Archives

Severe Hypothyroidism in the Elderly

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Elderly patients with severe hypothyroidism often present with variable symptoms that may be masked or potentiated by co-morbid conditions. Characteristic symptoms may include fatigue, weight gain, cold intolerance, hoarseness, constipation, and myalgias. Neurologic symptoms may include ataxia, depression, and mental status changes ranging from mild confusion to overt dementia. Clinical findings that may raise suspicion of thyroid hormone deficiency include hypothermia, bradycardia, goitrous enlargement of the thyroid, cool dry skin, myxedema, delayed relaxation of deep tendon reflexes, a pericardial or abdominal effusion, hyponatremia, and hypercholesterolemia.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL

 

Autoimmune (Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis with destruction of functioning tissue is the most common endogenous cause of hypothyroidism in elderly patients. Checkpoint inhibitors that are used to treat a variety of malignancies can induce a rapidly progressing form of autoimmune thyroiditis. Unrecognized or untreated cases can progress to a state of pronounced thyroid hormone deficiency over weeks to months. Administration of radioactive iodine to treat hyperthyroidism ascribed to Graves’ disease usually causes permanent hypothyroidism. Surgery performed to remove thyroid cancer or an enlarged multinodular goiter inevitably leads to overt hypothyroidism. External beam radiation used to treat lymphoid malignancies and head and neck cancer can lead to rapid or delayed development of hypothyroidism. Pituitary dysfunction that inhibits secretion of TSH may be caused by growth of a mass in the sella turcica or may develop as a complication of surgery performed to remove a tumor. 

 

Table 1: Causes of Hypothyroidism in the Elderly

Primary hypothyroidism

Autoimmune (Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis

Amiodarone induced hypothyroidism

Lithium induced hypothyroidism

Post-ablative hypothyroidism

Post-surgical hypothyroidism

Radiation-induced hypothyroidism
Thyroiditis induced by checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, interferon alpha, or CAMPATH

Central hypothyroidism

Pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction

Decreased absorption of levothyroxine

Celiac disease

Drugs: iron sulfate, bile acid resins, sucralfate, calcium

Accelerated metabolism of thyroid hormone

Increased deiodinase activity (consumptive hypothyroidism)

Drugs: phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, rifampin

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS NEEDED AND SUGGESTED

 

Laboratory tests that demonstrate an elevated TSH level in tandem with a low free or total T4 level confirm a diagnosis of primary hypothyroidism. Commonly used drugs including ASA and phenytoin lower total T4 levels and may cause interference with FT4 assays. Anti-thyroid peroxidase and anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels may be checked to confirm the presence of autoimmune thyroiditis, but this usually isn’t necessary as it is the presumptive diagnosis in patients who haven’t been treated with other predisposing therapies. A low free or total T4 level detected in tandem with a low or inappropriately normal TSH level may raise suspicion of central hypothyroidism. This may prompt further biochemical evaluation of other pituitary hormones and anatomic imaging of the pituitary and hypothalamus. Serious illness in the elderly is often accompanied by the non-thyroidal illness (euthyroid sick) syndrome that presents with a normal or low total T4 level, a low total T3 level, and an inappropriately low or normal TSH level. Recognition of this syndrome requires exclusion of other causes of hypothyroidism or pituitary dysfunction. Appropriate treatment of this condition is controversial. Subclinical hypothyroidism, with a normal range freeT4 level and elevated TSH level is not infrequent in elderly patients, and if due to autoimmune thyroiditis, often progresses to overt hypothyroidism.

 

THERAPY

 

Levothyroxine (T4) is the principal thyroid hormone preparation used to treat hypothyroidism. Regimens that include liothyronine (T3) have not been shown to be any more efficacious and run the risk of triggering atrial arrhythmias in susceptible individuals. Most adults require a full replacement dose of 1.6 mcg per kilogram of body weight. The major concern in elderly patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease is to avoid exacerbating underlying conditions. In these circumstances levothyroxine should be started at a low dose of 12.5-25 mcg daily. If this dose does not provoke ischemic symptoms or an atrial arrhythmia, it can be increased in 25 mcg increment at 4-week intervals. Patients who develop hypothyroidism after treatment of hyperthyroidism can be treated with full replacement doses from the outset. Agents that may block absorption of levothyroxine include iron sulfate, bile acid resins, sucralfate, and supplemental forms of calcium. Doses should be separated from ingestion of these agents by at least 4 hours. Higher than anticipated doses may be required in patients treated with other agents that increase metabolism of levothyroxine including phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and rifampin.

Appropriate treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism is open to debate. Some clinicians feel that treatment is indicated with any confirmed and unexplained elevation of TSH above normal but most clinicians do not initiate replacement therapy in elderly patients until the TSH level is > 10uU/ml on several occasions.

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

When treating primary hypothyroidism, a TSH level should be checked 6 weeks after starting a dose or 4 weeks after changing a dose of levothyroxine. Doses should be adjusted to maintain a TSH level within the reference range. Maintenance of a slightly elevated TSH level may be acceptable in cases where treatment to a full replacement dose triggers ischemic symptoms or atrial arrhythmias. When treating central hypothyroidism, doses should be adjusted to maintain a free T4 level in the upper half of the reference range. The TSH level is unreliable in this setting and should not be used to guide treatment.

 

GUIDELINES

 

Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, Cooper DS, Kim BW, Peeters RP, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM; American Thyroid Association Task Force on Thyroid Hormone Replacement. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the american thyroid association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid. 2014 Dec;24(12):1670-751

 

Jeffrey R. Garber, Rhoda H. Cobin, Hossein Gharib, James V. Hennessey, Irwin Klein, Jeffrey I. Mechanick, Rachel Pessah-Pollack, Peter A. Singer, and Kenneth A. Woeber. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypothyroidism in Adults: Cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):988-1028.

 

REFERENCES

 

Kim MI. Hypothyroidism in Older Adults. 2020 Jul 14. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Feldt-Rasmussen U. Treatment of hypothyroidism in elderly patients and in patients with cardiac disease. Thyroid. 2007 Jul;17(7):619-24.

 

Wiersinga WM. Adult Hypothyroidism.2014 Mar 28. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–

 

Akamizu T, Amino N. Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. 2017 Jul 17. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Myxedema and Coma (Severe Hypothyroidism)

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Myxedema coma is a rare life-threatening clinical condition in patients with longstanding severe untreated hypothyroidism, in whom adaptive mechanisms fail to maintain homeostasis. Most patients, however, are not comatose, and the entity rather represents a form of very severe, decompensated hypothyroidism. 

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Usually a precipitating event disrupts homeostasis which is maintained in hypothyroid patients by a number of neurovascular adaptations. These adaptations include chronic peripheral vasoconstriction, diastolic hypertension, and diminished blood volume, in an attempt to preserve a normal body core temperature. Homeostasis might no longer be maintained in severely hypothyroid patients if blood volume is reduced any further (e.g., by gastrointestinal bleeding or the use of diuretics), if respiration already compromised by a reduced ventilatory drive is further hampered by intercurrent pulmonary infection, of if CNS regulatory mechanisms are impaired by stroke, the use of sedatives, or hyponatremia.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL

 

The three key features of myxedema coma are: 

  1. Altered mental status. Usually somnolence and lethargy have been present for months. Lethargy may develop via stupor into a comatose state. There may have been transient episodes of reduced consciousness before a more complete comatose state develops.
  2. Defective thermoregulation: hypothermia. The lower the temperature, the worse the prognosis. Please check the ability of the thermometer to accurately measure decreased temperatures (automatic thermometers may not register frank hypothermia). Fever may be absent despite infections. With cold weather the body temperature may drop sharply. Myxedema coma commonly develops during winter months.
  3. Precipitating event. Look for cold exposure, infection, drugs (diuretics, tranquillizers, sedatives, analgesics), trauma, stroke, heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding. The typical patient often has a history of hypothyroidism, neck surgery or radioactive iodine treatment.

Physical examination may reveal hypothermia, hypoventilation, hypotension, bradycardia, dry coarse skin, macroglossia, and delayed deep-tendon reflexes. Absence of mild diastolic hypertension in severely hypothyroid patients is a warning sign of impending myxedema coma. 

Laboratory examination may reveal anemia, hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and high serum creatine kinase concentrations. Most patients have low serum FT4 and high serum TSH. Serum TSH can be low or normal, however, due to the presence of central hypothyroidism or the nonthyroidal illness syndrome. 

 

THERAPY

 

Myxedema coma is a medical emergency. Early diagnosis, rapid administration of thyroid hormones and adequate supportive measures (Table) are essential for a successful outcome. The prognosis, however, remains poor with a reported mortality between 20% and 50%. In-hospital mortality was 29.5% among 149 patients with myxedema coma identified between 2010-2013 through a national inpatient database in Japan (Ono et al. 2017).

 

MANAGEMENT OF MYXEDEMA COMA

1.Hypothyroidism       

large initial iv dose of 300-500 μg T4, if no response add T3;

1a

Alternative- initial iv dose of 200-300 μg T4 plus 10-25 μg T3

2.Hypocortisolemia    

iv hydrocortisone 200-400 mg daily

3. Hypoventilation       

don’t delay intubation and mechanical ventilation too long

4. Hypothermia

blankets, no active rewarming

5. Hyponatremia          

mild fluid restriction

6. Hypotension

cautious volume expansion with crystalloid or whole blood

7. Hypoglycemia

glucose administration

8. Precipitating event  

identification and elimination by specific treatment, liberal use of antibiotics

 

Note 1. Administration of thyroid hormone is essential, but opinions differ about the dose and the preparation (T4 or T3). A high dose carries the risk of precipitating fatal tachycardia or myocardial infarction, but a low dose may be unable to reverse a downhill course. Treatment with T4 may be less effective due to impaired conversion of T4 into T3 (associated with severe illness and inadequate caloric intake), but treatment with T3 may expose tissues to relatively high levels of thyroid hormone. In the absence of RCT’s, the available case series suggest higher mortality with initial T4 doses larger than 500 μg and with T3 doses larger than 75 μg daily. Treatment should be started intravenously because gastrointestinal absorption may be impaired. Typically, a large initial intravenous loading dose of 300-500 μg T4 may be given, followed by daily doses of 1.6 μg/kg (initially intravenously, and orally when feasible). If there is no improvement in clinical abnormalities within 24 hours, addition of T3 is recommended. An alternative scheme is an initial intravenous dose of 200-300 μg T4 plus 10-25 μg T3, followed by 2.5-10 μg T3 every 8 hours depending on the patient’s age and presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Upon clinical improvement, T3 is discontinued and a daily oral T4 replacement dose is maintained.

 

Note 2. Pituitary-adrenal function is impaired in severe hypothyroidism. Restoration of a normal metabolic rate with exogenous thyroid hormones may precipitate adrenal insufficiency. It is therefore prudent to administer glucocorticoids in stress doses (e.g., hydrocortisone 100 mg intravenously every 8 hours).

 

Note 3. Mechanical ventilation may be needed, particularly when obesity and myxedema coexist.

 

Note 4. The cutaneous blood flow is markedly reduced in severe hypothyroidism in order to conserve body heat. Warming blankets will defeat this mechanism. Thus, central warming may be attempted, but peripheral warming should not, since it may lead to vasodilatation and shock.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

 

Note 5. Fluid restriction and the use of isotonic sodium chloride will usually restore normal serum sodium. Normal saline should not be administered in patients with suspicious hyponatremic encephalopathy. In cases with severe symptomatic hyponatremia, 100 ml of 3% NaCl should be administered (Liamis et al. 2017). The new vasopressin antagonist conivaptan might be potentially useful in hyponatremia as high vasopressin levels have been observed in myxedema coma; however, no cases of myxedema coma have been reported in which this drug was administered.                                                                                                                                      

 

Note 6. Volume expansion is usually required in case of hypotension since patients are maximally vasoconstricted. Dopamine should be added if fluid therapy does not restore efficient circulation.                                                                                                                                                                                                         

 

Note 7. Serum glucose should be monitored. Supplemental glucose may be necessary, especially if adrenal insufficiency is present.                                                                                                                                                                              

 

Note 8. A vigorous search for precipitating events is mandatory. Signs of infection (like fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis) may be absent. Prophylactic antibiotics are indicated until infection can be ruled out.

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

In case treatment was initiated with intravenous T4 but after 24 hours the patient is still comatose or vital functions have not improved, iv administration of T3 should be considered. T3 should be discontinued and replaced by T4 once circulation and respiration have been stabilized. Intravenous administration of thyroid hormones is replaced by oral administration when the patient is fully awake.

 

GUIDELINES  

 

Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, Cooper DS, Kim BW, Peeters RP, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism. Prepared by the American Thyroid Association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid 2014; 24: 1670-1751.

 

Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, Pessah-Pollack R, Singer PA, Woeber KA; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Thyroid Association Taskforce on Hypothyroidism in Adults. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Endocr Pract. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):988-1028.

 

REFERENCES

 

Chen YJ, Hou SK, How CK, et al. Diagnosis of unrecognized primary overt hypothyroidism in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2010;28:866-870. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 20887907

Dutta P, Bhansali A, Masoodi SR, et al. Predictors of outcome in myxoedema coma: a study from a tertiary care centre. Crit Care 2008;12: R1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18173846

 

Gwiezdzinska J, Wartofsky L. Thyroid emergencies. Med Clin North Am 2012; 96: 385-403

Liamis G, Filippatos TD, Liontos A, Elisaf MS. Hypothyroidism-associated hyponatremia: mechanisms, implications and treatment. Eur J Endocrinol 2017; 176: R15-R20.

 

Ono Y, Ono S, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Tanaka Y. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of myxedema coma: analysis of a national inpatient database in Japan. J Epidemiol 2017; 27: 117-122

 

Reinhardt W, Mann K. Incidence, clinical picture, and treatment of hypothyroid coma: results of a survey. Med Klin1997; 92: 521-524. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9411198

 

Wiersinga WM. Adult Hypothyroidism. 2014 Mar 28. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

Severe Thyrotoxicosis in the Elderly

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Thyrotoxicosis in the elderly may elude detection by manifesting only fatigue, weakness, and relative apathy. More commonly it presents with any of a range of symptoms including fatigue, weight loss, heat intolerance, palpitations, weakness, insomnia, irritability, confusion, and agitation. Clinical findings that may raise suspicion include tachycardia, proptosis, goitrous enlargement of the thyroid, palpable thyroid nodules, warm moist skin, brisk deep tendon reflexes, and a resting tremor. A newly detected atrial arrhythmia may be the first manifestation identified.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

 

Endogenous thyrotoxicosis may be caused by disorders that increase thyroid hormone production in functional thyroid tissue, or by disorders associated with inflammation of the thyroid that cause leakage of preformed thyroid hormone. The distinction between these classifications helps to dictate treatment. Increased thyroid hormone production may be caused by autoimmune stimulation of the thyroid, or by the growth of autonomously functioning nodules or neoplasms. Checkpoint inhibitors that are used to treat a range of malignancies can induce a rapidly progressing form of autoimmune thyroiditis associated with transient thyrotoxicosis. In patients treated with thyroid hormone preparations, ingestion of excessive doses may lead to severe thyrotoxicosis. Rarely thyrotoxicosis is induced during therapeutic administration of interferon alpha or CAMPATH. Finally, tyrosine kinase inhibitors can also induce hyperthyroidism.

 

Table 1. Causes of Thyrotoxicosis in Elderly

Increased thyroid hormone production

Graves’ disease

Toxic multinodular goiter

Toxic adenoma

Type 1 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

Metastatic thyroid cancer

Inflammation with leakage of thyroid hormone

Subacute thyroiditis

Autoimmune (Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis

Type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

Ingestion of exogenous thyroid hormone

Iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis

TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS NEEDED AND SUGGESTED

 

Suspected thyrotoxicosis may be confirmed when lab tests reveal a suppressed TSH level in tandem with an elevated free or total T4 level. A total T3 level should also be checked, as it is often disproportionately elevated in cases of untreated Graves’ disease. In patients who aren’t taking amiodarone and haven’t been recently exposed to iodinated contrast, a thyroid uptake study can distinguish increased production of thyroid hormone (marked by increased uptake), from inflammation with leakage of thyroid hormone (marked by decreased uptake). Thyroid scan images that reveal the distribution of increased uptake can help to distinguish Graves’ disease from toxic nodular disorders. In cases that demonstrate decreased uptake, an elevated ESR or CRP may reflect subacute thyroiditis, while elevated anti-thyroid peroxidase or anti-thyroglobulin antibody levels may reflect autoimmune thyroiditis. The absence of either of these findings may raise suspicion of iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis.

 

A suppressed TSH level with “normal” T4 and T3 levels indicates subclinical hyperthyroidism. This problem is common in elderly individuals with multinodular goiter or “hot” nodules. Long standing subclinical hyperthyroidism is associated with atrial arrhythmias, and for this reason, if confirmed and persistent, is often treated in the same manner as overt hyperthyroidism.

 

THERAPY

 

Severe thyrotoxicosis may induce or exacerbate atrial arrhythmias, ischemia, congestive heart failure or diabetes mellitus, problems requiring urgent diagnosis and therapy. Coincident anemia should be recognized. If tolerated, and in the absence of CHF, beta blockers may help to ameliorate some symptoms in patients presenting with thyrotoxicosis. Since administration of beta-blockers to patients with severe thyrotoxicosis has rarely been associated with vascular collapse, a reduced dose may be administered initially. In cases of severe hyperthyroidism ascribed to Graves’ disease, a toxic multinodular goiter, or a toxic adenoma, antithyroid drugs are usually administered as first line treatment. Methimazole is the usual agent of choice. Relatively high doses (20-40 mg daily) may be needed at the outset. Once adequate control of hyperthyroidism has been achieved, definitive therapy with radioactive iodine ablation or thyroid surgery may be considered. Patients who demonstrate an allergy or adverse side effects when taking antithyroid drugs may need to proceed directly to treatment with radioactive iodine ablation. Consideration should be given to the possibility of triggering increased thyrotoxicosis as a result of radioactive iodine treatment with adverse effects on cardiovascular disease. Pre-treatment with antithyroid drugs, repeated partial dose radioactive iodine therapy, or post-treatment with beta blockers or saturated solution of potassium iodide (at least 10 mg daily) may be considered. Thyroid surgery may be indicated in cases where substernal enlargement of a toxic multinodular goiter has caused significant compressive symptoms, and in cases with any suggestion of a thyroid malignancy. Temporizing treatment with high doses of NSAIDs or prednisone may help to relieve discomfort associated with the onset of subacute thyroiditis.

 

Table 2. Treatment

Beta blockers

Propranolol: 10-30 mg tid-qid, or 60-120 mg ER daily

Atenolol: 25-100 mg daily

Metoprolol: 25-50 mg bid, or 50-100 mg ER daily

Antithyroid drugs

Methimazole: 10-60 mg daily

Propylthiouracil: 50-150 mg bid-tid

Radioactive iodine

Thyroid surgery

Iodide

Saturated solution of potassium iodide: 1 drop bid

Antinflammatory agents

Ibuprofen 400-800 mg tid

Prednisone 10-40 mg daily

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

Serial profiles of thyroid function tests including TSH, free or total T4, and total T3 levels should be followed at regular 2-4 week intervals when treating and monitoring thyrotoxic disorders. In cases of treated hyperthyroidism, suppression of the TSH level may persist for several weeks after thyroid hormone levels have been brought under control. Treatment of post-ablative or post-surgical hypothyroidism with levothyroxine should be considered once T4 and T3 levels drop to low normal or subnormal ranges.

 

GUIDELINES

 

2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Walter MA.

Thyroid. 2016 Oct;26(10):1343-1421.

 

REFERENCES

 

Samuels MH. Hyperthyroidism in Aging. 2021 Aug 9. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

DeGroot LJ. Diagnosis and Treatment of Graves’ Disease. 2016 Nov 2. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Bartalena L. Graves’ Disease: Complications. 2018 Feb 20. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Kopp P. Thyrotoxicosis of other Etiologies. 2010 Dec 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Macchia PE, Feingold KR. Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis. 2018 Dec 24. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Patients treated with amiodarone for a cardiac arrhythmia may develop amiodarone Induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT). The risk of AIT is increased in iodine-deficient regions. The incidence of AIT varies greatly (between 0.003% and 10%). AIT occurs in 3% of patients treated with amiodarone in North America, but is much more frequent (up to 10%) in countries with a low iodine dietary intake. In contrast to the other forms of hyperthyroidism, AIT is more frequent in males than in females (M/F = 3/1).

 

AIT manifests with clinical signs indistinguishable from spontaneous hyperthyroidism, however symptoms and signs of thyrotoxicosis are not apparent in all patients, and may be obscured by an underlying cardiac condition. The reappearance or exacerbation of an underlying cardiac disorder after amiodarone is started, in a patient previously stable, should prompt an investigation into thyroid function for suspected development of AIT. Sometimes worsening of a cardiac arrhythmia with recurrence of atrial fibrillation and palpitations is the only clinical evidence of AIT. The development of angina may also occur. Similarly, unexplained changes in warfarin sensitivity, requiring a reduction in the dosage of this drug, can be the consequence of increased thyroid hormone levels, since hyperthyroidism increases warfarin effects.

 

AIT may develop early during amiodarone treatment, after many months of treatment, and has even been reported to occur several months after amiodarone withdrawal, since amiodarone and its metabolites have a long half-life due to accumulation in several tissues, especially fat.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

There are two different forms of AIT, and differential diagnosis between the two forms is important, since treatments are different. However, it is often not possible to clearly distinguish AIT1 and AIT2.

 

Type 1 AIT usually occurs in an abnormal thyroid gland (latent Graves’ disease, multinodular gland) and is the consequence of increased thyroid hormone biosynthesis due to iodine excess in patients with a preexisting thyroid disorder (Amiodarone contains 37% iodine by weight). Type 1 AIT is more common in iodine deficient regions. Type 2 AIT is a destructive process of the thyroid gland leading to the release of pre-formed hormone. This thyroiditis is an intrinsic toxic effect of amiodarone. Type 2 AIT usually persists for one to three months until thyroid hormone stores are depleted. In most countries Type 2 AIT is more common than Type 1 AIT. Differences between Type 1 and Type 2 AIT are described in table 1. Differentiating between AIT Type 1 and 2 is often very difficult.

 

Table 1 Differences between Type 1 and 2 Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis

 

Type 1

Type 2

Underlying thyroid disease

Yes (Multinodular goiter, Grave’s)

No

Time after starting amiodarone

Short (median 3 months)

Long (median 30 months)

24-hour iodine uptake

Low-Normal (may rarely be high in iodine deficient regions)

Low to Suppressed

Thyroid Ultrasound

Diffuse or Nodular Goiter may be present

Normal or small gland

Vascularity on Echo-color Doppler ultrasound

Increased

Absent

T4/T3 ratio

Usually <4

Usually >4

TgAb / TPOAb/ TSI

May be present

Usually absent

Circulating interleukin-6

Normal to high

Sometimes markedly elevated but usually doesn’t differentiate from AIT1

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

 

To confirm the diagnosis of AIT it is necessary to demonstrate a suppressed serum TSH associated with an increase in serum FT3 and FT4 levels in a patient currently or previously treated with amiodarone. T3 levels may not be as elevated as expected as amiodarone inhibits the conversion of T4 to T3 and severe non-thyroidal illness may be present blocking the increase in T3. The presence of a preexisting thyroid disorder is suggestive for Type 1 AIT. Frequently in patients with Type 2 AIT an increased T4/T3 ratio is present as a feature of destructive thyroiditis. Thyroid antibodies may be present in Type 1 AIT depending upon the underlying thyroid disorder. High levels of thyroglobulin antibodies and TPO antibodies have also been reported in 8% of Type 2 AIT patients. Type 2 AIT develops as an inflammatory process in a normal thyroid and therefore the levels of IL-6 may be markedly elevated but typically the IL-6 levels do not distinguish AIT2 from AIT1.

 

Color flow Doppler ultrasonography is useful to differentiate between Type 1 and Type 2 AIT. Intra-thyroidal vascular flow is increased in Type 1 AIT (pattern II-III) and reduced or absent in Type 2 (pattern 0).

In many patients with Type 1 AIT the 24-hr iodine uptake is low.  In rare patients with Type 1 AIT, despite the very high iodine load, a normal or inappropriately elevated 24-hr iodine uptake may be observed, especially if the patients live in an iodine deficient area. Patients with Type 2 AIT typically have a radioactive iodine uptake < 1%.

 

While the distinction between Type 1 and Type 2 may sometimes be clear, in many patients neither the clinical findings nor the response to treatment clearly indicate whether the patient has Type 1 or Type 2 AIT. Some patients may have a mixed form of AIT.

 

TREATMENT

 

AIT may lead to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in older patients with impaired left ventricular function. Thus, in most patients, prompt restoration and stable maintenance of euthyroidism should be achieved as rapidly as possible.

 

Mild AIT may spontaneously resolve in about 20% of the cases. Type 1 AIT should be treated with high doses of methimazole (20-60 mg/day) or propylthiouracil (400-600 mg/day) to block the synthesis of thyroid hormones (Figure 1). The response to methimazole or propylthiouracil is often modest due to the high iodine levels in patients taking amiodarone. In selected patients, potassium perchlorate when available can also be used to increase sensitivity of the gland to methimazole or propylthiouracil by blocking iodine uptake in the thyroid. KClO4 should be used for no more than 30 days at a daily dose < 1 g/day, since this drug, especially in higher doses, is associated with aplastic anemia or agranulocytosis. Once thyroid hormone levels are back to normal, definitive treatment of the hyperthyroidism should be considered. If thyroid uptake is sufficient (>10%) radioactive iodine can be used. Thyroid surgery is a good alternative. If thyrotoxicosis worsens after initial control, a mixed form Type1-Type 2 should be considered, and treatment for Type 2 AIT should be started.

 

Type 2 AIT can be treated with prednisone, starting with an initial dose of 0.5-0.7 mg/kg body weight per day and the treatment is generally continued for three months. If a worsening of the toxicosis occurs during the taper, the prednisone dose should be increased. Methimazole and propylthiouracil are generally not useful in Type 2 AIT.

 

Because the distinction between AIT Type 1 and 2 is difficult and not always clear, and because some patients have mixed forms of AIT, these therapies for AIT Type 1 and 2 are often combined.

 

For patients with persistent hyperthyroidism surgery is the optimal choice.  Propylthiouracil can be used to inhibit T4 to T3 conversion. Beta blockers will be helpful in preparation for surgery.

 

Figure 1. Management of Patients with Amiodarone Induced Thyrotoxicosis

FOLLOW-UP

It is still debatable whether amiodarone should be discontinued once the diagnosis of AIT is made. Because of the long half-life, there is no immediate benefit in stopping the drug. However, some forms of Type 2 AIT may remit with amiodarone withdrawal. If feasible from the cardiological point of view, it is probably safer to withdraw amiodarone and use a different anti-arrhythmic drug, but no controlled trials have been published on this question. A good alternative to amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter can be dronedarone, but this drug is contraindicated in patients with NYHA Class IV heart failure, or NYHA Class II–III heart failure with a recent decompensation. Some patients with Type 2 AIT may develop hypothyroidism due to thyroid gland destruction.

GUIDELINES

Bartalena L, Bogazzi F, Chiovato L, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A, Links TP, Vanderpump M. 2018 European Thyroid Association (ETA) Guidelines for the Management of Amiodarone-Associated Thyroid Dysfunction. Eur Thyroid J. 2018 Mar;7(2):55-66

 

Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Walter MA. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016 Oct;26(10):1343-1421.

 

REFERENCES

Kopp P. Thyrotoxicosis of other Etiologies. 2010 Dec 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

 

Bogazzi F, Tomisti L, Bartalena L., Aghini-Lombardi F, Martino E. Amiodarone and the thyroid: a 2012 update. J Endocrinol. Invest. 2012; 35:340-48.

 

Bogazzi F, Bartalena L, Martino E. Approach to the patient with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:2529-35.

 

Cohen-Lehman J, Dahl P, Danzi S, Klein I. Effects of amiodarone therapy on thyroid function. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010; 6:34-41.

 

Trohman RG, Sharma PS, McAninch EA, Bianco AC. Amiodarone and the thyroid physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Sep 20. pii: S1050-1738(18)30195-6.

 

Ylli D, Wartofsky L, Burman KD. Evaluation and Treatment of Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):226-236.

 

Subacute Thyroiditis

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Subacute thyroiditis (SAT) is an inflammatory condition of the thyroid with characteristic presentations and clinical course. Patients with the classic, painful (DeQuervain’s; Granulomatous) thyroiditis, (PFSAT) typically present with painful swelling of the thyroid. Transient vocal cord paresis may occur. At times, the pain begins and may be confined to the one lobe, but usually spreads rapidly to involve the rest of the gland ("creeping thyroiditis"). Pain may radiate to the jaw or the ears. Malaise, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia are common. A mild to moderate fever is expected, and at times a high fever of 104°F (40.0°C) may occur. The disease process may reach its peak within 3 to 4 days and subside and disappear within a week, but more typically, onset extends over 1 to 2 weeks and continues with fluctuating intensity for 3 to 6 weeks. The thyroid gland is typically enlarged, smooth, firm and tender to palpation, sometimes exquisitely so. Approximately one-half of the patients present during the first weeks of the illness, with symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. Subsequently patients often experience hypothyroidism before returning to normal (see figure 1). This painful condition lasts for a week to a few months, usually demonstrates a very high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), elevated C- reactive protein (CRP) levels, and has a tendency to recur.

 

Painless (silent, autoimmune) subacute thyroiditis (PLSAT) occurs spontaneously or following pregnancy when it is referred to as postpartum thyroiditis [PPT]). Autoimmune thyroiditis is histologically similar to Hashimoto's thyroiditis and occurs following 3.9-10% of pregnancies. The combination of thyroid enlargement usually without discomfort and positive anti-thyroid antibodies, associated with typical thyroid function test abnormalities (see figure 1), over a 9-12 month course should alert the clinician to the presence of PLSAT.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

A tendency for the painful form of the disease to follow upper respiratory tract infections or sore throats has suggested a viral infection. An autoimmune reaction is possible as patients with PFSAT often manifest HLA-Bw35 and those with PLSAT are frequently TPO or TG-ab positive. In both forms, clinical thyroid symptoms result from either the initial release of thyroid hormone from the inflamed tissue during the thyrotoxic phase or the lack of circulating thyroid hormones in the hypothyroid phase (See figure 1). Medications associated with SAT are summarized in table 4.

Figure 1. Time Course of Subacute Thyroiditis

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

 

Subacute thyroiditis is a diagnosis made clinically. Anterior neck pain, preceded by an upper respiratory inflammation, alerts the clinician to the classic PFSAT. Differential diagnostic considerations include acute (suppurative, thyroid abscess) thyroiditis (see table 1), which is usually a painful nodular enlargement of the thyroid or unusual presentations of Graves’ or nodular thyroid disease (see table 2 below) with pain generated by capsular stretching.

 

Thyroid function tests (see table 3) during the painful (initial) phase of SAT often reveal a suppressed TSH and elevation of total T4 and T3 levels consistent with the thyrotoxic state. T3 (ng/dl) to T4 (ug/dl) ratio is less than 20 in all forms of SAT. ESR is almost always greater than 50 and WBC counts and CRP levels are usually elevated in PFSAT. PLSAT (including PPT) is typically associated with the presence of anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO-ab) and thyroglobulin (Tg-ab) antibodies, both of which are usually absent or present only in low titers in PFSAT. Thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) are usually positive in Graves' disease and absent or low level in patients with PFSAT as well as PPT.

 

Radioactive iodine uptake and scan typically reveals a low RAIU and poor visualization of the thyroid in PFSAT and PLSAT whereas significant uptake is expected in Graves’ disease (GD) or toxic nodular goiters (TNG). PLSAT must be differentiated from other forms of low uptake thyrotoxicosis (see Table 2). Iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis (factitious [l-thyroxine (LT4), l-triiodothyronine (LT3) or T4/T3 combination] results in a suppressed thyroglobulin (TG) level. Ectopic thyroid hormone production in a Struma Ovarii or functional metastatic thyroid cancer can be detected with total body scanning. Iodine contamination after a contrast enhanced CT, obliterates the RAIU and obscures the presence of the more frequently encountered Graves’ disease or a toxic multinodular goiter. A recent CT scan will frequently alert the clinician to this artifact. Urine iodine measurement can quantify the degree of iodine contamination present.

 

Thyroid ultrasound typically shows a heterogeneously hypoechoic pattern and has a suppressed vascular pattern in SAT while patients with Graves’ disease demonstrate hyper-vascularity. The presence of thyroid nodules supports the presence of a toxic nodular goiter. Localized PFSAT, can be suggestive of thyroid cancer. Usually the pain, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and leukocytosis, and clinical remission or spread to other parts of the gland make clinical differentiation possible but may require a fine needle aspiration for definitive diagnosis.

 

Table 1. Features Useful in Differentiating Acute Suppurative Thyroiditis (AST) and Subacute Thyroiditis (SAT)

Characteristic

AST

SAT

Prior URI

88%

17%

Fever

100%

54%

Symptoms of Hyperthyroidism

Uncommon

47%

Sore throat

90%

36%

Painful thyroid swelling

100%

77%

Left side affected

85%

not specific

Migrating tenderness

Possible

27%

Erythema of skin

83%

not usually

Elevated WBC count

57%

25-50%

Elevated ESR

100%

85%

Abnormal TFTs

5-10%

60%

Enzymes- Alk-phos., AST/ALT 

Rare

common

FNA Purulent, bacteria or fungi present

~100%

0

Lymphocytes, macrophages, PNMs, giant cells

0

~100%

123I uptake low

Rarely

~100%

Abnormal thyroid scan

92%

Scan / US helpful in D/D

75%

Non-specific

Gallium scan positive

~100%

~100%

Barium swallow = fistula

Common

0

CT scan useful

Rarely

not useful

Clinical response to glucocorticoid treatment

Transient

100%

Incision/drainage required

85%

No

Recurrence following operative drainage

16%

No

Pyriform sinus fistula discovered

96%

No

URI= Upper Respiratory Infection, WBC= white blood cell count, ESR= Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, TFT’s= Thyroid function tests, Alk-Phos= Alkaline Phosphatase, AST= Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALT= Alanine Aminotransferase, FNA= Fine needle aspiration, US= Ultrasound examination, ↑= elevated

 

Table 2. Differential Diagnosis of Thyrotoxic Patients Based on Radioactive Iodine Uptake (RAIU)

Normal to ↑ 123-I RAIU

Near absent 123-I RAIU

Graves’ disease

Painless (silent) thyroiditis

Toxic multinodular goiter

Amiodarone-induced thyroiditis

Toxic solitary nodule

Subacute (painful) thyroiditis

Trophoblastic (hCG mediated) disease

Iatrogenic or factitious thyrotoxicosis

TSH-producing pituitary tumor

Ectopic tissue (Struma Ovarii, functional cancer)

Thyroid hormone resistance

Acute thyroiditis

 

Table 3. Differential Diagnostic Considerations in the Thyrotoxic Patient (Typical findings in each disease)

 

PFSAT

PLSAT

PPT

Graves’

Neck Pain

Yes

No

No

No

Recent URI

Yes

No

No

No

Systemic symptoms

Yes

No

No

No

Recent Pregnancy

No

No

Yes

No

Thyroid symptoms

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

ESR

Elevated

Normal

Normal

Normal

CRP

Elevated

Normal

Normal

Normal

TSH

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

Suppressed

FT4

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

Nl/↑

TT3

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

↑/ ↓/ Nl

Nl/ ↑

T3/T4

< 20

< 20

< 20

> 20

Thyroglobulin

Elevated

Elevated

Elevated

Elevated

TPO-ab

Negative

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

Tg-ab

Negative

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

+/−, Pos

TSHR-ab

Negative

Neg

Neg

Pos

RAIU/Scan

Low/ Not visible

Low/ Not visible

Low/ Not visible

High/ diffuse

US Echogenicity

Hypo-
echoic

Hypo-
echoic

Hypo-
echoic

Hypo-
echoic

Vascularity

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Increased

PFSAT= painful subacute thyroiditis; PLSAT= painless subacute thyroiditis; PPT= postpartum thyroiditis

 

Table 4. Causes of Drug Associated Thyrotoxicosis

Drug

Mechanism

Timing

Therapy

Amiodarone

Iodine (AIT 1)

months to years

Supportive, ATDs, Perchlorate, Surgery

Amiodarone

Thyroiditis (AIT 2)

Often > 1 year

Supportive care, Surgery, Prednisone

Lithium

Thyroiditis

Often > 1 year

ATDs, Supportive

Interferon-α

Thyroiditis or Graves’

Months

Supportive, ATDs, and /or 131-I (Graves’ only)

Interleukin-2

Thyroiditis or Graves’

Months

Supportive, ATDs, and /or 131-I (Graves’ only)

Contrast (I)

Thyroid autonomy

Weeks to months

ATDs

131-I Ablation

Destructive thyroiditis

1-4 weeks

Supportive, prednisone

131-I Rx of TMNG

Graves’ disease

3-6 months

131-I, surgery, ATDs

Check Point Inhibitors

Thyroiditis or autoimmune

Weeks to months

Supportive, 131-I, surgery, ATDs

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Thyroiditis

Weeks to months

Supportive

ATD= Anti thyroid drugs, TMNG= Toxic Multinodular Goiter

 

THERAPY

 

In some patients, no treatment is required. For many, analgesic therapy for relief of pain can be achieved with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. If this fails, prednisone administration should be employed with daily doses of 20-40 mg prednisone. After one to 2 weeks of this treatment, the dosage is tapered over a period of 6 weeks. Most patients have no recrudescence of symptoms, but occasionally this does occur and the dose must be increased again. The recurrence rate of painful subacute thyroiditis after cessation of prednisone therapy is about 20%. Beta blocking agents are usually administered for relief of thyrotoxic symptoms in the initial stage of SAT. Antithyroid drugs have no role in the management of established SAT as the excess thyroid hormone levels result from release of preformed thyroxine and triiodothyronine from inflamed tissue. Levothyroxine administration may be useful, at least transiently, if the patient enters a phase of hypothyroidism. Surgical intervention is not the primary treatment for subacute thyroiditis but is safe and with low morbidity, if necessary, because of the possibility of associated papillary cancer based on cytological examination.

 

FOLLOW-UP

 

In 90% or more of patients with classic painful subacute thyroiditis, there is a complete and spontaneous recovery and a return to normal thyroid function. However, the thyroid glands of patients with subacute thyroiditis may exhibit irregular scarring between islands of residual

functioning parenchyma. Up to 10% of the patients may become hypothyroid and require permanent replacement with levothyroxine. Rates of permanent hypothyroidism after antibody positive PLSAT and especially PPT are significantly higher.

 

GUIDELINES

 

Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Waiter MA. American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid 2016;26(10):1343–1421. 

 

REFERENCES

 

Shrestha RT, Hennessey J. Acute and Subacute, and Riedel’s Thyroiditis. 2015 Dec 8. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905408

 

Kopp P. Thyrotoxicosis of other Etiologies. 2010 Dec 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905417

 

Inaba H, Akamizu T. Postpartum Thyroiditis. 2018 May 8. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905230

 

Thyroid Storm

CLINICAL RECOGNITION


Thyroid (or thyrotoxic) storm is an acute, life-threatening syndrome due to an exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis. It is now an infrequent condition because of earlier diagnosis and treatment of thyrotoxicosis and better pre- and postoperative medical management. In the United States the incidence of thyroid storm ranged between 0.57 and 0.76 cases/100,000 persons per year. Thyroid storm may be precipitated by a number of factors including intercurrent illness, especially infections (Table 1). Pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, enteric infections, or any other infection can precipitate thyroid storm. Thyroid storm in the past most frequently occurred after surgery, but this is now unusual. Occasionally it occurs as a manifestation of untreated or partially treated thyrotoxicosis without another apparent precipitating factor. In the Japanese experience approximately 20% of patients developed thyroid storm before they received anti-thyroid drug treatment. Finally, if patients are not compliant with anti-thyroid medications thyroid storm may occur and this is a relatively common cause. Thyroid storm is typically associated with Graves' disease, but it may occur in patients with toxic nodular goiter or any other cause of thyrotoxicosis.

 

Table 1. Factors That May Precipitate Thyroid Storm

Infections

Acute Illness such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, trauma, etc.

Non-thyroid surgery in a hyperthyroid patient

Thyroid surgery in a patient poorly prepared for surgery

Discontinuation of anti-thyroid medications

Radioiodine therapy

Recent use of iodinated contrast

Pregnancy particularly during labor and delivery

 

Classic features of thyroid storm include fever, marked tachycardia, heart failure, tremor, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, restlessness, extreme agitation, delirium or coma (Table 2). Fever is typical and may be higher than 105.8 F (41 C). Patients may present with a true psychosis or a marked deterioration of previously abnormal behavior. Rarely thyroid storm takes a strikingly different form, called apathetic storm, with extreme weakness, emotional apathy, confusion, and absent or low fever.

 

Signs and symptoms of decompensation in organ systems may be present. Delirium is one example. Congestive heart failure may also occur, with peripheral edema, congestive hepatomegaly, and respiratory distress. Marked sinus tachycardia or tachyarrhythmia, such as atrial fibrillation, are common. Liver damage and jaundice may result from congestive heart failure or the direct action of thyroid hormone on the liver. Fever and vomiting may produce dehydration and prerenal azotemia. Abdominal pain may be a prominent feature. The clinical picture may be masked by a secondary infection such as pneumonia, a viral infection, or infection of the upper respiratory tract.

 

Table 2. Clinical Manifestations of Thyroid Storm

History of thyroid disease

Goiter/thyroid eye disease

High fever

Marked tachycardia, occasionally atrial fibrillation

Heart Failure

Tremor

Sweating

Nausea and vomiting

Agitation/psychosis

Delirium/coma

Jaundice

Abdominal pain

 

Death from thyroid storm is not as common as in the past if it is promptly recognized and aggressively treated in an intensive care unit, but is still approximately 10-25%. In recent nationwide studies from Japan the mortality rate was >10%. Death may be from cardiac failure, shock, hyperthermia, multiple organ failure, or other complications. Additionally, even when patients survive, some have irreversible damage including brain damage, disuse atrophy, cerebrovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and psychosis. 

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Thyroid storm classically began a few hours after thyroidectomy performed on a patient prepared for surgery by potassium iodide alone. Many such patients were not euthyroid and would not be considered appropriately prepared for surgery by current standards. Exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis is still seen in patients sent to surgery before adequate preparation, but it is unusual in the anti-thyroid drug-controlled patient. Thyroid storm occasionally occurs in patients operated on for some other illness while severely thyrotoxic. Severe exacerbation of thyrotoxicosis is rarely seen following 131-I therapy for hyperthyroidism; but some of these exacerbations may be defined as thyroid storm.

Thyroid storm appears most commonly following infection, which seems to induce an escape from control of thyrotoxicosis. Pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections, enteric infections, or any other infection can cause this condition. Interestingly, serum free T4 concentrations were higher in patients with thyroid storm than in those with uncomplicated thyrotoxicosis, while serum total T4 levels did not differ in the two groups, suggesting that events like infections may decrease serum binding of T4 and cause a greater increase in free T4 responsible for storm occurrence. Another common cause of thyroid storm is a hyperthyroid patient suddenly stopping their anti-thyroid drugs.

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL

Diagnosis of thyroid storm is made on clinical grounds and involves the usual diagnostic measures for thyrotoxicosis. A history of hyperthyroidism or physical findings of an enlarged thyroid or hyperthyroid eye findings is helpful in suggesting the diagnosis. The central features are thyrotoxicosis, abnormal CNS function, fever, tachycardia (usually above 130bpm), GI tract symptoms, and evidence of impending or present CHF. There are no distinctive laboratory abnormalities. Free T4 and, if possible, free T3 should be measured. Note that T3 levels may be markedly reduced in relation to the severity of the illness, as part of the associated “non-thyroidal illness syndrome”. As expected, TSH levels are suppressed. Electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), blood sugar, liver function tests, and plasma cortisol should be monitored. While the diagnosis of thyroid storm remains largely a matter of clinical judgment, there are two scales for assessing the severity of hyperthyroidism and determining the likelihood of thyroid storm (Figures 1 and 2). Recognize that these scoring systems are just guidelines and clinical judgement is still crucial. Data comparing these two diagnostic systems suggest an overall agreement, but a tendency toward underdiagnosis using the Japanese criteria. Unfortunately, there are no unique laboratory abnormalities that facilitate the diagnosis of thyroid storm.

Figure 1. Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Storm

Figure 2. Japanese Thyroid Association Criteria for Thyroid Storm

THERAPY

Thyroid storm is a medical emergency that has to be recognized and treated immediately (Table 3). Admission to an intensive care unit is usually required. Besides treatment for thyroid storm, it is essential to treat precipitating factors such as infections. As would be expected given the rare occurrence of thyroid storm there are very few randomized controlled treatment trials and therefore much of what is recommended is based on expert opinion.

 

Table 3. Treatment of Thyroid Storm

Supportive Measures
1. Rest
2. Mild sedation
3. Fluid and electrolyte replacement
4. Nutritional support and vitamins as needed
5. Oxygen therapy
6. Nonspecific therapy as indicated
7. Antibiotics
8. Cardio-support as indicated
9. Cooling, aided by cooling blankets and acetaminophen
Specific therapy
1. Beta-blocking agents. Propranolol (60 to 80 mg orally every 4 hours, or 1 to 3 mg intravenously every 4 to 6 hours), Start with low doses. Esmolol in ICU setting (loading dose of 250 mcg/kg to 500 mcg/kg followed by 50 mcg/kg to 100 mcg/kg/minute).
2. Antithyroid drugs (PTU 500–1000mg load, then 250mg every 4 hours or Methimazole 60-80mg/day), then taper as condition improves
3. Potassium iodide (one hour after first dose of antithyroid drugs):
 250mg orally every 6 hours
4. Hydrocortisone 300mg intravenous load, then 100mg every 8 hours.
Second Line Therapy
1. Plasmapheresis
2. Oral T4 and T3 binding resins- colestipol or cholestyramine
3. Dialysis

4. Lithium in patients who cannot take iodine

5. Thyroid surgery

 

It should be noted that if any possibility is present that orally given drugs will not be appropriately absorbed (e.g., due to stomach distention, vomiting, diarrhea or severe heart failure), the intravenous route should be used. If the thyrotoxic patient is untreated, an antithyroid drug should be given. PTU, 500–1000mg load, then 250mg every 4 hours, should be used if possible, rather than methimazole, since PTU also prevents peripheral conversion of T4 to T3, thus it may more rapidly reduce circulating T3 levels. Methimazole (60–80mg/day) can be given orally, or if necessary, the pure compound can be made up in a 10 mg/ml solution for parenteral administration. Methimazole is also absorbed when given rectally in a suppository. After initial stabilization, one should taper the dose and treat with Methimazole if PTU was started at the beginning as the safety profile of Methimazole is superior. If the thyroid storm is due to thyroiditis neither PTU not Methimazole will be effective and should not be used.

 

An hour after PTU or Methimazole has been given, iodide should be administered. A dosage of 250 mg every 6 hours is more than sufficient. The iodine is given after PTU or Methimazole because the iodine could stimulate thyroid hormone synthesis. Unless congestive heart failure contraindicates it, propranolol or other beta-blocking agents should be given at once, orally or parenterally, depending on the patient's clinical status. Beta-blocking agents control tachycardia, restlessness, and other symptoms. Additionally, propranolol inhibits type 1 deiodinase decreasing the conversion of T4 to T3. Probably lower doses should be administered initially, since administration of beta-blockers to patients with severe thyrotoxicosis has been associated with vascular collapse. Esmolol, a short-acting beta blocker, at a loading dose of 250 mcg/kg to 500 mcg/kg followed by 50 mcg/kg to 100 mcg/kg/minute can be used in an ICU setting.  For patients with reactive airway disease, a cardioselective beta blocker like atenolol or metoprolol can be employed.

 

Permanent correction of the thyrotoxicosis by either 131-I or thyroidectomy should be deferred until euthyroidism is restored. Other supporting measures should fully be exploited, including sedation, oxygen, treatment for tachycardia or congestive heart failure, rehydration, multivitamins, occasionally supportive transfusions, and cooling the patient to lower body temperature down. Antibiotics may be given on the presumption of infection while results of cultures are awaited.

 

The adrenal gland may be limited in its ability to increase steroid production during thyrotoxicosis. Therefore, hydrocortisone (100-300 mg/day) or dexamethasone (2mg every 6 hours) or its equivalent should be given. The dose can rapidly be reduced when the acute process subsides. Pharmacological doses of glucocorticoids (2 mg dexamethasone every 6 h) acutely depress serum T3 levels by reducing T4 to T3 conversion. This effect of glucocorticoids is beneficial in thyroid storm and supports their routine use in this clinical setting.

 

Usually rehydration, repletion of electrolytes, treatment of concomitant disease, such as infection, and specific agents (antithyroid drugs, iodine, propranolol, and corticosteroids) produce a marked improvement within 24 hours. A variety of additional approaches have been reported and may be used if the response to standard treatments is not sufficient. For example, plasmapheresis can remove circulating thyroid hormone and rapidly decrease thyroid hormone levels. Orally administered bile acid sequestrants (20-30g/day Colestipol-HCl or Cholestyramine) can trap thyroid hormone in the intestine and prevent recirculation. In most cases these therapies are not required but in the occasion patient that does not respond rapidly to initial therapy these modalities can be effective. Finally, in rare situations where medical therapy is ineffective or the patient develops side effects and contraindications to the available therapies’ thyroid surgery may be necessary.

 

FOLLOW-UP

Antithyroid treatment should be continued until euthyroidism is achieved, when a decision regarding definitive treatment of the hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs, surgery, or 131-I therapy can be made. Rarely urgent thyroidectomy is performed with antithyroid drugs, iodide, and beta blocker preparation.

 

Prevention of thyroid storm is key and involves recognizing and actively avoiding common precipitants, educating patients about avoiding abrupt discontinuation of anti-thyroid drugs, and ensuring that patients are euthyroid prior to elective surgery and labor and delivery.

 

GUIDELINES

Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, Greenlee MC, Laurberg P, Maia AL, Rivkees SA, Samuels M, Sosa JA, Stan MN, Walter MA. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid. 2016 Oct;26(10):1343-1421.

 

Satoh T, Isozaki O, Suzuki A, Wakino S, Iburi T, Tsuboi K, Kanamoto N, Otani H, Furukawa Y, Teramukai S, Akamizu T. 2016 Guidelines for the management of thyroid storm from The Japan Thyroid Association and Japan Endocrine Society (First edition). Endocr J. 2016 Dec 30;63(12):1025-1064

 

REFERENCES

Bartalena L. Graves’ Disease: Complications. 2018 Feb 20. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–

 

Akamizu T1, Satoh T, Isozaki O, Suzuki A, Wakino S, Iburi T, Tsuboi K, Monden T, Kouki T, Otani H, Teramukai S, Uehara R, Nakamura Y, Nagai M, Mori M Diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and incidence of thyroid storm based on nationwide surveys. Thyroid. 2012 Jul;22(7):661-79.

Swee du S, Chng CL, Lim A. Clinical characteristics and outcome of thyroid storm: a case series and review of neuropsychiatric derangements in thyrotoxicosis. Endocr Pract. 2015 Feb;21(2):182-9.

Angell TE, Lechner MG, Nguyen CT, Salvato VL, Nicoloff JT, LoPresti JS. Clinical features and hospital outcomes in thyroid storm: a retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015 Feb;100(2):451-9.

 

Chiha M, Samarasinghe S, Kabaker AS. Thyroid storm: an updated review. J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):131-40

 

Akamizu T. Thyroid Storm: A Japanese Perspective. Thyroid. 2018 Jan;28(1):32-40

 

Galindo RJ, Hurtado CR, Pasquel FJ, García Tome R, Peng L, Umpierrez GE. National Trends in Incidence, Mortality, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized for Thyrotoxicosis With and Without Thyroid Storm in the United States, 2004-2013. Thyroid. 2019 Jan;29(1):36-43.

 

Hypoglycemia

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

 

Hypoglycemia is uncommon in people who are not being treated for diabetes mellitus. Low blood glucose concentrations lead to adrenergic activation and neuroglycopenia (Table 1). Symptomatic hypoglycemia is diagnosed clinically using Whipple’s triad: symptoms of hypoglycemia, plasma glucose concentration<55 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/l), and resolution of those symptoms after the plasma glucose concentration is raised. Capillary blood glucose measurements should not be used in the evaluation of hypoglycemia due to poor accuracy.

 

Table 1. Symptoms of Hypoglycemia

Adrenergic

Neuroglycopenic

Sweating
Warmth
Anxiety
Tremor
Nausea
Palpitations
Tachycardia
Hunger

Behavioral changes
Changes in vision or speech
Confusion
Dizziness
Lethargy
Seizure
Loss of consciousness
Coma

 

DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

 

Hypoglycemia in diabetes is typically the result of treatments that raise insulin levels and thus lower plasma glucose concentrations (Table 2). In adults not taking glucose-lowering drugs to treat diabetes mellitus, critical illnesses, hormone deficiencies, and islet and non-islet cell tumors should be considered.

 

Table 2. Causes of Adult-Onset Hypoglycemia

Drugs - see Table 3

Hepatic, renal or cardiac failure

Sepsis, trauma, burns

Malnutrition

Hormonal deficiencies (cortisol, glucagon, epinephrine)

Non-islet cell tumors (IGF-II secreting tumors)

Insulinoma (insulin-secreting tumors)

Non-insulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia (NIPHS)

Post gastric bypass surgery

Post total pancreatectomy with islet auto-transplantation

Dumping syndrome or rapid gastric emptying

Insulin antibodies

Insulin receptor antibodies

Accidental, surreptitious or malicious including Munchausen syndrome by proxy

Adapted from: Cryer, PE, et al. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009.

 

Table 3. Drugs Reported to Cause Hypoglycemia

Insulin

Insulin secretagogues (especially sulfonylureas, meglitinides)

Alcohol

Cibenzoline

Glucagon (during endoscopy)

Indomethacin

Pentamidine

Sulfonamides

Quinine

Hydroxychloroquine

Artesunate/artemisin/artemether

Chloroquineoxaline

IGF-1

Lithium

Propoxyphene/dextropropoxyphene

Salicylates

The following are supported by very low-quality evidence:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin receptor antagonists

Nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonists

Fluoroquinolones

Gabapentin

Mifepristone

Disopyramide

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Heparin

6-Mercaptopurine

Adapted from: Cryer, PE, et al. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Glucose is an obligate fuel for the brain under physiologic conditions. In order to maintain proper brain function, plasma glucose must be maintained within a relatively narrow range. Redundant counter-regulatory mechanisms are in place to prevent or correct hypoglycemia. As glucose levels decline, major defenses include: 1) a decrease in insulin secretion; 2) an increase in glucagon secretion; 3) an increase in epinephrine secretion. Increased cortisol and growth hormone secretion also occur. If these defenses fail, plasma glucose levels will continue to fall. Symptoms, prompting food ingestion, typically develop at a plasma glucose of 55 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/liter). At glucose levels of 55 mg/dl and lower, insulin secretion is normally almost completely suppressed.

 

In longstanding type 1 and type 2 diabetes these counter-regulatory responses to hypoglycemia are impaired. This increases the risk of hypoglycemia and also contributes to hypoglycemia unawareness.

 

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

 

If the cause of the hypoglycemia is not evident, measure plasma glucose, insulin, c-peptide, proinsulin, and beta-hydroxybutyrate concentrations and screen for oral hypoglycemic agents (sulfonylurea and meglitinide drugs) during an episode of spontaneous hypoglycemia. Glucagon, 1 mg IV, should then be administered, with a rise in glucose >25 mg/dl (1.4 mmol/L) suggesting hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. The diagnosis of insulinoma is supported if insulin, c-peptide and proinsulin levels are elevated, beta-hydroxybutyrate is <2.7 mmol/l, and sulfonylurea/meglitinide levels are undetectable during the hypoglycemic episode.

 

If testing cannot be performed during a spontaneous episode of hypoglycemia, a 72 hour fast or a mixed meal test, performed in a monitored setting, followed by administration of glucagon is the most useful diagnostic strategy.

 

During a 72 hour fast, patients are allowed no food but can consume non-caloric caffeine-free beverages. Insulin, c-peptide and glucose samples are obtained at the beginning of the fast and every 4-6 hours. When the plasma glucose falls to <60 mg/dl, specimens should be taken every 1-2 hours under close supervision. Patients should continue activity when they are awake. The fast continues until the plasma glucose falls below 45 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l) [plasma glucose <55 mg/dl (3.0 mmol/l) is recommended in the Endocrine Society guidelines] and symptoms of neuroglucopenia develop, at which time insulin, glucose, c-peptide, oral insulin secretagogue, proinsulin, and beta-hydroxybutyrate levels are obtained and the fast is terminated. Additional samples for insulin antibodies, anti-insulin receptor antibodies, IGF-1/IGF-2, and plasma cortisol, glucagon or growth hormone can also be obtained at this time if a non-islet cell tumor, autoimmune etiology, or hormone deficiency is suspected. Patients are fed at the conclusion of the fast.

 

For patients with hypoglycemic symptoms several hours after meals, a mixed meal test may be performed. This test has not been well standardized. Patients eat a meal similar to one that provokes their symptoms, or a commercial mixed meal. Samples for plasma glucose, insulin, c-peptide, and proinsulin are collected prior to the meal and every 30 minutes thereafter for 5 hours. If symptoms occur prior to the end of the test then additional samples for the above are collected prior to administration of carbohydrates. If Whipple’s triad is demonstrated, testing for oral hypoglycemic drugs and testing for insulin antibodies should be done. Interpretation of test results is the same as for the 72-hour fast or spontaneous hypoglycemia (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Distinguishing Causes of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia After a Prolonged Fast

Insulin (µU/ml)

C-peptide (nmol/L)

Proinsulin (pmol/L)

Oral hypoglycemic

Interpretation

»3

<0.2

<5

No

Exogenous insulin

≥3

≥0.2

≥5

No

Endogenous insulina

≥3

≥0.2

≥5

Yes

Oral hypoglycemic drug

a- Insulinoma, non-insulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia (NIPHS), post gastric bypass surgery.

Adapted from: Cryer, PE, et al. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009

 

In a patient with documented hypoglycemia with laboratory findings consistent with endogenous hyperinsulinism localizing studies should be done to evaluate for insulinoma. These may include computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging, transabdominal and endoscopic ultrasonography, and, where available, new nuclear medicine scans (GLP-1 receptor imaging), somatostatin receptor imaging SPECT / PET, and 6-[fluoride-18] fluoro-levodopa-PET-CT. If the diagnosis remains unclear, selective pancreatic arterial calcium injections with measurements of hepatic venous insulin levels can be performed.

 

TREATMENT

 

Immediate treatment should be focused on reversing the hypoglycemia. If the patient is able to ingest carbohydrates 15 to 20 grams of glucose should be given every 15 minutes until the hypoglycemia has resolved. If the patient is unable to ingest carbohydrates, or if the hypoglycemic episode is severe then parenteral glucose should be administered. In a healthcare setting intravenous dextrose is used. Twenty-five-gram boluses of 50% dextrose are given until the hypoglycemia has resolved. If needed, an infusion of 10% or 20% dextrose can be used to sustain euglycemia in patients with recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia. In the outpatient setting, glucagon is used to correct hypoglycemia. Glucose gel and other forms of oral glucose should be used in impaired patients with caution and only in circumstances where no alternative is available, as they pose an aspiration risk.

 

Long-term treatment should be tailored to the specific hypoglycemic disorder, taking into account the burden of hypoglycemia on well-being and patient preferences. Offending medications should be discontinued and underlying illnesses treated, whenever possible.

 

Surgical resection can be curative for insulinomas, and can alleviate hypoglycemia in non-islet cell tumors, even if the malignancy cannot be cured. Partial pancreatectomy can be considered in patients with β-cell disorders. Medical treatment with frequent feedings, α-glucosidase inhibitors, diazoxide, or octreotide can be used if resection is not possible, or as a temporizing measure. New drugs that may be helpful include long-acting somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, and GLP-1 antagonists. Autoimmune hypoglycemic conditions may be treated with either glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants, but these disorders may be self-limited.

For adults taking insulin or insulin secretagogues for diabetes mellitus risk factors for hypoglycemia, such as advanced age and renal insufficiency, should be considered. The treatment regimen and glycemic goals should be reviewed and adjusted if needed. Patients should be instructed on how to manage hypoglycemia, either by the ingestion of carbohydrates if possible, or by parenteral glucagon or glucose. If the patient has hypoglycemia unawareness, a 2-to 3-week period of strict avoidance of hypoglycemia should be maintained, as hypoglycemia awareness will return in many patients. For individuals with type 1 diabetes and a history of serious hypoglycemia, the use of a personal continuous glucose monitoring device, sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy, or a hybrid closed loop system should be considered.

 

GUIDELINES

 

Cryer, PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, Heller SR, Montori VM, Seaquist ER, Service FJ. Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:709-728, 2009.

 

REFERENCES

 

Bansal N, Weinstock RS. Non-Diabetic Hypoglycemia. 2020 May 20. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 27099902

 

de Herder WW, Zandee WT, Hofland J. Insulinoma. 2020 Oct 25. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905215

 

Davis HA, Spanakis EK, Cryer PE, Davis SN. Hypoglycemia During Therapy of Diabetes. 2021 Jun 29. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905325

 

Inpatient Diabetes Management

CLINICAL RECOGNITION

Background

Appropriate inpatient glycemic management limits the risks of severe hypo- and hyperglycemia. Preventing and treating hyperglycemia reduces infections and minimizes fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. Specific glucose goals remain fluid. Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are associated with poor outcomes but the few prospective randomized studies have failed to demonstrate consistent improvements. For example, intensive glycemic control in the ICU increased mortality in one large trial. At this point, glucose goals should be thoughtful and tailored to the institution and its resources. To successfully manage inpatient diabetes, institutional infrastructure must be in place with institution specific guidelines and protocols for which all nursing staff, pharmacy staff, physicians, and others must be educated. The general guidelines below are appropriate at most institutions.

 

Check A1c level in all patients with diabetes and individuals with glucose levels greater than 140mg/dL if not performed in the prior 3 months to evaluate prior glycemic control.

 

Insulin therapy should be initiated if glucose levels are persistently ≥180 mg/dL. Once insulin therapy is started, a target glucose range of 140–180 mg/dL is recommended for most hospitalized patients but in selected patients (e.g., critically ill postsurgical patients or patients with cardiac surgery) glucose levels between 110–140 mg/dL may be targeted if they can be achieved without significant hypoglycemia. Glucose levels between 180-250 mg/dL may be acceptable in patients with severe comorbidities and in hospitals where frequent glucose monitoring or close nursing supervision is not possibility. In terminally ill patients with a short life expectancy glucose level >250 mg/dL with less aggressive insulin regimens to minimize glucosuria, dehydration, and electrolyte disturbances may be appropriate. 

Physiologic Insulin Regimen

All patients have “basal, nutritional, and correctional” requirements which they must meet with endogenous or exogenous insulin.

 

  • Basal: insulin needed even when patient is not eating (to control gluconeogenesis). Use long-acting insulins such as glargine (usually once daily in AM or at bedtime) or detemir (once daily or q 12 hours). If there are financial limitations NPH at bedtime or AM and bedtime may be used. Additionally, a continuous insulin infusion can provide basal insulin and is often employed in ICU settings.
  • Nutritional: insulin to cover carbohydrate intake from food, dextrose in IV fluid, tube feeds, TPN. Use rapid-acting insulin (aspart, lispro, or glulisine) or if financial limitations short-acting insulin (regular).
  • Correctional: insulin given to bring a high blood glucose level down to target range (with target usually below 150 mg/dL pre-meal, and below 200mg/dL at bedtime or 2am). Use rapid-acting insulin (aspart, lispro, or glulisine) or short-acting insulin (regular).

General Rules

  • A PATIENT WITH TYPE 1 DM WILL ALWAYS NEED EXOGENOUS BASAL INSULIN, EVEN IF NPO. FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH A PATIENT INSULIN WILL LEAD TO DKA.
  • Arbitrary sliding scale insulin should be avoided as it is not only ineffective but also potentially dangerous.
  • Ad hoc insulin orders should not be used. Comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) order sets, or pre-printed order forms should only be used to order subcutaneous insulin and insulin infusions. This standardization will decrease the risks of insulin dosing and administration errors.
  • Check blood glucose (BG) before meals and at bedtime. Check BG q 4 or q 6 hours in a patient who is NPO or is receiving continuous tube feeds or TPN. Continuous glucose monitoring may be used in certain patients (for example it was used in patients with COVID-19 infections to minimize patient contact).
  • Involve the diabetes educator or nurse specialist if available.
  • On admission, begin planning discharge, especially if the discharge plan will require new outpatient insulin use. Identify whether the patient will need a new glucose meter. Prescribe insulin, insulin pens with pen needles, syringes/needles, lancets, glucose strips, glucose tablets, and glucagon kit in the discharge prescription if needed. 

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents

In general, oral diabetes medications and injectables other than insulin (e.g., GLP agonists) are inappropriate for initial management of the hyperglycemia patient. Hospitalized patients often have the potential for renal impairment, tissue hypoxia, or need IV contrast, and these are all contraindications for using metformin. Sulfonylureas should be held on admission because of current or potential NPO status resulting in a high risk of hypoglycemia. As a patient’s status improves, however, it may be appropriate to restart oral medications. DPP4 inhibitors may be useful for patients who have minimally elevated glucoses as there is a minimal risk for hypoglycemia. 

Miscellaneous Guidelines

  • Nutritional coverage: Regular insulin is given 30 min before each meal.  Lispro, aspart, or glulisine are given with each meal or immediately after eating (can base on amount eaten).
  • Infection and glucocorticoids increase insulin needs; renal insufficiency decreases insulin needs.
  • Total daily dose of insulin needed: Type 1 patients require approximately 0.4 units/kg/day; type 2 patients vary in their insulin resistance and may require from 0.5 to 2 units/kg/day.

THERAPY

Insulin Regimens

The guidelines below assist with initial determination and subsequent adjustment of insulin doses. Insulin doses must be reevaluated on a daily basis and orders should be rewritten in order to achieve goals and to adapt to the patients’ changing clinical situation.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT CONTROLLED WITH DIET AT HOME BUT NEEDING INSULIN IN HOSPITAL

Day 1:  Order a correctional sliding scale for before meals and bedtime (with lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on BMI – see Table 1.

Day 2:  If BG pre-meals are >150 mg/dL, add nutritional insulin (with lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on appetite).  Also, if AM fasting BG is >150 mg/dL, add bedtime basal insulin (with glargine, detemir, or NPH) dosed 0.1-0.2 unit/kg.

Day 3:  Adjust insulin doses based on BG pattern: Increase or decrease basal insulin based on AM fasting BG, and adjust nutritional insulin based on pre-meal BG levels (see below for details).

 

Table 1. Correctional Insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular)

BG

(mg/dL)

Pre-meal:

Sensitive (BMI <25 or <50 units/d)

Pre-meal:

Average (BMI 25-30 or 50-90 units/d)

Pre-meal:

Resistant (BMI >30 or >90 units/d)

Bedtime

and 2 a.m.

131-150

 0 units

1 unit

2 units

0 units

151-200

1 unit

2 units

3 units

0 units

201-250

2 units

4 units

6 units

1 unit

251-300

3 units

6 units

9 units

2 units

301-350

4 units

8 units

12 units

3 units

351-400

5 units

10 units

15 units

3 units

>400

6 units

12 units

18 units

3 units

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT ON ORAL AGENT(S) BUT REQUIRING INSULIN IN HOSPITAL BECAUSE OF HYPERGLYCEMIA OR CONTRAINDICATIONS TO THE ORAL AGENT(S)

Day 1:  Start nutritional insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on appetite – generally about 0.1-0.2 units per kg, divided between the three meals for the day.  Also, order a correctional sliding scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on BMI – see Table 1.

Day 2:  If AM fasting BG is >150 mg/dL, add bedtime basal (glargine, detemir or NPH) dose of 0.1-0.2 units/kg.

Day 3:  Adjust insulin doses based on BG pattern: Increase or decrease basal insulin based on AM fasting BG, and adjust nutritional insulin based on pre-meal BG levels (see below for details).

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT ON INSULIN AT HOME

  • If possible, consider home BG control, appetite, renal function, and risk for hypoglycemia.
  • All three components of insulin replacement must be addressed: basal, nutritional and correctional.
  • Basal requirements: Continue home regimen if patient has been well-controlled at home, but consider decreasing the total dose by 20-30% to reduce the risk of in-hospital hypoglycemia. Alternatively, start bedtime glargine, detemir or NPH at a dose of 0.2 units/kg
  • Nutritional requirements: Order nutritional insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on appetite, or consider pre-meal dosing of 0.2 units/kg divided by 3 for the dose at each meal.
  • Correctional need: Order a correctional sliding scale based on total insulin dose or BMI – see Table 1.

INSULIN REGIMEN WHEN A PATIENT IS MADE NPO FOR A PROCEDURE

A patient will always require his or her basal insulin, even while NPO, and should not become hypoglycemic if that basal insulin is dosed appropriately.  For safety purposes, however:

 

  • The night before, give the usual dose of bedtime NPH, if applicable, or decrease the usual dose of bedtime glargine/detemir by 25%.
  • The morning of, if applicable, decrease the usual dose of morning NPH by 50%, or decrease the usual dose of morning glargine by 25%.
  • Do not give nutritional insulin (as patient is not eating), but continue the usual correctional insulin.
  • (An online resource to determine patient specific instructions when preparing for an NPO episode is athttp://ucsf.logicnets.com)

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR AN ICU OR SURGICAL PATIENT WHO IS NPO

 Consider insulin infusion therapy.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT STARTING CONTNUOUS TUBE FEEDING

  • Consider insulin infusion therapy.
  • If moving from IV to SQ see below.
  • Basal need: The daily basal dose (glargine, detemir or total bid NPH dose) is the estimated total daily dose divided by 2.
  • Nutritional need: Divide the estimated total daily dose by 10 for the total nutritional (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) dose, to be given q 4 hours while tube feeding is active.
  • Correctional need: Order a correctional scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on total insulin dose or BMI (Table 1)
  • If not using IV insulin to start:
  • Estimate the tube feed formula’s 24-hour carbohydrate load.
  • Estimate the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, starting with 1 unit insulin for every 10 grams carbohydrate.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT RECEIVING TPN

  • Standard TPN often contains 25% glucose, which, if 100 ml/hour, yields 25 g glucose/hour.
  • Basal and nutritional needs: Adding insulin to the TPN is safest, as the unexpected discontinuation of TPN will also mean the discontinuation of the insulin.  Start with 0.1 unit per gram glucose. If patient previously needed high doses of basal insulin, divide that total daily dose by the number of TPN bottles to be administered daily, and add that to the prior calculation.
  • Correctional: Order a correctional sliding scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) based on BMI (Table 1).

INSULIN REGIMEN TO TRANSITION FROM AN INSULIN INFUSION TO SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN

  • Calculate the patient’s total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, based on the most recent insulin infusion rate. For safety purposes, take 80% of that dose.
  • Basal need: Divide the 80% of the TDD by 2 and give half for the daily glargine, detemir, or total NPH dose.
  • Nutritional need: If the patient is eating, divide the 80% of the TDD by 6 for the pre-meal lispro, aspart, glulisine, or regular dose.  If the patient is receiving tube feeds, divide the 80% of the TDD by 10 for the nutritional (lispro, aspart, glulisine or regular) dose, to be given q 4 hours.  If the patient is not receiving nutrition, do not order nutritional insulin.
  • Correctional need: Order a q4h correctional scale (lispro, aspart, glulisine, or regular) based on total insulin dose or BMI (Table 1).
  • Give the first basal insulin SQ injection 1-2 hours before the infusion is discontinued. If the transition is being made in the morning, consider using a one-time AM NPH injection or ½ of daily glargine or detemir dose to bridge until bedtime glargine, detemir or NPH begins.

INSULIN REGIMEN FOR A PATIENT RECEIVING GLUCOCORTICOIDS

  • Glucocorticoids may dramatically increase postprandial BG levels but have little effect on gluconeogenesis (fasting glucose levels). Often, BG levels are very high during the day, then lower overnight.
  • Anticipate post-prandial hyperglycemia by increasing the nutritional insulin doses.
  • The insulin dose will typically increase by 50% from before glucocorticoid use and the total amount may be 0.5 to significantly >1 Unit/kg

DAILY INSULIN ADJUSTMENTS

There are no validated formulas for making these adjustments, but the following rules generally work well.

 

  • Basal Insulin: Generally, the basal insulin dose is adjusted based on fasting glucose levels.  For example, if FBS <140, no change.  If FBS 141-160, increase basal dose by 2-3 units.  If FBS 160-180, increase basal dose by 4-5 units. If FBS 180-200, increase basal dose by 6-7 units.  If FBS >200, increase basal dose by 8 units.  With this approach, the basal insulin can be titrated up to the patient’s actual requirement relatively quickly.
  • Nutritional Insulin: The adequacy of the nutritional insulin dose is based on the glucose level prior to the next meal. For example, the glucose level just before lunch will indicate whether the insulin given at breakfast was appropriate.  The glucose level at bedtime will indicate whether the insulin given at dinner was appropriate.  A simple approach is as follows: If there was no significant change in the glucose level from before breakfast to before lunch, then the total dose of insulin the patient received at breakfast (nutritional plus correctional) should be used as the nutritional dose for breakfast the next day.  If there was a significant increase in the glucose level from before breakfast to before lunch, then the total dose of insulin the patient received at breakfast (nutritional plus correctional) should be increased and should become the nutritional dose for breakfast the next day.  If the glucose level before breakfast was high, and the glucose level at lunch was at goal, then no change in the nutritional dose will be required for the next day.  Finally, no matter what the glucose level was at breakfast, if the glucose level after breakfast or before lunch was low, then the breakfast nutritional dose should be decreased for the next day.

Hypoglycemic Protocols      

  • BG <70 mg/dL: If patient taking po, give 20 grams of oral fast-acting carbohydrate either as glucose tablets or 6 oz. fruit juice.  If patient cannot take po, give 25 mL D50 IV push.
  • Check BG every 15 minutes and repeat above treatment until BG is ≥100 mg/dL.

Insulin Infusions

  • Use your hospital’s pre-printed order form or protocol in EMR and hospital-specific protocol for insulin infusions. Using an insulin infusion without a standardized protocol and trained providers can be unsafe.
  • Continuous glucose intake (in IV fluid or continuous TPN or tube feeds) is required during the infusion. Remember to manually adjust the infusion rate and/or the algorithm if there are changes in nutrition (e.g., if tube feeding or TPN is held) or other rapid changes in medical status.
  • When converting to SQ insulin, give the basal SQ dose 1-2 hours before discontinuing the insulin infusion.

GUIDELINE

Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diabetes Care December 2021, Vol.45, S244-S253.

 

Umpierrez GE, Hellman R, Korytkowski MT, Kosiborod M, Maynard GA, Montori VM, Seley JJ, Van den Berghe G; Endocrine Society. Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):16-38.

REFERENCES

 

Society for Hospital Medicine Diabetes Resource Room:  http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/ResourceRoomRedesign/GlycemicControl.cfm

Dhatariya K, Corsino L, Umpierrez GE. Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients. 2020 Dec 30. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–.

PMID: 25905318

 

Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Cholesterol

ABSTRACT

 

The cholesterol hypothesis holds that high blood cholesterol is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and lowering cholesterol levels will reduce risk for ASCVD. This hypothesis is based on epidemiological evidence that both within and between populations higher cholesterol levels raise the risk for ASCVD; and conversely, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) show that lowering cholesterol levels will reduce risk. Cholesterol in the circulation is embedded in lipoproteins. The major atherogenic lipoproteins are low density lipoproteins (LDL), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), and remnants. Together they constitute non-high-density lipoproteins (non-HDL).  Clinically these lipoproteins are identified by their cholesterol (C) content, i.e., LDL-C, VLDL-C, and non-HDL-C.  Atherogenic lipoproteins can be reduced by both lifestyle intervention and cholesterol-lowering drugs. The efficacy of lifestyle intervention is best demonstrated in epidemiological studies, whereas efficacy of drugs is revealed through RCTs. Currently available cholesterol-lowering drugs are statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, bile acid sequestrants, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, niacin, fibrates, and n-3 fatty acids (e.g., icosapent ethyl). The latter three generally are reserved for patients with hypertriglyceridemia; here they can be combined with statins that together lower non-HDL-C. Highest priority for cholesterol-lowering therapy goes to patients with established ASCVD (secondary prevention).  RCTs in such patients show that “lower is better” for cholesterol reduction. The greatest risk reductions are attained by reducing LDL-C concentrations by at least 50% with a high intensity statin; and if necessary, to achieve LDL-C < 55-70 mg/dL, combining a statin with ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitor. For primary prevention, a decision to initiate statin therapy is made on multiple factors (i.e., presence of diabetes or severe hypercholesterolemia, estimated 10-year risk or lifetime risk for ASCVD, presence of risk enhancing factors (e.g., metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease); and if in doubt, detection of subclinical atherosclerosis (e.g., coronary artery calcium [CAC]).  A reasonable goal for primary prevention using moderate-intensity statin therapy is an LDL-C in the range of 70-99 mg/dL. Both population epidemiology and genetic epidemiology show that low serum cholesterol throughout life will minimize lifetime risk of ASCVD.  For this reason, cholesterol-lowering intervention, preferably through lifestyle change, should be carried out as early as possible. If cholesterol concentrations are very high in younger adults, it sometimes may be judicious to introduce a cholesterol-lowering drug. 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the foremost cause of death among chronic diseases. Its prevalence is increasing in many countries. This increase results from aging of the population combined with atherogenic lifestyles. Even so, mortality from ASCVD has been declining in most developed countries. This decline comes from improvements in preventive measures and better clinical interventions. One of the most important advances in the cardiovascular field resulted from identifying risk factors for ASCVD.  Risk factors directly or indirectly promote atherosclerosis, or they otherwise predispose to vascular events. The major risk factors are cigarette smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and advancing age. Dyslipidemia consists of elevations of atherogenic lipoproteins (LDL, VLDL, Lp(a), and remnants) and low levels of HDL. Advancing age counts as a risk factor because it reflects the impact of all risk factors over the lifespan. Several other factors, called risk enhancing factors, associate with higher risk for ASCVD (1). Lifestyle factors (for example, overnutrition and physical inactivity) contribute importantly to both major and enhancing risk factors. Hereditary factors undoubtedly contribute to the identifiable risk factors; but genetic influences also affect ASCVD risk through other ways not yet understood (2).

 

HISTORY OF THE CHOLESTEROL HYPOTHESIS AND CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPY

 

The first evidence for a connection between serum cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis came from laboratory animals (3). Feeding cholesterol to various animal species raises serum cholesterol and causes deposition of cholesterol in the arterial wall (3). The latter recapitulates early stages of human atherosclerosis. Subsequently, in humans, severe hereditary hypercholesterolemia was observed to cause premature atherosclerosis and ASCVD (3).  Later, population surveys uncovered a positive association between serum cholesterol levels and ASCVD (4,5).  Finally, clinical trials with cholesterol-lowering agents documented that lowering of serum cholesterol levels reduces the risk for ASCVD (6). These findings have convinced most investigators that the cholesterol hypothesis is proven. Moreover, the relationship between cholesterol levels and ASCVD risk is bidirectional; raising cholesterol levels increases risk, whereas reducing levels decreases risk (Figure 1).

Figure 1. The Cholesterol Hypothesis. Between the years 1955 and 1985, many epidemiologic studies showed a positive relation between cholesterol levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. Over the next 30 years, a host of randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that lowering cholesterol levels will reduce the risk for ASCVD. This bidirectional relationship between cholesterol levels and ASCVD provides ample support for the cholesterol hypothesis.

 

Epidemiological Evidence

 

A relationship between cholesterol levels and ASCVD risk is observed in both developing and developed countries (4,5). Populations with the lowest cholesterol levels and LDL-C levels have the lowest rates of ASCVD. Within populations, individuals with the lowest serum cholesterol or LDL-C levels carry the least risk. In other words, “the lower, the better” for cholesterol levels holds, both between populations and for individuals within populations.

 

Pre-Statin Clinical Trial Evidence

 

Another line of evidence supporting the cholesterol hypothesis comes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cholesterol-lowering therapies. Several earlier RCTs tested efficacy by reducing cholesterol through diet, bile acid sequestrants, or ileal exclusion operation (Table 1) (4). When taken individually, results from some of the smaller trials were not definitive; but meta-analysis, which combines data from all RCTs, demonstrated significant risk reduction due to cholesterol lowering. In addition, before the discovery of statins, several secondary-prevention RCTs were performed with various cholesterol-lowering drugs. Although some of these trials showed significant risk reduction, others gave equivocal results. But again when taken together, meta-analysis demonstrated ASCVD risk reduction from cholesterol reduction (7).

 

Table 1. Summary of Pre-Statin Clinical Trials of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy

Intervention

No. trials

No. treated

Person-years

Mean cholesterol reduction (%)

CHD incidence

(% change)

CHD Mortality

(%change)

Surgery

1

421

4,084

22

-43

-30

Sequestrants

3

1,992

14,491

9

-21

-32

Diet

6

1,200

6,356

11

-24

-21

This table is derived from National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (4)

 

Statins and Clinical Trial Evidence

 

Statins were discovered in the 1970s by Endo of Japan (8). These drugs lower cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis in the liver. They block HMG CoA reductase, a key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. This inhibition enhances the liver’s synthesis of LDL receptors. The latter, discovered by Brown and Goldstein (9), remove LDL and VLDL from the bloodstream, which lowers serum cholesterol levels.  Statin have proven to be highly efficacious with few side effects. The development of statins as a cholesterol-lowering drug has been actively pursued by the pharmaceutical industry. Seven statins have been approved for use in clinical practice by the FDA (for a detailed discussion of statins see (10)). Over the past three decades, a series of RCTs have been carried out that documents the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. In these RCTs, statin therapy has been shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality from ASCVD. Although individual RCTs produced significant results, the strongest evidence of benefit comes from meta-analysis. i.e., by combining data from all the trials (6). 

 Meta-analysis has shown that for every mmol/L (39 mg/dl) reduction in LDL-C with statin therapy there is an approximate 22% reduction in ASCVD events (6,11-14). Another report (15) showed that an almost identical relationship holds when several different kinds of LDL-lowering therapy were analyzed together. This response appears to be consistent throughout all levels of LDL-C.  Individual statins vary in their intensity of cholesterol-lowering therapy at a given dose (1,10) (Table 2).  For example, per mg per day, rosuvastatin is twice as efficacious as atorvastatin, which in turn is twice as efficacious as simvastatin.   Statins are best classified according to percentage reductions in LDL-C.  As shown in Table 2, moderate- intensity statins reduce LDL-C by 30-49 %, whereas high-intensity statins reduce LDL-C by > 50%.  On average, a 35% LDL-C reduction by moderate-intensity statin reduces risk by approximately one third, whereas high-intensity statins lower risk by about one-half.  But, in fact, absolute reductions vary depending on baseline levels of LDL-C. For example, for a baseline LDL-C of 200 mg/dL, a 50% reduction in LDL-C equates to a 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) decline; this translates into a 59% reduction in 10-year risk for ASCVD events. In contrast, in a patient with a baseline LDL-C a 100 mg per dL, a 50% reduction in LDL-C equates to a 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) decline, which will reduce ASCVD risk by about 30%.  Thus, at lower and lower levels of LDL-C, progressive reductions of LDL-C produce diminishing benefit from cholesterol-lowering therapy. This modifies the aphorism "lower is better".  Whereas the statement is true, it must be kept in mind that there are diminishing benefits from intensifying cholesterol-lowering therapy when LDL-C levels are already low. One needs to balance the benefits of further reducing LDL-C levels with the risks and costs of additional therapy. 

Table 2.  Categories of Intensities of Statins

Drug

Low-Intensity

20-25% LDL-C

Moderate-Intensity

30-49% LDL-C

High Intensity

>50% LDL-C

Lovastatin

10-20 mg

40-80 mg

 

Pravastatin

10-20 mg

40-80 mg

 

Simvastatin

10 mg

20-40 mg

 

Fluvastatin

20-40 mg

80 mg

 

Pitavastatin

 

1-4 mg

 

Atorvastatin

5 mg

10-20 mg

40-80 mg

Rosuvastatin

 

5-10 mg

20-40 mg

 

Non-Statin Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs

 

Beyond statins, other agents are currently available or loom on the horizon (Table 3). Bile acid sequestrants inhibit intestinal absorption of bile acids, which like statins raise hepatic LDL receptors (10). They are moderately efficacious for reducing LDL-C concentrations. A large RCT showed that bile acid sequestrants significantly reduce risk for CHD in patients with baseline elevations in LDL-C (16). Theoretically, bile acid sequestrants could enhance risk reduction in patients with ASCVD who are treated with statins.

 

Ezetimibe blocks cholesterol absorption in the intestine and also raises hepatic LDL receptor activity (10). It moderately lowers LDL-C (15-25%). The combination of statin + ezetimibe is additive for LDL-C lowering (17).  A clinical trial (18) demonstrated that adding ezetimibe to moderate intensity statins in very high-risk patients with ASCVD is beneficial showing that combination therapy reduced risk of cardiovascular events more than a statin alone (18). In this trial, the higher the risk, the greater was risk reduction (19). Ezetimibe is a generic drug and relatively inexpensive.

 

Bempedoic acid is an adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor and thereby inhibits cholesterol synthesis leading to an increase in LDL receptor activity (20). Bempedoic acid is a pro-drug and conversion to its CoA-derivative is required for activity and this occurs primarily in the liver. Bempedoic acid typically lowers LDL-C by 15-25% (10,20). The effect of bempedoic acid on cardiovascular disease is currently being evaluated in a large clinical trial.

 

Niacin and fibrates, which are primarily triglyceride-lowering drugs, have been used for many years. They modestly reduce cholesterol levels as well. Their effects on ASCVD risk vary.  Niacin used alone appears to attenuate risk, but when used in combination with high-intensity statin, any incremental benefit is minimal (21).  Like niacin, fibrates moderately reduce risk for CHD when used alone in patients with hypertriglyceridemia; risk reduction is less in those who do not have elevated triglycerides (22).  When fibrates are used in combination with statins, risk for severe myopathy is greater than for statins alone. Fenofibrate is the preferred fibrate in combination with statins because it carries the lowest risk of myopathy (23). For a detailed discussion of niacin and fibrates see the Endotext chapter on Triglyceride Lowering Drugs (24). Omega-3 fatty acids also lower serum triglyceride (24). In one notable RCT, treatment of high-risk, hypertriglyceridemic patients with statin + 2 g of the omega-3 fatty acid icosapent ethyl twice daily, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the risk of ischemic events, including cardiovascular death (25). In contrast, a recent RCT that randomized high risk hypertriglyceridemic patients on statin therapy to an omega-3 carboxylic acid formulation 4 grams per day did not observe any benefits on ASCVD (26). In both trials the reduction in triglyceride levels was similar and the explanation for the different results in these trials is uncertain. For a detailed discussion of omega-3 fatty acidssee the Endotext chapter on Triglyceride Lowering Drugs (24).   Other LDL-lowering drugs include microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitors (27) and RNA antisense drugs that block hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein B (no longer available) (28). Both of these drugs inhibit secretion of atherogenic lipoproteins into the circulation.  At present their use is restricted to patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. Evinacumab is a human monoclonal antibody against angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) that is approved for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (29). Evinacumab decreases LDL-C levels by approximately 50% independent of LDL receptor activity by accelerating the clearance of VLDL thereby reducing the production of LDL (30). Another class of drugs inhibits cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP); these agents lower LDL-C levels as well as raising HDL-C (31,32).  RCTs show their benefit is small, if any, so the pharmaceutical industry shows little interest in further development and CETP inhibitors are not FDA approved.  Finally, a class of drugs inhibits a circulating protein called proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9); the PCSK9 protein promotes degradation of LDL receptors and raises LDL-C levels (10).  Inhibition of PCSK9 markedly lowers LDL-C concentrations (10,33).  Recent reports indicate that PCSK9 inhibitors reduce risk in ASCVD patients at very high risk when combined with statins (34,35).  PCSK9 inhibitors are useful for patients who are statin intolerant, those with very high baseline LDL-C, such as familial hypercholesterolemia, or patients at very high risk for additional ASCVD events.  For additional information on cholesterol and triglyceride lowering drugs see the chapters in Endotext that address these topics (10,24).  

Table 3. Non-Statin Cholesterol Lowering Drugs

Drug Class

Mechanism of Action

Effects on Plasma Lipids

LDL-C lowering

Side effects

Bile acid sequestrants

Impairs reabsorption of bile acids

Raise LDL receptor activity

Reduces LDL

Raises VLDL

Minimal effect on HDL

15-25%, depending on dose

Constipation

GI distress

Increases TG

 

Ezetimibe

Impairs absorption of cholesterol

Raises LDL receptor activity

Reduces LDL

Reduces VLDL

Minimal effect on HDL

15-25%

Rare

Bempedoic acid

Inhibitor of ATP-citrate lyase leading to decreased cholesterol synthesis and an increase in LDL receptor activity

Reduces LDL

 

15-25%

Increases uric acid leading to gout

Tendon rupture has been reported

Niacin

Reduces hepatic secretion of VLDL

 

Reduces VLDL

Reduces LDL

Raises HDL

5-20%

Flushing, rash, raise plasma glucose, hepatic dysfunction, others

Fibrates

Reduces secretion of VLDL

Enhances degradation of VLDL

Reduces VLDL

(lowers TG 25-35%)

Small effect on LDL

Raises HDL

5-15%

Myopathy (in combination with statins)

Gallstones

Uncommonly various others

MTP inhibitors

Approved for treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Reduces hepatic secretion of VLDL

Reduces VLDL and LDL

50+%

Fatty liver

Mipomersen

(RNA antisense)

No longer available

Reduces hepatic secretion of VLDL

Reduces VLDL and LDL

50+%

Fatty liver

CETP inhibitors

Not approved by FDA

 

Blocks transfer of cholesterol from HDL to VLDL&LDL

Raises HDL

Lowers LDL

20-30%

 

 

PCSK9 inhibitors

Recommended for ASCVD patients at high risk

Blocks effects of PCSK9 to destroy LDL receptors

Lowers LDL

45-60%

 

Evinacumab

Approved for treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Blocks angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3)

Lowers LDL

Lowers TG (~50%)

Lowers HDL (~30%)

Approx. 50%

 

 

HISTORY OF U.S. GUIDELINES FOR CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT

 

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)

 

The most influential guidelines for cholesterol management in the United States have been those developed by the NECP. This program was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and included many health-related organizations in the United States (36).  Between 1987 and 2004, three major Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) reports (4,37,38) and one update were published (39) (Table 4).

 

Table 4. National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) Reports

Guideline

ATP I

ATP II

ATP III

ATP III Update

Year

1987

1994

2001

2004

Thrust

Primary prevention

Secondary prevention

High-risk primary prevention

Very high risk

Drugs

Bile acid resins Nicotinic acid Fibrates

Same as ATPI   +Statins

Same as ATP II

 

Same as ATP III

Major Targets

LDL-C; HDL-C

LDL-C; HDL-C

LDL-C;                Non-HDL-C

LDL-C;         Non-HDL-C

LDL-C goal

     (mg/dL)

Low risk <190 Moderate risk <160              High risk < 130

Low risk   <160 Moderate risk <130             High risk <100

Low risk <160 Moderate risk <130          Moderately high risk <130    

High risk < 100

Low risk <160 Moderate risk <130

Moderately high    risk <130      High risk < 100   Very high risk < 70

 

ATP reports identified LDL-C as the major target of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The intensity of LDL-lowering therapy was based on aggregate knowledge from multiple sources in the cholesterol field. Priority was given to the clinical trial evidence when available. ATP I (1987) emphasized lifestyle therapy for primary prevention. Use of cholesterol-lowering drugs was down-played in ATP I.  ATP II (1993) placed more emphasis on secondary prevention; this was because a large meta-analysis of RCTs using cholesterol-lowering drugs confirmed CHD risk reduction. ATP III (2001) added more emphasis on high-risk primary prevention.  At each successive ATP report, the intensity of LDL lowering therapy was increased with lower LDL-C goals.

 

The NCEP put highest priority for cholesterol management for patients with clinical forms of atherosclerotic disease. The latter included coronary heart disease, clinical carotid artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. ASCVD is the inclusive term for these conditions. The 10-year risk for future cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD is usually > 20%.  In ATP III, the presence of ASCVD of any type warranted an LDL-C goal of < 100 mg/dL.  For high-risk patients with hypertriglyceridemia, a non-HDL-C goal of < 130 mg/dL was recommended.

 

For primary prevention, ATP III identified four levels of risk for increasing intensity of LDL-C lowering. Different LDL-C goals were set for different levels of risk (Table 4). Risk for CHD was calculated using Framingham risk scoring. Framingham risk factors included cigarette smoking, hypertension, elevated total cholesterol, low HDL-C, and advancing age. A 10-year risk > 20% for CHD was called high risk. Moderately high risk was defined as a 10-year risk of 10-19%; at this level of risk, cholesterol-lowering drugs were considered to be cost-effective.  A 10-year risk of < 10% was divided into moderate risk and low risk depending on the presence or absence of major risk factors. Moderate risk corresponds to a 10-year risk for CHD of approximately 5-9%.   Generally speaking, cholesterol-lowering drugs were not recommended for low- to- moderate risk individuals except when LDL-C levels are high.

 

In 2004, ATP III underwent an update and set an optional LDL-C goal of < 70 mg/dL for patients deemed to be at very high risk for future CHD events. This option included CHD plus other atherosclerotic conditions and/or multiple major risk factors. This progression of treatment intensity was made possible by the results of several clinical trials with statin therapy.

 

Transfer of NHLBI Guidelines to American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC)

 

In 2013, NHLBI made the decision to remove treatment guidelines from its agenda. This was done even though it had almost finished writing prevention guidelines. These included guidelines for high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity, and nutrition. Late in this process, the guideline process was transferred to the (American Heart Association) AHA and American College of Cardiology (ACC). Then in 2013 the NHLBI guidelines for high blood cholesterol were modified to fit the criteria for guideline development required by AHA/ACC. The 2013 cholesterol guidelines (40) adhered closely to the Institute of Medicine (National Academy of Medicine) recommendations for evidence-based guidelines (41). These recommendations advocated priority to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the foundation of evidence-based medicine. The NHLBI cholesterol committee carried out an extensive review of the literature and limited recommendations based largely to RCTs. Most acceptable RCTs had utilized statin therapy in middle-aged persons. Therefore, the 2013 report committee did not include detailed recommendations for younger or older adults.  Recommendations were largely limited to the age range 40-75 years. High-intensity statin therapy was recommended for patients with established ASCVD. For primary prevention, risk was stratified by use of a pool cohort equation (PCE), which are derived from five large population studies in the United States (42). The PCE was an extension of the Framingham Heart Study risk equations. 10-year risk for ASCVD was based on the following risk factors: age, gender, cigarette smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and presence or absence of diabetes.  Although the PCE was validated in another large study (43), it has been criticized by some investigators as being imprecise for many individuals or specific groups (44-48).

 

For primary prevention, an effort was made to determine what level 10-year risk is associated with efficacy of reduction of ASCVD from statin RCTs.  It was determined that statins are effective for risk reduction when 10-year risk for ASCVD is > 7.5%.  Most primary prevention trials employed moderate intensity statins, so these were recommended for most patients; but in one RCT (49), a high-intensity statin appeared to produce greater risk reduction than found with moderate-intensity statins. So high-intensity statins were considered a favorable option in patients at higher 10-year risk. Notably LDL-C goals were not emphasized. It was recognized that these recommendations may not be optimal for all patients; therefore, consideration should be given to any extenuating circumstances that could modify the translation of RCTs directly into clinical care. A clinician patient risk discussion thus was advocated for all patients to consider the pros and cons of statin therapy.

 

2018 AHA/ACC/MULTI-SOCIETY REPORT

 

2018 cholesterol guidelines were revised by AHA/ACC in collaboration with multiple other societies concerned with preventive medicine (1).  These guidelines extended those published in 2013. They expanded recommendations to include children, adolescents, young adults (20-39 years), and older patients (> 75 years). Although RCTs may be lacking in these categories, epidemiology and clinical studies indicate that high blood cholesterol is an important risk factor for future ASCVD in these age ranges. From the evidence acquired over many years related to the cholesterol hypothesis, it is reasonable to craft recommendations based on the totality of the evidence. In the following, 2018 guidelines will be highlighted in relation to general areas of cholesterol management as identified by all the previous national and international guidelines. These guidelines proposed a top-10 list of recommendations to highlight the key points. These key points will be examined.

 

Lifestyle Intervention

 

1. IN ALL INDIVIDUALS, EMPHASIZE HEART-HEALTHY LIFESTYLE ACROSS THE LIFE-COURSE.

 

There is widespread agreement in the cardiovascular field that lifestyle factors contribute to the risk for ASCVD. These factors include cigarette smoking, sedentary life habits, obesity, and an unhealthy eating pattern. The ACC/AHA strongly recommends that a healthy lifestyle be adopted throughout life. These recommendations are strongly supported by 2018 cholesterol guidelines. They are the foundation for cardiovascular prevention and should receive appropriate attention in clinical practice (50). For a detailed discussion of the effect of diet on lipid levels and atherosclerosis see the Endotext chapter The Effect of Diet on Cardiovascular Disease and Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels (51).

 

Secondary Prevention

 

2. IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL ASCVD, REDUCE LDL-C WITH HIGH-INTENSITY STATINS OR MAXIMALLY TOLERATED STATINS TO DECREASE ASCVD RISK. THE GOAL OF THERAPY IS TO REDUCE LDL-C BY > 50%. IF NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL, CONSIDER ADDING EZETIMIBE TO MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY.

 

The strongest evidence for efficacy of statin therapy is a meta-analysis of RTCs carried out in patients with established ASCVD.  As previously mentioned, the best fit line comparing percent ASCVD versus LDL-C in secondary prevention studies demonstrates that for every mmol/L (39mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C the risk for ASCVD is decreased by approximately 22% (11). High intensity statins typically reduce LDL-C by 50% or more; this percentage reduction occurs regardless of baseline levels of LDL-C. This explains why the guidelines set a goal for LDL-C secondary prevention to be a > 50% reduction in levels.  There are two options to achieve such reductions. RCTs give priority to use of high-intensity statins. But second, if high-intensity statins are not tolerated, similar LDL-C lowering can be attained by combining a moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe (18). An approach to lowering LDL-C in patients with ASCVD is shown in Figure 2.

 

Figure 2. Secondary Prevention in Patients with Clinical ASCVD (1)

 

3. IN VERY HIGH-RISK PATIENTS WITH ASCVD, FIRST USE A MAXIMALLY TOLERATED STATIN + EZETIMIBE TO ACHIEVE AN LDL-C GOAL OF < 70 MG/DL (<1.8 MMOL/L). IF THIS GOAL IS NOT ACHIEVED, CONSIDER ADDING A PCSK9 INHIBITOR.

 

2018 guidelines defined very high risk of future ASCVD events as a history of multiple ASCVD events or one major event plus multiple high-risk conditions (Table 5). This definition is based in large part on subgroup analysis of the IMPROVE-IT trial (18,19).

 

Table 5. Very High Risk of Future ASCVD Events (1)

Major ASCVD Events

Recent ACS (within the past 12 months)

History of MI (other than recent acute coronary syndrome event listed above)

History of ischemic stroke

Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (history of claudication with ABI <0.85, or previous revascularization or amputation)

High Risk Conditions

Age ≥65 y

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

History of prior coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention outside of the major ASCVD event(s)

Diabetes mellitus

Hypertension 

CKD (eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m2)

Current smoking

Persistently elevated LDL-C (LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL [≥2.6 mmol/L]) despite maximally tolerated statin therapy and ezetimibe

History of congestive heart failure

ABI indicates ankle-brachial index; CKD indicates chronic kidney disease

 

Recent RCTs have demonstrated that addition of non-statins to statin therapy can enhance risk reduction. These RCTs (and their add-on drugs) were IMPROVE-IT (ezetimibe) (18), FOURIER (evolocumab) (34), and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (alirocumab) (35).  All RCTs were carried out in patients at very high-risk.  For IMPROVE-IT, addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy produced an additional 6% reduction in ASCVD events. In this trial, baseline LDL-C on moderate-intensity statin alone averaged about 70 mg/dL; in spite of this low level, further LDL lowering with addition of ezetimibe enhanced risk reduction. RCTs with the two PCSK9 inhibitors (evolocumab and alirocumab) restricted recruitment to patients having LDL-C > 70 mg/dL on maximally tolerated statin+ ezetimibe. In these RCTs, duration of therapy was only about 3 years. A marked additional LDL lowering was achieved. In both trials, risk for ASCVD events was reduced by 15%.

 

2018 guidelines allow consideration of PCSK9 inhibitor as an add-on drug if patients are at very high risk for future ASCVD events and have an LDL-C > 70 mg/dL during treatment with maximally tolerated statin plus ezetimibe (Figure 3). This latter threshold LDL-C was chosen because it was a recruitment criteria for PCSK9 inhibitor therapy in reported RTCs (34,35)

 

An important question about use of PCSK9 inhibitors is whether they are cost-effective   When they first became available, they were marketed at a very high cost, which was widely considered to be excessive. More recently, the cost of these drugs has declined considerably.   An analysis of cost-effectiveness has shown that at current prices in very high-risk patients PCSK9 inhibitors can be cost-effective (52).  Another analysis (53) of approximately 1 million patients with ASCVD in the Veterans Affairs system indicate that approximately 10% of patients will be classified as very high risk and having LDL-C > 70 mg/dL while taking maximal statin therapy plus ezetimibe. These later patients are potential candidates for PCSK9 inhibitors. 

 

Figure 3. Secondary Prevention in Patients with Very High-Risk ASCVD (1)

 

 Primary Prevention

 

4. IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA (LDL-C ≥190 MG/DL (≥4.9 MMOL/L)), WITHOUT CONCOMITANT ASCVD, BEGIN HIGH-INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY (OR MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN + EZETIMIBE) TO ACHIEVE IN LDL-C GOAL OF < 100 MG/DL; IF THIS GOAL IS NOT ACHIEVED, CONSIDER ADDING PCSK9 INHIBITOR IN SELECTED PATIENTS AT HIGHER RISK. MEASUREMENT OF 10-YEAR RISK FOR ASCVD IS NOT NECESSARY.

 

Patients with severe hypercholesterolemia are known to be at relatively high risk for developing ASCVD (54,55). In view of massive evidence that elevated LDL-C promotes atherosclerosis and predisposes to ASCVD, it stands to reason that such patients deserve intensive treatment with LDL-lowering drugs. RCTs with cholesterol-lowering drugs demonstrate benefit of statin therapy in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia (56,57). It is not necessary to calculate 10-year risk in such patients. Moreover, patients who have extreme elevations of LDL-C (e.g., heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) may be candidates for PCSK9 inhibitors if LDL-C cannot be lowered sufficiently with maximal statin therapy plus ezetimibe.

 

5. IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS AGED 40 TO 75 YEARS WITH AN LDL-C ≥70 MG/DL (≥1.8 MMOL/L), WITHOUT CONCOMITANT ASCVD, BEGIN MODERATE-INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY. FOR OLDER PATIENTS (>50 YEARS), CONSIDER USING HIGH-INTENSITY STATIN (OR MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN PLUS EZETIMIBE) TO ACHIEVE A REDUCTION IN LDL-C OF > 50%. MEASUREMENT OF 10-YEAR RISK FOR ASCVD IS NOT NECESSARY.

 

Middle-aged patients with diabetes have an elevated lifetime risk for ASCVD (58). The trajectory of risk is steeper in patients with diabetes than in those without. For this reason, estimation of 10-year risk for ASCVD with pooled cohort equation (PCE) is not a reliable indicator of lifetime risk.  Meta-analysis of RCTs in middle-aged patients with diabetes treated with moderate intensity statins therapy shows significant risk reduction (14). Hence, most middle-aged patients with diabetes deserve statin therapy. It is not necessary to measure 10-year risk before initiation of statin therapy in these patients. With progression of age and accumulation of, multiple risk factors, increasing the intensity of statin therapy or adding ezetimibe seems prudent (Tables 6 and 7).

 

Table 6. Diabetes Specific Risk Enhancers That Are Independent of Other Risk Factors in Diabetes (1)

Long duration (≥10 years for type 2 diabetes mellitus or ≥20 years for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Albuminuria ≥30 mcg of albumin/mg creatinine

eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2

Retinopathy

Neuropathy

ABI <0.9

ABI indicates ankle-brachial index

 

Table 7. ASCVD Risk Enhancers (1)

Family history of premature ASCVD

Persistently elevated LDL > 160mg/dl (>4.1mmol/L

Chronic kidney disease

Metabolic syndrome

History of preeclampsia

History of premature menopause

Inflammatory disease (especially rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, HIV)

Ethnicity (e.g., South Asian ancestry)

Persistently elevated triglycerides > 175mg/dl (>2.0mmol/L)

Hs-CRP > 2mg/L

Lp(a) > 50mg/dl or >125nmol/L

Apo B > 130mg/dl

Ankle-brachial index (ABI) < 0.9

 

6. INITIATION OF PRIMARY PREVENTION SHOULD BEGIN WITH A CLINICIAN-PATIENT RISK DISCUSSION.

 

This discussion is necessary to put a patient’s total risk status in perspective. The risk discussion should always begin with a review of the critical importance of lifestyle intervention. This is true for all age groups. Beyond the issue of lifestyle, the discussion can further consider the potential benefit of a cholesterol-lowering drug, especially statin therapy. When the latter may be beneficial, the provider should next review major risk factors and estimated 10-year risk for ASCVD derived from the pooled cohort equation (PCE) risk calculator (59) (https://www.acc.org/guidelines/hubs/blood-cholesterol). Estimation of lifetime risk is also useful, particularly in younger individuals. All major risk factors (e.g., cigarette smoking, elevated blood pressure, LDL-C, hemoglobin A1C [if indicated], should be discussed. In patients 40-75 years, the 10-year risk estimate is most useful. In these patients, four categories of 10-year risk for ASCVD are recognized: low risk (<5%); borderline risk (5-7.4%); intermediate risk (7.5-19.9 %), and high risk (> 20%). Estimates of lifetime risk for patients 20-39 years also are available (https://www.acc.org/guidelines/hubs/blood-cholesterol  or        https://qrisk.org/lifetime/index.php).  Three other components of the risk discussion are: risk enhancing factors (see #8), possible measurement of coronary artery calcium (CAC) (see #9), and a review of extenuating life circumstances (issues of cost and safety considerations, as well as patient motivation and preferences). The decision to initiate statin therapy should be shared between clinician and patient. All of these factors deserve a full discussion in view of the fact that statin therapy represents a lifetime commitment to taking a cholesterol-lowering drug.

 

Patients should also recognize that atherosclerosis begins early in life and progresses overtime before manifesting as clinical disease. The cumulative LDL-C levels (“LDL-C years”) strongly influence the timing of clinical manifestation (figure 4). In patients with high cholesterol levels (homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) ASCVD can occur early in life whereas in patients with loss of function mutations in PCSK9 and low cholesterol level have a reduced occurrence of ASCVD.

 

Figure 4. Relationship between cumulative LDL-C exposure, age, and the development of the clinical manifestations of ASCVD. Figure from reference (60).

 

Additionally, patients should be appraised of comparisons of the reduction in ASCVD events in individuals with genetic variations resulting in life-long reductions in LDL-C levels vs. individuals treated with statins to lower LDL-C later in life. Variants in the HMG-CoA reductase, NPC1L1, PCSK9, ATP citrate lyase, and LDL receptor genes result in a lifelong decrease in LDL-C and a 10mg/dL decrease in LDL-C with any of these genetic variants was associated with a 16-18% decrease in ASCVD events (61). As noted above a 39mg/dL decrease in LDL-C in the statin trials resulted in a 22% decrease in ASCVD events. Thus, a life-long decrease in LDL-C levels results in a decrease in ASCVD events that is three to four times as great as that seen with short-term LDL-C lowering with drugs later in life suggesting that the sooner the LDL-C level is lowered the better the prevention of cardiovascular events.

 

7. IN ADULTS 40 TO 75 YEARS OF AGE WITHOUT DIABETES AND LDL-C ≥70 MG/DL (≥1.8 MMOL/L), RTC'S SHOW THAT MODERATE INTENSITY STATIN THERAPY IS EFFICACIOUS WHEN 10-YEAR RISK FOR DEVELOPING ASCVD IS > 7.5%. THEREFORE, INITIATING STATIN THERAPY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN THE RISK DISCUSSION.

 

A 10-year risk > 7.5% does not mandate statin therapy but indicates that moderate-intensity statins can reduce risk by 30-40% with a minimum of side effects (62). This fact alone can justify moderate intensity statin therapy, but only if other considerations noted above (#6) are taken into account in the risk discussion. An approach to lipid lowering in primary prevention patients is shown in figure 5.

 

Figure 5. Approach to Primary Prevention in Patients without LDL-C >190mg/dl or Diabetes (1)

 

8. DETERMINE PRESENCE OF RISK-ENHANCING FACTORS IN ADULTS 40 TO 75 YEARS OF AGE TO INFORM THE DECISION REGARDING INITIATION OF STATIN THERAPY.

 

If risk assessment based on PCE is equivocal or ambiguous, the presence of risk enhancing factors in patients at intermediate risk (10-year risk 7.5 to 19.9%), can tip the balance in favor of statin therapy. Risk enhancing factors are shown in Table 7.

 

9. IF A DECISION ABOUT STATIN THERAPY IS UNCERTAIN IN ADULTS 40 TO 75 YEARS OF AGE WITHOUT DIABETES MELLITUS, WITH LDL-C LEVELS ≥ 70 MG/DL, AND WITH A 10 YEAR ASCVD RISK OF ≥ 7.5% TO 19.9% (INTERMEDIATE RISK) CONSIDER MEASURING CAC.

 

CAC measurements are a safe and inexpensive method to assess severity of coronary atherosclerosis. CAC scores generally reflect lifetime exposure to coronary risk factors and therefore in young individuals (men < 40 years of age; women < 50 years of age) the long-term predictive value is limited because the CAC score is often 0. Studies show that CAC accumulation is a strong predictor of probability of ASCVD events (63). A CAC core of zero generally is accompanied by few if any ASCVD events over the subsequent decade. A CAC score of 1-100 Agatston units is associated with relatively low rates of ASCVD, both in middle-aged and older patients. In contrast, a CAC >100 Agatston units carries a risk well into the statin-benefit zone.  Data such as these led to the following recommendation of 2018 guidelines for patients at intermediate risk by PCE.

 

  1. If CAC is zero, treatment with statin therapy may be withheld or delayed, except in cigarette smokers, those with diabetes mellitus, those with a strong family history of premature ASCVD, and possibly chronic inflammatory conditions such as HIV.
  2. A CAC score of 1 to 99 Agatston units favors statin therapy in intermediate-risk patients ≥55 years of age, whereas benefit in 40-54 years is marginal (note these focuses on 10-year risk and a CAC score in this range in a younger individual is predictive of long-term risk (64)).
  3. A CAC score ≥100 Agatston units (or ≥75th percentile), strongly favors statin therapy, unless otherwise countermanded by clinician–patient risk discussion.

 

Monitoring

 

10. ASSESS ADHERENCE AND PERCENTAGE RESPONSE TO LDL-C LOWERING MEDICATIONS AND/OR LIFESTYLE CHANGES WITH REPEAT LIPID MEASUREMENT 4 TO 12 WEEKS AFTER STATIN INITIATION OR DOSE ADJUSTMENT AND EVERY 3-12 MONTHS AS NEEDED.

 

Remember that the LDL-C goal for patients with ASCVD or severe hypercholesterolemia is a > 50% reduction in LDL-C. For most such patients, this goal can be achieved by high-intensity statin therapy + ezetimibe. In ASCVD patients at very high risk, the goal is an LDL-C lowering >50% and LDL-C < 70 mg/dL. To achieve these goals, it may be necessary to combine a PCSK9 inhibitor with maximal statin therapy + ezetimibe.  For statin therapy in primary prevention, the goal is a lowering of > 35%. This goal can be achieved in most patients with a moderate intensity statin + ezetimibe

 

 2018 guidelines did not set a precise on-treatment LDL-C target of therapy, but instead, offer percent reductions as goals of therapy. Baseline levels of LDL-C can be obtained either by chart review or withholding statin therapy for about two weeks. In addition, on-treatment LDL-C can provide useful information about efficacy of treatment (Figure 6). This figure shows expected LDL-C levels for 50% or 35% reductions at different baseline levels of LDL-C.  For example, in secondary prevention, an on-treatment LDL-C of <70 mg/dL can be considered adequate treatment regardless of baseline LDL-C. On-treatment levels in the range of 70-100 mg/dL are adequate if baseline-LDL C is known to be in the range of 140- 200 mg/dL; if there is uncertainty about baseline levels, reevaluation of statin adherence and reinforcement of treatment regimen is needed. For optimal treatment, on-treatment levels in this range warrant consideration of adding ezetimibe to maximal statin therapy. If on treatment LDL-C is > 100 mg/dL, the treatment regimen is probably inadequate, and intensification of therapy is needed. For primary prevention, the LDL-C goal is a reduction > 35%, and a similar scheme for evaluating efficacy of therapy can be used.

 

Figure 6. Predicted on-treatment LDL-C compared to baseline LDL-C and suggested actions for each category of on-treatment LDL-C in secondary and primary prevention.

 

Other Issues

 

OTHER AGE GROUPS

 

2018 guidelines offered suggestions for management of high blood cholesterol in children, adolescents, young adults (20-39 years), and elderly patients > 75 years. There is no strong RCT evidence to underline cholesterol management in these populations. Instead, treatment suggestions depend largely on epidemiologic data. Lifestyle intervention is a primary method for cholesterol treatment in these age groups. However, under certain circumstances LDL-lowering drugs may be indicated. This is particularly the case for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or similar forms of very high LDL-C. In young adults, particularly those with other risk factors, LDL lowering drug therapy (statin or ezetimibe) may be reasonable when LDL-C levels are in the range of 160-189 mg/dL or if the lifetime risk is high. Older adults having concomitant risk factors are potential candidates for initiation of statins or continuation of existing statin therapy. In all cases, clinical estimation of risk status is critical in a decision to initiate statins.

 

For details on the approach to treating hypercholesterolemia in older adults see the Endotext chapter entitled “Management of Dyslipidemia in the Elderly” (65). For details on the approach to treating hypercholesterolemia children and adolescence see the Endotext section on Pediatric Lipidology.

 

STATIN NON-ADHERENCE   

 

 In spite of proven benefit of statin therapy in high-risk patients, there is a relatively high prevalence of nonadherence to the prescribed drug (66). Some studies suggest that up to 50% of patients discontinue use of prescribed statins over the long run (67-70). This finding creates a major challenge to the health care system for prevention of ASCVD. Table 8 lists several factors that may contribute to a high prevalence of nonadherence.  

Table 8. Factors Associated with Statin Nonadherence

Healthcare system factors

Accompanying medical care costs

Lack of medical oversight and follow-up (provider therapeutic inertia)

Provider concern for side effects

Patient factors

Uncertainty of benefit

Lack of health consciousness

Lack of motivation

Lack of perceived benefit

Perceived side effects

Nocebo effects

Myalgias

Myopathy

“Brain fog”

Misattributed symptoms or syndromes (arthritis, spondylosis, neuropathy, insomnia, mental confusion and memory loss, fibromyalgia, gastrointestinal symptoms, liver dysfunction, cataract; cancer).

 When a decision is made to initiate statin therapy, the presumption is that statins are a lifetime treatment. Their use is similar to other medications, such as antihypertensive drugs, which are expected to be taken for the rest of one’s life. Such treatments imply indefinite participation in the healthcare system. This means regular ongoing visits to a prescribing clinic. Even for those with medical insurance there are usually co-pays both for the visit and for medication, not to mention cost of transportation to and from the clinic. All of these cost-related issues can be an impediment to long-term statin usage. Provider therapeutic inertia (66) can result from lack of provider education, excessive workload, and concerns about statin side effects. From the patient’s point of view, common issues are lack of understanding of the potential benefits of therapy and lack of health consciousness and motivation. A related problem is expectation of side effects because of preconditioning by information received from the news media, package inserts, Internet, family, and friends. This expectation can discourage individuals from continuation of statin therapy (nocebo effect) (71). The most common symptoms attributed to statin therapy are muscle pain and tenderness (myalgias) (10).  A complaint of statin intolerance is registered in about 5-15% of patients. If myalgias attributed to statins are due to actual pathological changes, the character of the changes is yet to be determined. In almost all cases, serum creatine kinase (CK) levels are not increased. There is no evidence for long-term muscle damage. A few reports nonetheless suggest that statins can produce a low-grade myopathy (72); such an effect has not been widely accepted. The literature is replete with case reports of other symptoms attributed to statins (66). In fact, much of the symptomology reported by patients are unrelated to statin treatment but are in fact the symptoms of other conditions. Statin therapy has been given to large numbers of people for many years without evidence of long-term muscle dysfunction. 

Still, in rare cases, especially when blood levels of statins are raised, severe myopathy (rhabdomyolysis) can occur. This proves that statins can be myotoxic. Table 9 lists conditions associated with statin-induced severe myopathy (73,74). In most such cases, severe myopathy is reversible. If the cause can be identified and eliminated, a statin can be cautiously reinstituted. Alternatively, a non-statin LDL-lowering drug (e.g., ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, or PCSK9 inhibitor) can be substituted for the offending statin (10,75).

 

Table 9. Factors Associated with Statin - Induced Rhabdomyolysis

Advanced age (>80 y)Small body frame and fragilityFemale sexAsian ethnicityPre-existing neuromuscular conditionKnown history of myopathy or family history of myopathy syndromePre-existing liver disease, kidney disease, hypothyroidismCertain rare genetic polymorphismsHigh-dose statin (?)Postoperative periodsExcessive alcohol intakeDrug interactions (gemfibrozil, antipsychotics, amiodarone, verapamil, cyclosporine, macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals, protease inhibitors)

 

These considerations indicate that statin therapy is a much greater investment in time and effort than commonly recognized. Since statins have the potential to prevent many ASCVD events, they offer great potential in clinical management of patients at risk. Nonetheless, to achieve this benefit, the health care system must be adjusted to the requirements of statin therapy as well as other risk-reducing therapies. Unless these adjustments are made, much of the potential benefit of statin treatment will be lost. It will be necessary to address all the components of healthcare and patient factors to improve long-term adherence of statin therapy.

 

EUROPEAN GUIDELINES FOR CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT

 

The most influential of European guidelines for management of cholesterol and dyslipidemia are those developed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS), and representatives from other European organizations (76). A task force appointed by these organizations have published an update on dyslipidemia management (77). The recommendations of this report resemble in many ways those of the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines (1). But notable differences can be identified for specific recommendations. A review of these differences may help to identify gaps in knowledge needed to format best recommendations. In the following, recommendations proposed by AHA/ACC and by ESC/EAS will be compared. These comparisons should illuminate areas of uncertainty where more information is needed for definitive recommendations. At the same time, it is important to emphasize that in many critical areas the two sets of guidelines are in strong agreement. These will be noted first.

 

Agreement Between AHA/ACC and ESC/EAS Guidelines

 

There is agreement that elevated LDL is the major atherogenic lipoprotein and that LDL-C is the primary target of treatment. Likewise, both guidelines agree that the intensity of LDL-C lowering therapy should depend on absolute risk to patients. In other words, patients who have highest risk should receive the most intensive cholesterol reduction. Both guidelines emphasize therapeutic lifestyle intervention as the foundation of risk reduction, both for elevated cholesterol and for other risk factors. The highest risk patients are those with atherosclerotic disease and are potential candidates for combined drug therapy for cholesterol-lowering. For primary prevention, the intensity of treatment depends on absolute risk as determined by population-based algorithms.  For drug therapy, statins are first-line treatment, but in highest risk patients, consideration can be given to adding non-statin drugs (e.g., ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors).   Beyond population-based algorithms for primary prevention, measurement of other dyslipidemia markers or other higher risk conditions can be used as risk- enhancing factors to modify intensity of lipid-lowering therapy.  

 

Differences Between AHA/ACC and ESC/EAS Guidelines

 

DEFINITION OF VERY HIGH RISK  

 

This definition is important because it sets the stage for considering combined drug therapy for LDL-C lowering. AHA/ACC defines very high risk as a history of multiple ASCVD events or of one event + multiple high-risk conditions.  This limits the definition of very high risk to the highest risk patients among those with ASCVD. In contrast, ESC/EAS considers all patients with clinical ASCVD or ASCVD on imaging as very high risk. Additionally, ESC/EAS allows extension of the definition to highest risk patients in primary prevention, that is, to patients with multiple risk factors and/or subclinical atherosclerosis (table 10). Overall, more patients will be identified as being at very high risk by ESC/EAS guidelines. This could enlarge the usage of PCSK9 inhibitors. AHA/ACC limits the use of PCSK9 inhibitors to patients at highest risk, because of their high cost. One recent study (53) showed that only about 10% of patients with established ASCVD will be eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors by AHA/ACC recommendations.

 

Table 10. ESC/EAS Cardiovascular Risk Categories

Very High-Risk

Ø  ASCVD, either clinical or unequivocal on imaging

Ø  DM with target organ damage or at least three major risk factors or T1DM of long duration (>20 years)

Ø  Severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)

Ø  A calculated SCORE >10% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD.

Ø  FH with ASCVD or with another major risk factor

High-Risk

Ø  Markedly elevated single risk factors, in particular Total Cholesterol >8 mmol/L (>310mg/dL), LDL-C >4.9 mmol/L (>190 mg/dL), or BP >180/110 mmHg.

Ø  Patients with FH without other major risk factors.

Ø  Patients with DM without target organ damage, with DM duration > 10 years or another additional risk factor.

Ø  Moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2).

Ø  A calculated SCORE >5% and <10% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD.

Moderate Risk

Ø  Young patients (T1DM <35 years; T2DM <50 years) with DM duration <10 years, without other risk factors.

Ø  Calculated SCORE >1 % and <5% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD.

Low Risk

Ø  Calculated SCORE <1% for 10-year risk of fatal CVD

 

GOALS FOR LDL-C   

 

In 2013, the AHA/ACC eliminated specific numerical goals for LDL-C in both primary and secondary prevention.  Recommendations for LDL-C lowering therapy were based exclusively on RCTs of statin therapy. These recommendations have been criticized for lacking a means to evaluate efficacy of statin therapy. In 2018, AHA/ACC identified 2 goals for LDL-C lowering, namely, > 50% LDL-C reduction in secondary prevention and > 35% reduction in primary prevention. These values are based on the expected reductions achieved by high-intensity statins for secondary prevention and by moderate-intensity statins for primary prevention.  Again, no numerical targets are identified. The only exception was the recognition of an LDL-C threshold goal of 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) for consideration of PCSK9 inhibitors in very high-risk patients on maximal statin therapy + ezetimibe.

 

ESC/EAS supports the 50% reduction of LDL-C in high-risk patients but also includes a goal of <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). This goal applies to all high-risk patients, whether in primary or secondary prevention. For very high-risk patients, the goal is an LDL-C of < 1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL). For moderate-risk patients in primary prevention, the goal is LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). The guideline task force presumably believed that having defined LDL-C goals facilitates cholesterol-lowering therapy in clinical practice. Additionally, following the ESC/EAS LDL-C goals will most likely result in lower LDL-C levels in many patients.  

 

Table 11. ESC/EAS LDL Cholesterol Goals

Very High Risk

LDL-C reduction of >50% from baseline and an LDL-C goal of <1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) is recommended

High Risk

LDL-C reduction of >50% from baseline and an LDL-C goal of <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) is recommended

Moderate Risk

LDL-C goal of <2.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) should be considered

Low Risk

LDL-C goal <3.0 mmol/L (<116 mg/dL) may be considered.

 

RISK ESTIMATION FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION

 

AHA/ACC employed a pooled cohort equation (PCE) developed from five large population groups in the USA to estimate 10-year risk (and lifetime risk) for ASCVD events. ESC/EAS for several years has employed a SCORE algorithm based on risk for ASCVD mortality in European populations. Both PCE and SCORE are used to define “statin eligibility” for primary prevention. A study suggests that more people are “eligible” for statin therapy using PCE compared to SCORE (78). If this finding can be confirmed, it suggests that ESC/EAS guidelines are less aggressive for reducing LDL-C in lower risk individuals (compared to AHA/ACC guidelines). In contrast, ESC/EAS appears to be more aggressive in use of non-statins for LDL lowering in higher risk patients than is AHA/ACC.

 

RISK ENHANCING FACTORS   

 

AHA/ACC proposed that several risk enhancing factors favor the decision to use statin therapy in patients at intermediate risk. Although European guidelines did not specify a list of such factors, most were considered to justify more intensive therapy. Notable among risk enhancing factors were apolipoprotein B (apoB) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]). ESC/EAS seemingly placed more emphasis on these two factors for adjusting intensity of therapy; this report’s recommendations can be taken to mean that apoB and Lp(a) should be measured more frequently in risk assessment than stated by AHA/ACC.  In fact, neither guideline was highly specific as to when to exercise the option of their measurements. This option depends largely on clinical judgment.

 

SUBCLINICAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS  

 

AHA/ACC propose that CAC measurement can assist in deciding whether to use statin therapy in patients at intermediate risk. AHA/ACC in particular noted that the absence of CAC justifies delaying statin therapy. No other modalities of measurement of subclinical atherosclerosis were advocated by AHA/ACC. In contrast, ESC/EAS supported use of different modes of cardiovascular imaging to assist in decisions about intensity of LDL-C lowering therapy. Beyond this, however, recommendations for cardiovascular imaging were not highly specific.  Nonetheless, these guidelines suggest that the finding of substantial subclinical atherosclerosis in any arterial bed elevates a patient’s risk to the category of established ASCVD and can justify adding non-statin therapy to statins in such patients.

 

GUIDELINE SPECIFICITY

 

AHA/ACC guidelines place great emphasis on data from RCTs to justify its recommendations.  However, RTC’s related to specific questions typically are limited in number. AHA/ACC recommendations are highly codified and kept to a minimum. ESC/EAS in contrast bases its recommendations both on clinical trials and other types of evidence. It explores available evidence in greater detail, and many of its recommendations are more nuanced. This approach to guideline development has its advantages and disadvantages. For example, it gives the reader a broader base of information to assist in clinical decisions. On the other hand, many of its recommendations are made outside of an RCT-evidence base. Without doubt, cholesterol management in all age and gender groups with various risk factor profiles is complex. The ESC/EAS attempts to provide a rationale for management of this complexity. The AHA/ACC, on the other hand, simplifies management as much as possible; it is written specifically for the practitioner, and leaves the complexities of management to a lipid specialist. ESC/EAS delves into the complexities in more detail so that its recommendations are applicable to both practitioner and specialist.

 

KEY PRINCIPLES  

 

There are certain key principles that clinicians should remember when deciding who to treat and how aggressively to treat hypercholesterolemia.

 

  • The Sooner the Better- atherosclerosis begins early in life and progresses overtime with LDL-C levels playing a major role in the rate of development. Lowering LDL-C levels by lifestyle changes early in life will have long-term benefits. Additionally, in selected individuals initiating drug therapy sooner rather than latter will reduce ASCVD events later in life.
  • The Lower the Better- studies have clearly demonstrated that the lower the LDL-C levels the greater the decrease in ASCVD events. Clinicians need to balance the benefits of more aggressively lowering LDL-C levels with the risks and costs of high dose or additional drug therapy. It should be recognized that statins and ezetimibe are generic drugs and very inexpensive. In contrast, PCSK9 inhibitors and bempedoic acid are expensive. In many patients using high-intensity statin therapy in combination with ezetimibe can lead to marked reductions in LDL-C levels with minimal risk and at low cost.
  • The Higher the LDL-C the Greater the Benefit- if the baseline LDL-C is high the magnitude of the reduction in LDL-C will be greater leading to a larger decrease in ASCVD events. Clinicians should be more aggressive in patients with high LDL-C levels.
  • The Greater the Risk of ASCVD the Greater the Absolute Reduction in ASCVD- clinicians should identify patients at higher risk for ASCVD and more aggressively treat these patients.

 

Following these general principles will help clinicians make informed decisions in deciding on their approach to lowering LDL-C levels and will facilitate discussions with patients on the benefits and risks of treatment. For an in-depth discussion of these key principles see the following references (79,80).    

 

SUMMARY

 

Advances in the drug therapy of elevated cholesterol levels offer great potential for reducing both new-onset ASCVD and recurrent ASCVD events in those with established disease. This benefit can be enhanced by judicious use of lifestyle intervention. But among drugs, statins are first-line therapy. They are generally safe and inexpensive. They have been shown to reduce ASCVD events in both secondary and primary prevention. Ezetimibe has about half the LDL-lowering efficacy of statins; it too is generally safe, and is a generic relatively inexpensive drug. Ezetimibe can be used as an add-on drug to moderate intensity statins, especially for those who do not tolerate a high-intensity statin. PCSK9 inhibitors are powerful LDL-lowering drugs, and they appear to be largely safe. The major drawback is cost. If the cost of these inhibitors can be reduced, they too have the potential for wide usage, especially in patients who are “statin intolerant”. The major challenge for use of cholesterol-lowering drugs is the problem of long-term non-adherence. Improving adherence will require fundamental changes in the current healthcare system in which patient monitoring and follow-up is often not a high priority.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC, Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139:e1082-e1143
  2. Aragam KG, Natarajan P. Polygenic Scores to Assess Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Clinical Perspectives and Basic Implications. Circ Res 2020; 126:1159-1177
  3. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. A century of cholesterol and coronaries: from plaques to genes to statins. Cell 2015; 161:161-172
  4. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report. Circulation 2002; 106:3143-3421
  5. Law MR, Wald NJ, Thompson SG. By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease? BMJ 1994; 308:367-372
  6. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Keech A, Simes J, Barnes EH, Voysey M, Gray A, Collins R, Baigent C. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012; 380:581-590
  7. Rossouw JE, Lewis B, Rifkind BM. The Value of Lowering Cholesterol after Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 1990; 323:1112-1119
  8. Endo A. The discovery and development of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Journal of Lipid Research 1992; 33:1569-1582
  9. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A Receptor-Mediated Pathway for Cholesterol Homeostasis. Science 1986; 232:34-47
  10. Feingold KR. Cholesterol Lowering Drugs. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  11. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators, Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Mihaylova B, Simes J, Collins R, Kirby A, Colhoun H, Braunwald E, La Rosa J, Pedersen TR, Tonkin A, Davis B, Sleight P, Franzosi MG, Baigent C, Keech A. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 385:1397-1405
  12. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaborators, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010; 376:1670-1681
  13. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2019; 393:407-415
  14. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R, Keech A, Simes J, Peto R, Armitage J, Baigent C. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 371:117-125
  15. Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, Wiviott SD, Giugliano RP, Grundy SM, Braunwald E, Sabatine MS. Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions. JAMA 2016; 316:1289-1297
  16. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial Results. JAMA 1984; 251:351-364
  17. Lakoski SG, Xu F, Vega GL, Grundy SM, Chandalia M, Lam C, Lowe RS, Stepanavage ME, Musliner TA, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Indices of cholesterol metabolism and relative responsiveness to ezetimibe and simvastatin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:800-809
  18. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, Darius H, Lewis BS, Ophuis TO, Jukema JW, De Ferrari GM, Ruzyllo W, De Lucca P, Im K, Bohula EA, Reist C, Wiviott SD, Tershakovec AM, Musliner TA, Braunwald E, Califf RM. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. New England Journal of Medicine 2015; 372:2387-2397
  19. Bohula EA, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA, He P, Park J-G, Murphy SA, White JA, Kesaniemi YA, Pedersen TR, Brady AJ, Mitchel Y, Cannon CP, Braunwald E. Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and Ezetimibe for Secondary Prevention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017; 69:911-921
  20. Burke AC, Telford DE, Huff MW. Bempedoic acid: effects on lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 2019; 30:1-9
  21. HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group, Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, Parish S, Aung T, Tomson J, Wallendszus K, Craig M, Jiang L, Collins R, Armitage J. Effects of Extended-Release Niacin with Laropiprant in High-Risk Patients. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 371:203-212
  22. Lee M, Saver JL, Towfighi A, Chow J, Ovbiagele B. Efficacy of fibrates for cardiovascular risk reduction in persons with atherogenic dyslipidemia: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2011; 217:492-498
  23. Guo J, Meng F, Ma N, Li C, Ding Z, Wang H, Hou R, Qin Y. Meta-Analysis of Safety of the Coadministration of Statin With Fenofibrate in Patients With Combined Hyperlipidemia. The American Journal of Cardiology 2012; 110:1296-1301
  24. Feingold KR. Triglyceride Lowering Drugs. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  25. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, Doyle RT, Juliano RA, Jiao L, Granowitz C, Tardif J-C, Ballantyne CM. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2019; 380:11-22
  26. Nicholls SJ, Lincoff AM, Garcia M, Bash D, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Davidson MH, Kastelein JJP, Koenig W, McGuire DK, Mozaffarian D, Ridker PM, Ray KK, Katona BG, Himmelmann A, Loss LE, Rensfeldt M, Lundstrom T, Agrawal R, Menon V, Wolski K, Nissen SE. Effect of High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Corn Oil on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The STRENGTH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 324:2268-2280
  27. Cuchel M, Bloedon LT, Szapary PO, Kolansky DM, Wolfe ML, Sarkis A, Millar JS, Ikewaki K, Siegelman ES, Gregg RE, Rader DJ. Inhibition of Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein in Familial Hypercholesterolemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 356:148-156
  28. Stein EA, Dufour R, Gagne C, Gaudet D, East C, Donovan JM, Chin W, Tribble DL, McGowan M. Apolipoprotein B Synthesis Inhibition With Mipomersen in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 2012; 126:2283-2292
  29. Raal FJ, Rosenson RS, Reeskamp LF, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJP, Rubba P, Ali S, Banerjee P, Chan KC, Gipe DA, Khilla N, Pordy R, Weinreich DM, Yancopoulos GD, Zhang Y, Gaudet D, Elipse HoFH Investigators. Evinacumab for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:711-720
  30. Adam RC, Mintah IJ, Alexa-Braun CA, Shihanian LM, Lee JS, Banerjee P, Hamon SC, Kim HI, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH, Van Hout C, Gromada J, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Sleeman MW, Gusarova V. Angiopoietin-like protein 3 governs LDL-cholesterol levels through endothelial lipase-dependent VLDL clearance. J Lipid Res2020; 61:1271-1286
  31. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Brumm J, Chaitman BR, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJV, Mundl H, Nicholls SJ, Shah PK, Tardif J-C, Wright RS. Effects of Dalcetrapib in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2012; 367:2089-2099
  32. HPS3/TIMI55–REVEAL Collaborative Group, Bowman L, Hopewell JC, Chen F, Wallendszus K, Stevens W, Collins R, Wiviott SD, Cannon CP, Braunwald E, Sammons E, Landray MJ. Effects of Anacetrapib in Patients with Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 377:1217-1227
  33. Lo Surdo P, Bottomley MJ, Calzetta A, Settembre EC, Cirillo A, Pandit S, Ni YG, Hubbard B, Sitlani A, Carfí A. Mechanistic implications for LDL receptor degradation from the PCSK9/LDLR structure at neutral pH. EMBO Rep 2011; 12:1300-1305
  34. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Kuder JF, Wang H, Liu T, Wasserman SM, Sever PS, Pedersen TR. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 376:1713-1722
  35. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, Edelberg JM, Goodman SG, Hanotin C, Harrington RA, Jukema JW, Lecorps G, Mahaffey KW, Moryusef A, Pordy R, Quintero K, Roe MT, Sasiela WJ, Tamby J-F, Tricoci P, White HD, Zeiher AM. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2018; 379:2097-2107
  36. Cleeman JI, Lenfant C. New guidelines for the treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults from the National Cholesterol Education Program. From controversy to consensus. Circulation 1987; 76:960-962
  37. Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. The Expert Panel. Archives of Internal Medicine 1988; 148:36-69
  38. National Cholesterol Education Program. Second Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Circulation 1994; 89:1333-1445
  39. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Bairey Merz CN, Brewer HB, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Stone NJ. Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004; 44:720-732
  40. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Watson K, Wilson PWF. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014; 63:2889-2934
  41. Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice G. In: Graham R MM, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Press; 2011.
  42. Goff DC, Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Jr., Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PWF. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014; 63:2935-2959
  43. Muntner P, Colantonio LD, Cushman M, Goff DC, Jr., Howard G, Howard VJ, Kissela B, Levitan EB, Lloyd-Jones DM, Safford MM. Validation of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Pooled Cohort risk equations. JAMA 2014; 311:1406-1415
  44. Ridker PM, Cook NR. Statins: new American guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular disease. The Lancet2013; 382:1762-1765
  45. Kavousi M, Leening MJG, Nanchen D, Greenland P, Graham IM, Steyerberg EW, Ikram MA, Stricker BH, Hofman A, Franco OH. Comparison of Application of the ACC/AHA Guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in a European Cohort. JAMA 2014; 311:1416-1423
  46. DeFilippis AP, Young R, Carrubba CJ, McEvoy JW, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS, Kronmal RA, McClelland RL, Nasir K, Blaha MJ. An analysis of calibration and discrimination among multiple cardiovascular risk scores in a modern multiethnic cohort. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:266-275
  47. Damen JA, Pajouheshnia R, Heus P, Moons KGM, Reitsma JB, Scholten RJPM, Hooft L, Debray TPA. Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019; 17:109-109
  48. Rana JS, Tabada GH, Solomon MD, Lo JC, Jaffe MG, Sung SH, Ballantyne CM, Go AS. Accuracy of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Equation in a Large Contemporary, Multiethnic Population. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016; 67:2118-2130
  49. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, Genest J, Gotto AM, Kastelein JJP, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, MacFadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Glynn RJ. Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein. New England Journal of Medicine 2008; 359:2195-2207
  50. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, Michos ED, Miedema MD, Muñoz D, Smith SC, Jr., Virani SS, Williams KA, Sr., Yeboah J, Ziaeian B. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 140:e596-e646
  51. Feingold KR. The Effect of Diet on Cardiovascular Disease and Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2021.
  52. Fonarow GC, Keech AC, Pedersen TR, Giugliano RP, Sever PS, Lindgren P, van Hout B, Villa G, Qian Y, Somaratne R, Sabatine MS. Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab Therapy for Reducing Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2:1069-1078
  53. Virani SS, Akeroyd JM, Smith SC, Al-Mallah M, Maddox TM, Morris PB, Petersen LA, Ballantyne CM, Grundy SM, Stone NJ. Very High-Risk ASCVD and Eligibility for Nonstatin Therapies Based on the 2018 AHA/ACC Cholesterol Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019; 74:712-714
  54. Khera AV, Won H-H, Peloso GM, Lawson KS, Bartz TM, Deng X, van Leeuwen EM, Natarajan P, Emdin CA, Bick AG, Morrison AC, Brody JA, Gupta N, Nomura A, Kessler T, Duga S, Bis JC, van Duijn CM, Cupples LA, Psaty B, Rader DJ, Danesh J, Schunkert H, McPherson R, Farrall M, Watkins H, Lander E, Wilson JG, Correa A, Boerwinkle E, Merlini PA, Ardissino D, Saleheen D, Gabriel S, Kathiresan S. Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Utility of Sequencing Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genes in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016; 67:2578-2589
  55. Warden BA, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Genes and Beyond. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  56. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). The Lancet 1994; 344:1383-1389
  57. Kashef MA, Giugliano G. Legacy effect of statins: 20-year follow up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS). Glob Cardiol Sci Pract 2016; 2016:e201635-e201635
  58. Feingold KR. Role of Glucose and Lipids in the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of Patients with Diabetes. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2020.
  59. Lloyd-Jones DM, Braun LT, Ndumele CE, Smith SC, Sperling LS, Virani SS, Blumenthal RS. Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2019; 139:e1162-1177
  60. Horton JD, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. PCSK9: a convertase that coordinates LDL catabolism. J Lipid Res 2009; 50 Suppl:S172-177
  61. Ference BA, Ray KK, Catapano AL, Ference TB, Burgess S, Neff DR, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Kastelein JJP, Nicholls SJ. Mendelian Randomization Study of ACLY and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1033-1042
  62. Yebyo HG, Aschmann HE, Kaufmann M, Puhan MA. Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants. American Heart Journal 2019; 210:18-28
  63. Tota-Maharaj R, Blaha MJ, Blankstein R, Silverman MG, Eng J, Shaw LJ, Blumenthal RS, Budoff MJ, Nasir K. Association of coronary artery calcium and coronary heart disease events in young and elderly participants in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: a secondary analysis of a prospective, population-based cohort. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89:1350-1359
  64. Stone NJ, Smith SC, Jr., Orringer CE, Rigotti NA, Navar AM, Khan SS, Jones DW, Goldberg R, Mora S, Blaha M, Pencina MJ, Grundy SM. Managing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Young Adults: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:819-836
  65. Streja E, Streja DA. Management of Dyslipidemia in the Elderly. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  66. Banach M, Stulc T, Dent R, Toth PP. Statin non-adherence and residual cardiovascular risk: There is need for substantial improvement. International Journal of Cardiology 2016; 225:184-196
  67. Avorn J, Monette J, Lacour A, Bohn RL, Monane M, Mogun H, LeLorier J. Persistence of Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications. JAMA 1998; 279:1458
  68. Simons LA, Levis G, Simons J. Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs. Medical Journal of Australia 1996; 164:208-211
  69. Gamboa CM, Safford MM, Levitan EB, Mann DM, Yun H, Glasser SP, Woolley JM, Rosenson R, Farkouh M, Muntner P. Statin underuse and low prevalence of LDL-C control among U.S. adults at high risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Med Sci 2014; 348:108-114
  70. Blackburn DF, Dobson RT, Blackburn JL, Wilson TW, Stang MR, Semchuk WM. Adherence to statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors following a first cardiovascular event: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Cardiol 2005; 21:485-488
  71. Tobert JA, Newman CB. The nocebo effect in the context of statin intolerance. Journal of Clinical Lipidology2016; 10:739-747
  72. Golomb BA, Evans MA. Statin Adverse Effects: a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 2008; 8:373-418
  73. Fitchett DH, Hegele RA, Verma S. Statin Intolerance. Circulation 2015; 131:e389-391
  74. Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Jr., Bairey-Merz CN, Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Lenfant C, American College of C, American Heart A, National Heart L, Blood I. ACC/AHA/NHLBI Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Circulation 2002; 106:1024-1028
  75. Nissen SE, Stroes E, Dent-Acosta RE, Rosenson RS, Lehman SJ, Sattar N, Preiss D, Bruckert E, Ceška R, Lepor N, Ballantyne CM, Gouni-Berthold I, Elliott M, Brennan DM, Wasserman SM, Somaratne R, Scott R, Stein EA. Efficacy and Tolerability of Evolocumab vs Ezetimibe in Patients With Muscle-Related Statin Intolerance. JAMA 2016; 315:1580-1590
  76. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, Hoes AW, Jennings CS, Landmesser U, Pedersen TR, Reiner Ž, Riccardi G, Taskinen M-R, Tokgozoglu L, Verschuren WMM, Vlachopoulos C, Wood DA, Zamorano JL. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias. European Heart Journal 2016; 37:2999-3058
  77. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O, Group ESCSD. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020; 41:111-188
  78. Lee JC, Zdrojewski T, Pencina MJ, Wyszomirski A, Lachacz M, Opolski G, Bandosz P, Rutkowski M, Gaciong Z, Wyrzykowski B, Navar AM. Population Effect of Differences in Cholesterol Guidelines in Eastern Europe and the United States. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1:700-707
  79. Feingold KR, Chait A. Approach to patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022:101658
  80. Feingold KR. Maximizing the benefits of cholesterol-lowering drugs. Curr Opin Lipidol 2019; 30:388-394

Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency Clinical Management

ABSTRACT

 

The clinical syndrome of GH deficiency (GHD) is characterized by non-specific features including variable presence of decreased mood and general well-being, reduced bone remodeling activity, change in body fat distribution with increased central adiposity, hyperlipidemia, and increased predisposition to atherogenesis. The goal of GH replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency is to correct the wide spectrum of associated clinical alterations. The estimated prevalence of GHD is approximately 2-3:10,000 population. GHD is caused by structural pituitary disease or cranial irradiation, and usually occurs in the context of additional features of hypopituitarism. Pituitary adenomas are the most important cause of adult-onset GHD followed by craniopharyngiomas, which combined account for 57% of cases. Less common causes are irradiation, head injury, vascular, infiltrative, infectious. and autoimmune disease. Diagnosing patients with GHD should first of all consider who should be tested for GHD, which includes patients at relevant risk with an intention to treat, and second which stimulation test to be used including the proper diagnostic cut-off concentration of GH. The diagnosis of GHD in adults is then usually straightforward. Dosage of h-GH replacement is dependent on age, and gender with adolescents and women usually requiring an increased dosage. The dose titration is monitored by IGF-I concentrations and apart from that a number of organ end points, which may act as ‘biomarkers’ of the treatment effects. This chapter provides an update on GHD including diagnostic pitfalls, and treatment effect, safety, and monitoring.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The term "midget" as description of a proportionate dwarf was first used in 1816, but it was not until 1912, that Harvey Cushing in “The Pituitary Gland” proposed the existence of a "hormone of growth" promoting skeletal growth in children (1). Growth hormone (GH) or somatrophin was first extracted from cadaveric pituitaries in the late 1950es, and other more metabolic actions of this hormone in humans were described soon after by Maurice Raben (2). The purified hormone was initially only used for the treatment of short stature in hypopituitary children, although Raben already in 1962 described general health improvement after injection of GH in a hypopituitary adult (2). Further, increasing knowledge of GH effects in adults was brought forward by the introduction in 1962 by Utiger et al of a radioimmunoassay for measuring GH in human serum (3).

 

The clinical syndrome of GH deficiency in adults is a consequence of decreased secretion of GH from the anterior pituitary. Until thirty years ago it was widely held that GH deficiency had little pathophysiological consequence despite the previously mentioned earlier anecdotal reports suggesting presence of GH-remediable symptoms of fatigue and decreased general well-being which responded to GH replacement (2). In retrospect, these observations of more than fifty years ago described quite precisely the later well-known classical features of the GH deficiency syndrome. However, the imitated supplies of cadaveric GH and the focus on pediatric usage resulted in delayed further elucidation of the adult GH deficiency state. The measurement of serum GH and the production of recombinant human GH (rhGH) in 1981 made studies of GH concentrations in adults as well as effects on the human body of GH deficiency possible, and clinical studies on replacement with rhGH could begin.

 

The initial pivotal trials of GH replacement therapy in adult hypopituitary patients were published in 1989 (4, 5). Numerous subsequent studies have provided compelling evidence for the existence of a syndrome of adult GH deficiency (6-8). This is characterized by the variable presence of decreased exercise tolerance, decreased mood and general well-being, reduced bone remodeling activity, change in body fat distribution with increased central adiposity, hyperlipidemia, and increased predisposition to atherogenesis. However, it is important to recognize that adult-onset GH deficiency is due to structural pituitary or hypothalamic disease or cranial irradiation for other pathologies and, therefore, usually occurs in the context of additional features of hypopituitarism (9, 10). For this reason, the clinical features attributable to GH deficiency may be compounded by, or directly related to, other pituitary deficiencies. Nonetheless, the fact that GH replacement therapy may favorably alter these clinical features provides considerable surrogate evidence for GH deficiency as a causal factor.

 

Adult GH deficiency is thus a well-recognized clinical entity. It causes abnormalities in substrate metabolism, bone remodeling, body composition, as well as physical, and psychosocial function. Since the mid 80-ies an improvement has been recognized with GH replacement, and this has gradually been incorporated in clinical routine based on the few short-term initial randomized clinical trials, which led to the first international consensus guidelines from Growth Hormone Research Society in 1997 (11) and updated in 2007 (12).

Fig 1. Growth hormone secretion varies throughout life. From: Ho KY et al. (13)

Less well recognized is the fact that the early clinical trials were based on selected groups of patients with very severe hypopituitarism and therefore had a high a priory likelihood of severe GH deficiency, there were few study participants, short-term treatment, and supraphysiological GH doses were calculated based on the experience from childhood GH deficiency. Despite knowledge of the very high influence of age on the secretion of GH (Fig 1) and subsequently on Insulin-like-Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) the initial adult doses in the studies were nevertheless chosen too high (4, 5). Most of the current recommendations and guidelines over the years have thus been based on subsequent retrospective single center experience or data from large surveillance databases run by the pharmaceutical industry as the best surrogates for efficacy and safety of GH therapy of adult GH deficiency (14). The Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study (HypoCCS) compiled data from 5,893 patients on Humatrope® and reported that significant shifts in diagnostic patterns have occurred over 10 years after approval of the adult GH deficiency indication, with a trend to less severe forms of GH deficiency (15). This was further documented in a recent publication from KIMS (Pfizer’s International Metabolic Database) where data compiled over 20 years were retrieved for a total of 6,069 patients with adult-onset GH deficiency and treated with Genotropin® from six countries (Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and UK). The degree of confirmed GH deficiency became less pronounced and more patients with co-morbidities and diabetes were considered for GH replacement therapy, possibly reflecting increased knowledge and confidence in GH therapy gained with time. Thus, the effects of 1 year of GH replacement were similar over the entry year periods despite changes in the patients’ baseline characteristics (16).

 

Also, less well recognized is the fact that new possible indications for testing and treatment of GH deficiency have emerged and these very likely have a lower a priori likelihood of the disease than the severely hypopituitary patients initially investigated thus challenging the diagnostic criteria laid down for severe GH deficiency. Clinicians are therefore now dealing with other patient populations as, e.g. traumatic brain injury, where neither testing nor treatment efficacy have been scrutinized sufficiently (17) and where current guidelines therefore may fail to apply correctly.

 

This chapter is an update of our chapter from 2017 which was in turn based on the previous chapter on the topic written by John Monson, Antonia Brooke and Scott Akker and the update will describe the diagnostic procedures, as well as the clinical consequences and management of adult patient with GH deficiency. The basic physiology of GH and the pathophysiology of GH deficiency in adults have been dealt with in other Endotext chapters (www.endotext.org).

 

PREVALENCE, INCIDENCE, AND ETIOLOGY OF GH DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS

 

The true prevalence and incidence rate of adult-onset GH deficiency is difficult to estimate with certainty. A reasonable estimate of the prevalence may be obtained from prevalence data for pituitary macroadenomas, which approximate to 1-2:10,000 population (20-22). Addition of cases of childhood-onset GH deficiency persisting into adult life gives an overall prevalence of 2-3:10,000 population. Incidence rates have been assessed in a Danish nationwide study based on registries (23), including 1,823 patients who were divided in males and females with childhood and adult onset GH deficiency, respectively. The average incidence rates were for childhood onset males, 2.58 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.30-2.88), childhood onset females, 1.70 (95% CI, 1.48-1.96), adult-onset males, 1.90 (95% CI, 1.77-2.04), and adult-onset females, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.31-1.54) all per 100,000, which are slightly higher than previously reported (24, 25). The incidence rate in the Danish study was significantly higher in males compared to females in the childhood onset GH deficiency group and in the adult-onset GH deficiency group in the age ranges of 45-64 and 65+years, while there was no significant gender difference in the 18-44 years age group. The etiology spectrum of GH deficiency is summarized in figure 2.

Figure 2. Congenital and acquired causes of growth hormone deficiency

Pituitary adenomas are statistically the most important cause of adult-onset GH deficiency followed by craniopharyngiomas, which combined account for 57% of cases in the study based on data from KIMS, a multinational, pharmacoepidemiological surveillance database for adult hypopituitary patients receiving GH replacement with Genotropin® (Table 1) (26). Over a decade, there was a decrease in patients enrolled in the surveillance databases with diagnoses of pituitary adenoma (50.2 to 38.6%; P<0.001); craniopharyngioma (13.3 to 8.4%; P=0.005) and pituitary hemorrhage (5.8 to 2.8%; P=0.001); increases in idiopathic GH deficiency (13.9 to 19.3%; P<0.001) and undefined/unknown diagnosis (1.3 to 8.6%; P<0.001) in HypoCCS(15).

 

Table 1. Etiology in Patients with GH Deficiency (from the KIMS database)

Etiology category

Category components

   n

Patient-years

Pituitary adenoma

Non-functioning adenoma

5261

28 065

 

Prolactinoma

 

 

 

Gonadotropinoma

 

 

 

Thyrotropinoma

 

 

Cushing's disease

Cushing's disease

859

4814

Acromegaly

Acromegaly

239

1396

Pituitary atrophy

Congenital

2496

10 535

 

Idiopathic

 

 

 

Empty sella

 

 

Craniopharyngioma

Craniopharyngioma

1562

8392

Benign tumor/lesion

Hamartoma

462

2114

 

Cyst

 

 

 

Meningioma

 

 

 

Schwannoma

 

 

Aggressive tumor  (+hematological neoplasm)

Germ cell tumor

1135

5552

 

Glioma

 

 

 

Chordoma

 

 

 

Sarcoma

 

 

 

Astrocytoma

 

 

 

Ependymoma

 

 

 

Medulloblastoma

 

 

 

Leukemia

 

 

 

Lymphoma

 

 

Miscellaneous etiology

Traumatic brain injury

1969

8189

 

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

 

 

 

Aneurysm

 

 

 

Sheehan's syndrome

 

 

 

Hydrocephalus

 

 

 

Granulomatosis

 

 

 

Histiocytosis

 

 

 

Hypophysitis

 

 

 

Hemochromatosis

 

 

 

Missing etiology

 

 

From: Gaillard et al (26)

 

Irradiation includes both pituitary tumors but also other forms of childhood and adult cranial irradiation. Less common causes of adult hypopituitarism are head injury (27), postpartum ischemic necrosis [Sheehan’s syndrome], pituitary apoplexy, infiltrative diseases, and autoimmune lymphocytic hypophysitis. Traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage are increasingly recognized as a cause of hypopituitarism, in particular GH deficiency, which the recently updated guidelines from American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology indicated to be one of the most common causes of adult GH deficiency seen in clinical practice (18). Several anti-cancer drugs modulating the immune system and used for antineoplastic purposes may result in hypophysitis with hypofunction including GH deficiency (29, 30), and the list of drugs influencing GH secretion may be increasing, perhaps also including treatment of patient groups with autoimmune diseases.

 

Most cases of adult GH deficiency arise in adulthood, but a proportion of them are suffering from childhood onset GH deficiency thus also including congenital causes. The proportion in each clinical center will depend on referral practice. In the Danish nationwide study 27% of GH deficiency patients were of childhood origin (23). The congenital cases (figure 2) are due to structural lesions such as Rathke’s pouch cysts, pituitary hypoplasia, and midline defects, or to functionally deficient GH biosynthesis and release such as pituitary-specific transcription factors (PROP1, POU1F1, HESX1, LHX3, LHX4), and LEPR or IGSF1. Thus, childhood-onset GH deficiency due to proven genetic defects in GH synthesis is never reversible and therefore does not require retesting prior to treatment on adult indication. The reversibility of isolated idiopathic GH deficiency of childhood is on the other hand well established with normal GH responses on dynamic testing in various series being described in between 30 and 70% of subjects with confirmed GH deficiencies in childhood at completion of linear growth (31-33). Therefore, childhood-onset isolated GH deficiency should always be challenged by rigorous re-evaluation of causes and retesting at completion of final height.

Fig 3. Mean (±SEM) serum GH response to insulin hypoglycemia in normal subjects (▲) and obese subjects before (●) and after (○) weight loss. From: Rasmussen et al (34).

Isolated idiopathic GH deficiency is not accepted as de novo deficiency in adults at this point in time. This is particularly important in the assessment of non-specific symptoms in ageing or overweight persons without additional evidence of pituitary disease; body mass index of >32 kg/m2 is associated with reduced GH reserve on dynamic testing in approximately 30% of patients but this is reversible with weight loss (Fig 3) (34-37). However, combined deficiency of GH and other anterior pituitary hormones, in the absence of structural disease, may be a feature of an evolving endocrinopathy due to deficiencies of the transcription factors PIT-1 or Prop-1. These cases, and possibly also others, may account for some of the patients with isolated GH deficiency developing into multiple pituitary hormone insufficiencies in 6-65% of cases over time (Fig 4) (38-40).

Fig 4. Number of patients with GH deficiency and at least one additional pituitary deficit at baseline who developed central hypothyroidism, hypoadrenalism, hypogonadism or ADH deficiency in relation to years from baseline. From: Klose et al (38)

The sequence of loss of pituitary functions is displayed in Fig 5, demonstrating that GH deficiency usually occurs early in the progression of pituitary insufficiency, at least in pituitary adenomas (10). Normalization of GH but also other deficiencies are sometimes observed after selective adenectomy (41-43).

Fig 5. Sequence of pituitary hormone loss in relation to increasing mass effect from a pituitary tumor. From: Feldt-Rasmussen & Klose (10)

CLINICAL FEATURES OF GH DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS

 

Adult GH deficiency is associated with an extensive array of non-specific symptoms and physical signs, which are nevertheless recognized by experienced endocrinologists to justify their designation as a clinical syndrome (6-8, 44). Typical symptoms and signs are listed in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Typical Symptoms and Signs of the Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency Syndrome

Body composition

·       increased body fat, particularly central adiposity

·       decreased muscle mass

·       decreased muscle function

Cardiovascular and metabolism

·       decreased sweating and poor thermoregulation

·       decreased insulin sensitivity and increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance

·       increased total and LDL cholesterol and Apo B. Decreased HDL cholesterol

·       accelerated atherogenesis

·       a variable decrease in cardiac muscle mass

·       impaired cardiac function

·       decreased exercise capacity

·       decreased total and extracellular fluid volume

·       increased concentration of plasma fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor type I

Bones

·       decreased bone mineral density, associated with an increased risk of fracture

Quality of Life

·       depressed mood

·       reduced concentration

·       increased anxiety

·       fatigue

·       lack of energy levels

·       low self-esteem

·       increased sick days

·       social isolation

·       lack of positive well being

 

Body Composition and Heart

 

GH deficiency is characterized by substantial changes in body composition with increments in total fat, percentage fat, and particularly visceral fat mass (45-52). Methodologies employed for this purpose have included dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (53), bioelectrical impedance (6-8), CT scan of specific body parts, or the simple measurement of the ratio of waist to hip circumference (52-56) (Table 2) and there is complete concordance among all studies which have examined these aspects in hypopituitary adults. Importantly, although the prevalence of obesity is increased in hypopituitary adults, the increment in visceral fat is also evident in those patients who are non-obese (45). In parallel with changes in fat mass, lean body mass is reduced. The latter may explain the reductions in muscle strength (57-59) and exercise tolerance, which have been documented in adult GH deficiency. The degree to which lean body mass is reduced is difficult to determine because of the reduction in total body water which is also evident in the GH deficiency state; body composition measurements, particularly bioelectrical impedance, may overestimate changes in lean body mass as a consequence of alterations in tissue hydration. Furthermore, the reduction in extracellular water, which is compounded by reduced total body sodium in GH deficiency, may be a major factor underlying the reported reductions in exercise capacity (60-64). To this may be added the effect of reduced left ventricular mass and function which have been described in a number of studies (65-75), although some of these studies on cardiac function in GH deficiency have been less clear.

 

Glucose Metabolism

 

In contrast to GH deficiency occurring in children, adult GH deficiency is associated with relative insulin resistance (45, 76-79) and an increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus (76). The adverse changes in insulin sensitivity are predictably most obvious in obese patients but are also evident in hypopituitary patients with normal body mass index in whom the inverse relationship between insulin sensitivity and central fat mass, which characterizes the 'metabolic syndrome' is clearly seen (45, 76-79). It is therefore likely that the changes in insulin sensitivity observed in adult GH deficiency are due predominantly to increases in central fat mass. Interestingly, adult subjects with lifetime congenital untreated isolated GH deficiency have reduced β-cell function, no evidence of insulin resistance, and a higher frequency of impaired glucose tolerance (79).Thus, lifetime, untreated isolated GH deficiency increases insulin sensitivity, but impairs β-cell function, and does not provide protection from diabetes (79, 80). It has been postulated that changes in body composition and particularly fat mass might be a consequence of unphysiological glucocorticoid replacement. Against this is the fact that the doses of glucocorticoid replacement used in primary adrenal failure, which are similar to those used in hypopituitarism, are not associated with abnormalities of body composition. However, local tissue exposure to either endogenous or exogenous cortisol may be different in secondary as opposed to primary adrenal failure. The GH/IGF-I axis is now recognized to be an important modulator of the activity of the enzyme 11b hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase Type 1 (11bHSD1) (81). This isoenzyme acts as a predominant reductase, particularly in liver and adipose tissue, increasing the net conversion of inactive cortisone to the active cortisol. The activity of the enzyme is decreased by GH and, as a consequence GH deficiency is associated with a shift in the equilibrium set point in favor of cortisol. It is therefore possible that the increase in central adiposity, which characterizes the GH deficiency state, could be compounded by enhanced exposure to cortisol within adipocytes; hepatic metabolism might be perturbed by a similar mechanism. These mechanisms would tend to increase serum cortisol concentrations in patients receiving hydrocortisone replacement, which is quite often supraphysiological doses, but not in patients with intact ACTH reserve in whom negative feedback would determine maintenance of stable circulating cortisol concentrations. However, GH is also a negative determinant of serum cortisol binding globulin and therefore comparisons of serum total cortisol concentrations between GH deficient and GH replete states are not valid.

 

Atherosclerosis Risk Factors- Lipids and Hypertension

 

Adult GH deficiency is associated with an increase in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (4-8, 82, 83). A modest decrement in HDL-cholesterol has also been described in some studies. These changes are evident in both sexes and are quantitatively greater in women. Despite GH deficiency related sodium and water depletion, an increased prevalence of hypertension in adult hypopituitarism has been documented and may be related to a reduced activity of nitric oxide synthase, and consequent increased peripheral vascular resistance, as a result of GH deficiency. The changes in lipoprotein metabolism, body composition, insulin sensitivity, and peripheral vascular resistance indicated above would predict increased atherogenesis in the GH deficiency state. Indeed, several studies have reported an increase in ultrasonographically determined intima-media thickness and plaque formation in large arteries of patients with adult-onset GH deficiency as well as in adults with childhood-onset disease (84, 85).

 

Bone Mineralization

 

Decreased bone mineral density is a recognized phenomenon in adult hypopituitary patients (53, 82, 86-92) and is associated with an increased fracture risk (Fig 6) (92-96). Measurements of markers of bone formation and bone resorption are consistent with a low bone turnover state in GH deficiency. Deficits in bone mineral content and density are more striking in adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency and this is likely to be a consequence of failure to achieve genetic potential peak bone mass either because of inadequate GH replacement in childhood or its early cessation at the time of slowing of linear growth (86). Failure to achieve peak bone mass has important implications for the future development of osteoporosis and fracture risk. In the study by Lange et al (96), it was found that patients with idiopathic childhood onset GH deficiency, who at retest in adulthood did not have GH deficiency according to adult criteria, had reduced serum IGF-I and BMD/BMC compared to controls. This observation was also made in the patients who did have persistent GH deficiency in adulthood. The findings may reflect the fact that the present diagnostic criteria for adult GH deficiency (i.e., response to the ITT) do not reflect the clinical consequences of disordered GH-IGF axis in childhood onset GH deficiency young adults who were treated with GH in childhood. Alternatively, despite seemingly adequate GH treatment in childhood an optimal peak bone mass in adolescence may never have been reached in either of the groups. Noteworthy, IGF-I levels correlated with clinical signs of the adult GH deficiency syndrome. The situation in hypopituitarism is further complicated by the frequent accompaniment of gonadal steroid deficiency, often of unknown duration, which has a documented effect on the BMD (97). In addition, glucocorticoid replacement for primary adrenal failure is associated with modest reductions in bone mineral density, but over-replacement in hypopituitary patients does accelerate bone loss (98). Thus, glucocorticoid over-replacement may increase the prevalence of vertebral fractures in patients with untreated GH deficiency. However, treatment of GH deficiency seems to protect the skeleton from the deleterious effects of glucocorticoid overtreatment in hypopituitary patients. Along the same line, data suggest that the characteristics of patients in the various diagnostic groups of hypopituitarism depend on the primary disease which resulted in GH deficiency, and that the clinical expression of GH deficiency does not differ between the groups. Patients with previous hypercortisolism showed more long-term effects of their disease, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and fractures (99), and patients with former Cushing’s disease have more fractures (100). Furthermore, Lange et al reported abnormal bone collagen morphology and decreased bone strength in rats with isolated GH deficiency (101), which might provide a co-explanation for the increased fracture rate in GH deficiency. Whether similar conditions are present in patients with GH deficiency needs further study, but results from a human study of muscle and tendon biopsies from patients with GH deficiency or acromegaly indicated a collagen-stimulating role of local IGF-I in human connective tissue and add to the understanding of musculoskeletal pathology in patients with either high or low GH/IGF-I axis activity (102).

Fig. 6. Comparisons of the prevalence of (A) all fractures in the EVOS (European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study) participants and in KIMS participants over the age of 60 years and (B) all fractures in naïve and non-naïve KIMS patients and of fractures of the radius in naïve and non-naïve and in patients with adult onset (AO) and childhood onset (CO) disease. From: Wüster et al (92)

Nonetheless, available evidence indicates that qualitatively similar changes in bone mineral density are found in adult-onset isolated GH deficiency as in panhypopituitarism, therefore supporting a role for GH deficiency in the pathogenesis. Furthermore, these abnormalities in bone metabolism and bone density are favorably influenced by GH replacement (see later).

 

Quality of Life

 

Decreased psychological well-being and quality of life (QoL) are recognized as particularly important for patients with GH deficiency and from the patients' perspective they have arguably become the major indication for GH replacement therapy. In some countries such as UK, decreased QoL is a needed symptom of a certain quantitative level as measured by validated GH deficiency questionnaires before even considering testing and treatment for GH deficiency according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence or NICE (103). QoL is also related to a number of other features of GH deficiency. Thus Chikani et al. found subnormal anaerobic capacity, which independently predicted stair-climbing capacity and QoL in adults with GH deficiency. The authors concluded that GH regulates anaerobic capacity, which determines QoL and selective aspects of physical function (Fig 7) (104).

Fig 7. Relationship between stair-climb performance and anaerobic power (A) and VO2max (B), and between daily step counts quantified by pedometry and anaerobic power (C) and VO2max (D) in the combined groups of 13 adults with GHD (●) and matched normal subjects (○). LBM, lean body mass; VO2max, maximal oxygen consumption. From: Chikani et al (104)

QoL issues have been examined using various generic measures including the Nottingham Health Profile and the Psychological General Well Being Schedule (105-108). These instruments determine various aspects of health-related and needs-based quality of life and the most prevalent findings from various studies have been deficits in the domains of mood, anxiety, and social interaction. In one of the studies the Nottingham Health profile was adapted to a 9-year follow-up study of adults with untreated GH deficiency. During this 9-year study, small but significant declines in health were observed in GH-deficient adults who remained untreated. By contrast, the patients who received GH continuously experienced improvements in energy levels while all other areas of QoL were maintained. The beneficial effects of GH on QoL are therefore maintained with long-term GH replacement and obviate the reduction in QoL seen over time in untreated GH-deficient adults (106). Although these findings are readily apparent in many patients with adult-onset GH deficiency, it has proven more difficult to discern similar phenomena in patients with childhood-onset disease. This may be due to at least two factors. Firstly, standard generic quality of life instruments may be insensitive in the investigation of young people and secondly, there may be a major element of psychological adaptation or decreased expectation when the condition has commenced early in life. In an attempt to improve the reproducibility of studies of QoL in adults with GH deficiency, questionnaires have been developed which focus on those symptoms, which are most frequently documented in hypopituitary adults during extended open interviews.

 

One such instrument, which is now widely used for the baseline and longitudinal follow-up of patients, is the Quality-of-Life Assessment in Growth Hormone Deficient Adults (QoL-AGHDA) (107-111), which is also the one required by NICE. This is a needs-based instrument consisting of 25 questions with a yes/no answer format and the final score is obtained by summating all the positive responses; a higher score, to a maximum of 25, denotes poorer quality of life. The questionnaire has been shown to be reproducible in a variety of languages and satisfies Rasch analysis criteria for unidimensionality, construct validity, and hierarchical ordering of items (108).  In the long-term KIMS study surprisingly, QoL-AGHDA scores increased, indicating worsening of QoL across the entry year periods(16). This possibly reflected a patient selection bias, due to the change in the underlying etiology of GH deficiency: for example, the increase in the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury or other less defined diagnoses may affect QoL. Alternatively, patients with poor QoL were more likely to receive GH treatment (15).     

 

Mortality

 

Over the past decades it has been increasingly recognized that hypopituitarism is associated with premature mortality. Studies in Sweden and the UK have demonstrated a two-to-three-fold increase in standardized mortality ratio, most striking in women (112-115). Specific pituitary pathologies, especially craniopharyngioma, may convey an increased mortality rate, which is likely to be independent of specific hormonal deficiencies (114). However, bearing in mind the numerical preponderance of pituitary macroadenomas as the cause of hypopituitarism, the overall findings from these studies favor an increase in morbidity and mortality from macrovascular disease and, in one of the Swedish studies, predominantly cerebrovascular disease (113). The increase in cardiovascular mortality in the initial Swedish study (116) was paralleled by a reduction in deaths from malignant disease in males but this has not been a definite feature of subsequent observations.

 

Much debate surrounds the mechanism for increased prevalence of vascular disease. These patients were replaced with glucocorticoids, thyroxine, and in some cases gonadal steroids, which prompted the conclusion that untreated GH deficiency was the major causal factor (117). However, this interpretation assumed that replacement of adrenal and thyroid deficiency was optimal and must also take into account that estrogen deficiency may not have been replaced. In fact, replacement, particularly with hydrocortisone, was often supraphysiological (118-120), while thyroxine replacement was more likely underdosed (10, 120-123), and estrogen is often not replaced in females of the fertile age (124). Recent clinical practice has rectified this mistake and consequently hydrocortisone doses are now significantly lower and thyroxine doses significantly higher than when the original mortality data were collected. Anecdotally, a recent paper on lifelong untreated isolated GH deficiency due to a mutation in the GH releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor gene found no alteration of longevity in this highly selected genetic background (125).Nonetheless, the fact that untreated GH deficiency, in the context of varying degrees of hypopituitarism, is associated with an adverse cardiovascular risk profile provides circumstantial evidence for a causative role for GH deficiency to mediate increased rates of vascular disease (45, 54, 77, 84, 85).

 

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES

 

GH is secreted in a pulsatile fashion with serum measurements varying between peaks and troughs, the latter falling below the assay detection limit of conventional radioimmunoassays. For this reason, a diagnosis of GH deficiency cannot be made by measurement of baseline serum GH concentration although a single serum GH measurement taken fortuitously at the time of a secretory peak may serve to exclude GH deficiency. Therefore, the diagnosis of GH deficiency is dependent on the demonstration of a subnormal rise in serum GH in response to one or more dynamic stimulation tests. Many diagnostic tests have been developed for GH deficiency, most of them for patients with established hypothalamo-pituitary disease with a high a priori test outcome for deficiency. The same tests are now also used for diagnosing GH deficiency in a number of other potential patient populations raising high risk of misuse and wasting of resources. Further, the technical performance of hormone assays is highly variable among different laboratories(126). Thus, diagnosing patients with GH deficiency should first of all consider who should be tested for GH deficiency, the validity of the chosen stimulation test including the proper diagnostic cut-off concentration of GH, and the availability of local resources and expertise. As stated in the 2019 ACCE/ACE paper, cases with no suggestive history such as hypothalamo-pituitary disease or cranial therapy i.e., cases with a low pretest probability or low a priori likelihood of GH deficiency (18), GH stimulation testing should not be performed.

 

The recommendations for stimulation testing of patients for adult GH deficiency are provided in the guidelines mentioned in Fig. 8 (11, 12, 18, 19). Noteworthy all guidelines mention the patients eligible for testing as having either hypothalamo-pituitary pathology, verified GH deficiency in childhood, or have had intracranial irradiation. Options include the insulin tolerance test (ITT), glucagon test, and combinations of arginine and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) or GH secretagogues. Recently, the macimorelin test was approved for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (127).

Fig 8. Guideline recommendations for whom to test for GH deficiency.

Fig 9. Plasma human growth hormone (HGH) and blood glucose concentrations after insulin administered intravenously. (PAR, a hypophysectomized patient; other patients, normal). From: Roth et al (128)

The first description of stimulation of GH upon hypoglycemia was published already in 1963 (128) (Fig 9), and the insulin stimulation test (ITT) is still considered the ‘gold’ standard stimulation test for GH deficiency.

 

The ITT is the best validated test, and  has been demonstrated to distinguish reliably between GH responses in patients with structural pituitary disease and those of age matched controls across the adult age range (Fig 10A) (129). A variety of serum GH cut off points have been used to define GH deficiency. However, an international consensus (convened by the Growth Hormone Research Society) has defined severe GH deficiency in adults as a peak response to ITT of <3 µg/L (11).

 

It is essential that the ITT is carried out in dedicated units under strict supervision by experienced staff and it is contraindicated in patients with epilepsy and/or ischemic heart disease. The ITT may have a questionable reproducibility, probably due to low degree of robustness to everyday life as it strongly depends on pre-test events as well as on the patient (130, 131). Further, the ITT holds a certain risk especially in inexperienced hands (132), although it is quite safe in experienced centers (133).

                          

A particular advantage of insulin and glucagon testing is the simultaneous assessment of the adequacy of ACTH reserve. Combinations of GHRH and either arginine, pyridostigmine (or GH secretagogues) are the most potent stimuli of GH secretion and normative data for these tests have been set to define GH deficiency (28, 134-136). These tests appear to be reliable and practical, with few contraindications and the GHRH + arginine test may eventually replace ITT as the diagnostic test of choice (134, 137) in European countries. However, peak GH in response to these tests as well as to the glucagon test is highly affected by BMI, and thus BMI related cut off levels are mandatory (135).

 

Choice of stimulation test may be quite difficult, and the evidence from studies is variable. Furthermore, GHRH is not available in USA, which has prompted reassessment of the use of the glucagon as alternative test when ITT is contraindicated (18, 138-141). However, the diagnostic accuracy of the glucagon stimulation test is unclear especially in patients who are overweight. Recently, the macimorelin test showed promising good overall agreement with the ITT at the same cut point, and seemed unaffected by BMI, age, and sex (127), and is now considered a good alternative.

Fig 10. Results of tests of GH deficiency in normal (○) and hypopituitary patients (●). From: Hoffman et al (129)

As a result of an age related increase in somatostatinergic tone, spontaneous GH secretion declines by approximately 14% per decade of adult life but this does not alter substantially the response to dynamic tests of GH reserve and the same cut-off GH concentrations can be used across the age range (142). However, several tests pose more risks in elderly individuals (e.g., ITT, glucagon) compared to the young (141, 143), and older people are more likely to be obese with a high waist circumference. They are therefore more at risk of getting a false positive test outcome (144, 145), at least if not lowering the cut-off GH concentration. In general, to avoid misdiagnosing hypopituitary patients with GH deficiency, the importance of using local laboratory assay and test specific cut-off concentrations cannot be overemphasized (28, 146-149).

 

Severe obesity may decrease the GH response to insulin hypoglycemia to levels suggestive of GH deficiency but this is a completely reversible phenomenon if weight loss is achieved (Fig 3) (34). Body composition is by far the most important factor that needs to be considered when GH responses are evaluated and waist corrected GH-responses may be superior to BMI-corrected cut-offs (130). However, regarding the impact of BMI or waist circumference on GH-responses, further studies are needed to establish cut-off values also considering age, sex and ethnicity. Glucocorticoid therapy, including substitution therapy, probably reduces GH-responses to the GHRH + arginine test in line with the PD–GHRH test (150). Failure to recognize the impact of obesity on stimulated GH secretion may result in a false positive diagnosis of GH deficiency (28, 34, 37, 149, 151) and it is now standard practice that the diagnosis should be made in conjunction with evidence of structural pituitary disease and/or the documentation of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies. The latter provide robust support for a diagnosis of GH deficiency because of the increasing probability of GH deficiency in the presence of one (c.80%) or more (c.90%) additional pituitary trophic hormone deficiencies (152, 153) (Fig 11). Sadly, one publication (154) documented that many centers do not comply with recommendations, since the percent of patients meeting recommended test-specific cut points varied from 32 to 100%, depending on the stimulation test used. There was no mentioning of laboratory or assay specific cut-off concentrations. The study thereby highlights the need for continued education regarding treatment guidelines for adult GH deficiency, including the testing procedures.

Fig 11. Likelihood of GH deficiency related to number of pituitary hormone deficiencies other than GH deficiency. From: Sönksen PH et al. (155)

GH secretory reserve may also be assessed by measurement of serum concentrations of the GH-dependent peptides IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and the acid labile subunit of the ternary complex (ALS). Of these, IGF-I is the most sensitive marker of GH action and provides a reliable test of GH reserve in childhood-onset disease. Its diagnostic value for GH deficiency is limited by the fact that between 30 and 40% of individuals with severe GH deficiency of adult-onset will demonstrate a serum IGF-I concentration in the low part of the normal age related reference range (116). Nonetheless, in the absence of liver dysfunction or malnutrition, which may secondarily reduce IGF-I generation, and if determined in the appropriate clinical context of pituitary disease and hypopituitarism, a decreased serum IGF-I provides a strong confirmatory indication for GH deficiency (129).

 

Testing of patients with suspected non-classical causes of hypopituitarism is much more challenging, since most available evidence of diagnostic reliability has been based on patients with structural hypothalamo-pituitary pathology, genetic causes of GH deficiency, documented GH deficiency in childhood, or brain irradiation. In recent years there has been considerable focus on etiologies previously considered rare causes of hypopituitarism. Published series of hypopituitarism in traumatic brain injury  and subarachnoid hemorrhage suggested prevalence rates up to 25-50% (17, 156, 157), and both traumatic brain injury  and subarachnoid hemorrhage were subsequently highlighted in the guidelines as new indication for GH testing (12, 19). Still it is notable that the large majority of these patients had isolated deficiencies and in particular isolated GH deficiency (27). Acknowledging the many aforementioned caveats for the diagnosis of GH deficiency these cases may have been strongly overemphasized also because most data were based on only single testing. The fairness of such concerns was evident in a Danish study showing a low concordance of repeated testing for GH deficiency in TBI (Fig 12) (28), which underlines the importance of stringent testing including a second confirmatory test in patients with low a-priory likelihood of GH deficiency. This approach is consistent with the ACCE/ACE 2019 guidelines (18).

Fig 12. The prevalence of insufficient test responses in the total cohort (A) and in the subgroup undergoing dual testing (B). A, Prevalence of insufficient test responses to either ITT or PD-GHRH/GHRH-arg (i.e., combined tests) in the total cohort of TBI patients (black columns) and healthy controls (white columns), respectively, as defined by either local or guideline-derived cutoffs. Whiskers indicate the 95% CI. GHD was more frequently diagnosed in TBI patients tested by a combined test as compared with ITT, and even more so if guideline cutoff values were applied instead of local cutoffs. The results from healthy controls illustrate the high false-positive rate resulting from application of guideline-derived cutoffs, which was significantly above the generally accepted 2.5% for the combined tests (P = .02). *, P < .005 compared with patients. B, Prevalence of insufficient test responses in the subgroups of patients (black columns, n = 169) and controls (white columns, n = 117) undergoing dual testing, as defined by either local cutoff values or guideline-derived cutoff values. Confirmed insufficiency was defined as a concordant positive result to both the ITT and a combined test. Whiskers indicate the 95% CI. [Reproduced with permission]. From: Klose et al. (28)

Main Conclusions

 

True GH deficiency is an important clinical entity that should be tested, treated, and managed properly. On the other hand, it is important to avoid false diagnosis, which might lead to unnecessary life-long therapy with GH replacement.

 

The diagnosis of GH deficiency is rather simple in patients with a typical structural pathology in the hypothalamo-pituitary region, especially in cases of multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies and low IGF-I concentrations, where the likelihood of GH deficiency exceeds 97% (Fig 11), and a stimulation test is rarely indicated (Fig 8). In all other cases a stimulation test is needed for the diagnosis and in some patients 2 tests should be performed in order to avoid the risk of overtreatment on a false basis. The knowledge of one’s own laboratory performance as well as own reference population data with BMI cut offs for control persons is crucial in interpretation of results. The same holds true for the testing of the other hormone axes, some of which have similar challenges in diagnosing correctly in hypothalamo-pituitary disease states.

 

New indications for GH deficiency testing should not be accepted without prior stringent evaluation of test reliability for the particular condition in question by several tests, and preferably in different laboratories, given that the classical GH deficiency phenotype such as obesity, fatigue and QoL often has other causes than GH deficiency.

 

Table 3. Strategy for Diagnosing Adult GH Deficiency for the Purpose of Replacement Therapy

  • Assess basis for hypopituitary diagnosis
  • Check if the patient is eligible for GH replacement
  • Measure IGF-I age related reference SDS – if below 0 SDS continue testing
  • Assess number of other pituitary hormone deficiencies
  • Make sure other pituitary hormone deficiencies are properly replaced
  • Choose GH stimulation test(s)
  • Perform stimulation test according to:
    • Guidelines
    • Proper local test validation
    • Own reference cut off based on local assay and normal reference population
    • BMI
    • Other confounders
  • MR/CT scan of pituitary in patients with abnormalities
  • QoL assessment (e.g., QoL-AGHDA)(requirement in UK)
  • Severe GH deficiency as defined by the respective GH stimulation tests (fig. 8)

 

GH: Growth Hormone; SDS: Standard Deviation Score; IGF-I: Insulin like Growth factor-I; BMI: Body mass index; MR: Magnetic Resonance; CT: Computer Tomography; QoL: Quality of Life; AGHDA: Adult growth hormone deficiency assessment.

 

RESPONSE TO GH REPLACEMENT IN ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY

 

Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being              

 

Potentially, the greatest immediate indication for growth hormone supplementation is in patients who are assessed as having impaired QoL, and this is in some countries, such as the UK, a prerequisite for reimbursement (table 4) (103). This recommendation from NICE is unchanged and has not been updated.

 

Table 4. NICE Recommendations for Treatment with Growth Hormone

NICE has recommended that recombinant human growth hormone should be used only for adults with severe growth hormone deficiency that is severely affecting their quality of life. To be a part of this group, NICE says a person should:

● have a peak growth hormone response of less than 9 mU/L (<3 µg/L) in the ‘insulin tolerance test’ for growth hormone deficiency or a similar low result in another reliable test, and

● have an impaired quality of life because of their growth hormone deficiency (judged using a specific questionnaire called the 'Quality of life assessment of growth hormone deficiency in adults’ designed to assess the quality of life in people with growth hormone deficiency; a person should score at least 11 in this questionnaire), and

● already be receiving replacement hormone treatment for any other deficiencies of pituitary hormones if he or she has one or more other deficiencies.

From: NICE guidelines (103)

 

The early high dose placebo controlled trials suggested that around 50% of these patients demonstrated a significant improvement and a desire to continue with replacement longer term (8). The greatest benefit was shown in patients who had severe GH deficiency and greater distress, in terms of energy and vitality, prior to commencing GH. More recent experience using lower doses with fewer side effects, also indicated clear improvement with wish to continue in >90% of patients selected on the basis of a perceived QoL deficit (53, 158). A six-month course of optimally titrated GH replacement is usually needed before the benefits can be assessed clearly, although many patients show a substantial improvement in QoL within three months. For reasons that are unclear, a small proportion of patients (<20%) may not demonstrate significant subjective benefit in QoL until 9 to 12 months after commencing treatment (159). It is important to recognize that the time taken to achieve a maintenance dose of GH may extend to 12 weeks in some patients and is longer on average in women than in men; this should be recognized in therapeutic trials of GH replacement with a finite time frame. It is clear that the time taken to derive subjective benefit from GH replacement in many patients provides strong evidence against a pure placebo effect in this respect. Furthermore, the duration of benefit in QoL, which has been observed for periods of up to 10 years, is similarly indicative of a therapeutic rather than a placebo phenomenon (106, 111, 160). Patients QoL improves most rapidly in the first 12 months of treatment, but even after this there is continued improvement towards the country specific population mean, with particular improvement in problems socializing, tenseness, and self-confidence, which normalize to the background population (161). The improvement is seen in patients with all etiologies of GH deficiency including previous acromegaly (162-164), isolated GH deficiency (56) and previous Cushing’s disease (99, 100). However, not all aspects of QoL normalize and this is particularly true in patients under 60 yrs of age.

 

The reasons for the differences in QoL outcome between the early studies and current clinical practice has been the subject of much debate and at least three factors are likely to be particularly relevant. Firstly, the initial randomized control trials utilized GH doses based on body weight or surface area and did not take account of the substantial variation in individual responsiveness to GH occurring as a result of gender and other factors. This strategy resulted in excessive GH doses in men and obese subjects and relative undertreatment of women. The adverse symptoms associated with excess GH doses included arthralgia and myalgia, due to GH-induced anti-natriuresis, and it is probable that these factors may have obscured potential subjective benefit. In addition, it is probable that the strict entry criteria inherent in any placebo-controlled study designed to prove concept may have inadvertently eliminated patients who were most likely to demonstrate a benefit in QoL (Table 3) (164). Finally, the current strategy of GH replacement is not to await the full-blown phenotype to develop, but rather to start replacement as soon as the diagnosis is made, as with any other hormone replacement.

 

These latter phenomena are readily evident when baseline indices of QoL in patients enrolled into randomized control trials are compared with those of patients commencing GH replacement selectively in the clinical practice setting (53, 158, 165), and even more so with the changed selection of patients eligible for GH replacement over the years (16).

 

The mechanism for the beneficial effect of GH on well-being and QoL remains speculative (164). GH has been shown to cross the blood brain barrier (166, 167) and to exert physiological effects in the central nervous system as evidenced by the generation of neurotransmitters (166), an effect reduced by progressive aging (168, 169). However, the effects of GH in restoring normal hydration and increasing exercise capacity are additional potential contributors to the positive effects on well-being (170).

 

Table 5. Effects of Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy on Quality of Life in Adults in Published Trials

Reference

GHD onset

(etiology)

N

Dosage per day or titration

Duration

Design (Controls)

Tests

Change in QoL in the GHD adults

Baum et al

(1998)

AO

40

2-6 μg/kg

18 m

PCDB

NHP

PGWB

GHQ

MMPI-2

Cognition tests

= cognition, QoL

Burman et al

(1995)

Mostly

AO

36

2-4 U

21 m

PCDB

NHP

PGWB

HSCL

Spousal report

↑ QoL placebo + GH

groups (HSCL)

↑QoL GH group

(NHP, spousal report)

McGauley et al (1989)

Mostly

AO

24

0.07 U/kg

6 m

PCDB

NHP

PGWB

GHQ

↑ subjective well-being

↑ QoL (NHP)

↑ QoL (PGWB)

Soares et al

(1999)

Not stated

9

0.035 U/kg

6 m

PCDB

HDS

BDI

Cognitive tests

↑ QoL, cognition

Attanasio et al(1997)

AO+ CO

173

12.5 μg/kg

18 m

6m PCDB

12 m open

NHP

=mobility, energy (6 m)

↑mobility, energy (12m)

Beshyah et al

(1995)

AO+ CO

40

0.04 U/kg

18 m

6m PCDB

12 m open

CPRS

GHQ

↑QoL 12m (CPRS)

↑QoL 6m placebo (GHQ)

Caroll et al

(1997)

Not stated

42

0.024 (6m)

0.012 (6m)

μg/kg

12 m

6m PCDB

6m open

NHP

PGWB

↑ QoL on both scales

↑ NHP score in placebo

Mahajan et al

(2004)

AO+CO

25

0.04 (1m)

0.08 (1m)

mg/kg/week, Normal IGF-I

4 m

PCDB

Cross over

NHP

HDRS

MADRS

=mobility, pain

↑energy and emotional reactions

↓social isolation, sleep disturbance

↓depression

Mardh et al

(1994)

AO

124

Not stated

12-18 m

6m PCDB

6-12m open

NHP

PGWB

↑ QoL (NHP)

↑ Well-being

Urushihara et al (2007)

AO+CO

64

0.021-0.042-0.083

mg/kg/week, Normal IGF-I

16 m

24 weeks DBPC

48 weeks Open

SF-36

↑ physical functioning and general health (AO)

↓social functioning and mental health (CO)

Wallymahmed et al (1997)

Mostly

AO

32

0.018 (1m)

0.035 (5m)

U/kg

12 m

6m PCDB

6m open

GHD-LFS

GHD-IS

NHP

HADS

SES

MFS

↑ Self esteem

↑ Energy and emotional

reaction (transient)

Bengtsson et al (1993)

AO

10

13-26 μg/kg

6 m

PCDB

Cross-over

CPRS

SCL-90

↑ QoL (CPRS)

= QoL (SCL-90)

Degerblad et al (1990)

AO

6

0.07-0.09 U/kg

3 m

PCDB

Cross-over

Mood questionnaires

Psychometric

Testing

= mood, cognition

↑ vitality, mental

alertness

Whitehead et al (1992)

AO+ CO

14

0.07 U/kg

6 m

PCDB

Cross-over

PGWB

= QoL, but no ↑ IGF-I

Cuneo et al

(1998)

Mostly

AO

166

0.018 (1 m)

0.036 (11m)

U/kg

12 m

6m PC

6m open

NHP

GHDQ

Social history

↑ QoL 12m (NHP)

= QoL (GHDQ)

Deijen et al

(1998)

CO (men)

48

1-3 U/m2

24 m

PC

Psychological

Testing

= well-being

↑ memory

Florkowski et al

(1998)

AO+ CO

20

0.035 U/kg

3m

Randomized

PC

Cross-over

DSQ

SCL-90

SAS

↑ QoL placebo + GH

groups

Giusti et al

(1998)

AO

25

0.5-1 U

6 m

Randomized

PC

HDS

KSQ

↑ QoL (HDS)

= KSQ

Miller et al

(2010)

AO (Acromegaly)

30

Normal IGF-I

6 m

Randomized PC

AGHDA

SF-36

SQ

↑ QoL (AGHDA)

↑ vitality, mental health, soc functioning, general health

↓ role limitation

Verhelst et al

(1997)

Mostly

AO

148

0.035 U/kg

24 m

6m PC

18m open

NHP

Social history

↑ QoL placebo + GH

↓ sick leave

 hospitalization

Ahmad et al

(2001)

AO

46

Normal IGF-I

3 m

Open

AGHDA

↑ QoL after 1 and 3 m

Abs et al

(2005)

AO+CO (IGHD)

1775

Not stated

12 m

Open (MPHD)

AGHDA

↑ QoL IGHD+MPHD

IGHD=MPHD

Drake et al

(1998)

AO

50

Normal IGF-I

6 m

Open

AGHDA

↑ QoL after 3 and 6 m

Follin et al.

(2010)

CO (ALL)

13

0.2-0.8 mg/d

60 m

Open

(No GH)

Symptom checklist-90

ISSI

= QoL

Gibney et al

(1999)

AO+ CO

11

0.025 U/kg

120 m

Open

(No GH)

NHP

↑ QoL (NHP), energy,

emotional reaction

Gilchrist et al

(2002)

AO+ CO

61

Not stated

108 m

Open

(No GH)

NHP

PGWB

↑ energy (NHP)

↑ vitality (PGWB)

Hernberg-Stahl

et al (2001)

AO

304

0.125-0.25 U/kg

12 m

Open

AGHDA

↑ QoL after 1 m,

higher after 3 m

Höybye et al

(2010)

AO (CD)

1070

Normal IGF-I

36 m

Open

(NFPA)

AGHDA

↑ QoL CD+NFPA

CD > NFPA

Kelestimur et al (2005)

AO (SS)

143

Normal IGF-I

24 m

Open

(NFPA)

AGHDA

↑ QoL SS+NFPA

SS=NFPA

Klose et al.

(2009)

AO (IGHD)

1152

Normal IGF-I

24 m

Open

(MPHD)

AGHDA

↑ QoL IGHD+MPHD

IGHD=MPHD

Koltowska-H et al (2006)

AO

1117

Normal IGF-I

1 – 8 yrs

Open

AGHDA

↑ QoL

Kreitschmann-Andermahr et al. (2008)

AO+CO (TBI)

41

Normal IGF-I

12 m

Open

(NFPA)

 

AGHDA

↑ QoL TBI+NFPA

GHD TBI = GHD NFPA

Link et al.

(2006)

CO (ALL)

14

Normal IGF-I

12 m

Open

Neuropsycho-

logical testing

=

Maiter et al

(2006)

AO+CO (irradiated)

1077

Normal IGF-I

12 m

24 m

Open

(non-irradiated)

AGHDA

↑ QoL irradiated+non-irradiated

irradiated=non-irradiated

Moock et al.

(2009)

Mostly AO

651

Normal IGF-I

12 m

Open

AGHDA

↑ QoL

Mukherjee et al (2005)

AO+CO

(cancer survivors)

97

Normal IGF-I

3-13 m

24-77 m

Open

(pituitary pathology)

PGWB

AGHDA

↑ QoL cancer+pit. GHD cancer survivors = pituitary pathology

Mukherjee et al (2005)

AO+CO

30

Normal IGF-I

3 m

6 m

Open

PGWB

AGHDA

↑ QoL

Murray et al

(1999)

AO + CO

65

Normal IGF-I

8 m

Open

PGWB

AGHDA

↑ QoL

Murray et al

(2001)

CO (cancer)

27

Normal IGF-I

18 m

Open

PGWB

AGHDA

↑ QoL (large, 3 m)

Rosilio et al

(2004)

AO + CO

576

Normal IGF-I

12 m

48 m

Open

QLS-H

↑ QoL

Van der Klaauw et al. (2009)

AO

(Acromegaly)

16

Normal IGF-I

12 m

Open

HADS

MFI-20

NHP

AGHDA

= QoL

Verhelst et al.

(2005)

AO (CP)

721

Normal IGF-I

24 m

Open

(NFPA)

AGHDA

↑ QoL CP+NFPA

CP = NFPA

Wiren et al

(1998)

AO + CO

71

6-12 μg/kg

20-50 m

Open

NHP

PGWB

↑ QoL

QoL, quality of life; GHD, growth hormone deficiency; AO, adult onset; CO, childhood onset; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia CP, craniopharyngioma; CS, Cushing’s Disease; NFPA, non-functional pituitary adenoma; SS, Sheehan’s syndrome; TBI, traumatic brain injury; n, number of subjects; PC, placebo-controlled; PCDB, placebo-controlled, double-blind; open, open label; Tests used to quantify QoL  ↑, =, ↓, change in QoL parameter in GH-treated patients and when available compared to controls (Modified and updated from Hull and Harvey(171) with permission from the authors). From: Klose et al (164)

 

Body Composition: Fat Mass, Fat Distribution, and Lean Body Mass

 

GH replacement produces a significant redistribution of body mass, decreasing body fat, and particularly central fat, and increasing lean body mass (6-9, 172). Body fluid balance is also restored. The beneficial effects of GH on total body fat and its distribution have been examined by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), computerized tomography (CT), bioelectrical impedance, and ratio of waist to hip circumference (55, 173) (fig 13) and qualitatively similar results have been obtained with excellent concordance between virtually all reported studies. The restoration of normal total body water may result in an artefactual increment in determinations of lean body mass particularly when the latter is measured by bioelectrical impedance. The abnormal fat distribution in GH deficiency is characterized by an increase in the ratio of waist to hip circumference and during long term follow up, serial measurement of waist circumference provides a simple, rapid and reproducible means of monitoring improvement in body fat distribution.

Fig. 13. Median waist/hip ratio at 0, 6 and 12 months after commencement of GH replacement, men versus women. From: Data from Drake et al (173)

Reductions in body fat are attributed to the lipolytic effect of GH but additional indirect hormonal effects may be important. The conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine was shown to be enhanced by GH in early studies of GH replacement (123, 174) although this is a dose related phenomenon and is less evident with the lower doses in current use. However, levothyroxine replacement has very likely not been optimal (121, 122), and increased dosages have improved the lipids over time (121, 122). Also, the enzyme 11ßHSD1 that reduces cortisone to the active hormone cortisol shows increased activity in the GH deficient state and is normalized by low dose GH replacement(81); the consequent increase in cortisol metabolism may result in reduced tissue specific exposure to glucocorticoid in adipocytes and hepatocytes (81). The latter effect provides an additional explanation for decreased total and central fat mass during GH replacement.

 

Serum Lipoprotein Profiles

 

The effect of GH replacement on lipoprotein profiles has been examined in numerous studies using differing dose regimens. Regardless of whether the GH dose has been based on body weight or titrated against serum IGF-I the universal finding has been a reduction of serum total cholesterol, accounted for virtually entirely by a reduction in LDL-cholesterol (48, 69, 160, 175-182). The extent of this reduction is greatest in those patients with higher baseline serum cholesterol (fig 14), and independent on obesity variables (182). The median change in an unselected hypopituitary population is between 0.3 and 0.4 mmol/L (48, 175). Importantly, the improvement in LDL-cholesterol is additive to the effects of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors if the patient is receiving concurrent therapy and possibly even synergistic (173), as well as synergistic with optimization of levothyroxine therapy (120-123). The degree of reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol during GH replacement would predict an overall reduction in cardiovascular events in the range of 20%. In addition, some studies have documented an increase in serum HDL-cholesterol, but serum triglyceride levels remain unchanged. Serum lipoprotein(a) has been shown to increase in some studies in patients who demonstrated favorable changes in LDL-cholesterol (45, 183, 184) but the data remain somewhat contradictory by virtue of lipoprotein(a) assay differences; the overall significance in terms of cardiovascular risk is unclear (185).

Fig 14. Relationship between the lowering of cholesterol (∆Cholesterol) and the pretreatment serum Cholesterol concentration. Derived from data from Florakis et al (175)

Carbohydrate Metabolism and Insulin Sensitivity

 

Untreated GH deficiency of adult onset is associated with reduced insulin sensitivity, which is, at least in part, related to increased central adiposity (45, 77). The latter improves within the first 3 months of GH replacement but this does not result in an immediate improvement in insulin sensitivity (45). In fact, because of the antagonistic effects of GH on the actions of insulin mediated by hepatic effects, and the increase in circulating free fatty acids, there is on average a further decline in insulin sensitivity, which subsequently returns to baseline over the first year of GH replacement therapy (77). The decline in insulin sensitivity during GH therapy is associated with a slight elevation of fasting plasma glucose and a parallel increase in glycated hemoglobin, both within the normal reference range. Importantly, the increment in glycated hemoglobin is not evident in patients with prior abnormalities of glucose tolerance but is significantly correlated with baseline body mass index, the latter emphasizing the importance of additional dietary and lifestyle advice in these patients.

 

Reference to the KIMS database indicates that there is an increased baseline prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus prior to commencing GH replacement but subsequently the incidence of new cases of diabetes is not increased provided the body mass index is accounted for. Thus, a recent study of data from the NordiNet® surveillance database concluded that 4 years' GH-replacement therapy did not adversely affect glucose homeostasis in the majority of adults with GH deficiency (186). Yet, the long-term effects of GH replacement on insulin sensitivity can still not be considered quite clear although they are likely to vary depending on age, duration of pituitary disease, and increase in weight/BMI/waist circumference.

 

Cardiac Function

 

The GH/IGF-I axis is a recognized modulator of cardiac function and a positive inotropic effect of GH/IGF-I occurs early in the natural history of acromegaly. In contrast, GH deficiency is associated with a reduction in left ventricular wall mass and cardiac output, which is most evident in childhood-onset disease. The variable discordance between childhood-onset and adult-onset GH deficiency in this regard is likely to be due to additional factors impacting on cardiac morphology in adult-onset, including an increased prevalence of hypertension. GH replacement results in increased left ventricular wall mass, fractional shortening, stroke volume and favorable changes in the echocardiographically determined e/a ratio reflecting improved diastolic function (8, 65-75). In some studies, in adult-onset patients, left ventricular hypertrophy has been documented during GH replacement, confirming further the heterogeneity in response to GH replacement. Importantly, GH replacement does not increase blood pressure; in fact, a modest reduction may be seen in patients with pre-existing hypertension reflecting increased generation of nitric oxide as a result of activation of nitric oxide synthase.

 

Exercise Capacity and Performance

 

Increased exercise capacity, as measured by maximal oxygen uptake, power output, and isometric muscle strength, has been observed during GH replacement in GH deficient adults (63, 64, 187, 188). A meta-analysis concluded that evidence from short-term controlled studies failed to support a benefit on muscle strength of GH replacement in GH deficient patients, which is likely to occur over a longer time-course, as seen in open-label studies (188) (Fig 15).

 

The impact of these changes for individual patients is variable and dependent on age and previous exercise requirements. It is intuitively probable that the improvements depend at least in part on improvements in lean body mass. However, restoration of normal circulating volume may also play a positive role (170). In addition, improvement in psychological well-being might be expected to enhance physical activity whilst the latter may have a reciprocal beneficial effect on well-being.

Fig 15. Per cent change from baseline in lean body mass (Panel A), fat mass (Panel B), anaerobic power (Panel C) and VO2max (Panel D) following 1 month of placebo and 1 month of GH (randomized controlled study) and 6 months of GH (open-label study) in 18 patients with GH deficiency. From: Chikani et al (170).

Indices of Bone Remodeling and Bone Mineral Density

 

GH deficiency is associated with reduced activity of bone formation and resorption. GH replacement reverses this situation rapidly resulting in increases in markers of bone formation (e.g., osteocalcin and bone specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (e.g., urine deoxypyridinoline) (Fig 16) (189).

Fig 16. Markers of bone turnover during 18 months of GH (▲) treatment in a randomized, placebo- controlled (O), double blinded study. Values are given as means (^S.E.). The P values for differences of change from baseline between GH- and placebo-treated patients are *P, 0:05; **P, 0:01; ***P, 0:001; ****P, 0:0001: Creat, creatinine. From: Sneppen et al (189).

This increase in bone metabolism eventually results in an increase in bone mineral density (BMD) but this is not evident for approximately 18 months of treatment and is preceded by a reduction attributable to an increase in the bone remodeling space (53, 93, 189-197). The fact that BMD increases under the influence of GH replacement at physiological doses provides important surrogate evidence for an etiological role for GH deficiency in mediating the reduced BMD observed in hypopituitarism. The improvement is quantitatively more obvious in men than women despite the achievement of similar serum IGF-I SD scores and therefore constitutes a genuine difference in gender susceptibility (fig 17).

Fig 17. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine during long-term GH replacement therapy. From Drake et al (173).

Although the improvement in BMD would predict a reduction in fracture rates confirmation of this necessitates long term follow up. Evidence is now emerging supporting a lower fracture risk with GH replacement (92, 198). A prospective cohort study has shown that GH deficient patients treated with GH before the onset of osteoporosis have a lower fracture risk than those untreated, over a mean follow up of 4.6 years (SD 3.8)(199). Increased fracture risk in child onset GH deficiency women can most likely be explained by interaction between oral estrogen and the GH-IGF-I axis. The adequate substitution rate of testosterone (90%) and GH (94%) may have resulted in significantly lower fracture risk in adult-onset GH deficiency men (198). Finally, although in vitro studies have shown that GH has a direct effect on bone remodeling, present physiological concepts and the results of clinical trials from 1996 to 2008 suggest that the anabolic changes in muscle mass and strength may also contribute to changes in BMD/BMC in GH-treated adult GH deficiency patients (200).

 

GH REPLACEMENT IN ELDERLY HYPOPITUITARY PATIENTS

 

Published work indicates that the baseline characteristics and response to GH replacement in hypopituitary patients aged over 65 years are qualitatively similar to those in younger patients (52, 201-203). Importantly, GH deficiency in the elderly is distinguishable on dynamic tests from the well-recognized physiological reduction in spontaneous GH secretion with advancing age (142). It is therefore appropriate to consider older hypopituitary patients for GH replacement and to apply similar criteria to those outlined above. Elderly people with GH deficiency, in particular women, require less GH than at their earlier age, since they will be either spontaneously postmenopausal or taken off estrogen replacement.

 

TRANSITION BETWEEN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT CARE FOR CHILDHOOD ONSET GH DEFICIENCY

 

The transition from childhood into adulthood is generally a very vulnerable period in any young person’s life. It is therefore pertinent to make the transition as smooth as possible. The best way to do this is to have common transition clinics with both a pediatrician and adult endocrinologist having joint consultations to prepare the adolescent for what is going to happen. The timing can be somewhat individual but aiming at a time around final height and completion of puberty seems appropriate. The pediatrician should prepare the child for this/these consultation(s), and the adult endocrinologist taking over future follow up needs to be aware of the fact that obtaining final height and a post pubertal state does not mean that the adolescent is fully matured in a physiological as well as psychological sense.   

 

It is important to confirm persistence of GH deficiency at the time of completion of linear growth, particularly in children with isolated GH deficiency (18). In the presence of a structural lesion in childhood and multiple hormone deficiencies or some genetic causes, a low IGF-I (in the absence of poorly controlled diabetes, liver disease, or oral estrogen) is sufficient to confirm GH deficiency, without a stimulation test (19). Subsequently, decisions must be taken regarding recommencement of GH or longitudinal clinical observation off treatment. Arguments supporting continuation of GH therapy include the observation of increased accumulation of fat mass off treatment (204, 205) and continued acquisition of bone mass in young adults continuing GH in contrast to static bone mass in those discontinuing treatment at the time of completion of linear growth (206). There is no detriment seen in QoL in those patients who withdraw from GH at the completion of linear growth. There is an apparent improvement in insulin sensitivity but, as is the case during normal puberty, this may not be beneficial in the context of continuing somatic development. Given that the major indication for adult GH replacement is the impairment of QOL, then there is no clear consensus as to which patients should continue therapy seamlessly, virtually without interruption, and in which patients it may be reasonable to undertake a period of careful clinical assessment. A recent observational study has raised concern about discontinuation of GH replacement therapy in pediatrics in severely persistent GH deficiency patients, as well as about the often insufficient dose of GH in the treatment of adult patients (207). Follow-up showed improvement in lipid profile and bone mineral density in severely persistent GH deficiency patients under GH therapy. In multivariate analysis, the associated pituitary deficits seemed stronger determinant factors of metabolic and bone status than GH deficiency per se. A consensus meeting convened by The European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology suggested offering continuation of therapy (after retesting) and monitoring those who decline continuation of treatment. If therapy is continued the optimum dosing strategy has not been clearly defined although a titration approach as outlined above would seem empirically appropriate (208). The Endocrine Society Clinical practice guidelines recommend GH therapy to be continued after adult height to allow full skeletal and muscle maturation, which is often delayed in this population (18, 19).

 

INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER PITUITARY AND ADRENAL HORMONES

 

GH is known to inhibit 11ßHSD-1, therefore favoring metabolism to inactive cortisone over active cortisol (72). Hence patients who are partially ACTH deficient or on suboptimal replacement should be carefully monitored at initiation of GH replacement, which might otherwise lead to partial cortisol deficiency, and risk of Addisonian crisis by even simple infections (118, 209).

 

GH also interacts with the TSH axis (120, 123). Patients without defined TSH deficiency demonstrate a reduction in serum thyroxine (T4) after initiation of GH replacement, although maintain stable serum liothyronine (T3) (10, 210, 211), and patients on thyroxine replacement frequently require an increase in their dose (120, 121, 212).The mechanism remains unclear, but it has been postulated that GH may enhance peripheral conversion of T4 to T3 but also have a central inhibitory effect on TSH release at least in children. Clinicians should therefore be aware that the hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid axis can very easily be both underdiagnosed and under replaced in GH deficiency, and upon commencement of GH preplacement (120, 121, 213).

 

Women require a higher GH dose than men to achieve a similar increment in IGF-I. GH sensitivity is blunted in females on oral estrogen (214-216). Transdermal estrogen reduces IGF-I generation to a lesser extent than oral estrogen. The effect of estrogen is thought to be mainly due to first pass metabolism inhibiting hepatic synthesis of IGF-I (217, 218). Testosterone stimulates GH secretion centrally, and also amplifies GH stimulation of IGF-I (216, 217). In addition to gonadal steroids, DHEA replacement has been shown to have an impact on IGF-I generation and psychological well-being (219, 220). DHEA improves psychological well-being independently of an effect on IGF-I (229). DHEA has been shown to potentiate IGF-I generation (219, 220) such that females on DHEA replacement require a lower GH dose to achieve the same IGF-I (219, 221). The mechanism is unknown, but DHEA is metabolized to testosterone and it is postulated that increased serum testosterone may be responsible, hence explaining the lack of a DHEA effect in men who are either eugonadal or are on testosterone replacement.

 

GROWTH HORMONE REPLACEMENT

 

Selecting Patients for Growth Hormone Replacement

 

The diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults is usually straightforward and consensus guidelines have been established with generalized acceptance (Fig 8). Nonetheless there is continuing debate regarding the selection of patients for GH replacement. Practice varies between countries and is undoubtedly influenced by availability of funding for treatment. In clinical practice, patients are selected for treatment on the basis of perceived need according to one or more of a number of specific criteria as outlined in Tables 3 and 4, including severe GH deficiency defined by the insulin tolerance test (ITT), glucagon test or alternative tests such as arginine plus growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) or the Macimorellin test.

 

Establishing the Maintenance GH Dose 

 

When the indication for GH-replacement has been ascertained, the patient is usually on a low initial dose (0.2 mg daily), but dependent on age, since adolescents during transition may benefit from higher initial doses, as will also women on estrogen therapy (replacement or oral contraceptives) a higher dose may be employed (214, 222-224). The dose titration is monitored by IGF-I concentrations (12, 154, 158), and a number of end organ end responses, which may act as ‘biomarkers’ of the treatment effects (table 6).

 

The doses used in published studies vary widely and much of the published data in this area is derived from dosing schedules established on body weight or surface area criteria which were in effect an extrapolation of earlier pediatric practice. Ongoing assessment in the routine clinical setting has indicated that patients can now be managed on much lower doses (158). Using a widely accepted clinical strategy, patients are commenced on 0.2 mg somatotrophin subcutaneously once a day initially. The dose is reviewed every two to four weeks according to clinical response, serum IGF-I levels, and any side effects and the dose is increased, if necessary, at 4 weekly intervals until the maintenance level is achieved (225). This results in a median dose requirement of 0.4 mg daily with a greater sensitivity to a given dose in male patients so that median dose requirement is lower in men. Several sustained release long-acting GH preparations are currently undergoing clinical trials (226-230) and may become an alternative, with some now being marketed in Asia, US and Europe. However, long-term surveillance of safety and efficacy of long-acting GH analogs are not available to address potential pitfalls of the sustained release preparations (231).Serum IGF-I levels may be in the lower part of the age-related reference range in approximately 40% of patients with adult-onset hypopituitarism before any GH treatment across the total age range and this becomes more likely with advancing age. An empirical strategy is to use the minimum dose of GH, which places the serum IGF-1 level between the median value and the upper limit of the age matched normal range for the individual patient. This approach minimizes the risk of overtreatment and the potential sequelae, which may ensue. Serum IGF binding protein-3 and acid-labile subunit lack sensitivity for the titration of GH replacement and are not recommended for this purpose. IGF-I, however, is regulated by several other factors than GH and changes in body composition can be seen with the addition of GH even without any alteration in the IGF-I level. For this reason other biomarkers of GH action are being sought (232).

 

Table 6. What variables and organ functions should be followed in diagnosed GH deficient adult patients treated with GH replacement?

Variables

·       IGF-I (therapy monitoring, titrate to concentration between 0 and + 2SDS)

·       Other pituitary hormone deficiencies

·       MR/CT scan of pituitary in if abnormalities present

·       Safety (adverse effect)

·       QoL assessment (AGHDA)

Metabolic variables

·       Glucose metabolism

·       Lipids

·       BMI

·       Body composition (waist-hip, fat mass, lean body mass)

·       Dexa scan of bones

·       Physical capacity

·       Cardiovascular

IGF-I: Insulin like Growth factor-I; MR: Magnetic Resonance; CT: Computer Tomography; QoL: Quality of Life; AGHDA: Adult growth hormone deficiency assessment: BMI: Body mass index                     

 

Adverse Effects

 

The main adverse effects directly attributable to GH replacement result from the correction of the sodium and water depletion present in GH deficiency patients. This manifests as arthralgia, myalgia, edema, and carpal tunnel syndrome and are usually rapidly reversible with GH dose reduction. They were predominantly a feature of the early experience when GH dose was determined by body weight rather than being based on a titration regimen commencing with a low starting dose as described above. Such adverse effects were predictably more frequent in male patients reflecting their greater sensitivity to GH. Benign intracranial hypertension is a recognized complication of GH replacement in pediatric practice but is much less likely in adult patients especially when low doses are used. However, persistent severe headache should prompt examination and investigation to exclude raised intracranial pressure. The potential mitogenic effects of IGF-I have raised concerns regarding a possible increased risk of either neoplasia or regrowth of residual pituitary and peripituitary tumors. Extensive surveillance studies based on large multinational databases, including several thousand patients on GH replacement followed longitudinally, have not demonstrated an increased incidence of de novo neoplasia and prospective magnetic resonance imaging studies have not indicated an increased risk of pituitary or parasellar tumor regrowth (233, 234). In the childhood cancer survivor study (235) there was no increased risk of recurrence over 5 years follow-up in those who received GH and on 15-year follow-up of patients with previous cranial irradiation who receive GH replacement there was no increased risk of malignancy (236). In addition, there has been no correlation between the serum IGF-I level within the normal reference range and risk of further malignancy (237).

 

Mortality

 

Definition of the precise relationship between GH deficiency and mortality must await long term observations of mortality rate in patients on GH replacement set against background mortality rates in the general population adjusted for national variations but a recent Dutch study provides some evidence that mortality is not increased by replacement and may play a role in normalizing it (particularly in men) (238).

Fig 18. Mortality in hypopituitary patients with-/without GH replacement. From: Gaillard et al (26)

The potential impact of GH replacement on the increased mortality rates described in hypopituitary patients can only be determined by long-term surveillance of treated patients in comparison with normal population data. The multinational databases designed to monitor safety of long-term GH replacement may provide useful information in this regard. Reassuringly, the mortality rates in the KIMS database were similar to the background populations (fig 18), and a later large study in a much larger population with longer follow-up did not observe any increased mortality in GH treated GH deficient patients in the KIMS database (26). Danish nationwide studies have indicated that mortality was not increased in GH treated patients with childhood onset GH deficiency (239, 240), but was highly dependent on the primary cause of GH deficiency (241), since the primary causes of childhood onset GH deficiencyand concomitant diseases severely impaired socioeconomic conditions and impacted mortality; and only the subgroup of patients with idiopathic GH deficiency conditions was similar to the background population. In two Swedish publications there was evidence that hypocortisolism during acute stress, and de novo malignant brain tumors contributed to increased mortality (242), and GH deficient men receiving GH treatment had a mortality rate no different from the background population. In women, after exclusion of high-risk patients, mortality was not different from the background population except for CVD. Mortality due to malignancies was not elevated in adults receiving GH treatment. Next to gender, the heterogeneous etiology influences mortality in GH deficient adults with GH treatment (243). In the French SAGhE study mortality rates were increased in their population of adults treated as children with recombinant GH, particularly in those who had received the highest doses. Specific effects were detected in terms of death due to bone tumors or cerebral hemorrhage but not for all cancers. These results highlight the need for additional studies of long-term mortality and morbidity after GH treatment in childhood (244). Thus, the more recent studies have been reassuring concerning GH replacement and mortality, since those groups with higher mortality seem to have been limited to patient groups with a prior higher risk due to concomitant confounding mortality risks.

 

COSTS VERSUS BENEFITS OF GH REPLACEMENT THERAPY

 

Population studies in Sweden have documented a significantly greater medical and social burden for patients with established hypopituitarism. This continuing cost occurs irrespective of the initial cost of treating the pituitary pathology and derives from issues including unemployment, early retirement, depressive illness, and requirement for disability pension. A social circumstances analysis of the KIMS database has shown that approximately 11% of males and 31% of females require assistance with activities of daily living (245) (fig 19). Additional treatment cost factors, which might be inferred from risk factor profiles in adult GH deficiency populations, include increased prevalence of ischemic heart disease and increased fracture rates. So, whilst the cost of GH replacement to the hypopituitary population is easily determined, matching this with data for economic benefit requires a quantification of long-term complications arising from surrogate markers for long-term morbidity observed in GH deficient patients. Assessments of the effectiveness of GH replacement over time is influenced by the changing characteristics of the patients, with lower doses of GH replacement being used and a shorter period of time from diagnosis of GH deficiency to treatment (181). This means that accurate assessments of cost benefit using long-term data is not yet possible, and probably never will be. A recent study based on patients enrolled into the KIMS database has demonstrated significant reductions in the numbers of patients requiring assistance with the activities of daily living, a decrease in medical consultations and a decrease in hospital in-patient stays over a period of 24 months of GH replacement (fig 20).

Fig 19. Activity of daily living in adult patient with GH deficiency before and after GH replacement therapy. From: Hernberg-Stahl et al (245)

Fig 20. Sick leave and length of hospital stays in adult patients with GH deficiency before and after GH replacement therapy. From: Hernberg-Stahl et al (245).

ADHERENCE TO MANAGEMENT OF ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

 

Despite 30 years of evidence, guidelines, and clinical experience with adult GH deficiency and its management, a very recently published survey within the auspices of European Society of Endocrinology (246) has indicated that despite many guidelines on safety and efficacy of GH replacement in deficient patients as well as the above health economic considerations, GH replacement is still not available or reimbursed in all European countries. It also seems that both health care professionals and health administrators need improved knowledge to optimize the care of adults with GH deficiency. The publication results were further commented upon (247) indicating that in some health care communities reimbursement has been a major issue, because the discussion of GH replacement in truly GH deficient adults has been mixed with the discussion of utilizing GH therapy for sporting enhancement or for anti-ageing purposes, both of which are strongly discouraged. Also continuous presentations of unclear indications for GH diagnosis and replacement in small cohorts of mixed etiologies also pollute the field of health care discussions of proper clear cut cases of GH deficiency according to the official guidelines (248).

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Cushing H. The Pituitary Body and its Disorders: Clinical States produced by Disorders of the Hypophysis Cerebri. The Journal of Laryngology, Rhinology, and Otology. 1913;28(7):382-90.
  2. Raben MS. Growth hormone. 2. Clinical use of human growth hormone. N Engl J Med. 1962;266:82-6 concl.
  3. Utiger RD, Parker ML, Daughaday WH. Studies on human growth hormone. I. A radio-immunoassay for human growth hormone. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1962;41(2):254-61.
  4. Jorgensen JO, Pedersen SA, Thuesen L, Jorgensen J, Ingemann-Hansen T, Skakkebaek NE, et al. Beneficial effects of growth hormone treatment in GH-deficient adults. Lancet. 1989;1(8649):1221-5.
  5. Salomon F, Cuneo RC, Hesp R, Sonksen PH. The effects of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone on body composition and metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency. NEnglJMed. 1989;321(26):1797-803.
  6. Cuneo RC, Salomon F, McGauley GA, Sönksen PH. The growth hormone deficiency syndrome in adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992;37(5):387-97.
  7. de Boer H, Blok GJ, Van der Veen EA. Clinical aspects of growth hormone deficiency in adults. Endocrine reviews. 1995;16(1):63-86.
  8. Carroll PV, Christ ER, Bengtsson BA, Carlsson L, Christiansen JS, Clemmons D, et al. Growth hormone deficiency in adulthood and the effects of growth hormone replacement: a review. Growth Hormone Research Society Scientific Committee. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1998;83(2):382-95.
  9. Littley MD, Shalet SM, Beardwell CG, Ahmed SR, Applegate G, Sutton ML. Hypopituitarism following external radiotherapy for pituitary tumours in adults. The Quarterly journal of medicine. 1989;70(262):145-60.
  10. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Klose M. Central hypothyroidism and its role for cardiovascular risk factors in hypopituitary patients. Endocrine. 2016;54(1):15-23.
  11. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency: summary statement of the Growth Hormone Research Society Workshop on Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1998;83(2):379-81.
  12. Ho KK. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency II: a statement of the GH Research Society in association with the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Lawson Wilkins Society, European Society of Endocrinology, Japan Endocrine Society, and Endocrine Society of Australia. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2007;157(6):695-700.
  13. Ho KY, Hoffman DM. Growth hormone replacement therapy in adults – pros and cons. Larsson C, Butenandt O, editors. Tel Aviv/London: Freund Publishing House; 1993.
  14. Höybye C, Beck-Peccoz P, Simsek S, Zabransky M, Zouater H, Stalla G, et al. Safety of current recombinant human growth hormone treatments for adults with growth hormone deficiency and unmet needs. Expert opinion on drug safety. 2020;19(12):1539-48.
  15. Webb SM, Strasburger CJ, Mo D, Hartman ML, Melmed S, Jung H, et al. Changing patterns of the adult growth hormone deficiency diagnosis documented in a decade-long global surveillance database. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(2):392-9.
  16. Höybye C, Burman P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hey-Hadavi J, Aydin F, Camacho-Hubner C, et al. Change in baseline characteristics over 20 years of adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency on GH replacement therapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(6):629-38.
  17. Klose M, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Chronic endocrine consequences of traumatic brain injury - what is the evidence? Nature reviews Endocrinology. 2018;14(1):57-62.
  18. Yuen KCJ, Biller BMK, Radovick S, Carmichael JD, Jasim S, Pantalone KM, et al. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS AND PATIENTS TRANSITIONING FROM PEDIATRIC TO ADULT CARE. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2019;25(11):1191-232.
  19. Molitch ME, Clemmons DR, Malozowski S, Merriam GR, Vance ML. Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2011;96(6):1587-609.
  20. Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JA. Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(3):377-82.
  21. Agustsson TT, Baldvinsdottir T, Jonasson JG, Olafsdottir E, Steinthorsdottir V, Sigurdsson G, et al. The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955-2012: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(5):655-64.
  22. Daly AF, Beckers A. The Epidemiology of Pituitary Adenomas. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 2020;49(3):347-55.
  23. Stochholm K, Gravholt CH, Laursen T, Jorgensen JO, Laurberg P, Andersen M, et al. Incidence of GH deficiency - a nationwide study. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2006;155(1):61-71.
  24. Parkin JM. Incidence of growth hormone deficiency. Archives of disease in childhood. 1974;49(11):904-5.
  25. Sassolas G, Chazot FB, Jaquet P, Bachelot I, Chanson P, Rudelli CC, et al. GH deficiency in adults: an epidemiological approach. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141(6):595-600.
  26. Gaillard RC, Mattsson AF, Akerblad AC, Bengtsson B, Cara J, Feldt-Rasmussen U, et al. Overall and cause-specific mortality in GH-deficient adults on GH replacement. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(6):1069-77.
  27. Klose M, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Hypopituitarism in Traumatic Brain Injury-A Critical Note. Journal of clinical medicine. 2015;4(7):1480-97.
  28. Klose M, Stochholm K, Janukonyte J, Lehman CL, Frystyk J, Andersen M, et al. Prevalence of posttraumatic growth hormone deficiency is highly dependent on the diagnostic set-up: results from The Danish National Study on Posttraumatic Hypopituitarism. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;99(1):101-10.
  29. Barroso-Sousa R, Barry WT, Garrido-Castro AC, Hodi FS, Min L, Krop IE, et al. Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction Following the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA oncology. 2018;4(2):173-82.
  30. Torino F, Barnabei A, Paragliola RM, Marchetti P, Salvatori R, Corsello SM. Endocrine side-effects of anti-cancer drugs: mAbs and pituitary dysfunction: clinical evidence and pathogenic hypotheses. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(6):R153-64.
  31. Gleeson HK, Gattamaneni HR, Smethurst L, Brennan BM, Shalet SM. Reassessment of growth hormone status is required at final height in children treated with growth hormone replacement after radiation therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):662-6.
  32. Gasco V, Corneli G, Beccuti G, Prodam F, Rovere S, Bellone J, et al. Retesting the childhood-onset GH-deficient patient. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;159 Suppl 1:S45-52.
  33. Berberoğlu M, Sıklar Z, Darendeliler F, Poyrazoğlu S, Darcan S, Işgüven P, et al. Evaluation of permanent growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in young adults with childhood onset GHD: a multicenter study. Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology. 2008;1(1):30-7.
  34. Rasmussen MH, Hvidberg A, Juul A, Main KM, Gotfredsen A, Skakkebaek NE, et al. Massive weight loss restores 24-hour growth hormone release profiles and serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels in obese subjects. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1995;80(4):1407-15.
  35. De Marinis L, Bianchi A, Mancini A, Gentilella R, Perrelli M, Giampietro A, et al. Growth hormone secretion and leptin in morbid obesity before and after biliopancreatic diversion: relationships with insulin and body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(1):174-80.
  36. Makimura H, Stanley T, Mun D, You SM, Grinspoon S. The effects of central adiposity on growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine stimulation testing in men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008;93(11):4254-60.
  37. Rasmussen MH. Obesity, growth hormone and weight loss. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2010;316(2):147-53.
  38. Klose M, Jonsson B, Abs R, Popovic V, Koltowska-Häggström M, Saller B, et al. From isolated GH deficiency to multiple pituitary hormone deficiency: an evolving continuum - a KIMS analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161 Suppl 1:S75-83.
  39. Blum WF, Deal C, Zimmermann AG, Shavrikova EP, Child CJ, Quigley CA, et al. Development of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies in pediatric patients originally diagnosed with idiopathic isolated GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(1):13-21.
  40. Child CJ, Blum WF, Deal C, Zimmermann AG, Quigley CA, Drop SL, et al. Development of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies in pediatric patients originally diagnosed with isolated growth hormone deficiency due to organic causes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(5):669-79.
  41. Arafah BM, Kailani SH, Nekl KE, Gold RS, Selman WR. Immediate recovery of pituitary function after transsphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1994;79(2):348-54.
  42. Fatemi N, Dusick JR, Mattozo C, McArthur DL, Cohan P, Boscardin J, et al. Pituitary hormonal loss and recovery after transsphenoidal adenoma removal. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4):709-18; discussion 18-9.
  43. Pedersen MB, Dukanovic S, Springborg JB, Andreassen M, Krogh J. Endocrine function after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroendocrinology. 2022.
  44. Jørgensen JO, Müller J, Møller J, Wolthers T, Vahl N, Juul A, et al. Adult growth hormone deficiency. Hormone research. 1994;42(4-5):235-41.
  45. Weaver JU, Monson JP, Noonan K, John WG, Edwards A, Evans KA, et al. The effect of low dose recombinant human growth hormone replacement on regional fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and cardiovascular risk factors in hypopituitary adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(1):153-9.
  46. Rosén T, Bosaeus I, Tölli J, Lindstedt G, Bengtsson BA. Increased body fat mass and decreased extracellular fluid volume in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993;38(1):63-71.
  47. Li Voon Chong JS, Groves T, Foy P, Wallymahmed ME, MacFarlane IA. Elderly people with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and untreated GH deficiency: clinical outcome, body composition, lipid profiles and quality of life after 2 years compared to controls. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;56(2):175-81.
  48. Bengtsson BA, Abs R, Bennmarker H, Monson JP, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hernberg-Stahl E, et al. The effects of treatment and the individual responsiveness to growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in 665 GH-deficient adults. KIMS Study Group and the KIMS International Board. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(11):3929-35.
  49. Gomes-Santos E, Salvatori R, Ferrão TO, Oliveira CR, Diniz RD, Santana JA, et al. Increased visceral adiposity and cortisol to cortisone ratio in adults with congenital lifetime isolated GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):3285-9.
  50. Fideleff HL, Boquete HR, Stalldecker G, Giaccio AV, Sobrado PG. Comparative results of a 4-year study on cardiovascular parameters, lipid metabolism, body composition and bone mass between untreated and treated adult growth hormone deficient patients. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2008;18(4):318-24.
  51. Mersebach H, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Growth hormone and body composition. Frontiers of hormone research. 2005;33:185-95.
  52. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Wilton P, Jonsson P. Aspects of growth hormone deficiency and replacement in elderly hypopituitary adults. Growth HormIGFRes. 2004;14 Suppl A:S51-S8.
  53. Drake WM, Rodríguez-Arnao J, Weaver JU, James IT, Coyte D, Spector TD, et al. The influence of gender on the short and long-term effects of growth hormone replacement on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in hypopituitary adults: a 5-year study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;54(4):525-32.
  54. Johansson JO, Landin K, Tengborn L, Rosén T, Bengtsson BA. High fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity in growth hormone-deficient adults. Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology. 1994;14(3):434-7.
  55. Klose M, Watt T, Brennum J, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Posttraumatic hypopituitarism is associated with an unfavorable body composition and lipid profile, and decreased quality of life 12 months after injury. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;92(10):3861-8.
  56. Abs R, Mattsson AF, Bengtsson BA, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Goth MI, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, et al. Isolated growth hormone (GH) deficiency in adult patients: baseline clinical characteristics and responses to GH replacement in comparison with hypopituitary patients. A sub-analysis of the KIMS database. Growth HormIGFRes. 2005;15(5):349-59.
  57. Merola B, Sofia M, Longobardi S, Fazio S, Micco A, Esposito V, et al. Impairment of lung volumes and respiratory muscle strength in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 1995;133(6):680-5.
  58. Janssen YJ, Doornbos J, Roelfsema F. Changes in muscle volume, strength, and bioenergetics during recombinant human growth hormone (GH) therapy in adults with GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(1):279-84.
  59. Modesto Mde J, Amer NM, Erichsen O, Hernandez S, dos Santos CD, de Carvalho J, et al. Muscle strength and body composition during the transition phase in patients treated with recombinant GH to final height. Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM. 2014;27(9-10):813-20.
  60. Johannsson G, Sverrisdóttir YB, Ellegård L, Lundberg PA, Herlitz H. GH increases extracellular volume by stimulating sodium reabsorption in the distal nephron and preventing pressure natriuresis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1743-9.
  61. Simpson JA, Lobo DN, Anderson JA, Macdonald IA, Perkins AC, Neal KR, et al. Body water compartment measurements: a comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis with tritium and sodium bromide dilution techniques. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2001;20(4):339-43.
  62. Møller J, Frandsen E, Fisker S, Jørgensen JO, Christiansen JS. Decreased plasma and extracellular volume in growth hormone deficient adults and the acute and prolonged effects of GH administration: a controlled experimental study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;44(5):533-9.
  63. Jørgensen JO, Vahl N, Hansen TB, Thuesen L, Hagen C, Christiansen JS. Growth hormone versus placebo treatment for one year in growth hormone deficient adults: increase in exercise capacity and normalization of body composition. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;45(6):681-8.
  64. Widdowson WM, Gibney J. The effect of growth hormone replacement on exercise capacity in patients with GH deficiency: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(11):4413-7.
  65. Lombardi G, Colao A, Cuocolo A, Longobardi S, Di Somma C, Orio F, et al. Cardiological aspects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I. Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM. 1997;10(6):553-60.
  66. Colao A, Cuocolo A, Di Somma C, Cerbone G, Della Morte AM, Nicolai E, et al. Impaired cardiac performance in elderly patients with growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(11):3950-5.
  67. Thuesen L, Jørgensen JO, Müller JR, Kristensen BO, Skakkebaek NE, Vahl N, et al. Short and long-term cardiovascular effects of growth hormone therapy in growth hormone deficient adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;41(5):615-20.
  68. Lanes R, Gunczler P, Lopez E, Esaa S, Villaroel O, Revel-Chion R. Cardiac mass and function, carotid artery intima-media thickness, and lipoprotein levels in growth hormone-deficient adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(3):1061-5.
  69. Maison P, Chanson P. Cardiac effects of growth hormone in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2003;108(21):2648-52.
  70. Moisey R, Orme S, Barker D, Lewis N, Sharp L, Clements RE, et al. Cardiac functional reserve is diminished in growth hormone-deficient adults. Cardiovascular therapeutics. 2009;27(1):34-41.
  71. Thomas JD, Dattani A, Zemrak F, Burchell T, Akker SA, Gurnell M, et al. Characterisation of myocardial structure and function in adult-onset growth hormone deficiency using cardiac magnetic resonance. Endocrine. 2016;54(3):778-87.
  72. Mihaila S, Mincu RI, Rimbas RC, Dulgheru RE, Dobrescu R, Magda SL, et al. Growth hormone deficiency in adults impacts left ventricular mechanics: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2015;31(6):752-9.
  73. Sneppen SB, Steensgaard-Hansen F, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Cardiac effects of low-dose growth hormone replacement therapy in growth hormone-deficient adults. An 18-month randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Hormone research. 2002;58(1):21-9.
  74. Andreassen M, Faber J, Kjaer A, Petersen CL, Kristensen L. Cardiac function in growth hormone deficient patients before and after 1 year with replacement therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Pituitary. 2011;14(1):1-10.
  75. Ozdogru I, Tanriverdi F, Dogan A, Kaya MG, Tugrul Inanc M, Kalay N, et al. Impaired longitudinal myocardial velocities in patients with growth hormone deficiency improves after hormone replacement therapy. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2007;20(9):1093-9.
  76. Jørgensen JO, Krag M, Jessen N, Nørrelund H, Vestergaard ET, Møller N, et al. Growth hormone and glucose homeostasis. Hormone research. 2004;62 Suppl 3:51-5.
  77. Fowelin J, Attvall S, Lager I, Bengtsson BA. Effects of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone on insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Metabolism. 1993;42(11):1443-7.
  78. Giovannini L, Tirabassi G, Muscogiuri G, Di Somma C, Colao A, Balercia G. Impact of adult growth hormone deficiency on metabolic profile and cardiovascular risk [Review]. Endocrine journal. 2015;62(12):1037-48.
  79. Oliveira CR, Salvatori R, Barreto-Filho JA, Rocha IE, Mari A, Pereira RM, et al. Insulin sensitivity and β-cell function in adults with lifetime, untreated isolated growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(3):1013-9.
  80. Vicente TA, Rocha IE, Salvatori R, Oliveira CR, Pereira RM, Souza AH, et al. Lifetime congenital isolated GH deficiency does not protect from the development of diabetes. Endocrine connections. 2013;2(2):112-7.
  81. Gelding SV, Taylor NF, Wood PJ, Noonan K, Weaver JU, Wood DF, et al. The effect of growth hormone replacement therapy on cortisol-cortisone interconversion in hypopituitary adults: evidence for growth hormone modulation of extrarenal 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48(2):153-62.
  82. Roemmler J, Kuenkler M, Schneider HJ, Dieterle C, Schopohl J. Comparison of glucose and lipid metabolism and bone mineralization in patients with growth hormone deficiency with and without long-term growth hormone replacement. Metabolism. 2010;59(3):350-8.
  83. Elbornsson M, Götherström G, Bosæus I, Bengtsson B, Johannsson G, Svensson J. Fifteen years of GH replacement improves body composition and cardiovascular risk factors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(5):745-53.
  84. Markussis V, Beshyah SA, Fisher C, Sharp P, Nicolaides AN, Johnston DG. Detection of premature atherosclerosis by high-resolution ultrasonography in symptom-free hypopituitary adults. Lancet. 1992;340(8829):1188-92.
  85. Capaldo B, Patti L, Oliviero U, Longobardi S, Pardo F, Vitale F, et al. Increased arterial intima-media thickness in childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(5):1378-81.
  86. Johansson AG, Burman P, Westermark K, Ljunghall S. The bone mineral density in acquired growth hormone deficiency correlates with circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor I. Journal of internal medicine. 1992;232(5):447-52.
  87. Kaufman JM, Taelman P, Vermeulen A, Vandeweghe M. Bone mineral status in growth hormone-deficient males with isolated and multiple pituitary deficiencies of childhood onset. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74(1):118-23.
  88. Bing-You RG, Denis MC, Rosen CJ. Low bone mineral density in adults with previous hypothalamic-pituitary tumors: correlations with serum growth hormone responses to GH-releasing hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, and IGF binding protein 3. Calcified tissue international. 1993;52(3):183-7.
  89. Rosén T, Hansson T, Granhed H, Szucs J, Bengtsson BA. Reduced bone mineral content in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. Acta endocrinologica. 1993;129(3):201-6.
  90. de Boer H, Blok GJ, van Lingen A, Teule GJ, Lips P, van der Veen EA. Consequences of childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency for adult bone mass. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 1994;9(8):1319-26.
  91. Holmes SJ, Economou G, Whitehouse RW, Adams JE, Shalet SM. Reduced bone mineral density in patients with adult onset growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(3):669-74.
  92. Wuster C, Abs R, Bengtsson BA, Bennmarker H, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hernberg-Stahl E, et al. The influence of growth hormone deficiency, growth hormone replacement therapy, and other aspects of hypopituitarism on fracture rate and bone mineral density. JBone MinerRes. 2001;16(2):398-405.
  93. Vestergaard P, Jørgensen JO, Hagen C, Hoeck HC, Laurberg P, Rejnmark L, et al. Fracture risk is increased in patients with GH deficiency or untreated prolactinomas--a case-control study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;56(2):159-67.
  94. Mazziotti G, Doga M, Frara S, Maffezzoni F, Porcelli T, Cerri L, et al. Incidence of morphometric vertebral fractures in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. Endocrine. 2016;52(1):103-10.
  95. Rosén T, Wilhelmsen L, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Lappas G, Bengtsson BA. Increased fracture frequency in adult patients with hypopituitarism and GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 1997;137(3):240-5.
  96. Lange M, Müller J, Svendsen OL, Kastrup KW, Juul A, Feldt-Rasmussen U. The impact of idiopathic childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (GHD) on bone mass in subjects without adult GHD. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;62(1):18-23.
  97. Tritos NA, Greenspan SL, King D, Hamrahian A, Cook DM, Jönsson PJ, et al. Unreplaced sex steroid deficiency, corticotropin deficiency, and lower IGF-I are associated with lower bone mineral density in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a KIMS database analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1516-23.
  98. Mazziotti G, Porcelli T, Bianchi A, Cimino V, Patelli I, Mejia C, et al. Glucocorticoid replacement therapy and vertebral fractures in hypopituitary adult males with GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(1):15-20.
  99. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Abs R, Bengtsson BA, Bennmarker H, Bramnert M, Hernberg-Ståhl E, et al. Growth hormone deficiency and replacement in hypopituitary patients previously treated for acromegaly or Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146(1):67-74.
  100. Höybye C, Ragnarsson O, Jönsson PJ, Koltowska-Häggström M, Trainer P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, et al. Clinical features of GH deficiency and effects of 3 years of GH replacement in adults with controlled Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162(4):677-84.
  101. Lange M, Qvortrup K, Svendsen OL, Flyvbjerg A, Nowak J, Petersen MM, et al. Abnormal bone collagen morphology and decreased bone strength in growth hormone-deficient rats. Bone. 2004;35(1):178-85.
  102. Doessing S, Holm L, Heinemeier KM, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Schjerling P, Qvortrup K, et al. GH and IGF1 levels are positively associated with musculotendinous collagen expression: experiments in acromegalic and GH deficiency patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(6):853-62.
  103. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA64?UNLID=10228138712014122893019?print=true. Human growth hormone (somatropin) in adults with growth hormone deficiency. 2017.
  104. Chikani V, Cuneo RC, Hickman I, Ho KK. Impairment of anaerobic capacity in adults with growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(5):1811-8.
  105. Herschbach P, Henrich G, Strasburger CJ, Feldmeier H, Marín F, Attanasio AM, et al. Development and psychometric properties of a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for adult patients with growth hormone deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;145(3):255-65.
  106. Gilchrist FJ, Murray RD, Shalet SM. The effect of long-term untreated growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and 9 years of GH replacement on the quality of life (QoL) of GH-deficient adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;57(3):363-70.
  107. McKenna SP, Doward LC, Alonso J, Kohlmann T, Niero M, Prieto L, et al. The QoL-AGHDA: an instrument for the assessment of quality of life in adults with growth hormone deficiency. QualLife Res. 1999;8(4):373-83.
  108. Wiren L, Whalley D, McKenna S, Wilhelmsen L. Application of a disease-specific, quality-of-life measure (QoL-AGHDA) in growth hormone-deficient adults and a random population sample in Sweden: validation of the measure by rasch analysis. Clinical Endocrinology. 2000;52(2):143-52.
  109. Koltowska-Haggstrom M, Hennessy S, Mattsson AF, Monson JP, Kind P. Quality of life assessment of growth hormone deficiency in adults (QoL-AGHDA): comparison of normative reference data for the general population of England and Wales with results for adult hypopituitary patients with growth hormone deficiency. HormRes. 2005;64(1):46-54.
  110. Webb SM. Measurements of quality of life in patients with growth hormone deficiency. Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2008;31(9 Suppl):52-5.
  111. Woodhouse LJ, Mukherjee A, Shalet SM, Ezzat S. The influence of growth hormone status on physical impairments, functional limitations, and health-related quality of life in adults. Endocrine reviews. 2006;27(3):287-317.
  112. Rosen T, Bengtsson BA. Premature mortality due to cardiovascular disease in hypopituitarism. Lancet. 1990;336(8710):285-8.
  113. Bülow B, Hagmar L, Mikoczy Z, Nordström CH, Erfurth EM. Increased cerebrovascular mortality in patients with hypopituitarism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997;46(1):75-81.
  114. Tomlinson JW, Holden N, Hills RK, Wheatley K, Clayton RN, Bates AS, et al. Association between premature mortality and hypopituitarism. West Midlands Prospective Hypopituitary Study Group. Lancet. 2001;357(9254):425-31.
  115. Bates AS, Van't Hoff W, Jones PJ, Clayton RN. The effect of hypopituitarism on life expectancy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1996;81(3):1169-72.
  116. Erfurth EM, Bülow B, Eskilsson J, Hagmar L. High incidence of cardiovascular disease and increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in women with hypopituitarism not receiving growth hormone treatment: preliminary results. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 1999;9 Suppl A:21-4.
  117. Bengtsson BA. Untreated growth hormone deficiency explains premature mortality in patients with hypopituitarism. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 1998;8 Suppl A:77-80.
  118. Filipsson H, Monson JP, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, Mattsson A, Johannsson G. The impact of glucocorticoid replacement regimens on metabolic outcome and comorbidity in hypopituitary patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3954-61.
  119. Ragnarsson O, Nyström HF, Johannsson G. Glucocorticoid replacement therapy is independently associated with reduced bone mineral density in women with hypopituitarism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;76(2):246-52.
  120. Filipsson Nyström H, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Kourides I, Popovic V, Koltowska-Häggström M, Jonsson B, et al. The metabolic consequences of thyroxine replacement in adult hypopituitary patients. Pituitary. 2012;15(4):495-504.
  121. Klose M, Marina D, Hartoft-Nielsen ML, Klefter O, Gavan V, Hilsted L, et al. Central hypothyroidism and its replacement have a significant influence on cardiovascular risk factors in adult hypopituitary patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(9):3802-10.
  122. Filipsson H, Johannsson G. GH replacement in adults: interactions with other pituitary hormone deficiencies and replacement therapies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161 Suppl 1:S85-95.
  123. Feldt-Rasmussen U. Interactions between growth hormone and the thyroid gland -- with special reference to biochemical diagnosis. Current medicinal chemistry. 2007;14(26):2783-8.
  124. Olivius C, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Olsson DS, Johannsson G, Tivesten Å. Prevalence and treatment of central hypogonadism and hypoandrogenism in women with hypopituitarism. Pituitary. 2018;21(5):445-53.
  125. Sanmartí A, Lucas A, Hawkins F, Webb SM, Ulied A. Observational study in adult hypopituitary patients with untreated growth hormone deficiency (ODA study). Socio-economic impact and health status. Collaborative ODA (Observational GH Deficiency in Adults) Group. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141(5):481-9.
  126. Clemmons DR. Consensus statement on the standardization and evaluation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor assays. ClinChem. 2011;57(4):555-9.
  127. Garcia JM, Biller BMK, Korbonits M, Popovic V, Luger A, Strasburger CJ, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the macimorelin test for diagnosis of AGHD. Endocrine connections. 2021;10(1):76-83.
  128. Roth J, Glick SM, Yalow RS, Bersonsa. Hypoglycemia: a potent stimulus to secretion of growth hormone. Science (New York, NY). 1963;140(3570):987-8.
  129. Hoffman DM, O'Sullivan AJ, Baxter RC, Ho KK. Diagnosis of growth-hormone deficiency in adults. Lancet. 1994;343(8905):1064-8.
  130. Hoeck HC, Vestergaard P, Jakobsen PE, Laurberg P. Test of growth hormone secretion in adults: poor reproducibility of the insulin tolerance test. Eur J Endocrinol. 1995;133(3):305-12.
  131. Fisker S, Jorgensen JO, Orskov H, Christiansen JS. L-arginine and insulin-tolerance tests in the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency: influence of confounding factors. Clinical Endocrinology. 1998;48(1):109-15.
  132. Shah A, Stanhope R, Matthew D. Hazards of pharmacological tests of growth hormone secretion in childhood. Bmj. 1992;304(6820):173-4.
  133. Lange M, Svendsen OL, Skakkebaek NE, Muller J, Juul A, Schmiegelow M, et al. An audit of the insulin-tolerance test in 255 patients with pituitary disease. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2002;147(1):41-7.
  134. Andersen M. The robustness of diagnostic tests for GH deficiency in adults. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2015;25(3):108-14.
  135. Corneli G, Di Somma C, Baldelli R, Rovere S, Gasco V, Croce CG, et al. The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2005;153(2):257-64.
  136. Aimaretti G, Corneli G, Razzore P, Bellone S, Baffoni C, Arvat E, et al. Comparison between insulin-induced hypoglycemia and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone + arginine as provocative tests for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1998;83(5):1615-8.
  137. Abs R. Update on the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;148 Suppl 2:S3-8.
  138. Yuen KC, Biller BM, Molitch ME, Cook DM. Clinical review: Is lack of recombinant growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone in the United States a setback or time to consider glucagon testing for adult GH deficiency? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2702-7.
  139. Diri H, Karaca Z, Simsek Y, Tanriverdi F, Unluhizarci K, Selcuklu A, et al. Can a glucagon stimulation test characterized by lower GH cut-off value be used for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults? Pituitary. 2015;18(6):884-92.
  140. Hamrahian AH, Yuen KC, Gordon MB, Pulaski-Liebert KJ, Bena J, Biller BM. Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study. Pituitary. 2016;19(3):332-41.
  141. Tavares AB, Seixas-da-Silva IA, Silvestre DH, Paixão CM, Jr., Vaisman M, Conceição FL. Potential risks of glucagon stimulation test in elderly people. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2015;25(1):53-6.
  142. Toogood AA, O'Neill PA, Shalet SM. Beyond the somatopause: growth hormone deficiency in adults over the age of 60 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(2):460-5.
  143. Yuen KC, Biller BM, Katznelson L, Rhoads SA, Gurel MH, Chu O, et al. Clinical characteristics, timing of peak responses and safety aspects of two dosing regimens of the glucagon stimulation test in evaluating growth hormone and cortisol secretion in adults. Pituitary. 2013;16(2):220-30.
  144. Micmacher E, Assumpção RP, Redorat RG, Spina LD, Cruz IC, Silva CA, et al. Growth hormone secretion in response to glucagon stimulation test in healthy middle-aged men. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia. 2009;53(7):853-8.
  145. Wilson JR, Utz AL, Devin JK. Effects of gender, body weight, and blood glucose dynamics on the growth hormone response to the glucagon stimulation test in patients with pituitary disease. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2016;26:24-31.
  146. Biller BM, Samuels MH, Zagar A, Cook DM, Arafah BM, Bonert V, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of six tests for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2002;87(5):2067-79.
  147. Junnila RK, Strasburger CJ, Bidlingmaier M. Pitfalls of insulin-like growth factor-i and growth hormone assays. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. 2015;44(1):27-34.
  148. Pokrajac A, Wark G, Ellis AR, Wear J, Wieringa GE, Trainer PJ. Variation in GH and IGF-I assays limits the applicability of international consensus criteria to local practice. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67(1):65-70.
  149. Toogood A, Brabant G, Maiter D, Jonsson B, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, et al. Similar clinical features among patients with severe adult growth hormone deficiency diagnosed with insulin tolerance test or arginine or glucagon stimulation tests. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2012;18(3):325-34.
  150. Andersen M, Støving RK, Hangaard J, Petersen PH, Hagen C. The effect of short-term cortisol changes on growth hormone responses to the pyridostigmine-growth-hormone-releasing-hormone test in healthy adults and patients with suspected growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;49(2):241-9.
  151. Dichtel LE, Yuen KC, Bredella MA, Gerweck AV, Russell BM, Riccio AD, et al. Overweight/Obese adults with pituitary disorders require lower peak growth hormone cutoff values on glucagon stimulation testing to avoid overdiagnosis of growth hormone deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;99(12):4712-9.
  152. Toogood AA, Beardwell CG, Shalet SM. The severity of growth hormone deficiency in adults with pituitary disease is related to the degree of hypopituitarism. Clinical Endocrinology. 1994;41(4):511-6.
  153. Aimaretti G, Corneli G, Di Somma C, Baldelli R, Gasco V, Rovere S, et al. Different degrees of GH deficiency evidenced by GHRH+arginine test and IGF-I levels in adults with pituritary disease. JEndocrinolInvest. 2005;28(3):247-52.
  154. Gordon MB, Levy RA, Gut R, Germak J. TRENDS IN GROWTH HORMONE STIMULATION TESTING AND GROWTH HORMONE DOSING IN ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY PATIENTS: RESULTS FROM THE ANSWER PROGRAM. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2016;22(4):396-405.
  155. Sonksen PH. In: Adashi EY, Thorner MO, editors. The somatotrophic axis and the reproductive process in health and disease. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995.
  156. Schneider HJ, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Ghigo E, Stalla GK, Agha A. Hypothalamopituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(12):1429-38.
  157. Garrahy A, Sherlock M, Thompson CJ. MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Neuroendocrine surveillance and management of neurosurgical patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;176(5):R217-r33.
  158. Murray RD, Skillicorn CJ, Howell SJ, Lissett CA, Rahim A, Shalet SM. Dose titration and patient selection increases the efficacy of GH replacement in severely GH deficient adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999;50(6):749-57.
  159. Wirén L, Bengtsson BA, Johannsson G. Beneficial effects of long-term GH replacement therapy on quality of life in adults with GH deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48(5):613-20.
  160. Gibney J, Wallace JD, Spinks T, Schnorr L, Ranicar A, Cuneo RC, et al. The effects of 10 years of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in adult GH-deficient patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(8):2596-602.
  161. Koltowska-Haggstrom M, Mattsson AF, Monson JP, Kind P, Badia X, Casanueva FF, et al. Does long-term GH replacement therapy in hypopituitary adults with GH deficiency normalise quality of life? European Journal of Endocrinology. 2006;155(1):109-19.
  162. Miller KK, Wexler T, Fazeli P, Gunnell L, Graham GJ, Beauregard C, et al. Growth hormone deficiency after treatment of acromegaly: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of growth hormone replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(2):567-77.
  163. Valassi E, Brick DJ, Johnson JC, Biller BM, Klibanski A, Miller KK. Effect of growth hormone replacement therapy on the quality of life in women with growth hormone deficiency who have a history of acromegaly versus other disorders. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2012;18(2):209-18.
  164. Klose M, Rasmussen AK, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Quality of Life in adult hypopituitary patiens treated for growth hormone deficiency. The Open Endocrinology Journal. 2012;6:91-102.
  165. Baum HB, Katznelson L, Sherman JC, Biller BM, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Effects of physiological growth hormone (GH) therapy on cognition and quality of life in patients with adult-onset GH deficiency. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1998;83(9):3184-9.
  166. Nyberg F, Burman P. Growth hormone and its receptors in the central nervous system--location and functional significance. Hormone research. 1996;45(1-2):18-22.
  167. Burman P, Hetta J, Wide L, Mansson JE, Ekman R, Karlsson FA. Growth hormone treatment affects brain neurotransmitters and thyroxine [see comment]. Clinical Endocrinology. 1996;44(3):319-24.
  168. Nyberg F. Aging effects on growth hormone receptor binding in the brain. Experimental gerontology. 1997;32(4-5):521-8.
  169. Lai Z, Roos P, Zhai O, Olsson Y, Fhölenhag K, Larsson C, et al. Age-related reduction of human growth hormone-binding sites in the human brain. Brain research. 1993;621(2):260-6.
  170. Chikani V, Cuneo RC, Hickman I, Ho KK. Growth hormone (GH) enhances anaerobic capacity: impact on physical function and quality of life in adults with GH deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2016;85(4):660-8.
  171. Hull KL, Harvey S. Growth hormone therapy and Quality of Life: possibilities, pitfalls and mechanisms. The Journal of endocrinology. 2003;179(3):311-33.
  172. Hazem A, Elamin MB, Bancos I, Malaga G, Prutsky G, Domecq JP, et al. Body composition and quality of life in adults treated with GH therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(1):13-20.
  173. Drake WM, Coyte D, Camacho-Hübner C, Jivanji NM, Kaltsas G, Wood DF, et al. Optimizing growth hormone replacement therapy by dose titration in hypopituitary adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(11):3913-9.
  174. Jørgensen JO, Pedersen SA, Laurberg P, Weeke J, Skakkebaek NE, Christiansen JS. Effects of growth hormone therapy on thyroid function of growth hormone-deficient adults with and without concomitant thyroxine-substituted central hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(6):1127-32.
  175. Florakis D, Hung V, Kaltsas G, Coyte D, Jenkins PJ, Chew SL, et al. Sustained reduction in circulating cholesterol in adult hypopituitary patients given low dose titrated growth hormone replacement therapy: a two year study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;53(4):453-9.
  176. Abrahamsen B, Nielsen TL, Hangaard J, Gregersen G, Vahl N, Korsholm L, et al. Dose-, IGF-I- and sex-dependent changes in lipid profile and body composition during GH replacement therapy in adult onset GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(5):671-9.
  177. Lind S, Rudling M, Ericsson S, Olivecrona H, Eriksson M, Borgström B, et al. Growth hormone induces low-density lipoprotein clearance but not bile acid synthesis in humans. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2004;24(2):349-56.
  178. Attanasio AF, Bates PC, Ho KK, Webb SM, Ross RJ, Strasburger CJ, et al. Human growth hormone replacement in adult hypopituitary patients: long-term effects on body composition and lipid status--3-year results from the HypoCCS Database. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1600-6.
  179. Höybye C, Christiansen JS. Growth hormone replacement in adults - current standards and new perspectives. Best practice & research Clinical endocrinology & metabolism. 2015;29(1):115-23.
  180. van Bunderen CC, van den Dries CJ, Heymans MW, Franken AA, Koppeschaar HP, van der Lely AJ, et al. Effect of long-term GH replacement therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in isolated GH deficiency compared with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies: a sub-analysis from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in Adults. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(2):151-60.
  181. Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Siegel S, Francis F, Buchfelder M, Schneider HJ, Kann PH, et al. Variation of the baseline characteristics and treatment parameters over time: an analysis of 15 years of growth hormone replacement in adults in the German KIMS database. Pituitary. 2012;15 Suppl 1:S72-80.
  182. Abrams P, Boquete H, Fideleff H, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Jönsson PJ, Koltowska-Häggström M, et al. GH replacement in hypopituitarism improves lipid profile and quality of life independently of changes in obesity variables. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;159(6):825-32.
  183. Olivecrona H, Ericsson S, Berglund L, Angelin B. Increased concentrations of serum lipoprotein (a) in response to growth hormone treatment. Bmj. 1993;306(6894):1726-7.
  184. Svensson J, Jansson JO, Ottosson M, Johannsson G, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, et al. Treatment of obese subjects with the oral growth hormone secretagogue MK-677 affects serum concentrations of several lipoproteins, but not lipoprotein(a). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(6):2028-33.
  185. Wieringa G, Toogood AA, Ryder WD, Anderson JM, Mackness M, Shalet SM. Changes in lipoprotein(a) levels measured by six kit methods during growth hormone treatment of growth hormone-deficient adults. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2000;10(1):14-9.
  186. Weber MM, Biller BM, Pedersen BT, Pournara E, Christiansen JS, Höybye C. The effect of growth hormone (GH) replacement on blood glucose homeostasis in adult nondiabetic patients with GH deficiency: real-life data from the NordiNet(®) International Outcome Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;86(2):192-8.
  187. Bollerslev J, Hallén J, Fougner KJ, Jørgensen AP, Kristo C, Fagertun H, et al. Low-dose GH improves exercise capacity in adults with GH deficiency: effects of a 22-month placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153(3):379-87.
  188. Widdowson WM, Gibney J. The effect of growth hormone (GH) replacement on muscle strength in patients with GH-deficiency: a meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010;72(6):787-92.
  189. Sneppen SB, Hoeck HC, Kollerup G, Sørensen OH, Laurberg P, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Bone mineral content and bone metabolism during physiological GH treatment in GH-deficient adults--an 18-month randomised, placebo-controlled, double blinded trial. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146(2):187-95.
  190. Johannsson G, Rosén T, Bosaeus I, Sjöström L, Bengtsson BA. Two years of growth hormone (GH) treatment increases bone mineral content and density in hypopituitary patients with adult-onset GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(8):2865-73.
  191. Holmes SJ, Whitehouse RW, Swindell R, Economou G, Adams JE, Shalet SM. Effect of growth hormone replacement on bone mass in adults with adult onset growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;42(6):627-33.
  192. Barake M, Klibanski A, Tritos NA. Effects of recombinant human growth hormone therapy on bone mineral density in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(3):852-60.
  193. Rahim A, Holmes SJ, Adams JE, Shalet SM. Long-term change in the bone mineral density of adults with adult onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency in response to short or long-term GH replacement therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;48(4):463-9.
  194. Davidson P, Milne R, Chase D, Cooper C. Growth hormone replacement in adults and bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004;60(1):92-8.
  195. Clanget C, Seck T, Hinke V, Wüster C, Ziegler R, Pfeilschifter J. Effects of 6 years of growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone mineral density in GH-deficient adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;55(1):93-9.
  196. Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Claessen KM, Hamdy NA, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR. Effects of up to 15 years of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement on bone metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD): the Leiden Cohort Study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;81(5):727-35.
  197. Tritos NA, Hamrahian AH, King D, Greenspan SL, Cook DM, Jönsson PJ, et al. Predictors of the effects of 4 years of growth hormone replacement on bone mineral density in patients with adult-onset growth hormone deficiency - a KIMS database analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013;79(2):178-84.
  198. Holmer H, Svensson J, Rylander L, Johannsson G, Rosén T, Bengtsson BA, et al. Fracture incidence in GH-deficient patients on complete hormone replacement including GH. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2007;22(12):1842-50.
  199. Mo D, Fleseriu M, Qi R, Jia N, Child CJ, Bouillon R, et al. Fracture risk in adult patients treated with growth hormone replacement therapy for growth hormone deficiency: a prospective observational cohort study. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2015;3(5):331-8.
  200. Klefter O, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Is increase in bone mineral content caused by increase in skeletal muscle mass/strength in adult patients with GH-treated GH deficiency? A systematic literature analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(2):213-21.
  201. Monson JP, Abs R, Bengtsson BA, Bennmarker H, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hernberg-Stâhl E, et al. Growth hormone deficiency and replacement in elderly hypopituitary adults. KIMS Study Group and the KIMS International Board. Pharmacia and Upjohn International Metabolic Database. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;53(3):281-9.
  202. Fernholm R, Bramnert M, Hägg E, Hilding A, Baylink DJ, Mohan S, et al. Growth hormone replacement therapy improves body composition and increases bone metabolism in elderly patients with pituitary disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4104-12.
  203. Kokshoorn NE, Biermasz NR, Roelfsema F, Smit JW, Pereira AM, Romijn JA. GH replacement therapy in elderly GH-deficient patients: a systematic review. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(5):657-65.
  204. Vahl N, Juul A, Jørgensen JO, Orskov H, Skakkebaek NE, Christiansen JS. Continuation of growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: a two-year placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(5):1874-81.
  205. Carroll PV, Drake WM, Maher KT, Metcalfe K, Shaw NJ, Dunger DB, et al. Comparison of continuation or cessation of growth hormone (GH) therapy on body composition and metabolic status in adolescents with severe GH deficiency at completion of linear growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(8):3890-5.
  206. Drake WM, Carroll PV, Maher KT, Metcalfe KA, Camacho-Hübner C, Shaw NJ, et al. The effect of cessation of growth hormone (GH) therapy on bone mineral accretion in GH-deficient adolescents at the completion of linear growth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(4):1658-63.
  207. Courtillot C, Baudoin R, Du Souich T, Saatdjian L, Tejedor I, Pinto G, et al. Monocentric study of 112 consecutive patients with childhood onset GH deficiency around and after transition. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(5):587-96.
  208. Clayton PE, Cuneo RC, Juul A, Monson JP, Shalet SM, Tauber M. Consensus statement on the management of the GH-treated adolescent in the transition to adult care. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152(2):165-70.
  209. Toogood AA, Taylor NF, Shalet SM, Monson JP. Modulation of cortisol metabolism by low-dose growth hormone replacement in elderly hypopituitary patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(4):1727-30.
  210. Agha A, Walker D, Perry L, Drake WM, Chew SL, Jenkins PJ, et al. Unmasking of central hypothyroidism following growth hormone replacement in adult hypopituitary patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66(1):72-7.
  211. Jørgensen JO, Møller J, Laursen T, Orskov H, Christiansen JS, Weeke J. Growth hormone administration stimulates energy expenditure and extrathyroidal conversion of thyroxine to triiodothyronine in a dose-dependent manner and suppresses circadian thyrotrophin levels: studies in GH-deficient adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994;41(5):609-14.
  212. Jørgensen JO, Møller J, Skakkebaek NE, Weeke J, Christiansen JS. Thyroid function during growth hormone therapy. Hormone research. 1992;38 Suppl 1:63-7.
  213. Laurberg P, Jakobsen PE, Hoeck HC, Vestergaard P. Growth hormone and thyroid function: is secondary thyroid failure underdiagnosed in growth hormone deficient patients? Thyroidology. 1994;6(3):73-9.
  214. Span JP, Pieters GF, Sweep CG, Hermus AR, Smals AG. Gender difference in insulin-like growth factor I response to growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH-deficient adults: role of sex hormone replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(3):1121-5.
  215. Wolthers T, Hoffman DM, Nugent AG, Duncan MW, Umpleby M, Ho KK. Oral estrogen antagonizes the metabolic actions of growth hormone in growth hormone-deficient women. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism. 2001;281(6):E1191-6.
  216. Birzniece V, Ho KKY. Sex steroids and the GH axis: Implications for the management of hypopituitarism. Best practice & research Clinical endocrinology & metabolism. 2017;31(1):59-69.
  217. Christiansen JJ, Fisker S, Gravholt CH, Bennett P, Svenstrup B, Andersen M, et al. Discontinuation of estrogen replacement therapy in GH-treated hypopituitary women alters androgen status and IGF-I. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152(5):719-26.
  218. Weissberger AJ, Ho KK, Lazarus L. Contrasting effects of oral and transdermal routes of estrogen replacement therapy on 24-hour growth hormone (GH) secretion, insulin-like growth factor I, and GH-binding protein in postmenopausal women. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1991;72(2):374-81.
  219. Brooke AM, Kalingag LA, Miraki-Moud F, Camacho-Hübner C, Maher KT, Walker DM, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) replacement reduces growth hormone (GH) dose requirement in female hypopituitary patients on GH replacement. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;65(5):673-80.
  220. Arlt W, Callies F, van Vlijmen JC, Koehler I, Reincke M, Bidlingmaier M, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(14):1013-20.
  221. van Thiel SW, Romijn JA, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, Roelfsema F, van Hemert A, et al. Effects of dehydroepiandrostenedione, superimposed on growth hormone substitution, on quality of life and insulin-like growth factor I in patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency: a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(6):3295-303.
  222. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Brabant G, Maiter D, Jonsson B, Toogood A, Koltowska-Haggstrom M, et al. Response to GH treatment in adult GH deficiency is predicted by gender, age, and IGF1 SDS but not by stimulated GH-peak. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(5):733-43.
  223. Mah PM, Webster J, Jönsson P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Koltowska-Häggström M, Ross RJ. Estrogen replacement in women of fertile years with hypopituitarism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(11):5964-9.
  224. Ho KKY, Gibney J, Johannsson G, Wolthers T. Regulating of growth hormone sensitivity by sex steroids: implications for therapy. Frontiers of hormone research. 2006;35:115-28.
  225. Fleseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, Melmed S, Murad MH, Salvatori R, et al. Hormonal Replacement in Hypopituitarism in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(11):3888-921.
  226. Johannsson G, Gordon MB, Højby Rasmussen M, Håkonsson IH, Karges W, Sværke C, et al. Once-weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Adults with GH Deficiency: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(4):e1358-76.
  227. Sävendahl L, Battelino T, Højby Rasmussen M, Brod M, Saenger P, Horikawa R. Effective GH Replacement With Once-weekly Somapacitan vs Daily GH in Children with GHD: 3-year Results From REAL 3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(5):1357-67.
  228. Maniatis AK, Casella SJ, Nadgir UM, Hofman PL, Saenger P, Chertock ED, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Lonapegsomatropin in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: enliGHten Trial 2-Year Results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022.
  229. Deal C, Steelman J, Vlachopapadopoulou E, Stawerska R, Silverman LA, Phillip M, et al. Efficacy and safety of weekly somatrogon vs daily somatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency: a phase 3 study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022.
  230. Du H, Wu D, Yi P, Bai X, Luo Y, Yang H, et al. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of long-acting PEGylated recombinant human growth hormone (Jintrolong) for patients with growth hormone deficiency. Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM. 2022;35(4):511-7.
  231. Yuen KCJ, Miller BS, Boguszewski CL, Hoffman AR. Usefulness and Potential Pitfalls of Long-Acting Growth Hormone Analogs. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2021;12:637209.
  232. Cruz-Topete D, Jorgensen JO, Christensen B, Sackmann-Sala L, Krusenstjerna-Hafstrøm T, Jara A, et al. Identification of new biomarkers of low-dose GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):2089-97.
  233. Frajese G, Drake WM, Loureiro RA, Evanson J, Coyte D, Wood DF, et al. Hypothalamo-pituitary surveillance imaging in hypopituitary patients receiving long-term GH replacement therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5172-5.
  234. Chung TT, Drake WM, Evanson J, Walker D, Plowman PN, Chew SL, et al. Tumour surveillance imaging in patients with extrapituitary tumours receiving growth hormone replacement. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63(3):274-9.
  235. Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Boice JD, Chow EJ, Davies SM, Donaldson SS, et al. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a National Cancer Institute-supported resource for outcome and intervention research. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27(14):2308-18.
  236. Mackenzie S, Craven T, Gattamaneni HR, Swindell R, Shalet SM, Brabant G. Long-term safety of growth hormone replacement after CNS irradiation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2756-61.
  237. Popovic V, Mattsson AF, Gaillard RC, Wilton P, Koltowska-Häggström M, Ranke MB. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins 2 and 3, and the risk for development of malignancies in adults with growth hormone (GH) deficiency treated with GH: data from KIMS (Pfizer International Metabolic Database). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4449-54.
  238. van Bunderen CC, van Nieuwpoort IC, Arwert LI, Heymans MW, Franken AA, Koppeschaar HP, et al. Does growth hormone replacement therapy reduce mortality in adults with growth hormone deficiency? Data from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(10):3151-9.
  239. Berglund A, Gravholt CH, Olsen MS, Christiansen JS, Stochholm K. Growth hormone replacement does not increase mortality in patients with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;83(5):677-83.
  240. Stochholm K, Gravholt CH, Laursen T, Laurberg P, Andersen M, Kristensen L, et al. Mortality and GH deficiency: a nationwide study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(1):9-18.
  241. Stochholm K, Juul S, Christiansen JS, Gravholt CH. Mortality and socioeconomic status in adults with childhood onset GH deficiency (GHD) is highly dependent on the primary cause of GHD. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167(5):663-70.
  242. Burman P, Mattsson AF, Johannsson G, Höybye C, Holmer H, Dahlqvist P, et al. Deaths among adult patients with hypopituitarism: hypocortisolism during acute stress, and de novo malignant brain tumors contribute to an increased mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1466-75.
  243. Erfurth EM. Update in mortality in GH-treated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(11):4219-26.
  244. Carel JC, Ecosse E, Landier F, Meguellati-Hakkas D, Kaguelidou F, Rey G, et al. Long-term mortality after recombinant growth hormone treatment for isolated growth hormone deficiency or childhood short stature: preliminary report of the French SAGhE study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(2):416-25.
  245. Hernberg-Ståhl E, Luger A, Abs R, Bengtsson BA, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Wilton P, et al. Healthcare consumption decreases in parallel with improvements in quality of life during GH replacement in hypopituitary adults with GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5277-81.
  246. Martel-Duguech LM, Jorgensen JOL, Korbonits M, Johannsson G, Webb SM, Amadidou F, et al. ESE audit on management of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency in clinical practice. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020.
  247. Yuen KCJ. Adult growth hormone deficiency guidelines: more difficult than it seems to incorporate into clinical practice universally. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;184(4):C5-c7.
  248. Mancini A, Bruno C, Vergani E, Brunetti A, Palmisano G, Pontecorvi A. "Non-Classical" Indication for Provocative Testing of Growth Hormone: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Adult Patients Under Replacement Therapy. Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets. 2021;21(8):1406-12.