasma renin and aldosterone levels (110).

 

CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE (CHF)

 

In a meta-analysis of seven studies with a total of 10,040 participants with 641 CHF events, pioglitazone treatment increased the risk of developing CHF by 33% (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14–1.54) (111). Another meta-analysis found that pioglitazone was associated with a 51% increased risk of CHF while rosiglitazone was associated with a 173% increase (112). In the RECORD trial, the rosiglitazone group had an increased rate of severe episodes of CHF resulting in hospital admission or death (OR 2.10, p = 0.001) (98). Similarly, in the PROactive trial, the pioglitazone group also had increased rates of CHF (6% vs. 4%, p = 0.007) (87). Patients treated with TZDs have a higher risk for CHF development if they have a history of cardiovascular disease (107). Interestingly, TZD-associated CHF has not been linked with increased mortality (87,113).

 

Although TZDs are associated with worsening of CHF or CHF development, they are not associated with adverse effects on cardiac function or structure (107). It is thought that the CHF is mainly due to fluid retention rather than TZDs inducing primarily cardiac dysfunction (107).

 

OSTEOPOROSIS

 

Large randomized trials have shown that TZDs increase fracture risk, particularly in women. In the ADOPT study, which compared rosiglitazone, metformin, and glyburide, there was no difference in the incidence of fractures in men (114). However, fractures in women at 5 years was increased in the group treated with rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone 15.1%, metformin 7.3%, and glyburide 7.7%) (114). The increase in fractures with rosiglitazone occurred in pre- and postmenopausal women, and were seen predominantly in the lower and upper limbs (114). In the PROactive study there was a higher rate of bone fractures in females treated with pioglitazone vs. placebo (5.1% vs 2.5%) (115). In the RECORD trial upper and distal lower limb fracture rates were increased mainly in women in the rosiglitazone treatment group (98). Hip and femur fracture were not increased with rosiglitazone treatment (98). In the IRIS trial an increased risk of fracture was seen in both males and females (men 9.4% vs 5.2%; HR, 1.83; women 14.9% vs 11.6%; HR, 1.32) (116). In a meta-analysis of 22 randomized controlled trials with 24,544 participants with 896 fracture cases there was a significantly increased incidence of fracture in women (OR=1.94; P<0.001), but not in men (OR=1.02; P=0.83) treated with TZDs (117). The risk of a fracture was similar with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone treatment and appeared to be similar for participants aged <60 years old and older than ≥60 years of age (117). Of note, in the ACCORD trial the risk of fractures in the women treated with rosiglitazone decreased after discontinuing rosiglitazone therapy (118).

 

In mice, TZDs suppress bone formation and increase bone resorption resulting in decreased bone mass (85). Additionally, TZD administration in mice results in the massive accumulation of adipocytes in the bone marrow cavity (85). In a meta-analysis of 14 trials with 1,734 participants, treatment with TZDs for 3 to 24 months decreased bone mineral density measured by DEXA at the lumbar spine (difference -1.1%; p < 0.0001), total hip (-1.0%; p < 0.0001) and forearm (-0.9%; p = 0.007) (117). In five studies TZD therapy was discontinued and after 24-52 weeks there was no increase in bone mineral density indicating no restoration of bone mineral density with cessation of TZD treatment (117). In an observation study each year of TZD use was associated with greater bone loss at the whole body (additional loss of -0.61% per year), lumbar spine (-1.23% per year), and trochanter (-0.65% per year) in women, but not in men (119).The effect of TZD treatment on bone turnover markers varied considerably between individual studies (117). This reduction in bone mass induced by TZD treatment could contribute to the increase in fractures but it is possible that changes in the microarchitecture of bone also plays a role.

 

BLADDER CANCER

 

In preclinical studies pioglitazone administration increased bladder cancer in male rats but not in female rats or in mice, dogs, or monkeys (120). In the PROactive study there was a nonsignificant increase in the number of patients who developed bladder cancer (16 vs 6, p = 0.069) (87). In a number of instances, the development of bladder cancer could not plausibly be related to treatment due to the temporal sequence of drug exposure and cancer diagnosis. After eliminating these patients there were six patients with bladder cancer in the pioglitazone group and three patients in the placebo group (87). After 10 years of follow-up, bladder cancer was reported in 0.8% of patients (n = 14) in the pioglitazone versus 1.2% (n = 21) in the placebo group (relative risk 0.65) during the follow-up period (121). In the IRIS study bladder cancer occurred in 12 patients in the pioglitazone group and in 8 in the placebo group (P=0.37) (88). Thus, in large randomized trials the data do not definitively support that pioglitazone significantly increases the risk of bladder cancer. The short duration of the randomized studies and infrequent occurrence of bladder cancer make interpretation of these studies difficult.

 

Because of the preclinical data the FDA requested that the manufacturer of pioglitazone initiate a prospective study to examine the relationship between pioglitazone and bladder cancer. This 10-year study of 193,099 persons did not find any statistically significant association between pioglitazone treatment and bladder cancer (122). Additionally, in a multinational cohort of 1.01 million patients with T2DM there was no evidence for any association between cumulative exposure to pioglitazone and bladder cancer in men or women after adjustment for age, calendar year, diabetes duration, smoking, and any ever use of pioglitazone (123). Similarly, no association was observed between rosiglitazone and bladder cancer in men or women (123). In a careful review of 23 epidemiological studies Davidson concluded that there was little evidence that pioglitazone increased the risk of bladder cancer (120). The FDA still warns about the possibility of bladder cancer with pioglitazone use and recommends that pioglitazone not be used in diabetic patients with active bladder cancer or history of bladder cancer (package insert).

 

MACULA EDEMA

 

Macular edema has been reported in patients taking TZDs (124,125).  Patients may present with blurred vision or decreased visual acuity or be diagnosed on routine ophthalmologic examination. Most patients had peripheral edema at the time macular edema was diagnosed (125). Some patients had improvement in their macular edema after discontinuation of the TZD (125).

 

OVULATION AND PREGNANCY

 

As discussed above in the polycystic ovary section, TZD treatment of premenopausal women with PCOS may induce ovulation and thereby result in unplanned pregnancies. In premenopausal anovulatory women started on a TZD one needs to discuss the need for contraception.

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

TZDs are contraindicated in patients with NYHA Class III or IV heart failure. Pioglitazone should not be used in diabetic patients with active bladder cancer or history of bladder cancer.

 

Strong CYP2C8 inhibitors (e.g., gemfibrozil) increase pioglitazone and rosiglitazone concentrations and one should limit pioglitazone dose to 15 mg daily (package insert).

 

Summary

 

TZDs are effective drugs in improving glycemic control and have significant benefits on disorders that occur commonly in patients with T2DM (cardiovascular disease, NAFLD/NASH, PCOS). Unfortunately, TZDs also have serious side effects, such as edema, CHF, osteoporosis, and weight gain, that limit their use. Clinicians need to balance the advantages and disadvantages of TZDs for the individual patient.

 

Table 12. The Advantages and Disadvantages of Thiazolidinediones

Advantages

Disadvantages

Once a day administration

Edema

Reduces CVD (pioglitazone)

Heart failure

Durable Effect

Weight gain

Reduces MASLD

Osteoporosis

No hypoglycemia

Bladder cancer (pioglitazone)?

Relatively inexpensive

Macula edema?

No dose adjustment for renal disease

Small increase in LDLc

Increase HDL-C and decrease triglycerides

 

 

ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE INHIBITORS

 

Introduction

 

Acarbose (Precose, Glucobay), miglitol (Glycet), and voglibose (Basen, Voglib) are members of the α-glucosidase inhibitor class of oral anti-hyperglycemic compounds that were introduced in the 1990s (20).

 

Administration

 

The recommended starting dosage of acarbose and miglitol is 25 mg given orally three times daily at the start of each meal. The dose of acarbose and miglitol can be adjusted at 4 to 8-week intervals based on one-hour postprandial glucose or A1c levels, and on tolerance. The dosage can be increased from 25 mg tid with meals to 50 mg tid with meals. The maximum dose is 100 mg tid with meals. Note that the dose can be varied based on the amount of carbohydrate in the meal. In some patients one can initiate therapy once a day with the largest meal.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are competitive, reversible inhibitors of pancreatic α-amylase and membrane-bound intestinal α-glucosidase hydrolase enzymes (20,126). Inhibiting these enzymes prevents the metabolism of disaccharides and oligosaccharides into monosaccharides delaying carbohydrate digestion and absorption (20,126).  Carbohydrate absorption occurs more distally in the intestine reducing the postprandial increase in glucose and lowering postprandial insulin levels (20,126). Acarbose and miglitol have minimal inhibitory activity against lactase and consequently will not prevent the increase in plasma glucose following the ingestion of milk or cause lactose intolerance (package insert). In addition to effecting carbohydrate absorption, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors increase postprandial GLP-1 secretion and reduce glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) secretion (20).

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

The typical decrease in A1c levels is relatively modest with alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (0.5-1.0%) (41,126,127). The decrease in A1c is predominantly due to decreases in post meal glucose levels and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors have only modest effects on fasting glucose levels (20,126,127). Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors can be combined with other hypoglycemic drugs with additive effects and are particularly useful to lower postprandial glucose levels (41,126). Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are most effective in patients who ingest a high carbohydrate diet and for this reason have been widely used and very effective in Asian populations (20).

 

These drugs do not cause weight gain and hypoglycemia is uncommon (20,41,127). If a patient experiences hypoglycemia while taking an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor in combination with insulin or sulfonylureas the patient should be instructed to use glucose (gel, tablets, etc.) as alpha-glucosidase inhibitors will prevent the breakdown of sucrose and delay glucose absorption resulting in a failure to quickly correct hypoglycemia. Severe hypoglycemia may require intravenous glucose or intramuscular glucagon administration.

 

Other Effects

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

In the STOP-NIDDM trial 1,429 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance were randomized to placebo vs. acarbose and followed for 3.3 years (128). In the acarbose group a 49% relative risk reduction in the development of cardiovascular events was observed (hazard ratio 0.51; P =0.03). Among cardiovascular events, the major reduction was in the risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.09; P =0.02). In a smaller trial, 135 patients hospitalized for the acute coronary syndrome who were newly diagnosed with IGT were randomly assigned to acarbose or placebo (129). During a mean follow-up of 2.3 years the risk of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular event was decreased significantly in the acarbose group compared with the control group (26.7% versus 46.9%, P < 0.05).

 

Despite these favorable observations a large trial failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of acarbose in Chinese patients with impaired glucose tolerance (ACE trial) (130). In a randomized trial acarbose vs. placebo was compared in 6,522 patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina, and hospital admission for heart failure and patients were followed for a median of 5 years. The primary outcome was similar in the acarbose and placebo groups (hazard ratio 0.98; p=0.73). No significant differences were seen for death from any cause, cardiovascular death, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, hospital admission for unstable angina, hospital admission for heart failure, or impaired renal function.

 

Thus, whether acarbose favorably affects cardiovascular disease in patients at high risk for developing diabetes is uncertain. Moreover, the effect of acarbose on cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes is unknown.

 

WEIGHT

 

Acarbose is may result in a very small decrease in weight (0.4kg) (131).

 

Side Effects

 

Gastrointestinal side effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors include flatulence, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea and are very commonly encountered (20,41,127). These side effects can lead to the inability to tolerate these drugs. A high carbohydrate diet may worsen the GI adverse effects. Over time the GI symptoms tend to decrease as the intestines adapt (126). GI side effects are due to the mechanism of action of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (126). The inhibition of carbohydrate digestion in the small intestine leads to the delivery of undigested carbohydrates to the large intestine where microorganisms metabolize them into short-chain fatty acids, methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen, that can cause abdominal discomfort, increased flatulence, and diarrhea (126).

 

Acarbose, particularly at doses in excess of 50 mg tid, may give rise to elevations of serum transaminases and, in rare instances, hyperbilirubinemia. It is recommended that serum transaminase levels be checked every 3 months during the first year of treatment with acarbose and periodically thereafter. If elevated transaminases are observed, a reduction in dosage or withdrawal of therapy may be indicated, particularly if the elevations persist (package insert).

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Acarbose and miglitol are contraindicated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, colonic ulceration, intestinal obstruction or those predisposed to intestinal obstruction, patients with chronic intestinal disease, or conditions that will be worsened by the increased gas formation in the intestine (41) (package insert). Acarbose is contraindicated in patients with cirrhosis (package insert).

 

Acarbose and miglitol should not be used in patients with a creatinine > 2 mg/dl (package insert).

 

Summary

 

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are excellent drugs for lowering postprandial glucose levels. Unfortunately, because of their GI side effects many patients are unable to tolerate these drugs. Additionally, the need for three times a day administration makes it difficult for patients to comply with these drugs.

 

Table 13. Advantages and Disadvantages of Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

No hypoglycemia

GI side effects

Weight neutral

Frequent dosing schedule

Decreases postprandial glucose

Avoid if renal disease (creatinine> 2mg/dL

Relatively inexpensive

Limited glucose lowering effect

 

SODIUM-GLUCOSE TRANSPORT PROTEIN 2 (SGLT2) INHIBITORS

 

Introduction

 

There are currently five SGLT2 inhibitors available (Canagliflozin/ Invokana; Dapagliflozin/ Farxiga; Empagliflozin/Jardiance; Ertugliflozin/ Stelgatro; Bexagliflozin/ Brenzavvy) (132). These drugs are very similar and there are only a few differences between these agents.

 

Administration

 

The recommended starting dose of canagliflozin is 100 mg once daily, taken before the first meal of the day. In patients tolerating canagliflozin 100 mg once daily who have an eGFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater and require additional glycemic control, the dose can be increased to 300 mg once daily.

 

The recommended starting dose of dapagliflozin is 5 mg once daily, taken in the morning, with or without food. In patients tolerating dapagliflozin 5 mg once daily who require additional glycemic control, the dose can be increased to 10 mg once daily.

 

The recommended starting dose of empagliflozin is 10 mg once daily in the morning, taken with or without food. In patients tolerating empagliflozin, the dose may be increased to 25 mg.

 

The recommended starting dose of ertugliflozin is 5 mg once daily, taken in the morning, with or without food. In patients tolerating ertugliflozin 5 mg once daily who require additional glycemic control, the dose can be increased to 15 mg once daily.

 

The recommended starting dose of bexagliflozin is 20 mg once daily, taken in the morning, with

or without food.

 

Before initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy one should assess renal function and volume status. The dose of SGLT2 inhibitors may need to be adjusted based on renal function (see below).

 

Mechanism of Action

 

SGLT2 is a low-affinity, high-capacity glucose transporter in the proximal tubules of the kidneys, which is responsible for the reabsorption of the majority of the filtered glucose (approximately 90%) entering the tubules (20,133). SGLT1, which is predominantly expressed in the intestines is also expressed in the kidneys, is a high-affinity, low-capacity glucose transporter in the proximal tubules, which makes a minor contribution to the reabsorption of filtered glucose (approximately 10%) (20,133). SGLT 1 and 2 transporters are capable of reabsorbing virtually all the filtered glucose when blood glucose levels are less than approximately 180mg/dL. When blood glucose levels are greater than approximately 180mg/dL, glucose begins to appear in the urine (i.e., glycosuria). The higher the blood glucose level the greater the quantity of glucose in the urine. Patients with T2DM express a greater number of SGLT2 transporters in the proximal tubule than do healthy individuals and hence glucose reabsorption from the glomerular filtrate is increased in patients with diabetes and glycosuria occurs at a higher blood glucose level (typically approximately 220mg/dl (134).

 

Inhibition of SGLT2 by drugs results in glycosuria and can lead to the excretion of 60–90 grams of glucose in the urine per day (Figure 5) (20). The amount of glucose excreted in the urine can vary considerably depending on renal function and the degree of hyperglycemia (20). Decreased renal function results in a decrease in filtered glucose and less glucose in the urine while high blood glucose levels increase filtered glucose and increases the loss of glucose in the urine (20). The ability of the inhibition of SGLT2 to lower blood glucose levels is not dependent on insulin action and hence is not affected by insulin levels or insulin resistance (20). As will be discussed below many of the non-glucose lowering benefits and side effects of SGLT2 inhibitors can be explained by the increase in glucose excretion in the urine. It should be recognized that glycosuria results in an osmotic diuresis. Additionally, because the SGLT2 transporters also facilitate the reabsorption of sodium from the filtrate there is also the loss of sodium in the urine. 

Figure 5. Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors on the Kidney.

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

A meta-analysis of 66 randomized trials found that SGLT2 inhibitors decreased A1c levels by 0.4 to 1.1% (135). In comparison to other hypoglycemic drugs, it was found that SGLT‐2 inhibitors showed a greater efficacy than DPP‐4 inhibitors and similar or slightly less efficacy compared to metformin and TZDs (13,135). Sulfonylureas appeared to be superior to SGLT‐2 inhibitors at 12 weeks, but at 24- and 52-weeks efficacy was similar or slightly lower (13,135). However, SGLT‐2 inhibitors produced a greater reduction in HbA1c than sulfonylureas at 104 weeks perhaps due to the lack of durability of sulfonylurea therapy discussed earlier (135). The A1c lowering ability of the different SGLT2 inhibitors is similar but A1c is reduced to a slightly greater extent by high-dose canagliflozin, which is probably a result of its additional action of inhibiting SGLT1 in the intestine decreasing dietary glucose absorption (132,133,135). SGLT2 inhibitors when used as an add-on therapy to metformin, insulin, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, sulfonylureas, or metformin ± DPP-4 inhibitor were similarly effective in reducing A1c levels as when used in monotherapy (20,133). The efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors is dependent on renal function and as renal function decreases the ability of these drugs to lower A1c levels diminishes (20,133). SGLT2 inhibitors lower both fasting and postprandial glucose levels (133). In monotherapy SGLT2 inhibitors have a low risk of causing hypoglycemia but in combinations with insulin or sulfonylureas may potentiate the development of hypoglycemia (20). In patients in good glycemic control, one often decreases the insulin or sulfonylurea dose when initiating therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor. If glucose levels are very high SGLT2 inhibitors can result in marked polyuria and nocturia that leads to uncomfortable symptoms and therefore many clinicians do not initiate SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with high HbA1c levels until glucose control is in a more reasonable range.

 

Other Effects

 

WEIGHT

 

SGLT2 inhibitors lead to weight loss (20,133). In general patient’s lose approximately 1- 3 kg on these drugs (20,132,133). SGLT2 inhibitor-induced weight loss results primarily from a decrease in fat mass, including reductions in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (133). The weight loss is due to the loss of glucose in the urine, which represents the loss of calories (133,136).  The excretion of 50 grams of glucose in the urine is equivalent to the loss of 225 calories (50-grams X 4.5 calories per gram of glucose). However, the amount of glucose lost in the urine should result in a greater weight loss than is typically observed and a compensatory increase in food intake blunts the weight loss (136). There are likely to be other homeostatic mechanisms that also play a role in limiting weight loss with SGLT2 inhibitors.

 

GLUCOSE MONITORING

 

Monitoring glycemic control with 1,5-AG assay is not accurate as measurements of 1,5-AG are unreliable in patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors.

 

BLOOD PRESSURE

 

SGLT2 inhibitors decrease systolic BP by approximately 3-6 mmHg and diastolic BP by approximately 2-3 mmHg (20,133).  Patients with poorly controlled BP at baseline experience the largest reduction in BP (132). SGLT2 inhibitors lower BP by promoting an osmotic diuresis and decreasing intravascular volume (133). Weight loss may also contribute to the decrease in BP.

 

LIPID LEVELS

 

SGLT2 inhibitors cause a small increase in LDL and HDL cholesterol levels. In the EMPA-REG outcome study, described in detail below, LDL cholesterol levels were increased by 2-4 mg/dL and HDL cholesterol by 2-3 mg/dL in the group treated with empagliflozin (137). Similarly, in the CANVAS outcome study, discussed in detail below, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were also marginally increased in the canagliflozin treated group (LDL cholesterol 4-5 mg/dL and HDL cholesterol 2-3 mg/dL) (138). In a meta-analysis of 43 randomized trials with 22,528 patient’s triglyceride levels were decreased by 2 mg/dL (139). In a meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials SGLT2 inhibitors significantly increased LDL-C (3.8mg/dl, p < 0.00001), HDL-C (2.3mg/dl, p < 0.00001), and decreased triglyceride levels (8.8mg/dl, p < 0.00001) (140). It is unlikely that these small changes in LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels are of clinical significance. The mechanism for these increases in LDL and HDL cholesterol is unknown but could be due to a decrease in plasma volume. The decrease in triglycerides might be secondary to weight loss.

 

URIC ACID

 

SGLT2 inhibitors lower blood uric acid levels (141). This decrease is due to an increase in uric acid excretion by the kidneys. In an observational study 47,905 individuals receiving an SGLT2 inhibitor and 183,303 receiving a DPP4 inhibitor it was observed that the incidence of gout was 20.26 per 1000 patient-years for SGLT2 inhibitor users and 24.30 per 1000 patient-years for

DPP4 inhibitor users (142). A similar study found that a gout flare was lower among SGLT2 inhibitor users than DPP-4 inhibitor users (52.4 vs. 79.7 events per 1000 person-years) (143). Additionally, an observations study found that the incidence of gout was lower among SGLT2i initiators than sulfonylurea initiators (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80) (144).

 

CARDIOVASCULAR

 

There have been numerous large randomized studies of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events published (others are in progress).

 

EMPA-REG Outcome Trial 

 

In this study, 7,020 patients with established cardiovascular disease and T2DM were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg or 25 mg of empagliflozin or placebo once daily and were followed for 3.1 years (137). In the combined empagliflozin treated groups there was a statistically significant 14% reduction in the primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). As compared with placebo, empagliflozin treatment did not result in a significant difference in the occurrence of non-fatal myocardial infarction or strokes. However, empagliflozin resulted in a significantly lower risk of death from cardiovascular causes (HR 0.62), death from any cause (HR 0.68), and hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.65). The beneficial effects of empagliflozin were noted to occur very rapidly and the beneficial effects on heart failure appeared to be the dominant effect compared to effects on atherosclerotic events. Decreases in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality with empagliflozin occurred across the range of cardiovascular risk (145). Additionally, the reduction in hospitalizations for heart failure and cardiovascular death were observed both in patients with and without heart failure at baseline (146).

 

CANVAS Trial

 

The effects of placebo vs. canagliflozin 100mg or 300mg per day were determined in two combined trials involving a total of 10,142 participants with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk (approximately 70% of patients had established cardiovascular disease) (138). The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke and the mean follow-up was 188 weeks. The primary outcome was reduced in the canagliflozin group (HR 0.86; P=0.02). The effect of canagliflozin on the primary outcome was similar in people with chronic kidney disease and those with preserved kidney function (147). Death from any cause (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.74-1.01) and death from cardiovascular disease (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.72-1.06) were reduced but were not statistically significant. Similarly, canagliflozin treatment did not result in a significant difference in non-fatal strokes or non-fatal myocardial infarctions. As seen with empagliflozin, hospitalization for heart failure was markedly reduced (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.52-0.87) and this beneficial effect occurred rapidly.

 

CREDENCE Trial

 

In a second canagliflozin trial that focused on patients with kidney disease, a decrease in cardiovascular events was also observed (148). In this double-blind trial 4,401 patients with chronic kidney disease and T2DM were randomized to canagliflozin 100mg per day or placebo and followed for a median of 2.62 years. All the patients had an eGFR of 30 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000). In this trial hospitalization for heart failure was reduced by 39%. The relative benefits of canagliflozin for cardiovascular outcomes was similar in individuals across the spectrum of eGFR levels (149)

 

DECLARE–TIMI 58 Trial

 

The effect of dapagliflozin on cardiovascular events has been reported (150). 17,160 patients with T2DM, including 10,186 without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, were randomized to dapagliflozin 10mg per day or placebo and followed for a median of 4.2 years. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. Dapagliflozin did not result in a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (8.8% in the dapagliflozin group and 9.4% in the placebo group; HR 0.93; P=0.17) but did result in a lower rate of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (4.9% vs. 5.8%; HR 0.83; P=0.005), which reflected a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88). Interestingly, in the patients with a history of a previous MI dapagliflozin reduced the risk of a MACE (HR 0.84; P=0.039), whereas there was no effect in patients without a previous MI (151). Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of heart failure in patients with and without a history of heart failure but the benefit was greater in patients with a history of heart failure (with heart failure HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45-0.86; without heart failure HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.74-1.03) (152). Dapagliflozin also reduced the risk of heart failure in patients without a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (153).

 

VERTIS CV

 

Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and T2DM were randomized to ertugliflozin 5mg (n=2752), 15mg (2747), or placebo (n=2747) and the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death and non-fatal MI or stroke was determined after a mean duration of follow-up of 3.5 years (154). This trial did not demonstrate a significant difference in the primary endpoint (MACE) nor any components of the primary endpoint. However, heart failure hospitalizations were significantly reduced by 30% in the patients treated with ertugliflozin (HR 0.70; CI 0.54–0.90). The benefits on heart failure were observed in both patients with a history of heart failure (decreased 37%) and patients without a history of heart failure (decreased 21%) (155).

 

DAPA HF Trial

 

In this trial 4,744 patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomized to receive either dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for a median of 18.2 months (156). The primary outcome was a composite of worsening heart failure (hospitalization or an urgent visit resulting in intravenous therapy for heart failure) or cardiovascular death. Of note only approximately 45% of the patients had T2DM. Treatment with dapagliflozin reduced the primary outcome (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001), heart failure (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.83), and death from cardiovascular disease (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98). Symptoms of heart failure were also improved with dapagliflozin treatment. Additionally, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of any serious ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, or sudden death (157). The benefits of dapagliflozin were similar in patients with and without T2DM (158). This study demonstrates that an SGLT2 inhibitor is beneficial in patients with pre-existing heart failure and this occurs in both patients with and without T2DM.

 

EMPEROR-Reduced Trial

 

In this trial 3,730 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for a median of 16 months (159). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. Approximately 50% of the patients had T2DM. Treatment with empagliflozin reduced the primary outcome (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86; P<0.001) and hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81) but did not reduce cardiovascular death (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.12). The beneficial effects were observed in patients with and without diabetes. This study is concordant with the results observed in the DAPA HF trial and demonstrates that SGLT2 inhibitors are beneficial in patients with pre-existing heart failure and this occurs in both patients with and without diabetes. Notably, the beneficial effects of empagliflozin on heart failure decreased when the drug was stopped indicating that therapy needs to be continued (160) 

 

DAPA CKD Trial

 

This trial randomized 4,304 participants with an eGFR of 25 to 75 ml/min/1.73 m2 of body-surface area and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio 200 to 5000 mg/g to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for a median of 2.4 years (161). Approximately 67% of the patients had diabetes. The composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure was decreased in the dapagliflozin group (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55–0.92).  

 

EMPEROR-Preserved Trial

 

This trial randomized 5,988 patients with heart failure with an ejection fraction of >40% to treatment with placebo or empagliflozin 10 mg daily (162). Empagliflozin decreased the combined risk of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or an emergency or urgent heart failure visit by 23% (HR 0.77; P<0.0001). Moreover, this benefit occurred rapidly reaching statistical significance at 18 days after randomization. The benefit of empagliflozin was similar in patients with an ejection fraction of >40% to <50% and 50% to <60%, but was attenuated at higher ejection fractions. These results indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors are beneficial even in patients with a preserved ejection fraction.

 

Deliver Trial

 

This trial randomized 6,263 patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40% to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo (163). Treatment with dapagliflozin reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure by 18% (HR 0.82; P<0.001). Similar benefit was seen in patients with and without diabetes. Additionally, in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 60% or those with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 60% the results were similar. These results confirm the results of the EMPEROR Preserved Trial described above and further suggest that even patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction greater than 60% will benefit from SGLT2 inhibitors.

 

EMPACT-MI Trial

 

Patients hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg daily (n=3260) or placebo (n=3262) for a median follow-up of 17.9 months (164). Patients were at high risk of heart failure with evidence of newly developed left ventricular ejection fraction <45% or signs or symptoms of congestion plus other factors such as age > 65 years or older, a newly developed ejection fraction < than 35%, T2DM, or an GFR < than 60. Approximately 32% of the participants were diabetic. The composite primary end point of hospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause occurred in 8.2% in the empagliflozin group and 9.1% in the placebo group (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.06; P=0.21). Death from any cause was similar in both groups but first hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 3.6% in the empagliflozin group and in 4.7% in the placebo group (HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98). Total heart failure events were reduced by 33% (risk ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.51- 0.89; P=0.006) and the decrease was similar in patients with and without diabetes (165). This study demonstrates that initiating SLT2 inhibitor therapy during hospitalization for a myocardial infarction will reduce the occurrence of heart failure in high-risk patients.

 

Summary

 

Thus, a large number of randomized trials of SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated a robust decrease in heart failure with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy (table 14) without a consistent strong effect on myocardial infarctions or strokes (166-168). In a meta-analysis of eight of these trials (not including Emperor Preserved or the Deliver Trial) with 59,747 patients it was observed that SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.78-0.91), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.93), hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74), and myocardial infarction (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.99), but there was no significant effect on the risk of stroke (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.86-1.11) (167). The reduction in heart failure was seen in patients with and without diabetes, patients with renal disease, and patients with and without a history of heart failure. The Emperor Preserved and Deliver trial demonstrated that patients with a preserved ejection fraction also benefit from treatment with a SGLT2 inhibitor. Finally, the EMPULSE trial demonstrated that starting empagliflozin during the hospitalization for heart failure was beneficial (169) while the EMPACT-MI Trial demonstrated that starting empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for a myocardial infarction who were at high risk for heart failure also reduced the risk of developing heart failure (164,165).

 

Table 14. Summary of Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Heart Failure

 

Number

Prior Heart Failure

Mean Follow-up (years)

Hazard Ratio* (95% CI)

P value

EMPA-REG

Empagliflozin

7,020

10.1%

3.1

0.65

(0.05-0.85)

0.002

CANVAS

Canagliflozin

10,142

14.4%

3.6

0.67

(0.52-0.87)

--

DECLARE-TIMI 58

Dapagliflozin

17,160

10.0%

4.2

0.73

(0.61-0.88)

0.0007

VERTIS-CV

Ertugliflozin

8,246

23.7%

3.0

0.70

(0.54-0.90)

0.006

CREDENCE

Canagliflozin

4,401

14.8%

2.6

0.61

(0.47-0.80

0.001

DAPA-HF

Dapagliflozin

4,774

100%

1.5

0.70

(0.59-0.83)

0.001

EMPEROR

Empagliflozin

3,730

100%

1.3

0.69

(0.59-0.81)

<0.001

EMPEROR Preserved

5,988

100%

2.2

0.73

(0.61 to 0.88)

<0.001

DAPA-CKD

4,304

11%

2.4

0.71**

(0.55–0.92)

<0.009

Modified from reference (167).

*Hospitalization for Heart Failure.

** Hospitalization for Heart Failure and death from cardiovascular disease.

 

A meta-analysis of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on patients with diabetes (n= 74,437) and various other disorders (ASCVD, heart failure, and chronic renal disease) is shown in table 15 (168). In patients with diabetes with or without ASCVD, heart failure, or chronic renal disease SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of heart failure and decreased cardiovascular death (the decrease in cardiovascular death was not statistically significant in patients without ASCVD and without heart failure). These results indicate that treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitors will be beneficial in a wide spectrum of patients with diabetes.

 

Table 15. The Decrease in Key Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Treated with SGLT2 Inhibitors

 

First Hospitalization for Heart Failure

Cardiovascular Death

Overall

28%

15%

With ASCVD

29%

17%

Without ASCVD

37%

5%*

With Chronic Kidney Disease

34%

17%

Without Chronic Kidney Disease

27%

22%

With Heart Failure

28%

14%

Without Heart Failure

28%

13%*

Modified from reference (168).

*not statistically significant.

 

The mechanisms accounting for the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure are uncertain (170). Glycemic control was better in the SGLT2 inhibitor treated patients but it is doubtful that this modest decrease in glucose could account for the observed results (additionally benefit in non-diabetics makes a glucose effect very unlikely). SGLT2 inhibitor treatment was associated with small reductions in weight, waist circumference, uric acid level, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, with no increase in heart rate and small increases in both LDL and HDL cholesterol. Whether these changes played a role in reducing events remains to be determined but it is unlikely that these play a major role as other treatments that effect these factors do not markedly diminish the risk of heart failure events. It is possible that hemodynamic changes secondary to the osmotic diuresis induced by SGLT2 inhibitors contributed to the beneficial effects. In an analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, the change in hematocrit (~3% increase), corresponding to ~7% reduction in plasma volume, accounted for approximately 50% of the benefit of the drug on cardiovascular death (171). Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors increase free fatty acid levels and glucagon secretion, which promotes the production of ketone bodies such as beta-hydroxybutyrate that are utilized by the heart for energy production (172). It is possible that this alternative source of energy could be protective for heart function. Finally, there may be direct effects of SGLT2 inhibition on myocardial and renal metabolism (170,173,174). Further studies are required to better elucidate the mechanism of the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure.

 

RENAL DISEASE

 

The large randomized SGLT2 inhibitor cardiovascular outcome trials described above also examined the effect of these drugs on renal disease.

 

EMPA-REG Outcome Trial

 

The effect of empagliflozin on renal outcomes was studied in 4,124 patients with T2DM who were randomized to empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg) or placebo (175). The prespecified outcomes were progression to macroalbuminuria, doubling of the serum creatinine level, initiation of renal-replacement therapy, or death from renal disease, and incident albuminuria. Worsening nephropathy occurred in 12.7% of patients in the empagliflozin group and in 18.8% of patients in the placebo group, a relative risk reduction of 39% (P<0.001). Progression to macroalbuminuria was reduced 38%, doubling of serum creatinine by 44%, and initiation of renal replacement therapy by 55% (all statistically significant). The renal benefit was seen regardless of baseline eGFR, occurring in individuals with an eGFR as low as 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. While empagliflozin caused an initial decrease in eGFR over the long term eGFR decreased in the placebo group at a more rapid rate than the empagliflozin group. Additionally, patients treated with empagliflozin were more likely to convert from microalbuminuria to normoalbuminuria (HR 1.43; p<0.0001) or from macroalbuminuria to microalbuminuria or normoalbuminuria (HR 1.82; p<0.0001), and were less likely to experience a sustained deterioration from normoalbuminuria to microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria (HR 0.84; p=0.0077) (176).

 

CANVAS Trial

 

Similar to the results seen with empagliflozin, canagliflozin has also been shown to decrease renal disease. 10,142 participants with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to receive canagliflozin or placebo and were followed for a mean of 188.2 weeks (138). Progression of albuminuria occurred less frequently in the canagliflozin group (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79). In addition, regression of albuminuria also occurred more frequently in the canagliflozin group (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.51 to 1.91). Most importantly, the composite outcome of sustained 40% reduction in eGFR, the need for renal-replacement therapy, or death from renal causes occurred less frequently in the canagliflozin group (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.77). Annual eGFR decline was slower (slope difference between groups 1.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year, 95% CI 1.0-1.4) and mean urinary albumin creatinine ratio was 18% lower (95% CI 16-20) in participants treated with canagliflozin than in those treated with placebo (177). The benefits of canagliflozin on renal disease occurred across a wide spectrum of eGFR ranging from 30-45 to ≥90 and in patients with moderate and severe albuminuria (147,178).

 

CREDENCE Trial

 

The CREDENCE Trial focused on patients with renal disease. In a double-blind trial 4,401 patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease were randomized to canagliflozin or placebo and followed for a median of 2.62 years (148). All the patients had an eGFR of 30 to <90 and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000) and were treated with renin-angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. The primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group (HR 0.70; P = 0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was 34% lower (HR 0.66; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was 32% lower (HR 0.68; P = 0.002). Benefits were seen regardless of baseline eGFR.

 

DECLARE–TIMI 58 Trial

 

In this trial of 17,160 participants a secondary outcome was a renal composite outcome defined as a sustained decrease of 40% or more in eGFR to < 60, new end-stage renal disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (150). As seen in the other SGLT2 inhibitor studies there was a decrease in the development of renal disease with the incidence of the renal outcome 4.3% in the dapagliflozin group vs. 5.6% in the placebo group (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.87). Excluding death from cardiovascular causes as part of the composite endpoint, the reduction in renal events was even more impressive (HR 0.53 p<0.0001) (179). The risk of end-stage renal disease or renal death was lower in the dapagliflozin group than in the placebo group (HR 0.41; p=0.012) (179).

 

VERTIS CV Trial

 

In VERTIS CV trial the renal composite end point of renal death, dialysis/transplant, or doubling of serum creatinine was reduced but not statistically significant in the ertugliflozin treated group (HR 0.81; CI 0.63–1.04) (154).

 

DAPA-HF Trial

 

In this trial 4,744 patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomized to receive either dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily) or placebo for a median of 18.2 months (156). The renal outcome was a composite outcome of a reduction of 50% or more in the estimated GFR sustained for at least 28 days, end-stage renal disease, or death from renal causes. End-stage renal disease was defined as an eGFR of <15, long-term dialysis, or kidney transplantation. There was a trend towards benefit with dapagliflozin treatment that was not statistically significant due to a small number of events (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.16).

 

EMPEROR-Reduced Trial

 

In this trial 3,730 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for a median of 16 months (159). The annual rate of decline in the eGFR was decreased in the empagliflozin group compared to the placebo group (-0.55 vs. -2.28 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area per year, P<0.001). Additionally, a composite renal outcome (chronic dialysis or renal transplantation or a profound, sustained reduction in the eGFR) was decreased in the empagliflozin group (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.77).

 

DAPA-CKD Trial

 

In this trial 4,304 individuals with and without diabetes with an eGFR of 25 to 75 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 200 to 5000mg/g were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg/day or placebo for a median of 2.4 years (this study was stopped early by the data monitoring board) (161). The primary outcome was a composite of a sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes and this was reduced by 39% in the dapagliflozin group (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.72; P<0.001; number needed to treat to prevent one primary outcome event, 19). All of the components of this primary outcome were decreased in the dapagliflozin group. A sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal causes was reduced by 44% in the dapagliflozin group (HR 0.56; P<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with Stage 4 chronic kidney disease (eGFR< 30) the benefits of dapagliflozin were similar to those described above indicating that even in patients with severe renal disease dapagliflozin is beneficial (180) Finally, the benefits of dapagliflozin were similar in participants with T2DM (36% decrease) and in those without T2DM (50% decrease). Thus, similar to the CREDENCE trial, this trial demonstrates that dapagliflozin decreases renal disease progression in patients with pre-existing renal disease. Moreover, this benefit is seen in patients with and without T2DM. Finally, benefit was observed in the dapagliflozin group regardless of the type of kidney disease (diabetic, ischemic, hypertensive, glomerulonephritis, other, or unknown) (181).

 

EMPA-KIDNEY

 

6609 patients with chronic kidney disease who had an eGFR > 20 but < 45 or who had an eGFR > 45 but < 90 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of at least 200 were randomized empagliflozin 10 mg/day or placebo (182). The primary outcome was a composite of progression of kidney disease (end-stage kidney disease, a sustained decrease in eGFR to <10, a sustained decrease in eGFR of ≥40% from baseline, or death from renal causes) or death from cardiovascular causes. After a median of 2.0 years of follow-up, progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 13.1% in the empagliflozin group and 16.9% in the placebo group (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.82; P<0.001). Progression of kidney disease occurred in 11.6% in the empagliflozin group and 15.2 of the placebo group (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.62–0.81). Similar benefits were seen in patients with or without diabetes and in patients with an eGFR < 30 and > 45. Empagliflozin slowed the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease regardless of the level of albuminuria or the cause of chronic kidney disease (183,184).  

 

Summary

 

Multiple trials clearly demonstrate that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial effects on renal function and decrease the development and progression of renal disease (Table 16). In a meta-analysis of 8 trials with 59,747 patients there was a robust decrease in the composite end points of renal disease (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) (167). The benefits are observed in patients with and without diabetes, with and without renal disease, and also in patients with heart failure. In a smaller meta-analysis this renal disease benefit was seen in patients with and without atherosclerosis (185). These renal benefits are independent of improvement in glycemic control and occurs in patients without diabetes (186). A more recent meta-analysis of 13 studies reported that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced by 31% the occurrence of a composite primary renal outcome consisting of a doubling of serum creatinine, decline of eGFR > 50%, end-stage kidney disease, renal replacement therapy, transplantation, or renal death (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.61–0.79) (187).

 

Table 16. Summary of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Renal Disease

 

Number

Mean Follow-up (years)

Hazard Ratio* (95% CI)

EMPA-REG; Empagliflozin

7,020

3.1

0.54 (0.40-0.75

CANVAS; Canagliflozin

10,142

3.6

0.60 (0.47-0.77)

DECLARE-TIMI 58; Dapagliflozin

17,160

4.2

0.53 (0.43-0.66)

VERTIS-CV; Ertugliflozin

8,246

3.0

0.81 (0.63-1.04)

CREDENCE; Canagliflozin

4,401

2.6

0.66 (0.53-0.81)

DAPA-HF; Dapagliflozin

4,774

1.5

0.71 (0.44-1.16)

EMPEROR; Empagliflozin

3,730

1.3

0.52 (0.32-0.77)

DAPA-CKD; Dapagliflozin

4304

2.4

0.56 (0.45-0.68)

*Renal composite outcomes.

 

The mechanism accounting for this effect is unknown but a leading hypothesis is that an increase of sodium chloride in the macula densa due to SGLT2 inhibition triggers a cascade that reduces GFR through constriction of the afferent glomerular arterioles (tubuloglomerular feedback) (133,186). This would reduce glomerular hydrostatic pressure and initially decrease GFR, an effect that is observed with SGLT2 treatment, but in the long run this decrease in GFR protects the kidney from damage resulting in improved kidney function long-term (133).

 

METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE (MASLD) AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED STEATOHEPATITIS (MASH)

 

Numerous studies have shown that treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors decrease liver enzymes (101,188-192).  Moreover, studies have shown a decrease in liver fat and liver stiffness (101,188,189,191-193). A study of 5 patients showed an improvement in liver histology after 24 weeks of therapy with canagliflozin (194). Further studies are required to determine whether SGLT-2 inhibitors will result in clinical benefits in patients with MASLD and MASH.

 

MORTALITY

 

A meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials with 70,364 individuals reported that all-cause mortality was decreased by 14% (195). The decrease in all-cause mortality was seen with all of the SGLT2 inhibitors but was not statistically significant with ertugliflozin.

 

EFFECT OF SGLT2 INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS ON GLP1 RECEPTOR AGONIST THERAPY

 

A meta-analysis of 12 randomized cardiovascular or renal trials of SGLT2 inhibitors where 3065 (4·2%) of 73,238 participants with T2DM were using GLP-1RA at baseline examined the effectiveness of combination therapy (196). SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death) in individuals both receiving and not receiving GLP-1RA (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.63-1.03 vs 0.90; 0.86-0.94; p-heterogeneity=0.31). Similarly, the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death (HR 0.76; 95%CI 0.57-1.01 vs 0.78, 0.74-0.82; p-heterogeneity=0.90), and chronic kidney disease progression (HR 0.65; 95%CI 0.46-0.94 vs 0.67; 0.62-0.72; p-heterogeneity=0.81) in individuals both receiving and not receiving GLP-1RA was reduced. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors decreased the rate of decline in eGFR as measured by chronic and total eGFR slope regardless of GLP-1RA use. These results are not surprising as SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA have different mechanisms of action. Thus, the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors occur even in patients on GLP1RA therapy.

 

Side Effects

 

In a meta-analysis of 51 randomized controlled trials involving 24,371 patients it was noted that the frequency of side effects was similar with high dose and low dose SGLT-2 inhibitors (197).

 

URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS

 

In some but not all studies an increased risk of urinary tract infections was observed with SGLT2 inhibitors (20,132). In the large randomized cardiovascular outcome trials, an increase in urinary tract infections were not observed (137,138,150). In a meta-analysis of 10 large outcome trials with 71,553 participants the relative risk of urinary tract infection was minimal (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12) (198). Similarly, another meta-analysis of 213 studies with 150,140 participants found only a small increased risk of urinary tract infections (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.06- 1.16) (199). In contrast, a meta-analysis of 86 randomized trials with 50,880 patients an increase in urinary tract infections was not observed (200). The potential increase in the occurrence and severity of urinary tract infections is due to the glycosuria as glucose is an excellent substrate for the growth of micro-organisms.

 

GENITAL MYCOTIC INFECTIONS

 

Genital mycotic infections (mainly balanitis and vulvovaginitis) are increased with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment (132). The risk of genital mycotic infections is greater in women than men. In a meta-analysis that included over 2000 patients treated with canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg vs. placebo, genital mycotic infections were seen in greater than 10% of women (100mg-10.4%, 300 mg-11.4%, placebo-3.2%) and around 4% of men (100 mg-4.2%, 300 mg-3.7%, placebo- 0.6%) (201). In a large meta-analysis of 188 studies with 121,275 participants the risk of genital mycotic infections was markedly increased (OR 3.5; 95% CI 3.1-3.9) (199). In uncircumcised men the risk of genital mycotic infections is greater than in circumcised men. Genital mycotic infections are the most common side effect seen with SGLT2 inhibitors but fortunately these infections are generally mild and relatively easy to treat (20).

 

The increase in genital mycotic infections is due to the glycosuria as glucose is an excellent substrate for the growth of Candida.

 

FOURNIER GANGRENE

 

Fournier gangrene (FG) is a necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum that is characterized by a rapidly progressive necrotizing infection of the external genitalia, perineum, and perianal region (202). Many of the patients with FG have diabetes (32-66%) (202). FG occurs most commonly in males and is a rare condition with an incidence of 3.3 in 100,000 men aged 50 to 79 years (202). In a recent case series of 59 patients over a 10-year period at a single institution, the incidence was estimated at 32 cases per 100,000 admissions (203).  Risk factors included very high A1c (mean 9.6%), obesity, immunocompromised state, and illicit drug use (203).  FG is a urologic emergency and requires treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics and immediate surgical intervention (202).

 

A recent report described 55 FG cases in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors in the last 6 years since they were approved for use in the US (202). In contrast, only 19 cases of FG were reported in 35 years among patients receiving other hypoglycemic drugs. All of the SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with FG except ertugliflozin, which is likely explained by this drug only recently being approved for the treatment of diabetes. However, the authors were unable to assess the incidence of FG or whether SGLT2 inhibitors were causative. A second study compared the occurrence of FG in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors (15.0 per 100,000 person-years) vs DPP4 inhibitors (9.7 per 100 000 person-years) in men 65 years and

older who have T2DM using large data bases (204). Other studies have not found an increased risk of FG with SGLT2 inhibitors (205,206). A major difficulty in determining if SGLT2 inhibitors actually increase the risk of FG is that FG is very rare making definitive studies difficult.

 

Early recognition of FG is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. Typical presentations include systemic symptoms, such as fatigue, fever, and malaise, and local symptoms that include tenderness, erythema, and swelling (202). Pain out of proportion to the clinical findings is highly suggestive of necrotizing fasciitis (202).

 

HYPOVOLEMIA AND HYPOTENSION

 

SGLT2 inhibitors induce an osmotic diuresis (132). This effect can result in postural dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, falls, and dehydration, particularly in elderly individuals, patients with kidney disease, patients on either diuretics or medications that interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (e.g., angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers), and patients with low systolic blood pressure (132) (package insert). In a meta-analysis of 10 large outcome studies the risk of volume depletion was modestly increased (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23) (198). Volume status should be determined prior to initiating therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor.

 

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

 

SGLT2 inhibitors have been reported to cause acute kidney injury (132). It is likely that volume depletion and hypotension lead to the acute kidney injury (132). In an analysis of two large health care utilization cohorts SGLT2 inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (207). Similarly, in the cardiovascular outcome studies described earlier an increase in acute kidney injury was not observed. In fact, in a meta-analysis of 4 large studies (EMPA-REG, CANVAS, CREDENCE, and DECLARE-TIMI 58) a decrease in acute kidney injury was observed (Risk ratio 0.75; p<0.0001) (208). Similarly, a meta-analysis of 10 studies with 71,553 participants also did not observe an increase in acute kidney injury and in fact observed a decrease (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91) (198). Even in patients over age 75 years of age an increase in acute kidney injury was not observed with SGLT2 treatment (209).

 

Before initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy one should consider factors that may predispose patients to acute kidney injury including hypovolemia, chronic renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, and concomitant medications (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, NSAIDs). Consider temporarily discontinuing SGLT2 inhibitors in any setting of reduced oral intake (such as acute illness or fasting) or fluid losses (such as gastrointestinal illness or excessive heat exposure) (package insert).

 

DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS

 

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) has been observed in patients with T2DM treated with SGLT2 inhibitors but is a rare side effect (20,132). In some instances, the glucose levels are not very elevated despite the patient having DKA (euglycemic DKA) and this can result in a delay in diagnosing DKA (132). SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with approximately twice the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis compared to treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors (210). Additionally, in several of the large cardiovascular studies described above an increase in DKA was observed (CANVAS Trial- canagliflozin 0.6 vs. placebo 0.3 participants with an event per 1000 patient-years; CREDENCE Trial- canagliflozin 2.2 vs. placebo 0.2 per with an event per 1000 patient-years; DECLARE–TIMI 58-dapagliflozin 27 episodes vs placebo 12 episodes; VERTIS trial 0.3% 5mg ertugliflozin, 0.4% 15mg dose, and 0.1% placebo group) (138,148,150,154). In a meta-analysis of 10 studies with 71,553 participants the risk of DKA was increased (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.36-3.63) (198).  

 

Many of the DKA events occurred in patients with T2DM treated with insulin who had reduced or stopped insulin or experienced an intercurrent illness that could precipitate DKA (20,211). In some instances, the patients were thought to have T2DM but actually had latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA), a form of Type 1 diabetes (20). The hyperglycemia in DKA associated with SGLT2 inhibitors is typically mild because the SGLT2 inhibitors reduce blood glucose levels (20). SGLT2 inhibitors should be temporarily discontinued in clinical situations known to predispose to ketoacidosis (e.g., prolonged fasting due to acute illness or surgery) (package insert). DKA developing during hospitalizations has been described emphasizing the need for vigilance when continuing SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients admitted to the hospital (212). Patients should be educated regarding this potential complication and in high-risk patients (for example patients on insulin therapy with a history of poor glycemic control or DKA) one could provide the patient with methods to measure either blood or urine ketone levels at home to facilitate the early diagnosis of DKA.

 

A possible mechanism for the increased risk of DKA is SGLT2 inhibitors increasing plasma glucagon levels thereby increasing ketone production (132,211). In combination with the low insulin levels this could potentiate the development of DKA.

 

OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRACTURES

 

In the CANVAS cardiovascular outcome study, the rate of all fractures was higher in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (15.4 vs. 11.9 participants with fracture per 1000 patient-years; HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.52) (138). A similar trend was observed for low-trauma fracture events (canagliflozin 11.6 vs. placebo 9.2 participants with fracture per 1000 patient-years; HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.52) (138). The incidence of fractures in the CANVAS study was increased with canagliflozin vs. placebo across subgroups based on sex, age, duration of Type 2 diabetes, baseline eGFR, and prior fracture history (213). Notably, the increase in fractures associated with canagliflozin treatment began within weeks of drug initiation indicating that the increased risk occurs rapidly (213).

 

In contrast, both the EMPA-REG, VERTIS, and DECLARE cardiovascular outcome studies did not demonstrate an increase in fractures with empagliflozin or dapagliflozin, respectively (137,150,154). Additionally, in the CREDENCE outcome study, canagliflozin did not increase fracture risk in patients with chronic kidney disease defined as an eGFR of 30 to <90 and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], >300 to 5000) (148). Similarly, in a pooled analysis of 8 randomized canagliflozin studies with 5867 participants (CANVAS trial excluded) an increase in fractures was not observed (213). Moreover, in a meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials with an average duration of 64 weeks that compared the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors to a placebo in 20,895 participants there was no increased risk of fractures with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.81- 1.28) (214). Similarly, a meta-analysis of 10 large outcome studies also did not observe an increase in fractures (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95- 1.12) (198).

 

Several studies have examined the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone mineral density. Canagliflozin was associated with a decrease in total hip bone mineral density over 104 weeks, (placebo-subtracted changes:100mg -0.9% and 300mg -1.2%), but did not result in changes in bone mineral density in the femoral neck, lumbar spine, or distal forearm (215). In a 2-year study dapagliflozin did not significantly affect bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip (216). In a 26-week study ertugliflozin also had no adverse effect on bone mineral density (217).

 

Thus, the evidence that SGLT2 inhibitors increase the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, with the possible exception of canagliflozin, is not very strong. One should recognize though, that hypoglycemia, hypovolemia, and hypotension could increase the risk of falls and thereby increase the risk of fractures in susceptible individuals.

 

AMPUTATIONS

 

In the CANVAS study described above, canagliflozin was associated with an increased risk of amputations (HR 1.97; 95% CI 1.41 to 2.75), which were primarily at the level of the toe or metatarsal (138). Amputation risk was strongly associated with baseline history of prior amputation and risk factors for amputation (peripheral vascular disease and neuropathy). The risk of amputation was low with 6.3 of participants per 1000 patients-years in the canagliflozin group having an amputation vs. 3.4 in the placebo group. The basis for the increase in amputations is unknown.

 

However, the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial with empagliflozin, the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial with dapagliflozin, and the VERTIS CV trial with ertuglifozin did not report an increase in amputations in the patients treated with an SGLT2 inhibitor(137,150,154,218). Moreover, in the CREDENCE trial, canagliflozin also did not cause an increase in amputations in the patients treated with the SLGT2 inhibitor (148). In a meta-analysis of 7 large cardiovascular/renal outcome trials described above (excluding CANVAS) there was no increased risk of amputations in the SGLT2 inhibitor treated group vs. placebo group (RR 1.09; CI 95% 0.94-1.26) (219). Given that only one of eight large randomized trials has demonstrated an increased risk of amputations it is unlikely that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly increase the risk of amputations.

 

Nevertheless, before initiating SGLT2 inhibitor therapy one should consider factors in the patient history that may predispose them to the need for amputations, such as a history of prior amputation, peripheral vascular disease, severe neuropathy, and diabetic foot ulcers and weigh the risks and benefits of therapy (package insert). 

 

ACUTE ILLNESS

 

Because of the risk of hypovolemia, hypotension, and DKA the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors should be suspended during acute illness or planned surgical procedures. SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may be resumed following recovery.

 

This view needs to be modified based on the results of the DARE 19 study and DEFENDER Trial (220,221). In the DARE 19 study patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor (i.e., hypertension, T2DM, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease) were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 30 days (220). While dapagliflozin did not result in a statistically significant risk reduction in organ dysfunction or death, or improvement in clinical recovery, the drug was well tolerated indicating that SGLT2 inhibitors can be safely given to hospitalized patients if there are strong indications for their use. Additionally, The DEFENDER trial randomized intensive care unit patients to dapagliflozin (n = 248) or placebo (n = 259) hoping to improve outcomes (221). Unfortunately, the addition of dapagliflozin to critically ill patients did not improve clinical outcomes but also did not cause harm.

 

CANCER

 

A meta-analysis of seventy-six randomized trials with 116,375 participants followed for over 48 weeks did not find an increased risk of cancer or cancer mortality with SGLT2 inhibitors (222).   

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

RENAL FUNCTION

 

The dose of SGLT2 inhibitors needs to be adjusted based on renal function. Therefore, renal function needs to be assessed prior to initiating therapy and periodically thereafter (because changes in the recommendation occur rapidly with SGLT2 inhibitors please check the most recent package insert for the latest guidelines).

 

Dosage recommendations for dapagliflozin and canagliflozin are shown in tables 17 and 18.

 

 Table 17. Dose Recommendations for Dapagliflozin

eGFR > 45

To improve glycemic control, the recommended starting dose is 5 mg orally once daily. Dose can be increased to 10 mg orally once daily for additional glycemic control. For all other indications, the recommended starting dose is 10 mg orally once daily.

eGFR 25-45

10 mg orally once daily

eGFR < 25

Initiation is not recommended; however, patients may continue 10 mg orally once daily to reduce the risk of eGFR decline, ESKD, CV death, and heart failure.

Dialysis

Contraindicated

 

Table 18. Dose Recommendations for Canagliflozin

eGFR > 60

100 mg orally once daily, taken before the first meal of the day. Dose can be increased to 300 mg once daily for additional glycemic control.

eGFR 30-60

100 mg once daily.

eGFR < 30

Initiation is not recommended, however patients with albuminuria greater than 300 mg/day may continue 100 mg once daily to reduce the risk of ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine, CV death, and hospitalization for heart failure

Dialysis

Contraindicated

 

Empagliflozin is not recommended for glycemic control in patients with an eGFR < 30 and is contraindicated in patients on dialysis. Data are insufficient to provide a dosing recommendation in patients who have T2DM and established cardiovascular disease with an eGFR less than 30 or who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with an eGFR less than 20.

 

Ertugliflozin is not recommended in patients with an eGFR less than 45 and is contraindicated in patients on dialysis.

 

Bexagliflozin is not recommended in patients with an eGFR less than 30.

 

Summary

 

SGLT2 inhibitors are effective at lowering glucose levels and even more importantly have beneficial effects on heart failure and renal disease. They have a number of potential side effects but many are not definitively associated with SGLT2 inhibitors (fractures, urinary tract infections, amputations, Fournier’s gangrene) or are rare (DKA). The major side effect is genital mycotic infections, which usually are mild and respond to treatment. In patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, at high risk for cardiovascular disease particularly heart failure, or with renal disease SGLT2 inhibitors are a leading therapeutic choice.

 

Table 19. Advantages and Disadvantages of SGLT2 Inhibitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Weight loss

Urinary Tract Infections?

No hypoglycemia

Genital Mycotic Infections

Decrease heart failure

Increased LDL (small increase)

Decreases renal disease

Increased risk of DKA

Once a day administration

Postural hypotension/volume depletion

Decrease BP

Fractures/ Osteoporosis?

 

Increased risk amputations (canagliflozin)?

 

Fournier’s gangrene (rare)?

 

Expensive

 

 

COMBINATION SGLT1 AND SGLT2 INHIBITORS

 

Introduction

 

Sotagliflozin (Zynquista, Inpefa) inhibits both SGLT1 and SGLT2 (223). Sotaglifozin’s effectiveness in inhibiting SGLT-2 is similar to that of the selective SGLT-2 inhibitors discussed above but it is > 10-fold more potent in inhibiting SGLT-1(224). In the US the drug was approved in 2023 to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and urgent heart failure visits in patients with heart failure or type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and other cardiovascular risk factors. Sotagliflozin was approved in Europe for the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes but is no longer available. It was used in overweight patients (BMI> 27 kg/m2) when optimal insulin on its own does not achieve adequate glycemic control (package insert- https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/zynquista-epar-product-information_en.pdf).

 

Administration

 

The starting dose of sotagliflozin is 200 mg daily which may be increased to 400 mg as tolerated. In patients with decompensated heart failure, begin dosing when patients are hemodynamically stable. Renal function and volume status should be assessed prior to initiating therapy. Studies with sotagliflozin did not include patients with an eGFR less than 25 or on dialysis and in these studies, sotagliflozin was discontinued if eGFR fell below 15 or chronic dialysis was initiated.

 

Because of an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis ketone monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes and in others at risk for ketoacidosis (patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy) should be considered, particularly when precipitating conditions for diabetic ketoacidosis occur such as acute febrile illness, reduced caloric intake, ketogenic diet, surgery, insulin dose reduction, volume depletion, or alcohol abuse.

 

In order to avoid hypoglycemia in patients on insulin a reduction in insulin dose may be considered, particularly in patients with good glycemic control. Similarly, there is a risk of hypoglycemia in patients taking insulin secretagogues.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

The mechanism by which inhibition of SGLT2 decreases glucose levels was discussed in the prior section on SGLT2 inhibitors. Inhibition of SGLT1 will have additional effects. In the kidney SGLT1 is responsible for approximately 10% of the transport of luminal glucose and thus inhibiting SGLT1 may facilitate SGLT2 induced loss of glucose in the urine (223,225). Moreover, SGLT1 is expressed in the small intestine and facilitates the absorption of dietary glucose (223,225,226). SGLT1 expression in the small intestine is increased in patients with diabetes (225,226). Inhibition of SGLT1 delays, and perhaps reduces, glucose absorption, and enhances circulating levels of GLP-1 reducing post-prandial glucose excursions (223,226-228). Finally, SGLT1 is expressed in human heart capillaries and whether this plays a role in cardiac protection remains to be determined (224).  

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

TYPE 1 DIABETES (T1DM)

 

The inTandem1 trial was carried out in North American adults and randomized patients with T1DM to placebo (n = 268), sotagliflozin 200 mg (n = 263), or sotagliflozin 400 mg (n = 262) (229). Baseline A1c was 7.57% and the placebo-adjusted A1c reductions were 0.36% and 0.41% with sotagliflozin 200 and 400 mg, respectively, at 24 weeks and 0.25% and 0.31% at 52 weeks (all P < 0.001). At 52 weeks the difference in body weight between the placebo group and 400mg sotagliflozin group was -4.32 kg (-5.00 to -3.64). Notably hypoglycemia was not increased with sotagliflozin treatment. However, DKA occurred more frequently with sotagliflozin treatment (placebo 0.4%, sotagliflozin 200mg 3.4%, sotagliflozin 400mg 4.2%).

 

The inTandem2 trial was carried out in European adults and randomized patients with T1DM to placebo (n = 258), oral sotagliflozin 200 mg (n = 261), or 400 mg (n = 263) (230). Baseline A1c was 7.7% and the placebo-adjusted A1c reductions were 0.37% and 0.35% with sotagliflozin 200 and 400 mg, respectively, at 24 weeks and 0.21% and 0.37% at 52 weeks (all P < 0.001). At 52 weeks the difference in body weight between the placebo group and 400mg sotagliflozin group was −2.92 kg (-3.62 to −2.22). Hypoglycemia was not increased with sotagliflozin treatment. DKA occurred more frequently with sotagliflozin treatment (placebo 0%, sotagliflozin 200mg 2.3%, sotagliflozin 400mg 3.4%).

 

The inTandem3 trial was a multicenter world-wide study in patients with T1DM randomized to placebo (n=703) or sotagliflozin 400mg (n=699) for 24 weeks (231). The baseline A1c was 8.2% and sotagliflozin decreased A1 by −0.46% compared to placebo. Hypoglycemia with a blood glucose level < 55 mg/dL was significantly lower in the sotagliflozin group than in the placebo group (11.8 per person-year vs. 15.4 per person-year) but severe hypoglycemia (episode needing assistance from another person or resulting in loss of consciousness or a seizure) was similar. Notably the risk of DKA was increase with sotagliflozin treatment (sotagliflozin 3.0% and placebo 0.6%).

 

Thus, in patients with T1DM sotagliflozin causes a modest reduction in A1c and body weight but increases the risk of DKA.

 

TYPE 2 DIABETES

 

Studies of the effect of sotagliflozin on glycemic control in patients with T2DM have not been as extensive as in patients with T1DM. In a 12-week trial that compared placebo (n= 60), sotagliflozin 200mg (n= 60), or sotagliflozin 400mg (n= 60) in patients with T2DM on metformin monotherapy a decrease in A1c of -0.09%, -0.50, and -0.92% occurred in patients treated with placebo, sotagliflozin 200mg, and sotagliflozin 400mg, respectively (232). As expected, there was a decrease in body weight and an increase in urinary glucose excretion with sotagliflozin treatment. Of note a study has shown that in patients with T2DM sotagliflozin treatment is effective in lowering postprandial glucose levels even in patients with an eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (233).

 

In a small study comparing the effect of sotagliflozin and empagliflozin the decrease in A1c levels were very similar as were measurements of glycemia using continuous glucose monitoring (234).

 

Other Effects

 

CARDIOVASCULAR

 

The SOLOIST-WHF Trial was a multicenter trial in which patients with T2DM who were recently hospitalized for worsening heart failure were randomly assigned to receive sotagliflozin 200 mg once daily (with a dose increase to 400 mg, depending on side effects) (n= 608), or placebo (n= 614) (235). The primary end point was the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure (first and subsequent events). Because of loss of funding from the sponsor the study was stopped early and the median duration of follow-up was only 9 months. The primary end-point was reduced in the sotagliflozin group vs. placebo group (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.85; P<0.001) as was hospitalizations or urgent visits for heart failure (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.83: P <0.001). Of particular note benefit was observed in patients with reduced or preserved ejection fractions (<50% or ≥50%). This study demonstrates benefits in patients with a reduced or preserved ejection fractions and that treatment initiated during an acute heart failure episode is beneficial. DKA was uncommon in both the sotagliflozin group (0.3%) and placebo group (0.7%) but severe hypoglycemia was increased (sotagliflozin 1.5% vs placebo 0.3%).

 

The SCORED trial was a multicenter trial in which patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease (eGFR- 25 to 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria was not required), and risks for cardiovascular disease were randomized to sotagliflozin (200 mg once daily, with an increase to 400 mg once daily if unacceptable side effects did not occur) (n= 5292) or placebo (n= 5292) and followed for a median of 16 months (236). The primary end point was the composite of the total number of deaths from cardiovascular causes, hospitalizations for heart failure, and urgent visits for heart failure. Sotagliflozin treatment decreased the primary end point (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63–0.88; P <0.001), hospitalizations or urgent visits for heart failure (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55–0.82; P <0.001), and deaths from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and nonfatal strokes (HR 0.77; 95%CI 0.65–0.91). Sotagliflozin reduced the risk of renal disease defined as first event of sustained ≥50% decline in eGFR, eGFR <15, dialysis, or kidney transplant with 1.6% events in the sotagliflozin group and 2.6% events in the placebo group (HR   0.62; 95% CI 0.48 - 0.82; P < 0.001) (237). A1c was decreased by 0.42% compared to placebo.

DKA while infrequent was increased in the sotagliflozin group (0.6% vs 0.3%; P=0.02).

 

RENAL

 

As noted above in the SCORED trial in patients with T2DM there was a reduction in renal disease endpoints in the participants treated with sotagliflozin.

 

Side Effects

 

The side effects of sotagliflozin are similar to those described previously for SGLT2 inhibitors. In addition, sotagliflozin also causes diarrhea and flatulence due to the inhibition of SGLT1 mediated glucose uptake in the small intestine.

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Patients at high risk for DKA should not be started on sotagliflozin. Sotagliflozin is not recommended during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy or during breastfeeding.

 

Summary

 

In patients with T1DM sotagliflozin modestly reduces A1c levels and body weight but increases the risk of DKA. In patient with T2DM sotagliflozin reduces A1c levels more effectively and decreases body weight with a relatively low risk of DKA.

 

While studies have shown beneficial effects of sotagliflozin on the development of heart failure and renal disease it is not clear whether this benefit is solely due to inhibition of SGLT2 or whether inhibition of SGLT1 plays a significant role. 

 

DOPAMINE AGONIST (CYCLOSET)

 

Introduction

 

In 2009, a quick-release formulation of bromocriptine (Cycloset, bromocriptine-QR) was approved to improve glycemic control in patients with T2DM (238,239). Bromocriptine is a centrally-acting dopamine D2 receptor agonist that has been used for many years for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia and Parkinson’s disease (238,239). It can be used to improve glycemic control in patients with T2DM either as monotherapy or in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs (238,239).

 

Administration

 

Bromocriptine-QR should be initiated at one tablet (0.8 mg) within two hours after waking in the morning. The dose can be increased by one tablet per week until a maximum daily dose of 6 tablets (4.8 mg) or until the maximal tolerated number of tablets between 2 and 6 per day is reached. Taking bromocriptine-QR with food is recommended to decrease gastrointestinal side effects (238).

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Bromocriptine-QR decreases insulin resistance resulting in an increase in glucose disposal and a decrease in hepatic glucose production (238). Bromocriptine-QR does not increase insulin levels (238). Thus, the effectiveness of bromocriptine-QR will be greatest in patients that are insulin resistant and produce insulin (238). Based on animal studies it is thought that bromocriptine-QR acts on the central nervous system, particularly the hypothalamus, to increase insulin sensitivity in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue (238).

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

In a 24 week monotherapy study the A1c level was 0.4% lower in the bromocriptine-QR group compared to placebo group (240).  Both fasting and postprandial glucose levels were decreased with bromocriptine-QR treatment (240). Bromocriptine-QR treatment was associated with a decrease in triglyceride levels (32 mg/dL) but no significant change in LDL or HDL cholesterol levels or change in body weight (240). A trial adding bromocriptine-QR to sulfonylurea therapy demonstrated a 0.55% lower A1c in the bromocriptine-QR group compared to placebo (240). As in the monotherapy study fasting glucose, postprandial glucose, and triglyceride levels were decreased with no change in LDL or HDL cholesterol levels (240). Addition of bromocriptine-QR to other hypoglycemic drugs including insulin results in an approximate decrease in A1c of 0.5 to 1.0% (238,239). Hypoglycemia is a rare side effect with use of bromocriptine-QR alone, but is increased with use of insulin secretagogue therapy or insulin (239,240).

 

Other Effects

 

BLOOD PRESSURE

 

Bromocriptine-QR modestly decreases systolic and diastolic blood pressure (239,240).

 

LIPIDS

 

Bromocriptine-QR treatment decreases triglyceride levels but has no significant effect on LDL or HDL cholesterol levels (239,240). The decrease in triglyceride levels is thought to be due to a decrease in hepatic triglyceride synthesis, likely due to a decrease in adipose tissue lipolysis resulting in decreased blood free fatty acid levels and decreased delivery of fatty acids to the liver for triglyceride synthesis (238).  

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

A 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial evaluated cardiovascular safety in 3,095 patients with T2DM treated with bromocriptine-QR or placebo (241).  The composite end point of first myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina or congestive heart failure occurred in 1.8% of the bromocriptine-QR treated vs. 3.2% of the placebo-treated patients resulting in a 40% decrease in cardiovascular events (HR 0.60; CI 0.37– 0.96). Clearly further studies to confirm this finding and to elucidate the mechanism of this beneficial effect are required.

 

Side Effects

 

The most common side effect of bromocriptine-QR therapy is nausea which is usually transient and improves with time (239,240). This side effect can be minimized by reducing the dose (239,240). In the pooled phase 3 trials adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 539 (24%) of the bromocriptine-QR treated patients and 118 (9%) of the placebo-treated patients. This between-group difference was driven mostly by gastrointestinal adverse events, particularly nausea (package insert). Similarly, in the bromocriptine-QR safety trial adverse events leading to discontinuation of drug occurred in 24% of the bromocriptine-QR treated patients and 15% of the placebo-treated patients, a difference again driven mostly by gastrointestinal adverse events, particularly nausea (package insert).

 

Hypotension resulting in syncope can occur particularly in patients on anti-hypertensive medications (package insert). Other side effects include somnolence, fatigue, vomiting, headache, and dizziness (package insert).

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Bromocriptine-QR is metabolized by the Cyp3A4 system and therefore the drug should not be used with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., azole antimycotics, HIV protease inhibitors) and the dose should not exceed 1.6 mg during concomitant use of a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor (e.g., erythromycin) (package insert).

 

Bromocriptine-QR is contraindicated in patients with syncopal migraine because it increases the likelihood of a hypotensive episode (package insert). The use of bromocriptine-QR in patients with severe psychotic disorders in not recommended as it may exacerbate the disorder or diminish the effectiveness of drugs used to treat the disorder (for example clozapine, olanzapine, ziprasidone) (package insert).

 

Summary

 

Bromocriptine-QR has modest effects on A1c levels by decreasing insulin resistance. In clinical trials the drug was often discontinued due to nausea. Because of the modest effects on A1c and the prominent side effects this drug is not widely used in the treatment of patients with T2DM. If further studies confirmed the decrease in cardiovascular events in patients treated with bromocriptine-QR the use of this drug would increase.

 

Table 20. Advantages and Disadvantages of Bromocriptine-QR

Advantages

Disadvantage

Decreases triglycerides

Need to titrate dose

Once a day dosing

Modest effect on A1c

Cardiovascular benefits?

Frequent discontinuation due to GI side effects

Decrease BP

Expensive

Neutral weight effect

 

Hypoglycemia uncommon

 

 

OVERVIEW OF THE INCRETIN SYSTEM

 

 

The incretin effect refers to a greater insulin stimulatory effect after an oral glucose load than from an intravenous (IV) glucose infusion when plasma glucose concentrations are matched (242). Thus, glucose and other nutrients delivered via the gastrointestinal tract potentiates the ability of the beta cells in the pancreas to produce insulin resulting in greater insulin secretion than with IV glucose (243). The increase in insulin levels with IV glucose is only approximately one‐third of that elicited by oral glucose. The majority of the incretin effect is due to two GI hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) with GIP having a dominant role (Figure 6) (242). The basal plasma levels of the incretin hormones are low but after eating the levels increase reaching concentrations that augment the insulin secretory responses if glucose levels are high but are ineffective at low glucose concentrations (i.e. glucose dependent effect) (242).

 

Patients with T2DM have a significant reduction of the incretin effect but GLP-1 and GIP levels in the blood after meals are not reduced in patients with T2DM (242). Rather decreased functional beta cell mass and resistance to the effects of GLP-1 and GIP in patients with T2DM accounts for the decreased incretin effect (242). Infusion of GIP or GLP-1 has a decreased effect on insulin secretion in patients with T2DM (resistance to effect of GIP and GLP-1) compared to normal individuals likely secondary to decreased functional beta cell mass (242). Achieving near-normoglycemia by intensified insulin regimens improved beta cell responsiveness to exogenous GIP and GLP-1, although the increase in insulin secretion was still much lower than in individuals without diabetes (242). The reduced incretin effect in patients with T2DM occurs after the diagnosis of diabetes is established, suggesting this abnormality is secondary to the diabetic state rather than the cause of diabetes (243).   

 

Glucagon Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)

 

GLP-1 is cleaved from the pro-glucagon molecule by pro-hormone convertase enzymes in the intestine (243). GLP-1 is stored in the L-cells of the intestine, predominantly in the ileum and colon, and is released at mealtime in response to neurohormonal signals and the presence of food in the gut (242,243). GLP-1 affects postprandial glucose levels through several mechanisms, including enhancing insulin secretion by the beta cells and inhibiting postprandial glucagon secretion by the alpha cells in a glucose-dependent manner (i.e. GLP-1 does not stimulate insulin secretion or inhibit glucagon secretion unless glucose levels are elevated) (243). This glucose dependent effect accounts for why incretin-based drugs do not cause serious hypoglycemia. Activation of GLP-1 receptors on beta cells increases cAMP levels, which potentiates insulin release in the presence of elevated glucose concentrations. In addition, GLP-1 slows the rate of gastric emptying, which is often paradoxically accelerated in patients with diabetes (243). GLP-1 also acts as a postprandial satiety signal through neurohormonal networks that signal the brain to suppress appetite and food intake, which can lead to weight loss (243). Animal studies suggest that exogenous GLP-1 has the ability to increase islet size, enhance beta-cell proliferation, inhibit beta-cell apoptosis, and regulate islet growth (244). The administration of GLP-1 intravenously increases insulin secretion, reduces glucagon secretion, and decreases glucose levels during fasting and in the post-prandial state (242). GLP-1 is rapidly degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) into inactive peptides (half-life is minutes) (Figure 6).

 

Figure 6. Incretin Hormone Secretion and Effect on Pancreas

 

Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Peptide (GIP)

 

Within minutes after ingestion of food, GIP is secreted from the K-cells located in the proximal region of the jejunum (242,243). GIP helps maintain normal glucose homeostasis by stimulating an increase in insulin secretion by the beta cells (Figure 6). Studies have suggested that the increase in insulin with food intake (Incretin effect) is primarily mediated by GIP (242). In contrast to GLP-1, GIP does not inhibit glucagon secretion, and in fact may stimulate glucagon secretion during euglycemic states. Additionally, GIP has no effect on gastric emptying. GIP concentrations in patients with T2DM are either normal or slightly increased following a meal indicating that the failure to secrete is not the explanation for the decreased incretin effect. Rather, beta cells in patients with T2DM are resistant to GIP. GIP is rapidly degraded by DPP-4 into inactive peptides (half-life is minutes) (Figure 6). The characteristics of GLP-1 and GIP are shown in table 21.

 

Table 21. Characteristics of GLP-1 and GIP

 

GLP-1

GIP

Post meal levels in patients with diabetes

Normal

Normal

Effect on insulin secretion

Stimulates

Stimulates

Effect on glucagon secretion

Inhibits

No effect or stimulates

Gastric emptying

Delays

No effect

Satiety

Induces

Induces

Degradation by DPP-4

Yes

Yes

 

DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 (DPP-4) INHIBITORS

 

Introduction

 

The currently available DPP-4 inhibitors in the US are sitagliptin (Januvia), saxagliptin (Onglyza), linagliptin (Tradjenta), and alogliptin (Nesina). Vidigliptin (Galvus) is available in Europe (245). DPP-4 inhibitors can be used as monotherapy, dual therapy, triple drug therapy, or in combination with insulin (245). These drugs are very similar and the minor differences will be discussed below.

 

Administration

 

The recommended dose of sitagliptin is 100 mg once daily with or without food. In patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m2 but < 45, the dose of sitagliptin is 50 mg once daily. In patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30) the dose of sitagliptin is 25 mg once daily.

 

The recommended dosage of saxagliptin is 2.5 mg or 5 mg once daily with or without food. In patients with a creatinine clearance CrCl ≤50 mL/min the dose of saxagliptin is 2.5 mg.

 

The recommended dose of linagliptin is 5 mg once daily with or without food. No dose adjustment is required for decreased renal function.

 

The recommended dose of alogliptin is 25 mg once daily with or without food. The dose of alogliptin is 12.5 mg once daily for patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥30 to <60 mL/min) and 6.25 mg with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min).

 

Renal function should be checked prior to initiating treatment and periodically because dose adjustments are required for all DPP-4 inhibitors except linagliptin.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

DPP-4 inhibitors increase the concentration and activity of the endogenous incretins, GLP-1 and GIP, by inhibiting the proteolytic cleavage of these hormones by DPP-4, into inactive molecules (245).  As discussed above, GLP-1 is secreted by L-cells in the intestines and stimulates insulin secretion and suppresses glucagon secretion in a glucose dependent manner. GIP is secreted by the K cells in the proximal intestine and stimulates insulin secretion in a glucose dependent manner.

 

An increase in active GLP-1 and GIP potentiates glucose induced insulin secretion and an increase in GLP-1 inhibits glucagon secretion (245). Together an increase in insulin and a decrease in glucagon will result in a decrease in blood glucose levels. Of note, DPP-4 inhibition results in a 2–3-fold increase in postprandial active GLP-1 levels, which is not at a level that delays gastric emptying or increases satiety and induces weight loss. This is in contrast to GLP-1 receptor agonist administration that results in marked elevations in active GLP1 activity that is equivalent to a >10-fold increase in GLP-1, which can delay gastric emptying and increase satiety.

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

DPP-4 inhibitors typically reduce A1c levels by 0.5-1.0% and are less effective in lowering A1c compared to metformin, TZDs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists (Table 6) (13,20,245). With regards to sulfonylureas, studies have shown a greater decrease in A1c with sulfonylureas compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in short term studies but in studies greater than one year the effect of sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors on A1c were similar (20,245). The ability of DPP-4 inhibitors to lower A1c is similar in monotherapy and when DPP-4 inhibitors are used in combination with other drugs (20,245). The decrease in A1c is similar for the different DPP-4 inhibitors (13,20). DPP-4 inhibitors are effective in lowering postprandial glucose levels. Because of their mechanism of action, DPP-4 inhibitors do not cause hypoglycemia but can potentiate the hypoglycemia induced by insulin or sulfonylureas (20,245). An adjustment in the dose of sulfonylureas or insulin may be required to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.

 

The results of the GRADE study, which compared glargine insulin, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin added to metformin, are discussed in the section entitled “OVERVIEW OF DRUGS”. The GLP1 receptor agonist was better than the sulfonylurea which was better than DPP-4 inhibitor in glycemic control (15).

 

Other Effects

 

WEIGHT

 

DPP-4 inhibitors are weight neutral (20,245).

 

BLOOD PRESSURE

 

A meta-analysis of 15 trials involving 5,636 participants found that DPP-4 inhibitors compared to placebo reduced systolic BP (mean difference, -3.04  mmHg: P < 0.00001) and diastolic BP (mean difference, -1.47 mmHg; P < 0.00001) (246).

 

LIPIDS

 

DPP-4 inhibitors decrease postprandial triglycerides by reducing circulating chylomicrons by decreasing intestinal lipoprotein production while having minimal effects on fasting lipid levels (247).

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

The effect of the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin on cardiovascular endpoints has been reported. In the saxagliptin study (SAVOR‐TIMI 53 trial), 16,492 patients with T2DM who had a history of cardiovascular events or who were at high risk were randomized to saxagliptin or placebo for 2.1 years (248). Saxagliptin did not increase or decrease cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. Interestingly more patients treated with saxagliptin were admitted to the hospital for heart failure. The risk of heart failure with saxagliptin was greatest in patients at a high overall risk of heart failure (i.e., history of heart failure, impaired renal function, or elevated baseline levels of NT-proBNP) (249). Additionally, in the patients treated with saxagliptin the increase in heart failure was an early event with a 6-month rate of 1.1% vs. 0.6% in the placebo group (HR 1.80, p=0·001) and a 12-month rate of 1·9% vs. 1·3% (1.46; p=0.002) (249). In contrast, after 12 months no difference in the rate of heart failure was observed in the saxagliptin and placebo groups indicating that the development of heart failure is an early event (249)

 

In the alogliptin trial (EXAMINE), 5,380 patients with either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the previous 15-90 days were randomized to alogliptin or placebo and followed for a median of 18 months (250). As seen in the saxagliptin study the rates of cardiovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) were similar in the alogliptin and placebo groups. The risk of hospitalization for heart failure was not statistically increased in the entire subset of patients treated with alogliptin (251). However, the hazard ratio for the subgroup of patients without heart failure at baseline was 1.76, p=0.026) (251).

 

In the sitagliptin trial (TECOS), 14,671 patients with established cardiovascular disease were randomized to sitagliptin or placebo for 3 years (252). Sitagliptin did not decrease the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events or increase hospitalization for heart failure. Finally, in the linagliptin trial (CARMELINA), 6,979 patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease were randomized to linagliptin or placebo for a median follow-up of 2.2 years (253). As in the other DPP-4 inhibitor studies, linagliptin did not have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular events. Additionally, linagliptin did not increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (254).

 

Thus, these results indicate that DPP-4 inhibitors do not reduce cardiovascular disease. Whether specific DPP-4 inhibitors (saxagliptin, alogliptin) increase the risk of heart failure remains to be resolved. Of note, a meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials involving 29,938 patients comparing the effects of saxagliptin vs. placebo or sulfonylureas did not observe an increase in heart failure (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.10; p = 0.85) (255).

 

RENAL DISEASE

 

Changes in renal function were examined in the large cardiovascular outcome trials described above. In the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial treatment with saxagliptin decreased albuminuria but had no effect on eGFR (256). Saxagliptin reduced the development of macroalbuminuria independent of changes in A1c levels (248,256). Doubling of serum creatinine, initiation of chronic dialysis, renal transplantation, or serum creatinine >6.0 mg/dL, were similar in the saxagliptin and placebo groups (256). In the TECOS trial treatment sitagliptin also reduced the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio with no effect on eGFR (257). In the CARMELINA trial many of the patents had pre-existing renal disease (74% of patients had prevalent diabetic kidney disease, 43% had an eGFR below 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, 15.2% had an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 80% had a urinary albumin creatinine ratio >30 mg/g) (253). Treatment with linagliptin reduced the progression of albuminuria but had no effect on death due to renal failure, ESRD, or sustained 40% or higher decrease in eGFR from baseline (253).

 

Taken together these studies indicate that DPP-4 inhibitors decrease proteinuria but do not provide data suggesting an improvement or delay in worsening of renal function. However, using large data bases studies have suggested that DPP-4 inhibitors have favorable effects on renal function and decrease the development of end stage renal disease (258-260). Randomized trials of DPP4 specifically examining the effect of renal parameters would be helpful.

 

Side Effects

 

DPP-4 inhibitors have been safe drugs with minimal side effects and are well tolerated by patients. Very rarely hypersensitivity reactions including urticaria, facial edema, anaphylaxis, angioedema, and exfoliative skin conditions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome have occurred (261). Bullous pemphigoid has also rarely been associated with DPP-4 inhibitor treatment (261).

 

ACUTE PANCREATITIS

 

The package insert of DPP-4 inhibitors indicates that acute pancreatitis is a complication of DPP-4 inhibitor treatment. The individual results of the SAVOR–TIMI, EXAMINE, and TECOS trials discussed above did not show an increased risk of pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer. However, two meta-analyses of these studies demonstrated an 80% increased risk of acute pancreatitis in patients using DPP-4 inhibitors compared with those receiving standard care (262,263). It should be noted that the absolute risk was small (0.13%), which would result in one to two additional cases of acute pancreatitis for every 1,000 patients treated for 2 years (263). Thus, pancreatitis appears to be a rare side effect of DPP-4 inhibitors. In patients on DPP-4 inhibitors who have GI symptoms suggestive of pancreatitis further evaluation is indicated. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis requires the presence of two of the following three criteria: acute onset of persistent, severe, epigastric pain often radiating to the back, elevation in serum lipase or amylase to three times or greater than the upper limit of normal, and characteristic findings of acute pancreatitis on imaging (264). 

 

ARTHRALGIA

 

Severe and disabling arthralgia in patients taking DPP-4 inhibitors has been reported (265). The time to onset of symptoms following initiation of drug therapy varied from one day to years. Patients experienced relief of symptoms upon discontinuation of the medication and a subset of patients experienced a recurrence of symptoms when restarting the same drug or a different DPP-4 inhibitor. If a patient develops severe joint pain discontinue the DPP-4 inhibitor.

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

It is unknown whether patients with a history of pancreatitis or who are at increased risk for the development of pancreatitis should be started on DPP-4 inhibitors. Given the availability of other hypoglycemic drugs many clinicians avoid the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in these patients.

 

The dosage of saxagliptin is 2.5 mg once daily when co-administered with a strong cytochrome P450 3A4/5 inhibitor (e.g., ketoconazole, atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and telithromycin) (package insert).

 

Summary

 

DPP-4 inhibitors, while not the most potent drugs at lowering A1c, nevertheless are very attractive to use in the treatment of patients with T2DM as they are safe drugs that do not have many side effects. They do not cause hypoglycemia, weight gain, or cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, they do not reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease or prevent loss of renal function.

 

Table 22. Advantages and Disadvantages of DPP-4 Inhibitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

No hypoglycemia

Pancreatic disease

Weight neutral

Heart failure (saxagliptin/alogliptin)?

Decreases postprandial glucose

Arthritis

Once a day

Bullous pemphigoid

Well tolerated

Relatively expensive

Decreases BP

Modest glycemic lowering

 

INJECTABLE GLUCAGON LIKE PROTEIN-1 (GLP-1) RECEPTOR AGONISTS

 

Introduction

 

There are currently six GLP-1 RAs available in the US, three drugs administered daily and three drugs administered weekly (Figure 6). Albiglutide (Tanzeum) was withdrawn from the market for commercial reasons and is no longer available. GLP-1 RAs can be used in combination with multiple oral anti‐diabetic drugs or in combination with insulin (266). The circulating concentrations of GLP-1 RA activity are much higher than physiological levels of GLP-1 activity (20). The GLP-1 RAs that are similar to exendin-4 (Exenatide and Lixisenatide) are eliminated by the kidneys and therefore in patients with severe renal disease these drugs are contraindicated (20). In contrast, the drugs that are analogues of GLP-1 are degraded by peptidases (20).

 

Figure 6. Structure of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

 

SHORT ACTING GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS

 

Exenatide (Byetta) is a synthetic exendin-4 that is a peptide originally isolated from the saliva of the Gila monster that has a 53% homology with human GLP-1 and is resistant to degradation by DPP-4 (20,266). Lixisenatide (Adylyxin) is an exendin-4 analogue with six Lys residues added at the C terminus to confer resistance to DPP-4 (20,266).

 

LONG ACTING GLP-1 RECPTOR AGONISTS

 

Even though liraglutide (Victoza) is administered daily it is considered a long acting GLP-1 RA because its effects on fasting glucose levels are similar to weekly GLP-1 RAs and its effects on gastric emptying wane as seen with weekly GLP-1 RAs. Liraglutide is an analogue of GLP-1 with the addition of a 16-carbon fatty acid chain that masks the DPP-4 cleavage site preventing degradation (8,179). Once weekly exenatide (Bydureon and Bydueron BCise) is a sustained-release formulation that consists of exenatide embedded within biodegradable polymeric microspheres of poly (DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (20). Dulaglutide (Trulicity) has two copies of a GLP-1 analogue covalently linked to an Fc fragment of human IgG4 (20,266). Semaglutide (Ozempic) is an analogue of human GLP‐1 RA and is linked via a hydrophilic spacer and a fatty acid side chain to albumin (266).

 

For information on the use of GLP-1 RAs for the treatment of weight loss see the Endotext chapter entitled “Pharmacologic Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults” (267).

 

Administration

 

SHORT ACTING GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS

 

Initiate exenatide at 5 ug twice daily; increase to 10 ug twice daily after 1 month based on clinical response. Inject subcutaneously within 60 minutes prior to morning and evening meals (or before the two main meals of the day).

 

The starting dose of lixisenatide is 10 ug subcutaneously once daily within one hour before the first meal of the day for 14 days and then increase the dose to the maintenance dose of 20 ug once daily.

 

LONG ACTING GLP-1 RECPTOR AGONISTS

 

Initiate liraglutide with a dose of 0.6 mg per day for one week. After one week at 0.6 mg per day, the dose should be increased to 1.2 mg. If the 1.2 mg dose does not result in acceptable glycemic control, the dose can be increased to 1.8 mg. Inject subcutaneously once-daily at any time of day, independently of meals.

 

The recommended dose of long acting exenatide is 2 mg subcutaneously once every 7 days (weekly). The dose can be administered at any time of day, with or without meals.

 

The recommended initiating dose of dulaglutide is 0.75 mg subcutaneously with or without food once weekly. The dose may be increased to 1.5 mg once weekly to achieve glycemic control. If after 4 weeks glycemic control is not achieved the dose can be increased to 3.0 mg once weekly and then after another 4 weeks to 4.5 mg once weekly for additional glycemic control.

 

The recommended initiating dose of semaglutide is 0.25 mg subcutaneous injection with or without food once weekly for 4 weeks. The 0.25 mg dose is intended for treatment initiation and is not effective for glycemic control. After 4 weeks on the 0.25 mg dose, increase the dosage to 0.5 mg once weekly. If additional glycemic control is needed after at least 4 weeks on the 0.5 mg dose, the dosage may be increased to 2 mg once weekly (note the maximum dose for the treatment of obesity is 2.4mg).

 

Note that exenatide and lixisenatide are contraindicated in patients with renal dysfunction (for details see Contraindications section).

 

Information on the pen delivery systems for the GLP-1 RAs is shown in table 23.

 

Table 23. Characteristics of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Pen Devices

Generic

Exenatide

Exenatide

Exenatide

Lixisenatide

Liraglutide

Dulaglutide

Semaglutide

Brand

Byetta

Bydureon

Bydureon

BCise

Lyxumia

Victoza

Trulicity

Ozempic

Single or multiple use

Multiple

Single

Single

Multiple

Multiple

Single

Multiple

Dose*

5 or 10ug

2mg

2mg

10 or 20ug

0.6, 1.2, or 1.8mg

0.75 or 1.5mg

0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2mg

Preparation

None

Resuspend

Mix

None

None

None

None

*Only the liraglutide pen can deliver different doses.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

GLP-1 RAs potentiate glucose dependent insulin secretion increasing insulin levels and lowering glucose levels (20). In addition, GLP-1 RAs potentiate the glucose dependent inhibition of glucagon secretion, which will also lower glucose levels (20). Finally, because of the supraphysiological levels of GLP-1 activity, GLP-1 RAs may delay gastric emptying resulting in a decrease in postprandial glucose levels and induce satiety, which will decrease food intake (20).

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

GLP-1 RAs typically lower A1c by 1-2% (20). The efficacy of GLP-1 RAs vary with semaglutide being the most potent and lixisenatide being the least potent (see table 6) (13).  Note table 6 does not include the 3.0mg and 4.5mg of dulaglutide, which lower A1c by 1.6% and 1.8% respectively (268). In general, long acting GLP-1 RAs are better at lowering A1c levels compared to short acting agents (13,266). The efficacy in lowering A1c is similar in monotherapy and during combination therapy (20). The reduction in A1c is sustained over several years (164). Long acting GLP-1 RAs lower fasting glucose levels more effectively than short acting drugs (266). Conversely, short acting GLP-1 RAs lower postprandial glucose excursions to a greater extent than long acting agents (266). Short acting GLP-1 RAs induce a substantial retardation in gastric emptying, which likely contributes significantly to the lowering of postprandial glucose excursions after meals when they are administered (266). Notably, the ability of short acting GLP-1 RAs to prevent postprandial glucose excursions is greatly diminished for meals when they are not administered (266). In patients with diminished beta cell function the glycemic response to GLP-1 RAs therapy is reduced (269).

 

The GRADE trial compared treatment with liraglutide to treatment with a sulfonylurea or DPP4 inhibitor (15). As one would expect liraglutide was more effective in lowering A1c levels and more patients achieved an A1c level less than 7% than with either sulfonylurea or DPP4 inhibitor therapy.

 

Studies have compared adding a GLP-1 RA to basal insulin vs. adding rapid acting insulin to basal insulin (270). In a meta-analysis there were no differences in lowering A1c levels but treatment with basal insulin plus GLP-1 RA led to a significant reduction in body weight, whereas basal insulin plus rapid acting insulin treatment was associated with weight gain (difference -2.95 kg; p = 0.0001) (270). Additionally, patients treated with basal insulin plus GLP-1 RA were less likely to experience symptomatic hypoglycemia (OR: 0.52; p < 0.0001) and severe hypoglycemia (OR: 0.27; p = 0.07) than those treated with basal insulin plus rapid acting insulin. Thus, adding a GLP-1 RA to basal insulin instead of bolus insulin will result in similar improvements in glycemic control with fewer side effects.

 

Studies have also compared adding insulin therapy vs. adding a GLP-1 RA. In a meta-analysis of 19 studies GLP-1 RAs reduced A1c levels slightly more than insulin therapy (difference -0.12%, P < .0001) (271). As expected, hypoglycemia was less frequent in the patients treated with the GLP-1 RAs.

 

Because the effect of GLP‐1 RAs on insulin and glucagon secretion are glucose dependent they have a low potential to cause hypoglycemia (20,266).  The risk of hypoglycemia increases when  GLP-1 RAs are used in combination with insulin or insulin  secretagogues (266).

 

Both GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors have been shown to decrease cardiovascular disease (GLP-1 RAs primarily decrease atherosclerotic complications while SGLT-2 inhibitors primarily decrease heart failure). Therefore, the use of these drugs in combination to prevent cardiovascular disease has been proposed. In an analysis of four randomized trials adding a GLP-1 RA to a SGLT-2 inhibitor it was reported that the addition of a GLP-1 receptor agonist resulted in a greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.74%), body weight (-1.61 kg), and systolic blood pressure (-3.32 mmHg) demonstrating the benefits of using these drugs in combination (272).  

 

Other Effects

 

WEIGHT LOSS

 

GLP-1 RAs induce weight loss (20,266).  A comparison of the ability of the maximum dose of different GLP-1 RAs to induce weight loss are shown in table 24. It should be recognized that the weight loss shown in Table 24 represents averages. In clinical practice some patients lose a large amount of weight with GLP-1 RAs while other patients can actually gain weight. The author has personally seen patients’ loss more than 50 lbs. Higher doses of liraglutide and semaglutide are approved for the treatment of obesity, which is discussed in the Endotext chapter “Pharmacologic Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults” (273). Studies have compared the effect of high doses of GLP-1 RAs used for weight loss and lower doses used for treating diabetes (table 25). In general, higher doses of GLP-1 RAs result in a modest further lowering of A1c and a more robust decrease in body weight.

 

Table 24. Effect of GLP-Receptor Agonists on Mean Weight Loss (13)

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Mean Weight Loss

Dulaglutide 1.5mg weekly

1.1Kg

Exenatide 10ug bid

1.2Kg

Exenatide 2mg weekly

1.1Kg

Liraglutide 1.8mg qd

1.5Kg

Lixisenatide 20ug qd

0.7Kg

Semaglutide 1mg weekly

3.8Kg

Based on a baseline weight of 90 kg after 26 weeks of treatment

 

Table 25. Comparison of Low and High Dose GLP-1 RA on A1c and Body Weight

 

Change in A1c (%)

Change in Body Weight (% or kg)

SCALE Diabetes (274)

Placebo

-0.3%

-2.0%

Liraglutide 1.8mg qd

-1.1%

-4.7%

Liraglutide 3.0mg qd

-1.3%

-6.0%

STEP-2 (275)

Placebo

-0.4%

-3.4%

Semaglutide 1mg weekly

-1.5%

-7.0%

Semaglutide 2.4mg weekly

-1.6%

-9.6%

SUSTAIN FORTE (276)

Semaglutide 1mg weekly

-1.9%

-6.2%

Semaglutide 2.0mg weekly

-2.2%

-7.2%

AWARD-11 (268)

 

 

Dulaglutide 1.5mg weekly

-1.5%

-3.1kg

Dulaglutide 3.0mg weekly

-1.7%

-4.0kg

Dulaglutide 4.5mg weekly

-1.9%

-4.7kg

 

The exact mechanisms responsible for the decrease in weight are not yet fully understood but both central and peripheral mechanisms are thought to play a part in activating receptors in the central nervous system associated with weight loss (266). GLP‐1 RAs are thought to reduce body weight through decreased gastrointestinal motility and the promotion of satiety via the activation of GLP‐1 receptors in various regions of the brain (266).

 

BLOOD PRESSURE

 

GLP-1 RAs result in modest but significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (2-5 mmHg) (20).

 

HEART RATE

 

The effects of GLP-1 RAs on heart rate differ between drugs. Short-acting GLP-1 RAs result in a modest increase (1-3 beats per minute) while long-acting GLP-1 RAs are associated with a more pronounced and sustained increase (3-10 beats per minute) during the day and night (277).

 

LIPIDS

 

GLP-1 RAs can favorably affect the lipid profile by inducing weight loss (decreasing triglycerides and very modestly decreasing LDL-C levels) (82). In a review by Nauck and colleagues it was noted that GLP-1 RAs lowered TG levels by 18 to 62 mg/dl depending upon the specific GLP-1 RA while decreasing LDL-C by 3-8 mg/dl and increasing HDL-C by less than 1 mg/dl (247). Additionally, GLP-1 RAs reduce postprandial triglycerides by reducing circulating chylomicrons by decreasing intestinal lipoprotein production (82,247).

 

ATHEROSCLEROTIC CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

The effect of six GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular disease has been reported.

 

ELIXA

 

In the Elixa trial 6,068 patients with T2DM and who recently had a myocardial infarction or been hospitalized for unstable angina were randomized to placebo or lixisenatide, and followed for a median of 25 months (278). The primary end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina was similar in the placebo or lixisenatide groups.

 

LEADER Trial

 

In contrast, the LEADER trial has shown that liraglutide decreased cardiovascular events (279). In this trial 9,340 patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk (~ 81% with established cardiovascular disease) were randomly assigned to receive liraglutide or placebo. After a median time of 3.5 years, the primary outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke occurred in significantly fewer patients in the liraglutide group (13.0%) than in the placebo group (14.9%) (HR 0.87, P=0.01). Additionally, deaths from cardiovascular causes (HR 0.78, P=0.007) or any cause was lower in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group (HR 0.85; P=0.02). Interestingly patients with established cardiovascular disease or decreased renal function (eGFR < 60) appeared to derive the greatest benefit of liraglutide treatment (280,281). The decrease in cardiovascular events were similar in patients with and without a history of heart failure (282). Finally, a significant reduction in amputations with liraglutide vs. placebo was observed (HR 0.65; P = 0.03]) (283).

 

SUSTAIN 6 Trial

 

In support of the beneficial effects of some GLP1 receptor agonists to reduce cardiovascular events, semaglutide has also been shown to reduce cardiovascular events (284). In this trial, 3,297 patients with T2DM with established cardiovascular disease (83%), chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or age >60 with at least one cardiovascular risk factor were randomized to receive once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg) or placebo for 104 weeks. The primary outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke occurred in 6.6% of the semaglutide group and 8.9% of the placebo group (HR 0.74; P = 0.02).

 

EXSCEL Trial

 

The effect of once weekly exenatide vs. placebo on cardiovascular outcomes was tested in 14,752 patients with T2DM, 73% who had cardiovascular disease (285). The primary outcome was the occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years (duration of drug exposure 2.4 years) the primary outcome was reduced in the exenatide treated group but this difference just missed achieving statistical significance (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-1.00; p=0.06). While not statistically significant these results are consistent with the results observed with other GLP-1 receptor agonists. It should be recognized that a high percentage of patients discontinued exenatide therapy in this trial (>40%) and this could have adversely affected the ability of exenatide treatment to favorably effect cardiovascular outcomes.

 

HARMONY Outcomes Trial

 

The effect of once weekly albiglutide vs. placebo was tested in 9,463 patients with T2DM and cardiovascular disease (286). The primary outcome was first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. After a median follow-up of 1.6 years a 22% decrease in the primary endpoint was observed in the albiglutide group (HR 0.78, p<0·0001). It should be noted that albiglutide is no longer available as it was removed from the market due to commercial considerations by the manufacturer.

 

REWIND Trial

 

This was a randomized study of weekly dulaglutide (1.5 mg) or placebo in 9,901 patients with T2DM who had either a previous cardiovascular event or cardiovascular risk factors (approximately 70% of patients did not have prior cardiovascular disease) (287).  During a median follow-up of 5.4 years the primary outcome of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes was decreased by 12% in the dulaglutide treated group (HR 0.88, p=0.026). The decrease in events was similar in participants with and without previous cardiovascular disease. In an analysis that focused on stroke it was noted that dulaglutide reduced ischemic stroke by 25% compared to placebo but had no effect on hemorrhagic stroke (288).

 

GRADE Trial

 

This trial compared the effect of adding 4 different hypoglycemic agents to metformin therapy in 5,047 patients with a relatively short duration of diabetes (mean 4.2 years) (16). The vast majority of participants had no history of cardiovascular disease (6% had positive history). The duration of this trial was approximately 5 years. The results are shown in table 26 and suggest that in this population treatment with liraglutide has beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease. One should note that this was predominantly a primary prevention trial. This trial supports the observations in the REWIND trial that patients without cardiovascular disease may benefit from GLP-1 agonist therapy. However, because of the complexity of this trial the authors note “These results should not be viewed as definitive proof that GLP-1 RAs reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease in low-risk populations”. Clearly additional trials are required in low-risk populations.

 

Table 26.  Cardiovascular Outcomes in the GRADE Trial

Outcome

Rate* (95% CI)

Glargine

(N=1263)

Glimepiride

(N=1254)

Liraglutide (N=1262)

Sitagliptin (N=1268)

Any cardiovascular disease

1.87

(1.54–2.25)

1.92

(1.59–2.31)

1.36

(1.08–1.69)

2.00

(1.66–2.39)

MACE**

1.05

(0.81–1.34)

0.96

(0.73–1.24)

0.78

(0.57–1.03)

1.12

(0.87–1.41)

Hospitalization for heart failure

0.42

(0.27–0.61)

0.48

(0.33–0.69)

0.22

(0.12–0.38)

0.48

(0.32–0.68)

Death from cardiovascular causes

0.33

(0.21–0.51)

0.26

(0.15–0.42)

0.14

(0.07–0.27)

0.33

(0.21–0.51)

*Rate is events per 100 participant years.

**MACE- death from cardiovascular disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke.

 

Summary

 

Thus, most studies have clearly demonstrated that treatment with GLP-1 RAs reduces cardiovascular events. Why there are differences in results between these studies is unknown but could be due to differential effects of the GLP-1 RAs, differences in the patient populations studied, or other unrecognized variables. A meta-analysis of 7 cardiovascular outcome studies using GLP-1 RAs (ELIXA (lixisenatide), LEADER (liraglutide), SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide), EXSCEL (exenatide), Harmony Outcomes (albiglutide), REWIND (dulaglutide), and PIONEER 6 (oral semaglutide) reported a 12% decrease in cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (p<0.0001), 12% decrease in cardiovascular deaths (p<0.003), 16% decrease in fatal or non-fatal strokes (p<0·0001), and 9% decrease in fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarctions (p=0.043) (289) (Table 27). It should be noted that in a large randomized trial (n= 17,604) in patients with obesity without diabetes semaglutide decreased a composite of endpoint consisting of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke by 20% compared to placebo (HR 0.80; 95%CI 0.72 to 0.90; P<0.001) (290). Thus, GLP-1 RAs reduce cardiovascular disease in patients with and without diabetes.  

 

Table 27. Summary of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Cardiovascular Outcome Trials

 

Number

Prior CVD

HbA1c

Mean Follow-up (years)

Hazard Ratio* (95% CI)

P value

ELIXA

Lixisenatide

6068

100%

7.7%

2.1

1.02

(0.89-1.17)

0.78

LEADER

Liraglutide

9340

81%

8.7%

3.8

0.87

(0.78-0.97)

0.015

SUSTAIN 6

Semaglutide

3297

83%

8.7%

2.1

0.74

(0.58-0.95)

0.016

EXSCEL

Exenatide

14,752

73%

8.0%

3.2

0.91

(0.83-1.00)

0.061

HARMONY

Albiglutide

9463

100%

8.7%

1.6

0.78

(0.68-0.90)

<0.001

REWIND

Dulaglutide

9901

31%

7.3%

5.4

0>88

(0.79-0.99)

0.026

PIONEER 6**

Semaglutide oral

3183

85%

8.2%

1.3

0.79

(0.57-1.11)

0.17

Overall (289)

 

 

 

 

0.88

(0.82-0.94)

<0.001

*CVD death, MI, Stroke. ** The Pioneer study is included in this table to provide information on all the studies examining the effect of GLP-1raon cardiovascular disease.

 

The mechanism accounting for this decrease in cardiovascular disease is uncertain but could be related to reductions in glycated hemoglobin, body weight, systolic blood pressure, postprandial triglyceride levels, inflammation, or the direct effect of activation of GLP-1 receptors on the atherosclerotic process such as improving endothelial function (291).

 

The effect of a GLP-1 receptor agonist (efpeglenatide- not available) in patients on an SGLT-2 inhibitor was determined in the AMPLITUDE-O trial (292). The effect of efpeglenatide vs. placebo on cardiovascular and renal outcomes (macroalbuminuria) was similar in the absence and presence of baseline SGLT-2 inhibitors. (see section below on combination therapy).  

 

HEART FAILURE

 

Several of the large cardiovascular outcome trials described above have analyzed the effect of administration of GLP-1 RAs in the subgroup of patients with a history of heart failure. In the EXSCEL trial patients with heart failure at baseline had no decrease in all-cause mortality whereas mortality was reduced in the subgroup without HF (HR 0.79; CI 0.68–0.92) (293). Similarly, in the combined data from the SUSTAIN-6 and PIONEER-6, patients with prior heart failure were the only subgroup that did not have a decrease in cardiovascular events (294). In contrast, in the LEADER trial the decrease in cardiovascular events were similar in patients with and without a history of heart failure (282).

 

The large cardiovascular outcome studies have determined the effect of GLP-1 RAs on the occurrence of heart failure events. In a meta-analysis of the seven large cardiovascular outcome trials with a combined total of 56,004 participants, hospital admission for heart failure was decreased by 9% (HR 0.91, 0.83-0.99; p=0.028) (289) (Table 28). In the SELECT trial that determined the effect of semaglutide 2.4mg weekly in patients with obesity who were not diabetic a decrease in heart failure events was also observed (HR 0.82; 95%CI 0.71- 0.96) (290).

 

Table 28. Effect of GLP-1 RAs on Heart Failure

Cardiovascular Outcome Trial

Heart Failure Hospitalization Heart Failure (HR (CI))

ELIXA (lixisenatide)

0.96 (0.75–1.23)

LEADER (liraglutide)

0.87 (0.73–1.05)

SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide)

1.11 (0.77–1.61)

EXSCEL (exenatide)

0.94 (0.78–1.13)

HARMONY (albiglutide)

0.71 (0.53–0.94)

PIONEER-6 (oral semaglutide)

0.86 (0.48–1.55)

REWIND (dulaglutide)

0.93 (0.77–1.12)

Meta-analysis (289)

0.91 (0.83–0.99)

HR= hazard ratio; CI= 95% confidence interval.

 

In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a BMI> 30, and type 2 diabetes the effect of weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) (n= 310) vs placebo (n= 306) for 52 weeks was determined (295). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score, a measure of symptoms and physical limitations, was greatly improved in the semaglutide group and the 6-minute walk distance increased by 12.7 meters in the semaglutide group and decreased by 1.6 meters in the placebo group. Additionally, the NT-proBNP level decreased by 23% in the semaglutide vs. 4.6% the placebo group. Finally, hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure was decreased in the semaglutide group (2.3% vs 5.9%). Similar beneficial effects of semaglutide on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have been observed in patients without diabetes (296). The mechanisms accounting for this improvement is uncertain but could be related to reductions in glycated hemoglobin, body weight, systolic blood pressure, postprandial triglyceride levels, inflammation, or the direct effect of activation of GLP-1 receptors on the myocardium.

 

The results of these studies provide evidence that GLP-1 RAs have favorable effects on heart failure and additional studies are in progress to confirm and extend these findings.

 

RENAL DISEASE

 

The cardiovascular outcome studies described above also examined the effect of GLP-1 RAs on kidney disease.

 

ELIXA Trial

 

Lixisenatide treatment decreased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with pre-existing micro or macroalbuminuria (297). Additionally, lixisenatide was associated with a reduced risk of new-onset macroalbuminuria compared with placebo (297). However, no significant differences in eGFR decline or the number of patients doubling their serum creatinine levels were seen between the lixisenatide treated group vs. placebo group (297).

 

LEADER Trial

 

The renal outcome in this trial was a composite of new-onset persistent macroalbuminuria, persistent doubling of the serum creatinine level, end-stage renal disease, or death due to renal disease. The renal outcome occurred in fewer patients in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group (HR 0.78; P=0.003) (298). This favorable outcome was driven primarily by a decrease in the development of macroalbuminuria. The renal benefits did not appear to be driven by changes in A1c, body weight, or decreases in systolic BP.

 

SUSTAIN 6 Trial

 

In this trial, new or worsening nephropathy, defined as persistent macroalbuminuria, persistent doubling of the serum creatinine, or a creatinine clearance < 45ml/min/1.73m2, occurred in 3.8% of the patients in the semaglutide group and 6.1% of the patients in the placebo group (HR 0.64; P=0.005) (284). As seen in the LEADER trial this favorable outcome was driven primarily by a decrease in the development of macroalbuminuria.

 

EXSCEL Trial

 

Exenatide treatment resulted in a reduction in new‐onset macroalbuminuria compared with placebo (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = 0.031), with no significant changes in either microalbuminuria (7.2% vs 7.5%) or ESKD requiring renal replacement therapy (0.7% vs 0.9%) (285).

 

REWIND Trial

 

The renal outcome included the occurrence of new macroalbuminuria (UACR >33·9 mg/mmol), a sustained decline in eGFR of 30% or more from baseline, or chronic renal replacement therapy (299). During a median follow-up of 5.4 years the renal outcome developed in 17.1% of patients in the dulaglutide group and in 19.6% of patients in the placebo group (HR 0.85, p=0·0004). This beneficial effect was driven by a reduction in the development of macroalbuminuria (HR 0.77; p<0.0001)

 

AWARD 7 Trial

 

While the large studies described above demonstrated that GLP-1 RAs primarily decrease albuminuria the AWARD 7 trial provides data on eGFR. The Award 7 was a multicenter randomized trial of dulaglutide 0.75mg weekly (n= 190), 1.5mg weekly (n= 193), or daily insulin glargine (n= 194) in patients with T2DM and Stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (300). At 52 weeks, eGFR was higher with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (eGFR 34.0; p=0.005 vs insulin glargine) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (eGFR 33.8; p=0·009 vs insulin glargine) than with insulin glargine (31.3mL/min per 1·73 m2). In contrast to the cardiovascular studies described above at 52 weeks dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg did not affect albuminuria.

 

FLOW Trial

 

In this trial patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease (defined by an eGFR of 50 to 75 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >300 and <5000 or an eGFR of 25 to <50 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >100 and <5000) were randomized to receive semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly (n= 1767) or placebo (n= 1766) and followed for a median of 3.4 years (301). The primary outcome was a composite of the onset of kidney failure (dialysis, transplantation, or an eGFR of <15 ml), at least a 50% reduction in the eGFR from baseline, or death from kidney-related or cardiovascular causes and was decreased by 24% in the semaglutide group (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88; P = 0.0003). Notably, the composite of the kidney-specific components of the primary outcome was reduced by 21% (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.94) while cardiovascular death was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.89). Additionally, the decrease in eGFR was slower in the semaglutide group. These beneficial effects were seen regardless of glycemic control, eGFR, or albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio. Interestingly, in patients taking an SGLT2 inhibitor no benefit was observed but the number of events in this subgroup was very small and therefore larger studies are required to address this important issue.

 

Summary

 

The Flow trial in combination with the other trials demonstrates that GLP-1 RAs have beneficial effects on kidney function decreasing albuminuria and slowing the decrease in eGFR. A pooled analysis of the LEADER (liraglutide) and SUSTAIN 6 trials found a preservation in eGFR with GLP-1 RAs, particularly in patients with a reduced baseline eGFR (302). Moreover, the FLOW trial demonstrated a decrease in clinically important kidney outcomes including kidney failure (dialysis, transplantation, or an eGFR of <15 ml), a 50% reduction in the eGFR, or death from kidney-related causes. Similar beneficial effects on renal function have been observed in patients with obesity treated with semaglutide (303). Specifically, there was a 22% decrease in the development of the composite kidney endpoint (death from kidney disease, initiation of chronic kidney replacement therapy, onset of persistent eGFR) < 15, persistent ≥50% reduction in eGFR or onset of persistent macroalbuminuria), primarily due to a reduction in persistent macroalbuminuria, in the semaglutide group compared to placebo. 

 

METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE (MASLD) AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION ASSOCIATED STEATOHEPATITIS (MASH)

 

Studies have suggested that GLP-1 RAs have beneficial effects on MASLD and MASH (101). A meta-analysis of liraglutide studies and a separate meta-analysis of lixisenatide studies have reported that these drugs decrease liver enzymes (304,305). A 12-week randomized trial in 60 patients with MASLD of exenatide + basal insulin vs. rapid acting insulin + basal insulin demonstrated lower liver enzymes in the exenatide treated group (306). Moreover, the reversal rate of fatty liver was greater in the group treated with exenatide (93.3%) than the intensive insulin group (66.7%) (p < 0.01). Similarly, liraglutide and dulaglutide has also been shown to decrease intrahepatic fat (307-309).  

 

In the LEAN Trial 52 patients with MASH were randomized to liraglutide 1.8 mg daily or placebo and followed for 48 weeks (310). Resolution of MASH occurred in 39% of patients treated with liraglutide and only 9% of patients in the placebo group (RR 4.3; p=0.019). Progression of fibrosis occurred in 9% of patients in the liraglutide group versus 36% of patients in the placebo group (p=0.04).

 

A recent trial of semaglutide subcutaneously given daily (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg) demonstrated an improvement in MASH without a beneficial effect on fibrosis (311). Whether weekly semaglutide or daily oral semaglutide would have similar effects is unknown. 

 

While these data are suggestive larger and longer studies on the effect of GLP-1 RAs on MASLD and MASH are required.

 

EFFECT OF GLP1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS IN PATIENTS ON SGLT2 INHIBITOR THERAPY

 

As discussed earlier, the effect of a GLP-1 RA (efpeglenatide- not available) in patients on an SGLT-2 inhibitor was determined in the AMPLITUDE-O trial (292). The effect of efpeglenatide vs. placebo on cardiovascular and renal outcomes (macroalbuminuria) was similar in the absence and presence of baseline SGLT-2 inhibitors. In the HARMONY trial the effect of albiglutide in patients on an SGLT-2 inhibitor on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was similar.  

 

In patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease treated with semaglutide (FLOW trial), a small number of patients were taking a SGLT2 inhibitor at baseline (N = 550) (312). The primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure, ≥50% estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction, kidney death, or cardiovascular death. In patients not taking an SGLT2 inhibitor (N = 2,983) the primary endpoint was reduced by 27% (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.85; P < 0.001) and the kidney specific endpoint by 25% (HR 0.75; 95%CI 0.61-0.90; P = 0.003). In patients on a SGLT2 inhibitor at baseline the primary endpoint and kidney specific endpoint were not decreased (Primary endpoint- HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.69-1.67; P = 0.755; Kidney endpoints- HR 1.18; 95%CI 0.71-1.98; P = 0.532). In contrast, cardiovascular death, all cause death, and non-fatal MI were decreased in the sitagliptin group to a similar degree with or without SGLT2 inhibitor use at baseline. Thus, the results of this analysis do not provide strong evidence that adding a GLP1 RA to a SGLT2 inhibitor will provide additional benefits on renal outcomes.

 

Thus, treatment with a GLP-1 RA reduces cardiovascular events to a similar degree in patients regardless of whether they are taking an SGLT2 inhibitor at baseline. The effect of a GLP-1 RA on renal outcomes in patients on a SGLT2 inhibitor is not clear. It should be recognized that there were only a small number of patients on combination therapy in the studies described above, which limits the ability to make firm conclusions and larger studies of combination therapy are required.   

 

Side Effects

 

GASTROINTESTINAL

 

The most common adverse effects are GI and include nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea (266). These symptoms are usually transient, resolving overtime (20). The GI side effects can be reduced by slowly increasing the dose (20). GI side effects tend to be more pronounced with short acting GLP-1 RAs (266). Dehydration can occur secondary to GI side effects and can result in acute kidney failure (package insert).

 

GALL BLADDER DISEASE

 

Observational studies have shown an association of treatment with GLP-1 RAs and bile duct and gallbladder disease (313). Additionally, a meta-analysis of randomized trials using GLP-1 RAs reported an association with an increased risk of cholelithiasis (314). Higher doses and a longer duration of treatment increased the risk of gallbladder disease (315). Finally, large cardiovascular trials with liraglutide (LEADER Trial), exenatide (EXSCEL Trial), and lixisenatide (ELIXA Trial) also reported an increased risk of gall bladder or biliary tract disease (278,285,316), however the large cardiovascular trial with semaglutide (SUSTAIN 6) did not observe an increase (284). It has been hypothesized that weight loss and/or decreased gallbladder motility induced by GLP-1 RAs could contribute to this increase in gall bladder disease.

 

INJECTION-SITE REACTIONS

 

Injection-site reactions (rash, erythema) are also common with GLP-1 RAs (20). Subcutaneous injection-site nodules may occur with the use of weekly exenatide (package insert), an abnormality that is due to the formulation.

 

MEDULLARY THYROID CANCER

 

Thyroid C-cell hyperplasia and medullary cell carcinoma has also been raised as possible concerns based on preclinical studies in rodents, but clinical studies in humans have not shown any indication of thyroid disorders (20). A meta-analysis of the four large cardiovascular outcome studies described above did not demonstrate an increased risk of medullary thyroid cancer with GLP-1 RA treatment (317)

 

PANCREATITIS

 

Subclinical increases in pancreatic enzyme levels are commonly observed with all GLP‐1 RAs and pancreatitis has been reported (266). Importantly increases in lipase and amylase were not predictive of subsequent pancreatitis (318). A meta-analysis of four large cardiovascular outcome studies described above did not demonstrate an increased risk of pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer with GLP-1 RA treatment (317,319). A meta-analysis of all seven cardiovascular outcome studies also did not demonstrate an increase in pancreatitis with GLP-1 RA treatment (320).

 

RETINOPATHY

 

In the SUSTAIN 6 trial described above the rates of retinopathy complications (vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or conditions requiring treatment with an intravitreal agent or photocoagulation) were significantly higher in the semaglutide group compared to the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.76; P=0.02) (284). This increased risk of retinopathy complications has been attributed to the magnitude and rapidity of A1c reduction during the first 16 weeks of treatment in patients who had pre-existing retinopathy and poor glycemic control at baseline (“early worsening”) (321). A meta-analysis of GLP-1 RA cardiovascular trials found an association between retinopathy and the magnitude of A1c reduction supporting the hypothesis that the increase in retinopathy in SUSTAIN 6 was due to lowering of A1c (322).

 

Of note, other trials using semaglutide did not observe an increased risk of retinopathy (321). Additionally, an increase in diabetic retinopathy was not observed in the other cardiovascular outcome trials (278,279,285,286). In a meta-analysis of 60 studies with 60,077 patients, treatment with GLP-1RAs did not increase the incidence of diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, retinal detachment, or retinal hemorrhage (323). However, the incidence of vitreous hemorrhage was higher in subjects treated with GLP-1 RAs compared with placebo (odds ratios 1.93; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.42). Thus, it is possible that GLP-1 RA treatment results in an increase in diabetic eye disease. A 5 years eye safety study for semaglutide, the FOCUS trial (NCT03811561), is currently underway and should provide a definitive answer.

 

 

As discussed above GLP-1 RAs slow gastric emptying and the retention of gastric contents could increase the risk of aspiration during surgical procedures. The American Society of Anesthesiologists recommended “For patients on daily dosing consider holding GLP-1 agonists on the day of the procedure/surgery. For patients on weekly dosing consider holding GLP-1 agonists a week prior to the procedure/surgery. This suggestion is irrespective of the indication (type 2 diabetes mellitus or weight loss), dose, or the type of procedure/surgery. If the patient has no GI symptoms, but the GLP-1 agonists were not held as advised, proceed with ‘full stomach’ precautions…” (324). A clinical practice update by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) pointed out the lack of meaningful data and that well-designed studies investigating patients on GLP-1 RAs are needed (324). In the absence of definitive data they advised that patients on GLP-1 RAs who have followed standard perioperative procedures and who do not have symptoms of nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, or abdominal distention, to proceed with upper and/or lower endoscopy. In patients with symptoms suggesting possible retained gastric contents, transabdominal ultrasonography can be used to assess the presence of stomach contents but evidence to support this is lacking. Rapid-sequence intubation can be considered if there is uncertainty. “Lastly, when possible, placing patients on a liquid diet the day before sedated procedures may be a more acceptable strategy, in lieu of stopping GLP-1 RAs, and more consistent with the holistic preprocedural management of other similar conditions.” Clearly this is an area that requires additional studies and health care providers will need to use their judgement in deciding how to manage anesthesia in patients taking GLP-1 RAs.

 

SUICIDE

 

Concerns have been raised that GLP-1 RAs increase the risk of suicide and self-harm. A large cohort study compared 124,517 patients started on a GLP-1 RA and 174,036 patients started on an SGLT2 inhibitor and did not find an association between use of GLP-1 RAs and an increased risk of suicide death, self-harm, or incident depression and anxiety-related disorders (325). Other studies have reported similar results (326-328).  

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

RENAL

 

Care needs to be exercised in patients with severe renal disease as they are more susceptible to the side effects of GLP-1 RAs and more likely to have serious side effects (package inserts). There is limited data in patients with end stage renal disease.

 

Exenatide should not be used in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) or end-stage renal disease (package insert). Caution should be applied when initiating or escalating doses of exenatide from 5 mcg to 10 mcg in patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 30 to 50 mL/min) (package insert).

 

Weekly exenatide is not recommended for use in patients with eGFR below 45 mL/min/1.73m2 or end stage renal disease (package insert).

 

Lixisenatide is not recommended in patients with end stage renal disease (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2) (package insert).

 

No dose adjustments for liraglutide, semaglutide, or dulaglutide are recommended for patients with renal impairment (package insert).

 

OTHER

 

Exenatide is not recommended in patients with gastroparesis or severe gastrointestinal disease (package insert).

 

In patients with a history of pancreatitis or at high risk for pancreatitis many clinicians avoid GLP-1 RAs.

 

GLP-1 RAs are contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of Medullary Thyroid Cancer and in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2) (package insert).

 

Summary

 

The ability of GLP-1 RAs to effectively decrease A1c levels, reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and induce significant weight loss make these drugs very attractive in the treatment of patients with T2DM.Additionally, once weekly administration for certain drugs in this class can improve compliance. 

 

Table 29. Advantages and Disadvantages of GLP- 1 Receptor Agonists

Advantages

Disadvantages

Weight Loss

GI side effects

No Hypoglycemia

Requires Injection

Reduce CVD (liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide)

Pancreatitis?

Improve NAFLD

Thyroid cancer?

Once a week therapy possible

Gall bladder disease

Decrease renal disease

Expensive

Decrease postprandial glucose

 

Improve heart failure

 

 

ORAL GLUCAGON LIKE PROTEIN-1 (GLP-1) RECEPTOR AGONISTS

 

Introduction

 

In 2019 an oral form of semaglutide (Rybelsus) became available. To facilitate absorption of semaglutide, which is a 31 amino acid peptide, the tablet contains a permeation enhancer N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl]amino)caprylic acid (SNAC, Eligen® Technology, Emisphere Technologies), which is a small fatty acid derivative that accelerates the absorption of semaglutide across the gastric epithelium avoiding the activation of proteolytic enzymes and pH-induced degradation in the stomach (329). This allows for the absorption of an intact peptide. One should note that the bioavailability of oral semaglutide is very low as the dose of oral semaglutide is 7-14 mg per day vs 0.5-2.0 mg once a week with the injectable dose.

 

Administration

 

The oral form of semaglutide must be taken at least 30 minutes before the first food, beverage, or other oral medications of the day with no more than 4 ounces of plain water (package insert). Waiting less than 30 minutes, or taking with food, beverages (other than plain water), or other oral medications will adversely affect the absorption of semaglutide. Waiting more than 30 minutes to eat may increase the absorption. The starting dose is 3 mg once daily for 30 days. After 30 days on the 3 mg dose, increase the dose to 7 mg once daily. The dose may be increased to 14 mg once daily if additional glycemic control is needed after at least 30 days on the 7 mg dose (package insert). Patients treated with once weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg injections can be transitioned to oral semaglutide 7 mg or 14 mg a day. No dose adjustment is recommended for patients with renal or hepatic impairment (package insert).

 

Mechanism of Action

 

The mechanism of action is identical to injected GLP-1 RAs described above.

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

In a meta-analysis of five trials of oral semaglutide vs. placebo, treatment with oral semaglutide reduced HbA1c by 0.89% (330). In the Pioneer 1 study 703 patients were randomized (mean baseline HbA1c 8.0%) to placebo vs. various doses of oral semaglutide (331).  After 26 weeks of treatment A1c decreased by -0.6% in the 3 mg group, -0.9% in the 7 mg group, and -1.1% in the 14 mg group compared to placebo (P < 0.001 for all results). If the decrease in A1c was adjusted for premature drug discontinuation or initiation of rescue medication the estimated decreases in A1c were -0.7% in the 3 mg group, -1.2% in the 7 mg group, and -1.4% in the 14 mg group (P < 0.001 for all).

 

Studies have also examined the ability of oral semaglutide to lower A1c vs. other drugs. Compared to sitagliptin, oral semaglutide 7mg per day reduced A1c by -0.3% while 14mg per day reduced A1c by 0.5% (P < .001 for both) (332). In a similar trial with flexible dose adjustment of semaglutide, treatment with semaglutide (60% on 14mg per day) resulted in a 1.4% decrease in A1c while 100mg sitagliptin decreased A1c by 0.7% (333). In a randomized trial comparing switching to oral semaglutide vs. DPP-4 inhibitor continuation A1c was decreased by 0.7% in the semaglutide group compared to continuing the DPP4 inhibitor (334). In a trial comparing empagliflozin vs. oral semaglutide, treatment with semaglutide resulted in a greater decrease in A1c compared to empagliflozin (-1.3% vs. -0.9%; P < 0.0001) (335). In a comparison of liraglutide 1.8mg per day vs. oral semaglutide 14mg per day the change from baseline in A1c was -1.2% (SE 0·1) with oral semaglutide and -1.1% with subcutaneous liraglutide (336). If the decrease in A1c was adjusted for premature drug discontinuation or initiation of rescue medication then oral semaglutide treatment resulted in a slightly greater decreases in A1c than subcutaneous liraglutide (estimated treatment difference -0·2%). Finally, early in the development of oral semaglutide various doses of oral semaglutide were compared to weekly injected semaglutide (337). Compared to placebo 10mg per day of oral semaglutide reduced A1c by –1.2%, 20mg by –1.4%, while 1mg per week of injected semaglutide decreased A1c by 1.9% (not significantly different than the 20mg oral dose). Thus, oral semaglutide is more effective in lowering A1c levels than DPP-4 inhibitors or SGLT2 inhibitors and similar to liraglutide and perhaps slightly less potent than injected semaglutide.

 

While not approved studies have shown that higher doses of oral semaglutide are more effective in lowering A1c levels (14mg- 1.5% decrease, 25mg- 1.8% decrease, 50mg- 2.0% decrease) (338).

 

Other Effects

 

WEIGHT LOSS

 

In a meta-analysis of weight loss, treatment with oral semaglutide reduced body weight by 2.99 kg compared to placebo (330). In a 26-week study comparing sitagliptin vs. oral semaglutide the 7mg dose resulted in a 1.6kg decrease and the 14mg dose a 2.5kg decrease in weight compared to sitagliptin (332). In contrast, oral semaglutide 14mg and empagliflozin 25mg resulted in a similar decrease in body weight at 26-weeks (-3.8 vs. -3.7kg) and 52-weeks (-3.8 vs. -3.6kg) (335). Finally, in a 26-week trial oral semaglutide resulted in greater weight loss (-4.4 kg than liraglutide (-3·1 kg) (336). 

 

While not approved higher doses of oral semaglutide are more effective in decreasing body weight ((14mg- 4.7% decrease, 25mg- 7.3% decrease, and 50mg- 8.5% decrease) (338).

 

BLOOD PRESSURE AND PULSE RATE

 

In a meta-analysis of blood pressure, treatment with oral semaglutide reduced systolic blood pressure by 3.16 mmHg and increased pulse rate by 1.90 beats per minute compared with placebo (330).

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

In the PIONEER 6 study 3,183 patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk (age of ≥50 years with established cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease, or age of ≥60 years with cardiovascular risk factors) were randomly assigned to receive oral semaglutide or placebo (339). After a median time of 15.9 months, major adverse cardiovascular events, the primary outcome, occurred in 3.8% of the subjects treated with oral semaglutide and 4.8% of the placebo group (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.11). Deaths from cardiovascular causes were 0.9% in the oral semaglutide group and 1.9% in the placebo group (HR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.92) while death from any cause occurred in 1.4% in the oral semaglutide group and 2.8% in the placebo group (HR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.84). It should be noted that the primary outcome was not statistically decreased in this study, which may be due to the relatively small number of subjects studied and the short duration of the study that together resulted in a small number of events. Additionally, more patients in the placebo group received treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor than in the oral semaglutide group and SGLT2 inhibitors are well recognized to reduce cardiovascular disease events (see section on SGLT2 inhibitors), which could also have diminished the ability to observe a decrease in events in the oral semaglutide group. Because the glucose lowering, weight loss, and many other effects of oral semaglutide are very similar to injected semaglutide many experts consider the effects on cardiovascular and renal disease to also be similar. 

 

Side Effects

 

The most common adverse effects are GI and include nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea (329). Transient mild or moderate nausea was the most common adverse event occurring in 5-21% of subjects treated with oral semaglutide (329).

 

Severe hypoglycemia is uncommon in patients treated with oral semaglutide (329). The risk of hypoglycemia is increased when oral semaglutide is used in combination with insulin secretagogues (e.g., sulfonylureas) or insulin. Patients may require a lower dose of the secretagogue or insulin to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia when used in combination with oral semaglutide.

 

The safety profile of oral semaglutide is similar to other GLP-1 RAs (see side effect section for GLP1 receptor agonists).

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Similar to other GLP1 RAs oral semaglutide is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2.

 

No notable drug interactions have been described (package insert).

 

Summary

 

The delivery of a GLP1 RA via the oral route is advantageous and make oral semaglutide an attractive choice in the treatment of patients with T2DM who do want to inject medications given its ability to decrease A1c, body weight, and blood pressure with few serious side effects. Some patients may have difficulty following the relatively complex instructions for taking this medication. It should be noted that weight loss is less with oral semaglutide and studies using higher doses for weight loss are underway. It is likely that the other beneficial effects of GLP1 receptor agonists (e.g., reducing cardiovascular disease and renal disease) will also occur with the oral formulation.

 

DUEL GLP-1 RECEPTOR AND GIP RECEPTOR AGONIST

 

Introduction

 

Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) is a 39 amino acid peptide that was engineered from the native GIP sequence and has agonist activity at both the GIP and GLP-1 receptors (340,341). A C20 fatty diacid moiety is conjugated at the position 20 lysine residue, which facilitates binding to albumin thereby resulting in a half-life after administration of approximately 5 days allowing for weekly administration (340,341).

 

For information on the use of tirzepatide for the treatment of weight loss see the Endotext chapter entitled “Pharmacologic Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults” (267).

 

Administration

 

Tirzepatide is administered weekly at any time of day, with or without meals. The starting dose is 2.5mg subcutaneously and after 4 weeks the dose is increased to 5 mg (341). Depending upon the response one may increase the dosage in 2.5 mg increments every 4 weeks to a maximum dose of 15 mg per week (341). No dosage adjustment is recommended for renal or hepatic disease (package insert).

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Both GLP-1 and GIP stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose dependent fashion (342). The higher the glucose the greater the effect with no effect when glucose levels are in the normal to low range (342). As one would expect tirzepatide stimulates both first- and second-phase insulin secretion (341,343). GLP-1 inhibits glucagon secretion when glucose levels are increased while GIP will stimulate glucagon secretion, particularly when glucose levels are in the normal to low range (342). Tirzepatide reduces fasting and postprandial glucagon concentrations (343). These effects on insulin and glucagon secretion lead to decreases in glucose levels with a low risk of hypoglycemia as the increase in insulin secretion and decrease in glucagon secretion are dependent on elevated glucose levels. In addition, tirzepatide improves insulin sensitivity (343,344). While this increase in insulin sensitivity may be due to weight loss studies suggest that there may be additional factors contributing to the improved insulin sensitivity (344). GIP may have peripheral effects that could enhance insulin sensitivity.

 

Pharmacologic levels of GLP-1 slow gastric emptying and induce satiety by activating receptors in the hypothalamus thereby leading to decreased food intake and weight loss (342). GIP also appears to have central effects leading to decreased food intake in rodents but the effect in humans is not well defined (342).

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

A number of different studies (SURPASS trials) have examined the effect of 5mg, 10mg, and 15mg of tirzepatide on glycemic control under a variety of clinical situations (Table 30). SURPASS 1 compared tirzepatide vs. placebo in patients on no medications (345), SURPASS 2 compared tirzepatide vs. semaglutide at a dose of 1 mg in patients on metformin (346), SURPASS 3 compared tirzepatide vs. degludec insulin in patients on metformin alone or in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor (347). SURPASS 4 compared tirzepatide vs glargine insulin in patients treated with any combination of metformin, sulfonylurea, or SGLT-2 inhibitor (348), and SURPASS 5 compared tirzepatide vs. placebo in patients treated with glargine insulin with or without metformin (349). The treatment duration was 40 weeks in SURPASS 1, 2, and 5 and 52 weeks in SURPASS 3 and 4. Baseline A1c levels were between 7.9% and 8.5% in the SURPASS studies.

 

Table 30. Decrease in HbA1c with Tirzepatide Treatment 

 

SURPASS 1

SURPASS 2

SURPASS 3

SURPASS 4

SURPASS 5

 

Tirzepatide vs. Placebo

Tirzepatide vs. Semaglutide

Tirzepatide vs. Degludec

Tirzepatide vs.

Glargine

Tirzepatide vs. Placebo

Baseline A1c

7.9%

8.3%

8.2%

8.5%

8.3%

Tirzepatide 5mg

-1.8

-2.0

-1.9

-2.1

-2.1

Tirzepatide 10mg

-1.7

-2.2

-2.0

-2.3

-2.4

Tirzepatide 15mg

-1.7

-2.3

-2.1

-2.4

-2.3

Comparator

-0.1

-1.9

-1.3

-1.4

-0.9

 

It should be noted that the reduction in A1c induced by tirzepatide is quite impressive and results in an A1c level in an “intensive” control range. For example, in the SURPASS 2 trial 80% of patients had an A1c < 6.5% and 46% < 5.7% on 15mg tirzepatide. Additionally, comparison with semaglutide (SURPASS 2) demonstrated a modestly greater lowering of A1c with tirzepatide. A greater difference in the ability to decrease A1c was seen in an earlier study comparing tirzepatide vs. dulaglutide (tirzepatide 5mg- 1.6%, 10mg- 2.0%,15 mg- 2.4%; duluglutide 1.5mg- 1.1%) (350). Note the comparisons with semaglutide and dulaglutide used doses in these studies that were not the maximal dose. Comparisons with insulin therapy (SURPASS 3 and 4) show better glycemic control with tirzepatide, which is likely due to an increased risk of hypoglycemia with insulin therapy that limits treatment. In SURPASS 3, 48% of patients on insulin therapy had a blood glucose < 70mg/dL while on tirzepatide treatment 8-14% of patients had a blood glucose < 70mg/dL. The SURPASS 6 trial compared the addition of tirzepatide vs. insulin lispro three times per day (351). Tirzepatide decreased A1c by -2.1% vs -1.1% with insulin lispro with less severe hypoglycemia and greater weight loss. Severe hypoglycemia is not frequently observed with tirzepatide in the absence of concomitant insulin or sulfonylurea therapy. Finally, it is worth noting that the additional A1c reduction with an increased dose of tirzepatide is very modest. This is important to recognize that in patients that have side effects with higher doses of tirzepatide treatment it is not necessary to achieve maximal doses of tirzepatide to robustly improve glycemic control.

 

Other Effects

 

WEIGHT LOSS

 

Significant weight loss has been observed with tirzepatide administration. Table 31 shows the weight loss observed in the SURPASS trials. In contrast to the modest effects of increased doses of tirzepatide on A1c levels increased doses of tirzepatide have a greater effect on weight loss. At the 15mg dose over a 10% loss in weight is observed. It should be noted that in SURPASS 2 tirzepatide is compared to semaglutide 1.0mg, which is not the dose that is recommended for weight loss (the recommended dose is 2.4mg) and therefore one cannot be certain that tirzepatide is more efficacious than higher doses of semaglutide. In a comparison of tirzepatide vs. dulaglutide, tirzepatide resulted in greater weight loss (tirzepatide 5mg- 4.8kg, 10mg- 8.7kg, 15mg-11.3kg; dulaglutide 1.5mg- 2.7kg) (350). In a large 72-week trial focused on weight loss (SURMONT-2) in adults living with obesity and type 2 diabetes, once-weekly tirzepatide 10 mg (n=312) and 15 mg (n=311) resulted in a 9.6% and 11.6% loss in weight compared to the placebo group (n=315) (352).

 

Table 31. Decrease in Weight with Tirzepatide Treatment 

 

SURPASS 1

SURPASS 2

SURPASS 3

SURPASS 4

SURPASS 5

 

Tirzepatide vs. Placebo

Tirzepatide vs. Semaglutide

Tirzepatide vs. Degludec

Tirzepatide vs.

Glargine

Tirzepatide vs. Placebo

Tirzepatide 5mg

-6.3kg/ -7.9%

-7.6kg/ -8.5%

-7.0kg/ -8.1%

-6.4kg/ -8.1%

-5.4kg/ -6.6%

Tirzepatide 10mg

-7.0kg/ -9.3%

-9.3kg/ -11.0%

-9.6kg/ -11.4%

-8.9kg/ -10.7%

-7.5kg/ -8.9%

Tirzepatide 15mg

-7.8kg/ -11.0%

-11.2kg/ -13.1%

-11.3kg/ -13.9%

-10.6kg/ -13.0%

-8.8kg/ -11.6%

Comparator

-1.0kg/ -0.9%

-5.7kg/ -6.7%

+1.9kg/ +2.7%

+1.7kg/ +2.2%

+1.6kg/ +1.7%

 

BLOOD PRESSURE AND PULSE

 

In the SURPASS studies described above tirzepatide treatment decreased systolic BP by 2.8 to 12.6 mm Hg and diastolic BP by 0.8 to 4.5 mm Hg (340). Tirzepatide treatment increased heart rate by approximately 2 to 4 beats per minute.

 

LIPIDS

 

In the SURPASS studies described above plasma triglyceride levels were consistently decreased by 13-25% (table 32). In most studies with the exception of SURPASS 5, HDL cholesterol levels increased by 3-11%. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels are modestly decreased in most studies. Not unexpectedly given the decrease in triglyceride levels small LDL particles were decreased (353). The decrease in triglycerides could be related to weight loss, which is well known to affect triglycerides (354). Additionally, GIP and tirzepatide increase lipoprotein lipase activity, which could increase the clearance of triglyceride rich lipoproteins (342,353). Finally, tirzepatide lowered Apo-CIII levels, which could also play a role in the decrease in triglyceride levels (353).

 

Table 32. Effect of Tirzapetide 15mg on Lipid Levels

 

SURPASS 1

SURPASS 2

SURPASS 3

SURPASS 4

SURPASS 5

 

Tirzepatide vs. Placebo

Tirzepatide vs. Semaglutide

Tirzepatide vs. Degludec

Tirzepatide vs.

Glargine

Tirzepatide vs. Placebo

Total Cholesterol

-7.6%

-1.5%

-3.0%

-5.6%

-12.6%

Triglycerides

-25.7%

-13.3%

-13.0%

-16.1%

-19.4%

LDLc

-10.8%

+1.2%

-3.8%

-9.3%

-17.3%

HDLc

+11.3%

+2.7%

+9.2%

+7.9%

-0.8%

Results are percent change in tirzepatide group minus percent change in comparator group.

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials with 4,887 participants treated with tirzepatide and 2,328 control participants found that MACE 4 (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalized unstable angina) was decreased but not statistically significant (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.57–1.11) (355). One should note that the number of events in this meta-analysis was small because the duration of these studies was relatively short (approximately 1 year) and the population of patients included in these studies were not at high risk for cardiovascular events (only 1/3 with pre-existing cardiovascular disease). A long-term trial dedicated to determining the effect of tirzepatide on cardiovascular disease is ongoing (SURPASS-CVOT trial NCT04255433) (356).

 

RENAL DISEASE

 

A post-hoc analysis of the SURPASS-4 compared the effect of tirzepatide and glargine insulin on kidney function with a median treatment duration of treatment 85 weeks (357). The mean rate of eGFR decline was -1.4 per year in the combined tirzepatide groups and -3.6 per year in the insulin group (between-group difference 2.2 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.8]) with a greater benefit in participants with eGFR < 60 (i.e., patients with pre-existing kidney disease). It should be noted that tirzepatide treatment resulted in an early decrease in eGFR, however, after 12 weeks eGFR values were higher in the tirzepatide group than in the glargine insulin group. Additionally, urine albumin to creatinine ratio in the glargine insulin group increased but in the tirzepatide treated group there was very little change. The UACR stabilizing effect of tirzepatide was similar in SGLT2 inhibitor users vs. non-users suggesting that these drugs will have additive beneficial effects on kidney function. The SURPASS 1, 3, and 5 trials similarly showed beneficial effects on urine albumin to creatinine ratio. The SURPASS 2 trial compared tirzepatide and semaglutide and there was no difference in the urine albumin to creatinine ratio. The effect of tirzepatide on urine albumin to creatinine ratio and eGFR did not appear to be mediated by changes in HbA1c or bodyweight. Most importantly, tirzepatide reduced the risk of the composite kidney endpoint of new-onset macroalbuminuria, eGFR decline of at least 40%, end-stage kidney disease, or death due to kidney failure by 42% (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43–0.80), mainly due to a reduction in new-onset macroalbuminuria (357).

 

These results strongly suggest that tirzepatide has beneficial on kidney function but further studies dedicated to determining the benefits of tirzepatide on renal function are indicated.  

 

LIVER DISEASE

 

Liver fat content was decreased to a greater degree with tirzepatide treatment compared to treatment with insulin degludec (358). Additionally, tirzepatide decreased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels (359).

 

A recent randomized trial compared the response to tirzepatide 5, 10, or 15mg vs. placebo in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) with moderate or severe fibrosis after 52 weeks of treatment (360). Resolution of MASH without worsening of fibrosis was seen in 10% of the patients in the placebo group, 44% of the patients in the 5-mg tirzepatide group, 56% of the patients in the 10-mg tirzepatide group, and 62% of the patients in the 15-mg tirzepatide group (P<0.001 for all three comparisons with placebo group). Improvement of at least one fibrosis stage without worsening of MASH occurred in 30% of the placebo group, 55% of the 5-mg tirzepatide group, 51% of the 10-mg tirzepatide group, and 51% of the 15-mg tirzepatide group. As seen in other studies alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase decreased by approximately 50% and liver fat by 40-50% in patients treated with tirzepatide compared to placebo.

 

These studies suggest that tirzepatide will have beneficial effects in patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and MASH.

 

 OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA

 

In individuals who were not diabetic but were obese with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, treatment with tirzepatide resulted in “a clinically meaningful change in sleep-disordered breathing and alleviation of perceived sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment, as well as reductions in common obstructive sleep apnea-related cardiovascular risk factors” (361). Hopefully future studies will determine if similar beneficial effects with tirzepatide treatment occur in patients with diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea.

 

Side Effects

 

The side effects described in the section on GLP-1 RAs also are of concern with tirzepatide.

 

Patients treated with tirzepatide in combination with a sulfonylurea or insulin may have an increased risk of hypoglycemia. The risk of hypoglycemia may be decreased by a reduction in sulfonylurea or insulin dose.

 

The incidence of pancreatitis was increased in patients treated with tirzepatide compared to comparator treatment ((0.23 patients per 100 years of exposure vs. 0.11 patients per 100 years of exposure) (package insert). Additionally, acute gallbladder disease (cholelithiasis, biliary colic, and cholecystectomy) was increased with tirzepatide treatment (0.6% of tirzepatide-treated patients and 0% of placebo-treated patients) (package insert).

 

As with other GLP-1 RAs nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, dyspepsia, constipation, and decreased appetite are common side effects.

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Tirzepatide is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or in patients with MEN2. Tirzepatide has not been studied in patients with a prior history of pancreatitis and it is unknown if patients with a history of pancreatitis are at higher risk for developing pancreatitis.

 

Tirzepatide delays gastric emptying and thereby has the potential to impact the absorption of concomitantly administered oral medications. The delay is largest after the first dose and diminishes over time.

 

Summary

 

The major advantage of tirzepatide compared to GLP-1 RAs is the greater decrease in weight and A1c levels.   

 

INSULIN-GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST COMBINATIONS

 

Introduction

 

There are currently two insulin-GLP-1 RA combinations available for use; glargine insulin/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) (Soliqua) and degludec insulin/liraglutide (iDegLira) (Xultophy). Both combine a basal insulin with a once-a-day GLP-1 RA. iGlarLixi contains 100U glargine and 33 ug lixisenatide per ml. iDegLira contains 100U degludec insulin and 3.6 mg liraglutide per ml.

 

Administration

 

In patients naive to basal insulin or to a GLP-1 RA, currently on a GLP-1 RA, or currently on less than 30 units of basal insulin daily the recommended starting dosage of iGlarLixi 100/33 is 15 units (15 units insulin glargine/5 ug lixisenatide) given subcutaneously once daily. In patients currently on 30 to 60 units of basal insulin daily, with or without a GLP-1 RA the recommended starting dosage of iGalLixi 100/33 is 30 units (30 units insulin glargine/10 ug lixisenatide) given subcutaneously once daily. After starting with the recommended dose, titrate the dosage upwards or downwards by two to four units weekly based on the patient’s glycemic control until the desired fasting plasma glucose is achieved. Administer iGlarLixi 100/33 subcutaneously once a day within an hour prior to the first meal of the day. The maximum dose of iGlarLixi 100/33 is 60 units daily (60 units insulin glargine/20 ug lixisenatide).

 

The recommended starting dose of iDegLira 100/3.6 is 16 units (16 units of insulin degludec and 0.58 mg of liraglutide) given subcutaneously once-daily. After starting the recommended starting dose, titrate the dosage upwards or downwards by two units every three to four days based on the patient’s blood glucose monitoring results and glycemic control goal until the desired fasting plasma glucose is achieved. Administer iDegLira 100/3.6 by subcutaneous injection once-daily at the same time each day with or without food. The maximum dose of iDegLira 100/3.6 is 50 units daily (50 units of insulin degludec and 1.8 mg of liraglutide).

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Basal insulin regulates fasting blood glucose levels between meals and overnight while a GLP-1 RA lowers postprandial glucose levels (362). Together this drug combination results in 24-hour glycemic control.

 

Glycemic Efficacy 

 

A number of studies have compared the ability of the combination of insulin-GLP RA to lower A1c levels compared to either insulin alone or GLP-1 RA alone (362). Table 33 shows the results of two large studies. As shown in Table 33 combination therapy was better at lowering A1c levels compared to the individual components (362). Additionally, the risk of hypoglycemia was similar with combination therapy compared to basal insulin alone. In a study of patients poorly controlled on glargine insulin adding rapid acting insulin (basal/bolus therapy) vs. switching to iDegLira was found to result in a similar reduction in A1c levels but the risk of hypoglycemia was greater with basal/bolus insulin (363). Not unexpectedly basal/bolus insulin resulted in greater weight gain (difference 3.6 kg) (363). Indirect comparisons suggest that iDegLira reduces A1C slightly more (< 0.5%) than iGlarLixi but this could be due to different study design, different patient populations, or other differences between the trials (362). A meta-analysis of 8 studies concluded that iDegLira and iGlarLixi demonstrated no significant differences in absolute HbA1c changes, fasting plasma glucose levels, or body weight changes relative to baseline (364). Moreover, a small head-to-head comparison of iDegLira and iGlarLixi did not demonstrate differences in glycemic control (365).

 

Table 33. Effect of Combination Therapy vs Individual Components on Key Outcomes

Study

Treatment

A1c Reduction

% Subjects with Hypoglycemia

Change in Body Weight (Kg)

Rosenstock et al (366)

iGlarLixi

1.6%

26

-0.3

 

Glar

1.3%

24

+1.1

 

Lixi

0.9%

6

-2.3

Gough et al (367)

iDegLira

1.9%

32

-0.5

 

Deg

1.4%

39

+1.6

 

Lira

1.3%

7

-3.0

 

Other Effects

 

As shown in Table 33 the typical weight gain seen with insulin therapy alone is blunted with combination therapy.

 

Side Effects

 

Studies have noted that the typical GI side effects seen with GLP-1 RA therapy is blunted with combination therapy (148). The likely explanation is that the titration of the GLP-1 RA is slower with combination therapy (148).

 

Contraindications

 

The maximum daily insulin dose of 60 units for iGlarLixi and 50 units for iDegLira, may not be sufficient in patients requiring higher daily basal insulin doses (e.g., patients with severe insulin resistance). The maximum dose is determined by the GLP-1 RA (the max dose of iDegLira delivers 1.8 mg of liraglutide while the max dose of iGlarLixa delivers 20 ug of lixisenatide). Conversely, there may be some patients who require only a low dose of basal insulin and thus because of the fixed ratio of basal insulin to GLP-1 RA the dose of the GLP-1 RA may be too low. These examples are a limitation of fixed ratio delivery systems. In these patients one can use basal insulin and a GLP-1 RA independently. It should be noted that for the majority of patients the fixed ratio will be acceptable.

 

Summary

 

The effects of combination therapy are predictable based on studies of basal insulin and GLP-1 RAs but providing them in a single injection provides convenience and makes it easier for patients to comply. Additionally, these combination drugs are titrated based on fasting glucose values and therefore frequent home blood glucose monitoring is not required, which also makes compliance easier. In patients who do not have adequate control on basal insulin alone or a GLP-1 RA alone combination therapy can be a useful therapeutic option.

 

 

BILE ACID SEQUESTRANTS

 

Introduction

 

Colesevelam (Welchol) is a non-absorbed, polymeric, LDL cholesterol lowering and glucose lowering agent that is a high-capacity bile acid-binding molecule (368). This drug was developed primarily to lower LDL cholesterol levels and was later noted to have favorable effects on blood glucose levels and was approved for improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM (20,368). It should be noted that other bile acid sequestrants (cholestyramine) also have favorable effects on glycemic control (369).

 

Administration

 

The recommended dose of colesevelam is 6 tablets once daily or 3 tablets twice daily with meals (tabs 625 mg). Alternatively, one can take one 3.75-gram packet once daily mixed with water, fruit juice, or diet soft drinks and taken with meals or one flavored chewable bar (80 calories per bar) with meals. For patients with difficulty swallowing tablets the use of packets or chewable bars is recommended.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

The mechanism by which bile acid sequestrants improve glucose metabolism is not well understood and the literature on this topic is often contradictory (370,371). Colesevelam does not alter hepatic or peripheral insulin sensitivity or decrease glucose GI absorption (371,372). Neither acute nor chronic treatment affect post oral glucose tolerance test blood glucose levels (372). Additionally, colesevelam treatment did not alter endogenous glucose production, gluconeogenesis, or glycogenolysis (371,372). Thus, the mechanisms accounting for the decrease in glucose effect of bile acid sequestrants remain unclear.

 

A leading hypothesis is that bile acid sequestrants improve glucose metabolism by stimulating the incretin pathway. Colesevelam increases GLP-1 and GIP concentrations suggesting that an increase in incretins contributes to the improvement in glycemic control (372-374). There are two pathways by which colesevelam increases GLP-1 secretion; (1) TGR5-mediated GLP-1 secretion in L cells and (2) intestinal proglucagon expression.

 

TGR5 is a G protein–coupled receptor expressed in many organs and tissues including the intestine (372,374). Bile acids activate TGR5 on the surface of intestinal L cells promoting GLP-1 secretion (372,374,375). Bile acid sequestrants appear to augment TGR5 activation and GLP-1 release, which occurs primarily in the distal intestine and colon (372,375,376). 

 

FXR is a nuclear hormone receptor that complexes with RXR to alter the expression of a large number of genes (374). Bile acids are a ligand for FXR and activate FXR thereby regulating gene expression (374). FXR activation in intestinal L cells decreases proglucagon expression resulting in a decrease in GLP-1 production (377). Conversely, a decrease in bile acids due to binding to colesevelam increases GLP-1 gene expression and secretion in response to glucose improving glucose metabolism (377).

 

It is likely that there are both incretin dependent and independent mechanisms that account for the improvement in glycemic control with colesevelam treatment. The exact mechanisms by which bile acid sequestrants lower A1c levels remain to be elucidated.

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

Colesevelam has modest effects on glycemic control, lowering A1c levels by approximately 0.5% when added to metformin, sulfonylureas, pioglitazone, or insulin (20,368,378). Colesevelam does not lead to an increase in weight (368). In combination with metformin hypoglycemia is not a problem but when used in combination with insulin or sulfonylureas hypoglycemia may occur (368).

 

Other Effects

 

LIPIDS

 

Colesevelam lowers LDL cholesterol levels by 15-20% and has only a modest effect on HDL cholesterol levels (368,379). The effect of bile acid sequestrants on triglyceride levels varies (379). In patients with normal triglyceride levels, bile acid sequestrants increase triglyceride levels by a small amount. However, as baseline triglyceride levels increase, the effect of bile acid sequestrants on plasma triglyceride levels becomes greater, and can result in substantial increases in triglyceride levels (379). In patients with triglycerides > 500mg/dl the use of bile acid sequestrants is contraindicated (379).

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

 

There have been no randomized studies that have examined the effect of bile acid sequestrants on cardiovascular end points in subjects with diabetes. In non-diabetic-subjects bile acid sequestrants have reduced cardiovascular events(380,381). Since bile acid sequestrants have a similar beneficial impact on serum lipid levels in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects one would anticipate that these drugs would also result in a reduction in events in the diabetic population.

 

Side Effects

 

Colesevelam does not have major systemic side effects as it is not absorbed and remains in the intestinal tract (379). However, it does cause gastrointestinal (GI) side effects (379). Constipation is a common side effect and can be severe. In addition, patients will often complain of bloating, dyspepsia, abdominal discomfort, and aggravation of hemorrhoids. Because of GI distress, a small number of patients will discontinue therapy with colesevelam. One can reduce or ameliorate these GI side effects by increasing hydration, adding fiber to the diet (psyllium), and using stool softeners.

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Colesevelam treatment is contraindicated in patients with a history of bowel obstruction and is cautioned in those with a history of gastrointestinal motility disorders (i.e., gastroparesis) or gastrointestinal surgery (368,379). Colesevelam is contraindicated in patients with plasma triglyceride levels > 500 mg/dL or a history of hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (package insert).

 

In the intestine bile acid sequestrants can impede the absorption of many other drugs (379). Colesevelam, which requires a much lower quantity of drug because of its high affinity and binding capacity for bile salts, has less of an effect on the absorption of other drugs than other bile acid sequestrants but can still adversely affect the absorption of certain drugs (Table 34) (379). Administration of these drugs, as well as vitamin supplements, 4 hours prior to administration of colesevelam minimizes pharmacokinetic interactions (379). This is particularly important with drugs that have a narrow toxic/therapeutic window, such as thyroid hormone, digoxin, or warfarin. It can be difficult for some patients, particularly those on multiple medications, to take colesevelam given the need to separate pill ingestion.

 

Table 34. Drugs Affected by Colesevelam

L-thyroxine

Cyclosporine

Glimepiride

Glipizide

Glyburide

Phenytoin

Olmesartan

Warfarin

Oral contraceptives

Repaglinide

Fenofibrate

Vitamin Supplements

 

Colesevelam may also decrease the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K (package insert).

 

Summary

 

Colesevelam has the advantage of lowering both A1c and LDL cholesterol levels. However, the efficacy of lowering A1c and LDL cholesterol levels is modest compared to other drugs. Additionally, in our patients with diabetes who are often on multiple medications it can be difficult to coordinate taking colesevelam with these other medications.

 

Table 35. Advantages and Disadvantages of Colesevelam

Advantages

Disadvantages

Lowers LDL cholesterol

Increases triglyceride levels particularly if already high

Minimal systemic effects

GI side effects

Once a day administration possible

Inhibits the absorption of other drugs

No hypoglycemia

Modest effect on A1c

Weight neutral

Relatively Expensive

 

PRAMLINTIDE (SYMLIN)

 

Introduction

 

Pramlintide is a soluble synthetic analog of human amylin (382). Amylin is co-sequestered and co-secreted with insulin by the pancreatic beta cells in response to nutrient stimuli (382). Amylin secretion in response to nutrients is absent in type 1 diabetes and in patients with T2DM there is impaired beta-cell secretion of amylin in response to nutrients (382). Amylin suppresses post-prandial arginine-stimulated glucagon secretion, suppresses appetite, and slows gastric emptying time through effects on the brain (382).

 

Administration

 

In patients with T2DM initiate pramlintide at 60 ug subcutaneously immediately prior to each major meal. Increase the dose from 60 to 120 ug prior to each major meal when no clinically significant nausea has occurred for at least 3 days. Note the dose used to treat patients with Type 1 diabetes differs from the dose used in patients with T2DM.

 

Mechanism of Action

 

Pramlintide attenuates post-prandial glucagon secretion, enhances satiety, and reduces food intake, which together improve glycemic control (382). These effects are mediated centrally (382)

 

Glycemic Efficacy

 

In a review of three randomized trials in patients with T2DM comparing pramlintide vs. placebo the A1c level was decreased by approximately 0.3-0.6% in the pramlintide group (383). Postprandial glucose excursions are significantly blunted with the addition of pramlintide (382). Pramlintide has only minimal effects on fasting glucose levels (383).

 

In a study comparing rapid acting insulin vs. pramlintide with meals a similar reduction in A1c was observed (384). In contrast to rapid acting insulin, patients treated with pramlintide did not gain weight (384). Additionally, the frequency of hypoglycemia was less with pramlintide compared with rapid acting insulin (384).  

 

Other Effects

 

Pramlintide treatment decreases weight (approximately 1-3 kg), which is likely due to decreased food intake (382,383). In a comparison of food intake during an ad libitum buffet meal, treatment with pramlintide resulted in an approximately 200 calorie decrease in food intake compared to placebo administration (385). Pramlintide also decreases gastric emptying (382).

 

Side Effects

 

A major side effect of pramlintide is nausea which can lead to patients discontinuing this drug (383).

 

Although pramlintide alone does not cause hypoglycemia, in combination with rapid acting meal time insulin the two drugs synergistically increase the risk of severe hypoglycemia (382). Therefore, rapid acting meal time insulin needs to be reduced upon initiation of pramlintide treatment to decrease the risk of hypoglycemia (382). Reducing rapid acting meal time insulin by 30-50% is recommended during the initial dose titration period (382).

 

Contraindications and Drug Interactions

 

Pramlintide is contraindicated in patients with hypoglycemia unawareness and confirmed gastroparesis (package insert).

 

Summary

 

Pramlintide is currently seldom used. Its modest effect on A1c levels coupled with the difficulties of administration (extra injections) and side effects has led to minimal use of this agent. Additionally, its major advantage of weight loss is now superseded by the use of GLP-1 RAs.

 

Table 36. Advantages and Disadvantages of Pramlintide

Advantages

Disadvantages

Weight loss

Hypoglycemia

Decrease postprandial glucose

Frequent dosing

 

GI side effects

 

Expensive

 

Modest reduction in A1c

 

SUMMARY

 

A large number of drugs are now available for lowering glucose levels. For information on the management of T2DM and selecting amongst the available pharmacological agents see the chapter by Schroeder (5).  For information on the use of these drugs to treat diabetes during pregnancy, in children and adolescents, and for the prevention of diabetes see other Endotext chapters (2-4).

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

This work was supported by grants from the Northern California Institute for Research and Education.

 

REFERENCES

 

 

  1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S77-S110
  2. Perreault L. Prediabetes. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, C et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2022.
  3. Wang XY, Cleary EM, Thung SF, Venkatesh KK, Buschur EO. Gestational Diabetes. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2024.
  4. Yau M, Sperling M. Treatment of Diabetes mellitus in Children and Adolescents. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2021.
  5. Schroeder EB. Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Selecting Amongst Available Pharmacological Agents. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2022.
  6. Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ, Buse JB. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2018; 41:2669-2701
  7. American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S158-S178
  8. Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, Rossing P, Mingrone G, Mathieu C, D'Alessio DA, Davies MJ. 2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2020; 43:487-493
  9. Solis-Herrera C, Triplitt C, Cersosimo E, DeFronzo RA.. Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Perreault L, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Trence DL, Vinik A, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  10. Bloomgarden ZT, Dodis R, Viscoli CM, Holmboe ES, Inzucchi SE. Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy: a meta-regression analysis. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:2137-2139
  11. DeFronzo RA, Stonehouse AH, Han J, Wintle ME. Relationship of baseline HbA1c and efficacy of current glucose-lowering therapies: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabet Med 2010; 27:309-317
  12. Shields BM, Dennis JM, Angwin CD, Warren F, Henley WE, Farmer AJ, Sattar N, Holman RR, Jones AG, Pearson ER, Hattersley AT. Patient stratification for determining optimal second-line and third-line therapy for type 2 diabetes: the TriMaster study. Nat Med 2023; 29:376-383
  13. Maloney A, Rosenstock J, Fonseca V. A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of 24 Antihyperglycemic Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: Comparison of Treatment Effects at Therapeutic Doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019; 105:1213-1223
  14. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Kahn SE, Krause-Steinrauf H, Larkin ME, Staten M, Wexler D, Lachin JM. Rationale and design of the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: a comparative effectiveness study (GRADE). Diabetes Care 2013; 36:2254-2261
  15. Grade Study Research Group, Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Balasubramanyam A, Burch HB, Buse JB, Butera NM, Cohen RM, Crandall JP, Kahn SE, Krause-Steinrauf H, Larkin ME, Rasouli N, Tiktin M, Wexler DJ, Younes N. Glycemia Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes - Glycemic Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1063-1074
  16. Grade Study Research Group, Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Bebu I, Burch HB, Buse JB, Cherrington AL, Fortmann SP, Green JB, Kahn SE, Kirkman MS, Krause-Steinrauf H, Larkin ME, Phillips LS, Pop-Busui R, Steffes M, Tiktin M, Tripputi M, Wexler DJ, Younes N. Glycemia Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes - Microvascular and Cardiovascular Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1075-1088
  17. Green JB, Everett BM, Ghosh A, Younes N, Krause-Steinrauf H, Barzilay J, Desouza C, Inzucchi SE, Pokharel Y, Schade D, Scrymgeour A, Tan MH, Utzschneider KM, Mudaliar S. Cardiovascular Outcomes in GRADE (Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study). Circulation 2024; 149:993-1003
  18. Thule PM, Umpierrez G. Sulfonylureas: a new look at old therapy. Curr Diab Rep 2014; 14:473
  19. Khunti K, Chatterjee S, Gerstein HC, Zoungas S, Davies MJ. Do sulphonylureas still have a place in clinical practice? Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:821-832
  20. Tahrani AA, Barnett AH, Bailey CJ. Pharmacology and therapeutic implications of current drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2016; 12:566-592
  21. Prentki M, Matschinsky FM, Madiraju SR. Metabolic signaling in fuel-induced insulin secretion. Cell Metab 2013; 18:162-185
  22. Thorens B. GLUT2, glucose sensing and glucose homeostasis. Diabetologia 2015; 58:221-232
  23. MacDonald PE, Wheeler MB. Voltage-dependent K(+) channels in pancreatic beta cells: role, regulation and potential as therapeutic targets. Diabetologia 2003; 46:1046-1062
  24. Ashcroft FM, Gribble FM. ATP-sensitive K+ channels and insulin secretion: their role in health and disease. Diabetologia 1999; 42:903-919
  25. Zhang CL, Katoh M, Shibasaki T, Minami K, Sunaga Y, Takahashi H, Yokoi N, Iwasaki M, Miki T, Seino S. The cAMP sensor Epac2 is a direct target of antidiabetic sulfonylurea drugs. Science 2009; 325:607-610
  26. DeFronzo RA. Pharmacologic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131:281-303
  27. Sherifali D, Nerenberg K, Pullenayegum E, Cheng JE, Gerstein HC. The effect of oral antidiabetic agents on A1C levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2010; 33:1859-1864
  28. Phung OJ, Scholle JM, Talwar M, Coleman CI. Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2010; 303:1410-1418
  29. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP, Kravitz BG, Lachin JM, O'Neill MC, Zinman B, Viberti G. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2427-2443
  30. Goldner MG, Knatterud GL, Prout TE. Effects of hypoglycemic agents on vascular complications in patients with adult-onset diabetes. 3. Clinical implications of UGDP results. JAMA 1971; 218:1400-1410
  31. Meinert CL, Knatterud GL, Prout TE, Klimt CR. A study of the effects of hypoglycemic agents on vascular complications in patients with adult-onset diabetes. II. Mortality results. Diabetes 1970; 19:Suppl:789-830
  32. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352:837-853
  33. Rosenstock J, Kahn SE, Johansen OE, Zinman B, Espeland MA, Woerle HJ, Pfarr E, Keller A, Mattheus M, Baanstra D, Meinicke T, George JT, von Eynatten M, McGuire DK, Marx N. Effect of Linagliptin vs Glimepiride on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The CAROLINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019;
  34. Silbert R, Salcido-Montenegro A, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Katabi A, McCoy RG. Hypoglycemia Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies. Curr Diab Rep 2018; 18:53
  35. Middleton TL, Wong J, Molyneaux L, Brooks BA, Yue DK, Twigg SM, Wu T. Cardiac Effects of Sulfonylurea-Related Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:663-670
  36. Hay LC, Wilmshurst EG, Fulcher G. Unrecognized hypo- and hyperglycemia in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the results of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003; 5:19-26
  37. Gangji AS, Cukierman T, Gerstein HC, Goldsmith CH, Clase CM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of hypoglycemia and cardiovascular events: a comparison of glyburide with other secretagogues and with insulin. Diabetes Care 2007; 30:389-394
  38. Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, Chiang JL, de Boer IH, Goldstein-Fuchs J, Hirsch IB, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Narva AS, Navaneethan SD, Neumiller JJ, Patel UD, Ratner RE, Whaley-Connell AT, Molitch ME. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:2864-2883
  39. By the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:674-694
  40. Guardado-Mendoza R, Prioletta A, Jimenez-Ceja LM, Sosale A, Folli F. The role of nateglinide and repaglinide, derivatives of meglitinide, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Sci 2013; 9:936-943
  41. Tran L, Zielinski A, Roach AH, Jende JA, Householder AM, Cole EE, Atway SA, Amornyard M, Accursi ML, Shieh SW, Thompson EE. Pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes: oral medications. Ann Pharmacother 2015; 49:540-556
  42. Scott LJ. Repaglinide: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2012; 72:249-272
  43. Horton ES, Clinkingbeard C, Gatlin M, Foley J, Mallows S, Shen S. Nateglinide alone and in combination with metformin improves glycemic control by reducing mealtime glucose levels in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:1660-1665
  44. Rosenstock J, Hassman DR, Madder RD, Brazinsky SA, Farrell J, Khutoryansky N, Hale PM. Repaglinide versus nateglinide monotherapy: a randomized, multicenter study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:1265-1270
  45. NAVIGATOR Study Group, Holman RR, Haffner SM, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1463-1476
  46. Rena G, Hardie DG, Pearson ER. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia 2017; 60:1577-1585
  47. Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M, Viollet B. Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metab 2014; 20:953-966
  48. LaMoia TE, Shulman GI. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Metformin Action. Endocr Rev 2021; 42:77-96
  49. Buse JB, DeFronzo RA, Rosenstock J, Kim T, Burns C, Skare S, Baron A, Fineman M. The Primary Glucose-Lowering Effect of Metformin Resides in the Gut, Not the Circulation: Results From Short-term Pharmacokinetic and 12-Week Dose-Ranging Studies. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:198-205
  50. Pollak M. The effects of metformin on gut microbiota and the immune system as research frontiers. Diabetologia2017; 60:1662-1667
  51. Sanchez-Rangel E, Inzucchi SE. Metformin: clinical use in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2017; 60:1586-1593
  52. Williams LK, Padhukasahasram B, Ahmedani BK, Peterson EL, Wells KE, Gonzalez Burchard E, Lanfear DE. Differing effects of metformin on glycemic control by race-ethnicity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99:3160-3168
  53. Fujioka K, Pans M, Joyal S. Glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus switched from twice-daily immediate-release metformin to a once-daily extended-release formulation. Clin Ther 2003; 25:515-529
  54. Wulffele MG, Kooy A, de Zeeuw D, Stehouwer CD, Gansevoort RT. The effect of metformin on blood pressure, plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Intern Med 2004; 256:1-14
  55. Feingold KR. Role of Glucose and Lipids in the Cardiovascular Disease of Patients with Diabetes. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2023.
  56. Ratner R, Goldberg R, Haffner S, Marcovina S, Orchard T, Fowler S, Temprosa M. Impact of intensive lifestyle and metformin therapy on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:888-894
  57. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352:854-865
  58. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1577-1589
  59. Kooy A, de Jager J, Lehert P, Bets D, Wulffele MG, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:616-625
  60. Hong J, Zhang Y, Lai S, Lv A, Su Q, Dong Y, Zhou Z, Tang W, Zhao J, Cui L, Zou D, Wang D, Li H, Liu C, Wu G, Shen J, Zhu D, Wang W, Shen W, Ning G. Effects of metformin versus glipizide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:1304-1311
  61. Legro RS. Evaluation and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2017.
  62. Heckman-Stoddard BM, DeCensi A, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Ford LG. Repurposing metformin for the prevention of cancer and cancer recurrence. Diabetologia 2017; 60:1639-1647
  63. Mallik R, Chowdhury TA. Metformin in cancer. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018; 143:409-419
  64. Goodwin PJ, Chen BE, Gelmon KA, Whelan TJ, Ennis M, Lemieux J, Ligibel JA, Hershman DL, Mayer IA, Hobday TJ, Bliss JM, Rastogi P, Rabaglio-Poretti M, Mukherjee SD, Mackey JR, Abramson VG, Oja C, Wesolowski R, Thompson AM, Rea DW, Stos PM, Shepherd LE, Stambolic V, Parulekar WR. Effect of Metformin vs Placebo on Invasive Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer: The MA.32 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 327:1963-1973
  65. Mesquita LA, Spiazzi BF, Piccoli GF, Nogara DA, da Natividade GR, Garbin HI, Wayerbacher LF, Wiercinski VM, Baggio VA, Zingano CP, Schwartsmann G, Lopes G, Petrie JR, Colpani V, Gerchman F. Does metformin reduce the risk of cancer in obesity and diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:1929-1940
  66. Dujic T, Zhou K, Donnelly LA, Tavendale R, Palmer CN, Pearson ER. Association of Organic Cation Transporter 1 With Intolerance to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes: A GoDARTS Study. Diabetes 2015; 64:1786-1793
  67. Dawed AY, Zhou K, van Leeuwen N, Mahajan A, Robertson N, Koivula R, Elders PJM, Rauh SP, Jones AG, Holl RW, Stingl JC, Franks PW, McCarthy MI, t Hart LM, Pearson ER. Variation in the Plasma Membrane Monoamine Transporter (PMAT) (Encoded by SLC29A4) and Organic Cation Transporter 1 (OCT1) (Encoded by SLC22A1) and Gastrointestinal Intolerance to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes: An IMI DIRECT Study. Diabetes Care 2019; 42:1027-1033
  68. de Jager J, Kooy A, Lehert P, Wulffele MG, van der Kolk J, Bets D, Verburg J, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Long term treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 340:c2181
  69. Aroda VR, Edelstein SL, Goldberg RB, Knowler WC, Marcovina SM, Orchard TJ, Bray GA, Schade DS, Temprosa MG, White NH, Crandall JP. Long-term Metformin Use and Vitamin B12 Deficiency in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:1754-1761
  70. American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S158-S178
  71. Yki-Jarvinen H. Thiazolidinediones. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1106-1118
  72. Willson TM, Lambert MH, Kliewer SA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and metabolic disease. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70:341-367
  73. Memon RA, Tecott LH, Nonogaki K, Beigneux A, Moser AH, Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR-alpha) and PPAR-gamma messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the liver in murine obesity: troglitazone induces expression of PPAR-gamma-responsive adipose tissue-specific genes in the liver of obese diabetic mice. Endocrinology 2000; 141:4021-4031
  74. Aronoff S, Rosenblatt S, Braithwaite S, Egan JW, Mathisen AL, Schneider RL. Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose-response study. The Pioglitazone 001 Study Group. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:1605-1611
  75. Dennis JM, Shields BM, Henley WE, Jones AG, Hattersley AT. Disease progression and treatment response in data-driven subgroups of type 2 diabetes compared with models based on simple clinical features: an analysis using clinical trial data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7:442-451
  76. Tan MH, Baksi A, Krahulec B, Kubalski P, Stankiewicz A, Urquhart R, Edwards G, Johns D. Comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in sustaining glycemic control over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:544-550
  77. Gastaldelli A, Ferrannini E, Miyazaki Y, Matsuda M, Mari A, DeFronzo RA. Thiazolidinediones improve beta-cell function in type 2 diabetic patients. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 292:E871-883
  78. Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL, Marroquin A, Goico J, Ochoa C, Kawakubo M, Buchanan TA. Effect of pioglitazone on pancreatic beta-cell function and diabetes risk in Hispanic women with prior gestational diabetes. Diabetes2006; 55:517-522
  79. DeFronzo RA, Inzucchi S, Abdul-Ghani M, Nissen SE. Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2019; 16:133-143
  80. Sarafidis PA, Stafylas PC, Georgianos PI, Saratzis AN, Lasaridis AN. Effect of thiazolidinediones on albuminuria and proteinuria in diabetes: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 55:835-847
  81. Qayyum R, Adomaityte J. A meta-analysis of the effect of thiazolidinediones on blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2006; 8:19-28
  82. Ferrannini E, DeFronzo RA. Impact of glucose-lowering drugs on cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:2288-2296
  83. Spanheimer R, Betteridge DJ, Tan MH, Ferrannini E, Charbonnel B. Long-term lipid effects of pioglitazone by baseline anti-hyperglycemia medication therapy and statin use from the PROactive experience (PROactive 14). Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:234-239
  84. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M, Rodrigues A, Burke MF, Jafri K, French BC, Phillips JA, Mucksavage ML, Wilensky RL, Mohler ER, Rothblat GH, Rader DJ. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:127-135
  85. Deeg MA, Buse JB, Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Zagar AJ, Jacober SJ, Khan MA, Perez AT, Tan MH. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care 2007; 30:2458-2464
  86. Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA, Buse JB, Zagar AJ, Pinaire JA, Tan MH, Khan MA, Perez AT, Jacober SJ. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:1547-1554
  87. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Moules IK, Skene AM, Tan MH, Lefebvre PJ, Murray GD, Standl E, Wilcox RG, Wilhelmsen L, Betteridge J, Birkeland K, Golay A, Heine RJ, Koranyi L, Laakso M, Mokan M, Norkus A, Pirags V, Podar T, Scheen A, Scherbaum W, Schernthaner G, Schmitz O, Skrha J, Smith U, Taton J. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366:1279-1289
  88. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Furie KL, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, Gorman M, Guarino PD, Lovejoy AM, Peduzzi PN, Conwit R, Brass LM, Schwartz GG, Adams HP, Jr., Berger L, Carolei A, Clark W, Coull B, Ford GA, Kleindorfer D, O'Leary JR, Parsons MW, Ringleb P, Sen S, Spence JD, Tanne D, Wang D, Winder TR. Pioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1321-1331
  89. Spence JD, Viscoli CM, Inzucchi SE, Dearborn-Tomazos J, Ford GA, Gorman M, Furie KL, Lovejoy AM, Young LH, Kernan WN. Pioglitazone Therapy in Patients With Stroke and Prediabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IRIS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76:526-535
  90. Vaccaro O, Masulli M, Nicolucci A, Bonora E, Del Prato S, Maggioni AP, Rivellese AA, Squatrito S, Giorda CB, Sesti G, Mocarelli P, Lucisano G, Sacco M, Signorini S, Cappellini F, Perriello G, Babini AC, Lapolla A, Gregori G, Giordano C, Corsi L, Buzzetti R, Clemente G, Di Cianni G, Iannarelli R, Cordera R, La Macchia O, Zamboni C, Scaranna C, Boemi M, Iovine C, Lauro D, Leotta S, Dall'Aglio E, Cannarsa E, Tonutti L, Pugliese G, Bossi AC, Anichini R, Dotta F, Di Benedetto A, Citro G, Antenucci D, Ricci L, Giorgino F, Santini C, Gnasso A, De Cosmo S, Zavaroni D, Vedovato M, Consoli A, Calabrese M, di Bartolo P, Fornengo P, Riccardi G. Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol2017; 5:887-897
  91. Vaccaro O, Lucisano G, Masulli M, Bonora E, Del Prato S, Rivellese AA, Giorda CB, Mocarelli P, Squatrito S, Maggioni AP, Riccardi G, Nicolucci A. Cardiovascular Effects of Pioglitazone or Sulfonylureas According to Pretreatment Risk: Moving Toward Personalized Care. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104:3296-3302
  92. Langenfeld MR, Forst T, Hohberg C, Kann P, Lubben G, Konrad T, Fullert SD, Sachara C, Pfutzner A. Pioglitazone decreases carotid intima-media thickness independently of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a controlled randomized study. Circulation 2005; 111:2525-2531
  93. Mazzone T, Meyer PM, Feinstein SB, Davidson MH, Kondos GT, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Perez A, Provost JC, Haffner SM. Effect of pioglitazone compared with glimepiride on carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006; 296:2572-2581
  94. Saremi A, Schwenke DC, Buchanan TA, Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Banerji M, Bray GA, Clement SC, Henry RR, Kitabchi AE, Mudaliar S, Ratner RE, Stentz FB, Musi N, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA, Reaven PD. Pioglitazone slows progression of atherosclerosis in prediabetes independent of changes in cardiovascular risk factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013; 33:393-399
  95. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, Nesto R, Kupfer S, Perez A, Jure H, De Larochelliere R, Staniloae CS, Mavromatis K, Saw J, Hu B, Lincoff AM, Tuzcu EM. Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial. JAMA2008; 299:1561-1573
  96. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2457-2471
  97. Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. JAMA2007; 298:1189-1195
  98. Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Curtis PS, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJ. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 2009; 373:2125-2135
  99. Mahaffey KW, Hafley G, Dickerson S, Burns S, Tourt-Uhlig S, White J, Newby LK, Komajda M, McMurray J, Bigelow R, Home PD, Lopes RD. Results of a reevaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in the RECORD trial. Am Heart J 2013; 166:240-249 e241
  100. Bach RG, Brooks MM, Lombardero M, Genuth S, Donner TW, Garber A, Kennedy L, Monrad ES, Pop-Busui R, Kelsey SF, Frye RL. Rosiglitazone and outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. Circulation 2013; 128:785-794
  101. Kim KS, Lee BW, Kim YJ, Lee DH, Cha BS, Park CY. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Diabetes: Part II: Treatment. Diabetes Metab J 2019; 43:127-143
  102. Belfort R, Harrison SA, Brown K, Darland C, Finch J, Hardies J, Balas B, Gastaldelli A, Tio F, Pulcini J, Berria R, Ma JZ, Dwivedi S, Havranek R, Fincke C, DeFronzo R, Bannayan GA, Schenker S, Cusi K. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2297-2307
  103. Cusi K, Orsak B, Bril F, Lomonaco R, Hecht J, Ortiz-Lopez C, Tio F, Hardies J, Darland C, Musi N, Webb A, Portillo-Sanchez P. Long-Term Pioglitazone Treatment for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165:305-315
  104. Musso G, Cassader M, Paschetta E, Gambino R. Thiazolidinediones and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:633-640
  105. Rosenstock J, Vico M, Wei L, Salsali A, List JF. Effects of dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, on HbA(1c), body weight, and hypoglycemia risk in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on pioglitazone monotherapy. Diabetes Care 2012; 35:1473-1478
  106. Abdul-Ghani MA, Puckett C, Triplitt C, Maggs D, Adams J, Cersosimo E, DeFronzo RA. Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT): a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17:268-275
  107. Nesto RW, Bell D, Bonow RO, Fonseca V, Grundy SM, Horton ES, Le Winter M, Porte D, Semenkovich CF, Smith S, Young LH, Kahn R. Thiazolidinedione use, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:256-263
  108. Mudaliar S, Chang AR, Henry RR. Thiazolidinediones, peripheral edema, and type 2 diabetes: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. Endocr Pract 2003; 9:406-416
  109. Guan Y, Hao C, Cha DR, Rao R, Lu W, Kohan DE, Magnuson MA, Redha R, Zhang Y, Breyer MD. Thiazolidinediones expand body fluid volume through PPARgamma stimulation of ENaC-mediated renal salt absorption. Nat Med 2005; 11:861-866
  110. Zanchi A, Chiolero A, Maillard M, Nussberger J, Brunner HR, Burnier M. Effects of the peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist pioglitazone on renal and hormonal responses to salt in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89:1140-1145
  111. de Jong M, van der Worp HB, van der Graaf Y, Visseren FLJ, Westerink J. Pioglitazone and the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017; 16:134
  112. Hernandez AV, Usmani A, Rajamanickam A, Moheet A. Thiazolidinediones and risk of heart failure in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2011; 11:115-128
  113. Masoudi FA, Inzucchi SE, Wang Y, Havranek EP, Foody JM, Krumholz HM. Thiazolidinediones, metformin, and outcomes in older patients with diabetes and heart failure: an observational study. Circulation 2005; 111:583-590
  114. Kahn SE, Zinman B, Lachin JM, Haffner SM, Herman WH, Holman RR, Kravitz BG, Yu D, Heise MA, Aftring RP, Viberti G. Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: an Analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT). Diabetes Care 2008; 31:845-851
  115. Dormandy J, Bhattacharya M, van Troostenburg de Bruyn AR. Safety and tolerability of pioglitazone in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: an overview of data from PROactive. Drug Saf 2009; 32:187-202
  116. Viscoli CM, Inzucchi SE, Young LH, Insogna KL, Conwit R, Furie KL, Gorman M, Kelly MA, Lovejoy AM, Kernan WN. Pioglitazone and Risk for Bone Fracture: Safety Data From a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:914-922
  117. Zhu ZN, Jiang YF, Ding T. Risk of fracture with thiazolidinediones: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Bone 2014; 68:115-123
  118. Schwartz AV, Chen H, Ambrosius WT, Sood A, Josse RG, Bonds DE, Schnall AM, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Banerji MA, Cohen RM, Hamilton BP, Isakova T, Sellmeyer DE, Simmons DL, Shibli-Rahhal A, Williamson JD, Margolis KL. Effects of TZD Use and Discontinuation on Fracture Rates in ACCORD Bone Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2015; 100:4059-4066
  119. Schwartz AV, Sellmeyer DE, Vittinghoff E, Palermo L, Lecka-Czernik B, Feingold KR, Strotmeyer ES, Resnick HE, Carbone L, Beamer BA, Park SW, Lane NE, Harris TB, Cummings SR. Thiazolidinedione use and bone loss in older diabetic adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:3349-3354
  120. Davidson MB. Pioglitazone (Actos) and bladder cancer: Legal system triumphs over the evidence. J Diabetes Complications 2016; 30:981-985
  121. Erdmann E, Harding S, Lam H, Perez A. Ten-year observational follow-up of PROactive: a randomized cardiovascular outcomes trial evaluating pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016; 18:266-273
  122. Lewis JD, Habel LA, Quesenberry CP, Strom BL, Peng T, Hedderson MM, Ehrlich SF, Mamtani R, Bilker W, Vaughn DJ, Nessel L, Van Den Eeden SK, Ferrara A. Pioglitazone Use and Risk of Bladder Cancer and Other Common Cancers in Persons With Diabetes. JAMA 2015; 314:265-277
  123. Levin D, Bell S, Sund R, Hartikainen SA, Tuomilehto J, Pukkala E, Keskimaki I, Badrick E, Renehan AG, Buchan IE, Bowker SL, Minhas-Sandhu JK, Zafari Z, Marra C, Johnson JA, Stricker BH, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Ruiter R, de Keyser CE, MacDonald TM, Wild SH, McKeigue PM, Colhoun HM. Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a multipopulation pooled, cumulative exposure analysis. Diabetologia 2015; 58:493-504
  124. Idris I, Warren G, Donnelly R. Association between thiazolidinedione treatment and risk of macular edema among patients with type 2 diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172:1005-1011
  125. Ryan EH, Jr., Han DP, Ramsay RC, Cantrill HL, Bennett SR, Dev S, Williams DF. Diabetic macular edema associated with glitazone use. Retina 2006; 26:562-570
  126. Coniff R, Krol A. Acarbose: a review of US clinical experience. Clin Ther 1997; 19:16-26; discussion 12-13
  127. Van de Laar FA, Lucassen PL, Akkermans RP, Van de Lisdonk EH, Rutten GE, Van Weel C. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD003639
  128. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M. Acarbose treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: the STOP-NIDDM trial. JAMA 2003; 290:486-494
  129. Yun P, Du AM, Chen XJ, Liu JC, Xiao H. Effect of Acarbose on Long-Term Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients with Newly Diagnosed Impaired Glucose Tolerance. J Diabetes Res 2016; 2016:1602083
  130. Holman RR, Coleman RL, Chan JCN, Chiasson JL, Feng H, Ge J, Gerstein HC, Gray R, Huo Y, Lang Z, McMurray JJ, Ryden L, Schroder S, Sun Y, Theodorakis MJ, Tendera M, Tucker L, Tuomilehto J, Wei Y, Yang W, Wang D, Hu D, Pan C. Effects of acarbose on cardiovascular and diabetes outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance (ACE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5:877-886
  131. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Leppin A, Sonbol MB, Altayar O, Undavalli C, Wang Z, Elraiyah T, Brito JP, Mauck KF, Lababidi MH, Prokop LJ, Asi N, Wei J, Fidahussein S, Montori VM, Murad MH. Clinical review: Drugs commonly associated with weight change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:363-370
  132. Lupsa BC, Inzucchi SE. Use of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: weighing the risks and benefits. Diabetologia2018; 61:2118-2125
  133. Thomas MC, Cherney DZI. The actions of SGLT2 inhibitors on metabolism, renal function and blood pressure. Diabetologia 2018; 61:2098-2107
  134. Rahmoune H, Thompson PW, Ward JM, Smith CD, Hong G, Brown J. Glucose transporters in human renal proximal tubular cells isolated from the urine of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes 2005; 54:3427-3434
  135. Monami M, Liistro F, Scatena A, Nreu B, Mannucci E. Short and medium-term efficacy of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20:1213-1222
  136. Ferrannini G, Hach T, Crowe S, Sanghvi A, Hall KD, Ferrannini E. Energy Balance After Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:1730-1735
  137. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2117-2128
  138. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, Shaw W, Law G, Desai M, Matthews DR. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:644-657
  139. Mazidi M, Rezaie P, Gao HK, Kengne AP. Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransport-2 Inhibitors on Blood Pressure in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 43 Randomized Control Trials With 22 528 Patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6
  140. Sanchez-Garcia A, Simental-Mendia M, Millan-Alanis JM, Simental-Mendia LE. Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol Res 2020; 160:105068
  141. van Baar MJB, van Ruiten CC, Muskiet MHA, van Bloemendaal L, RG IJ, van Raalte DH. SGLT2 Inhibitors in Combination Therapy: From Mechanisms to Clinical Considerations in Type 2 Diabetes Management. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1543-1556
  142. Chung MC, Hung PH, Hsiao PJ, Wu LY, Chang CH, Wu MJ, Shieh JJ, Chung CJ. Association of Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 Inhibitor Use for Type 2 Diabetes and Incidence of Gout in Taiwan. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2135353
  143. McCormick N, Yokose C, Wei J, Lu N, Wexler DJ, Avina-Zubieta JA, De Vera MA, Zhang Y, Choi HK. Comparative Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Recurrent Gout Flares and Gout-Primary Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations : A General Population Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1067-1080
  144. McCormick N, Yokose C, Lu N, Wexler DJ, Avina-Zubieta JA, De Vera MA, McCoy RG, Choi HK. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors vs Sulfonylureas for Gout Prevention Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Metformin. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:650-660
  145. Fitchett D, Inzucchi SE, Cannon CP, McGuire DK, Scirica BM, Johansen OE, Sambevski S, Kaspers S, Pfarr E, George JT, Zinman B. Empagliflozin Reduced Mortality and Hospitalization for Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial. Circulation 2019; 139:1384-1395
  146. Fitchett D, Butler J, van de Borne P, Zinman B, Lachin JM, Wanner C, Woerle HJ, Hantel S, George JT, Johansen OE, Inzucchi SE. Effects of empagliflozin on risk for cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization across the spectrum of heart failure risk in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) trial. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:363-370
  147. Neuen BL, Ohkuma T, Neal B, Matthews DR, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Desai M, Li Q, Deng H, Rosenthal N, Jardine MJ, Bakris G, Perkovic V. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes With Canagliflozin According to Baseline Kidney Function. Circulation 2018; 138:1537-1550
  148. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM, Edwards R, Agarwal R, Bakris G, Bull S, Cannon CP, Capuano G, Chu PL, de Zeeuw D, Greene T, Levin A, Pollock C, Wheeler DC, Yavin Y, Zhang H, Zinman B, Meininger G, Brenner BM, Mahaffey KW. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2019;
  149. Jardine MJ, Zhou Z, Mahaffey KW, Oshima M, Agarwal R, Bakris G, Bajaj HS, Bull S, Cannon CP, Charytan DM, de Zeeuw D, Di Tanna GL, Greene T, Heerspink HJL, Levin A, Neal B, Pollock C, Qiu R, Sun T, Wheeler DC, Zhang H, Zinman B, Rosenthal N, Perkovic V. Renal, Cardiovascular, and Safety Outcomes of Canagliflozin by Baseline Kidney Function: A Secondary Analysis of the CREDENCE Randomized Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:1128-1139
  150. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, Silverman MG, Zelniker TA, Kuder JF, Murphy SA, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Ruff CT, Gause-Nilsson IAM, Fredriksson M, Johansson PA, Langkilde AM, Sabatine MS. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:347-357
  151. Furtado RHM, Bonaca MP, Raz I, Zelniker TA, Mosenzon O, Cahn A, Kuder J, Murphy SA, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Ruff CT, Nicolau JC, Gause-Nilsson IAM, Fredriksson M, Langkilde AM, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Previous Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2019; 139:2516-2527
  152. Kato ET, Silverman MG, Mosenzon O, Zelniker TA, Cahn A, Furtado RHM, Kuder J, Murphy SA, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Desai AS, Goto S, Johansson PA, Gause-Nilsson I, Johanson P, Langkilde AM, Raz I, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD. Effect of Dapagliflozin on Heart Failure and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation 2019; 139:2528-2536
  153. Cahn A, Raz I, Leiter LA, Mosenzon O, Murphy SA, Goodrich EL, Yanuv I, Rozenberg A, Bhatt DL, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Gause-Nilsson IAM, Langkilde AM, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD. Cardiovascular, Renal, and Metabolic Outcomes of Dapagliflozin Versus Placebo in a Primary Cardiovascular Prevention Cohort: Analyses From DECLARE-TIMI 58. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:1159-1167
  154. Cannon CP, Pratley R, Dagogo-Jack S, Mancuso J, Huyck S, Masiukiewicz U, Charbonnel B, Frederich R, Gallo S, Cosentino F, Shih WJ, Gantz I, Terra SG, Cherney DZI, McGuire DK. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Ertugliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1425-1435
  155. Cosentino F, Cannon CP, Cherney DZI, Masiukiewicz U, Pratley R, Dagogo Jack S, Frederich R, Charbonnel B, Mancuso J, Shih WJ, Terra SG, Cater NB, Gantz I, McGuire DK. Efficacy of Ertugliflozin on Heart Failure-Related Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Results of the VERTIS CV Trial. Circulation 2020;
  156. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Kober L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Belohlavek J, Bohm M, Chiang CE, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukat A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O'Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Held C, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Bengtsson O, Sjostrand M, Langkilde AM. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1995-2008
  157. Curtain JP, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Petrie MC, Inzucchi SE, Kober L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Bengtsson O, Langkilde AM, Sjostrand M, Solomon SD, McMurray JJV. Effect of dapagliflozin on ventricular arrhythmias, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or sudden death in DAPA-HF. Eur Heart J 2021;
  158. Petrie MC, Verma S, Docherty KF, Inzucchi SE, Anand I, Belohlavek J, Bohm M, Chiang CE, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukat A, Ge J, Howlett J, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O'Meara E, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Kober L, Kosiborod MN, Langkilde AM, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Sjostrand M, Solomon SD, Johanson P, Greasley PJ, Boulton D, Bengtsson O, Jhund PS, McMurray JJV. Effect of Dapagliflozin on Worsening Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Heart Failure With and Without Diabetes. JAMA 2020;
  159. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Januzzi J, Verma S, Tsutsui H, Brueckmann M, Jamal W, Kimura K, Schnee J, Zeller C, Cotton D, Bocchi E, Bohm M, Choi DJ, Chopra V, Chuquiure E, Giannetti N, Janssens S, Zhang J, Gonzalez Juanatey JR, Kaul S, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Merkely B, Nicholls SJ, Perrone S, Pina I, Ponikowski P, Sattar N, Senni M, Seronde MF, Spinar J, Squire I, Taddei S, Wanner C, Zannad F. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1413-1424
  160. Packer M, Butler J, Zeller C, Pocock SJ, Brueckmann M, Ferreira JP, Filippatos G, Usman MS, Zannad F, Anker SD. Blinded Withdrawal of Long-Term Randomized Treatment With Empagliflozin or Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure. Circulation 2023; 148:1011-1022
  161. Heerspink HJL, Stefansson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, Mann JFE, McMurray JJV, Lindberg M, Rossing P, Sjostrom CD, Toto RD, Langkilde AM, Wheeler DC. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:1436-1446
  162. Packer M, Butler J, Zannad F, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Anand I, Doehner W, Haass M, Komajda M, Miller A, Pehrson S, Teerlink JR, Schnaidt S, Zeller C, Schnee JM, Anker SD. Effect of Empagliflozin on Worsening Heart Failure Events in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: EMPEROR-Preserved Trial. Circulation 2021; 144:1284-1294
  163. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, de Boer RA, DeMets D, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Shah SJ, Desai AS, Jhund PS, Belohlavek J, Chiang CE, Borleffs CJW, Comin-Colet J, Dobreanu D, Drozdz J, Fang JC, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Al Habeeb W, Han Y, Cabrera Honorio JW, Janssens SP, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Merkely B, O'Meara E, Saraiva JFK, Tereshchenko SN, Thierer J, Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Verma S, Pham VN, Wilderang U, Zaozerska N, Bachus E, Lindholm D, Petersson M, Langkilde AM. Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1089-1098
  164. Butler J, Jones WS, Udell JA, Anker SD, Petrie MC, Harrington J, Mattheus M, Zwiener I, Amir O, Bahit MC, Bauersachs J, Bayes-Genis A, Chen Y, Chopra VK, Figtree G, Ge J, Goodman SG, Gotcheva N, Goto S, Gasior T, Jamal W, Januzzi JL, Jeong MH, Lopatin Y, Lopes RD, Merkely B, Parikh PB, Parkhomenko A, Ponikowski P, Rossello X, Schou M, Simic D, Steg PG, Szachniewicz J, van der Meer P, Vinereanu D, Zieroth S, Brueckmann M, Sumin M, Bhatt DL, Hernandez AF. Empagliflozin after Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1455-1466
  165. Hernandez AF, Udell JA, Jones WS, Anker SD, Petrie MC, Harrington J, Mattheus M, Seide S, Zwiener I, Amir O, Bahit MC, Bauersachs J, Bayes-Genis A, Chen Y, Chopra VK, G AF, Ge J, S GG, Gotcheva N, Goto S, Gasior T, Jamal W, Januzzi JL, Jeong MH, Lopatin Y, Lopes RD, Merkely B, Parikh PB, Parkhomenko A, Ponikowski P, Rossello X, Schou M, Simic D, Steg PG, Szachniewicz J, van der Meer P, Vinereanu D, Zieroth S, Brueckmann M, Sumin M, Bhatt DL, Butler J. Effect of Empagliflozin on Heart Failure Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the EMPACT-MI Trial. Circulation 2024; 149:1627-1638
  166. Patel SM, Kang YM, Im K, Neuen BL, Anker SD, Bhatt DL, Butler J, Cherney DZI, Claggett BL, Fletcher RA, Herrington WG, Inzucchi SE, Jardine MJ, Mahaffey KW, McGuire DK, McMurray JJV, Neal B, Packer M, Perkovic V, Solomon SD, Staplin N, Vaduganathan M, Wanner C, Wheeler DC, Zannad F, Zhao Y, Heerspink HJL, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes: A SMART-C Collaborative Meta-Analysis. Circulation 2024; 149:1789-1801
  167. Salah HM, Al'Aref SJ, Khan MS, Al-Hawwas M, Vallurupalli S, Mehta JL, Mounsey JP, Greene SJ, McGuire DK, Lopes RD, Fudim M. Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes-Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Am Heart J 2021; 232:10-22
  168. Usman MS, Bhatt DL, Hameed I, Anker SD, Cheng AYY, Hernandez AF, Jones WS, Khan MS, Petrie MC, Udell JA, Friede T, Butler J. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure outcomes and cardiovascular death across the cardiometabolic disease spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12:447-461
  169. Voors AA, Angermann CE, Teerlink JR, Collins SP, Kosiborod M, Biegus J, Ferreira JP, Nassif ME, Psotka MA, Tromp J, Borleffs CJW, Ma C, Comin-Colet J, Fu M, Janssens SP, Kiss RG, Mentz RJ, Sakata Y, Schirmer H, Schou M, Schulze PC, Spinarova L, Volterrani M, Wranicz JK, Zeymer U, Zieroth S, Brueckmann M, Blatchford JP, Salsali A, Ponikowski P. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: a multinational randomized trial. Nat Med 2022; 28:568-574
  170. Lytvyn Y, Bjornstad P, Udell JA, Lovshin JA, Cherney DZI. Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibition in Heart Failure: Potential Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Summary of Clinical Trials. Circulation 2017; 136:1643-1658
  171. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Fitchett D, Wanner C, Ferrannini E, Schumacher M, Schmoor C, Ohneberg K, Johansen OE, George JT, Hantel S, Bluhmki E, Lachin JM. How Does Empagliflozin Reduce Cardiovascular Mortality? Insights From a Mediation Analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:356-363
  172. Ferrannini E. Sodium-Glucose Co-transporters and Their Inhibition: Clinical Physiology. Cell Metab 2017; 26:27-38
  173. Mudaliar S, Alloju S, Henry RR. Can a Shift in Fuel Energetics Explain the Beneficial Cardiorenal Outcomes in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Study? A Unifying Hypothesis. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:1115-1122
  174. Verma S, McMurray JJV. SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the-art review. Diabetologia 2018; 61:2108-2117
  175. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, von Eynatten M, Mattheus M, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Zinman B. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:323-334
  176. Cherney DZI, Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Koitka-Weber A, Mattheus M, von Eynatten M, Wanner C. Effects of empagliflozin on the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease: an exploratory analysis from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5:610-621
  177. Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Erondu N, Shaw W, Barrett TD, Weidner-Wells M, Deng H, Matthews DR, Neal B. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:691-704
  178. Neuen BL, Ohkuma T, Neal B, Matthews DR, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Li Q, Jardine M, Oh R, Heerspink HL, Perkovic V. Effect of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes across Different Levels of Albuminuria: Data from the CANVAS Program. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:2229-2242
  179. Mosenzon O, Wiviott SD, Cahn A, Rozenberg A, Yanuv I, Goodrich EL, Murphy SA, Heerspink HJL, Zelniker TA, Dwyer JP, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Kato ET, Gause-Nilsson IAM, Fredriksson M, Johansson PA, Langkilde AM, Sabatine MS, Raz I. Effects of dapagliflozin on development and progression of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019;
  180. Chertow G, Vart P, Jongs N, Toto R, Gorriz JL, Hou FF, McMurray J, Correa-Rotter R, Rossing P, Sjostrom CD, Stefansson B, Langkilde AM, Wheeler D, Heerspink H. Effects of Dapagliflozin in Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021;
  181. Wheeler DC, Stefansson BV, Jongs N, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, McMurray JJV, Correa-Rotter R, Rossing P, Toto RD, Sjostrom CD, Langkilde AM, Heerspink HJL. Effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a prespecified analysis from the DAPA-CKD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021; 9:22-31
  182. The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group, Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Judge P, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu W, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Massey D, Eilbracht J, Brueckmann M, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:117-127
  183. EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Effects of empagliflozin on progression of chronic kidney disease: a prespecified secondary analysis from the empa-kidney trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12:39-50
  184. EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group. Impact of primary kidney disease on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: secondary analyses of the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12:51-60
  185. Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, Furtado RHM, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Sabatine MS. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet 2019; 393:31-39
  186. Muskiet MHA, Wheeler DC, Heerspink HJL. New pharmacological strategies for protecting kidney function in type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7:397-412
  187. Reyes-Farias CI, Reategui-Diaz M, Romani-Romani F, Prokop L. The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295059
  188. Shimizu M, Suzuki K, Kato K, Jojima T, Iijima T, Murohisa T, Iijima M, Takekawa H, Usui I, Hiraishi H, Aso Y. Evaluation of the effects of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis using transient elastography in patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:285-292
  189. Eriksson JW, Lundkvist P, Jansson PA, Johansson L, Kvarnstrom M, Moris L, Miliotis T, Forsberg GB, Riserus U, Lind L, Oscarsson J. Effects of dapagliflozin and n-3 carboxylic acids on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in people with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study. Diabetologia 2018; 61:1923-1934
  190. Sattar N, Fitchett D, Hantel S, George JT, Zinman B. Empagliflozin is associated with improvements in liver enzymes potentially consistent with reductions in liver fat: results from randomised trials including the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) trial. Diabetologia 2018; 61:2155-2163
  191. Kuchay MS, Krishan S, Mishra SK, Farooqui KJ, Singh MK, Wasir JS, Bansal B, Kaur P, Jevalikar G, Gill HK, Choudhary NS, Mithal A. Effect of Empagliflozin on Liver Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial (E-LIFT Trial). Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1801-1808
  192. Raj H, Durgia H, Palui R, Kamalanathan S, Selvarajan S, Kar SS, Sahoo J. SGLT-2 inhibitors in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. World J Diabetes 2019; 10:114-132
  193. Kahl S, Gancheva S, Strassburger K, Herder C, Machann J, Katsuyama H, Kabisch S, Henkel E, Kopf S, Lagerpusch M, Kantartzis K, Kupriyanova Y, Markgraf D, van Gemert T, Knebel B, Wolkersdorfer MF, Kuss O, Hwang JH, Bornstein SR, Kasperk C, Stefan N, Pfeiffer A, Birkenfeld AL, Roden M. Empagliflozin Effectively Lowers Liver Fat Content in Well-Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 4, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:298-305
  194. Akuta N, Watanabe C, Kawamura Y, Arase Y, Saitoh S, Fujiyama S, Sezaki H, Hosaka T, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Suzuki F, Ikeda K, Kumada H. Effects of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease complicated by diabetes mellitus: Preliminary prospective study based on serial liver biopsies. Hepatol Commun 2017; 1:46-52
  195. Silverii GA, Monami M, Mannucci E. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:1052-1056
  196. Apperloo EM, Neuen BL, Fletcher RA, Jongs N, Anker SD, Bhatt DL, Butler J, Cherney DZI, Herrington WG, Inzucchi SE, Jardine MJ, Liu CC, Mahaffey KW, McGuire DK, McMurray JJV, Neal B, Packer M, Perkovic V, Sabatine MS, Solomon SD, Staplin N, Szarek M, Vaduganathan M, Wanner C, Wheeler DC, Wiviott SD, Zannad F, Heerspink HJL. Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors with and without glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: a SMART-C collaborative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12:545-557
  197. Shi FH, Li H, Yue J, Jiang YH, Gu ZC, Ma J, Lin HW. Clinical Adverse Events of High-Dose vs Low-Dose Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of 51 Randomized Clinical Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105
  198. Lin DS, Lee JK, Chen WJ. Clinical Adverse Events Associated with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis Involving 10 Randomized Clinical Trials and 71 553 Individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:2133-2145
  199. Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Genito-urinary infectious adverse events related to sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2024; 17:515-524
  200. Puckrin R, Saltiel MP, Reynier P, Azoulay L, Yu OHY, Filion KB. SGLT-2 inhibitors and the risk of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol 2018; 55:503-514
  201. Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin 2014; 30:1109-1119
  202. Bersoff-Matcha SJ, Chamberlain C, Cao C, Kortepeter C, Chong WH. Fournier Gangrene Associated With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: A Review of Spontaneous Postmarketing Cases. Ann Intern Med2019;
  203. Chia L, Crum-Cianflone NF. Emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) causing Fournier's gangrene. J Infect 2018; 76:38-43
  204. Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Patorno E. Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Treatment With Risk of Hospitalization for Fournier Gangrene Among Men. JAMA Intern Med 2019;
  205. Yang JY, Wang T, Pate V, Buse JB, Sturmer T. Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fournier's gangrene. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020; 8
  206. Silverii GA, Dicembrini I, Monami M, Mannucci E. Fournier's gangrene and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22:272-275
  207. Nadkarni GN, Ferrandino R, Chang A, Surapaneni A, Chauhan K, Poojary P, Saha A, Ferket B, Grams ME, Coca SG. Acute Kidney Injury in Patients on SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:1479-1485
  208. Neuen BL, Young T, Heerspink HJL, Neal B, Perkovic V, Billot L, Mahaffey KW, Charytan DM, Wheeler DC, Arnott C, Bompoint S, Levin A, Jardine MJ. SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7:845-854
  209. Cahn A, Mosenzon O, Wiviott SD, Rozenberg A, Yanuv I, Goodrich EL, Murphy SA, Bhatt DL, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Wilding JPH, Gause-Nilsson IAM, Fredriksson M, Johansson PA, Langkilde AM, Sabatine MS, Raz I. Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in the Elderly: Analysis From the DECLARE-TIMI 58 Study. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:468-475
  210. Fralick M, Schneeweiss S, Patorno E. Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis after Initiation of an SGLT2 Inhibitor. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:2300-2302
  211. Taylor SI, Blau JE, Rother KI. SGLT2 Inhibitors May Predispose to Ketoacidosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100:2849-2852
  212. Hamblin PS, Wong R, Ekinci EI, Fourlanos S, Shah S, Jones AR, Hare MJL, Calder GL, Epa DS, George EM, Giri R, Kotowicz MA, Kyi M, Lafontaine N, MacIsaac RJ, Nolan BJ, O'Neal DN, Renouf D, Varadarajan S, Wong J, Xu S, Bach LA. SGLT2 Inhibitors Increase the Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis Developing in the Community and During Hospital Admission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104:3077-3087
  213. Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:157-166
  214. Li X, Li T, Cheng Y, Lu Y, Xue M, Xu L, Liu X, Yu X, Sun B, Chen L. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on fractures and bone mineral density in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2019:e3170
  215. Bilezikian JP, Watts NB, Usiskin K, Polidori D, Fung A, Sullivan D, Rosenthal N. Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Biomarkers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Canagliflozin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:44-51
  216. Bolinder J, Ljunggren O, Johansson L, Wilding J, Langkilde AM, Sjostrom CD, Sugg J, Parikh S. Dapagliflozin maintains glycaemic control while reducing weight and body fat mass over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014; 16:159-169
  217. Rosenstock J, Frias J, Pall D, Charbonnel B, Pascu R, Saur D, Darekar A, Huyck S, Shi H, Lauring B, Terra SG. Effect of ertugliflozin on glucose control, body weight, blood pressure and bone density in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy (VERTIS MET). Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20:520-529
  218. Inzucchi SE, Iliev H, Pfarr E, Zinman B. Empagliflozin and Assessment of Lower-Limb Amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:e4-e5
  219. Patoulias D, Papadopoulos C, Doumas M. Updated meta-analysis assessing the risk of amputation with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in the hallmark cardiovascular and renal outcome trials. Diabetes Obes Metab2021; 23:1063-1065
  220. Kosiborod MN, Esterline R, Furtado RHM, Oscarsson J, Gasparyan SB, Koch GG, Martinez F, Mukhtar O, Verma S, Chopra V, Buenconsejo J, Langkilde AM, Ambery P, Tang F, Gosch K, Windsor SL, Akin EE, Soares RVP, Moia DDF, Aboudara M, Hoffmann Filho CR, Feitosa ADM, Fonseca A, Garla V, Gordon RA, Javaheri A, Jaeger CP, Leaes PE, Nassif M, Pursley M, Silveira FS, Barroso WKS, Lazcano Soto JR, Nigro Maia L, Berwanger O. Dapagliflozin in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors hospitalised with COVID-19 (DARE-19): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;
  221. Tavares CAM, Azevedo LCP, Rea-Neto A, Campos NS, Amendola CP, Kozesinski-Nakatani AC, David-Joao PG, Lobo SM, Filiponi TC, Almeida GMB, Bergo RR, Guimaraes-Junior MRR, Figueiredo RC, Castro JR, Schuler CJ, Westphal GA, Carioca ACR, Monfradini F, Nieri J, Neves FMO, Paulo JA, Albuquerque CSN, Silva MCR, Kosiborod MN, Pereira AJ, Damiani LP, Correa TD, Serpa-Neto A, Berwanger O, Zampieri FG. Dapagliflozin for Critically Ill Patients With Acute Organ Dysfunction: The DEFENDER Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2024; 332:401-411
  222. Spiazzi BF, Naibo RA, Wayerbacher LF, Piccoli GF, Farenzena LP, Londero TM, da Natividade GR, Zoldan M, Degobi NAH, Niches M, Lopes G, Boyko EJ, Utzschneider KM, Colpani V, Gerchman F. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and cancer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 198:110621
  223. Rendell MS. Efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin in treating diabetes type 1. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19:307-315
  224. Cefalo CMA, Cinti F, Moffa S, Impronta F, Sorice GP, Mezza T, Pontecorvi A, Giaccari A. Sotagliflozin, the first dual SGLT inhibitor: current outlook and perspectives. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019; 18:20
  225. Song P, Onishi A, Koepsell H, Vallon V. Sodium glucose cotransporter SGLT1 as a therapeutic target in diabetes mellitus. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2016; 20:1109-1125
  226. Nuffer W, Williams B, Trujillo JM. A review of sotagliflozin for use in type 1 diabetes. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab2019; 10:2042018819890527
  227. Zambrowicz B, Ogbaa I, Frazier K, Banks P, Turnage A, Freiman J, Boehm KA, Ruff D, Powell D, Sands A. Effects of LX4211, a dual sodium-dependent glucose cotransporters 1 and 2 inhibitor, on postprandial glucose, insulin, glucagon-like peptide 1, and peptide tyrosine tyrosine in a dose-timing study in healthy subjects. Clin Ther 2013; 35:1162-1173 e1168
  228. Powell DR, Zambrowicz B, Morrow L, Beysen C, Hompesch M, Turner S, Hellerstein M, Banks P, Strumph P, Lapuerta P. Sotagliflozin Decreases Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Concentrations by Delaying Intestinal Glucose Absorption. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105
  229. Buse JB, Garg SK, Rosenstock J, Bailey TS, Banks P, Bode BW, Danne T, Kushner JA, Lane WS, Lapuerta P, McGuire DK, Peters AL, Reed J, Sawhney S, Strumph P. Sotagliflozin in Combination With Optimized Insulin Therapy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The North American inTandem1 Study. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1970-1980
  230. Danne T, Cariou B, Banks P, Brandle M, Brath H, Franek E, Kushner JA, Lapuerta P, McGuire DK, Peters AL, Sawhney S, Strumph P. HbA1c and Hypoglycemia Reductions at 24 and 52 Weeks With Sotagliflozin in Combination With Insulin in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The European inTandem2 Study. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1981-1990
  231. Garg SK, Henry RR, Banks P, Buse JB, Davies MJ, Fulcher GR, Pozzilli P, Gesty-Palmer D, Lapuerta P, Simo R, Danne T, McGuire DK, Kushner JA, Peters A, Strumph P. Effects of Sotagliflozin Added to Insulin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:2337-2348
  232. Rosenstock J, Cefalu WT, Lapuerta P, Zambrowicz B, Ogbaa I, Banks P, Sands A. Greater dose-ranging effects on A1C levels than on glucosuria with LX4211, a dual inhibitor of SGLT1 and SGLT2, in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:431-438
  233. Zambrowicz B, Lapuerta P, Strumph P, Banks P, Wilson A, Ogbaa I, Sands A, Powell D. LX4211 therapy reduces postprandial glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal impairment despite low urinary glucose excretion. Clin Ther 2015; 37:71-82 e12
  234. Posch MG, Walther N, Ferrannini E, Powell DR, Banks P, Wason S, Dahmen R. Metabolic, Intestinal, and Cardiovascular Effects of Sotagliflozin Compared With Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Diabetes Care 2022; 45:2118-2126
  235. Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Steg PG, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Lewis JB, Riddle MC, Voors AA, Metra M, Lund LH, Komajda M, Testani JM, Wilcox CS, Ponikowski P, Lopes RD, Verma S, Lapuerta P, Pitt B. Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Recent Worsening Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:117-128
  236. Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Pitt B, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, Lewis JB, Riddle MC, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Cherney DZI, Dwyer JP, Scirica BM, Bailey CJ, Diaz R, Ray KK, Udell JA, Lopes RD, Lapuerta P, Steg PG. Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:129-139
  237. Sridhar VS, Bhatt DL, Odutayo A, Szarek M, Davies MJ, Banks P, Pitt B, Steg PG, Cherney DZI. Sotagliflozin and Kidney Outcomes, Kidney Function, and Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes and CKD: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORED Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 19:557-564
  238. Raskin P, Cincotta AH. Bromocriptine-QR therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: developmental basis and therapeutic profile summary. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2016; 11:113-148
  239. Lamos EM, Levitt DL, Munir KM. A review of dopamine agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes and effects on cardio-metabolic parameters. Prim Care Diabetes 2016; 10:60-65
  240. Holt RI, Barnett AH, Bailey CJ. Bromocriptine: old drug, new formulation and new indication. Diabetes Obes Metab2010; 12:1048-1057
  241. Gaziano JM, Cincotta AH, O'Connor CM, Ezrokhi M, Rutty D, Ma ZJ, Scranton RE. Randomized clinical trial of quick-release bromocriptine among patients with type 2 diabetes on overall safety and cardiovascular outcomes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33:1503-1508
  242. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. The incretin effect in healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes: physiology, pathophysiology, and response to therapeutic interventions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4:525-536
  243. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Incretin hormones: Their role in health and disease. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20 Suppl 1:5-21
  244. Brubaker PL, Drucker DJ. Minireview: Glucagon-like peptides regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis in the pancreas, gut, and central nervous system. Endocrinology 2004; 145:2653-2659
  245. Sesti G, Avogaro A, Belcastro S, Bonora BM, Croci M, Daniele G, Dauriz M, Dotta F, Formichi C, Frontoni S, Invitti C, Orsi E, Picconi F, Resi V, Bonora E, Purrello F. Ten years of experience with DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol 2019;
  246. Zhang X, Zhao Q. Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2016; 34:167-175
  247. Nauck MA, Meier JJ, Cavender MA, Abd El Aziz M, Drucker DJ. Cardiovascular Actions and Clinical Outcomes With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors. Circulation 2017; 136:849-870
  248. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, Steg PG, Davidson J, Hirshberg B, Ohman P, Frederich R, Wiviott SD, Hoffman EB, Cavender MA, Udell JA, Desai NR, Mosenzon O, McGuire DK, Ray KK, Leiter LA, Raz I. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1317-1326
  249. Scirica BM, Braunwald E, Raz I, Cavender MA, Morrow DA, Jarolim P, Udell JA, Mosenzon O, Im K, Umez-Eronini AA, Pollack PS, Hirshberg B, Frederich R, Lewis BS, McGuire DK, Davidson J, Steg PG, Bhatt DL. Heart failure, saxagliptin, and diabetes mellitus: observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 randomized trial. Circulation 2014; 130:1579-1588
  250. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, Nissen SE, Bergenstal RM, Bakris GL, Perez AT, Fleck PR, Mehta CR, Kupfer S, Wilson C, Cushman WC, Zannad F. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1327-1335
  251. Zannad F, Cannon CP, Cushman WC, Bakris GL, Menon V, Perez AT, Fleck PR, Mehta CR, Kupfer S, Wilson C, Lam H, White WB. Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2015; 385:2067-2076
  252. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, Buse JB, Engel SS, Garg J, Josse R, Kaufman KD, Koglin J, Korn S, Lachin JM, McGuire DK, Pencina MJ, Standl E, Stein PP, Suryawanshi S, Van de Werf F, Peterson ED, Holman RR. Effect of Sitagliptin on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:232-242
  253. Rosenstock J, Perkovic V, Johansen OE, Cooper ME, Kahn SE, Marx N, Alexander JH, Pencina M, Toto RD, Wanner C, Zinman B, Woerle HJ, Baanstra D, Pfarr E, Schnaidt S, Meinicke T, George JT, von Eynatten M, McGuire DK. Effect of Linagliptin vs Placebo on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 321:69-79
  254. McGuire DK, Alexander JH, Johansen OE, Perkovic V, Rosenstock J, Cooper ME, Wanner C, Kahn SE, Toto RD, Zinman B, Baanstra D, Pfarr E, Schnaidt S, Meinicke T, George JT, von Eynatten M, Marx N, Cahn A. Linagliptin Effects on Heart Failure and Related Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk in CARMELINA. Circulation 2019; 139:351-361
  255. Men P, Li XT, Tang HL, Zhai SD. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197321
  256. Mosenzon O, Leibowitz G, Bhatt DL, Cahn A, Hirshberg B, Wei C, Im K, Rozenberg A, Yanuv I, Stahre C, Ray KK, Iqbal N, Braunwald E, Scirica BM, Raz I. Effect of Saxagliptin on Renal Outcomes in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:69-76
  257. Cornel JH, Bakris GL, Stevens SR, Alvarsson M, Bax WA, Chuang LM, Engel SS, Lopes RD, McGuire DK, Riefflin A, Rodbard HW, Sinay I, Tankova T, Wainstein J, Peterson ED, Holman RR. Effect of Sitagliptin on Kidney Function and Respective Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: Outcomes From TECOS. Diabetes Care2016; 39:2304-2310
  258. Hashimoto H, Satoh M, Nakayama S, Toyama M, Murakami T, Obara T, Nakaya N, Mori T, Hozawa A, Metoki H. Comparison of renal prognosis between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor users and non-users. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024;
  259. Esaki H, Tachi T, Goto C, Sugita I, Kanematsu Y, Yoshida A, Saito K, Noguchi Y, Ohno Y, Aoyama S, Yasuda M, Mizui T, Yamamura M, Teramachi H. Renoprotective Effect of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Front Pharmacol 2017; 8:835
  260. Hsu WC, Lin CS, Chen JF, Chang CM. The Effects of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on Renal Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Med 2022; 11
  261. Zaresharifi S, Niroomand M, Borran S, Dadkhahfar S. Dermatological side effects of dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitors in diabetes management: a comprehensive review. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 10:6
  262. Roshanov PS, Dennis BB. Incretin-based therapies are associated with acute pancreatitis: Meta-analysis of large randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015; 110:e13-17
  263. Tkac I, Raz I. Combined Analysis of Three Large Interventional Trials With Gliptins Indicates Increased Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:284-286
  264. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62:102-111
  265. Saito T, Ohnuma K, Suzuki H, Dang NH, Hatano R, Ninomiya H, Morimoto C. Polyarthropathy in type 2 diabetes patients treated with DPP4 inhibitors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013; 102:e8-e12
  266. Gentilella R, Pechtner V, Corcos A, Consoli A. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes treatment: are they all the same? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2019; 35:e3070
  267. Tchang BG, Aras M, Kumar RB, Aronne LJ. Pharmacologic Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2024.
  268. Frias JP, Bonora E, Nevarez Ruiz L, Li YG, Yu Z, Milicevic Z, Malik R, Bethel MA, Cox DA. Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11). Diabetes Care 2021; 44:765-773
  269. Jones AG, McDonald TJ, Shields BM, Hill AV, Hyde CJ, Knight BA, Hattersley AT. Markers of beta-Cell Failure Predict Poor Glycemic Response to GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:250-257
  270. Wysham CH, Lin J, Kuritzky L. Safety and efficacy of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist added to basal insulin therapy versus basal insulin with or without a rapid-acting insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a meta-analysis. Postgrad Med 2017; 129:436-445
  271. Abd El Aziz MS, Kahle M, Meier JJ, Nauck MA. A meta-analysis comparing clinical effects of short- or long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists versus insulin treatment from head-to-head studies in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Obes Metab 2017; 19:216-227
  272. Castellana M, Cignarelli A, Brescia F, Perrini S, Natalicchio A, Laviola L, Giorgino F. Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists as add-on to SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:19351
  273. Tchang BG, Kumar RB, Aronne LJ. Pharmacologic Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2024.
  274. Davies MJ, Bergenstal R, Bode B, Kushner RF, Lewin A, Skjoth TV, Andreasen AH, Jensen CB, DeFronzo RA. Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015; 314:687-699
  275. Davies M, Faerch L, Jeppesen OK, Pakseresht A, Pedersen SD, Perreault L, Rosenstock J, Shimomura I, Viljoen A, Wadden TA, Lingvay I. Semaglutide 2.4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 397:971-984
  276. Frias JP, Auerbach P, Bajaj HS, Fukushima Y, Lingvay I, Macura S, Sondergaard AL, Tankova TI, Tentolouris N, Buse JB. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2.0 mg versus 1.0 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN FORTE): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3B trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021; 9:563-574
  277. Lorenz M, Lawson F, Owens D, Raccah D, Roy-Duval C, Lehmann A, Perfetti R, Blonde L. Differential effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on heart rate. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2017; 16:6
  278. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, Dickstein K, Gerstein HC, Kober LV, Lawson FC, Ping L, Wei X, Lewis EF, Maggioni AP, McMurray JJ, Probstfield JL, Riddle MC, Solomon SD, Tardif JC. Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2247-2257
  279. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JF, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Poulter NR, Ravn LS, Steinberg WM, Stockner M, Zinman B, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:311-322
  280. Mann JFE, Fonseca V, Mosenzon O, Raz I, Goldman B, Idorn T, von Scholten BJ, Poulter NR. Effects of Liraglutide Versus Placebo on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease. Circulation 2018; 138:2908-2918
  281. Verma S, Poulter NR, Bhatt DL, Bain SC, Buse JB, Leiter LA, Nauck MA, Pratley RE, Zinman B, Orsted DD, Monk Fries T, Rasmussen S, Marso SP. Effects of Liraglutide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With or Without History of Myocardial Infarction or Stroke. Circulation 2018; 138:2884-2894
  282. Marso SP, Baeres FMM, Bain SC, Goldman B, Husain M, Nauck MA, Poulter NR, Pratley RE, Thomsen AB, Buse JB. Effects of Liraglutide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With or Without Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75:1128-1141
  283. Dhatariya K, Bain SC, Buse JB, Simpson R, Tarnow L, Kaltoft MS, Stellfeld M, Tornoe K, Pratley RE. The Impact of Liraglutide on Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration and Associated Complications in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events: Results From the LEADER Trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:2229-2235
  284. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jodar E, Leiter LA, Lingvay I, Rosenstock J, Seufert J, Warren ML, Woo V, Hansen O, Holst AG, Pettersson J, Vilsboll T. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:1834-1844
  285. Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, Thompson VP, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, Chan JC, Choi J, Gustavson SM, Iqbal N, Maggioni AP, Marso SP, Ohman P, Pagidipati NJ, Poulter N, Ramachandran A, Zinman B, Hernandez AF. Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1228-1239
  286. Hernandez AF, Green JB, Janmohamed S, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Granger CB, Jones NP, Leiter LA, Rosenberg AE, Sigmon KN, Somerville MC, Thorpe KM, McMurray JJV, Del Prato S. Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 392:1519-1529
  287. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P, Probstfield J, Riesmeyer JS, Riddle MC, Ryden L, Xavier D, Atisso CM, Dyal L, Hall S, Rao-Melacini P, Wong G, Avezum A, Basile J, Chung N, Conget I, Cushman WC, Franek E, Hancu N, Hanefeld M, Holt S, Jansky P, Keltai M, Lanas F, Leiter LA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cardona Munoz EG, Pirags V, Pogosova N, Raubenheimer PJ, Shaw JE, Sheu WH, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019;
  288. Gerstein HC, Hart R, Colhoun HM, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Botros FT, Probstfield J, Riddle MC, Ryden L, Atisso CM, Dyal L, Hall S, Avezum A, Basile J, Conget I, Cushman WC, Hancu N, Hanefeld M, Jansky P, Keltai M, Lanas F, Leiter LA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Munoz EGC, Pogosova N, Raubenheimer PJ, Shaw JE, Sheu WH, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. The effect of dulaglutide on stroke: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8:106-114
  289. Kristensen SL, Rorth R, Jhund PS, Docherty KF, Sattar N, Preiss D, Kober L, Petrie MC, McMurray JJV. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7:776-785
  290. Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, Deanfield J, Emerson SS, Esbjerg S, Hardt-Lindberg S, Hovingh GK, Kahn SE, Kushner RF, Lingvay I, Oral TK, Michelsen MM, Plutzky J, Tornoe CW, Ryan DH, Investigators ST. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:2221-2232
  291. Sposito AC, Berwanger O, de Carvalho LSF, Saraiva JFK. GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes: mechanisms that underlie cardiovascular effects and overview of cardiovascular outcome data. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2018; 17:157
  292. Lam CSP, Ramasundarahettige C, Branch KRH, Sattar N, Rosenstock J, Pratley R, Del Prato S, Lopes RD, Niemoeller E, Khurmi NS, Baek S, Gerstein HC. Efpeglenatide and Clinical Outcomes With and Without Concomitant Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibition Use in Type 2 Diabetes: Exploratory Analysis of the AMPLITUDE-O Trial. Circulation 2022; 145:565-574
  293. Fudim M, White J, Pagidipati NJ, Lokhnygina Y, Wainstein J, Murin J, Iqbal N, Ohman P, Lopes RD, Reicher B, Holman RR, Hernandez AF, Mentz RJ. Effect of Once-Weekly Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With and Without Heart Failure and Heart Failure-Related Outcomes: Insights From the EXSCEL Trial. Circulation2019; 140:1613-1622
  294. Husain M, Bain SC, Jeppesen OK, Lingvay I, Sorrig R, Treppendahl MB, Vilsboll T. Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22:442-451
  295. Kosiborod MN, Petrie MC, Borlaug BA, Butler J, Davies MJ, Hovingh GK, Kitzman DW, Moller DV, Treppendahl MB, Verma S, Jensen TJ, Liisberg K, Lindegaard ML, Abhayaratna W, Ahmed FZ, Ben-Gal T, Chopra V, Ezekowitz JA, Fu M, Ito H, Lelonek M, Melenovsky V, Merkely B, Nunez J, Perna E, Schou M, Senni M, Sharma K, van der Meer P, Von Lewinski D, Wolf D, Shah SJ. Semaglutide in Patients with Obesity-Related Heart Failure and Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1394-1407
  296. Kosiborod MN, Abildstrom SZ, Borlaug BA, Butler J, Rasmussen S, Davies M, Hovingh GK, Kitzman DW, Lindegaard ML, Moller DV, Shah SJ, Treppendahl MB, Verma S, Abhayaratna W, Ahmed FZ, Chopra V, Ezekowitz J, Fu M, Ito H, Lelonek M, Melenovsky V, Merkely B, Nunez J, Perna E, Schou M, Senni M, Sharma K, Van der Meer P, von Lewinski D, Wolf D, Petrie MC. Semaglutide in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1069-1084
  297. Muskiet MHA, Tonneijck L, Huang Y, Liu M, Saremi A, Heerspink HJL, van Raalte DH. Lixisenatide and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome: an exploratory analysis of the ELIXA randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:859-869
  298. Mann JFE, Orsted DD, Brown-Frandsen K, Marso SP, Poulter NR, Rasmussen S, Tornoe K, Zinman B, Buse JB. Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:839-848
  299. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P, Probstfield J, Botros FT, Riddle MC, Ryden L, Xavier D, Atisso CM, Dyal L, Hall S, Rao-Melacini P, Wong G, Avezum A, Basile J, Chung N, Conget I, Cushman WC, Franek E, Hancu N, Hanefeld M, Holt S, Jansky P, Keltai M, Lanas F, Leiter LA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cardona Munoz EG, Pirags V, Pogosova N, Raubenheimer PJ, Shaw JE, Sheu WH, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. Dulaglutide and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019;
  300. Tuttle KR, Lakshmanan MC, Rayner B, Busch RS, Zimmermann AG, Woodward DB, Botros FT. Dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (AWARD-7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:605-617
  301. Perkovic V, Tuttle KR, Rossing P, Mahaffey KW, Mann JFE, Bakris G, Baeres FMM, Idorn T, Bosch-Traberg H, Lausvig NL, Pratley R. Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2024; 391:109-121
  302. Shaman AM, Bain SC, Bakris GL, Buse JB, Idorn T, Mahaffey KW, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, Rasmussen S, Rossing P, Wolthers B, Zinman B, Perkovic V. Effect of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Semaglutide and Liraglutide on Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Pooled Analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and LEADER. Circulation 2022; 145:575-585
  303. Colhoun HM, Lingvay I, Brown PM, Deanfield J, Brown-Frandsen K, Kahn SE, Plutzky J, Node K, Parkhomenko A, Ryden L, Wilding JPH, Mann JFE, Tuttle KR, Idorn T, Rathor N, Lincoff AM. Long-term kidney outcomes of semaglutide in obesity and cardiovascular disease in the SELECT trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:2058-2066
  304. Gluud LL, Knop FK, Vilsboll T. Effects of lixisenatide on elevated liver transaminases: systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open2014; 4:e005325
  305. Armstrong MJ, Houlihan DD, Rowe IA, Clausen WH, Elbrond B, Gough SC, Tomlinson JW, Newsome PN. Safety and efficacy of liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated liver enzymes: individual patient data meta-analysis of the LEAD program. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37:234-242
  306. Shao N, Kuang HY, Hao M, Gao XY, Lin WJ, Zou W. Benefits of exenatide on obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with elevated liver enzymes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2014; 30:521-529
  307. Yan J, Yao B, Kuang H, Yang X, Huang Q, Hong T, Li Y, Dou J, Yang W, Qin G, Yuan H, Xiao X, Luo S, Shan Z, Deng H, Tan Y, Xu F, Xu W, Zeng L, Kang Z, Weng J. Liraglutide, Sitagliptin, and Insulin Glargine Added to Metformin: The Effect on Body Weight and Intrahepatic Lipid in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology 2019; 69:2414-2426
  308. Bouchi R, Nakano Y, Fukuda T, Takeuchi T, Murakami M, Minami I, Izumiyama H, Hashimoto K, Yoshimoto T, Ogawa Y. Reduction of visceral fat by liraglutide is associated with ameliorations of hepatic steatosis, albuminuria, and micro-inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients with insulin treatment: a randomized control trial. Endocr J 2017; 64:269-281
  309. Kuchay MS, Krishan S, Mishra SK, Choudhary NS, Singh MK, Wasir JS, Kaur P, Gill HK, Bano T, Farooqui KJ, Mithal A. Effect of dulaglutide on liver fat in patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD: randomised controlled trial (D-LIFT trial). Diabetologia 2020; 63:2434-2445
  310. Armstrong MJ, Gaunt P, Aithal GP, Barton D, Hull D, Parker R, Hazlehurst JM, Guo K, team Lt, Abouda G, Aldersley MA, Stocken D, Gough SC, Tomlinson JW, Brown RM, Hubscher SG, Newsome PN. Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet 2016; 387:679-690
  311. Newsome PN, Buchholtz K, Cusi K, Linder M, Okanoue T, Ratziu V, Sanyal AJ, Sejling AS, Harrison SA. A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:1113-1124
  312. Mann JFE, Rossing P, Bakris G, Belmar N, Bosch-Traberg H, Busch R, Charytan DM, Hadjadj S, Gillard P, Gorriz JL, Idorn T, Ji L, Mahaffey KW, Perkovic V, Rasmussen S, Schmieder RE, Pratley RE, Tuttle KR. Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial. Nat Med 2024;
  313. Faillie JL, Yu OH, Yin H, Hillaire-Buys D, Barkun A, Azoulay L. Association of Bile Duct and Gallbladder Diseases With the Use of Incretin-Based Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:1474-1481
  314. Monami M, Nreu B, Scatena A, Cresci B, Andreozzi F, Sesti G, Mannucci E. Safety issues with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and cholelithiasis): Data from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2017; 19:1233-1241
  315. He L, Wang J, Ping F, Yang N, Huang J, Li Y, Xu L, Li W, Zhang H. Association of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use With Risk of Gallbladder and Biliary Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:513-519
  316. Nauck MA, Muus Ghorbani ML, Kreiner E, Saevereid HA, Buse JB, La Macchia O. Effects of Liraglutide Compared With Placebo on Events of Acute Gallbladder or Biliary Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events in the LEADER Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2019; 42:1912-1920
  317. Bethel MA, Patel RA, Merrill P, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, Mentz RJ, Pagidipati NJ, Chan JC, Gustavson SM, Iqbal N, Maggioni AP, Ohman P, Poulter NR, Ramachandran A, Zinman B, Hernandez AF, Holman RR. Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:105-113
  318. Steinberg WM, Buse JB, Ghorbani MLM, Orsted DD, Nauck MA. Amylase, Lipase, and Acute Pancreatitis in People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Liraglutide: Results From the LEADER Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:966-972
  319. Liu Y, Tian Q, Yang J, Wang H, Hong T. No pancreatic safety concern following glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapies: A pooled analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2018; 34:e3061
  320. Singh AK, Gangopadhyay KK, Singh R. Risk of acute pancreatitis with incretin-based therapy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 13:461-468
  321. Vilsboll T, Bain SC, Leiter LA, Lingvay I, Matthews D, Simo R, Helmark IC, Wijayasinghe N, Larsen M. Semaglutide, reduction in glycated haemoglobin and the risk of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20:889-897
  322. Bethel MA, Diaz R, Castellana N, Bhattacharya I, Gerstein HC, Lakshmanan MC. HbA1c Change and Diabetic Retinopathy During GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Cardiovascular Outcome Trials: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:290-296
  323. Avgerinos I, Karagiannis T, Malandris K, Liakos A, Mainou M, Bekiari E, Matthews DR, Tsapas A. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:188-193
  324. Hashash JG, Thompson CC, Wang AY. AGA Rapid Clinical Practice Update on the Management of Patients Taking GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Prior to Endoscopy: Communication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:705-707
  325. Ueda P, Soderling J, Wintzell V, Svanstrom H, Pazzagli L, Eliasson B, Melbye M, Hviid A, Pasternak B. GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Suicide Death. JAMA Intern Med 2024;
  326. Hurtado I, Robles C, Peiro S, Garcia-Sempere A, Sanfelix-Gimeno G. Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with suicidal ideation and self-injury in individuals with diabetes and obesity: a propensity-weighted, population-based cohort study. Diabetologia 2024;
  327. Tang H, Lu Y, Donahoo WT, Shao H, Shi L, Fonseca VA, Guo Y, Bian J, Guo J. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors in U.S. Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:1004-1015
  328. Wang W, Volkow ND, Berger NA, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Association of semaglutide with risk of suicidal ideation in a real-world cohort. Nat Med 2024; 30:168-176
  329. Hedrington MS, Davis SN. Oral semaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:133-141
  330. Avgerinos I, Michailidis T, Liakos A, Karagiannis T, Matthews DR, Tsapas A, Bekiari E. Oral semaglutide for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;
  331. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Terauchi Y, Altuntas Y, Lalic NM, Morales Villegas EC, Jeppesen OK, Christiansen E, Hertz CL, Haluzik M. PIONEER 1: Randomized Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Monotherapy in Comparison With Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019; 42:1724-1732
  332. Rosenstock J, Allison D, Birkenfeld AL, Blicher TM, Deenadayalan S, Jacobsen JB, Serusclat P, Violante R, Watada H, Davies M. Effect of Additional Oral Semaglutide vs Sitagliptin on Glycated Hemoglobin in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled With Metformin Alone or With Sulfonylurea: The PIONEER 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 321:1466-1480
  333. Pieber TR, Bode B, Mertens A, Cho YM, Christiansen E, Hertz CL, Wallenstein SOR, Buse JB. Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment versus sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7:528-539
  334. Furusawa S, Nomoto H, Yokoyama H, Suzuki Y, Tsuzuki A, Takahashi K, Miya A, Kameda H, Cho KY, Takeuchi J, Nagai S, Taneda S, Kurihara Y, Nakamura A, Atsumi T. Glycaemic control efficacy of switching from dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors to oral semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison study (SWITCH-SEMA 2 study). Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:961-970
  335. Rodbard HW, Rosenstock J, Canani LH, Deerochanawong C, Gumprecht J, Lindberg SO, Lingvay I, Sondergaard AL, Treppendahl MB, Montanya E. Oral Semaglutide Versus Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin: The PIONEER 2 Trial. Diabetes Care 2019; 42:2272-2281
  336. Pratley R, Amod A, Hoff ST, Kadowaki T, Lingvay I, Nauck M, Pedersen KB, Saugstrup T, Meier JJ. Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3a trial. Lancet 2019; 394:39-50
  337. Davies M, Pieber TR, Hartoft-Nielsen ML, Hansen OKH, Jabbour S, Rosenstock J. Effect of Oral Semaglutide Compared With Placebo and Subcutaneous Semaglutide on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 318:1460-1470
  338. Aroda VR, Aberle J, Bardtrum L, Christiansen E, Knop FK, Gabery S, Pedersen SD, Buse JB. Efficacy and safety of once-daily oral semaglutide 25 mg and 50 mg compared with 14 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes (PIONEER PLUS): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3b trial. Lancet 2023; 402:693-704
  339. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, Dungan K, Eliaschewitz FG, Franco DR, Jeppesen OK, Lingvay I, Mosenzon O, Pedersen SD, Tack CJ, Thomsen M, Vilsboll T, Warren ML, Bain SC. Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:841-851
  340. Bucheit J, Ayers J, Pamulapati L, Browning A, Sisson E. A Novel Dual Incretin Agent, Tirzepatide (LY3298176), for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiometabolic Health. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2022; 80:171-179
  341. Syed YY. Tirzepatide: First Approval. Drugs 2022;
  342. Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Pfeiffer AFH. The evolving story of incretins (GIP and GLP-1) in metabolic and cardiovascular disease: A pathophysiological update. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23 Suppl 3:5-29
  343. Heise T, Mari A, DeVries JH, Urva S, Li J, Pratt EJ, Coskun T, Thomas MK, Mather KJ, Haupt A, Milicevic Z. Effects of subcutaneous tirzepatide versus placebo or semaglutide on pancreatic islet function and insulin sensitivity in adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, phase 1 clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022; 10:418-429
  344. Thomas MK, Nikooienejad A, Bray R, Cui X, Wilson J, Duffin K, Milicevic Z, Haupt A, Robins DA. Dual GIP and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Tirzepatide Improves Beta-cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:388-396
  345. Rosenstock J, Wysham C, Frias JP, Kaneko S, Lee CJ, Fernandez Lando L, Mao H, Cui X, Karanikas CA, Thieu VT. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398:143-155
  346. Frias JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, Perez Manghi FC, Fernandez Lando L, Bergman BK, Liu B, Cui X, Brown K. Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide Once Weekly in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:503-515
  347. Ludvik B, Giorgino F, Jodar E, Frias JP, Fernandez Lando L, Brown K, Bray R, Rodriguez A. Once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec as add-on to metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398:583-598
  348. Del Prato S, Kahn SE, Pavo I, Weerakkody GJ, Yang Z, Doupis J, Aizenberg D, Wynne AG, Riesmeyer JS, Heine RJ, Wiese RJ. Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 398:1811-1824
  349. Dahl D, Onishi Y, Norwood P, Huh R, Bray R, Patel H, Rodriguez A. Effect of Subcutaneous Tirzepatide vs Placebo Added to Titrated Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SURPASS-5 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 327:534-545
  350. Frias JP, Nauck MA, Van J, Kutner ME, Cui X, Benson C, Urva S, Gimeno RE, Milicevic Z, Robins D, Haupt A. Efficacy and safety of LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet 2018; 392:2180-2193
  351. Rosenstock J, Frias JP, Rodbard HW, Tofe S, Sears E, Huh R, Fernandez Lando L, Patel H. Tirzepatide vs Insulin Lispro Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes: The SURPASS-6 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 330:1631-1640
  352. Garvey WT, Frias JP, Jastreboff AM, le Roux CW, Sattar N, Aizenberg D, Mao H, Zhang S, Ahmad NN, Bunck MC, Benabbad I, Zhang XM. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 402:613-626
  353. Wilson JM, Nikooienejad A, Robins DA, Roell WC, Riesmeyer JS, Haupt A, Duffin KL, Taskinen MR, Ruotolo G. The dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, tirzepatide, improves lipoprotein biomarkers associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22:2451-2459
  354. Feingold KR. Obesity and Dyslipidemia. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2023.
  355. Sattar N, McGuire DK, Pavo I, Weerakkody GJ, Nishiyama H, Wiese RJ, Zoungas S. Tirzepatide cardiovascular event risk assessment: a pre-specified meta-analysis. Nat Med 2022; 28:591-598
  356. Nicholls SJ, Bhatt DL, Buse JB, Prato SD, Kahn SE, Lincoff AM, McGuire DK, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Sattar N, Zinman B, Zoungas S, Basile J, Bartee A, Miller D, Nishiyama H, Pavo I, Weerakkody G, Wiese RJ, D'Alessio D. Comparison of tirzepatide and dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: SURPASS-CVOT design and baseline characteristics. Am Heart J 2024; 267:1-11
  357. Heerspink HJL, Sattar N, Pavo I, Haupt A, Duffin KL, Yang Z, Wiese RJ, Tuttle KR, Cherney DZI. Effects of tirzepatide versus insulin glargine on kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes in the SURPASS-4 trial: post-hoc analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022; 10:774-785
  358. Gastaldelli A, Cusi K, Fernandez Lando L, Bray R, Brouwers B, Rodriguez A. Effect of tirzepatide versus insulin degludec on liver fat content and abdominal adipose tissue in people with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3 MRI): a substudy of the randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 SURPASS-3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol2022; 10:393-406
  359. Hartman ML, Sanyal AJ, Loomba R, Wilson JM, Nikooienejad A, Bray R, Karanikas CA, Duffin KL, Robins DA, Haupt A. Effects of Novel Dual GIP and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Tirzepatide on Biomarkers of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020; 43:1352-1355
  360. Loomba R, Hartman ML, Lawitz EJ, Vuppalanchi R, Boursier J, Bugianesi E, Yoneda M, Behling C, Cummings OW, Tang Y, Brouwers B, Robins DA, Nikooie A, Bunck MC, Haupt A, Sanyal AJ. Tirzepatide for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis with Liver Fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2024; 391:299-310
  361. Malhotra A, Grunstein RR, Fietze I, Weaver TE, Redline S, Azarbarzin A, Sands SA, Schwab RJ, Dunn JP, Chakladar S, Bunck MC, Bednarik J. Tirzepatide for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obesity. N Engl J Med 2024;
  362. Perreault L, Rodbard H, Valentine V, Johnson E. Optimizing Fixed-Ratio Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes. Adv Ther 2019; 36:265-277
  363. Billings LK, Doshi A, Gouet D, Oviedo A, Rodbard HW, Tentolouris N, Gron R, Halladin N, Jodar E. Efficacy and Safety of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled on Metformin and Basal Insulin: The DUAL VII Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1009-1016
  364. Cai X, Gao X, Yang W, Ji L. Comparison between insulin degludec/liraglutide treatment and insulin glargine/lixisenatide treatment in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017; 18:1789-1798
  365. Kawaguchi Y, Hajika Y, Rinka M, Masumoto K, Sawa J, Hamazaki K, Kumeda Y. Comparison of efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine U-100/lixisenatide in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus using professional continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Investig 2024; 15:598-607
  366. Rosenstock J, Aronson R, Grunberger G, Hanefeld M, Piatti P, Serusclat P, Cheng X, Zhou T, Niemoeller E, Souhami E, Davies M. Benefits of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine Plus Lixisenatide, Versus Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide Monocomponents in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Oral Agents: The LixiLan-O Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:2026-2035
  367. Gough SC, Bode B, Woo V, Rodbard HW, Linjawi S, Poulsen P, Damgaard LH, Buse JB. Efficacy and safety of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with its components given alone: results of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, 26-week, treat-to-target trial in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2:885-893
  368. Younk LM, Davis SN. Evaluation of colesevelam hydrochloride for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2012; 8:515-525
  369. Garg A, Grundy SM. Cholestyramine therapy for dyslipidemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A short-term, double-blind, crossover trial. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:416-422
  370. Prawitt J, Caron S, Staels B. Glucose-lowering effects of intestinal bile acid sequestration through enhancement of splanchnic glucose utilization. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2014; 25:235-244
  371. Hansen M, Sonne DP, Knop FK. Bile acid sequestrants: glucose-lowering mechanisms and efficacy in type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2014; 14:482
  372. Sonne DP, Hansen M, Knop FK. Bile acid sequestrants in type 2 diabetes: potential effects on GLP1 secretion. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 171:R47-65
  373. Beysen C, Murphy EJ, Deines K, Chan M, Tsang E, Glass A, Turner SM, Protasio J, Riiff T, Hellerstein MK. Effect of bile acid sequestrants on glucose metabolism, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, and cholesterol and bile acid kinetics in type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled study. Diabetologia 2012; 55:432-442
  374. Shapiro H, Kolodziejczyk AA, Halstuch D, Elinav E. Bile acids in glucose metabolism in health and disease. J Exp Med 2018; 215:383-396
  375. Potthoff MJ, Potts A, He T, Duarte JA, Taussig R, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, Burgess SC. Colesevelam suppresses hepatic glycogenolysis by TGR5-mediated induction of GLP-1 action in DIO mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2013; 304:G371-380
  376. Harach T, Pols TW, Nomura M, Maida A, Watanabe M, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K. TGR5 potentiates GLP-1 secretion in response to anionic exchange resins. Sci Rep 2012; 2:430
  377. Trabelsi MS, Daoudi M, Prawitt J, Ducastel S, Touche V, Sayin SI, Perino A, Brighton CA, Sebti Y, Kluza J, Briand O, Dehondt H, Vallez E, Dorchies E, Baud G, Spinelli V, Hennuyer N, Caron S, Bantubungi K, Caiazzo R, Reimann F, Marchetti P, Lefebvre P, Backhed F, Gribble FM, Schoonjans K, Pattou F, Tailleux A, Staels B, Lestavel S. Farnesoid X receptor inhibits glucagon-like peptide-1 production by enteroendocrine L cells. Nat Commun 2015; 6:7629
  378. Ooi CP, Loke SC. Colesevelam for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12:CD009361
  379. Feingold KR. Cholesterol Lowering Drugs. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Perreault L, Purnell J, Rebar R, Singer F, Trence DL, Vinik A, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2024.
  380. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA 1984; 251:351-364
  381. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. II. The relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA 1984; 251:365-374
  382. Younk LM, Mikeladze M, Davis SN. Pramlintide and the treatment of diabetes: a review of the data since its introduction. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2011; 12:1439-1451
  383. Singh-Franco D, Perez A, Harrington C. The effect of pramlintide acetate on glycemic control and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in obese patients without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13:169-180
  384. Riddle M, Pencek R, Charenkavanich S, Lutz K, Wilhelm K, Porter L. Randomized comparison of pramlintide or mealtime insulin added to basal insulin treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32:1577-1582
  385. Chapman I, Parker B, Doran S, Feinle-Bisset C, Wishart J, Strobel S, Wang Y, Burns C, Lush C, Weyer C, Horowitz M. Effect of pramlintide on satiety and food intake in obese subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005; 48:838-848

 

Cushing’s Syndrome

ABSTRACT

 

Cushing’s syndrome results from chronic exposure to excessive circulating levels of glucocorticoids. Cushing’s disease, pituitary-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, is the most common cause of endogenous hypercortisolism. The recommended screening tests include the 1mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test, late-night salivary cortisol (at least 2 samples), and 24-hour urinary free cortisol (at least two 24-hour collections). If the initial test is positive on 2 occasions the patient should be evaluated by an endocrinologist for further assessment. Plasma 09:00h ACTH measurement guides imaging and further investigations. If ACTH is elevated/inappropriately normal, MRI scanning of the pituitary should be performed, but if ACTH is suppressed imaging of the adrenals should follow. The corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) or desmopressin tests helps distinguishing pituitary from ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome, while bilateral petrosal sinus sampling remains the gold standard test and should be considered, if available, with the exception of the presence of a pituitary macroadenoma. It is prudent to perform a CT of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis in all patients. Transsphenoidal surgery is the first line treatment for Cushing’s disease, followed by radiotherapy as a second-line option. Adrenalectomy is the first-choice treatment for adrenal ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome and resection of the ACTH source should be performed for the ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, where possible. Bilateral adrenalectomy can always be considered as an option. Steroidogenesis inhibitors remain the most effective medical agents and are useful when surgery or the effects of radiotherapy are awaited or are unsuccessful.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Cushing’s syndrome results from chronic exposure to excessive circulating levels of glucocorticoids. It is now more than one hundred years since Harvey Cushing reported the classical clinical syndrome that bears his name. Even now, its investigation and management can vex the most experienced endocrinologist. It may be difficult to miss the diagnosis in its most florid form but, given the high prevalence of many of its non-specific symptoms such as obesity, muscle weakness, and depression, clinicians are now required to consider the diagnosis in its earlier manifestations. The plethora of investigations often needed for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis has grown over the intervening century, and require careful interpretation. In its severe form and when untreated, the metabolic upset of Cushing's syndrome is associated with a high mortality. However, more subtle excesses of cortisol may also have significant effects on glycemic control and blood pressure, and may therefore be an important cause of morbidity. Treatment is often complex and may require all the modalities of surgery, radiotherapy. and medical management.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, ETIOLOGY, AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CUSHING’S SYNDROME

 

In normal physiology the final product of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is the glucocorticoid cortisol, secreted from the zona fasciculata of the adrenal gland under the stimulus of adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) from the pituitary gland. ACTH is secreted in response to corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) and vasopressin from the hypothalamus. Cortisol exerts negative feedback control on both CRH and vasopressin in the hypothalamus, and ACTH in the pituitary. In normal individuals, cortisol is secreted in a circadian rhythm; levels fall during the day from a peak at 07.00h-08.00h to a nadir at around midnight: they then begin to rise again at 02.00h.

 

It is the loss of this circadian rhythm, together with loss of the normal feedback mechanism of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which results in chronic exposure to excessive circulating cortisol levels and that gives rise to the clinical state of endogenous Cushing's syndrome (1, 2). Any of the numerous synthetic steroids that have glucocorticoid activity, if administered in excessive quantities, can give rise to exogenous Cushing's syndrome. This is the commonest cause of Cushing's syndrome seen in general clinical practice, usually due to treatment for chronic conditions such as asthma or rheumatological disease. The clinician needs to carefully search for exogenous exposure to topical, inhaled, or injected forms of corticosteroids.

 

The etiology of Cushing's syndrome can broadly be divided into two categories, ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent (Table 1).

 

ACTH-dependent forms are characterized by excessive ACTH production, which stimulates all three layers of adrenal cortex and results in bilateral adrenocortical hyperplasia and hypertrophy of adrenal gland. This results in increased weight of the adrenals, which often show micronodular or sometimes macronodular changes. Circulating glucocorticoids are increased and often, to a lesser extent, are accompanied by a rise in serum androgens.

 

ACTH-independent forms constitute a heterogeneous group characterized by low levels of plasma ACTH, either because of adrenal glucocorticoid hypersecretion or secondary to the exogenous administration of glucocorticoids. Except for adrenal adenomas, which usually secrete only glucocorticoids, among the other endogenous adrenal entities there is usually also a rise in androgens and sometimes steroid precursors. The microscopic and macroscopic appearance of non-affected adrenal tissue mainly depends on the etiology of the disorder.

 

Table 1. Etiology of Cushing's Syndrome

ACTH-dependent

Pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome (Cushing's disease)

Ectopic ACTH syndrome

Ectopic CRH syndrome (very rare)

Exogenous ACTH administration

ACTH-independent

Adrenocortical adenoma

Adrenocortical carcinoma

ACTH-independent bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (AIMAH) – now known as bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease (BMAD)(3)

Idiopathic micronodular adrenocortical disease (i-MAD)

Primary pigmented (micro)nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD, <1cm nodules), associated with Carney complex (c-PPNAD) or idiopathic (i-PPNAD)

McCune-Albright syndrome

Exogenous glucocorticoid administration

 

ACTH-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome

 

CUSHING’S DISEASE

 

Pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome, better known as Cushing's disease, is the most common cause of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, accounting for 60-80% of all cases. Epidemiologic studies from Europe suggest an incidence of between 0.7 and 2.4 per million per year (4, 5). It presents much more commonly in women, usually between 25 and 40 years of age.

 

It is almost always due to a corticotroph adenoma (6, 7). Although apparent nodular corticotroph hyperplasia (in the absence of an CRH-producing tumor) has been described, it is rare in large surgical series (8, 9), and its existence is still debated. The majority of tumors are intrasellar microadenomas (<1 cm in diameter), although macroadenomas account for approximately 5-10% of tumors, and extrasellar extension or invasion may occur. True pituitary corticotroph carcinomas with extra-pituitary metastases causing Cushing's syndrome have also rarely been described (10, 11).

 

Despite much research, the molecular pathogenesis of corticotroph adenomas remains unknown, but the evidence supports the concept of primary pituitary rather than a hypothalamic disorder (12). However, recent data suggest that around one-third are due to a somatic mutation causing constitutive activation of USP8, a deubiquitinase which leads to increased expression of the EGF receptor on corticotrophs (13). Corticotroph adenomas could rarely be associated with familial syndromes such as MEN1, MEN2, Carney Complex, or familial isolated pituitary adenoma syndrome. Those are secondary to mutations in the menin gene (MEN1), the RET oncogene, PRKR1A and the AIP (gene coding for aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein) respectively (14). Very rarely, Cushing’s disease has been described in individuals with McCune-Albright and Beckwick-Wiedemann syndromes, where ACTH-independent CS is more common.

 

Up to 40 percent of older patients with long-existing Cushing’s disease develop ACTH-dependent macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia. The adrenals tend to be enlarged, with occasional prominent nodules, but invariably with internodular hyperplasia (15, 16); the level of ACTH may be lower than anticipated, and recovery of the hypercortisolemia delayed after apparent removal of the pituitary tumor.

 

ECTOPIC ACTH SYNDROME AND ECTOPIC CRH TUMORS

 

Most other cases of endogenous ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, after excluding Cushing’ disease, are associated with non-pituitary tumors secreting ACTH, referred to as the ectopic ACTH syndrome. Ectopic sources of ACTH derive from a diverse group of tumor types, which can broadly be divided into the group of highly malignant carcinomas and the more indolent group of neuroendocrine tumors, although this may be thought of as a continuum rather than as a binary separation. This may not be evident from series at endocrine centers where often more occult tumors are investigated (Table 2), but bronchial neuroendocrine tumors tend to predominate and account for up to 25% of ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome cases. The next in frequency is small-cell lung carcinoma, causing around 19% of ectopic Cushing's syndrome (17-19). Around 16% patients with an ectopic source of ACTH remain occult and require repeat imaging. The ectopic ACTH syndrome is more common in men, and usually presents after the age of 40 years, but should always be considered, even in children. 

 

Table 2. Etiology of the Ectopic ACTH Syndrome in Patients (17-19)

Tumor type

Percentage of total Ectopic Cushing's syndrome cases reported in selected literature (n=398)

Lung carcinoma

18.8

Bronchial neuroendocrine tumor

25.4

Thymic neuroendocrine tumor

7.3

Medullary cell carcinoma

4.5

Pancreatic or gastrointestinal NET

11.8

Phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma

3.8

NET of unknown primary

6.0

Occult tumor

16.1

Miscellaneous malignant tumors

6.3

NET - neuroendocrine tumor

 

The ACTH precursor molecule, pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) is expressed not only in normal pituitary but also in several normal extra-pituitary tissues, as well as in some tumors (lung, testis) (20). The mechanism by which these non-corticotroph tumors express the POMC gene is not fully understood, but may be related to hypomethylation of the POMC promoter (21, 22). In general, such tumors tend to produce higher amounts of POMC compared to ACTH, in contrast to the situation in Cushing’s disease. As well as producing ACTH and POMC, these tumors may also produce other pre-ACTH precursor peptides, so-called "big" ACTH (23, 24), which may potentially be helpful in the differential diagnosis of these tumors (25). However, assays for these are not routinely available in clinical practice. Isolated ectopic CRH production is difficult to diagnose and exceedingly rare, with few confirmed cases described in the literature (26). In general, patients secreting CRH ectopically usually also secrete ACTH, rendering the distinction of little practical value.

 

ACTH-Independent Cushing’s Syndrome

 

ACTH-independent causes of Cushing’s syndrome, apart from exogenous glucocorticoids, encompass a heterogeneous group of diseases. The most common pathology is an adrenal adenoma or carcinoma. The latter may lack some of the classic histological features of malignancy, but can usually be differentiated on the basis of weight (more than 100g), nuclear pleomorphism, necrosis, mitotic figures, and vascular or lymphatic invasion. These features are incorporated in the Weiss score for the distinction between adenomas and carcinomas.

 

Adrenal adenomas occur most often around 35 years of age and are significantly more common in women, with an incidence of approximately 0.6 per million per year (5). The incidence of adrenal cancer is approximately 0.2 per million per year (5). It is one and a half times more common in women, and has a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in childhood and adolescence, and 40-50 years (1, 27). Approximately 50-60% of adrenocortical carcinomas secrete adrenal hormones of which the most common are glucocorticoids and adrenal androgens (28).

 

Bilateral macronodular adrenocortical disease (BMAD, previously known as ACTH-independent bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (AIMAH)) is a rare form of Cushing’s syndrome with sometimes huge nodular (>5cm) adrenal glands with more than 1cm nodules on imaging. Most cases are sporadic, but a few familial cases have been reported (29). In most the etiology is unknown, but in a few cases the nodules have been shown to express increased numbers of receptors normally found on the adrenal gland, or ectopic receptors that then can stimulate cortisol production. Most present as subclinical CS. The best described example is food-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, in which ectopic glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors on the adrenal glands respond to GIP released after a meal causing hypercortisolemia (30). Treatment with octreotide may ameliorate the syndrome (31); however, the effect decreases after few months due to down-regulation of somatostatin receptors in the intestine (32). Abnormal expression of vasopressin, b-adrenergic, luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotrophin, serotonin, angiotensin, leptin, glucagon, IL-1, and TSH have also been described and functionally linked to cortisol production (32). BMAD tissue may express more than one of these aberrant receptors (33). Around one-third of patients with BMAD have been found to show inactivating germline mutations of the tumor suppressor gene ARMC5 (armadillo repeat containing protein 5), with each of the nodules demonstrating second independent hits in the same gene: familial forms of BMAD have been described (34). Heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in KDM1A gene encoding lysine-specific demethylase 1 have been reported in GIP-dependent Cushing’s syndrome in BMAD (35). In some individuals with BMAD, germline mutations in MEN1, FH (fumarate hydratase gene), and ACP (familial polyposis coli gene) have been found (36, 37)

 

Cushing’s syndrome due to bilateral nodular adrenal disease can also be a feature of McCune-Albright syndrome (38). The characteristic features are fibrous dysplasia of bone, café-au-lait skin pigmentation, and endocrine dysfunction: pituitary, thyroid, adrenal, or most commonly gonadal hyperfunction (precocious puberty). This condition is caused by an activating mutation in the GNAS gene encoding for the a-subunit of the G protein stimulating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) formation. This occurs in a mosaic pattern in early embryogenesis (39). However, if this affects some adrenal cells the constitutive activation of adenylate cyclase leads to nodule formation and glucocorticoid excess. The normal adrenal cortex, where the mutation is not present, becomes atrophic (40, 41).

 

Primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease (PPNAD), otherwise known as micronodular adrenal disease, is another rare form of Cushing’s syndrome. It is characterized by small or normal-size adrenal glands with cortical micronodules (average 2–3 mm) that may be dark or black in color. The internodular cortex is usually atrophic, unlike in ACTH-dependent macronodular hyperplasia (42). Cases of PPNAD have been reported without Cushing’s syndrome. Bilateral adrenalectomy is curative. 70% of PPNAD occur as part of the Carney complex in association with a variety of other abnormalities, including myxomas of the heart, skin or breast, hyperpigmentation of the skin, and other endocrine disorders (sexual precocity; Sertoli cell, Leydig cell, or adrenal rest tumors; and acromegaly). Cushing’s syndrome occurs in approximately 30% of cases of Carney complex. The tumor suppressor gene PRKAR1A (type 1A regulatory subunit of protein kinase A) has been shown to be mutated in over 70% of patients with Carney complex. A few cases of pituitary corticotrophinoma have been identified in patients with Carney complex, one of them having both adrenal and pituitary Cushing’s syndrome (43, 44). In isolated PPNAD, mutations in PRKAR1A and also the phosphodiesterase 11A (PDE11A) gene have been demonstrated (45, 46).

 

A missense mutation of the ACTH receptor resulting in its constitutive activation and ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome has also been reported (47).

 

Other very rare causes of Cushing's syndrome have been reported: adrenal rest tissue in the liver, in the adrenal beds, or in association with the gonads which may produce hypercortisolemia, usually in the context of ACTH-dependent disease after adrenalectomy (48, 49). Ectopic cortisol production by an ovarian carcinoma has also been noted (50).

 

Exogenous Cushing’s Syndrome

 

The basis for iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome was discussed earlier. The development of the features of Cushing’s syndrome depends on the dose, duration, and potency of the corticosteroids used in clinical practice. ACTH is rarely prescribed nowadays, but it will also result in Cushingoid features if administered long-term. Some features, such as an increase in intraocular pressure, cataracts, benign intracranial hypertension, aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, osteoporosis, and pancreatitis, are reported as more common in iatrogenic than endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, whereas other features, notably hypertension, hirsutism, and oligomenorrhoea/amenorrhea, are less prevalent. However, it is unclear as to whether these are true differences (51).

 

Pseudo-Cushing's Syndrome

 

Pseudo-Cushing's states are conditions in which a patient presents with clinical features suggestive of true Cushing's syndrome and with some biochemical evidence of hypercortisolemia. Both resolve after resolution of the predisposing condition. The pathophysiology has not clearly been established. Depression and alcohol abuse are the two most common such states (1).

 

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF CUSHING’S SYNDROME

 

The clinical manifestations in Cushing’s syndrome result from a chronic exposure to excess glucocorticoids and show a wide spectrum of abnormalities, from mild, subclinical disease to florid manifestations.

 

The classical impression of the disease in its most obvious form, as the association of gross obesity of the trunk with wasting of the limbs, facial rounding and plethora, hirsutism with frontal balding, muscle weakness, spontaneous bruising, vertebral fractures, hypertension and diabetes mellitus, is less commonly seen nowadays (Table 3) (52-54). More frequently, the clinical diagnosis may be equivocal because many symptoms common in Cushing's syndrome, including lethargy, depression, obesity, hypertension, hirsutism, and menstrual irregularity, are also very common in the general population. Therefore, it is useful to have an investigation strategy exploring the more specific features considering the diagnosis, most helpfully relating to the catabolic features of glucocorticoid excess. It is very helpful to notice the presence of several signs and symptoms, accompanied by a progressive course. Sequential photographs of the patient over many years can be extremely helpful in demonstrating progression to a Cushingoid state.

 

The clinical manifestations are usually determined by the duration and amplitude of glucocorticoid exposure, but in some aggressive cases of ectopic ACTH secretion, such as small cell carcinoma, symptoms of hypercortisolism are hard to detect because of the predominant malignant signs and symptoms such as weight loss and anorexia. The mean time to diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is reported as 34 months, and depends on the cause of glucocorticoid excess with shortest time to diagnosis in the ectopic Cushing’s syndrome (14 months), ACTH-independent CS (30months) and the longest with Cushing’s disease (38 months)(55).

 

The type of steroid excess is determined by the underlying condition. Adrenal adenomas generally secrete glucocorticoids, but in ACTH-dependent disease or a carcinoma hyperandrogenism is common.

 

Table 3. Presenting features of patients with Cushing’s syndrome (43-45)

Presenting features

Prevalence (% of patients)

Weight gain/obesity

81-97

Muscle weakness/tiredness

46-67

Round face

88-92

Skin thinning

84

Easy bruising

21-62

Edema

48-50

Purple wide striae

35-84

Hirsutism

56-81

Acne

19-64

Female balding

13-51

Dysmenorrhea

35-84

Reduced libido

33-100 (higher in men)

Hypertension

68-90

Mental health disorders

26-62

Recurrent infections

14-25

Diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance

43-50

Fractures

21-56

 

It is important to observe that combinations of Cushingoid features very much depend on the natural course of its underlying cause.

 

Patients with the ectopic ACTH syndrome usually present with severe and rapidly developing metabolic signs, most prominently anorexia, myopathy, and glucose intolerance. Because of severe hypercortisolemia and additional mineralocorticoid effect, hypokalemic alkalosis is found with peripheral edema on clinical examination. The combination of rapid clinical deterioration, hyperpigmentation, hypokalemic alkalosis, and clinical signs of mineralocorticoid excess should be indicative for suspicion of a small cell lung carcinoma secreting ACTH, or a high-grade bronchial carcinoid or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. In contrast, most patients with ACTH-producing low-grade bronchial carcinoids, because of the long duration of hypercortisolemia before clinical presentation, tend to develop all of the typical Cushingoid features, complicating its differentiation from Cushing’s disease.

 

Patients with adrenal carcinomas have a rapid onset of symptoms, and may complain of abdominal pain accompanied with a palpable tumor mass. In addition to hypercortisolism, they often secrete mineralocorticoids and androgens, therefore distinguishing them from benign adenomas which usually secrete cortisol alone (56). In women with androgen secreting ACC acne and hirsutism is usually readily apparent. However, increasingly, these tumors are discovered incidentally after routine scanning for other reasons.

 

In 10 percent of patients with adrenal incidentalomas, “subclinical” Cushing’s syndrome (currently called mild autonomous cortisol secretion, MACS) can be found; this is characterized by mild hypercortisolism without very obvious clinical manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome (57).

 

Unlike in men, where the main source of androgens is the testes, in women a substantial proportion of circulating androgens are adrenal in origin, such that the signs and symptoms of adrenal hyperandrogenism are readily diagnosed by symptoms of hirsutism and acne, and signs of virilization.

 

Obesity and weight gain are among the most common signs in Cushing’s syndrome. The distribution of fat can be useful, as typically in Cushing's syndrome there is increased visceral adiposity giving rise to truncal obesity, fat deposition in the cheeks and temporal fossae ("moon face"), dorsocervical area ("buffalo hump"), and supraclavicular fat pads (52, 58). Rarely, fat deposition in the epidural space can be manifest as a neurological deficit (59), while retroorbital deposition is noticeable as exophthalmos (60). In children, more generalized weight gain associated with growth retardation should highlight the possibility of the diagnosis (2). Other signs that are more discriminatory are proximal myopathy, wide purple striae, osteoporosis, thin skin, and easy bruising. Based on the screening study of 369 individuals with obesity, or weight in the overweight range, there were no reported cases of Cushing’s syndrome (61). Therefore, screening patients with generalized obesity and no specific features of Cushing’s syndrome is generally not recommended.

 

Myopathy of the proximal muscles of the lower limb and shoulder results from a catabolic glucocorticoid effect and is reported in 40-70% of patients with active Cushing’s syndrome.  When assessing for myopathy it is useful to ask questions about function, typically affected by proximal muscle weakness, such as climbing stairs or getting up from a chair. Formal testing can be of leg extension whilst sitting, or rising unaided from a squatting position. Muscle weakness can be exacerbated by hypokalemia, as a result of concomitant mineralocorticoid activity; it is uncommon in pseudo-Cushing’s states (1). The myopathy may not fully recover after cure of hypercortisolism has been achieved (62).

 

Osteoporosis occurs in approximately 50% of adult patients with Cushing’s syndrome (63) and can be assessed by formal bone densitometry, or from a history of fractures, typically vertebral due to the preferential loss of trabecular bone induced by glucocorticoids. Glucocorticoids inhibit osteoblast function (64). Vertebral compression fractures lead to height loss. Rib fractures are often painless, with typical radiographic appearance of exuberant callus. Also, osteonecrosis (aseptic necrosis) of the femoral head has been described, usually in relation to iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome following chronic high-dose glucocorticoid therapy (65). After successful treatment of the cause, bone density improves to a large extent (66-68).

 

There are many changes in the skin and subcutaneous tissue, which are rarely seen in the general population, suggesting the possibility of Cushing’s syndrome (1, 52). The result of hypercortisolemia is thinning of the skin, which is best tested over the dorsum of the hand, visible as “cigarette paper” (Liddle’s sign), but it is helpful to consider the age and gender of the patient as natural atrophy increases with age. In addition, skin thickness may be preserved in women with hyperandrogenemia related to Cushing's syndrome. The classic plethora (facial redness) is not only a consequence of skin thinning but also of a loss of a facial subcutaneous fat. Because subcutaneous fat and elastic tissue is also diminished, patients suffer easy bruising, which often can be misinterpreted as senile purpura or even a coagulation disorder. Purple-colored "violaceous" striae greater than 1 cm in diameter are almost pathognomonic of Cushing's syndrome (Figure 1). Typically seen on the abdomen, they can also occur in other areas, such as the thighs, breasts and arms. Narrow and colored striae are more commonly present, and should be differentiated from the typical healed ‘pearl’ striae seen most commonly post-partum.

 

Figure 1. The wide purple striae on the abdominal wall due to Cushing’s syndrome (patient permission obtained).

 

Increased fine non-pigmented vellus hair on the upper cheeks or forehead may be seen in Cushing’s syndrome, as well as more typical terminal hair hirsutism on the face and body, reflecting increased androgens. Cutaneous fungal infections as truncal tinea versicolor and onychomycosis are often found.

 

Skin hyperpigmentation is much more common in ectopic Cushing’s syndrome (most often from small cell lung carcinoma) than Cushing’s disease. It is also associated with the rapid onset of profound weakness, often with little or no weight gain, and an absence of a gross Cushingoid appearance. However, as noted above, other forms of the ectopic ACTH syndrome, particularly associated with neuroendocrine tumors, may be clinically indistinguishable from patients with other forms of hypercortisolism (69).

 

Severe hirsutism and virilization strongly suggest an adrenal carcinoma (70).

 

Hypercortisolism may suppress other pituitary hormones. In both men and women, hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism is common and correlates with the degree of hypercortisolemia (71). Glucocorticoids inhibit gonadotrophin–releasing hormone pulsatility and the release of luteinizing (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Women experience menstrual irregularity, while both sexes have decreased libido. Gonadal dysfunction is reversible after correction of the hypercortisolemia (72). In addition, the coexistence of polycystic ovarian syndrome in Cushing’s syndrome is common (73). There is reduced GH secretion during sleep and blunted GH responses to dynamic stimulation tests (74). Thyrotrophin-releasing hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone release has been shown to be disturbed, and in particular the nocturnal surge of thyroid-stimulating hormone is lost (75). This may not have a significant effect on free thyroid hormone levels during active hypercortisolemia, but there is a significantly increased prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease in patients successfully treated for Cushing’s syndrome, and it is therefore important to follow them with serial thyroid function tests (76, 77).

 

Hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis is related to the degree of hypercortisolemia and represents a mineralocorticoid action of cortisol at the renal tubule due to saturation of the enzyme 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2, which inactivates cortisol to cortisone and allows selective binding of aldosterone to the mineralocorticoid receptor (78). When this occurs, cortisol can now access the mineralocorticoid receptor and act as a mineralocorticoid. This hypersaturation occurs when urine free cortisol excretion is greater than about 4100 nmol per day (79). Therefore, although a more common feature of ectopic ACTH secretion, it may also occur in approximately 10% of patients with Cushing’s disease.

 

Cushing’s syndrome is characterized by insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. Glucose intolerance is evident in 20-64%, and overt diabetes mellitus in 30-47% of patients (80-83). Glucocorticoids stimulate glycogen deposition, promote gluconeogenesis, inhibit glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, activate lipolysis, and have a permissive effect on the counter-regulatory hormones, glucagon and catecholamines. An excess of cortisol also stimulates serum and glucocorticoids-inducible kinase-1 which raises the phosphorylation of the forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) in adipocytes, increasing insulin resistance (84). It has been suggested that 2-3% of overweight, poorly-controlled patients with diabetes may have occult Cushing’s syndrome (85, 86). However, in the absence of clinical suspicion the percentage is lower (87, 88), and therefore it is probably not justified to screen for Cushing’s in poorly-controlled diabetic patients unless other suggestive features are present (89). Hyperglycemia becomes easier to control after treatment of hypercortisolism and diabetes remits with cure of Cushing’s syndrome in the majority of patients (90).  .

 

There is an increase in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and a variable effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL). These changes are multifactorial, including cortisol effects on increased hepatic synthesis of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), lipolysis, and free fatty acid metabolism (91, 92).

 

The major cause of mortality in Cushing’s disease are cardiovascular events, and patients exhibit direct markers of accelerated cardiovascular disease, including increased carotid artery intima-media thickness and atherosclerotic plaques (93) as well as hypertension, glucose intolerance, overt diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and visceral obesity. Overall, hypertension is common in patients with Cushing’s syndrome (82). Severe hypertension with additional hypokalemia is more prevalent in ectopic Cushing’s syndrome, usually best controlled with spironolactone or related drug (94). Cardiovascular risk markers continue to be present long after cure of the hypercortisolemia (95) and the cardiovascular risk remains increased (96, 97). Sympathetic autonomic function is also abnormal in patients with Cushing's syndrome (98), and the ECG abnormalities of a prolonged QTc dispersion and left ventricular hypertrophy have been identified as characteristic features in patients with Cushing's disease (99).

 

Hypercortisolemia increases clotting factors including factor VIII, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor, and reduces fibrinolytic activity by elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and antiplasmin. This along with other risk factors such as obesity, surgery, and invasive investigative procedures, results in a significantly increased risk of thrombotic events in patients with Cushing's syndrome (100). Rates of thromboembolic events, either postoperatively or unrelated to surgery, are 18-fold higher in patients with Cushing’s syndrome than the estimated incidence in an age and sex matched control population (101, 102). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported in 20% of patients with Cushing’s syndrome who did not receive thromboprophylaxis, at a mean follow-up of 6-9 years (103). In contrast, VTE occurred in only 6% of patients who received a therapeutic dose of unfractionated heparin at least for 2 weeks after any surgery. The hypercoagulable state may persist even up to 12 months of Cushing’s syndrome remission, and some experts recommend thromboprophylaxis from 24 hours following surgery; however, there is no clear evidence substantiating the duration of thromboprophylaxis (104). The recent Pituitary Society guidelines recommended use of thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing surgery for Cushing’s syndrome and having an additional risk for VTE such us previous VTE, use of estrogens, reduced mobility, and severe hypercortisolism; however, there is no consensus on the duration of VTE prophylaxis (105). This ranged from 2-14 days before surgery to 2 days - 3months after surgery.

 

Ophthalmic complications include glaucoma and exophthalmos due to retroorbital fat deposition (106). Cataract is rare, mostly a complication of diabetes.

 

Psychiatric symptoms such as insomnia, depression, anxiety, easy irritability, paranoid episodes, and attempted suicide or panic attacks are present in more than half of patients having any cause of Cushing’s syndrome (107, 108). Cognitive defects as learning, cognition, and impairment of short-term memory may be prominent (109, 110). These changes are not always reversible with treatment.

 

In patients with Cushing's syndrome there is a greater frequency of infections because of inhibition of immune function by glucocorticoids by decreasing the number of CD4 cells and NK cells and inhibition in cytokine synthesis (111), with predominant effects on cell-mediated immunity (Th1 responses). The most common infections are bacterial, and special attention should be pointed to the possibility of opportunistic pathogens, especially in cases of severe hypercortisolism (112).

 

Some cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome occur in a periodic or cyclical form, with intermittent and variable cortisol secretion, the symptoms and signs waxing and waning according to the active periods of the disease. These patients can cause particular diagnostic difficulty, as it is imperative that the diagnostic tests are performed in the presence of hypercortisolemia to allow accurate interpretation. Patients may 'cycle in' or 'cycle out' over periods of months or years; if at presentation they are eucortisolemic, they will need regular re-evaluation usually with urinary free cortisol or late-night salivary cortisol to allow full investigation at the appropriate time. Cyclicity can in fact occur with all causes of Cushing’s syndrome (113).

 

BIOCHEMICAL CONFIRMATION OF CUSHING’S SYNDROME

 

As stated above, there are many clinical features in various combinations in Cushing’s syndrome, but a small number of relatively pathognomonic ones, such as myopathy, wide purple striae, skin thinning and bruising, usually suggest the need for biochemical investigation. The basis for establishing the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is biochemical confirmation of hypercortisolism, prior to any test of the differential diagnosis in terms of a specific cause.

 

Hypercortisolemia together with the loss of the normal circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion, and disturbed feedback of the HPA axis, are the cardinal biochemical features of Cushing's syndrome. Almost all tests to confirm the diagnosis are based upon these principles. Furthermore, to screen for Cushing's syndrome, tests of high sensitivity should be used initially so as to avoid missing milder cases. Tests of high specificity can then be employed to exclude false positives. In moderate to high clinical probability of Cushing’s syndrome, 2-3 different screening tests should be used, while if the probability of CS is low 1 negative test such as an overnight dexamethasone suppression test is generally sufficient (105).

 

It is important to realize that the validation of the published test criteria employed have been on specific assays, and thus test responses should ideally be validated on the local assay used before the results can be interpreted in particular patients. This is aided by supra-regional and nationwide inter-assay quality control assurance programs (1).

 

Cortisol is normally secreted in a circadian rhythm, with the highest levels early in the morning (07.00-08.00h) and reaching their nadir levels at about midnight (<50 nmol/L or 1.8 μg/dL). In patients with Cushing’s syndrome the circadian rhythm is lost. However, many patients still maintain their morning values within the normal range, but have raised nocturnal levels, rendering midnight levels most useful diagnostically. The measurement of free serum cortisol is very challenging, so either levels of salivary cortisol or total serum cortisol are used. However, exogenous oral estrogens and some medical conditions (see below) will increase cortisol-binding globulin and therefore total cortisol levels. Hence, in all investigations relying on a serum cortisol assay that measures total cortisol, hormone replacement therapy or the oral contraceptive pill should be stopped 4-6 weeks prior to investigation, although it is likely that a shorter time off treatment may still be effective.

 

Late Night Salivary Cortisol

 

Late-night salivary cortisol measurement accurately reflects the plasma free cortisol concentration, because cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) is absent from saliva. Loss of the circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion by measuring late night-time salivary cortisol (best taken at bedtime as nadir salivary cortisol level is detected at the time of falling asleep) can be utilized as a sensitive screening test for Cushing’s syndrome. Due to the simple non-invasive collection procedure which can conveniently be performed at home, and the fact that salivary cortisol is stable for days at room temperature, it offers a number of attractive advantages over blood collection, particularly in children or in cyclical Cushing’s syndrome. Due to variability, taking at least 2 samples on different days is recommended and patients should be advised not to eat, drink, smoke or brush teeth at least 15 minutes before saliva collection. Understandably, this test should not be used in the night-shift workers and individuals with a variable work pattern. Assays using a modification of the plasma cortisol radioimmunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry are now widely available.

 

Over the past decade there has been considerable increasing interest in this test and it was used in 28% of patients with Cushing’s syndrome from a European registry of 1341 patients diagnosed in 2000-2016 and included in the ERCUSYN registry (114). It has been evaluated at a large number of centers worldwide. In a meta-analysis of multiple studies, in adult patients the sensitivity and specificity of the late-night salivary cortisol appears to be relatively consistent in different centers, and overall is 92% and 96% respectively (115). However, it should be noted that the diagnostic value cut-off varies between studies because of different assays and the comparison groups studied. Late-night salivary cortisol used as a screening test had a somewhat lower sensitivity of 88-89% in subjects from the ERCUSYN registry. Normal values also differ between adults and pediatric populations, and may be affected by other comorbidities such as diabetes (116), and the method by which the saliva is collected (117). Not surprisingly, this test performs less well in patients with ‘subclinical Cushing's syndrome’ (118). Salivary cortisol has also been evaluated as the endpoint for the overnight dexamethasone suppression test. This has the potential benefit in terms of convenience but requires further evaluation (119). Salivary cortisol has also been advocated as a sensitive tool to detect recurrence or treatment failure in patient’s post-pituitary surgery for Cushing's disease (120, 121).

 

In summary, late-night salivary cortisol appears to be a useful and convenient screening test for Cushing's syndrome, particularly in the outpatient setting. However, local normal ranges need to be validated based on the assay used and population studied.

 

Urinary Free Cortisol

 

Measurement of urinary free cortisol (UFC) is a non-invasive test that is most commonly used in the screening of Cushing's syndrome (performed in 78% of individuals in the ERCUSYN registry) (114). Under normal conditions, 5-10% of plasma cortisol is 'free' or unbound and physiologically active. Unbound cortisol is filtered by the kidney, with the majority being reabsorbed in the tubules, and the remainder excreted unchanged. As serum cortisol increases in Cushing’s syndrome, the binding capacity of CBG is exceeded and a disproportionate rise in UFC is seen. Thus, 24-hour UFC collection produces an integrated measure of serum cortisol, smoothing out the variations in cortisol during the day and night. In a series of 146 patients with Cushing's syndrome, UFC measurement was shown to have a sensitivity of 95% for the diagnosis (122). However, within this series 11% had at least one of four UFC collections within the normal range, which confirmed the need for multiple collections (at least 2-3 collections are recommended). Furthermore, this sensitivity figure is based on the more florid cases, and is likely to be much less for the more common subtle cases now being seen (123). In the ERCUSYN registry UFC was reported to show 86% sensitivity in adrenal and ectopic Cushing's syndrome and 95% in Cushing’s disease (114).

 

The major drawback of the test is the potential for an inadequate 24-hour urine collection, and written instructions must be given to the patient. Also, multiple collections reduce the possibility of overlooking episodic cortisol secretion. In addition, simultaneous creatinine excretion in the collection should be measured to assess completeness, and should equal approximately 1g/24 hours in a 70kg patient (variations depend on muscle mass). This should not vary by more than 10% between collections in the same individual (70). The cortisol to creatinine ratio in the first urine specimen can be used as a screening test, especially when cyclic secretion is suspected (124), with a cortisol to creatinine ratio over 25 nmol/mmol being suggestive of Cushing’s syndrome.

 

The 24-hour UFC is of little value in the differentiation from pseudo-Cushing's states (125, 126).

 

High-performance liquid chromatography or tandem mass spectrometry are now used to measure UFC, which overcomes the previous problem with conventional radioimmunoassays of cross-reactivity of some exogenous glucocorticoids and other structurally similar steroids (127). Drugs such as carbamazepine, digoxin, and fenofibrate may co-elute with cortisol during high-performance liquid chromatography and cause falsely elevated results (128).

 

In summary, UFC measurements have a high sensitivity if collected correctly, and several completely normal collections make the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome very unlikely. Values greater than four-fold normal are rare except in Cushing's syndrome. For intermediate values the specificity is somewhat lower, and thus patients with marginally elevated levels require further biochemical assessment (1, 123). It is our opinion that the test is of little use for screening, and in general we rarely utilize it as a 1st line screening test nowadays.

 

Low-Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test (LDDST)

 

This test works on the principle that in normal individual’s administration of an exogenous glucocorticoid results in suppression of the HPA axis, whilst patients with Cushing's syndrome are resistant, at least partially, to negative feedback. Dexamethasone is a synthetic glucocorticoid that is 30 times more potent than cortisol, and with a long duration of action. It does not cross-react with most cortisol assays. The original low-dose dexamethasone test  (LDDST) described by Liddle in 1960 measured urinary 17-hydroxy-corticosteroid after 48 hours of dexamethasone 0.5mg 6 hourly (129). However, the simpler measurement of a single plasma or serum cortisol at 09.00h has been validated in various series, and gives the test a sensitivity of between 95% and 100% (123, 130).

 

The overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ONDST) was first proposed by Nugent et al. in 1965; this measures a 09.00h plasma cortisol after a single dose of 1mg dexamethasone taken at midnight (131), and is thus considerably easier to perform. Since then, various doses have been suggested for the overnight test, between 0.5 and 2mg, and various diagnostic cut-offs have been used (132, 133). There appears to be no advantage in discrimination between 1mg and 1.5mg or 2mg (134). Although higher doses have been tried, the increased suppression in some patients with Cushing's syndrome significantly decreases the sensitivity of the test (135). The 1mg ONDST was used in 60% of the subjects in the European registry of Cushing's syndrome (n=1341) and had the best performance among screening tests, with a sensitivity of 98-99% (114).

 

In a comprehensive review of the LDDST, both the original 2-day test and the overnight protocol appear to have comparable sensitivities (98-100%) using the criteria of a post-dexamethasone serum cortisol of <50nmol/L (1.8μg/dl) (136). However, the specificity is greater for the 2-day test (95-100%) compared to the overnight test (88%) (136).

 

If the ONDST test is used, we suggest that a dose of dexamethasone 1mg to be given at midnight and a threshold of cortisol <50nmol/L (1.8 μg/dl) at 09.00h will rarely lead to the diagnosis being missed, but false positives remain significant. In general, the overnight test is an excellent screening test, and we use the 48 hours LDDST as a confirmation test.

It may be useful to measure the dexamethasone level when ONDST is positive to exclude interference of other medications acting as CYP3A4 inducers causing fast metabolism of dexamethasone and subsequent false positive results (see below), although such measurements are not readily available. Another reason for the false positive results on LDDST is increasing cortisol-binding globulin (seen in pregnancy, estrogens users or chronic active hepatitis).

 

It should be noted that patients with PPNAD may show a paradoxical rise in cortisol levels to dexamethasone (137).

 

Second Line Tests

 

In some patients with equivocal results, other tests may be needed. The most useful of these are a midnight serum cortisol, LDDST as described above, and the dexamethasone-CRH test. Less reliable tests include the insulin tolerance test and the loperamide test (138). The desmopressin test is discussed below.

 

MIDNIGHT SERUM CORTISOL       

 

Before the introduction of salivary cortisol, measurement of a midnight serum cortisol was the only reliable method used to determine loss of the circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion. It is still useful as a second-line test in cases of diagnostic difficulty. However, it is a burdensome test that requires that the patient should have been an in-patient for at least 48 hours to allow acclimatization to the hospital environment. The patient should not be forewarned of the test, and should be asleep prior to venipuncture, which must be performed within 5-10 minutes of waking the patient. A single sleeping midnight plasma cortisol <50nmol/L (1.8 μg/dL) effectively excludes Cushing's syndrome (139), but false positive results do occur, particularly in the critically ill, in acute infection, heart failure, and in the pseudo-Cushing's state associated with depression (140).

 

An awake midnight cortisol of greater than 207 nmol/L (7.5 mg/dL) was reported to show 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the differentiation of Cushing's syndrome from pseudo-Cushing's states (141). In the ERCUSYN cohort, 62% individuals with Cushing's syndrome had this test performed with a reported sensitivity of 96-99% (114).

This test has been currently replaced by LNSC and in most hospitals with high demand for the in-patient medical beds, investigations for CS are done mainly on an out-patient environment.

 

DEXAMETHASONE-CRH TEST

 

In 1993 the combined dexamethasone-CRH (Dex-CRH) test was introduced for the difficult scenario of the differentiation of pseudo-Cushing’s states (currently known as non-neoplastic hypercortisolism) from true Cushing’s syndrome in patients with only mild hypercortisolemia and equivocal physical findings (125). The theory is that a small number of patients with Cushing's disease as well as normal individuals will show suppression to dexamethasone, but those with Cushing's disease should still respond to CRH with a rise in ACTH and cortisol afterwards. In the original description of the test, dexamethasone 0.5 mg every 6 hours was given for eight doses, ending 2 hours before administration of ovine CRH (1 µg/kg intravenously) to 58 adults with UFC less than 1000 nmol/day (360 µg/day). Subsequent evaluation proved 39 to have Cushing’s syndrome and 19 to have a pseudo-Cushing’s state. The plasma cortisol value 15 minutes after CRH was less than 38 nmol/L (<1.4 µg/dL) in all patients with pseudo-Cushing’s states and greater in all patients with Cushing’s syndrome. A prospective follow-up study by the same group in 98 patients continued to show the test to have an impressive sensitivity and specificity of 99% and 96%, respectively (125). Importantly, in these two studies although eight of 59 patients with proven Cushing's disease showed suppression to dexamethasone, all were correctly characterized after CRH. However, the results from a number of other smaller studies have challenged the diagnostic utility of this test over the standard LDDST. Overall, in these reports the specificity of the LDDST in 92 patients without Cushing's syndrome was 79%, versus 70% for the Dex-CRH. The sensitivity in 59 patients with Cushing's syndrome was 96% for the LDDST versus 98% for the Dex-CRH (142). It is perhaps not surprising that the diagnostic utility of the Dex-CRH has altered with further studies at more centers. There are a number of reasons why there might be the case: variable dexamethasone metabolism in individuals; different definitions of patients with pseudo-Cushing's; different protocols and assays; and variable diagnostic thresholds. It is recommended that if this test is used, a dexamethasone level is measured at the time of CRH administration and the serum cortisol assay is accurate down to these low levels (89). We would not recommend its use, and indeed with the lack of availability of CRH currently, it is generally impossible to perform.

 

DESMOPRESSIN TEST

 

ACTH-secreting adenomas express V3 receptors therefore desmopressin increases ACTH and subsequently cortisol in patients with Cushing’s disease. The test involves intravenous injection of 10mcg of desmopressin and ACTH measurement every 15 minutes from -15minutes to 90minutes. The study of 173 subjects including 76 with Cushing’s disease, 30 with non-neoplastic hypercortisolism, 36 with obesity and 31 of controls proposed cut-off criteria for positive desmopressin test as ACTH increment of >6pmol/L (30ng/L) (143). Subsequently, another study of 52 patients with Cushing’s syndrome and 28 controls suggested new criteria with ACTH increment of 4pmol/L and basal cortisol above 331nmol/L providing sensitivity of 90.3% and specificity of 91.5% (144). The meta-analysis of 3 studies described use of desmopressin test in differentiation of Cushing’s disease and non-neoplastic hypercortisolism with cut-off for ACTH increment by 6 pmol/L in 2 studies and ACTH increment of 4 pmol/L and basal cortisol more than 331nmol/L gave pooled sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 94% (143-145). However, there was high patient selection bias and low certainty of evidence in that meta-analysis (145).

 

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CUSHING’S SYNDROME

 

Once Cushing's syndrome has been diagnosed, the next step is to differentiate between ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent causes by measurement of plasma ACTH. Modern two-site immunoradiometric assays are more sensitive than the older radioimmunoassays and therefore provide the best discrimination. Rapid collection and processing of the sample is essential as ACTH is susceptible to degradation by peptidases so that the sample must be kept in an ice water bath and centrifuged, aliquoted, and frozen within 2 hours to avoid a spuriously low result. Measurements are usually taken on two different days to avoid misinterpretation because of the episodic secretion of ACTH. The circadian rhythm of ACTH in patients having Cushing’s syndrome is lost, as it is for cortisol measurement, and the optimal sample should be taken at 08.00-09.00h (146).

 

It is useful to repeat this test because patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s disease have been shown to have on occasion ACTH levels less than 10 ng/L (2 pmol/L) on conventional radioimmunoassay (147). The ACTH immunoassays can interfere with heterophilic antibodies or ACTH fragments and cases of falsely elevated ACTH have been reported using the Immulite ACTH assay (148). Therefore, if results are inconsistent or not in keeping with the clinical or imaging features, ACTH should be remeasured using an alternative immunoassay.

 

Consistent ACTH measurements of <10 ng/L (2 pmol/L) essentially confirm ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome, and radiologic evaluation of adrenals is the next step in diagnosis. Conversely, if levels are consistently greater than 20-30 ng/L (4-6 pmol/L), Cushing's syndrome is ACTH-dependent, due to pituitary disease or ectopic ACTH secretion.

 

Intermediate levels are less discriminatory, but a lack of ACTH response to the CRH test or the desmopressin test (see below) may be particularly helpful in these intermediate cases.

 

Investigating ACTH-Independent Cushing's Syndrome

 

Imaging of the adrenal glands is the mainstay in differentiating between the various types of ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning of the adrenal glands is the investigation of choice, is accurate for masses greater than 1 cm, and allows evaluation of the contralateral gland (149). MRI may be useful for the differential diagnosis of adrenal masses; the T2-weighted signal is progressively less intense in phaeochromocytoma, carcinoma, adenoma, and finally normal tissue (150).

 

Adrenal tumors typically appear as a unilateral mass with an atrophic contralateral gland (151). If the lesion is greater than 5 cm in diameter it should be considered to be potentially malignant until proven otherwise, and discussed in the local adrenal Multidisciplinary Team meeting (MDT). In comparison to carcinomas, adrenal adenomas are usually smaller and have a lower unenhanced CT attenuation value (usually <20HU) (152). Adrenal adenomas are homogeneous and hypointense on MRI T1-weighted images and iso- or hyperintense comparing to the liver on T2 images. Adrenal adenomas also demonstrate signal drop on out-of-phase MR imaging consistent with lipid-rich tissue. Signs of necrosis, hemorrhage and calcification are characteristics of both carcinoma and phaeochromocytomas, which can also co-secrete ACTH (153). Additional laboratory diagnostics reveal solely raised cortisol levels in adenomas, unlike additionally raised androgen levels in adrenocortical carcinomas. Bilateral adenomas can be present (154).

 

In PPNAD the adrenal glands appear normal or slightly lumpy from multiple small nodules, but are not generally enlarged (150, 155).

 

Exogenous administration of glucocorticoids results in adrenal atrophy and very small glands may be a clue as to this entity.

 

BMAD is characterized by bilaterally large (>5 cm) adrenals with a nodular configuration (15, 156).

 

Confusion can arise as the CT appearance of the adrenals in BMAD may be similar to the appearance seen in ACTH-dependent forms of Cushing's syndrome, where adrenal enlargement is present in 70% of cases (157), but the two can usually be distinguished by the ACTH level and the degree of adrenal enlargement. Some patients with Cushing's disease can also develop a degree of adrenal autonomy which can cause biochemical confusion (16).

 

Identifying the Source in ACTH-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome

 

This has been one of the most significant challenges in the investigation of Cushing's syndrome in the past, although advances over the last 15 years have greatly improved our diagnostic capability. Cushing's disease accounts for by far the majority of cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome, between 85% and 90% in most series. In the European registry of Cushing’s syndrome (n=1341), 67% of cases were due to pituitary disease and, of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome , 92% were of pituitary origin (54).This depends on gender, and in the series of 115 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome, of the 85 women, 92% had Cushing's disease; this percentage was 77% in the 30 men (158). Therefore, even before one starts investigation, the pretest probability that the patient with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome has Cushing's disease is very high, and any investigation must improve on this pretest likelihood. However, as transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is widely accepted as the primary treatment of Cushing's disease, testing should be designed to avoid inappropriate pituitary surgery in patients with ectopic ACTH production. Thus, any test should ideally be set with 100% specificity for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease.

 

Levels of serum cortisol and ACTH tend to be higher in the ectopic ACTH syndrome, but there is considerable overlap of values, producing poor discrimination (158, 159). Hypokalemia is more common in ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome than in patients with Cushing’s disease.

 

INVASIVE TESTING

 

Bilateral Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling

 

This is the "gold standard" test for distinguishing between Cushing's disease and an ectopic source of ACTH. However, most experts agree that if a pituitary macroadenoma (tumor of ³ 10mm) is visualized on MRI and dynamic tests (hCRH/desmopressin) are consistent with Cushing’s disease, Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) is not necessary (105).The procedure involves placement of sampling catheters in the inferior petrosal sinuses that drain the pituitary. Blood for measurement of ACTH is obtained simultaneously from each sinus and a peripheral vein at two time points before and at 3-5 minutes and possibly also 10 minutes after the administration of 100mcg of human CRH if available, or nowadays 10mg desmopressin. A central (inferior petrosal) to peripheral plasma ACTH gradient of 2:1 or greater pre-desmopressin, or a gradient of 3:1 post-desmopressin (previously post-CRH), is consistent with Cushing's disease. The results from early series show these criteria to be 100% sensitive and specific for Cushing’s disease when CRH stimulation was used (160, 161). However, it is now clear that false negative tests and to a smaller degree false positive test results do occur (162-164). A meta-analysis including 23 studies and 1642 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome reported that IPSS had sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 89% with area under the ROC curve of 97% to diagnose Cushing’s disease again all with CRH stimulation (165).

 

In order to minimize these inaccuracies it is important to ensure the patient is actively hypercortisolemic (as above) at the time of the study (166), and that catheter position is confirmed as bilateral and any anomalous venous drainage noted by venography before sampling (167). There appears to be no discriminatory difference between ovine or human sequence CRH; however, as CRH is no longer available, desmopressin 10 μg shows similar efficacy (168). The study with 226 patients with Cushing’s disease and 24 patients with ectopic ACTH-dependent CS who underwent BIPSS with desmopressin stimulation achieved sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 100% when ACTH ration >2.8 was applied (169). However, it has been noted that for all with >6mm pituitary microadenoma on MRI baseline ACTH ratio of >1.4 distinguished all with Cushing’s disease without need for desmopressin stimulation. The meta-analysis of 11 studies including 611 patients compared BIPPS with CRH versus DDAVP stimulation and found no statistical difference in the results with pooled sensitivity of 96 % for desmopressin and 98% for CRH with 100% specificity (170). None of the studies using desmopressin reported subsequent hyponatremia when fluid restriction in the next 24hs has been followed.

 

It should be noted that the procedure is technically difficult, and should only be performed by radiologists experienced in the technique. The most common complications are transient ear discomfort or pain, and local groin hematomas. More serious transient and permanent neurological sequelae have been reported, including brainstem infarction, although these are rare (<1%), and most have been related to a particular type of catheter used (171, 172); if there are any early warning signs of such events the procedure should be immediately halted. Patients should be given heparin during sampling to prevent thrombotic events (82). There appears to be no advantage in trying to sample the cavernous sinus. Sampling of the internal jugular veins is a simpler procedure but is not as sensitive as BIPSS (173).

 

A baseline inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) to peripheral prolactin ratio of >1.8 has been suggested as a confirmation of a successful catheterization (174). A multicenter study including 156 individuals with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s disease  who underwent IPSS reported that IPS to peripheral ACTH to prolactin ratio of ³1.4 improved further BIPSS performance in differentiating Cushing’s disease from ectopic ACTH-dependent CS with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% (175), but not all are agreed that this extra level of analysis is worthwhile.

 

BIPSS has also been suggested to help to lateralize microadenomas within the pituitary using the inferior petrosal sinus ACTH gradient (IPSG), with a basal or post-stimulus inter-sinus ratio of at least 1.4 being the criteria for lateralization used in all large studies (161, 162, 176, 177). In these studies, the diagnostic accuracy of localization as assessed by operative outcome varied between 59% and 83%. This is improved if venous drainage is assessed to be symmetric (178). A study of 501 cases of Cushing’s disease showed that an interpetrosal ACTH ratio of ≥1.4 was achieved in 98% of patients but lateralized the lesion correctly in only 69% of subjects. A pituitary lesion was identified on the pre-operative MRI in 42% of patients in that study and, if seen, had a positive predictive value of 86% (179). Hence, the interpetrosal ratio can guide pituitary exploration in cases of a normal pre-surgery MRI scan. In this study, MRI was falsely positive in 12% of individuals.

 

An enhanced dynamic MRI has a better detection rate of pituitary microadenomas than conventional MRI and was reported to identify a pituitary lesion in 81% (83 out of 102) of patients with Cushing’s disease and lateralized correctly the pituitary adenoma in 62 out of 71 patients with histologically-proven Cushing's disease (180).

 

The accuracy of lateralization appears to be higher in children (90%), a situation where imaging is often negative (181). There is some discrepancy between studies as to whether CRH or desmopressin improve the predictive value of the test (182). If a reversal of lateralization is seen pre- and post-stimulus, the test cannot be relied upon (183).

 

NON-INVASIVE TESTS

 

High Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test

 

As with the LDDST, the high dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) was originally proposed by Liddle to differentiate between cortisol-secreting adrenal tumors and Cushing's disease (129). The HDDST’s role in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome is based on the premise that most pituitary corticotroph tumors retain some albeit reduced responsiveness to negative glucocorticoid feedback, whereas ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors, like adrenal tumors, typically do not, with the exception of some neuroendocrine tumors, mainly bronchial (184, 185).

 

The test is performed according to the same protocol as the LDDST, either as 2mg 6 hourly for 2 days, or as an overnight using a single dose of 8mg of dexamethasone at 23.00h. The latter is more convenient for a patient because a single blood specimen is being tested on the next day at 08.00h. In most patients with pituitary-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, the final serum cortisol level is less than 5 mcg/dL (140 nmol/L). In normal subjects the level is usually undetectable (186).

 

Overall, only about 80% of patients with Cushing's disease will show a positive response to the test, defined by suppression of cortisol to less than 50% of the basal value. There are a high number of false positive tests (~10-30%) seen in ectopic Cushing’s syndrome (186-189). Shifting the criteria can only increase sensitivity with a loss of specificity, and vice-versa. Therefore, the test achieves worse discrimination than the pretest probability of Cushing's disease. In addition, one study has shown that suppression to HDDST can be inferred by a >30% suppression of serum cortisol to the 2-day LDDST (190). Therefore, we no longer recommend the routine use of the HDDST except when bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling is not available, and then only as part of a combined testing strategy with other tests. (see below).

 

The HDDST was performed in 30% of subjects (n=402) from the European registry of patients with Cushing's syndrome, with a cortisol reduction supporting the diagnosis of pituitary Cushing's syndrome in 92% and ectopic Cushing's syndrome in 93% of patients (specificity not given) (114). When used in individuals with negative IPSS, HDDST supported the diagnosis of pituitary disease in 100% and ectopic Cushing's syndrome in 82%.

 

The combined use of the HDDST and enhanced dynamic MRI of the pituitary was compared to BIPSS in 71 patients with histologically-proven Cushing's disease (180). The combination had a 98.6% positive predictive value (PPV) for Cushing's disease but a sensitivity of only 69.6%. In that study BIPSS alone had a similar PPV of 97%.

 

The CRH Test

 

Both ovine and human-sequence CRH are currently unavailable in most countries, and the test has been superseded by desmopressin. However, as it may become available in the future, the following section may be useful.

 

The use of the CRH (corticotrophin-releasing hormone) test for the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome is based on the premise that pituitary corticotroph adenomas retain responsivity to CRH, while ectopic ACTH tumors lack CRH receptors and therefore do not respond to the agent. 100 µg of human sequence CRH (hCRH) is given as a bolus injection and the change in ACTH and cortisol measured. Human-sequence CRH has qualitatively similar properties to oCRH, although it is shorter-acting with a slightly smaller rise in plasma cortisol and ACTH in obese patients, and in those with Cushing's disease (191). This may be related to the more rapid clearance of the human sequence by endogenous CRH-binding protein (192).

 

Different centers have used differing protocols, including type of CRH and sampling time-points, and thus there is little consensus on a universal criterion for interpreting the test. In one of the largest published series of the use of oCRH, an increase in ACTH by at least 35% from a mean basal (-5 and -1 minutes) to a mean of 15 and 30 minutes after oCRH in 100 patients with Cushing's disease and 16 patients with the ectopic ACTH syndrome gave the test a sensitivity of 93% for diagnosing Cushing’s disease, and was 100% specific (193). Conversely, in the large series of the use of hCRH in 101 patients with Cushing's disease and 14 with the ectopic ACTH syndrome, the best criterion to differentiate Cushing's disease from ectopic ACTH syndrome was a rise in cortisol of at least 14% from a mean basal (-15 and 0 minutes) to a mean of 15 and 30 minutes, giving a sensitivity of 85% with 100% specificity. The best ACTH response was a maximal rise of at least 105%, giving 70% sensitivity and 100% specificity (158). In a multicentered analysis from Italy, both hCRH and oCRH were used in 148 patients with Cushing's disease and 12 with the ectopic ACTH syndrome. A maximal 50% increase in ACTH and cortisol levels were considered as consistent with Cushing's disease, excluding all patients with the ectopic ACTH syndrome and thus giving 100% specificity. The sensitivity and specificity for the ACTH response were comparable for the two types of CRH (sensitivity: 85% vs 87% for oCRH and hCRH respectively).

 

A CRH test was performed in 351 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome from the European registry of Cushing's syndrome, with a peak ACTH supporting the diagnosis of Cushing's disease in 90% of cases and ectopic Cushing's syndrome in 84% of patients (114). However, the sensitivity for the cortisol response was significantly greater with oCRH than with hCRH (sensitivity: 67% vs 50% for oCRH and hCRH respectively) (194). The authors do not report in this paper or an associated publication (27) whether time-point combinations other than the maximal were analyzed for the rise in cortisol. Indeed, our data showed that if the maximal rise in cortisol is used the sensitivity falls to 71% (158). These results again demonstrate that specific criteria need to be developed for each test, and cannot readily be extrapolated from other similar but non-identical agents.

 

In summary, the CRH test has been a useful discriminator between causes of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome, particularly in a combined testing strategy with the HDDST or LDDST when diagnostic accuracy is greater than that of either test alone, yielding 98% to 100% sensitivity, and an 88% to 100% specificity (187, 190, 195). Which cut-off to use should be evaluated at individual centers, and caution should be exercised as there will undoubtedly be patients with the ectopic ACTH syndrome who respond outside these cut-offs. However, it should be remembered that responses to both CRH and high-dose dexamethasone are more frequently discordant in Cushing's disease due to a macroadenoma (196). Nevertheless, where BIPSS is unavailable, a response to both CRH (a rise) and the LDDST (a fall) renders an ectopic source extremely unlikely.

 

Desmopressin Test

 

Both vasopressin and desmopressin (a synthetic long-acting vasopressin analogue without the V1-mediated pressor effects) stimulate ACTH release in Cushing’s disease, probably through the corticotroph-specific V3 (or V1b) receptor. The study of 170 patients including 149 with Cushing’s disease reported that an ACTH increase after desmopressin by more than 32.4% provided sensitivity of 83% but specificity of 62%, which was inferior to HDDST (197). The meta-analysis of 11 studies using DDAVP in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome reported that combination of an ACTH increase of >35% and a cortisol increase of >20% including 511 individuals had a pooled sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 74% to correctly diagnose Cushing’s disease (145).

 

Hexarelin, a growth hormone secretagogue, stimulates ACTH release probably occurs through stimulation of vasopressin release in normal subjects (198), and by stimulation of aberrant growth hormone secretagogue receptors in corticotroph tumors (199).

These peptides have been utilized in a similar manner to CRH to try and improve the differentiation of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, but have unfortunately proved inferior (200-202).

 

A combined desmopressin and hCRH stimulation test initially looked promising (203), but further study of this combined test showed significant overlap in the responses (204). The inferior discriminatory value of these stimulants is most likely due to the expression of both vasopressin and growth hormone secretagogue receptors by some ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors (82, 205).

 

A retrospective study including 167 patients with Cushing’s disease and 27 patients with ectopic ACTH-dependent CS reported 100% positive predictive value for diagnosing Cushing’s disease when both CRH-stimulation test and DDAVP stimulation test were positive when the pituitary MRI scan and CT scan for ectopic source were negative. The positive test was defined as an ACTH increment of >33% and cortisol increment of >18% after administration of desmopressin and ACTH increment of 37% and cortisol >18% after administration of CRH (206). The negative predictive value was 100% when both tests were negative and pituitary MRI was negative but CT for ectopic source of ACTH positive. The authors concluded that this strategy would avoid IPSS in 47% of the patients.

 

IMAGING

 

Pituitary

 

Imaging of the pituitary is an important part of the investigation of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome to identify a possible pituitary lesion and to aid the surgeon during exploration. However, the results must be used in conjunction with the biochemical assessment as approximately 10% of normal subjects may have pituitary incidentalomas on MRI (207). Modern MRI techniques using T1-weighted spin echo and/or spoiled gradient recalled acquisition (SPGR, 1mm slice thickness) techniques will identify an adenoma in up to 80% of patients with Cushing’s disease (208). They provide greater sensitivity than conventional MRI but with more false positive results (208, 209). On MRI, 95% of microadenomas exhibit a hypointense signal with no post-gadolinium enhancement (Figure 2); however, as the remaining 5% have an isointense signal post-gadolinium, pre-gadolinium images are essential (210). The delayed pituitary microadenoma contrast washout was detected on FLAIR MRI as hyperintensity in 80% of patients with Cushing's disease and negative dynamic MRI (n=5) (211, 212).

 

If corticotroph microadenoma has not been clearly identified with modern MRI techniques, 11C-methionine PET co-registered with 3D gradient echo MRI may help in selected cases (213). The main limitation of this technique is short half-life of isotope of around 20min and it requires cyclotron on the site.

 

CT has a sensitivity of only approximately 40-50% for identifying microadenomas, and is thus significantly inferior to MRI (sensitivity 50-60%) (27, 214), and it should therefore be reserved for patients in whom MRI is contraindicated or unavailable. CT imaging typically shows a hypodense lesion that fails to enhance post-contrast.

 

Preoperative localization to one side of the pituitary gland by MRI had been advocated as better than BIPSS with a positive predictive value of 93% (163, 215). Other groups have found MRI less effective (162, 216). In addition, as noted above, we have found MRI often to be unhelpful in the pediatric age group, and BIPSS to be of significant value in these patients (181).

 

Figure 2. Magnetic resonance scan of the head with gadolinium showing left-sided pituitary hypointense microadenoma (white arrows) in 2 different patients (T1 image post-contrast).

 

Ectopic Tumors

 

Visualizing an ectopic ACTH source can be a challenge, but in general patients should begin with imaging of the chest and abdomen with CT and/or MRI, bearing in mind likely sites (Table 2). The most common site of the secretory lesion is the chest, and although small cell lung carcinomas are generally easily visualized, small bronchial carcinoid tumors that can be less than 1cm in diameter often prove more difficult. Fine-cut high-resolution CT scanning with both supine and prone images can help differentiate between tumors and vascular shadows (1). MRI can identify chest lesions that are not evident on CT scanning, and characteristically show a high signal on T2-weighted and short-inversion-time inversion-recovery images (STIR) (217). 

 

The majority of ectopic ACTH secreting tumors are of neuroendocrine origin and therefore may express somatostatin receptor subtypes. Therefore, the radiolabeled somatostatin analogue  (111In-pentetreotide) scintigraphy may be useful to show either functionality of identified tumors, or to try and localize radiologically unidentified tumors (218). Undoubtedly this is a useful technique, but to date there are only sporadic reports that it identifies lesions not apparent using conventional imaging (219, 220). However, a lesion of uncertain pathology is more likely to represent a neuroendocrine tumor, and hence an ectopic source of ACTH, if somatostatin scintigraphy is positive. Unless the tumors are metabolically active, which is not usually the case, 18F-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) does not generally offer any advantage over conventional CT or MRI (221, 222). However, 68Ga-DOTA-conjugated peptides (octreotide, lanreotide or octreotide) PET scanning, targeting SST receptors 1-5, is more sensitive than conventional octreotide scintigraphy and is indicated in the detection of primary occult neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) when conventional imaging modalities have failed (223). In a systematic review of small studies including a total of 77 patients with ectopic Cushing’s syndrome, the detection rate of the tumor was 70% for 68Ga-labelled peptide PET and 61% for 18F-FDG PET (224). Subsequent systematic review of 68Gallium-DOTATATE, DOTATOC, and DOTANOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-SSTR PET/CT) in detecting ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors had a pooled sensitivity of 64%, increasing to 76% in histologically confirmed lesions (225). 68Ga-somatostatin receptor analogues had better sensitivity in the diagnosis of bronchial carcinoids causing Cushing’s syndrome, while 18F-FDG PET appeared superior for small-cell lung cancers and other aggressive tumors (226).

 

STRATEGY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CUSHING’S SYNDROME

 

There have been a number of international consensus statements published for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome, the latest on the diagnosis in 2021 (82, 89, 105). It is recommended that UFC (at least two measurements), the LDDST, or late-night salivary cortisol (two measurements) are used as the first line screening test. A second test should confirm abnormal results on one test (Figure 3).

 

Figure 3. Investigations algorithm for suspected Cushing’s syndrome; CS – Cushing’s syndrome, ONDST – overnight dexamethasone suppression test, UFC – urinary free cortisol, LDDST – low dose dexamethasone suppression test, HDDST – high dose dexamethasone suppression test, BIPSS – bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling, PPNAD – primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease, BMAD - bilateral multinodular adrenocortical disease.

 

In patients with discordant results second-line tests should be used as necessary for confirmation. Once the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is unequivocal, ACTH levels, the desmopressin test (combined with the results of the LDDST), together with appropriate imaging, are the most useful non-invasive investigations to determine the etiology. BIPSS is recommended in cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome where the clinical, biochemical, or radiological results are discordant or equivocal. However, in many centers where BIPSS is available and validated, the practice is to use this test in almost all cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome with the exception of corticotroph macroadenomas, although the Bordeaux group have indicated that the use of dynamic testing plus high-quality imaging can reduce the necessity for BIPSS to some 50% of cases (206).  

 

TREATMENT OF CUSHING’S SYNDROME

 

Treatment should be directed toward resolving the primary cause of Cushing’s syndrome, presuming accurate differential diagnosis. Hypercortisolism, accompanied with fatal consequences if left untreated, should be controlled by all means. Whenever possible, surgery, regardless of etiology, presents a first-line treatment option aiming for a permanent cure and resolving the hypercortisolism together with its clinical consequences. However, the approach to the patient with Cushing’s syndrome is individual, so radiation therapy or even medical therapy as first-line treatment could be appropriate depending on etiology, clinical state, and the personal choice of a patient.

 

Following treatment, all of the signs and symptoms of adrenal deficiency should be promptly corrected with steroid replacement therapy. Associated medical disorders of Cushing’s syndrome such as diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, and hypertension should be treated, aiming to avoid permanent dependence on therapy after resolving the primary cause of Cushing’s syndrome.

 

It should also be emphasized that in severely-unwell patients the metabolic complications should be vigorously treated as a matter of priority, including hypokalemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. Any infections should be sought and treated, and some would advise prophylactic antibiotics (especially against pneumocystis infections) if the serum cortisol is especially high (>1000-1200 nmol/L). Most importantly, most centers would now advise immediate anti-coagulation with prophylactic low molecular weight heparin peri-operatively in all but the mildest cases or unless there are contraindications (227).

 

Treatment of Cushing’s Disease

 

First-line therapy almost always comprises transsphenoidal surgery (Figure 4). Patients with persistent Cushing’s post-operatively can be re-operated with a lower success rate than primary surgery and with higher rates of other pituitary hormonal deficiencies. Prior to repeated surgery it is wise to repeat diagnostic testing, especially if corticotrophinoma has not been found on pathologic examination, to exclude the possibility of missed ectopic ACTH syndrome. Besides re-operation, patients can be treated either by radiotherapy, medical therapy, or as a definitive solution to the hypercortisolism, bilateral adrenalectomy.

 

TRANSSPHENOIDAL SURGERY

 

According to the relevant 2021 consensus statement on the treatment of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome (105, 228, 229), transsphenoidal surgery is widely regarded as the treatment of choice for Cushing’s disease (229). Besides the traditional microscopic approach there is an endoscopic approach which appears useful in patients with persistent or recurrent disease (230, 231) and is associated with a shorter hospital stay (232), and is now most often utilized. It is recommended to limit the number of surgeons performing transsphenoidal surgery to increase the number of operations performed per surgeon per year and have one dedicated surgeon per center for treatment of Cushing’s disease. The surgeons who have performed 200 transsphenoidal operations have the best outcomes and the lowest complication rates (233). The Pituitary Society consensus recommends that surgery for Cushing’s disease should be performed in the Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence when possible (105). The remission rate of Cushing’s disease due to pituitary microadenoma is similar for both techniques (around 80%, total n=6695), with better results in pituitary macroadenomas when using endoscopic approach (59.9% vs 76.3%) (234).

 

The procedure is not without risks, and in the European Cushing’s disease survey group of 668 patients, the perioperative mortality was 1.9%, with other major complications occurring in 14.5% (235). The frequency of reported adverse events varies widely: diabetes insipidus (AVP-deficiency, either temporary or permanent) (3-46%); hypogonadism (14-53%); hypothyroidism (14-40%); cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea (4.6-27.9%); severe growth hormone deficiency (13%); bleeding (1.3-5%); and meningitis (0-2.8%) (235-237).

 

Where an adenoma is apparent at transsphenoidal exploration, a selective microadenomectomy of tumor tissue is performed, and the surgeon may be guided by pre-operative imaging. However, where no tumor is obvious, and there is no concern regarding fertility, subtotal resection of 85-90% of the anterior pituitary gland should be considered, leaving a small part near the pituitary stalk. However, there is still a substantial and unpredictable risk of panhypopituitarism.

 

The overall remission rate combined for microadenomas and macroadenomas in various large series is in the order of 70-79%, although higher rates of approximately 90% can be achieved with microadenomas (8, 234-236, 238-242) (241). Remission rates are based on post-operative pathologic and biochemical results, although both can be equivocal. Half of all tumors cannot be pre-operatively visualized (243), and therefore parts of the tumor can be overlooked intra-operatively and left behind, affecting the surgical success rate (244). Adenomas can occur near or within the pituitary stalk, rarely in ectopic locations (245, 246), and may show signs of microscopic invasion (247).

 

Prognostic markers of long-term remission are patient age over 25 years, a microadenoma detected by MRI, lack of invasion of the dura or cavernous sinus, histological confirmation of an ACTH-secreting tumor, low post-operative cortisol levels, and long-lasting adrenal insufficiency (228, 241). (242, 248).

 

Figure 4. Management algorithm of Cushing’s disease; TSA, Transsphenoidal adenomectomy; CD, Cushing’s disease.

 

Of patients achieving remission, some 10-15% of these will have a recurrence by 10 years  and 20% by 20 years (249), this emphasizing the need for long-term annual follow-up based on the same diagnostic criteria as with initial diagnostics in the following order; salivary late-night cortisol, an overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test, and lastly 24hours UFC (105). Special attention should be paid to patients with intermittent hypercortisolism (250). Transsphenoidal surgery is also a useful procedure in patients with Nelson’s syndrome to reduce tumor size, and ameliorate hyperpigmentation (251).

 

Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin should be considered peri-operatively in all surgical procedures for Cushing's syndrome (100, 101, 105). The recent Pituitary Society guidelines recommended use of thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing surgery for Cushing’s syndrome and especially having an additional risk for VTE such us previous VTE, use of estrogens, reduced mobility and severe hypercortisolism; however, there is no consensus on duration of VTE prophylaxis (105). Our practice is generally to consider LMW heparin prophylaxis in all patients, and to continue for some 2-3 months post-operatively.

 

POST-OPERATIVE EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT

 

Many use glucocorticoid coverage for transsphenoidal surgery, tapering off within 1 to 3 days. Morning (09.00h) serum cortisol measurements are then obtained on day 4 or 5 post-operatively starting 20 hours after the last glucocorticoid administration, during which time the patient should be closely observed for the development of signs of adrenal insufficiency (252). However, where there is close post-operative supervision, it may be possible to assess early cortisol results in the absence of corticosteroid cover.

 

In the immediate post-operative period, there is a wide range of possible biochemical results. Post-operative hypocortisolemia (<50 nmol/L [1.8 µg/dL] at 09.00h) is probably the best indicator of the likelihood of long-term remission (253-255). However, detectable cortisol levels of less than 140 nmol/L (<5µg/dL) are also compatible with sustained remission (256-258). In cases of a mild or cyclic Cushing’s disease the normal corticotrophs may not be suppressed and sustain a normal cortisol level with a normal diurnal rhythm.

 

Higher post-operative cortisol levels are more likely to be associated with failed surgery; however, cortisol levels may sometimes gradually decline over 1-2 months reflecting gradual infarction of remnant tumor or a gradual loss of autonomy of the adrenal, reported in some 5% of patients (256, 259). Regardless of the possibility of this late remission, the approach should be individualized and additional testing done prior to 3 months if there is reason to believe in residual disease. Persistent cortisol levels greater than 140 nmol/L (>5 µg/dL) 3 months after surgery require further investigation. Persistent hypercortisolemia after transsphenoidal exploration should prompt reevaluation of the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease, especially if previous diagnostic test results were indeterminate or conflicting, or if no tumor was found on pathological examination.

 

The treatment options for patients with persistent Cushing’s disease include: repeat surgery, radiation therapy, and bilateral adrenalectomy. If immediate surgical remission is not achieved at the first exploration, early repeat transsphenoidal surgery including the endoscopic technique may be worthwhile in a significant proportion of patients (approximately 50%), at the expense of an increased likelihood of hypopituitarism (231, 260, 261). Repeat sellar exploration is less likely to be helpful in patients with empty sella syndrome or very little pituitary tissue on MRI scans. Patients with cavernous sinus or dural invasion identified at the initial procedure are not candidates for repeat surgery to treat hypercortisolism and should receive alternative therapy.

 

Patients who are hypocortisolemic should be started on glucocorticoid replacement. Eventually, hydrocortisone 15-20 mg total daily dose in three divided doses is the preferred choice by most. The largest dose (10 mg) should be taken before getting out of bed, and the last 5mg dose should be taken in early afternoon and no later than 18.00h because later administration of glucocorticoids may result in disordered sleep. This low dose of hydrocortisone should be used to avoid long-term suppression of the HPA axis. All patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid replacement therapy should be instructed that they are “dependent” on taking glucocorticoids as prescribed, and that failure to take or absorb the medication could lead to adrenal crisis and possibly death. They should be prescribed a 100mg hydrocortisone (or other high-dose glucocorticoid) intramuscular injection pack for emergency use. They should also obtain a medical information bracelet or necklace that identifies this requirement (Medic-Alert Foundation or similar). Education should stress the need for compliance with the daily dose of glucocorticoid; the need to double the oral dose for nausea, diarrhea, and fever; and the need for parenteral administration and medical evaluation during emesis, trauma, or severe medical stress.

 

The patient should be told to expect desquamation of the skin, and flu-like symptoms (malaise, joint aching, anorexia, and nausea) during the early post-operative months, and that these are signs that indicate remission. Symptoms can be especially prominent in patients with long-standing, severe Cushing’s syndrome. Some of these symptoms have been related to high levels of circulating interleukin-6 (262). Most patients tolerate these symptoms of glucocorticoid withdrawal much better if they are forewarned and alerted to their ‘positive’ nature. Signs of adrenal insufficiency, such as vomiting, electrolyte abnormalities, and postural hypotension, should be excluded (263). However, if patients develop severe symptoms of glucocorticoids withdrawal significantly affecting their quality of life, an initial higher dose of hydrocortisone replacement can be prescribed e.g. starting with double dose and tapering down to the total 20mg daily over 2-3 months (264).

 

Recovery of the HPA axis can be monitored by measurement of 09.00h serum cortisol after omission of hydrocortisone replacement for 20 hours. Because recovery after transsphenoidal surgery rarely occurs before 3-6 months and is common at 1 year, initial testing at 3-4 to 9 months is reasonable (122). If the cortisol is undetectable on 2 consecutive days, then recovery of the axis has not occurred and glucocorticoid replacement can be restarted. If the cortisol is >100nmol/L, adequate reserve of the HPA axis can be assessed using the insulin tolerance test (231), with a peak cortisol value of greater than 500 nmol/L (>18 µg/dL), indicating adequate reserve (265), although this value may need to be revised downwards with more recent assays. Many centers use the cortisol response to 250 µg synthetic (1-24) ACTH (Short Synacthen Test) as an alternative means of assessing HPA reserve (266, 267), but there is some controversy as to its reliability in this situation (267, 268) and it is certainly not recommended in the first 6 weeks post-surgery. If it is used instead of the insulin tolerance test, a 30-minute cortisol is most reliable (265), but the cut-off value for a ‘passed’ SST can vary between laboratories and assays (430-550nmol/L).  Glucocorticoid replacement can be discontinued abruptly if the cortisol response is shown to be normal. Where recovery of the HPA axis is only partial on dynamic testing, but the 09.00h cortisol levels are above the lower limit of the normal range (200 nmol/L [7 µg/dL]), it is reasonable to slightly lower the hydrocortisone dose and repeat SST in 3-6 months unless symptoms of adrenal insufficiency occur. Patients need to continue to be aware of the continuing need for additional glucocorticoids at times of stress or illness and should be given a supply of oral hydrocortisone and an intramuscular injection pack. Assessment of adequate replacement of hydrocortisone dosing by measuring serum cortisol at various points throughout the day, ensuring that levels are always sufficient (>50 nmol/L [>1.8 µg/dL]) before each dose, is useful. This may mean that the peak levels after each dose appear to be unphysiological, but there is a trade-off between mirroring a normal physiologic rhythm as far as possible and the inconvenience of multiple dosing. Modified release hydrocortisone may provide more physiological replacement (269).

 

Two further conundrums may arise: the questions of recurrence and permanent lack of recovery of the axis. Life-long monitoring for recurrence of hypercortisolism is required (270). The evaluation of recurrence should start after the recovery of HPA axis has been confirmed and continue annually along clinical assessment. Patients who articulate that the Cushing’s syndrome has returned are often correct, even before physical and biochemical evidence are unequivocal. Investigation is warranted in a patient with these complaints or with recurrent physical signs characteristic of hypercortisolemia. Measurement of late-night salivary cortisol (at least 2 samples on different days) is most sensitive for detecting recurrence (105, 271), followed by 1mg dexamethasone suppression test and 24hours UFC (again at least 2-3 collections).

 

If recurrent Cushing’s disease is diagnosed, the therapeutic options are the same as for persistent disease. Repeat transsphenoidal surgery should be offered for recurrence of Cushing’s disease if tumor is visible on MRI, ACTH-staining from 1st operation confirmed a corticotroph adenoma or the initial IPSS was consistent with Cushing’s disease (272, 273). The remission rates from re-operation are reported between 37% and 88% with increasing risk of complications (241). Predictors of remission were post-operative cortisol of <55nmol/L (<2ng/dL), and operation for recurrence rather than persistent disease. It should be remembered when investigating recurrence that long-standing ACTH stimulation by a pituitary adenoma causing macronodular adrenal hyperplasia may subsequently involve semi-autonomous cortisol production (274).

 

The patient who has a subnormal cortisol response to ACTH 3 years after transsphenoidal surgery (in the absence of over-replacement) is likely to proceed to life-long ACTH deficiency, but this is also highly indicative of a lack of recurrence long-term.

 

Post-operatively, assessment for deficiencies of other pituitary hormones should also be sought, and the appropriate replacement regimen initiated as necessary, especially growth hormone deficiency in children.

 

Diuresis is common after transsphenoidal surgery and may result from intraoperative or glucocorticoid-induced fluid overload or may be due to AVP deficiency. For these reasons, assessment of paired serum and urine osmolality and the serum sodium concentration is essential. It is advisable to withhold specific therapy unless the serum osmolality is greater than 295 mOsm/kg, the serum sodium is greater than 145 mmol/L, and the urine output is greater than 200 mL/hour with an inappropriately low urine osmolality. Desmopressin (DDAVP, Ferring) 0.5-1 µg given subcutaneously will provide adequate vasopressin replacement for 12 hours or more.

 

Hyponatremia may occur in as many as 20% of patients within 10 days of surgery. This may be due to injudicious fluid replacement or the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIAD) as is frequently seen after extensive gland exploration, and fluid intake should be restricted (275).

 

While transient central diabetes insipidus is common, in about 20% of operations (276), a small minority of patients proceed to permanent AVP deficiency, requiring long-term treatment with a vasopressin analogue. The state of permanent diabetes insipidus is usually accompanied by other anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies (277).

 

Many glucocorticoid-induced abnormalities, including hypokalemia, hypertension, and glucose intolerance, may be normalized during the post-operative period so that preoperative treatments for these need to be reassessed.

 

BILATERAL ADRENALECTOMY 

 

Bilateral adrenalectomy is also an important therapeutic option in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome not cured by other techniques, particularly in young patients desiring fertility where there are concerns over radiotherapy-induced hypopituitarism. However, it has the disadvantages of life-long glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid replacement therapy, and increased peri-operative morbidity and mortality (although these complications should be extremely low following laparoscopic adrenalectomy in experienced centers). The incidence of adrenal crisis following bilateral adrenalectomy throughout life is reported higher than in patients with Addison’s disease or ACTH deficiency (9.3 events per 100 patients versus 3-6 events/100 patients) (278). In the post-operative period after bilateral adrenalectomy, the hydrocortisone dose should be maintained at 50mg of hydrocortisone four times a day by intravenous/intramuscular injection or 200mg per 24 hours in continuous intravenous infusion (279). When no complications are seen after 48 hours post-operatively, the dose of hydrocortisone is reduced to the double replacement dose (40 mg total/day). At this stage, fludrocortisone 100-200mcg daily orally should be introduced.

 

In addition, the development of Nelson’s syndrome in patients with ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas occurs in between 28% and 53% of cases (280-283) at a mean time of 5.3 years following surgery. The chance of developing Nelson’s syndrome (later renamed as “corticotroph tumor progression after bilateral adrenalectomy”) appears to be greater if adrenalectomy is performed at a younger age, and if a pituitary adenoma is confirmed at previous pituitary surgery (280, 284). Prophylactic pituitary radiotherapy probably reduces the risk of developing Nelson’s syndrome (280). However, it may be best to hold radiotherapy in reserve and undertake regular MRI scanning of the pituitary, especially when imaging has originally not shown any clear tumor (285). The expert consensus recommends MRI scanning at 3 months then 12-monthly for 3 years after bilateral adrenalectomy and every 2-4 years afterwards (283). New or worsening skin hyperpigmentation should prompt ACTH measurement and pituitary MRI. The ACTH threshold proposed as a cut-off for diagnosis of Nelson’s syndrome is not agreed and varies between 200 and 700pg/mL (44-154pmol/L, taken before the morning dose of hydrocortisone) with progressive increase of ACTH being more indicative (283). Others have advocated unilateral adrenalectomy plus pituitary irradiation as an alternative to bilateral adrenalectomy, as it gives similar remission rates to primary transsphenoidal surgery (286), but this should be reserved for selected cases. Transsphenoidal surgery for corticotroph tumor progression should be considered as first-line treatment before extrasellar expansion occurs with radiotherapy as second-line treatment if appropriate following multi-disciplinary team discussion (283). There is no established medical treatment in Nelson’s syndrome, and single case reports of aggressive tumors suggest some response to temozolomide (287, 288). A recurrence of hypercortisolism following bilateral adrenalectomy due to growth of rest adrenal tissue with persistent ACTH stimulation is reported in <10% of cases (105).

 

PITUITARY RADIOTHERAPY

 

For patients in whom fertility does not represent an important issue and with uncertain preoperative localization, radiotherapy may be used as primary treatment, while in patients showing no signs of remission after transsphenoidal resection of a tumor, pituitary irradiation is one of the next treatment options. It may also be considered as primary therapy for children under age 18 years, because results are comparable to surgery (289, 290). Pituitary irradiation may also decrease the occurrence of Nelson's syndrome (“corticotroph tumor progression after bilateral adrenalectomy”) after medical or surgical adrenalectomy, but this has not been tested in a prospective randomized trial (291).

 

Primary pituitary radiotherapy for the treatment of Cushing’s disease in adults has been shown to produce rather poor long-term remission rates of around 50% (249, 292). In contrast, as a second-line therapy to failed pituitary surgery, better results are achieved with around 80% showing long-term remission as defined by the normalization of the clinical state and biochemical parameters (293, 294). In children, however, not only primary therapy shows better results with cure rate of 80%, but also they respond more rapidly, usually within 12 months (290), while remission in adults usually occurs by two years although it can take considerably longer. Medical therapy to control hypercortisolemia is usually utilized in the interim, and patients should be reassessed at least yearly (295). In order to evaluate results of pituitary irradiation, urinary free cortisol or several serum cortisol levels throughout the day are measured and medical therapy should be stopped for several consecutive days, followed upon patient education of early recognition signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency in outpatient conditions.

 

Conventional pituitary radiotherapy using a linear accelerator is delivered at a total dose of 45 to 50 Gy in 25 fractional doses over 35 days using a 3-or 5-field (opposed lateral fields and vertex field) technique. Side effects when given as primary therapy are rare, but there is significant risk of growth hormone deficiency occurring early in 36-68% of treated adults, while other anterior pituitary deficiencies may develop over time in around 20% of patients (96, 293, 296). There is some evidence of an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications, which is of concern particularly in younger patients (297), but not all studies agree and further studies are required (298). The incidence of ischemic infarcts after fractionated radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas was reported in the mean of 6.7% of patients (0-11.6%) in the systematic review of 11 studies including 4394 patients. Four studies on complications of gamma-knife surgery described no ischemic events (299) (see below). The risk of optic neuropathy is low and probably less than 1% as long as low-dose fractions are used. Although meningiomas and gliomas have been reported after pituitary radiotherapy (295, 300), a recent analysis suggests that external beam radiotherapy induces second tumors in around 4% of patients with pituitary tumors compared to 2% in controls (301) .

 

Stereotactic radiotherapy using a gamma-knife or Cyber-knife (‘radiosurgery’) is used to optimize the tumor dose and minimize radiation to other areas by delivering a single high dose (average dose of 20-25Gy) to a small tumor. This approach seeks to avoid the complications of optic neuritis and cortical necrosis associated with larger total and fractional doses (302), not to mention convenience for the patient receiving therapy in one treatment. It has been less well investigated so far, but has a number of theoretical advantages, including a possible reduction in risk of cerebrovascular disease. It is hard to make a direct comparison in effectiveness between methods because of the difference in size of the treated tumors (302, 303). Most patients still develop endocrine deficiencies in the years after treatment (304-306). Because of the high dose of delivered radiation, it is not suitable for large lesions because of the large volume of exposed tissue, or for lesions near to radiosensitive tissues, such as the optic chiasm or optic nerves (recommended at least 3-5mm distance), because of the potential for visual damage. Otherwise, if the adenoma is not close to the optic pathway, it may be superior to conventional fractionated therapy. Gamma knife radiosurgery is probably the most widely used of these techniques. As adjunctive therapy after failed transsphenoidal surgery it achieves biochemical remission in about 48-55%, although follow-up times have not been as long as for conventional radiotherapy (296, 306, 307). It can also be used as salvage therapy in difficult tumors (307, 308). Radiosurgery of the pituitary gland using proton beams has similar efficacy as second-line therapy (309), and while possibly more precise is not widely available. Cyber-knife radiotherapy for Cushing’s disease is less well described, but there are reports of some success in a small number of patients (310). As with other forms of radiotherapy, new hormone deficiencies are the major side-effect. It should be emphasized again that stereotactic radiotherapy cannot be used when the tumor is close to the optic chiasm. There is a difference in tolerance of radiation between cranial nerves, with optic nerves most sensitive. A dose above 8Gy should be avoided and a clearance of 3-5mm from the optic nerves is required, while for other cranial nerves doses of 19-23Gy are acceptable (311). Data on the use of proton beam therapy are sparse, but in time this may come to replace other forms of radiosurgery (312).

 

Treatment for the Ectopic ACTH Syndrome

 

If the ectopic ACTH-secreting tumor is non-metastatic and amenable to surgical excision, such as in a lobectomy for a bronchial carcinoid tumor, the chance of cure of Cushing’s syndrome is high.

 

Local radiotherapy following surgical resection of an ectopic ACTH-secreting source, may also be beneficial, particularly in non-metastatic thoracic carcinoid tumors (313, 314), but is not usually required. The course of the disease is mainly determined by the type of tumor, the presence of metastases, and degree of hypercortisolism. The lowest survival rate comes with small cell lung cancer, medullary thyroid cancer, and gastrinomas (17, 18). In patients with metastases solely in the liver, cryoablation, resection, or even liver transplantation can be curable. Prognosis is the best in patients younger than 50 years of age, with primary bowel or lung carcinoids (19, 315, 316). However, if significant metastatic disease is present, surgery is not curative, although it may still be of benefit in selected cases. Therapy for residual or metastatic disease should be based on current guidelines for neuroendocrine tumors (317).

 

Regardless of the prognosis, control of the hypercortisolism should be established medically by inhibiting steroidogenesis. If medical management fails, surgical bilateral adrenalectomy may be an option, but should be at least considered in the majority of cases where long-term treatment of the neuroendocrine tumor is considered. Patients in whom control over hypercortisolism is established can develop thymic hyperplasia (318), which should be distinguished from tumor metastases or a primary thymic tumor. In cases where primary tumor origin remains unknown, adrenal inhibitor therapy can be maintained as long as the patient undergoes to periodic re-examination for tumor localization (17, 18).

 

The ectopic CRH syndrome is rare and usually is associated with pulmonary carcinoid tumors, following the same therapeutic principles as ACTH-secreting tumors (319).

 

Treatment of ACTH-Independent Cushing’s Syndrome

 

Adrenalectomy is the treatment of choice for all cases of ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome. This is either unilateral in the case of an adrenal adenoma or carcinoma, or bilateral in cases of bilateral hyperplasia, either micronodular or macronodular. The only exception can be the case of milder hypercortisolism in macronodular hyperplasia, when unilateral adrenalectomy may provide hormonal control, at least temporarily (320, 321). Pre-operatively, adrenal enzyme inhibitor therapy can be used such that the clinical state of the patient is improved thus reducing the risk of complications. In cases where macronodular hyperplasia comes as a consequence of aberrant hormonal receptor expression, eucortisolemia can be achieved by using the appropriate receptor blockade (322, 323), but this is unlikely to be useful in the long-term. 

 

In adrenal adenomas, cure following surgery in skilled hands approaches 100% (324), and is associated with low morbidity and mortality (325).

 

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy, both unilateral and bilateral, has been shown in experienced hands to be a safe procedure and in most centers has become the approach of choice for non-malignant disease. Its complication rate is lower than with the open approach, and the in-patient stay is significantly reduced (326, 327). A study comparing three surgical techniques (anterior laparoscopic, posterior laparoscopic, and robotic surgery) for bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s syndrome showed similar morbidity in all approaches (328).

 

When the adrenal lesion is more than 6cm and suggestive of malignancy, open adrenalectomy remains the gold standard (329). In adrenal cancer, more aggressive surgical approaches probably account for the increase in life span reported in this disease (330). This approach may require multiple operations to resect primary lesions, local recurrences, and hepatic, thoracic, and, occasionally, intracranial metastases, and is usually accompanied by adjuvant mitotane, as discussed below. Overall, there is no significant evidence that radiotherapy improves survival in adrenocortical carcinoma, although in the literature there are sporadic reports that it may be helpful adjuvant treatment to radical surgery in selected cases and may decrease local recurrence (331-333).

 

Medical Therapy of Cushing’s Syndrome

 

Although the primary therapy of hypercortisolism in Cushing’s disease is surgical, medical therapy can be required in cases when surgery is delayed, contraindicated, or unsuccessful. The most common therapy is the use of adrenal enzyme inhibitors, less frequently somatostatin and dopamine receptor agonists and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists. 

 

The role of medical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome is an important one. It is practice of many groups to pre-treat Cushing's syndrome patients with severe disease prior to surgical treatment to reverse the hypercortisolemia and its metabolic sequelae, and to hopefully reduce the complications of the definitive procedure. However, it is not routine practice for most patients with Cushing’s disease. Similarly, medical treatment is desirable in patients with Cushing's disease whilst awaiting for pituitary radiotherapy to take effect. In patients where surgery and/or radiotherapy have failed, medical management is often essential prior to (or long-term as an alternative to) bilateral adrenalectomy. Sometimes, in the occult ectopic ACTH syndrome, it may not always be possible to identify the source of secretion, and therefore medical management is desirable pending re-investigation. Finally, medical therapy is helpful as a palliative modality in patients with metastatic disease-causing Cushing's syndrome, at least in the short-term.

 

The most commonly used agents are adrenal enzyme inhibitors, but adrenolytic agents, pituitary-targeted therapies, or glucocorticoid-receptor antagonists are also used (Table 4). Drugs can be used in combinations in lower doses, aiming for side effect reduction with synergistic effects.

 

When determining the approach to treatment, the first step is to determine whether the final goal is reducing the level of serum cortisol to normal values or complete cortisol secretion blockade. The latter approach is convenient for patients with more variable secretion, while patients showing less variability can benefit more from lowering the values to the normal range and therefore avoiding the necessity of steroid replacement therapy, as well as a possibility of side effects connected to the higher dosages required with that strategy. A meta-analysis of 35 studies including 1520 patients reported pooled effectiveness of most commonly used medical agents in treatment of Cushing's syndrome, with mitotane being most effective in normalizing cortisol levels in 81.8% of patients and cabergoline (see below) being least effective and normalizing cortisol in 35.7% (334). However, as noted below, mitotane is not a simple drug to use or monitor, and generally it is reserved for adrenocortical carcinoma. The use of multiple agents achieved normalization of cortisol in 65.7% of patients.

 

ADRENAL ENZYME INHIBITORS 

 

These agents are primarily used as inhibitors of steroid biosynthesis in the adrenal cortex (Figure 5), and thus can be utilized in all cases of hypercortisolemia regardless of cause, but most commonly in ACTH-dependent forms, often with rapid improvement in the clinical features of Cushing's syndrome. The most commonly used agents are metyrapone, ketoconazole, and in certain circumstances etomidate. In the UK ketoconazole and metyrapone are licensed for the treatment of Cushing's syndrome, while mitotane is licensed for the treatment of hypercortisolemia due to adrenocortical carcinoma. The use of etomidate or mifepristone in Cushing's syndrome is off-license. Osilodrostat has also been approved for treatment of Cushing’s syndrome in USA and in Europe in 2020 and NICE-approved it in UK in 2021. However, the regulations could differ in different countries. When used in combinations, they have a synergistic therapeutic effect, lowering the rate of side effects.

Figure 5. Steroidogenesis with main adrenal enzyme inhibitors point of action marked; SCCE – side-chain cleavage enzyme, HSD – hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, OH – hydroxylase, DHEA – dehydroepiandrosterone, AR – aromatase, AS – aldosterone synthetase.

 

Metyrapone

 

Metyrapone acts primarily to inhibit the enzyme 11β-hydroxylase, thus blocking the production of cortisol from 11-deoxycortisol in the adrenal gland (335) (Figure 5). As a consequence of the blockade of cortisol synthesis, levels of adrenal androgens and deoxycorticosterone rise. The subsequent elevation of 11-deoxycortisol can be monitored in the serum of patients treated with metyrapone. It should be noted that there may be cross-reactivity from 11-deoxycortisol with some cortisol radioimmunoassays: this may result in an unnecessary increase in the metyrapone dose and subsequent clinical hypoadrenalism (336). It is preferable to measure the serum cortisol via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in patients treated with metyrapone (337). The fall in cortisol is rapid, with trough levels at 2 hours post-dose, and sometimes administration of a test dose of 750 mg with hourly cortisol estimation for 4 hours is performed, although not strictly necessary in our opinion (338). Maintenance therapy is usually in the range 750-6000 mg/day in 3-4 divided doses daily. Metyrapone has been used to good effect to reduce the hypercortisolemia in patients with Cushing's syndrome from adrenal tumors, the ectopic ACTH syndrome, and Cushing's disease. In the former, patients can be very sensitive to low doses of this agent, whilst in Cushing’s disease higher doses are often required. In Cushing's disease this can be due to the compensatory rise in ACTH in patients not having received pituitary radiotherapy. During short-term follow-up (1-16 weeks) of 54 patients with Cushing’s disease, cortisol normalized on the metyrapone treatment in 75% of participants and in 81% of 16 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma or adenoma (338). A subsequent multicenter study on 164 patients with Cushing’s disease reported that 43% achieved control of hypercortisolism at the mean of 8 months of treatment (339).A meta-analysis of 18 retrospective studies including patients with CD showed an average remission rate of 75.9% (31.3-83.2%) (334). The recent prospective study PROMPT including 50 patients with Cushing’s syndrome reported remission in 47% participants (340).

 

There have not been serious maternal or perinatal complications connected with the use of metyrapone in pregnant women, but the question of safety remains open (341-343). However, metyrapone and ketoconazole are the medications most commonly used in the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy (344).

 

The principal side effects with metyrapone are hirsutism and acne (as predicted by the rise in adrenal androgens) and reported by 70-83% of women. Dizziness and gastrointestinal upset occurring in 5% and 15% respectively. Because of the androgen effect the drug is not considered appropriate for the first-line therapy of long-term treatment in women (345, 346). However, it is hypoadrenalism that remains the most important potential problem, and careful monitoring of treatment and education of the patient is required. If there is uncertainty as to whether the measured cortisol is valid, and not over-estimated by cross-reactivity, it may be appropriate to consider a ‘block-and-replace’ regimen. Hypokalemia, edema, and hypertension due to salt retention because of mineralocorticoid activity of raised levels of 11-deoxycorticosterone are infrequent (338), but may require cessation of therapy (347).

 

Ketoconazole

 

Ketoconazole is an imidazole derivative originally developed as an oral anti-fungal agent. It is a potent inhibitor of sex steroids (androstendione and testosterone) production by its action on C17-20 lyase, and cortisol secretion by 11β-hydroxylase inhibition (348-350). It also inhibits 17-hydroxylase and 18-hydroxylase activity, amongst other enzymes (351). It has also been reported to have a direct effect on ectopic ACTH secretion from a thymic carcinoid tumor (352), and possibly corticotroph ACTH release.

 

The treatment for Cushing's syndrome is usually started at a dose of 200 mg twice daily, with an onset of action that is probably slower than metyrapone. The usual maximum dose is 400 mg three times a day. It has been used successfully to lower cortisol levels in patients with Cushing's syndrome of various etiologies including adrenal carcinoma, the ectopic ACTH syndrome, and invasive ACTH-producing pituitary carcinoma, with doses required between 200-1200 mg/day in up to 4 divided daily doses (353, 354), although 2-3 times daily is more usual. Although there have not been consequences on human fetuses, considering animal teratogenicity and toxicity the drug is not recommend for use during pregnancy (343, 355, 356). The normalization of cortisol levels was achieved in 71.1% of patients in pooled meta-analysis of all causes of Cushing's syndrome including 220 individuals and in 49% of patients with Cushing’s disease (334). A subsequent meta-analysis of 270 patients with CD treated with ketoconazole after failed transsphenoidal surgery included in 10 studies (all but 1 retrospective) reported control of hypercortisolism in 63% of individuals (95% CI 50-74%) (357).

 

The principal side effect of ketoconazole is hepatotoxicity (358, 359). A reversible elevation of hepatic serum transaminases occurs in approximately 5-20% of patients, with the incidence of serious hepatic injury at around 1 in 15,000 patients (360, 361).  The hepatotoxicity appears to be idiosyncratic, but has been reported within first 4 weeks of the initiation of treatment in a patient with Cushing's syndrome and resolves within 2-12 weeks after dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment (361, 362). Prior to the start of therapy liver function tests should be performed. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level should be monitored weekly within the first month of therapy, then once a month in the following trimester and afterwards sporadically or when the dose is changed. If levels reach 3-times above the upper normal range, therapy should be discontinued. Other adverse reactions of ketoconazole include skin rashes and gastrointestinal upset, and one must always be wary of causing adrenal insufficiency (362-364).

 

Ketoconazole is a CYP3A4 inhibitor and increases the availability of medications metabolized by that enzyme. Hence, the reduction of the dose of affected medications maybe required. Ketoconazole is a mixture of levo- and dextro- enantiomeric forms. Currently, the levo-enantiomer of ketoconazole is less likely to be hepatotoxic than the racemic mixture (see below).

 

Due to its C17-20 lyase inhibition and consequent anti-androgenic properties, ketoconazole is particularly useful in female patients where hirsutism is an issue, which may be worsened with metyrapone. Conversely, gynecomastia and reduced libido in male patients may be unacceptable as a first-line long-term treatment and require alternative agents. However, replacement therapy is an option. On the other hand, women having lower levels of estradiol and testosterone do not experience clinically manifest disorder because of the usually present menstrual irregularity. Ketoconazole requires gastric acid for absorption, so should not be given with proton-pump inhibitors. One further advantage of ketoconazole is its inhibition of cholesterol synthesis, particularly LDL cholesterol (365), and in 34 patients with Cushing's syndrome the mean total cholesterol was reduced from 6.1 to 5.0 mmol/l on ketoconazole (363).

 

The triazole antifungal, fluconazole can also be effective in treatment of Cushing’s syndrome, but experience is limited to single case reports. They described an effective control of hypercortisolism on 200-1200mg daily dose of fluconazole (366, 367). Fluconazole was reported in vitro to be 40% less effective in inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase and 17-hydrohylase than ketoconazole (368). The side effects of fluconazole are similar to those of ketoconazole.

 

Osilodrostat

 

Osilodrostat is a novel steroidogenesis inhibitor. FDA approved osilodrostat for treatment of Cushing's disease in 2020 and NICE in 2021 in the UK. It is a selective inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase, an aldosterone synthase and a non-steroidal aromatase. It causes a decrease in cortisol and aldosterone levels and an increase of 11-deoxycorticosterone and 11-deoxycortisol. Osilodrostat was evaluated in phase II trial as a potential anti-hypertensive agent in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism and essential hypertension (369). In 10-week study in patients with Cushing's disease (n=12) who were not cured by previous surgery, osilodrostat normalized urinary free cortisol (UFC) in 92% of subjects with more than 50% decrease in UFC in all participants (370). In 22-week phase II trial in patients with Cushing’s disease (n=19) and UFC >1.5 of the upper normal limit, osilodrostat (10-60mg/day) normalized UFC in 79% of patients. It also produced no significant change in blood pressure and an increase of ACTH 3-4-fold. Adrenal insufficiency was seen in 32% of subjects leading to the reduction of the dose, while an increase of testosterone and hirsutism was reported in around 30% of women (370).  The phase III study was a double-blind randomized trial with a withdrawal phase after 24 weeks of treatment followed by continuation of osilodrostat mean dose of 5mg twice a day from 40 to 48 weeks (371). Fifty-three percent of participants in the osilodrostat arm (n=36) maintained UFC in the normal range without increasing the dose at 24 weeks, compared to 29% in the placebo group (n=35). Sixty-six patients were not randomized to withdrawal of treatment and continued osilodrostat due to higher cortisol levels. Of 137 individuals with Cushing's disease, 66% maintained UFC in the normal range after 48 weeks (6 months) (371). The extension study up to 70 months (6 years) showed maintained complete remission of hypercortisolism in 50-88% of participants and partial control in additional 18% of individuals (372, 373). The most frequent side effects included nausea (42%), headache (34%), fatigue (28%) and adrenal insufficiency (28%). Forty two percent of patients had reported hypertension and hypokalemia due to increased adrenal precursors and 11% of women noted increased hirsutism. The side effects related to hypoadrenalism reduced to 27.3% in the extension study (373).

 

Levoketoconazole

 

Levoketoconazole is a stereoisomer of ketoconazole and its efficacy and safety has been assessed in the SONICS study, phase III open-label trial of 94 individuals with Cushing's syndrome (85% with Cushing’s disease) and mean UFC 4.9 times upper normal range (374). The starting dose was 150mg twice a day and titrated up to a total daily dose of 1200mg aiming for normal UFC. Thirty-one percent maintained normal UFC by 6 months of treatment and 36% during maintenance phase. However, only 55 patients completed the maintenance phase and of those 61% were in remission (374). The phase III placebo-controlled randomized-withdrawal study, LOGICS, included 79 patients with Cushing’s syndrome on a levoketoconazole maintenance dose, 40.9% lost the control of hypercortisolemia comparing to the placebo arm where 95.5% became hypercortisolemic (375). Most common adverse effects were nausea (29-32%), headache (23-28%), and deranged liver function in 11-44% of participants. However, it remains to be seen whether it proves in practice to be less hepatotoxic than the racemic mixture. Levoketoconazole has been approved for treatment of Cushing’s syndrome in adults by the FDA but not currently by the EMA.

 

Etomidate

 

Etomidate is an imidazole-derived anesthetic agent which was reported to have an adverse effect on adrenocortical function in 1983 (376). Compared to the other imidazole derivative ketoconazole, etomidate more potently inhibits adrenocortical 11β-hydroxylase, has a similar inhibition of 17-hydroxylase, but has less of an effect on C17-20 lyase (377). At higher concentrations it also appears to have an effect on cholesterol side-chain cleavage (378, 379). Following their initial report in 1983, Allolio and colleagues showed that intravenous non-hypnotic etomidate dose (2.5 mg/hour) normalized cortisol levels in 5 patients with Cushing's syndrome of various etiologies (380). Since then, there have been a number of case reports on the use of etomidate in successfully reducing hypercortisolemia in seriously-ill patients with either Cushing's disease or the ectopic ACTH syndrome (381-384).

 

It is usually given at a dose of 2.5-3.0 mg/hour, which is adjusted based on the serum cortisol levels. It usually takes several hours for cortisol to be lowered to within the normal range (385). Etomidate is an effective agent that acts rapidly, but is limited in its use by the fact it has to be given parenterally and requires intensive care settings to safely manage and monitor cortisol and potassium levels 4-6 hours to adjust the infusion rate (386). Similar to metyrapone and osilodrostat, high levels 11-deoxycortisol may cross-react with many assays. A simultaneous infusion of hydrocortisone of 0.5-2 mg/h may be required to maintain normal cortisol levels. However, in this situation it may be lifesaving. The preparation available in the USA contains the vehicle propylene glycol with the potential for nephrotoxicity and lactic acidosis, as opposed to the preparation available in Europe which contains alcohol.

 

Mitotane

 

Mitotane (o’p'DDD), an isomer of DDD (belonging to the same family of chemicals as the insecticide DDT), was developed following the observation of adrenal atrophy in dogs administered DDD. Mitotane inhibits steroidogenesis by reducing cortisol and aldosterone production by blocking cholesterol side-chain cleavage and 11β-hydroxylase in the adrenal gland (387). It also acts as an adrenolytic drug, causing medical adrenalectomy, after being metabolized into an acyl chloride that binds in mitochondria and causes necrosis of adrenocortical cells (388).

 

Mitotane is used as a treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma and causes tumor regression and improved survival in some patients (389, 390). It has a beneficial effect on endocrine hypersecretion in approximately 75% of patients (391). It is also utilized in Cushing's syndrome of non-malignant origin, and in this regard lower doses can be utilized (up to 4 g/day), thus reducing the incidence of side effects, particularly gastrointestinal (392). At these lower doses the onset of the cortisol-lowering effect takes longer (6-8 weeks) than with higher doses. Mitotane should not be used in pregnant women, and reproductively active women must use reliable contraception while on therapy (393). A pooled meta-analysis of all causes of Cushing's syndrome in 173 patients reported the normalization of cortisol levels on mitotane treatment in 79.8% of all patients and in 81.8% of participants with Cushing’s disease (334).

 

The main side effect of mitotane treatment include nausea, vomiting and lethargy. One problem even with low-dose mitotane is the hypercholesterolemia (principally an increase in LDL-cholesterol), which appears to be due to the impairment of hepatic production of oxysteroids, normally a brake on the enzyme HMG CoA reductase (394). However, simvastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, can reverse the hypercholesterolemia, and it or a similar agent should be used, if necessary, in patients treated with mitotane. Other side effects of mitotane include neurological disturbances; elevation of hepatic enzymes; hypouricemia; gynecomastia in men; and a prolonged bleeding time (391, 395). Most importantly, it elevates cortisol-binding globulin, such that levels of total serum cortisol are misleading. Control should be titrated using urinary free cortisol or salivary cortisol. Monitoring of serum levels of mitotane should be undertaken due to its narrow therapeutic window and the risk of toxicity. In the long-term, measurement of blood levels can allow dose titration and reduction as appropriate. A therapeutic level of 14-20 mg/L has been recommended for adrenocortical carcinoma, but lower levels can be sought for simple control of elevated cortisol levels. Mitotane is taken up by fatty tissues, sometimes being released gradually several months after discontinuing therapy, therefore requiring adjustments in glucocorticoid therapy dosage (396). Mitotane shows cytotoxic activity on both normal and tumorous tissue causing primary adrenal insufficiency and therefore requiring glucocorticoid replacement therapy. It tends to spare the zona glomerulosa, but in long-term use mineralocorticoid replacement is also needed (397). In general, despite effective in other forms of Cushing’s syndrome, its use has been limited outside of adrenocortical carcinoma, in which cases it has been shown to prolong life (390).

 

Table 4. Currently Available Medical Therapy for Cushing’s Syndrome (CS)

Medication

Action

Dosage

Side effects

Contra-indications

Comments

Steroidogenesis inhibitors

Metyrapone

11b-hydroxylase inhibitor

250-1000mg 

tds-qds, max 6g/day po

Nausea, vomiting, acne, hirsutism, hypo- or hypertension, oedema, hypokalemia

Pregnancy, breast-feeding, porphyria, severe liver impairment

1st line treatment when available, avoid long-term use in young women

Ketoconazole

11b-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase inhibitor,

200-400mg

tds po

Gynecomastia, alopecia, hypogonadism in men, hepatotoxicity, Gastrointestinal symptoms, rash

Liver impairment, pregnancy/

breast-feeding,

porphyria

Slow in onset of action, 1stline in children, stop PPI/H2-antagonist as gastric acid needed for absorption

Osilodrostat

11b-hydroxylase inhibitor,

2-7mg bd po

Hypertension, hypokalemia, hirsutism, asthenia, GI symptoms, adrenal insufficiency, headache

Pregnancy & breast feeding,

 

To use low dose in liver impairment,

Risk of increasing QT interval

Mitotane

Adrenolytic

500-1000mg tds-qds, gradually increased from 500-1000mg/day to max 6g/day po

Gastrointestinal symptoms, deranged LFTs and TFTs, hyper-cholesterolemia, ataxia, orthostatic hypotension

Pregnancy/

breast-feeding,

stage 4-5 renal failure, severe liver impairment

Slow in action, hyperglycemia, mitotane level monitoring required, accumulates, now rarely used for CD, high rate of withdrawal due to intolerance

Etomidate

11b-hydroxylase inhibitor

0.01-0.5mg/kg/h iv

Sedation, nausea and vomiting, temporary uncontrolled muscle movements,

rash, angioedema

Pregnancy, breast-feeding, porphyria

Parenteral, rapid onset of action, anesthetic agent so ITU settings required, frequent monitoring of cortisol and K+

Modulators of ACTH release

Cabergoline

 

Dopamine agonist

1-7mg/week po

postural hypotension, nausea, increased tendency of gambling, hallucinations, oedema, depression, possibility of heart valve sclerosis (only very high doses)

Porphyria, pregnancy, hyper-sensitivity to ergot derivates,

valvulopathy

Effective in <40% of patients, which wears off with time, cheap

Pasireotide

Somatostatin analogue

600-900mg 

twice daily sc

Hyperglycemia, cholelithiasis, diarrhea, headache

Severe liver impairment,

Avoid in poorly controlled diabetes

Effective only in mild CD, treatment of hyperglycemia frequently required

 

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonist

Mifepristone

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonist

300-1200mg daily po

nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, arthralgia, increased TSH, decreased HDL, endometrial thickening, rash, oedema

Severe asthma, porphyria, renal failure, severe liver impairment, breast-feeding

Cortisol and ACTH levels remain high so hypokalemia may persist, also anti-progesterone, monitoring difficult

Investigational status in some countries

Levoketoco-nazole

11b-hydroxylase and 17,20-lyase inhibitor

300-1200mg, bd po

Headache, oedema, GI symptoms, increased liver enzymes, adrenal insufficiency

Liver impairment, pregnancy/

breast-feeding,

porphyria

FDA & EMA orphan drug status

CBG – cortisol binding globulin, CD – Cushing’s disease, tds – 3 times a day; qds – 4 times a day, LFTs – liver function tests, TFTs – thyroid function tests, PPI – proton pump inhibitor, K+ - potassium, ACTH – adrenocorticotrophin hormone, po – orally, iv- intravenous, sc – subcutaneous, ITU – intensive care unit, FDA – Food and Drug Administration (USA), EMA – European Medicines Agency.

 

MODULATORS OF ACTH RELEASE   

 

Pasireotide

 

Somatostatin receptors have been demonstrated on both corticotroph adenomas, and some ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors. However, although octreotide has been helpful in reducing ACTH and cortisol levels in selected case reports of ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors there has been much more limited success in patients with Cushing's syndrome probably through down-regulation of receptor sub-type 2 in these tumors by hypercortisolemia (398).

 

There has been renewed interest with the introduction of pasireotide, a somatostatin analogue with a broader spectrum of activity for somatostatin receptor subtypes, including type 5, which is not down-regulated during hypercortisolemia.  Ever since this agent was shown in vitro to reduce human corticotroph proliferation and ACTH secretion (399, 400), there have now been a number of clinical trials published. In an initial phase II trial, pasireotide 600µg injected twice daily for 15 days reduced urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels in 76% of 29 patients and normalized levels in 17% (401). A multicenter phase III dose-randomized trial in 162 patients with either new, persistent, or recurrent Cushing's disease has shown at six months a reduction in UFC levels in 91 of 103 evaluable patients, with a median UFC reduction of 48%. Normalization of UFC levels were achieved in 14.6% of patients on the 600µg dose twice daily, and 26% of patients on the 900µg twice-daily dose. Patients who showed <50% reduction in UFC levels from baseline by month two were unlikely to show improvement by month 6 or 12.

 

The most clinically relevant adverse events were hyperglycemia (73%), with 46% developing frank diabetes mellitus related to decreases in both insulin and incretin secretion, and hypocortisolemia (8%) (401, 402). Other side effects included elevated liver enzymes, cholelithiasis, nausea and diarrhea at the rate expected from experience with other somatostatin analogues (402).

 

There is now also experience with pasireotide long-acting repeatable (pasireotide LAR), a monthly injection of 10 or 30mg, reporting around 41% of patients achieving normal UFC levels at 7 months of treatment and a similar safety profile to the subcutaneous form (403). More than a 20% reduction in size of the pituitary adenoma was described in 45% of patients and an increase by more than 20% in 10% of individuals (403). Long-term extension studies of monthly pasireotide showed improvement of cortisol levels up to 5 years (404). Pasireotide LAR decreased median volume of the corticotroph adenoma by 16.3-17.8% in 43-47% of patients (403).

 

Pasireotide is not recommended as a first-line treatment but can be considered as add-on therapy or second-line treatment if other medications are not tolerated. In cases where there is no clinical response, it should be discontinued.

 

Pasireotide at a lower dose of 250 µg three times daily has also been used in stepwise combination therapy with the dopamine agonist cabergoline (previously been demonstrated to have modest but variable efficacy as monotherapy in Cushing's disease (405), and ketoconazole. Pasireotide monotherapy induced normalization of UFC levels in 5 of 17 patients (29%). The addition of cabergoline normalized UFC levels in an additional 4 patients (24%). The further addition of ketoconazole in the remaining 8 patients induced normalization of UFC levels in 6 of these. Thus, in total, remission was achieved in 88% of patients using combination therapy out to 80 days of treatment (405). Therefore, pasireotide represents a potential new treatment for mild Cushing's disease or in combination therapy for individuals with higher hypercortisolemia, although the frequency of hyperglycemia is of major concern.

 

Corticotroph adenomas with USP8 mutations had been reported to have higher SST5 receptor expression which may suggest higher response rate to pasireotide treatment in this subgroup (406, 407).

 

Cabergoline

 

The presence of dopamine receptors (D2) on around 80% of corticotroph adenomas supported the use of cabergoline in patients with Cushing’s disease (408). Cabergoline at a dose of 1-7mg weekly was reported to control hypercortisolemia due to Cushing’s disease in 25-40% of patients in small case series (409). A multicenter retrospective study of 53 patients treated with a median dose of 2.3mg/week normalized UFC in 40% of individuals in the first year of treatment, which was reduced to 23% at 32.5 months (410).

 

It is usually well tolerated and the most common side effects include nausea and dizziness. At the doses used for the treatment of pituitary tumors, the incidence of cardiac valve sclerosis and subsequent regurgitation was not increased in one large study, and therefore echocardiograms are not routinely needed unless high, long-term treatment is required (411). However, escape is seen in some patients, so the percentage of patients with long-term control is low. Another side effect is an impulse control disorder for which patients should be counselled before initiation of treatment (412).

 

Temozolomide

 

Temozolomide is an oral alkylating prodrug that is converted in vivo to the DNA repair inhibitor, dacarbazine. Traditionally, this chemotherapy agent has been used in the treatment of malignant gliomas, but recent evidence suggests it is also useful in selected aggressive pituitary tumors including corticotroph pituitary carcinomas (413, 414). Although, some reports suggested that the response to temozolomide in pituitary tumors can be predicted by low expression of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), possibly related to MGMT gene promotor methylation (415, 416), not all studies have confirmed this (417, 418). However, the therapeutic response can usually be determined after 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Reported partial or complete response from case reports is around 80%, with improvement seen after 2 months with tumor size reduction from stable to 50% (419). Side effects include cytopenia, GI symptoms, headaches, hearing loss and dizziness.

 

OTHER AGENTS

 

Retinoic Acid

 

Retinoic acid has been found to inhibit ACTH-secretion and cell proliferation both in vitro in ACTH-producing tumor cell lines and cultured human corticotroph adenomas, and in vivo in nude mice (420). However, clinical trials in man are limited, and it is unlikely to be a major contributor to control.

 

Rosiglitazone

 

The thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone, a PPAR-γ agonist, was shown in supra-pharmacological doses to suppress ACTH secretion in human and murine corticotroph tumor cells. In addition, the development of murine corticotroph tumors, generated by subcutaneous injection of ACTH-secreting AtT20 cells, were prevented (421). It appears this is not specific to corticotroph adenomas, but also applies to other forms of pituitary tumor (422). However, the results in human subjects with Cushing's disease have been disappointing (423-425). This may be because doses used in the animal studies were much higher than the equivalent licensed dose in humans. Its use cannot be recommended.

 

Receptor Antagonists to GIP, β-adrenergic and LH/hCG Receptors

 

In the rare causes of Cushing’s syndrome due to bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (BMAD) and aberrant receptor expression of GIP, β-adrenergic and LH/hCG receptors, specific receptor antagonists may prove to be useful (426). Although octreotide has been shown to have a therapeutic response in GIP-related BMAD as mentioned above (31), others have found neither this somatostatin analogue nor pasireotide to be helpful in inducing a sustained response (427).

 

Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonist(s)

 

Mifepristone (RU 486), is a potent antagonist of glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors that blocks the peripheral actions of glucocorticoids and progestogens (428, 429). As a consequence it also blocks glucocorticoid-induced negative feedback at the hypothalamo-pituitary level, inducing a rise in ACTH, arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and hence cortisol (430). It has occasionally been given to patients with all forms of Cushing's syndrome (431, 432), showing effectiveness in rapidly reducing symptoms of cortisol-induced psychosis (433, 434), and improving glycemic control and hypertension (432). Although, it has been proven to be effective in the treatment of hypercortisolemia-related symptoms and signs (431, 435), the major drawback is the lack of biochemical markers to assess either therapeutical effectiveness or possible hypoadrenalism. Adrenal insufficiency is challenging to treat, because the drug, besides blocking endogenous cortisol, also blocks the action of synthetic steroids as replacement therapy. Hypokalemia is a frequent problem due to the saturation of 11β-HSD type 2 and cortisol action on the mineralocorticoid receptor, although it responds well to spironolactone. The daily dose of mifepristone ranges between 300 and 1200mg. It showed a significant improvement of glucose and HbA1c in 60% of patients with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes (432). Mifepristone could be used as add-on therapy for Cushing’s syndrome with associated hyperglycemia. Endometrial thickening and vaginal bleeding secondary to the anti-progestin effect are likely to be seen in women. However, a new derivative of mifepristone with less anti-progestogen blocking activity, relacorilant, is currently under trial.

 

Relacorilant (CORT125134)

 

Relacorilant is a glucocorticoid receptor inhibitor with no effect on the progesterone receptor. A phase II study (GRACE) included 130 patients with Cushing’s syndrome and type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension. Half of the patients receiving higher doses (range of 100mg-400mg daily) of relacorilant for 16 weeks and the HbA1c was reduced by ≥0.5% or the dose of insulin/sulfonylurea reduced by ≥25%. A reduction of systolic BP by at least 5mmHg was reported in 64% of participants receiving a higher dose of medication.  A Phase III multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal trial is still on-going and expected to be completed in 2024 (clinicaltrials.gov code: NCT03697109).

 

It should be noted that the use of all these novel agents may be limited by their expense and availability.

 

MONITORING TREATMENT   

 

It is important to monitor all patients on medical therapy for Cushing’s syndrome in order to assess the effectiveness of treatment, and in particular to avoid adrenal insufficiency. Serum cortisol level and/or urine cortisol level are used in order to estimate steroid inhibitor therapy. One way is to assess the mean of 5 serum cortisol measurements across the day, although others favor measurement of urinary free cortisol (UFC). A mean serum cortisol between 150 and 300 nmol/L (5.5-11 μg/dL) corresponded to a normal cortisol production rate (436), and this range should be the aim of therapy, although this figure may be an overestimate as it is based on older cortisol assays. As mentioned above, a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrography cortisol assay is preferable in patients on metyrapone, osilodrostat and etomidate.

 

When mitotane is used, only measurement of 24-hour urinary free cortisol reflects therapy effectiveness and concentration of serum free cortisol, because mitotane reduces 17-OHCS excretion. Because it raises the level of cortisol binding globulin (CBG), the level of total serum cortisol is inappropriate for monitoring of cortisol secretion, as it can be two to threefold elevated (437, 438). The high level of CBG explains why replacement dosage of steroids needs to be increased in cases of adrenal insufficiency, although there is also a contribution from increased hepatic steroid metabolism.

 

CUSHING’S SYNDROME IN SPECIFIC GROUPS

 

Chronic Renal Failure

 

Cushing’s syndrome in the setting of chronic renal failure is poorly described, but may pose diagnostic difficulties. In chronic renal failure serum levels of cortisol are generally normal but with some radioimmunoassays may be increased (439, 440). ACTH levels are increased (441). Glomerular filtration rates of less than 30 mL/min result in decreased cortisol excretion and spuriously low UFC values (442). The ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH may be suppressed in patients with renal failure, except for those undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (443). The metabolism of dexamethasone is normal in chronic renal failure, but the oral absorption can be altered in some patients. There is a reduced degree of suppression of cortisol by dexamethasone suggesting a prolonged half-life of cortisol. Normal suppression during the overnight 1-mg LDDST is uncommon, and the 2-day LDDST is better in this regard (439, 444).

 

Pediatric Cushing’s Syndrome

 

The most common presentation of Cushing’s syndrome in children is growth retardation, with weight increases (445). However, one proviso is that patients with virilizing adrenal tumors may show growth acceleration (446). Other virilizing signs such as acne and hirsutism are seen in approximately 50% of patients regardless of etiology (445). Hypertension and striae are seen in approximately 50% of cases (447). Muscle weakness may be less common in the pediatric patient due to increased exercise (448). Psychiatric and cognitive changes may affect school performance; however, children may show “compulsive diligence” and actually do quite well academically (449). Headaches and fatigue are common(445). Cushing’s disease accounts for the between 75% and 80% of Cushing’s syndrome in older children, but before the age of 10 years ACTH-independent causes of Cushing’s syndrome are more common (450). Cushing’s disease has a male predominance in pre-pubertal children. Two causes of ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome, McCune-Albright syndrome and PPNAD, are typically diseases of childhood or young adults. Signs of virilization in the very young (<4 years) suggest adrenal carcinoma.  Ectopic secretion of ACTH occurs rarely in the pediatric population and is usually due to bronchial or thymic carcinoids (2).

 

As mentioned previously, late night salivary cortisol measurement has particular logistic benefits in children (451, 452). Serum midnight cortisol measurements in in-patients has high sensitivity (453). UFC should be corrected for body surface area (454). The standard 2-day LDDST adult protocol can be used in children weighing 40kg or more, otherwise the dexamethasone dose is adjusted to 30µg/kg/day (455). As in adults, there is a good correlation between the cortisol suppression on the LDDST and the HDDST for the differential diagnosis and thus the latter is unnecessary (456). Although it can be argued that the ectopic ACTH syndrome is so rare in children that BIPSS is not necessary, it does add reassurance in those with a negative pituitary MRI, which is the case in more than 50% of cases. In addition, BIPSS has arguably better accuracy in lateralization of the pituitary tumor (385). MRI is at least as useful as CT in the evaluation of adrenal causes (457).

 

Transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice in children with Cushing's disease, with similar rates of remission as in adults in expert hands (458). Conventional radiotherapy after non-curative transsphenoidal surgery performs even better than in adults, with reported remission rates as high as 100%, with remission usually occurring within 12 months (459). Following pituitary surgery, plus or minus radiotherapy, the incidence of growth hormone deficiency is high, but prompt diagnosis and treatment with human growth hormone ensure acceptable growth acceleration and catch-up growth, although an abnormal body composition often persists (460).  Normalization of reduced bone mineral density can also be achieved (384). Adrenalectomy is first-line therapy in ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome.

 

Cushing’s Syndrome in Pregnancy

 

Cushing’s syndrome in pregnancy is fortunately rare, because ovulatory disorders and consequently infertility constitute the clinical picture in 75% of untreated patients with Cushing’s syndrome (341, 342). The epidemiology in pregnant women is different to that in the non-pregnant population, in that pregnant patients show a 60% prevalence of ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome (48% adenoma and 10% carcinoma) followed by Cushing’s disease and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, and rarely ectopic disease (342, 343, 461). The onset of adrenal-dependent Cushing’s syndrome may relate to the aberrant expression of LH receptors on the tumor, cross-reacting with hCG. The diagnosis is challenging because of the symptoms and signs common to both Cushing’s syndrome and normal physiological changes in pregnancy; such as weight gain, fatigue, striae, hypertension, and glucose intolerance. In addition, the hormonal changes, which occur during pregnancy may confuse the interpretation of the biochemical test procedures (343).

 

Total serum cortisol levels increase in pregnancy, as a result of induced production of corticosteroid-binding globulin by estrogens, beginning in the first trimester and peaking at 6 months, with a decrease only after delivery. Levels of free cortisol are also raised. Late night salivary cortisol levels are 2-fold higher in normal pregnancy. In contrast to patients with pathologic hypercortisolism, levels of urinary 17-OH-corticosteroid excretion are within the normal range and the cortisol diurnal rhythm is maintained, but with a higher nadir (461). UFC excretion is normal in the first trimester and then rises up to three-fold by term (462). Suppression to dexamethasone testing is blunted, especially after the first trimester (135). Plasma ACTH levels are slightly decreased in the beginning of the pregnancy, but later tends to rise, partially because of placental ACTH and CRH secretion. The circadian rhythm of cortisol is usually maintained in the first 2 trimesters of pregnancy and becomes blunted in the 3rd trimester.

 

In general, biochemical evaluation follows the same principles as with the non-pregnant patients. However, there are no agreed guidelines in interpreting results of hormonal measurements in pregnant Cushing’s patients, considering normal physiological deflection of cortisol metabolism in pregnant women. As mentioned above, UFC excretion is normally increased, so if there is less than a 3-fold rise it cannot be diagnostic, and the dexamethasone response is blunted therefore cannot be used as screening test because of the possibility of a false positive result. Late night salivary cortisol is an alternative screening test for pregnant women and probably the most reliable investigation (463, 464). In pregnant women with Cushing’s syndrome, higher cut-offs for LNSC are suggested, depending on the trimester, of 7, 7.2 and 7.9nmol/L for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester respectively (465). Therefore, the differential diagnosis regarding the possible etiology of Cushing’s syndrome can be quite demanding. If suppressed, levels of ACTH can point to adrenal origin, but lack of suppression does not eliminate the possibility of ACTH-independent cause. The high-dose dexamethasone test may be useful to distinguish an adrenal cause, because women with adrenal causes tend not to suppress, while those with Cushing’s disease do (461, 466, 467). As an initial evaluation the basal levels of ACTH and the high-dose dexamethasone test may be performed. Furthermore, due to the high prevalence of primary adrenal disease, it is reasonable to perform an abdominal ultrasound at an early stage.

 

The CRH test has also been used to identify patients with Cushing's disease, and there is no evidence of harm both in animal studies and the small number of pregnant patients studied with CRH. There are 2 case reports of desmopressin test being carried out in pregnancy with significant ACTH increment suggesting Cushing’s disease, later confirmed on post-TSS histology (468, 469).

 

MRI without gadolinium enhancement is considered safe in the third trimester, and its use in combination with the non-invasive tests above should be able to resolve most diagnostic issues. Current guidelines allow use of contrast only if it is going to change fetal or maternal outcomes (470). BIPSS with appropriate additional radiation protection for the fetus should be reserved only for the rare cases where diagnostic uncertainty remains. Ultrasound of the adrenals can be used as a first-line imaging in ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome.

 

Maternal hypercortisolism is associated with 40-70% hypertension, 14-26% preeclampsia, 25-37% diabetes mellitus, 5% osteoporosis and fractures, 3% cardiac failure, 4% mental health disorders and rarely (2%) death (471, 472).

 

Although the fetus is partially protected from maternal hypercortisolism by placental 11-B-hydroxisteroid dehydrogenase type 2, which converts 85% of cortisol to inactive cortisone (405), the untreated condition is associated with miscarriage, premature delivery, and neonatal adrenal insufficiency (472).

 

Because of both maternal and neonatal risk, definitive surgical treatment of adrenal or pituitary disease is recommended to achieve eucortisolemia. The second trimester is probably the safest time for adrenal surgery or transsphenoidal operation, although adverse fetal outcomes after the successful treatment may still persist, such as intrauterine growth restriction and premature birth, but it does appear to prevent stillborn deliveries (472) (396).

 

Medical treatment carries potential risks to the fetus and should be considered only as second-line therapy when the benefit outweighs the risk, and generally only as an interim measure to operation or awaiting the pre-pregnancy pituitary radiation effect. Metyrapone is probably the adrenolytic agent of choice, although an association with pre-eclampsia has been reported (343). Ketoconazole has been utilized successfully in a small number of patients but is teratogenic in animals, and therefore should be used with caution. Cabergoline is probably a safe potential treatment option for mild hypercortisolism during pregnancy.

 

Pseudo-Cushing’s Syndrome

 

Pseudo-Cushing’s states (PCS) or more recently called non-neoplastic hypercortisolism are conditions which cause increased cortisol production, manifest with some features of Cushing’s syndrome but are reversible by resolution of the causal state. Distinguishing pseudo-Cushing’s state from a true Cushing’s syndrome could often be challenging even for the endocrinologist. The detailed history taking is the key in diagnosis of PCS.

 

The states causing PCS could be physiological or related to other disorders. The physiological ones include severe persistent stress (emotional or related to severe illness), major surgery, persistent strenuous exercise or prolonged fasting/eating disorders. Non-physiological causes of PCS are alcoholism, severe depression or anxiety, poorly controlled diabetes, polycystic ovaries syndrome or obesity (473).

 

In alcoholism the majority of individuals have facial plethora, proximal weakness, central obesity or hypertension but rarely have purple striae (474). The hypercortisolism results from the elevation of CRH and stimulation of the HPA axis, an increased activity of 11B-HSD type 1, and reduced cortisol clearance due to liver disease (475). The abstinence from alcohol for more than 1 month resolves hypercortisolism.

 

In severe depression hypercortisolism is seen in 20-30% of patients but clinical features of Cushing’s syndrome are usually rare. The hypercortisolism is due to stimulation of HPA axis and reduced activity of 11B-HSD type 2 (476). Successful treatment of depression resolves the hypercortisolism.

 

Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, and obesity may also be associated with increased cortisol levels and lack of suppression on overnight dexamethasone suppression test. Although the majority of individuals with those disorders have hypertension, hyperlipidemia and other features of metabolic syndrome, they are unlikely to have proximal myopathy, purple striae or bruising (473, 475).

 

In anorexia nervosa cortisol levels are often increased but features of hypercortisolism are absent. High levels of CRH but normal ACTH, reduced cortisol clearance and usually preserved cortisol circadian rhythm are reported in eating disorders (477).

 

As discussed in the second line investigations for Cushing’s syndrome, a mid-night cortisol, LDDST-CRH test and desmopressin test were helpful differentiating Cushing’s syndrome from pseudo-Cushing’s states. Overnight dexamethasone suppression test usually fails in most of patients with pseudo-Cushing’s states with specificity of 58%. The LDDST has slightly better specificity of 74% (473).

 

An awake midnight cortisol of greater than 207 nmol/L (7.5 mg/dL) was reported to show 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the differentiation of Cushing's syndrome from pseudo-Cushing's states (141).

 

Due to shortage of CRH, desmopressin test is the next line test. The study of 173 subjects including 76 with Cushing’s disease, 30 with non-neoplastic hypercortisolism, 36 with obesity and 31 of controls proposed cut-off criteria for positive desmopressin test as ACTH increment of >6pmol/L (30ng/L) (143). Subsequently, another study of 52 patients with Cushing’s syndrome and 28 controls suggested new criteria with ACTH increment of 4pmol/L and basal cortisol above 331nmol/L providing sensitivity of 90.3% and specificity of 91.5% (144). The meta-analysis of 3 studies described use of desmopressin test in differentiation of Cushing’s disease and non-neoplastic hypercortisolism with cut-off for ACTH increment by 6 pmol/L in 2 studies and ACTH increment of 4 pmol/L and basal cortisol more than 331nmol/L gave pooled sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 94% (143-145). However, there was high patient selection bias and low certainty of evidence in that meta-analysis (145).

 

PROGNOSIS AND COURSE AFTER EFFECTIVE TREATMENT

 

Before treatment was readily available, the mortality rate for Cushing’s syndrome was 50% after the first symptoms appeared, mainly due to cardiovascular, thromboembolic, infectious or hypertensive complications (478).

 

Even today, patients with severe hypercortisolism have a raised mortality rate due to increased coagulability and it’s the consequences or opportunistic infections (112, 479, 480), emphasizing the need for controlling the hormonal situation as soon as possible. The prognosis is mainly a reflection of the underlying condition. The life expectancy of patients with non-malignant causes of Cushing's syndrome has improved dramatically with effective surgical and medical treatments.

 

Even when cured by strict criteria, Cushing’s disease may often recur over time (481). From a number of studies in patients with Cushing’s disease treated in the era of transsphenoidal surgery, it initially appeared that after curative transsphenoidal surgery long-term mortality was not significantly different from that in the general population (480, 482). However, another population-based study suggested that mortality is marginally increased (4),while even more recently a very significantly increased mortality was shown even in patients who remained cured. A large European Registry of 1564 patients with Cushing’s syndrome, including 1045 patients with Cushing's disease, reported a 3.1% 90-day mortality in this group generally (483). The main cause of death was progression of the main disease (36%), infections (31%), and cardio- and cerebro-vascular disease (17%). As expected, the highest mortality was in individuals with ectopic Cushing's syndrome (20.2%), 2.2% in patients with Cushing's disease and 1.6% in those with ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome. However, a large-scale meta-analysis showed that patients with Cushing’s disease who were cured at their first operation showed a normalized standardized mortality ratio, further emphasizing the importance of this modality of treatment and the necessity for an experienced surgeon. Nevertheless, while abdominal obesity may improve, hypertension and insulin resistance leading to increased cardiovascular risk with evidence of atherosclerotic disease persists when measured 5 years after remission of Cushing’s disease (96). It is therefore important to aggressively treat associated conditions such as hypertension and diabetes, even when the Cushing’s per se has been controlled. Unlike some signs and symptoms that disappear gradually over the next year after successful treatment, co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension improve, but may not resolve completely, requiring further aggressive treatment. There is also some evidence that the outcome from Cushing's disease may be worse in males (53). Some of the signs and symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome are expected to disappear gradually over the following year after the treatment; skin thickness improves in weeks, but for some it may take longer, as does muscle strength.

 

The outcome of pediatric Cushing’s disease is excellent if treated at centers with appropriate experience (447, 484).

 

Cushing's syndrome results in significant impairment in quality of life (485, 486), psychiatric symptoms (487), and cognitive deficits (488), as previously noted. However, in general these are only partially improved with treatment, and often do not resolve completely in either children or adults.

 

There is some evidence that deficits in bone mass may be partially reversed after treatment of hypercortisolemia (489, 490). Bisphosphonate treatment may induce a more rapid improvement in bone mineral density (491), and should be considered (along with calcium and vitamin D supplements), but it is unclear whether they are needed for the majority of patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporosis starts to improve after 6 months, with rapid improvement over the next two years, but with the possibility of residual disease to some extent (492). However, in general the prognosis is good without any specific treatment, and the care should be expectant.

 

The prognosis of the potentially malignant causes of Cushing's syndrome is more variable. Adrenal cancer associated with Cushing's syndrome has an extremely poor prognosis. Tumors that produce ectopic ACTH tend to have a poorer prognosis, compared with tumors from the same tissue that do not produce ACTH. Small cell lung cancer, islet cell tumors, and thymic carcinoids illustrate this phenomenon: up to 82% of patients with small cell lung cancer and Cushing’s syndrome were reported to die within 2 weeks from the start of chemotherapy (493), although currently a survival in terms of months should be expected.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Besser M, Grossman A. The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome and pseudo-Cushing's states. Endocr Rev. 1998;19(5):647-72.
  2. Storr HL, Chan LF, Grossman AB, Savage MO. Paediatric Cushing's syndrome: epidemiology, investigation and therapeutic advances. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007;18(4):167-74.
  3. Mete O, Erickson LA, Juhlin CC, de Krijger RR, Sasano H, Volante M, et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Adrenal Cortical Tumors. Endocr Pathol. 2022;33(1):155-96.
  4. Etxabe J, Vazquez JA. Morbidity and mortality in Cushing's disease: an epidemiological approach. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(4):479-84.
  5. Lindholm J, Juul S, Jorgensen JO, Astrup J, Bjerre P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, et al. Incidence and late prognosis of cushing's syndrome: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(1):117-23.
  6. Gicquel C, Le Bouc Y, Luton JP, Girard F, Bertagna X. Monoclonality of corticotroph macroadenomas in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(2):472-5.
  7. Biller BM, Alexander JM, Zervas NT, Hedley-Whyte ET, Arnold A, Klibanski A. Clonal origins of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary tissue in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(5):1303-9.
  8. Mampalam TJ, Tyrrell JB, Wilson CB. Transsphenoidal microsurgery for Cushing disease. A report of 216 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109(6):487-93.
  9. Young WF, Jr., Scheithauer BW, Gharib H, Laws ER, Jr., Carpenter PC. Cushing's syndrome due to primary multinodular corticotrope hyperplasia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988;63(3):256-62.
  10. Holthouse DJ, Robbins PD, Kahler R, Knuckey N, Pullan P. Corticotroph pituitary carcinoma: case report and literature review. Endocr Pathol. 2001;12(3):329-41.
  11. Gaffey TA, Scheithauer BW, Lloyd RV, Burger PC, Robbins P, Fereidooni F, et al. Corticotroph carcinoma of the pituitary: a clinicopathological study. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2):352-60.
  12. Dahia PL, Grossman AB. The molecular pathogenesis of corticotroph tumors. Endocr Rev. 1999;20(2):136-55.
  13. Reincke M, Sbiera S, Hayakawa A, Theodoropoulou M, Osswald A, Beuschlein F, et al. Mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 cause Cushing's disease. Nat Genet. 2015;47(1):31-8.
  14. Tatsi C, Flippo C, Stratakis CA. Cushing syndrome: Old and new genes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34(2):101418.
  15. Doppman JL, Nieman LK, Travis WD, Miller DL, Cutler GB, Jr., Chrousos GP, et al. CT and MR imaging of massive macronodular adrenocortical disease: a rare cause of autonomous primary adrenal hypercortisolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15(5):773-9.
  16. Aron DC, Findling JW, Fitzgerald PA, Brooks RM, Fisher FE, Forsham PH, et al. Pituitary ACTH dependency of nodular adrenal hyperplasia in Cushing's syndrome. Report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Med. 1981;71(2):302-6.
  17. Ilias I, Torpy DJ, Pacak K, Mullen N, Wesley RA, Nieman LK. Cushing's syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years' experience at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4955-62.
  18. Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Pozza C, Frajese V, Newell-Price J, Reznek RH, et al. The ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, management, and long-term follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):371-7.
  19. Aniszewski JP, Young WF, Jr., Thompson GB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA. Cushing syndrome due to ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion. World J Surg. 2001;25(7):934-40.
  20. Drouin J. 60 YEARS OF POMC: Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of POMC gene expression. J Mol Endocrinol. 2016;56(4):T99-T112.
  21. Ye L, Li X, Kong X, Wang W, Bi Y, Hu L, et al. Hypomethylation in the promoter region of POMC gene correlates with ectopic overexpression in thymic carcinoids. J Endocrinol. 2005;185(2):337-43.
  22. Newell-Price J, King P, Clark AJ. The CpG island promoter of the human proopiomelanocortin gene is methylated in nonexpressing normal tissue and tumors and represses expression. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15(2):338-48.
  23. Clark AJ, Lavender PM, Besser GM, Rees LH. Pro-opiomelanocortin mRNA size heterogeneity in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. J Mol Endocrinol. 1989;2(1):3-9.
  24. Stewart MF, Crosby SR, Gibson S, Twentyman PR, White A. Small cell lung cancer cell lines secrete predominantly ACTH precursor peptides not ACTH. Br J Cancer. 1989;60(1):20-4.
  25. Oliver RL, Davis JR, White A. Characterisation of ACTH related peptides in ectopic Cushing's syndrome. Pituitary. 2003;6(3):119-26.
  26. Shahani S, Nudelman RJ, Nalini R, Kim HS, Samson SL. Ectopic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) syndrome from metastatic small cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol. 2010;5:56.
  27. Invitti C, Pecori Giraldi F, de Martin M, Cavagnini F. Diagnosis and management of Cushing's syndrome: results of an Italian multicentre study. Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):440-8.
  28. Angelousi A, Kassi E, Kaltsas GA. Current Issues in the Diagnosis and Management of Adrenocortical Carcinomas. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  29. Findlay JC, Sheeler LR, Engeland WC, Aron DC. Familial adrenocorticotropin-independent Cushing's syndrome with bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76(1):189-91.
  30. Lacroix A, Bolte E, Tremblay J, Dupre J, Poitras P, Fournier H, et al. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide-dependent cortisol hypersecretion--a new cause of Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(14):974-80.
  31. Reznik Y, Allali-Zerah V, Chayvialle JA, Leroyer R, Leymarie P, Travert G, et al. Food-dependent Cushing's syndrome mediated by aberrant adrenal sensitivity to gastric inhibitory polypeptide. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(14):981-6.
  32. Karapanou O, Vlassopoulou B, Tzanela M, Stratigou T, Tsatlidis V, Tsirona S, et al. Adrenocorticotropic hormone independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia due to aberrant receptor expression: is medical treatment always an option? Endocr Pract. 2013;19(3):e77-82.
  33. de Groot JW, Links TP, Themmen AP, Looijenga LH, de Krijger RR, van Koetsveld PM, et al. Aberrant expression of multiple hormone receptors in ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia causing Cushing's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(2):293-9.
  34. Assie G, Libe R, Espiard S, Rizk-Rabin M, Guimier A, Luscap W, et al. ARMC5 mutations in macronodular adrenal hyperplasia with Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2105-14.
  35. Chasseloup F, Bourdeau I, Tabarin A, Regazzo D, Dumontet C, Ladurelle N, et al. Loss of KDM1A in GIP-dependent primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia with Cushing's syndrome: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):813-24.
  36. Ventura M, Melo M, Carrilho F. Outcome and long-term follow-up of adrenal lesions in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(5):516-23.
  37. Hsiao HP, Kirschner LS, Bourdeau I, Keil MF, Boikos SA, Verma S, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity, overlap with other tumor syndromes, and atypical glucocorticoid hormone secretion in adrenocorticotropin-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia compared with other adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2930-7.
  38. Kirk JM, Brain CE, Carson DJ, Hyde JC, Grant DB. Cushing's syndrome caused by nodular adrenal hyperplasia in children with McCune-Albright syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;134(6):789-92.
  39. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, Merino MJ, Friedman E, Spiegel AM. Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(24):1688-95.
  40. Boston BA, Mandel S, LaFranchi S, Bliziotes M. Activating mutation in the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein in an infant with Cushing's syndrome and nodular adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(3):890-3.
  41. Boyce AM. Fibrous Dysplasia. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  42. Travis WD, Tsokos M, Doppman JL, Nieman L, Chrousos GP, Cutler GB, Jr., et al. Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease. A light and electron microscopic study of eight cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13(11):921-30.
  43. Kiefer FW, Winhofer Y, Iacovazzo D, Korbonits M, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E, et al. PRKAR1A mutation causing pituitary-dependent Cushing disease in a patient with Carney complex. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177(2):K7-K12.
  44. Hernandez-Ramirez LC, Tatsi C, Lodish MB, Faucz FR, Pankratz N, Chittiboina P, et al. Corticotropinoma as a Component of Carney Complex. J Endocr Soc. 2017;1(7):918-25.
  45. Stratakis CA, Boikos SA. Genetics of adrenal tumors associated with Cushing's syndrome: a new classification for bilateral adrenocortical hyperplasias. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3(11):748-57.
  46. Kaltsas G, Kanakis G, Chrousos G. Carney Complex. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  47. Swords FM, Baig A, Malchoff DM, Malchoff CD, Thorner MO, King PJ, et al. Impaired desensitization of a mutant adrenocorticotropin receptor associated with apparent constitutive activity. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16(12):2746-53.
  48. Lalau JD, Vieau D, Tenenbaum F, Westeel PF, Mesmacque A, Lenne F, et al. A case of pseudo-Nelson's syndrome: cure of ACTH hypersecretion by removal of a bronchial carcinoid tumor responsible for Cushing's syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest. 1990;13(6):531-7.
  49. Contreras P, Altieri E, Liberman C, Gac A, Rojas A, Ibarra A, et al. Adrenal rest tumor of the liver causing Cushing's syndrome: treatment with ketoconazole preceding an apparent surgical cure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;60(1):21-8.
  50. Marieb NJ, Spangler S, Kashgarian M, Heimann A, Schwartz ML, Schwartz PE. Cushing's syndrome secondary to ectopic cortisol production by an ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(4):737-40.
  51. Nicolaides NC, Pavlaki AN, Maria Alexandra MA, Chrousos GP. Glucocorticoid Therapy and Adrenal Suppression. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  52. Ross EJ, Linch DC. Cushing's syndrome--killing disease: discriminatory value of signs and symptoms aiding early diagnosis. Lancet. 1982;2(8299):646-9.
  53. Pecori Giraldi F, Moro M, Cavagnini F, Study Group on the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis of the Italian Society of E. Gender-related differences in the presentation and course of Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(4):1554-8.
  54. Valassi E, Santos A, Yaneva M, Toth M, Strasburger CJ, Chanson P, et al. The European Registry on Cushing's syndrome: 2-year experience. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(3):383-92.
  55. Rubinstein G, Osswald A, Hoster E, Losa M, Elenkova A, Zacharieva S, et al. Time to Diagnosis in Cushing's Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis Based on 5367 Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(3).
  56. Puglisi S, Perotti P, Pia A, Reimondo G, Terzolo M. Adrenocortical Carcinoma with Hypercortisolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018;47(2):395-407.
  57. Chatzellis E, Kaltsas G. Adrenal Incidentaloma. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  58. Wajchenberg BL, Bosco A, Marone MM, Levin S, Rocha M, Lerario AC, et al. Estimation of body fat and lean tissue distribution by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and abdominal body fat evaluation by computed tomography in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(9):2791-4.
  59. Koch CA, Doppman JL, Watson JC, Patronas NJ, Nieman LK. Spinal epidural lipomatosis in a patient with the ectopic corticotropin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(18):1399-400.
  60. Panzer SW, Patrinely JR, Wilson HK. Exophthalmos and iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10(4):278-82.
  61. Baid SK, Rubino D, Sinaii N, Ramsey S, Frank A, Nieman LK. Specificity of screening tests for Cushing's syndrome in an overweight and obese population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10):3857-64.
  62. Reincke M. Cushing Syndrome Associated Myopathy: It Is Time for a Change. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021;36(3):564-71.
  63. Kaltsas G, Manetti L, Grossman AB. Osteoporosis in Cushing's syndrome. Front Horm Res. 2002;30:60-72.
  64. Canalis E. Clinical review 83: Mechanisms of glucocorticoid action in bone: implications to glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(10):3441-7.
  65. Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Across-study evaluation of association between steroid dose and bolus steroids and avascular necrosis of bone. Lancet. 1987;1(8538):902-6.
  66. Kristo C, Jemtland R, Ueland T, Godang K, Bollerslev J. Restoration of the coupling process and normalization of bone mass following successful treatment of endogenous Cushing's syndrome: a prospective, long-term study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(1):109-18.
  67. Toth M, Grossman A. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: lessons from Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79(1):1-11.
  68. Ilias I, Milionis C, Zoumakis E. An Overview of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  69. Wajchenberg BL, Mendonca BB, Liberman B, Pereira MA, Carneiro PC, Wakamatsu A, et al. Ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome. Endocr Rev. 1994;15(6):752-87.
  70. Orth DN. Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(12):791-803.
  71. Lado-Abeal J, Rodriguez-Arnao J, Newell-Price JD, Perry LA, Grossman AB, Besser GM, et al. Menstrual abnormalities in women with Cushing's disease are correlated with hypercortisolemia rather than raised circulating androgen levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(9):3083-8.
  72. Luton JP, Thieblot P, Valcke JC, Mahoudeau JA, Bricaire H. Reversible gonadotropin deficiency in male Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1977;45(3):488-95.
  73. Kaltsas GA, Korbonits M, Isidori AM, Webb JA, Trainer PJ, Monson JP, et al. How common are polycystic ovaries and the polycystic ovarian syndrome in women with Cushing's syndrome? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;53(4):493-500.
  74. Giustina A, Bossoni S, Bussi AR, Pozzi A, Wehrenberg WB. Effect of galanin on the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in patients with Cushing's disease. Endocr Res. 1993;19(1):47-56.
  75. Bartalena L, Martino E, Petrini L, Velluzzi F, Loviselli A, Grasso L, et al. The nocturnal serum thyrotropin surge is abolished in patients with adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent or ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(6):1195-9.
  76. Colao A, Pivonello R, Faggiano A, Filippella M, Ferone D, Di Somma C, et al. Increased prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity in patients successfully treated for Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;53(1):13-9.
  77. Niepomniszcze H, Pitoia F, Katz SB, Chervin R, Bruno OD. Primary thyroid disorders in endogenous Cushing's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;147(3):305-11.
  78. Stewart PM, Krozowski ZS. 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Vitam Horm. 1999;57:249-324.
  79. Christy NP, Laragh JH. Pathogenesis of hypokalemic alkalosis in Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1961;265:1083-8.
  80. Biering H, Knappe G, Gerl H, Lochs H. [Prevalence of diabetes in acromegaly and Cushing syndrome]. Acta Med Austriaca. 2000;27(1):27-31.
  81. Pivonello R, Isidori AM, De Martino MC, Newell-Price J, Biller BM, Colao A. Complications of Cushing's syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(7):611-29.
  82. Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB, Bertagna X, Cavagnini F, Chrousos GP, et al. Diagnosis and complications of Cushing's syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(12):5593-602.
  83. Sharma ST, Nieman LK, Feelders RA. Comorbidities in Cushing's disease. Pituitary. 2015;18(2):188-94.
  84. Salehidoost R KM. Glucose and lipid metabolism abnorMalities in C ushing’s syndrome. J Neuroendocrinol 2022;34:e13143.
  85. Catargi B, Rigalleau V, Poussin A, Ronci-Chaix N, Bex V, Vergnot V, et al. Occult Cushing's syndrome in type-2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(12):5808-13.
  86. Krarup T, Krarup T, Hagen C. Do patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased prevalence of Cushing's syndrome? Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(3):219-27.
  87. Mullan K, Black N, Thiraviaraj A, Bell PM, Burgess C, Hunter SJ, et al. Is there value in routine screening for Cushing's syndrome in patients with diabetes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(5):2262-5.
  88. Newsome S, Chen K, Hoang J, Wilson JD, Potter JM, Hickman PE. Cushing's syndrome in a clinic population with diabetes. Intern Med J. 2008;38(3):178-82.
  89. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1526-40.
  90. Chiodini I, Morelli V, Salcuni AS, Eller-Vainicher C, Torlontano M, Coletti F, et al. Beneficial metabolic effects of prompt surgical treatment in patients with an adrenal incidentaloma causing biochemical hypercortisolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2736-45.
  91. Arnaldi G, Scandali VM, Trementino L, Cardinaletti M, Appolloni G, Boscaro M. Pathophysiology of dyslipidemia in Cushing's syndrome. Neuroendocrinology. 2010;92 Suppl 1:86-90.
  92. Feingold KR. The Effect of Endocrine Disorders on Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  93. Neary NM, Booker OJ, Abel BS, Matta JR, Muldoon N, Sinaii N, et al. Hypercortisolism is associated with increased coronary arterial atherosclerosis: analysis of noninvasive coronary angiography using multidetector computerized tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):2045-52.
  94. Torpy DJ, Mullen N, Ilias I, Nieman LK. Association of hypertension and hypokalemia with Cushing's syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion: a series of 58 cases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;970:134-44.
  95. De Leo M, Pivonello R, Auriemma RS, Cozzolino A, Vitale P, Simeoli C, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Cushing's syndrome: heart versus vasculature. Neuroendocrinology. 2010;92 Suppl 1:50-4.
  96. Colao A, Pivonello R, Spiezia S, Faggiano A, Ferone D, Filippella M, et al. Persistence of increased cardiovascular risk in patients with Cushing's disease after five years of successful cure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(8):2664-72.
  97. Faggiano A, Pivonello R, Spiezia S, De Martino MC, Filippella M, Di Somma C, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and common carotid artery caliber and stiffness in patients with Cushing's disease during active disease and 1 year after disease remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):2527-33.
  98. Jyotsna VP, Naseer A, Sreenivas V, Gupta N, Deepak KK. Effect of Cushing's syndrome - Endogenous hypercortisolemia on cardiovascular autonomic functions. Auton Neurosci. 2011;160(1-2):99-102.
  99. Alexandraki KI, Kaltsas GA, Vouliotis AI, Papaioannou TG, Trisk L, Zilos A, et al. Specific electrocardiographic features associated with Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011;74(5):558-64.
  100. Trementino L, Arnaldi G, Appolloni G, Daidone V, Scaroni C, Casonato A, et al. Coagulopathy in Cushing's syndrome. Neuroendocrinology. 2010;92 Suppl 1:55-9.
  101. Stuijver DJ, van Zaane B, Feelders RA, Debeij J, Cannegieter SC, Hermus AR, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with Cushing's syndrome: a multicenter cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):3525-32.
  102. Wagner J, Langlois F, Lim DST, McCartney S, Fleseriu M. Hypercoagulability and Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Endogenous Cushing's Syndrome: A Systematic Meta-Analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:805.
  103. Boscaro M, Sonino N, Scarda A, Barzon L, Fallo F, Sartori MT, et al. Anticoagulant prophylaxis markedly reduces thromboembolic complications in Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(8):3662-6.
  104. van der Pas R, Leebeek FW, Hofland LJ, de Herder WW, Feelders RA. Hypercoagulability in Cushing's syndrome: prevalence, pathogenesis and treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;78(4):481-8.
  105. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz NR, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):847-75.
  106. Kelly W. Exophthalmos in Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;45(2):167-70.
  107. Kelly WF. Psychiatric aspects of Cushing's syndrome. QJM. 1996;89(7):543-51.
  108. Santos A, Resmini E, Pascual JC, Crespo I, Webb SM. Psychiatric Symptoms in Patients with Cushing's Syndrome: Prevalence, Diagnosis and Management. Drugs. 2017;77(8):829-42.
  109. Forget H, Lacroix A, Somma M, Cohen H. Cognitive decline in patients with Cushing's syndrome. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6(1):20-9.
  110. Starkman MN, Gebarski SS, Berent S, Schteingart DE. Hippocampal formation volume, memory dysfunction, and cortisol levels in patients with Cushing's syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 1992;32(9):756-65.
  111. Scheinman RI, Cogswell PC, Lofquist AK, Baldwin AS, Jr. Role of transcriptional activation of I kappa B alpha in mediation of immunosuppression by glucocorticoids. Science. 1995;270(5234):283-6.
  112. Sarlis NJ, Chanock SJ, Nieman LK. Cortisolemic indices predict severe infections in Cushing syndrome due to ectopic production of adrenocorticotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(1):42-7.
  113. Meinardi JR, Wolffenbuttel BH, Dullaart RP. Cyclic Cushing's syndrome: a clinical challenge. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(3):245-54.
  114. Valassi E, Franz H, Brue T, Feelders RA, Netea-Maier R, Tsagarakis S, et al. Diagnostic tests for Cushing's syndrome differ from published guidelines: data from ERCUSYN. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(5):613-24.
  115. Carroll T, Raff H, Findling JW. Late-night salivary cortisol for the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome: a meta-analysis. Endocr Pract. 2009;15(4):335-42.
  116. Liu H, Bravata DM, Cabaccan J, Raff H, Ryzen E. Elevated late-night salivary cortisol levels in elderly male type 2 diabetic veterans. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63(6):642-9.
  117. Raff H. Utility of salivary cortisol measurements in Cushing's syndrome and adrenal insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10):3647-55.
  118. Masserini B, Morelli V, Bergamaschi S, Ermetici F, Eller-Vainicher C, Barbieri AM, et al. The limited role of midnight salivary cortisol levels in the diagnosis of subclinical hypercortisolism in patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(1):87-92.
  119. Castro M, Elias PC, Quidute AR, Halah FP, Moreira AC. Out-patient screening for Cushing's syndrome: the sensitivity of the combination of circadian rhythm and overnight dexamethasone suppression salivary cortisol tests. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(3):878-82.
  120. Nunes ML, Vattaut S, Corcuff JB, Rault A, Loiseau H, Gatta B, et al. Late-night salivary cortisol for diagnosis of overt and subclinical Cushing's syndrome in hospitalized and ambulatory patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(2):456-62.
  121. Carrasco CA, Coste J, Guignat L, Groussin L, Dugue MA, Gaillard S, et al. Midnight salivary cortisol determination for assessing the outcome of transsphenoidal surgery in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(12):4728-34.
  122. Doherty GM, Nieman LK, Cutler GB, Jr., Chrousos GP, Norton JA. Time to recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis after curative resection of adrenal tumors in patients with Cushing's syndrome. Surgery. 1990;108(6):1085-90.
  123. Galm BP, Qiao N, Klibanski A, Biller BMK, Tritos NA. Accuracy of Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(6).
  124. Corcuff JB, Tabarin A, Rashedi M, Duclos M, Roger P, Ducassou D. Overnight urinary free cortisol determination: a screening test for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48(4):503-8.
  125. Yanovski JA, Cutler GB, Jr., Chrousos GP, Nieman LK. Corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation following low-dose dexamethasone administration. A new test to distinguish Cushing's syndrome from pseudo-Cushing's states. JAMA. 1993;269(17):2232-8.
  126. Carroll BJ, Curtis GC, Davies BM, Mendels J, Sugerman AA. Urinary free cortisol excretion in depression. Psychol Med. 1976;6(1):43-50.
  127. Lin CL, Wu TJ, Machacek DA, Jiang NS, Kao PC. Urinary free cortisol and cortisone determined by high performance liquid chromatography in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(1):151-5.
  128. Meikle AW, Findling J, Kushnir MM, Rockwood AL, Nelson GJ, Terry AH. Pseudo-Cushing syndrome caused by fenofibrate interference with urinary cortisol assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(8):3521-4.
  129. Liddle GW. Tests of pituitary-adrenal suppressibility in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1960;20:1539-60.
  130. Kennedy L, Atkinson AB, Johnston H, Sheridan B, Hadden DR. Serum cortisol concentrations during low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing's syndrome. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;289(6453):1188-91.
  131. Nugent CA, Nichols T, Tyler FH. Diagnosis of Cushing's Syndrome; Single Dose Dexamethasone Suppression Test. Arch Intern Med. 1965;116:172-6.
  132. McHardy-Young S, Harris PW, Lessof MH, Lyne C. Singledose dexamethasone suppression test for Cushing's Syndrome. Br Med J. 1967;2(5554):740-4.
  133. Shimizu N, Yoshida H. Studies on the "low dose" suppressible Cushing's disease. Endocrinol Jpn. 1976;23(6):479-84.
  134. Crapo L. Cushing's syndrome: a review of diagnostic tests. Metabolism. 1979;28(9):955-77.
  135. Odagiri E, Demura R, Demura H, Suda T, Ishiwatari N, Abe Y, et al. The changes in plasma cortisol and urinary free cortisol by an overnight dexamethasone suppression test in patients with Cushing's disease. Endocrinol Jpn. 1988;35(6):795-802.
  136. Wood PJ, Barth JH, Freedman DB, Perry L, Sheridan B. Evidence for the low dose dexamethasone suppression test to screen for Cushing's syndrome--recommendations for a protocol for biochemistry laboratories. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;34 ( Pt 3):222-9.
  137. Doppman JL, Chang R, Oldfield EH, Chrousos G, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. The hypoplastic inferior petrosal sinus: a potential source of false-negative results in petrosal sampling for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):533-40.
  138. Bernini GP, Argenio GF, Cerri F, Franchi F. Comparison between the suppressive effects of dexamethasone and loperamide on cortisol and ACTH secretion in some pathological conditions. J Endocrinol Invest. 1994;17(10):799-804.
  139. Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Perry L, Wass J, Grossman A, Besser M. A single sleeping midnight cortisol has 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;43(5):545-50.
  140. Trainer PJ, Grossman A. The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;34(4):317-30.
  141. Papanicolaou DA, Yanovski JA, Cutler GB, Jr., Chrousos GP, Nieman LK. A single midnight serum cortisol measurement distinguishes Cushing's syndrome from pseudo-Cushing states. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(4):1163-7.
  142. Nieman L. Editorial: The dexamethasone-suppressed corticotropin-releasing hormone test for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: what have we learned in 14 years? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):2876-8.
  143. Moro M, Putignano P, Losa M, Invitti C, Maraschini C, Cavagnini F. The desmopressin test in the differential diagnosis between Cushing's disease and pseudo-Cushing states. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3569-74.
  144. Tirabassi G, Faloia E, Papa R, Furlani G, Boscaro M, Arnaldi G. Use of the desmopressin test in the differential diagnosis of pseudo-Cushing state from Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(3):1115-22.
  145. Giampietro RR, Cabral MVG, Pereira EG, Machado MC, Vilar L, Nunes-Nogueira VDS. Accuracy of the 10 mug desmopressin test for differential diagnosis of Cushing syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1332120.
  146. Van Cauter E, Refetoff S. Evidence for two subtypes of Cushing's disease based on the analysis of episodic cortisol secretion. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(21):1343-9.
  147. Lytras N, Grossman A, Perry L, Tomlin S, Wass JA, Coy DH, et al. Corticotrophin releasing factor: responses in normal subjects and patients with disorders of the hypothalamus and pituitary. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1984;20(1):71-84.
  148. Greene LW, Geer EB, Page-Wilson G, Findling JW, Raff H. Assay-Specific Spurious ACTH Results Lead to Misdiagnosis, Unnecessary Testing, and Surgical Misadventure-A Case Series. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3(4):763-72.
  149. Fig LM, Gross MD, Shapiro B, Ehrmann DA, Freitas JE, Schteingart DE, et al. Adrenal localization in the adrenocorticotropic hormone-independent Cushing syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109(7):547-53.
  150. Wagner-Bartak NA, Baiomy A, Habra MA, Mukhi SV, Morani AC, Korivi BR, et al. Cushing Syndrome: Diagnostic Workup and Imaging Features, With Clinical and Pathologic Correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(1):19-32.
  151. Doppman JL, Miller DL, Dwyer AJ, Loughlin T, Nieman L, Cutler GB, et al. Macronodular adrenal hyperplasia in Cushing disease. Radiology. 1988;166(2):347-52.
  152. Fassnacht M, Tsagarakis S, Terzolo M, Tabarin A, Sahdev A, Newell-Price J, et al. European Society of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenal incidentalomas, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2023;189(1):G1-G42.
  153. Blake MA, Kalra MK, Sweeney AT, Lucey BC, Maher MM, Sahani DV, et al. Distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses: multi-detector row CT protocol with 10-minute delay. Radiology. 2006;238(2):578-85.
  154. Wei J, Li S, Liu Q, Zhu Y, Wu N, Tang Y, et al. ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome with bilateral cortisol-secreting adrenal adenomas: a case report and review of literatures. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018;18(1):22.
  155. Doppman JL, Travis WD, Nieman L, Miller DL, Chrousos GP, Gomez MT, et al. Cushing syndrome due to primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease: findings at CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172(2):415-20.
  156. Malchoff CD, Rosa J, DeBold CR, Kozol RA, Ramsby GR, Page DL, et al. Adrenocorticotropin-independent bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia: an unusual cause of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;68(4):855-60.
  157. Sohaib SA, Hanson JA, Newell-Price JD, Trainer PJ, Monson JP, Grossman AB, et al. CT appearance of the adrenal glands in adrenocorticotrophic hormone-dependent Cushing's syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(4):997-1002.
  158. Newell-Price J, Morris DG, Drake WM, Korbonits M, Monson JP, Besser GM, et al. Optimal response criteria for the human CRH test in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1640-5.
  159. Howlett TA, Drury PL, Perry L, Doniach I, Rees LH, Besser GM. Diagnosis and management of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: comparison of the features in ectopic and pituitary ACTH production. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1986;24(6):699-713.
  160. Findling JW, Kehoe ME, Shaker JL, Raff H. Routine inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome: early recognition of the occult ectopic ACTH syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73(2):408-13.
  161. Oldfield EH, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Miller DL, Katz DA, et al. Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releasing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(13):897-905.
  162. Kaltsas GA, Giannulis MG, Newell-Price JD, Dacie JE, Thakkar C, Afshar F, et al. A critical analysis of the value of simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling in Cushing's disease and the occult ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):487-92.
  163. Colao A, Faggiano A, Pivonello R, Pecori Giraldi F, Cavagnini F, Lombardi G, et al. Inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: results of an Italian multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;144(5):499-507.
  164. Swearingen B, Katznelson L, Miller K, Grinspoon S, Waltman A, Dorer DJ, et al. Diagnostic errors after inferior petrosal sinus sampling. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(8):3752-63.
  165. Wang H, Ba Y, Xing Q, Cai RC. Differential diagnostic value of bilateral inferior Petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) in ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMC Endocr Disord. 2020;20(1):143.
  166. Yamamoto Y, Davis DH, Nippoldt TB, Young WF, Jr., Huston J, 3rd, Parisi JE. False-positive inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the diagnosis of Cushing's disease. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(6):1087-91.
  167. McCance DR, McIlrath E, McNeill A, Gordon DS, Hadden DR, Kennedy L, et al. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling as a routine procedure in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1989;30(2):157-66.
  168. Machado MC, de Sa SV, Domenice S, Fragoso MC, Puglia P, Jr., Pereira MA, et al. The role of desmopressin in bilateral and simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling for differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66(1):136-42.
  169. Chen S, Chen K, Wang S, Zhu H, Lu L, Zhang X, et al. The Optimal Cut-off of BIPSS in Differential Diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's Syndrome: Is Stimulation Necessary? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(4).
  170. Valizadeh M, Ahmadi AR, Ebadinejad A, Rahmani F, Abiri B. Diagnostic accuracy of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling using desmopressin or corticotropic- releasing hormone in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23(5):881-92.
  171. Miller DL, Doppman JL, Peterman SB, Nieman LK, Oldfield EH, Chang R. Neurologic complications of petrosal sinus sampling. Radiology. 1992;185(1):143-7.
  172. Lefournier V, Gatta B, Martinie M, Vasdev A, Tabarin A, Bessou P, et al. One transient neurological complication (sixth nerve palsy) in 166 consecutive inferior petrosal sinus samplings for the etiological diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(9):3401-2.
  173. Erickson D, Huston J, 3rd, Young WF, Jr., Carpenter PC, Wermers RA, Bonelli FS, et al. Internal jugular vein sampling in adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent Cushing's syndrome: a comparison with inferior petrosal sinus sampling. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004;60(4):413-9.
  174. Sharma ST, Raff H, Nieman LK. Prolactin as a marker of successful catheterization during IPSS in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3687-94.
  175. Detomas M, Ritzel K, Nasi-Kordhishti I, Schernthaner-Reiter MH, Losa M, Troger V, et al. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling with human CRH stimulation in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: results from a retrospective multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2023.
  176. Tabarin A, Greselle JF, San-Galli F, Leprat F, Caille JM, Latapie JL, et al. Usefulness of the corticotropin-releasing hormone test during bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73(1):53-9.
  177. Landolt AM, Schubiger O, Maurer R, Girard J. The value of inferior petrosal sinus sampling in diagnosis and treatment of Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(4):485-92.
  178. Lefournier V, Martinie M, Vasdev A, Bessou P, Passagia JG, Labat-Moleur F, et al. Accuracy of bilateral inferior petrosal or cavernous sinuses sampling in predicting the lateralization of Cushing's disease pituitary microadenoma: influence of catheter position and anatomy of venous drainage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(1):196-203.
  179. Wind JJ, Lonser RR, Nieman LK, DeVroom HL, Chang R, Oldfield EH. The lateralization accuracy of inferior petrosal sinus sampling in 501 patients with Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2285-93.
  180. Liu Z, Zhang X, Wang Z, You H, Li M, Feng F, et al. High positive predictive value of the combined pituitary dynamic enhanced MRI and high-dose dexamethasone suppression tests in the diagnosis of Cushing's disease bypassing bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14694.
  181. Lienhardt A, Grossman AB, Dacie JE, Evanson J, Huebner A, Afshar F, et al. Relative contributions of inferior petrosal sinus sampling and pituitary imaging in the investigation of children and adolescents with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(12):5711-4.
  182. Morris DG, Grossman AB. Dynamic tests in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(7 Suppl):64-73.
  183. Miller DL, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, Cutler GB, Jr., Chrousos G, Loriaux DL, et al. Petrosal sinus sampling: discordant lateralization of ACTH-secreting pituitary microadenomas before and after stimulation with corticotropin-releasing hormone. Radiology. 1990;176(2):429-31.
  184. Strott CA, Nugent CA, Tyler FH. Cushing's syndrome caused by bronchial adenomas. Am J Med. 1968;44(1):97-104.
  185. Malchoff CD, Orth DN, Abboud C, Carney JA, Pairolero PC, Carey RM. Ectopic ACTH syndrome caused by a bronchial carcinoid tumor responsive to dexamethasone, metyrapone, and corticotropin-releasing factor. Am J Med. 1988;84(4):760-4.
  186. Dichek HL, Nieman LK, Oldfield EH, Pass HI, Malley JD, Cutler GB, Jr. A comparison of the standard high dose dexamethasone suppression test and the overnight 8-mg dexamethasone suppression test for the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(2):418-22.
  187. Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Oldfield EH, Avgerinos PC, Cutler GB, Jr., Loriaux DL. The ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test and the dexamethasone suppression test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105(6):862-7.
  188. Grossman AB, Howlett TA, Perry L, Coy DH, Savage MO, Lavender P, et al. CRF in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: a comparison with the dexamethasone suppression test. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1988;29(2):167-78.
  189. Tyrrell JB, Findling JW, Aron DC, Fitzgerald PA, Forsham PH. An overnight high-dose dexamethasone suppression test for rapid differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104(2):180-6.
  190. Isidori AM, Kaltsas GA, Mohammed S, Morris DG, Jenkins P, Chew SL, et al. Discriminatory value of the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in establishing the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5299-306.
  191. Trainer PJ, Faria M, Newell-Price J, Browne P, Kopelman P, Coy DH, et al. A comparison of the effects of human and ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone on the pituitary-adrenal axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(2):412-7.
  192. Trainer PJ, Woods RJ, Korbonits M, Popovic V, Stewart PM, Lowry PJ, et al. The pathophysiology of circulating corticotropin-releasing hormone-binding protein levels in the human. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(5):1611-4.
  193. Nieman LK, Oldfield EH, Wesley R, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Cutler GB, Jr. A simplified morning ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test for the differential diagnosis of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77(5):1308-12.
  194. Pecori Giraldi F, Invitti C, Cavagnini F, Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology on the Pathophysiology of the Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal a. The corticotropin-releasing hormone test in the diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: a reappraisal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;54(5):601-7.
  195. Hermus AR, Pieters GF, Pesman GJ, Smals AG, Benraad TJ, Kloppenborg PW. The corticotropin-releasing-hormone test versus the high-dose dexamethasone test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Lancet. 1986;2(8506):540-4.
  196. Woo YS, Isidori AM, Wat WZ, Kaltsas GA, Afshar F, Sabin I, et al. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of adrenocorticotropin-secreting macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4963-9.
  197. Barbot M, Trementino L, Zilio M, Ceccato F, Albiger N, Daniele A, et al. Second-line tests in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Pituitary. 2016;19(5):488-95.
  198. Korbonits M, Kaltsas G, Perry LA, Putignano P, Grossman AB, Besser GM, et al. The growth hormone secretagogue hexarelin stimulates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis via arginine vasopressin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(7):2489-95.
  199. Korbonits M, Bustin SA, Kojima M, Jordan S, Adams EF, Lowe DG, et al. The expression of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor ligand ghrelin in normal and abnormal human pituitary and other neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):881-7.
  200. Tabarin A, San Galli F, Dezou S, Leprat F, Corcuff JB, Latapie JL, et al. The corticotropin-releasing factor test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: a comparison with the lysine-vasopressin test. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1990;123(3):331-8.
  201. Malerbi DA, Mendonca BB, Liberman B, Toledo SP, Corradini MC, Cunha-Neto MB, et al. The desmopressin stimulation test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993;38(5):463-72.
  202. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Ramunni J, Colao A, Gianotti L, Deghenghi R, et al. Adrenocorticotropin- and cortisol-releasing effect of hexarelin, a synthetic growth hormone-releasing peptide, in normal subjects and patients with Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(8):2439-44.
  203. Newell-Price J, Perry L, Medbak S, Monson J, Savage M, Besser M, et al. A combined test using desmopressin and corticotropin-releasing hormone in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(1):176-81.
  204. Tsagarakis S, Tsigos C, Vasiliou V, Tsiotra P, Kaskarelis J, Sotiropoulou C, et al. The desmopressin and combined CRH-desmopressin tests in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: constraints imposed by the expression of V2 vasopressin receptors in tumors with ectopic ACTH secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1646-53.
  205. Korbonits M, Jacobs RA, Aylwin SJ, Burrin JM, Dahia PL, Monson JP, et al. Expression of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor in pituitary adenomas and other neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(10):3624-30.
  206. Frete C, Corcuff JB, Kuhn E, Salenave S, Gaye D, Young J, et al. Non-invasive Diagnostic Strategy in ACTH-dependent Cushing's Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(10).
  207. Hall WA, Luciano MG, Doppman JL, Patronas NJ, Oldfield EH. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in normal human volunteers: occult adenomas in the general population. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(10):817-20.
  208. Patronas N, Bulakbasi N, Stratakis CA, Lafferty A, Oldfield EH, Doppman J, et al. Spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state technique is superior to conventional postcontrast spin echo technique for magnetic resonance imaging detection of adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(4):1565-9.
  209. Tabarin A, Laurent F, Catargi B, Olivier-Puel F, Lescene R, Berge J, et al. Comparative evaluation of conventional and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;49(3):293-300.
  210. Findling JW, Doppman JL. Biochemical and radiologic diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1994;23(3):511-37.
  211. Chatain GP, Patronas N, Smirniotopoulos JG, Piazza M, Benzo S, Ray-Chaudhury A, et al. Potential utility of FLAIR in MRI-negative Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(3):620-8.
  212. Evanson J. Radiology of the Pituitary. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  213. Koulouri O, Steuwe A, Gillett D, Hoole AC, Powlson AS, Donnelly NA, et al. A role for 11C-methionine PET imaging in ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M107-20.
  214. Escourolle H, Abecassis JP, Bertagna X, Guilhaume B, Pariente D, Derome P, et al. Comparison of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the examination of the pituitary gland in patients with Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993;39(3):307-13.
  215. de Herder WW, Uitterlinden P, Pieterman H, Tanghe HL, Kwekkeboom DJ, Pols HA, et al. Pituitary tumour localization in patients with Cushing's disease by magnetic resonance imaging. Is there a place for petrosal sinus sampling? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;40(1):87-92.
  216. Buchfelder M, Nistor R, Fahlbusch R, Huk WJ. The accuracy of CT and MR evaluation of the sella turcica for detection of adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenomas in Cushing disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14(5):1183-90.
  217. Doppman JL, Pass HI, Nieman LK, Findling JW, Dwyer AJ, Feuerstein IM, et al. Detection of ACTH-producing bronchial carcinoid tumors: MR imaging vs CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(1):39-43.
  218. de Herder WW, Lamberts SW. Tumor localization--the ectopic ACTH syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(4):1184-5.
  219. Tabarin A, Valli N, Chanson P, Bachelot Y, Rohmer V, Bex-Bachellerie V, et al. Usefulness of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with occult ectopic adrenocorticotropin syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(4):1193-202.
  220. Torpy DJ, Chen CC, Mullen N, Doppman JL, Carrasquillo JA, Chrousos GP, et al. Lack of utility of (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy in localizing ectopic ACTH producing tumors: follow-up of 18 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(4):1186-92.
  221. Kumar J, Spring M, Carroll PV, Barrington SF, Powrie JK. 18Flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the localization of ectopic ACTH-secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;64(4):371-4.
  222. Pacak K, Ilias I, Chen CC, Carrasquillo JA, Whatley M, Nieman LK. The role of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and [(111)In]-diethylenetriaminepentaacetate-D-Phe-pentetreotide scintigraphy in the localization of ectopic adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumors causing Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(5):2214-21.
  223. Bozkurt MF, Virgolini I, Balogova S, Beheshti M, Rubello D, Decristoforo C, et al. Guideline for PET/CT imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms with (68)Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor targeting peptides and (18)F-DOPA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(9):1588-601.
  224. Santhanam P, Taieb D, Giovanella L, Treglia G. PET imaging in ectopic Cushing syndrome: a systematic review. Endocrine. 2015;50(2):297-305.
  225. Varlamov E, Hinojosa-Amaya JM, Stack M, Fleseriu M. Diagnostic utility of Gallium-68-somatostatin receptor PET/CT in ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors: a systematic literature review and single-center clinical experience. Pituitary. 2019;22(5):445-55.
  226. Treglia G, Giovanella L, Lococo F. Evolving role of PET/CT with different tracers in the evaluation of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(5):853-5.
  227. Isidori AM, Minnetti M, Sbardella E, Graziadio C, Grossman AB. Mechanisms in endocrinology: The spectrum of haemostatic abnormalities in glucocorticoid excess and defect. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(3):R101-13.
  228. Biller BM, Grossman AB, Stewart PM, Melmed S, Bertagna X, Bertherat J, et al. Treatment of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(7):2454-62.
  229. Lamberts SW, van der Lely AJ, de Herder WW. Transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy is the treatment of choice in patients with Cushing's disease. Considerations concerning preoperative medical treatment and the long-term follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(11):3111-3.
  230. Netea-Maier RT, van Lindert EJ, den Heijer M, van der Eerden A, Pieters GF, Sweep CG, et al. Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery via the endoscopic technique: results in 35 consecutive patients with Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(5):675-84.
  231. Wagenmakers MA, Netea-Maier RT, van Lindert EJ, Timmers HJ, Grotenhuis JA, Hermus AR. Repeated transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TS) via the endoscopic technique: a good therapeutic option for recurrent or persistent Cushing's disease (CD). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;70(2):274-80.
  232. Atkinson AB, Kennedy A, Wiggam MI, McCance DR, Sheridan B. Long-term remission rates after pituitary surgery for Cushing's disease: the need for long-term surveillance. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63(5):549-59.
  233. Mortini P, Nocera G, Roncelli F, Losa M, Formenti AM, Giustina A. The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): A surgical perspective. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020;21(4):527-36.
  234. Broersen LHA, Biermasz NR, van Furth WR, de Vries F, Verstegen MJT, Dekkers OM, et al. Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2018;21(5):524-34.
  235. Bochicchio D, Losa M, Buchfelder M. Factors influencing the immediate and late outcome of Cushing's disease treated by transsphenoidal surgery: a retrospective study by the European Cushing's Disease Survey Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(11):3114-20.
  236. Blevins LS, Jr., Christy JH, Khajavi M, Tindall GT. Outcomes of therapy for Cushing's disease due to adrenocorticotropin-secreting pituitary macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(1):63-7.
  237. Hughes NR, Lissett CA, Shalet SM. Growth hormone status following treatment for Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999;51(1):61-6.
  238. Kelly DF. Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: a review of success rates, remission predictors, management of failed surgery, and Nelson's Syndrome. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(3):E5.
  239. Yamada S, Inoshita N, Fukuhara N, Yamaguchi-Okada M, Nishioka H, Takeshita A, et al. Therapeutic outcomes in patients undergoing surgery after diagnosis of Cushing's disease: A single-center study. Endocr J. 2015;62(12):1115-25.
  240. Braun LT, Rubinstein G, Zopp S, Vogel F, Schmid-Tannwald C, Escudero MP, et al. Recurrence after pituitary surgery in adult Cushing's disease: a systematic review on diagnosis and treatment. Endocrine. 2020;70(2):218-31.
  241. Stroud A, Dhaliwal P, Alvarado R, Winder MJ, Jonker BP, Grayson JW, et al. Outcomes of pituitary surgery for Cushing's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2020;23(5):595-609.
  242. Koh CH, Khan DZ, Digpal R, Layard Horsfall H, Ali AMS, Baldeweg SE, et al. The clinical outcomes of imaging modalities for surgical management Cushing's disease - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:1090144.
  243. Bakiri F, Tatai S, Aouali R, Semrouni M, Derome P, Chitour F, et al. Treatment of Cushing's disease by transsphenoidal, pituitary microsurgery: prognosis factors and long-term follow-up. J Endocrinol Invest. 1996;19(9):572-80.
  244. Prevedello DM, Pouratian N, Sherman J, Jane JA, Jr., Vance ML, Lopes MB, et al. Management of Cushing's disease: outcome in patients with microadenoma detected on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(4):751-9.
  245. Wilson CB, Mindermann T, Tyrrell JB. Extrasellar, intracavernous sinus adrenocorticotropin-releasing adenoma causing Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(6):1774-7.
  246. Weil RJ, Vortmeyer AO, Nieman LK, Devroom HL, Wanebo J, Oldfield EH. Surgical remission of pituitary adenomas confined to the neurohypophysis in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(7):2656-64.
  247. Meij BP, Lopes MB, Ellegala DB, Alden TD, Laws ER, Jr. The long-term significance of microscopic dural invasion in 354 patients with pituitary adenomas treated with transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2):195-208.
  248. Jane JA, Jr., Catalino MP, Laws ER, Jr. Surgical Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  249. Sonino N, Zielezny M, Fava GA, Fallo F, Boscaro M. Risk factors and long-term outcome in pituitary-dependent Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(7):2647-52.
  250. Streeten DH, Anderson GH, Jr., Dalakos T, Joachimpillai AD. Intermittent hypercortisolism: a disorder strikingly prevalent after hypophysial surgical procedures. Endocr Pract. 1997;3(3):123-9.
  251. Kelly PA, Samandouras G, Grossman AB, Afshar F, Besser GM, Jenkins PJ. Neurosurgical treatment of Nelson's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(12):5465-9.
  252. McCance DR, Besser M, Atkinson AB. Assessment of cure after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;44(1):1-6.
  253. Estrada J, Garcia-Uria J, Lamas C, Alfaro J, Lucas T, Diez S, et al. The complete normalization of the adrenocortical function as the criterion of cure after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(12):5695-9.
  254. Newell-Price J. Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: defining cure and following outcome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;56(1):19-21.
  255. Yap LB, Turner HE, Adams CB, Wass JA. Undetectable postoperative cortisol does not always predict long-term remission in Cushing's disease: a single centre audit. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;56(1):25-31.
  256. Pereira AM, van Aken MO, van Dulken H, Schutte PJ, Biermasz NR, Smit JW, et al. Long-term predictive value of postsurgical cortisol concentrations for cure and risk of recurrence in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(12):5858-64.
  257. Esposito F, Dusick JR, Cohan P, Moftakhar P, McArthur D, Wang C, et al. Clinical review: Early morning cortisol levels as a predictor of remission after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(1):7-13.
  258. Lindsay JR, Oldfield EH, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. The postoperative basal cortisol and CRH tests for prediction of long-term remission from Cushing's disease after transsphenoidal surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):2057-64.
  259. Valassi E, Biller BM, Swearingen B, Pecori Giraldi F, Losa M, Mortini P, et al. Delayed remission after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(2):601-10.
  260. Ram Z, Nieman LK, Cutler GB, Jr., Chrousos GP, Doppman JL, Oldfield EH. Early repeat surgery for persistent Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(1):37-45.
  261. Locatelli M, Vance ML, Laws ER. Clinical review: the strategy of immediate reoperation for transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(9):5478-82.
  262. Papanicolaou DA, Tsigos C, Oldfield EH, Chrousos GP. Acute glucocorticoid deficiency is associated with plasma elevations of interleukin-6: does the latter participate in the symptomatology of the steroid withdrawal syndrome and adrenal insufficiency? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(6):2303-6.
  263. Leshin M. Acute adrenal insufficiency: recognition, management, and prevention. Urol Clin North Am. 1982;9(2):229-35.
  264. Theiler-Schwetz V, Prete A. Glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome: what to expect and how to manage. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2023;30(3):167-74.
  265. Bangar V, Clayton RN. How reliable is the short synacthen test for the investigation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis? Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;139(6):580-3.
  266. Stewart PM, Corrie J, Seckl JR, Edwards CR, Padfield PL. A rational approach for assessing the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Lancet. 1988;1(8596):1208-10.
  267. Orme SM, Peacey SR, Barth JH, Belchetz PE. Comparison of tests of stress-released cortisol secretion in pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;45(2):135-40.
  268. Ammari F, Issa BG, Millward E, Scanion MF. A comparison between short ACTH and insulin stress tests for assessing hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal function. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;44(4):473-6.
  269. Debono M, Ghobadi C, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Huatan H, Campbell MJ, Newell-Price J, et al. Modified-release hydrocortisone to provide circadian cortisol profiles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(5):1548-54.
  270. Hinojosa-Amaya JM, Varlamov EV, McCartney S, Fleseriu M. Hypercortisolemia Recurrence in Cushing's Disease; a Diagnostic Challenge. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:740.
  271. Amlashi FG, Swearingen B, Faje AT, Nachtigall LB, Miller KK, Klibanski A, et al. Accuracy of Late-Night Salivary Cortisol in Evaluating Postoperative Remission and Recurrence in Cushing's Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(10):3770-7.
  272. Rutkowski MJ, Flanigan PM, Aghi MK. Update on the management of recurrent Cushing's disease. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(2):E16.
  273. Patil CG, Veeravagu A, Prevedello DM, Katznelson L, Vance ML, Laws ER, Jr. Outcomes after repeat transsphenoidal surgery for recurrent Cushing's disease. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(2):266-70; discussion 70-1.
  274. Timmers HJ, van Ginneken EM, Wesseling P, Sweep CG, Hermus AR. A patient with recurrent hypercortisolism after removal of an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma due to an adrenal macronodule. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29(10):934-9.
  275. Olson BR, Rubino D, Gumowski J, Oldfield EH. Isolated hyponatremia after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(1):85-91.
  276. Nemergut EC, Zuo Z, Jane JA, Jr., Laws ER, Jr. Predictors of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery: a review of 881 patients. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(3):448-54.
  277. Burke CW, Adams CB, Esiri MM, Morris C, Bevan JS. Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease: does what is removed determine the endocrine outcome? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990;33(4):525-37.
  278. Ritzel K, Beuschlein F, Mickisch A, Osswald A, Schneider HJ, Schopohl J, et al. Clinical review: Outcome of bilateral adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome: a systematic review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):3939-48.
  279. Bornstein SR, Allolio B, Arlt W, Barthel A, Don-Wauchope A, Hammer GD, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(2):364-89.
  280. Kemink L, Pieters G, Hermus A, Smals A, Kloppenborg P. Patient's age is a simple predictive factor for the development of Nelson's syndrome after total adrenalectomy for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(3):887-9.
  281. Fountas A, Karavitaki N. Nelson's Syndrome: An Update. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020;49(3):413-32.
  282. Reincke M, Albani, A., Stratakis, C.A .,Buchfelder, M., Heaney, A.P., van Rossum, E., Grossman, A., Findling, J., Brue, T., Murakami, M., Pecori Giraldi, F., Losa, M., Theodoropoulou, M., Pivonello, R., Detomas, M., Daniele, A., Sbiera, S., Honegger, J., Elenkova, A., Zacharieva, S., Lacroix, A., Pérez‐Rivas, L.G., Di Dalmazi, G., Laws, E.R., Newell-Price, J.D., Gomez-Sanchez, C.E., Karavitaki, N., Bancos, I., Rainey, W.E., Chabre, O., Valassi, E., Assie, G., Schopohl, J., Rubinstein, G. and Ritzel, K. Corticotroph tumor progression after bilateral adrenalectomy (Nelson’s syndrome: Systematic review and “Munich Expert Consensus. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020.
  283. Reincke M, Albani A, Assie G, Bancos I, Brue T, Buchfelder M, et al. Corticotroph tumor progression after bilateral adrenalectomy (Nelson's syndrome): systematic review and expert consensus recommendations. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;184(3):P1-P16.
  284. Fountas A, Lim ES, Drake WM, Powlson AS, Gurnell M, Martin NM, et al. Outcomes of Patients with Nelson's Syndrome after Primary Treatment: A Multicenter Study from 13 UK Pituitary Centers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(5).
  285. Assie G, Bahurel H, Coste J, Silvera S, Kujas M, Dugue MA, et al. Corticotroph tumor progression after adrenalectomy in Cushing's Disease: A reappraisal of Nelson's Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(1):172-9.
  286. Nagesser SK, van Seters AP, Kievit J, Hermans J, van Dulken H, Krans HM, et al. Treatment of pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome: long-term results of unilateral adrenalectomy followed by external pituitary irradiation compared to transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;52(4):427-35.
  287. Kurowska M, Nowakowski A, Zielinski G, Malicka J, Tarach JS, Maksymowicz M, et al. Temozolomide-Induced Shrinkage of Invasive Pituitary Adenoma in Patient with Nelson's Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2015;2015:623092.
  288. Bruno OD, Juarez-Allen L, Christiansen SB, Manavela M, Danilowicz K, Vigovich C, et al. Temozolomide Therapy for Aggressive Pituitary Tumors: Results in a Small Series of Patients from Argentina. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:587893.
  289. Devoe DJ, Miller WL, Conte FA, Kaplan SL, Grumbach MM, Rosenthal SM, et al. Long-term outcome in children and adolescents after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(10):3196-202.
  290. Jennings AS, Liddle GW, Orth DN. Results of treating childhood Cushing's disease with pituitary irradiation. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(18):957-62.
  291. Nelson DH, Meakin JW, Thorn GW. ACTH-producing pituitary tumors following adrenalectomy for Cushing's syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1960;52:560-9.
  292. Howlett TA, Plowman PN, Wass JA, Rees LH, Jones AE, Besser GM. Megavoltage pituitary irradiation in the management of Cushing's disease and Nelson's syndrome: long-term follow-up. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1989;31(3):309-23.
  293. Estrada J, Boronat M, Mielgo M, Magallon R, Millan I, Diez S, et al. The long-term outcome of pituitary irradiation after unsuccessful transsphenoidal surgery in Cushing's disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(3):172-7.
  294. Minniti G, Osti M, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Esposito V, Cantore G, Maurizi Enrici R. Long-term follow-up results of postoperative radiation therapy for Cushing's disease. J Neurooncol. 2007;84(1):79-84.
  295. Vance ML. Cushing's disease: radiation therapy. Pituitary. 2009;12(1):11-4.
  296. Mathieu D, Kotecha R, Sahgal A, De Salles A, Fariselli L, Pollock BE, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for secretory pituitary adenomas: systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice recommendations. J Neurosurg. 2022;136(3):801-12.
  297. Brada M, Ashley S, Ford D, Traish D, Burchell L, Rajan B. Cerebrovascular mortality in patients with pituitary adenoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;57(6):713-7.
  298. Erfurth EM, Bulow B, Svahn-Tapper G, Norrving B, Odh K, Mikoczy Z, et al. Risk factors for cerebrovascular deaths in patients operated and irradiated for pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):4892-9.
  299. van Westrhenen A, Muskens IS, Verhoeff JJC, Smith TRS, Broekman MLD. Ischemic stroke after radiation therapy for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. J Neurooncol. 2017;135(1):1-11.
  300. Plowman PN. Pituitary adenoma radiotherapy-when, who and how? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999;51(3):265-71.
  301. Hamblin R, Vardon A, Akpalu J, Tampourlou M, Spiliotis I, Sbardella E, et al. Risk of second brain tumour after radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma or craniopharyngioma: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study of 3679 patients with long-term imaging surveillance. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(8):581-8.
  302. Mitsumori M, Shrieve DC, Alexander E, 3rd, Kaiser UB, Richardson GE, Black PM, et al. Initial clinical results of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42(3):573-80.
  303. Landolt AM, Haller D, Lomax N, Scheib S, Schubiger O, Siegfried J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent surgically treated acromegaly: comparison with fractionated radiotherapy. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(6):1002-8.
  304. Thoren M, Hoybye C, Grenback E, Degerblad M, Rahn T, Hulting AL. The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol. 2001;54(2):197-203.
  305. Sheehan J, Lopes MB, Laws E. Pathological findings following radiosurgery of pituitary adenomas. Prog Neurol Surg. 2007;20:172-9.
  306. Bunevicius A, Laws ER, Vance ML, Iuliano S, Sheehan J. Surgical and radiosurgical treatment strategies for Cushing's disease. J Neurooncol. 2019;145(3):403-13.
  307. Swords FM, Monson JP, Besser GM, Chew SL, Drake WM, Grossman AB, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery: a safe and effective salvage treatment for pituitary tumours not controlled despite conventional radiotherapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(6):819-28.
  308. Mehta GU, Ding D, Gupta A, Kano H, Sisterson ND, Martinez-Moreno N, et al. Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for Cushing's disease: outcomes of an international, multicenter study. J Neurooncol. 2018;138(3):519-25.
  309. Petit JH, Biller BM, Yock TI, Swearingen B, Coen JJ, Chapman P, et al. Proton stereotactic radiotherapy for persistent adrenocorticotropin-producing adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(2):393-9.
  310. Swords FM, Allan CA, Plowman PN, Sibtain A, Evanson J, Chew SL, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery XVI: a treatment for previously irradiated pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5334-40.
  311. Jagannathan J, Sheehan JP, Pouratian N, Laws ER, Steiner L, Vance ML. Gamma Knife surgery for Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(6):980-7.
  312. Almeldin D, Fersht N, Kosmin M. Radiotherapy for Pituitary Tumors. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  313. He J, Zhou J, Lu Z. Radiotherapy of ectopic ACTH syndrome due to thoracic carcinoids. Chin Med J (Engl). 1995;108(5):338-41.
  314. Andres R, Mayordomo JI, Ramon y Cajal S, Tres A. Paraneoplastic Cushing's syndrome associated to locally advanced thymic carcinoid tumor. Tumori. 2002;88(1):65-7.
  315. Miller CA, Ellison EC. Therapeutic alternatives in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1998;7(4):863-79.
  316. Lehnert T. Liver transplantation for metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: an analysis of 103 patients. Transplantation. 1998;66(10):1307-12.
  317. Rinke A, Ambrosini V, Dromain C, Garcia-Carbonero R, Haji A, Koumarianou A, et al. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for colorectal neuroendocrine tumours. J Neuroendocrinol. 2023;35(6):e13309.
  318. Tabarin A, Catargi B, Chanson P, Hieronimus S, Corcuff JB, Laurent F, et al. Pseudo-tumours of the thymus after correction of hypercortisolism in patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome: a report of five cases. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;42(2):207-13.
  319. Ur E, Grossman A. Corticotropin-releasing hormone in health and disease: an update. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1992;127(3):193-9.
  320. Ogura M, Kusaka I, Nagasaka S, Yatagai T, Shinozaki S, Itabashi N, et al. Unilateral adrenalectomy improves insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in a patient with ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia. Endocr J. 2003;50(6):715-21.
  321. Lamas C, Alfaro JJ, Lucas T, Lecumberri B, Barcelo B, Estrada J. Is unilateral adrenalectomy an alternative treatment for ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia?: Long-term follow-up of four cases. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146(2):237-40.
  322. Lacroix A, Hamet P, Boutin JM. Leuprolide acetate therapy in luteinizing hormone--dependent Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(21):1577-81.
  323. Lacroix A, Tremblay J, Rousseau G, Bouvier M, Hamet P. Propranolol therapy for ectopic beta-adrenergic receptors in adrenal Cushing's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(20):1429-34.
  324. Valimaki M, Pelkonen R, Porkka L, Sivula A, Kahri A. Long-term results of adrenal surgery in patients with Cushing's syndrome due to adrenocortical adenoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1984;20(2):229-36.
  325. Sarkar R, Thompson NW, McLeod MK. The role of adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome. Surgery. 1990;108(6):1079-84.
  326. McCallum RW, Connell JM. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;55(4):435-6.
  327. Elfenbein DM, Scarborough JE, Speicher PJ, Scheri RP. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy: results from American College of Surgeons-National Surgery Quality Improvement Project. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):216-20.
  328. Raffaelli M, Brunaud L, De Crea C, Hoche G, Oragano L, Bresler L, et al. Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing's syndrome: laparoscopic versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus robotic approach. World J Surg. 2014;38(3):709-15.
  329. Taffurelli G, Ricci C, Casadei R, Selva S, Minni F. Open adrenalectomy in the era of laparoscopic surgery: a review. Updates Surg. 2017;69(2):135-43.
  330. Bellantone R, Ferrante A, Boscherini M, Lombardi CP, Crucitti P, Crucitti F, et al. Role of reoperation in recurrence of adrenal cortical carcinoma: results from 188 cases collected in the Italian National Registry for Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma. Surgery. 1997;122(6):1212-8.
  331. Magee BJ, Gattamaneni HR, Pearson D. Adrenal cortical carcinoma: survival after radiotherapy. Clin Radiol. 1987;38(6):587-8.
  332. de Castro F, Isa W, Aguera L, Rosell Costa D, Abad JI, Robles JE, et al. [Primary adrenal carcinoma]. Actas Urol Esp. 1993;17(1):30-4.
  333. Fassnacht M, Hahner S, Polat B, Koschker AC, Kenn W, Flentje M, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy of the tumor bed on local recurrence of adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4501-4.
  334. Broersen LHA, Jha M, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Dekkers OM. Effectiveness of medical treatment for Cushing's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2018;21(6):631-41.
  335. Carballeira A, Fishman LM, Jacobi JD. Dual sites of inhibition by metyrapone of human adrenal steroidogenesis: correlation of in vivo and in vitro studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42(4):687-95.
  336. Trainer PJ, Besser M. Cushing's syndrome. Therapy directed at the adrenal glands. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1994;23(3):571-84.
  337. Owen LJ, Halsall DJ, Keevil BG. Cortisol measurement in patients receiving metyrapone therapy. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010;47(Pt 6):573-5.
  338. Verhelst JA, Trainer PJ, Howlett TA, Perry L, Rees LH, Grossman AB, et al. Short and long-term responses to metyrapone in the medical management of 91 patients with Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;35(2):169-78.
  339. Daniel E, Aylwin S, Mustafa O, Ball S, Munir A, Boelaert K, et al. Effectiveness of Metyrapone in Treating Cushing's Syndrome: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in 195 Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(11):4146-54.
  340. Lynnette K Nieman M, Marco Boscaro, MD, Carla Maria Scaroni, MD, Timo Deutschbein, MD, Emese Mezosi, MD, Natacha Driessens, . Metyrapone Treatment in Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome: Results at Week 12 From PROMPT, a Prospective International Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase III/IV Study. J Endocr Soc. 2021;3:A515.
  341. Aron DC, Schnall AM, Sheeler LR. Cushing's syndrome and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(1):244-52.
  342. Buescher MA, McClamrock HD, Adashi EY. Cushing syndrome in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(1):130-7.
  343. Machado MC, Fragoso M, Bronstein MD. Pregnancy in Patients with Cushing's Syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018;47(2):441-9.
  344. Hamblin R, Coulden A, Fountas A, Karavitaki N. The diagnosis and management of Cushing's syndrome in pregnancy. J Neuroendocrinol. 2022;34(8):e13118.
  345. Schteingart DE. Drugs in the medical treatment of Cushing's syndrome. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2009;14(4):661-71.
  346. Feelders RA, Hofland LJ, de Herder WW. Medical treatment of Cushing's syndrome: adrenal-blocking drugs and ketaconazole. Neuroendocrinology. 2010;92 Suppl 1:111-5.
  347. Connell JM, Cordiner J, Davies DL, Fraser R, Frier BM, McPherson SG. Pregnancy complicated by Cushing's syndrome: potential hazard of metyrapone therapy. Case report. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(11):1192-5.
  348. Santen RJ, Van den Bossche H, Symoens J, Brugmans J, DeCoster R. Site of action of low dose ketoconazole on androgen biosynthesis in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(4):732-6.
  349. Pont A, Goldman ES, Sugar AM, Siiteri PK, Stevens DA. Ketoconazole-induced increase in estradiol-testosterone ratio. Probable explanation for gynecomastia. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(8):1429-31.
  350. Engelhardt D, Dorr G, Jaspers C, Knorr D. Ketoconazole blocks cortisol secretion in man by inhibition of adrenal 11 beta-hydroxylase. Klin Wochenschr. 1985;63(13):607-12.
  351. Engelhardt D, Weber MM, Miksch T, Abedinpour F, Jaspers C. The influence of ketoconazole on human adrenal steroidogenesis: incubation studies with tissue slices. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;35(2):163-8.
  352. Steen RE, Kapelrud H, Haug E, Frey H. In vivo and in vitro inhibition by ketoconazole of ACTH secretion from a human thymic carcinoid tumour. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991;125(3):331-4.
  353. Chou SC, Lin JD. Long-term effects of ketoconazole in the treatment of residual or recurrent Cushing's disease. Endocr J. 2000;47(4):401-6.
  354. Ahmed M, Kanaan I, Alarifi A, Ba-Essa E, Saleem M, Tulbah A, et al. ACTH-producing pituitary cancer: experience at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre. Pituitary. 2000;3(2):105-12.
  355. Amado JA, Pesquera C, Gonzalez EM, Otero M, Freijanes J, Alvarez A. Successful treatment with ketoconazole of Cushing's syndrome in pregnancy. Postgrad Med J. 1990;66(773):221-3.
  356. Berwaerts J, Verhelst J, Mahler C, Abs R. Cushing's syndrome in pregnancy treated by ketoconazole: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1999;13(3):175-82.
  357. Viecceli C, Mattos ACV, Hirakata VN, Garcia SP, Rodrigues TDC, Czepielewski MA. Ketoconazole as second-line treatment for Cushing's disease after transsphenoidal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1145775.
  358. McCance DR, Hadden DR, Kennedy L, Sheridan B, Atkinson AB. Clinical experience with ketoconazole as a therapy for patients with Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;27(5):593-9.
  359. Castinetti F, Guignat L, Giraud P, Muller M, Kamenicky P, Drui D, et al. Ketoconazole in Cushing's disease: is it worth a try? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1623-30.
  360. Lewis JH, Zimmerman HJ, Benson GD, Ishak KG. Hepatic injury associated with ketoconazole therapy. Analysis of 33 cases. Gastroenterology. 1984;86(3):503-13.
  361. Young J, Bertherat J, Vantyghem MC, Chabre O, Senoussi S, Chadarevian R, et al. Hepatic safety of ketoconazole in Cushing's syndrome: results of a Compassionate Use Programme in France. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178(5):447-58.
  362. McCance DR, Ritchie CM, Sheridan B, Atkinson AB. Acute hypoadrenalism and hepatotoxicity after treatment with ketoconazole. Lancet. 1987;1(8532):573.
  363. Sonino N, Boscaro M, Paoletta A, Mantero F, Ziliotto D. Ketoconazole treatment in Cushing's syndrome: experience in 34 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;35(4):347-52.
  364. Tucker WS, Jr., Snell BB, Island DP, Gregg CR. Reversible adrenal insufficiency induced by ketoconazole. JAMA. 1985;253(16):2413-4.
  365. Miettinen TA. Cholesterol metabolism during ketoconazole treatment in man. J Lipid Res. 1988;29(1):43-51.
  366. Schwetz V, Aberer F, Stiegler C, T RP, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Pilz S. Fluconazole and acetazolamide in the treatment of ectopic Cushing's syndrome with severe metabolic alkalosis. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2015;2015:150027.
  367. Canteros TM, De Miguel V, Fainstein-Day P. Fluconazole treatment in severe ectopic Cushing syndrome. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2019;2019(1).
  368. van der Pas R, Hofland LJ, Hofland J, Taylor AE, Arlt W, Steenbergen J, et al. Fluconazole inhibits human adrenocortical steroidogenesis in vitro. J Endocrinol. 2012;215(3):403-12.
  369. Calhoun DA, White WB, Krum H, Guo W, Bermann G, Trapani A, et al. Effects of a novel aldosterone synthase inhibitor for treatment of primary hypertension: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase 2 trial. Circulation. 2011;124(18):1945-55.
  370. Bertagna X, Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Zhang Y, Robinson P, Taylor A, et al. LCI699, a potent 11beta-hydroxylase inhibitor, normalizes urinary cortisol in patients with Cushing's disease: results from a multicenter, proof-of-concept study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):1375-83.
  371. Fleseriu M, Pivonello R, Young J, Hamrahian AH, Molitch ME, Shimizu C, et al. Osilodrostat, a potent oral 11beta-hydroxylase inhibitor: 22-week, prospective, Phase II study in Cushing's disease. Pituitary. 2016;19(2):138-48.
  372. Varlamov EV, Han AJ, Fleseriu M. Updates in adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors for Cushing's syndrome - A practical guide. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;35(1):101490.
  373. Fleseriu M BM, et al. . Long-term control of urinary free cortisol with osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s Disease: final results from the LINC 2 study. . J Endocr Soc. 2021;5:A521–A2.
  374. Fleseriu M, Pivonello R, Elenkova A, Salvatori R, Auchus RJ, Feelders RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of levoketoconazole in the treatment of endogenous Cushing's syndrome (SONICS): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, single-arm trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(11):855-65.
  375. Pivonello R, Elenkova A, Fleseriu M, Feelders RA, Witek P, Greenman Y, et al. Levoketoconazole in the Treatment of Patients With Cushing's Syndrome and Diabetes Mellitus: Results From the SONICS Phase 3 Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:595894.
  376. Ledingham IM, Watt I. Influence of sedation on mortality in critically ill multiple trauma patients. Lancet. 1983;1(8336):1270.
  377. Weber MM, Lang J, Abedinpour F, Zeilberger K, Adelmann B, Engelhardt D. Different inhibitory effect of etomidate and ketoconazole on the human adrenal steroid biosynthesis. Clin Investig. 1993;71(11):933-8.
  378. Lamberts SW, Bons EG, Bruining HA, de Jong FH. Differential effects of the imidazole derivatives etomidate, ketoconazole and miconazole and of metyrapone on the secretion of cortisol and its precursors by human adrenocortical cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987;240(1):259-64.
  379. De Coster R, Beerens D, Haelterman C, Wouters L. Effects of etomidate on cortisol biosynthesis in isolated guinea-pig adrenal cells: comparison with metyrapone. J Endocrinol Invest. 1985;8(3):199-202.
  380. Allolio B, Schulte HM, Kaulen D, Reincke M, Jaursch-Hancke C, Winkelmann W. Nonhypnotic low-dose etomidate for rapid correction of hypercortisolaemia in Cushing's syndrome. Klin Wochenschr. 1988;66(8):361-4.
  381. Herrmann BL, Mitchell A, Saller B, Stolke D, Forsting M, Frilling A, et al. [Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy of a patient with an ACTH-producing pituitary adenoma and an "empty sella" after pretreatment with etomidate]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2001;126(9):232-4.
  382. Drake WM, Perry LA, Hinds CJ, Lowe DG, Reznek RH, Besser GM. Emergency and prolonged use of intravenous etomidate to control hypercortisolemia in a patient with Cushing's syndrome and peritonitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(10):3542-4.
  383. Krakoff J, Koch CA, Calis KA, Alexander RH, Nieman LK. Use of a parenteral propylene glycol-containing etomidate preparation for the long-term management of ectopic Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(9):4104-8.
  384. Greening JE, Brain CE, Perry LA, Mushtaq I, Sales Marques J, Grossman AB, et al. Efficient short-term control of hypercortisolaemia by low-dose etomidate in severe paediatric Cushing's disease. Horm Res. 2005;64(3):140-3.
  385. Schulte HM, Benker G, Reinwein D, Sippell WG, Allolio B. Infusion of low dose etomidate: correction of hypercortisolemia in patients with Cushing's syndrome and dose-response relationship in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70(5):1426-30.
  386. Preda VA, Sen J, Karavitaki N, Grossman AB. Etomidate in the management of hypercortisolaemia in Cushing's syndrome: a review. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167(2):137-43.
  387. Young RB, Bryson MJ, Sweat ML, Street JC. Complexing of DDT and o,p'DDD with adrenal cytochrome P-450 hydroxylating systems. J Steroid Biochem. 1973;4(6):585-91.
  388. Cueto C, Brown JH, Richardson AP, Jr. Biological studies on an adrenocorticolytic agent and the isolation of the active components. Endocrinology. 1958;62(3):334-9.
  389. Icard P, Goudet P, Charpenay C, Andreassian B, Carnaille B, Chapuis Y, et al. Adrenocortical carcinomas: surgical trends and results of a 253-patient series from the French Association of Endocrine Surgeons study group. World J Surg. 2001;25(7):891-7.
  390. Terzolo M, Angeli A, Fassnacht M, Daffara F, Tauchmanova L, Conton PA, et al. Adjuvant mitotane treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(23):2372-80.
  391. Luton JP, Cerdas S, Billaud L, Thomas G, Guilhaume B, Bertagna X, et al. Clinical features of adrenocortical carcinoma, prognostic factors, and the effect of mitotane therapy. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(17):1195-201.
  392. Schteingart DE, Tsao HS, Taylor CI, McKenzie A, Victoria R, Therrien BA. Sustained remission of Cushing's disease with mitotane and pituitary irradiation. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(5):613-9.
  393. Leiba S, Weinstein R, Shindel B, Lapidot M, Stern E, Levavi H, et al. The protracted effect of o,p'-DDD in Cushing's disease and its impact on adrenal morphogenesis of young human embryo. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1989;50(1):49-53.
  394. Maher VM, Trainer PJ, Scoppola A, Anderson JV, Thompson GR, Besser GM. Possible mechanism and treatment of o,p'DDD-induced hypercholesterolaemia. Q J Med. 1992;84(305):671-9.
  395. Haak HR, Caekebeke-Peerlinck KM, van Seters AP, Briet E. Prolonged bleeding time due to mitotane therapy. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(5):638-41.
  396. Hogan TF, Citrin DL, Johnson BM, Nakamura S, Davis TE, Borden EC. o,p'-DDD (mitotane) therapy of adrenal cortical carcinoma: observations on drug dosage, toxicity, and steroid replacement. Cancer. 1978;42(5):2177-81.
  397. Vilar O, Tullner WW. Effects of o,p' DDD on histology and 17-hydroxycorticosteroid output of the dog adrenal cortex. Endocrinology. 1959;65(1):80-6.
  398. Lamberts SW, de Herder WW, Krenning EP, Reubi JC. A role of (labeled) somatostatin analogs in the differential diagnosis and treatment of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(1):17-9.
  399. Batista DL, Zhang X, Gejman R, Ansell PJ, Zhou Y, Johnson SA, et al. The effects of SOM230 on cell proliferation and adrenocorticotropin secretion in human corticotroph pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4482-8.
  400. Hofland LJ, van der Hoek J, Feelders R, van Aken MO, van Koetsveld PM, Waaijers M, et al. The multi-ligand somatostatin analogue SOM230 inhibits ACTH secretion by cultured human corticotroph adenomas via somatostatin receptor type 5. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152(4):645-54.
  401. Boscaro M, Ludlam WH, Atkinson B, Glusman JE, Petersenn S, Reincke M, et al. Treatment of pituitary-dependent Cushing's disease with the multireceptor ligand somatostatin analog pasireotide (SOM230): a multicenter, phase II trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(1):115-22.
  402. Colao A, Petersenn S, Newell-Price J, Findling JW, Gu F, Maldonado M, et al. A 12-month phase 3 study of pasireotide in Cushing's disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):914-24.
  403. Lacroix A, Gu F, Gallardo W, Pivonello R, Yu Y, Witek P, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: a 12 month clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(1):17-26.
  404. Fleseriu M, Petersenn S, Biller BMK, Kadioglu P, De Block C, T'Sjoen G, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: A Phase III extension study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019;91(6):776-85.
  405. Feelders RA, de Bruin C, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Netea-Maier RT, Hermus AR, et al. Pasireotide alone or with cabergoline and ketoconazole in Cushing's disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1846-8.
  406. Hayashi K, Inoshita N, Kawaguchi K, Ibrahim Ardisasmita A, Suzuki H, Fukuhara N, et al. The USP8 mutational status may predict drug susceptibility in corticotroph adenomas of Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(2):213-26.
  407. Castellnou S, Vasiljevic A, Lapras V, Raverot V, Alix E, Borson-Chazot F, et al. SST5 expression and USP8 mutation in functioning and silent corticotroph pituitary tumors. Endocr Connect. 2020;9(3):243-53.
  408. Pivonello R, Ferone D, de Herder WW, de Krijger RR, Waaijers M, Mooij DM, et al. Dopamine receptor expression and function in human normal adrenal gland and adrenal tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(9):4493-502.
  409. Godbout A, Manavela M, Danilowicz K, Beauregard H, Bruno OD, Lacroix A. Cabergoline monotherapy in the long-term treatment of Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(5):709-16.
  410. Ferriere A, Cortet C, Chanson P, Delemer B, Caron P, Chabre O, et al. Cabergoline for Cushing's disease: a large retrospective multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(3):305-14.
  411. Trifiro G, Mokhles MM, Dieleman JP, van Soest EM, Verhamme K, Mazzaglia G, et al. Risk of cardiac valve regurgitation with dopamine agonist use in Parkinson's disease and hyperprolactinaemia: a multi-country, nested case-control study. Drug Saf. 2012;35(2):159-71.
  412. Hinojosa-Amaya JM, Johnson N, Gonzalez-Torres C, Varlamov EV, Yedinak CG, McCartney S, et al. Depression and Impulsivity Self-Assessment Tools to Identify Dopamine Agonist Side Effects in Patients With Pituitary Adenomas. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:579606.
  413. Curto L, Torre ML, Ferrau F, Pitini V, Altavilla G, Granata F, et al. Temozolomide-induced shrinkage of a pituitary carcinoma causing Cushing's disease--report of a case and literature review. ScientificWorldJournal. 2010;10:2132-8.
  414. Bode H, Seiz M, Lammert A, Brockmann MA, Back W, Hammes HP, et al. SOM230 (pasireotide) and temozolomide achieve sustained control of tumour progression and ACTH secretion in pituitary carcinoma with widespread metastases. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010;118(10):760-3.
  415. McCormack AI, McDonald KL, Gill AJ, Clark SJ, Burt MG, Campbell KA, et al. Low O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression and response to temozolomide in aggressive pituitary tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71(2):226-33.
  416. Kovacs K, Scheithauer BW, Lombardero M, McLendon RE, Syro LV, Uribe H, et al. MGMT immunoexpression predicts responsiveness of pituitary tumors to temozolomide therapy. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;115(2):261-2.
  417. Bush ZM, Longtine JA, Cunningham T, Schiff D, Jane JA, Jr., Vance ML, et al. Temozolomide treatment for aggressive pituitary tumors: correlation of clinical outcome with O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(11):E280-90.
  418. Raverot G, Sturm N, de Fraipont F, Muller M, Salenave S, Caron P, et al. Temozolomide treatment in aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas: a French multicenter experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(10):4592-9.
  419. Ji Y, Vogel RI, Lou E. Temozolomide treatment of pituitary carcinomas and atypical adenomas: systematic review of case reports. Neurooncol Pract. 2016;3(3):188-95.
  420. Paez-Pereda M, Kovalovsky D, Hopfner U, Theodoropoulou M, Pagotto U, Uhl E, et al. Retinoic acid prevents experimental Cushing syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(8):1123-31.
  421. Heaney AP, Fernando M, Yong WH, Melmed S. Functional PPAR-gamma receptor is a novel therapeutic target for ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Nat Med. 2002;8(11):1281-7.
  422. Heaney AP, Fernando M, Melmed S. PPAR-gamma receptor ligands: novel therapy for pituitary adenomas. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(9):1381-8.
  423. Ambrosi B, Dall'Asta C, Cannavo S, Libe R, Vigo T, Epaminonda P, et al. Effects of chronic administration of PPAR-gamma ligand rosiglitazone in Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(2):173-8.
  424. Cannavo S, Arosio M, Almoto B, Dall'Asta C, Ambrosi B. Effectiveness of long-term rosiglitazone administration in patients with Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63(1):118-9.
  425. Suri D, Weiss RE. Effect of pioglitazone on adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol secretion in Cushing's disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(3):1340-6.
  426. Lacroix A, N'Diaye N, Mircescu H, Tremblay J, Hamet P. The diversity of abnormal hormone receptors in adrenal Cushing's syndrome allows novel pharmacological therapies. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2000;33(10):1201-9.
  427. Preumont V, Mermejo LM, Damoiseaux P, Lacroix A, Maiter D. Transient efficacy of octreotide and pasireotide (SOM230) treatment in GIP-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Horm Metab Res. 2011;43(4):287-91.
  428. Baulieu EE. The steroid hormone antagonist RU486. Mechanism at the cellular level and clinical applications. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1991;20(4):873-91.
  429. Bertagna X, Basin C, Picard F, Varet B, Bertagna C, Hucher M, et al. Peripheral antiglucocorticoid action of RU 486 in man. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1988;28(5):537-41.
  430. Healy DL, Chrousos GP, Schulte HM, Gold PW, Hodgen GD. Increased adrenocorticotropin, cortisol, and arginine vasopressin secretion in primates after the antiglucocorticoid steroid RU 486: dose response relationships. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;60(1):1-4.
  431. Bertagna X, Bertagna C, Laudat MH, Husson JM, Girard F, Luton JP. Pituitary-adrenal response to the antiglucocorticoid action of RU 486 in Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63(3):639-43.
  432. Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Findling JW, Molitch ME, Schteingart DE, Gross C, et al. Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):2039-49.
  433. Castinetti F, Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Terzolo M, Bouchard P, Chanson P, et al. Merits and pitfalls of mifepristone in Cushing's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(6):1003-10.
  434. Johanssen S, Allolio B. Mifepristone (RU 486) in Cushing's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(5):561-9.
  435. Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Kellner C, Spitz IM, Nisula BC, Cutler GB, et al. Successful treatment of Cushing's syndrome with the glucocorticoid antagonist RU 486. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;61(3):536-40.
  436. Trainer PJ, Eastment C, Grossman AB, Wheeler MJ, Perry L, Besser GM. The relationship between cortisol production rate and serial serum cortisol estimation in patients on medical therapy for Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993;39(4):441-3.
  437. van Seters AP, Moolenaar AJ. Mitotane increases the blood levels of hormone-binding proteins. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991;124(5):526-33.
  438. Alexandraki KI, Kaltsas GA, le Roux CW, Fassnacht M, Ajodha S, Christ-Crain M, et al. Assessment of serum-free cortisol levels in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma treated with mitotane: a pilot study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(3):305-11.
  439. Workman RJ, Vaughn WK, Stone WJ. Dexamethasone suppression testing in chronic renal failure: pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and demonstration of a normal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63(3):741-6.
  440. Nolan GE, Smith JB, Chavre VJ, Jubiz W. Spurious overestimation of plasma cortisol in patients with chronic renal failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;52(6):1242-5.
  441. Luger A, Lang I, Kovarik J, Stummvoll HK, Templ H. Abnormalities in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1987;9(1):51-4.
  442. Chan KC, Lit LC, Law EL, Tai MH, Yung CU, Chan MH, et al. Diminished urinary free cortisol excretion in patients with moderate and severe renal impairment. Clin Chem. 2004;50(4):757-9.
  443. Siamopoulos KC, Dardamanis M, Kyriaki D, Pappas M, Sferopoulos G, Alevisou V. Pituitary adrenal responsiveness to corticotropin-releasing hormone in chronic uremic patients. Perit Dial Int. 1990;10(2):153-6.
  444. Ramirez G, Gomez-Sanchez C, Meikle WA, Jubiz W. Evaluation of the hypothalamic hypophyseal adrenal axis in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142(8):1448-52.
  445. Weber A, Trainer PJ, Grossman AB, Afshar F, Medbak S, Perry LA, et al. Investigation, management and therapeutic outcome in 12 cases of childhood and adolescent Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;43(1):19-28.
  446. Lee PD, Winter RJ, Green OC. Virilizing adrenocortical tumors in childhood: eight cases and a review of the literature. Pediatrics. 1985;76(3):437-44.
  447. Savage MO, Lienhardt A, Lebrethon MC, Johnston LB, Huebner A, Grossman AB, et al. Cushing's disease in childhood: presentation, investigation, treatment and long-term outcome. Horm Res. 2001;55 Suppl 1:24-30.
  448. Urbanic RC, George JM. Cushing's disease--18 years' experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 1981;60(1):14-24.
  449. Streeten DH, Faas FH, Elders MJ, Dalakos TG, Voorhess M. Hypercortisolism in childhood: shortcomings of conventional diagnostic criteria. Pediatrics. 1975;56(5):797-803.
  450. Korbonits M, Blair JC, Boguslawska A, Ayuk J, Davies JH, Druce MR, et al. Consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: Part 2, specific diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2024;20(5):290-309.
  451. Martinelli CE, Jr., Sader SL, Oliveira EB, Daneluzzi JC, Moreira AC. Salivary cortisol for screening of Cushing's syndrome in children. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999;51(1):67-71.
  452. Gafni RI, Papanicolaou DA, Nieman LK. Nighttime salivary cortisol measurement as a simple, noninvasive, outpatient screening test for Cushing's syndrome in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2000;137(1):30-5.
  453. Batista DL, Riar J, Keil M, Stratakis CA. Diagnostic tests for children who are referred for the investigation of Cushing syndrome. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e575-86.
  454. Carpenter PC. Diagnostic evaluation of Cushing's syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1988;17(3):445-72.
  455. Magiakou MA, Mastorakos G, Oldfield EH, Gomez MT, Doppman JL, Cutler GB, Jr., et al. Cushing's syndrome in children and adolescents. Presentation, diagnosis, and therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(10):629-36.
  456. Dias R, Storr HL, Perry LA, Isidori AM, Grossman AB, Savage MO. The discriminatory value of the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in the investigation of paediatric Cushing's syndrome. Horm Res. 2006;65(3):159-62.
  457. Hanson JA, Weber A, Reznek RH, Cotterill AM, Ross RJ, Harris RJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of adrenocortical adenomas in childhood: correlation with computed tomography and ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol. 1996;26(11):794-9.
  458. Storr HL, Afshar F, Matson M, Sabin I, Davies KM, Evanson J, et al. Factors influencing cure by transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy in paediatric Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152(6):825-33.
  459. Storr HL, Plowman PN, Carroll PV, Francois I, Krassas GE, Afshar F, et al. Clinical and endocrine responses to pituitary radiotherapy in pediatric Cushing's disease: an effective second-line treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(1):34-7.
  460. Davies JH, Storr HL, Davies K, Monson JP, Besser GM, Afshar F, et al. Final adult height and body mass index after cure of paediatric Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;62(4):466-72.
  461. Lindsay JR, Jonklaas J, Oldfield EH, Nieman LK. Cushing's syndrome during pregnancy: personal experience and review of the literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(5):3077-83.
  462. Carr BR, Parker CR, Jr., Madden JD, MacDonald PC, Porter JC. Maternal plasma adrenocorticotropin and cortisol relationships throughout human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139(4):416-22.
  463. Ambroziak U, Kondracka A, Bartoszewicz Z, Krasnodebska-Kiljanska M, Bednarczuk T. The morning and late-night salivary cortisol ranges for healthy women may be used in pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;83(6):774-8.
  464. Lopes LM, Francisco RP, Galletta MA, Bronstein MD. Determination of nighttime salivary cortisol during pregnancy: comparison with values in non-pregnancy and Cushing's disease. Pituitary. 2016;19(1):30-8.
  465. Crespo I, Santos A, Gomez-Anson B, Lopez-Mourelo O, Pires P, Vives-Gilabert Y, et al. Brain metabolite abnormalities in ventromedial prefrontal cortex are related to duration of hypercortisolism and anxiety in patients with Cushing's syndrome. Endocrine. 2016;53(3):848-56.
  466. Barasch E, Sztern M, Spinrad S, Chayen R, Servadio C, Kaufman H, et al. Pregnancy and Cushing's syndrome: example of endocrine interaction. Isr J Med Sci. 1988;24(2):101-4.
  467. Ross RJ, Chew SL, Perry L, Erskine K, Medbak S, Afshar F. Diagnosis and selective cure of Cushing's disease during pregnancy by transsphenoidal surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 1995;132(6):722-6.
  468. Ragonese M, Cotta OR, Ferrau F, Trimarchi F, Cannavo S. How to diagnose and manage Cushing's disease during pregnancy, when hypercortisolism is mild? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(8):637-9.
  469. Parksook WW, Porntharukchareon T, Sunthornyothin S. Desmopressin Stimulation Test in a Pregnant Patient with Cushing's Disease. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2022;8(3):105-8.
  470. Lum M, Tsiouris AJ. MRI safety considerations during pregnancy. Clin Imaging. 2020;62:69-75.
  471. Bronstein MD, Machado MC, Fragoso MC. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Management of pregnant patients with Cushing's syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(2):R85-91.
  472. Caimari F, Valassi E, Garbayo P, Steffensen C, Santos A, Corcoy R, et al. Cushing's syndrome and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review of published cases. Endocrine. 2017;55(2):555-63.
  473. Androulakis, II, Kaltsas G, Chrousos G. Pseudo-Cushing's States. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  474. Besemer F, Pereira AM, Smit JW. Alcohol-induced Cushing syndrome. Hypercortisolism caused by alcohol abuse. Neth J Med. 2011;69(7):318-23.
  475. Scaroni C, Albiger NM, Palmieri S, Iacuaniello D, Graziadio C, Damiani L, et al. Approach to patients with pseudo-Cushing's states. Endocr Connect. 2020;9(1):R1-R13.
  476. Romer B, Lewicka S, Kopf D, Lederbogen F, Hamann B, Gilles M, et al. Cortisol metabolism in depressed patients and healthy controls. Neuroendocrinology. 2009;90(3):301-6.
  477. Connan F, Lightman SL, Landau S, Wheeler M, Treasure J, Campbell IC. An investigation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity in anorexia nervosa: the role of CRH and AVP. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(1-2):131-43.
  478. Plotz CM, Knowlton AI, Ragan C. Natural course of Cushing's syndrome as compared with the course of rheumatoid arthritis treated by hormones. Ann Rheum Dis. 1952;11(4):308-9.
  479. Van Zaane B, Nur E, Squizzato A, Dekkers OM, Twickler MT, Fliers E, et al. Hypercoagulable state in Cushing's syndrome: a systematic review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2743-50.
  480. Clayton RN, Jones PW, Reulen RC, Stewart PM, Hassan-Smith ZK, Ntali G, et al. Mortality in patients with Cushing's disease more than 10 years after remission: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(7):569-76.
  481. Alexandraki KI, Kaltsas GA, Isidori AM, Storr HL, Afshar F, Sabin I, et al. Long-term remission and recurrence rates in Cushing's disease: predictive factors in a single-centre study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(4):639-48.
  482. Swearingen B, Biller BM, Barker FG, 2nd, Katznelson L, Grinspoon S, Klibanski A, et al. Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(10):821-4.
  483. Valassi E, Tabarin A, Brue T, Feelders RA, Reincke M, Netea-Maier R, et al. High mortality within 90 days of diagnosis in patients with Cushing's syndrome: results from the ERCUSYN registry. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(5):461-72.
  484. Savage MO, Storr HL, Chan LF, Grossman AB. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric Cushing's disease. Pituitary. 2007;10(4):365-71.
  485. Lindsay JR, Nansel T, Baid S, Gumowski J, Nieman LK. Long-term impaired quality of life in Cushing's syndrome despite initial improvement after surgical remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):447-53.
  486. Santos A, Resmini E, Martinez Momblan MA, Valassi E, Martel L, Webb SM. Quality of Life in Patients With Cushing's Disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:862.
  487. Dorn LD, Burgess ES, Friedman TC, Dubbert B, Gold PW, Chrousos GP. The longitudinal course of psychopathology in Cushing's syndrome after correction of hypercortisolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(3):912-9.
  488. Forget H, Lacroix A, Cohen H. Persistent cognitive impairment following surgical treatment of Cushing's syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002;27(3):367-83.
  489. Manning PJ, Evans MC, Reid IR. Normal bone mineral density following cure of Cushing's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992;36(3):229-34.
  490. Di Somma C, Pivonello R, Loche S, Faggiano A, Klain M, Salvatore M, et al. Effect of 2 years of cortisol normalization on the impaired bone mass and turnover in adolescent and adult patients with Cushing's disease: a prospective study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58(3):302-8.
  491. Di Somma C, Colao A, Pivonello R, Klain M, Faggiano A, Tripodi FS, et al. Effectiveness of chronic treatment with alendronate in the osteoporosis of Cushing's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48(5):655-62.
  492. Hermus AR, Smals AG, Swinkels LM, Huysmans DA, Pieters GF, Sweep CF, et al. Bone mineral density and bone turnover before and after surgical cure of Cushing's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(10):2859-65.
  493. Dimopoulos MA, Fernandez JF, Samaan NA, Holoye PY, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R. Paraneoplastic Cushing's syndrome as an adverse prognostic factor in patients who die early with small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 1992;69(1):66-71.