Archives

Lipid Disorders In People With HIV

ABSTRACT

 

Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent in people with HIV (PWH) and contributes to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease seen in this patient population. Factors that contribute to dyslipidemia include HIV infection itself and certain types of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Moreover, the effects of ART on lipids have changed over time as newer therapies have become available. Because some ART medications interact with lipid-lowering therapies, the type of lipid-lowering therapy initiated needs to be considered in this context. Of note, current cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators underestimate CVD risk in PWH because HIV-specific factors also contribute to CVD. HIV-specific variables should be taken into account when calculating atherosclerotic CVD risk in PWH. In addition to statins, other lipid lowering agents, including PCSK9 inhibitors, have been studied in PWH and can be considered in the treatment of dyslipidemia, particularly for low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) lowering. The ongoing REPRIEVE study will contribute to a better understanding of the use of statins in primary prevention of CV disease in PWH with low CVD risk.  Aggressive lipid management in PWH is essential for primary and secondary CVD prevention and optimization of health span and lifespan in this high-risk population.

 

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN PEOPLE WITH HIV

 

People with HIV (PWH) are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular (CV) disease, including acute myocardial infarction (MI), even after adjusting for traditional CVD risk factors. Multiple factors, including HIV itself, antiretroviral therapy (ART), inflammation, and dyslipidemia, account for this finding (1). In the SMART study, PWH were randomized to either drug conservation, in which ART was administered or held based on pre-specified CD4 cell counts, or viral suppression, in which ART was continued uninterrupted. Published in 2006, the SMART study showed that drug conservation was associated with a greater rate of death from any cause compared to continuous viral suppression. PWH in the drug conservation experienced a greater number of CV events, compared to those participants in the continuous viral suppression group (hazard ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.0 to 2.5), p = 0.05) (2). This finding was the opposite of the investigators’ hypothesis that increased exposure to ART might be associated with greater CV events in the continuous viral suppression group (2), based on data from that time period, including an association between longer duration of combination ART (including a protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and incident MI (Table 1) (3). This study unequivocally showed the importance of uncontrolled HIV, even with relatively preserved immune function, in the pathogenesis of CVD.

 

Table 1. Classes of ART and Some Individual Drugs within the Classes

Class of ART

Drugs

NRTIs

Emtricitabine

Tenofovir alafenamide

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Abacavir

Lamivudine

NNRTIs

Efavirenz

Rilpivirine

Doravirine

Rilipvirine

Nevirapine

PIs

Atazanavir

Darunavir

Ritonavir

INSTIs

Bictegravir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

Elvitegravir

Medications used for boosting or increasing another ART medication’s effect

Ritonavir

Cobicistat

NRTIs = nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NNRTIs = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PIs = protease inhibitors; INSTIs = integrase inhibitors

 

Another landmark study on the risk of CV disease in PWH, conducted within the Veterans’ Administration from 2003 to 2009, found that HIV serostatus was associated with a 50% increased risk of acute MI in a predominantly male cohort of veterans, despite controlling for traditional CV disease risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking (1). Other major studies found similar findings. In the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study of men with and without HIV, Post et al showed that men with HIV had greater coronary artery plaque prevalence than men without HIV, as measured by coronary CT angiography, and among men with coronary artery plaque, men with HIV had a greater extent of non-calcified plaque, which is more prone to rupture (4). Similarly, in a cohort study within the Partners HealthCare system, investigators demonstrated that the rate of acute MI was greater in PWH compared to individuals without HIV, particularly in women with HIV (unadjusted acute MI rate of 12.71 in women with HIV versus 4.88 in women without HIV) (5). Thus, studies from several different cohorts of PWH and individuals without HIV exhibit the association of HIV serostatus with CV disease and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

 

One question that has been raised is the effect of ART on CV disease risk, a topic that is addressed further below in this chapter. In the multicenter, international Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) Study, the predicted risk of MI in those PWH without prior MI was highest in those patients who were taking 3 different classes of ART (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), NNRTI, and PI) (6). Certain types of ART, including the NRTI abacavir, and the PIs darunavir (with ritonavir boosting), indinavir, and lopinavir (with ritonavir boosting), have been associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events (7,8). (Pharmacokinetic boosting or enhancing of ART is achieved via medications including ritonavir and cobicistat). Most recently, in a large multicenter cohort study of PWH from Europe and Australia, recent integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) exposure (<6 months) was associated with an increase risk of MI, compared to a lack of InSTI exposure, after accounting for CVD risk factors. After 6 months exposure, however, this elevated risk decreased and was no longer observed after 24 months. This finding requires replication in other cohorts and the potential underlying mechanisms need to be further explored.

 

Also, up to 30% of PWH have hepatitis C co-infection (9). Individuals with HIV and hepatitis C co-infection are at greater risk of CV disease than individuals with HIV infection alone (10). One reason for this may include higher levels of inflammatory markers seen in PWH with hepatitis C co-infection, including sICAM-1 and IL-6, that have been associated with CV disease in PWH (11).

 

In summary, multiple factors, including dyslipidemia, inflammation, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and central obesity, as well as ART-specific effects, contribute to increased CV disease risk in PWH.

 

HISTORY OF LIPID DISORDERS IN PEOPLE WITH HIV (PWH)

 

HIV infection is associated with dyslipidemia. In the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV infection results in lower total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels (Table 2) (12). The decreases in HDL-C and LDL-C can also be seen in other states of infection and/or inflammation (13).

 

Table 2. The Effect on Lipid Levels in Different Clinical Situations of PWH (12,14,15)

Class of ART

Effect on TC

Effect on LDL-C

Effect on HDL-C

Effect on TG

HIV not on ART

Decrease (v. pre-seroconversion)

Decrease (v. pre-seroconversion)

Decrease (v. pre-seroconversion)

No change (v. individuals without HIV)

HIV on ART

Increase (v. before ART initiation)

Increase (v. before ART initiation)

No change (v. before ART initiation)

Effect can depend on ART type

HIV with AIDS

Decrease (v. individuals without HIV)

Decrease (v. individuals without HIV

Decrease (v. individuals without HIV)

Increase (v. PWH without AIDS and individuals without HIV)

 

Early studies of lipids in PWH described differences in levels of triglycerides (TG), HDL-C, and LDL-C between individuals with AIDS, individuals with HIV but without AIDS, and control participants. Grunfeld et al found that participants with AIDS had the highest levels of TG compared to participants with HIV and controls. TC and HDL-C were lower in individuals with AIDS and in those with HIV compared to controls, and LDL-C was significantly lower in individuals with AIDS compared to control participants. The high levels of TG in participants with AIDS is secondary to increased hepatic output of VLDL and slower TG clearance (14,16).

 

In a study of lipid level changes pre- and post-HIV seroconversion and pre- and post-ART initiation in 50 men from the Multicenter Cohort AIDS Study, investigators observed mean increases in TC and LDL-C three years after ART initiation, compared to before ART initiation, with a minimal change in HDL. In addition, they found that TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C decreased from pre-seroconversion to the time before initiating ART (12). These findings demonstrated that ART is associated with an increase in TC and LDL-C in PWH. It is unclear however whether these changes with ART initiation were due to return to heath with reduction of systemic inflammation with virologic suppression or metabolic toxicity of ART. Of note, the majority of men in this study, which was published in 2003, received older generation protease inhibitor (PI) based regimens so the findings may not be as applicable to PWH treated with current ART regimens.

 

In addition, changes in non-traditional lipid markers have been studied in HIV infection. A higher proportion of men with AIDS have been shown to have small, dense LDL, compared to control patients without AIDS (17). In the Swiss National HIV Cohort, greater pro-atherogenic small dense LDL was directly associated with coronary heart disease events (18). In addition to small dense LDL, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has also been studied in PWH. In the general population, lipoprotein (Lp(a)) is associated with increased CVD risk (19,20). However, the association between HIV and Lp(a) levels has been equivocal (21,22). Nonetheless, poorly controlled HIV infection is thought to increase the atherogenic effect of allele-specific apolipoprotein(a), which is carried by Lp(a) (23). Moreover, Lp(a) and pro-atherogenic smaller apo(a) have been associated with greater carotid intima media thickness in women with HIV (24).

 

As alluded to above, the study and management of lipids in PWH have evolved over the course of the history of HIV infection and can be divided into the following time periods: before ART, early ART, and present-day ART.

 

MONITORING LIPIDS IN PATIENTS WITH HIV

 

CDC, NIH, and HIV Medicine Association of the IDSA guidelines recommend that a fasting or random lipid profile be obtained in PWH at the following time points: at introduction to care, at ART initiation or at the time of change in ART, and then every year, if the previous lipid test results were normal, or every 6 months, if the previous lipid test results were abnormal. If a random lipid panel is outside of the reference range, then the guidelines recommend obtaining a fasting lipid panel (25). Specialized tests, including Lp(a) or small dense LDL, are not specifically mentioned in the IDSA guidelines.

 

ART EFFECTS ON LIPIDS BY MEDICATION CLASS

 

Background

           

Current IDSA guidelines recommend the following ART regimens: 2 NRTIs plus a 3rd agent from the following categories, integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), NNRTIs, or PIs with either cobicistat or ritonavir added as pharmacokinetic boosters. An alternative regimen can consist of the INSTI dolutegravir and the NRTI lamivudine. Specific considerations are outlined in detail and accessible on the website aidsinfo.nih.gov (26).

 

Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs)

 

Tenofovir is an NRTI, and tenofovir-based regimens are among the initial treatments recommended for most PWH by current CDC, NIH, and HIV Medicine Association of the IDSA guidelines (27). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based regimens result in elevated plasma levels of tenofovir, which can cause adverse renal and bone effects. On the other hand, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimens result in lower plasma levels of tenofovir, but greater intracellular levels of tenofovir-diphosphate than TDF and fewer adverse renal and bone effects.

 

Moreover, TAF results in a more atherogenic lipid profile than TDF (Table 3), and a “statin-like” effect of TDF has been reported. In one study of PWH switching to a TAF-based regimen, investigators observed significant increases in TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG post switch; the mean increase in LDL-C was 9.8 mg/dL (28). In a safety and efficacy study of 1733 treatment-naïve PWH randomized to either a TDF-based regimen or TAF-based regimen over a 144 week duration, TAF-based regimens increased median levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG, compared to the TDF treatment group (at 144 weeks, median increase in LDL-C of 19 mg/dL in TAF-based treatment group versus 6 mg/dL in TDF-based treatment group, p < 0.001). However, no significant differences in either CV or cerebrovascular events between the treatment groups (2.8% of participants in the TAF group, 3.8% of participants in the TDF group, p = 0.28) was noted (29). The investigators also found that atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) risk when estimated at week 96 and as calculated using the ACC/AHA 2013 Pooled Cohort equations was similar between the two treatment groups, and no difference was detected in the proportion of participants in each treatment group eligible for high-intensity statin use based on 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines (30). Thus, despite the more negative effect of TAF-based regimens on lipids compared to TDF-based regimens, studies to date have not shown that there is a difference between the two treatment regimens in cardiovascular outcomes.

 

Table 3. Some Effects of Different Classes of ART on Lipid Levels*

Class of ART

Effect on TC

Effect on LDL-C

Effect on HDL-C

Effect on TG

NRTIs

Increase, no change with lamivudine

Increase, no change with lamivudine

Increase, no change with lamivudine

Increase, no change with lamivudine

NNRTIs

Increase, except no change with etravirine

Increase, except no change with etravirine

Increase, except no change with etravirine

Increase, except no change with etravirine

PIs

Increase

Increase by most PIs

Decrease by low dose ritonavir

Increase

INSTIs

No change

No change

No change

No change

*This table was adapted from Myerson et al. “Management of lipid disorders in patients living with HIV.” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2015, 55(9) 957-974 and Lagathu et al. “Metabolic complications affecting adipose tissue, lipid, and glucose metabolism associated with HIV antiretroviral treatment.” Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Sep;18(9):829-840.

 

Another point of difference between TAF- and TDF-based regimens is the effect of each on weight. In one study of PWH with a mean history of HIV infection of 18 years who switched from a TDF-based regimen to a TAF-based regimen, participants had a significant increase in weight, from 73.8 ± 14.3 kg (mean ± standard deviation) at 12 months before switch to 77.7 ± 42.3 kg at 3 months after switch and 75.5 ± 14.5 kg at 6 months after switch (p < 0.0001 for trend) (31). Similar findings have been seen in PWH who were ART naïve (32). The different effects of TAF- and TDF-based regimens on weight should be taken into consideration in the treatment of PWH, as these weight changes may alter CVD risk.

 

As noted previously, the NRTI abacavir has been linked to adverse cardiovascular events. However, studies comparing CVD risk with abacavir to other NRTIs have had equivocal results, and a clear mechanism that would explain such an association has not been presented (33). Of note, switching to an abacavir-based regimen from a TDF-based regimen has not been associated with a significant change in lipid levels (34).

 

Another point of interest with regards to NRTIs is the legacy effect of older generation NRTIs on metabolic health, as defined by having ≤ 2 of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel criteria, including TG > 150 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL. In a study focused on the prevalence of metabolic health in men with HIV in the MACS, both zidovudine and stavudine use were associated with a lower probability of being metabolically healthy, even though very few participants were receiving these medications at the time of assessment (35). Of note, stavudine, an older generation NRTI, is no longer recommended (25).

 

Protease Inhibitors (PIs)

 

PIs can be divided into older and newer-generation categories. Older-generation PIs include indinavir, saquinavir, and full dose ritonavir, and newer-generation PIs include atazanavir and darunavir (36). Current guidelines do not recommend indinavir (25). Newer generation PIs that are part of first-line ART have fewer adverse effects on lipids than older generation PIs (37).

 

Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with specific PIs (38,39), and in particular, the PI ritonavir has been associated with hyperlipidemia (40). In a study that compared cholesterol levels among PI-naïve participants and PI-treated participants started on ritonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir, either alone or in addition to saquinavir, the greatest increases in TC and TG were seen in the ritonavir based treatment group (77.3 ± 11.6 mg/dL (mean ± standard error of mean), p ≤ 0.001 versus change in the PI-naïve group, and 70.8 ± 17.8 mg/dL, p ≤ 0.001 versus change in the PI-naïve group, respectively) (41). In another study of 415 PWH on a boosted PI regimen and at high risk of CV disease, a switch from taking a boosted PI to the integrase inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir (N = 205 participants) resulted in significant decreases in TC (mean change from baseline -8.7% versus 0.7%) and LDL-C (mean change from baseline -7.7% versus 2%) compared to those seen in participants who did not switch (N = 210 participants) (42).

 

In a 24-week study focusing on the effects of newer generation PIs, including atazanavir and darunavir on lipids, PWH were randomized to the NRTIs TDF/emtricitabine and either ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or ritonavir-boosted darunavir. No significant differences in TC, LDL-C, or HDL-C were observed between the two treatment groups. TG increased in both treatment groups, but there was no significant difference in TG change between the two groups (43). Similarly, in another study of PWH, the effects of ritonavir-boosted darunavir and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir on TG over 12 weeks were similar (44). Of note, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir increases in TG more than ritonavir-boosted darunavir (45) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (46).

           

In summary, newer PIs have less metabolic side effects, but their effects on lipids should be considered in the care of PWH with dyslipidemia.

 

Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)

 

The effects of NNRTIs on lipids varies depending on the individual drug. Etravirine has a neutral effect on TC, LDL-C, and TG. Efavirenz increases LDL-C more than rilpivirine and increases TG more than both rilpivirine and nevirapine (15). However, nevirapine is not a first-line recommended ART in part because of its side effect profile. Switching from nevirapine-based ART to rilpivirine-based ART was shown to result in a mean (95% confidence interval) decrease in TC of -25.9 mg/dL (-19.3 to -32.1 mg/dL) and LDL-C of -13.9 (-8.1 to -19.7 mg/dL) at 24 weeks (47). The NNRTI, doravirine, has been associated with decreases in LDL-C and non-HDL-C in those switching from a PI-based regimen. With ART initiation, doravrine was associated with fewer lipid changes compared to efavirenz.

 

Integrase Inhibitors (INSTIs)

 

Integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), in particular, bictegravir, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are among the initial ART recommended in ART-naïve PWH, based on their efficacy in lowering viral load and favorable adverse effect profiles (15). With respect to the effects of individual INSTIs on lipid profiles, in a phase 3 study of PWH randomized to 2 NRTIs and either the INSTI dolutegravir or the INSTI raltegravir, no significant differences in fasting lipid panels were observed between the two groups over the study duration of 48 weeks (48).

 

The effects of INSTIs on lipids in comparison to other classes of ART has also been studied. In the Surveillance Cohort Long-Term Toxicity Antiretrovirals (SCOLTA), an observational cohort study, 490 PWH on either 2 NRTIs and the NNRTI efavirenz or a ritonavir-boosted PI switched either from efavirenz or a ritonavir-boosted PI to dolutegravir, elvitegravir, or the NNRTI rilpivirine. Among those who switched to an INSTI, a decrease in TC was seen in all groups except in the efavirenz to elvitegravir group, and a decrease in LDL-C was noted in those patients who switched from a ritonavir-boosted PI to elvitegravir (-12 ± 5.6 mg/dL for LDL-C (mean ± standard error). No significant change in TG was noted in any of the participants who switched to an INSTI-based regimen. In summary, the investigators found that switching off of a ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimen to either dolutegravir, elvitegravir, or rilpivirine improved TC, whereas switching off of a ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimen to rilpivirine improved TG and LDL-C also. Moreover, the switch from efavirenz to rilpivirine improved LDL and TG, compared to switching to an INSTI, although inter-group differences were not significant (49).

           

With regards to those ART naïve PWH, in the FLAMINGO study of PWH who were ART naïve and randomized to either dolutegravir-based or ritonavir-boosted darunavir-based ART, LDL-C was significantly greater at 96 weeks in the ritonavir-based darunavir-based ART arm compared to the dolutegravir-based ART arm (adjusted mean difference -12.8 mg/dL, 95% CI -17.4 to -8.1 mg/dL). Similarly, TG increased more in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir-based ART group than in the dolutegravir-based ART group (50). In summary, in ART naïve PWH started on either an INSTI-based or ritonavir-boosted PI based ART, those who received an INSTI-based treatment regimen had lower TG and TC at 96 weeks. 

           

Another aspect of metabolic health to consider in patients on integrase inhibitors, in particular, dolutegravir and bictegravir, is their effects on weight. Data from observational and retrospective studies suggests that weight gain is seen in PWH who start or switch to an INSTI (51). In addition, data from randomized trials also supports this. For example, in the open-label ADVANCE study conducted in South Africa, ART naïve PWH were randomized to either TDF-emtricitabine (or lamivudine)-efavirenz or one of the following: TAF-emtricitabine-dolutegravir or TDF-emtricitabine-dolutegravir. After 48 weeks, absolute weight gain and incident obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) was greater in the dolutegravir-based arms (6 kg in the TAF-emtricitabine-dolutegravir group and 3 kg in the TDF-emtricitabine-dolutegravir group compared to 1 kg in the TDF-emtricitabine (or lamivudine)-efavirenz group) (52).

 

INTSI use has also been associated with incident diabetes mellitus.  In an administrative database from the US examining PWH who initiated ART, INSTI use was associated with a 31% increase in incident diabetes compared to non-INSTI use.  In the NA_ACCORD study, INSTI initiation was associated with an increased risk of diabetes compared to ART initiation with either a PI or NNRTI-based regimen, an effect which was mediated in part by weight gain. In the treatment of overall metabolic health of PWH, the effect of INSTIs on weight gain should be kept in mind.

 

Additional Considerations Regarding ART and Dyslipidemia

 

The question of whether one type of ART should be changed to another to avoid negative effects on lipids must take into consideration multiple factors, including compliance with medications, resistance to ART, and additional co-morbidities (37,53). The effects on CVD outcomes of switching from a PI-based ART regimen to an NNRTI- or INSTI-based treatment in PWH with dyslipidemia have not been studied in controlled trials (54). However, in patients who are receiving PIs and have significant dyslipidemia, a switch to an INSTI or a lipid neutral NNRTI (rilpivirine, etravirine, doravirine) should be considered if equally as efficacious from an HIV control standpoint. In general, older generation PIs should be avoided.

 

MANAGEMENT OF DYSLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HIV

 

CV Risk Calculators in Patients With HIV and Goal LDL-C

 

Because of non-traditional risk factors that place PWH at heightened risk of CV disease, the question of whether risk calculators including the Pooled Cohort equations (PCE) are accurate in PWH has been raised. A 2018 Circulationstudy compared CV risk calculators, including the Framingham equation for coronary heart disease, the Framingham equation for ASCVD, and the PCE and found that all of these equations underestimated CV outcomes in men with HIV, with suboptimal discrimination (c statistics 0.68, 0.67, and 0.65, respectively). In other words, these equations may not be able to detect those patients with HIV at high risk of CVD who would benefit from treatment of modifiable risk factors (55).

 

Risk models specific to PWH were created using the D:A:D Study. In addition to including traditional CV risk factors, the D:A:D models included exposure to specific ART agents, including abacavir, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, and indinavir (56). However, in a study that compared 4 CV risk algorithms, including the D:A:D and the PCE, within the ATHENA cohort of PWH in the Netherlands, both the D:A:D and PCE algorithms underestimated CV disease risk in PWH with low baseline CV disease risk, with mean observed:expected ratios of 1.34 and 1.4 (57).

 

Questions that providers may have include which CV risk equation(s) should be used in PWH. A 2019 Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association (AHA) on CV disease in PWH notes that no optimal CV risk calculator exists, although HIV-specific risk factors, including hepatitis C co-infection, a current or nadir CD4 T cell count of < 350 cells/mm3, and lipodystrophy, contribute to increased ASCVD risk (Figure 1) (37). However, the statement does not specify what the goal LDL-C level should be in PWH. For the general population, the 2019 American College of Cardiology/AHA (ACC/AHA) Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease recommend that LDL-C should be lowered by ≥ 50% in those patients at high risk of CV disease (ASCVD risk score ≥ 20%). In those patients with intermediate risk of CV disease (ASCVD risk score of ≥ 7.5 to < 20%), risk enhancers, of which HIV is considered one, should be considered in the decision to start a moderate intensity statin with the goal of lowering LDL by 30-49% (58).

 

Figure 1: Estimating and Treating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk in People with HIV. *In patients on atazanavir/cobicistat, atorvastatin is contraindicated. In patients on darunavir/ritonavir, darunavir/cobicistat, or elvitegravir/cobicistat, the maximum recommended dose of atorvastatin is 20 mg daily. Similarly, atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/cobicistat, the maximum recommended dose of rosuvastatin is 10 mg daily.

 

Statin Initiation Decision Making: When to Start a Statin in Patients With HIV?

 

As noted above, the 2019 ACC/AHA Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease guidelines recognize HIV infection as a risk-enhancing factor for CV disease. As such, for those PWH who are at either borderline or intermediate risk of CV disease, HIV infection should be considered in the patient-provider discussion on statin initiation (58). The 2019 AHA Scientific Statement on CV disease in PWH also recommends that treatment decisions, such as statin initiation, should be based on an individualized assessment of CV disease risk, taking into account factors including prolonged viremia (Figure 1) (37). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) may also be useful in determining whether a patient with HIV is at high risk for ASCVD. If CAC > 0, then healthy lifestyle changes and statin treatment are indicated (37).

 

However, evidence has shown a disconnect between guidelines regarding CV disease and the practice of these guidelines, specifically in the care of PWH. Agents used in the primary and secondary prevention of CV disease, including statins, aspirin, and antihypertensives, are often under-prescribed in PWH compared to people without HIV (59).

           

An ongoing study to date that will better inform the patient-provider discussion on statin initiation for primary prevention of CV disease in PWH is the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE). REPRIEVE is a multisite, international study of PWH on ART, aged 40-75 years at low CVD risk. Participants were randomized to either placebo or pitavastatin 4 mg daily, and the primary outcome is time to major adverse cardiac event. Between March 2015 and March 2019, more than 7000 participants were enrolled, with a median follow-up time planned for 6 years (60).

 

Considerations to make in the decision to start a statin include the type of ART the patient is taking (Table 4). Several types of ART increase levels of atorvastatin, including ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, darunavir, and atazanavir, atazanavir alone, and cobicistat-boosted atazanavir and darunavir. As such, atorvastatin doses should be adjusted accordingly, and patients should be monitored for any adverse drug effects. Similarly, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, darunavir, and atazanavir and cobicistat-boosted atazanavir and darunavir increase rosuvastatin levels. Although atazanavir and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and darunavir affect pitavastatin levels, no dose adjustment of pitavastatin is recommended. A comprehensive list of statin-ART interactions is shown in Table 5 and detailed on the website https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/ (under Drug-Drug Interactions) (26,61).

 

Table 4. Some Statin-ART Interactions*

Statin

PIs

NRTIs

NNRTIs

INSTIs

Statin

 

 

 

 

Atorvastatin

Contraindicated with cobicistat-boosted atazanavir

 

Decrease levels with etravirine

No change in levels

Rosuvastatin

With some PIs, levels increase

 

No change in levels

Increase levels with cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir

Pitavastatin

No interactions with PIs

 

No change in levels

No change in levels; no data however with elvitegravir

*Reference: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/adult-and-adolescent-arv/                                         

** PIs=protease inhibitors; NRTIs=nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NNRTIs=non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; INSTIs=integrase inhibitors

 

Table 5. Interaction of Antiretroviral Therapy and Statins

Statin

Antiretroviral Drug

Recommendations

                          Protease Inhibitors

Atorvastatin

 

Atazanavir

Atazanavir/ritonavir

Titrate atorvastatin dose carefully and administer the lowest effective dose while monitoring for toxicities.

Atazanavir/cobicistat

Do not co-administer.

Darunavir/cobicistat

Darunavir/ritonavir

Titrate atorvastatin dose carefully and administer the lowest effective dose while monitoring for toxicities. Do not exceed 20 mg atorvastatin daily.

Lopinavir/ritonavir

Titrate atorvastatin dose carefully and administer the lowest effective dose while monitoring for toxicities. Do not exceed 20 mg atorvastatin daily.

Tipranavir/ritonavir

Do not co-administer.

Lovastatin

All protease inhibitors

Contraindicated

Pitavastatin

All protease inhibitors

No dose adjustment needed.

Pravastatin

 

Atazanavir/ritonavir

Atazanavir/cobicistat

Titrate pravastatin dose carefully while monitoring

for pravastatin-related adverse events.

Darunavir/cobicistat

Darunavir/ritonavir

Titrate pravastatin dose carefully while monitoring

for pravastatin-related adverse events.

Lopinavir/ritonavir

No dose adjustment needed.

Rosuvastatin

 

Atazanavir/ritonavir

Titrate rosuvastatin dose carefully and administer lowest effective dose while monitoring for rosuvastatin-related adverse events.

Atazanavir/cobicistat

Do not exceed rosuvastatin 10 mg daily.

Darunavir/cobicistat

Titrate rosuvastatin dose carefully and administer lowest effective dose while monitoring for rosuvastatin-related adverse events. Do not exceed rosuvastatin 20 mg daily.

Darunavir/ritonavir

Titrate rosuvastatin dose carefully and administer the lowest effective dose while monitoring for rosuvastatin-related adverse events.

Lopinavir/ritonavir

Titrate rosuvastatin dose carefully and administer the lowest effective dose. Do not exceed rosuvastatin 10 mg daily.

Tipranavir/ritonavir

No dose adjustment needed.

Simvastatin

All protease inhibitors

Contraindicated.

                      Non-Nucleoside Reverse

                      Transcriptase Inhibitors

Atorvastatin

 

Doravirine

Rilpivirine

No dose adjustment needed.

Efavirenz

Etravirine

Adjust atorvastatin dose according to lipid response, but do not exceed the maximum recommended dose.

Nevirapine

Adjust atorvastatin dose according to lipid response, but do not exceed the maximum recommended dose.

Fluvastatin

 

Doravirine

Rilpivirine

Nevirapine

No dose adjustment needed.

Efavirenz

Etravirine

Dose adjustments for fluvastatin may be necessary. Monitor for fluvastatin toxicity.

Lovastatin

Simvastatin

 

Doravirine

Rilpivirine

No dose adjustment needed.

Efavirenz

Adjust simvastatin dose according to lipid response, but do not exceed the maximum recommended dose.

Etravirine

Nevirapine

Adjust lovastatin or simvastatin dose according to lipid response, but do not exceed the maximum recommended dose.

Pitavastatin

All NNRTIs

No dose adjustment needed.

Pravastatin

 

Doravirine

Rilpivirine

Nevirapine

No dose adjustment needed.

Efavirenz

Etravirine

Adjust statin dose according to lipid responses, but do not exceed the maximum recommended dose.

Rosuvastatin

All NNRTIs

No dose adjustment needed.

                       Nucleoside Reverse

                      Transcriptase Inhibitors

All Statins

All NRTIs

No dose adjustment needed.

                        Integrase Strand

                       Transfer Inhibitors

Atorvastatin

 

Bictegravir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

No dose adjustment needed.

Elvitegravir/cobicistat

Titrate statin dose carefully and administer the lowest effective dose while monitoring for adverse events. Do not exceed 20 mg atorvastatin daily.

Lovastatin

 

Bictegravir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

No dose adjustment needed.

Elvitegravir/cobicistat

Contraindicated.

Pitavastatin Pravastatin

 

Bictegravir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

No dose adjustment needed.

Elvitegravir/cobicistat

No data available for dose recommendation.

Rosuvastatin

 

Bictegravir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

No dose adjustment needed.

Elvitegravir/cobicistat

Titrate statin dose carefully and use the lowest effective dose while monitoring for adverse events.

Simvastatin

 

Bictegravir

Dolutegravir

Raltegravir

No dose adjustment needed.

Elvitegravir/cobicistat

Contraindicated.

 

We generally prefer the high potency statins, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but will limit the dose if needed depending on the specific antiretroviral medications the patient is receiving and the potential for drug-drug interactions. In patients receiving concomitant PIs, the maximum dose of atorvastatin is 20 mg daily and the maximum dose of rosuvastatin is 10-20 mg daily (https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/adult-and-adolescent-arv/drug-interactions-between-protease-inhibitors-and-other-drugs?view=full). If drug-drug interactions are a major concern, pitavastatin, which does not have drug-drug interactions with PIs, is a good alternative. 

 

Lifestyle Interventions

 

Lifestyle interventions to improve lipids and CV risk include change in diet, weight loss, and/or exercise.

 

The 2019 ACC/AHA Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease guidelines recommend either ≥ 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise per week or ≥ 75 minutes of vigorous intensity exercise per week (58). However, factors associated with decreased activity in PWH include older age, lower CD4 T cell count, and having lipodystrophy (62). These factors and any other barriers to exercise should be considered when counseling PWH about exercise.

 

The Primary Prevention guidelines also recommend greater intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts and fish and less intake of trans fats, sugar sweetened beverages, processed meats, and refined carbohydrates (58). Studies on diet quality in PWH, however, have demonstrated lower diet quality, as measured by the Healthy Eating Index, in PWH compared to individuals without HIV (63-65). Diet is an important modifiable risk factor in primary prevention ASCVD and should be addressed in the care of PWH.

 

In a study of PWH with a Framingham score > 10% randomized to either intensive lifestyle intervention, which included diet and exercise counseling, or routine care, TC in the participants in the intensive lifestyle arm decreased by −27.1 mg/dL (p = 0.021) at 36 months, compared to baseline, whereas the change in TC in the routine care arm was not significant. Similarly, at 24 months, LDL-C decreased significantly (p = 0.011) in the treatment arm, compared to the routine care arm (66). However, a meta-analysis of dietary interventions in PWH demonstrated that dietary intervention did not result in a significant change in TC or LDL-C compared to control, but did result in a significantly lower TG level, with a weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval) of -41 mg/dL (-75 to -6) (67). Thus, the above data on the effect of lifestyle interventions on specific lipid parameters in PWH are somewhat equivocal, although in general, anti-atherogenic lipid changes were noted with lifestyle interventions.

 

Weight loss improves ASCVD risk factors in patients who are overweight or obese (58). Especially because the median BMI of ART-naïve PWH has increased over time (68), weight loss is an important point to address in PWH when discussing ASCVD risk reduction. However, studies in PWH to date have not necessarily demonstrated an improvement in lipids with weight loss. In women with obesity with and without HIV who lost 6-8% weight, no significant changes from baseline in either LDL-C or triglycerides was observed in either group of women (69). Similar findings were observed in another study (70). However, other CV benefits were seen, including improved insulin sensitivity (69).

 

When to Start Non-Statin Agents in Patients With HIV for LDL-C Lowering?

 

EZETIMBE

 

Ezetimibe has been studied as monotherapy for treatment of dyslipidemia in PWH. In PWH with LDL ≥ 130 mg/dL on low-dose pravastatin, the addition of ezetimibe resulted in LDL levels < 130 mg/dL in 62.5% of the participants (71). In PWH with LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL already on statin therapy (stable doses of either fluvastatin, pravastatin, or atorvastatin), ezetimibe has been shown to significantly lower LDL-C (median (interquartile range) percent change -20.8% (-25.4, -10.7), compared to placebo (72). In a separate study of 43 PWH on either rosuvastatin 10 mg daily and ezetimibe 10 mg daily or rosuvastatin 20 mg daily alone for 12 weeks, Saeedi et al noted that participants in the two treatment groups had similar levels of LDL-C lowering (-26.3 ± 20.9 mg/dL in the combined treatment group and -18.6 ± 21.3 mg/dL in the rosuvastatin only group). No significant change in HDL-C was noted in either arm, but a significant decrease in TG (mean ± standard deviation -54.9 mg/dL ± 51.4) from baseline was noted in the ezetimibe add-on arm. In terms of adverse drug effects, both treatments were tolerated well (73). Ezetimibe should be considered in a PWH at higher CVD risk if a statin is not tolerated or as an adjunctive treatment to maximum tolerated doses of statins if the treatment goal has not been achieved (either by % LDL-c reduction or LDL-c > 70 mg/dL).

 

PCSK9 INHIBITORS

 

PCSK9 inhibitors have not been well studied in PWH. However, given the interactions of statins with some ART, PCSK9 inhibitors do appear to be an attractive alternative LDL lowering medication class.

           

In a meta-analysis not restricted to PWH, PCSK9 levels were found to be independently associated with incident CV disease (74). PCSK9 levels have been studied in PWH, with some studies finding elevated levels in PWH compared to people without HIV (75,76). A cross-sectional study within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study that included PWH ≥ 40 years of age not on statin treatment found that in a multivariate analysis with traditional CV risk factors, low CD4 count (≤ 200 cells/μL) was positively associated with plasma PCSK9 levels (77). In another study, in individuals with HIV and hepatitis C co-infection, PCSK9 levels were found to be higher and TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C lower, than in uninfected controls or individuals with HIV infection alone, thought to be in part secondary to a greater level of IL-6 negatively impacting hepatic production of lipoproteins.

 

As LDL lowering medications, PCSK9 inhibitors’ use in PWH is beginning to be studied. In one study, “Evolocumab in HIV-Infected Patients With Dyslipidemia: Primary Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind BEIJERINCK Study,” participants were randomized to either placebo or evolocumab for 24 weeks. The primary outcome of this study was change in LDL-C from baseline. Compared to placebo, the treatment decreased LDL-C by 56.9% (95% confidence interval: -61.6% to -52.3%). In addition, evolocumab was found to be safe and was well-tolerated (78).

 

In an ongoing study, the Effect of PCSK9 Inhibition on Cardiovascular Risk in Treated HIV Infection (EPIC-HIV Study), PWH on ART with either established ASCVD or moderate or high risk for ASCVD will be randomized to either alirocumab or placebo for 52 weeks. Two of the primary outcomes of this study are change in arterial inflammation as measured by FDG PET/CT and change in lipids and lipoproteins (79).  PCSK9 inhibitors should be considered in high-risk CVD patients, especially in those with a previous CVD event, who have not reached LDL-c goals on a statin +/- ezetimibe.

 

To date, no studies have been published on the effects of bempedoic acid or bile acid sequestrants on lipids in PWH.

 

When to Start Non-Statin Agents in Patients With HIV for TG Lowering?

 

BACKGROUND

           

In the general population, the 2018 ACC/AHA Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines note that TG levels from 500 to 999 mg/dL are a risk factor for acute pancreatitis (80). General population studies have shown a direct association between triglyceride levels and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) (81,82), with some suggesting that certain gene alleles associated with elevated TG may be causal factors in the development of ASCVD (83,84). However, this link is not completely certain (85).

 

The 2019 AHA Scientific Statement on CV disease in PWH does not note a specific TG goal for PWH. However, studies of PWH treated with non-statin agents have addressed their effects on TG.

 

NIACIN

           

As seen in the general population AIM-HIGH study, the use of niacin in patients on statins with ASCVD and LDL-C < 70 mg/dL did not reduce ASCVD events, despite significant TG lowering (86). Niacin has been studied in PWH. In one study of PWH on ART with TG levels between 150 to 800 mg/dL, extended-strength niacin was compared to fenofibrate on the primary outcome of endothelial function as measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Over the 24-week study duration, the decreases in TG and increases in HDL-C were similar between the two treatment groups (for TG, -65 mg/dL (interquartile range -163 to 8 mg/dL) in the niacin group and -54 mg/dL (interquartile range -113 to -1 mg/dL) in the fenofibrate group). Flushing was the most common adverse effect among participants on niacin. No change in endothelial function was observed in either treatment group (87). Given that the results of AIM-HIGH did not demonstrate a benefit in ASCVD event reduction, we would not recommend the first-line use of niacin for TG lowering.

 

EZETIMIBE

           

In a study by Saeedi et al cited earlier of PWH on either rosuvastatin 10 mg daily and ezetimibe 10 mg daily or rosuvastatin 20 mg daily for 12 weeks, participants in the combined statin-ezetimibe group experienced a significant drop in TG, compared to the other treatment group (-55 mg/dL versus -15 mg/dL, p = 0.03) (73). Similarly, in the IMPROVE-IT study in which participants from the general population with a history of an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to either simvastatin/ezetimibe or simvastatin/placebo, simvastatin/ezetimibe resulted in a greater reduction in triglycerides (least squares estimate difference in means at 1 year, -14.04 mg/dL (-15.71, -12.37) (88). However, the American Heart Association guidelines focus on ezetimibe as an LDL-C lowering adjunct to statins, not as a triglyceride lowering agent (80).

 

FIBRATES

           

The Heart Positive study of 191 PWH on ART participants randomized to one of five treatment groups: usual care, low saturated fat diet and exercise, diet exercise plus fenofibrate, diet and exercise plus niacin, or diet and exercise plus fenofibrate and niacin. Compared to usual care, a combination of fenofibrate, niacin, and diet and exercise significantly decreased TG by 52% over 24 weeks (89).

 

OMEGA-3-FATTY ACIDS

           

In a meta-analysis of PWH treated with omega-3-fatty acids, Oliveira et al found that omega-3-fatty acids reduced TG by about 80 mg/dL. However, limitations of the meta-analysis were that the included studies varied with respect to dose of omega-3-fatty acids studied and study duration (90). Omega-3-fatty acids do not interact with available ART formulations. The current literature does not have any studies on the effect of icosapent ethyl in PWH, although the REDUCE-IT trial, which was conducted in a general population group of participants with either ASCVD or diabetes and a fasting TG of 135 to 499 mg/dL and on statin therapy, showed a benefit from icosapent ethyl in reducing ASCVD events (91).

 

SUMMARY

 

Our general approach is to focus on triglyceride lowering if the TG>500 mg/dL to prevent possible pancreatitis.  In addition to controlling secondary factors (e.g., hyperglycemia, excess adiposity, heavy alcohol use, estrogen use, other drugs that increase triglycerides, etc.), pharmacologic treatment with fibrates or omega-3 fatty acids is indicated in this population. For patients with TG between 150 and 500 mg/dL, pharmacologic interventions (fibrates or omega-3 fatty acids) can be considered after the LDL-C goal has been reached, especially in those at higher CVD risk (>20% 10-year risk). Note that in these patients non-HDL-C levels will likely be above goal. 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Dyslipidemia is common in PWH and is a modifiable risk factor for CV disease. PWH are at increased risk for developing interactions of specific ART with lipid lowering agents and this should be kept in mind in the treatment of dyslipidemia in PWH. Non-statin agents have been studied in the treatment of dyslipidemia in PWH and can be considered in cases of statin intolerance or contraindication. Ongoing research will provide more information on the use of statins in primary prevention of CV disease in PWH.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Freiberg MS, Chang CC, Kuller LH, et al. HIV infection and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173(8):614-622.
  2. Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study G, El-Sadr WM, Lundgren J, et al. CD4+ count-guided interruption of antiretroviral treatment. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(22):2283-2296.
  3. Friis-Moller N, Sabin CA, Weber R, et al. Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(21):1993-2003.
  4. Post WS, Budoff M, Kingsley L, et al. Associations between HIV infection and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Annals of internal medicine. 2014;160(7):458-467.
  5. Triant VA, Lee H, Hadigan C, Grinspoon SK. Increased acute myocardial infarction rates and cardiovascular risk factors among patients with human immunodeficiency virus disease. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2007;92(7):2506-2512.
  6. Law M, Friis-Moller N, Weber R, et al. Modelling the 3-year risk of myocardial infarction among participants in the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (DAD) study. HIV Med. 2003;4(1):1-10.
  7. Ryom L, Lundgren JD, El-Sadr W, et al. Cardiovascular disease and use of contemporary protease inhibitors: the D:A:D international prospective multicohort study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(6):e291-e300.
  8. Worm SW, Sabin C, Weber R, et al. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with HIV infection exposed to specific individual antiretroviral drugs from the 3 major drug classes: the data collection on adverse events of anti-HIV drugs (D:A:D) study. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(3):318-330.
  9. Osibogun O, Ogunmoroti O, Michos ED, et al. HIV/HCV coinfection and the risk of cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(11):998-1004.
  10. Bedimo R, Westfall AO, Mugavero M, Drechsler H, Khanna N, Saag M. Hepatitis C virus coinfection and the risk of cardiovascular disease among HIV-infected patients. HIV Med. 2010;11(7):462-468.
  11. Chew KW, Hua L, Bhattacharya D, et al. The effect of hepatitis C virologic clearance on cardiovascular disease biomarkers in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014;1(3):ofu104.
  12. Riddler SA, Smit E, Cole SR, et al. Impact of HIV infection and HAART on serum lipids in men. Jama. 2003;289(22):2978-2982.
  13. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. The Effect of Inflammation and Infection on Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al., eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.
  14. Grunfeld C, Pang M, Doerrler W, Shigenaga JK, Jensen P, Feingold KR. Lipids, lipoproteins, triglyceride clearance, and cytokines in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74(5):1045-1052.
  15. Myerson M, Malvestutto C, Aberg JA. Management of lipid disorders in patients living with HIV. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55(9):957-974.
  16. Reeds DN, Mittendorfer B, Patterson BW, Powderly WG, Yarasheski KE, Klein S. Alterations in lipid kinetics in men with HIV-dyslipidemia. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;285(3):E490-497.
  17. Feingold KR, Krauss RM, Pang MY, Doerrler W, Jensen P, Grunfeld C. The Hypertriglyceridemia of Acquired-Immunodeficiency-Syndrome Is Associated with an Increased Prevalence of Low-Density-Lipoprotein Subclass Pattern-B. J Clin Endocr Metab. 1993;76(6):1423-1427.
  18. Bucher HC, Richter W, Glass TR, et al. Small Dense Lipoproteins, Apolipoprotein B, and Risk of Coronary Events in HIV-Infected Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy: The Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Jaids-J Acq Imm Def. 2012;60(2):135-142.
  19. Kamstrup PR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Steffensen R, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2009;301(22):2331-2339.
  20. Emerging Risk Factors C, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, et al. Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA. 2009;302(4):412-423.
  21. Constans J, Pellegrin JL, Peuchant E, et al. High plasma lipoprotein (a) in HIV-positive patients. Lancet. 1993;341(8852):1099-1100.
  22. Enkhmaa B, Anuurad E, Zhang W, et al. Effect of antiretroviral therapy on allele-associated Lp(a) level in women with HIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study. J Lipid Res. 2018;59(10):1967-1976.
  23. Enkhmaa B, Anuurad E, Zhang W, et al. HIV Disease Activity as a Modulator of Lipoprotein(a) and Allele-Specific Apolipoprotein(a) Levels. Arterioscl Throm Vas. 2013;33(2):387-392.
  24. Enkhmaa B, Anuurad E, Zhang W, et al. Lipoprotein(a) and HIV Allele-Specific Apolipoprotein(a) Levels Predict Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in HIV-Infected Young Women in the Women's Interagency HIV Study. Arterioscl Throm Vas. 2017;37(5):997-+.
  25. https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed (October 3, 2020). PoAGfAaAGftUoAAiAaAwHDoHaHSAa.
  26. http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Section accessed (September 25, 2019) (Table 21a). PoAGfAaAGftUoAAiAaAwHDoHaHSAa.
  27. Services DoHaH. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV.
  28. Lacey A, Savinelli S, Barco EA, et al. Investigating the effect of antiretroviral switch to tenofovir alafenamide on lipid profiles in people living with HIV within the UCDID Cohort. AIDS. 2020.
  29. Arribas JR, Thompson M, Sax PE, et al. Brief Report: Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF), Each Coformulated With Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, and Emtricitabine (E/C/F) for Initial HIV-1 Treatment: Week 144 Results. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(2):211-218.
  30. Aneni EC, Osondu CU, De La Cruz J, et al. Lipoprotein Sub-Fractions by Ion-Mobility Analysis and Its Association with Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in High-Risk Individuals. Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2019;26(1):50-63.
  31. Taramasso L, Berruti M, Briano F, Di Biagio A. The switch from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide determines weight gain in patients on rilpivirine-based regimen. AIDS. 2020;34(6):877-881.
  32. Sax PE, Erlandson KM, Lake JE, et al. Weight Gain Following Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: Risk Factors in Randomized Comparative Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2019.
  33. Llibre JM, Hill A. Abacavir and cardiovascular disease: A critical look at the data. Antiviral Res. 2016;132:116-121.
  34. Palacios R, Perez-Hernandez IA, Martinez MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching to abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) plus rilpivirine (RPV) in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients on HAART. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(5):815-819.
  35. Lake JE, Li X, Palella FJ, Jr., et al. Metabolic health across the BMI spectrum in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected men. AIDS. 2018;32(1):49-57.
  36. Lundgren J, Mocroft A, Ryom L. Contemporary protease inhibitors and cardiovascular risk. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31(1):8-13.
  37. Feinstein MJ, Hsue PY, Benjamin LA, et al. Characteristics, Prevention, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in People Living With HIV: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation.2019;140(2):E98-E124.
  38. Markowitz M, Saag M, Powderly WG, et al. A preliminary study of ritonavir, an inhibitor of HIV-1 protease, to treat HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(23):1534-1539.
  39. Cameron DW, Heath-Chiozzi M, Danner S, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ritonavir in advanced HIV-1 disease. The Advanced HIV Disease Ritonavir Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351(9102):543-549.
  40. Sullivan AK, Nelson MR. Marked hyperlipidaemia on ritonavir therapy. AIDS. 1997;11(7):938-939.
  41. Periard D, Telenti A, Sudre P, et al. Atherogenic dyslipidemia in HIV-infected individuals treated with protease inhibitors. The Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Circulation. 1999;100(7):700-705.
  42. Gatell JM, Assoumou L, Moyle G, et al. Switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to a dolutegravir-based regimen for maintenance of HIV viral suppression in patients with high cardiovascular risk. AIDS. 2017;31(18):2503-2514.
  43. Martinez E, Gonzalez-Cordon A, Ferrer E, et al. Early lipid changes with atazanavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir. HIV Med. 2014;15(6):330-338.
  44. Aberg JA, Tebas P, Overton ET, et al. Metabolic effects of darunavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV type 1-infected subjects over 48 weeks. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2012;28(10):1184-1195.
  45. Ortiz R, Dejesus E, Khanlou H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48. AIDS. 2008;22(12):1389-1397.
  46. Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, et al. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(3):323-332.
  47. Rokx C, Verbon A, Rijnders BJA. Short Communication: Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk After Switching HIV-1 Patients on Nevirapine and Emtricitabine/Tenofovir-DF to Rilpivirine/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir-DF. Aids Res Hum Retrov. 2015;31(4):363-367.
  48. Raffi F, Rachlis A, Stellbrink HJ, et al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):735-743.
  49. Taramasso L, Tatarelli P, Ricci E, et al. Improvement of lipid profile after switching from efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to rilpivirine or once-daily integrase inhibitors: results from a large observational cohort study (SCOLTA). BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):357.
  50. Molina JM, Clotet B, van Lunzen J, et al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 96 week results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3b study. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(4):e127-136.
  51. Eckard AR, McComsey GA. Weight gain and integrase inhibitors. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2020;33(1):10-19.
  52. Venter WDF, Moorhouse M, Sokhela S, et al. Dolutegravir plus Two Different Prodrugs of Tenofovir to Treat HIV. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(9):803-815.
  53. Maggi P, Di Biagio A, Rusconi S, et al. Cardiovascular risk and dyslipidemia among persons living with HIV: a review. Bmc Infect Dis. 2017;17.
  54. Boccara F, Lang S, Meuleman C, et al. HIV and Coronary Heart Disease Time for a Better Understanding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(5):511-523.
  55. Triant VA, Perez J, Regan S, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Functions Underestimate Risk in HIV Infection. Circulation. 2018;137(21):2203-2214.
  56. Friis-Moller N, Thiebaut R, Reiss P, et al. Predicting the risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients: the data collection on adverse effects of anti-HIV drugs study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(5):491-501.
  57. van Zoest RA, Law M, Sabin CA, et al. Predictive Performance of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Algorithms in People Living With HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;81(5):562-571.
  58. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019.
  59. Ladapo JA, Richards AK, DeWitt CM, et al. Disparities in the Quality of Cardiovascular Care Between HIV-Infected Versus HIV-Uninfected Adults in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(11).
  60. Grinspoon SK, Fitch KV, Overton ET, et al. Rationale and design of the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE). Am Heart J. 2019;212:23-35.
  61. http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Section accessed (September 25, 2019) (Table 22d). PoAGfAaAGftUoAAiAaAwHDoHaHSAa.
  62. Vancampfort D, Mugisha J, Richards J, De Hert M, Probst M, Stubbs B. Physical activity correlates in people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review of 45 studies. Disability and rehabilitation. 2018;40(14):1618-1629.
  63. Weiss JJ, Sanchez L, Hubbard J, Lo J, Grinspoon SK, Fitch KV. Diet Quality Is Low and Differs by Sex in People with HIV. The Journal of nutrition. 2019;149(1):78-87.
  64. Anema A, Fielden SJ, Shurgold S, et al. Association between Food Insecurity and Procurement Methods among People Living with HIV in a High Resource Setting. Plos One. 2016;11(8):e0157630.
  65. Fitch KV. Contemporary Lifestyle Modification Interventions to Improve Metabolic Comorbidities in HIV. Current HIV/AIDS reports. 2019;16(6):482-491.
  66. Saumoy M, Alonso-Villaverde C, Navarro A, et al. Randomized trial of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention in HIV-infected patients with moderate-high cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:301-308.
  67. Stradling C, Chen YF, Russell T, Connock M, Thomas GN, Taheri S. The Effects of Dietary Intervention on HIV Dyslipidaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plos One. 2012;7(6).
  68. Sax PE, Erlandson KM, Lake JE, et al. Weight Gain Following Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: Risk Factors in Randomized Comparative Clinical Trials. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2020;71(6):1379-1389.
  69. Reeds DN, Pietka TA, Yarasheski KE, et al. HIV infection does not prevent the metabolic benefits of diet-induced weight loss in women with obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2017;25(4):682-688.
  70. Engelson ES, Agin D, Kenya S, et al. Body composition and metabolic effects of a diet and exercise weight loss regimen on obese, HIV-infected women. Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2006;55(10):1327-1336.
  71. Negredo E, Molto J, Puig J, et al. Ezetimibe, a promising lipid-lowering agent for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected patients with poor response to statins. AIDS. 2006;20(17):2159-2164.
  72. Chow D, Chen H, Glesby MJ, et al. Short-term ezetimibe is well tolerated and effective in combination with statin therapy to treat elevated LDL cholesterol in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2009;23(16):2133-2141.
  73. Saeedi R, Johns K, Frohlich J, Bennett MT, Bondy G. Lipid lowering efficacy and safety of Ezetimibe combined with rosuvastatin compared with titrating rosuvastatin monotherapy in HIV-positive patients. Lipids Health Dis.2015;14:57.
  74. Vlachopoulos C, Terentes-Printzios D, Georgiopoulos G, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular events with levels of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2016;252:50-60.
  75. Leucker TM, Weiss RG, Schar M, et al. Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction Is Associated With Elevated Serum PCSK9 Levels in People With HIV Independent of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(19):e009996.
  76. Boccara F, Ghislain M, Meyer L, et al. Impact of protease inhibitors on circulating PCSK9 levels in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients from an ongoing prospective cohort. AIDS. 2017;31(17):2367-2376.
  77. Gencer B, Pagano S, Vuilleumier N, et al. Clinical, behavioral and biomarker predictors of PCSK9 levels in HIV-infected patients naive of statin therapy: A cross-sectional analysis from the Swiss HIV cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2019;284:253-259.
  78. Boccara F, Kumar PN, Caramelli B, et al. Evolocumab in HIV-Infected Patients With Dyslipidemia Primary Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind BEIJERINCK Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(20):2570-2584.
  79. Effect of PCSK9 Inhibition on Cardiovascular Risk in Treated HIV Infection (EPIC-HIV Study) (EPIC-HIV). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03207945. Accessed on October 3, 2019.
  80. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082-e1143.
  81. Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(3):299-308.
  82. Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Schnohr P, Jensen GB, Nordestgaard BG. Nonfasting cholesterol and triglycerides and association with risk of myocardial infarction and total mortality: the Copenhagen City Heart Study with 31 years of follow-up. J Intern Med. 2011;270(1):65-75.
  83. Do R, Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, et al. Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45(11):1345-+.
  84. Sarwar N, Sandhu MS, Ricketts SL, et al. Triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary disease: collaborative analysis of 101 studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1634-1639.
  85. Dron JS, Hegele RA. Genetics of Triglycerides and the Risk of Atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19(7).
  86. Investigators A-H, Boden WE, Probstfield JL, et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(24):2255-2267.
  87. Dube MP, Komarow L, Fichtenbaum CJ, et al. Extended-Release Niacin Versus Fenofibrate in HIV-Infected Participants With Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: Effects on Endothelial Function, Lipoproteins, and Inflammation. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(5):840-849.
  88. Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;372(25):2387-2397.
  89. Balasubramanyam A, Coraza I, Smith EO, et al. Combination of niacin and fenofibrate with lifestyle changes improves dyslipidemia and hypoadiponectinemia in HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy: results of "heart positive," a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):2236-2247.
  90. Oliveira JM, Rondo PH. Omega-3 fatty acids and hypertriglyceridemia in HIV-infected subjects on antiretroviral therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. HIV Clin Trials. 2011;12(5):268-274.
  91. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):11-22.

 

Is Atherosclerosis a Pediatric Disease

ABSTRACT

 

In the US and other developed countries, cardiovascular disease is a major health burden and the leading cause of death. There are at least three lines of evidence that support the concept of atherosclerosis, the principle cause of cardiovascular disease, having its origins in childhood.  Although the most direct is in children with genetic dyslipidemia, such as familial hypercholesterolemia, there is evidence that in-utero and acquired effects may play a role as well. The ability to identify genetic mutations and/or acquired factors or conditions early in childhood creates the opportunity to prevent development of risk factors and future CVD-related events by effective and timely intervention.  

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Since publication of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommendations in 1992 (1), there has been growing interest in early identification and intervention of children at moderate to high risk of premature cardiovascular disease.  Since that time, additional pediatric specific guidelines and recommendations have been published (2,3, 4). A fundamental question, however, is whether atherosclerosis, the underlying basis for cardiovascular disease, is a pediatric disease.

 

Arteriosclerosis is characterized by deposits of lipoproteins and calcium in the arterial intima (plaques), resulting in inflammation and subsequent fibrosis. The buildup of arterial plaques reduces blood flow and often leads to symptoms of cardiovascular disease (CVD), such as angina, and CVD-related events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke.  Although the atherosclerotic process rarely leads to CVD-related symptoms or events in children, its origins can be demonstrated at a very young age in those with genetic mutations and acquired risk factors and conditions.  In contrast to those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, children with a homozygous disease have early clinical manifestations (xanthoma) and significant, symptomatic ASCVD that generally results in premature death, often during adolescence or early adulthood.

 

There are at least three lines of evidence that support the concept of atherosclerosis having its origins in childhood.  Although the most direct is in children with genetic dyslipidemia, such as familial hypercholesterolemia, there is evidence that in-utero and acquired effects may play a role as well.

 

FETAL STUDIES

 

During pregnancy maternal hypercholesterolemia, such as occurs in women with familial hypercholesterolemia, may have an adverse effect on the future health of the fetus. The presence of greatly increased fatty streak formation in human fetal arteries has been reported in over 50% of fetuses of mothers who were hypercholesterolemic during pregnancy (5).  Strong correlations were noted between maternal and fetal plasma cholesterol levels, which in turn were proportional to the extent of lesion formation in the fetus. Despite similar plasma cholesterol levels during childhood, atherosclerosis in children of hypercholesterolemic mothers progressed much more rapidly than did children of mothers who had normal cholesterol levels (6).  Use of cholesterol lowering agents or antioxidants in the mother greatly reduced fetal and postnatal atherosclerosis in the offspring (7). 

 

A potential mechanism for this susceptibility to atherosclerosis is suggested by animal models that demonstrate persistence differences in arterial gene expression after birth between offspring of mothers who have normal compared to elevated levels of cholesterol. This evidence supports the assumption that fetal lesion information is associated with genetic programming, which may in turn affect postnatal atherogenesis (8).  Cholesterol-lowering and antioxidant treatment during pregnancy appear to positively influence in-utero programming and decrease postnatal susceptibility to atherogenesis (9).

 

OBSERVATIONAL/EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES

 

Fatty streaks, the earliest progenitor lesions, are present from early childhood and well established by 20 or 30 years of age. Such lesions, as well as raised plaques, increase rapidly in prevalence and extent during the 15-34 year age span.  Relatively advanced levels of atherosclerosis, including fibrous plaques, have been found in adolescents and young adults. (10-12). Fatty streaks progress to raised lesions at vulnerable anatomic sites (13).  Vascular surfaces subjected to turbulent flow, the preferred sites for fatty streaks, are the same sites as those for advanced lesions, the latter being vulnerable to plaque rupture and thrombosis (10,14,15). Observational studies from autopsies have helped inform us about the timing, extent and severity of atherosclerotic lesions. Thirty percent (30%) of autopsy specimens of black males contained aortic atheroma by age 10 years (16).  Autopsy studies of U.S. soldiers killed during the Korean War showed significant evidence of CVD in 77% of soldiers, with an average age of 22 years. (17). Similar findings were reported in Vietnam War casualties (18).

 

In addition to autopsy findings, studies using noninvasive measures, including carotid intima-medial thickness (cIMT) and arterial distensibility, have shown anatomic and functional changes of atherosclerosis in youth (10-23). Thickness of the far wall of the internal carotid progresses with age and risk factors alone and together predict thickness in young adults (24).

 

The risk factors associated with early arterial lesions in children and young adults are the same as those associated with the advanced lesions that cause symptomatic coronary artery disease in adulthood (12, 25).  Increased body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), diabetes mellitus, and the presence of cigarette smoking are all associated with greater atherosclerotic plaque coverage and more advanced atherosclerotic lesions. (12,26-28). Autopsy data show that the severity of asymptomatic CVD increases as the number of risk factors increase from 2 - 39 years of age (13,29).

 

Based on considerable evidence, we can conclude that observational and epidemiologic studies have documented: 1) the origins of atherosclerosis are present from a very early age; 2) there is a striking increase in both the severity and extent of atherosclerosis as age and the number of risk factors increase; 3) the presence and intensity of risk factors are highly correlated with the extent and severity of atherosclerosis; and 4) the combined impact of multiple risk factors is exponentially greater than individual factors alone.

 

MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION STUDIES

 

Genetic mutations characterized by lifelong elevations of cholesterol are associated with increased cardiovascular disease and premature events, and provide the best evidence relating risk to future probability of ASCVD.  Conversely, genome wide analysis has demonstrated many alleles that profoundly decrease CVD risk by lifelong lower levels of cholesterol (Table 1). (30-32). It cannot be assumed, however, that a comparable level of lipid lowering achieved with the use of medication will offer the same protective effects (33). This, in part, may be due to initiation of lipid-lowering therapy after clinical disease is recognized, which may be insufficient to prevent the progression of established atherosclerosis. Additionally, the duration of the low cholesterol level is lifelong vs. relatively short number of years on lipid lowering therapy.

 

In a 20-year follow-up study of statin therapy in children with hypercholesterolemia, 98% of whom had genetically confirmed FH, early treatment was shown to slow the progression of cIMT thickness and reduced the risk of CVD in adulthood (34). In this study of 184 subjects with FH were compared to 77 unaffected siblings, as well as the outcomes of their affected parent. The mean LDL-C level in the subjects with FH decreased 32% from the baseline (237.3 to 160.7 mg/L or 6.13 to 4.16 mmol/L); while treatment goals of LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) were achieved in only 20%. Mean progression of cIMT thickness was not significantly different between those with FH and their siblings, indicating a normalization of the rate of cIMT thickening. The cumulative incidence of CVD-related events (1% vs. 26%) and of death from CVD causes at 39 years of age (0% vs. 7%) was lower among the subjects with FH than among their affected parents. Such findings suggest early identification and initiation of effective lipid lowering therapy, although not to LDL-C levels less than 100 mg/dL, significantly reduces the occurrence and progression of atherosclerosis.

 

Thus, growing trial evidence is consistent with genetic studies that support therapeutic intervention to achieve lower lipid levels, although the long-term safely and efficacy of medications to accomplish this goal in the pediatric population cannot be documented at this time.

 

Table 1. Key Mendelian Randomization Studies

Mutation

LDL-Cholesterol Reduction

CHD Risk

APOC-III (35)

↓16%

↓23.4 mg/dL

(0.60 mmol/L)

↓40%

NPC1L1 (36)

---

↓12 mg/dL

(0.31 mmol/L)

↓53%

PCSK9 (30)

                                 Blacks

                                 Whites

 

↓28%

↓15%

 

↓40 mg/dL

↓20 mg/dL

 

(1.0 mmol/L)

(0.5 mmol/L)

 

↓88%

↓47%

From: Wilson, Don P and Gidding, S. The Journal of Clinical Lipidology. September–October, 2015. Volume 9, Issue 5, Supplement, Pages S1–S4

 

Although limited information is available in youth, there is growing interest in the role of TGs as a CVD risk factor. Mendelian randomization studies of individuals with TG-lowering variants in the lipoprotein lipase gene and LDL-C-lowering variants in the LDL receptor gene were found to be associated with similar lower risk of coronary heart disease per 10-mg/dL lower level of ApoB-containing lipoproteins (odds ratios of 0.771 and 0.773, respectively).  Importantly, the clinical benefit of lower TG levels was similar to that of lower LDL-C levels per 10mg/dl decrease in ApoB. However, a much larger decrease in TG levels (approx. 70mg/dl) was required to decrease Apo B by 10mg compared to LDL cholesterol (approx. 14mg/dl). This finding suggests that the causal effect of all ApoB-containing lipoprotein particles on the risk of CVD appears to be determined by the circulating concentration of those particles rather than by the mass of cholesterol or triglyceride that they carry (37). This observation, if confirmed, could prove important since 1) significant numbers of youth have elevated non-HDL cholesterol levels, a surrogate marker of apoB, as a result of adverse lifestyles, underlying genetic mutations in TG metabolism, or both; 2) the presence of elevated ApoB during childhood, which often persists into adulthood, represent a much longer period of exposure than that of adult onset; and 3) several novel therapies that potently reduce TG levels are currently in development, some of which have been shown to be effective in youth. However, long-term studies addressing risk reduction and outcomes, safety and FDA approval for use in youth are lacking at this time.

 

As an alternative to statins, the utility of newer therapies such as ATP citrate lyase inhibitors (ACLY), an enzyme in the cholesterol–biosynthesis pathway upstream of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), are being explored.  Studies of genetic variants that mimic the effect of ATP citrate lyase inhibitors showed that, compared to statins, ACLY inhibitors appear to lower plasma LDL-C levels by the same mechanism of action. Both were associated with similar effects on the risk of CVD per unit decrease in the LDL-C level (38). These findings, if found to be safe and effective, offer new opportunities for future drug development.

 

Table 2.  Effects on the Risk of CV Events per Decrease of 10 mg/DL in the LDL-C* or ApoB-containing Lipoproteins** Level

Polygenic Risk Score

OR

95% CI

P

Reference

*ACLY score

0.823

0.78 to 0.87

4.0×10−14

Ference, NEJM 2019

*HMGCR score

0.836

0.81 to 0.87

3.9×10−19

Ference, NEJM 2019

 

 

 

 

 

**LPL score

0.771

0.741 to 0.802

3.9 × 10−38

Ference, JAMA 2019

**LDLR score

0.773

0.747 to 0.801

1.1 × 10−46

Ference, JAMA 2019

*Mendelian Randomization Study of ACLY and Cardiovascular Disease. Ference BA, Ray KK, Catapano AL, Ference TB, Burgess S, Neff DR, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Kastelein JJP, Nicholls SJ. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 14;380(11):1033-1042.

**Association of Triglyceride-Lowering LPL Variants and LDL-C-Lowering LDLR Variants With Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. Ference BA, Kastelein JJP, Ray KK, Ginsberg HN, Chapman MJ, Packard CJ, Laufs U, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Nicholls SJ, Bhatt DL, Sabatine MS, Catapano ALJAMA. 2019 Jan 29;321(4):364-373

 

ACQUIRED RISK FACTORS AND RISK CONDITIONS

 

Risk factors and risk conditions (Table 3) are often acquired during childhood and may accelerate development of ASCVD. In clinical practice dyslipidemia is most commonly encountered in children and adolescents who are obese (BMI > 95th percentile) and insulin resistant, the latter clinically manifest by the presence of acanthosis nigricans, impaired or elevated fasting glucose, hypertension, and in girls, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).  There is a striking increase in both severity and extent of atherosclerosis as age and the number of risk factors increases. The presence and intensity of risk factors are highly correlated with the extent and severity of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, risk factors measured in childhood and adolescence have been shown to be better predictors of the severity of atherosclerosis than risk factors measured in young adults (13).

 

Table 3. Acquired Risk Factors and Risk Conditions

Risk Factors

Non-Modifiable

Modifiable

·       Family History

·    Nutrition/Diet

·       Age

·    Physical Inactivity

·       Gender

·    Tobacco Exposure

·       Perinatal Factors

·    Blood Pressure

 

·    Lipid Levels

 

·    Overweight/Obesity

 

·    Diabetes Mellitus

 

·    Metabolic Syndrome

 

·    Inflammation

Risk Conditions

Moderate Risk

High Risk

·       Kawasaki disease with regressed coronary aneurysms

·    Kawasaki disease with current coronary aneurysms

·       Chronic inflammatory diseases

·    Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus

·       HIV infection

·    Post-orthotopic heart transplant

 

The ability to identify genetic mutations and/or acquired factors or conditions early in this vulnerable population creates the opportunity to prevent development of risk factors and future CVD-related events by effective and timely intervention.  All children, including those with genetic dyslipidemia, should be encouraged to follow a heart healthy lifestyle.  If begun early, such efforts have the potential of preventing behaviors and risk factors that increase future CVD risk. To assist clinicians in this task, the American Heart Association (AHA) has defined four health behaviors and four health factors that are strongly correlated with ideal cardiovascular health (39). Observational studies of individuals who were able to achieve and maintain one or more ideal cardiovascular health behaviors into middle age had greater longevity, longer morbidity-free survival, compression of morbidity to the end of the lifespan, greater health-related quality of life in older age, and substantially lower healthcare costs later in life (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Correlation of Health Behaviors and Factors with Ideal Cardiovascular Health

 

 

Number of Health Behaviors* (% lower risk for incidence CHD)

Study

N

1

2

3

4

5

Males (40)

42,847

(54%)

(63%)

(71%)

(78%)

(87%)

Females (41)

84,129

---

---

(57%)

(66%)

(83%)

 

 

Using the seven AHA cardiovascular health metrics, scoring of adolescents using NHANES data showed low scores, especially deficient in points for diet and exercise (42). Retrospective analysis revealed that the seven metrics score in adolescents is inversely associated with cIMT and directly associated with arterial elasticity, suggesting that this evaluation of cardiovascular wellness can be applied to evaluation of adolescents and targeted as part of primordial prevention (43). 

 

Cardiovascular disease risk factors are associated with both the early and advanced stages of atherosclerosis. Individuals at increased risk should be encouraged to achieve a low lifetime risk by preventing development of risk factors starting in youth. Recognizing that this process begins during childhood is key to facilitating implementation of measures that will prevent atherosclerosis and thereby reduce or eliminate future CVD-related events.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. National Cholesterol Education Program: Report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 1992 Mar;89(3 Pt 2):525-84.
  2. Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: Summary report. Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128 Suppl 5:S213-56.
  3. Jacobson TA, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Jones PH, Kris-Etherton P, Sikand G, et al. National Lipid Association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: Part 2. J Clin Lipidol. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6 Suppl):S1,122.e1.
  4. Grundy, S. M., Stone, N. J., Bailey, A. L., Beam, C., Birtcher, K. K., Blumenthal, R. S., . . . Yeboah, J. (2019). 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation, 139(25), e1082-e1143.
  5. Napoli C, D'Armiento FP, Mancini FP, Postiglione A, Witztum JL, Palumbo G, et al. Fatty streak formation occurs in human fetal aortas and is greatly enhanced by maternal hypercholesterolemia. Intimal accumulation of low density lipoprotein and its oxidation precede monocyte recruitment into early atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1997 Dec 1;100(11):2680-90.
  6. Napoli C, Glass CK, Witztum JL, Deutsch R, D'Armiento FP, Palinski W. Influence of maternal hypercholesterolaemia during pregnancy on progression of early atherosclerotic lesions in childhood: Fate of Early Lesions in Children (FELIC) study. Lancet. 1999 Oct 9;354(9186):1234-41.
  7. Napoli C, Witztum JL, Calara F, de Nigris F, Palinski W. Maternal hypercholesterolemia enhances atherogenesis in normocholesterolemic rabbits, which is inhibited by antioxidant or lipid-lowering intervention during pregnancy: An experimental model of atherogenic mechanisms in human fetuses. Circ Res. 2000 Nov 10;87(10):946-52.
  8. Palinski W. Effect of maternal cardiovascular conditions and risk factors on offspring cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2014 May 20;129(20):2066-77.
  9. Palinski W, Napoli C. The fetal origins of atherosclerosis: Maternal hypercholesterolemia, and cholesterol-lowering or antioxidant treatment during pregnancy influence in utero programming and postnatal susceptibility to atherogenesis. FASEB J. 2002 Sep;16(11):1348-60.
  10. McGill HC, Jr, McMahan CA. Determinants of atherosclerosis in the young. Pathobiological Ddeterminants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Nov 26;82(10B):30T-6T.
  11. Strong JP. Natural history and risk factors for early human atherogenesis. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group. Clin Chem. 1995 Jan;41(1):134-8.
  12. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, Newman WP,3rd, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 4;338(23):1650-6.
  13. McGill HC, Jr, McMahan CA, Gidding SS. Preventing heart disease in the 21st century: Implications of the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) study. Circulation. 2008 Mar 4;117(9):1216-27.
  14. Constantinides P. Experimental atherosclerosis. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1965:1
  15. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W,Jr, Rosenfeld ME, et al. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 May;14(5):840-56.
  16. Strong JP, Malcom GT, Oalmann MC. Environmental and genetic risk factors in early human atherogenesis: Lessons from the PDAY study. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Pathol Int. 1995 Jun;45(6):403-8.
  17. Enos WF, Holmes RH, Beyer J. Coronary disease among United States soldiers killed in action in Korea; preliminary report. J Am Med Assoc. 1953 Jul 18;152(12):1090-3.
  18. McNamara JJ, Molot MA, Stremple JF, Cutting RT. Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam. JAMA. 1971 May 17;216(7):1185-7.
  19. Davis PH, Dawson JD, Riley WA, Lauer RM. Carotid intimal-medial thickness is related to cardiovascular risk factors measured from childhood through middle age: The Muscatine study. Circulation. 2001 Dec 4;104(23):2815-9.
  20. Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Kahonen M, Taittonen L, Laitinen T, Maki-Torkko N, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in childhood and carotid artery intima-media thickness in adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2277-83.
  21. Urbina EM, Kieltkya L, Tsai J, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Impact of multiple cardiovascular risk factors on brachial artery distensibility in young adults: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Hypertens. 2005 Jun;18(6):767-71.
  22. Juonala M, Magnussen CG, Venn A, Dwyer T, Burns TL, Davis PH, et al. Influence of age on associations between childhood risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness in adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study, the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study, the Bogalusa Heart Study, and the Muscatine Study for the International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort (i3C) Consortium. Circulation. 2010 Dec 14;122(24):2514-20.
  23. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Tutar E, Ziada KM, Hobbs RE, McCarthy PM, et al. High prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic teenagers and young adults: Evidence from intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2001 Jun 5;103(22):2705-10.
  24. Magnussen CG, Venn A, Thomson R, Juonala M, Srinivasan SR, Viikari JS, et al. The association of pediatric low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol dyslipidemia classifications and change in dyslipidemia status with carotid intima-media thickness in adulthood: Evidence from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study, the Bogalusa Heart study, and the CDAH (Childhood Determinants of Adult Health) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 10;53(10):860-9.
  25. Lloyd-Jones DM, Leip EP, Larson MG, D'Agostino RB, Beiser A, Wilson PW, et al. Prediction of lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease by risk factor burden at 50 years of age. Circulation. 2006 Feb 14;113(6):791-8.
  26. Newman WP,3rd, Freedman DS, Voors AW, Gard PD, Srinivasan SR, Cresanta JL, et al. Relation of serum lipoprotein levels and systolic blood pressure to early atherosclerosis. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 16;314(3):138-44.
  27. McGill HC, Jr, McMahan CA, Zieske AW, Malcom GT, Tracy RE, Strong JP. Effects of nonlipid risk factors on atherosclerosis in youth with a favorable lipoprotein profile. Circulation. 2001 Mar 20;103(11):1546-50.
  28. McGill HC, Jr, McMahan CA, Malcom GT, Oalmann MC, Strong JP. Effects of serum lipoproteins and smoking on atherosclerosis in young men and women. The PDAY research group. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Jan;17(1):95-106.
  29. McMahan CA, McGill HC, Gidding SS, Malcom GT, Newman WP, Tracy RE, et al. PDAY risk score predicts advanced coronary artery atherosclerosis in middle-aged persons as well as youth. Atherosclerosis. 2007 Feb;190(2):370-7.
  30. Mortality in treated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: Implications for clinical management. Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group. Atherosclerosis. 1999 Jan;142(1):105-12.
  31. Cohen JC, Boerwinkle E, Mosley TH,Jr, Hobbs HH. Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1264-72.
  32. Kathiresan S, Melander O, Guiducci C, Surti A, Burtt NP, Rieder MJ, et al. Six new loci associated with blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides in humans. Nat Genet. 2008 Feb;40(2):189-97.
  33. Cohen JC, Stender S, Hobbs HH. APOC3, coronary disease, and complexities of Mendelian randomization. Cell Metab. 2014 Sep 2;20(3):387-9.
  34. Luirink, Wiegman, Kusters, et al. 20-Year Follow-up of Statins in Children with Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1547-56.
  35. TG and HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Crosby J, Peloso GM, Auer PL, Crosslin DR, Stitziel NO, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 3;371(1):22-31.
  36. Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium Investigators. Inactivating mutations in NPC1L1 and protection from coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 27;371(22):2072-82.
  37. Ference BA, Kastelein JJP, Ray KK, Ginsberg HN, Chapman MJ, Packard CJ, Laufs U, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Nicholls SJ, Bhatt DL, Sabatine MS, Catapano AL.Association of Triglyceride-Lowering LPL Variants and LDL-C-Lowering LDLR Variants With Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA. 2019 Jan 29;321(4):364-373
  38. Ference BA, Ray KK, Catapano AL, Ference TB, Burgess S, Neff DR, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Danesh J, Kastelein JJP, Nicholls SJ. Mendelian Randomization Study of ACLY and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 14;380(11):1033-1042)
  39. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: The American Heart Association's strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):586-613.
  40. Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Sacks FM, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: Benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications. Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):160-7.
  41. Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 6;343(1):16-22.
  42. Shay CM, Ning H, Daniels SR, Rooks CR, Gidding SS, Lloyd-Jones DM. Status of cardiovascular health in US adolescents: Prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2005-2010. Circulation. 2013 Apr 2;127(13):1369-76.
  43. Pahkala K, Hietalampi H, Laitinen TT, Viikari JS, Ronnemaa T, Niinikoski H, et al. Ideal cardiovascular health in adolescence: Effect of lifestyle intervention and association with vascular intima-media thickness and elasticity (the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children [STRIP] study). Circulation. 2013 May 28;127(21):2088-96.

Male Androgenetic Alopecia

ABSTRACT

 

Male androgenetic alopecia (MAA) is the most common form of hair loss in men, affecting 30-50% of men by age 50. MAA occurs in a highly reproducible pattern, preferentially affecting the temples, vertex and mid frontal scalp. Although MAA is often regarded as a relatively minor dermatological condition, hair loss impacts self-image and is a great cause of anxiety and depression in some men. MAA is increasingly identified as a risk factor for arterial stiffness and cardiovascular disease. A familial tendency to MAA and racial variation in the prevalence is well recognized, with heredity accounting for approximately 80% of predisposition. Normal levels of androgens are sufficient to cause hair loss in genetically susceptible individuals. The key pathophysiological features of MAA are alteration in hair cycle development, follicular miniaturization, and inflammation. In MAA, the anagen phase decreases with each cycle, while the length of telogen remains constant or is prolonged. Ultimately, anagen duration becomes so short that the growing hair fails to achieve sufficient length to reach the surface of the skin, leaving an empty follicular pore. Hair follicle miniaturization is the histological hallmark of androgenetic alopecia. Once the arrector pili muscle, that attaches circumferentially around the primary follicle, has detached from all secondary follicles and primary follicles have undergone miniaturization and detachment, hair loss is likely irreversible. While many men choose not to undergo treatment, topical minoxidil and oral finasteride are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (USA) for the treatment of MAA. Both medications prevent further hair loss, but only partially reverse baldness, and require continuous use to maintain the effect. Topical minoxidil is well tolerated as a 2% or 5% solution or 5% foam. There is initially accelerated hair loss for several weeks due to telogen hairs falling out. Minor adverse effects include itching of the scalp, dandruff, and erythema. Finasteride is a potent and selective antagonist of the type II 5 alpha reductase, and is not an anti-androgen. 5 alpha reductase converts testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT).  DHT binding to the scalp hair follicle androgen receptors produces MAA. A daily oral finasteride dose of one milligram reduces scalp dihydrotestosterone by 64% and serum dihydrotestosterone by 68%. Adverse effects, including sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction, low libido, anorgasmia) are uncommon, and most often resolve without discontinuing treatment. Permanent sexual adverse effects have been reported on social media and internet forums; however, the true incidence is unknown. Dutasteride inhibits type I and type II 5 alpha reductase, and it might be superior to finasteride in improving hair growth in young males. However, adverse sexual side effects are more common with dutasteride than with finasteride. Combining medications with different mechanisms of action enhances the efficacy. Topical antiandrogens, prostaglandin analogues, topical antifungals, growth factors, and laser treatment are all emerging medical treatments for MAA, yet lack the necessary research to confirm efficacy and safety. Hair transplantation involves removal of hair from the occipital scalp and re-implantation into the bald vertex and frontal scalp. With modern techniques, graft survival in excess of 90% can be reliably achieved. A combination of these therapeutic options is now available for men experiencing MAA, with favorable cosmetic outcomes possible.

 

INTRODUCTION 

 

Male androgenetic alopecia (MAA, male pattern baldness) is the most common cause of hair loss in men. The hair loss is progressive. Gradual conversion of terminal hairs into vellus hairs occurs in a highly reproducible pattern, denudes the scalp and leads to baldness. While some degree of androgen-dependent hair loss is universal after puberty, the prevalence of alopecia of sufficient severity to warrant a diagnosis of balding increases with advancing age. Twin studies confirm that hair loss is a genetically determined phenomenon. Observational studies in eunuchs have established the androgen-dependent nature of this condition.

 

The morbidity of MAA is predominately psychological, although MAA is associated with slight increased risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer of the scalp. MAA has a variable psychosocial impact on the affected individual, however premature MAA is more likely to cause emotional distress. MAA is reportedly associated with increased incidence of myocardial infarction, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

 

Topical minoxidil and finasteride (5 alpha reductase type II inhibitor) are the only FDA approved treatments for MAA. Both agents arrest progression of hair loss and stimulate partial regrowth of hair. Dutasteride (dual 5 alpha reductase type I and II inhibitor) is more potent and has been more effective than finasteride in phase II trials but phase III trial data are limited. Hair transplantation is widely practiced in the USA and takes advantage of the relative sparing and androgen-resistant nature of donor occipital hairs.

 

New insights into the pathophysiology, genetic basis of MAA, and the role of androgens may help in the discovery of additional treatments for androgenetic alopecia.

 

EPIDEMIOLOGY

 

Hamilton estimated that 30% to 50% of men developed MAA by the age of 50 (1). Many Western studies have shown that there are racial as well as age-related differences in the incidence and pattern of hair loss in MAA (2).

 

The incidence and severity of MAA is reported to be more common in Caucasian men than other nationalities. It has been observed that advanced degrees of alopecia are more frequent and develop at an earlier age in Caucasian than in Mongolian populations (3). The onset of MAA in the Japanese occurs one decade later than in Caucasians.(4) Black, Oriental, Native American, and African-American men are more likely to have preservation of their frontal hair lines, less extensive and late onset baldness than Caucasians (1,5-7). A population study completed in Singapore supports that Chinese men are reported to have a lower incidence of MAA (8).

 

Age prevalence of MAA has been documented in numerous study populations. In Australia, a study of 1390 men between the ages of 40 and 69 was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors for MAA. The prevalence of vertex or full baldness (Figure 1) (Norwood Hamilton scale) increases with age from 31% (age 40-55) to 53% (age 65-69). A receding frontal hairline was found in 25% of men aged 40-55 and 31% aged 65-69 (9). A survey done in the USA reported a prevalence of moderate or severe MAA of 53% in the age group 40-49 (10). An increased incidence of MAA with aging has also been reported in Korean population, with type III-vertex involvement most commonly seen in the third to seventh decades (11).  The prevalence of MAA in Singaporean males was reported to be 63%, increasing with age, from 32% at 17-26 years to 100% after 80 years (8).

Figure 1. Androgenetic alopecia patterns in men.

 

PSYCHOSOCIAL IMPACT OF MAA

 

Hair is an essential part of an individual's self-image and its main significance relates to socialization. Thus, the consequences of MAA are predominantly psychological. Several studies show that the negative self-perception of balding patients appears to be consistent between Western (12, 13) and Asian cultures (14). The negative impact of MAA is often trivialized or ignored by unaffected people (15). However, there is evidence that perception by others may compound the psychological problems suffered by balding men. A Korean study of the perception of balding men by women and non-balding men found that their negative perception of men with MAA was similar to the psychosocial effects reported by the patients themselves (14). Of note, a perception of bald men looking less attractive was found in more than 90% of subjects surveyed. This view was more common in women than non-balding men. Such negative perceptions may further impair the social functioning of balding men. A recent study confirmed a high prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients experiencing androgenetic alopecia, who often utilize avoidant coping strategies (16). It is important to note however, that most affected men cope well with androgenetic alopecia, without significant impact on their psychosocial function. Thus, those who do seek help are likely to be in greater emotional distress and have been dissatisfied with any treatment they have received. The most distressed balding men are those with more extensive hair loss, those who have very early onset, and those that believe their balding is progressive (12). It is important for the physician to address the patients’ emotional responses to alopecia, including anger, anxiety, and depression, including their beliefs about the impact of their condition (16).

 

MAA AND DISEASE ASSOCIATIONS

 

Cotton et al. first suggested idea that male pattern baldness may be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (17). This has been subsequently supported by several other studies (18-21). A recent study found that asymptomatic young men with at least Grade 3 vertex baldness have a significantly greater risk of arterial stiffness than those with normal hair status (22). However, most of these studies were conducted by non-dermatologists and no dermatologic input was included for confirmation of MAA diagnoses. These statistically-significant, though weak, associations were discovered in epidemiological, cohort, and case control studies. Severe early onset of MAA in subjects before age 30 may be associated with a higher risk for ischemic heart disease. In a retrospective study of 22,071 American subjects, men experiencing vertex balding were shown to have an increased incidence of myocardial infarction compared with frontal alopecia (23). One study showed that frontal male pattern baldness in young men was associated with increased serum cholesterol levels and higher blood pressure compared to men of similar age with no hair loss (23). Increased incidences of hypertension and elevated aldosterone levels have also been found in women with female pattern hair loss (24,25). No clear link between cardiovascular diseases and MAA has been established. High androgen levels have been postulated to cause MAA as well as atherosclerosis and thrombosis, however some data has shown no association between baldness and established coronary risk factors (26).

 

An increased incidence of benign prostatic hyperplasia has been associated with MAA, and MAA could be an early marker of the disease (27-29). A recent study, however, suggested that there is no relationship between androgenetic alopecia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, PSA level, and prostate volume (30). Prostate cancer has also been found to be positively associated with MAA in various studies (31,31). A large scale Australian case-control study found that vertex balding was associated with a 50% increase in risk of prostate cancer and 11 year follow up data suggests that vertex androgenetic alopecia at age of 40 years might be a marker of increased risk of early-onset prostate cancer (32,33). A meta-analysis conducted using Medline and Cochrane databases suggests that an increased risk of prostate cancer was only associated with vertex baldness, whereas other patterns appear to have no association (34).However, associations with high-grade prostate cancer were found in all patterns of MAA, being especially significant in men aged 60-69 years. An association and a pathophysiological mechanism for the link between MAA and prostate cancer also remains to be established but may involve the dual dependence of these conditions on dihydrotestosterone (35).

 

A meta-analysis of case-control studies (n=5) has suggested a reduced risk of testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) in men with MAA (36).  They reported that a statistically significant association was observed, suggesting that MAA might become a protective factor for the risk of TGCT. Testicular cancer is hormone-dependent as supported by its rapid increase in incidence starting at pubertal age and late onset of puberty has been inversely associated with the risk of testicular cancer. MAA and testicular cancer share some biological and epidemiologic risk factors including: aging, genetic inheritance, and androgenetic influence. Androgen metabolic pathway genetic variation studies showed that Ser312-Asn polymorphism of the luteinizing hormone receptor was linked to a decreased relative risk of TGCT(37). These conclusions have been based on a limited number of case-control studies and further research is required. 

 

Recent studies suggest higher prevalence, comorbidity, and mortality rates of COVID-19 in males than females. A review of 59,254 individuals from 11 countries, demonstrated higher mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection in males. A possible suggestion of MAA and worse Covid-19 outcomes has led to several studies reviewing this association (38-40). One study assessed the severity of hair loss in 1,941 admitted male symptomatic patients that tested  for SARS-CoV-2 infection, consisted of 1,605 negative-tested and 336 positives. Classification of hair loss was obtained from the UK Biobank data based on the Hamilton–Norwood Scale (HNS). Severe MAA (HNS 4–7) was significantly associated with a higher rate of positive COVID-19 tests (41). In addition, severe MAA had a higher odds ratio than other important risk factors consisting of increased Body Mass Index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. However, mild and moderate MAA (in comparison with patients with no hair loss) did not correlate significantly with increased COVID-19 positivity. The main limitation of that study was that the MAA characterization of patients was based on self-reported data (41). Wambier et al. in a recent study, described SARS-CoV-2 infectivity through transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), which is associated with androgen sensitivity (42). Moreover, the prospective cohort study of Goren et al. involved 77 men admitted with COVID-19; ICU admission was significantly lower (1 out of 12 patients; 8%) in the group taking anti-androgens (dutasteride, finasteride, spironolactone, etc.) relative to the group that did not use anti-androgens (38 out of 65 patients; 58%) (43). Recent studies suggested both high and low androgen levels could lead to a severe course of COVID-19 (44). Increased tissue dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels are seen in hyperandrogenic conditions like MAA, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer (45).Notably, Motopoli et al. studied androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in 118 prostate cancer patients and demonstrated that ADT might have a protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection (46).

 

ETIOLOGY

 

Genetic factors and androgens both play key roles in causing “androgenic” hair loss.

 

Genetics and Androgenetic Alopecia

 

A familial tendency to MAA and racial variation in the prevalence of balding is well recognized (5,47). Twin studies identified heredity as accounting for around 80% of the predisposition to baldness (48). Genetic factors modify the magnitude of the hair follicle response to circulating androgens. Those with a strong predisposition go bald in their teenage years, while those with a weak predisposition may not go bald until they are in their 60s or 70s. Fewer than 15% of men have little or no baldness by the age of 70 (49). Osborne in 1916 suggested that the baldness gene behaved in an autosomal dominant manner in men and an autosomal recessive fashion in women (50). Happle and Küster were unable to demonstrate a bimodal distribution of phenotypes with clearly unaffected and clearly affected individuals as is usually seen in autosomal dominant disorders (51). In contrast they observed a range of phenotypes for men and women that seem to follow a normal distribution. This, together with the finding that baldness risk increases with the number of affected family members, is more consistent with polygenic inheritance. Furthermore, they noted that inherited traits due to single gene defects rarely have an incidence greater that 1:1000, while polygenic diseases are much more common, as is the case with androgenetic alopecia. The current concept of it being a polygenic inheritance is supported by an Australian study that examined the frequency of baldness in the fathers of balding men (52). Of the fifty-four father-son relationships, 81.5% of balding sons had fathers who had cosmetically significant balding. This figure greatly exceeded the proportion expected of an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. The same authors also described an association of male pattern baldness with a polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene on the X chromosome (52,53). The androgen receptor gene restriction fragment length polymorphism [RFLP] was found in almost all (98.1%) young bald men, older bald men (92.3%), but only in 77% of non-bald men. This polymorphism appears to be necessary for the development of MAA, but its presence in non-bald men indicates that it is necessary but not sufficient to cause the phenotype (53). In addition, several shorter triplet repeat haplotypes were found in higher frequency in bald men than in normal controls. These RFLPs appear to be associated with a functional variant of the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Of note, the androgen receptor gene is located on the X chromosome, which is passed on from mother to a male child. However, family studies have shown resemblance of hair loss between fathers and sons, which cannot be explained by AR gene mutations alone. 

 

These data suggest that other autosomal genes may also be contributing to the phenotype. Several studies have examined the other candidate genes and chromosomal regions that can contribute to the hair loss.

 

Genetic association studies of 5 alpha reductase genes SRD5A1 on chromosome 5 and SRD5A2 on chromosome 2, using dimorphic intragenic restriction fragment length polymorphisms in 828 families, failed to show an association between these genes and MAA (53). However, the role of the 5 alpha reductase enzyme in MAA is evident from its role in the metabolism of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and the effect of 5 alpha reductase inhibitors in treating hair loss. The cytochrome p450 alpha aromatase enzyme has also been found to contribute to androgenetic alopecia. Aromatase diminishes intra-follicular testosterone by catalyzing the conversion of testosterone to estradiol. Differences exist in the expression of aromatase in balding and non-balding scalp (54). Yip et al suggest that the aromatase gene (CYP19A1) might predispose to hair loss in women (55).  

 

Hillmer et al sought to identify new susceptibility genes in MAA (56). In a genome wide scan and fine mapping linkage study performed on 95 families, they found that there is strong evidence for an MAA susceptibility locus on chromosome 3q26 (56). This study could not confirm or exclude the relevance of chromosomes 11q22-q24, 18p11-q22, and 19p13-q13 in causing MAA. Another genome-wide association study completed by Hillmer et al found a highly significant association on chromosome 20p11 suggesting that the 20p11 locus has a role in a yet-to-be-identified androgen-independent pathway (57). A new susceptibility variant on chromosome 7p21.1 suggests HDAC9 is a 3rd candidate gene for male-pattern baldness (58).

 

A recent genome wide association study conducted in the United Kingdom, using 25,662 MPB cases and 17,928 controls, found 71 significantly associated loci, 30 of which were previously undescribed. These loci account for 38% of the heritability of MAA, suggesting a relatively low level of complexity in the genetic architecture (59).

 

GENETIC TESTING IN ANDROGENETIC ALOPECIA

 

A gene polymorphism-based diagnostic test that will predict the chances of future androgenetic alopecia development is now in the market (53,56). For young patients concerned about hair loss, this test may help to define the value of early treatment initiation.

In males, the gene test can predict the chances for MAA by reporting the presence or absence of a specific variation in the androgen receptor gene found on the X chromosome. The variant androgen receptor gene causes changes in the hair follicle’s response to dihydrotestosterone, resulting in alterations in the hair growth cycle. A positive test result indicates a 70% chance of developing MAA, whereas a negative test result indicates a 70% chance of not developing MAA. The test is of value as a screening test in predicting the future chances of developing MAA rather than a confirmatory test.

 

Recently, a gene test has been developed that is designed to evaluate an individual’s response to finasteride therapy. The test is based on significant association of specific variations in the androgen receptor gene and the likelihood that a man will respond to finasteride therapy (60). The test provides the patient’s CAG repeat length score in the androgen receptor gene. A shorter CAG repeat length (<22) is associated with a greater likelihood that the patient will experience a significant benefit by using finasteride for the treatment of MAA. The genetic test for finasteride response helps determine if the patient will have a slight, moderate, or great response to finasteride treatment. These tests are not routinely performed in clinical practice currently.

 

Hormones and Androgenetic Alopecia

 

The role of androgen in male pattern hair loss is well established. American anatomist James Hamilton observed that castrated males did not develop MAA unless they were supplemented with testosterone (61).

 

Measurements of serum androgens, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA), and free testosterone levels have failed to demonstrate a reproducible difference between cases and controls (62). A study that assessed different hormonal levels in MAA and age-matched controls measured elevated levels of cortisol and androstenedione in those experiencing MAA (63). This study further suggests a broad range of hormones may influence androgenetic alopecia. Even though scalp hair loss and hirsutism are essential features of hyperandrogenism in women, several investigations failed to demonstrate raised androgen levels in women (64). Therefore, it is suggested that normal levels of androgens are sufficient to cause hair loss in genetically susceptible individuals.

 

The observation that eunuchoidal patients with androgen-insensitivity syndrome and 5 alpha-reductase deficiency do not go bald suggests that MAA is induced by activation of follicular androgen receptors by DHT (65-67). Patients affected by Kennedy's disease, with a functional abnormality of the androgen receptor gene, have a reduced risk of MAA (68). Increased levels of DHT have been found in balding scalp compared to non-balding scalp (69).

 

Intrafollicular androgen over-activity may also be the result of local factors including an increased number of androgen receptors, functional polymorphisms of the androgen receptor, increased local production of DHT, and reduced local degradation of DHT (70).

Similar to the classical steroidogenic organs, such as gonads and adrenal glands, the skin and its appendages, including hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and eccrine/apocrine glands, are armed with all the necessary enzymes required for androgen synthesis and metabolism. The 5 alpha reductase enzyme plays a central role through the intrafollicular conversion of testosterone to the more active metabolite DHT (71). DHT binds the androgen receptor with 5 times the avidity of testosterone and is more potent in its ability to cause downstream activation (72). Two 5 alpha reductase isoenzymes have been characterized, based on their different pH optima and tissue expression patterns (73). Type 1 5 alpha reductase is found immunohistochemically in sebaceous glands, epidermis, eccrine sweat glands, apocrine sweat glands, and hair follicles. In the skin, the activity of the type 1 5 alpha reductase is concentrated in sebaceous glands and is significantly higher in sebaceous glands from the face and scalp compared with non-acne-prone areas. Northern blot studies reveal an abundance of type 1 mRNA in neonatal foreskin keratinocytes, followed by adult facial sebocytes, and stronger expression in dermal papilla (DP) from occipital hair cells than from beard (74). It is also found in the liver, adrenals and kidneys. Despite the wide expression pattern of type 1 enzyme, its physiological function is uncertain. The type 2 enzyme has been found by immunohistochemistry to be in the dermal papilla, the inner layer of the outer root sheath, the sebaceous ducts, and proximal inner root sheath of scalp hair follicles (75). It is also found in the prostate, testes, and liver. Type 2 5 alpha reductase accounts for about 80% of circulating DHT.

 

Recent studies by Hoffmann et al demonstrate that there are number of other enzymes involved in the pathogenesis of androgenetic hair loss. 17-beta- and 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSD), with type 2 5 alpha reductase within the dermal papilla, play a central role in the intrafollicular conversion of testosterone to DHT (76). Fritsch et al suggest that small levels of some isoenzymes found in normal states may have important implications in disease states (77). Steroid sulfatase, 3-beta-HSD1, 17-beta-HSD3, and type 1 5 alpha reductase are the major steroidogenic enzymes responsible for the formation of potent androgens, whereas 17-beta-HSD2, 3-alpha-HSD, and aromatase seem to inactivate the excess androgens locally in order to achieve androgen homeostasis in the hair follicles (77).

 

Human hair follicles, distributed in specific sites of the body, appear to have an inherited susceptibility for androgen-dependent growth starting during puberty. Depending on the body sites, androgens have paradoxically different effects on human hair follicles. Androgens stimulate hair growth in some sites such as the beard, axillary, and pubic areas and suppress the growth of frontal scalp hair of genetically disposed individuals. Itami et al proposed that the second messenger system determines whether androgen sensitive follicles will respond to androgens by either miniaturization or enhancement (78). Androgen stimulation of cultured beard dermal papilla cells lead to increased transcription of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and enhanced growth of co-cultured keratinocytes. Androgen stimulation of dermal papilla cells derived from balding scalp lead to suppression of growth of co-cultured keratinocytes. This growth suppression of keratinocytes was mediated by transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) derived from dermal papilla cells from men with MAA, suggesting that TGF-beta1 is a paracrine mediator for MAA (79). Beard dermal papilla cells are known to secrete growth-inducing autocrine growth factors in response to testosterone, leading to an increase in dermal papilla size and enlargement of the hair follicle and hair cortex. IGF-1 has been identified as a major component of secreted cytokines (80).

 

Hair loss on the scalp progresses in an orderly and reproducible pattern, and is a function of factors intrinsic to each hair follicle. In vitro experiments have shown that the hair follicles are able to self-regulate their response to androgens by regulating the expression of 5 alpha reductase and androgen receptors (81-83). This self-regulation is postulated to produce the quantifiable difference in androgen receptor numbers and 5 alpha reductase activity that is observed between balding and non-balding areas of the scalp (54, 81, 82, 84). This intrinsic regulation is best demonstrated in hair transplantation experiments: occipital hairs maintain their resistance to MAA when transplanted to the vertex, and scalp hairs from the vertex transplanted to the forearm miniaturize at the same pace as hairs neighboring the donor site (85).

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Large terminal follicles are shed and replaced by small vellus hairs in androgenetic alopecia. Three areas of the scalp are affected preferentially: the temples, vertex scalp, and mid frontal scalp (Figure 2). Within these areas the process is strictly patterned. Bitemporal hair loss starts at the anterior hairline and moves posteriorly over the scalp. Hair loss over the vertex scalp begins centrally and radiates outwards circumferentially. Over the mid frontal scalp, hair follicle miniaturization leads to a pattern of hair loss reminiscent of a Christmas tree (86). These three zones are not affected equally leading to clinical variations in the pattern of hair loss, with some men balding more to the front while other bald more over the crown.

Figure 2. Areas of the scalp. F-Frontal / M-Mid frontal / T-Temple / V-Vertex.

 

The 3 key features of MAA are alteration of hair cycle dynamics, follicular miniaturization, and inflammation.

 

Hair Cycle Dynamics and Androgenetic Alopecia

 

Hair is lost and replaced cyclically. Follicles undergo corresponding cyclic phases of growth, involution, quiescence, and regeneration (Figure 3). The growth phase (anagen) lasts for 3-5 years (87). As hair elongation is relatively constant at 1 cm per month, the duration of the growth phase is the primary determinant of the final hair length. At the end of anagen the involutional phase (catagen) lasts for a few weeks. The period of hair follicle quiescence (telogen) that follows lasts approximately 3 months (88). Hair follicle regeneration occurs in approximately the first week of anagen and once regenerated, the anagen phase continues until the hair reaches its final (possibly predetermined) length.

 Figure 3. Normal hair cycle - Each telogen hair is replaced by a new anagen hair.

 

Hair cycle in mammals has an intrinsic rhythmic behavior and this is modified by systemic and local factors. Humans have an asynchronous hair cycle and the duration of anagen and the final length of hair differ between regions of the body. A number of molecular signals including growth factors, nuclear receptors, cytokines, and intracellular signaling pathways are involved in controlling the hair cycle. Growth factors such as IGF-1, hepatocyte growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promote the anagen phase of the hair cycle. Similarly, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta), interleukin 1-alpha, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha promote onset of catagen (89).

 

In androgenetic alopecia, the duration of anagen decreases with each cycle, while the length of telogen remains constant or is prolonged; this results in a reduction of the anagen to telogen ratio (47). Balding patients often describe periods of excessive hair shedding, most noticeable while combing or washing. This is due to the relative increase in numbers of follicles in telogen. As the hair growth rate remains relatively constant, the duration of anagen growth determines hair length. Thus, with each successively foreshortened hair cycle, the length of each hair shaft is reduced. Ultimately, anagen duration becomes so short that the growing hair fails to achieve sufficient length to reach the surface of the skin, leaving an empty follicular pore. Prolongation of the kenogen phase, the lag phase or the delayed replacement of telogen hair, seems to last longer in MAA leaving a higher percentage of empty hair follicles contributing to balding (90,91). Further, the kenogen (latent phase) is prolonged in MAA, reducing hair numbers and contributing to the balding process (90).

 

In MAA tiny, pale hairs gradually replace large, pigmented ones. Androgens appear to reduce alopecia hair color by inhibiting dermal papilla stem cell factor (SCF) production, which is important in embryonic melanocyte migration and bulbar melanocyte pigmentation (92).

 

Hair Follicle Miniaturization

 

Hair follicle miniaturization is the histological hallmark of androgenetic alopecia (93). Hair follicles consist of mesenchymal and ectodermal components. The ectodermal part consists of an invagination of epidermis into the dermis and subcutaneous fat. The hair bulb contains the hair matrix which produces the hair shaft. The mesenchymal component is the dermal papilla, a small collection of specialized fibroblasts that is totally surrounded by the hair bulb.

 

In association with the changes in hair cycle dynamics, there is progressive, stepwise miniaturization of the entire follicular apparatus in MAA (Figure 4). The mesenchyme-derived dermal papilla, located in the middle of the hair bulb at the follicle base, regulates many aspects of the epithelial follicle and determines the type of hair produced (94,95).As the dermal papilla is central in the maintenance and control of hair growth, it is likely to be the target of androgen-mediated events leading to miniaturization and hair cycle changes (96-98). The constant geometric relationship between the dermal papilla size and the size of the hair matrix suggests that the size of the dermal papilla determines the size of the hair bulb and ultimately the hair shaft produced (99, 100).

Figure 4. Progressive miniaturization of hair in each cycle.

 

A greater than tenfold reduction in overall cell numbers is likely to account for the decrease in hair follicular size (101).The mechanism by which this decrease occurs is unexplained, and may be the result of either apoptotic cell death, decreased proliferation of keratinocytes (92), cell displacement with loss of cellular adhesion leading to dermal papilla fibroblasts dropping off into the dermis, or migration of dermal papilla cells into the dermal sheath associated with the outer root sheath of the hair follicle (100, 102). In vitro studies demonstrate that human balding dermal papilla cells secrete inhibitory factors, which affect the growth of both human and rodent dermal papilla cells, and factors that delay the onset of anagen in mice in vivo. These inhibitory factor(s) probably cause the formation of smaller dermal papillae and smaller hairs in MAA (103). Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) has a demonstrated antagonistic effect on keratinocyte proliferation in the hair follicle in transgenic mice studies (104).

 

Smaller follicles result in finer hairs. The caliber of hair shafts reduces from 0.08mm to less than 0.06mm. On the balding scalp, transitional indeterminate hairs represent the bridge between full-sized and miniaturized terminal hairs (105). Traditional models of MAA show follicular miniaturization occurring in a stepwise fashion. This has recently been contested, and it is now believed that the transition from terminal to vellus hair occurs as an abrupt, large step process. Either way, the cross-sectional area of individual hair shafts remains constant throughout fully developed anagen, indicating that the hair follicle, and its dermal papilla, remains the same size (105). Therefore, follicular miniaturization occurs between anagen cycles rather than within the anagen phase. This short window of androgen effect may also explain the lengthy delay experienced between clinical response and the commencement of therapy, as any pharmacological intervention will only have effect at the point of miniaturization (105).

 

Follicular miniaturization leaves behind stelae as dermal remnants of the full-sized follicle. These stelae, also known as fibrous tracts or streamers, extend from the subcutaneous tissue up the old follicular tract to the miniaturized hair and mark the formal position of the original terminal follicle (106, 107). Arao-Perkins bodies may be seen with elastic stains within the follicular stelae. An Arao-Perkins body begins as a small cluster of elastic fibers in the neck of the dermal papilla. These clump during catagen and remain situated at the lowest point of origin of the follicular stelae. With the progressive shortening of anagen hair seen in androgenetic alopecia, multiple elastic clumps may be found in a stela, like the rungs of a ladder (108).

 

In addition to the hair follicle miniaturization that leads to thin fibers in androgenetic alopecia, a reduction in anagen duration leads to shorter hair length, while an increase in telogen duration delays regeneration. This results in hairs so short and fine that they fail to achieve sufficient length to reach the surface of the scalp.

 

 While miniaturized hairs are also seen in alopecia areata, that autoimmune condition is potentially fully reversible with treatment (e.g., corticosteroid). In contrast, MAA is only partially reversible at its best. The mechanism for the difference may be related to the attachment of arrector pili muscle and the hair follicle, which will be discussed later in this chapter.

 

Pattern of Hair Loss

 

There are 2 concurrent patterns in the hair loss; a macroscopic pattern and a microscopic pattern. The macroscopic pattern of hair loss is highly reproducible with certain zones of the scalp being affected preferentially. This is best seen over the vertex scalp where the baldness begins at a central focus and hair loss progresses radially in all directions.  There are no-skip lesions. Hair transplantation studies have demonstrated that this pattern is not due to a local signal or a diffusible chemical but rather genetically imprinted in the follicle. The orderly and systematic progression of hair loss is retained even when follicles are relocated to distant sites. 

 

The microscopic pattern of hair loss refers to the pattern of hair loss within scalp follicular units (109). In contrast to beard hairs, scalp hairs exist as compound follicles with between 2 and 5 hairs emerging from a single pore. Miniaturization within these follicular units is also ordered and leads to a reduction in the number of terminal hairs per follicular unit, which can be demonstrated via dermoscopy (Figure 5). This is perceived by the affected individual as a loss of hair volume. When all the hairs within a follicular unit have miniaturized, additional denuded scalp is visible and perceived by affected individuals as baldness.

Figure 5. Dermoscopic images of scalp in different stages of alopecia. A) Normal scalp with 2-4 hairs in most follicular units. B) Early androgenetic alopecia with mixture of multiple and single hair in follicular units. C)  Advanced androgenetic alopecia with thin and single hair in most follicular units.

 

Inflammation

 

Studies suggest that inflammation is a feature in MAA even though its significance in the pathogenesis of the disease is controversial. Activated T-cells infiltrating the lower portions of follicular infundibula have been demonstrated in scalp biopsies (110). A moderate perifollicular, lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, perhaps with concentric layers of perifollicular collagen deposition, is present in some 40% of cases of androgenetic alopecia, but only 10% of normal controls (107). Occasional eosinophils and mast cells can be seen. The cellular inflammatory changes also occur around lower follicles in some cases and occasionally involve follicular stelae. A considerable difference in the inflammatory infiltrate has been observed between balding and non-balding scalp (111).

 

A modest degree of chronic inflammation around the upper part of hair follicles has been well described by many investigators (108, 111, 112).

 

Scarring

 

The possibility of a slow inflammatory scarring process has been suggested by the irreversibility of the hair loss, the histological evidence of fibrous tracts, and the histological similarity seen between MAA and lichen planopilaris (113).

 
HISTOPATHOLOGY

 

Histological diagnosis is rarely necessary for MAA. In patients where the diagnosis is equivocal, 4mm punch vertex scalp biopsies are the ideal specimen. Horizontal scalp biopsies have more diagnostic information than vertical biopsies (107). Triple horizontal biopsies have showed 98% diagnostic accuracy compared with 79% in a single biopsy in female androgenetic alopecia (114).

 

The prime feature found in scalp biopsies is the reduction in the terminal anagen hair count. The apparent reduction in the number of terminal hairs is due to progressive replacement of terminal hairs with secondary pseudo-vellus hairs, with residual angiofibrotic tracts (112). There is a change in the ratio of terminal to vellus hairs from greater than 6:1 to less than 4:1. Also, the anagen to telogen hair ratio reduces from 12:1 to 5:1 (107).

 

Messenger et al reported that there is an increase in vellus follicle numbers with increasing severity of hair loss in women with female pattern hair loss, suggesting that terminal follicles do indeed miniaturize (115).

 

Considering that hair follicle miniaturization is the key point during androgenic alopecia onset and development, diversity in hair diameter represents an important feature histologically, reflecting the different stages of miniaturization, and this accurately correlates with the clinical hair diameter diversity (116).

 

Arrector Pili Muscle and Androgenetic Alopecia

 

Hair exists as follicular units consisting of 3-5 terminal hairs per follicular unit nourished by a single arborizing arrector pili muscle (APM), which attaches circumferentially around the primary follicle with variable attachment to other follicles (103, 109). A study by Yazdabadi et al demonstrated that in MAA and female pattern hair loss, where follicle miniaturization is either irreversible or only partially reversible, there was a consistent loss of attachment of the arrector pilli muscle to vellus hair follicles (Figure 6). This was in contrast to potentially reversible alopecia areata, in which the arrector pilli muscle maintained contact with the miniaturized secondary vellus follicles (Figure 7). The study suggests that the persisting contact between the APM and follicular unit predicts reversibility of miniaturization (117).

 

A recent proposition for the pathogenesis and mechanism of androgenetic alopecia suggests that in the early stages of MAA, the arrector pili muscle remains attached to the primary follicle, yet loses attachment to a number of the regressing secondary follicles in some follicular units (93). As further miniaturization and detachment occurs, patients may first notice a change in their hair density and complain of thinning. Once the arrector pili muscle has detached from all secondary follicles and primary follicles have undergone miniaturization and detachment, hair loss is likely irreversible (93). This proposed mechanism establishes the importance of early treatment to halt balding prior to the loss of primary hair follicles.

Figure 6. Illustrations showing the progressive miniaturization within the follicular units and the detachment with the arrector pili muscle.

Figure 7. Three-dimensional reconstructions of alopecia areata (a) and MAAs (b) demonstrating the loss of contact of the arrector pili muscle with the outer root sheath of the vellus hair follicle in MAA that is largely irreversible compared with maintenance of this contact of the arrector pili muscle with outer root sheath which is potentially completely reversible in alopecia area.

 

CLINICAL SYNDROME

 

The clinical appearance of MAA is universally and instantly recognizable in most cases. The progression of the hair loss occurs in an orderly manner and has been well documented by Hamilton (1) and Norwood (118) (Figure 8). These authors use a modified grading scale for male pattern hair loss (Figure 9). Affected hairs are miniaturized and there is decreased hair density. Progressive replacement of terminal hairs by vellus hairs leads to an overall decrease in hair density in affected zones as a precursor to total baldness.

 

Androgenetic alopecia in men typically presents with bitemporal recession and vertex balding (male pattern hair loss). However, 3.9% of Australian men (119) and 11.1% of Korean men (11) with androgenetic alopecia present with “female pattern hair loss (FPHL),” characterized by diffuse rarefaction of hair on the mid-frontal aspect of the scalp and crown, with preservation of the anterior hairline. Expert dermatologists experienced in the treatment of hair disorders participated in the development of a modified Sinclair scale for men by modeling it on the original Sinclair scale, a 5-point visual analog scale for the assessment of FPHL in women. The modified Sinclair scale similarly comprises 5 clinical photographs of men's scalps and is made up of 2 separate composite images for use in men with shorter and longer hairstyles (Figure 10) (120).

 

The scalp is generally normal, and periods of increased hair shedding may be accompanied by a positive “hair pull” on examination. A positive hair pull test is when hair is easily plucked from the scalp. A family history of MAA on either side of the family is seen in around 80% while in 20% of cases, there is no family history.

Figure 8. The Hamilton-Norwood classification of male androgenetic alopecia.

Figure 9. Modified male pattern hair loss grading scale.

 Figure 10. Modified Sinclair Scale for female pattern hair loss (a less common type of MAA) in men with short hair and long hair.

 

MANAGEMENT

 

A number of options are available to balding men. Firstly, as the condition is not life threatening and the morbidity are variable, a reasonable option is to have no treatment and allow the balding to progress naturally. In fact, this is what the vast majority of men elect to do. Regardless of whether patients pursue treatment, an adequate explanation of the pathogenesis of the disease, how common it is in the community, and the various treatment options available form an important part of the support and counselling that should occur with each patient. It is very important to ascertain whether patients' expectations regarding treatment outcome are achievable before embarking on medical therapy. Patients should also be educated about the advantage of early treatment and the necessity of prolonged therapy.
 

Camouflage and Wigs

 

Camouflage is the simplest and easiest way to deal with mild MAA. Changing the hair styling to cover the balding scalp, adding small fibers held in place electrostatically and dyeing the scalp the same color as hair are important and cheap measures that can achieve cosmetically satisfactory results. Modern wigs can be styled, washed, and give a natural look.

 

Medical Management

 

Topical minoxidil and oral finasteride are the only two treatments currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (USA) for androgenetic alopecia in men. Both of these medications prevent further hair loss but are only able to partially reverse the baldness. Both require continuous use to maintain the effect. As clinical response may take 6-12 months to become apparent, these agents should be used for at least one year before deciding whether to continue treatment. HairMax LaserComb, also known as low level laser therapy is also FDA-cleared in the context of androgenetic alopecia (121). These are the only treatments recognized by the FDA for treatment of androgenetic alopecia.

 

MINOXIDIL

 

Oral Minoxidil has been used to treat hypertension since the 1960s (122). Hypertrichosis as a consequence of minoxidil treatment was observed shortly thereafter and has been said to occur in 100% of the users (123, 124).These observations led to the development of topical minoxidil as a treatment for hair loss (125). It was approved by the FDA for the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia in 1984.

 

A number of investigators have advanced hypotheses as to the mechanism of action of minoxidil. One important hypothesis is that it has vasodilatory properties. Cutaneous blood flow was observed to increase after 10 to 15 minutes of applying topical minoxidil (126). Up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which helps in maintaining dermal papilla vasculature and hair growth, is another important action of minoxidil (127). Li et al proposed a possible mechanism for minoxidil stimulation of VEGF from experiments on dermal papilla cells (128).They suggest that binding of minoxidil to adenosine receptors A1 and A2, as well as the sulphonylurea receptor SUR2B, activates adenosine-signaling pathways and increase the release of VEGF. Overexpression of VEGF increases perifollicular vascularization and accelerate hair growth.

 

The prevailing view is that minoxidil promotes hair regrowth through its action to open potassium channels (129, 130).It is postulated that minoxidil sulfate, the active metabolite, opens the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) sensitive potassium channels (KATP channel), thereby having a relaxant effect on vascular smooth muscle and rendering the intracellular potential more negative. This negative gradient promotes depletion of intracellular calcium. In the presence of calcium, epidermal growth factor has been shown to inhibit hair follicular growth in vitro. The conversion of minoxidil to minoxidil sulfate is higher in hair follicles than in the surrounding skin and may suppress EGF-induced inhibition of growth, prolonging the anagen growth phase of hair follicles (128). The effect on the cell cycle is to initiate the onset of anagen (and thereby shorten telogen duration) and to prolong the duration of anagen by delaying initiation of catagen. 

 

Several studies have shown the effect of topical minoxidil in promoting hair growth (131, 132).  A five-year follow up with topical minoxidil has shown the sustained effect of minoxidil with long term use (133). Minoxidil works as a non-specific promoter of hair growth, but the slow miniaturization of hair follicles induced by androgens continues in spite of treatment. Evidence for this is seen in a 120-week double-blind study comparing the clipped hair weight of men treated with 5% minoxidil, 2% minoxidil, and placebo and a group with no treatment (132). As expected, the minoxidil groups experienced a surge in hair weights at the induction of therapy. The 5% group was superior to the 2% group in terms of the initial peak in hair weights. Both were superior to placebo and no treatment groups. However, all groups (minoxidil, placebo, and no treatment) showed a progressive 6% per annum decrease in hair weights during the treatment period. This would mean that patients using minoxidil as mono-therapy for MAA continue to bald despite of treatment. If treatment is ceased, any positive effect on hair growth is lost in 4-6 months (134).

Minoxidil topical preparations are available in 2% and 5% solutions. Both strengths are currently in use for treatment in males, yet the 5% minoxidil solution used twice daily has shown higher efficacy than the 2% solution (135). A recent advancement in the use of minoxidil as a hair loss treatment is the development of a 5% topical foam. The traditional topical solution consists of a liquid vehicle with a tendency to spread beyond the intended site of treatment, and that takes time to dry. It also contains a high concentration of propylene glycol, a potential irritant. The newly developed topical hydroalcoholic foam is propylene glycol-free, and it is more easily applied specifically to target areas and rubbed directly on to the scalp skin. Placebo controlled double-blind trials have demonstrated that the hydroalcoholic foam is efficacious, safe and well accepted cosmetically by patients (136).

 

On commencing treatment, minoxidil may cause a surge in the growth of miniaturized hairs and induction of anagen from resting hair follicles. This may produce a rapid hair shedding of previous telogen hairs 2-8 weeks after treatment initiation. This temporary shedding may be interpreted as a clinical indication that the minoxidil is having a beneficial effect and the hair shedding usually resolves after a few weeks.

 

Hypertrichosis (fine hairs on non-androgen-sensitive skin) on the face and hands is a common side effect observed following topical and oral minoxidil. Itching of the scalp, increased dandruff, and erythema are commonly reported with topical minoxidil preparations. Contact allergic dermatitis to minoxidil can occur and could either be due to minoxidil itself or more commonly to propylene glycol in the vehicle (137). Patch testing is worthwhile in differentiating the cause of contact dermatitis and the new minoxidil form which does not contain propylene glycol is an alternative in these patients.

 

Oral Minoxidil is not licensed for the use in androgenetic alopecia; however, it is increasingly being utilized for a variety of hair disorders including MAA (138). An open-label, prospective, single-arm study of thirty men aged 24–59 years with AGA types III vertex to V were treated with oral minoxidil 5 mg once daily for 24 weeks (139). They found a significant increase in total hair counts from baseline at weeks 12 and 24 (both p = 0.007). Photographic assessment of the vertex area by an expert panel revealed 100% improvement, with 43% of patients showing excellent improvement. The frontal area also showed a significant response but less than that of the vertex area. Common side effects were hypertrichosis (93%) and pedal edema (10%). No serious cardiovascular adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings were observed. The reassuring safety profile of oral minoxidil has also been reflected in a large multicenter study evaluating the safety of oral minoxidil in a total of 1404 patients (943 women [67.2%] and 461 men [32.8%]) with a mean age of 43 years (range 8-86). The most frequent adverse effect was hypertrichosis (15.1%). Systemic adverse effects included lightheadedness (1.7%), fluid retention (1.3%), tachycardia (0.9%), headache (0.4%), periorbital edema (0.3%), and insomnia (0.2%), leading to drug discontinuation in 29 patients (1.2%). No life-threatening adverse effects were observed (140).

 

FINASTERIDE

 

Finasteride is a synthetic azo-steroid that is a potent and highly selective antagonist of type II 5 alpha reductase. It is not an anti-androgen. It binds irreversibly to the enzyme and inhibits the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. Thus, while the pharmacokinetic half-life is approximately eight hours, the biological effect persists for much longer. Finasteride was initially FDA approved for use in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and was approved to treat MAA in 1997. The underlying principle for its use in MAA is the reduction of DHT production in order to limit its action on scalp hair follicles.

 

Various studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of finasteride in MAA, with the most benefits seen in patients with primarily type III vertex or type IV Hamilton/Norwood hair loss  (141-147). Finasteride has been reported to slow the progression of MAA and to produce partial regrowth in about two thirds of men (141). A study measuring hair counts using macrophotographs found that both total and anagen hair counts increase with treatment of finasteride (142). A significant increase in the anagen to telogen ratio was also achieved. This demonstrates the ability of finasteride to stimulate conversion of hair follicles into the anagen phase, possibly through reversion of the decrease in anagen phase and the increase in lag phase. A study looking at scalp biopsies shows that finasteride stimulates an increase in terminal hair counts and a decrease in vellus hair counts (143). Other studies have used hair count and hair weight as objective measures of outcome and demonstrated that both increase, with hair weight increasing to a larger extent (144, 148). Factors that affect hair weight include the number of hairs, hair growth rate and hair thickness. These findings show the ability of finasteride to reverse the miniaturization process, producing hair of greater length and thickness, and possibly with a greater growth rate.

 

A daily oral finasteride dose of one milligram reduces scalp DHT by 64% and serum DHT by 68% (145). Finasteride was originally given for benign prostatic hyperplasia at 5mg daily. For the treatment of androgenetic alopecia, dose ranging studies have found no significant difference in clinical benefit between five and one milligram daily regimens, nor is there any significant further reduction of scalp or serum DHT levels (135). In practice, finasteride can be administered at either a dose of one milligram per day, or at longer intervals. A 5-year multinational study looking at the effect of finasteride on treatment of MAA found it to be superior to placebo (146).  The placebo group suffered a progressive decline in hair count, losing approximately 26% of terminal hairs compared to baseline counts at the end of the 5-year study. In contrast, patients on finasteride experienced a 10% increase in hair count at the end of the first year. Hair count declined somewhat thereafter but remained above baseline, remaining at 5% above baseline hair count after 5 years of treatment. The rate of decline in hair count in the finasteride group is significantly less than that of the placebo group. Taken together, there is a progressive increase in the difference between treatment and placebo group over time. This demonstrates the effects of finasteride in stimulating a substantial amount of hair regrowth, reaching its peak efficacy after one year of treatment, and slowing the progression of hair loss thereafter. At the end of the first year, some in the placebo group were swapped onto receiving finasteride for the remaining four years. These patients demonstrated a decrease in hair count during the first year with placebo, followed by an improvement in the subsequent four years with finasteride. The improvement is similar to that of the group who received finasteride for five years throughout the study. However, mean hair count level is less than that of the patients who have taken finasteride "a year earlier" at all comparable time points, with the difference being similar to the amount of hair loss sustained during the year of placebo treatment. This shows the relative benefits of early commencement of treatment with finasteride. Some of the finasteride patients were also crossed-over to receive placebo after a year of finasteride treatment. A decrease in hair count was observed twelve months later, demonstrating the reversal of the beneficial effects of treatment obtained during the first year.

 

Further evidence of the efficacy of finasteride in the treatment of MAA is seen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled twin study (147). At month 12, all subjects in the finasteride group demonstrated an increase in hair count, while a decrease was found in 44% of the placebo group. Serum DHT levels were significantly decreased in the finasteride group, with no significant change observed in the placebo group. Global photography assessment shows significant improvement on hair growth in vertex and superior-frontal scalp in the finasteride group, with no significant differences between treatment groups observed in the temporal or anterior hairline views. This finding shows the relative effectiveness of finasteride for protecting hair loss over the vertex and superior-frontal regions of the scalp, in comparison to the minimal response over the temporal and the anterior hairline regions. An open randomized comparative study with 5% topical minoxidil and oral finasteride 1 milligram a day showed significantly more hair growth in the finasteride group (149).

 

One Japanese study shows that the hair growth with finasteride continues to increase with continuing treatment without significant side effects (150).  A recent 10-year study of 118 men treated with 1 mg/day finasteride for androgenic alopecia found that 86% of men continued to benefit from treatment over the entire course of 10 years — showing increased or stable rates of hair growth and only 14% experiencing any further hair loss (151). Sexual side effects are a main concern when treating patients for male pattern baldness with finasteride. The evidence available to date about the safety of the drug is controversial and needs to be further evaluated. In view of this, it is very important to properly counsel patients before the treatment.

 

Long-term studies have reported few adverse effects when using finasteride. In the finasteride group loss of libido was reported in 1.9% and erectile dysfunction (ED) in 1.4% in the first year. The placebo groups reported these same events with frequencies of 1.3% and 0.6% respectively. These events appeared to resolve on cessation of the drug and, in some ceased with continued treatment. It has been suggested that even these figures overstate the true incidence of sexual dysfunction (106, 148, 152). A recent review of the efficacy and safety of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia concluded that sexual side effects are uncommon and most often resolve spontaneously even without discontinuing treatment (153).

 

However, a recent study by Irwig et al conducted standardized interviews with 71 otherwise healthy men aged 21-46 years taking finasteride (154). The subjects reported the onset of sexual side effects associated with the temporary use of finasteride, with symptoms persisting for at least three months despite stopping the drug. The study revealed that the subjects reported new-onset persistent sexual dysfunction (low libido, ED, and problems with orgasm) associated with the use of finasteride. Total sexual dysfunction score increased for both before and after finasteride use (P< 0.0001 for both). The small number of patients, selection bias, recall bias prior to finasteride use, and the absence of serum hormone analyses were the limiting factors of the study. The study recommended that physicians treating MAA should discuss the potential risk levels with patients while prescribing the drug. Furthermore, a meta-analysis in 2015 describes available toxicity information for finasteride as limited, of poor quality, and systematically biased (155). Further pharmaco-epidemiological studies, with clear evaluation of adverse events and their duration, may be needed.

 

In view of the conflicting and continuing data and importance of the subject, the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery (ISHRS) established a Task Force on Finasteride Adverse Event Controversies to evaluate published data and make recommendations. ISHRS recommend that finasteride use for MAA is entirely at the discretion of the patient given that the male pattern hair loss is largely a cosmetic condition. However, the treating physician should provide full information about the drug to enable the patient to make an informed decision.

 

Of note, older men on finasteride experienced a 50% reduction in serum prostate specific antigen [PSA] levels, which could result in an underestimation of prostatic cancer risk. Previous recommendations in the urology literature state that PSA levels remain valid whilst patients are on finasteride, but the value should be doubled to correct for the finasteride effect (156, 157).  Men between 18 to 41 years old are thought to have a negligible decrease in measured PSA levels. More recent studies now suggest that finasteride treatment at the 5mg/day dose affects the serum PSA concentration in a time-dependent manner (158). In the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, the adjustment factor needed to be increased from 2 at 24 months to 2.5 at 7 years after the initiation of finasteride (159). In a study conducted with men aged 40-60 years taking 1mg finasteride /day for 48 weeks, results suggest that existing recommendations for the adjustment of serum PSA concentration in prostate-cancer screening in men taking 5 mg/day finasteride should also apply to men taking the 1 mg/day preparation for MAA (160). Limited data suggest that reduction in PSA of malignant origin appears to be no greater than the percentage reduction in PSA of benign origin (161). The free/total PSA ratio, currently used to help differentiate benign from malignant processes in the prostate, remains valid during treatment with finasteride, as finasteride does not affect the free/total PSA ratio in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (but might decrease the ratio in men with prostate cancer) (156).

 

The effect of finasteride on the incidence and severity of prostate cancer has been extensively investigated and conflicting evidence for the risk of increased incidence of high-grade prostate cancer associated with finasteride prevents its use as a chemoprevention agent. In a trial involving 18,882 men older than 54 years with a normal digital rectal examination and a serum PSA equal to or less than 3ng/ml, men were randomized to finasteride 5mg daily or placebo groups. There was a 25% reduction in prostate cancer prevalence in those taking finasteride (162). However, 6.4% of the men taking finasteride developed histologically high-grade cancer (Gleason score 7-10), compared with 5.1% of those in the placebo group. Recent data suggest that several confounding factors could have contributed to the above results. It is suggested that morphological and histological alterations, the degree of sampling error induced by the reduction of prostate volume, differential sensitivity of the biopsy between the groups, and increased sensitivity of PSA in detecting prostate cancer with finasteride may have contributed to an apparent increase of higher grade cancers (163-167). Alternatively, finasteride use has also been suggested to significantly improve prostate cancer detection with digital rectal examination (168).

 

Topical finasteride has been investigated as potential variation in drug delivery. While a 0.05% of finasteride solution applied to the scalp was well absorbed and produced a 40% reduction in serum DHT, it had shown no effect on hair regrowth. One explanation for this observation is that inhibition of prostatic DHT production is an important factor in preventing hair loss with finasteride, i.e. a significant reduction in circulating DHT is required in addition to the local blockade of 5 alpha reductase at the hair follicle (169). However, a double blind, randomized clinical study between oral finasteride and topical finasteride showed similar efficacy after 18 months in one study (170). Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of topical finasteride.

 

Medical treatment should be continued indefinitely, as the benefit will not be maintained upon ceasing therapy. Up to one year of treatment may be required before any clinical response is noticeable.

 

Baseline and follow up photographs are helpful in monitoring the response to treatment, but unlikely to detect changes of less than 20% in hair density. The authors make use of a camera mounted on a stereotactic device; a system that is identical to the set-up used in the phase III finasteride trials (169). Photographs are taken of the vertex and frontal hairline at six-monthly to yearly intervals and hair densities at these time points can be readily compared. This set-up is proving to be useful in the long-term monitoring of treatment response (Figure 10 & 11). Patients are able to observe their regrowth during treatment, while the photographs serve as a motivating factor, improving long-term patient compliance to medical treatment. Similar set-ups using digital photographs also appear useful (171).

 

 

 Figure 11. Photographic evaluation of treatment response to finasteride. a - pretreatment. b - post treatment.

 

Figure 11. Hair photography using the stereotactic device.

 

Finasteride is a teratogen, pregnancy category X drug and is therefore contraindicated in pregnancy. Male rats exposed to finasteride in utero develop hypospadias with cleft prepuce, decreased anogenital distance, reduced prostate weight, and altered nipple formation (160). As the drug is secreted in the semen and can be absorbed through the vagina during intercourse, it was originally advocated that men taking finasteride should avoid unprotected intercourse with pregnant women. In practice, the concentration of finasteride in the semen is well below the minimum effect dosage, and no recommendations regarding the use of condoms are made in the product information leaflet. To date there are no reports of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women whose partners take finasteride.

 

Finasteride has demonstrable small effect on semen parameters in normal men including decreased total sperm count, semen volume, sperm concentration, and sperm motility but no apparent effect on sperm morphology (172). With regards to long-term safety, finasteride has now been in use for over 10 years. Many recipients are elderly men taking 5mg per day. Very few side-effects have been observed. There is no effect of long-term use on bone mineral density (173-174). Reversible painful gynecomastia has been reported and the incidence is thought to be around 0.001% (175, 176). Depression measured by increased Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) before and after treatment has been reported (177)

 

Finasteride related reports of suicidality and psychological adverse events have led to coining of the term post finasteride syndrome and the creation of organizations such as the Post-Finasteride Syndrome Foundation (178). In 2011, a post-marketing report was sent to the US Food and Drug Administration suggesting that finasteride might be linked to depression, self-harm, and suicide (178). In the last 5 years, health authorities in Canada, Korea, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom have also acknowledged these potential adverse effects and issued warnings for finasteride (178). There is a potential biological basis linking finasteride with depression and anxiety. Some reports suggest that men with depression have lower levels of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone, which is produced by the 5α-reductase enzyme and has antidepressant and anxiolytic effects (179).

 

Topical finasteride application for the treatment of MAA was first explored by Mazarella et al. in a study involving 52 patients (28 men). They reported at 6 months of treatment, a progressive and significant decrease in the rate of hair loss was observed in the topical finasteride versus placebo group, with no significant changes in plasma levels of total testosterone, free testosterone, and DHT between treatment groups (180). Pirraccin et al. reported a phase III randomized control trial reviewing safety and efficacy of topical finasteride spray solution (181). A total of 458 patients were randomized, 323 completed the study and 446 were evaluated for safety. Their primary endpoint was defined as change from baseline in target area hair count at week 24. They found this was significantly greater with topical finasteride than placebo (adjusted mean change 20.2 vs. 6.7 hairs; P<0.001), and numerically similar between topical and oral finasteride. No serious adverse events were reported. As maximum plasma finasteride concentrations were >100 times lower, and reduction from baseline in mean serum DHT concentration was less (34.5 vs. 55.6%), with topical versus oral finasteride, there is less likelihood of systemic sexual adverse events related to a decrease in DHT with topical finasteride (181).

 

DUTASTERIDE

 

Dutasteride inhibits both type I and type II 5-alpha reductase. It is approximately 3 times and more than 100 times more potent than finasteride at inhibiting the type I and II 5-alpha reductase isoenzymes respectively (182).  Dutasteride can decrease serum DHT by more than 90%, while finasteride decreases serum DHT by 70% (182, 183).

 

The serum half-life of dutasteride is 4 weeks as compared with a serum half-life of 6-8 hours for finasteride. There is persistent suppression of DHT level after dutasteride is ceased. For this reason, patients taking dutasteride should not donate blood until at least 6 months after stopping their medication, to prevent administration to a pregnant transfusion recipient (184). Dutasteride 0.5mg dose is FDA approved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia while its use in MAA is ‘off label’.

 

A phase II randomized placebo-controlled study of dutasteride versus finasteride showed that the effect of dutasteride was dose dependent and 2.5mg of dutasteride was superior to 5mg finasteride in improving scalp hair growth in men between the ages of 21 and 45 years (184). It was also able to produce hair growth earlier than finasteride. This was evidenced by target area hair counts and clinical assessment at 12 and 24 weeks. In addition, a recent randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study on the efficacy of dutasteride 0.5mg/day in identical twins demonstrated that dutasteride was able to significantly reduce hair loss progression in men with MAA (185). A single case report showed improvement of hair loss with dutasteride 0.5mg in a woman who had failed to show any response to finasteride (186).

 

In one phase III study dutasteride 0.5mg daily showed significantly higher efficacy than placebo based on subject self-assessment and by investigator and panel photographic assessment (187).  There was no major difference in adverse events between the two groups, the treatment and placebo groups. However, this study was limited to only 6 months. Another more recent phase III trial found that dutasteride 0.5mg was statistically superior to finasteride 1mg and placebo at 24 weeks (188).

 

Side effects, including decreased libido, impotence, and gynecomastia, are slightly more common with dutasteride than with finasteride (184, 189). Reduction in the sperm count and the volume has been reported with dutasteride (187, 190).  There is no effect on bone density (189). The issue of 5alpha reductase inhibitor use and prostate cancer is considered in another Endotext chapter.

 

Dutasteride mesotherapy or microinjections were developed as an alternative to systemic antiandrogens in view of several men being reluctant to treat their MAA with systemic 5a-reductase enzyme inhibitors due to risk of adverse sexual side-effects. Saceda-Corralo et al. reported improvement of AGA in men treated with 1 mL of intradermal dutasteride 0.01% mesotherapy. Another study evaluated intradermal injection of dutasteride in 28 male patients with AGA over 11 weeks (191). Villarreal-Villarreal et al. reviewed dutasteride injections combined with oral minoxidil versus oral minoxidil alone and found a better response on the vertex area compared to the frontal area. They hypothesize that dutasteride might be more effective in vertex due to the greater concentration of 5 alpha reductase compared to the frontal zone. There have been no reports of sexual dysfunction in these patients and the main adverse event experienced is pain during the injections (192, 193).

 

Emerging Medical Therapy

 

TOPICAL ANTIANDROGENS

 

Oral anti-androgens (e.g., spironolactone, cyproterone acetate) have been widely used to treat women with androgenetic alopecia. However, these are contraindicated in men due to its feminization effects. A topical anti-androgen, fluridil has been rationally developed for use in male androgenetic alopecia. It is designed to be locally metabolized, not systemically resorbable, and degradable into inactive metabolites without systemic anti-androgenic activity (194). A double blind, placebo-controlled study showed that patients using topical fluridil had an increase in the anagen to telogen ratio, and the maximum attainable effect was achieved within the first 90 days of daily use. No side effects on libido and sexual performance have been found. Nevertheless, a long-term study is required to further investigate fluridil's long-term safety and effectiveness in male androgenetic alopecia.

 

Clascoterone (cortexolone 17α-proprionate) is a novel androgen receptor inhibitor, and recent trials reporting its topical use in acne have demonstrated promising results. Clascoterone antagonizes dihydrotestosterone (DHT) through competitive binding with cytoplasmic androgen receptors as it shares the same fused four-ring backbone structure (195). In August 2020, clascoterone cream 1% received its first approval in the USA for the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years of age or older (196). Clascoterone has been found to have the same efficacy as finasteride in vitro (197).

 

LATANOPROST

 

The prostaglandin analogue latanoprost stimulates hair growth supposedly by prolonging the anagen phase of the hair cycle. Lengthening of eyelashes and eyebrows has been observed when latanoprost is used topically for glaucoma (198). In a placebo controlled study, latanoprost was able to significantly increase hair density compared with baseline and placebo and may also encourage pigmentation (199)

 

TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS AND ANTIFUNGALS

 

The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of MAA is not clear. In particular, the significance of inflammatory cells close to the infra infundibulum of transitional hairs remains obscure. A study conducted in 20 men who used a lotion containing antimicrobials, piroctoneolamine and triclosan, regularly for 18 months showed a decrease in the density of activated T cells in the region of the follicular infra-infundibulum and isthmus over time (200). Trichograms taken at 3-month intervals suggested signs of hair regrowth with moderate increase in density of transitional hairs. Further studies are needed to confirm the effect of topical antimicrobials as a therapeutic option for MAA.

 

Topical ketoconazole shampoo has been shown to increased hair growth in both humans and in rodents when compared with placebo (201). Oral ketoconazole has been beneficial in treating hirsutism but the potential side effects do not warrant its use for androgenic alopecia. Ketoconazole shampoo is a good additive treatment and thought to be having anti-inflammatory and anti-androgenic properties, and it will also help associated seborrheic dermatitis if present (202).

 

GROWTH FACTORS

 

The growth and development of hair follicles is influenced by a number of different growth factors and cytokines. Use of such growth factors to promote hair growth, topically or subcutaneously, is a potential therapeutic target. Preliminary investigations using animal models have shown positive results. A phase I, double-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety of a bioengineered, non-recombinant, human cell–derived formulation containing follistatin, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was performed to assess the efficacy in stimulating hair growth (203). Twenty-six subjects were entered into the study and none showed an adverse reaction to the single intradermal injection. After one year, a statistically significant increase in total hair count continued to be seen.

 

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) isolated from whole blood can be used for its growth factors and stimulatory mediators. Some hair transplant surgeons use this product to encourage transplanted graft growth (204). Platelet-rich plasma is also available as a stand-alone treatment for MAA, with recent limited data suggesting positive regrowth with minimal side effects (205, 206).  It is hypothesized that platelet-rich plasma stimulates hair growth by improving follicle vascularization, inhibiting apoptosis and therefore, prolonging the anagen phase, and inducing a faster transition from the telogen to the anagen phase (207).

 

LASER TREATMENT

 

Laser/light treatment for hair loss has become very popular in the last few years for a number of dermatological conditions. It has also been promoted as a preventative measure against MAA. Several different manufacturers provide lasers and light sources of varying wavelengths and with different suggested modes of use. Whilst there is evidence that laser light can stimulate hair growth at some wavelengths, the biological mechanism by which it occurs has not been defined and clinical data from large scale, placebo controlled trials is lacking (208-210).  The most well-recognized modality are low-level laser/light therapies (LLLT), such as the HairMax Lasercomb®, and He-Ne laser, which are considered safe, effective, and easily accessible treatment options (211). Fractional laser is hypothesizedthat it induces hair growth when restricted to appropriate settings by upregulating the Wnt/βcatenin pathways and efficiently penetrating the scalp (212). Although the exact mechanisms of certain fractional lasers on hair regrowth arestill uncertain, trauma stimulated wound healing likely plays a role. Hair follicle stem cells provide progeny that migrate to the epidermal defect and promote re-epithelialization (212).

 

Laser-assisted drug delivery is an evolving technology with potentially broad clinical applications. Lasers stimulate drug delivery by means of 3 processes; 1) tissue ablation; 2) photomechanical waves, resulting from the conversion of light into mechanical energy giving the laser a therapeutic effect; and 3) non-ablative resurfacing where thermal and physical injuries disrupt the skin barrier, promoting the delivery of medications through these laser channels (213). A prospective study comparing the efficacy and safety of fractional erbium-glass (Er:Glass) laser used in combination with topical 5% minoxidil versus 5% minoxidil alone for the treatment of male AGA. They treated 30 men with AGA who were randomized to 24 weeks of split-scalp treatment using fractional Er:Glass laser and 5% minoxidil on one side (combined therapy) or 5% minoxidil alone on the other side (monotherapy). The primary outcome was the difference in hair density and diameter, from baseline, between two treatment sides, at week 24. The secondary outcome was a global photographic assessment, evaluated by two dermatologists and the participants. Results demonstrated that combination therapy provided significantly superior results for both the primary and secondary outcomes (214). Further studies are required to formally evaluate the role of LAD in MAA treatment algorithm.

 

CLINICAL TRIALS

 

There is currently an open label study, evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy in both males and females with androgenetic alopecia being treated with HMI-115 over a 24-week treatment period (215). HMI-115 is a potent monoclonal antibody, blocking the prolactin (PRL) receptor-mediated pathway in a non-competitive manner. It can be administered subcutaneously. The antibody was well tolerated in a clinical Ph I study (combined single and multiple dosing). The antibody was effective in stimulating hair growth in aged stump-tailed macaques, nearly doubling the number of terminal hairs after 6 months even in previously fully bald areas and showing a sustainable impact even after 2 years post treatment (216). The stump-tail macaque model is considered one of the rare predictive animal models for male and female pattern hair loss in humans (217).

 

Surgical Treatments

 

Hair transplantation involves removal of hair from the occipital scalp and re-implantation into the bald vertex and frontal scalp. With modern techniques, graft survival in excess of 90% can be reliably achieved. Prerequisites for the procedure are stabilization of the hair loss with medical treatment and good donor hair population on the occipital hair. 

 

The modern hair transplant technique was started in Japan in the 1930s, where small punch grafts were used to cover damaged eyebrows or lashes.(218)  Norman Orentreich reported on the use of autografts and proposed the term "donor dominance", in that the hair taken from the androgen resistant occipital scalp remain androgen resistant when implanted into the androgen sensitive bald areas of the scalp (85).

 

In 1995, Bernstein, Rassman et al introduced "Follicular Unit Transplantation," where hair is transplanted in naturally occurring units of 1-4 hair (219). In "Follicular Unit Transplantation", donor hair can be harvested in two different ways:

 

Strip Harvesting - a strip of scalp 8 - 14 mm and 20 – 30 cm is removed under local anesthesia, from the occipital scalp and the wound is then sutured back together. The donor hair is then separated into follicular units and then transplanted into the balding area. The main disadvantage of this method is that it will leave a linear scar in the donor occipital area.

 

∙Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) Harvesting - individual follicles of occipital hair are removed under local anesthesia with 1mm punch biopsies. Each unit is then reinserted back into the scalp in the bald areas using a micro blade. The advantages of this technique are that there are no visible scars and takes a shorter time to heal than strip harvesting.

 

Both techniques can achieve good results, but follicular unit transplantations have the advantage of being able to achieve much greater hair densities. It is preferable that surgical candidates have frontal or mid-frontal hair loss as opposed to hair loss at the vertex, and their donor hair density needs to be adequate to support the surgery (i.e., > 40 follicular units/cm2). Also, thicker donor hairs are able to create better coverage compared with finer hair. Disadvantages of hair transplants are increased time and labor requirements, which translates to greater cost for the patient. Transplanted hairs seem to immediately go into a telogen resting phase after insertion. Thus, surgical results can only be adequately assessed after no less than three months after surgery. There is always a degree of graft failure. Various reasons account for dead grafts, including the skill of the surgeon, the density of graft placement, careless handling and preparation of the graft units, and desiccation of the grafts whilst awaiting insertion. 

 

Scalp reductions result in a more unnatural look with excision scars tending to be more noticeable over time (220). In addition, the inability to predict further hair loss over time in each patient has meant that the procedures are now uncommonly performed.

 

Combination of Medical, Medical and Surgical Therapy

 

An open, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy of available medications as monotherapy or combined therapy (finasteride alone, finasteride and 2% topical minoxidil, topical minoxidil alone and finasteride and ketoconazole shampoo) showed that finasteride in combination with either topical minoxidil or ketoconazole showed significantly better hair regrowth than with finasteride as monotherapy and showed no difference in the incidence of side effects. It is inferred that the combination of medication with different mechanisms of action enhances the efficacy (221). A recent case study showed that adding dutasteride 0.5mg in a patient who had poor response to finasteride had marked improvement of hair loss (222).

 

Topical minoxidil and finasteride can be a useful adjunct to hair transplant surgery for MAA. Without adjuvant medical therapy to prevent progression of balding process, an unnatural appearance can evolve over time. A successful medical treatment is key to stopping hair loss progression and offering a better guarantee of a sustained long-term transplant outcome. Hair transplant surgeons therefore recommend medical therapy should first be initiated prior to reviewing the option of transplantation (223). Studies have found that topical use of minoxidil in perioperative period could prevent the usual shedding that occurs 1 to 2 weeks after transplantation and speed the time for regrowth (224). These results were confirmed by a double-blind trial, which showed that significantly less grafted hair was lost during the shedding period (225). Use of topical minoxidil as a premedication in hair transplant surgery has the advantage of stabilizing the hair loss, increasing the number of hairs in anagen phase and decreasing post-surgical telogen effluvium. Minoxidil should be stopped 2 to 3 days before surgery to minimize skin irritation and to reduce the theoretical risk of intraoperative bleeding caused by vasodilation. Therapy should be restarted in 1-2 weeks. A randomized, double-blind trial in 79 men with MAA using finasteride 1 mg daily or placebo 4 weeks before and 48 weeks after hair transplantation demonstrated that the treatment group had significant improvement from baseline, in comparison with placebo group (226).

 

CONCLUSION

 

MAA is increasingly common among men as they age. Many men find it a distressing and unwelcome event and increasing numbers are seeking treatment to prevent further hair loss and reverse the process. In addition, MAA may be a marker of increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. The hair follicle is a complex organ biologically. The changes in the hair follicles that lead to baldness have caught the interest of stem cell scientists, geneticists, developmental biologists, and immunologists and hair biology has become an increasingly fruitful field of scientific endeavor. A number of therapeutic options are now available for these men with favorable cosmetic outcomes possible in the majority of cases.

 

 REFERENCES

 

  1. Hamilton JB. Patterned loss of hair in man; types and incidence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1951;53(3):708–728.
  2. Olsen EA. Disorders of Hair Growth: Diagnosis and Treatment. McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2003.
  3. Montagna W, Ellis RA. The Biology of Hair Growth. Elsevier; 2013.
  4. Ishino A, Uzuka M, Tsuji Y, Nakanishi J, Hanzawa N, Imamura S. Progressive decrease in hair diameter in Japanese with male pattern baldness. J. Dermatol. 1997;24(12):758–764.
  5. Setty LR. Hair patterns of the scalp of white and Negro males. American Journal of Physical Anthropology1970;33(1):49–55.
  6. Smith MA. Male-Type Alopecia, Alopecia Areata, and Normal Hair in Women. Archives of Dermatology1964;89(1):95.
  7. Muller SA. Alopecia: syndromes of genetic significance. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1973;60(6):475–492.
  8. Tang PH, Chia HP, Cheong LL, Koh D. A community study of male androgenetic alopecia in Bishan, Singapore. Singapore Med. J. 2000;41(5):202–205.
  9. Severi G, Sinclair R, Hopper JL, English DR, McCredie MRE, Boyle P, Giles GG. Androgenetic alopecia in men aged 40-69 years: prevalence and risk factors. Br. J. Dermatol. 2003;149(6):1207–1213.
  10. Rhodes T, Girman CJ, Savin RC, Kaufman KD, Guo S, Lilly FR, Siervogel RM, Chumlea WC. Prevalence of male pattern hair loss in 18-49 year old men. Dermatol. Surg. 1998;24(12):1330–1332.
  11. Paik JH, Yoon JB, Sim WY, Kim BS, Kim NI. The prevalence and types of androgenetic alopecia in Korean men and women. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001;145(1):95–99.
  12. Cash TF. The psychological effects of androgenetic alopecia in men. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1992;26(6):926–931.
  13. Budd D, Himmelberger D, Rhodes T, Cash TE, Girman CJ. The effects of hair loss in European men: a survey in four countries. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2000;10(2):122–127.
  14. Lee H-J, Ha S-J, Kim D, Kim H-O, Kim J-W. Perception of men with androgenetic alopecia by women and nonbalding men in Korea: how the nonbald regard the bald. Int. J. Dermatol. 2002;41(12):867–869.
  15. Passchier J. Quality of life issues in male pattern hair loss. Dermatology 1998;197(3):217–218.
  16. Tabolli S, Sampogna F, di Pietro C, Mannooranparampil TJ, Ribuffo M, Abeni D. Health Status, Coping Strategies, and Alexithymia in Subjects with Androgenetic Alopecia. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology2013;14(2):139–145.
  17. Cotton SG, Nixon JM, Carpenter RG, Evans DW. Factors discriminating men with coronary heart disease from healthy controls. Br. Heart J. 1972;34(5):458–464.
  18. Herrera CR, D’Agostino RB, Gerstman BB, Bosco LA, Belanger AJ. Baldness and coronary heart disease rates in men from the Framingham Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1995;142(8):828–833.
  19. Ford ES, Freedman DS, Byers T. Baldness and ischemic heart disease in a national sample of men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1996;143(7):651–657.
  20. Lesko SM, Rosenberg L, Shapiro S. A case-control study of baldness in relation to myocardial infarction in men. JAMA 1993;269(8):998–1003.
  21. Schnohr P, Lange P, Nyboe J, Appleyard M, Jensen G. Gray hair, baldness, and wrinkles in relation to myocardial infarction: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Am. Heart J. 1995;130(5):1003–1010.
  22. Agac MT, Bektas H, Korkmaz L, Cetin M, Erkan H, Gurbak I, Hatem E, Celik S. Androgenetic alopecia is associated with increased arterial stiffness in asymptomatic young adults. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2015;29(1):26–30.
  23. Lotufo PA, Chae CU, Ajani UA, Hennekens CH, Manson JE. Male pattern baldness and coronary heart disease: the Physicians’ Health Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000;160(2):165–171.
  24. Arias-Santiago S, Gutiérrez-Salmerón MT, Buendía-Eisman A, Girón-Prieto MS, Naranjo-Sintes R.Hypertension and aldosterone levels in women with early-onset androgenetic alopecia. British Journal of Dermatology 2010;162(4):786–789.
  25. Ahouansou S, Le Toumelin P, Crickx B, Descamps V. Association of androgenetic alopecia and hypertension. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2007;17(3):220–222.
  26. Ellis JA, Stebbing M, Harrap SB. Male pattern baldness is not associated with established cardiovascular risk factors in the general population. Clin. Sci. 2001;100(4):401–404.
  27. Oh BR, Kim SJ, Moon JD, Kim HN, Kwon DD, Won YH, Ryu SB, Park YI. Association of benign prostatic hyperplasia with male pattern baldness. Urology 1998;51(5):744–748.
  28. Chen W, Yang C-C, Chen G-Y, Wu M-C, Sheu H-M, Tzai T-S. Patients with a large prostate show a higher prevalence of androgenetic alopecia. Archives of Dermatological Research 2004;296(6):245–249.
  29. Arias-Santiago S, Arrabal-Polo MA, Buenda-Eisman A, Arrabal-Martn M, Gutirrez-Salmern MT, Girn-Prieto MS, Jimenez-Pacheco A, Calonje JE, Naranjo-Sintes R, Zuluaga-Gomez A, Ortega SS. Androgenetic alopecia as an early marker of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2012;66(3):401–408.
  30. Dastgheib L, Shirazi M, Moezzi I, Dehghan S, Sadati M-S. Is there a relationship between androgenic alopecia and benign prostatic hyperplasia? Acta Med. Iran. 2015;53(1):30–32.
  31. Hawk E, Breslow RA, Graubard BI. Male pattern baldness and clinical prostate cancer in the epidemiologic follow-up of the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.2000;9(5):523–527.
  32. Giles GG, Severi G, Sinclair R, English DR, McCredie MRE, Johnson W, Boyle P, Hopper JL. Androgenetic alopecia and prostate cancer: findings from an Australian case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(6):549–553.
  33. Muller DC, Giles GG, Sinclair R, Hopper JL, English DR, Severi G. Age-Dependent Associations between Androgenetic Alopecia and Prostate Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention2013;22(2):209–215.
  34. Amoretti A, Laydner H, Bergfeld W. Androgenetic alopecia and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013;68(6):937–943.
  35. Denmark-Wahnefried W, Schildkraut JM, Thompson D, Lesko SM, McIntyre L, Schwingl P, Paulson DF, Robertson CN, Anderson EE, Walther PJ. Early onset baldness and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(3):325–328.
  36. Zhou J, Xia S, Li T, Liu R. Association between male pattern baldness and testicular germ cell tumor: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019;19(1):53.
  37. Ingles SA, Liu SV, Pinski J. LHRH and LHR genotypes and prostate cancer incidence and survival. Int. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Genet. 2013;4(4):228–234.
  38. Moravvej H, Pourani MR, Baghani M, Abdollahimajd F. Androgenetic alopecia and COVID-19: A review of the hypothetical role of androgens. Dermatol. Ther. 2021;34(4):e15004.
  39. Ghafoor R, Ali SM, Patil A, Goldust M. Association of androgenetic alopecia and severity of coronavirus disease 2019. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2022;21(3):874–879.
  40. Wambier CG, Vaño-Galván S, McCoy J, Gomez-Zubiaur A, Herrera S, Hermosa-Gelbard Á, Moreno-Arrones OM, Jiménez-Gómez N, González-Cantero A, Fonda-Pascual P, Segurado-Miravalles G, Shapiro J, Pérez-García B, Goren A. Androgenetic alopecia present in the majority of patients hospitalized with COVID-19: The “Gabrin sign.” J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020;83(2):680–682.
  41. Lee J, Yousaf A, Fang W, Kolodney MS. Male balding is a major risk factor for severe COVID-19. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2020;83(5):e353–e354.
  42. Wambier CG, Goren A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is likely to be androgen mediated. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020;83(1):308–309.
  43. Goren A, Wambier CG, Herrera S, McCoy J, Vaño-Galván S, Gioia F, Comeche B, Ron R, Serrano-Villar S, Ramos PM, Cadegiani FA, Kovacevic M, Tosti A, Shapiro J, Sinclair R. Anti-androgens may protect against severe COVID-19 outcomes: results from a prospective cohort study of 77 hospitalized men. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021;35(1):e13–e15.
  44. Kalra S, Bhattacharya S, Kalhan A. Testosterone in COVID-19 - Foe, Friend or Fatal Victim? Eur Endocrinol2020;16(2):88–91.
  45. McCoy J, Cadegiani FA, Wambier CG, Herrera S, Vaño‐Galván S, Mesinkovska NA, Ramos PM, Shapiro J, Sinclair R, Tosti A, Goren A. 5‐alpha‐reductase inhibitors are associated with reduced frequency of COVID‐19 symptoms in males with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2021;35(4). doi:10.1111/jdv.17021.
  46. Montopoli M, Zumerle S, Vettor R, Rugge M, Zorzi M, Catapano CV, Carbone GM, Cavalli A, Pagano F, Ragazzi E, Prayer-Galetti T, Alimonti A. Androgen-deprivation therapies for prostate cancer and risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2: a population-based study (N = 4532). Annals of Oncology 2020;31(8):1040–1045.
  47. Ellis JA, Sinclair R, Harrap SB. Androgenetic alopecia: pathogenesis and potential for therapy. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2002;4(22):1–11.
  48. Nyholt DR, Gillespie NA, Heath AC, Martin NG. Genetic basis of male pattern baldness. J. Invest. Dermatol.2003;121(6):1561–1564.
  49. Ellis JA, Harrap SB. The genetics of androgenetic alopecia. Clin. Dermatol. 2001;19(2):149–154.
  50. Osborn. Inheritance of baldness: various patterns due to heredity and sometimes present at birth—a sex-limited character—dominant in man—women not bald …. J. Hered. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110746.
  51. Küster W, Happle R. The inheritance of common baldness: Two B or not two B ? Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1984;11(5):921–926.
  52. Ellis JA, Stebbing M, Harrap SB. Genetic Analysis of Male Pattern Baldness and the 5α-Reductase Genes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1998;110(6):849–853.
  53. Ellis JA, Stebbing M, Harrap SB. Polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene is associated with male pattern baldness. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2001;116(3):452–455.
  54. Sawaya ME, Price VH. Different Levels of 5α-Reductase Type I and II, Aromatase, and Androgen Receptor in Hair Follicles of Women and Men with Androgenetic Alopecia. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1997;109(3):296–300.
  55. Yip L, Zaloumis S, Irwin D, Severi G, Hopper J, Giles G, Harrap S, Sinclair R, Ellis J. Gene-wide association study between the aromatase gene (CYP19A1) and female pattern hair loss. British Journal of Dermatology2009;161(2):289–294.
  56. Hillmer AM, Flaquer A, Hanneken S, Eigelshoven S, Kortüm A-K, Brockschmidt FF, Golla A, Metzen C, Thiele H, Kolberg S, Reinartz R, Betz RC, Ruzicka T, Hennies HC, Kruse R, Nöthen MM. Genome-wide Scan and Fine-Mapping Linkage Study of Androgenetic Alopecia Reveals a Locus on Chromosome 3q26. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;82(3):737–743.
  57. Hillmer AM, Brockschmidt FF, Hanneken S, Eigelshoven S, Steffens M, Flaquer A, Herms S, Becker T, Kortüm A-K, Nyholt DR, Zhao ZZ, Montgomery GW, Martin NG, Mühleisen TW, Alblas MA, Moebus S, Jöckel K-H, Bröcker-Preuss M, Erbel R, Reinartz R, Betz RC, Cichon S, Propping P, Baur MP, Wienker TF, Kruse R, Nöthen MM. Susceptibility variants for male-pattern baldness on chromosome 20p11. Nature Genetics2008;40(11):1279–1281.
  58. Brockschmidt FF, Heilmann S, Ellis JA, Eigelshoven S, Hanneken S, Herold C, Moebus S, Alblas MA, Lippke B, Kluck N, Priebe L, Degenhardt FA, Jamra RA, Meesters C, Jöckel K-H, Erbel R, Harrap S, Schumacher J, Fröhlich H, Kruse R, Hillmer AM, Becker T, Nöthen MM. Susceptibility variants on chromosome 7p21.1 suggest HDAC9 as a new candidate gene for male-pattern baldness. British Journal of Dermatology 2011;165(6):1293–1302.
  59. Pirastu N, Joshi PK, de Vries PS, Cornelis MC, McKeigue PM, Keum N, Franceschini N, Colombo M, Giovannucci EL, Spiliopoulou A, Franke L, North KE, Kraft P, Morrison AC, Esko T, Wilson JF. GWAS for male-pattern baldness identifies 71 susceptibility loci explaining 38% of the risk. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):1584.
  60. Yamazaki M, Sato A, Toyoshima K-E, Kojima Y, Okada T, Ishii Y, Kurata S, Yoshizato K, Tsuboi R. Polymorphic CAG repeat numbers in the androgen receptor gene of female pattern hair loss patients. J. Dermatol.2011;38(7):680–684.
  61. Hamilton JB. Male hormone stimulation is prerequisite and an incitant in common baldness. Am. J. Anat.1942;71(3):451–480.
  62. Pitts RL. Serum elevation of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate associated with male pattern baldness in young men. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1987;16(3 Pt 1):571–573.
  63. Schmidt JB. Hormonal basis of male and female androgenic alopecia: clinical relevance. Skin Pharmacol.1994;7(1-2):61–66.
  64. Schmidt JB, Lindmaier A, Trenz A, Schurz B, Spona J. Hormone studies in females with androgenic hairloss. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 1991;31(4):235–239.
  65. Hamilton JB. Effect of castration in adolescent and young adult males upon further changes in the proportions of bare and hairy scalp. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1960;20:1309–1318.
  66. Wilson JD, Griffin JE, Russell DW. Steroid 5 alpha-reductase 2 deficiency. Endocr. Rev. 1993;14(5):577–593.
  67. Imperato-McGinley J, Guerrero L, Gautier T, Peterson RE. Steroid 5alpha-reductase deficiency in man: an inherited form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Science 1974;186(4170):1213–1215.
  68. Sinclair R, Greenland KJ, van Egmond S, Hoedemaker C, Chapman A, Zajac JD. Men with Kennedy disease have a reduced risk of androgenetic alopecia. British Journal of Dermatology 2007;157(2):290–294.
  69. Schweikert HU, Wilson JD. Regulation of Human Hair Growth by Steroid Hormones. II. Androstenedione Metabolism in Isolated Hairs. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 1974;39(6):1012–1019.
  70. Randall VA, Julie Thornton M, Hamada K, Messenger AG. Androgen Action in Cultured Dermal Papilla Cells from Human Hair Follicles. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology 1994;7(1-2):20–26.
  71. Kaufman KD. Androgen metabolism as it affects hair growth in androgenetic alopecia. Dermatol. Clin.1996;14(4):697–711.
  72. Androgen influence on hair growth. In: Skin, Hair, and Nails. CRC Press; 2003:353–374.
  73. Itami S, Kurata S, Sonoda T, Takayasu S. Characterization of 5α-Reductase in Cultured Human Dermal Papilla Cells from Beard and Occipital Scalp Hair. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1991;96(1):57–60.
  74. Chen W, Thiboutot D, Zouboulis CC. Cutaneous androgen metabolism: basic research and clinical perspectives. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2002;119(5):992–1007.
  75. Bayne, Bayne, Flanagan, Einstein, Ayala, Chang, Azzolina, Whiting, Mumford, Thiboutot, Singer, Harris.Immunohistochemical localization of types 1 and 2 5α-reductase in human scalp. British Journal of Dermatology1999;141(3):481–491.
  76. Hoffmann R, Happle R. Current understanding of androgenetic alopecia. Part I: etiopathogenesis. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2000;10(4):319–327.
  77. Fritsch M, Orfanos CE, Zouboulis CC. Sebocytes are the key regulators of androgen homeostasis in human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2001;116(5):793–800.
  78. Itami S, Kurata S, Takayasu S. Androgen Induction of Follicular Epithelial Cell Growth Is Mediated via Insulin-like Growth Factor-I from Dermal Papilla Cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications1995;212(3):988–994.
  79. Inui S, Fukuzato Y, Nakajima T, Yoshikawa K, Itami S. Androgen‐inducible TGF‐β1 from balding dermal papilla cells inhibits epithelial cell growth: a clue to understanding paradoxical effects of androgen on human hair growth. The FASEB Journal 2002;16(14):1967–1969.
  80. Thornton MJ, Hamada K, Messenger AG, Randall VA. Androgen-dependent beard dermal papilla cells secrete autocrine growth factor(s) in response to testosterone unlike scalp cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1998;111(5):727–732.
  81. Randall VA, Thornton MJ, Messenger AG. Cultured dermal papilla cells from androgen-dependent human hair follicles (e.g. beard) contain more androgen receptors than those from non-balding areas of scalp. Journal of Endocrinology 1992;133(1):141–147.
  82. Thornton MJ, Laing I, Hamada K, Messenger AG, Randall VA. Differences in testosterone metabolism by beard and scalp hair follicle dermal papilla cells. Clinical Endocrinology 1993;39(6):633–639.
  83. Itami S, Kurata S, Takayasu S. 5α-Reductase Activity in Cultured Human Dermal Papilla Cells from Beard Compared with Reticular Dermal Fibroblasts. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1990;94(1):150–152.
  84. Boudou P. Increased scalp skin and serum 5 alpha-reductase reduced androgens in a man relevant to the acquired progressive kinky hair disorder and developing androgenetic alopecia. Archives of Dermatology1997;133(9):1129–1133.
  85. Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1959;83:463–479.
  86. Olsen EA. Female pattern hair loss: Clinical features and potential hormonal factors. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2001;45(3):S69.
  87. Kligman AM. The Human Hair Cycle11From the Department of Dermatology of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. This research was supported by U.S. Army Research Contract DA 49-007-MD-154. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1959;33(6):307–316.
  88. Burns T, Breathnach SM, Cox N, Griffiths CEM. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  89. Messenger AG, de Berker DAR, Sinclair RD. Disorders of Hair. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology 2010:1–100.
  90. Courtois M, Loussouarn G, Hourseau C, Grollier JF. Hair Cycle and Alopecia. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology 1994;7(1-2):84–89.
  91. Guarrera M, Rebora A. Anagen hairs may fail to replace telogen hairs in early androgenic female alopecia. Dermatology 1996;192(1):28–31.
  92. Randall VA, Jenner TJ, Hibberts NA, De Oliveira IO, Vafaee T. Stem cell factor/c-Kit signalling in normal and androgenetic alopecia hair follicles. J. Endocrinol. 2008;197(1):11–23.
  93. Sinclair R, Torkamani N, Jones L. Androgenetic alopecia: new insights into the pathogenesis and mechanism of hair loss. F1000Res. 2015;4(F1000 Faculty Rev):585.
  94. Jahoda CAB, Horne KA, Oliver RF. Induction of hair growth by implantation of cultured dermal papilla cells. Nature 1984;311(5986):560–562.
  95. Jahoda CAB, Reynolds AJ. Dermal-epidermal interactions—follicle-derived cell populations in the study of hair-growth mechanisms. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1993;101(1):S33–S38.
  96. Randall VA, Hibberts NA, Hamada K. A comparison of the culture and growth of dermal papilla cells from hair follicles from non-balding and balding (androgenetic alopecia) scalp. British Journal of Dermatology1996;134(3):437–444.
  97. Obana N, Chang C, Uno H. Inhibition of Hair Growth by Testosterone in the Presence of Dermal Papilla Cells from the Frontal Bald Scalp of the Postpubertal Stumptailed Macaque1. Endocrinology 1997;138(1):356–361.
  98. Oliver RF, Jahoda CAB. The Dermal Papilla and Maintenance of Hair Growth. The Biology of Wool and Hair1988:51–67.
  99. van Scott EJ, Ekel TM. Geometric Relationships Between the Matrix of the Hair Bulb and its Dermal Papilla in Normal and Alopecic Scalp11From the Dermatology Service, General Medical Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1958;31(5):281–287.
  100. Jahoda CA. Cellular and developmental aspects of androgenetic alopecia. Exp. Dermatol. 1998;7(5):235–248.
  101. Elliott K, Messenger AG, Stephenson TJ. Differences in Hair Follicle Dermal Papilla Volume are Due to Extracellular Matrix Volume and Cell Number: Implications for the Control of Hair Follicle Size and Androgen Responses. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1999;113(6):873–877.
  102. Prieto VG. Androgenetic Alopecia: Analysis of Proliferation and Apoptosis. Archives of Dermatology2002;138(8):1101–1102.
  103. Hamada K, Randall VA. Inhibitory autocrine factors produced by the mesenchyme-derived hair follicle dermal papilla may be a key to male pattern baldness. British Journal of Dermatology 2006;154(4):609–618.
  104. Weger N, Schlake T. Igfbp3 Modulates Cell Proliferation in the Hair Follicle. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2005;125(4):847–849.
  105. Sinclair R. Fortnightly review: Male pattern androgenetic alopecia. BMJ 1998;317(7162):865–869.
  106. Whiting DA. Possible mechanisms of miniaturization during androgenetic alopecia or pattern hair loss. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001;45(3 Suppl):S81–6.
  107. Whiting DA. Diagnostic and predictive value of horizontal sections of scalp biopsy specimens in male pattern androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1993;28(5):755–763.
  108. Pinkus H. Differential patterns of elastic fibers in scarring and non-scarring alopecias. J. Cutan. Pathol.1978;5(3):93–104.
  109. Yazdabadi A, Magee J, Harrison S, Sinclair R. The Ludwig pattern of androgenetic alopecia is due to a hierarchy of androgen sensitivity within follicular units that leads to selective miniaturization and a reduction in the number of terminal hairs per follicular unit. British Journal of Dermatology 2008;159(6):1300–1302.
  110. Jaworsky C, Kligman AM, Murphy GF. Characterization of inflammatory infiltrates in male pattern alopecia: implications for pathogenesis. British Journal of Dermatology 1992;127(3):239–246.
  111. Sueki H, Stoudemayer T, Kligman AM, Murphy GF. Quantitative and ultrastructural analysis of inflammatory infiltrates in male pattern alopecia. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1999;79(5):347–350.
  112. Kligman AM. The comparative histopathology of male-pattern baldness and senescent baldness. Clinics in Dermatology 1988;6(4):108–118.
  113. Zinkernagel MS, Med C, Trüeb RM. Fibrosing Alopecia in a Pattern Distribution. Archives of Dermatology2000;136(2). doi:10.1001/archderm.136.2.205.
  114. Sinclair R, Jolley D, Mallari R, Magee J. The reliability of horizontally sectioned scalp biopsies in the diagnosis of chronic diffuse telogen hair loss in women. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology2004;51(2):189–199.
  115. Messenger AG, Sinclair R. Follicular miniaturization in female pattern hair loss: clinicopathological correlations. British Journal of Dermatology 2006;155(5):926–930.
  116. Deloche C, de Lacharrière O, Misciali C, Piraccini BM, Vincenzi C, Bastien P, Tardy I, Bernard BA, Tosti A.Histological features of peripilar signs associated with androgenetic alopecia. Archives of Dermatological Research 2004;295(10):422–428.
  117. Yazdabadi A, Rufaut NW, Whiting D, Sinclair R. Miniaturized hairs maintain contact with the arrector pili muscle in alopecia areata but not in androgenetic alopecia: A model for reversible miniaturization and potential for hair regrowth. International Journal of Trichology 2012;4(3):154.
  118. Norwood OT. Male Pattern Baldness: classification and Incidence. Southern Medical Journal 1975;68(11):1359–1365.
  119. Kerkemeyer KL, de Carvalho LT, Jerjen R, John J, Sinclair RD, Pinczewski J, Bhoyrul B. Female pattern hair loss in men: A distinct clinical variant of androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2021;85(1):260–262.
  120. Kerkemeyer KL, Poa JE, de Carvalho LT, Eisman S, Imperial IC, Sinclair RD, Bhoyrul B. Development and initial validation of a modified Sinclair scale for female pattern hair loss in men. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2022;86(6):1406–1408.
  121. Adil A, Godwin M. The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017;77(1):136–141.e5.
  122. Kosman ME. Evaluation of a new antihypertensive agent. Minoxidil. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1980;244(1):73–75.
  123. Devine BL, Fife R, P M Trust. Minoxidil for severe hypertension after failure of other hypotensive drugs. BMJ1977;2(6088):667–669.
  124. Lietman PS, Pennisi AJ, Takahashi M, Bernstein BH, Singsen BH, Uittenbogaart C, Ettenger RB, Malekzadeh MH, Hanson V, Fine RN. Minoxidil therapy in children with severe hypertension. The Journal of Pediatrics1977;90(5):813–819.
  125. Kreindler TG. Topical minoxidil in early androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1987;16(3):718–724.
  126. Wester RC, Maibach HI, Guy RH, Novak E. Minoxidil stimulates cutaneous blood flow in human balding scalps: pharmacodynamics measured by laser Doppler velocimetry and photopulse plethysmography. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1984;82(5):515–517.
  127. Lachgar, Lachgar, Charveron, Gall, Bonafe. Minoxidil upregulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human hair dermal papilla cells. British Journal of Dermatology 1998;138(3):407–411.
  128. Marubayashi A, Nakaya Y, Fukui K, Li M, Arase S. Minoxidil-Induced Hair Growth is Mediated by Adenosine in Cultured Dermal Papilla Cells: Possible Involvement of Sulfonylurea Receptor 2B as a Target of Minoxidil. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2001;117(6):1594–1600.
  129. Buhl AE, Waldon DJ, Conrad SJ, Mulholland MJ, Shull KL, Kubicek MF, Johnson GA, Brunden MN, Stefanski KJ, Stehle RG, Gadwood RC, Kamdar BV, Thomasco LM, Schostarez HJ, Schwartz TM, Diani AR. Potassium Channel Conductance: A Mechanism Affecting Hair Growth both In Vitro and In Vivo. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1992;98(3):315–319.
  130. Buhl AE, Conrad SJ, Waldon DJ, Brunden MN. Potassium Channel Conductance as a Control Mechanism in Hair Follicles. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 1993;101(s1):148S–152S.
  131. Katz HI, Hien NT, Prawer SE, Goldman SJ. Long-term efficacy of topical minoxidil in male pattern baldness. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1987;16(3):711–718.
  132. Price VH, Menefee E, Strauss PC. Changes in hair weight and hair count in men with androgenetic alopecia, after application of 5% and 2% topical minoxidil, placebo, or no treatment. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1999;41(5 Pt 1):717–721.
  133. Olsen EA, Weiner MS, Amara IA, DeLong ER. Five-year follow-up of men with androgenetic alopecia treated with topical minoxidil. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1990;22(4):643–646.
  134. Olsen EA, DeLong ER, Weiner MS. Long-term follow-up of men with male pattern baldness treated with topical minoxidil. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1987;16(3):688–695.
  135. Roberts JL, Fiedler V, Imperato-McGinley J, Whiting D, Olsen E, Shupack J, Stough D, DeVillez R, Rietschel R, Savin R, Bergfeld W, Swinehart J, Funicella T, Hordinsky M, Lowe N, Katz I, Lucky A, Drake L, Price VH, Weiss D, Whitmore E, Millikan L, Muller S, Gencheff C, Carrington P, Binkowitz B, Kotey P, He W, Bruno K, Jacobsen C, Terranella L, Gormley GJ, Kaufman KD. Clinical dose ranging studies with finasteride, a type 2 5α-reductase inhibitor, in men with male pattern hair loss. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1999;41(4):555–563.
  136. Olsen EA, Whiting D, Bergfeld W, Miller J, Hordinsky M, Wanser R, Zhang P, Kohut B. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of a novel formulation of 5% minoxidil topical foam versus placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2007;57(5):767–774.
  137. Friedman ES, Friedman PM, Cohen DE, Washenik K. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical minoxidil solution: Etiology and treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2002;46(2):309–312.
  138. do Nascimento IJB, Harries M, Rocha VB, Thompson JY, Wong CH, Varkaneh HK, Guimarães NS, Rocha Arantes AJ, Marcolino MS. Effect of Oral Minoxidil for Alopecia: Systematic Review. Int. J. Trichology2020;12(4):147–155.
  139. Panchaprateep R, Lueangarun S. Efficacy and Safety of Oral Minoxidil 5 mg Once Daily in the Treatment of Male Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia: An Open-Label and Global Photographic Assessment. Dermatol. Ther. 2020;10(6):1345–1357.
  140. Vañó-Galván S, Pirmez R, Hermosa-Gelbard A, Moreno-Arrones ÓM, Saceda-Corralo D, Rodrigues-Barata R, Jimenez-Cauhe J, Koh WL, Poa JE, Jerjen R, Trindade de Carvalho L, John JM, Salas-Callo CI, Vincenzi C, Yin L, Lo-Sicco K, Waskiel-Burnat A, Starace M, Zamorano JL, Jaén-Olasolo P, Piraccini BM, Rudnicka L, Shapiro J, Tosti A, Sinclair R, Bhoyrul B. Safety of low-dose oral minoxidil for hair loss: A multicenter study of 1404 patients. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2021;84(6):1644–1651.
  141. Kaufman KD, Olsen EA, Whiting D, Savin R, DeVillez R, Bergfeld W, Price VH, Van Neste D, Roberts JL, Hordinsky M, Shapiro J, Binkowitz B, Gormley GJ. Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1998;39(4):578–589.
  142. Van Neste D, Fuh V, Sanchez-Pedreno P, Lopez-Bran E, Wolff H, Whiting D, Roberts J, Kopera D, Stene J-J, Calvieri S, Tosti A, Prens E, Guarrera M, Kanojia P, He W, Kaufman KD. Finasteride increases anagen hair in men with androgenetic alopecia. British Journal of Dermatology 2000;143(4):804–810.
  143. Whiting DA, Waldstreicher J, Sanchex M, Kaufman KD. Measuring Reversal of Hair Miniaturization in Androgenetic Alopecia by Follicular Counts in Horizontal Sections of Serial Scalp Biopsies: Results of Finasteride 1mg Treatment of Men and Postmenopausal Women. Journal of Investigative Dermatology Symposium Proceedings 1999;4(3):282–284.
  144. Price VH, Menefee E, Sanchez M, Kaufman KD. Changes in hair weight in men with androgenetic alopecia after treatment with finasteride (1 mg daily): Three- and 4-year results. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2006;55(1):71–74.
  145. Drake L, Hordinsky M, Fiedler V, Swinehart J, Unger WP, Cotterill PC, Thiboutot DM, Lowe N, Jacobson C, Whiting D, Stieglitz S, Kraus SJ, Griffin EI, Weiss D, Carrington P, Gencheff C, Cole GW, Pariser DM, Epstein ES, Tanaka W, Dallob A, Vandormael K, Geissler L, Waldsteicher J. The effects of finasteride on scalp skin and serum androgen levels in men with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology1999;41(4):550–554.
  146. Gillespie JDN. Journal Review: Long-term (5-year) multinational experience with finasteride 1mg in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery 2002;12(3):129–129.
  147. Stough D. Dutasteride improves male pattern hair loss in a randomized study in identical twins. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 2007;6(1):9–13.
  148. Price VH, Menefee E, Sanchez M, Ruane P, Kaufman KD. Changes in hair weight and hair count in men with androgenetic alopecia after treatment with finasteride, 1 mg, daily. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2002;46(4):517–523.
  149. Arca E, Açikgöz G, Taştan HB, Köse O, Kurumlu Z. An open, randomized, comparative study of oral finasteride and 5% topical minoxidil in male androgenetic alopecia. Dermatology 2004;209(2):117–125.
  150. Sato A, Takeda A. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of finasteride 1 mg in 3177 Japanese men with androgenetic alopecia. J. Dermatol. 2012;39(1):27–32.
  151. Rossi A, Cantisani C, SCARNò M, Trucchia A, Fortuna MC, Calvieri S. Finasteride, 1 mg daily administration on male androgenetic alopecia in different age groups: 10-year follow-up. Dermatologic Therapy 2011;24(4):455–461.
  152. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Soli M. Evaluation of sexual function in subjects taking finasteride for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2001;15(5):418–421.
  153. Yim E, Baquerizo Nole KL, Tosti A. 5α-Reductase inhibitors in androgenetic alopecia. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity 2014;21(6):493–498.
  154. Irwig MS. Persistent Sexual Side Effects of Finasteride: Could They Be Permanent? The Journal of Sexual Medicine 2012;9(11):2927–2932.
  155. Belknap SM, Aslam I, Kiguradze T, Temps WH, Yarnold PR, Cashy J, Brannigan RE, Micali G, Nardone B, West DP. Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials of Finasteride for Androgenic Alopecia. JAMA Dermatology2015;151(6):600.
  156. Matzkin H, Barak M, Braf Z. Effect of finasteride on free and total serum prostate-specific antigen in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br. J. Urol. 1996;78(3):405–408.
  157. Keetch DW, Andriole GL, Ratliff TL, Catalona WJ. Comparison of percent free prostate-specific antigen levels in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with finasteride, terazosin, or watchful waiting. Urology1997;50(6):901–905.
  158. Marks LS, Andriole GL, Fitzpatrick JM, Schulman CC, Roehrborn CG. The Interpretation of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in Men Receiving 5α-Reductase Inhibitors: A Review and Clinical Recommendations. Journal of Urology 2006;176(3):868–874.
  159. Etzioni RD, Howlader N, Shaw PA, Ankerst DP, Penson DF, Goodman PJ, Thompson IM. LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF FINASTERIDE ON PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS: RESULTS FROM THE PROSTATE CANCER PREVENTION TRIAL. Journal of Urology 2005;174(3):877–881.
  160. D’Amico AV, Roehrborn CG. Effect of 1 mg/day finasteride on concentrations of serum prostate-specific antigen in men with androgenic alopecia: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology 2007;8(1):21–25.
  161. Guess HA, Heyse JF, Gormley GJ. The effect of finasteride on prostate-specific antigen in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Prostate 1993;22(1):31–37.
  162. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Scott Lucia M, Miller GJ, Ford LG, Lieber MM, Duane Cespedes R, Atkins JN, Lippman SM, Carlin SM, Ryan A, Szczepanek CM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA. The Influence of Finasteride on the Development of Prostate Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2003;349(3):215–224.
  163. Redman MW, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Scott Lucia M, Coltman CA, Thompson IM. Finasteride Does Not Increase the Risk of High-Grade Prostate Cancer: A Bias-Adjusted Modeling Approach. Cancer Prevention Research 2008;1(3):174–181.
  164. Lucia MS, Epstein JI, Goodman PJ, Darke AK, Reuter VE, Civantos F, Tangen CM, Parnes HL, Lippman SM, La Rosa FG, Kattan MW, Crawford ED, Ford LG, Coltman CA, Thompson IM. Finasteride and High-Grade Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute2007;99(18):1375–1383.
  165. Cohen YC, Liu KS, Heyden NL, Carides AD, Anderson KM, Daifotis AG, Gann PH. Detection Bias Due to the Effect of Finasteride on Prostate Volume: A Modeling Approach for Analysis of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007;99(18):1366–1374.
  166. Kramer BS, Hagerty KL, Justman S, Somerfield MR, Albertsen PC, Blot WJ, Ballentine Carter H, Costantino JP, Epstein JI, Godley PA, Harris RP, Wilt TJ, Wittes J, Zon R, Schellhammer P. Use of 5-α-Reductase Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention: American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Urological Association 2008 Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27(9):1502–1516.
  167. Elliott CS, Shinghal R, Presti JC. The Influence of Prostate Volume on Prostate-Specific Antigen Performance: Implications for the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Outcomes. Clinical Cancer Research 2009;15(14):4694–4699.
  168. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Scott Lucia M, Parnes HL, Lippman SM, Coltman CA. Finasteride Improves the Sensitivity of Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Detection. Journal of Urology2007;177(5):1749–1752.
  169. Sinclair RD, Dawber RPR. Androgenetic alopecia in men and women. Clinics in Dermatology 2001;19(2):167–178.
  170. Hajheydari Z, Akbari J, Saeedi M, Shokoohi L. Comparing the therapeutic effects of finasteride gel and tablet in treatment of the androgenetic alopecia. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2009;75(1):47–51.
  171. Trüeb RM, Itin P, Itin und Schweizerische Arbeitsgruppe für Trichologie. [Photographic documentation of the effectiveness of 1 mg. oral finasteride in treatment of androgenic alopecia in the man in routine general practice in Switzerland]. Praxis 2001;90(48):2087–2093.
  172. Amory JK, Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ, Walker SE, Haberer LJ, Clark RV.The Effect of 5α-Reductase Inhibition with Dutasteride and Finasteride on Semen Parameters and Serum Hormones in Healthy Men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2007;92(5):1659–1665.
  173. Tollin SR, Rosen HN, Zurowski K, Saltzman B, Zeind AJ, Berg S, Greenspan SL. Finasteride therapy does not alter bone turnover in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia--a Clinical Research Center study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996;81(3):1031–1034.
  174. Matsumoto AM, Tenover L, McCLUNG M, Mobley D, Geller J, Sullivan M, Grayhack J, Wessells H, Kadmon D, Flanagan M, Zhang GK, Schmidt J, Taylor AM, Lee M, Waldstreicher J. The Long-Term Effect Of Specific Type II 5??-Reductase Inhibition With Finasteride on Bone Mineral Density in Men: Results of a 4-Year Placebo Controlled Trial. The Journal of Urology 2002:2105–2108.
  175. Wade MS, Sinclair RD. Reversible painful gynaecomastia induced by low dose finasteride (1 mg/day). Australas. J. Dermatol. 2000;41(1):55.
  176. Ferrando J, Grimalt R, Alsina M, Bulla F, Manasievska E. Unilateral gynecomastia induced by treatment with 1 mg of oral finasteride. Arch. Dermatol. 2002;138(4):543–544.
  177. Rahimi-Ardabili B, Pourandarjani R, Habibollahi P, Mualeki A. Finasteride induced depression: a prospective study. BMC Clin. Pharmacol. 2006;6:7.
  178. Nguyen D-D, Marchese M, Cone EB, Paciotti M, Basaria S, Bhojani N, Trinh Q-D. Investigation of Suicidality and Psychological Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Finasteride. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(1):35–42.
  179. Dubrovsky B. Neurosteroids, neuroactive steroids, and symptoms of affective disorders. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2006;84(4):644–655.
  180. Mazzarella GF, Loconsole GF, Cammisa GA, Mastrolonardo GM, Vena G. Topical finasteride in the treatment of androgenic alopecia. Preliminary evaluations after a 16-month therapy course. J. Dermatolog. Treat.1997;8(3):189–192.
  181. Piraccini BM, Blume-Peytavi U, Scarci F, Jansat JM, Falqués M, Otero R, Tamarit ML, Galván J, Tebbs V, Massana E, Topical Finasteride Study Group. Efficacy and safety of topical finasteride spray solution for male androgenetic alopecia: a phase III, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.2022;36(2):286–294.
  182. Clark RV, Hermann DJ, Cunningham GR, Wilson TH, Morrill BB, Hobbs S. Marked Suppression of Dihydrotestosterone in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Dutasteride, a Dual 5α-Reductase Inhibitor. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2004;89(5):2179–2184.
  183. Dallob AL, Sadick NS, Unger W, Lipert S, Geissler LA, Gregoire SL, Nguyen HH, Moore EC, Tanaka WK. The effect of finasteride, a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, on scalp skin testosterone and dihydrotestosterone concentrations in patients with male pattern baldness. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1994;79(3):703–706.
  184. Olsen EA, Hordinsky M, Whiting D, Stough D, Hobbs S, Ellis ML, Wilson T, Rittmaster RS. The importance of dual 5α-reductase inhibition in the treatment of male pattern hair loss: Results of a randomized placebo-controlled study of dutasteride versus finasteride. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology2006;55(6):1014–1023.
  185. Debruyne F, Barkin J, van Erps P, Reis M, Tammela TLJ, Roehrborn C. Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Treatment with the Dual 5α-Reductase Inhibitor Dutasteride in Men with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. European Urology 2004;46(4):488–495.
  186. Olszewska M, Rudnicka L. Effective treatment of female androgenic alopecia with dutasteride. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2005;4(5):637–640.
  187. Eun HC, Kwon OS, Yeon JH, Shin HS, Kim BY, Ro BI, Cho HK, Sim WY, Lew BL, Lee W-S, Park HY, Hong SP, Ji JH. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dutasteride 0.5 mg once daily in male patients with male pattern hair loss: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2010;63(2):252–258.
  188. Harcha WG, Martínez JB, Tsai T-F, Katsuoka K, Kawashima M, Tsuboi R, Barnes A, Ferron-Brady G, Chetty D.A randomized, active- and placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of different doses of dutasteride versus placebo and finasteride in the treatment of male subjects with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2014;70(3):489–498.e3.
  189. Andriole GL, Kirby R. Safety and Tolerability of the Dual 5α-Reductase Inhibitor Dutasteride in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. European Urology 2003;44(1):82–88.
  190. Roehrborn CG. The Effect of 5α-Reductase Inhibition With Dutasteride and Finasteride on Bone Mineral Density, Serum Lipoproteins, Hemoglobin, Prostate Specific Antigen and Sexual Function in Healthy Young Men. Yearbook of Urology 2008;2008:88–89.
  191. Saceda-Corralo D, Rodrigues-Barata A, Vano-Galvan S, Jaen-Olasolo P. Mesotherapy with dutasteride in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. International Journal of Trichology 2017;9(3):143.
  192. Villarreal-Villarreal CD, Boland-Rodriguez E, Rodríguez-León S, Le Voti F, Vano-Galvan S, Sinclair RD.Dutasteride intralesional microinjections in combination with oral minoxidil vs. oral minoxidil monotherapy in men with androgenetic alopecia: a retrospective analysis of 105 patients. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol.2022;36(7):e570–e572.
  193. Saceda-Corralo D, Moustafa F, Moreno-Arrones Ó, Jaén-Olasolo P, Vañó-Galván S, Camacho F. Mesotherapy With Dutasteride for Androgenetic Alopecia: A Retrospective Study in Real Clinical Practice. J. Drugs Dermatol.2022;21(7):742–747.
  194. Sovak M, Seligson AL, Kucerova R, Bienova M, Hajduch M, Bucek M. Fluridil, a Rationally Designed Topical Agent for Androgenetic Alopecia: First Clinical Experience. Dermatologic Surgery 2002;28(8):678–685.
  195. Hebert A, Thiboutot D, Stein Gold L, Cartwright M, Gerloni M, Fragasso E, Mazzetti A. Efficacy and Safety of Topical Clascoterone Cream, 1%, for Treatment in Patients With Facial Acne: Two Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(6):621–630.
  196. Dhillon S. Clascoterone: First Approval. Drugs 2020;80(16):1745–1750.
  197. Rosette C, Rosette N, Mazzetti A, Moro L, Gerloni M. Cortexolone 17α-Propionate (Clascoterone) is an Androgen Receptor Antagonist in Dermal Papilla Cells In Vitro. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(2):197–201.
  198. Wolf R, Matz H, Zalish M, Pollack A, Orion E. Prostaglandin analogs for hair growth: Great Expectations. Dermatology Online Journal 2003;9(3). doi:10.5070/d34hz1f3rr.
  199. Blume-Peytavi U, Lönnfors S, Hillmann K, Bartels NG. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study to assess the efficacy of a 24-week topical treatment by latanoprost 0.1% on hair growth and pigmentation in healthy volunteers with androgenetic alopecia. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology2012;66(5):794–800.
  200. Piérard G, Piérard-Franchimont C, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, Nikkels A, Saint Léger D. Improvement in the inflammatory aspect of androgenetic alopecia. A pilot study with an antimicrobial lotion. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 1996;7(3):153–157.
  201. Inui S, Itami S. Reversal of androgenetic alopecia by topical ketoconzole: relevance of anti-androgenic activity. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2007;45(1):66–68.
  202. Perez BSH, Hugo Perez BS. Ketocazole as an adjunct to finasteride in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men. Medical Hypotheses 2004;62(1):112–115.
  203. Ziering CL, Perez-Meza D, Zimber M, Zeigler F, Hubka M, Mansbridge J, Hubka K, Naughton GK. Hair regrowth following treatment with hypoxic cell-derived hair follicle signaling molecules; safety and efficacy in a first-in-man clinical trial. International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery 2011;21(5):162–165.
  204. Rose PT. The latest innovations in hair transplantation. Facial Plast. Surg. 2011;27(4):366–377.
  205. Takikawa M, Nakamura S, Nakamura S, Ishirara M, Kishimoto S, Sasaki K, Yanagibayashi S, Azuma R, Yamamoto N, Kiyosawa T. Enhanced Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Containing a New Carrier on Hair Growth. Dermatologic Surgery 2011;37(12):1721–1729.
  206. Gentile P, Garcovich S, Bielli A, Scioli MG, Orlandi A, Cervelli V. The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Hair Regrowth: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2015;4(11):1317–1323.
  207. Li ZJ, Choi H-I, Choi D-K, Sohn K-C, Im M, Seo Y-J, Lee Y-H, Lee J-H, Lee Y. Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Potential Therapeutic Tool for Promoting Hair Growth. Dermatologic Surgery 2012;38(7):1040–1046.
  208. Lee G-Y, Lee S-J, Kim W-S. The effect of a 1550 nm fractional erbium-glass laser in female pattern hair loss. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2011;25(12):1450–1454.
  209. Leavitt M, Charles G, Heyman E, Michaels D. HairMax LaserComb laser phototherapy device in the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia: A randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled, multicentre trial. Clin. Drug Investig. 2009;29(5):283–292.
  210. Lanzafame RJ, Blanche RR, Chiacchierini RP, Kazmirek ER, Sklar JA. The growth of human scalp hair in females using visible red light laser and LED sources. Lasers Surg. Med. 2014;46(8):601–607.
  211. Hamblin MR, Agrawal T, de Sousa M. Handbook of Low-Level Laser Therapy. CRC Press; 2016.
  212. Bae JM, Jung HM, Goo B, Park YM. Hair regrowth through wound healing process after ablative fractional laser treatment in a murine model. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2015;47(5):433–440.
  213. Haedersdal M, Erlendsson AM, Paasch U, Anderson RR. Translational medicine in the field of ablative fractional laser (AFXL)-assisted drug delivery: A critical review from basics to current clinical status. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016;74(5):981–1004.
  214. Suchonwanit P, Rojhirunsakool S, Khunkhet S. A randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled, split-scalp study of the efficacy and safety of a 1550-nm fractional erbium-glass laser, used in combination with topical 5% minoxidil versus 5% minoxidil alone, for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Lasers Med. Sci.2019;34(9):1857–1864.
  215. To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy in Male and Female With AGA Treated With HMI-115 Over a 24-week Treatment Period. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324293. Accessed September 5, 2022.
  216. Hope Medicine Inc. Hope Medicine announced global license agreement with Bayer AG to advance the development and commercialization of the monoclonal antibody directed against prolactin (PRL) receptor. PR Newswire 2019. Available at: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hope-medicine-announced-global-license-agreement-with-bayer-ag-to-advance-the-development-and-commercialization-of-the-monoclonal-antibody-directed-against-prolactin-prl-receptor-300824750.html. Accessed September 5, 2022.
  217. Sundberg JP, Beamer WG, Uno H, Van Neste D, King LE. Androgenetic Alopecia: In Vivo Models. Experimental and Molecular Pathology 1999;67(2):118–130.
  218. Twitty VC, Bodenstein D. Correlated genetic and embryological experiments on Triturus. III. Further transplantation experiments on pigment development. IV. The study of pigment cell behavior in vitro. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1939;81(3):357–398.
  219. Rassman WR, Bernstein RM, McClellan R, Jones R, Worton E, Uyttendaele H. Follicular Unit Extraction: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hair Transplantation. Dermatologic Surgery 2002;28(8):720–728.
  220. Norwood OT. Scalp reduction in the treatment of androgenic alopecia. Dermatol. Clin. 1987;5(3):531–544.
  221. Khandpur S, Suman M, Reddy BS. Comparative Efficacy of Various Treatment Regimens for Androgenetic Alopecia in Men. The Journal of Dermatology 2002;29(8):489–498.
  222. Boyapati A, Sinclair R. Combination therapy with finasteride and low-dose dutasteride in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2013;54(1):49–51.
  223. Jimenez F, Alam M, Vogel JE, Avram M. Hair transplantation: Basic overview. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.2021;85(4):803–814.
  224. Kassimir JJ. Use of topical minoxidil as a possible adjunct to hair transplant surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1987;16(3):685–687.
  225. Inc. KN, Kernel Networks Inc. Comparison of Topical Minoxidil 5% in Ethanol Plus Propylene Glycol Versus Minoxidil 5% in Ethanol Alone in Treatment of Women With Female Pattern Hair Loss. Case Medical Research2019. doi:10.31525/ct1-nct04090801.
  226. Leavitt M, David P-M, Rao NA, Barusco M, Kaufman KD, Ziering C. Effects of Finasteride (1 mg) on Hair Transplant. Dermatologic Surgery 2005;31(10):1268–1276.

 

Adrenal Androgens and Aging

ABSTRACT

                                                                                         

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its metabolite DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), are steroid pre-hormones synthesized and secreted primarily by the zona reticularis of the adrenal cortex in response to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). They are both precursor hormones that may be transformed into weak androgens or estrogens. During the last decades, several epidemiologic and cohort studies have shown the age-related circulating levels of DHEA/DHEAS; these first increase in childhood, a process called “adrenarche”, peak in the 3rd decade of life, and progressively decrease in midlife, a phenomenon called “adrenopause”.  Some authors have linked obesity in childhood with early adrenarche, i.e., increased circulating levels of adrenal androgens; others have associated low levels in late life with increased frailty and all-cause mortality. The potential clinical and therapeutic roles of DHEA/DHEAS have been studied extensively, but the data remain controversial and largely inconclusive. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the physiology and pathophysiology of adrenal androgen synthesis, secretion, and action and present current evidence regarding their efficacy in the management of adrenal insufficiency or aging-related disorders.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its metabolite DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), are steroid hormones synthesized and secreted primarily by the zona reticularis of the adrenal cortex in response to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). They exert weak androgenic effects and are therefore considered precursor hormones that need to be transformed to potent androgens or estrogens to exert their effects. The potential clinical roles of DHEA/DHEAS have been studied extensively, as previous epidemiologic and prospective studies associated the age-related decrease of DHEA/DHEAS levels with higher prevalence of degenerative disorders and increased frailty and mortality from all causes in the elderly, attributing to adrenal androgens anti-aging properties. But do they really suggest that they are hormones related to longevity or just another pointless alchemy against aging? This chapter summarizes the physiology and pathophysiology of adrenal androgen synthesis, secretion, and action and provides current evidence regarding their efficacy in the management of aging-related disorders.

 

THE ADRENAL ANDROGENS

 

The Adrenal Cortex; Embryology and Normal Structure

 

The adrenal cortex is derived from the mesoderm lining the posterior abdominal wall. The fetal cortex begins its development in the 5-week-old fetus. At 2 months of gestation, it is already identifiable as a separate organ and is composed of the inner fetal zone (85% of the cortex) and the outer permanent definitive zone. The anatomic relation of the fetal and definitive zones is maintained during gestation; at birth the adrenal glands are 10–20 times larger than the adult gland, relative to kilograms of body weight. After birth, the fetal zone undergoes rapid involution resulting in a rapid decrease of adrenocortical weight in the 3 months following birth. During the next 3 years, the adult adrenal cortex develops from cells of the outer layer of the cortex and differentiates into the three adult zones, the subcapsular zona glomerulosa, the zona fasciculate, which is the thickest zone (70% of the cortex), and the inner zona reticularis.

 

Biosynthesis of Adrenal Androgens

 

The adrenal cortex produces many steroid hormones among which the major ones are cortisol, aldosterone, and the adrenal androgens. The subcapsular zona glomerulosa produces aldosterone while the inner two zones fasciculata and reticularis appear to function as a unit and produce cortisol, androgens, and small amounts of estrogens under the regulatory effect of ACTH and maybe of some other factors produced within the adrenal gland, including neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, and nitric oxide. The biosynthetic pathway of the adrenal androgens is shown below (Fig. 1).

 

Figure 1. Steroid biosynthesis in the adrenal cortex.

Quantitatively, the most abundantly produced adrenal androgens are dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulphated form dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS); the latter is the most abundantly produced adrenal steroid. It also has a long half-life and provides a stable pool of circulating DHEA. The ovaries also synthesize DHEA; however, they lack the enzyme DHEA-sulphotransferase so that DHEAS is almost exclusively synthesized and secreted by the adrenals. DHEA is further metabolized to androstenedione (1,2), which may in turn be aromatized to estrone. Whether the adrenals may also produce small amounts of testosterone by further metabolism of androstenedione is controversial (3). Although DHEA and DHEAS are secreted in greater quantities, androstenedione is qualitatively more important since it is more readily converted to testosterone in peripheral tissues. Roughly, the relative androgenic potency of DHEA, androstenedione, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) are 5:10:100:300, respectively. As ACTH is the main regulator of adrenal androgen production in adults, both DHEA and androstenedione exhibit circadian periodicity in concert with ACTH and cortisol and their plasma concentrations increase rapidly following ACTH administration; also, they are suppressed by glucocorticoid administration. Because of its slow metabolic clearance, DHEAS does not exhibit diurnal rhythm variation.

 

Circulation of Adrenal Androgens

 

The adrenal androgens are secreted in an unbound state. Soon after their release in the circulation they bind to plasma proteins, chiefly to albumin (90%). Androstenedione, DHEA, and DHEAS circulate weakly bound to albumin, while testosterone is bound extensively to the sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Bound steroids are biologically inactive; the unbound steroids are free to interact with target cells either to exert their effects or to be transformed into inactive or active metabolites.

 

Metabolism of Adrenal Androgens; Gender-Dependent Synthesis Of DHEA/DHEAS

 

Due to lack or only minor inherent steroidogenic activity, adrenal androgens are precursor hormones (pro-hormones) that need to be transformed to potent androgens or estrogens to exert their effects (4,5). Their transformation into active sex steroids depends upon the level of expression of the various steroidogenic and metabolizing enzymes in each cell type which allows all androgen-sensitive and estrogen-sensitive tissues to have some control over the local levels of sex steroids according to their needs (6). Active androgens and estrogens thus synthesized exert their activity in the target cells with little diffusion, resulting in low levels in the general circulation. This intracrine mechanism serves to eliminate the exposure of other tissues to androgens or estrogens, minimizing unwanted side effects (4,7-9).

 

In males with normal gonadal function, the conversion of adrenal androgens to testosterone accounts for less than 5% of the total amount of this hormone, and thus the physiologic effect is negligible. In females of reproductive age, the adrenal contribution to total androgen production is more important; during the follicular phase, the adrenal precursors account for 2/3 of total testosterone production and 1/2 of DHT production. During midcycle, the ovarian contribution increases, and the adrenal precursors account for only 40% of testosterone production.

 

Apart from their peripheral conversion to more potent androgens, the adrenal androgens may be also aromatized to estrogens or undergo degradation and inactivation (4,5) (Fig 2). In more detail, DHEA is readily converted within the adrenal gland to DHEAS. DHEA secreted by the adrenal glands and the ovaries is also converted to DHEAS by the liver and the kidneys or it may be converted to Δ4-androstenedione. The adrenally produced DHEAS may be excreted without further metabolism or it may further undergo limited conversion to DHEA. Both DHEAS and DHEA may be metabolized to 7alpha- and 16alpha-hydroxylated derivatives and by 17β reduction to Δ5-Androstenediol and its sulfate. Androstenedione is converted either to testosterone or by reduction of its 4,5 double bonds to etiocholanolone or androsterone, which may be further converted by 17 alpha reductions to etiocholanediol and androstanediol, respectively. Testosterone is converted to DHT in androgen-sensitive tissues by 5 alpha reduction and it in turn is mainly metabolized by 3 alpha reductions to androstanediol. The metabolites of these androgens are conjugated either as glucuronides or sulfates and excreted in the urine. Regarding aromatization to estrogens, it was shown that not only androstenedione and testosterone, but also DHEA, may be converted to estrogens in peripheral tissues such as brain, bone, breast, and ovaries (6,10); this might be of importance, especially in women during the menopausal transition (see below) (11,12).

Figure 2. Metabolism of adrenal androgens; 3BHSD, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes; 17BHSD, 17β -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isozymes; 5aRed, 5α -reductase isozymesP450 aromatase, steroid sulfatase, STS.

Age-Dependent Synthesis of DHEA/DHEAS

 

Fetal DHEA and DHEAS fall rapidly after birth and remain low until adrenarche; they then start rising again and peak during the third decade of life after which the serum levels of DHEA and DHEAS progressively decline with advancing age by around 2–5% per year (10,13), so that by menopause the DHEA level has decreased by 60% (14), and by 80-90% of the peak production by the eighth or ninth decade of life (15,16). This decline has been termed “adrenopause”, however, cortisol secretion does not decline with age or may even increase (16,17). Adrenopause is independent of menopause and occurs in both sexes as a gradual process at similar ages. A decrease in 17,20-lyase activity may be responsible for the progressive diminution of DHEA and DHEA-S with advancing age (18,19), although other mechanisms, such as a reduction in the mass of the zona reticularis (20) or a decrease in IGF-I and IGF-II have also been proposed (21). Recent study by Heaney et al. in accordance with previous research found that older subjects exhibited lower plasma and saliva DHEA levels overall, while with increasing age, the DHEA area under the curve was attenuated and the slope of decline became less steep (17,22).

 

Although DHEAS concentration does not vary throughout the day, DHEA secretion exhibits a diurnal rhythm like that of cortisol. Studies have indicated that DHEA secretion is reduced in the morning period resulting in a flatter diurnal rhythm among the oldest old, in contrast to cortisol which remains stable or even increases in the morning (17,23). The above diurnal rhythms of cortisol and DHEA, lead to an elevated cortisol: DHEA ratio, which is most pronounced in the morning period.

 

The age-related decline in DHEA/DHEAS levels shows high inter-individual variability (20). There is a clear sex difference in DHEA/DHEAS concentrations with lower DHEAS concentrations in adult women compared to men (24), while there is also a clear genetic component predetermining circulating DHEA/DHEAS. Notably, data from the largest population-based twin study to estimate the genetic and environmental contributions of diurnal DHEAS concentrations demonstrated that salivary DHEAS is a heritable measure, with genetic effects accounting for 37%–46% of the total variance for the late morning and afternoon age-adjusted measures (25).

 

Since DHEA is the main source of androgens in women, its age-related decline leads to a corresponding decrease in the total androgen pool. Although there is no defined level of androgen below which women can be said to be deficient, the decline of DHEA in postmenopausal women would suggest they are “deficient” in both estrogens and androgens (14). The declining circulating levels of adrenal androgens with advancing age have been related to clinical symptoms and disorders (see below).

 

In the last few years, the concept that adrenal androgen production gradually declines with advancing age has changed following the analysis of the longitudinal data collected in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) (26). When the annual serum levels of DHEAS were aligned according to ovarian status, it was recognized that despite the overall age-related decline in DHEAS, in most women (85% of those studied) the adrenal androgen production rose during the menopausal transition, starting in the early peri-menopause and continuing into the early post-menopause. The DHEAS rise was attributed to the adrenals and not the ovaries, as a similar rise was also observed in intact and ovariectomized women (27); the gender-related rise of adrenal DHEAS and the time course of that rise that returns to a progressive decline following menopause, implies ovarian influences over adrenal steroidogenesis (28). Considering previous failure to adequately attribute phenotype, symptoms, and health trajectories to the observed longitudinal changes in circulating estradiol and progesterone (29), the perimenopausal rise in adrenal androgens could potentially suggest a more important role of these hormones in the occurrence of symptoms during the menopausal transition (30). The observational, epidemiologic, and interventional studies addressing this hypothesis are analyzed below. Some conditions and diseases, like poor life quality, satisfaction and psychosocial, as well as acute stress, severe chronic systemic diseases, anorexia nervosa, Cushing syndrome and chronic administration of glucocorticoids are associated with lower levels of DHEA and DHEAS. Hyperprolactinemia is associated with elevated levels of DHEAS (31,32).

 

Biologic Effects of Adrenal Androgens; Cellular and Molecular Actions

 

ROLE AS PRO-HORMONES

 

DHEA possesses pleiotropic effects. Epidemiologic and prospective studies have associated the decline of circulating levels of androgens with the development and progression of degenerative disorders. The exact mechanism of action and clinical role of DHEA and DHEAS, if any, remain unclear. Due to lack or only minor inherent steroidogenic activity, the adrenal androgens need to be transformed to potent androgens or estrogens to exert their effects on peripheral tissues. Recent data suggest additional direct actions of the adrenal androgens further to those exerted through the androgen and estrogen receptors (see below).

 

The principal biologic effects of the adrenal androgens typically seen during adrenarche consist mainly of pubic and axillary hair growth and the change of sweat composition that produces adult body odor (33). During the reproductive years, in males with normal gonadal function, the adrenal androgens account for less than 5% of the daily production rate of testosterone and thus the physiologic effect is negligible. DHEA and DHEA-S levels have been shown to be associated with nutritional status. Obese children have higher levels of DHEA and/or DHEA-S and achieve adrenarche earlier than lean children. Indeed, a recent study showed that obese children with higher DHEAS concentrations at the age of seven years had more total and central adiposity and higher insulin than did nonobese children of the same age (34,35). Some research suggests that adrenal androgens directly or after peripheral conversion to estrogen modulate hypothalamic activity influencing the gonadarche. When produced in excess however, the adrenal androgens may have no clinical consequences in adult males or result in LH /FSH suppression and oligospermia/infertility. In boys, the adrenal androgen excess is associated with clinical manifestations including premature penile enlargement, early development of secondary sexual characteristics, premature closure of the epiphyseal growth plates and short final height. In females the excessive production of adrenal steroids as seen in Cushing syndrome, adrenal carcinoma, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia via peripheral conversion to testosterone and eventually to DHT result in acne, hirsutism, and menstrual/fertility defects or even virilization in more severe cases. 

 

MEMBRANE ASSOCIATED DHEA RECEPTORS

 

Further to their effect via the estrogen and androgen receptors, recent data support direct actions of DHEA through specific G protein-coupled membrane receptors in bovine aortic and primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (36-38) through which DHEA activates the endothelial NO synthetase (eNOS) (eNOS/cGMP pathway) [38] and increases the production of nitric oxide (NO), a key modulator of vascular function, by endothelial cells. Such receptors are also seen in the kidney, heart, and liver but at lower level than that in bovine aortic endothelial cells (39) as well as in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs), where DHEA inhibits voltage-dependent T type Ca-channels (40). In systemic circulation, a plasma membrane receptor has been suggested in the anti-remodeling action of DHEA involving inhibition of the Akt/GSK-3β signaling pathway (41). Other studies have shown inhibitory effect of DHEA on proliferation and apoptosis of endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells independently of both estrogen and androgen receptors (42,43). The above suggest the presence of a membrane-associated DHEA specific receptor; the molecular structure of this receptor remains to be elucidated.

 

CYTOSOLIC NUCLEAR RECEPTORS

 

Steroid action involves cytosolic/nuclear hormone receptors (44); thus, most of the studies looking at the mechanism(s) responsible for DHEA action focused on such receptors (45). However, since DHEA can be metabolized into androgens/estrogens, it is not always easy to determine whether DHEA exerts its effects directly through the estrogen/androgen receptors or after conversion to these hormones. There is some new evidence showing that DHEA and some of its metabolites either bind to or activate nuclear receptors such as pregnane X receptor, constitutive androstanol receptor, estrogen receptor-β, and peroxisome proliferators activated receptors (46-49). Through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha for example, DHEA inhibits the activation of nuclear factor-κB and the secretion of interleukin-6 and interleukin-12, through which DHEA exerts anti-inflammatory effects (50,51). 7α-and 7β-hydroxylated derivatives of DHEA also seem to have direct effects on nuclear receptors, but their physiological function is not clear (39). Finally, DHEA inhibits apoptosis and promotes proliferation of osteoblasts in rats through MAPK signaling pathways, independently from androgens and estrogens (52); this action could be beneficial for preservation of bone mass and reduction of fracture risk.

 

ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM RECEPTOR SIGMA 1 RECEPTOR

 

More recently, it has been suggested that DHEA is an agonist of sigma-1 receptor (Sigma-1R) expressed in the endoplasmic reticulum of the heart, kidney, liver, and brain (53,54). Under physiological conditions, the sigma-1 receptor chaperones the functional inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate receptor at the endoplasmic reticulum participating in the calcium signaling pathway (53,55). Animal studies have shown that via sigma-1R, but also by Akt– eNOs signaling pathway stimulation, DHEA may improve cardiac function (56) and exert vasculo-protective effects (57). There is a great volume of data suggesting antioxidant properties of DHEA; overproduction of oxygen-free radicals (oxidative stress) upregulates inflammation and cellular proliferation and is believed to play a critical role in the development of cancer, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease, as well as the basic aging process (58-60). DHEA inhibits glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PDH) (61,62) and NADPH production. The decrease in NADPH levels results in reduced oxygen-free radical production via NADPH oxidase (62). Moreover, a study found that DHEA treatment of mice increased the number of Brd U-positive neurons co-expressing β-catenin, a downstream GSK-3β target, concluding that sigma-1 receptor stimulation by DHEA led to altered OBX-induced depressive-like behaviors by increasing neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus through activation of the Akt/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway (63). Increased plasma DHEA and DHEAS have been demonstrated in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), predicting symptom improvement and coping as well as resilience adaptation. The same study suggested that decreased cortisol/DHEA ratio was associated with severe childhood trauma and current symptoms (64).

 

In summary, DHEA mediates its action via transformation into androgen and estrogen derivatives acting through their specific receptors, but also via multiple (57,65) signaling pathways involving specific membrane, cytosolic/nuclear and endoplasmic reticulum receptors.

 

POTENTIAL TREATMENT BENEFITS  

 

Data from epidemiologic and prospective studies indicate an inverse relation between low circulating levels of DHEA and DHEA-S and a host of aging-associated pathologies such as sexual dysfunction, mood defects, and poor sense of well-being (27,28), as well as higher risk of hospital admission (66), poor muscle strength (67) and mobility (66,68), and higher prevalence of frailty (69), insulin resistance, obesity, cardiovascular disease (45) and mortality from cardiovascular disease (70). At the same time, a positive relation between higher levels of DHEA-S and better health and well-being was documented (71). Furthermore, animal (primarily rodent) studies have suggested many beneficial effects of DHEA treatment, including improved immune function and prevention of atherosclerosis, cancer, diabetes, and obesity. Therefore, the therapeutic role of DHEA replacement as an anti-aging factor for the prevention and/or treatment of the above conditions was studied; recent systematic reviews of the reports do not seem promising, however (72-78).

 

Treatment Modalities

 

DHEA is considered as a hormone in Europe and thus becomes available only by prescription, while in the United States it is considered as a nutritional supplement and is sold over the counter without a prescription. This difference has no scientific foundation and is mostly a matter of declaration. Most DHEA supplements are made in laboratories from a substance called diosgenin, a plant sterol found in soy and wild yams. DHEA supplements were taken off the U.S. market in 1985 because of their unproven safety and effectiveness, but were reintroduced as a dietary supplement after the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act was passed in 1994. At present, questionable over-the-counter DHEA preparations lacking pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are widely used in the United States. There is no standard dosage of DHEA replacement; some studies have used between 25 and 200 milligrams a day, or sometimes even higher amounts. DHEA in current preparations has a long half-life (45), which allows a single intake a day. Target levels of DHEA are around the middle of normal range for healthy young subjects, measured in a blood sample 24 hr after the last intake (79).

 

The adrenal androgens are mainly thought to act as prohormones and exert at least part of their action via conversion to androgens and/or estrogens. Previous studies have shown that the end- products of DHEA supplementation depend on the patient’s gender, with a non-symmetrical transformation of DHEA favoring androgens in women and estrogens in men (72,80,81). The above refer to oral administration of DHEA supplements; percutaneous administration of DHEA seems to provoke similar increases in both estrogens and androgens in the two genders (82).

 

Adrenal Insufficiency

 

Adrenal insufficiency, despite supplementation of glucocorticoids, has been associated with decreased quality of life when compared to a healthy population (79,83,84). DHEA supplementation has been suggested as an accessory treatment to conventional adrenal replacement therapy with glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids. The exact physiological roles of DHEA still remain unclear and the routine therapy of individuals with adrenal insufficiency is still controversial. Some authors reported significant improvements of mood, well-being, sexual thoughts, libido, interest, and satisfaction following DHEA replacement, particularly in females (79,83-85). Other analyses of DHEA administration in women with primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency have resulted in inconsistent and unreproducible results (85). Recently, the supplementation of DHEA was suggested in women with adrenal insufficiency and low libido, depressive symptoms, or low energy levels despite optimal glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid replacement (86).

 

LOW DHEA/DHEAS LEVELS AND ASSOCIATED COMORBIDITIES

 

DHEA And Musculoskeletal Disorders

 

The increasing incidence of fractures with advancing age has been related, among other factors, with the aging-related reduced muscle mass and strength, that increase the propensity for falling (87). A body of evidence exists on the effect of circulating DHEA/DHEAS on various markers of strength and physical function in older individuals. Studies in elderly individuals support a positive relation between DHEA blood levels and muscle mass (67), muscle strength (67,88), and mobility (68), as well as better self-reported (89) and objectively assessed physical function (90), and measured peak volume of oxygen consumed per minute (91) in elderly with higher DHEA/DHEAS concentrations. In this direction, higher DHEAS levels were associated with increased bone mass density (BMD) in both men (92) and post-menopausal women and inversely related to risk for falls (93). Finally, low DHEAS levels have been associated with a higher prevalence of frailty, a geriatric syndrome of loss of reserve characterized by weight loss, fatigue, weakness, and vulnerability to adverse events (69,94), and low back pain in both genders and slow rehabilitation of low-back pain in women (71,95,96).

 

Reports from interventional studies support a therapeutic role of DHEA replacement in aging-associated musculoskeletal defects. For example, DHEA exerted positive effects on muscle strength, body composition (97-99), and physical performance (100), as well as on bone mass density (BMD) in both lumbar spine and the hip (15,72,98,101-105) when administered to post-menopausal women and elderly people over a period of 52 weeks. The above positive effects on musculoskeletal system were attributed to the DHEA-related increase of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels (97,106) and bioavailability (decrease of insulin growth factor binding protein-1 [IGFBP-1]) (106) in both men and women and/or to the increase of androgen levels mostly in women (97,106,107). Some other data also suggest aromatase activity of primary human osteoblasts converting DHEA to estrone (108), while it was shown in vitro that DHEA inhibits apoptosis and promotes proliferation of rat osteoblasts through MAPK signaling pathways, independently from androgen and estrogen effects (52). The above support a positive effect of DHEA on bone through conversion to estrogens, but also independently from its hormonal end-products. Other studies, however, failed to show a beneficial effect of DHEA supplementation on muscle function (109-111) or on BMD (99,100,112); of note all these studies were conducted over a shorter period (26 weeks only). Whether these conflicting data result from DHEA’s mild/moderate effect or from great differences between study designs, such as short duration of treatment and small number of participants, is difficult to say (73). Overall, the effect of DHEA supplementation on BMD is small in relation to other treatments for bone loss, and no fracture data are available. Therefore, its therapeutic utility in rehabilitation and/or fracture/frailty prevention and treatment protocols for older patients remains unclear.

 

A recent systematic review (73) of the literature (72,83,97,100,113-116) concluded that overall, the benefit (113,116) of DHEA on muscle strength and physical function in older adults remains inconclusive. Some measures of muscle strength may improve, although DHEA does not appear to routinely benefit measures of physical function or performance. Therefore, consensus has not been reached. Further large clinical trials are necessary to better identify the clinical role of DHEA supplementation in this population.

 

DHEA, Well-Being and Sexual Function

 

If DHEA’s effects on musculoskeletal disorders are inconclusive, its utility for the management of ageing-related poor sense of well-being and sexual dysfunction is a question for top puzzle solvers. What we know so far from epidemiologic studies is that sexual function problems are common among women and increase with increasing age (117-119). The sex steroid hormones estrogens and androgens seem to play an important role in the sexual life of women; androgens affect the reusability, pleasure, and intensity of orgasm in women and are particularly implicated in the neurovascular smooth muscle response of swelling and lubrication, whereas estrogens contribute to vulval and vaginal congestive response and affect mood and sexual responses (120). Conditions such as menopausal symptoms, loss of libido, vulvovaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction, and poor sense of well-being seen in menopausal and peri-menopausal women were related to the age-associated decline in sex steroids (121). Furthermore, interventional studies in postmenopausal women with estrogens have shown much improvement on vaginal atrophy and vasomotor symptoms (121-124); there is also much clinical evidence for the efficacy of testosterone treatment for low sexual function in women (119,125-129).

 

Given that a) the adrenal steroids are the most abundant sex steroids in post-menopausal women and provide a large reservoir of precursors for the intracellular production of androgens and estrogens in non-reproductive tissues, b) DHEA levels decline with age, c) pre- and post-menopausal women with lower sexual responsiveness have lower levels of serum DHEAS (130) and d) treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen and testosterone have shown some improvement in sexual function, it was proposed that restoring the circulating levels of DHEA to those found in young women may improve sexual function and well-being in postmenopausal women (131). Some early randomized trials that suffered from methodological issues, such as small number of participants, short treatment duration, and supraphysiological doses, demonstrated positive effects of DHEA replacement on sexual function and well-being (15,130,132-134), as well as on relief of menopausal symptoms (134-136). Similarly, women with adrenal insufficiency treated with oral DHEA replacement demonstrated significant improvement in overall well-being, as well as in frequency of sexual thoughts, sexual interest, and satisfaction (80,84). Other studies, however, failed to show any benefit of DHEA replacement on sexual function, well-being, and menopausal symptoms in peri- and post-menopausal women (74,75,106,137,138) and women with adrenal insufficiency (85,139,140). A recent review of the available data concluded that current evidence does not support the routine use of DHEA in women with adrenal insufficiency (76). Furthermore, the more recent placebo-controlled randomized trials that are of superior design compared to the early trials, as they use validated measures of sexual function, have larger sample sizes, and are of longer duration, failed to document any significant benefit of oral DHEA therapy on well-being or sexual function in women (72-75,77). It has been hypothesized that the efficacy of DHEA to improve sexual function might be dependent on the route of its administration. In women, androgens and estrogens are produced from DHEA in the vagina tissue. As vaginal atrophy and dryness are common symptoms of estrogen deficiency during menopause, causing dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction (141), a possible benefit that emerged is that vaginally administered DHEA may improve the postmenopausal vaginal atrophy-related sexual dysfunction (142) without increasing the circulating levels of estrogen above the postmenopausal range (80,142-144). Despite initial promising, beneficial effects on sexual function, again, even with intravaginally administered DHEA, a study failed to show significant benefits (77).

 

In men lower circulating levels of DHEA was related to erectile dysfunction. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study that enrolled men with erectile dysfunction treated with oral DHEA 50 mg daily has shown some promise for improving sexual performance in men who had low DHEA blood levels (145). However, high-quality studies have demonstrated inconsistent results regarding DHEA supplementation for improving sexual function, libido, and erectile dysfunction. Although research in this area is promising, additional well-designed studies are required.

 

DHEA And Mood Disorders

 

The prevalence of depression increases in cohorts of the elderly and has been independently related to high morbidity and mortality (146). In the central nervous system, DHEA is considered a neurosteroid with a wide range of functions. Animal studies demonstrated several DHEA-modulated neurotransmitters, including dopamine, glutamate, and c-amino butyric acid (39), as well as DHEA-induced increased activity of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) neurons (147), providing the cellular basis for a potential antidepressant effect of DHEA. Furthermore, typical neuroleptic-like effects of DHEA were displayed in animal models of schizophrenia suggesting potential role of DHEA replacement in the treatment of schizophrenia (148).

 

Previous studies suggested a strong relation between low levels of DHEA/DHEA-S and major depression in children and adolescents (149), as well as adults and the elderly (150,151). On the contrary, higher DHEA-S levels were positively associated with depressive symptoms during the menopausal transition (152) and depression in patients with major depression (153,154); whether the elevated DHEA-S levels in the above studies represent increased adrenal activity that could explain the depressive symptoms is not clear, as cortisol was not measured. Moreover, successful treatment of depression was followed by reductions in both DHEA-S (153-155) and DHEA levels (155), making the relation between DHEA/DHEAS and depression even more confusing.

 

Several interventional studies have shown that DHEA replacement may improve negative and depressive symptoms (132,133,156-158). In women with adrenal insufficiency, oral DHEA replacement significantly improved the overall well-being, as well as scores for depression and anxiety (110); similar results were found in the management of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia (158). Recent placebo-controlled randomized trials, however, failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of DHEA therapy on mood, quality of life, perceptions of physical and emotional health, and life satisfaction in postmenopausal women (72,74,75). However, recent data have suggested that increased circulating DHEA(S) levels may predict SSRI-associated remission in major depression (159). Thus, the therapeutic role of DHEA on mood disorders remains unclear.

 

DHEA and Psychosocial Stress

 

It has long been suggested that long-term psychosocial stress may cause or contribute to different diseases and symptoms, including atherosclerosis (160), coronary heart disease (161) and acute coronary events (162), as well as accelerated aging (163,164). Whether DHEA/DHEAS levels are related to psychological stress or not is still debatable. Exposure to prolonged psychosocial stress has been related to reduced (165-167) or elevated levels of DHEA/DHEA-S (168), while some other studies failed to show any clear association in any direction (169,170). A recent study by Lennartsson et al. demonstrated that DHEA and DHEA-S levels are markedly lower in individuals that report perceived stress at work than in individuals who report no perceived stress at work (171). Whether this is of clinical importance is not clear.

 

 

The incidence of dementia increases exponentially with increasing age in both men and women (172). The number of elderly people nowadays is the fastest growing segment of the population, which means the related personal, social, and economic burdens of dementia are extremely high and could increase dramatically over the next few decades. Therefore, effective prevention/treatment of neurodegenerative disorders is imperative. It has been proposed that DHEA and DHEAS may exert neuroprotective effects in the brain mainly through DHEA-dependent neural stem cell stimulation, genomic activity modulation, and upregulation of androgen receptor levels (173,174), as well as via the DHEA-induced inhibition of pro-inflammatory factor production, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (39) that are involved in the pathogenesis of the amyloid plaques of Alzheimer disease (175). Higher serum levels of DHEAS have been related to more favorable cognitive function in older people, such as better concentration and working memory (176,177) and higher scores on the Mini Mental State Examination (178). In this direction, low DHEA/DHEAS levels in particular brain regions were thought to play a role in the development of Parkinson disease, which is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, just behind Alzheimer (179), while DHEA administration showed some beneficial effect in a primate model of Parkinson disease (180,181). Inverse relations between DHEAS levels in saliva (181) and circulation (176) and some domains of memory impairment were also documented, supporting the hypothesis that DHEA supplementation may improve cognition in the elderly; yet solid evidence of associations between the endogenous levels of these steroids and measures of cognitive function is lacking.

 

No studies with DHEA replacement, either acute administration or chronic (up to 12 months) supplementation, have shown a benefit in cognitive function in healthy elderly populations (74,137,181-185). Furthermore, DHEA supplementation failed to show any benefit in patients with Alzheimer disease (186) and had only minimal beneficial effect on specific cognitive domains such as the verbal fluency in older women with mild to moderate cognitive impairment (187). Remarkably, some other studies have shown a negative effect of DHEAS replacement on cognitive performance (183,188,189). It should be noted however, that most studies included only small groups of patients and were up to a yearlong, which is probably not enough time to address the potential role of DHEA / DHEAS in neurodegenerative disorders.

 

DHEA and Metabolism

 

LIPIDS

 

In women, the effects of sex steroids on lipid profile differ according to the steroid treatment (estrogen or androgen) and to the route of administration. Thus, oral methyltestosterone lowers high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (190), and oral estrogen increases HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides and lowers low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and total cholesterol (191,192), while transdermal estradiol and transdermal testosterone have little or no effect on lipids (193). Combined oral estrogen and methyltestosterone is associated with lowering of HDL-cholesterol (194,195). Considering that DHEA can be converted intracellularly to estrogens and androgens, the effect on the lipid profile could be mixed and may vary between individuals. Most of the recent well-designed studies, addressing this issue report no association or even an adverse association (at least in women) (196,197) between plasma levels of DHEA (198,199) or DHEA administration (97,109,192,200,201) and the lipid profile.

 

BODY MASS INDEX (BMI)

 

Animal studies support a beneficial effect of DHEA administration on obesity (202-204). In humans, two sets of longitudinal analyses of studies with women in menopausal transition showed that elevated DHEAS level is negatively related to BMI (27,28). On the other hand, baseline analyses by Santoro et al [209] did not find much association between DHEAS and BMI, waist-hip ratio, or waist. Childhood obesity is associated with higher levels of DHEAS (34). Similarly, a 2-year, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study involving elderly men and women with low levels of DHEAS, showed no significant effect of DHEA replacement (75 mg per day orally) on body composition measurements (72). Interestingly, a, recent meta-analysis of intervention studies showed that DHEA supplementation in elderly men can induce only a small positive effect on body composition which is strictly dependent on DHEA conversion into its bioactive metabolites such as androgens or estrogens (205). Putting together these results, current data regarding DHEA effect on BMI contradict each other, and its usage in clinical practice for body weight management is not suggested or recommended at the present.

 

INSULIN RESISTANCE

 

DHEA may at least theoretically improve endothelial function (43), and ameliorate local/systemic inflammation (50,51) and oxidative stress (58-60,206). These effects in association with DHEAS’s inverse relation with body mass index (BMI) (23,27,28,207) would most probably suggest beneficial effect of DHEA/DHEAS supplement on insulin sensitivity (207). This hypothesis was confirmed by reports from animal studies in which DHEA replacement had a beneficial effect on insulin sensitivity (202,203). In human studies, however, the results are rather inconsistent. In some studies, the lower levels of DHEA seen with aging have been associated with impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, and diabetes (208-211), while in another (212) exactly the opposite relation was shown as higher levels of DHEA were associated with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus in post-menopausal women. The truth regarding DHEA/DHEAS and insulin resistance and its associated conditions gets even more complicated considering conflicting results from interventional studies with DHEA replacement. Thus, an ameliorating effect of long-term treatment with DHEA on insulin resistance was described in a group of middle-aged hypo-adrenal women treated with DHEA (213), but also in groups of elderly men (214) and postmenopausal women (213-217) replaced with DHEA. The DHEA dose used ranged between 25 and 100 mg/day oally and the duration of treatment varied between 3 and 12 months; in one study transdermal DHEA was used (217). Most other interventional studies addressing this issue, failed to demonstrate any significant effect of DHEA on insulin resistance/sensitivity (72,97,110,112,113,139) and so did a recent review of the available data regarding use of DHEA in women with adrenal insufficiency (76). Remarkably, Mortola and Yen (84) reported worsening insulin resistance with DHEA replacement in postmenopausal women; in this study however, the number of participants was small (n=6), the duration of treatment short (28 days), and the DHEA dosage supraphysiological (1600 mg/day orally). Putting together the above, the relation between DHEA and carbohydrate metabolism is still uncertain.

 

DHEA and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

 

CVD represents a serious public health problem; its prevalence increases with advancing age (218). Low androgen levels have been related to atherogenic profile in men (219,220), while data from acute coronary units have shown a transient fall of the testosterone levels in the first 24 hours after myocardial infarction (MI) (221,222), which probably deprives these patients of testosterone’s pro-fibrinolytic activity (223-225) and may actually result in increased 30-day mortality rate following acute MI (226); the above findings suggest a strong relation between sex steroid hormones and CVD morbidity and mortality. Many studies have previously documented a significant inverse relation between low DHEA/DHEAS levels and key elements involved in the development of atherosclerosis and CVD, including carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) (227,228), oxidative stress (58,59), and endothelial dysfunction (229), independent of other coronary risk factors. Low DHEAS levels (201,230-233) were also predictive of severe coronary atherosclerosis on coronary angiography (234), but also of earlier cardiac allograft vasculopathy development in heart transplant patients (235).

 

These findings are suggestive of anti-atherogenic and cardioprotective effect of DHEA/DHEAS. Numerous epidemiological studies have, therefore, looked at the specific relation between plasma levels of adrenal androgens and CVD. Most have shown that low plasma levels of DHEA/DHEA-S were clearly associated with increased incidence of atherosclerotic vascular diseases (91,234,236-238) and cardiovascular morbidity (234,239-245), independently from classic cardiovascular risk factors, as well as with increased CVD-related mortality in elderly men but not in postmenopausal women, unless they had pre-existing coronary disease (16,70,199,241,246-248).

 

The plasma levels of DHEA were also inversely associated with the progression (249) and prognosis of heart failure (250), at least in men. The exact pathophysiologic background is still more or less unclear. Some preliminary data in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that the adrenal androgens may increase the generation of activated protein C, an important anticoagulant protein that protects from acute coronary events (228). Furthermore, DHEA may directly stimulate eNOS phosphorylation/activation in endothelial cells and NO production (36,39,251), which in turn induces vasodilation, and preserves myocardial perfusion (252). DHEA may also exert anti-inflammatory actions (39,253), through which it may alleviate endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis (254), and the acute thrombotic complications of atheroma (39,253,255-258) enhanced by systemic inflammation. The protective effects of DHEA on endothelium were also shown in several in vitro studies in which DHEA increased endothelial proliferation (43) and protected endothelial cells against apoptosis (59,259). Finally, DHEA can alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) via ERK1/2 and NF-κB signaling pathways, although it has no effect on their phenotype transition (260).

 

Other studies, however, have failed to show a significant relation between DHEA/DHEA-S and CVD. In men for example, myocardial infarction occurrence was not altered by DHEA-S levels, and acute myocardial infarctions were seen in patients with either low or high DHEA-S levels (261-264). Similarly in women, lower DHEA-S levels in ischemic heart disease patients versus control were observed in some studies, but not in others (238,265,266). The reasons that account for the discrepancies among the above studies are not clear. It can be argued that smoking could be a possible confounding variable for both DHEA-S levels and CVD, as smoking increases DHEA-S levels but also increases the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (267,268). The discrepancies among the above studies may also be attributed to population variability; for example, in the study by Mazat et al. the relative risk of an 8-year mortality associated with low DHEA-S was 3.4 times higher in males under 70 years compared to older men (odds ratio of 6.5 versus 1.9) (16). Finally, DHEA-S was checked just once in some retrospective studies, often several years before the adverse cardiovascular events (269).

 

Whether exogenously administered DHEA could ameliorate key elements involved in the generation and progression of the atherosclerotic process was addressed in humans with atherosclerosis and experimental animal models. The human studies have shown a beneficial effect of DHEA on angiographic evidence of atherosclerosis and improvement of vascular endothelial function (43,234,270). Several animal studies have also clearly demonstrated the inhibitory effect of orally administered DHEA on atherosclerosis and plaque progression (271,272) as well as beneficial effects on ischemia–reperfusion injury in the microcirculation (273,274) and cardiac dysfunction (56,57). Arterial stiffness, which is also considered a risk factor for CVD, significantly improved after DHEA replacement in both elderly men and women (275,276). Whether the above findings could be translated into DHEA administration in clinical practice for the reduction of CVD morbidity and/or mortality is not well documented and supported by current reports. However, since DHEA is a well-tolerated molecule and an inexpensive drug, additional large multi-centric clinical studies could address its role in the prevention and/or management of CVD.

 

DHEA and Cerebrovascular Disease

 

Stroke is the third-leading cause for disability worldwide (277); therefore, early risk stratification for an optimized allocation of health care resources is imperative. The ischemic strokes that account for the great majority of all stroke cases (87 percent) occur as a result of acute obstruction of atherosclerotic blood vessels supplying blood to the brain (278). Considering DHEAS has neuroprotective and antiatherosclerotic properties (243,279,280) and its synthesis has been documented in the brain (175,281,282), the role of DHEA/DHEAS in acute stroke incidence and outcome was investigated. Interestingly, in women from Nurses’ Health Study, lower DHEAS levels were associated with a greater risk of ischemic stroke (283). In addition, it was suggested that DHEAS levels in the blood may predict the severity and functional outcome of acute strokes (284,285). Whether the above findings suggest baseline DHEAS levels could alter stroke management in clinical practice or whether DHEA replacement has a therapeutic potential role in stroke management need to be addressed.

 

DHEA and Pulmonary Hypertension

 

The previously described vasorelaxant properties of DHEA in systemic circulation were also investigated in pulmonary hypertension in animal models and in humans. Several studies have shown that DHEA replacement could effectively prevent and reverse hypoxic pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary arterial remodeling, and right ventricular hypertrophy in rats (286-288) in a dose-dependent manner (289) and also prevent the age-related frailty induced by hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in older mice (288). The effect of DHEA is selective to the pulmonary circulation since the systemic blood pressure was not altered. It was shown that the beneficial effects of DHEA on pulmonary hypertension were at least partly independent of its conversion to estrogen/testosterone and eNOS activation. Some of the potential molecular mechanism by which DHEA promotes pulmonary artery relaxation appears to involve K+ channel activation, upregulation of soluble guanylate cyclase (287,290,291), downregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1a (HIF-1a) (292), and by NADPH oxidation-elicited subunit dimerization of protein kinase G 1α (293).

 

As previously discussed, DHEA may inhibit and reverse chronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats. Little is known, however, about the effects of DHEA on the pulmonary circulation in humans. The levels of DHEA/DHEA-S in patients with pulmonary hypertension over time have not been determined, but the recent Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) - Right Ventricle (RV) Study found that higher DHEA levels were associated with increased RV mass and stroke volume in women (294). Another prospective study suggested a strong inverse correlation between natural DHEA/DHEA-S blood levels and the ten-year mortality in old male smokers and ex-smokers (16). Prompted by the experimental findings in the pulmonary circulation, a recent study investigated whether DHEA can improve the clinical and hemodynamic status of patients with pulmonary hypertension associated to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eight patients with the disease were treated with DHEA (200mg daily orally) for 3 months. The results were very promising as DHEA treatment significantly improved the pulmonary hemodynamics and the physical performance of the patients, without worsening gas exchange, as do other pharmacological treatments of pulmonary hypertension (295).

 

Putting together the above evidence, there are experimental data to support the beneficial role of DHEA treatment in models with pulmonary hypertension, but only a few studies supporting its beneficial effect in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further clinical studies would probably clarify its therapeutic role in the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice.

 

DHEA and Autoimmune Disorders

 

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD)

 

DHEA has anti-inflammatory properties (50,51). Its levels appear to be low in people with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, irrespective of the patient’s age (296,297). A phase II small pilot trial in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease refractory to other drugs, treated with 200 mg dehydroepiandrosterone per day orally for 56 days (298) showed that DHEA may decrease the clinical activity of the disease and may even cause a remission. More studies are needed before saying for sure whether DHEA helps IBD or not.

 

SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE)

 

Several randomized controlled clinical studies have reported that regardless of the patient’s age, taking DHEA (50-200mg/day) along with other medications improves quality of life for people with mild to moderate SLE, decreases corticosteroid requirements, and reduces the frequency of flare-ups, though it probably does not change the overall course of their disease (84,299-303). A study had shown DHEA replacement may increase bone mass in women with lupus (302). A 2007 report in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (78) suggests a "modest but clinically significant impact" of DHEA replacement on health-related quality of life in the short-term for people with SLE; the impact on disease activity was inconsistent. Long- term outcomes and safety remain unstudied.

 

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA)

 

DHEA levels have been found to be low in people with rheumatoid arthritis (304,305) and decrease further with glucocorticoid therapy (306). Considering the well-demonstrated immune-suppressive activities exerted by the adrenal androgens and their derivatives (307-309), the utility of DHEA as potential therapy for management of male and female RA patients was studied. Preliminary data from animal studies showed benefits of DHEA treatment in collagen-induced arthritis (310-312). However, in carefully controlled human clinical trials, DHEA treatment produced only modest benefits (313), probably with the exception of female-treated RA patients who benefit the most by DHEA replacement (314). The noted discrepancy in benefits from DHEA treatment between animals and humans may be related to the low endogenous DHEA in rodents relative to humans because of low levels of cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase (175), but also because of different DHEA metabolism between species; remarkably, in rodents DHEA has many highly oxygenated metabolites and a surprisingly complex metabolism that results in production of a multitude highly oxygenated species that may exert the beneficial effects on arthritis (315).

 

DHEA AND ADVERSE HEALTH OUTCOMES

 

DHEA supplements are generally well tolerated in studies using oral or percutaneous administration, with daily doses ranging from 25 mg to 1,600 mg. DHEA is an important precursor for estrogen and androgen production. In women DHEA when administered orally is mainly converted to androgen metabolites. As a result, some minimal androgenic adverse effects have been reported, including mild acne, seborrhea, facial hair growth, and ankle swelling (45,75,315).

 

A hormonal etiology has long been suspected for breast and endometrial cancer as several risk factors for each cancer, such as obesity, nulliparity, and early menarche are hormonally related (78,316-318). The plasma concentrations of the adrenal androgens in premenopausal women were previously associated with higher risk for development of breast cancer (319-321). Furthermore, DHEA-S levels above a cut off limit predicted disease progression in hypoestrogenized women treated for breast cancer (322). On the other hand, in vitro studies support an inhibitory effect of DHEA on the growth of human mammary cancer cells and the growth of chemically-induced mammary cancer in rats (10,62,323). It was shown that the effect of DHEA in mammary tissue depends on the level of plasma estrogens. Thus, growth inhibition occurs only in the presence of high estrogen concentrations, and growth stimulation occurs in the presence of a low-level estrogen milieu (12,324). The exact role of DHEA supplementation on breast cancer in humans has not been fully studied. A previous review of clinical, epidemiological, and experimental studies suggests late promotion of breast cancer in postmenopausal women by prolonged intake of DHEA, especially if central obesity coexists, and suggests extra caution when DHEA supplements are used by obese postmenopausal women (325). A more recent review of the medical literature investigating DHEA physiology and randomized controlled trials of the use of DHEA in postmenopausal women, however, did not find any adverse effect of DHEA supplementation (31).

 

Unopposed estrogen is also known to be associated with an increased risk of endometrial carcinoma (316). DHEA supplementation did not increase the endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women treated with 25 mg/day DHEA orally for 6 months (136) or 50 mg daily for 12 months (135,136,326). In addition, DHEA administered percutaneously for 12 months to postmenopausal women was shown to have an estrogenic effect on the vagina without affecting the endometrium that remained atrophic (105).

 

In men, DHEA supplements are mainly transformed to estrogen metabolites but also to more potent androgens. As a result, concerns regarding the effect of DHEA supplementation on prostate were raised, especially after the finding that about 15% of DHT present in the prostate comes from DHEA metabolism (327). A 2-year, placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind study involving elderly men receiving DHEA did not show any adverse effects in prostate (72).

 

As long as long-term safety data for DHEA supplementation are lacking, the American Cancer Society advices caution in its use in people who have cancer, especially types of cancer that respond to hormones, such as certain types of breast cancer, prostate cancer, and endometrial cancer (328). The authors of a Cochrane Systematic Review regarding the supplementation of DHEA in peri- and post-menopausal women, questioned the effectiveness of DHEA in women, and concluded that the overall quality of the studies analyzed was moderate to low and that the study outcomes were inconsistent and could not be pooled to obtain an overall effect due to the diversity of the measurement methods employed (329).

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Theoretically, supplementing a pre-hormone is extremely interesting as it would provide peripheral tissues with levels of sex steroids according to local needs and would eliminate the exposure of other tissues to androgens or estrogens, minimizing unwanted side effects. Therefore, DHEA administration is closer to ‘‘hormonal optimization’’ than hormonal supplementation. In older people, lower than normal levels of DHEA/DHEAS were previously related to aging-associated degenerative disorders, including metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, poor physical performance, mood and memory defects, sexual dysfunction, and poor sense of wellbeing. Whether this is just a statistical finding with no practical clinical meaning has been investigated by many interventional studies most of which, however, were of short duration and had a small number of participants. Without exception, all recent reviews of the available data regarding DHEA replacement utility for the management of aging-related disorders do not support its use in clinical practice (72-78); no significant adverse or negative side effects of DHEA were reported in clinical studies, but also no significant evidence that low levels of DHEA cause the aging-related degenerative disorders or that taking DHEA can help prevent/treat them. Thus, current clinical modalities with DHEA supplements do not comply with evidence-based medicine. Since there are several known biochemical actions by which DHEA could ameliorate disorders affecting the elderly population and is a well-tolerated molecule and an inexpensive drug, additional large multi-center clinical studies would probably give us a better understanding of its clinical utility in the management of aging-related disorders. Till then, we should probably reconsider suggesting patients to start on a pro-hormone that would help them only as much as a placebo would help.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Auchus RJ. Overview of dehydroepiandrosterone biosynthesis. Seminars in reproductive medicine.2004;22(4):281-288.
  2. Payne AH, Hales DB. Overview of steroidogenic enzymes in the pathway from cholesterol to active steroid hormones. Endocrine reviews. 2004;25(6):947-970.
  3. Davis SR. Androgens and female sexuality. The journal of gender-specific medicine : JGSM : the official journal of the Partnership for Women's Health at Columbia. 2000;3(1):36-40.
  4. Labrie F. Extragonadal synthesis of sex steroids: intracrinology. undefined. 2003.
  5. Labrie F, Bélanger A, Cusan L, Candas B. Physiological changes in dehydroepiandrosterone are not reflected by serum levels of active androgens and estrogens but of their metabolites: intracrinology. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1997;82(8):2403-2409.
  6. Labrie F. Intracrinology. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 1991;78(3).
  7. Labrie C, Belanger A, Labrie F. Androgenic activity of dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione in the rat ventral prostate. Endocrinology. 1988;123(3):1412-1417.
  8. Labrie F. Adrenal androgens and intracrinology. Semin Reprod Med. 2004;22(4):299-309.
  9. Labrie F. DHEA as physiological replacement therapy at menopause. Journal of endocrinological investigation.1998;21(6):399-401.
  10. Labrie F, Luu-The V, Labrie C, Belanger A, Simard J, Lin SX, Pelletier G. Endocrine and intracrine sources of androgens in women: inhibition of breast cancer and other roles of androgens and their precursor dehydroepiandrosterone. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(2):152-182.
  11. Poulin R, Labrie F. Stimulation of cell proliferation and estrogenic response by adrenal C19-delta 5-steroids in the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res. 1986;46(10):4933-4937.
  12. Seymour-Munn K, Adams J. Estrogenic effects of 5-androstene-3 beta, 17 beta-diol at physiological concentrations and its possible implication in the etiology of breast cancer. Endocrinology. 1983;112(2):486-491.
  13. Labrie F, Bélanger A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Candas B. Marked decline in serum concentrations of adrenal C19 sex steroid precursors and conjugated androgen metabolites during aging. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1997;82(8):2396-2402.
  14. Labrie F, Bélanger A, Bélanger P, Bérubé R, Martel C, Cusan L, Gomez J, Candas B, Castiel I, Chaussade V, Deloche C, Leclaire J. Androgen glucuronides, instead of testosterone, as the new markers of androgenic activity in women. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2006;99(4-5):182-188.
  15. Baulieu EE, Thomas G, Legrain S, Lahlou N, Roger M, Debuire B, Faucounau V, Girard L, Hervy MP, Latour F, Leaud MC, Mokrane A, Pitti-Ferrandi H, Trivalle C, De Lacharrière O, Nouveau S, Rakoto-Arison B, Souberbielle JC, Raison J, Le Bouc Y, Raynaud A, Girerd X, Forette F. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA sulfate, and aging: contribution of the DHEAge Study to a sociobiomedical issue. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(8):4279-4284.
  16. Mazat L, Lafont S, Berr C, Debuire B, Tessier JF, Dartigues JF, Baulieu EE. Prospective measurements of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in a cohort of elderly subjects: relationship to gender, subjective health, smoking habits, and 10-year mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.2001;98(14):8145-8150.
  17. Heaney JL, Phillips AC, Carroll D. Ageing, physical function, and the diurnal rhythms of cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(3):341-349.
  18. Laughlin GA, Barrett-Connor E. Sexual Dimorphism in the Influence of Advanced Aging on Adrenal Hormone Levels: The Rancho Bernardo Study*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Printed. 2000;85(10).
  19. Baulieu EE. Androgens and aging men. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2002;198(1-2):41-49.
  20. Parker CR. Dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate production in the human adrenal during development and aging. Steroids. 1999;64(9):640-647.
  21. Yen SSC, Laughlin GA. Aging and the adrenal cortex. Experimental Gerontology. 1998;33(7-8):897-910.
  22. Ahu RS, Lee YJ, Choi JY, Kwon HB, Chun SI. Salivary cortisol and DHEA levels in the Korean population: age-related differences, diurnal rhythm, and correlations with serum levels. Yonsei medical journal. 2007;48(3):379-388.
  23. Liu CH, Laughlin GA, Fischer UG, Yen SSC. Marked attenuation of ultradian and circadian rhythms of dehydroepiandrosterone in postmenopausal women: evidence for a reduced 17,20-desmolase enzymatic activity. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1990;71(4):900-906.
  24. Orentreich N, Brind JL, Rizer RL, Vogelman JH. Age changes and sex differences in serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations throughout adulthood. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1984;59(3):551-555.
  25. Prom-Wormley EC, York TP, Jacobson KC, Eaves LJ, Mendoza SP, Hellhammer D, Maninger N, Levine S, Lupien S, Lyons MJ, Hauger R, Xian H, Franz CE, Kremen WS. Genetic and environmental effects on diurnal dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations in middle-aged men. Psychoneuroendocrinology.2011;36(10):1441-1452.
  26. Lasley BL, Santoro N, Randolf JF, Gold EB, Crawford S, Weiss G, McConnell DS, Sowers MF. The relationship of circulating dehydroepiandrosterone, testosterone, and estradiol to stages of the menopausal transition and ethnicity. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2002;87(8):3760-3767.
  27. Lasley BL, Crawford SL, Laughlin GA, Santoro N, McConnell DS, Crandall C, Greendale GA, Polotsky AJ, Vuga M. Circulating dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in women who underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during the menopausal transition. Menopause (New York, NY). 2011;18(5):494-498.
  28. Crawford S, Santoro N, Laughlin GA, Sowers MF, McConnell D, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Weiss G, Vuga M, Randolph J, Lasley B. Circulating dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations during the menopausal transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2945-2951.
  29. Randolph JF, Sowers M, Gold EB, Mohr BA, Luborsky J, Santoro N, McConnell DS, Finkelstein JS, Korenman SG, Matthews KA, Sternfeld B, Lasley BL. Reproductive hormones in the early menopausal transition: relationship to ethnicity, body size, and menopausal status. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2003;88(4):1516-1522.
  30. Lasley BL, Crawford S, McConnell DS. Adrenal androgens and the menopausal transition. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 2011;38(3):467-475.
  31. Davis SR, Panjari M, Stanczyk FZ. Clinical review: DHEA replacement for postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(6):1642-1653.
  32. Pluchino N, Drakopoulos P, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Wenger JM, Petignat P, Genazzani AR. Neurobiology of DHEA and effects on sexuality, mood and cognition. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;145:273-280.
  33. Parker LN. Adrenarche. Endocrinologist. 1993;3(6):385-391.
  34. Corvalan C, Uauy R, Mericq V. Obesity is positively associated with dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations at 7 y in Chilean children of normal birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(2):318-325.
  35. Rabijewski M, Papierska L, Binkowska M, Maksym R, Jankowska K, Skrzypulec-Plinta W, Zgliczynski W. Supplementation of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in pre- and postmenopausal women - position statement of expert panel of Polish Menopause and Andropause Society. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(9):554-562.
  36. Liu D, Dillon JS. Dehydroepiandrosterone stimulates nitric oxide release in vascular endothelial cells: Evidence for a cell surface receptor. Steroids. 2004;69(4):279-289.
  37. Liu D, Dillon JS. Dehydroepiandrosterone activates endothelial cell nitric-oxide synthase by a specific plasma membrane receptor coupled to Galpha(i2,3). The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(24):21379-21388.
  38. Simoncini T, Mannella P, Fornari L, Varone G, Caruso A, Genazzani AR. Dehydroepiandrosterone modulates endothelial nitric oxide synthesis via direct genomic and nongenomic mechanisms. Endocrinology.2003;144(8):3449-3455.
  39. Traish AM, Kang HP, Saad F, Guay AT. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-A precursor steroid or an active hormone in human physiology (CME). Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2011;8(11):2960-2982.
  40. Chevalier M, Gilbert G, Lory P, Marthan R, Quignard JF, Savineau JP. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) inhibits voltage-gated T-type calcium channels. Biochemical pharmacology. 2012;83(11):1530-1539.
  41. Bonnet S, Paulin R, Sutendra G, Dromparis P, Roy M, Watson KO, Nagendran J, Haromy A, Dyck JRB, Michelakis ED. Dehydroepiandrosterone reverses systemic vascular remodeling through the inhibition of the Akt/GSK3-{beta}/NFAT axis. Circulation. 2009;120(13):1231-1240.
  42. Williams MRI, Ling S, Dawood T, Hashimura K, Dai A, Li H, Liu JP, Funder JW, Sudhir K, Komesaroff PA. Dehydroepiandrosterone inhibits human vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation independent of ARs and ERs. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2002;87(1):176-181.
  43. Williams MRI, Dawood T, Ling S, Dai A, Lew R, Myles K, Funder JW, Sudhir K, Komesaroff PA. Dehydroepiandrosterone increases endothelial cell proliferation in vitro and improves endothelial function in vivo by mechanisms independent of androgen and estrogen receptors. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2004;89(9):4708-4715.
  44. Levin ER. Integration of the extranuclear and nuclear actions of estrogen. Molecular Endocrinology.2005;19(8):1951-1959.
  45. Legrain S, Massien C, Lahlou N, Roger M, Debuire B, Diquet B, Chatellier G, Azizi M, Faucounau V, Porchet H, Forette F, Baulieu EE. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement administration: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in healthy elderly subjects. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.2000;85(9):3208-3217.
  46. Moore LB, Parks DJ, Jones SA, Bledsoe RK, Consler TG, Stimmel JB, Goodwin B, Liddle C, Blanchard SG, Willson TM, Collins JL, Kliewer SA. Orphan nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor share xenobiotic and steroid ligands. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(20):15122-15127.
  47. Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, Willson TM. The nuclear pregnane X receptor: a key regulator of xenobiotic metabolism. Endocrine reviews. 2002;23(5):687-702.
  48. Goodwin B, Redinbo MR, Kliewer SA. Regulation of CYP3A gene transcription by the pregnane X receptor. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2002;42:1-23.
  49. Ripp SL, Fitzpatrick JL, Peters JM, Prough RA. Induction of CYP3A expression by dehydroepiandrosterone: involvement of the pregnane X receptor. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.2002;30(5):570-575.
  50. Straub RH, Konecna L, Hrach S, Rothe G, Kreutz M, Schölmerich J, Falk W, Lang B. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA sulfate are negatively correlated with serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), and DHEA inhibits IL-6 secretion from mononuclear cells in man in vitro: possible link between endocrinosenescence and immunosenescence. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 1998;83(6):2012-2017.
  51. Poynter ME, Daynes RA. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation modulates cellular redox status, represses nuclear factor-kappaB signaling, and reduces inflammatory cytokine production in aging. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998;273(49):32833-32841.
  52. Wang L, Wang YD, Wang WJ, Zhu Y, Li DJ. Dehydroepiandrosterone improves murine osteoblast growth and bone tissue morphometry via mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway independent of either androgen receptor or estrogen receptor. Journal of molecular endocrinology. 2007;38(4):467-479.
  53. Maurice T, Grégoire C, Espallergues J. Neuro(active)steroids actions at the neuromodulatory sigma1 (sigma1) receptor: biochemical and physiological evidences, consequences in neuroprotection. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior. 2006;84(4):581-597.
  54. Cheng ZX, Lan DM, Wu PY, Zhu YH, Dong Y, Ma L, Zheng P. Neurosteroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate inhibits persistent sodium currents in rat medial prefrontal cortex via activation of sigma-1 receptors. Experimental neurology. 2008;210(1):128-136.
  55. Tsai S-Y, Hayashi T, Mori T, Su T-P. Sigma-1 receptor chaperones and diseases. Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry. 2009;9(3):184-189.
  56. Tagashira H, Bhuiyan S, Shioda N, Fukunaga K. Distinct cardioprotective effects of 17β-estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone on pressure overload-induced hypertrophy in ovariectomized female rats. Menopause (New York, NY). 2011;18(12):1317-1326.
  57. Bhuiyan MS, Tagashira H, Fukunaga K. Dehydroepiandrosterone-mediated stimulation of sigma-1 receptor activates Akt-eNOS signaling in the thoracic aorta of ovariectomized rats with abdominal aortic banding. Cardiovascular therapeutics. 2011;29(4):219-230.
  58. Camporez JP, Akamine EH, Davel AP, Franci CR, Rossoni LV, Carvalho CR. Dehydroepiandrosterone protects against oxidative stress-induced endothelial dysfunction in ovariectomized rats. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 10):2585-2596.
  59. Nheu L, Nazareth L, Xu GY, Xiao FY, Luo RZ, Komesaroff P, Ling S. Physiological effects of androgens on human vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells in culture. Steroids. 2011;76(14):1590-1596.
  60. Jacob MH, Janner Dda R, Bello-Klein A, Llesuy SF, Ribeiro MF. Dehydroepiandrosterone modulates antioxidant enzymes and Akt signaling in healthy Wistar rat hearts. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;112(1-3):138-144.
  61. Levy HR, Daouk GH. Simultaneous analysis of NAD- and NADP-linked activities of dual nucleotide-specific dehydrogenases. Application to Leuconostoc mesenteroides glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1979;254(11):4843-4847.
  62. Schwartz AG, Pashko LL. Dehydroepiandrosterone, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and longevity. Ageing Res Rev. 2004;3(2):171-187.
  63. Moriguchi S, Shinoda Y, Yamamoto Y, Sasaki Y, Miyajima K, Tagashira H, Fukunaga K. Stimulation of the sigma-1 receptor by DHEA enhances synaptic efficacy and neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of olfactory bulbectomized mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60863.
  64. Yehuda R, Brand SR, Golier JA, Yang RK. Clinical correlates of DHEA associated with post-traumatic stress disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114(3):187-193.
  65. Bhuiyan MS, Fukunaga K. Stimulation of Sigma-1 receptor by dehydroepiandrosterone ameliorates hypertension-induced kidney hypertrophy in ovariectomized rats. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, NJ). 2010;235(3):356-364.
  66. Forti P, Maltoni B, Olivelli V, Pirazzoli GL, Ravaglia G, Zoli M. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and adverse health outcomes in older men and women. Rejuvenation Res. 2012;15(4):349-358.
  67. Valenti G, Denti L, Maggio M, Ceda G, Volpato S, Bandinelli S, Ceresini G, Cappola A, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. Effect of DHEAS on skeletal muscle over the life span: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.2004;59(5):466-472.
  68. Ravaglia G, Forti P, Maioli F, Boschi F, Cicognani A, Bernardi M, Pratelli L, Pizzoferrato A, Porcu S, Gasbarrini G. Determinants of functional status in healthy Italian nonagenarians and centenarians: a comprehensive functional assessment by the instruments of geriatric practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(10):1196-1202.
  69. Leng SX, Cappola AR, Andersen RE, Blackman MR, Koenig K, Blair M, Walston JD. Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), and their relationships with serum interleukin-6, in the geriatric syndrome of frailty. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(2):153-157.
  70. Ohlsson C, Labrie F, Barrett-Connor E, Karlsson MK, Ljunggren O, Vandenput L, Mellstrom D, Tivesten A. Low serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly Swedish men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(9):4406-4414.
  71. Kroboth PD, Salek FS, Pittenger AL, Fabian TJ, Frye RF. DHEA and DHEA-S: a review. J Clin Pharmacol.1999;39(4):327-348.
  72. Nair KS, Rizza RA, O'Brien P, Dhatariya K, Short KR, Nehra A, Vittone JL, Klee GG, Basu A, Basu R, Cobelli C, Toffolo G, Dalla Man C, Tindall DJ, Melton LJ, 3rd, Smith GE, Khosla S, Jensen MD. DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(16):1647-1659.
  73. Baker WL, Karan S, Kenny AM. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on muscle strength and physical function in older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(6):997-1002.
  74. Kritz-Silverstein D, von Muhlen D, Laughlin GA, Bettencourt R. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation on cognitive function and quality of life: the DHEA and Well-Ness (DAWN) Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1292-1298.
  75. Panjari M, Bell RJ, Jane F, Wolfe R, Adams J, Morrow C, Davis SR. A randomized trial of oral DHEA treatment for sexual function, well-being, and menopausal symptoms in postmenopausal women with low libido. J Sex Med. 2009;6(9):2579-2590.
  76. Alkatib AA, Cosma M, Elamin MB, Erickson D, Swiglo BA, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of DHEA treatment effects on quality of life in women with adrenal insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10):3676-3681.
  77. Labrie F, Archer D, Bouchard C, Fortier M, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Girard G, Baron M, Ayotte N, Moreau M, Dube R, Cote I, Labrie C, Lavoie L, Berger L, Gilbert L, Martel C, Balser J. Effect of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (Prasterone) on libido and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Menopause.2009;16(5):923-931.
  78. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, Folsom AR, Fraser G, Goldbohm RA, Graham S, Kushi L, Marshall JR, Miller AB, Rohan T, Smith-Warner SA, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Wolk A, Hunter DJ. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol.2000;152(6):514-527.
  79. Arlt W. The approach to the adult with newly diagnosed adrenal insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2009;94(4):1059-1067.
  80. Panjari M, Davis SR. DHEA for postmenopausal women: a review of the evidence. Maturitas. 2010;66(2):172-179.
  81. Labrie F, Belanger A, Belanger P, Berube R, Martel C, Cusan L, Gomez J, Candas B, Chaussade V, Castiel I, Deloche C, Leclaire J. Metabolism of DHEA in postmenopausal women following percutaneous administration. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;103(2):178-188.
  82. Labrie F, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Martel C, Berube R, Belanger P, Chaussade V, Deloche C, Leclaire J. Changes in serum DHEA and eleven of its metabolites during 12-month percutaneous administration of DHEA. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;110(1-2):1-9.
  83. Arlt W, Callies F, Koehler I, van Vlijmen JC, Fassnacht M, Strasburger CJ, Seibel MJ, Huebler D, Ernst M, Oettel M, Reincke M, Schulte HM, Allolio B. Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation in healthy men with an age-related decline of dehydroepiandrosterone secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(10):4686-4692.
  84. Arlt W, Callies F, van Vlijmen JC, Koehler I, Reincke M, Bidlingmaier M, Huebler D, Oettel M, Ernst M, Schulte HM, Allolio B. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency. N Engl J Med.1999;341(14):1013-1020.
  85. Lovas K, Gebre-Medhin G, Trovik TS, Fougner KJ, Uhlving S, Nedrebo BG, Myking OL, Kampe O, Husebye ES. Replacement of dehydroepiandrosterone in adrenal failure: no benefit for subjective health status and sexuality in a 9-month, randomized, parallel group clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(3):1112-1118.
  86. Bornstein SR, Allolio B, Arlt W, Barthel A, Don-Wauchope A, Hammer GD, Husebye ES, Merke DP, Murad MH, Stratakis CA, Torpy DJ. Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(2):364-389.
  87. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(5):664-672.
  88. Kostka T, Arsac LM, Patricot MC, Berthouze SE, Lacour JR, Bonnefoy M. Leg extensor power and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, insulin-like growth factor-I and testosterone in healthy active elderly people. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82(1-2):83-90.
  89. Berkman LF, Seeman TE, Albert M, Blazer D, Kahn R, Mohs R, Finch C, Schneider E, Cotman C, McClearn G, et al. High, usual and impaired functioning in community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Aging. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1129-1140.
  90. Morrison MF, Katz IR, Parmelee P, Boyce AA, TenHave T. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and psychiatric and laboratory measures of frailty in a residential care population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry.1998;6(4):277-284.
  91. Abbasi A, Duthie EH, Jr., Sheldahl L, Wilson C, Sasse E, Rudman I, Mattson DE. Association of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, body composition, and physical fitness in independent community-dwelling older men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(3):263-273.
  92. Clarke BL, Ebeling PR, Jones JD, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL, Fitzpatrick LA. Predictors of bone mineral density in aging healthy men varies by skeletal site. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;70(3):137-145.
  93. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Orav EJ, Dawson-Hughes B. Additive benefit of higher testosterone levels and vitamin D plus calcium supplementation in regard to fall risk reduction among older men and women. Osteoporos Int.2008;19(9):1307-1314.
  94. Voznesensky M, Walsh S, Dauser D, Brindisi J, Kenny AM. The association between dehydroepiandosterone and frailty in older men and women. Age Ageing. 2009;38(4):401-406.
  95. Hasselhorn HM, Theorell T, Vingard E, Musculoskeletal Intervention Center -Norrtalje Study G. Endocrine and immunologic parameters indicative of 6-month prognosis after the onset of low back pain or neck/shoulder pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(3):E24-29.
  96. Schell E, Theorell T, Hasson D, Arnetz B, Saraste H. Stress biomarkers' associations to pain in the neck, shoulder and back in healthy media workers: 12-month prospective follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):393-405.
  97. Morales AJ, Haubrich RH, Hwang JY, Asakura H, Yen SS. The effect of six months treatment with a 100 mg daily dose of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on circulating sex steroids, body composition and muscle strength in age-advanced men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998;49(4):421-432.
  98. Villareal DT, Holloszy JO, Kohrt WM. Effects of DHEA replacement on bone mineral density and body composition in elderly women and men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;53(5):561-568.
  99. Kaiman DS, Colker CM, Swain MA, Torina GC, Shi Q. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 3-acetyl-7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone in healthy overweight adults. Current Therapeutic Research.2000;61(7):435-442.
  100. Kenny AM, Boxer RS, Kleppinger A, Brindisi J, Feinn R, Burleson JA. Dehydroepiandrosterone combined with exercise improves muscle strength and physical function in frail older women. J Am Geriatr Soc.2010;58(9):1707-1714.
  101. Weiss EP, Shah K, Fontana L, Lambert CP, Holloszy JO, Villareal DT. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in older adults: 1- and 2-y effects on bone. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1459-1467.
  102. von Muhlen D, Laughlin GA, Kritz-Silverstein D, Bergstrom J, Bettencourt R. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation on bone mineral density, bone markers, and body composition in older adults: the DAWN trial. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(5):699-707.
  103. Jankowski CM, Gozansky WS, Kittelson JM, Van Pelt RE, Schwartz RS, Kohrt WM. Increases in bone mineral density in response to oral dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in older adults appear to be mediated by serum estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(12):4767-4773.
  104. Jankowski CM, Gozansky WS, Schwartz RS, Dahl DJ, Kittelson JM, Scott SM, Van Pelt RE, Kohrt WM. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in older adults: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2986-2993.
  105. Labrie F, Diamond P, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Candas B. Effect of 12-month dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy on bone, vagina, and endometrium in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1997;82(10):3498-3505.
  106. Morales AJ, Nolan JJ, Nelson JC, Yen SS. Effects of replacement dose of dehydroepiandrosterone in men and women of advancing age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78(6):1360-1367.
  107. Yen SS, Morales AJ, Khorram O. Replacement of DHEA in aging men and women. Potential remedial effects. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;774:128-142.
  108. Nawata H, Tanaka S, Tanaka S, Takayanagi R, Sakai Y, Yanase T, Ikuyama S, Haji M. Aromatase in bone cell: association with osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;53(1-6):165-174.
  109. Jedrzejuk D, Medras M, Milewicz A, Demissie M. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in healthy men with age-related decline of DHEA-S: effects on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism. Aging Male.2003;6(3):151-156.
  110. Callies F, Fassnacht M, van Vlijmen JC, Koehler I, Huebler D, Seibel MJ, Arlt W, Allolio B. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency: effects on body composition, serum leptin, bone turnover, and exercise capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(5):1968-1972.
  111. Flynn MA, Weaver-Osterholtz D, Sharpe-Timms KL, Allen S, Krause G. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in aging humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(5):1527-1533.
  112. Casson PR, Santoro N, Elkind-Hirsch K, Carson SA, Hornsby PJ, Abraham G, Buster JE. Postmenopausal dehydroepiandrosterone administration increases free insulin-like growth factor-I and decreases high-density lipoprotein: a six-month trial. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(1):107-110.
  113. Igwebuike A, Irving BA, Bigelow ML, Short KR, McConnell JP, Nair KS. Lack of dehydroepiandrosterone effect on a combined endurance and resistance exercise program in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(2):534-538.
  114. Muller M, van den Beld AW, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Lamberts SW. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and atamestane supplementation on frailty in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2006;91(10):3988-3991.
  115. Villareal DT, Holloszy JO. DHEA enhances effects of weight training on muscle mass and strength in elderly women and men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291(5):E1003-1008.
  116. Percheron G, Hogrel JY, Denot-Ledunois S, Fayet G, Forette F, Baulieu EE, Fardeau M, Marini JF, Double-blind placebo-controlled t. Effect of 1-year oral administration of dehydroepiandrosterone to 60- to 80-year-old individuals on muscle function and cross-sectional area: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Arch Intern Med.2003;163(6):720-727.
  117. Nijland E, Davis S, Laan E, Schultz WW. Female sexual satisfaction and pharmaceutical intervention: a critical review of the drug intervention studies in female sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2006;3(5):763-777.
  118. Hayes RD, Dennerstein L, Bennett CM, Koochaki PE, Leiblum SR, Graziottin A. Relationship between hypoactive sexual desire disorder and aging. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):107-112.
  119. Shifren JL, Braunstein GD, Simon JA, Casson PR, Buster JE, Redmond GP, Burki RE, Ginsburg ES, Rosen RC, Leiblum SR, Caramelli KE, Mazer NA. Transdermal testosterone treatment in women with impaired sexual function after oophorectomy. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(10):682-688.
  120. Genazzani AD, Lanzoni C, Genazzani AR. Might DHEA be considered a beneficial replacement therapy in the elderly? Drugs Aging. 2007;24(3):173-185.
  121. Nappi RE, Polatti F. The use of estrogen therapy in women's sexual functioning (CME). J Sex Med.2009;6(3):603-616; quiz 618-609.
  122. Bachmann GA, Leiblum SR. The impact of hormones on menopausal sexuality: a literature review. Menopause.2004;11(1):120-130.
  123. Alexander JL, Kotz K, Dennerstein L, Kutner SJ, Wallen K, Notelovitz M. The effects of postmenopausal hormone therapies on female sexual functioning: a review of double-blind, randomized controlled trials. Menopause. 2004;11(6 Pt 2):749-765.
  124. Modelska K, Cummings S. Female sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women: systematic review of placebo-controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):286-293.
  125. Goldstat R, Briganti E, Tran J, Wolfe R, Davis SR. Transdermal testosterone therapy improves well-being, mood, and sexual function in premenopausal women. Menopause. 2003;10(5):390-398.
  126. Braunstein GD, Sundwall DA, Katz M, Shifren JL, Buster JE, Simon JA, Bachman G, Aguirre OA, Lucas JD, Rodenberg C, Buch A, Watts NB. Safety and efficacy of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Intern Med.2005;165(14):1582-1589.
  127. Davis SR, van der Mooren MJ, van Lunsen RH, Lopes P, Ribot C, Rees M, Moufarege A, Rodenberg C, Buch A, Purdie DW. Efficacy and safety of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause. 2006;13(3):387-396.
  128. Buster JE, Kingsberg SA, Aguirre O, Brown C, Breaux JG, Buch A, Rodenberg CA, Wekselman K, Casson P. Testosterone patch for low sexual desire in surgically menopausal women: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol.2005;105(5 Pt 1):944-952.
  129. Davis S, Papalia MA, Norman RJ, O'Neill S, Redelman M, Williamson M, Stuckey BG, Wlodarczyk J, Gard'ner K, Humberstone A. Safety and efficacy of a testosterone metered-dose transdermal spray for treating decreased sexual satisfaction in premenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(8):569-577.
  130. Davis SR, Davison SL, Donath S, Bell RJ. Circulating androgen levels and self-reported sexual function in women. JAMA. 2005;294(1):91-96.
  131. Panjari M, Davis SR. DHEA therapy for women: effect on sexual function and wellbeing. Hum Reprod Update.2007;13(3):239-248.
  132. Schmidt PJ, Daly RC, Bloch M, Smith MJ, Danaceau MA, St Clair LS, Murphy JH, Haq N, Rubinow DR. Dehydroepiandrosterone monotherapy in midlife-onset major and minor depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry.2005;62(2):154-162.
  133. Bloch M, Schmidt PJ, Danaceau MA, Adams LF, Rubinow DR. Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment of midlife dysthymia. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;45(12):1533-1541.
  134. Hackbert L, Heiman JR. Acute dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) effects on sexual arousal in postmenopausal women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11(2):155-162.
  135. Genazzani AR, Stomati M, Valentino V, Pluchino N, Pot E, Casarosa E, Merlini S, Giannini A, Luisi M. Effect of 1-year, low-dose DHEA therapy on climacteric symptoms and female sexuality. Climacteric. 2011;14(6):661-668.
  136. Stomati M, Monteleone P, Casarosa E, Quirici B, Puccetti S, Bernardi F, Genazzani AD, Rovati L, Luisi M, Genazzani AR. Six-month oral dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation in early and late postmenopause. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2000;14(5):342-363.
  137. Mortola JF, Yen SS. The effects of oral dehydroepiandrosterone on endocrine-metabolic parameters in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;71(3):696-704.
  138. Wolf OT, Neumann O, Hellhammer DH, Geiben AC, Strasburger CJ, Dressendorfer RA, Pirke KM, Kirschbaum C. Effects of a two-week physiological dehydroepiandrosterone substitution on cognitive performance and well-being in healthy elderly women and men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(7):2363-2367.
  139. Johannsson G, Burman P, Wiren L, Engstrom BE, Nilsson AG, Ottosson M, Jonsson B, Bengtsson BA, Karlsson FA. Low dose dehydroepiandrosterone affects behavior in hypopituitary androgen-deficient women: a placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):2046-2052.
  140. van Thiel SW, Romijn JA, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, Roelfsema F, van Hemert A, Ballieux B, Smit JW. Effects of dehydroepiandrostenedione, superimposed on growth hormone substitution, on quality of life and insulin-like growth factor I in patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency: a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(6):3295-3303.
  141. Avis NE, Brockwell S, Randolph JF, Jr., Shen S, Cain VS, Ory M, Greendale GA. Longitudinal changes in sexual functioning as women transition through menopause: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Menopause. 2009;16(3):442-452.
  142. Labrie F, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Cote I, Berube R, Belanger P, Martel C, Labrie C. Effect of intravaginal DHEA on serum DHEA and eleven of its metabolites in postmenopausal women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;111(3-5):178-194.
  143. Labrie F, Archer D, Bouchard C, Fortier M, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Girard G, Baron M, Ayotte N, Moreau M, Dube R, Cote I, Labrie C, Lavoie L, Berger L, Martel C, Balser J. High internal consistency and efficacy of intravaginal DHEA for vaginal atrophy. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26(7):524-532.
  144. Ibe C, Simon JA. Vulvovaginal atrophy: current and future therapies (CME). J Sex Med. 2010;7(3):1042-1050; quiz 1051.
  145. Reiter WJ, Pycha A, Schatzl G, Pokorny A, Gruber DM, Huber JC, Marberger M. Dehydroepiandrosterone in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Urology. 1999;53(3):590-594; discussion 594-595.
  146. Steffens DC. A multiplicity of approaches to characterize geriatric depression and its outcomes. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009;22(6):522-526.
  147. Robichaud M, Debonnel G. Modulation of the firing activity of female dorsal raphe nucleus serotonergic neurons by neuroactive steroids. J Endocrinol. 2004;182(1):11-21.
  148. Kilic FS, Kulluk D, Musmul A. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone in amphetamine-induced schizophrenia models in mice. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2014;19(2):100-105.
  149. Goodyer IM, Herbert J, Altham PM, Pearson J, Secher SM, Shiers HM. Adrenal secretion during major depression in 8- to 16-year-olds, I. Altered diurnal rhythms in salivary cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) at presentation. Psychol Med. 1996;26(2):245-256.
  150. Barrett-Connor E, von Muhlen D, Laughlin GA, Kripke A. Endogenous levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, but not other sex hormones, are associated with depressed mood in older women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(6):685-691.
  151. Michael A, Jenaway A, Paykel ES, Herbert J. Altered salivary dehydroepiandrosterone levels in major depression in adults. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48(10):989-995.
  152. Morrison MF, Freeman EW, Lin H, Sammel MD. Higher DHEA-S (dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate) levels are associated with depressive symptoms during the menopausal transition: results from the PENN Ovarian Aging Study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14(5):375-382.
  153. Takebayashi M, Kagaya A, Uchitomi Y, Kugaya A, Muraoka M, Yokota N, Horiguchi J, Yamawaki S. Plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in unipolar major depression. Short communication. J Neural Transm (Vienna).1998;105(4-5):537-542.
  154. Assies J, Visser I, Nicolson NA, Eggelte TA, Wekking EM, Huyser J, Lieverse R, Schene AH. Elevated salivary dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate but normal cortisol levels in medicated depressed patients: preliminary findings. Psychiatry Res. 2004;128(2):117-122.
  155. Fabian TJ, Dew MA, Pollock BG, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Mulsant BH, Butters MA, Zmuda MD, Linares AM, Trottini M, Kroboth PD. Endogenous concentrations of DHEA and DHEA-S decrease with remission of depression in older adults. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50(10):767-774.
  156. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Roberts E, Manfredi F, Chan T, Raum WJ, Ormiston S, Johnson R, Canick J, Brizendine L, Weingartner H. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) treatment of depression. Biol Psychiatry.1997;41(3):311-318.
  157. Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Keebler A, Nelson N, Friedland M, Brizendine L, Roberts E. Double-blind treatment of major depression with dehydroepiandrosterone. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(4):646-649.
  158. Strous RD, Maayan R, Lapidus R, Stryjer R, Lustig M, Kotler M, Weizman A. Dehydroepiandrosterone augmentation in the management of negative, depressive, and anxiety symptoms in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(2):133-141.
  159. Hough CM, Lindqvist D, Epel ES, Denis MS, Reus VI, Bersani FS, Rosser R, Mahan L, Burke HM, Wolkowitz OM, Mellon SH. Higher serum DHEA concentrations before and after SSRI treatment are associated with remission of major depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;77:122-130.
  160. Kaplan JR, Manuck SB, Clarkson TB, Lusso FM, Taub DM. Social status, environment, and atherosclerosis in cynomolgus monkeys. Arteriosclerosis. 1982;2(5):359-368.
  161. Kivimaki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012;380(9852):1491-1497.
  162. Marmot M. Psychosocial factors and cardiovascular disease: epidemiological approaches. Eur Heart J.1988;9(6):690-697.
  163. Epel ES, Blackburn EH, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Adler NE, Morrow JD, Cawthon RM. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(49):17312-17315.
  164. Wolkowitz OM, Epel ES, Reus VI, Mellon SH. Depression gets old fast: do stress and depression accelerate cell aging? Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(4):327-338.
  165. Jeckel CM, Lopes RP, Berleze MC, Luz C, Feix L, Argimon, II, Stein LM, Bauer ME. Neuroendocrine and immunological correlates of chronic stress in 'strictly healthy' populations. Neuroimmunomodulation.2010;17(1):9-18.
  166. Izawa S, Saito K, Shirotsuki K, Sugaya N, Nomura S. Effects of prolonged stress on salivary cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone: a study of a two-week teaching practice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(6):852-858.
  167. Brzoza Z, Kasperska-Zajac A, Badura-Brzoza K, Matysiakiewicz J, Hese RT, Rogala B. Decline in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate observed in chronic urticaria is associated with psychological distress. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(6):723-728.
  168. Lac G, Dutheil F, Brousse G, Triboulet-Kelly C, Chamoux A. Saliva DHEAS changes in patients suffering from psychopathological disorders arising from bullying at work. Brain Cogn. 2012;80(2):277-281.
  169. Du CL, Lin MC, Lu L, Tai JJ. Correlation of Occupational Stress Index with 24-hour Urine Cortisol and Serum DHEA Sulfate among City Bus Drivers: A Cross-sectional Study. Saf Health Work. 2011;2(2):169-175.
  170. Kim MS, Lee YJ, Ahn RS. Day-to-day differences in cortisol levels and molar cortisol-to-DHEA ratios among working individuals. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51(2):212-218.
  171. Lennartsson AK, Theorell T, Rockwood AL, Kushnir MM, Jonsdottir IH. Perceived stress at work is associated with lower levels of DHEA-S. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72460.
  172. Jorm AF, Jolley D. The incidence of dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 1998;51(3):728-733.
  173. Lu SF, Mo Q, Hu S, Garippa C, Simon NG. Dehydroepiandrosterone upregulates neural androgen receptor level and transcriptional activity. J Neurobiol. 2003;57(2):163-171.
  174. Suzuki M, Wright LS, Marwah P, Lardy HA, Svendsen CN. Mitotic and neurogenic effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on human neural stem cell cultures derived from the fetal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(9):3202-3207.
  175. Lang PO, Mitchell WA, Lapenna A, Pitts D, Aspinall R. Immunological pathogenesis of main age-related diseases and frailty: Role of immunosenescence. European Geriatric Medicine. 2010;1(2):112-121.
  176. Davis SR, Shah SM, McKenzie DP, Kulkarni J, Davison SL, Bell RJ. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels are associated with more favorable cognitive function in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(3):801-808.
  177. Hildreth KL, Gozansky WS, Jankowski CM, Grigsby J, Wolfe P, Kohrt WM. Association of serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and cognition in older adults: sex steroid, inflammatory, and metabolic mechanisms. Neuropsychology. 2013;27(3):356-363.
  178. Valenti G, Ferrucci L, Lauretani F, Ceresini G, Bandinelli S, Luci M, Ceda G, Maggio M, Schwartz RS. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and cognitive function in the elderly: The InCHIANTI Study. J Endocrinol Invest.2009;32(9):766-772.
  179. Weill-Engerer S, David JP, Sazdovitch V, Liere P, Eychenne B, Pianos A, Schumacher M, Delacourte A, Baulieu EE, Akwa Y. Neurosteroid quantification in human brain regions: comparison between Alzheimer's and nondemented patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):5138-5143.
  180. Belanger N, Gregoire L, Bedard PJ, Di Paolo T. DHEA improves symptomatic treatment of moderately and severely impaired MPTP monkeys. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27(11):1684-1693.
  181. van Niekerk JK, Huppert FA, Herbert J. Salivary cortisol and DHEA: association with measures of cognition and well-being in normal older men, and effects of three months of DHEA supplementation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2001;26(6):591-612.
  182. Bielohuby M, Roemmler J, Manolopoulou J, Johnsen I, Sawitzky M, Schopohl J, Reincke M, Wolf E, Hoeflich A, Bidlingmaier M. Chronic growth hormone excess is associated with increased aldosterone: a study in patients with acromegaly and in growth hormone transgenic mice. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, NJ).2009;234(8):1002-1009.
  183. Wolf OT, Kudielka BM, Hellhammer DH, Hellhammer J, Kirschbaum C. Opposing effects of DHEA replacement in elderly subjects on declarative memory and attention after exposure to a laboratory stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1998;23(6):617-629.
  184. Wolf OT, Kirschbaum C. Actions of dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulfate in the central nervous system: effects on cognition and emotion in animals and humans. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999;30(3):264-288.
  185. Grimley Evans J, Malouf R, Huppert F, van Niekerk JK. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation for cognitive function in healthy elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006(4):CD006221.
  186. Wolkowitz OM, Kramer JH, Reus VI, Costa MM, Yaffe K, Walton P, Raskind M, Peskind E, Newhouse P, Sack D, De Souza E, Sadowsky C, Roberts E, Research DH-AsDC. DHEA treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 2003;60(7):1071-1076.
  187. Yamada S, Akishita M, Fukai S, Ogawa S, Yamaguchi K, Matsuyama J, Kozaki K, Toba K, Ouchi Y. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation on cognitive function and activities of daily living in older women with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10(4):280-287.
  188. Parsons TD, Kratz KM, Thompson E, Stanczyk FZ, Buckwalter JG. Dhea supplementation and cognition in postmenopausal women. Int J Neurosci. 2006;116(2):141-155.
  189. Morrison MF, Redei E, TenHave T, Parmelee P, Boyce AA, Sinha PS, Katz IR. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and psychiatric measures in a frail, elderly residential care population. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47(2):144-150.
  190. Somboonporn W, Davis S, Seif MW, Bell R. Testosterone for peri- and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(4):CD004509.
  191. Darling GM, Johns JA, McCloud PI, Davis SR. Estrogen and progestin compared with simvastatin for hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(9):595-601.
  192. Barnhart KT, Freeman E, Grisso JA, Rader DJ, Sammel M, Kapoor S, Nestler JE. The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation to symptomatic perimenopausal women on serum endocrine profiles, lipid parameters, and health-related quality of life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(11):3896-3902.
  193. Davis SR, Goldstat R, Newman A, Berry K, Burger HG, Meredith I, Koch K. Differing effects of low-dose estrogen-progestin therapy and pravastatin in postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women. Climacteric.2002;5(4):341-350.
  194. Floter A, Nathorst-Boos J, Carlstrom K, von Schoultz B. Serum lipids in oophorectomized women during estrogen and testosterone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2004;47(2):123-129.
  195. Leao LM, Duarte MP, Silva DM, Bahia PR, Coeli CM, de Farias ML. Influence of methyltestosterone postmenopausal therapy on plasma lipids, inflammatory factors, glucose metabolism and visceral fat: a randomized study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(1):131-139.
  196. Srinivasan M, Irving BA, Dhatariya K, Klaus KA, Hartman SJ, McConnell JP, Nair KS. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone replacement on lipoprotein profile in hypoadrenal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2009;94(3):761-764.
  197. Srinivasan M, Irving BA, Frye RL, O'Brien P, Hartman SJ, McConnell JP, Nair KS. Effects on lipoprotein particles of long-term dehydroepiandrosterone in elderly men and women and testosterone in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(4):1617-1625.
  198. Bell RJ, Davison SL, Papalia MA, McKenzie DP, Davis SR. Endogenous androgen levels and cardiovascular risk profile in women across the adult life span. Menopause. 2007;14(4):630-638.
  199. Shufelt C, Bretsky P, Almeida CM, Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Azziz R, Braunstein GD, Pepine CJ, Bittner V, Vido DA, Stanczyk FZ, Bairey Merz CN. DHEA-S levels and cardiovascular disease mortality in postmenopausal women: results from the National Institutes of Health--National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(11):4985-4992.
  200. Christiansen JJ, Andersen NH, Sorensen KE, Pedersen EM, Bennett P, Andersen M, Christiansen JS, Jorgensen JO, Gravholt CH. Dehydroepiandrosterone substitution in female adrenal failure: no impact on endothelial function and cardiovascular parameters despite normalization of androgen status. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66(3):426-433.
  201. Panjari M, Bell RJ, Jane F, Adams J, Morrow C, Davis SR. The safety of 52 weeks of oral DHEA therapy for postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2009;63(3):240-245.
  202. Mohan PF, Ihnen JS, Levin BE, Cleary MP. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone treatment in rats with diet-induced obesity. J Nutr. 1990;120(9):1103-1114.
  203. Cleary MP, Zisk JF. Anti-obesity effect of two different levels of dehydroepiandrosterone in lean and obese middle-aged female Zucker rats. Int J Obes. 1986;10(3):193-204.
  204. Hansen PA, Han DH, Nolte LA, Chen M, Holloszy JO. DHEA protects against visceral obesity and muscle insulin resistance in rats fed a high-fat diet. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(5):R1704-1708.
  205. Corona G, Rastrelli G, Giagulli VA, Sila A, Sforza A, Forti G, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation in elderly men: a meta-analysis study of placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2013;98(9):3615-3626.
  206. Jia C, Chen X, Li X, Li M, Miao C, Sun B, Fan Z, Ren L. The effect of DHEA treatment on the oxidative stress and myocardial fibrosis induced by Keshan disease pathogenic factors. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2011;25(3):154-159.
  207. Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest.1996;97(11):2601-2610.
  208. Labrie F, Luu-The V, Belanger A, Lin SX, Simard J, Pelletier G, Labrie C. Is dehydroepiandrosterone a hormone? J Endocrinol. 2005;187(2):169-196.
  209. Wellman M, Shane-McWhorter L, Orlando, Jennings JP. The role of dehydroepiandrosterone in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 1999;19(5):582-591.
  210. Livingstone C, Collison M. Sex steroids and insulin resistance. Clin Sci (Lond). 2002;102(2):151-166.
  211. Golden SH, Dobs AS, Vaidya D, Szklo M, Gapstur S, Kopp P, Liu K, Ouyang P. Endogenous sex hormones and glucose tolerance status in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(4):1289-1295.
  212. Barrett-Connor E, Ferrara A. Dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, obesity, waist-hip ratio, and noninsulin-dependent diabetes in postmenopausal women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(1):59-64.
  213. Dhatariya K, Bigelow ML, Nair KS. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone replacement on insulin sensitivity and lipids in hypoadrenal women. Diabetes. 2005;54(3):765-769.
  214. Villareal DT, Holloszy JO. Effect of DHEA on abdominal fat and insulin action in elderly women and men: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292(18):2243-2248.
  215. Lasco A, Frisina N, Morabito N, Gaudio A, Morini E, Trifiletti A, Basile G, Nicita-Mauro V, Cucinotta D. Metabolic effects of dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Eur J Endocrinol.2001;145(4):457-461.
  216. Gomez-Santos C, Larque E, Granero E, Hernandez-Morante JJ, Garaulet M. Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate replacement improves the human plasma fatty acid profile in plasma of obese women. Steroids.2011;76(13):1425-1432.
  217. Diamond P, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Labrie F. Metabolic effects of 12-month percutaneous dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. J Endocrinol. 1996;150 Suppl:S43-50.
  218. Paul S Jellinger DAS, Adi E Mehta, Om Ganda, Yehuda Handelsman, Helena W Rodbard, Mark D Shepherd, John A Seibel, AACE Task Force for Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Atherosclerosis. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Atherosclerosis. Endocrine Practice. 2012(Mar-Apr;18):1-78.
  219. Phillips GB, Pinkernell BH, Jing TY. Are major risk factors for myocardial infarction the major predictors of degree of coronary artery disease in men? Metabolism. 2004;53(3):324-329.
  220. Freedman DS, O'Brien TR, Flanders WD, DeStefano F, Barboriak JJ. Relation of serum testosterone levels to high density lipoprotein cholesterol and other characteristics in men. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11(2):307-315.
  221. Tripathi Y, Hegde BM. Serum estradiol and testosterone levels following acute myocardial infarction in men. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998;42(2):291-294.
  222. Pugh PJ, Channer KS, Parry H, Downes T, Jone TH. Bio-available testosterone levels fall acutely following myocardial infarction in men: association with fibrinolytic factors. Endocr Res. 2002;28(3):161-173.
  223. Glueck CJ, Glueck HI, Stroop D, Speirs J, Hamer T, Tracy T. Endogenous testosterone, fibrinolysis, and coronary heart disease risk in hyperlipidemic men. J Lab Clin Med. 1993;122(4):412-420.
  224. Caron P, Bennet A, Camare R, Louvet JP, Boneu B, Sie P. Plasminogen activator inhibitor in plasma is related to testosterone in men. Metabolism. 1989;38(10):1010-1015.
  225. De Pergola G, De Mitrio V, Sciaraffia M, Pannacciulli N, Minenna A, Giorgino F, Petronelli M, Laudadio E, Giorgino R. Lower androgenicity is associated with higher plasma levels of prothrombotic factors irrespective of age, obesity, body fat distribution, and related metabolic parameters in men. Metabolism. 1997;46(11):1287-1293.
  226. Militaru C, Donoiu I, Dracea O, Ionescu DD. Serum testosterone and short-term mortality in men with acute myocardial infarction. Cardiol J. 2010;17(3):249-253.
  227. Fukui M, Kitagawa Y, Nakamura N, Kadono M, Yoshida M, Hirata C, Wada K, Hasegawa G, Yoshikawa T. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentration and carotid atherosclerosis in men with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2005;181(2):339-344.
  228. Suzuki T, Yano Y, Sakamoto M, Uemura M, Yasuma T, Onishi Y, Sasaki R, Matsumoto K, Hayashi T, Maruyama-Furuta N, Akatsuka H, Gabazza EC, Sumida Y, Takei Y. Correlation of circulating dehydroepiandrosterone with activated protein C generation and carotid intima-media thickness in male patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):e41-46.
  229. Akishita M, Hashimoto M, Ohike Y, Ogawa S, Iijima K, Eto M, Ouchi Y. Association of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate levels with endothelial function in postmenopausal women with coronary risk factors. Hypertens Res. 2008;31(1):69-74.
  230. Gebre-Medhin G, Husebye ES, Mallmin H, Helstrom L, Berne C, Karlsson FA, Kampe O. Oral dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) replacement therapy in women with Addison's disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf).2000;52(6):775-780.
  231. Nestler JE, Barlascini CO, Clore JN, Blackard WG. Dehydroepiandrosterone reduces serum low density lipoprotein levels and body fat but does not alter insulin sensitivity in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1988;66(1):57-61.
  232. Casson PR, Faquin LC, Stentz FB, Straughn AB, Andersen RN, Abraham GE, Buster JE. Replacement of dehydroepiandrosterone enhances T-lymphocyte insulin binding in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril.1995;63(5):1027-1031.
  233. Basu R, Dalla Man C, Campioni M, Basu A, Nair KS, Jensen MD, Khosla S, Klee G, Toffolo G, Cobelli C, Rizza RA. Two years of treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone does not improve insulin secretion, insulin action, or postprandial glucose turnover in elderly men or women. Diabetes. 2007;56(3):753-766.
  234. Herrington DM. Dehydroepiandrosterone and coronary atherosclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;774:271-280.
  235. Herrington DM, Nanjee N, Achuff SC, Cameron DE, Dobbs B, Baughman KL. Dehydroepiandrosterone and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15(1 Pt 1):88-93.
  236. Shono N, Kumagai S, Higaki Y, Nishizumi M, Sasaki H. The relationships of testosterone, estradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate and sex hormone-binding globulin to lipid and glucose metabolism in healthy men. J Atheroscler Thromb. 1996;3(1):45-51.
  237. Bernini GP, Moretti A, Sgro M, Argenio GF, Barlascini CO, Cristofani R, Salvetti A. Influence of endogenous androgens on carotid wall in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2001;8(1):43-50.
  238. Bernini GP, Sgro M, Moretti A, Argenio GF, Barlascini CO, Cristofani R, Salvetti A. Endogenous androgens and carotid intimal-medial thickness in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(6):2008-2012.
  239. Alexandersen P, Haarbo J, Christiansen C. The relationship of natural androgens to coronary heart disease in males: a review. Atherosclerosis. 1996;125(1):1-13.
  240. Feldman HA, Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Mohr BA, Longcope C, McKinlay JB. Low dehydroepiandrosterone and ischemic heart disease in middle-aged men: prospective results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(1):79-89.
  241. Trivedi DP, Khaw KT. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and mortality in elderly men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(9):4171-4177.
  242. Hak AE, Witteman JC, de Jong FH, Geerlings MI, Hofman A, Pols HA. Low levels of endogenous androgens increase the risk of atherosclerosis in elderly men: the Rotterdam study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2002;87(8):3632-3639.
  243. Herrington DM, Gordon GB, Achuff SC, Trejo JF, Weisman HF, Kwiterovich PO, Jr., Pearson TA. Plasma dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16(6):862-870.
  244. Ishihara F, Hiramatsu K, Shigematsu S, Aizawa T, Niwa A, Takasu N, Yamada T, Matsuo K. Role of adrenal androgens in the development of arteriosclerosis as judged by pulse wave velocity and calcification of the aorta. Cardiology. 1992;80(5-6):332-338.
  245. Mitchell LE, Sprecher DL, Borecki IB, Rice T, Laskarzewski PM, Rao DC. Evidence for an association between dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and nonfatal, premature myocardial infarction in males. Circulation.1994;89(1):89-93.
  246. Barrett-Connor E, Goodman-Gruen D. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate does not predict cardiovascular death in postmenopausal women. The Rancho Bernardo Study. Circulation. 1995;91(6):1757-1760.
  247. Barrett-Connor E, Goodman-Gruen D. The epidemiology of DHEAS and cardiovascular disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;774:259-270.
  248. Berr C, Lafont S, Debuire B, Dartigues JF, Baulieu EE. Relationships of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in the elderly with functional, psychological, and mental status, and short-term mortality: a French community-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(23):13410-13415.
  249. Nakamura S, Yoshimura M, Nakayama M, Ito T, Mizuno Y, Harada E, Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Nakao K, Yasue H, Ogawa H. Possible association of heart failure status with synthetic balance between aldosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone in human heart. Circulation. 2004;110(13):1787-1793.
  250. Jankowska EA, Biel B, Majda J, Szklarska A, Lopuszanska M, Medras M, Anker SD, Banasiak W, Poole-Wilson PA, Ponikowski P. Anabolic deficiency in men with chronic heart failure: prevalence and detrimental impact on survival. Circulation. 2006;114(17):1829-1837.
  251. Formoso G, Chen H, Kim JA, Montagnani M, Consoli A, Quon MJ. Dehydroepiandrosterone mimics acute actions of insulin to stimulate production of both nitric oxide and endothelin 1 via distinct phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathways in vascular endothelium. Mol Endocrinol.2006;20(5):1153-1163.
  252. Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Inhibition of nitric oxide production aggravates myocardial hypoperfusion during exercise in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis. Circ Res. 1994;74(4):629-640.
  253. Wang L, Hao Q, Wang YD, Wang WJ, Li DJ. Protective effects of dehydroepiandrosterone on atherosclerosis in ovariectomized rabbits via alleviating inflammatory injury in endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 2011;214(1):47-57.
  254. Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):115-126.
  255. Libby P, Geng YJ, Aikawa M, Schoenbeck U, Mach F, Clinton SK, Sukhova GK, Lee RT. Macrophages and atherosclerotic plaque stability. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1996;7(5):330-335.
  256. Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2001;104(3):365-372.
  257. Libby P, Simon DI. Inflammation and thrombosis: the clot thickens. Circulation. 2001;103(13):1718-1720.
  258. Belosjorow S, Bolle I, Duschin A, Heusch G, Schulz R. TNF-alpha antibodies are as effective as ischemic preconditioning in reducing infarct size in rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284(3):H927-930.
  259. Liu D, Si H, Reynolds KA, Zhen W, Jia Z, Dillon JS. Dehydroepiandrosterone protects vascular endothelial cells against apoptosis through a Galphai protein-dependent activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and regulation of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 expression. Endocrinology. 2007;148(7):3068-3076.
  260. Chen J, Xu L, Huang C. DHEA inhibits vascular remodeling following arterial injury: a possible role in suppression of inflammation and oxidative stress derived from vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Cell Biochem.2014;388(1-2):75-84.
  261. Hautanen A, Manttari M, Manninen V, Tenkanen L, Huttunen JK, Frick MH, Adlercreutz H. Adrenal androgens and testosterone as coronary risk factors in the Helsinki Heart Study. Atherosclerosis. 1994;105(2):191-200.
  262. LaCroix AZ, Yano K, Reed DM. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, incidence of myocardial infarction, and extent of atherosclerosis in men. Circulation. 1992;86(5):1529-1535.
  263. Zumoff B, Troxler RG, O'Connor J, Rosenfeld RS, Kream J, Levin J, Hickman JR, Sloan AM, Walker W, Cook RL, Fukushima DK. Abnormal hormone levels in men with coronary artery disease. Arteriosclerosis.1982;2(1):58-67.
  264. Slowinska-Srzednicka J, Zgliczynski S, Ciswicka-Sznajderman M, Srzednicki M, Soszynski P, Biernacka M, Woroszylska M, Ruzyllo W, Sadowski Z. Decreased plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and dihydrotestosterone concentrations in young men after myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 1989;79(2-3):197-203.
  265. Haffner SM, Moss SE, Klein BE, Klein R. Sex hormones and DHEA-SO4 in relation to ischemic heart disease mortality in diabetic subjects. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes Care.1996;19(10):1045-1050.
  266. Golden SH, Maguire A, Ding J, Crouse JR, Cauley JA, Zacur H, Szklo M. Endogenous postmenopausal hormones and carotid atherosclerosis: a case-control study of the atherosclerosis risk in communities cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(5):437-445.
  267. Khaw KT, Tazuke S, Barrett-Connor E. Cigarette smoking and levels of adrenal androgens in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(26):1705-1709.
  268. Salvini S, Stampfer MJ, Barbieri RL, Hennekens CH. Effects of age, smoking and vitamins on plasma DHEAS levels: a cross-sectional study in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74(1):139-143.
  269. Wu FC, von Eckardstein A. Androgens and coronary artery disease. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(2):183-217.
  270. Kawano H, Yasue H, Kitagawa A, Hirai N, Yoshida T, Soejima H, Miyamoto S, Nakano M, Ogawa H. Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improves endothelial function and insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(7):3190-3195.
  271. Eich DM, Nestler JE, Johnson DE, Dworkin GH, Ko D, Wechsler AS, Hess ML. Inhibition of accelerated coronary atherosclerosis with dehydroepiandrosterone in the heterotopic rabbit model of cardiac transplantation. Circulation. 1993;87(1):261-269.
  272. Gordon GB, Bush DE, Weisman HF. Reduction of atherosclerosis by administration of dehydroepiandrosterone. A study in the hypercholesterolemic New Zealand white rabbit with aortic intimal injury. J Clin Invest.1988;82(2):712-720.
  273. Aragno M, Parola S, Brignardello E, Mauro A, Tamagno E, Manti R, Danni O, Boccuzzi G. Dehydroepiandrosterone prevents oxidative injury induced by transient ischemia/reperfusion in the brain of diabetic rats. Diabetes. 2000;49(11):1924-1931.
  274. Ayhan S, Tugay C, Norton S, Araneo B, Siemionow M. Dehydroepiandrosterone protects the microcirculation of muscle flaps from ischemia-reperfusion injury by reducing the expression of adhesion molecules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(7):2286-2294.
  275. Kinlay S, Creager MA, Fukumoto M, Hikita H, Fang JC, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide regulates arterial elasticity in human arteries in vivo. Hypertension. 2001;38(5):1049-1053.
  276. Weiss EP, Villareal DT, Ehsani AA, Fontana L, Holloszy JO. Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in older adults improves indices of arterial stiffness. Aging Cell. 2012;11(5):876-884.
  277. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet.2012;380(9859):2197-2223.
  278. Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21(st) Century: A Snapshot of the Burden, Epidemiology, and Quality of Life. Stroke Res Treat. 2018;2018:3238165.
  279. Baulieu EE, Robel P. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) as neuroactive neurosteroids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(8):4089-4091.
  280. Lapchak PA, Chapman DF, Nunez SY, Zivin JA. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is neuroprotective in a reversible spinal cord ischemia model: possible involvement of GABA(A) receptors. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1953-1956; discussion 1957.
  281. Corpechot C, Robel P, Axelson M, Sjovall J, Baulieu EE. Characterization and measurement of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(8):4704-4707.
  282. Baulieu EE. Neuroactive neurosteroids: dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA sulphate. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999;88(433):78-80.
  283. Jimenez MC, Sun Q, Schurks M, Chiuve S, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rexrode KM. Low dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke among women. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1784-1789.
  284. Pappa T, Vemmos K, Saltiki K, Mantzou E, Stamatelopoulos K, Alevizaki M. Severity and outcome of acute stroke in women: relation to adrenal sex steroid levels. Metabolism. 2012;61(1):84-91.
  285. Blum CA, Mueller C, Schuetz P, Fluri F, Trummler M, Mueller B, Katan M, Christ-Crain M. Prognostic value of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate and other parameters of adrenal function in acute ischemic stroke. PLoS One.2013;8(5):e63224.
  286. Hampl V, Bibova J, Povysilova V, Herget J. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate reduces chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in rats. Eur Respir J. 2003;21(5):862-865.
  287. Bonnet S, Dumas-de-La-Roque E, Begueret H, Marthan R, Fayon M, Dos Santos P, Savineau JP, Baulieu EE. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) prevents and reverses chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(16):9488-9493.
  288. Debonneuil EH, Quillard J, Baulieu EE. Hypoxia and dehydroepiandrosterone in old age: a mouse survival study. Respir Res. 2006;7(1):144.
  289. Oka M, Karoor V, Homma N, Nagaoka T, Sakao E, Golembeski SM, Limbird J, Imamura M, Gebb SA, Fagan KA, McMurtry IF. Dehydroepiandrosterone upregulates soluble guanylate cyclase and inhibits hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;74(3):377-387.
  290. Farrukh IS, Peng W, Orlinska U, Hoidal JR. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: a Ca(2+)-activated K(+)-channel opener. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(2):L186-195.
  291. Gupte SA, Li KX, Okada T, Sato K, Oka M. Inhibitors of pentose phosphate pathway cause vasodilation: involvement of voltage-gated potassium channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;301(1):299-305.
  292. Dessouroux A, Akwa Y, Baulieu EE. DHEA decreases HIF-1alpha accumulation under hypoxia in human pulmonary artery cells: potential role in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;109(1-2):81-89.
  293. Patel D, Kandhi S, Kelly M, Neo BH, Wolin MS. Dehydroepiandrosterone promotes pulmonary artery relaxation by NADPH oxidation-elicited subunit dimerization of protein kinase G 1alpha. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014;306(4):L383-391.
  294. Ventetuolo CE, Ouyang P, Bluemke DA, Tandri H, Barr RG, Bagiella E, Cappola AR, Bristow MR, Johnson C, Kronmal RA, Kizer JR, Lima JA, Kawut SM. Sex hormones are associated with right ventricular structure and function: The MESA-right ventricle study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(5):659-667.
  295. Dumas de La Roque E, Savineau JP, Metivier AC, Billes MA, Kraemer JP, Doutreleau S, Jougon J, Marthan R, Moore N, Fayon M, Baulieu EE, Dromer C. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) improves pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a pilot study. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2012;73(1):20-25.
  296. Straub RH, Vogl D, Gross V, Lang B, Scholmerich J, Andus T. Association of humoral markers of inflammation and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate or cortisol serum levels in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(11):2197-2202.
  297. de la Torre B, Hedman M, Befrits R. Blood and tissue dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate levels and their relationship to chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1998;16(5):579-582.
  298. Andus T, Klebl F, Rogler G, Bregenzer N, Scholmerich J, Straub RH. Patients with refractory Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis respond to dehydroepiandrosterone: a pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(3):409-414.
  299. van Vollenhoven RF, Engleman EG, McGuire JL. An open study of dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(9):1305-1310.
  300. van Vollenhoven RF, Engleman EG, McGuire JL. Dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(12):1826-1831.
  301. van Vollenhoven RF, Morabito LM, Engleman EG, McGuire JL. Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus with dehydroepiandrosterone: 50 patients treated up to 12 months. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(2):285-289.
  302. van Vollenhoven RF, Park JL, Genovese MC, West JP, McGuire JL. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of dehydroepiandrosterone in severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 1999;8(3):181-187.
  303. Chang DM, Lan JL, Lin HY, Luo SF. Dehydroepiandrosterone treatment of women with mild-to-moderate systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum.2002;46(11):2924-2927.
  304. Wilder RL. Adrenal and gonadal steroid hormone deficiency in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996;44:10-12.
  305. Kanik KS, Chrousos GP, Schumacher HR, Crane ML, Yarboro CH, Wilder RL. Adrenocorticotropin, glucocorticoid, and androgen secretion in patients with new onset synovitis/rheumatoid arthritis: relations with indices of inflammation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(4):1461-1466.
  306. Yukioka M, Komatsubara Y, Yukioka K, Toyosaki-Maeda T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T. Adrenocorticotropic hormone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with glucocorticoids. Mod Rheumatol. 2006;16(1):30-35.
  307. Danenberg HD, Alpert G, Lustig S, Ben-Nathan D. Dehydroepiandrosterone protects mice from endotoxin toxicity and reduces tumor necrosis factor production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36(10):2275-2279.
  308. Daynes RA, Araneo BA, Ershler WB, Maloney C, Li GZ, Ryu SY. Altered regulation of IL-6 production with normal aging. Possible linkage to the age-associated decline in dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulfated derivative. J Immunol. 1993;150(12):5219-5230.
  309. Keller ET, Chang C, Ershler WB. Inhibition of NFkappaB activity through maintenance of IkappaBalpha levels contributes to dihydrotestosterone-mediated repression of the interleukin-6 promoter. J Biol Chem.1996;271(42):26267-26275.
  310. Williams PJ, Jones RH, Rademacher TW. Reduction in the incidence and severity of collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice, using exogenous dehydroepiandrosterone. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(5):907-911.
  311. Kobayashi Y, Tagawa N, Muraoka K, Okamoto Y, Nishida M. Participation of endogenous dehydroepiandrosterone and its sulfate in the pathology of collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Biol Pharm Bull.2003;26(11):1596-1599.
  312. Rontzsch A, Thoss K, Petrow PK, Henzgen S, Brauer R. Amelioration of murine antigen-induced arthritis by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Inflamm Res. 2004;53(5):189-198.
  313. Giltay EJ, van Schaardenburg D, Gooren LJ, Dijkmans BA. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;876:152-154.
  314. Cutolo M. Sex hormone adjuvant therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000;26(4):881-895.
  315. Marwah A, Marwah P, Lardy H. Ergosteroids. VI. Metabolism of dehydroepiandrosterone by rat liver in vitro: a liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric study. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci.2002;767(2):285-299.
  316. Gambacciani M, Monteleone P, Sacco A, Genazzani AR. Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;17(1):139-147.
  317. Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Towards an integrated model for breast cancer etiology: the lifelong interplay of genes, lifestyle, and hormones. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(5):213-218.
  318. Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer MS. Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(12):1531-1543.
  319. Kaaks R, Berrino F, Key T, et al. Serum sex steroids in premenopausal women and breast cancer risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(10):755-765.
  320. Tworoger SS, Missmer SA, Eliassen AH, Spiegelman D, Folkerd E, Dowsett M, Barbieri RL, Hankinson SE. The association of plasma DHEA and DHEA sulfate with breast cancer risk in predominantly premenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(5):967-971.
  321. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, Reeves G, Endogenous H, Breast Cancer Collaborative G. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(8):606-616.
  322. Morris KT, Toth-Fejel S, Schmidt J, Fletcher WS, Pommier RF. High dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate predicts breast cancer progression during new aromatase inhibitor therapy and stimulates breast cancer cell growth in tissue culture: a renewed role for adrenalectomy. Surgery. 2001;130(6):947-953.
  323. Schwartz AG, Pashko LL. Cancer prevention with dehydroepiandrosterone and non-androgenic structural analogs. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1995;22:210-217.
  324. Maggiolini M, Donze O, Jeannin E, Ando S, Picard D. Adrenal androgens stimulate the proliferation of breast cancer cells as direct activators of estrogen receptor alpha. Cancer Res. 1999;59(19):4864-4869.
  325. Stoll BA. Dietary supplements of dehydroepiandrosterone in relation to breast cancer risk. Eur J Clin Nutr.1999;53(10):771-775.
  326. Genazzani AD, Stomati M, Bernardi F, Pieri M, Rovati L, Genazzani AR. Long-term low-dose dehydroepiandrosterone oral supplementation in early and late postmenopausal women modulates endocrine parameters and synthesis of neuroactive steroids. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1495-1501.
  327. Arnold JT. DHEA metabolism in prostate: For better or worse? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;301(1-2):83-88.
  328. Schwartz AG. Dehydroepiandrosterone, Cancer, and Aging. Aging Dis. 2022;13(2):423-432.
  329. Scheffers CS, Armstrong S, Cantineau AEP, Farquhar C. Dehydroepiandrosterone for menopausal women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014(4).

Guidelines for Screening, Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Children and Adolescents

ABSTRACT

 

Clinical practice guidelines are developed to create a synthesis of evidence which, in turn, leads to recommendations that improve clinical decision-making. Guidelines are helpful for busy clinicians to improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary practice variation. Historically, guidelines were largely based on expert opinion. The modern approach to guideline development includes a complete review and grading of the available evidence.  The evidence is then used to construct recommendations for clinical practice with grades based on the level of evidence to support them. Pediatric lipid guidelines were first published in 1992. These guidelines included a screening approach based on family history and recommended a population approach to improve diet and physical activity in all children and adolescents, as well as a high-risk approach. This approach focused on treatment with lifestyle or with pharmacologic agents for those identified at high risk. The 2011 Integrated Guidelines provide the most comprehensive and up-to-date approach to pediatric dyslipidemia. In these guidelines, universal screening in 9-11-year-olds is recommended to identify children with genetic dyslipidemia or more lifestyle- related dyslipidemia. Pharmacologic treatment is recommended only for a small group of children and adolescents with marked elevation of LDL-C due to genetic dyslipidemias. New guidelines from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology largely support the Integrated Guidelines.

 

CLINICAL PRACTICE AND GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT

 

Clinical practice guidelines are becoming an increasingly important aspect of clinical care. Guidelines are designed to create a synthesis of evidence, including expert opinion where little evidence exists, to provide a straightforward approach to clinical decision making. Guideline development recognizes that the average practicing clinician has difficulty keeping abreast of developing medical science across a wide range of areas. This is especially true for generalists in primary care who must cover a wide range of medical issues with their patients. Guidelines are particularly helpful where there may be conflicting evidence or a range of levels of quality among studies included in the evidence base. In addition, when guidelines are widely utilized, they help to diminish unnecessary practice variation, improve outcomes, and potentially can reduce costs by providing a more efficient pathway to appropriate diagnosis and treatment while eliminating unnecessary tests and procedures.

 

 

While the value of well-done clinical practice guidelines is now widely accepted, concerns have been expressed historically about their development (1). These concerns include the fact that there were no standards for the guideline development process or guideline committee composition. This sometimes resulted in concerns about the balance in expertise. In addition, relationships between committee members and pharmaceutical companies or other entities were often not disclosed, making potential conflicts of interest difficult to discern. There also have been no universal standards for the approach to reviewing and grading the evidence. This can lead to selective inclusion of research or to different approaches to weighting of the evidence. There has also been no standard approach to translating the evidence review into graded recommendations, which is the aspect of the process that is most useful, and most used by clinicians. Often, clinical recommendations were presented as unanimous when, in fact, there was substantial discussion and even disagreement on the part of the committee members. This lack of a standard accepted process has sometimes led to clinical practice guidelines from different organizations that presented very different recommendations on the same topic, which potentially increases the confusion of clinicians even more.

 

As more experience has been gained with the process of guideline development, the process has improved over time. Presently, the government and health organizations which oversee guideline construction now generally focus on more balanced committee membership and a more transparent approach to potential conflicts of interest. They require completion of a documented review of the evidence, increased transparency of committee discussion, and improved identification of expert opinion in the guideline development process. However, key elements of the process remain controversial. Good guidelines require the development of good key questions at the onset of the process. Constructing the best key questions still seems more of an art than a scientific endeavor. In addition, different organizations have different approaches to grading evidence and to constructing and grading recommendations from the evidence. For example, some organizations will essentially accept only evidence derived from randomized controlled clinical trials. While those trials do represent the strongest science, they are also the most difficult and expensive studies to perform. Clinical trials by their nature often address very narrow scientific and clinical questions. In addition, there are many areas that remain unaddressed by clinical trials for a variety of reasons, including areas where such trials are difficult to perform or even may be considered unethical, as well as areas where funding for such studies has not been available.

 

In the past, clinical practice guidelines have been viewed as static documents. This is not appropriate as the science that informs clinical decision making is always evolving. In the case where the science is rapidly evolving, a guideline may be out of date shortly after it is published. Thus, guideline creation should best be viewed as a continuous improvement process with new studies reviewed and graded as they become available. Newer electronic data bases and electronic health records make this approach to ongoing refinement of guidelines more feasible.

 

Unfortunately, guidelines are often not implemented in practice. Research has demonstrated that there is often a lag, which can be as long as a decade or more between development and routine implementation of guidelines (2). This suggests that clinicians may be implementing treatment that is not supported by the best evidence. This is an area where more research is needed to determine best practices to encourage and enhance utilization of guidelines once they are developed.

 

GUIDELINES FOR PEDIATRIC DYSLIPIDEMIA

 

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) 1992

 

The first guidelines on pediatric lipid management were developed by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and were published in 1992 (3). The guidelines were developed by a pediatric committee that worked in parallel with the NCEP adult panel of experts. The guideline construction did not involve a complete, formal evidence review with grading of the evidence.  Much of the report was based on expert opinion and extrapolation of data collected in adults to create an approach to pediatric patients. The report presented two approaches to pediatric dyslipidemia. The first was a population-based approach, which focused on diet and lifestyle issues for the entire population. The second was focused on identification and treatment of higher risk children and adolescents. The goal of the population approach was to prevent dyslipidemia from developing in the first place. This has come to be called primordial prevention. The population approach encourages healthy diet and physical activity for all children and adolescents. This approach includes all family members, as well.

 

The individualized approach aimed to identify and treat children and adolescents who are at greatest risk for having high blood cholesterol as adults and who had an increased lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In the individual approach, the committee recommended selective screening of children who have a family history of premature cardiovascular disease or at least one parent with elevated serum cholesterol. This approach assumed that all adults would have their lipid levels tested as part of routine care. The committee considered universal screening, but decided that the selective screening approach would recognize the influence of genes and environment and would be more efficient. This selective screening approach, sometimes referred to as cascade screening, is used in many European countries to identify children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The committee also presented cut points for acceptable, borderline and high elevated LDL-C based on percentiles from the Lipid Research Clinical Prevalence Study (4). The panel then used these cut points to establish an approach to initiation of and goals for diet therapy. The panel developed separate cut points derived from studies of adults for initiation of drug therapy. They developed a two-step approach to diet therapy with Step 2 having greater restriction of saturated fat and cholesterol in the diet. For drug therapy, the panel recommended the use of bile acid sequestering agents for routine use. This report did not provide a focus on triglycerides or HDL-C and did not recommend the use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors for pharmacologic therapy.

 

These 1992 Guidelines served as the approach to screening, diagnosis, and treatment for many years. They also served as the basis for research with investigators studying the effectiveness of a selective approach to screening and other aspects of the guidelines (5). In addition, clinical trials were launched to study the effect of dietary and pharmacologic intervention in children and adolescents with dyslipidemia (6,7).

 

As new evidence became available, some of which supported the 1992 Guidelines and others which suggested alternative approaches, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (8,9) and the American Heart Association (10,11) empaneled committees to produce guidelines and recommendations, which were refinements of the original 1992 guidelines. None of these efforts included a formal, complete review and grading of the evidence or grading of the recommendations.

 

United States Preventive Services Task Force 2016

 

In a parallel process, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) initiated a review of the evidence regarding cholesterol screening in children and adolescents (12). This review was updated in 2016. The USPSTF uses a formal evidence review and grading based on a series of key questions. The USPSTF has reported an “I” recommendation on lipid screening. This means that they found insufficient evidence for or against lipid screening in children and adolescents. This is a call for more research in this area.

 

There are several reasons why an “I” recommendation resulted from the USPSTF review of the evidence. The first has to do with the key questions asked as the framework for the review. A close inspection of the key questions demonstrates that several of the key questions are probably not answerable because the types of studies needed to answer the questions cannot reasonably be done. The USPSTF also requires a very high standard for research, including randomized clinical trials of screening, which are much less likely to be done in children than in adults.

 

The 2016 USPSTF review of cholesterol screening was improved in several ways compared to previous reviews (13-15). First, there was a separate analysis of the evidence to support screening for individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia. In previous USPSTF reviews, these individuals had been excluded from consideration. The 2016 USPSTF review also included a review of the evidence to screen for multifactorial dyslipidemia. The key questions were also modified somewhat from previous reviews. However, the answer for key questions, such as:

 

1)   Does screening for dyslipidemia in asymptomatic children and adolescents delay or reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction or stroke in adulthood, or

 

2)   Does treatment of dyslipidemia with lifestyle modification or lipid lowering medications in children and adolescents delay or reduce the incidence of adult myocardial infarction and stroke events?

 

These questions still require studies that are virtually impossible to do. Such studies would require randomization of young individuals and following them for decades to observe the outcomes. Utilization of these key questions make it quite difficult for the USPSTF to achieve anything other than an “I” statement for pediatric lipid screening.

 

There were several commentaries of the 2016 USPSF reviews that serve to put the results in broader context (16, 17). These commentaries pointed out that a statement of insufficient evidence for or against lipid screening was not particularly helpful for the clinician on the front line and that other health organizations, such as the American Heart Association and the American Academy of Pediatricians have recommended lipid screening in children and adolescents based on separate review and grading of the evidence.

 

It is important to note that an “I” statement from the USPSTF should not be taken as a recommendation against lipid screening. The USPSTF does recommend against screening when the evidence demonstrates that screening or treatment are ineffective or harmful. In the face of an “I” statement and given the high bar for evidence required by the USPSTF, it is up to individual clinicians and health organizations to weight the available evidence and decide on a course of action.

 

National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 2011

 

In 2011, the results of an NHLBI panel, which performed a complete review and grading of the evidence for screening and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents, including dyslipidemia, were published as part of an integrated approach to CVD risk factor evaluation and management (18, 19). These Integrated Guidelines represent the most comprehensive, up-to-date approach to lipid screening, diagnosis, and treatment and are a departure from previous guidelines. First, the guidelines recommended universal screening for lipid disorders. This means that all children should have their lipids tested one time between the ages of 9-11. This can be performed with either a fasting lipid profile or a non-fasting test to evaluate non-HDL-C. This universal approach was recommended because studies showed that using only a selective screening approach based on family history would potentially miss 30-60% of children and adolescents with substantial elevations of cholesterol (5). The universal screening approach is largely designed to identify children with genetic dyslipidemia, such as familial hypercholesterolemia. However, it will also identify children with dyslipidemia, largely elevated triglycerides and low HDL-C, due to lifestyle factors and obesity.

 

The Integrated Guidelines continued to support both a population and a high-risk approach to dyslipidemia. The recommendation for diet for the general population is the Cardiovascular Health Integrated Lifestyle Diet (CHILD) 1. For higher-risk patients identified through screening, the CHILD 2-LDL diet was recommended if the LDL-C was elevated. This diet further restricts intake of saturated fat and cholesterol in the diet. For those with elevated triglycerides and low HDL-C, the CHILD 2-TG diet was recommended. This diet includes reduced intake of simple sugars in addition to reduction in saturated fat.

 

The Integrated Guidelines presented statin agents as first-line pharmacologic treatment for substantial elevation of LDL-C (>190mg/dL) with no other risk factors, or >160mg/dL with 1 high level or ≥ 2 moderate-level risk factors in children and adolescents age 10 years and older.

 

The Integrated Guidelines have not been without controversy (20-22). In addition, uptake of the Integrated Guidelines has been less than optimum (23,24). One potential reason for confusion regarding the guidelines is the potential concern about the impact of obesity on dyslipidemia. This result, in part, derives from a misunderstanding of the difference between the issues related to genetic forms of dyslipidemia, such as FH, and those that are largely due to lifestyle. It needs to be clarified that most individuals who have an LDL-C level in the range where medication would be recommended have a genetic form of dyslipidemia, usually heterozygous FH. Children and adolescents with lifestyle-based dyslipidemia rarely have LDL-C levels that would trigger the recommendation for pharmacologic treatment. Obesity results in elevated triglycerides and low HDL-C with only a modest increase in LDL-C. These children and adolescents should be treated with changes in lifestyle, including a more healthful diet and increased levels of physical activity. Estimates are that fewer than 1% of children and adolescents would qualify for statin treatment (25).

 

American Heart Association (AHA) and the National Lipid Association (NLA)

 

This potential confusion over different aspects of dyslipidemia and their consequences have led to American Heart Association (AHA) and the National Lipid Association (NLA) to sharpen the focus on familial hypercholesterolemia (25-27). While these scientific statements did not include a formal review and grading of the evidence, they provided a new focus for clinicians and may simplify the clinical approach to pediatric dyslipidemia. Clinicians should probably focus first on identification and treatment of individuals with the array of genetic defects that underlie FH and their family members who also have this genetic abnormality. Because this genetic defect occurs in approximately 1:250 individuals, it is one of the most prevalent genetic diseases. Individuals with heterozygous FH have substantial and often marked elevation of LDL-C. These individuals have been shown to be at increased lifetime risk of atherosclerotic CVD and are at risk for adverse outcomes in their 30’s, 40’s, 50’s and 60’s. Unfortunately, the first clinical sign of the disease for these patients may be a myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death. Because this is often an asymptomatic condition, particularly in childhood, lipid testing is essentially the only way to identify affected individuals. Treatment with statins and other pharmacologic agents can be quite effective at lowering LDL-C levels and decreasing the risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

 

American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines 2018

 

The most recent clinical practice guidelines regarding dyslipidemia are the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines published in 2018 (28). These guidelines included a complete evidence review and systematic grading of the evidence and the recommendations. These guidelines largely focus on the management of blood cholesterol in adults, but also included a section on children. These guidelines indicate that, in children (age 10-19 years of age) and young adults (20-39 years of age), priority should be given to evaluation of lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and promotion of lifestyle risk reduction.

 

In the AHA/ACC 2018 guidelines, screening for dyslipidemia based on family history is given a B-nonrandomized level of evidence and a IIa strength of recommendation (28). Universal screening for dyslipidemia once between age 9-11 years and once between age 17-21 is given a B-nonrandomized level of evidence and a IIb strength of recommendation. The B-NR level of evidence indicates moderate quality of evidence from observational studies. The class IIa recommendation is a moderate recommendation, while a class IIb recommendation is considered weaker (might be reasonable).

 

For treatment of dyslipidemia in children and adolescents, lifestyle approaches receive a level A for the evidence and have a class I strength of recommendation. For children and adolescents age 10 and over with an LDL-C persistently above 190mg/dL or above 160mg/dL with a clinical presentation consistent with familial hypercholesterolemia who do not adequately respond to lifestyle change after 3-6 months, initiating statin therapy received a B-randomized level of evidence and a class IIa recommendation (22).

 

These newest guidelines are essentially in line with the 2011 Integrated Guidelines from the NHLBI. However, they also emphasize that more high-quality evidence is needed. This should drive research efforts in the areas of screening and management for pediatric dyslipidemia.

 

CONCLUSION

 

In conclusion, the evidence related to risk, identification, and effective treatment of dyslipidemia has continued to expand. This has allowed development of guidelines for management of pediatric patients with dyslipidemia. Unfortunately, uptake of these guidelines by primary care clinicians has been slow. There is a need for ongoing high-quality studies in this area so that new study results can be included in subsequent evidence reviews and clinical practice guidelines can be improved.

 

A major limiting factor in the development of Guidelines regarding the screening, identification, and treatment of dyslipidemia in children and adolescents is the lack of studies which produce the evidence to support such guidelines. There are examples of guidelines in pediatric healthcare that have been well accepted based on evidence. These include US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for screening for obesity using Body Mass Index (22), guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (23), and for the diagnosis and management of an initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants from the American Academy of Pediatrics (24). These guidelines have generally been accepted in pediatric practice, although not always without controversy (25). As we seek to improve outcomes through better standardization of delivery of healthcare, improved evidence-based guidelines will be increasingly important.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Sniderman AD, Furberg Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA. 2009;301:429- 31.
  2. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii-iv, 1-72.
  3. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): highlights of the report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Pediatrics. 1992;89:495- 501.
  4. Tamir I, Heiss G, Glueck CJ, Christensen B, Kwiterovich P, Rifkind BM. Lipid and lipoprotein distributions in white children ages 6-19 The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34:27-39.
  5. Ritchie SK1, Murphy EC, Ice C, Cottrell LA, Minor V, Elliott E, Neal Universal versus targeted blood cholesterol screening among youth: The CARDIAC project. Pediatrics. 2010;126:260-5.
  6. The Writing Group for the DISC Collaborative Research Group. Efficacy and safety of lowering dietary intake of fat and cholesterol in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC). The Writing Group for the DISC Collaborative Research Group. JAMA. 1995;273:1429-35
  7. McCrindle BW1, Ose L, Marais AD. Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hyperlipidemia: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003;143:74-80.
  8. American Academy of Committee on Nutrition. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Nutrition. Cholesterol in childhood. Pediatrics. 1998;101(1 Pt 1):141-7.
  9. Daniels SR, Greer FR; Committee on Lipid screening and cardiovascular health in childhood. Pediatrics. 2008;122:198-208.
  10. Kavey RE, Daniels SR, Lauer RM, Atkins DL, Hayman LL, Taubert K; American Heart Association. American Heart Association guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in Circulation. 2003;107:1562- 6.
  11. McCrindle BW, Urbina EM, Dennison BA, Jacobson MS, Steinberger J, Rocchini AP, Hayman LL, Daniels SR; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee; American Heart Association Council of Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Drug therapy of high-risk lipid abnormalities in children and adolescents: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee, Council of Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, with the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2007;115:1948-67.
  12. US Preventive Services Task Screening for lipid disorders in children: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e215-9.
  13. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;316:625-33.
  14. Lozano P, Henrikson NB, Dunn J, Morrison CC, Nguyen M, Blasi PR, Anderson L, Whitlock EP. Lipid screening in childhood and adolescence for detection of familial hypercholesterolemia: Evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;316(6):645-55.
  15. Lozano P, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Dunn J, Nguyen M, Blasi PR, Whitlock EP. Lipid screening in childhood and adolescence for detection of multifactorial dyslipidemia: Evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;316(6):634-44.
  16. Urbina EM, de Ferranti SD. Lipid screening in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2016;316(6):589-91.
  17. Daniels SR. On the US Preventive Services Task Force Statement on screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents: One step forward and 2 steps sideways. JAMA Pediatrics. 2016;170(10):932-34.
  18. Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Expert panel on integrated guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents: summary report. Pediatrics. 2011;128 Suppl 5:S213-56.
  19. Gidding SS, Daniels SR, Kavey RE; Expert Panel on Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Developing the 2011 Integrated Pediatric Guidelines for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e1311-9.
  20. Newman TB, Pletcher MJ, Hulley Overly aggressive new guidelines for lipid screening in children: evidence of a broken process. Pediatrics. 2012;130:349-52.
  21. McCrindle BW1, Kwiterovich PO, McBride PE, Daniels SR, Kavey Guidelines for lipid screening in children and adolescents: bringing evidence to the debate. Pediatrics. 2012;130:353-6.
  22. Gillman MW, Daniels Is universal pediatric lipid screening justified? JAMA. 2012;307:259-60.
  23. Valle CW, Binns HJ, Quadri-Sheriff M, Benuck I, Patel Physicians' Lack of Adherence to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Guidelines for Pediatric Lipid Screening. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015;54:1200-5.
  24. de Ferranti SD, Rodday AM, Parsons SK, Cull WL, O’Connor KG, Daniels SR, Leslie LK. Cholesterol screening and treatment practices and preferences: A survey of United States pediatricians. J Pediatr. 2017;185:99-105.
  25. McCrindle BW1, Tyrrell PN, Kavey Will obesity increase the proportion of children and adolescents recommended for a statin? Circulation. 2013;128:2162-5.
  26. Gidding SS, Champagne MA, de Ferranti SD, Defesche J, Ito MK, Knowles JW, McCrindle B, Raal F, Rader D, Santos RD, Lopes-Virella M, Watts GF, Wierzbicki AS; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Young Committee of Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. The Agenda for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:2167-92.
  27. Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ, Robinson JG, Daniels SR, Gidding SS, de Ferranti SD, Ito MK, McGowan MP, Moriarty PM, Cromwell WC, Ross JL, Ziajka PE. Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5:133-40.
  28. Writing Committee, Cholesterol Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e1046-e1081.

 

Gynecomastia: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

ABSTRACT

 

Gynecomastia is a relatively common disorder. Its causes range from benign physiological processes to rare neoplasms. To diagnose the etiology of the gynecomastia, the clinician must understand the hormonal factors involved in breast development. Parallel to female breast development, estrogen, growth hormone (GH), and IGF-1 are required for breast growth in males. Since a balance exists between estrogen and androgens in males, any disease state or medication that increases circulating estrogens or decreases circulating androgens, causing an elevation in the estrogen to androgen ratio, can induce gynecomastia. Due to the diversity of possible etiologies, including a neoplasm, performing a careful history and physical is imperative. Once gynecomastia has been diagnosed, treatment of the underlying cause is warranted. If no underlying cause is discovered, then close observation is appropriate. If the gynecomastia is severe and of recent onset, medical therapy can be attempted, and if ineffective, glandular tissue can be removed surgically.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

This chapter reviews the ontogeny and physiology of breast development; factors that influence breast enlargement in the male; the differential diagnosis of gynecomastia; the process of diagnostic investigation; and treatment of gynecomastia.

 

BREAST ONTOGENY AND DEVELOPMENT

 

Male breast development occurs in an analogous fashion to female breast development. At puberty in the female, a complex hormonal interplay occurs resulting in growth and maturation of the adult female breast.

 

In early fetal life, epithelial cells, derived from the epidermis of the area programmed to become the areola, proliferate into ducts, which connect to the nipple at the skin's surface. The blind ends of these ducts bud to form alveolar structures in later gestation. With the decline in fetal prolactin and placental estrogen and progesterone at birth, the infantile breast regresses until puberty (1).

 

During thelarche in females, the initial clinical appearance of the breast bud and growth and division of the ducts occur, giving rise to club-shaped terminal end buds, which then form alveolar buds. Approximately a dozen alveolar buds will cluster around a terminal duct, forming the type 1 lobule. The type 1 lobule will mature into types 2 and 3 lobules, called ductules. The number of alveolar buds increases to as many as 50 in type 2 and 80 in type 3 lobules. The entire differentiation process takes years after the onset of puberty and, if pregnancy is not achieved, may never be completed (2). On the contrary, there is usually no further development of breast because of the rising testosterone concentrations at puberty. Some peri-pubertal boys may transiently develop type 1 lobules that may undergo atrophy at a later stage.

 

HORMONAL REGULATION OF BREAST DEVELOPMENT

 

The initiation and progression of breast development involves a coordinated effort of pituitary and ovarian hormones, as well as local mediators (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Hormones affecting growth and differentiation of breast tissue.

ESTROGEN, GH AND IGF-1, PROGESTERONE, & PROLACTIN

 

Estrogen and progesterone act in an integrative fashion to stimulate normal adult female breast development. Estrogen, acting through its estrogen receptor (ER), promotes ductal growth, while progesterone, acting through its receptor (PR), promotes alveolar development (1). This is demonstrated by experiments in ER knockout mice that display grossly impaired ductal development, whereas PR knockout mice possess significant ductal development, but lack alveolar differentiation (3, 4).

 

Although estrogens and progestogens are vital to mammary growth, they are ineffective in the absence of anterior pituitary hormones (5). Thus, neither estrogen alone nor estrogen plus progesterone can sustain breast development without other mediators, such as GH and IGF-1. This was confirmed by studies involving the administration of estrogen and GH to hypophysectomized and oophorectomized female rats that resulted in breast ductal development. The GH effects on ductal growth are mediated through stimulation of IGF-1. This is demonstrated by studies of estrogen and GH administration to IGF-1 knockout rats that showed significantly decreased mammary development when compared to age-matched IGF-1- intact controls. Combined estrogen and IGF-1 treatment in these IGF-1 knockout rats restored mammary growth (6, 7). In addition, Walden et al. demonstrated that GH-stimulated production of IGF-1 mRNA in the mammary gland itself, suggesting that IGF-1 production in the stromal compartment of the mammary gland acts locally to promote breast development (8). Furthermore, other data indicates that estrogen promotes GH secretion and increases GH levels, stimulating the production of IGF-1, which synergizes with estrogen to induce ductal development. In a population-based study of healthy boys and adolescents, IGF-I levels were found to be elevated in boys with pubertal gynecomastia compared with boys without gynecomastia suggesting that the GH-IGF-I axis may be involved in the pathogenesis of pubertal gynecomastia (9). Indeed, dating back to 1950, it had already been reported that gynecomastia was found in a young patient with acromegaly (97).

 

Progesterone has minimal effects on breast development without concomitant anterior pituitary hormones, indicating that progesterone also interacts closely with pituitary hormones. For example, prolonged treatment of dogs with progestogens such as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or with proligestone was associated with increased GH and IGF-1 levels, suggesting that progesterone may stimulate GH secretion (10). In addition, clinical studies have correlated maximal cell proliferation to specific phases in the female menstrual cycle. For example, maximal proliferation occurs not during the follicular phase when estrogens reach peak levels and progesterone is low (less than 1 ng/mL [3.1nmol/mL]), but rather, it occurs during the luteal phase when progesterone reaches concentrations of 10-20 ng/mL (31- 62 nmol/mL) and estrogen concentrations are two to three times lower than in the follicular phase (11). Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies of ER and PR showed that the highest percentage of proliferating cells, found almost exclusively in the type 1 lobules, contained the highest percentage of ER and PR positive cells (2). Similarly, there is immunocytological presence of ER, PR, and androgen receptors (AR) in gynecomastia and male breast carcinoma. ER, PR and AR expression was observed in 100% (30/30) of gynecomastia cases (12). Given these data and the fact that PR knockout mice lack alveolar development in breast tissue, it seems that progesterone, analogous to estrogen, increases GH secretion and acts through the PR on mammary cells to enhance breast development and alveolar differentiation (13, 4).

 

Prolactin is another anterior pituitary hormone integral to breast development. Prolactin is not only secreted by the pituitary gland but may be produced by normal mammary tissue epithelial cells and breast tumors (14, 15). Prolactin stimulates epithelial cell proliferation only in the presence of estrogen and enhances lobulo-alveolar differentiation only with concomitant progesterone. Gynecomastia is seen rarely in hyperprolactinemia, possibly because of the low estrogen levels due to suppression of LH secretion. Previously, receptors for LH/ human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) have been found in male and female breast tissues, but their functional roles remain to be determined (16).

 

ANDROGEN AND AROMATASE

 

Estrogen effects on the breast is the result of circulating estradiol levels or locally produced estrogens. Aromatase P450 catalyzes the conversion of the C19 steroids-- androstenedione, testosterone, and 16- α- hydroxyandrostenedione-- to estrone, estradiol-17β and estriol. As such, an overabundance of substrate (e.g., testosterone) or an increased enzyme activity (aromatase) for estrogen production can increase serum and breast estrogen concentrations and initiate the cascade to breast development in females and males. For example, in the more complete forms of androgen insensitivity syndromes in genetically male (XY) patients, excess androgen is aromatized into estrogen that results in gynecomastia and an overall phenotypic female appearance. Furthermore, the loss of the anti-proliferative effect of androgens on breast also contributes significantly to breast development in XY individuals with complete androgen insensitivity. Likewise, the biologic effects of over-expression of the aromatase enzyme in female and male mice transgenic for the aromatase gene result in increased breast proliferation. In female transgenics, over-expression of aromatase promotes the induction of hyperplastic and dysplastic changes in breast tissue. Over-expression of aromatase in male transgenics causes increased mammary growth and histological changes similar to gynecomastia, increased estrogen and progesterone receptors, and increased downstream breast growth factors such as TGF-beta and βFGF (17). Interestingly, treatment with an aromatase inhibitor leads to involution of the mammalian gland phenotype (18). Thus, although androgens do not stimulate breast development directly, they may do so if they aromatize to estrogen. This occurs in cases of androgen excess or in patients with increased aromatase activity.

 

PHYSIOLOGIC GYNECOMASTIA

 

Gynecomastia, breast development in males, can occur normally during three phases of life. The first occurs shortly after birth in both males and females. This is partly caused by the high fetal blood levels of estradiol and progesterone (produced by the mother) that stimulate breast tissue in the newborn. Another mechanism is the increased conversion of steroid hormone precursors to sex steroids and increased aromatization of androgen as a result of neonatal surge of luteinizing hormone (LH). Neonatal gynecomastia may persist for several weeks after birth and may be associated with a milky breast discharge called "witch's milk" (2).

 

Puberty marks the second period when gynecomastia can occur physiologically. In fact, up to 60% of boys have clinically detectable gynecomastia by age 14. Although it is mostly bilateral, it is often asymmetrical and can occur unilaterally. Pubertal gynecomastia usually resolves within 3 years of onset (2). In early puberty, the pituitary gland releases gonadotropins at night and stimulates testicular production of testosterone during the very early morning hours. Serum estradiol concentration, however, remains elevated above prepubertal concentrations throughout the day. Compared with boys who do not develop gynecomastia, boys with pubertal gynecomastia have a decreased androgen to estrogen ratio (19, 100). Furthermore, another study showed increased aromatase activity in the skin fibroblasts of boys with gynecomastia (103). Thus, the mechanism by which pubertal gynecomastia occurs may be due to either decreased production of androgens or increased aromatization of circulating androgens, thus increasing the estrogen to androgen ratio (20).

 

The third age range in which gynecomastia is frequently seen is during older age (>60 years). The reported prevalence varies from 36 to 57%, possibly because of different selected populations and different diagnostic criteria (101). Although the exact mechanisms by which this occurs have not been fully elucidated, evidence suggests that it may result from increased peripheral aromatase activity secondary to increased total body fat, relatively elevated LH concentrations, and decreased serum testosterone concentrations associated with male aging. For instance, investigators have shown increased urinary estrogen concentrations in obese individuals and have demonstrated aromatase expression in adipose tissue (21). Thus, like the gynecomastia of obesity, the gynecomastia of aging may partly result from increased aromatase activity, causing increased conversion of androgens to estrogens (22). Moreover, not only does total body fat increase with age, but there may be an increase in aromatase activity in the adipose tissue already present, further increasing circulating estrogens. Serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations increase with age in men. Because SHBG binds estrogen with less affinity than testosterone, the bioavailable estradiol to bioavailable testosterone ratio may increase in older men. Lastly, elderly patients may take multiple medications associated with gynecomastia. One cohort study suggests medications play a role in 80% of gynecomastia in older men (23).     

 

PATHOLOGIC GYNECOMASTIA

 

Pathologic gynecomastia is due to an increase in the circulating and/or local breast tissue ratio of estrogen to androgen.

 

Increased Estrogen

 

Breast development requires the presence of estrogen. Androgens, on the other hand, have anti-proliferative effects on breast tissue. Thus, an equilibrium exists between estrogen and androgens in the adult male to prevent growth of breast tissue, whereby either an increase in estrogen or a decrease in androgen can tip the balance toward gynecomastia. Increased estrogen levels will increase glandular proliferation by several mechanisms. These include direct stimulation of glandular tissue and by suppressing LH, therefore decreasing testosterone secretion by the testes and exaggerating the already high estrogen to androgen ratio. Since the development of breast tissue in males occurs in an analogous manner to that in females, the same hormones that affect female breast tissue can cause gynecomastia. In post-pubertal boys and adult men, the testes secrete 6-10 µg of estradiol and 2.5 µg of estrone per day. Testicular production comprises a small fraction of estrogens in circulation (i.e., 15% of estradiol and 5% of estrone), and the remainder of estrogen in men is derived from the extraglandular aromatization of testosterone and androstenedione to estradiol and estrone (24). Thus, any cause of estrogen excess from overproduction to peripheral aromatization of androgens can initiate the cascade to breast development.

 

TUMORS

 

Testicular tumors can lead to increased blood estrogen levels by the following mechanisms: estrogen overproduction, androgen overproduction with extragonadal aromatization to estrogens, and secretion of hCG that stimulates normal Leydig cells (via the LH receptor). Tumors causing an overproduction of estrogen represent an unusual but important cause of estrogen excess. Examples of estrogen-secreting tumors include Leydig cell tumors, Sertoli cell tumors, granulosa cell tumors, and adrenal tumors.

 

Leydig cell tumors constitute 1%-3% of all testicular tumors. Usually, they occur in men between the ages of 20 and 60, although up to 25% of them occur prepubertally. In prepubertal cases, isosexual precocity, rapid somatic growth, and increased bone age with elevated serum testosterone and urinary 17-ketosteroid levels are the presenting features. In adults, elevated estrogen levels coupled with a palpable testicular mass and gynecomastia suggests a testicular tumor. Of note, feminization (particularly gynecomastia) is common in adults, but it is rare in boys. Some Leydig cell tumors may only be apparent on ultrasound because of their small size; some may produce testosterone and do not cause gynecomastia. Though mostly benign, Leydig cell tumors may be malignant and metastasize to lung, liver, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes (25, 26).

 

Sertoli cell tumors comprise less than 1% of all testicular tumors and occur at all ages, but one third have occurred in patients less than 13 years, usually in boys under 6 months of age. Although they arise in young boys, they usually do not produce endocrine effects in children. Again, the majority are benign, but up to 10% are malignant. Gynecomastia occurs in one third of cases of Sertoli cell tumors, presumably due to increased estrogen production (26). Sertoli cell tumors in boys with Peutz-Jegher syndrome, an autosomal dominant disease characterized by pigmented macules on the lips, gastrointestinal polyposis, and hormonally active tumors in males and females, for instance, have aromatase overactivity, resulting in gynecomastia, rapid growth, and advanced bone age as presenting features (29, 30, 31). Feminizing Sertoli cell tumors with increased aromatase activity can also be seen in the Carney complex, an autosomal dominant disease characterized by cardiac myxomas, cutaneous pigmentation, adrenal nodules and hypercortisolism

 

Granulosa cell tumors, occurring very rarely in the testes, can also overproduce estrogen. Gynecomastia at presentation was reported in some cases (27).

 

Germ cell tumors are the most common cancer in males between the ages of 15 and 35. They are divided into seminomatous and non-seminomatous subtypes and include embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, and teratoma. Elevated serum hCG or hCG subunits (e.g., may be present in both seminomatous and non-seminomatous types of germ cell tumors), whereas AFP may be elevated only in the non-seminomatous type. As a result of the increased hCG that stimulates the Leydig cell via the LH receptor, testicular testosterone and estrogen (estrogen out of proportion to testosterone) production is increased and may cause gynecomastia. Although germ cell tumors generally arise in the testes, they can also originate extragonadally, specifically in the mediastinum. These extragonadal tumors also possess the capability of producing hCG, but they must be differentiated from a multitude of other tumors such as large cell carcinomas of the lung that can synthesize hCG or hCG subunits (28).

 

Some neoplasms that overproduce estrogens also possess aromatase overactivity. Other than sex-cord tumors, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma has also been shown to possess ectopic aromatase activity, causing severe gynecomastia in two boys (32, 33).

 

Furthermore, adrenal tumors can secrete excess dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA-sulfate (DHEAS), and androstenedione that can then be aromatized peripherally to estradiol. Some adrenal tumors may secret estrogen directly. Typically, feminizing-adrenal tumors are large, aggressive, and malignant (90).    

 

Table 1. Tumors Causing Gynecomastia

Tumor type

Hormone produced

Aromatase overactivity

Leydig cell tumor

Testosterone, estrogen  

 

Sertoli cell tumor

Estrogen

+ (in Peutz-Jegher syndrome), + (in Carney complex)

Granulosa cell tumor

Estrogen

 

Adrenal tumor

Estrogen, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S), and androstenedione that are converted in the periphery to estrogens.

 

Gonadal germ cell tumor

hCG and β-hCG

 

Extragonadal germ cell tumor e. G lung, gastric, renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma

hCG and β-hCG

 

 

NON-TUMOR CAUSES OF ESTROGEN EXCESS

 

Increased Aromatase Activity

 

Besides tumors, other conditions have also been associated with excessive aromatization of testosterone and other androgens to estrogen leading to gynecomastia. For instance, obesity is strongly associated with gynecomastia. The mechanism is thought to be related to the increased aromatase activity in adipose tissues, but most obese men do not have high estrogen concentrations (104). Leptin has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of gynecomastia because it might stimulate aromatase in adipose and breast tissue. Leptin might also directly stimulate the growth of epithelial cells in the breast or enhance the sensitivity of epithelial cells to estrogen (98). There is a very rare familial form of gynecomastia in which affected family members have an elevation of extragonadal aromatase activity (34). Novel gain-of-function mutations in chromosome 15 have been reported to cause gynecomastia, possibly by forming cryptic promoters that lead to over expression of aromatase (35). Polymorphism of the aromatase cytochrome P45019 (CYP19) has also been found to be associated with gynecomastia (36).

 

Displacement of Estrogens From SHBG   

 

Another cause of gynecomastia from estrogen excess includes steroid displacement from SHBG. SHBG binds androgens more avidly than estrogen. Thus, any condition or drug such as spironolactone that displaces steroids from SHBG more easily displace estrogen than testosterone, resulting in a higher estrogen to testosterone ratio. Drugs can cause gynecomastia by numerous mechanisms besides displacement from SHBG. These drugs and their mechanisms are discussed below.

 

Decreased Testosterone and Androgen Resistance  

 

Besides increased estrogen production, decreased testosterone levels can cause an elevation in the estrogen to androgen ratio, thereby producing gynecomastia. Primary hypogonadism, with its reduction in serum testosterone and increased serum LH levels increases aromatization of testosterone to estradiol and is associated with an increased estrogen to androgen ratio. Klinefelter syndrome occurs in 1 in 600-700 males and is caused by supernumerary X chromosomes (XXY or XXXY karyotype) and primary testicular failure and often prominent gynecomastia, due to decreased testosterone production, compensatory increased LH secretion, overstimulation of the Leydig cells, and relative estrogen excess. In addition, any acquired testicular disease resulting in primary hypogonadism such as severe, postpubertal viral and bacterial orchitis, or scrotal trauma or radiation can promote gynecomastia by the same mechanisms (24). Lastly, enzyme deficiencies in the testosterone synthesis pathway from cholesterol also result in depressed testosterone levels and hence a relative increase in estrogen. Deficiency of 17-oxosteroid reductase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androstenedione to testosterone and estrone and estrone to estradiol, for example, will cause elevation in estrone and androstenedione, which is then further aromatized to estradiol (22).

 

Secondary hypogonadism results in low serum testosterone and unopposed estrogen effect from increased conversion of adrenal precursors to estrogens (24). Thus, patients with Kallmann syndrome, a form of congenital secondary hypogonadism with anosmia, also develop gynecomastia. In fact, androgen deficiency (hypogonadism) from whatever cause constitutes most cases of gynecomastia.

 

The androgen resistance syndromes, including complete and partial testicular feminization are characterized by gynecomastia and varying degrees of pseudohermaphroditism. Kennedy disease, a neurodegenerative disease, is caused by an increased number of CAG (polyglutamine) repeats in the androgen receptor gene that leads to a decrease in sensitivity of the receptor (2). The gynecomastia is the combined result of decreased androgen responsiveness at the breast level and increased estrogen production as a result of elevated androgen precursors of estradiol and estrone. Androgen resistance at the pituitary results in elevated serum LH levels and increased circulating testosterone. The increased serum testosterone is then aromatized peripherally, promoting gynecomastia.

 

Other Diseases  

 

Men with end-stage renal disease may have reduced testosterone and elevated gonadotropins. This apparent primary testicular failure may then lead to increased breast development (13). The gynecomastia of liver disease, particularly cirrhosis, does not have a clear etiology. Cirrhosis is associated with increased SHBG that binds testosterone more avidly than estrogen. Some have speculated that the gynecomastia is the result of estrogen overproduction, possibly secondary to increased extraglandular aromatization of androstenedione, which may have decreased hepatic clearance in cirrhosis. However, testosterone administration to patient with cirrhosis causes a rise in estradiol, but decreases the prevalence of gynecomastia (5, 37, 38). Therefore, although the association of gynecomastia with liver disease is apparent, current data are conflicting and the mechanism remains unclear.

 

Thyrotoxicosis is associated with gynecomastia. Patients often have elevated estrogen that may result from a stimulatory effect of thyroid hormone on peripheral aromatase. In addition, LH is also increased in many men with thyrotoxicosis, and LH also stimulates aromatization of testosterone (13,39, 96). Furthermore, thyroxine stimulates production of SHBG in the liver. Because SHBG binds testosterone more avidly than estradiol, there is a higher ratio of free estradiol to free testosterone. Thus, with normal testosterone and increased estrogen, there is an elevated free estrogen to testosterone ratio.

 

Gynecomastia is associated with spinal cord disorders. Most patients with spinal cord disorders often have low testosterone levels and, in fact, can develop testicular atrophy with resultant hypogonadism and infertility, which may be exacerbated by increased scrotal temperature. The exact mechanism, however, remains elusive (40).

 

Refeeding gynecomastia refers to breast development in men recovering from a malnourished state (1). Although most cases regress within several months, the etiology of this phenomenon has not been fully elucidated.

 

HIV patients can also develop gynecomastia. There is a high incidence of androgen deficiency due to multifactorial causes, including primary and secondary hypogonadism and certain drugs used to treat HIV (e.g., efavirenz) (24).

 

Drugs

 

About 20% of gynecomastia is caused by medications or exogenous chemicals (41). Some drugs may increase estrogen effect by several mechanisms: 1) they possess intrinsic estrogen-like properties, 2) they increase endogenous estrogen production, or 3) they supply an excess of an estrogen precursor (e.g., testosterone or androstenedione) that can be aromatized to estrogen. Examples of drugs that cause gynecomastia are listed in Tables 2 and 3. Contact with estrogen vaginal creams, for instance, can elevate circulating estrogen levels. Since some of the creams contain synthetic estrogens, they might not be detected by standard estrogenic qualitative assays. An estrogen-containing embalming cream has been reported to cause gynecomastia in morticians (42, 43). A topical estrogen spray, used for relief of menopausal hot flushes may lead to gynecomastia in children through skin contact (44). Recreational use of marijuana, heroin, methadone, and amphetamines has also been associated with gynecomastia (45). Herbs containing phytoestrogen or ginseng with estrogen-like structure (46) may also lead to gynecomastia. It has been suggested that digitalis causes gynecomastia due to its ability to bind to estrogen receptors (13, 47). The appearance of gynecomastia has been described in body builders and athletes after the administration of aromatizable androgens. The gynecomastia was presumably caused by an excess of circulating estrogens due to the conversion of androgens to estrogen by peripheral aromatase enzymes (48).

 

Table 2. Drugs That May Induce Gynecomastia by Known or Proposed Mechanisms  

Estrogen-like, or binds to estrogen receptor

Stimulate estrogen synthesis

Supply aromatizable estrogen precursors

Direct Testicular Damage

Block testosterone synthesis

Block androgen action

Displace estrogen from SHBG

Estrogen vaginal cream

Gonadotropins

Exogenous androgen

Busulfan

Ketoconazole

Flutamide

Spironolactone

Estrogen-containing embalming cream

Growth Hormone

Androgen precursors (i.e., androstenedione and DHEA)

Nitrosurea

Spironolactone

Bicalutamide

Ethanol

Delousing powder

 

 

Vincristine

Metronidazole

Finasteride

 

Digitalis

 

 

Ethanol

Etomidate

Cyproterone

 

Clomiphene

 

 

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

 

Zanoterone

 

Marijuana*

 

 

 

 

Cimetidine

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ranitidine*

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spironolactone

 

* Weak evidence

 

Table 3. Drugs That May Cause Gynecomastia by Uncertain Mechanisms

 

Cardiac and antihypertensive medications:

1.     Calcium channel blockers (verapamil, nifedipine, diltiazem)

2.     Angiotensin-converting enzyme Inhibitors* (captopril, enalapril)

3.     Alpha-blockers*

4.     Amiodarone

5.     Methyldopa

6.     Reserpine

7.     Nitrates

Psychoactive drugs:

1.     Neuroleptics

2.     Anxiolytic agents* (e.g., diazepam)

3.     Phenytoin

4.     Tricyclic antidepressants

5.     Haloperidol

6.     Atypical antipsychotic agents

Drugs for infectious diseases:

1.     Antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS (e.g., efavirenz)

2.     Isoniazid

3.     Ethionamide

4.     Griseofulvin

5.     Minocycline

Drugs of Abuse:

1.     Amphetamines

2.     Heroin

3.     Methadone

Others:

1.     Theophylline

2.     Omeprazole

3.     Auranofin

4.     Diethylpropion

5.     Domperidone

6.     Penicillamine

7.     Sulindac

8.     Heparin

9.     Methotrexate

10.  Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors  

11.  Statin*

* Weak evidence

 

Drugs and chemicals that cause decreased testosterone levels either by causing direct testicular damage, by blocking testosterone synthesis, or by blocking androgen action can also produce gynecomastia. For instance, phenothrin, a chemical component in delousing agents, possessing anti-androgenic activity, has been attributed as the cause of an epidemic of gynecomastia among Haitian refugees in US detention centers in 1981 and 1982 (49). Chemotherapeutic drugs, such as alkylating agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (102), can cause Leydig cell and germ cell damage, resulting in primary hypogonadism. Flutamide, an anti-androgen used as treatment for prostate cancer, blocks androgen action in peripheral tissues. Ketoconazole, on the other hand, can inhibit steroidogenic enzymes required for testosterone synthesis. 5α-reductase inhibitors, finasteride and dutasteride, that reduce the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone may cause gynecomastia (50). They also cause an increase in the synthesis of testosterone and, subsequently estrogen through aromatization. Spironolactone causes gynecomastia (up to 10%) by several mechanisms. Like ketoconazole, it can block androgen production by inhibiting enzymes in the testosterone synthetic pathway (i.e., 17α-hydroxylase and 17-20-desmolase), but it can also block receptor-binding of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (51). In addition to decreasing testosterone levels and biologic effects, spironolactone also displaces estradiol from SHBG, increasing free estrogen levels. Of note, the anti-androgenic property of spironolactone has been used in gender identity disorder (from male to female) and spironolactone is considered to be a cost-saving medication (52). On the other hand, eplerenone is more specific for the mineralocorticoid receptor and less associated with ant-androgenic effects such as gynecomastia (up to 0.5%) (53). Switching from spironolactone to eplerenone may reverse painful gynecomastia induced by spironolactone in patients with cirrhosis (54). Ethanol increases the estrogen to androgen ratio and induces gynecomastia by multiple mechanisms as well. Firstly, it is associated with increased SHBG, which decreases free testosterone levels. Secondly, it increases hepatic clearance of testosterone, and thirdly, it has a direct toxic effect on the testes (24). Besides the drugs stated, a multitude of others have been associated with gynecomastia by unknown mechanisms (92) (Table 3). For many of these drugs, the causal relationship with gynecomastia has not been established or the evidence is weak.

 

MALE BREAST CANCER

 

Male breast cancer is rare and comprises only 0.2% of all male cancers. The overall prevalence of invasive carcinomas was 0.11% and of in situ carcinomas was 0.18% in in a 20-year national registry study of surgically excised breast specimens with the diagnosis of gynecomastia (55).  Although male breast cancer is rare and gynecomastia is not considered a premalignant condition (101), men with gynecomastia, especially elderly, worry about breast cancer and often seek medical advice (56) and it is important to differentiate male breast cancer from gynecomastia (Table 4). Of note, men with Klinefelter syndrome have a 20- to 50-fold increased risk of breast cancer. Other risk factors include hyperestrogenic conditions like obesity, alcohol, exogenous estrogen exposure (e.g., gender reassignment), and testicular disorders. It is unclear if these are specific risks for breast cancer are linked to the stimulatory process responsible for gynecomastia (57). Old age, working in environment with high temperature, exhaust emissions, radiation to chest, and liver damage are also risk factors for male breast cancer (58). Family history should always be explored. In particular, a family history of BRCA2 positive breast cancer significantly increases the risk of male breast cancer in carriers of mutation (59).

 

Table 4. Clinical Findings of Gynecomastia and Male Breast Cancer

Clinical findings

Gynecomastia

Male breast cancer

Unilateral/ bilateral  

Mostly bilateral, can be unilateral

Unilateral

Consistency

Rubbery or firm

Firm or hard

Location

Concentric, around the nipple

More peripheral, outside the nipple

Pain

Painful if recent onset or rapid enlargement

Usually painless

Associated features such as skin dimpling, nipple retraction, bloody discharge

No

Possible

Palpable axillary or supraclavicular lymph node(s)

No

Possible

 

PATIENT EVALUATION

 

History Taking and Physical Examination

 

At presentation, all patients require a thorough history and physical exam. Particular attention should be given to medications, drugs and alcohol abuse, as well as other chemical exposures. Symptoms of underlying systemic illness, such as hyperthyroidism, liver disease, or renal failure should be sought. Furthermore, the clinician must recall neoplasm as a possible etiology and should establish the duration and timing of breast development. Chronic gynecomastia is more reassuring because it is almost never due to malignancy. Additionally, the clinician should inquire about fertility, erectile dysfunction, and libido to rule out hypogonadism.

 

In our experience, the breast examination is best performed with the patient supine and with the examiner palpating from the periphery to the areola. When firmness is noted, the glandular mass should be measured in diameter. Clinically, gynecomastia is diagnosed by finding subareolar breast tissue of 2 cm in diameter or greater. Malignancy should be suspected if an immobile, firm mass is found on physical examination. Skin dimpling, nipple retraction or discharge, and large, firm axillary or supraclavicular lymphadenopathy further support malignancy as a possible diagnosis. Tenderness may be present in patients with gynecomastia of less than 6 months’ duration, but it is unusual in patients with breast cancer (Table 4).

 

A thorough testicular exam is essential. When clinical exam suggests a testicular mass or when serum hCG is elevated, testicular ultra-sound (USG) is warranted. Bilaterally small testes imply testicular failure, while asymmetric testes or a testicular mass suggest the possibility of neoplasm. Visual field impairment may suggest pituitary disease. Physical findings of underlying systemic conditions such as thyrotoxicosis, HIV disease, liver, or kidney failure should also be assessed. As obesity is often associated with gynecomastia, body mass index should be documented (56).

 

Laboratory Evaluation

 

All patients who present with gynecomastia should have serum testosterone, estradiol, LH, and hCG measured (93) (using an assay that detects all forms of hCG) (Fig 2). Further testing should be tailored according to the history, physical examination and the results of these initial tests. An elevated beta hCG or hCG or a markedly elevated serum estradiol suggests neoplasm and a testicular ultrasound is warranted to identify a testicular tumor. However, non-testicular tumors can also secrete beta hCG or hCG and therefore further imaging such as CT thorax and abdomen is indicated if ultrasound does not show a testicular mass. A low testosterone level, with an elevated LH indicates primary hypogonadism. If the history suggests Klinefelter syndrome, then a karyotype should be performed for definitive diagnosis. Low testosterone and low LH indicate secondary hypogonadism, and hypothalamic or pituitary causes should be sought. If testosterone and LH are elevated, then the diagnosis of androgen resistance should be considered. In case of estrogen-secreting tumor, LH is usually suppressed with low or low normal testosterone concentrations and negative pituitary imaging. Estradiol concentrations are high. Liver, kidney and thyroid function should be assessed if clinically indicated. Furthermore, if examination of breast tissue suggests malignancy, a biopsy should be performed. This is of particular importance in patients with Klinefelter syndrome, who have an increased risk of breast cancer. On the other hand, if the examination finding is compatible with breast abscess, then fine needle aspiration for microscopy and culture is warranted (60). Acid-fast bacilli and tuberculosis culture can be done if there is risk factor(s) for tuberculosis.

 

Figure 2. Algorithm for investigation of gynecomastia

TREATMENT

 

Treatment of the underlying endocrinologic or systemic disease that has caused gynecomastia is appropriate when possible. Testicular tumors, such as Leydig cell, Sertoli cell, or granulosa cell tumors should be surgically removed. In addition to surgery, germ cell tumors are further managed with chemotherapy involving cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide (25, 26). Should underlying thyrotoxicosis, renal, or hepatic failure be discovered, appropriate therapy should be initiated. Medications that cause gynecomastia should also be discontinued whenever possible based on their role in management of the underlying condition. The improvement should be apparent within a month after discontinuation of the culprit drug (61). If the gynecomastia has been present for more than six months, regression is unlikely because of the presence of less reversible fibrotic tissues (62). Of course, if a breast biopsy indicates malignancy, then mastectomy should be performed.

 

If no pathologic etiology is detected, then appropriate treatment is close observation. A careful breast exam should be done initially every 3-6 months until the gynecomastia regresses or stabilizes, after which a breast exam can be performed yearly. It is important to remember that most cases of pubertal gynecomastia may resolve spontaneouslywithin one to two years, around 20% of patients have residual gynecomastia at the age of 20 (63). An information sheet about gynecomastia is available for those patients who are interested to know more about their conditions (64).

 

Medical Treatment  

 

If the gynecomastia is severe, does not resolve, of recent onset (less than 6 months) and does not have a treatable underlying cause, some medical therapies may be attempted. There are 3 classes of medical treatment for gynecomastia: androgens (testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, danazol), anti-estrogens (clomiphene citrate, tamoxifen), and aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole and anastrozole.

 

Once gynecomastia is established, testosterone treatment of hypogonadal men with gynecomastia often fails to produce breast regression. Testosterone treatment may theoretically produce the side effect of gynecomastia by being aromatized to estradiol, but this side effect is uncommon and transient. Having said that, there is limited data to suggest its use to specifically counteract gynecomastia in hypogonadism (65). Dihydrotestosterone, a non-aromatizable androgen, has been used in patients with prolonged pubertal gynecomastia with good response rates but it is not commercially available (66). Danazol, a weak androgen that inhibits gonadotropin secretion, resulting in decreased serum testosterone levels, has been studied in a prospective placebo-controlled trial, whereby gynecomastia resolved in 23 percent of the patients, as opposed to 12 percent of the patients on placebo (67). The dose used for gynecomastia is 200 mg orally twice daily. Unfortunately, undesirable side effects including edema, acne, and cramps have limited its use (24).

 

Investigators have reported a 64 percent response rate with 100 mg/day of clomiphene citrate, a weak estrogen and moderate anti-estrogen in a cohort study (68). Lower doses of clomiphene have shown varied results, indicating that higher doses may need to be administered, if clomiphene is to be attempted. Tamoxifen, also an anti-estrogen, has been studied in 2 randomized, double-blind studies in which a statistically significant regression in breast size was achieved, although complete regression was not documented (69). One retrospective study compared tamoxifen with danazol in the treatment of gynecomastia. It was found that patients taking tamoxifen had a greater response with complete resolution in 78 percent of patients treated with tamoxifen, as compared to only a 40 percent response in the danazol-treated group, and the relapse rate was higher for the tamoxifen group (70), though the relapse was not systemically defined and patients with chronic gynecomastia were included. Another prospective cohort study found that 90% of patients taking tamoxifen had successful resolution of their symptoms (89). Although there is a chance of recurrence with cessation of therapy, tamoxifen, due to relatively lower side effect profile and high efficacy, may be a more reasonable choice when compared to the other therapies. If used, tamoxifen should be given at a dose of 10 mg twice or 20 mg daily a day for 3-6 months (24). Responders usually improve with reduced pain within 1 month. Another anti-estrogen, raloxifene, has also been used in the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia but its efficacy needs to be evaluated in randomized prospective studies (71).

 

An aromatase inhibitor, testolactone, has also been studied in an uncontrolled trial with promising effects (72). Further studies must be performed on this drug before any recommendations can be established on its usefulness in the treatment of gynecomastia. Newer aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole and letrozole may have therapeutic potential (73, 74), but randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have not confirmed their efficacy. In a study involving patients receiving bicalutamide therapy for prostate cancer, only tamoxifen, but not anastrozole, significantly reduced the incidence of gynecomastia/breast pain when used prophylactically and therapeutically (75, 76). In another study with pubertal gynecomastia, no significant difference was demonstrated between the anastrozole and placebo groups in patients suffering from pubertal gynecomastia (77). The use of aromatase inhibitors is notorious for accelerated bone loss in women, but it is uncertain whether the extent of bone loss is similar in adult men (91). Furthermore, men taking anastrozole results in an increase in body fat and decline in sexual function (105).

 

From various case series, many patients with idiopathic gynecomastia show no significant improvement after medical treatment. The disappointing result may be related to the stage of disease at which medical treatment is initiated. It is likely that many or all of the men who failed to respond to medical therapy had chronic gynecomastia with fibrotic breast tissue that will not change with medical therapy or over time (56, 63). Medical therapy is only used for a short time (up to 6 months) in men with idiopathic and acute (tender, breast tissue present < 6 months) gynecomastia. Tamoxifen has the best evidence for effective medical therapy of acute, idiopathic gynecomastia.    

 

Surgical Treatment  

 

When medical therapy is ineffective, particularly in cases of longstanding gynecomastia, or when the gynecomastia interferes with the patient's activities of daily living, or when there is suspicion of malignancy of breast, then surgical therapy is appropriate. On the other hand, surgical treatment should be postponed in pubertal gynecomastia, after completion of puberty, to minimize the chance of recurrent gynecomastia after surgery (62). Surgery should also be deferred until the underlying cause of gynecomastia has resolved or been treated. Surgical treatment includes removal of glandular tissue coupled with liposuction, if needed, preferably with an individualized approach (78, 79). Nowadays, minimally invasive surgery is available and it may be associated with few complications and prompt recovery (80). If malignancy is suspected, histological examination is mandatory (56). Use of delicate cosmetic surgical techniques are warranted to prevent unsightly scarring.

 

PREVENTION OF GYNECOMASTIA IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER

 

Because androgen deprivation is one of the commonly used treatment modalities for advanced prostate cancer, its possible role in the development of gynecomastia is of particular concern to clinicians. Up to 80% of patients receiving non-steroidal anti-androgen therapy may develop gynecomastia, usually 6-9 months after hormonal treatment. Some patients may have painful and disfiguring gynecomastia (81). Preventive options include tamoxifen, radiation therapy, or aromatase inhibitors.

 

Tamoxifen is the most effective preventive therapy for gynecomastia due to anti-androgen therapy for treatment of prostate cancer. Tamoxifen is superior to radiotherapy in preventing gynecomastia in patients receiving bicalutamide (Casodex) for prostate cancer in a randomized controlled trial (82). Tamoxifen is superior to aromatase inhibitor to prevent gynecomastia in patients with prostate cancer. For instance, Boccardo, et al. showed that 10% patients in the tamoxifen group (20 mg daily dose) developed gynecomastia, whereas 51% in the anastrozole group and 73% in the placebo group had gynecomastia over a period of 48 weeks (74). Fradet, et al. showed tamoxifen reduced the incidence of breast events (gynecomastia and/or breast pain) in patients with prostate cancer receiving bicalutamide in a dose-dependent manner (83). Likewise, it has been shown that low dose weekly tamoxifen (20 mg/week) is inferior to the usual dose daily regimen (20mg/day) in terms of the prevention and treatment of gynecomastia (84). Current data suggests tamoxifen 10-20 mg per day is the optimum dose required for prophylaxis of gynecomastia in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (83, 84, 85). Low dose prophylactic irradiation has been reported to reduce the rate of gynecomastia but not breast pain in men receiving estrogens or anti-androgens for prostate cancer (11, 86, 87). Compared with tamoxifen, irradiation seems to be less effective for prevention and treatment of gynecomastia but it is usually well-tolerated (94).

 

Some studies suggest that the new generation of anti-androgen drugs such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide might be associated with less gynecomastia (88, 95); More recently, it has been reported that 36.6% of patients receiving enzalutamide develop gynecomastia; this incidence seems to be lower than reported in patients who were treated with older anti-androgens such as bicalutamide (99).

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Franz A, Wilson J: Williams Textbook of Endocrinology ninth edition, 877-885, 1998.
  2. Santen R: Endocrinology fourth edition vol. 3: 2335-2341, 2001.
  3. Bocchinfuso WP, Korach KS: Mammary Gland Development and Tumorigenesis in Estrogen Receptor Knockout Mice. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 90: 323-334, 1997.
  4. Lubahn, DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS: Alteration of Reproductive Function but not Prenatal Sexual Development after Insertional Disruption of the Mouse Estrogen Receptor Gene. Proc Soc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:11162-11166, 1993
  5. Edman DC, Hemsell DL, Brenner PF: Extraglandular Estrogen Formation in Subjects with Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 69: 819, 1975.
  6. Kleinberg DL, Feldman M, Ruan W: IGF-1: An Essential Factor in Terminal End Bud Formation and Ductal Morphogenesis. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 5(1):7-17, 2000.
  7. Ruan W, Kleinberg DL: Insulin-like Growth Factor I is Essential for Terminal End Bud Formation and Ductal Morphogenesis during Mammary Development. Endocrinology 140(11): 5075-81, 1999.
  8. Walden PD, Ruan W, Feldman M, Kleinberg DL: Evidence that the Mammary Fat Pad Mediated the Action of Growth Hormone in Mammary Gland Development, Endocrinology 139 (2): 659-62, 1998.
  9. Mieritz MG, Sorensen K, Aksglaede L et al. Elevated serum IGF-I, but unaltered sex steroid levels, in healthy boys with pubertal gynaecomastia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014 May;80(5):691-8 
  10. Mol JA, Van Garderen E, Rutteman GR, Rijnberk A: New Insights in the Molecular Mechanism of Progestin-induced Proliferation of Mammary Epithelium: Induction of the Local Biosynthesis of Growth Hormone in the Mammary Gland of Dogs, Cats, and Humans. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 57 (1-2): 67-71, 1996. 
  11. Ozen H, Akyol F, Toktas G, Eskicorapci S, Unluer E, Kuyumcuoglu U, Abay E, Cureklibatur I, Sengoz M, Yalcin V, Akpinar H, Zorlu F, Sengor F, Karaman I. Is prophylactic breast radiotherapy necessary in all patients with prostate cancer and gynecomastia and/or breast pain? J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):519-24. 
  12. Sasano H, Kimura m, Shizawa s, Kimura N, Nagua H, Aromatase and Steroid Receptors in Gynecomastia and Male Breast Carcinoma: an Immunohistochemical Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 81 (8): 3063-7, 1996. 
  13. Glass AR: Gynecomastia. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America. 23(4): 825-837, 1994. 
  14. LeProvost F, Leroux, C, Martin P Gaye P, Djiane, J, Prolactin Gene Expression in Ovine and Caprine Mammary Gland, Neuroendocrinology 60: 305-313, 1994. 
  15. Steinmetz R, Grant A, Malven, P: Transcription of Prolactin Gene in Milk Secretory Cells of the Rat Mammary Gland. Journal of Endocrinology 36: 305-313,1993. 
  16. Carlson HE, Kane P, Lei ZM, et al: Presence of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptors in male breast tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(8):4119-23, 2004.  
  17. Gill K, Kirma N, Tekmal RR: Overexpression of Aromatase in Transgenic Male Mice Results in the Induction of Gynecomastia and other Biochemical Changes in Mammary Gland. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 77(1):13-18, 2001.  
  18. Li X, Warri A, Makela S, Ahonen T, Streng T, Santti R, Poutanen M. Mammary gland development in transgenic male mice expressing human P450 aromatase. Endocrinology 143(10):4074-83, 2002. 
  19. Moore DC, Schlaepfer, LP, Sizonenko PC: Hormonal Changes During Puberty: Transient Pubertal Gynecomastia; Abnormal Androgen-Estrogen Ratios. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 58:492-499, 1984.
  20. Mahoney CP: Adolescent Gynecomastia. Differential Diagnosis and Management. Pediatric Clinics of North America 37(6): 1389-1404, 1990.
  21. Niewoehner CB, Nuttall FQ: Gynecomastia in Hospitalized Male Population. American Journal of Medicine 77: 633-638, 1984. 
  22. Braunstein GD. Aromatase and Gynecomastia. Endocrine-Related Cancer 6: 315-324, 1999. 
  23. Ikard RW, Vavra D, Forbes RC, Richman JC, Roumie CL. Management of senescent gynecomastia in the Veterans Health Administration. Breast J. 2011 Mar;17(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01050.x.  
  24. Mathur R, Braunstein: Gynecomastia: Pathomechanisms and Treatment Strategies. Hormone Research 48:95-102, 1997.  
  25. Gana BM: Leydig Cell Tumor, British Journal of Urology 75(5): 676-8, 1995. 
  26. Richie J: Campbell's Urology 7th Edition, 2439-2443, 1998. 
  27. Hanson JA, Ambaye AB. Adult testicular granulosa cell tumor: a review of the literature for clinicopathologic predictors of malignancy.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Jan;135(1):143-6.
  28. Moran CA, Suster S: Primary Mediastinal Choriocarcinoma: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study of Eight Cases. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 21(9): 1007-1012, 1997.  
  29. Coen P, Kulin H, Ballantine T, Zaino r, Frauenhoffer E, Boal D, Inkster S, Brodie A, Santen R: An Aromatase-Producing Sex-cord Tumor Resulting in Prepubertal Gynecomastia. New England Journal of Medicine 324 (5): 317-22, 1991. 
  30. Hertl MC, Wiebel J, Schafer H, Willig HP, Lambrecht W. Feminizing Sertoli Cell Tumors Associated with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome: An Increasingly Recognized Cause of Prepubertal Gynecomastia. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 102(4):1151-57, 1998.  
  31. Young S, Gooneratne S. Straus FH 2nd, Zeller WP, Bulun SE, Rosenthal IM: Feminizing Sertoli Cell Tumors in Boys with Peutz-Jehgers Syndrome. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 19 (1):50-58, 1995.   
  32. Agarwal VR, Takayama K, Van Wyk JJ, Sasano H, Simpson ER, Bulun SE: Molecular Basis of Severe Gynecomastia Associated with Aromatase Expression in a Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metab 83(5): 1797-1800, 1988.  
  33. Muramori K, Taguchi S, Taguchi T, Kohashi K, Furuya K, Tokuda K, Ishii E. High Aromatase Activity and Overexpression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Child. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011. May 5.    
  34. Berkovitz GD, Guerami, Brown TR, MacDonald PC Migeon CJ: Familial Gynecomastia with Increased Extraglandular Aromatization of Plasma Carbon 19-Steroids. Journal of Clinical Investigation 75: 1763-1769, 1985.  
  35. Shozu M, Sebastian S, Takayama K, Hsu WT, Schultz RA, Neely K, Bryant M, Bulun SE. Estrogen excess associated with novel gain-of-function mutations affecting the aromatase gene. N Engl J Med 8;348(19):1855-65, May, 2003.  
  36. Czajka-Oraniec I, Zgliczynski W, Kurylowicz A, Mikula M, Ostrowski J. Association between gynecomastia and aromatase (CYP19) polymorphisms. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008 May;158(5):721-7.
  37. Bahnsen M, Gluud C, Johnsen SG: Pituitary-testicular Function in Patients with Alcoholic Cirrhosis of the Liver. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 11: 473-479, 1981.    
  38. Olivo J, Gordon GG, Raifi F: Estrogen Metabolism in Hyperthyroidism and in Cirrhosis of the Liver. Steroids 26: 47-56, 1975. 
  39. Chan WB, Yeung VT, Chow CC, So WY, Cockram CS: Gynaecomastia as a Presenting Feature of Thyrotoxicosis. Postgraduate Medical Journal 75(882): 229-231, 1999   
  40. Herito RJ, Dankner R, Berezin M, Zeilig G, Ohry A: Gynecomastia Following Spinal Cord Disorder. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(5): 534-537, 1997. 
  41. Bowman JD, Kim H, Bustamante JJ. Drug-induced gynecomastia. Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Dec;32(12):1123-40.  
  42. Bhat N, Rosato E, Gupta P: gynecomastia in a mortician: A case report. Acta Cytol 34:31, 1990.   
  43. Finkelstein J, McCully W, MacLaughlin D, et al.: The mortician's mystery: Gynecomastia and reversible hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in an embalmer. N Eng J Med 319:961, 1988. 
  44. Voelker R.Estrogen spray poses risks to children, pets through contact with treated skin. JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):953.
  45. Nordt CA, DiVasta AD. Gynecomastia in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Aug;20(4):375-82. 
  46. Kakisaka Y, Ohara T, Tozawa H. Panax ginseng: a newly identified cause of gynecomastia. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;228(2):143-5.  
  47. Rifka SM, Pita JC, Vigersky RA, et al. Interaction of digitalis and spironolactone with human sex steroid receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1977; 46:228-244.  
  48. Calzada L, Torres-Calleja JM, Martinez N: Measurement of Androgen and Estrogen Receptors in Breast Tissue from Subjects with Anabolic Steroid-Dependent Gynecomastia. Life Sciences 69 (2110): 1465-1479. 
  49. Brody SA, Loriaux DL. Epidemic of gynecomastia among Haitian refugees: exposure to an environmental antiandrogen. Endocr Pract 9(5):370-5, Set-Oct, 2003.  
  50. Traish AM, Hassani J, Guay AT, Zitzmann M, Hansen ML. Adverse Side Effects of 5α-Reductase Inhibitors Therapy: Persistent Diminished Libido and Erectile Dysfunction and Depression in a Subset of Patients. J Sex Med. 2010 Dec 22. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02157.x  
  51. Thompson DF, Carter J: Drug-induced gynecomastia. Pharmacotherapy 13(1): 37-45. 1993 
  52. Spack NP. Management of transgenderism. JAMA. 2013 Feb 6;309(5):478-84.  
  53. Parthasarathy HK, Ménard J, White WB, Young WF Jr, Williams GH, Williams B, Ruilope LM, McInnes GT, Connell JM, Macdonald TM. A double-blind, randomized study comparing the antihypertensive effect of eplerenone and spironolactone in patients with hypertension and evidence of primary aldosteronism. J Hypertens. 2011 May;29(5):980-990.  
  54. Dimitriadis G, Papadopoulos V, Mimidis K. Eplerenone reverses spironolactone-induced painful gynaecomastia in cirrhotics. Hepatol Int. 2011 Jun;5(2):738-9.
  55. Lapid O, Jolink F, Meijer SL. Pathological findings in gynecomastia: analysis of 5113 breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;74(2):163-6.  
  56. Johnson RE, Murad MH. Gynecomastia: Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Management Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(11):1010-1015.   
  57. Hsing A, McLaughlin J, Cocco p, Chen H, Fraumeni JF: Risk factors for male breast cancer. Cancer Causes and Control 9; 269-275, 1998.  
  58. Fentiman IS, Fourquet A, Hortobagyi GN: Male breast cancer. Lancet 367(9510):595-604, 2006.    
  59. Evans DG, Susnerwala I, Dawson J et al. Risk of breast cancer in male BRCA2 carriers. J Med Genet. 2010 Oct;47(10):710-1.  
  60. Koh J, Tee A. Images in clinical medicine. Tuberculous abscess manifesting as unilateral gynecomastia. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2270.    
  61. Braunstein GD. Clinical practice. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 20;357(12):1229-37.  
  62. Carlson HE. Approach to the patient with gynecomastia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):15-21.   
  63. Singh Narula H, Carlson HE. Gynaecomastia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am2007;48:497-519.    
  64. Hormone Foundation. Patient information page. Gynecomastia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):0   
  65. Treves N: Gynecomastia: the origins of mammary swelling in the male: and analysis of 406 patients with breast hypertrophy, 525 with testicular tumors, and 13 with adrenal neoplasms. Cancer 11: 1083-102, 1958.    
  66. Kuhn JM, Roca R, Laudat MH, et al: Studies on the treatment of idiopathic gynecomastia with percutaneous dihydrotestosterone. Clin Endo 19: 513-20, 1983.    
  67. Jones DJ, Holt SD, Surtees P, et al: A comparison of danazol and placebo in the treatment of adult idiopathic gynaecomastia: results of a prospective study in 55 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 72:296-8, 1990.   
  68. Leroith D, Sobel R, Glick SM: The effect of clomiphene citrate on pubertal gynaecomastia. Acta Endocrinol (copenh). 95:177-80, 1980. 
  69. Alagaratnam TT: Idiopathic gynecomastia treated with tamoxifen; a preliminary report. Clin Ther 9:483-7, 1987.   
  70. Ting AC, Chow LW, Leung Yf: Comparison of tamoxifen with danazol in the management of idiopathic gynecomastia. Am Surg 66(1):38-40, 2000.
  71. Lawrence SE, Faught KA, Vethamuthu J, Lawson ML Beneficial effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen in the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia. J Pediatr;145(1):71-6,2004.  
  72. Zachmann M, Eiholzer U, Muritano M, et al: Treatment of pubertal gynaecomastia with testolactone. Acta Endocrinol supple (copenh) 279:218-26, 1986.   
  73. Miller WR, Jackson J: The therapeutic potential of aromatase inhibitors. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 12(3):337-51, Mar, 2003.     
  74. Riepe FG, Baus I, Wiest S, et al: Treatment of Pubertal Gynecomastia with the Specific Aromatase Inhibitor Anastrozole. Horm Res 20;62(3):113-118, 2004.   
  75. Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Battaglia M, et al: Evaluation of tamoxifen and anastrozole in the prevention of gynecomastia and breast pain induced by bicalutamide monotherapy of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1;23(4):808-15, 2005  
  76. Saltzstein D, Sieber P, Morris T, Gallo J: Prevention and management of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain: randomized endocrinologic and clinical studies with tamoxifen and anastrozole. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 8(1):75-83. 2005.  
  77. Plourde PV, Reiter EO, Jou HC, Desrochers PE, Rubin SD, Bercu BB, Diamond FB Jr, Backeljauw PF: Safety and efficacy of anastrozole for the treatment of pubertal gynecomastia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(9):4428-33, 2004.  
  78. Fischer S, Hirsch T, Hirche C et al. Surgical treatment of primary gynecomastia in children and adolescents. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Jun;30(6):641-7.  
  79. Hammond DC. Surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1 Suppl):61e-68e.   
  80. Jarrar G, Peel A, Fahmy R, Deol H, Salih V, Mostafa A. Single incision endoscopic surgery for gynaecomastia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 May 12.     
  81. Michalopoulos NV, Keshtgar MR. Images in clinical medicine. Gynecomastia induced by prostate-cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 11;367(15):1449.  
  82. Perdonà S, Autorino R, De Placido S, D'Armiento M, Gallo A, Damiano R, Pingitore D, Gallo L, De Sio M, Bianco AR, Di Lorenzo G. Efficacy of tamoxifen and radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide in prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005 May;6(5):295-300.   
  83. Fradet Y, Egerdie B, Andersen M, Tammela TL, Nachabe M, Armstrong J, Morris T, Navani S. Tamoxifen as prophylaxis for prevention of gynaecomastia and breast pain associated with bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response study. Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):106-14    
  84. Bedognetti D, Rubagotti A, Conti G, Francesca F, De Cobelli O, Canclini L, Gallucci M, Aragona F, Di Tonno P, Cortellini P, Martorana G, Lapini A, Boccardo F. An open, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of two tamoxifen schedules in preventing gynaecomastia induced by bicalutamide monotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):238-45.     
  85. Serretta V, Altieri V, Morgia G et al. A randomized trial comparing tamoxifen therapy vs. tamoxifen prophylaxis in bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012 Sep;10(3):174-9.   
  86. Tyrrell CJ, Payne H, Tammela TL, Bakke A, Lodding P, Goedhals L, Van Erps P, Boon T, Van De Beek C, Andersson SO, Morris T, Carroll K. Prophylactic breast irradiation with a single dose of electron beam radiotherapy (10 Gy) significantly reduces the incidence of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:476–483.   
  87. Widmark A, Fossa SD, Lundmo P, Damber JE, Vaage S,Damber L, Wiklund F, Klepp O.: Does prophylactic breast irradiation prevent antiandrogen-induced gynecomastia? Evaluation of 253 patients in the randomized Scandinavian trial SPCG-7/SFUO-3. J Urol 170(1):320, 2003.  
  88. Alesini D, Iacovelli R, Palazzo A et al. Multimodality treatment of gynecomastia in patients receiving antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer in the era of abiraterone acetate and new antiandrogen molecules. Oncology. 2013;84(2):92-9.
  89. Mannu GS, Sudul M, Bettencourt-Silva JH, Tsoti SM, Cunnick G, Ahmed SF. Role of tamoxifen in idiopathic gynecomastia: A 10-year prospective cohort study. Breast J. 2018 Nov;24(6):1043-1045.
  90. Ali SN, Jayasena CN, Sam AH. Which patients with gynaecomastia require more detailed investigation? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018 Mar;88(3):360-363.
  91. Tan RB, Guay AT, Hellstrom WJ. Clinical use of aromatase inhibitors in adult males.Sex Med Rev. 2014 Apr;2(2):79-90.
  92. He B, Carleton B, Etminan M. Risk of Gynecomastia with Users of Proton Pump Inhibitors. 2019 Mar 13. doi: 10.1002/phar.2245
  93. Gronowski AM. Clinical assays for human chorionic gonadotropin: what should we measure and how? Clin Chem. 2009 Nov;55(11):1900-4.
  94. Di Lorenzo G, Perdonà S, De Placido S, D’Armiento M, Gallo A, Damiano R, Pingitore D, Gallo L, De Sio M, Autorino R. Gynecomastia and breast pain induced by adjuvant therapy with bicalutamide after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: the role of tamoxifen and radiotherapy. J Urol. 2005;174:2197–2203.
  95. Ghadjar P, Aebersold DM, Albrecht C, Böhmer D, Flentje M, Ganswindt U, Höcht S, Hölscher T, Müller AC, Niehoff P, Pinkawa M, Sedlmayer F, Zips D, Wiegel T; Prostate Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and The Working Party Radiation Oncology of the German Cancer Society (DKG-ARO). Treatment strategies to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer: Statement from the DEGRO working group prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Jul;196(7):589-597. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01598-9. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
  96. Mohammadnia N, Simsek S, Stam F. Gynecomastia as a presenting symptom of Graves’ disease in a 49-year-old man. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2021 Apr 1;2021:20-0181. doi: 10.1530/EDM-20-0181.
  97. SL Simpson. Acromegaly and gigantism including a new syndrome in childhood. Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.26.294.201 on 1 April 1950.
  98. Dundar B, Dundar N, Erci T, Bober E, Büyükgebiz A. Leptin levels in boys with pubertal gynecomastia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Oct;18(10):929-34. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2005.18.10.929.
  99. Shore ND, Renzulli J, Fleshner NE, Hollowell CMP, Vourganti S, Silberstein J, Siddiqui R, Hairston J, Elsouda D, Russell D, Cooperberg MR, Tomlins SA. Enzalutamide Monotherapy vs Active Surveillance in Patients With Low-risk or Intermediate-risk Localized Prostate Cancer: The ENACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1128-1136. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1641.
  100. Reinehr T, Kulle A, Barth A, Ackermann J, Lass N, Holterhus PM. Sex hormone profile in pubertal boys with gynecomastia and pseudogynecomastia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Apr 1;105(4).
  101. Kanakis GA, Nordkap L, Bang AK, Calogero AE, Bártfai G, Corona G, Forti G, Toppari J, Goulis DG, Jørgensen N. EAA clinical practice guidelines-gynecomastia evaluation and management. Andrology. 2019 Nov;7(6):778-793. doi: 10.1111/andr.12636. Epub 2019 May 16.
  102. Ghalaut VS, Prakash G, Bansal P, Dahiya K, Dokwal S, Ghalaut PS, Bala M, Dhankhar R. Effect of imatinib on male reproductive hormones in BCR-ABL positive CML patients: A preliminary report. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):243-8. doi: 10.1177/1078155213500686. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
  103. Bulard J, Mowszowicz I, Schaison G. Increased aromatase activity in pubic skin fibroblasts from patients with isolated gynecomastia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;64:618–623.
  104. Stárka L, Hill M, Pospíšilová H, Dušková M. Estradiol, obesity and hypogonadism. Physiol Res. 2020 Sep 30;69(Suppl 2):S273-S278. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934510.
  105. Finkelstein JS, Lee H, Burnett-Bowie SA, Pallais JC, Yu EW, Borges LF, Jones BF, Barry CV, Wulczyn KE, Thomas BJ, Leder BZ. Gonadal steroids and body composition, strength, and sexual function in men. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1011-1022.

 

Utility of Advanced Lipoprotein Testing in Clinical Practice

ABSTRACT

 

A standard lipid panel includes total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-C. LDL-C can then be calculated. While the Friedewald formula is the classical method to calculate LDL-C levels recently developed formulas such as Martin Hopkins formula or Sampson-NIH formula are more accurate when triglycerides are elevated and/or LCL-C levels are low. In some instances, a direct LDL-C assay is employed, particularly when the triglyceride levels are elevated (>400mg/dL). Non-HDL-C can also be calculated (non-HDL-C = total cholesterol – HDL-C). Increasing levels of LDL-C and non-HDL-C are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, numerous studies have demonstrated that the association of non-HDL-C with ASCVD is more robust. It is possible to measure apolipoprotein B and A-I levels, LDL and HDL size, LDL and HDL particle number, and Lp(a). Numerous studies have documented a link between small dense LDL particles and an increased risk of ASCVD; however, the association is markedly reduced or entirely eliminated when the analyses are adjusted for other factors that affect ASCVD risk. Similarly, there is little data demonstrating that HDL subfractions are useful in risk prediction beyond HDL and other traditional risk factors. Apolipoprotein B levels and LDL particle number are more strongly associated with ASCVD than LDL-C, particularly when the levels of LDL-C and apolipoprotein B levels or LDL particle number are discordant. Similarly, while apolipoprotein B levels or LDL particle number are significantly better than non-HDL-C in predicting ASCVD risk when the levels of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B levels or LDL particle number are discordant whether this will alter therapy in most patients is debated. The guidelines put forth by a variety of different expert panels and organizations do not require apolipoprotein B or LDL particle number but may use them as risk enhancing factor. It is also the author’s opinion that at this time the routine measurement of apolipoprotein B and/or LDL particle number is not required. Until data demonstrate the superiority of measuring apolipoprotein B or LDL particle number on clinical outcomes it is hard to recommend the routine use of such testing. However, in situations where there is uncertainty measurement of apolipoprotein B and/or LDL particle number can be helpful. Studies have demonstrated an association of Lp(a) with ASCVD. Many experts recommend measuring Lp(a) once in all patients while other experts recommend measuring Lp(a) more selectively in a) patients with unexplained premature CHD, b) patients with a strong family history of premature CHD, c) patients with resistance to LDL lowering with statins, d) patients with rapid unexplained progression of atherosclerosis, and e) patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Elevations in Lp(a) will stimulate more aggressive lowering of LDL and the consideration of adding drugs that lower Lp(a) such as PCSK9 inhibitors. While routine use of advanced lipoprotein testing is not routinely recommended it should be recognized that in selected patients the additional information provided can be helpful and result in changes in treatment. As additional drugs to treat lipids are developed and our understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism expands in the future the use of advanced lipoprotein analysis may assume a more important role.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

A variety of specialized lipid and lipoprotein tests are available and a question that is frequently asked is whether and when to utilize these tests in evaluating and treating patients with lipid disorders. The standard lipid panel includes the measurement of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). The LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) can then be calculated using the Friedewald formula (LDL-C = total cholesterol – HDL-C – TG/5). In some instances, a direct LDL-C assay is employed because as the triglyceride levels increase the accuracy of the calculated LDL-C decreases and once the triglyceride levels are greater than 400mg/dl most laboratories will no longer provide a calculated LDL-C level. In patients with normal triglyceride levels and LDL levels > 100mg/dl calculated LDL-C and directly measured LDL-C are very strongly correlated and the difference between the levels is relatively small (1-3). However, if the triglyceride levels are greater than 150-200mg/dl the calculated LDL-C will be lower than the directly measured LDL-C level (1). Additionally, if the LDL-C level is low (<100mg/dl) the calculated LDL-C also tends to underestimate the true LDL-C level (1-5). Because of the inaccuracies of LDL-C levels calculated by the Friedewald formula a new and more accurate formula (Martin Hopkins Formula) has been developed (6). Several studies have demonstrated the increased accuracy of this new formula compared to the Friedewald formula with a particular advantage in settings of low LDL-C and high triglycerides (7-12). Major laboratories such as Quest now calculate LDL-C levels using the Martin Hopkins formula. A disadvantage of the Martin Hopkins formula is that it is more complex than the Friedewald formula and the LDL-C cannot be simply calculated. However, there is free, online access that allows for the automated calculation of LDL cholesterol by the Martin Hopkins formula (www.LDL-Calculator.com/) and a smart phone application (LDL cholesterol calculator: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/apps/all-apps/ldl-cholesterol-calculator). In addition to the Martin Hopkins formula other formulas to more accurately calculate LDL-C levels have been developed. The Sampson-NIH equation in some studies was more accurate when the triglyceride levels were elevated than the Martin Hopkins formula (13,14) but in other studies the Martin Hopkins formula was more accurate (15). The key is that there are better methods to calculate LDL-C levels than the Friedewald formula when triglyceride levels are elevated or LDL-C levels are low.

Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels can also be calculated from a routine lipid panel (non-HDL-C = total cholesterol – HDL-C). “Remnant cholesterol” can also be estimated from the routine lipid panel (Remnant cholesterol = total cholesterol – LDL-C (direct measurement) – HDL-C) (16,17). High calculated remnant cholesterol levels are associated with an increased risk of ASCVD (16). Whether remnant cholesterol levels provide information on ASCVD risk above that provided by non-HDL-C and triglyceride levels is not clear. It should be noted that there is no accepted standard for defining remnant lipoproteins or the methods used to accurately measure remnant particles (18). Of note most guidelines and risk calculators do not require lipid and lipoprotein measurements beyond a routine lipid panel. For example, the ACC/AHA (Pooled Cohort Equations), QRISK, Reynolds, SCORE, and Framingham calculators utilize total cholesterol and HDL-C levels in order to calculate the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (19-23).

 

In the past fasting lipid panels were exclusively recommended but recent guidelines recommend either fasting or non-fasting lipid panels ((24-26). Non-fasting lipid panels will increase the convenience of obtaining lipid studies. Additionally, in patients with diabetes, fasting for the lipid panel increases the risk of hypoglycemia (27). Moreover, studies have shown that the ability of fasting and non-fasting lipid panels to predict ASCVD is similar (28-32). Fasting and non-fasting total cholesterol, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels are virtually identical (33,34). Triglyceride levels may increase in the fed state depending upon the amount of fat consumed and the time after consumption and therefore depending upon the circumstances there may be a considerable difference between fasting and non-fasting triglyceride levels in some patients (33,34). LDL-C levels calculated by the Friedewald formula are often decreased in the fed state due to increases in triglyceride levels (33). In the non-fasting state when LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald formula 30% of patients had a ≥ 10 mg/dL difference compared to direct LDL-C measurements (9). In contrast, when LDL-C was calculated using the Hopkins Martin or Sampson-NIH formula the results were very similar to direct measurements. Therefore, if one is using non-fasting LDL-C in decision making one should calculate the LDL-C level using the Hopkins Martin or Sampson-NIH formula to increase accuracy. It should be noted that in patients where a genetic disorder of lipid metabolism is suspected or with previously elevated triglyceride levels a fasting lipid panel is preferred. Similarly, if triglyceride levels are elevated (>175mg/dL) with a non-fasting lipid panel the lipid panel should be repeated while fasting.

 

LDL CHOLESTEROL VS. NON-HDL CHOLESTEROL

 

LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels are strongly correlated and increasing levels of either parameter is associated with an increased risk of ASCVD. Numerous studies have compared the ability of LDL-C and non-HDL-C to predict ASCVD events (35). In general, while both LDL-C and non-HDL-C predict an increased risk, non-HDL-C levels are a better predictor (35-42). For example, in the Women’s Health Study, a prospective cohort study of 15,632 initially healthy US women aged 45 years or older, the relative risk of a cardiovascular event in the top vs. bottom quintile was 1.62 for LDL-C and 2.51 for non-HDL-C (41). Similarly, in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, a study of 51,529 US male health professionals between 40 to 75 years of age, the relative risk of a cardiovascular event in the highest quintile compared with the lowest quintile was 1.81 for LDL-C and 2.76 for non-HDL-C (42).

 

While LDL-C and non-HDL-C are strongly correlated there are some individuals where these measurements are discordant (i.e., a relatively low LDL-C and a relatively high non-HDL-C or conversely a relatively high LDL-C and a relatively low non-HDL-C). In discordant situations the non-HDL-C levels are a much better predictor of cardiovascular events than the LDL levels. For example, in a study by Mora of 27,533 healthy women, 11.6% had discordant levels with discordance defined as an LDL-C above the median and a non-HDL-C below the median or an LDL-C below the median with a non-HDL-C above the median (43). Most significantly, in women with a below-median LDL-C but a non-HDL-C above the median coronary risk was underestimated by almost 3-fold for women when the LDL-C was used to predict events (43). Conversely, in women with above-median LDL-C but a non-HDL-C below the median coronary risk was overestimated by almost 3-fold when their LDL-C was used to predict events (43). Thus, the risk of ASCVD tracks more closely with non-HDL-C levels and these results highlight the advantage of non-HDL-C measurements compared to LDL-C measurements in determining risk of ASCVD.

 

In addition, this discordance between calculated LDL-C (measured by the Friedewald formula) and non-HDL-C levels can result in the misclassification of patients. For example. in patients with LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, 15% had a non-HDL-C level ≥ 100 mg/dl and if the triglyceride levels were between 150-199mg/dl 22% had a non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dl (44). Thus, a significant number of patients who have reached their LDL-C goal of < 70mg/dl have not reached their non-HDL-C goal. The method used to determine LDL-C levels influences the rate of discordance between LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels. When the LDL-C levels were measured by the Friedewald formula the discordance was considerable higher than when LDL-C levels were measured using the Hopkins Martin formula (Table 1) (45).

 

Table 1. Discordance Between LDL-C and Non-HDL-C Levels

 

Percent with Non-HDL-C > 100mg/dl

LDL-C < 70mg/dL Friedewald Formula

14-15%

LDL-C < 70mg/dL Hopkins Martin Formula

~2%

 

Percent with Non-HDL-C > 130mg/dl

LDL-C < 100mg/dl Friedewald Formula

8-10%

LDL-C < 100mg/dl Hopkins Martin Formula

~ 1%

 

Finally, studies have examined the relative utility of LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels in determining the benefits of statin therapy. A meta-analysis by Boekholdt and colleagues looked at 8 statin trials with 62,154 patients (46). They found that while on treatment levels of both LDL-C and non-HDL-C were associated with the risk of future cardiovascular events the association was more robust for non-HDL-C (46).

 

Taken together these data indicate that while both LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels are predictive of ASCVD events non-HDL-C is a better predictor. The older NCEP guidelines recommended non-HDL-C as a therapeutic target if the triglyceride levels were greater than 200mg/dl and the newer National Lipid Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists recommendations consider non-HDL-C as a target along with LDL-C (19,26,47). The non-HDL-C targets are 30mg/dl higher than the LDL-C targets (for example if the LDL-C target is 70mg/dl the non-HDL-C target would be 100mg/dl). It is the opinion of this author that clinicians should utilize non-HDL-C levels more frequently in the evaluation and management of patients with hyperlipidemia. Additionally, non-HDL-C levels are easily calculated when one obtains a routine lipid panel in the fed or fasted state.

 

ADVANCED LIPOPROTEIN TESTS

 

In addition to a routine lipid panel, it is possible for the clinician to measure a number of other parameters including apolipoprotein B and A-I levels, LDL and HDL size, LDL and HDL particle number, and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels. A number of different tests are offered by large commercial laboratories. Currently, lipoprotein analysis by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR) is offered by LabCorp and Ion-Mobility Analysis is offered by Quest Diagnostics. Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation (VAP) by Atherotec was discontinued (Feb 2016). Both, LabCorp and Quest provide routine lipid panel measurements plus LDL particle number, apolipoprotein B levels, indication of LDL and HDL size, and Lp(a) measurements.

 

It should be recognized that the standardization of certain of these assays is not as rigorous as the standardization of routine lipid panel assays (3). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains a Lipid Standardization Program (LSP) that provides standards for measuring total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, apolipoprotein A-I, and apolipoprotein B. Measurements of LDL and HDL size and particle number are not as standardized and studies have shown differences in results between different methods (3,48,49). For example, Witte and colleagues compared LDL size using NMR and gradient gel electrophoresis and observed a correlation of only 0.39 between the two methods with an average difference in LDL size of 5.38nm with NMR values being lower (50). When these investigators classified patients according to whether they had small dense LDL (Pattern B) less than 50% of patients classified as pattern B using gradient gel electrophoresis were classified as pattern B using NMR (50). Similarly, Ensign et al., compared VAP, NMR, tube gel electrophoresis, and gradient gel electrophoresis to determine LDL subclasses and found a strong disagreement in patient LDL phenotyping among these four different methods (51). Measurement of LDL and HDL particle number has also shown discrepant results between different methods (52,53). These and other results highlight the lack of rigorous standardization (54).

 

LDL SIZE

 

The size of LDL particles is heterogeneous and there are a number of different methods to determine LDL size (ultracentrifugation, gradient gel electrophoresis, ion mobility, NMR) (55). As noted above, the different methods of LDL subclass analysis may produce different results and significant variations are possible even within one method (48). Studies have shown that small dense LDL is more pro-atherogenic than large LDL particles. Small dense LDL are thought to be more atherogenic because they are better able to penetrate the endothelial cell barrier and enter the intima, are more susceptible to oxidation, bind to proteoglycans in the arterial wall, and have a longer half time in the circulation than large LDL particles (56). It should be noted though that large LDL particles are also pro-atherogenic (57-61). For example, patients with familial hypercholesterolemia tend to have large LDL particles and these patients are at high risk to develop ASCVD (60). Small LDL particles are typically seen in patients with elevated triglyceride levels and decreased HDL-C levels (i.e. patients with the metabolic syndrome, obese patients, patients with diabetes) (62). Numerous studies have documented a link between small dense LDL particles and an increased risk of ASCVD (63,64). However, the association of small dense LDL with ASCVD is markedly reduced or entirely eliminated when the analyses are adjusted for other factors that affect the risk of ASCVD (63,64). The National Lipid Association expert panel was unable to identify any patient subgroups in which measuring LDL size is necessary (65). The author concurs with that viewpoint.

 

HDL SIZE

 

HDL particles are heterogeneous and vary in size (66,67). The metabolism and function of the spectrum of HDL particles is poorly understood. Additionally, there are a number of different methods of measuring HDL size and the comparability of the various methods is uncertain (54,66,67). Finally, and most importantly there is little data demonstrating that measurements of HDL subfractions are useful in risk prediction beyond measuring HDL and other traditional risk factors (64,67,68). Because of these issues the National Lipid Association Expert Panel was unable to find situations where HDL subfraction measurements would be recommended (65).

 

It should be recognized that the crucial issue with HDL may not be the HDL levels per se but rather the function of the HDL particles (54). Assays have been developed to determine the ability of HDL to facilitate cholesterol efflux from macrophages and these studies have shown that the levels of HDL-C do not necessarily indicate the ability to mediate cholesterol efflux (69). Moreover, cholesterol efflux from macrophages had a strong inverse association with both carotid intima-media thickness and the likelihood of angiographic coronary artery disease, independently of the HDL-C level (70). Additionally cholesterol efflux was also inversely associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events (71,72). These results indicate that it is the functional capability of HDL to facilitate cholesterol efflux that is important rather than simply HDL-C levels (73).

 

Assays have also been developed to measure the ability of HDL to protect LDL from oxidation (74). The ability of HDL to protect LDL from oxidation is decreased in patients with cardiovascular disease and in patients with inflammatory disorders who are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (74,75). Similar to studies of cholesterol efflux these observations suggest that HDL function is a key variable. Unfortunately assays to measure cholesterol efflux or the ability of HDL to prevent oxidation are not available outside of research laboratories.

 

APOLIPOPROTEIN B

 

All of the pro-atherogenic lipoproteins (chylomicron remnants, VLDL remnants, IDL, LDL, and Lp(a)) carry one apolipoprotein B on their surface such that apolipoprotein B levels reflect the total number of atherogenic particles (76). Most of the circulating apolipoprotein B is associated with LDL particles (76). However, the contribution of very high Lp(a) levels to total Apo B levels can be substantial (Estimated Apo B in LDL/VLDL = Apo B mg/dl – (Lp(a) mg/dl x 0.16) (77). Apo B levels measured in the non-fasting state are similar to fasting values.

 

The levels of apolipoprotein B, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C are strongly correlated. Almost all studies have shown that apolipoprotein B levels are more closely associated with ASCVD than LDL-C levels and the general consensus is that apolipoprotein B levels are a more accurate predictor of ASCVD events than LDL-C (41,42,65,78-85). Apolipoprotein B levels are equivalent to non-HDL-C levels in predicting ASCVD but when these measurements are discordant apolipoprotein B levels are a more accurate predictor of ASCVD.  

 

There are two large meta-analyses that have compared the ability of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B to predict ASCVD. The Emerging Risks Factor Collaboration examined 22 long term perspective studies with 91,307 subjects with a large number of events (4499) (28). In this study there were no differences in the ability of non-HDL-C or apolipoprotein B to predict ASCVD. The hazard ratio was increased approximately 2-fold in the upper quantile of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B compared to the lowest quantile. In contrast, another meta-analysis of 12 studies (not all perspective) with 233,455 subjects and 22,950 events reported slightly different results (86). In this study the relative risk ratio for apolipoprotein B was 1.43 (1.35-1.51) vs. 1.34 (1.24-1.44) for non-HDL-C, indicating a slightly greater predictive ability of apolipoprotein B (86).

 

A recent very large study has compared the predictive ability of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B (87). In the UK Biobank study 346,686 individuals without baseline CVD and not taking statins were followed for a median of 8.9 years. Fatal or nonfatal CVD events occurred in 6216 participants (1656 fatal). The conclusion of this very large study was that measurement of non-HDL-C was sufficient to capture the lipid-associated risk in CVD prediction, with no meaningful improvement from addition of apolipoprotein B.

 

Studies have also examined the predictive ability of non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B during treatment of dyslipidemia. In the Heart Protection Study (placebo vs. simvastatin) with over 20,000 participants and over 5,000 events the ability of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B to predict cardiovascular events were virtually identical (88). A meta-analysis by Boekholdt and colleagues looked at 8 statin trials with 62,154 patients and the adjusted hazard ratios for major cardiovascular events per 1-SD increase were very similar for apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C (46). A meta-analysis by Robinson et al of 25 trials (n = 131,134): 12 on statin, 4 on fibrate, 5 on niacin, 2 on simvastatin-ezetimibe, 1 on ileal bypass surgery, and 1 on aggressive versus standard low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and blood pressure targets observed that decreases in non-HDL cholesterol levels modestly outperformed apolipoprotein B in predicting cardiovascular events (89). Additionally, apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C decreases similarly predicted cardiovascular disease risk in the statin trials.

 

While apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C are strongly correlated there are some individuals where these measurements are discordant (i.e., a relatively low apolipoprotein B and a relatively high non-HDL-C or conversely a relatively high apolipoprotein B and a relatively low non-HDL-C). An analysis of the Interheart study explored the effect of discordance of apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C (90). The Interheart study is a case-control study of acute myocardial infarction with blood samples in 9345 cases and 12,120 controls from 52 countries. Concentrations of non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B were expressed as percentiles within the population. Concordance was defined as percentile non-HDL-C = percentile apolipoprotein B. Discordance was defined as percentile non-HDL-C > percentile apolipoprotein B or percentile non-HDL-C < percentile apolipoprotein B by 5%. The results of this study demonstrated that when apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C levels were discordant the apolipoprotein B measurement was a significantly better predictor of ASCVD (90). Subjects with a low apolipoprotein B and a high non-HDL-C were at low risk (Odds Ratio 0.72 (0.67-0.77 95% CI) whereas subjects with a high apolipoprotein B and a low non-HDL-C were at a high risk (Odds Ratio 1.58 (1.38-1.58 95% CI). Similar results have recently been reported from the Women’s Health Study (91). Subjects with a high apolipoprotein B level and a discordant lower non-HDL cholesterol level had an increased risk (hazard ratio 1.22 CI 1.07- 139). Of note the subjects with higher apolipoprotein B levels relative to non-HDL-C had an increased prevalence of the metabolic syndrome including higher triglyceride levels and decreased HDL-C levels. Finally, the Cardia study compared the ability of apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C levels to predict the development of coronary artery calcium, a surrogate marker of cardiovascular events (92). In this study apolipoprotein B levels were superior to non-HDL-C in predicting the development of coronary artery calcium (Table 2) (92). It is worth noting that the number of subjects that are discordant is relatively small (430 discordant/ 2794 total; 15.4% discordant).

 

Table 2. Cardia Study

Apo B/non-HDL-C (number of subjects)               

Odds Ratio (CI)

Low/low (1184)

1.00

Low/high (213)

1.30 (0.91-1.85)

High/low (217)

1.63 (1.15-2.32)

High/high (1180

2.32 (1.91-2.83)

 

A key question is whether measuring apolipoprotein B in addition to routine risk factors will significantly affect our ability to decide on whether and how to treat patients. Using data from the Framingham Heart Study it was shown that adding apolipoprotein B to non-HDL-C and standard risk factors increased the C-statistic from 0.723 to 0.730, a very small increase suggesting that routine measurements of apolipoprotein B would not be very helpful (81,93). Similarly, the Emerging Risk Factor Collaboration group and the Women’s Health Study also examined the effect of adding apolipoprotein B results on the C-statistic and found very little change (83,94). Additionally, the Emerging Risk Factor Collaboration modelled the effect of measuring apolipoprotein B levels on patient classification using the NCEP III guidelines. In 15,436 subjects with a cardiovascular risk of 10-20% over the next 10 years the addition of apolipoprotein B measurements would result in a change in classification in only 488 subjects (3.2%) (94). Most subjects would be moved to a lower risk category (334) and a very small number would be reclassified to a higher risk category (154). These results coupled with the C-statistic results noted above suggest that the routine addition of apolipoprotein measurements in primary prevention patients would likely not have a major effect in altering patient management.

 

In patients treated with statins a meta-analysis has compared the association of apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C levels on the risk of major cardiovascular events (46). While both on-treatment decreases in apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C levels were associated with a decrease in cardiovascular events the strength of the association was somewhat greater for non-HDL-C than apolipoprotein B (Table 3) (46). A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials comprising more than 60 000 study participants has also shown that changes in LDL-C, apoB100, and non-HDL-C all predicted similar CVD risk reduction after 1-year of statin therapy (-20, -24, and -20% risk reduction, respectively) (95). Finally, in another meta-analysis of 25 trials (12 statin, 4 fibrate, 5 niacin, 2 simvastatin-ezetimibe, 1 ileal bypass, 1 intensive vs. standard statin) the authors concluded that “across all drug classes, apo B decreases did not consistently improve risk prediction over LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol decreases” (89). Thus, in patients treated for hyperlipidemia the measurement of apolipoprotein B levels also does not appear to significantly contribute to the management of these patients.

 

Table 3.  Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Statin Treated Patients (Hazard Ratios)

Quartiles

Non-HDL-C

Apo B

1

1 (reference)

1 (reference)

2

1.12

1.05

3

1.17

1.12

4

1.42

1.33

 

Another approach to addressing the question of the importance of routinely measuring apolipoprotein levels is to determine if measuring apolipoprotein B level will alter our therapeutic approach. While most guidelines have not included apolipoprotein B goals there are guidelines that do recommend apolipoprotein B levels. For example, the National Lipid Association recommends in very high risk patients a LDL-C < 70mg/dL, a non-HDL-C < 100mg/dL, and an apolipoprotein B level < 80mg/dL (96). In an analysis by Sathiyakumar and colleagues if the LDL-C was < 70mg/dL and the non-HDL-C was < 100mg/dL (over 9000 subjects) fewer than 2% of the patients had an apolipoprotein B level > 80mg/dL (45). These results indicate that measuring apolipoprotein B levels will not identify a large number of patients that are not meeting the proposed goals.

 

In summary while measurement of apolipoprotein B levels is an excellent and likely the best predictor of ASCVD events whether it provides a substantial amount of information above and beyond what is provided by LDL-C and non-HDL-C and standard risk factors to justify routine apolipoprotein B measurement remains to be definitively determined. Whether routinely measuring apolipoprotein B levels will alter management in a sufficient number of patients to justify the extra expense of measuring apolipoprotein B needs to be rigorously studied. As noted earlier many of the patients with elevated apolipoprotein B levels relative to non-HDL-C levels are obese, diabetic, and have the metabolic syndrome and it is likely that clinicians will recognize based on non-lipid risk factors that these individuals are at high risk for ASCVD. There will of course be individual patients where measuring apolipoprotein levels will be helpful in determining treatment. For example, in patients thought to have Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia (Type 3 disease) the non-HDL-C/apolipoprotein B ratio is a simple test for selecting patients with mixed hyperlipidemia that may have Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia for additional studies (97). Similarly, in patients with high cholesterol levels and biliary obstruction a low apolipoprotein B level suggests the presence of lipoprotein X, an atypical lipoprotein particle containing unesterified cholesterol and phospholipids but not apolipoprotein B (3,98).

 

LDL PARTICLE NUMBER

 

The cholesterol content of LDL is not constant and can vary greatly between individuals and can change over time in a particular individual. For example, treatments that lower serum triglyceride levels can increase the size and cholesterol content of LDL (99,100). Measuring LDL particle number is an alternative way to quantitate LDL burden. While LDL-C and LDL particle number are strongly correlated there are some individuals who are discordant (relatively high LDL-C and relatively low LDL particle number or relatively low LDL-C and relatively high particle number). In patients with elevated triglycerides and/or low HDL levels the LDL-C levels are relatively low compared to LDL particle number (101,102).  Studies have shown that LDL particle number is more strongly associated with ASCVD than LDL-C, particularly when the levels of LDL-C and LDL particle number are discordant (43,83,103-106). Whether LDL particle number is a better predictor than non-HDL-C is discussed below.

 

Several studies have compared the ability of LDL particle number and non-HDL-C to predict ASCVD. In the Framingham Offspring Study there were 3,066 subjects with 431 events and LDL particle number was measured by NMR (103). In this study LDL particle number was more strongly associated with ASCVD than non-HDL-C (Hazard ratio 1.28 (CI 1.17-1.39) for LDL particle number vs. 1.21 (CI 1.10-1.33) for non HDL-C) (103). In the Women’s Health Study there were 27,673 subjects with 1015 events and LDL particle number was also measured by NMR (83). In this study the association of LDL particle number and non-HDL-C with ASCVD was very similar with the hazard ratio of 2.51 for LDL particle number and 2.52 for non-HDL-C (83). Finally, in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis subjects (n = 6693) no benefit of measuring LDL particle number compared to routine lipid measurements on predicting ASCVD could be demonstrated (107).

 

While there are several studies that have examined patients discordant for apolipoprotein B levels and non-HDL-C levels (see section on apolipoprotein B) only two studies have examined discordance between LDL particle number and non-HDL-C. In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis there were 6,814 men and women and LDL particle number was measured by NMR (108). The endpoint in this study was carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and coronary artery calcium (CAC), surrogate markers for ASCVD events. When there was discordance between LDL particle number and non-HDL-C, LDL particle number was more closely associated with CIMT and CAC but the differences were very modest (108). In the Women’s Health Study subjects with high LDL particle number measured by NMR that was discordant with non-HDL cholesterol levels were at increased risk of CHD (hazard ratio 1.13 CI 0.99-1.29) (91).

 

In patients on-treatment there is only a single study comparing LDL particle number and non-HDL-C. In the Heart Protection study 20,536 subjects were treated with simvastatin or placebo and LDL particle number was measured by NMR (88). The predictive strength of LDL particle number and non-HDL-C was very similar in both the placebo group and the statin group indicating no advantage of measuring LDL particle number (88).

 

It should also be noted that while LDL particle number and Apo B levels are highly correlated there are circumstances when they are discordant (109). High LDL particle number relative to Apo B levels was seen with insulin resistance, smaller LDL particle size, increased systemic inflammation, and low circulating LDL-C and HDL-C levels while high Apo B levels relative to LDL particle number was seen with larger LDL particle size and elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (109).

 

In summary, while measurement of LDL particle number is an excellent predictor of ASCVD events whether it provides a substantial amount of information beyond what is provided by non-HDL-C and standard risk factors to justify routine LDL particle measurement remains to be definitively determined.

 

Lp(a) MEASUREMENT

 

Lp(a) is an LDL particle with a single apolipoprotein B with a plasminogen like protein, apoprotein (a), attached by a disulfide bond (110-112). Apoprotein (a) is genetically very heterogeneous due to variations in molecular weight (from 300-800 kDa) due to differences in the number of Kringle repeats (110-112). The plasma levels of Lp(a) vary greatly with undetectable levels in some individuals (0.1mg/dl) and very high levels in others (>200mg/dl) (113). Individuals with genetically determined small apoprotein (a) have high plasma levels of Lp(a) whereas individuals with genetically determined large apoprotein (a) have low levels (110-112). The size of the apo(a) isoforms is inherited with an individual having two distinct apo(a) isoforms derived from apo(a) genes from their mother and father (113). This results in individuals having two different size Lp(a) particles in the serum. It is estimated that up to 90% of the variation in Lp(a) levels is determined genetically with environment having minimal effects. Lp(a) levels are very stable within an individual over their lifespan. Inflammation and renal disease increase while severe liver disease decrease Lp(a) levels (75,114).

 

Approximately 20% of subjects have Lp(a) levels greater than 50mg/dL and 30% have Lp(a) greater than 30mg/dL. Ethnicity greatly affects Lp(a) levels (114). The levels of Lp(a) in Blacks are approximately 2-3-fold higher than in Caucasians, Caucasians and Chinese have similar levels, South Asians have levels between Blacks and Caucasians, and Mexicans have levels lower than Caucasians (Blacks> South Asians > Caucasians/Chinese > Mexicans) (114). Lp(a) levels do not correlate with LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, or LDL particle number.

 

Several large meta-analyses have demonstrated an association of Lp(a) levels with ASCVD. For example, a meta-analysis by the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration looked at the individual records of 126,634 participants in 36 prospective studies with 9,336 CHD outcomes, 1,903 ischemic strokes, and 8,114 nonvascular deaths (115). They found a continuous association of Lp(a) with the risk of ASCVD that was not greatly affected by adjustment for other lipid levels or other established risk factors. In an analysis of 31 prospective studies with 9,870 events Bennet et al reported an odds ratio of 1.45 for individuals in the top third of Lp(a) compared with those in the bottom third (116). Of note adjustment for lipid levels and other established risk factors also had little effect on this association indicating that Lp(a) is an independent risk factor (116). Additionally, in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia elevated Lp(a) levels markedly increases the risk of the development of ASCVD (117). Mendelian randomization studies and basic science studies including experiments in animals that overexpress apoprotein (a) have suggested that increases in Lp(a) are not just a risk factor for atherosclerosis but causative for atherosclerosis (111,112,118-120). Finally, elevations in Lp(a) account for a significant proportion of the increased risk of ASCVD that is related to family history (121).

 

While the above studies clearly indicate that Lp(a) levels are a risk factor for the development of ASCVD the significance of Lp(a) in secondary prevention is not clear (122). Some studies have reported that Lp(a) is a risk factor in the setting of ASCVD (123-127) while other studies have failed to demonstrate a role for Lp(a) (128-131). In a meta-analysis of 11 studies with a total of 18,978 subjects the association between Lp(a) and ASCVD  was significant in studies in which the average LDL cholesterol was ≥130 mg/dl (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.73, p < 0.001), whereas this relationship was attenuated and did not achieve statistical significance for studies with an average LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dl (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.60, p = 0.21) (128). This observation suggests that in individuals with elevated LDL-C levels the impact of elevated Lp(a) levels will be magnified. However, in other studies Lp(a) was a risk factor even though LDL-C levels were relatively low (123,127). Recently Williet and colleagues reported a meta-analysis of patient-level data from seven randomized, placebo-controlled, statin outcomes trials that included 29,069 patients with repeat Lp(a) measurements (132). They found that elevated baseline and on-statin lipoprotein(a) showed an independent approximately linear relation with cardiovascular disease risk. Additionally, studies have shown that genetic variations at the LPA locus (apo(a) gene that effects Lp(a) levels) are associated with ASCVD events during statin therapy in patients (133). Taken together the bulk of the data suggests that elevated Lp(a) levels increase ASCVD risk even in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease.

 

The Emerging Risk Factor Collaboration modelled the effect of measuring Lp(a) levels on patient classification using the NCEP III guidelines (94). In 15,436 subjects with a cardiovascular risk of 10-20% over the next 10 years the addition of Lp(a) measurements would result in a change in classification in 1,517 subjects (9.8%). Most subjects would be moved to a lower risk category (962) and a number of subjects would be reclassified to a higher risk category (555) (94). These results coupled with the above findings suggest that the addition of Lp(a) measurements in patients might be useful in selected patients.

 

The potential benefits of measuring Lp(a) levels will become clearer when drugs are developed that specifically lower Lp(a) levels and clinical trials determining the effect of these drugs on ASCVD outcomes are completed. Without definitive data from randomized outcome trials demonstrating that specifically lowering Lp(a) levels results in a reduction in ASCVD events the advantages of measuring and treating Lp(a) will remain uncertain. Therapy to specifically lower Lp(a) is under development and hopefully in the near future will provide a clear demonstration of the benefits of monitoring and treating Lp(a) levels (134,135).

 

In the meantime, many experts would recommend measuring Lp(a) levels once in all patients (136-138) while other experts would measure Lp(a) in selected patients (Table 4) (65,139,140).  Elevations in Lp(a) will stimulate more aggressive lowering of LDL levels and the consideration of adding drugs that lower Lp(a) such as PCSK9 inhibitors (141).

 

Table 4. WHEN TO MEASURE LP(a) LEVELS

·       Patients with unexplained premature CHD

·       Patients with a strong family history of premature CHD

·       Patients with a family history of elevated Lp(a) levels (Cascade screening)

·       Patients with resistance to LDL-C lowering with statins

·       Patients with rapid unexplained progression of atherosclerosis

·       Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

·       Patients with aortic valvular stenosis of uncertain cause

·       Patients with intermediate risk profiles?

 

Standard measurements of LDL-C (either calculated or measured) include Lp(a) cholesterol (139,142). When Lp(a) levels are very high they can make a significant contribution to LDL-C levels. Similarly, when LDL-C levels are markedly reduced with treatment the LDL-C measured may include a significant contribution from Lp(a). The contribution of Lp(a) cholesterol to calculated LDL-C is approximately mg/dL Lp(a) x 0.3 (when both are expressed in mg/dL) (139,142). For example, if the Lp(a) level is 100mg/dL one can estimate that approximately 30mg/dL of the calculated LDL level is due to Lp(a). Note that these estimates are not precise and the percent cholesterol per mg Lp(a) particle can vary from 5.8% to 57.3% (143). Assays are underdevelopment to accurately determine the cholesterol in Lp(a) to allow for more accurate determinations of LDL-C levels (143).

 

Accurate measurement of Lp(a) represents a formidable technical challenge, unequalled in the world of biochemical diagnostics (139,144). This is due to the extreme length polymorphism of apo(a), whose size can vary over five-fold. Currently Lp(a) assays are not well standardized and there can be considerable variation between commercial assays. One study of 6 different assays found a variation from reference material of −8% to +22% (145) and another study found considerable variation in Lp(a) levels between 5 different assays (146). Hopefully more accurate assays using monoclonal antibodies will become widely available (147).  

 

Measuring Lp(a) mass (in mg/dL), as it is frequently done in commercial clinical labs, will not allow for a reliable and consistent way to convert Lp(a) concentration to nmol/l. For example, 50 mg/dL of Lp(a) with 40 kringle IV type 2 repeats is actually fewer particles than 30 mg/dL of an Lp(a) with 15 kringle IV type repeats. The solution is the adoption of an isoform-independent method that equally identifies each Lp(a) particle (139). Such a method is currently approximated by the use of a spectrum of isoform-specific calibrators, and providers should, if possible, have Lp(a) measured using this method and reported as concentration in nmol/l.

 

CONCLUSIONS 

 

While advanced lipoprotein measurements can provide additional insights and information it is not clear that for the evaluation and treatment of the vast majority of our patients that these measurements are necessary. Notably, the guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of hyperlipidemia put forth by a variety of different expert panels and organizations do not require advanced lipoprotein measurements. It is also the author’s opinion that at this time the routine use of advanced lipoprotein testing in clinical practice is not required and that LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels provide sufficient information to guide evaluation and treatment for most patients. Until clinical trial data demonstrate the superiority of utilizing advanced lipoprotein testing on clinical outcomes it is hard to recommend the routine use of such testing. However, it should be recognized that in selected patients the additional information provided can be helpful and result in changes in treatment. It is hoped that as additional drugs to treat lipids are developed and our understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism expands that in the future the use of advanced lipoprotein analysis will assume a more important role in the evaluation and treatment of patients to prevent ASCVD.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Brinton EA, Toth PP, McEvoy JW, Joshi PH, Kulkarni KR, Mize PD, Kwiterovich PO, Defilippis AP, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR. Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:732-739
  2. Mora S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Comparison of LDL cholesterol concentrations by Friedewald calculation and direct measurement in relation to cardiovascular events in 27,331 women. Clin Chem 2009; 55:888-894
  3. Wilson PWF, Jacobson TA, Martin SS, Jackson EJ, Le NA, Davidson MH, Vesper HW, Frikke-Schmidt R, Ballantyne CM, Remaley AT. Lipid measurements in the management of cardiovascular diseases: Practical recommendations a scientific statement from the national lipid association writing group. J Clin Lipidol 2021; 15:629-648
  4. Scharnagl H, Nauck M, Wieland H, Marz W. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2001; 39:426-431
  5. Meeusen JW, Snozek CL, Baumann NA, Jaffe AS, Saenger AK. Reliability of Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol. Am J Cardiol 2015; 116:538-540
  6. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. JAMA 2013; 310:2061-2068
  7. Quispe R, Hendrani A, Elshazly MB, Michos ED, McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Banach M, Kulkarni KR, Toth PP, Coresh J, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Martin SS. Accuracy of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation at very low levels. BMC Med 2017; 15:83
  8. Whelton SP, Meeusen JW, Donato LJ, Jaffe AS, Saenger A, Sokoll LJ, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Martin SS. Evaluating the atherogenic burden of individuals with a Friedewald-estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL compared with a novel low-density lipoprotein estimation method. J Clin Lipidol 2017; 11:1065-1072
  9. Sathiyakumar V, Park J, Golozar A, Lazo M, Quispe R, Guallar E, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Martin SS. Fasting Versus Nonfasting and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Accuracy. Circulation 2018; 137:10-19
  10. Martin SS, Giugliano RP, Murphy SA, Wasserman SM, Stein EA, Ceska R, Lopez-Miranda J, Georgiev B, Lorenzatti AJ, Tikkanen MJ, Sever PS, Keech AC, Pedersen TR, Sabatine MS. Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Assessment by Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald Estimation, and Preparative Ultracentrifugation: Insights From the FOURIER Trial. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3:749-753
  11. Lee J, Jang S, Son H. Validation of the Martin Method for Estimating Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Korean Adults: Findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2011. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0148147
  12. Chaen H, Kinchiku S, Miyata M, Kajiya S, Uenomachi H, Yuasa T, Takasaki K, Ohishi M. Validity of a Novel Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Diabetic Patients. J Atheroscler Thromb2016; 23:1355-1364
  13. Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, Harb R, Ashmaig M, Warnick R, Sethi A, Fleming JK, Otvos JD, Meeusen JW, Delaney SR, Jaffe AS, Shamburek R, Amar M, Remaley AT. A New Equation for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Normolipidemia and/or Hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5:540-548
  14. Ginsberg HN, Rosenson RS, Hovingh GK, Letierce A, Samuel R, Poulouin Y, Cannon CP. LDL-C calculated by Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, or NIH equation 2 versus beta-quantification: pooled alirocumab trials. J Lipid Res2022; 63:100148
  15. Sajja A, Park J, Sathiyakumar V, Varghese B, Pallazola VA, Marvel FA, Kulkarni K, Muthukumar A, Joshi PH, Gianos E, Hirsh B, Mintz G, Goldberg A, Morris PB, Sharma G, Blumenthal RS, Michos ED, Post WS, Elshazly MB, Jones SR, Martin SS. Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2128817
  16. Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant lipoproteins. Curr Opin Lipidol 2017; 28:300-307
  17. Nordestgaard BG, Langlois MR, Langsted A, Chapman MJ, Aakre KM, Baum H, Boren J, Bruckert E, Catapano A, Cobbaert C, Collinson P, Descamps OS, Duff CJ, von Eckardstein A, Hammerer-Lercher A, Kamstrup PR, Kolovou G, Kronenberg F, Mora S, Pulkki K, Remaley AT, Rifai N, Ros E, Stankovic S, Stavljenic-Rukavina A, Sypniewska G, Watts GF, Wiklund O, Laitinen P, European Atherosclerosis S, the European Federation of Clinical C, Laboratory Medicine Joint Consensus I. Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: Consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM. Atherosclerosis 2020; 294:46-61
  18. Krauss RM, King SM. Remnant lipoprotein particles and cardiovascular disease risk. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022:101682
  19. Expert Panel on Detection E, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285:2486-2497
  20. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Jr., Watson K, Wilson PW, Eddleman KM, Jarrett NM, LaBresh K, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC, Jr., Tomaselli GF, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation2014; 129:S1-45
  21. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Robson J, Brindle P. Derivation, validation, and evaluation of a new QRISK model to estimate lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: cohort study using QResearch database. BMJ 2010; 341:c6624
  22. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Ducimetiere P, Jousilahti P, Keil U, Njolstad I, Oganov RG, Thomsen T, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Tverdal A, Wedel H, Whincup P, Wilhelmsen L, Graham IM, Score Project Group. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:987-1003
  23. Ridker PM, Paynter NP, Rifai N, Gaziano JM, Cook NR. C-reactive protein and parental history improve global cardiovascular risk prediction: the Reynolds Risk Score for men. Circulation 2008; 118:2243-2251, 2244p following 2251
  24. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella-Tommasino J, Forman DE, Goldberg R, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA, Jones DW, Lloyd-Jones D, Lopez-Pajares N, Ndumele CE, Orringer CE, Peralta CA, Saseen JJ, Smith SC, Jr., Sperling L, Virani SS, Yeboah J. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. Circulation 2018:CIR0000000000000625
  25. Nordestgaard BG, Langsted A, Mora S, Kolovou G, Baum H, Bruckert E, Watts GF, Sypniewska G, Wiklund O, Boren J, Chapman MJ, Cobbaert C, Descamps OS, von Eckardstein A, Kamstrup PR, Pulkki K, Kronenberg F, Remaley AT, Rifai N, Ros E, Langlois M, European Atherosclerosis Society, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine Joint Consensus, Initiative. Fasting is not routinely required for determination of a lipid profile: clinical and laboratory implications including flagging at desirable concentration cut-points-a joint consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Eur Heart J 2016; 37:1944-1958
  26. Jacobson TA, Ito MK, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Bays HE, Jones PH, McKenney JM, Grundy SM, Gill EA, Wild RA, Wilson DP, Brown WV. National Lipid Association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: part 1 - executive summary. J Clin Lipidol 2014; 8:473-488
  27. Aldasouqi S, Sheikh A, Klosterman P, Kniestedt S, Schubert L, Danker R, Hershey DS. Hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes who are fasting for laboratory blood tests: the Cape Girardeau Hypoglycemia En Route Prevention Program. Postgrad Med 2013; 125:136-143
  28. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P, Kaptoge S, Ray KK, Thompson A, Wood AM, Lewington S, Sattar N, Packard CJ, Collins R, Thompson SG, Danesh J. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009; 302:1993-2000
  29. Mora S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Fasting compared with nonfasting lipids and apolipoproteins for predicting incident cardiovascular events. Circulation 2008; 118:993-1001
  30. Langsted A, Freiberg JJ, Nordestgaard BG. Fasting and nonfasting lipid levels: influence of normal food intake on lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, and cardiovascular risk prediction. Circulation 2008; 118:2047-2056
  31. Doran B, Guo Y, Xu J, Weintraub H, Mora S, Maron DJ, Bangalore S. Prognostic value of fasting versus nonfasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on long-term mortality: insight from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES-III). Circulation 2014; 130:546-553
  32. Mora S, Chang CL, Moorthy MV, Sever PS. Association of Nonfasting vs Fasting Lipid Levels With Risk of Major Coronary Events in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:898-905
  33. Rahman F, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Martin SS, Gluckman TJ, Whelton SP. Fasting or Non-fasting Lipids for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Treatment? Curr Atheroscler Rep 2018; 20:14
  34. Cartier LJ, Collins C, Lagace M, Douville P. Comparison of fasting and non-fasting lipid profiles in a large cohort of patients presenting at a community hospital. Clin Biochem 2018; 52:61-66
  35. Verbeek R, Hovingh GK, Boekholdt SM. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: current status as cardiovascular marker. Curr Opin Lipidol 2015; 26:502-510
  36. Arsenault BJ, Rana JS, Stroes ES, Despres JP, Shah PK, Kastelein JJ, Wareham NJ, Boekholdt SM, Khaw KT. Beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: respective contributions of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, triglycerides, and the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to coronary heart disease risk in apparently healthy men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 55:35-41
  37. Bittner V, Hardison R, Kelsey SF, Weiner BH, Jacobs AK, Sopko G, Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization I. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels predict five-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation 2002; 106:2537-2542
  38. Cui Y, Blumenthal RS, Flaws JA, Whiteman MK, Langenberg P, Bachorik PS, Bush TL. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease mortality. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161:1413-1419
  39. Kastelein JJ, van der Steeg WA, Holme I, Gaffney M, Cater NB, Barter P, Deedwania P, Olsson AG, Boekholdt SM, Demicco DA, Szarek M, LaRosa JC, Pedersen TR, Grundy SM, TNT Study Group, Ideal Study Group. Lipids, apolipoproteins, and their ratios in relation to cardiovascular events with statin treatment. Circulation2008; 117:3002-3009
  40. Lu W, Resnick HE, Jablonski KA, Jones KL, Jain AK, Howard WJ, Robbins DC, Howard BV. Non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: the strong heart study. Diabetes Care2003; 26:16-23
  41. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Cook NR, Bradwin G, Buring JE. Non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoproteins A-I and B100, standard lipid measures, lipid ratios, and CRP as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women. JAMA 2005; 294:326-333
  42. Pischon T, Girman CJ, Sacks FM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in the prediction of coronary heart disease in men. Circulation 2005; 112:3375-3383
  43. Mora S, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Discordance of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol with alternative LDL-related measures and future coronary events. Circulation 2014; 129:553-561
  44. Elshazly MB, Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Joshi PH, Toth PP, McEvoy JW, Al-Hijji MA, Kulkarni KR, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, guideline targets, and population percentiles for secondary prevention in 1.3 million adults: the VLDL-2 study (very large database of lipids). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1960-1965
  45. Sathiyakumar V, Park J, Quispe R, Elshazly MB, Michos ED, Banach M, Toth PP, Whelton SP, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR, Martin SS. Impact of Novel Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Assessment on the Utility of Secondary Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-C and Apolipoprotein B Targets in Selected Worldwide Dyslipidemia Guidelines. Circulation 2018; 138:244-254
  46. Boekholdt SM, Arsenault BJ, Mora S, Pedersen TR, LaRosa JC, Nestel PJ, Simes RJ, Durrington P, Hitman GA, Welch KM, DeMicco DA, Zwinderman AH, Clearfield MB, Downs JR, Tonkin AM, Colhoun HM, Gotto AM, Jr., Ridker PM, Kastelein JJ. Association of LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels with risk of cardiovascular events among patients treated with statins: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 307:1302-1309
  47. Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, Bloomgarden ZT, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, Grunberger G, Guerin CK, Bell DSH, Mechanick JI, Pessah-Pollack R, Wyne K, Smith D, Brinton EA, Fazio S, Davidson M. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Endocr Pract 2017; 23:1-87
  48. Chung M, Lichtenstein AH, Ip S, Lau J, Balk EM. Comparability of methods for LDL subfraction determination: A systematic review. Atherosclerosis 2009; 205:342-348
  49. Delatour V, Clouet-Foraison N, Gaie-Levrel F, Marcovina SM, Hoofnagle AN, Kuklenyik Z, Caulfield MP, Otvos JD, Krauss RM, Kulkarni KR, Contois JH, Remaley AT, Vesper HW, Cobbaert CM, Gillery P. Comparability of Lipoprotein Particle Number Concentrations Across ES-DMA, NMR, LC-MS/MS, Immunonephelometry, and VAP: In Search of a Candidate Reference Measurement Procedure for apoB and non-HDL-P Standardization. Clin Chem 2018; 64:1485-1495
  50. Witte DR, Taskinen MR, Perttunen-Nio H, Van Tol A, Livingstone S, Colhoun HM. Study of agreement between LDL size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance and gradient gel electrophoresis. J Lipid Res 2004; 45:1069-1076
  51. Ensign W, Hill N, Heward CB. Disparate LDL phenotypic classification among 4 different methods assessing LDL particle characteristics. Clin Chem 2006; 52:1722-1727
  52. Hopkins PN, Pottala JV, Nanjee MN. A comparative study of four independent methods to measure LDL particle concentration. Atherosclerosis 2015; 243:99-106
  53. Matera R, Horvath KV, Nair H, Schaefer EJ, Asztalos BF. HDL Particle Measurement: Comparison of 5 Methods. Clin Chem 2018; 64:492-500
  54. Ramasamy I. Update on the laboratory investigation of dyslipidemias. Clin Chim Acta 2018; 479:103-125
  55. Ivanova EA, Myasoedova VA, Melnichenko AA, Grechko AV, Orekhov AN. Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein as Biomarker for Atherosclerotic Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017; 2017:1273042
  56. Berneis KK, Krauss RM. Metabolic origins and clinical significance of LDL heterogeneity. J Lipid Res 2002; 43:1363-1379
  57. Campos H, Moye LA, Glasser SP, Stampfer MJ, Sacks FM. Low-density lipoprotein size, pravastatin treatment, and coronary events. JAMA 2001; 286:1468-1474
  58. Campos H, Roederer GO, Lussier-Cacan S, Davignon J, Krauss RM. Predominance of large LDL and reduced HDL2 cholesterol in normolipidemic men with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995; 15:1043-1048
  59. Mora S, Szklo M, Otvos JD, Greenland P, Psaty BM, Goff DC, Jr., O'Leary DH, Saad MF, Tsai MY, Sharrett AR. LDL particle subclasses, LDL particle size, and carotid atherosclerosis in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis 2007; 192:211-217
  60. Patsch W, Ostlund R, Kuisk I, Levy R, Schonfeld G. Characterization of lipoprotein in a kindred with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Lipid Res 1982; 23:1196-1205
  61. Rudel LL, Parks JS, Johnson FL, Babiak J. Low density lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res 1986; 27:465-474
  62. Krauss RM, Siri PW. Metabolic abnormalities: triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2004; 33:405-415
  63. Ip S, Lichtenstein AH, Chung M, Lau J, Balk EM. Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150:474-484
  64. Krauss RM. Lipoprotein subfractions and cardiovascular disease risk. Curr Opin Lipidol 2010; 21:305-311
  65. Davidson MH, Ballantyne CM, Jacobson TA, Bittner VA, Braun LT, Brown AS, Brown WV, Cromwell WC, Goldberg RB, McKenney JM, Remaley AT, Sniderman AD, Toth PP, Tsimikas S, Ziajka PE, Maki KC, Dicklin MR. Clinical utility of inflammatory markers and advanced lipoprotein testing: advice from an expert panel of lipid specialists. J Clin Lipidol 2011; 5:338-367
  66. Hafiane A, Genest J. High density lipoproteins: Measurement techniques and potential biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. BBA Clin 2015; 3:175-188
  67. Savolainen MJ. Epidemiology: disease associations and modulators of HDL-related biomarkers. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2015; 224:259-283
  68. Superko HR, Pendyala L, Williams PT, Momary KM, King SB, 3rd, Garrett BC. High-density lipoprotein subclasses and their relationship to cardiovascular disease. Journal of clinical lipidology 2012; 6:496-523
  69. Hovingh GK, Rader DJ, Hegele RA. HDL re-examined. Curr Opin Lipidol 2015; 26:127-132
  70. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M, Rodrigues A, Burke MF, Jafri K, French BC, Phillips JA, Mucksavage ML, Wilensky RL, Mohler ER, Rothblat GH, Rader DJ. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:127-135
  71. Rohatgi A, Khera A, Berry JD, Givens EG, Ayers CR, Wedin KE, Neeland IJ, Yuhanna IS, Rader DR, de Lemos JA, Shaul PW. HDL cholesterol efflux capacity and incident cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:2383-2393
  72. Qiu C, Zhao X, Zhou Q, Zhang Z. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity is inversely associated with cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis 2017; 16:212
  73. Anastasius M, Kockx M, Jessup W, Sullivan D, Rye KA, Kritharides L. Cholesterol efflux capacity: An introduction for clinicians. Am Heart J 2016; 180:54-63
  74. Navab M, Reddy ST, Van Lenten BJ, Anantharamaiah GM, Fogelman AM. The role of dysfunctional HDL in atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res 2009; 50 Suppl:S145-149
  75. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. The Effect of Inflammation and Infection on Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: De Groot LJ, Beck-Peccoz P, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, McLachlan R, New M, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, Weickert MO, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2022.
  76. Feingold KR. Introduction to Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: De Groot LJ, Beck-Peccoz P, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, Koch C, McLachlan R, New M, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, Weickert MO, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2021.
  77. Enkhmaa B, Anuurad E, Zhang W, Berglund L. Significant associations between lipoprotein(a) and corrected apolipoprotein B-100 levels in African-Americans. Atherosclerosis 2014; 235:223-229
  78. Benn M, Nordestgaard BG, Jensen GB, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Improving prediction of ischemic cardiovascular disease in the general population using apolipoprotein B: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007; 27:661-670
  79. Chien KL, Hsu HC, Su TC, Chen MF, Lee YT, Hu FB. Apolipoprotein B and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk of coronary heart disease in Chinese. J Lipid Res 2007; 48:2499-2505
  80. Holme I, Aastveit AH, Jungner I, Walldius G. Relationships between lipoprotein components and risk of myocardial infarction: age, gender and short versus longer follow-up periods in the Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk study (AMORIS). J Intern Med 2008; 264:30-38
  81. Ingelsson E, Schaefer EJ, Contois JH, McNamara JR, Sullivan L, Keyes MJ, Pencina MJ, Schoonmaker C, Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS. Clinical utility of different lipid measures for prediction of coronary heart disease in men and women. JAMA 2007; 298:776-785
  82. McQueen MJ, Hawken S, Wang X, Ounpuu S, Sniderman A, Probstfield J, Steyn K, Sanderson JE, Hasani M, Volkova E, Kazmi K, Yusuf S, Interheart Study Investigators. Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a case-control study. Lancet 2008; 372:224-233
  83. Mora S, Otvos JD, Rifai N, Rosenson RS, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Lipoprotein particle profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance compared with standard lipids and apolipoproteins in predicting incident cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 2009; 119:931-939
  84. Parish S, Peto R, Palmer A, Clarke R, Lewington S, Offer A, Whitlock G, Clark S, Youngman L, Sleight P, Collins R, International Studies of Infarct Survival Collaboration. The joint effects of apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A1, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol on risk: 3510 cases of acute myocardial infarction and 9805 controls. Eur Heart J 2009; 30:2137-2146
  85. Shai I, Rimm EB, Hankinson SE, Curhan G, Manson JE, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Ma J. Multivariate assessment of lipid parameters as predictors of coronary heart disease among postmenopausal women: potential implications for clinical guidelines. Circulation 2004; 110:2824-2830
  86. Sniderman AD, Williams K, Contois JH, Monroe HM, McQueen MJ, de Graaf J, Furberg CD. A meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011; 4:337-345
  87. Welsh C, Celis-Morales CA, Brown R, Mackay DF, Lewsey J, Mark PB, Gray SR, Ferguson LD, Anderson JJ, Lyall DM, Cleland JG, Jhund PS, Gill JMR, Pell JP, Sattar N, Welsh P. Comparison of Conventional Lipoprotein Tests and Apolipoproteins in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2019; 140:542-552
  88. Parish S, Offer A, Clarke R, Hopewell JC, Hill MR, Otvos JD, Armitage J, Collins R, Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Lipids and lipoproteins and risk of different vascular events in the MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study. Circulation 2012; 125:2469-2478
  89. Robinson JG, Wang S, Jacobson TA. Meta-analysis of comparison of effectiveness of lowering apolipoprotein B versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol for cardiovascular risk reduction in randomized trials. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:1468-1476
  90. Sniderman AD, Islam S, Yusuf S, McQueen MJ. Discordance analysis of apolipoprotein B and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol as markers of cardiovascular risk in the INTERHEART study. Atherosclerosis 2012; 225:444-449
  91. Lawler PR, Akinkuolie AO, Ridker PM, Sniderman AD, Buring JE, Glynn RJ, Chasman DI, Mora S. Discordance between Circulating Atherogenic Cholesterol Mass and Lipoprotein Particle Concentration in Relation to Future Coronary Events in Women. Clin Chem 2017; 63:870-879
  92. Wilkins JT, Li RC, Sniderman A, Chan C, Lloyd-Jones DM. Discordance Between Apolipoprotein B and LDL-Cholesterol in Young Adults Predicts Coronary Artery Calcification: The CARDIA Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67:193-201
  93. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Zdrojewski T, Williams K, Thanassoulis G, Furberg CD, Peterson ED, Vasan RS, Sniderman AD. Apolipoprotein B improves risk assessment of future coronary heart disease in the Framingham Heart Study beyond LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015; 22:1321-1327
  94. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Di Angelantonio E, Gao P, Pennells L, Kaptoge S, Caslake M, Thompson A, Butterworth AS, Sarwar N, Wormser D, Saleheen D, Ballantyne CM, Psaty BM, Sundstrom J, Ridker PM, Nagel D, Gillum RF, Ford I, Ducimetiere P, Kiechl S, Koenig W, Dullaart RP, Assmann G, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Dagenais GR, Cooper JA, Kromhout D, Onat A, Tipping RW, Gomez-de-la-Camara A, Rosengren A, Sutherland SE, Gallacher J, Fowkes FG, Casiglia E, Hofman A, Salomaa V, Barrett-Connor E, Clarke R, Brunner E, Jukema JW, Simons LA, Sandhu M, Wareham NJ, Khaw KT, Kauhanen J, Salonen JT, Howard WJ, Nordestgaard BG, Wood AM, Thompson SG, Boekholdt SM, Sattar N, Packard C, Gudnason V, Danesh J. Lipid-related markers and cardiovascular disease prediction. JAMA 2012; 307:2499-2506
  95. Thanassoulis G, Williams K, Ye K, Brook R, Couture P, Lawler PR, de Graaf J, Furberg CD, Sniderman A. Relations of change in plasma levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apoB with risk reduction from statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3:e000759
  96. Jacobson TA, Ito MK, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Bays HE, Jones PH, McKenney JM, Grundy SM, Gill EA, Wild RA, Wilson DP, Brown WV. National lipid association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: part 1--full report. J Clin Lipidol 2015; 9:129-169
  97. Boot CS, Middling E, Allen J, Neely RDG. Evaluation of the Non-HDL Cholesterol to Apolipoprotein B Ratio as a Screening Test for Dysbetalipoproteinemia. Clin Chem 2019; 65:313-320
  98. Arvind A, Osganian SA, Cohen DE, Corey KE. Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism in Liver Disease. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA) 2019.
  99. Frost RJ, Otto C, Geiss HC, Schwandt P, Parhofer KG. Effects of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate on lipoprotein profiles, low-density lipoprotein subfraction distribution, and hemorheologic parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:44-48
  100. Yuan J, Tsai MY, Hunninghake DB. Changes in composition and distribution of LDL subspecies in hypertriglyceridemic and hypercholesterolemic patients during gemfibrozil therapy. Atherosclerosis 1994; 110:1-11
  101. Cromwell WC, Otvos JD. Heterogeneity of low-density lipoprotein particle number in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:1599-1602
  102. Otvos JD, Jeyarajah EJ, Cromwell WC. Measurement issues related to lipoprotein heterogeneity. Am J Cardiol2002; 90:22i-29i
  103. Cromwell WC, Otvos JD, Keyes MJ, Pencina MJ, Sullivan L, Vasan RS, Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB. LDL Particle Number and Risk of Future Cardiovascular Disease in the Framingham Offspring Study - Implications for LDL Management. J Clin Lipidol 2007; 1:583-592
  104. Otvos JD, Mora S, Shalaurova I, Greenland P, Mackey RH, Goff DC, Jr. Clinical implications of discordance between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and particle number. J Clin Lipidol 2011; 5:105-113
  105. Blake GJ, Otvos JD, Rifai N, Ridker PM. Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation2002; 106:1930-1937
  106. El Harchaoui K, van der Steeg WA, Stroes ES, Kuivenhoven JA, Otvos JD, Wareham NJ, Hutten BA, Kastelein JJ, Khaw KT, Boekholdt SM. Value of low-density lipoprotein particle number and size as predictors of coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:547-553
  107. Manickam P, Rathod A, Panaich S, Hari P, Veeranna V, Badheka A, Jacob S, Afonso L. Comparative prognostic utility of conventional and novel lipid parameters for cardiovascular disease risk prediction: do novel lipid parameters offer an advantage? J Clin Lipidol 2011; 5:82-90
  108. Degoma EM, Davis MD, Dunbar RL, Mohler ER, 3rd, Greenland P, French B. Discordance between non-HDL-cholesterol and LDL-particle measurements: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2013; 229:517-523
  109. Varvel SA, Dayspring TD, Edmonds Y, Thiselton DL, Ghaedi L, Voros S, McConnell JP, Sasinowski M, Dall T, Warnick GR. Discordance between apolipoprotein B and low-density lipoprotein particle number is associated with insulin resistance in clinical practice. J Clin Lipidol 2015; 9:247-255
  110. Gudnason V. Lipoprotein(a): a causal independent risk factor for coronary heart disease? Curr Opin Cardiol2009; 24:490-495
  111. Koschinsky ML, Boffa MB. Lipoprotein(a): an important cardiovascular risk factor and a clinical conundrum. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2014; 43:949-962
  112. Lamon-Fava S, Diffenderfer MR, Marcovina SM. Lipoprotein(a) metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol 2014; 25:189-193
  113. Schmidt K, Noureen A, Kronenberg F, Utermann G. Structure, function, and genetics of lipoprotein (a). J Lipid Res 2016; 57:1339-1359
  114. Enkhmaa B, Anuurad E, Berglund L. Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions. J Lipid Res 2016; 57:1111-1125
  115. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Erqou S, Kaptoge S, Perry PL, Di Angelantonio E, Thompson A, White IR, Marcovina SM, Collins R, Thompson SG, Danesh J. Lipoprotein(a) concentration and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and nonvascular mortality. JAMA 2009; 302:412-423
  116. Bennet A, Di Angelantonio E, Erqou S, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Woodward M, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Danesh J, Gudnason V. Lipoprotein(a) levels and risk of future coronary heart disease: large-scale prospective data. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:598-608
  117. Alonso R, Andres E, Mata N, Fuentes-Jimenez F, Badimon L, Lopez-Miranda J, Padro T, Muniz O, Diaz-Diaz JL, Mauri M, Ordovas JM, Mata P, Safeheart Investigators. Lipoprotein(a) levels in familial hypercholesterolemia: an important predictor of cardiovascular disease independent of the type of LDL receptor mutation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:1982-1989
  118. Clarke R, Peden JF, Hopewell JC, Kyriakou T, Goel A, Heath SC, Parish S, Barlera S, Franzosi MG, Rust S, Bennett D, Silveira A, Malarstig A, Green FR, Lathrop M, Gigante B, Leander K, de Faire U, Seedorf U, Hamsten A, Collins R, Watkins H, Farrall M, Procardis Consortium. Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2518-2528
  119. Hobbs HH, Chiesa G, Gaw A, Lawn R, Maika SD, Koschinsky M, Hammer R. Apo(a) expression in transgenic mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1994; 714:231-236
  120. Liu AC, Lawn RM. Vascular interactions of lipoprotein (a). Curr Opin Lipidol 1994; 5:269-273
  121. Durrington PN, Ishola M, Hunt L, Arrol S, Bhatnagar D. Apolipoproteins (a), AI, and B and parental history in men with early onset ischaemic heart disease. Lancet 1988; 1:1070-1073
  122. Boffa MB, Stranges S, Klar N, Moriarty PM, Watts GF, Koschinsky ML. Lipoprotein(a) and secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events: A critical appraisal. J Clin Lipidol 2018; 12:1358-1366
  123. Albers JJ, Slee A, O'Brien KD, Robinson JG, Kashyap ML, Kwiterovich PO, Jr., Xu P, Marcovina SM. Relationship of apolipoproteins A-1 and B, and lipoprotein(a) to cardiovascular outcomes: the AIM-HIGH trial (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglyceride and Impact on Global Health Outcomes). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1575-1579
  124. Nestel PJ, Barnes EH, Tonkin AM, Simes J, Fournier M, White HD, Colquhoun DM, Blankenberg S, Sullivan DR. Plasma lipoprotein(a) concentration predicts future coronary and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013; 33:2902-2908
  125. Arsenault BJ, Barter P, DeMicco DA, Bao W, Preston GM, LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Deedwania P, Greten H, Wenger NK, Shepherd J, Waters DD, Kastelein JJ, Treating to New Targets Investigators. Prediction of cardiovascular events in statin-treated stable coronary patients of the treating to new targets randomized controlled trial by lipid and non-lipid biomarkers. PLoS One 2014; 9:e114519
  126. Berg K, Dahlen G, Christophersen B, Cook T, Kjekshus J, Pedersen T. Lp(a) lipoprotein level predicts survival and major coronary events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Clin Genet 1997; 52:254-261
  127. Khera AV, Everett BM, Caulfield MP, Hantash FM, Wohlgemuth J, Ridker PM, Mora S. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations, rosuvastatin therapy, and residual vascular risk: an analysis from the JUPITER Trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). Circulation2014; 129:635-642
  128. O'Donoghue ML, Morrow DA, Tsimikas S, Sloan S, Ren AF, Hoffman EB, Desai NR, Solomon SD, Domanski M, Arai K, Chiuve SE, Cannon CP, Sacks FM, Sabatine MS. Lipoprotein(a) for risk assessment in patients with established coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:520-527
  129. Zewinger S, Kleber ME, Tragante V, McCubrey RO, Schmidt AF, Direk K, Laufs U, Werner C, Koenig W, Rothenbacher D, Mons U, Breitling LP, Brenner H, Jennings RT, Petrakis I, Triem S, Klug M, Filips A, Blankenberg S, Waldeyer C, Sinning C, Schnabel RB, Lackner KJ, Vlachopoulou E, Nygard O, Svingen GFT, Pedersen ER, Tell GS, Sinisalo J, Nieminen MS, Laaksonen R, Trompet S, Smit RAJ, Sattar N, Jukema JW, Groesdonk HV, Delgado G, Stojakovic T, Pilbrow AP, Cameron VA, Richards AM, Doughty RN, Gong Y, Cooper-DeHoff R, Johnson J, Scholz M, Beutner F, Thiery J, Smith JG, Vilmundarson RO, McPherson R, Stewart AFR, Cresci S, Lenzini PA, Spertus JA, Olivieri O, Girelli D, Martinelli NI, Leiherer A, Saely CH, Drexel H, Mundlein A, Braund PS, Nelson CP, Samani NJ, Kofink D, Hoefer IE, Pasterkamp G, Quyyumi AA, Ko YA, Hartiala JA, Allayee H, Tang WHW, Hazen SL, Eriksson N, Held C, Hagstrom E, Wallentin L, Akerblom A, Siegbahn A, Karp I, Labos C, Pilote L, Engert JC, Brophy JM, Thanassoulis G, Bogaty P, Szczeklik W, Kaczor M, Sanak M, Virani SS, Ballantyne CM, Lee VV, Boerwinkle E, Holmes MV, Horne BD, Hingorani A, Asselbergs FW, Patel RS, consortium G-C, Kramer BK, Scharnagl H, Fliser D, Marz W, Speer T. Relations between lipoprotein(a) concentrations, LPA genetic variants, and the risk of mortality in patients with established coronary heart disease: a molecular and genetic association study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5:534-543
  130. Schwartz GG, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJV, Nicholls SJ, Olsson AG, Shah PK, Tardif JC, Kittelson J. Association of Lipoprotein(a) With Risk of Recurrent Ischemic Events Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis of the dal-Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol2018; 3:164-168
  131. Puri R, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Shao M, Barter P, Libby P, Chapman MJ, Erbel R, Arsenault BJ, Raichlen JS, Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ. Lipoprotein(a) and coronary atheroma progression rates during long-term high-intensity statin therapy: Insights from SATURN. Atherosclerosis 2017; 263:137-144
  132. Willeit P, Ridker PM, Nestel PJ, Simes J, Tonkin AM, Pedersen TR, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Colhoun HM, Kronenberg F, Drechsler C, Wanner C, Mora S, Lesogor A, Tsimikas S. Baseline and on-statin treatment lipoprotein(a) levels for prediction of cardiovascular events: individual patient-data meta-analysis of statin outcome trials. Lancet 2018; 392:1311-1320
  133. Wei WQ, Li X, Feng Q, Kubo M, Kullo IJ, Peissig PL, Karlson EW, Jarvik GP, Lee MTM, Shang N, Larson EA, Edwards T, Shaffer CM, Mosley JD, Maeda S, Horikoshi M, Ritchie M, Williams MS, Larson EB, Crosslin DR, Bland ST, Pacheco JA, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Cronkite D, Hripcsak G, Cox NJ, Wilke RA, Stein CM, Rotter JI, Momozawa Y, Roden DM, Krauss RM, Denny JC. LPA Variants Are Associated With Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Patients Receiving Statins. Circulation 2018; 138:1839-1849
  134. Tsimikas S, Viney NJ, Hughes SG, Singleton W, Graham MJ, Baker BF, Burkey JL, Yang Q, Marcovina SM, Geary RS, Crooke RM, Witztum JL. Antisense therapy targeting apolipoprotein(a): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 study. Lancet 2015; 386:1472-1483
  135. Tsimikas S. RNA-targeted therapeutics for lipid disorders. Curr Opin Lipidol 2018; 29:459-466
  136. Kronenberg F, Mora S, Stroes ESG. Consensus and guidelines on lipoprotein(a) - seeing the forest through the trees. Curr Opin Lipidol 2022; 33:342-352
  137. Pearson GJ, Thanassoulis G, Anderson TJ, Barry AR, Couture P, Dayan N, Francis GA, Genest J, Gregoire J, Grover SA, Gupta M, Hegele RA, Lau D, Leiter LA, Leung AA, Lonn E, Mancini GBJ, Manjoo P, McPherson R, Ngui D, Piche ME, Poirier P, Sievenpiper J, Stone J, Ward R, Wray W. 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults. Can J Cardiol 2021; 37:1129-1150
  138. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, De Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O, Group ESCSD. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 2020; 41:111-188
  139. Tsimikas S, Fazio S, Ferdinand KC, Ginsberg HN, Koschinsky ML, Marcovina SM, Moriarty PM, Rader DJ, Remaley AT, Reyes-Soffer G, Santos RD, Thanassoulis G, Witztum JL, Danthi S, Olive M, Liu L. NHLBI Working Group Recommendations to Reduce Lipoprotein(a)-Mediated Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71:177-192
  140. Wilson DP, Jacobson TA, Jones PH, Koschinsky ML, McNeal CJ, Nordestgaard BG, Orringer CE. Use of lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: A biomarker whose time has come. A scientific statement from the National Lipid Association. Don P. Wilson, MD, on behalf of the Writing group. J Clin Lipidol 2019;
  141. van Capelleveen JC, van der Valk FM, Stroes ES. Current therapies for lowering lipoprotein (a). J Lipid Res2016; 57:1612-1618
  142. Yeang C, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S. 'LDL-C' = LDL-C + Lp(a)-C: implications of achieved ultra-low LDL-C levels in the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 era of potent LDL-C lowering. Curr Opin Lipidol 2015; 26:169-178
  143. Yeang C, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S. Novel method for quantification of lipoprotein(a)-cholesterol: implications for improving accuracy of LDL-C measurements. J Lipid Res 2021; 62:100053
  144. Marcovina SM, Albers JJ. Lipoprotein (a) measurements for clinical application. J Lipid Res 2016; 57:526-537
  145. Scharnagl H, Stojakovic T, Dieplinger B, Dieplinger H, Erhart G, Kostner GM, Herrmann M, Marz W, Grammer TB. Comparison of lipoprotein (a) serum concentrations measured by six commercially available immunoassays. Atherosclerosis 2019; 289:206-213
  146. Wyness SP, Genzen JR. Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer. Pract Lab Med 2021; 25:e00218
  147. Marcovina SM, Navabi N, Allen S, Gonen A, Witztum JL, Tsimikas S. Development and validation of an isoform-independent monoclonal antibody-based ELISA for measurement of lipoprotein(a). J Lipid Res 2022; 63:100239

Reproductive Health and Its Impact On Lipid Management in Adolescent and Young Adult Females

ABSTRACT

 

Lipids disorders are common in youth.  Adolescents and young women of childbearing age who have moderate to severe lipid disorders may benefit from treatment with lipid lowering medications (LLM). However, most of these medications are contraindicated in pregnancy.  Those who are sexually active should receive counseling on effective methods to prevent unplanned pregnancies. While contraceptives, when appropriate, are typically prescribed by primary care physicians, lipidologists are often asked to address the unique aspects related to use of long-term LLMs, such as statins, in females with hypercholesterolemia.  Appropriate counseling and management require not only knowledge of the effects of sexual maturation on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, but a thorough understanding of current recommendations and potential harms associated with the use of some LLMs, such as statins, should pregnancy occur.  In this chapter, we review changes in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism during puberty, current guidelines for use of contraceptive methods in adolescent and young adult females and laws that pertain to this unique population.

 

CANDIDATES FOR LIPID LOWERING MEDICATIONS IN YOUTH

 

There are a number of lipid disorders, both acquired and genetic, that may warrant pharmacotherapy, beginning at an early age.  These include primary hypercholesterolemia, such as familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and the severe hypertriglyceridemia characteristic of familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS).  A discussion of the specific disorders causing moderate to severe dyslipidemia in adolescents and young adults can be found in Endotext (1-3).

 

LIPID AND LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM DURING PUBERTY

 

It should be noted that lipid levels vary throughout childhood and adolescence.  Prior studies have described these changes. At young ages, lipid levels are similar between boys and girls (3-12). Cholesterol levels at birth are typically very low.  A review of studies of serum cholesterol in the U.S. concluded that total cholesterol (TC) concentration, which is approximately 65 mg/dl (1.68 mmol/l) in umbilical cord blood, rises after birth to reach a mean level of 165 mg/dl (4.27 mmol/l) by 2 years-of-age (13). When trends are analyzed by chronological age, mean TC levels generally peak between ages 9 to 11, followed by a decline during puberty.  There are gender differences in the levels of other lipids and lipoproteins as well.  A review of data from NHANES demonstrated that the prevalence of elevated levels of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) was greater in girls (9.4%) than in boys (7.5%) (14). Levels rise again after puberty to reach the adult values. 

 

Since puberty has such a remarkable effect on lipid levels, it is important to understand the stages of pubertal development in assessing and making recommendations for treatment of dyslipidemia in youth.  Puberty is defined as the age at or period during which the body of a girl or boy matures and becomes capable of reproduction. Classically, there are five well-defined stages of puberty, often referred to as Tanner or pubertal stages 1 to 5 (Figure 1) (15-17). 

 

Figure 1. Pubertal Stages

Menarche, the term used to define the first menstrual cycle or episode of vaginal bleeding in females, generally occurs at pubertal stage 4; while pubertal stage 5 is used to define adult sexual maturity in both males and females.  Despite earlier onset of secondary sexual characteristics, such as pubic hair, historically the median age at menarche has remained relatively stable - occurring at approximately 12 to 13 years-of-age in most females - across well-nourished populations in developed countries.  Over the past 30 years, data from the U.S. NHANES has found no significant change in the median age at menarche, except among the non-Hispanic black population, which has a 5.5-month earlier median age at menarche than occurred previously. 

 

Excessive weight gain during childhood is associated with earlier onset of puberty.  Environmental factors, including socioeconomic conditions, nutrition, and access to preventive health care, may also influence the timing and progression of puberty.

 

By 15 years-of-age, 98% of females will have experienced menarche (18). In addition to a benchmark marking the beginning of reproductive life in females, both premature and delayed menarche appear to be associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (19-21).  Women with prolonged and irregular menstrual cycles also appear to have higher risk for premature CVD and type 2 diabetes (T2D) (22,23).

 

Previous studies have taken into account pubertal changes in assessing lipid and lipoprotein levels in youth (24-30). It should be noted that youth of the same age, sex, and race show considerable variability in their degree of sexual maturation and somatic growth. Thus, at all pubertal stages, chronological age can vary widely. This suggests that the use of age alone may be misleading when assessing the levels and changes in lipid levels in this population. In a longitudinal study that assessed pubertal stage at various ages, the levels of TC, low density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and non-HDL-C decreased in all groups during puberty (31).  HDL-C decreased and triglyceride (TG) levels increased in males during puberty, while no changes were observed in females. For HDL-C, sex differences in the pattern of change emerged by pubertal stage 3 (31).  Prior data has also suggested that HDL-C concentrations continue to decrease in males into early adulthood while remaining constant in females (32).  Pubertal development should, therefore, be considered when determining criteria for initiation of lipid screening in youth; pre-pubertal (often before 9 years-of-age) and post-pubertal (typically after 17 years-of-age) screening might be useful despite current recommendations to screen between 9 to 11 years-of-age (31).  For females who become pregnant, it is important to be aware of the additional changes in lipids that have been well-described (33).

 

EFFECT OF PREGNANCY ON LIPID DISORDERS

 

Management of dyslipidemia in adolescent and young adult females requires a thorough knowledge of lipid metabolism and physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy. Those who are considering pregnancy in the setting of a lipid disorder may benefit from preconception consultation with an obstetrician/maternal-fetal medicine specialist with knowledge of complex pregnancies to discuss the impact of pregnancy on maternal disease. If not seen prior to becoming pregnant, referral of those with severe dyslipidemia or FH is recommended early in pregnancy. Severe dyslipidemia has been associated with a variety of obstetric and maternal complications including preterm delivery, hypertension-related disorders of pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, increased fat deposition in the fetus, and maternal pancreatitis (34).

 

Physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy lead to an increase in plasma concentrations of lipids and lipoproteins. Maternal hyperlipidemia routinely occurs in the later part of pregnancy with levels of TG, very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL-C), LDL-C, and HDL-C increased compared to non-pregnant females (35). These changes are related to increased insulin resistance during pregnancy as well as increased production of estrogen (36). Given the expected increases seen in cholesterol during pregnancy and the limited treatment options that are available, routinely following lipid levels during pregnancy is not recommended. However, patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia who are at-risk of pancreatitis and those with FH who may develop symptomatic ASCVD during pregnancy are an exception and should be followed closely (37). Following delivery, cholesterol concentrations begin to decline with levels returning to baseline in most women by 6 weeks postpartum. However, some data suggest levels may remain elevated for as long as 20 weeks postpartum. Breastfeeding leads to decreases in TG levels, however HDL-C levels increase. The effect of breastfeeding on LDL-C levels is unclear (36).

 

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LIPID-LOWERING THERAPY WITH A RISK OF PREGNANCY

 

In addition to heart-healthy living, use of LLMs is currently recommended as a treatment option for females with moderate-to-severe dyslipidemia (39,40).  When prescribing these medications, it is important to understand the potential risks of each drug class as well as each individual drug, and effects on reproductive health.  While rare, most adverse events are similar for male and female youth (41). 

 

Recommendations for use of LLMs, such as statins, in females of childbearing age should consider the potential ofteratogenicity (33, 39). To date there have been two systematic reviews that evaluated statins and teratogenicity.  Neither found evidence that statins cause congenital anomalies independent of concomitant medical conditions associated with their use (42,43).  Of interest, in women with a prior history of pre-eclampsia use of pravastatin during subsequent pregnancy has shown promising results for preventing recurrence (44,45). Nonetheless, caution is advised when recommending the use of statins in females, including adolescent and young adult females.

 

 

If an adolescent or young adult female becomes pregnant while taking a LLM other than a bile acid sequestrant (e.g., colesevelam), best practice has been to immediately stop the LLM and the patient should be followed closely by an obstetrician in addition to a lipid specialist. LDL apheresis can be safely used during pregnancy and may be beneficial to some women.

 

It should be stated, however, that in 2021 the FDA requested revisions to the prescribing information about statin use during pregnancy, noting that contraindication of these drugs in all pregnant women is not appropriate.  The FDA recommended removing this labeling, based upon the benefits statins may have in preventing serious or potentially fatal events in a small group of very high-risk pregnant patients. Removing the contraindication enables health care professionals and patients to make individual decisions about benefit and risk, especially for those at very high risk of heart attack or stroke, such as homozygous FH and females who have previously had a heart attack or stroke (47).

 

NON-STATIN THERAPIES

 

Lifestyle changes, including dietary modifications, are recommended for all individuals with lipid disorders and should be considered a cornerstone of lipid management in pregnancy as well. There are limited data, however, on use of non-statin medications to treat elevations in cholesterol and triglyceride during pregnancy. If any of the following medications are considered in an adolescent or woman of child-bearing age, the potential for pregnancy and relative risks must be taken into consideration.

 

Bile Acid Sequestrants

 

Despite reassurance of statin safety, only bile acid sequestrants are currently considered safe for use in treating LDL-C disorders during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

 

Ezetimibe

 

No data are available on use during pregnancy. Animal studies have found ezetimibe crosses the placenta. At levels significantly higher than those achieved with human doses, there appears to be a slightly increased risk of skeletal abnormalities in rats and rabbits. Therefore, this agent is not recommended for use during pregnancy. If used prior to pregnancy, ezetimibe should be discontinued prior to attempting to become pregnant (48).

 

PCSK9 Inhibitors (Monoclonal Evolocumab, Alirocumab and mRNA Therapy Inclisiran)

 

No data are available on use during pregnancy. An observational trial of evolocumab in pregnant women with FH was terminated after being unable to enroll sufficient subjects (4 patients in 4 years; clinical trials.gov NCT02906124). PCSK9 inhibitors are not approved for use in pregnancy nor currently recommended (48).

 

Bempedoic acid

 

This drug should be discontinued when pregnancy is recognized, unless the benefits of therapy outweigh the potential risks to the fetus (49).

 

Evinacumab

 

No data are available on use during pregnancy. Based on animal studies, exposure during pregnancy may lead to fetal harm (49).

 

Lomitapide

 

This drug is not recommended during pregnancy due to concerns for fetal harm (49).

 

Fibrates

 

Limited data are available on use during pregnancy.  Adverse outcomes from the use of fibrates during the second trimester have not been reported. However, such observations are based on case reports (50). Most reported use of fibrates (both gemfibrozil and fenofibrate) during pregnancy occurred in the second trimester, after embryogenesis occurs. Studies in animals have found no increased risk of congenital malformations (48).

 

Omega-3-Fatty Acid

 

Lifestyle modifications with increase in dietary omega-3-fatty acids appear to be safe during pregnancy. Prescription omega-3-fatty acids are not approved for use during pregnancy (48).

 

Volanesorsen

 

No data are available on use during pregnancy. If used prior to pregnancy, volanesoren should be discontinued one month before attempting conception (51). This drug is not approved for use in the U.S.

 

Plasmapheresis

 

In those at-risk of severe elevations in TG due to acquired (insulin resistance/diabetes) and genetic causes (FCS and MCS), case reports and reviews have reported use of plasmapheresis in those who develop pancreatitis. The procedure appears to be safe and has the advantage of quickly lowering TG levels (52,53).

 

LDL Apheresis

 

This procedure can be safely used during pregnancy and may be beneficial to some women with severely elevated lipids, such as FH (39).

 

SEXUAL ACTIVITY, RISK OF PREGNANCY AND SEXUAL HISTORY TAKING

 

Drugs such as statins are increasingly prescribed to females of childbearing age, including prior to the onset of sexual maturity. Since current guidelines still suggest avoidance or discontinuation of most LLMs during pregnancy, it is important for clinicians to consider the appropriate age at which a conversation regarding contraceptive options should be initiated. In addition to knowledge regarding pubertal development and reproductive ability, clinicians should have an awareness of current sexual practices amongst adolescents. According to the National Center for Health Statistics Reports, an estimated 55% of U.S. male and female teens have had sexual intercourse by 18 years-of-age; approximately 80% of teens used some form of contraception during their first episode of sex (54).

 

The proportion of youth who have had sexual intercourse increases rapidly throughout adolescence. In 2013, approximately 1% of 10-year-olds, 20% of 15-year-olds and 65% of 18-year-olds reported having had sexual intercourse (Figure 2).

 

Figure 2. Percent of individuals 10-40 years-of-age who have had sexual intercourse. Modified from J. Philbin, Guttmacher Institute, unpublished data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2013 (93).

For youth 11 years-of-age and older, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends healthcare providers obtain a developmentally-appropriate sexual history, including assessing risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and pregnancy, and provision of appropriate screening, counseling, and, if needed, contraceptives options for adolescents during clinic visits (55).

 

An adolescent’s sexual history should be updated regularly and conducted in a confidential and non-judgmental manner, re-addressing the needs for contraception, STI screening, and appropriate counseling regarding reduction of health risks related to sexual activity (56). Pregnancy testing should be conducted when appropriate or requested.

 

Key to effective history taking is an honest, caring, non-judgmental approach by the healthcare provider. Interviews should be conducted in a comfortable, matter-of-fact manner to encourage questions and to build trust. This can be accomplished by assessing the “5 Ps” of sexual history taking:

 

  • Partners
  • Prevention of pregnancy
  • Protection from STIs
  • Sexual Practices
  • Past history of STIs and pregnancy

 

To encourage compliance, counseling should incorporate techniques of motivational interviewing (57).

 

Although there has been a decline in recent years, the pregnancy rate amongst adolescent females in the U.S. remains substantially higher than in other Western industrialized nations and racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in teen birth rates persist (58-62).

 

EFFECT OF CONTRACEPTIVE OPTIONS ON LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM

 

While clinicians should review the effects on lipid levels when prescribing contraception, there are limited data to aid selection of a specific contraceptive method based upon the individual’s underlying presumed or confirmed lipid disorder.

 

Review of the CDC Summary Chart of US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use suggests avoidance of estrogen containing birth control as well as DMPA in individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, which would include those with lipid disorders. Preferred methods of contraception for this vulnerable population would include the copper IUD, which contains no hormones, followed by a levonorgestrel containing IUD, implant, and progestin only contraceptive pills.

 

Although the impact of estrogen and progestin on lipid parameters has been well described, it is not known whether the hormone formulation or the means of administration of various contraceptive methods have any clinical significance either in women with normal baseline lipid levels or in those with lipid disorders (Table 1) (63). Furthermore, insufficient data are available in regard to the effect of various contraceptive methods when used in individuals with well-defined lipid disorders.

 

Table 1. The Effects of Contraceptive Methods on Lipids and Lipoproteins

Contraceptive Method

LDL-C

HDL-C

TG

Comments/References

Combined Oral Contraceptive Pill

·       Estrogen

Decrease

Increase

Increase

For OCPs with an identical dose of estrogen, the choice and dose of the progestin component may affect net lipid changes (63,64)

·       Progestin

Increase

Decrease

Decrease

Transdermal Patch

Decrease

Increase

Increase

(65)

Vaginal Ring

---

---

Increase

(66)

DMPA

Increase

Decrease

Neutral

(67,68)

LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG = triglycerides; DMPA = Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

 

In general, combined oral contraceptives (COCs) raise TGs slightly.  The effects on LDL-C and HDL-C are less predictable, but the effects are thought to be related to the dose of the ethinyl estradiol, the type of progestin, and health status of the patient (for example, obese versus not obese).  Once OCPs are discontinued, lipid and lipoprotein levels appear to return to pre-treatment levels (64). If an oral contraceptive is preferred, the use of COCs that contain 35 mcg or less of estrogen is generally recommended for most adult women with controlled dyslipidemia. 

 

Compared to COCs, transdermal and vaginal contraception have similar effects on lipid profiles. Barrier methods and IUDs are generally considered to be lipid neutral (65,66).

 

COCs have also been shown to increase plasma insulin and glucose levels and reduce insulin sensitivity in women; however, these effects are negligible for current formulations and among women of normal weight without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).  For females who are overweight/obese and those with PCOS, potential adverse effects should be considered in the choice of contraceptive method (67-74).

 

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CONTRACEPTIVE OPTIONS IN ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT FEMALES

 

How does one determine which contraceptive is the best option for an adolescent or young adult female with dyslipidemia?  From a practical point of view, this is largely dependent upon the individual’s needs, preference, resources, and ability to adhere to the method chosen. Abstinence is 100% effective in preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, and is an important part of contraceptive counseling. Although adolescents should be encouraged to delay onset of sexual activity, adherence to abstinence in this age group is low. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to discuss comprehensive sexual health and the risks/benefits of contraceptive options with all adolescents (56,75).

 

A review of the many options available for contraception is beyond the scope of this discussion. The safety and efficacy of contraceptive methods is also reviewed in the Endotext Chapter entitled “Contraception” (76). It is important to note that currently the most effective form of birth control is the contraceptive implant, followed by the IUD, and the progestin injection (Figures 3) (77).

 

Figure 3. Effectiveness of Contraceptive Options. (Adapted from World Health Organization 2011 and Trussell, 2011. (78,79). * The percentages indicate the number of women out of every 100 who experienced an unintended pregnancy within the first year of typical use of each contraceptive method.

Given their efficacy, safety, and ease of use, in coordination with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the AAP currently recommends long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) be considered first-line contraceptive choices for adolescents (56,80).

 

Key points for healthcare providers when recommending contraceptive methods:

 

  • Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and the contraceptive patch are highly effective methods of contraception that are much safer than pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to prescribe contraceptives or refer for IUD placement without first conducting a pelvic examination. Screenings for STIs, especially chlamydia, can be performed without a pelvic examination.
  • If appropriate, consistent and correct use of condoms with every act of sexual intercourse should be encouraged.
  • Physicians should have a working knowledge of the different combined hormonal methods and regimens for contraception and medical management of common conditions, such as acne, dysmenorrhea, and heavy menstrual bleeding.
  • Adolescents with chronic illnesses and disabilities (estimated to be16 to 25% of adolescents) have similar sexual health and contraceptive needs as their healthy adolescent counterparts, although the medical illness may complicate contraceptive choices (56).

 

Healthcare providers who desire more information regarding contraception options for adolescent and young adult females, including those with medical conditions, are encouraged to consult the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (81,82).

 

HORMONAL CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS IN FEMALES WITH COMPLEX MEDICAL CONDITIONS

 

Aside from concerns regarding the effects of medications during unplanned pregnancy, recommendations for choice of contraceptive methods in females with primary lipid disorders should follow the same guidelines as outlined for age-appropriate females.  Those with secondary dyslipidemia related to complicated, long-term medical conditions, such as chronic inflammatory diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus), diabetes, and HIV may require addition considerations prior to recommending use of a specific contraceptive method. The concurrent use of medications may also affect contraceptive choices. Table 2 provides a brief summary of the current guidelines to assist in clinical decision-making. For a more detailed discussion, a review of the US Selected Practice Recommendations (US SPR) for Contraceptive Use, 2016 is recommended (74-81).

 

Table 2. Summary of Classifications for Hormonal Contraceptive Methods and Intrauterine Devices

Condition

Cu-IUD

LNG-IUD

Implants

DMPA

POP

CHCs

Obesity

a. BMI ≥30 kg/m2

1

1

1

1

1

2

b. Menarche <18 years and BMI ≥30 kg/m2

1

1

1

2

1

2

Cardiovascular Disease

a.              Multiple risk factors for ASCVDa

1

2

2*

3*

2*

3/4*

Hypertensionb

a. Adequately controlled hypertension

1*

1*

1*

2*

1*

3*

b. Elevated blood pressure levels (properly taken measurements)

i.  SBP 140–159 mm Hg or DBP 90–99 mm Hg

1*

1*

1*

2*

1*

3*

ii. SBP ≥160 mm Hg or DBP ≥100 mm Hg

1*

2*

2*

3*

2*

4*

c. Vascular disease

1*

2*

2*

3*

2*

4*

Known thrombogenic mutationsc

1*

2*

2*

2*

2*

4*

Rheumatic Diseases

Systemic lupus erythematosusd

a. Positive (or unknown) antiphospholipid antibodies

 

3*

3*

 

3*

4*

Initiation

1*

 

 

3*

 

 

Continuation

1*

 

 

3*

 

 

b. Severe thrombocytopenia

 

2*

2*

 

2*

2*

Initiation

3*

 

 

3*

 

 

Continuation

2*

 

 

2*

 

 

c. Immunosuppressive therapy

 

2*

2*

 

2*

2*

Initiation

2*

 

 

2*

 

 

Continuation

1*

 

 

2*

 

 

d. None of the above

 

2*

2*

 

2*

2*

Initiation

1*

 

 

2*

 

 

Continuation

1*

 

 

2*

 

 

Rheumatoid arthritis

a. Receiving immunosuppressive therapy

 

 

1

2/3*

1

2

Initiation

2

2

 

 

 

 

Continuation

1

1

 

 

 

 

b. Not receiving immunosuppressive therapy

1

1

1

2

1

2

Reproductive Tract Infections and Disorders

a. Irregular pattern without heavy bleeding

1

 

2

2

2

1

Initiation

 

1

 

 

 

 

Continuation

 

1

 

 

 

 

b. Heavy or prolonged bleeding (regular and irregular patterns)

2*

 

2*

2*

2*

1*

Initiation

 

1*

 

 

 

 

Continuation

 

2*

 

 

 

 

Severe dysmenorrhea

2

1

1

1

1

1

HIV

High risk for HIV

 

 

1

1*

1

1

Initiation

2

2

 

 

 

 

Continuation

2

2

 

 

 

 

HIV infectione

 

 

1*

1*

1*

1*

Initiation

 

 

 

 

Continuation

 

 

 

 

a. Clinically well receiving ARV therapy

 

 

Initiation

1

1

 

 

 

 

Continuation

1

1

 

 

 

 

b. Not clinically well or not receiving ARV therapy

 

 

Initiation

2

2

 

 

 

 

Continuation

1

1

 

 

 

 

Endocrine Conditions

Diabetes

a.     Non-insulin dependent and Insulin dependentf

1

2

2

2

2

2

b.     Nephropathy, retinopathy, or neuropathy

1

2

2

3

2

3/4*

Hypothyroid

1

1

1

1

1

1

* Consult the respective appendix for each contraceptive method in the 2016 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use for clarifications to the numeric categories.

aOlder age, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, low HDL, high LDL, or high triglyceride levels; bSystolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg are associated with increased risk for adverse health events as a result of pregnancy; cFactor V Leiden; prothrombin mutation; and protein S, protein C, and antithrombin deficiencies are associated with increased risk for adverse health events as a result of pregnancy; dThis condition is associated with increased risk for adverse health events as a result of pregnancy; dFor women with HIV infection who are not clinically well or not receiving ARV therapy, this condition is associated with increased risk for adverse health events as a result of pregnancy; eInsulin-dependent diabetes; diabetes with nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, or diabetes with other vascular disease; or diabetes of >20 years’ duration are associated with increased risk of adverse health events as a result of pregnancy; fNonvascular disease

 

Categories for classifying hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine devices

1 = A condition for which there is no restriction for the use of the contraceptive method.

2 = A condition for which the advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks.

3 = A condition for which the theoretical or proven risks usually outweigh the advantages of using the method.

4 = A condition that represents an unacceptable health risk if the contraceptive method is used.

 

Modified from Curtis, 2016 (81,82).

               

 

WHEN CAN A CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD BE INITIATED?

 

Same day initiation of a contraceptive, often referred to as a “quick start”, should be considered when appropriate, since delayed initiation may represent a barrier. All contraceptive methods can be initiated at any time, including on the day of the visit, if there is reasonable certainty that the adolescent or young adult female is not pregnant. This can be ascertained via history (no intercourse since last menstrual period or less than 7 days from the first day of last menstrual period) and a negative urine pregnancy test. In the setting of uncertainty regarding the possibility of pregnancy, initiation of COC, progestin only pills, and DMPA can proceed as the benefits are thought to outweigh the risks.  Insertion of an IUD, however, should be avoided until the absence of pregnancy can be reasonably confirmed. https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Adolescent-Health-Care/Adolescent-Pregnancy-Contraception-and-Sexual-Activity?IsMobileSet=false

 

Although pregnancy tests are often performed before initiating contraception, it should be noted that the accuracy of qualitative urine pregnancy tests varies. Pregnancy detection rates can vary widely because of differences in test sensitivity and the timing of testing relative to missed menses (83,84).  A history of starting a normal menstrual period within the last 7 days or a denial of sexual intercourse since the start of the last normal menstrual period may not always be reliable. In addition, a young adolescent female may not have undergone menarche or may have irregular cycles within the first several months of initiating menarche, making it difficult to use this measure to rule out pregnancy.

 

Prior to starting contraception, expectation of bleeding and possible menstrual changes associated with various methods should be reviewed.

 

For females in which there is an uncertainty about the risk of pregnancy, except for an IUD, the benefits of starting other contraceptive methods likely exceed any risk.  A pregnancy test should be repeated in 2-4 weeks. Additional information is available in the CDC’s U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use.

 

SHOULD LABORATORY SCREENING AND PELVIC EXAMINATION BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF HORMONE CONTRACEPTION?

 

As opposed to the general population, adolescent and young adult females with known dyslipidemia face a unique challenge. Machado and colleagues, noted dyslipidemia in 33% of 516 women (18-40 years-of-age), often accompanied by a history of smoking and an elevated BMI (85). Those with known medical problems or other special conditions might need additional examinations or tests before being considered appropriate candidates for a particular method of contraception.

 

All adolescent and young adult females at-risk of CVD should have their blood pressure measured before initiation of COCs to ensure there is no underlying hypertension that might be exacerbated by the medication. Measurements of weight and a calculated BMI at baseline is helpful in monitoring changes and offering timely counseling to those who might be concerned about weight change perceived to be associated with their contraceptive method.

 

For most healthy females, few examinations or tests are generally needed before initiation of most contraceptive methods. Research suggests that mandatory laboratory screening prior to initiation of contraceptive methods in this population can increase costs and may impose barriers to contraceptive access, critical in reducing unintended pregnancy (81,82,86). In general, laboratory tests, such as glucose, liver enzymes, hemoglobin and thrombogenic gene variants, pelvic examination and even screening for STD/HIV in the general population, are not recommended prior to initiation of treatment, since they do not contribute substantially to safe and effective use of the contraceptive method.

 

CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MONITORING OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT WOMEN WITH DYSLIPIDEMIA DURING CONTRACEPTIVE USE

 

Guidelines for monitoring teenage girls with dyslipidemia during use of contraceptives are lacking. It seems reasonable, however, to measure fasting serum lipid levels within 3 months following initiation of a contraceptive; and less frequently once lipid parameters are stable. In those with an LDL-C 160 mg/dL or more, or multiple additional CVD risk factors (including smoking, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, TGs greater than 250 mg/dL, HDL-C less than 35 mg/dL, or a family history of premature coronary artery disease), use of alternative contraception method should be considered.  Preferred methods of contraception for this at-risk population include the copper IUD, which contains no hormones, followed by a levonorgestrel containing IUD, implant, and progestin only contraceptive pills. All are equally acceptable. No major concerns have been raised with interactions between lipid lowering medication and contraception.

 

 

One of the common legal concerns in treating youth less than 18 years-of-age is that of confidentiality for care surrounding reproductive health. The AAP supports policies of informed consent and protection of confidentiality for adolescents seeking contraception and sexual healthcare services. Confidentiality is critical in all discussions, care recommendations and documentation of sexual identity, sexual practices, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and contraceptive choices (56,87,88). These concepts are important, since limitations of confidentiality and consent are linked to lower use of contraceptives and higher adolescent pregnancy rates (89-92).

 

Over the past 30 years, in the U.S. states have expanded minors’ authority to consent to health care, including care related to sexual activity. This trend reflects the 1977 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Carey v. Population Services International that affirmed the constitutional right, in all states, to privacy for a minor to obtain contraceptives. The ruling also recognizes that while parental involvement is desirable, many minors will remain sexually active but may fail to seek reproductive advice or services if parental consent or acknowledged is required (93).

 

The majority of states have specific laws regarding a minor’s consent to contraception. The Guttmacher report (93) on current state laws and policies found:

 

  • 23 states and the District of Columbia explicitly allow all minors to consent to contraceptive services.
  • 24 states explicitly permit minors to consent to contraceptive services in one or more circumstances.
  • 4 states have no explicit policy on minors’ authority to consent to contraceptive services.

 

For states without specific laws, best practice guidelines, federal statutes and federal case law may support minor confidentiality and consent.  For example, family planning clinics funded by Title X of the federal Public Health Services Act (42 USC §§300–300a-6 [1970]) are required to provide confidential services to adolescents (94).

 

Even when a state has no relevant policy, case law or an explicit limitation, healthcare providers may provide medical care to a mature minor without parental consent, particularly if the state allows a minor to consent to related health services.

 

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) also specifically addresses minor confidentiality (95). Although HIPAA allows parents access to a minor’s medical record as personal representatives, that access is denied when the minor is provided with confidentiality under state or other laws or when the parent agrees that the minor may have confidential care (96).

 

Therefore, the AAP recommends that pediatricians have clinic policies that explicitly outline applicable confidential services and that healthcare providers discuss (and document) confidentiality policies with all parents and adolescents. HIPAA also states that if there is no applicable state law about the rights of parents to access the protected health information of their children, pediatricians (or other licensed health professionals) may exercise their professional judgment in providing or denying parental access to the medical records.  Providers are encouraged to include detailed documentation of the decision in the child's medical record (96).

 

Insurance, billing, and electronic health record systems create additional challenges, including an ability to maintain the confidentiality of visits, visit content, associated laboratory test results, and payment for the contraceptive method.  For additional discussion of electronic health records, the AAP has published a policy statement on health information technology (97). 

 

Although contraception services should be provided as a confidential service, adolescent females should be encouraged to involve parents or trusted adults whenever possible. In fact, many parents are supportive of minor consent and confidentiality for sexual health services (98,99). Adolescents who discuss sexuality and contraception with a parent or guardian are also more likely to use contraceptives consistently and are less likely to become pregnant (100,101).

 

For individuals who are sexually active, it is important to discuss and document a plan for pregnancy prevention.  Dermatologists have extensive experience with risk monitoring in adolescents. Use of isotretinoin, a medication with known teratogenic potential, requires an FDA mandated pregnancy prevention program (iPLEDGE).  In this program, females are required to undergo monthly pregnancy testing, and pharmacies, wholesalers and prescribers are all required to participate in a system of informed written consent, warning labels, database registration and monthly identification of contraceptive methods.  Despite its attempts to prevent adverse outcomes, the efficacy of this approach is debated (102).

 

SUMMARY AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

 

For adolescent and young adult females who may benefit from use of lipid-lowering medication, it is important to consider the individual’s stage of sexual maturation and sexual history in addition to the lipid disorder when making recommendation for contraception.  For those who are sexually active, a comprehensive, developmentally appropriate discussion and documentation of a plan for reproductive health and pregnancy prevention is recommended.  Most adolescents consider healthcare providers a highly reliable source of healthcare information.  Establishing relationships with adolescents and families allow them to inquire about sensitive topics, such as sexuality and relationships, and to promote healthy decision-making. Several organizations provide excellent resources and extensive guidance in the appropriate use of contraceptive methods. With careful attention to confidentiality and reliable implementation of the individual plan for pregnancy prevention, healthcare providers can navigate the legal and ethical concerns while providing appropriate and compassionate care.  When used cautiously in a supportive healthcare environment, lipid-lowering medications are safe and effective in treating lipid disorders in adolescent and young adult females.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

The authors would like to acknowledge Luke Hamilton, Suzanne Beckett, Dena Hanson, and Ashley Brock for their assistance in preparing and editing this manuscript.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Levenson AE, de Ferranti SD. Familial Hypercholesterolemia. 2020 Feb 8. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 27809433.
  2. Shah AS, Wilson DP. Genetic Disorders Causing Hypertriglyceridemia in Children and Adolescents. 2020 Jan 22. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 27809432.
  3. Benuck I, Wilson DP, McNeal C. Secondary Hypertriglyceridemia. 2020 Jun 1. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 27809435.
  4. Tamir I, Heiss G, Glueck CJ, Christensen B, Kwiterovich P, Rifkind BM. Lipid and lipoprotein distributions in white children ages 6-19 yr. The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. J Chronic Dis. 1981;34(1):27-39. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(81)90079-5
  5. Lauer RM, Lee J, Clarke WR. Factors affecting the relationship between childhood and adult cholesterol levels: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics. 1988;82(3):309-318.
  6. Srinivasan SR, Wattigney W, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Race and gender differences in serum lipoproteins of children, adolescents, and young adults--emergence of an adverse lipoprotein pattern in white males: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Prev Med. 1991;20(6):671-684. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(91)90063-a
  7. Twisk JW, Kemper HC, Mellenbergh GJ. Longitudinal development of lipoprotein levels in males and females aged 12-28 years: the Amsterdam Growth and Health Study. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24(1):69-77. doi:10.1093/ije/24.1.69
  8. Hickman TB, Briefel RR, Carroll MD, et al. Distributions and trends of serum lipid levels among United States children and adolescents ages 4-19 years: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Prev Med. 1998;27(6):879-890. doi:S0091-7435(98)90376-0
  9. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA. Trends in risk factors for cardiovascular disease among children and adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics. 2004;114(6):1534-1544. doi:114/6/1534
  10. Dai S, Fulton JE, Harrist RB, Grunbaum JA, Steffen LM, Labarthe DR. Blood lipids in children: age-related patterns and association with body-fat indices: Project HeartBeat! Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(1 Suppl):56. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.012.
  11. Kit BK, Carroll MD, Lacher DA, Sorlie PD, DeJesus JM, Ogden C. Trends in serum lipids among US youths aged 6 to 19 years, 1988-2010. JAMA. 2012;308(6):591-600. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.9136
  12. Mellerio H, Alberti C, Druet C, et al. Novel modeling of reference values of cardiovascular risk factors in children aged 7 to 20 years. Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):1020. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0449
  13. Drash A, Hengstenberg F. The identification of risk factors in normal children in the development of arteriosclerosis. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1972;2(5):348-359.
  14. Kit BK, Kuklina E, Carroll MD, Ostchega Y, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Prevalence of and trends in dyslipidemia and blood pressure among US children and adolescents, 1999-2012. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(3):272-279. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3216
  15. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969;44(235):291-303. doi:10.1136/adc.44.235.291
  16. Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child. 1970;45(239):13-23. doi: 0.1136/adc.45.239.13
  17. Beccuti G, Ghizzoni L. Normal and abnormal puberty. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext.MDText.com, Inc; South Dartmouth, MA: 2015.
  18. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 651: Menstruation in girls and adolescents: using the menstrual cycle as a vital sign. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):e143-e146. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001215
  19. Lakshman R, Forouhi NG, Sharp SJ, et al. Early age at menarche associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(12):4953-4960. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1789
  20. Rudra CL, Williams MA. BMI as a modifying factor in the relations between age at menarche, menstrual cycle characteristics, and risk of preeclampsia. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005;21(4):200-205. doi:P2G017365M63654M
  21. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, et al. The relation of menarcheal age to obesity in childhood and adulthood: the Bogalusa heart study. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:3-3. Epub 2003 Apr 30. doi:1471-2431-3-3
  22. Solomon CG, Hu FB, Dunaif A, et al. Menstrual cycle irregularity and risk for future cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):2013-2017. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.5.8471
  23. Veltman-Verhulst SM, van Rijn BB, Westerveld HE, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome and early-onset preeclampsia: reproductive manifestations of increased cardiovascular risk. Menopause. 2010;17(5):990-996. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ddf705
  24. Porkka KV, Viikari JS, Rönnemaa T, Marniemi J, Akerblom HK. Age and gender specific serum lipid and apolipoprotein fractiles of Finnish children and young adults. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83(8):838-848. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13155.x
  25. Armstrong N, Balding J, Gentle P, Kirby B. Serum lipids and blood pressure in relation to age and sexual maturity. Ann Hum Biol. 1992;19(5):477-487. doi:10.1080/03014469200002312
  26. Morrison JA, Laskarzewski PM, Rauh JL, et al. Lipids, lipoproteins, and sexual maturation during adolescence: the Princeton maturation study. Metabolism. 1979;28(6):641-649. doi:0026-0495(79)90017-9
  27. Altwaijri YA, Day RS, Harrist RB, Dwyer JT, Ausman LM, Labarthe DR. Sexual maturation affects diet-blood total cholesterol association in children: Project HeartBeat! Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(1 Suppl):65. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.007
  28. Srinivasan SR, Elkasabany A, Berenson GS. Distribution and correlates of serum high-density lipoprotein subclasses (LpA-I and LpA-I:A-II) in children from a biracial community. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Metabolism. 1998;47(6):757-763. doi:S0026-0495(98)90042-7
  29. Tell GS, Mittelmark MB, Vellar OD. Cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides during puberty: the Oslo Youth Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(5):750-761. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114158
  30. Sprecher DL, Morrison JA, Simbartl LA, et al. Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein differences in black and white girls. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(1):84-90. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170380088014
  31. Eissa MA, Mihalopoulos NL, Holubkov R, Dai S, Labarthe DR. Changes in fasting lipids during puberty. J Pediatr. 2016;170:199-205. doi:S0022-3476(15)01371-2
  32. Kreisberg RA, Kasim S. Cholesterol metabolism and aging. Am J Med. 1987;82(1B):54-60. doi:0002-9343(87)90272-5
  33. Grimes SB, Wild R. Effect of pregnancy on lipid metabolism and lipoprotein levels. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. MDText.com, Inc; South Dartmouth, MA: 2018.
  34. Mukherjee M. Dyslipidemia in pregnancy, expert analysis. American College of Cardiology web site. Updated 2014. Accessed March 8, 2022. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2014/07/18/16/08/dyslipidemia-in-pregnancy
  35. Lippi G, Albiero A, Montagnana M, et al. Lipid and lipoprotein profile in physiological pregnancy. Clin Lab. 2007;53(3-4):173-177.
  36. Maternal physiology. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al, eds. Williams obstetrics. 25th ed. McGraw-Hill Education Medical; 2018:49-78.
  37. Gupta M, Liti B, Barrett C, Thompson PD, Fernandez AB. Prevention and Management of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Am J Med. 2022 Jun;135(6):709-714. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.12.006. Epub 2022 Jan 23. PMID: 35081380.
  38. Gunderson EP, Chiang V, Pletcher MJ, et al. History of gestational diabetes mellitus and future risk of atherosclerosis in mid-life: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(2):e000490. doi:10.1161/JAHA.113.000490
  39. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3237-3241]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(24):e285-e350. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003
  40. de Ferranti SD, Steinberger J, Ameduri R, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric patients: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(13):e603-e634. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000618
  41. Miller, ML, Wright, CC, Rodrigues B, et al. Use of lipid lowering medications in youth. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext. MDText.com, Inc; South Dartmouth, MA: 2020.
  42. Karalis DG, Hill AN, Clifton S, Wild RA. The risks of statin use in pregnancy: a systematic review. J Clin Lipidol. 2016;10(5):1081-1090. doi:S1933-2874(16)30234-3
  43. Kusters DM, Hassani Lahsinoui H, van de Post, J. A., et al. Statin use during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012;10(3):363-378. doi:10.1586/erc.11.196
  44. Costantine MM, Cleary K, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Obstetric--Fetal Pharmacology Research Units Network*. Pravastatin for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):349-353. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827d8ad5
  45. Costantine MM, Cleary K, Hebert MF, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):720.e1-720.e17. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.038
  46. Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(Suppl 2):1-87. doi:10.4158/EP171764.APPGL
  47. Federal Drug Administration. Statins: Drug Safety Communication - FDA requests removal of strongest warning against using cholesterol-lowering statins during pregnancy. FDA web site. Updated 2021. Accessed Mar 8, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/safety/medical-product-safety-information/statins-drug-safety-communication-fda-requests-removal-strongest-warning-against-using-cholesterol.
  48. Reprotox - online database for medication and pregnancy/lactation
  49. Writing Committee, Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, Birtcher KK, Covington AM, DePalma SM, Minissian MB, Orringer CE, Smith SC Jr, Waring AA, Wilkins JT. 2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Nonstatin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Oct 4;80(14):1366-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Aug 25. PMID: 36031461.
  50. Wong B, Ooi TC, Keely E. Severe gestational hypertriglyceridemia: A practical approach for clinicians. Obstet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):158-67. doi: 10.1177/1753495X15594082. Epub 2015 Aug 21. PMID: 27512474; PMCID: PMC4935053.
  51. Kolovou G, Kolovou V, Katsiki N. Volanesorsen: A New Era in the Treatment of Severe Hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 13;11(4):982. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040982. PMID: 35207255; PMCID: PMC8880470.
  52. Cruciat G, Nemeti G, Goidescu I, Anitan S, Florian A. Hypertriglyceridemia triggered acute pancreatitis in pregnancy - diagnostic approach, management and follow-up care. Lipids Health Dis. 2020 Jan 4;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1180-7. PMID: 31901241; PMCID: PMC6942404.
  53. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Thandra KC, Gaduputi V. Hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis: updated review of current treatment and preventive strategies. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;11(6):441-448. doi: 10.1007/s12328-018-0881-1. Epub 2018 Jun 19. PMID: 29923163.
  54. Abma JC, Martinez GM. Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the United States, 2011-2015. Natl Health Stat Report. 2017;(104):1-23.
  55. Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan PM. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. 4th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.
  56. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):e1244-e1256.. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2299
  57. Reno H, Park I, Workowski K, Machefsky A, Bachmann L. A guide to taking a sexual history. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) web site.  Reviewed January 14, 2022. Accessed February 24, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/sexualhistory.pdf.
  58. Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, Eilers MA, Singh S. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(2):223-230. doi:S1054-139X(14)00387-5
  59. Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, et al. Reduced disparities in birth rates among teens aged 15-19 years - United States, 2006-2007 and 2013-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(16):409-414. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6516a1
  60. Lindberg L, Santelli J, Desai S. Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007-2012. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(5):577-583. doi:S1054-139X(16)30172-0
  61. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final data for 2017. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2018;67(8):1-50. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_08-508.pdf.
  62. Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Finer LB, Singh S. Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: the contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):150-156. doi:AJPH.2006.089169
  63. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 73: Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1453-1472. doi:107/6/1453
  64. Fotherby K. Oral contraceptives and lipids. BMJ. 1989;298(6680):1049-1050. doi:10.1136/bmj.298.6680.1049
  65. Elkind-Hirsch KE, Darensbourg C, Ogden B, Ogden LF, Hindelang P. Contraceptive vaginal ring use for women has less adverse metabolic effects than an oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2007;76(5):348-356. doi:S0010-7824(07)00350-2
  66. Guazzelli CA, Barreiros FA, Barbosa R, Torloni MR, Barbieri M. Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring versus hormonal oral contraceptives: effects on lipid metabolism. Contraception. 2012;85(4):389-393. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.08.014
  67. Cheang KI, Essah PA, Sharma S, Wickham EP,3rd, Nestler JE. Divergent effects of a combined hormonal oral contraceptive on insulin sensitivity in lean versus obese women. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):353-359.e1. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.039
  68. Adeniji AA, Essah PA, Nestler JE, Cheang KI. Metabolic effects of a commonly used combined hormonal oral contraceptive in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. J Womens Health. 2016;25(6):638-645. doi:10.1089/jwh.2015.5418
  69. Walsh BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, Greenberg L, Ravnikar V, Sacks FM. Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(17):1196-1204. doi:10.1056/NEJM199110243251702
  70. Walsh BW, Sacks FM. Effects of low dose oral contraceptives on very low density and low density lipoprotein metabolism. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(5):2126-2132. doi:10.1172/JCI116437
  71. Creasy GW, Fisher AC, Hall N, Shangold GA. Transdermal contraceptive patch delivering norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol. Effects on the lipid profile. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(3):179-186.
  72. Tuppurainen M, Klimscheffskij R, Venhola M, Dieben TO. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) and lipid metabolism: a comparative study. Contraception. 2004;69(5):389-394. doi:S0010782404000241
  73. Kongsayreepong R, Chutivongse S, George P, et al. A multicentre comparative study of serum lipids and apolipoproteins in long-term users of DMPA and a control group of IUD users. World Health Organization. Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Contraception. 1993;47(2):177-191. doi:0010-7824(93)90090-T
  74. Westhoff C. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Metabolic parameters and mood changes. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(5 Suppl):401-406.
  75. American Academy of Pediatrics. Contraception Explained: Options for Teens & Adolescents. HealthyChildren.org web site. Updated 2020. Accessed Feb 24, 2022.https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/teen/dating-sex/Pages/Birth-Control-for-Sexually-Active-Teens.aspx.
  76. Horvath S, Schreiber CA, Sonalkar S. Contraception. 2018 Jan 17. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hershman JM, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrère B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Morley JE, New M, Purnell J, Sahay R, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000–. PMID: 25905371.
  77. Horvath S, Schreiber CA, Sonalkar S. Contraception. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al, eds. Endotext.MDText.com, Inc; South Dartmouth, MA: 2018.
  78. World Health Organization, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Family planning: a global handbook for providers (2018 update): evidence-based guidance developed through worldwide collaboration. 3rd ed. World Health Organization; 2018.
  79. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 
    2011;83(5):397-404. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021
  80. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Work Group. Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):e251-e269. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002400
  81. Curtis KM, Jatlaoui TC, Tepper NK, et al. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(4):1-66. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6504a1
  82. Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(3):1-103. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1
  83. Cole LA. Human chorionic gonadotropin tests. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 
    2009;9(7):721-747. doi:10.1586/erm.09.51
  84. Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Dunson D, McChesney R, Weinberg CR. Natural limits of pregnancy testing in relation to the expected menstrual period. JAMA. 
    2001;286(14):1759-1761. doi:jbr10110
  85. Machado RB, Bernardes CR, de Souza IM, Santana N, Morimoto M. Is lipid profile determination necessary in women wishing to use oral contraceptives? Contraception. 
    2013;87(6):801-805. doi:S0010-7824(12)01034-7
  86. Tepper NK, Steenland MW, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM. Laboratory screening prior to initiating contraception: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013;87(5):645-649. doi:S0010-7824(12)00736-6
  87. Christopher BA, Pagidipati NJ. Clinical updates in women's health care summary: evaluation and management of lipid disorders: primary and preventive care review. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):609. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003139.
  88. Ford C, English A, Sigman G. Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper for the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35(2):160-167. doi:S1054-139X(04)00086-2
  89. Reddy DM, Fleming R, Swain C. Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA. 2002;288(6):710-714. doi:joc11794
  90. Zabin LS, Stark HA, Emerson MR. Reasons for delay in contraceptive clinic utilization. Adolescent clinic and nonclinic populations compared. J Adolesc Health. 1991;12(3):225-232. doi:0197-0070(91)90015-E
  91. Zavodny M. Fertility and parental consent for minors to receive contraceptives. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1347-1351. doi:94/8/1347
  92. Lehrer JA, Pantell R, Tebb K, Shafer MA. Forgone health care among U.S. adolescents: associations between risk characteristics and confidentiality concern. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(3):218-226. doi:S1054-139X(06)00375-2
  93. Guttmacher Institute. An Overview of Consent to Reproductive Health Services by Young People. Guttmacher Institute web site. Updated 2022. Accessed Feb 24, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-minors-consent-law
  94. Center for Adolescent Health & the Law. State minor consent laws: A summary. 3rd ed. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Adolescent Health & the Law; 2010.
  95. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPA), Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936. 1996
  96. English A, Ford CA. The HIPAA privacy rule and adolescents: legal questions and clinical challenges. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(2):80-86. doi:368004
  97. Council on Clinical Information Technology. Health information technology and the medical home. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5):978-982. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0454
  98. Dempsey AF, Singer DD, Clark SJ, Davis MM. Adolescent preventive health care: what do parents want? J Pediatr. 2009;155(5):689-94.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.029
  99. Jones RK, Purcell A, Singh S, Finer LB. Adolescents' reports of parental knowledge of adolescents' use of sexual health services and their reactions to mandated parental notification for prescription contraception. JAMA. 2005;293(3):340-348. doi:293/3/340
  100. Amialchuk A, Gerhardinger L. Contraceptive use and pregnancies in adolescents' romantic relationships: role of relationship activities and parental attitudes and communication. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015;36(2):86-97. doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000125
  101. Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, et al. Low parental monitoring predicts subsequent pregnancy among African-American adolescent females. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2002;15(1):43-46. doi:S1083318801001383
  102. Abroms L, Maibach E, Lyon-Daniel K, Feldman SR. What is the best approach to reducing birth defects associated with isotretinoin? PLoS Med. 2006;3(11):e483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030483

Osteoporosis: Prevention and Treatment

ABSTRACT

 

Despite the health consequences of osteoporosis and the availability of effective treatments, it is under-diagnosed and under-treated. For example, although 90% of patients with hip fractures have osteoporosis, in 2007 only 20% of patients with fragility fractures were evaluated and treated. In a retrospective study of patients with hip fractures, less than 15% of subjects were diagnosed and less than 13% were treated with medications for osteoporosis, including calcium and vitamin D. Fracture patients require evaluation of secondary causes and treatment of osteoporosis to help prevent subsequent fractures. The preceding chapters summarize the pathogenesis and the clinical evaluation of osteoporosis. This chapter will review established therapeutic options and new approaches for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Strategies include both lifestyle and medical approaches to enhance bone strength.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Osteoporosis is a major growing global health problem, resulting in 200 million osteoporotic fractures worldwide each year (1,2). Characterized by reduced bone mass and architectural deterioration, it leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures often occurring with minimal trauma such as falling from a standing height. These fractures rise exponentially with advancing age and most commonly involve the spine, hip or distal forearm. An estimated 1 in 2 women and 1 in 4 men aged 50 years and older will suffer a fragility fracture in their remaining lifetime. Hip fractures are the most serious of these fractures, given the high rates of morbidity and mortality. Approximately 50% of patients who sustain a hip fracture lose the ability to walk independently and 12-24% of women suffering a hip fracture die within the 1st year, compared to 33% of men (3-5). Vertebral compression fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures, but they are often asymptomatic and found incidentally on imaging done for other reasons. Vertebral fractures are, however, associated with high rates of morbidity involving height loss, kyphosis, restrictive lung disease, back pain, and functional impairment. Vertebral fractures are associated with a 5-fold increased risk of future vertebral fractures and a 2 to 3-fold risk of other fragility fractures. Although there are very effective treatments to reduce fracture risk, only 30% of patients with fragility fractures have a bone density test and/or are treated for their underlying osteoporosis. There are currently critically needed national and international efforts to improve fracture care and bone health in women and men. Identification of osteoporosis at the time of a hip, spine, or other fragility fracture is imperative so that patients with fragility fractures can be evaluated for secondary causes of osteoporosis and treated with osteoporosis medications for their underlying bone disease.

 

The preceding chapters summarize the pathogenesis and the clinical evaluation of osteoporosis. This chapter will focus on reviewing established therapeutic options and new approaches for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Strategies include both lifestyle and medical approaches to enhance bone strength and reduce fractures.

 

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

 

Bone is a dynamic organ with continuous remodeling occurring as osteoclasts resorb bone and osteoblasts form new bone. Among the key regulators of this process is the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) system. Interaction between RANKL, produced by the osteoblast lineage, and RANK receptor stimulates osteoclastic differentiation and activity; OPG, made by osteoblasts, is an endogenous decoy receptor that binds with RANKL, inhibiting bone resorption. In addition, the Wnt signaling pathway is involved in activation of transcription of genes that direct the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts. In the skeletal life cycle, there is acquisition of peak bone mass during adolescence and young adulthood. For women, bone loss is accelerated surrounding the time of menopause with decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) of approximately 2-3%/year. With advancing age, the decline in BMD occurs at a slower rate of approximately 0.1 to 0.5% per year in women and men.

 

DIAGNOSIS

 

BMD testing is typically measured in the proximal femur and lumbar spine, though the distal radius should be measured in patients with hyperparathyroidism or in those in whom the other major sites cannot be adequately assessed. Each SD below peak bone mass represents approximately 2-fold increase in fracture risk. Osteopenia is present when the BMD is between 1.0 and 2.5 SDs below bone density of young healthy individuals. More than 50% of fragility fractures occur in these patients (6). Osteoporosis is defined as a BMD≤-2.5 SDs of young normal, healthy individuals.

 

Vertebral imaging by DXA or X-ray is useful for identification of spinal fractures that frequently are not clinically evident. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF, previously the National Osteoporosis Foundation) currently recommends DXA for women ≥65 years and men ≥70 years, or earlier if clinical risk factors are present. Physicians should routinely perform height measurements preferably with a stadiometer as there is an association between height loss and spinal fractures. The BHOF Clinical Guide recommends vertebral imaging for spinal fractures in the presence of height loss of 1.5 inches or more and longitudinal height loss of 0.8 inches or more for postmenopausal women and men age 50-69. Vertebral imaging is also recommended in women and men age 70 and 80 years and older, respectively (7). When the diagnosis of a low bone density compared with age-adjusted controls or osteoporosis is made, a work-up to look for secondary causes of osteoporosis should be considered. See Table 1.

 

Table 1. Secondary Causes of Osteoporosis

Endocrinological Abnormalities

Glucocorticoid excess, hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism (androgen insensitivity, Turner’s and Klinefelter’s Syndrome, hyperprolactinemia, premature menopause), anorexia, athlete triad, vitamin D deficiency, hyperparathyroidism, diabetes mellitus (Types 1 and 2)

Cardiovascular, Renal, Pulmonary and Miscellaneous Disorders

Chronic kidney disease, post-transplant bone disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, AIDS/HIV

Connective Tissue Disorders

Osteogenesis imperfecta, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan Syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis,

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Celiac sprue, Inflammatory bowel disease, post-gastrectomy, primary biliary cirrhosis, bariatric surgery

Hematological Disorders

Multiple myeloma, mastocytosis, leukemia, hemophilia, sickle cell disease, leukemia, lymphoma, thalassemia

Other Genetic Disorders

Homocystinuria, cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, hypophosphatasia

Rheumatological Disorders

Ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis

Medications

Aromatase inhibitors, heparin (long term), anticonvulsants, methotrexate, cytoxan, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists, tamoxifen (in premenopausal women), excess thyroid hormone, lithium, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, glucocorticoids, thiazolidinediones, depo-medroxyprogesterone (premenopausal women) proton-pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tenofovir

 

Laboratory evaluation may include the following: Calcium, phosphorus, liver function tests (including alkaline phosphatase), complete blood count, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 24-hour urine calcium +/- PTH, TSH (if clinical evidence of hyperthyroidism or those already on thyroid hormone replacement), and serum testosterone in men. For select cases, one may consider sending specialized tests for gastrointestinal disorders (tissue transglutaminase with an IgA level for celiac sprue), infiltrative diseases (serum tryptase for mastocytosis), neoplastic (serum and urine protein electrophoresis), or excess glucocorticoid (cortisol levels, dexamethasone suppression test for Cushing’s syndrome).

 

To quantify an individual’s absolute fracture risk, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the FRAX® calculator (http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX), an integrative measure of various risk factors and femoral neck bone mineral density. In addition to BMD, the following risk factors are included - ethnicity, age, BMI, prior fracture history (designated as a previous fracture in adult life that occurred spontaneously or a fracture arising from trauma, which in a healthy individual would not have resulted in a fracture), glucocorticoid use, excessive alcohol (≥3 units per day), smoking, rheumatoid arthritis, and certain secondary causes of osteoporosis. These secondary causes include Type 1 diabetes, osteogenesis imperfecta, long-standing hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, premature menopause, malnutrition, malabsorption, or liver disease. If the 10-year absolute fracture risk is ≥3% for hip fractures or ≥20% for other major osteoporotic fractures, pharmacologic therapy should be considered (7). The FRAX® calculator should be utilized in postmenopausal woman ≥ 40 years and men ≥ 50 years with osteopenia. Although there are data analyzing the use of FRAX® in patients who have been treated with osteoporosis medications, its use is not currently validated for patients currently or formerly treated with pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis. Additionally, the FDA has approved the use of trabecular bone score (TBS), a structural measure derived from spinal bone density images that is associated with bone microarchitecture and fracture risk. Combining TBS and the FRAX score may increased the predictive value of the absolute fracture risk assessment (8).

 

Although the FRAX® calculator has greatly enhanced treatment of osteopenic women and men at risk for fractures, certain risk factors predictive of fracture risk are not accurately measured in this calculator. Patients on chronic glucocorticoids may warrant treatment earlier or at a lower threshold than determined by FRAX®; further, this tool does not include current or cumulative glucocorticoid doses or duration of treatment (9). Also, of note, spine BMD is not included in the algorithm. Once an initial bone density is measured, a follow-up BMD should be done 1-2 years after the initial screening depending on whether pharmacologic therapy was initiated. Biochemical bone turnover markers, collagen breakdown products, (e.g., N-telopeptide, C-telopeptide) may be helpful in select patients as an indicator of skeletal remodeling or to determine patient’s adherence to treatment.

 

EXERCISE

 

While pharmacological therapies are a major focus of this chapter, exercise and strategies to strengthen muscles and prevent falls are important components of osteoporosis care. Skeletal loading and mechanical loads from muscle forces have important effects on bone strength (10). Meta-analyses and clinical investigations have shown that exercise produces modest increases in BMD often ranging between 1% and 3% (11). Physical activity helps to maximize BMD during adolescence and young adulthood, diminish bone loss during aging, and improve stability and strength to minimize falls and fractures in the elderly (11-14). However, these benefits come from slow skeletal adaptations to training over time. Because it takes three to four months to complete the bone remodeling cycle of bone resorption, formation, and mineralization, a minimum of at least six to eight months of an exercise intervention is likely required to achieve a change in bone mass that is quantifiable (15,16). The benefits of exercise are lost when people stop exercising, therefore lifelong physical activity at all ages is strongly endorsed by the BHOF. Exercise recommendations generally should include weight-bearing, muscle-strengthening, and balance training exercises for 30 minutes 5 days per week or 75 minutes twice weekly, often consistent with other general health recommendations. Weight-bearing exercises are activities that make the body move against gravity such as walking, jogging, dancing, tennis, and Tai Chi. To protect the spine in patients with low spinal bone density, maintaining a straight spine and avoiding arching and twisting are generally recommended.

 

CALCIUM

 

Adequate calcium intake is essential to prevent calcium mobilization from the bone where 99% of calcium is stored. The effects of calcium supplementation on bone depend on age, menopausal status, calcium intake, and vitamin D sufficiency. Increased calcium intake is necessary during acquisition of peak bone mass and with advancing age. Calcium has modest effects on bone density (17). It is ineffective or minimally effective for prevention of bone loss in women within five years of menopause when there may be predominant effects of estrogen deficiency and other hormonal changes.

 

The Institute of Medicine's recommendations for daily calcium intake that meet the requirements of 97% of the population are shown in Table 2 (18). Unless a patient has an underlying disorder of calcium homeostasis, the upper limit of safety is considered 2,500 mg for adults aged 19 to 50 years and 2,000 mg for those >50 years (19). As maximum absorption of elemental calcium is about 500 to 600 mg at once, calcium intakes need to be divided into multiple doses throughout the day.

 

Table 2. Recommended Daily Elemental Calcium Intake (Adapted from 2011 IOM Report)

9-18 years 
Lactating Women

1,300 mg

Women 19-50 years, Men 19-70 years

1,000 mg

Women > 50 years, Men > 70 years

1,200 mg

 

Obtaining calcium through the diet is preferred. While dairy products contain the largest amount of endogenous calcium, many foods including juices, cereals, and cereal bars, may contain added calcium. An 8-ounce glass of milk or calcium-supplemented orange juice contains ~300 mg of elemental calcium, calcium-supplemented soy and almond milk contains ~450 mg, one ounce (or 1 cubic inch) of cheese contains ~200 mg, and certain cereals contain as much as 1000 mg. It is important for physicians to calculate the dietary calcium intake. Resources helpful for patients to calculate their calcium intake include the U.S. dairy council of California website, http://www.healthyeating.org/Healthy-Eating/Healthy-Eating-Tools/Calcium-Quiz.aspx?action=quiz, the International Osteoporosis Foundation website, https://www.iofbonehealth.org/calcium-calculator, and the NOF Clinical Guide also available on the website https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y (7). The former allows patients to check off the type and quantity of calcium-containing foods they usually consume and then calculates total daily calcium, with suggestions on how to increase calcium intake to recommended levels. The latter provides an easy tool to calculate calcium intakes from calcium-rich, dietary sources.

 

Supplemental calcium should be used if an individual’s dietary calcium intake does not meet the recommended daily calcium intake. Calcium carbonate contains 40% of elemental calcium and is a commonly used calcium supplement (e.g., Tums™, Oscal™, Caltrate™, and generic preparations). Calcium carbonate should be taken with food because patients with achlorhydria (or those on proton pump inhibitors chronically) cannot absorb this calcium salt well on an empty stomach (20). Adverse effects of calcium carbonate may include bloating and constipation. Calcium citrate (e.g., Citracal™), which contains 24% elemental calcium, is more bioavailable than calcium carbonate, can be taken while fasting and as a result is the formulation suggested when patients are on proton pump inhibitors chronically.

 

There have been a number of concerns related to the use of supplemental calcium and the risk of kidney stones and cardiovascular disease. Data from epidemiologic research and clinical trials suggest that vitamin D reduces the incidence of fractures and may also prevent falls and declining physical function, yet the available data are not consistent (21). Data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) calcium and vitamin D clinical trial (CT) of supplemental calcium (1000 mg daily) plus vitamin D (400 IU daily) versus placebo in 36,282 women showed a 17% increased risk of developing renal stones in those assigned calcium plus vitamin D. However, among those compliant with the calcium plus vitamin D regimen versus placebo, there was a 29% reduced risk of hip fracture over seven years (22). Some evidence suggests that calcium supplements but generally not dietary calcium may be associated with vascular calcifications and an increased risk for myocardial infarction (23). In a prospective study in the National Institutes of Health AARP Diet and Health Study of 388,229 women and men in whom baseline calcium intakes were ascertained after an average of 12 years of follow-up, supplemental but not dietary calcium intakes were associated with excess cardiovascular death in men but not women; adverse cardiovascular effects were only observed among smokers (23) (24). An analysis of the WHI randomized placebo-controlled calcium and vitamin D trial (CT) and the WHI prospective observational study (OS) showed that in the CT, in postmenopausal women who did not take supplemental calcium and vitamin D at baseline, supplemental calcium (1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (400 IU/D) versus placebo for ≥ 5years was associated with a 38% reduction in the risk of hip fracture. In a combined analysis of data from the CT and OS, supplemental calcium and vitamin D reduced the risk of a hip fracture by 35%. In these subset analyses of the large WHI, it is important to note that there were no adverse effects of supplemental calcium plus vitamin D on risks of myocardial infarction, stroke, or other cardiovascular disease (25). Although additional analyses are ongoing, calcium intakes within the ranges recommended by the IOM appear not to increase cardiovascular risk.

 

Recently, however, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against supplemental calcium (≤1000 mg/day) and low-dose vitamin D (≤400 IU/D) in healthy postmenopausal women due to lack of evidence of benefit in fracture reduction and evidence for increased risk of kidney stones. Thus, the risk of renal stones with calcium supplementation needs to be balanced with fracture reduction. These recommendations did not apply to adults with osteoporosis or vitamin D deficiency (22,26).

 

VITAMIN D

 

Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency is a common problem in many individuals. Individuals at increased risk for low vitamin D levels include the elderly and those with low vitamin D intake, malabsorption, inadequate sunlight exposure, use of sunblock, dark skin pigment, obesity, chronic kidney disease, and use of medications that increase the metabolism of vitamin D. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are common in adults with hip fractures (30,31). Vitamin D deficiency can lead to reduced calcium absorption, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and increased risk of fractures (30,32-34). Mild vitamin D insufficiency may not cause symptoms, but contributes to low bone mass. Severe vitamin D deficiency causes osteomalacia. In addition, although more data are needed, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with proximal muscle weakness, impaired physical performance, increased risk of falls, and possibly increased risks of some cancers (including colorectal, breast among others) (19,35-41). Deficient levels of vitamin D are generally defined as a 25-(OH) vitamin D <20 ng/ml, relative insufficiency as 21 to 29 ng/ml, and sufficient levels of vitamin D to prevent the rise in parathyroid hormone levels as a 25-(OH) vitamin D ≥ 30 to 32 ng/ml (42). The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) report showed that 32% of Americans have vitamin D deficiency (43).

 

Sources of dietary intake of vitamin D are limited and these include vitamin D-fortified milk and some soy milks (100 IU/glass), certain cereals, egg yolk, and oily fishes (e.g., salmon, mackerel, and sardines). Multivitamins typically contain 400 IU to 1,000 IU of vitamin D3, and many calcium preparations are supplemented with vitamin D. The NOF recommends 800 to 1000 IU vitamin D daily for adults aged 50 years and older, as do the International Osteoporosis Foundation and Endocrine Society (44,45). The IOM Committee report on the Dietary Reference Intakes for 97.5% of the population in North America was 600 IU/d of vitamin D for children and adults until age 70 and 800 IU/day for adults 71 years and older (46).

 

The USPTF recommended supplemental vitamin D for reduction in fall risk in women aged 65 and older. Although a meta-analysis of 31,022 individuals indicated that the highest quartile of vitamin D intakes (median 800 IU (and range 792 to 2000 IU/d) was associated with a 30% and 14% reduction in the risks of hip fractures and non-vertebral fractures, respectively, the USPSTF reported that recommendations concerning the safety and efficacy of higher doses of vitamin D on fracture reduction await additional research (26,27).

 

In the Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acid trial, a large randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 25,874 women and men across the United States of the effects of supplemental 2000 IU/d of cholecalciferol versus placebo determined the effect on the primary prevention of cardiovascular, fractures, cancer and other health outcomes. In addition, detailed in-person visits in a sub cohort provide extensive information on effects of supplemental vitamin D and/or omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes, bone health and many other clinical outcomes (28,29). This study found that in general, in a healthy population not preselected for low vitamin D levels or osteoporosis, supplemental vitamin D had no effect on bone density or bone structural measures or incident falls or fractures (194,195,196).

 

Patients with vitamin D deficiency need much higher doses. The upper limit of safety for vitamin D is 4000 IU/day. There are currently differing recommendations regarding the optimal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) level for bone health with the IOM committee recommending a 25-OH D level ≥20-29 ng/mL while several other societies recommend a 25-OHD level ≥30 ng/mL (44,45).

 

In the presence of vitamin D deficiency, it is safe to normalize vitamin D levels to a 25-(OH)D level of 30 ng/ml to prevent the compensatory rise in parathyroid hormone (PTH) level (33,47). This may be done in a variety of ways. High doses of vitamin D may be needed [e.g., 50,000 IU of D2 (ergocalciferol) or equivalent dose of D3(cholecalciferol) weekly for 8 weeks or according to the 25-hydroxyvitamin D level] (45). Individuals with malabsorption often require very high doses of supplemental vitamin D, and may benefit from evaluation by a bone specialist.

 

TREATMENT AND/OR PREVENTION OF OSTEOPOROSIS

 

There are effective therapies for osteoporosis and promising therapeutics under development. The antiresorptive therapies that reduce bone turnover include: bisphosphonates; estrogen or hormone therapy, estrogen agonists/antagonists [selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs)]; calcitonin; and denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody to RANK-ligand. At present there are two FDA-approved anabolic or bone forming osteoporosis therapy, teriparatide [PTH (1-34)] and abaloparatide. Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody to sclerostin and stimulates bone formation and inhibits bone resorption. In selection of the optimal therapy for a given individual, it is important to consider patient preference, cost, mode of administration, duration of treatment, and the effects of a treatment on reduction of spine, hip and other non-spine fractures. Tables 4 and 5 lists the currently available osteoporosis drugs approved by the FDA, their dosage, indication, and general efficacy for fracture reduction.

 

HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY

 

In postmenopausal women, it is well known that estrogen therapy (ET) and hormone therapy [estrogen plus progesterone (HT)] prevent bone loss and increase BMD through interaction with estrogen receptors on bone cells, activation of tissue-specific genes and proteins, and/or a reduction in cytokines that stimulate osteoclast function (51-54). In addition to the bone density benefit, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) did show that HT resulted in a 34% reduction in the risk of hip fractures and clinical spine fractures (55). However, the risks – increases in breast cancer, coronary heart disease (CHD), pulmonary embolism (PE), and stroke, outweighed the benefits. In addition, after cessation of ET or HT, the benefit of fracture reduction is not sustained (56,57). Although data from the WHI show that ET and HT reduce fractures, ET and HT are FDA-approved for the prevention of fractures but not for the treatment of osteoporosis (55,58).

Data has shown potential cardiovascular safety with use of ET in early menopause, though this remains controversial (the “critical window” hypothesis) (59-61).

 

Unlike oral estrogens, in postmenopausal women transdermal estrogens do not adversely affect clotting factors, and are therefore preferred. Transdermal estrogens prevent bone loss and are available in low doses (e.g., 0.014 to 0.0375 mg daily patch applied 2x/week). In women with premature or early menopause, hormone replacement can be considered until the natural age of menopause (51.3 years) (62). Before estrogen is prescribed, the benefits versus the risks of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and breast cancer should be reviewed. When prescribing estrogen, the FDA recommends the following: consider all non-estrogen preparations first for osteoporosis prevention; use the lowest dose of HT/ET for the shortest time interval to achieve therapeutic goals; and prescribe HT/ET when benefits outweigh risks in a given woman.

 

Estrogen Agonist/Antagonists

 

Estrogen Selective agonists/antagonists previously classified as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are a class of drugs that bind to estrogen receptors and can selectively function as agonists or antagonists in different tissues. Raloxifene (Evista™) is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Raloxifene was also approved by the FDA in 2007 for reduction in the risk of invasive breast cancer in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis and postmenopausal women at high risk for invasive breast cancer. The Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study was a randomized clinical trial of the effects of raloxifene versus placebo on bone density and fractures in 7,705 postmenopausal women (mean age of 67 years) with osteoporosis. Compared with placebo, raloxifene treatment for three years increased BMD of the spine by 2.6% and of the femoral neck by 2.1%. Over three years, raloxifene reduced spine fractures by 55% in women without prevalent vertebral fractures and by 30% in women with more than one prevalent vertebral fracture (63). Raloxifene therapy did not lead to a reduction in hip or wrist fractures, which was further confirmed in the Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista (CORE) trial (64). Additional benefits of raloxifene include the reduction in invasive breast cancer risk and mild decreases in LDL-cholesterol, with no effect on the risk of cardiovascular disease.

 

The side effects of raloxifene include an increase in deep venous thrombosis similar to use of estrogen, along with a small increase in hot flashes and leg cramps, and a small increased risk of fatal stroke in the Raloxifene Use for the Heart (RUTH trial).

 

Tamoxifen, a SERM used for the prevention and treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, has estrogen-like effects in bone. It also stimulates the endometrium and can result in uterine hyperplasia or malignancy (65). Bazedoxifene, lasofoxifene, and arzoxifene are third-generation SERMs, none of which appear to cause endometrial hyperplasia (66,67). In a study of 7492 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, women who received bazedoxifene (20 mg or 40 mg daily) compared with placebo had a lower incidence of new vertebral fractures, but not non-spine fractures (68). In a 7-year phase III, placebo-controlled study of 7492 women with osteoporosis , bazodoxifene versus placebo resulted in a 36.5% (40 mg daily dose) and 30.4% (20 mg daily dose) reduction in morphogenic spine fractures and no effect of overall incidence of nonvertebral fractures (69). In October, 2013, a combination of conjugated estrogens plus bazedoxifene (DuaveeTM) was FDA-approved for the treatment of moderate-severe vasomotor symptoms related to menopause and to prevent osteoporosis after menopause.

 

At present raloxifene and bazodoxifene, are the only estrogen agonist/antagonist that are FDA-approved for prevention (raloxifene and bazodoxifene) and treatment (raloxifene only) of osteoporosis.

 

Table 4. Effects of FDA-Approved Hormonal Osteoporosis Therapies on Fractures

Drug

Most Common Dosage

Fracture Risk Reduction

FDA Indications*

Estrogen Therapy (ET) Hormone Therapy (HT)

Many oral and transdermal preparations

Spine, total hip

PMO-Prevention

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators
Raloxifene

60 mg PO once daily

Spine

PMO - Prevention & Treatment; Reduce risk of invasive breast cancer in patients with osteoporosis and increased risk of breast cancer.

Basodoxifene + conjugated estrogens

20 mg/0.45 mg PO once daily

Spine

PMO- Prevention

PMO: postmenopausal osteoporosis; GIO: Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

 

CALCITONIN

 

Calcitonin is a 32-amino acid peptide produced by the parafollicular cells of the thyroid that inhibits bone resorption through direct effects on the osteoclasts. Calcitonin is a highly conserved protein, with human and salmon calcitonin differing by only one amino acid. Injectable salmon calcitonin was approved by the FDA in 1984 for the treatment of osteoporosis, although current use is limited because of the availability of other more effective medications for the treatment of osteoporosis. Calcitonin nasal spray (Miacalcin™ and Fortical™ 200 IU daily) is a form of calcitonin (70) approved by the FDA for the treatment of osteoporosis in women more than five years past menopause. Although studies have shown calcitonin nasal spray to decrease spine fractures, there is no effect on the prevention of hip and other non-spine fractures. Current and future use of calcitonin for osteoporosis has been limited, however, because of data analyses showing a potential increased risk of cancers, particularly liver cancer with calcitonin use, though this remains controversial (71). An FDA review found no causal relationship between calcitonin use and cancer but cautioned that physicians should evaluate the potential benefit to relative risk of calcitonin use in patients.

 

BISPHOSPHONATES

 

Bisphosphonates are analogs of pyrophosphate that inhibit bone turnover and because of their phosphorous-carbon-phosphorous structure are resistant to hydrolysis. They have a strong affinity for calcium crystals and bind avidly to the surface of bone. Bisphosphonates suppress bone resorption and interrupt osteoclast activity directly through several mechanisms including inhibition of acid production, lysosomal enzymes, and the mevalonate pathway (72-74) and indirectly through their effects on osteoblasts and macrophages. They also inhibit osteoclast recruitment and induce osteoclast apoptosis. Thus, through various mechanisms, bisphosphonates reduce the depth of resorption pits (thereby producing positive bone balance at individual bone remodeling units) and decrease the formation of new bone remodeling units.

 

Pharmacodynamics

 

Oral bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed. Less than 3% is absorbed in the fasting state, and absorption is significantly reduced if these drugs are taken with food, calcium, or beverages other than water. The skeleton rapidly takes up approximately half of the absorbed bisphosphonate, and the remainder is excreted unchanged by the kidney within hours. The drug remains at the bone surface for several weeks before becoming embedded in bone, where it is biologically inert. The embedded drug then remains in bone for many years and is slowly released, although the skeletal retention varies among bisphosphonates. Potency and side effects of the bisphosphonates vary according to the side chains (75,76).

 

Effective Therapies for Osteoporosis

 

Alendronate (Fosamax™), risedronate (Actonel™, Atelvia™), ibandronate (Boniva™), and zoledronic acid (Reclast™) are all FDA approved for osteoporosis prevention and/or treatment. Their indication and specific fracture benefits on fracture reduction are shown in Table 5. It is important to select an osteoporosis medication that reduces spine, hip and non-spine fractures, especially in high-risk individuals. Since around 50% of patients discontinue bisphosphonates within 1 year of treatment, it is essential to review compliance and adherence with patients. Of the approved bisphosphonates, Alendronate, Risedronate, and Zoledronic acid are now generic, making them affordable options for patients.

 

ALENDRONATE

 

Several longitudinal studies have shown that oral alendronate increases BMD and decreases the risk of osteoporotic fractures, and can be used for primary and secondary prevention

 

In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2007, the efficacy of alendronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women was evaluated (77). Eleven studies were selected, including three primary prevention studies (78-80) and eight secondary prevention studies involving women with low BMD on DXA and/or high prevalence of vertebral fracture (81-88). A total of 12,068 women received at least one year of oral alendronate (6543 women) or placebo (5525 women). Three trials, including the largest secondary prevention trial, Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT), used an initial daily dose of 5 mg and then switched to 10 mg for the remaining study duration. Other studies used 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg of alendronate daily. The length of follow-up ranged from one to four years, and the mean ages were 53 to 78 years. With alendronate 10 mg daily for secondary prevention, there was a significant 45% relative risk reduction (RRR) in vertebral fractures, 23% RRR in non-vertebral fractures, and 53% RRR in hip fractures. For primary prevention, the RRR was only significant for vertebral fractures (45%). No statistically significant differences in adverse events were found in any included study.

 

The prevalence of osteoporosis is lower in men than in women. It is estimated that one out of two women and one out of four men over age 50 will develop an osteoporotic fracture (89). Several longitudinal studies have evaluated the efficacy of treatment interventions on bone in osteoporotic men. Orwoll et al. enrolled 241 men with a femoral neck T score of ≤ -2 with a lumbar spine T score ≤ -1 or a history of osteoporotic fracture and a femoral neck T score ≤ -1. Compared with placebo, alendronate significantly increased BMD at each site and decreased markers of bone turnover over two years. From baseline, alendronate increased BMD by 3.1% in the total hip and by 7.1% in the lumbar spine and decreased urinary N-telopeptides by 59% and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase by 38%. The incidence of vertebral fractures was 7.1% in the placebo group versus 0.8% in the alendronate group; there was insufficient power to assess the effects of alendronate on non-vertebral fractures (90). Similar results were seen in a smaller study of hypogonadism-induced osteoporosis, indicating no difference in the skeletal response to alendronate in the presence of hypogonadism.

 

Alendronate is also effective in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. In glucocorticoid-treated men and women, alendronate resulted in increases in BMD (91,92) and decreases in incidence of radiographic vertebral fractures at two years (6.8% vs. 0.7%) (92).

Data show that weekly alendronate (70 mg) is effective and well tolerated, and this dosage has become the standard of care for use of this oral bisphosphonate. Alendronate is suitable for weekly dosing because of its long skeletal retention. It is often the first line treatment that is cost-effective as a generic preparation.

 

Long-term treatment with alendronate has beneficial effects on BMD. Bone et al. showed that spine BMD continued to rise in small increments during 10 years of treatment. Femoral neck and trochanter BMD increased during the first three years and then remained stable (93,94).

 

In an extension of FIT, the FIT Long-term Extension (FLEX) trial, 1099 women who had received alendronate (5 mg daily for two years and 10 mg daily thereafter) were again randomized to receive either 5 or 10 mg alendronate daily or placebo for five more years. With a pooled analysis of the alendronate doses, after five years, the alendronate-treated subjects had significantly better BMD changes at the total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, total body, and forearm. These changes included less loss of BMD at the total hip (placebo 3.38% decrease, pooled alendronate 1.02% decrease) and more gain in BMD at the lumbar spine (placebo 1.52% increase, pooled alendronate 5.26% increase). Subjects on placebo had increases in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate users. Alendronate users had lower risk of clinically recognized vertebral fractures, but the cumulative risk of nonvertebral fractures was not significantly different between the alendronate-treated women and those who received placebo. The authors concluded that for many women the discontinuation of alendronate for up to five years did not appear to significantly increase fracture risk, but women at high risk of vertebral fractures with a history of spinal fracture and a BMD T-score of -2 or less as well as those with osteoporosis according to BMD testing (T-score less than -2.5) after 5 years of treatment may benefit from continued alendronate use (95,96). This trial has limitations because patients with severe osteoporosis were excluded from enrollment, while those with osteopenia were included. There was an uncontrolled phase between FIT completion and FLEX enrollment. There was also a high dropout rate, limiting statistical power (97). As summarized below in the section on a bisphosphonate holiday, with these limitations, risk of fracture versus benefit of continuing treatment should be individualized.

 

RISEDRONATE

 

Risedronate increases BMD and decreases fracture risk among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Harris et al. reported data on 2,458 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis (subjects had either two or more vertebral fractures or one vertebral fracture and lumbar spine T score of -2 or less) and who were randomized to risedronate (5 mg daily) or placebo. Over three years, risedronate increased lumbar spine BMD by 5.4% and femoral neck BMD by 1.6%. Risedronate decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 41% and decreased the risk of non-vertebral fractures by 39% at three years (98). Reginster et al. showed in osteoporotic women that risedronate reduced spine fractures within the first year of treatment (99).

 

Risedronate therapy also reduces fracture risk in men (100), and is effective in the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women (101).

 

Weekly risedronate (35 mg) preparation used clinically is effective and well tolerated (102-104). Brown et al. randomized 1,468 women to daily or weekly risedronate. The increase in lumbar spine BMD at one year was similar between groups. Weekly risedronate was well tolerated, and the occurrence of adverse events was similar in daily and weekly treatment groups (102). A weekly preparation of risedronate that can be taken after breakfast is also available for clinical use. Monthly dosing of risedronate is available (150 mg once a month). Both monthly dosing regimens were shown to be non-inferior in efficacy and safety to the 5 mg daily regimen at one year (105,106). Thus, monthly risedronate provides alternative regimen for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. A formulation that can be taken with food is also available.

 

ZOLEDRONIC ACID

 

Zoledronic acid, an intravenous bisphosphonate, has been FDA approved for years for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy, multiple myeloma, and bone metastases from solid tumors. In August 2007, zoledronic acid (Reclast®) became the second intravenous bisphosphonate after ibandronate (Boniva®) to be FDA approved for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. It is considerably more potent than other available bisphosphonates. Thus, small doses and longer dosing intervals may be used (107). Reid et al. showed that zoledronic acid (4 mg annually) increases BMD and decreases markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

 

In the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly (HORIZON) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 7765 post-menopausal women with osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive a single 15-minute infusion of 5 mg of zoledronic acid or placebo at baseline, at 12 months, and at 24 months. The patients were followed over 36 months. In addition to positive effects on BMD and reduction in bone turnover biomarkers, treatment with zoledronic acid was associated with 70% RRR in morphogenic vertebral fractures and 41% RRR in hip fractures compared with placebo (108). Nonvertebral fractures, clinical fractures, and clinical vertebral fractures were reduced by 25%, 33%, and 77%, respectively. While adverse events, including change in renal function, were similar in both study groups, serious atrial fibrillation (AF) occurred slightly more frequently in the zoledronic acid group in the 3-year but not the 6-year data (108). Further analysis of the trial data and possible risk factors for rare AF are presented below under Adverse Effects (109).

 

In a study in 9355 women randomized to zoledronic acid versus placebo, zoledronic acid resulted in an early reduction in clinical fractures at one year that persisted for 3 years (110). Zoledronic acid is also effective in decreasing fracture risk in men (111).

 

In Horizon Recurrent Fracture trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with hip fractures, zoledronic acid versus placebo administered two weeks to 90 days post-surgical repair resulted in a 35% reduction in new clinical fractures and a 28% reduction in mortality (112). In a sub-sample analysis of this multi-national study, vitamin D deficiency was common and the median 25(OH)D level was only 14.7 ng/ml in these hip fracture study participants (113). Most study participants received 50,000 to 125,000 IU vitamin D at least two weeks prior to the zoledronic acid infusion. Once yearly infusion of zoledronic acid administered 2 weeks to 3 months after a hip fracture and after vitamin D supplementation, therefore, produced a decrease in clinical fractures and evidence of improved survival. Zoledronic acid is only FDA-approved therapy to reduce clinical fracture risk in adults with new hip fractures and provides skeletal protection for hip fracture patients as a once a year dosing. Zoledronic acid administered every 18 months for 6 years also decreased fracture incidence in women with low bone mass (197)

 

OTHER BISPHOSPHONATES

 

Ibandronate (oral and IV) is FDA-approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. In the larger clinical trial, it increased bone density and decreased vertebral fractures with both an oral daily regimen (2.5 mg daily) and an intermittent regimen (20 mg every other day for 12 doses every three months, 150 mg monthly) without reduction in hip fractures (114-116). Thus, unlike other bisphosphonates, ibandronate was not effective in decreasing non-spine fractures.

 

Pamidronate is not FDA approved for use in osteoporosis; however, it is occasionally used “off-label” for patients in patients with esophageal abnormalities (i.e., stricture or achalasia), organ transplants, or osteogenesis imperfecta. In adults, usually 30 to 60 mg is infused over two to four hours every three months. Pamidronate has been shown to increase BMD, but no fracture data are available (117-121).

 

Adverse Effects

 

GI EFFECTS

 

In general, the bisphosphonates are safe medications. Studies showing the long-term safety of alendronate, risedronate, and zoledronic acid are available for up to 10, 7, and 6 years respectively. Oral bisphosphonates are associated with some GI symptoms, and rare cases of severe esophagitis have been reported with alendronate, although reports are not consistent. However, Lanza et al. carried out a placebo-controlled endoscopic study in 277 subjects and found that the incidence of upper GI symptoms and endoscopic lesions was similar in the placebo and weekly alendronate groups (122). While in controlled trials the incidence of GI adverse effects did not differ in alendronate versus placebo groups, in clinical practice some patients discontinue bisphosphonates because of adverse GI experiences.

 

Because of the risk of esophagitis, alendronate is contraindicated for patients with esophageal abnormalities that delay esophageal emptying such as stricture or achalasia, and both alendronate and risedronate should not be used in patients who are unable to stand or sit upright for at least 30 minutes after drug administration because of increased risk of adverse esophageal effects.

 

ATYPICAL FEMUR FRACTURES

 

There has been concern over long-term bisphosphonate use and the reported risk of atypical femur fractures (AFF). AFF are thought to be stress or insufficiency fractures, caused by anti-resorptive-mediated suppression of intracortical remodeling, though the definite pathogenesis remains unclear. The absolute risk of AFF for patients taking bisphosphonates ranges from 3.2 to 50 per 100,000 person-years, but the risk with long-term bisphosphonate use is higher, ~100 per 100,000 person-years.

 

The Second Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) has defined AFF for case recognition. AFF must be located along the femoral diaphysis distal to the lesser trochanter and proximal to the supracondylar flare, and satisfy 4/5 major features: 1) the fracture is associated with minimal or no trauma, 2) the fracture line originates at the lateral cortex and is substantially transverse in its orientation (but can also be oblique as it progresses medially), 3) a complex fracture extends through both cortices and may have medial spike; or an incomplete fracture involves the lateral cortex, 4) the fracture is noncomminuted or minimally comminuted, and/or 5) localized periosteal or endosteal thickening of the lateral cortex is present at the fracture site (“beaking” or “flaring”). Other common features (minor features) include generalized increase in thickness of the femoral diaphyses, prodromal symptom of dull or aching pain in the groin or thigh, bilateral incomplete or complete femoral diaphysis fractures, and delayed fracture healing, though these are not required for case definition. Risk factors include use of bisphosphonates for >3-5 years, low vitamin D levels, and use of glucocorticoids (123).

 

The consensus has been that the number of fractures prevented far exceeds the number of AFF occurring as a result of bisphosphonate therapy, though further data is needed to guide decision-making around AFF risk.

 

Management of AFF recommended by the ASBMR task force includes surgical management with intramedullary fixation nailing or plating if the fracture is complete or incomplete accompanied by pain, with discontinuation of anti-resorptives, and adequate calcium and vitamin D intake. If the fracture is incomplete and pain is minimal, a trial of conservative management may be considered with use of crutches for 2-3 months, though there is a risk of progression to complete fracture with this method. In addition, obtaining X-ray imaging of the contralateral femur is recommended by the FDA, as ~28% of AFF also affect the contralateral leg. AFF noted on X-ray imaging should be followed by higher-order imaging, such as MRI or CT (123). Lastly, teriparatide may be considered in those who do not heal with other therapy (124).

 

OSTEONECROSIS OF THE JAW

 

Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) has also drawn attention even though this is a rare occurrence in patients treated with antiresorptive therapies. The International Task Force on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw defines ONJ as exposed bone in the maxillofacial region that does not heal within 8 weeks after identification by a health care provider, with prior exposure to an antiresorptive agent, and no history of radiation to the craniofacial region (125). It has been hypothesized that ONJ is the result of bone remodeling suppression combined with additional factors such as dental intervention or infection (126). Although very rare, it is more common after dental procedures such as tooth extraction. In 2005, the FDA requested that all oral and IV bisphosphonates include a class “precaution” labeling for ONJ. There have been no cases reported in randomized, placebo-controlled trials of alendronate, risedronate, or ibandronate. However, in a 2006 Medline review, 368 published cases were found, 94% of which involved patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates, 85% of which involved patients with multiple myeloma or metastatic cancer. Only 4% of patients had osteoporosis and data suggests a time- and dose-dependent effect. 60% of reported cases of ONJ occurred after dentoalveolar surgery for infections (tooth extractions), and the remaining 40% were likely related to infection, denture trauma, or other oral trauma (127). Based on both published and unpublished data, the risk of ONJ associated with oral bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis is low, estimated between one in 10,000 and less than one in 100,000 patient-treatment years (128). Some experts have suggested stopping bisphosphonates during a time before and after-invasive dental procedures. The American Dental Association 2011 Recommendations indicate that for patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy, the risk of developing osteonecrosis of the jaw is low and that for dental care they do not currently recommend stopping bisphosphonates (129,130). The American Dental Association does recommend maintenance of good dental hygiene and routine dental care.

 

The International Task Force on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in 2015 reported an incidence of ONJ of 0.001% to 0.01% in osteoporosis patients, which is slightly higher than the incidence in the general population (<0.001%). Risk factors for ONJ included glucocorticoid use, maxillary or mandibular bone surgery, poor oral hygiene, chronic inflammation, diabetes mellitus, ill-fitting dentures, as well as other drugs such as antiangiogenic agents. Incidence is greater in the oncology population (1-15%), who are receiving significantly more frequent and higher doses of anti-resorptives than the osteoporotic population. The task force recommended prevention of ONJ by eliminating or stabilizing oral disease prior to initiation of antiresorptive therapy, and considering the withholding of antiresorptive therapy in those at high risk for ONJ, such as cancer patients receiving bisphosphonates or denosumab and following extensive oral surgery until the surgical site heals with mature mucosal coverage (125). In a 2022 update by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons’ Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ), the risk of MRONJ in osteoporotic patients treated with bisphosphonates was 0.02 to 0.05 percent, compared to 0 to 0.02 percent with placebo (198).

 

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

 

In the HORIZON trial, serious atrial fibrillation (AF) was seen more frequently in patients who received IV zoledronic acid (50 subjects, 1.5%) than in those who received placebo (20 subjects 0.5%) (108). Significant risk factors were active tachyarrhythmia, congestive heart failure, previous bisphosphonate use, and advanced age (109). In a review of the results from FIT, there were more serious AF cases in the alendronate group (N=47 subjects, 1.5%) than in the placebo group (N=31 subjects, 1.0%), but these differences were not significant (131). These findings raised concern about a risk of AF with bisphosphonate use. In a case-control study published in 2008, researchers found more AF subjects than controls had ever used alendronate (n=47, 6.5% versus n=40, 4.1%) (132). A review of data from multiple trials did not find an association between risedronate use and AF (133). It is unclear how bisphosphonates may increase the risk of AF. Hypotheses include the release of inflammatory cytokines when IV bisphosphonates are administered, calcium shifts that can occur with IV and potent oral bisphosphonates, and relative binding affinity of the various bisphosphonates to bone. Both cytokines and calcium shifts may increase the risk of AF. The FDA released a review of spontaneous post-marketing reports of AF associated with oral and IV bisphosphonates and did not identify a risk of AF (134,135). The FDA continues to monitor such reports.

 

Post-Hip Fracture Care

 

Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly within the first-year post-fracture, hip fractures are the most serious of the osteoporotic fractures. There is a high prevalence of low vitamin D levels among hip fracture patients that warrants correction at the time of fracture (30,31). Nationally and internationally there is a large gap in fracture care and only 20% of fracture patients are evaluated and treated for their underlying osteoporosis. A fracture liaison service that identifies patients with fractures and initiates bone density testing and treatment has been very effective in reducing costs and improving post-fracture care (136-139). At Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) Endocrinologists and members of the Department of Orthopedic Surgery have worked together since 2004 to implement a hospital-based approach to advance fracture care and reverse the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among hip fracture patient using the electronic health record (140). This inter-disciplinary fracture pathway for hip fracture patients called the Brigham Fracture Intervention Team Initiative or “B-Fit®” includes testing of 25(OH)D, calcium, and creatinine levels on admission to the hospital, administration of one dose of 50,000 units of vitamin D, daily supplemental calcium and vitamin D, and an Endocrinology evaluation. Outpatient care coordination between endocrinologists and Orthopedic Surgeons include assessment for secondary causes of osteoporosis, bone density testing, and pharmacological intervention to reduce subsequent fractures (7, 140-142). Many national organizations are seeking to bring together stakeholders and improve patient care so patients with fragility fractures are evaluated and treated for their underlying osteoporosis (7).

 

Other Precautions

 

Bisphosphonates are excreted by the kidneys and should not be used for patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 35ml/min, Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min for Ibandronate). Studies in cancer patients, in whom cumulative doses are several-fold higher than in osteoporosis patients, show that age, concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, prior pamidronate use, history of hypercalcemia, renal disease, hypertension, and smoking are risk factors for renal failure (143,144).

 

Approximately 20% to 30% of subjects treated initially with intravenous administration of pamidronate or zoledronic acid (108,145) may develop an acute-phase reactions (e.g. fever, malaise, myalgia), which is typically less severe with subsequent infusions. Patients should be hydrated and often are premedicated with acetaminophen; symptoms are usually mild and transient.

 

Hypocalcemia may occur, but this is usually mild and asymptomatic. To avert marked hypocalcemia, it is important to ensure that the patient is vitamin D sufficient, which according to the authors’ practices, can best be achieved by checking a 25-hydroxy vitamin D level prior to each infusion. In addition, calcium and creatinine levels should be tested before each intravenous bisphosphonate treatment.

 

Bisphosphonate Holiday

 

Bisphosphonates have robust effects on fracture reduction when used for 3-5 years. There are concerns about the long-term use. According to the 2011 FDA review as summarized in the New England Journal of Medicine (146) there is no global regulatory restriction on duration of use. Post-hoc analyses of data from the FIT and FLEX studies for alendronate (up to 10 years of alendronate therapy) and the randomized extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (up to 6 years of zoledronic acid therapy) provide some guidance in these important clinical decisions (96,147).

 

According to the available data, alendronate and zoledronic acid may be discontinued in patients at low risk of fracture after 5 or 3 years of therapy, respectively. In the FLEX trial, continuation of alendronate to 10 years duration of therapy did reduce non-vertebral fractures in those with FN T-scores <-2.5 assessed at year 5, but not in those with T-scores >-2.0 at year 5 (96). In the HORIZON extension trial, stopping Zoledronic acid after 3 years duration of therapy did not significantly increase the risk of subsequent fracture in those with T-score >-2.5, no recent fractures, and no greater than 1 risk factor(148). The subgroups of patients who might benefit from continued therapy without holiday at 5 (oral) or 3 (IV) years of therapy include those with T-score <-2.5 at the hip, recent fracture on therapy, and prevalent spine fractures. Otherwise, annual evaluation while on holiday to assess each individuals fracture risk is recommended, in order to decide when to resume therapy (149). High risk individuals may benefit from use of an alternative treatment such as teriparatide or in some instances, raloxifene, during the time of bisphosphonate holiday. Ongoing evaluation of patients on a bisphosphonate holiday is important to reduce the risk of subsequent fractures (95,96,146,147,150).

 

The ASBMR Task Force for managing osteoporosis in patients on long-term bisphosphonate therapy included consideration of continuing therapy in any patients with history of hip, spine, or multiple other osteoporosis fractures before or during therapy, those with hip BMD T-score<=2.5 after treatment, or high fracture risk (151). However, these approaches do not replace clinical judgment.

 

Drug Administration

 

Oral bisphosphonates should be taken in the morning with water on an empty stomach. Because oral bisphosphonates are poorly absorbed, patients should wait at least 30 minutes before ingesting other beverages, food, or medications. To help patients avoid esophageal irritation, they are instructed to swallow oral bisphosphonates with six to eight ounces of water and to remain upright for at least 30 minutes and until they have had their first meal of the day (152). Intravenous preparations must be infused slowly to avoid renal toxicity.

 

When choosing an oral bisphosphonate and in the absence of contraindications, alendronate is often selected as initial therapy because of its efficacy in reduction of spine and non-spine fractures and its availability as a low cost, generic preparation. In addition to alendronate, risedronate has been on the market for more than 10 years and has favorable safety profiles when used in the indicated populations. While oral ibandronate is popular for its monthly dosing schedule, ibandronate reduces the incidence of spine but not non-spine fractures. In addition, ibandronate’s IV dosing is more expensive and requires more frequent dosing than the once-yearly, zoledronic acid. Thus, it has a limited role in osteoporosis treatment. In patients who are unable to comply with the administration requirements of the oral agents, and in those who experience intolerable GI effects, intravenous zoledronic acid is an effective therapy to reduce spine and non-spine fractures. Like alendronate and risedronate, it reduces the incidence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Zoledronic acid (5 mg infusion once a year) should also be considered in patients with a recent hip fracture after two weeks to 90 days. A post-hoc analysis suggested a superior bone density response when zoledronic acid was administered 4-6 weeks after a hip fracture than at the earlier time points (153). Vitamin D deficiency should be optimally corrected prior to use of zoledronic acid.

 

DENOSUMAB

 

Denosumab is the first FDA-approved human monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), an important regulator of bone remodeling. RANKL is secreted by osteoblast precursors and binds to its receptor, RANK, located on osteoclasts. Osteoprotegrin is an endogenous cytokine and decoy receptor that binds RANKL and inhibits osteoclast activation (154). The binding of RANKL to RANK promotes osteoclast proliferation, differentiation, activation, and survival. Denosumab inhibits RANKL and osteoclastogenesis and markedly reduces bone resorption.

 

Fracture Data

 

Denosumab is administered for osteoporosis treatment as a subcutaneous injection of 60 mg every 6 months. In its pivotal phase III randomized placebo-controlled study of 7868 osteoporotic women ages 60-90 years (FREEDOM), denosumab compared with placebo given twice yearly for 3 years was associated with a relative decrease in the risk of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures by 68%, 40%, and 20% respectively (155). In the extension of this trial, denosumab use for up to 10 years was associated with cumulative BMD gains of 21.7% at the lumbar spine and 9.2% at the total hip. Persistent reductions of bone turnover markers and fracture incidence was also noted, with a positive safety profile with up to 10 years of continued use (199).

 

Drug Administration

 

Denosumab may have advantages over current osteoporosis therapies: infrequent dosing (every six months), and rapid, effective, but reversible antiresorptive activity; drug adherence is, however, important to prevent the increase in bone turnover markers after 6 months of therapy.

 

Adverse Effects

 

Adverse effects of densoumab include hypocalcemia, nausea, musculoskeletal pain, serious skin infections (small risk), infections, dermatologic reactions, and cystitis. Infection risk has been a concern based on RANKL inhibition of non-skeletal immune cells causing theoretical immune suppression. The initial FREEDOM trial showed slightly higher infection rates (3 cases in densoumab arm vs. 0 cases in placebo arm of endocarditis, 0.4% risk in densoumab arm vs. <0.1% in placebo arm of severe skin events) while the extension trial showed no increased risk of infection compared to placebo. Furthermore, a meta-analysis failed to show an increased risk of serious infections with denosumab use (157). Given the unclear infection risk, its use in immunocompromised patients should be cautious. In addition, very rare osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures have occurred with denosumab use (similar to bisphosphonates). Stopping denosumab therapy has been shown to result in bone loss and, in some instances, spine fractures (200). Therefore, unlike bisphosphonates, a treatment holiday is not recommended. The FDA recommends initiation of antiresorptive therapy and a number of treatment regimens are undergoing evaluation in an effort to prevent this bone loss.

 

PARATHYROID HORMONE

 

Anabolic Action on Bone

 

Animal studies show that PTH is capable of both anabolic and catabolic actions on bone. PTH stimulates both bone formation and bone resorption; the net effect on BMD depends on the balance between these two processes (160). A continuous infusion of PTH increases both formation and resorption and leads to bone breakdown (160,161). However, intermittent exposure preferentially increases formation, thereby producing an anabolic effect on bone (160,162,163). Therefore, PTH can increase or decrease BMD depending on the pattern of exposure. Dosing PTH in a manner leading to stimulation of bone formation before causing bone resorption has become known as maximizing the “anabolic window” of PTH (164).

 

Cellular Mechanisms

 

PTH acts directly on osteoblasts and cells of the osteoblast lineage. PTH promotes differentiation of pre-osteoblasts to osteoblasts (161) and inhibits osteoblast apoptosis, thereby increasing the number of active osteoblasts (165). Furthermore, PTH triggers the production of several growth factors in bone cells, including insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) (161,166).

 

Teriparatide

 

In 2002, the FDA approved teriparatide (Forteo™), injectable recombinant human PTH (1-34), for the treatment of men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are at high risk for fracture (see Table 5). The biologically active fragment PTH (1-34) has properties similar to the full-length molecule PTH (1-84), which is approved for use in Europe. Antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates, increase BMD up to ~ 8%. However, many patients with osteoporosis have lost as much as 30% of their peak bone mass. Thus, agents that have an anabolic effect on bone are desirable (158). PTH directly stimulates bone formation before bone resorption, has robust effects on spinal BMD, improves bone structure, and reduces spine and non-spine fractures. The sequence of changes in bone formation and resorption leads to what is described as the anabolic window (159).

 

FRACTURE DATA

 

In a large multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled trial, Neer et al. reported the effects of PTH (1-34) on bone density and fractures in 1,637 postmenopausal women with baseline vertebral fractures randomized to 20 µg PTH daily, 40 µg PTH daily, or placebo. At a mean of 18 months’ follow-up, 20 µg PTH daily increased lumbar spine BMD by 9.7%, femoral neck BMD by 2.8%, and total hip BMD by 2.6%. There was a decrease of 0.1% at the distal radius, but this was not significantly different from the change seen in the placebo group. PTH (20 µg daily) reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by 65% and non-vertebral fragility fractures by 53% (and is the FDA-approved dose for treatment of osteoporosis). The two PTH (1-34) doses reduced fractures to a similar degree, but headache and nausea were more common in the group receiving the higher dose of 40 µg daily (167).

 

Abaloparatide

 

In 2017, an additional PTH analog was FDA approved for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Abaloparatide (Tymlos™) is a parathyroid (1-34) hormone-related protein (PTHrp) analog drug that shares similar anabolic effects as teriparatide. 

 

FRACTURE DATA

 

In the ACTIVE trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Miller et al (202) studied the effect of abaloparatide 80 mcg daily versus placebo in 1901 women with osteoporosis and baseline vertebral fractures over 18 months. At a mean of 18 months’ follow-up, abaloparatide increased lumbar spine BMD by 11.2%, femoral neck BMD by 3.6%, and total hip BMD by 4.18%. New vertebral fracture incidence was 0.6% with abaloparatide versus 4.2% with placebo (86% relative risk reduction, p<0.001). There was a 43% relative risk reduction of non-vertebral fracture with abaloparatide, which just met statistical significance, P=0.049.

 

Combination Therapy of Teriparatide and Bisphosphonates or Denosumab

 

The effects of concurrent or sequential therapy with PTH and antiresorptive agents have been studied. Black et al. compared the effects of PTH (1-84), alendronate, or both in combination in postmenopausal women (168). At one year, spine DXA had increased in all three groups. There was no difference in spine DXA between the PTH group and the combination group. However, the PTH group had a significantly greater increase in volumetric BMD of the spine on quantitative CT than the alendronate and combination groups. Finkelstein et al. also carried out a study in men (169). PTH (1-34) was started at 6 months, and all three groups were followed for 30 months. Spine BMD as measured by both DXA and quantitative CT increased to a greater degree in the PTH group than in the alendronate and combination groups. Thus, these studies show no evidence of synergy between PTH and alendronate. Furthermore, alendronate administered prior to teriparatide may impair the anabolic activity of PTH. It is hypothesized that PTH is less effective when bone turnover is suppressed.

 

While concurrent treatment with PTH and alendronate does not appear to be additive, bisphosphonate therapy initiated immediately upon completion of PTH course is beneficial. Rittmaster et al. demonstrated that PTH followed by alendronate produces progressive increases in BMD. In this study, 66 postmenopausal women were randomized to either 50 µg of recombinant human PTH (1-84) daily or placebo for the first year, and then all subjects were treated with alendronate on an open label extension for the second year. During the first year, the PTH group gained 4.3% BMD at the lumbar spine while the placebo group gained 1.3%. During the second year, the PTH group gained 6.3% BMD at the lumbar spine while the placebo group gained 5.7%. Thus, subjects previously treated with PTH continued to gain BMD with subsequent alendronate therapy (158). Black et al. extended their trial mentioned above (168). Post-menopausal women who had received PTH (1-84) in year one were randomly assigned to an additional year of placebo (n = 60) or alendronate (n = 59). Over two years, alendronate after PTH (1-84) led to significant increases in BMD compared to placebo after PTH (1-84), most notable at trabecular bone areas of the spine as assessed by quantitative CT [31% increase in alendronate after PTH (1-84) group versus14% increase in placebo after alendronate group]. Significant BMD loss was seen in year two in the placebo after PTH (1-84)group (170). Kurland et al. reported similar findings in men (171). Twenty-one men were followed for up to two years after discontinuing PTH (1-34). Those who were treated with a bisphosphonate immediately upon completion of the PTH gained an additional 8.9% BMD at the lumbar spine at two years, while the men who did not go on bisphosphonate therapy lost 3.7% BMD at the lumbar spine at one year. These studies support the immediate use of bisphosphonates upon completion of the recommended 24-month course of PTH therapy to consolidate the increases in bone density.

 

The Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration (DATA) trial investigated the combination of denosumab and teriparatide vs. monotherapy for 2 years. Combination therapy of daily teriparatide and denosumab every 6 months showed increases in spine and hip bone density greater than either drug alone (172).In the absence of fracture outcomes, the role of combination teriparatide and denosumab therapy in osteoporosis remains to be determined, but this regimen may be a therapeutic option in patients with severe osteoporosis or in those who have failed conventional therapy. In the DATA-Switch study, an extension of the DATA trial, subjects who were on denosumab only were switched to teriparatide, and those on teriparatide only were switch to denosumab; the former group were found to have bone loss, whereas the latter group have continued BMD increase (173). This may indicate that the choice of initial and subsequent osteoporosis treatment is an important consideration.

 

In an overlap study of teriparatide with alendronate added to teriparatide after 9 months, found a greater increase in BMD with overlap compared to teriparatide alone (174). These findings may be due to a “reopening” of the anabolic window described with teriparatide use. Of note, fracture data is not available.

 

Adverse Effects

 

In general, teriparatide and abaloparatide, injections are well tolerated and have been safely used for a decade (175). PTH is cleared from the circulation within four hours of subcutaneous administration. A daily injection is necessary and transient redness at the injection site has been noted. Headache and nausea occur in less than 10% of subjects receiving a daily dose of teriparatide 20 µg. Mild, early, transient hypercalcemia can occur, but severe hypercalcemia is rare. Prior to starting a PTH or PTH-rp analog, it is suggested to obtain serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and creatinine levels. Routine monitoring of serum calcium levels while on PTH or PTH-rp is not recommended by the manufacturer, though may be considered. Increases in urinary calcium (by 30 mg per day) and serum uric acid concentrations (by 13%) are seen but do not appear to have clinical consequences.

 

Fisher 344 rats treated with nearly life-long daily teriparatide or abaloparatide have an increased risk of osteosarcoma. Upon approval of teriparatide in 2002, the FDA placed a black box warning about osteosarcoma in rodents treated with teriparatide and the manufacturer has warned against using teriparatide in the following settings: Paget's disease or unexplained elevations of alkaline phosphatase, open epiphyses in children or young adults, bone metastases, prior radiation therapy involving the skeleton, metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis, and hypercalcemia. As summarized by Cipriani et al in 2013, there have been 3 reported cases of osteosarcoma in adults treated with PTH (1-34), which does not appear to be greater than the prevalence of osteosarcoma in the population (175). In the Osteosarcoma Surveillance Study, a 15-year surveillance study with 7 years of follow-up, there has not been evidence of a causal relationship between use of teriparatide and risk of osteosarcoma in humans. Among the 1448 cases of osteosarcoma, no patient in this study had been previously treated with teriparatide (176).

 

 In 2021, the FDA removed the black box warning for teriparatide based on 18 years of post-marketing surveillance using case-finding studies, which ruled out any but a small potential increase in risk of osteosarcoma in humans with the drug. The FDA no longer limits the lifetime use to a total of 2 years and longer use can be considered in patients at high fracture risk. The black box warning was also removed for abaloparatide, however, use is limited to 2 years in patient’s lifetime until more data is available. Use of teriparatide and abaloparatide, however, should be avoided in patients at risk for osteosarcoma (e.g., younger patients with open epiphyses or those with a history of skeletal malignancies, unexplained alkaline phosphatase, Paget’s disease of bone or radiation therapy to bone).

 

Off Label Uses

 

Teriparatide has been used off-label for numerous reasons, including improvement of bone healing with atypical femur fractures, and for treatment of vertebral fracture pain and fracture healing. More clinical data is needed in these areas. A systemic review of teriparatide use for healing of bisphosphonate-related AFF found anecdotal evidence of beneficial effects on fracture healing, noting the need for prospective data (124). In a small study of 34 patients with acute vertebral fractures given teriparatide vs. risedronate, those who received Teriparatide had lower rates of vertebral collapse, though had no significant difference in back pain scores (177).

 

Drug Administration

 

Teriparatide is supplied in a disposable pen device for subcutaneous injection into the thigh or abdomen. The pen requires refrigeration between uses. The recommended dosage is 20 µg once a day for two years, though its lifetime use may be extended beyond this in certain clinical situations (such as if a patient remains at or returns to a high risk of fracture). Abaloparatide is also supplied in a disposable pen device for subcutaneous injection into the thigh or abdomen, and can be stored at room temperature after first use for up to 30 days. The recommendation dosage is 80 µg once daily for no more than two years.

 

ROMOSOZUMAB

 

Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody to sclerostin, a potent inhibitor of osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by way of Wnt signaling inhibition.  Animal studies show that blocking the effect of sclerosin was associated with large increases in bone mass. In phase II trials, romosozumab administration shows increased BMD at the spine of 11.3%, as well as increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption (193). A dual effect of transiently increasing markers of bone formation (P1NP) while simultaneously lowering marker of bone resorption (CTX) was also demonstrated in the phase II trial.

 

Fracture Data

 

In its pivotal phase III trial (203) of 7180 women with osteoporosis, romosozumab reduced incidence of vertebral fractures compared to placebo by 73% at 12 months, and 75% at 24-months after transition to denosumab at 12 months. Non-vertebral fracture reduction was not demonstrated. In the ARCH trial (204), 4093 women with severe osteoporosis were randomized to Romosozumab or alendronate for 12 months. Incidence of new vertebral fractures was 4% with Romosozumab vs. 6.3% with alendronate (risk ratio 0.63, p=0.003). Changes in bone density were greater with Romosozumab compared to alendronate, 13.7% vs. 5% increase in lumbar BMD, and 6.2% vs.  2.8% increase in total hip BMD was demonstrated, respectively. In extension data, preservation of BMD accrual was achieved with transition to alendronate for up to 36 months based on trial duration.

 

Adverse Effects

 

Romosozumab has been associated with hypersensitivity reactions such as angioedema and urticaria. The most common side effects were arthralgia and headache (>5%). Cases of ONJ and AFF have been reported. Upon approval by the FDA in 2019, a black box warning was applied regarding a potential risk of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death. In the ARCH trial, there was a higher rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. However, in post-hoc pooled analysis by the TIMI Group of both FRAME and ARCH data, a significantly high rate of cardiovascular event was not demonstrated. The Endocrine Society advises that women at high risk for cardiovascular disease or stroke should not be considered romosozumab pending further studies on its cardiovascular risk (201).

 

GLUCOCORTICOID-INDUCED OSTEOPOROSIS

 

Glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis (GIO) affects the spine greater than other sites. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines can be used to help clinicians determine appropriate therapeutic options in those on glucocorticoid therapy (181). Epidemiological data has consistently shown that those taking glucocorticoids have fractures at higher T-scores. Glucocorticoids not only increase bone resorption, but also reduce bone formation. Thus, there are two important steps for targeted intervention—bisphosphonates and teriparatide, respectively. Rapid bone loss is prevalent in the first 6-12 months of glucocorticoid therapy; however, the increased fracture risk is already present within 3 months of initiating glucocorticoids. Thus, bone protection therapy should be started, at the onset, if the duration of glucocorticoids is anticipated to be 3 months or longer. For postmenopausal women and men over age 50, treatment for GIO is determined based on whether the patient’s risk for fracture—using FRAX® and clinical judgment—is low (<10%), moderate (10-20%), or high (>20%). For those taking prednisone dose >7.5 mg/day, the FDA has approved the following bisphosphonates—Risedronate, Alendronate, Zoledronate—and the anabolic agent, Teriparatide, for the treatment of GIO. In a 3-year randomized trial evaluating the prevention and treatment of GIO, teriparatide was statistically superior to alendronate in preventing BMD declines at the spine and hip (182).

 

Table 5. Effects of FDA-Approved Osteoporosis Therapies on Fractures

 

Most Common Dosage

Fracture Risk Reduction

FDA Indications*

Alendronate

70 mg PO weekly

Spine, non-spine, hip

PMO Treatment and Prevention in women, Treatment of osteoporosis in men, GIO treatment.

Ibandronate

150 mg PO monthly;
3 mg IV every 3 months

Spine

PMO Treatment and Prevention in women.

Risedronate

35 mg PO weekly;
150 mg PO monthly

Spine, non-spine, hip

PMO Treatment and Prevention in women, Treatment of osteoporosis in men, GIO treatment.

Zoledronic Acid (ZA)

5 mg IV / year (Treatment)
5 mg every other year (Prevention)

Spine, non-spine, hip

PMO Treatment and Prevention in women, Treatment of osteoporosis in men, GIO treatment

RANKL inhibitor
Denosumab

60 mg SC every 6 months

Spine, non-Spine, hip

PMO-Treatment in women and men at high fracture risk;

PTH - Teriparatide (PTH 1-34)

20 mcg SC daily (for maximum of 2 years)

Spine, non-Spine

PMO and GIO Treatment in women and men at high risk of fracture

PTH- Abaloparatide (PTH-rp 1-34)

80 mcg SC daily (for maximum of 2 years)

Spine, non-spine

PMO treatment in women at high risk of fracture

Anti-Sclerostin Antibody- Romosozumab

210 mcg SC monthly (for maximum of 12 months)

Spine, non-spine

PMO treatment in women at high risk of fracture

PMO: postmenopausal osteoporosis; GIO: Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

 

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING SELECTION OF ANTI-FRACTURE TREATMENT

 

When approaching a patient at high risk for fracture, several considerations may help guide the initial treatment selection. Anabolic agents (i.e., romosozumab, abaloparatide, or teriparatide) should be considered as first-line agents In patients deemed “very high risk” for fracture. This may include patients with very low T-scores <-3.0 at the lumbar spine or hip, recent fragility fracture, multiple risk factors for fractures or fractures while on approved osteoporosis therapy or intolerance to osteoporosis therapies. If anabolic treatment is contraindicated or not available for a patient, a parental anti-resorptive agent should be considered.

 

Denosumab can also increase bone density and reduce fracture risk in women and men at high risk for fracture. Denosumab is FDA approved to treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women at high risk for fracture, in women at high fracture risk on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer,  and in men treated with androgen deprivation for prostate cancer.

 

In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, treatment options can be limited. Bisphosphonates are generally contraindicated in those with eGFR <30-35. Denosumab (Prolia) is the preferred agent for those with more advanced kidney disease, given lack of direct renal toxicity and renal metabolism compared to bisphosphonates. However, it is important to note that though denosumab has been shown to improve bone mineral density in those with advanced renal disease, there is little evidence of fracture reduction in this population. Since patients with CKD may have several different types of metabolic bone diseases including osteoporosis, use of denosumab should be approached with caution given the increased complexity of bone disease in these patients.

 

It is important to note that when selecting an anabolic agent or denosumab, a plan for the next agent in their treatment sequence should be considered at the onset. Anabolic agents are approved for 1-2 years of use, thereafter their effects wane. At present use of teriparatide can be used for more than a total of 2 years in patients at high risk of fracture. Anti-resorptive agents should ideally be given after completion of a course of anabolic in order to prevent the bone loss that occurs with discontinuation of these therapies. Regarding denosumab, this is approved for 5-10 years of continuous use, but at the point when denosumab is discontinued, it must be followed at the time of first missed dose or just after with an alternative anti-resorptive to prevent rapid rebound bone loss and spine fractures. Ongoing research is assessing different approaches to prevent the bone loss associated with the discontinuation of denosumab. In patients with intolerance or a renal contraindication to using bisphosphonates, the options for the treatment sequence must be taken into account and discussed with the patient as part of shared-decision making.

 

Zoledronic acid is an appropriate first-line option for several different patient scenarios. As mentioned in the Zoledronic acid (ZA) section above, it is the optimal choice in patients post-hip fracture given the benefit in morbidity and mortality in this setting. ZA should also be considered in patients at high fracture risk who have upper gastrointestinal/esophageal disease, or significant malabsorption (i.e. post-gastric bypass surgery), as oral bisphosphonates may be associated with increased risk of GI intolerance or poor absorption and efficacy, respectively. In patients with compliance difficulties or major transportation concerns, zoledronic acid may also be optimal given its infrequent and flexible dosing (once yearly, though less frequently may also be appropriate in select patients). This is in contrast to denosumab, which requires strict adherence to an every 6 month schedule of injections in order to avoid the consequence of rebound bone loss if doses are missed or significantly delayed.

 

Lastly, raloxifene may be considered in patients within 10 years of menopause, who are at high fracture risk at the spine, and high risk for breast cancer based on familial history. Otherwise, an oral bisphosphonate (e.g., alendronate or risedronate) or intravenous bisphosphonate or denosumab is preferred over raloxifene as these therapies have been shown to reduce spine and non-spine fractures.

 

Clinical guides from the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (7), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (205), and the Endocrine Society (201) provide more detailed information on the management of osteoporosis in high- risk patients.

 

 

TREATMENT GAP IN OSTEOPOROSIS THERAPY

 

Despite having highly effective and well-tolerated available therapeutics for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, the rate of treatment of at-risk patients is much lower than desired. Based on prescription databases, bisphosphonate use declined by greater than 50% between 2008 and 2012 (183). In addition, the use of bisphosphonates among those with hip fractures declined from 15% in 2004 to only 3% in 2013, which is concerning given the high risk for future fracture in the setting of hip fracture (139). This decline in use temporally coincides with FDA warnings regarding potential risks related to anti-resorptive use, such as rare atypical femur fracture and osteonecrosis of the jaw, though the FDA has not restricted their use based on these risks (184). It is clear that many patients who would benefit from osteoporosis treatment are not receiving it, and this is a major concern for those who treat osteoporosis. Providers must be able to hold thorough and honest discussions with patients regarding the benefits and risks of osteoporosis treatment options in order for patients to accept and comply with needed treatment.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that affects approximately 50% of women and 25% of men aged 50 years and older and fractures increase exponentially with advancing age.  At present, a number of safe and very effective osteoporosis therapies are available. Antiresorptive agents, such as the bisphosphonates, raloxifene, estrogen (not approved for treatment) and denosumab increase bone density and reduce fractures. Teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab are anabolic therapies and their treatment effects are best consolidated with an inhibitor of bone resorption such as a bisphosphonate or denosumab. A comprehensive review of the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis is summarized in the 2022 Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician’s Guide (7). A multifaceted approach including calcium and vitamin D, exercise, pharmacologic therapy, and fall prevention strategies can reduce the risk of fractures and promote independent healthy lives in older men and women.  

 

ACKOWLEDGEMENTS

 

We wish to acknowledge Anjali Grover, MD, Kara Mikulec, MD and Kathryn E. Ackerman, MD, MPH, and thank them for their past contributions to the Endotext chapter and Jill MacLeod for her assistance in preparation of this review.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2:285–289. 
  2. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2007; 22:465-475.
  3. Chrischilles EA, Butler CD, Davis CS, Wallace RB. A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:2026–2032. 
  4. Magaziner J, Lydick E, Hawkes W, Fox KM, Zimmerman SI, Epstein RS, Hebel JR. Excess mortality attributable to hip fracture in white women aged 70 years and older. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1630–1636. 
  5. Melton LJ 3rd, Thamer M, Ray NF, Chan JK, Chesnut CH 3rd, Einhorn TA, Johnston CC, Raisz LG, Silverman SL, Siris ES. Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:16–23. 
  6. Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE, Berger ML. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1108–1112. 
  7. LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Siris ES. The clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022; 33(10):2049-2102.
  8. McCloskey EV, Oden NC, Harvey WD, Leslie D, Hans H, Johansson, et al. A Meta-analysis of trabecular bone score in fracture risk prediction and its relationship to FRAX. J Bone Miner Res. 2016; 31; 940-948.
  9. Watts NB, Ettinger B, LeBoff MS. Perspective: FRAX Facts. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2009;24:975–979. 
  10. Kohrt WM, Barry DW, Schwartz RS. Muscle forces or gravity: what predominates mechanical loading on bone? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:2050–2055. 
  11. Shea B, Bonaiuti D, Iovine R, Negrini S, Robinson V, Kemper HC, Wells G, Tugwell P, Cranney A. Cochrane Review on exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Eura Medicophys. 2004;40:199–209. 
  12. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Kohrt WM. Exercise and bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:741639. 
  13. Khosla S, Bellido TM, Drezner MK, Gordon CM, Harris TB, Kiel DP, Kream BE, LeBoff MS, Lian JB, Peterson CA, Rosen CJ, Williams JP, Winer KK, Sherman SS. Forum on aging and skeletal health: summary of the proceedings of an ASBMR workshop. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2565–2578. 
  14. Kohrt WM, Bloomfield SA, Little KD, Nelson ME, Yingling VR. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: physical activity and bone health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1985–1996. 
  15. Mundy G. Bone remodeling. In: Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism, MJ Favus (ed.), Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, 30–38.
  16. Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Horan SA, Beck BR. Heavy resistance training is safe and improves bone, function, and stature in postmenopausal women with low to very low bone mass: novel early findings from the LIFTMOR trial. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(12):2889-2894.
  17. Dawson-Hughes B, Dallal GE, Krall EA, Sadowski L, Sahyoun N, Tannenbaum S. A controlled trial of the effect of calcium supplementation on bone density in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:878–883. 
  18. Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Flouride. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
  19. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 Report on Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: What Clinicians Need to Know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:53–58. 
  20. Recker RR. Calcium absorption and achlorhydria. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:70–73. 
  21. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D: what dietetics practitioners need to know. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:524–527. 
  22. Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, Wallace RB, Robbins J, Lewis CE, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black HR, Blanchette P, Bonds DE, Brunner RL, Brzyski RG, Caan B, Cauley JA, Chlebowski RT, Cummings SR, Granek I, Hays J, Heiss G, Hendrix SL, Howard BV, Hsia J, Hubbell FA, Johnson KC, Judd H, Kotchen JM, Kuller LH, Langer RD, Lasser NL, Limacher MC, Ludlam S, Manson JE, Margolis KL, McGowan J, Ockene JK, O'Sullivan MJ, Phillips L, Prentice RL, Sarto GE, Stefanick ML, Van Horn L, Wactawski-Wende J, Whitlock E, Anderson GL, Assaf AR, Barad D. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:669–683. 
  23. Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Baron JA, Grey A, MacLennan GS, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis. Bmj. 2010;341:c3691. 
  24. Xiao Q, Murphy RA, Houston DK, Harris TB, Chow WH, Park Y. Dietary and Supplemental Calcium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: The National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. JAMA internal medicine. 2013:1–8. 
  25. Prentice RL, Pettinger MB, Jackson RD, Wactawski-Wende J, Lacroix AZ, Anderson GL, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, Van Horn L, Vitolins MZ, Datta M, Leblanc ES, Cauley JA, Rossouw JE. Health risks and benefits from calcium and vitamin D supplementation: Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:567–580. 
  26. Moyer VA., USPSTF. Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation to Prevent Fractures in Adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013 
  27. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Orav EJ, Lips P, Meunier PJ, Lyons RA, Flicker L, Wark J, Jackson RD, Cauley JA, Meyer HE, Pfeifer M, Sanders KM, Stahelin HB, Theiler R, Dawson-Hughes B. A pooled analysis of vitamin D dose requirements for fracture prevention. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:40–49. 
  28. Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Lee IM, Cook NR, Albert MA, Gordon D, Zaharris E, Macfadyen JG, Danielson E, Lin J, Zhang SM, Buring JE. The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:159–171. 
  29. LeBoff MS, Yue AY, Copeland T, Cook NR, Buring JE, Manson JE. VITAL-Bone Health: rationale and design of two ancillary studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D and/or omega-3 fatty acid supplements on incident fractures and bone health outcomes in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL). Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;41:259–268. 
  30. Leboff MS, Hawkes WG, Glowacki J, Yu-Yahiro J, Hurwitz S, Magaziner J. Vitamin D-deficiency and post-fracture changes in lower extremity function and falls in women with hip fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2008
  31. LeBoff MS, Kohlmeier L, Hurwitz S, Franklin J, Wright J, Glowacki J. Occult vitamin D deficiency in postmenopausal US women with acute hip fracture. Jama. 1999;281:1505–1511. 
  32. Heaney RP, Dowell MS, Hale CA, Bendich A. Calcium absorption varies within the reference range for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Am Coll Nutr. 2003;22:142–146. 
  33. Haden ST, Fuleihan GE, Angell JE, Cotran NM, LeBoff MS. Calcidiol and PTH levels in women attending an osteoporosis program. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999;64:275–279. 
  34. Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Duboeuf F, Brun J, Crouzet B, Arnaud S, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in the elderly women. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1637–1642. 
  35. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dietrich T, Orav EJ, Hu FB, Zhang Y, Karlson EW, Dawson-Hughes B. Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged > or =60 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:752–758. 
  36. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Dick W, Akos R, Knecht M, Salis C, Nebiker M, Theiler R, Pfeifer M, Begerow B, Lew RA, Conzelmann M. Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:343–351. 
  37. Moyer VA. Prevention of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2012;
  38. Murad MH, Elamin KB, Abu Elnour NO, Elamin MB, Alkatib AA, Fatourechi MM, Almandoz JP, Mullan RJ, Lane MA, Liu H, Erwin PJ, Hensrud DD, Montori VM. The Effect of Vitamin D on Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 
  39. John EM, Schwartz GG, Dreon DM, Koo J. Vitamin D and breast cancer risk: the NHANES I Epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971-1975 to 1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:399–406. 
  40. Rosen CJ, Adams JS, Bikle DD, Black DM, Demay MB, Manson JE, Murad MH, Kovacs CS. The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2012;33:456–492. 
  41. Giovannucci E, Liu Y, Rimm EB, Hollis BW, Fuchs CS, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and cancer incidence and mortality in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:451–459. 
  42. Dawson-Hughes B, Heaney R. P., Holick M. F., Lips P., Meunier P. J. R. V. Estimates of optimal vitamin D status. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:713–716. 
  43. Looker AC, Johnson CL, Lacher DA, Pfeiffer CM, Schleicher RL, Sempos CT. Vitamin D status: United States, 2001-2006. NCHS Data Brief. 2011:1–8. 
  44. Dawson-Hughes B, Mithal A, Bonjour JP, Boonen S, Burckhardt P, Fuleihan GE, Josse RG, Lips P, Morales-Torres J, Yoshimura N. IOF position statement: vitamin D recommendations for older adults. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2010; 21:1151-1154.
  45. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011;96:1911–1930. 
  46. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:53–58. 
  47. Chapuy MC, Preziosi P, Maamer M, Arnaud S, Galan P, Hercberg S, Meunier PJ. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:439–443. 
  48. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Wong JB, Giovannucci E, Dietrich T, Dawson-Hughes B. Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Jama. 2005;293:2257–2264. 
  49. Vieth R, Ladak Y, Walfish PG. Age-related changes in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D versus parathyroid hormone relationship suggest a different reason why older adults require more vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:185–191. 
  50. Vieth R. Why the optimal requirement for Vitamin D3 is probably much higher than what is officially recommended for adults. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;89-90:575–579. 
  51. Eriksen EF, Colvard DS, Berg NJ, Graham ML, Mann KG, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL. Evidence of estrogen receptors in normal human osteoblast-like cells. Science. 1988;241:84–86. 
  52. Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Cytokines, hematopoiesis, osteoclastogenesis, and estrogens. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;50:199–202. 
  53. Pacifici R, Rifas L, McCracken R, Vered I, McMurtry C, Avioli LV, Peck WA. Ovarian steroid treatment blocks a postmenopausal increase in blood monocyte interleukin 1 release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:2398–2402. 
  54. Pacifici R. Is there a causal role for IL-1 in postmenopausal bone loss? Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;50:295–299. 
  55. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–333. 
  56. Heiss G, Wallace R, Anderson GL, Aragaki A, Beresford SA, Brzyski R, Chlebowski RT, Gass M, LaCroix A, Manson JE, Prentice RL, Rossouw J, Stefanick ML, Investigators WHI. Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin. JAMA. 2008;299:1036–1045. 
  57. LaCroix AZ, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, Aragaki AK, Johnson KC, Martin L, Margolis KL, Stefanick ML, Brzyski R, Curb JD, Howard BV, Lewis CE, Wactawski-Wende J, Investigators WHI. Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:1305–1314. 
  58. Espeland MA, Rapp SR, Shumaker SA, Brunner R, Manson JE, Sherwin BB, Hsia J, Margolis KL, Hogan PE, Wallace R, Dailey M, Freeman R, Hays J. Women's Health Initiative Memory S. Conjugated equine estrogens and global cognitive function in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. 2004;291:2959–2968. 
  59. Manson JE. The Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study by Charlotte Barker. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2013;9:9–11. 
  60. Harman SM, Black DM, Naftolin F, Brinton EA, Budoff MJ, Cedars MI, Hopkins PN, Lobo RA, Manson JE, Merriam GR, Miller VM, Neal-Perry G, Santoro N, Taylor HS, Vittinghoff E, Yan M, Hodis HN. Arterial imaging outcomes and cardiovascular risk factors in recently menopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:249–260. 
  61. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Henderson VW, Shoupe D, Budoff MJ, Hwang-Levine J, Li Y, Feng M, Dustin L, Kono N, Stanczyk FZ, Selzer RH, Azen SP, Group ER. Vascular Effects of Early versus Late Postmenopausal Treatment with Estradiol. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1221–1231. 
  62. North American Menopause S. The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2012;19:257–271. 
  63. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, Christiansen C, Delmas PD, Zanchetta JR, Stakkestad J, Gluer CC, Krueger K, Cohen FJ, Eckert S, Ensrud KE, Avioli LV, Lips P, Cummings SR. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. Jama. 1999;282:637–645. 
  64. Siris ES, Harris ST, Eastell R, Zanchetta JR, Goemaere S, Diez-Perez A, Stock JL, Song J, Qu Y, Kulkarni PM, Siddhanti SR, Wong M, Cummings SR. Skeletal effects of raloxifene after 8 years: results from the continuing outcomes relevant to Evista (CORE) study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1514–1524. 
  65. Love RR, Mazess RB, Barden HS, Epstein S, Newcomb PA, Jordan VC, Carbone PP, DeMets DL. Effects of tamoxifen on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:852–856. 
  66. Albertazzi P, Sharma S. Urogenital effects of selective estrogen receptor modulators: a systematic review. Climacteric. 2005;8:214–220. 
  67. Burke TW, Walker CL. Arzoxifene as therapy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90:S40–46. 
  68. Silverman SL, Christiansen C, Genant HK, Vukicevic S, Zanchetta JR, de Villiers TJ, Constantine GD, Chines AA. Efficacy of bazedoxifene in reducing new vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from a 3-year, randomized, placebo-, and active-controlled clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1923–1934. 
  69. Palacios S, Silverman SL, de Villiers TJ, Levine AB, Goemaere S, Brown JP, De Cicco Nardone F, Williams R, Hines TL, Mirkin S, Chines AA. Bazedoxifene Study G. A 7-year randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the long-term efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: effects on bone density and fracture. Menopause. 2015;22:806–813. 
  70. Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C, Podenphant J, Johansen JS. Nasal calcitonin for treatment of established osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1989;30:435–442. 
  71. Sun LM, Lin MC, Muo CH, Liang JA, Kao CH. Calcitonin nasal spray and increased cancer risk: a population-based nested case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:4259–4264. 
  72. Zimolo Z, Wesolowski G, Rodan GA. Acid extrusion is induced by osteoclast attachment to bone. Inhibition by alendronate and calcitonin. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2277–2283. 
  73. Felix R, Graham R, Russell G, Fleisch H. The effect of several diphosphonates on acid phosphohydrolases and other lysosomal enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976;429:429–438. ]
  74. Luckman SP, Hughes DE, Coxon FP, Graham R, Russell G, Rogers MJ. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates inhibit the mevalonate pathway and prevent post-translational prenylation of GTP-binding proteins, including Ras. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 1998; 13:581-589.
  75. Fleisch H. Bisphosphonates in Bone Disease from the Laboratory to the Patient. Fourth ed: Academic Press.
  76. Watts NB. Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27:419–439. 
  77. Wells GA, Cranney A, Peterson J, Boucher M, Shea B, Robinson V, Coyle D, Tugwell P. Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD001155. 
  78. Ascott-Evans BH, Guanabens N, Kivinen S, Stuckey BG, Magaril CH, Vandormael K, Stych B, Melton ME. Alendronate prevents loss of bone density associated with discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:789–794. 
  79. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1998;280:2077–2082. 
  80. Hosking D, Chilvers CE, Christiansen C, Ravn P, Wasnich R, Ross P, McClung M, Balske A, Thompson D, Daley M, Yates AJ. Prevention of bone loss with alendronate in postmenopausal women under 60 years of age. Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:485–492. 
  81. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE. Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet. 1996;348:1535–1541. 
  82. Adams AL, Shi J, Takayanagi M, Dell RM, Funahashi TT, Jacobsen SJ. Ten-year hip fracture incidence rate trends in a large California population, 1997-2006. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:373–376. 
  83. Chesnut CH 3rd, McClung MR, Ensrud KE, Bell NH, Genant HK, Harris ST, Singer FR, Stock JL, Yood RA, Delmas PD, et al. Alendronate treatment of the postmenopausal osteoporotic woman: effect of multiple dosages on bone mass and bone remodeling. Am J Med. 1995;99:144–152. 
  84. Dursun N, Dursun E, Yalcin S. Comparison of alendronate, calcitonin and calcium treatments in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Int J Clin Pract. 2001;55:505–509. 
  85. Greenspan S, Field-Munves E, Tonino R, Smith M, Petruschke R, Wang L, Yates J, de Papp AE, Palmisano J. Tolerability of once-weekly alendronate in patients with osteoporosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:1044–1052. 
  86. Greenspan SL, Parker RA, Ferguson L, Rosen HN, Maitland-Ramsey L, Karpf DB. Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover predict the long-term response to alendronate therapy in representative elderly women: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 1998; 13:1431-1438.
  87. Liberman UA, Weiss SR, Broll J, Minne HW, Quan H, Bell NH, Rodriguez-Portales J, Downs RW Jr, Dequeker J, Favus M. Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1437–1443. 
  88. Pols HA, Felsenberg D, Hanley DA, Stepan J, Munoz-Torres M, Wilkin TJ, Qin-sheng G, Galich AM, Vandormael K, Yates AJ, Stych B. Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results of the FOSIT study. Fosamax International Trial Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:461–468. 
  89. Office of the Surgeon General. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md : U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General.
  90. Orwoll E, Ettinger M, Weiss S, Miller P, Kendler D, Graham J, Adami S, Weber K, Lorenc R, Pietschmann P, Vandormael K, Lombardi A. Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:604–610. 
  91. Saag KG, Emkey R, Schnitzer TJ, Brown JP, Hawkins F, Goemaere S, Thamsborg G, Liberman UA, Delmas PD, Malice MP, Czachur M, Daifotis AG. Alendronate for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Intervention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:292–299. 
  92. Adachi JD, Saag KG, Delmas PD, Liberman UA, Emkey RD, Seeman E, Lane NE, Kaufman JM, Poubelle PE, Hawkins F, Correa-Rotter R, Menkes CJ, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Schnitzer TJ, Block JA, Wing J, McIlwain HH, Westhovens R, Brown J, Melo-Gomes JA, Gruber BL, Yanover MJ, Leite MO, Siminoski KG, Nevitt MC, Sharp JT, Malice MP, Dumortier T, Czachur M, Carofano W, Daifotis A. Two-year effects of alendronate on bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in patients receiving glucocorticoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:202–211. 
  93. Tonino RP, Meunier PJ, Emkey R, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Menkes CJ, Wasnich RD, Bone HG, Santora AC, Wu M, Desai R, Ross PD. Skeletal benefits of alendronate: 7-year treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3109–3115. 
  94. Bone HG, Hosking D, Devogelaer JP, Tucci JR, Emkey RD, Tonino RP, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Downs RW, Gupta J, Santora AC, Liberman UA. Ten years' experience with alendronate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1189–1199. 
  95. Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, Satterfield S, Wallace RB, Bauer DC, Palermo L, Wehren LE, Lombardi A, Santora AC, Cummings SR, Group FR. Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2927–2938. 
  96. Schwartz AV, Bauer DC, Cummings SR, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Palermo L, Wallace RB, Hochberg MC, Feldstein AC, Lombardi A, Black DM. Efficacy of continued alendronate for fractures in women with and without prevalent vertebral fracture: the FLEX trial. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2010; 25:976-982.
  97. Briot K, Tremollieres F, Thomas T, Roux C. How long should patients take medications for postmenopausal osteoporosis? Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:24–31. 
  98. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M, Chesnut CH 3rd, Brown J, Eriksen EF, Hoseyni MS, Axelrod DW, Miller PD. Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Jama. 1999;282:1344–1352. 
  99. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, Hooper M, Roux C, Brandi ML, Lund B, Ethgen D, Pack S, Roumagnac I, Eastell R. Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:83–91. 
  100. Ringe JD, Faber H, Farahmand P, Dorst A. Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis: results of a 1-year study. Rheumatol Int. 2006;26:427–431. ]
  101. Cohen S, Levy RM, Keller M, Boling E, Emkey RD, Greenwald M, Zizic TM, Wallach S, Sewell KL, Lukert BP, Axelrod DW, Chines AA. Risedronate therapy prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:2309–2318. 
  102. Brown JP, Kendler DL, McClung MR, Emkey RD, Adachi JD, Bolognese MA, Li Z, Balske A, Lindsay R. The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71:103–111. 
  103. Gordon MS, Gordon MB. Response of bone mineral density to once-weekly administration of risedronate. Endocr Pract. 2002;8:202–207. 
  104. Delaney MF, Hurwitz S, Shaw J, LeBoff MS. Bone density changes with once weekly risedronate in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom. 2003;6:45–50. 
  105. Delmas PD, Benhamou CL, Man Z, Tlustochowicz W, Matzkin E, Eusebio R, Zanchetta J, Olszynski WP, Recker RR, McClung MR. Monthly dosing of 75 mg risedronate on 2 consecutive days a month: efficacy and safety results. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1039–1045. 
  106. Delmas PD, McClung MR, Zanchetta JR, Racewicz A, Roux C, Benhamou CL, Man Z, Eusebio RA, Beary JF, Burgio DE, Matzkin E, Boonen S. Efficacy and safety of risedronate 150 mg once a month in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone. 2008;42:36–42. 
  107. Cheer SM, Noble S. Zoledronic acid. Drugs. 2001;61:799–805. 
  108. Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Mautalen C, Mesenbrink P, Hu H, Caminis J, Tong K, Rosario-Jansen T, Krasnow J, Hue TF, Sellmeyer D, Eriksen EF, Cummings SR, Trial HPF. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1809–1822. 
  109. Cummings SR MP, Eriksen EF, Eastell R, Black DM. Risk factors for serious adverse events of atrial fibrillation in the HORIZON-PFT Trial of zoledronic acid. Am Soc Mineral Bone Res 29th Annual Meeting 2007, Abstract 1056.
  110. Boonen S, Eastell R, Su G, Mesenbrink P, Cosman F, Cauley JA, Reid IR, Claessens F, Vanderschueren D, Lyles KW, Black DM. Time to onset of antifracture efficacy and year-by-year persistence of effect of zoledronic acid in women with osteoporosis. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2012; 27:1487-1493.
  111. Boonen S, Reginster JY, Kaufman JM, Lippuner K, Zanchetta J, Langdahl B, Rizzoli R, Lipschitz S, Dimai HP, Witvrouw R, Eriksen E, Brixen K, Russo L, Claessens F, Papanastasiou P, Antunez O, Su G, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Hruska J, Incera E, Vanderschueren D, Orwoll E. Fracture risk and zoledronic acid therapy in men with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1714–1723.
  112. Lyles KW, Colon-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS, Adachi JD, Pieper CF, Mautalen C, Hyldstrup L, Recknor C, Nordsletten L, Moore KA, Lavecchia C, Zhang J, Mesenbrink P, Hodgson PK, Abrams K, Orloff JJ, Horowitz Z, Eriksen EF, Boonen S. Zoledronic Acid in Reducing Clinical Fracture and Mortality after Hip Fracture. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:nihpa40967.
  113. Pieper CF, Colon-Emeric C, Caminis J, Betchyk K, Zhang J, Janning C, Shostak J, LeBoff MS, Heaney RR, Lyles KW. Distribution and correlates of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in a sample of patients with hip fracture. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5:335–340. 
  114. Chesnut IC, Skag A, Christiansen C, Recker R, Stakkestad JA, Hoiseth A, Felsenberg D, Huss H, Gilbride J, Schimmer RC, Delmas PD. Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:1241–1249. 
  115. Reginster JY, Adami S, Lakatos P, Greenwald M, Stepan JJ, Silverman SL, Christiansen C, Rowell L, Mairon N, Bonvoisin B, Drezner MK, Emkey R, Felsenberg D, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Miller PD. Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:654–661. 
  116. Cranney A, Wells GA, Yetisir E, Adami S, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Miller PD, Papapoulos S, Reginster JY, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Siris E, Adachi JD. Ibandronate for the prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Osteoporos Int. 2008 
  117. Miller RG, Chretien KC, Meoni LA, Liu YP, Klag MJ, Levine MA. Comparison of intravenous pamidronate to standard therapy for osteoporosis: use in patients unable to take oral bisphosphonates. J Clin Rheumatol. 2005;11:2–7. 
  118. Heijckmann AC, Juttmann JR, Wolffenbuttel BH. Intravenous pamidronate compared with oral alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Neth J Med. 2002;60:315–319. 
  119. Vis M, Bultink IE, Dijkmans BA, Lems WF. The effect of intravenous pamidronate versus oral alendronate on bone mineral density in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1432–1435. 
  120. Cauza E, Etemad M, Winkler F, Hanusch-Enserer U, Partsch G, Noske H, Dunky A. Pamidronate increases bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal or steroid-induced osteoporosis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2004;29:431–436. 
  121. Chan SS, Nery LM, McElduff A, Wilmshurst EG, Fulcher GR, Robinson BG, Stiel JN, Gunton JE, Clifton-Bligh PB. Intravenous pamidronate in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Intern Med J. 2004;34:162–166. 
  122. Lanza F, Sahba B, Schwartz H, Winograd S, Torosis J, Quan H, Reyes R, Musliner T, Daifotis A, Leung A. The upper GI safety and tolerability of oral alendronate at a dose of 70 milligrams once weekly: a placebo-controlled endoscopy study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:58–64. 
  123. Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, Cheung AM, Cosman F, Curtis JR, Dell R, Dempster DW, Ebeling PR, Einhorn TA, Genant HK, Geusens P, Klaushofer K, Lane JM, McKiernan F, McKinney R, Ng A, Nieves J, O'Keefe R, Papapoulos S, Howe TS, van der Meulen MC, Weinstein RS, Whyte MP. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:1–23. 
  124. Im GI, Lee SH. Effect of Teriparatide on Healing of Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Systemic Review. Journal of bone metabolism. 2015;22:183–189. 
  125. Khan AA, Morrison A, Hanley DA, Felsenberg D, McCauley LK, O'Ryan F, Reid IR, Ruggiero SL, Taguchi A, Tetradis S, Watts NB, Brandi ML, Peters E, Guise T, Eastell R, Cheung AM, Morin SN, Masri B, Cooper C, Morgan SL, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Langdahl BL, Al Dabagh R, Davison KS, Kendler DL, Sandor GK, Josse RG, Bhandari M, El Rabbany M, Pierroz DD, Sulimani R, Saunders DP, Brown JP, Compston J. International Task Force on Osteonecrosis of the J. Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensus. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:3–23. 
  126. Allen MR. Bisphosphonates and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Moving from the Bedside to the Bench. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008 
  127. Woo SB, Hellstein JW, Kalmar JR. Narrative [corrected] review: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:753–761. 
  128. Khosla S, Burr D, Cauley J, Dempster DW, Ebeling PR, Felsenberg D, Gagel RF, Gilsanz V, Guise T, Koka S, McCauley LK, McGowan J, McKee MD, Mohla S, Pendrys DG, Raisz LG, Ruggiero SL, Shafer DM, Shum L, Silverman SL, Van Poznak CH, Watts N, Woo SB, Shane E. Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1479–1491. 
  129. Edwards BJ, Gounder M, McKoy JM, Boyd I, Farrugia M, Migliorati C, Marx R, Ruggiero S, Dimopoulos M, Raisch DW, Singhal S, Carson K, Obadina E, Trifilio S, West D, Mehta J, Bennett CL. Pharmacovigilance and reporting oversight in US FDA fast-track process: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:1166–1172. 
  130. Hellstein JW, Adler RA, Edwards B, Jacobsen PL, Kalmar JR, Koka S, Migliorati CA, Ristic H. Managing the care of patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:1243–1251. ]
  131. Cummings SR, Schwartz AV, Black DM. Alendronate and atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1895–1896. 
  132. Heckbert SR, Li G, Cummings SR, Smith NL, Psaty BM. Use of alendronate and risk of incident atrial fibrillation in women. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:826–831. 
  133. Karam R, Camm J, McClung M. Yearly zoledronic acid in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:712–713. 
  134. Cauley JA, Ensrud KE. Considering competing risks . . . Not all black and white. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:793–795. 
  135. Administration. UFaD. Early communication of an ongoing safety review (updated January 7, 2008). http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/early_comm/bisphosphonates.htm.
  136. Adler RA, Bates DW, Dell RM, LeBoff MS, Majumdar SR, Saag KG, Solomon DH, Suarez-Almazor ME. Systems-based approaches to osteoporosis and fracture care: policy and research recommendations from the workgroups. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2011; 22 Suppl 3:495-500.
  137. Dell R, Greene D. Is osteoporosis disease management cost effective? Current osteoporosis reports. 2010;8:49–55. 
  138. Dell R. Fracture prevention in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22 Suppl 3:457–460. 
  139. Eisman JA, Bogoch ER, Dell R, Harrington JT, McKinney RE Jr, McLellan A, Mitchell PJ, Silverman S, Singleton R, Siris E. Prevention ATFoSF. Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:2039–2046. 
  140. Glowacki J, Harris MB, Simon J, Wright J, Kolatkar NS, Thornhill TS, Leboff MS. Brigham fracture intervention team initiatives for hospital patients with hip fractures: a paradigm shift. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010:590751. 
  141. Glowacki J, LeBoff MS, Kolatkar NS, Thornhill TS, Harris MB. Importance of vitamin D in hospital-based fracture care pathways. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12:291–293. 
  142. Harris MB, LeBoff MS, Thornhill TS, Glowacki J. Evolution of comprehensive hospital care pathways to advance the treatment of fragility fractures. The Orthopaedic Journal at Harvard Medical School 2007:95-97.
  143. McDermott RS, Kloth DD, Wang H, Hudes GR, Langer CJ. Impact of zoledronic acid on renal function in patients with cancer: Clinical significance and development of a predictive model. J Support Oncol. 2006;4:524–529. 
  144. Oh WK, Proctor K, Nakabayashi M, Evan C, Tormey LK, Daskivich T, Antras L, Smith M, Neary MP, Duh MS. The risk of renal impairment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases treated with zoledronic acid. Cancer. 2007;109:1090–1096. 
  145. Reid IR, Brown JP, Burckhardt P, Horowitz Z, Richardson P, Trechsel U, Widmer A, Devogelaer JP, Kaufman JM, Jaeger P, Body JJ, Brandi ML, Broell J, Di Micco R, Genazzani AR, Felsenberg D, Happ J, Hooper MJ, Ittner J, Leb G, Mallmin H, Murray T, Ortolani S, Rubinacci A, Saaf M, Samsioe G, Verbruggen L, Meunier PJ. Intravenous zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:653–661. 
  146. Whitaker M, Guo J, Kehoe T, Benson G. Bisphosphonates for Osteoporosis - Where Do We Go from Here? N Engl J Med. 2012 
  147. Black DM, Reid IR, Boonen S, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Cummings SR, Hue TF, Lippuner K, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Martinez RL, Tan M, Ruzycky ME, Su G, Eastell R. The effect of 3 versus 6 years of zoledronic acid treatment of osteoporosis: a randomized extension to the HORIZON-Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT). J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:243–254. 
  148. Cosman F, Cauley JA, Eastell R, Boonen S, Palermo L, Reid IR, Cummings SR, Black DM. Reassessment of fracture risk in women after 3 years of treatment with zoledronic acid: when is it reasonable to discontinue treatment? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:4546–4554. 
  149. Watts NB, Diab DL. Long-term use of bisphosphonates in osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1555–1565. 
  150. Black DM, Bauer DC, Schwartz AV, Cummings SR, Rosen CJ. Continuing Bisphosphonate Treatment for Osteoporosis - For Whom and for How Long? N Engl J Med. 2012 
  151. Adler RA, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Bauer DC, Camacho PM, Clarke BL, Clines GA, Compston JE, Drake MT, Edwards BJ, Favus MJ, Greenspan SL, McKinney R Jr, Pignolo RJ, Sellmeyer DE. Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:16–35. 
  152. de Groen PC, Lubbe DF, Hirsch LJ, Daifotis A, Stephenson W, Freedholm D, Pryor-Tillotson S, Seleznick MJ, Pinkas H, Wang KK. Esophagitis associated with the use of alendronate. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1016–1021. 
  153. Eriksen EF, Lyles KW, Colon-Emeric CS, Pieper CF, Magaziner JS, Adachi JD, Hyldstrup L, Recknor C, Nordsletten L, Lavecchia C, Hu H, Boonen S, Mesenbrink P. Antifracture efficacy and reduction of mortality in relation to timing of the first dose of zoledronic acid after hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:1308–1313. 
  154. Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Kelley M, Chang MS, Luthy R, Nguyen HQ, Wooden S, Bennett L, Boone T, Shimamoto G, DeRose M, Elliott R, Colombero A, Tan HL, Trail G, Sullivan J, Davy E, Bucay N, Renshaw-Gegg L, Hughes TM, Hill D, Pattison W, Campbell P, Sander S, Van G, Tarpley J, Derby P, Lee R, Boyle WJ. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell. 1997;89:309–319. 
  155. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:756–765. 
  156. von Keyserlingk C, Hopkins R, Anastasilakis A, Toulis K, Goeree R, Tarride JE, Xie F. Clinical efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density and osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2011;41:178–186. 
  157. Rittmaster RS, Bolognese M, Ettinger MP, Hanley DA, Hodsman AB, Kendler DL, Rosen CJ. Enhancement of bone mass in osteoporotic women with parathyroid hormone followed by alendronate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2129–2134. 
  158. Rubin MR, Bilezikian JP. The anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone therapy. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 2003;19:415–432. 
  159. Tam CS, Heersche JN, Murray TM, Parsons JA. Parathyroid hormone stimulates the bone apposition rate independently of its resorptive action: differential effects of intermittent and continuous administration. Endocrinology. 1982;110:506–512. 
  160. Dempster DW, Cosman F, Parisien M, Shen V, Lindsay R. Anabolic actions of parathyroid hormone on bone. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:690–709. 
  161. Podbesek R, Edouard C, Meunier PJ, Parsons JA, Reeve J, Stevenson RW, Zanelli JM. Effects of two treatment regimes with synthetic human parathyroid hormone fragment on bone formation and the tissue balance of trabecular bone in greyhounds. Endocrinology. 1983;112:1000–1006. 
  162. Dobnig H, Turner RT. The effects of programmed administration of human parathyroid hormone fragment (1-34) on bone histomorphometry and serum chemistry in rats. Endocrinology. 1997;138:4607–4612. 
  163. Bilezikian JP. Combination anabolic and antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis: opening the anabolic window. Current osteoporosis reports. 2008;6:24–30. 
  164. Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Roberson P, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC. Increased bone formation by prevention of osteoblast apoptosis with parathyroid hormone. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:439–446. 
  165. Rosen CJ, Bilezikian JP. Clinical review 123: Anabolic therapy for osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:957–964. 
  166. Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1434–1441. 
  167. Black DM, Greenspan SL, Ensrud KE, Palermo L, McGowan JA, Lang TF, Garnero P, Bouxsein ML, Bilezikian JP, Rosen CJ. The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1207–1215. 
  168. Finkelstein JS, Hayes A, Hunzelman JL, Wyland JJ, Lee H, Neer RM. The effects of parathyroid hormone, alendronate, or both in men with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1216–1226. 
  169. Black DM, Bilezikian JP, Ensrud KE, Greenspan SL, Palermo L, Hue T, Lang TF, McGowan JA, Rosen CJ, Pa THSI. One year of alendronate after one year of parathyroid hormone (1-84) for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:555–565. 
  170. Kurland ES, Heller SL, Diamond B, McMahon DJ, Cosman F, Bilezikian JP. The importance of bisphosphonate therapy in maintaining bone mass in men after therapy with teriparatide. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:992–997. [human parathyroid hormone(1-34)]
  171. Tsai J, Uihlein A, Lee H, et al. Teriparatide and denosumab, alone or combined, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DATA study randomised trial. Lancet 2013 6;382(9886):50-6.
  172. Leder BZ, Tsai JN, Uihlein AV, Wallace PM, Lee H, Neer RM, Burnett-Bowie SA. Denosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1147–1155. 
  173. Muschitz C, Kocijan R, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lung S, Resch H. Antiresorptives overlapping ongoing teriparatide treatment result in additional increases in bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:196–205. 
  174. Cipriani C, Irani D, Bilezikian JP. Safety of osteoanabolic therapy: a decade of experience. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:2419–2428. 
  175. Andrews EB, Gilsenan AW, Midkiff K, Sherrill B, Wu Y, Mann BH, Masica D. The US postmarketing surveillance study of adult osteosarcoma and teriparatide: study design and findings from the first 7 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:2429–2437. 
  176. Tsuchie H, Miyakoshi N, Kasukawa Y, Nishi T, Abe H, Segawa T, Shimada Y. The effect of teriparatide to alleviate pain and to prevent vertebral collapse after fresh osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2016;34:86–91. 
  177. Michalska D, Luchavova M, Zikan V, Raska I Jr, Kubena AA, Stepan JJ. Effects of morning vs. evening teriparatide injection on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:2885–2891. 
  178. Matsumoto T, Shiraki M, Hagino H, Iinuma H, Nakamura T. Daily nasal spray of hPTH(1-34) for 3 months increases bone mass in osteoporotic subjects: a pilot study. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1532–1538. 
  179. Levin G MC. Transdermaly-delivered PTH(1-34), a new treatment for osteoporotic patients: results of phase I studies. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2007;22 Suppl 1:S324.
  180. Grossman JM, Gordon R, Ranganath VK, Deal C, Caplan L, Chen W, Curtis JR, Furst DE, McMahon M, Patkar NM, Volkmann E, Saag KG. American College of Rheumatology 2010 recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:1515–1526. 
  181. Saag KG, Shane E, Boonen S, Marin F, Donley DW, Taylor KA, Dalsky GP, Marcus R. Teriparatide or alendronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2028–2039. 
  182. Jha S, Wang Z, Laucis N, Bhattacharyya T. Trends in Media Reports, Oral Bisphosphonate Prescriptions, and Hip Fractures 1996-2012: An Ecological Analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:2179–2187. 
  183. Khosla S, Shane E. A Crisis in the Treatment of Osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2016 
  184. Leder BZ, O'Dea LS, Zanchetta JR, Kumar P, Banks K, McKay K, Lyttle CR, Hattersley G. Effects of abaloparatide, a human parathyroid hormone-related peptide analog, on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:697–706. 
  185. Miller P, Leder BZ, Hattersley G, Lau E, Alexandersen P, Hala T, Mustatea S, Storgaard Nedergaard B, Krogsaa A, Slesinger J, Zerbini CA, Valter I, Visockiene Z, Jendrych B, Kulak CA, Marquez F, Harris AG, Williams GC, Hu M, Riis BJ, Russo L, Christiansen C. Effects of Abaloparatide on Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis- Results of the Phase 3 Active Trial. Endocr Rev. 2015;(Apr):36.
  186. Jee WSS, Li X, Tian XY, Paszty C, Ke HZ. Anti-Sclerostin Antibody Increases Bone Mass by Stimulating Bone Formation and Inhibiting Bone Resorption in a Hindlimb-Immobilization Rat Model. Abstracts of the 30th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2008:S 1138.
  187. Li X, Warmington K, Niu QT, Grisanti M, Tan H, Dwyer D, Stolina M, Simonet WS, Kostenuik PJ, Paszty C, Ke HZ. Increases in BMD Observed with Anti-Sclerostin Antibody Treatment Are Reversible: A Longitudinal Ovariectomized Rat Study. Abstracts of the 30th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2008:S 1211.
  188. Recker RR, Benson CT, Matsumoto T, Bolognese MA, Robins DA, Alam J, Chiang AY, Hu L, Krege JH, Sowa H, Mitlak BH, Myers SL. A randomized, double-blind phase 2 clinical trial of blosozumab, a sclerostin antibody, in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30:216–224. 
  189. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, Langdahl BL, Reginster JY, Zanchetta JR, Wasserman SM, Katz L, Maddox J, Yang YC, Libanati C, Bone HG. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:412–420. 
  190. LeBoff MS, Chou SH, Ratliff KA, Cook NR, Khurana B, Kim E, Cawthon PM, Bauer DC, Black D, Gallagher JC, Lee I, Buring JE, Manson JE. Supplemental vitamin D and incident fractures in midlife and older adults. NEJM. 2022;387(4):299-309.
  191. LeBoff MS, Murata EM, Cook NR, Cawthon P, Chou SH, Kotler G, Bubes V, Buring JE, Manson JE. VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): Effects of Vitamin D Supplements on Risk of Falls in the US Population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jun 3;. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa311. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 32492153.
  192. LeBoff MS, Chou SH, Murata EM, Donlon CM, Cook N, Mora S, Lee I, Kotler G, Bubes V, Buring JE, Manson JE. Effects of Supplemental Vitamin D on Bone Health Outcomes in Women and Men in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL). J Bone Miner Res. 2020. PMID: 31923341.
  193. Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B, Stewart A, Garratt E, Wong S, Wiessing KR, Bolland MJ, Bastin S, Gamble GD. Fracture Prevention with Zoledronate in Older Women with Osteopenia. N Engl J Med. 2018;20:379(25):2407-2416. PMID: 30575489.
  194. Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Aghaloo T, Carlson ER, Ward BB, Kademani D. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws-2022 Update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80(5):920-943.
  195. Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, Czerwiński E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler DL, Lippuner K, Reginster JY, Roux C, Malouf J, Bradley MN, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Dakin P, Pannacciulli N, Dempster DW, Papapoulos S. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;5(7):513-523. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9. Epub 2017 May 22. PMID: 28546097.
  196. Cummings SR, Ferrari S, Eastell R, Gilchrist N, Jensen JB, McClung M, Roux C, Törring O, Valter I, Wang AT, Brown JP. Vertebral Fractures After Discontinuation of Denosumab: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized Placebo-Controlled FREEDOM Trial and Its Extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(2):190-198.
  197. Shoback D, Rosen CJ, Black DM, Cheung AM, Murad MH, Eastell R. Pharmacological Management of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: An Endocrine Society Guideline Update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(3)

202   Miller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ, Williams GC, Lau E, Russo LA, Alexandersen P, Zerbini CA, Hu MY, Harris AG, Fitzpatrick LA, Cosman F, Christiansen C; ACTIVE Study Investigators. Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):722-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11136. Erratum in: JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):442. PMID: 27533157.

  1. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, Hofbauer LC, Lau E, Lewiecki EM, Miyauchi A, Zerbini CA, Milmont CE, Chen L, Maddox J, Meisner PD, Libanati C, Grauer A. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 20;375(16):1532-1543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948. Epub 2016 Sep 18. PMID: 27641143.
  2. Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, Maddox J, Fan M, Meisner PD, Grauer A. Romosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1417-1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322. Epub 2017 Sep 11. PMID: 28892457.
  3. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, Harris ST, Hurley DL, Kelly J, Lewiecki EM, Pessah-Pollack R, McClung M, Wimalawansa SJ, Watts NB.. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis—2020 update. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(suppl 1):1-46

 

 

The Role of Exercise in Diabetes

ABSTRACT

 

Exercise is a key component to lifestyle therapy for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). These recommendations are based on positive associations between physical activity and T2D prevention, treatment, and disease-associated morbidity and mortality. For type 1 diabetes (T1D), we have evidence to support that exercise can reduce diabetes associated complications. However, there are physiological and behavioral barriers to exercise that people with both T2D and T1D must overcome to achieve these benefits. Physiological barriers include diabetes-mediated impairment in functional exercise capacity, increased rates of perceived exertion with lower workloads, and decision making regarding glycemic management. There are additional social and psychological stressors including depression and reduced self-efficacy. Interestingly, there is variability in the response to exercise by sex, genetics, and environment, further complicating the expectations for individual benefit from physical activity. Defining optimal dose, duration, timing, and type of exercise is still uncertain for individual health benefits of physical activity. In this review, we will discuss the preventative value of exercise for T2D development, the therapeutic impact of exercise on diabetes metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, the barriers to exercise including hypoglycemia, and the impact of sex and gender on cardiorespiratory fitness and adaptive training response in people with and without diabetes. There are still many unknowns regarding the diabetes-mediated impairment in cardiorespiratory fitness, the variability and individual response to exercise training, and the impact of sex and gender. However, there is no debate that exercise provides a health benefit for people with and at risk for diabetes.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Exercise, together with medical nutrition therapy, forms the cornerstone of diabetes therapy. In their 2022 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends that adults with diabetes participate in both aerobic activity and resistance training. They specify that this should entail at least 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activity per week, spread over at least three days per week to minimize consecutive days without activity, and two to three sessions of resistance exercise per week on nonconsecutive days (1). Regular exercise is associated with prevention and minimization of weight gain, reduction in blood pressure, improvement in insulin sensitivity and glucose control, and optimization of lipoprotein profile, all of which are independent risk factors for the development of T2D (2,3). Meeting physical activity guidelines has been associated with a 40% decrease in cardiovascular mortality with an even greater impact on all-cause mortality (3,4). This association is especially significant given that people with T1D and T2D have a two to six-fold increase in morbidity and premature mortality from clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) (5).

 

Despite these positive links, 34.3% of Americans diagnosed with diabetes are categorized as physically inactive (<10 minutes per week of moderate or vigorous physical activity) and 23.8% are meeting the 150-minute segment of physical activity guidelines (6). A worldwide pooled analysis of data from 358 surveys across 168 countries showed that the global age standardized prevalence of insufficient physical activity was 27.5% in 2016. The highest levels of insufficient activity were in women in Latin America and the Caribbean (43.7%), South Asia (43.0%) and high-income Western countries (42.3%) and the lowest levels were in men in Oceania (12.3%) (7). It is important for health care providers to understand that diabetes can lead to significant physiological barriers to exercise. These barriers include impaired maximal and submaximal exercise capacity (8,9), social and psychological barriers to exercise in T2D (10,11), the direct stress on the cardiovascular system caused by exercise, and the risk of hypoglycemia (12). Additionally, exercise studies have shown individual variation in response to physical activity, suggesting that there may be some individuals who are “non-responders” to exercise, in that they do not reap the specific anticipated benefits of exercise therapy such as improved glucose, blood pressure, or lipid profiles. This variation in “response” may be due to the modality employed (aerobic vs resistance exercise), the adaptive response to timing of intervention, and the endpoint examined (13). For example, someone with diabetes may respond with increased fitness but experience no change in glucose. There are also sex differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), discussed in more detail below (14). These findings speak to the complexity of the pathophysiology involved in exercise and the impact that diabetes has on these processes (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Cardiorespiratory fitness and Premature Mortality. CRF is a systems biology measure of the physiological response to a workload. Exercise requires cardiac, vascular, and skeletal muscle integration. Impairment is this integration is a risk for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Evidence supports a model wherein multiple modest functional derangements contribute to impaired CRF in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes.

 

In this chapter, we will discuss the relationship between exercise physiology and diabetes pathophysiology via an overview of the literature demonstrating the associations between exercise and preventative effects for diabetes, therapeutic value for established diabetes, and prognostic value for development of diabetic complications. We will discuss physiological and behavioral barriers that contribute to lack of achievement of physical activity guidelines including hypoglycemia and the impaired exercise capacity that diabetes itself can cause. We will conclude with a discussion on sex differences in exercise in diabetes.

 

THE VALUE OF EXERCISE IN DIABETES PREVENTION

 

Exercise is an established strategy for T2D prevention (3). The incidence of T2D is inversely proportional to participation in physical activity. In a systematic review by Warburton et al that analyzed 20 cohort studies, all were noted to show this inverse relationship with T2D incidence; additionally, when comparing the most active participants to the least active participants, they calculated the average risk reduction of the exercise intervention to be 42%. Within these studies, 84% showed a dose-response relationship to suggest that even small changes in physical activity level led to great reductions in T2D incidence (15).  Manson et al demonstrated that women who reported at least weekly vigorous exercise had a 16% reduced risk of developing T2D, when controlled for age and body mass index (16). In Hu et al’s analysis of the nurses’ Health Study, there was a 34% reduction in diabetes incidence for each hour per day of brisk walking (17). Furthermore, among high-risk women with a history of gestational diabetes, physical activity has been shown to be inversely associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes in a dose-dependent manner (18).

 

Physical activity is also a modifiable risk factor that influences CRF; there is a strong association between CRF and incidence of T2D. In the Henry Ford Exercise Testing Project, people who achieved >= 12 metabolic equivalents (METs) had a 54% lower risk of incident diabetes compared to people achieving <6 METs (controlled for age, sex, race, obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) (19). In a study of middle-aged men by Lynch et al, men with CRF levels greater than 31.0 mL of oxygen per kilogram per minute who exercised at moderate intensity (>5.5 METs) for >40 minutes per week had a decreased incidence of diabetes. This effect was seen even within a subgroup of men at high risk for diabetes (overweight or hypertensive with positive parental history); engagement in this level of moderate intensity exercise in this group reduced their risk of diabetes by 64% compared to men who did not engage in physical activity (20). For reference, 1 MET is equivalent to the amount of oxygen consumed while sitting at rest, which is 3.5 ml/O2/kg/min (21) and expending 2 METs means that an individual is exerting 2 times the energy than they would be while sitting still. Examples of common activities and their associated energy costs in METs are shown in Table 1 (21, 22).

 

Table 1. Metabolic Equivalents (METs) Expended for Common Activities

Activity

METs

Slow Walking (3 kilometers/hour)

3

Walking up stairs

4.7

Brisk Walking (6 kilometers/hour)

5.4

Bicycling (20 kilometers/hour)

7.1

Running (8 kilometers/hour)

8.2

Hockey

12.9

Boxing

13.4

 

 

CRF can be measured in a few different ways. The gold standard includes gas analysis and is reported as maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) or peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (23). This can be impractical in a clinical setting, so several walk tests have been developed to estimate CRF that either measures how much distance a person can cover within the designated time frame or how long it takes them to cover a designated distance. The 6-minute walk test is used in at-risk populations (23) and the 400-meter walk test is often used in older adults (24). 

 

At a practical level, it is useful to ask individuals a few questions about their ability to climb stairs, any changes in their ability to walk a given distance, and if they’ve experienced any changes in perceived exertion or shortness of breath with activity.

 

Weight loss is important for prevention of T2D (25). Analysis of people in the intensive lifestyle intervention arm of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Intensive Lifestyle indicated that there was a 16% reduction in diabetes risk per kilogram of weight loss (26). Theoretically, an increase in physical activity can lead to negative energy balance, which may result in weight loss if diet is unchanged. A study by Ross et al analyzed the effect of exercise-induced weight loss via a 500-700 kcal/day deficit during a 12-week intervention and showed an average weight loss of 7.6kg (8% initial body weight). Their findings also showed that exercise-induced weight loss decreases total fat percentage with increases in cardiovascular fitness to a greater degree than similar diet-induced weight loss (27). This degree of weight loss is uncommon in exercise interventional studies without simultaneous calorie restriction, so diet and exercise interventions should be administered simultaneously for maximal benefit (25). At the same time, there is a dynamic relationship between exercise dose, weight status, and diabetes incidence, wherein each of these components affects the other (3). To assess the complex association between obesity and physical inactivity for interaction, Quin et al conducted a systematic review that showed positive biological interaction on an additive scale (28). This interaction was further shown in a meta-analysis of 9 prospective cohort studies by Cloostermans et al, where there was a 7.4-fold increased risk of T2D in those who were obese and with a low physical activity level when compared to normal weight, highly active individuals (29).

 

Exercise aids with diabetes prevention even if weight loss is not achieved. There is a strong association between increased physical activity and prevention of weight gain (3). In DPP, those who achieved 150 minutes of moderate intensity activity per week had a 46% reduction in diabetes incidence, despite not always meeting weight loss goals (21). This effect was similarly seen in other international studies (Sweden (30), Finland (31), China (32), Japan (33), India (34)) when intensive lifestyle intervention was used for prevention of diabetes. The effect of exercise alone was specifically evaluated in the Chinese study where there was a reduction in incidence of diabetes by 33% in the diet-only group, 47% in the exercise-only group, and 38% in the diet-plus-exercise group; this effect was seen even when adjusting for interaction of BMI (31%, 46%, and 42% for diet, exercise, and diet-plus-exercise groups, respectively) (32). Additionally, Dai et al looked further into the efficacy of the type of exercise on prevention of diabetes. They randomized patients with prediabetes into 3 intervention groups of aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), and combined training (AT + RT). After 2 years of intervention, the T2D incidence was reduced by 74% in the AT + RT group, 65% in the RT alone group, and 72% in the AT alone group compared to controls. There was no significant difference in 2-hour glucose tolerance tests between intervention groups, providing support for both AT and RT, alone or in combination, benefiting T2D prevention (35).

 

Physical activity can also lead to improvement in cardiovascular risk factors. With regards to hypertension, there is an inverse relationship between blood pressure and physical activity level, with greater responses noted in those with hypertension/pre-hypertension compared to individuals with normal blood pressure (3). In the DPP, participants who received intensive lifestyle intervention had improved cardiovascular disease risk factor profiles (decreased blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) compared to the metformin treated and placebo groups after 5 years; this improvement was achieved with a decreased need for lipid and blood pressure medication initiation (36). Additionally, while the LOOK AHEAD trial in overweight or obese adults with T2D was negative for its primary cardiovascular outcome (37), further analysis showed that increasing fitness had a beneficial effect on fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, and other cardiovascular risk factors (HDL, triglycerides, and diastolic blood pressure), and cognition beyond the effect of weight change (38).

 

There is significant variability in changes to CRF with exercise therapy; not all individuals respond positively to exercise intervention. CRF is not always related to physical activity and is determined by genetics and other factors. In the HERITAGE Family Study, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, a measurement of CRF) response to exercise therapy varied significantly with some participants showing no improvement with exercise training and others exhibiting maximal improvement (>1L/min). Interestingly, there was 2.5 times more variance between families than within families, suggestive of a possible genetic component to exercise response (39). These individuals with little to no improvement with exercise are termed “non-responders.” In cross-over interventional studies that assessed poor responsiveness to aerobic exercise and resistance training, it was found that those who did not benefit from aerobic training, improved their CRF with resistance training. Alternatively, not all individuals who improved CRF with aerobic training had improvements with resistance training. This finding suggests that “non-responsiveness” may be related to exercise modality and that incidence of non-responsiveness to exercise for the endpoint of CRF may be resolved by changing the mode of training (40,41). All in all, to achieve the desired benefits of exercise (improvement in weight, glucose control, endurance, etc.), an individualized approach is key. One gap in practice is a lack of a commonly employed clinical measure of response to an exercise intervention. There is a need for exercise physiology expertise or provider comfort with exercise as a therapeutic tool to tailor and adjust sustained exercise interventions and employ exercise as medicine.

 

THERAPEUTIC VALUE OF EXERCISE IN DIABETES MANAGEMENT

 

Diet and exercise (lifestyle modification) are considered by all diabetes clinical guidelines to be the foundation for diabetes management. Exercise can augment glucose disposal and improve insulin action, and thus can be a tool to aid in glucose regulation. Muscle contraction and contraction-mediated skeletal muscle blood flow leads to glucose uptake via insulin-dependent and independent mechanisms. Exercise-mediated glucose disposal can decrease circulating blood glucose but may be affected by other determinants of systemic glucose metabolism. The components of glucose disposal need to be considered to better understand the impact of exercise on glucose clearance. Glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) translocation is acutely stimulated by muscle contraction, increasing facilitated transport of glucose into the muscle. In addition, contraction augments skeletal muscle blood flow and thereby increases the rate of glucose dispersion into the muscle interstitial space (42). Insulin also recruits GLUT4 to the muscle surface. Muscle glycogen stores and exogenous glucose are consumed during exercise leading to a glucose/glucose-6-phosphate gradient that favors additional glucose entry into the skeletal muscle. Based on these factors and other molecular changes in skeletal muscle signaling, exercise can impact glucose homeostasis for up to 48 hours (43).

 

Exercise training increases skeletal muscle GLUT4 expression and augments insulin receptor signaling and oxidative capacity which optimizes insulin action and glucose oxidation and storage (44). Therefore, routine moderate exercise usually improves sensitivity to insulin in individuals with T2D (45). This exercise effect is impacted by exercise type (aerobic versus resistance), dose, duration, and intensity of activity. For example, the energy expended per week, is a product of frequency, intensity, and duration of exercise and correlates with changes in insulin sensitivity (46,47). There is also an impact of each bout of exercise. Newsom et al found that low intensity activity (50% VO2peak) improved insulin sensitivity for ~19 hours after exercise in obese adults (48). These findings support the recommendation that people with T2D should engage in daily exercise, with no more than 2 days elapsing between episodes of physical activity; consistency is key and even small amounts of exercise are beneficial (49).

 

The modality of exercise to induce maximal intended benefit in individuals with T2D is not as clear. Physical activity guidelines for Americans suggest a mixture of resistance and aerobic activity based on limited prospective studies in this population (50,51). Studies vary by intervention structure and duration and in most cases specific exercise interventions have not been compared head-to-head. In one randomized control trial of sedentary individuals with T2D, a combination of aerobic and resistance training for 9 months significantly lowered HbA1c levels compared to a non-exercise control group (50). Similarly, high intensity interval training (HIIT) session (10 minutes of intense exercise) reduces postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with T2D, suggesting that it can be a time efficient way to achieve benefits of exercise training (52). At the same time, any type of exercise is beneficial. Individuals with T2D who engage in exercise have a decrease in HbA1c by 0.67%, regardless of type of exercise (structured aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training) (53). Therefore, the best therapy is one that an individual can and will maintain.

 

In patients with T1D, available evidence is mixed for whether exercise improves overall glycemic control, but it has been shown to have multiple benefits (54). Supervised exercise programs increase fitness in patients with T1D and inone study, VO2max increased by 27% after 4 months of participation in a bicycle exercise training program (55,56). Insulin requirements have also been shown to be reduced with exercise training in patients with T1D, with anywhere from a 6% to 18% daily insulin dose reduction across multiple studies (56–58). In the Pittsburgh Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus Morbidity and Mortality Study, activity level was inversely related to mortality risk and men who were sedentary were 3 times more likely to die than active males. A similar but nonsignificant trend was seen in women (59).

 

Regular exercise provides a physiological stress to the body and can generate adaptations such as induction of antioxidant defense mechanisms. Low exposure to a toxic or stress environment leads to positive biological responses, hormesis, whereas high exposure leads to negative responses (U-shaped dose response effect). Exercise induces low amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) acutely, which positively stimulates oxidative damage-repairing enzyme activity and results in improved biological fitness (60). For example, in the context of exercise, ROS formation can stimulate nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a transcription factor that is dormant in the cytoplasm. Low levels of oxidative stress stimulate Nrf2 translocation to the nucleus to stimulate expression of antioxidant enzymes; when Nrf2 activity is diminished, as in endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance and abnormal angiogenesis is seen, such as in individuals with T2D (61). This is one example of the molecular response to exercise. Many such examples exist and demonstrate similarly positive profiles: reduction in inflammatory markers (c-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α) and upregulation of anti-inflammatory substances (interleukin-4 and interleukin 10) (62). Ristow et al showed that exercise mediated ROS are integral to the process by which exercise improves insulin sensitivity (as measured by glucose infusion rates during a hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp and plasma adiponectin) (63). In their study, exercised muscles of previously untrained individuals showed a two-fold increase in oxidative stress (as measured by thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances [TBARS]). However, daily intake of antioxidant dietary supplementation (vitamin C and E) blunted this affect by blocking this initial step of transient increase of oxidative stress. Exercise mediated ROS induced expression of molecular regulators (PPARgand its coactivators PGC1a and PGC1b,) that coordinate insulin-sensitizing gene expression. Those treated with vitamin C and E had decreased expression of these molecular regulators. Consequently, non-supplemented individuals without diabetes had significant improvement in insulin sensitivity while those on antioxidant supplements had no change in insulin sensitivity. The NIH Molecular Transducers of Exercise (MoTrPAC) program will examine the molecular response to exercise in healthy people and rodent models to set the stage for more detailed assessments of these endpoints in disease states such as diabetes (64).

 

While lifestyle intervention through diet and exercise are the initial step in T2D treatment, pharmacologic therapy may also be needed to achieve glycemic targets for a person with T2D. Regardless, at each step of intensification of medical therapy for glucose or blood pressure lowering, exercise should be reinforced as an important part of treatment. Combination therapy with metformin monotherapy plus post-meal exercise, led to a 21% reduction in postprandial hyperglycemia, a comparable effect to that of sulfonylureas (-14%), thiazolidinediones (-20%), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4inhibitors (-23%) (65). At the same time, there is some evidence to suggest that metformin may attenuate the positive effects of exercise on insulin sensitivity and inflammation (66,67). Of note, these studies were performed in people with insulin resistance or increased risk of T2D and not in people with diabetes. Incorporation of exercise and diet into all diabetes management strategies is crucial for cardiometabolic health.

 

IMPACT OF EXERCISE ON DIABETES OUTCOMES

 

Beyond the therapeutic and preventative benefits of exercise discussed in previous sections, exercise also holds great prognostic value for people with diabetes. Observational studies have shown an inverse linear dose-response relationship between physical activity amount and mortality (68). Exercise capacity has been shown to be predictive of mortality in people with diabetes (69), echoing findings in the general population (70). Furthermore, decreased exercise capacity in people with T2D is associated with development of future cardiovascular events (71).

 

Additionally, associations between higher levels of physical activity and reduced complications in diabetes have been noted. Gulsin et al were able to show that exercise improved diastolic function in adults with T2D whereas weight loss via a low-energy diet alone did not improve diastolic function despite the diet leading to weight loss, improved glycemic control, and improved aortic stiffness and concentric LV remodeling (72). A meta-analysis on 18 studies of patients T1D and T2D showed that physical activity also increased glomerular filtration rate and decreased the urinary albumin creatinine ratio (73). In the Finish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study, low levels of self-reported leisure-time physical activity in people with T1D was associated with a greater degree of renal dysfunction, proteinuria, CVD, and retinopathy (74) and Kriska et al found that men with insulin-dependent diabetes who reported higher levels of physical activity in their past had lower prevalence of nephropathy and neuropathy (75). Bohn et al also found an inverse relationship between physical activity level and both retinopathy and microalbuminuria in people with T1D in the Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (DPV) database (76). Interestingly, a large cohort study of adults with T1D and T2D in Australia found that physical activity was protective against developing advanced diabetic retinopathy requiring retinal photocoagulation (however this finding was only significant for men) (77).

 

EXERCISE INTOLERANCE AS A BARRIER TO EXERCISE ADHERENCE IN DIABETES

 

Exercise holds great promise as a preventative and therapeutic intervention for people with diabetes. Yet, diabetes presents significant physiological, psychological, and socioeconomic barriers to physical activity. Despite these barriers, exercise remains a cornerstone of treatment for diabetes, and as such, it is useful to understand the barriers to exercise in diabetes and consider strategies for overcoming them (Table 2).

 

People with T2D are disproportionately sedentary and overweight (78) and report more physical discomfort during exercise (10). Excess weight itself can be a physical barrier to increased activity; in a study of obese subjects with diabetes, those who reported physical discomfort as a barrier to exercise had a significantly higher body mass index compared to those individuals who did not report it (36 vs 34, respectively, p=0.021) (79). A decreased level of fitness also contributes to this barrier of discomfort with physical activity. Functional exercise capacity (FEC), measured by VO2max, is impaired in both youth and adults with uncomplicated T1D and T2D (8,69). Insulin sensitivity has a direct association with VO2peak (80,81). Studies by Reusch, Regensteiner, and colleagues have demonstrated that adolescents and adults with uncomplicated T2D have reduced CRF compared to those without T2D. These findings persist in the absence of clinical cardiovascular disease and when matched by baseline exercise status and weight (82-84).

 

CRF is an outcome determined by various measures of cardiac and skeletal muscle function. Reductions in CRF are associated with reduced cardiac performance (85,86). Women recently diagnosed with T2D have been shown to have significantly increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and abnormal diastolic parameters during exercise compared to healthy control subjects, a finding concerning for subclinical diastolic dysfunction (14,87). Additionally, adolescents with T2D have been shown to have abnormal cardiac circumferential strain (CS), increased indexed LV mass, and decreased CRF compared to obese and lean healthy controls. In this study of youth with T2D, fat mass and low adiponectin correlated with CS and CRF. These associations suggest a role for obesity in cardiac impairment and CRF in T2D (88). In skeletal muscle, Reusch, Regensteiner and colleagues have reported a mismatch between skeletal muscle oxygen extraction, oxidative flux, and VO2peak in individuals with T2D (89,90). Additionally, studies have shown evidence of degradation of the vascular endothelial glycocalyx in individuals with T2D (91). These changes at the muscular level are thought to cause impaired microvascular perfusion, which likely ultimately contributes to decreased CRF in these individuals (92,93). Consistent with a relationship between microvascular dysfunction and fitness, people with diabetes who have developed microvascular complications (retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy with microalbuminuria) have decreased CRF compared to those without these complications (94). Fortunately, certain types of exercise can resolve the T2D associated impairment of skeletal muscle in vivomitochondrial oxidative flux. Scalzo et al showed that single-leg exercise training for 2 weeks increased in vivooxidative flux in participants with T2D but not in matched controls without T2D (95).

 

In addition to these cardiovascular contributions to impaired exercise function in diabetes, mitochondrial capacity is impaired (96), and mitochondrial content is reduced (97). Observations of an association between insulin sensitivity and exercise capacity (81) may also reflect additional metabolic determinants of exercise impairment beyond impaired muscle perfusion and reduced mitochondrial function. As a proof of concept, the PPARg  insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone has been shown to improve exercise capacity and insulin sensitivity in T2D in a three-month intervention (despite weight gain) (98,99). Improved CRF correlated with an improvement in endothelial function and blood flow (98). In contrast, in men with established coronary artery disease and T2D, a year-long-treatment with rosiglitazone lead to a decrease in CRF related to increased weight and subcutaneous fat mass expansion. Our current interpretation is that insulin action is a modifiable target for augmenting CRF but that currently available insulin sensitizers are not a durable intervention (100).

 

Exercise can be a cardiovascular stressor, and while chronic exercise is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk (101), acute exercise may precipitate events in susceptible individuals (102). Thus, in people at high risk for acute cardiovascular events, some caution is warranted in initiating a new exercise regimen. Low intensity exercise with high consistency may be a safer and more effective strategy than more sporadic, high intensity exercise. A cardiac rehabilitation approach is a great consideration, but not often covered by insurance. Discussion with a provider for people with diabetes prior to initiating an exercise program is recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine, especially if they are currently sedentary or have chronic complications from their diabetes (103). This recommendation is echoed but less formal in the ADA guidelines. In the opinion of these authors, people with diabetes should be encouraged to exercise and to build up to an exercise program. Providers should discuss anginal equivalents, and significant changes in exercise tolerance (for example, change in the distance a person can walk, or fewer flights of stairs) or shortness of breath with exercise as an indication for concern. Since exercise should be a vital sign, these discussions should happen with each clinical encounter. 

 

Additionally, presence of diabetes complications can be a barrier to exercise (74). There is a high association between diabetes complications and depression (104), which can reduce the desire to perform any activity. Decreased kidney function, such as that seen in diabetic nephropathy, is associated with a higher prevalence of anemia (105) which can make it difficult to exercise due to decreased oxygen delivery. Additionally, diabetic retinopathy with decreased vision, diabetic neuropathy with loss of balance, and diabetic foot ulcers can all pose physical limitations to exercise (106). Weight bearing exercise can increase foot trauma. Therefore, it is important for people with T2D to conduct frequent foot examinations when participating in physical activity. Contact footwear use can reduce rate of foot-related injury (107,108). However, these special considerations can lead to decreased incentive and increased distress when engaging in physical activity.

 

As may be expected, motivating people with diabetes to exercise regularly is often a considerable challenge in both T1D and T2D. Engaging people with diabetes to exercise generally requires changing ingrained lifestyle habits. Habitual and social barriers to exercise also add to the motivational difficulties of lifestyle-based interventions. Finally, barriers to exercise in T2D may be confounded by socioeconomic class. People with T2D tend to have lower socioeconomic status (109), which is itself associated with less physical activity (110). There is also increased concern for safety in low socioeconomic neighborhoods. Overcoming this array of physiological, psychological, and socioeconomic barriers to regular exercise in people with diabetes requires a nuanced, patient-specific approach. Strategies for motivating patients to engage in regular physical exercise include motivational interviewing (111), community-based interventions (112), group exercise, and surveillance using activity-tracking devices such as pedometers (113). Each of these strategies has been shown to achieve at least modest success, but the increasing prevalence and costs of T2D (114,115) indicate that more work is needed. 

EXERCISE INDUCED HYPOGLYCEMIA

 

Exercise can be acutely dangerous for people with diabetes who are on certain glucose lowering medications, such as insulin and sulfonylureas medications, as exercise can increase the risk of hypoglycemia in these patients. Hypoglycemia and fear of hypoglycemia with exercise represent real and major considerations for people with diabetes. These considerations are especially relevant to people with T1D, as episodes of severe (and particularly nocturnal) hypoglycemia are associated with large increases in mortality (116), and exercise can precipitate nocturnal hypoglycemia and impaired counterregulatory responses in people with T1D (117,118). This is also a risk, albeit to a lesser extent, for people with T2D on insulin or sulfonylureas (119). Exercise increases both the translocation and expression of GLUT4 (120), thus potentiating the effects of insulin, and greatly increases the metabolic demand for glucose (121). These factors predispose towards hypoglycemia. Exercise can impact glucose homeostasis for up to 48 hours (43). Fear of hypoglycemia is the primary barrier to exercise in people with T1D (12).

 

Different exercise modalities can cause varied effects on blood glucose in the acute setting. We will discuss simplified differences during a bout of moderate vs vigorous physical activity in the setting of a healthy individual (Figure 2) to contextualize the discussion that follows. The uptake of blood glucose by skeletal muscle increases with increasing intensity and duration of physical activity. With moderate activity, the fall in plasma glucose from muscle glucose uptake is coordinated with a fall in plasma insulin and increase in counterregulatory hormones, particularly glucagon, that help mobilize glucose (122). With vigorous activity, the distinction is that there is an exercise stimulated surge of counterregulatory hormones, independent of plasma glucose level, and this can stimulate an acute increase in plasma glucose (123). People with diabetes who are treated with insulin lose the ability to physiologically decrease circulating insulin with exercise and can have an impaired ability to augment secretion of glucagon, cortisol, growth hormone and catecholamines with exercise; factors that particularly predispose them to hypoglycemia. Post bout, muscle glycogen depletion from physical activity will lead to increased skeletal muscle glucose uptake for glycogen repletion and this increased insulin-independent glucose clearance contributes to a decrease in plasma glucose (124) (Figure 3).

Figure 2. Glucose homeostasis during a bout of moderate vs. vigorous physical activity.

Figure 3. Glucose homeostasis following a bout of physical activity.

 

In the literature, aerobic and resistance exercise are often compared as activities that have differing effects on hypoglycemia. The aerobic exercise regimens specified in the studies presented here are of moderate intensity and can be conceptualized as a moderate bout of physical activity and the resistance exercise regimens can be conceptualized as a vigorous bout. Yardley et al showed that resistance exercise tends to cause an acute increase in blood glucose superimposed with a subsequent increase in insulin sensitivity, whereas aerobic exercise causes a larger initial decrease in blood glucose but somewhat less sustained hypoglycemic effect. However, resistance exercise was associated with overall less blood glucose variability post-exercise (125). Additionally, a HIIT session is less likely to cause hypoglycemia compared to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (126). There is also evidence that performing resistance exercise prior to aerobic exercise can also lead to decreased glucose variability during exercise and attenuate post-exercise hypoglycemia (127). The optimal duration, intensity, and order of specific types of physical activities to prevent hypoglycemia in patients with T1D is the subject of continued research. Steineck et al found that the time patients with T1D spent in hypoglycemia over a 5-day period was similar if they exercised 5 consecutive days, consisting of 4 minutes of resistance training followed by 30 minutes of aerobic training per session, or if they exercised 2 days in this 5-day period and performed 10 minutes of resistance training followed by 75 minutes of aerobic exercise each session (128). Much like all aspects of diabetes management, the way an individual responds to exercise can be anticipated based on the literature, however, each individual will need to measure their blood glucose pre- and post- exercise for 4-24 hours post bout to understand their needs. Other factors such as sleep, stress, general physical fitness, and prior exercise training can all impact the glucose response to an exercise bout.

 

Beyond the features of a session of exercise, the cornerstone of mitigating the risk of exercise induced hypoglycemia in patients who are on multiple daily injections of insulin or insulin pumps without hybrid closed loop features, includes insulin dose reduction and consumption of carbohydrates. Consensus recommendations consist of complex and personalized algorithms, but some generalizations are to reduce pre-exercise meal bolus within 90 minutes before aerobic exercise by 30-50% and to consume 30-60gm of high glycemic index carbohydrates per hour of sport. Post-exercise recommendations are especially important for afternoon and evening exercise as nocturnal hypoglycemia occurs commonly in individuals with T1D and this risk is increased with exercise that is done later in the day. Some recommendations are to decrease the bolus for the meal after exercise by 50% and reduce basal rate by 20% for 6 hours at bedtime if exercise occurred in the afternoon (129).

 

Hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems are becoming more widely available and used in practice. They require clinicians to modify recommendations for exercise to account for the principles that affect a specific system’s automated insulin delivery algorithms. One clear advantage of HCL systems in this context is that they have a predictive low glucose suspend feature that suspends insulin delivery when a low glucose is predicted in the next 30 minutes (130). An adage that does need to be re-examined for HCL is one described in the previous paragraph wherein patients may eat uncovered carbohydrate snacks or partially covered meals prior to exercise. In HCL systems, the rise in glucose from eating uncovered carbohydrates prior to exercise can lead to an increase in automated insulin delivery (130) and in our clinical experience, extra insulin on board can then sometimes precipitate hypoglycemia with exercise. More research is needed in this arena. One main strategy that is agreed upon to use for hypoglycemia prevention with HCL is to increase the target glucose for a session of exercise. Some systems call this a “temporary target” while in others, an increased target is embedded into their “exercise mode”. Based upon personalized factors, the increased target should be set anywhere from 30 minutes to 2 hours prior to initiating physical activity and it should remain on for the duration of the activity and in some situations, up to a few hours afterwards (130). In a study of patients with T1D placed on HCL, their target was increased from 2 hours prior to exercise initiation to 15 minutes after. They engaged in either HIIT or moderate intensity exercise in a cross-over study design and only 1 of 12 participants experienced hypoglycemia and it was during their session of moderate intensity exercise. Time spent in hypoglycemia for 24 hours afterwards measured by continuous glucose monitors was minimal in both groups (0 and 0.4% respectively for HIIT and moderate intensity) (131). Tagougui et al studied adults with T1D using a HCL system during 60 minutes of 60% VO2 peak exercise who were randomized to either 1) increase target glucose level and reduce their meal bolus by 33% 90 minutes before exercise 2) increase target glucose but take a full meal bolus 90 minutes before exercise or 3) not change target glucose and take a full meal bolus. The increased target was maintained until 1 hour after exercise. During exercise and the 1-hour recovery period, time spent in hypoglycemia was significantly reduced in both groups 1 and 2 compared to 3 and there was a trend towards less time in hypoglycemia in group 1 vs group 2 (p=0.06) but at the expense of 24.6% more time in hyperglycemia (132).

 

SEX DIFFERENCES WITHIN DIABETES AND EXERCISE

 

According to the IDF Diabetes Atlas, the prevalence of diabetes in adult women in 2021 was 10.2%, compared to 10.8% of men worldwide (133). When adjusted for associated risk factors, women with diabetes have a higher incidence of CVD death and congestive heart failure compared to men (134). Excess CVD in women with T2D correlates with increased adiposity and CVD risk factor burden present in T2D women (135,136).

 

Additionally, based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys between 2007 and 2016, girls and women with T2D have lower physical activity levels than men across all age groups and settings (137). This observation may be due to barriers to exercise, as mentioned above. Of importance, there are sex differences in barriers to exercise as well (138). Women are more likely than men to consider activities of daily living as exercise when referring to physical activity behavior. They are also more likely to report decreased knowledge or skills associated with physical activity (139). Additional barriers for exercise specific to women include decreased perceived neighborhood safety and decreased perceived easy access to locations for physical activity (140). Women also had less self-efficacy, i.e. successful execution of a physical activity behavioral change, than men for participating in physical activity when other common barriers emerged (e.g. time constraints, bad weather) (139). In a meta-analysis of T2D across the lifespan it was shown that across all ages, males participated in more moderate and vigorous activity than females and in adulthood and late adulthood, men were more likely to achieve physical activity recommendations than women (141).

 

Furthermore, women with T2D have a more pronounced exercise impairment in cardiorespiratory fitness then men with T2D (84,87). Interestingly, while obese women with T2D have reduced VO2 kinetics when compared with controls, there is no difference in impairments based on menopausal status (142). The mechanism behind these differences and how it relates to insulin-mediated cardiac and skeletal muscle perfusion impairments is currently being studied.

 

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

 

Exercise is an important therapy in prevention and treatment of diabetes. At the same time, this is easier said than done, especially given the barriers to exercise that individuals with diabetes must overcome. These barriers are further complicated by sex differences, with sex also affecting prognosis with a diabetes diagnosis. The etiology of diabetes-related decreases in cardiorespiratory fitness is not yet fully understood; further research is being undertaken in this area to address potential therapeutic targets. Given the discussed correlation between CRF and morbidity and mortality, such an approach could aid in reduction of disability and mortality associated with diabetes. Additionally, a better strategy is needed to measure response to exercise therapy to aid in modification of a regimen to ensure continuous benefit. Given the high heterogeneity in response to exercise, other genetic and environmental components may be responsible. Further research on genetic contributions to exercise response is needed. Ultimately, future therapy will need to be more personalized such that every individual with diabetes receives a specific prescription for exercise based on factors such as sex, diabetes type and duration, comorbidities, genetic background and exercise phenotype, and environment.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. American Diabetes Association. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care 2022;45(Suppl. 1):S60–S82.
  2. Piercy KL, Troiano RP. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans From the US Department of Health and Human Services. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(11):e005263.
  3. Committee PAGA. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
  4. Sundquist K, Qvist J, Sundquist J, Johansson SE. Frequent and occasional physical activity in the elderly: a 12-year follow-up study of mortality. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(1):22-27.
  5. Morrish NJ, Wang SL, Stevens LK, Fuller JH, Keen H. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001;44 Suppl 2:S14-21.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report Website. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html. Accessed [9/22/2022].
  7. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077-e1086.
  8. Awotidebe TO, Adedoyin RA, Yusuf AO, Mbada CE, Opiyo R, Maseko FC. Comparative functional exercise capacity of patients with type 2-diabetes and healthy controls: a case control study. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:257.
  9. Komatsu WR, Gabbay MA, Castro ML, Saraiva GL, Chacra AR, de Barros Neto TL, Dib SA. Aerobic exercise capacity in normal adolescents and those with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes. 2005;6(3):145-149.
  10. Huebschmann AG, Reis EN, Emsermann C, Dickinson LM, Reusch JE, Bauer TA, Regensteiner JG. Women with type 2 diabetes perceive harder effort during exercise than nondiabetic women. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme. 2009;34(5):851-857.
  11. Korkiakangas EE, Alahuhta MA, Laitinen JH. Barriers to regular exercise among adults at high risk or diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):416-427.
  12. Brazeau AS, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Strychar I, Mircescu H. Barriers to physical activity among patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(11):2108-2109.
  13. Pickering C, Kiely J. Do Non-Responders to Exercise Exist-and If So, What Should We Do About Them? Sports Med. 2019;49(1):1-7.
  14. Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Huebschmann AG, Herlache L, Weinberger HD, Wolfel EE, Reusch JE. Sex differences in the effects of type 2 diabetes on exercise performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(1):58-65.
  15. Warburton DE, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, Nettlefold L, Bredin SS. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:39.
  16. Manson JE, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Krolewski AS, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. Lancet. 1991;338(8770):774-778.
  17. Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1785-1791.
  18. Yang J, Qian F, Chavarro JE, et al. Modifiable risk factors and long term risk of type 2 diabetes among individuals with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2022;378:e070312.
  19. Juraschek SP, Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, Brawner C, Qureshi W, Keteyian SJ, Schairer J, Ehrman JK, Al-Mallah MH. Cardiorespiratory fitness and incident diabetes: the FIT (Henry Ford ExercIse Testing) project. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1075-1081.
  20. Lynch J, Helmrich SP, Lakka TA, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Salonen R, Salonen JT. Moderately intense physical activities and high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness reduce the risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in middle-aged men. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(12):1307-1314.
  21. Jetté M, Sidney K, Blümchen G. Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin Cardiol. 1990;13(8):555-565.
  22. Mendes MA, da Silva I, Ramires V, et al. Metabolic equivalent of task (METs) thresholds as an indicator of physical activity intensity. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200701.
  23. Lang JJ, Wolfe Phillips E, Orpana HM, et al. Field-based measurement of cardiorespiratory fitness to evaluate physical activity interventions. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(11):794-796.
  24. Patrizio E, Calvani R, Marzetti E, Cesari M. Physical Functional Assessment in Older Adults. J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(2):141-149.
  25. Balk EM, Earley A, Raman G, Avendano EA, Pittas AG, Remington PL. Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(6):437-451.
  26. Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, Hoskin M, Kriska AM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pi-Sunyer X, Regensteiner J, Venditti B, Wylie-Rosett J. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes care. 2006;29(9):2102-2107.
  27. Ross R, Dagnone D, Jones PJ, Smith H, Paddags A, Hudson R, Janssen I. Reduction in obesity and related comorbid conditions after diet-induced weight loss or exercise-induced weight loss in men. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(2):92-103.
  28. Qin L, Knol MJ, Corpeleijn E, Stolk RP. Does physical activity modify the risk of obesity for type 2 diabetes: a review of epidemiological data. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(1):5-12.
  29. Cloostermans L, Wendel-Vos W, Doornbos G, Howard B, Craig CL, Kivimaki M, Tabak AG, Jefferis BJ, Ronkainen K, Brown WJ, Picavet SH, Ben-Shlomo Y, Laukkanen JA, Kauhanen J, Bemelmans WJ. Independent and combined effects of physical activity and body mass index on the development of Type 2 Diabetes - a meta-analysis of 9 prospective cohort studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:147.
  30. Eriksson KF, Lindgarde F. Prevention of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus by diet and physical exercise. The 6-year Malmo feasibility study. Diabetologia. 1991;34(12):891-898.
  31. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M, Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study G. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(18):1343-1350.
  32. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, Hu ZX, Lin J, Xiao JZ, Cao HB, Liu PA, Jiang XG, Jiang YY, Wang JP, Zheng H, Zhang H, Bennett PH, Howard BV. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4):537-544.
  33. Kosaka K, Noda M, Kuzuya T. Prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: a Japanese trial in IGT males. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;67(2):152-162.
  34. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V, Indian Diabetes Prevention P. The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 2006;49(2):289-297.
  35. Dai X, Zhai L, Chen Q, Miller JD, Lu L, Hsue C, Liu L, Yuan X, Wei W, Ma X, Fang Z, Zhao W, Liu Y, Huang F, Lou Q. Two-year-supervised resistance training prevented diabetes incidence in people with prediabetes: A randomised control trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Jul;35(5):e3143.
  36. Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study Research G, Orchard TJ, Temprosa M, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Goldberg RB, Mather KJ, Marcovina SM, Montez M, Ratner RE, Saudek CD, Sherif H, Watson KE. Long-term effects of the Diabetes Prevention Program interventions on cardiovascular risk factors: a report from the DPP Outcomes Study. Diabet Med. 2013;30(1):46-55.
  37. Look ARG, Wing RR, Bolin P, Brancati FL, Bray GA, Clark JM, Coday M, Crow RS, Curtis JM, Egan CM, Espeland MA, Evans M, Foreyt JP, Ghazarian S, Gregg EW, Harrison B, Hazuda HP, Hill JO, Horton ES, Hubbard VS, Jakicic JM, Jeffery RW, Johnson KC, Kahn SE, Kitabchi AE, Knowler WC, Lewis CE, Maschak-Carey BJ, Montez MG, Murillo A, Nathan DM, Patricio J, Peters A, Pi-Sunyer X, Pownall H, Reboussin D, Regensteiner JG, Rickman AD, Ryan DH, Safford M, Wadden TA, Wagenknecht LE, West DS, Williamson DF, Yanovski SZ. Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(2):145-154.
  38. Gibbs BB, Brancati FL, Chen H, Coday M, Jakicic JM, Lewis CE, Stewart KJ, Clark JM. Effect of improved fitness beyond weight loss on cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes in the Look AHEAD study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(5):608-617.
  39. Bouchard C, An P, Rice T, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Gagnon J, Perusse L, Leon AS, Rao DC. Familial aggregation of VO(2max) response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;87(3):1003-1008.
  40. Hautala AJ, Kiviniemi AM, Makikallio TH, Kinnunen H, Nissila S, Huikuri HV, Tulppo MP. Individual differences in the responses to endurance and resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(5):535-542.
  41. Bonafiglia JT, Rotundo MP, Whittall JP, Scribbans TD, Graham RB, Gurd BJ. Inter-Individual Variability in the Adaptive Responses to Endurance and Sprint Interval Training: A Randomized Crossover Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167790.
  42. McClatchey PM, Williams IM, Xu Z, Mignemi NA, Hughey CC, McGuinness OP, Beckman JA, Wasserman DH. Perfusion Controls Muscle Glucose Uptake by Altering the Rate of Glucose Dispersion In Vivo. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019.
  43. Cartee GD. Mechanisms for greater insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in normal and insulin-resistant skeletal muscle after acute exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;309(12):E949-959.
  44. McGarrah RW, Slentz CA, Kraus WE. The Effect of Vigorous- Versus Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise on Insulin Action. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(12):117.
  45. Way KL, Hackett DA, Baker MK, Johnson NA. The Effect of Regular Exercise on Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diabetes Metab J. 2016;40(4):253-271.
  46. Magkos F, Tsekouras Y, Kavouras SA, Mittendorfer B, Sidossis LS. Improved insulin sensitivity after a single bout of exercise is curvilinearly related to exercise energy expenditure. Clin Sci (Lond). 2008;114(1):59-64.
  47. Dube JJ, Allison KF, Rousson V, Goodpaster BH, Amati F. Exercise dose and insulin sensitivity: relevance for diabetes prevention. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(5):793-799.
  48. Newsom SA, Everett AC, Hinko A, Horowitz JF. A single session of low-intensity exercise is sufficient to enhance insulin sensitivity into the next day in obese adults. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2516-2522.
  49. Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, Horton ES, Castorino K, Tate DF. Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2065-2079.
  50. Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, Johannsen N, Johnson W, Kramer K, Mikus CR, Myers V, Nauta M, Rodarte RQ, Sparks L, Thompson A, Earnest CP. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(20):2253-2262.
  51. Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Boule NG, Wells GA, Prud'homme D, Fortier M, Reid RD, Tulloch H, Coyle D, Phillips P, Jennings A, Jaffey J. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(6):357-369.
  52. Gillen JB, Little JP, Punthakee Z, Tarnopolsky MA, Riddell MC, Gibala MJ. Acute high-intensity interval exercise reduces the postprandial glucose response and prevalence of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(6):575-577.
  53. Umpierre D, Ribeiro PA, Kramer CK, Leitao CB, Zucatti AT, Azevedo MJ, Gross JL, Ribeiro JP, Schaan BD. Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(17):1790-1799.
  54. Chimen M, Kennedy A, Nirantharakumar K, Pang TT, Andrews R, Narendran P. What are the health benefits of physical activity in type 1 diabetes mellitus? A literature review. Diabetologia. 2012;55(3):542-551.
  55. Laaksonen DE, Atalay M, Niskanen LK, et al. Aerobic exercise and the lipid profile in type 1 diabetic men: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9):1541-1548.
  56. Fuchsjäger-Mayrl G, Pleiner J, Wiesinger GF, et al. Exercise training improves vascular endothelial function in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(10):1795-1801.
  57. Yki-Järvinen H, DeFronzo RA, Koivisto VA. Normalization of insulin sensitivity in type I diabetic subjects by physical training during insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Care. 1984;7(6):520-527.
  58. Ramalho AC, de Lourdes Lima M, Nunes F, et al. The effect of resistance versus aerobic training on metabolic control in patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;72(3):271-276.
  59. Moy CS, Songer TJ, LaPorte RE, et al. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, physical activity, and death. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137(1):74-81.
  60. Golbidi S, Badran M, Laher I. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of exercise in diabetic patients. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:941868.
  61. Cheng X, Siow RC, Mann GE. Impaired redox signaling and antioxidant gene expression in endothelial cells in diabetes: a role for mitochondria and the nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2-Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 defense pathway. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(3):469-487.
  62. Kasapis C, Thompson PD. The effects of physical activity on serum C-reactive protein and inflammatory markers: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(10):1563-1569.
  63. Ristow M, Zarse K, Oberbach A, Kloting N, Birringer M, Kiehntopf M, Stumvoll M, Kahn CR, Bluher M. Antioxidants prevent health-promoting effects of physical exercise in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(21):8665-8670.
  64. Sanford JA, Nogiec CD, Lindholm ME, et al. Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC): Mapping the Dynamic Responses to Exercise. Cell. 2020;181(7):1464-1474.
  65. Erickson ML, Little JP, Gay JL, McCully KK, Jenkins NT. Postmeal exercise blunts postprandial glucose excursions in people on metformin monotherapy. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017;123(2):444-450.
  66. Malin SK, Braun B. Impact of Metformin on Exercise-Induced Metabolic Adaptations to Lower Type 2 Diabetes Risk. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2016;44(1):4-11.
  67. Konopka AR, Laurin JL, Schoenberg HM, Reid JJ, Castor WM, Wolff CA, Musci RV, Safairad OD, Linden MA, Biela LM, Bailey SM, Hamilton KL, Miller BF. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial adaptations to aerobic exercise training in older adults. Aging Cell. 2019;18(1):e12880.
  68. Lee IM, Skerrett PJ. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: what is the dose-response relation? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S459-471; discussion S493-454.
  69. Church TS, Cheng YJ, Earnest CP, Barlow CE, Gibbons LW, Priest EL, Blair SN. Exercise capacity and body composition as predictors of mortality among men with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):83-88.
  70. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):793-801.
  71. Seyoum B, Estacio RO, Berhanu P, Schrier RW. Exercise capacity is a predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2006;3(3):197-201.
  72. Gulsin GS, Swarbrick DJ, Athithan L, et al. Effects of Low-Energy Diet or Exercise on Cardiovascular Function in Working-Age Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded End Point Trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(6):1300-1310.
  73. Cai Z, Yang Y, Zhang J. Effects of physical activity on the progression of diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Biosci Rep. 2021;41(1):BSR20203624.
  74. Waden J, Forsblom C, Thorn LM, Saraheimo M, Rosengard-Barlund M, Heikkila O, Lakka TA, Tikkanen H, Groop PH, FinnDiane Study G. Physical activity and diabetes complications in patients with type 1 diabetes: the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):230-232.
  75. Kriska AM, LaPorte RE, Patrick SL, Kuller LH, Orchard TJ. The association of physical activity and diabetic complications in individuals with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study--VII. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1207-1214.
  76. Bohn B, Herbst A, Pfeifer M, Krakow D, Zimny S, Kopp F, Melmer A, Steinacker JM, Holl RW, Initiative DPV. Impact of Physical Activity on Glycemic Control and Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Study of 18,028 Patients. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1536-1543.
  77. Yan X, Han X, Wu C, Shang X, Zhang L, He M. Effect of physical activity on reducing the risk of diabetic retinopathy progression: 10-year prospective findings from the 45 and Up Study. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0239214.
  78. Kriska AM, Saremi A, Hanson RL, Bennett PH, Kobes S, Williams DE, Knowler WC. Physical activity, obesity, and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in a high-risk population. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(7):669-675.
  79. Egan AM, Mahmood WA, Fenton R, Redziniak N, Kyaw Tun T, Sreenan S, McDermott JH. Barriers to exercise in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. QJM. 2013;106(7):635-638.
  80. Reusch JE, Bridenstine M, Regensteiner JG. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and exercise impairment. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2013;14(1):77-86.
  81. Nadeau KJ, Zeitler PS, Bauer TA, Brown MS, Dorosz JL, Draznin B, Reusch JE, Regensteiner JG. Insulin resistance in adolescents with type 2 diabetes is associated with impaired exercise capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10):3687-3695.
  82. Nadeau KJ, Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Brown MS, Dorosz JL, Hull A, Zeitler P, Draznin B, Reusch JE. Insulin resistance in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and its relationship to cardiovascular function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(2):513-521.
  83. Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Reusch JE, Brandenburg SL, Sippel JM, Vogelsong AM, Smith S, Wolfel EE, Eckel RH, Hiatt WR. Abnormal oxygen uptake kinetic responses in women with type II diabetes mellitus. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;85(1):310-317.
  84. Regensteiner JG, Sippel J, McFarling ET, Wolfel EE, Hiatt WR. Effects of non-insulin-dependent diabetes on oxygen consumption during treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(5):661-667.
  85. Wong CY, O'Moore-Sullivan T, Fang ZY, Haluska B, Leano R, Marwick TH. Myocardial and vascular dysfunction and exercise capacity in the metabolic syndrome. The American journal of cardiology. 2005;96(12):1686-1691.
  86. Moir S, Hanekom L, Fang ZY, Haluska B, Wong C, Burgess M, Marwick TH. Relationship between myocardial perfusion and dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy: a study of quantitative contrast echocardiography and strain rate imaging. Heart. 2006;92(10):1414-1419.
  87. Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Reusch JE, Quaife RA, Chen MY, Smith SC, Miller TM, Groves BM, Wolfel EE. Cardiac dysfunction during exercise in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(5):977-984.
  88. Bjornstad P, Truong U, Dorosz JL, Cree-Green M, Baumgartner A, Coe G, Pyle L, Regensteiner JG, Reusch JE, Nadeau KJ. Cardiopulmonary Dysfunction and Adiponectin in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(3):e002804.
  89. Mason McClatchey P, Bauer TA, Regensteiner JG, Schauer IE, Huebschmann AG, Reusch JEB. Dissociation of local and global skeletal muscle oxygen transport metrics in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(8):1311-1317.
  90. Cree-Green M, Scalzo RL, Harrall K, Newcomer BR, Schauer IE, Huebschmann AG, McMillin S, Brown MS, Orlicky D, Knaub L, Nadeau KJ, McClatchey PM, Bauer TA, Regensteiner JG, Reusch JEB. Supplemental Oxygen Improves In Vivo Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Flux in Sedentary Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2018;67(7):1369-1379.
  91. Broekhuizen L, Lemkes B, Mooij HL, Meuwese MC, Verberne H, Holleman F, Schlingemann RO, Nieuwdorp M, Stroes ES, Vink H. Effect of sulodexide on endothelial glycocalyx and vascular permeability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2010;53(12):2646-2655.
  92. Cabrales P, Vazquez BY, Tsai AG, Intaglietta M. Microvascular and capillary perfusion following glycocalyx degradation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;102(6):2251-2259.
  93. McClatchey PM, Schafer M, Hunter KS, Reusch JE. The endothelial glycocalyx promotes homogenous blood flow distribution within the microvasculature. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;311(1):H168-176.
  94. Estacio RO, Regensteiner JG, Wolfel EE, Jeffers B, Dickenson M, Schrier RW. The association between diabetic complications and exercise capacity in NIDDM patients. Diabetes care. 1998;21(2):291-295.
  95. Scalzo RL, Schauer IE, Rafferty D, et al. Single-leg exercise training augments in vivo skeletal muscle oxidative flux and vascular content and function in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Physiol. 2022;600(4):963-978.
  96. Kelley DE, He J, Menshikova EV, Ritov VB. Dysfunction of mitochondria in human skeletal muscle in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(10):2944-2950.
  97. Ritov VB, Menshikova EV, He J, Ferrell RE, Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE. Deficiency of subsarcolemmal mitochondria in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54(1):8-14.
  98. Regensteiner JG, Bauer TA, Reusch JE. Rosiglitazone improves exercise capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(12):2877-2883.
  99. Kadoglou NP, Iliadis F, Angelopoulou N, Perrea D, Liapis CD, Alevizos M. Beneficial effects of rosiglitazone on novel cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2008;25(3):333-340.
  100. Bastien M, Poirier P, Brassard P, Arsenault BJ, Bertrand OF, Despres JP, Costerousse O, Piche ME. Effect of PPARgamma agonist on aerobic exercise capacity in relation to body fat distribution in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: a 1-yr randomized study. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;317(1):E65-E73.
  101. Bassuk SS, Manson JE. Epidemiological evidence for the role of physical activity in reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;99(3):1193-1204.
  102. Thompson PD, Franklin BA, Balady GJ, Blair SN, Corrado D, Estes NA, Fulton JE, Gordon NF, Haskell WL, Link MS, Maron BJ, Mittleman MA, Pelliccia A, Wenger NK, Willich SN, Costa F, American Heart Association Council on Nutrition PyA, and Metabolism, Cardiology AHACoC, Medicine ACoS. Exercise and acute cardiovascular events placing the risks into perspective: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism and the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;115(17):2358-2368.
  103. Kanaley JA, Colberg SR, Corcoran MH, et al. Exercise/Physical Activity in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Statement from the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(2):353-368.
  104. de Groot M, Anderson R, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2001;63(4):619-630.
  105. Astor BC, Muntner P, Levin A, Eustace JA, Coresh J. Association of kidney function with anemia: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(12):1401-1408.
  106. Crews RT, Schneider KL, Yalla SV, Reeves ND, Vileikyte L. Physiological and psychological challenges of increasing physical activity and exercise in patients at risk of diabetic foot ulcers: a critical review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(8):791-804.
  107. Bonner T, Foster M, Spears-Lanoix E. Type 2 diabetes-related foot care knowledge and foot self-care practice interventions in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2016;7:29758.
  108. Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG, Albert SF, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Kirkman MS, Lavery LA, Lemaster JW, Mills JL, Sr., Mueller MJ, Sheehan P, Wukich DK, American Diabetes A, American Association of Clinical E. Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1679-1685.
  109. Connolly V, Unwin N, Sherriff P, Bilous R, Kelly W. Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(3):173-177.
  110. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med. 2002;35(6):601-611.
  111. Miller ST, Marolen KN, Beech BM. Perceptions of physical activity and motivational interviewing among rural African-American women with type 2 diabetes. Womens Health Issues. 2010;20(1):43-49.
  112. Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Tristán ML, Nathan DM. Randomized controlled community-based nutrition and exercise intervention improves glycemia and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients in rural Costa Rica. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(1):24-29.
  113. Araiza P, Hewes H, Gashetewa C, Vella CA, Burge MR. Efficacy of a pedometer-based physical activity program on parameters of diabetes control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2006;55(10):1382-1387.
  114. Association AD. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):917-928.
  115. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P, Association AD. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917-932.
  116. McCoy RG, Van Houten HK, Ziegenfuss JY, Shah ND, Wermers RA, Smith SA. Increased mortality of patients with diabetes reporting severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(9):1897-1901.
  117. Maran A, Pavan P, Bonsembiante B, Brugin E, Ermolao A, Avogaro A, Zaccaria M. Continuous glucose monitoring reveals delayed nocturnal hypoglycemia after intermittent high-intensity exercise in nontrained patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(10):763-768.
  118. Ertl AC, Davis SN. Evidence for a vicious cycle of exercise and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20(2):124-130.
  119. Shahar J, Hamdy O. Medication and exercise interactions: considering and managing hypoglycemia risk. Diabetes Spectr. 2015;28(1):64-67.
  120. Richter EA, Hargreaves M. Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(3):993-1017.
  121. Katz A, Broberg S, Sahlin K, Wahren J. Leg glucose uptake during maximal dynamic exercise in humans. Am J Physiol. 1986;251(1 Pt 1):E65-70.
  122. Cockcroft EJ, Narendran P, Andrews RC. Exercise-induced hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. Exp Physiol. 2020;105(4):590-599.
  123. Marliss EB, Vranic M. Intense exercise has unique effects on both insulin release and its roles in glucoregulation: implications for diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51 Suppl 1:S271-S283.
  124. Richter, E. A., Derave, W., & Wojtaszewski, J. F. (2001). Glucose, exercise and insulin: emerging concepts. The Journal of physiology535(Pt 2), 313–322.
  125. Yardley JE, Kenny GP, Perkins BA, Riddell MC, Balaa N, Malcolm J, Boulay P, Khandwala F, Sigal RJ. Resistance versus aerobic exercise: acute effects on glycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(3):537-542.
  126. Guelfi KJ, Jones TW, Fournier PA. The decline in blood glucose levels is less with intermittent high-intensity compared with moderate exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1289-1294.
  127. Yardley JE, Kenny GP, Perkins BA, Riddell MC, Malcolm J, Boulay P, Khandwala F, Sigal RJ. Effects of performing resistance exercise before versus after aerobic exercise on glycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(4):669-675.
  128. Steineck IIK, Ranjan AG, Schmidt S, Norgaard K. Time spent in hypoglycemia is comparable when the same amount of exercise is performed 5 or 2 days weekly: a randomized crossover study in people with type 1 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e001919.
  129. Riddell MC, Gallen IW, Smart CE, Taplin CE, Adolfsson P, Lumb AN, Kowalski A, Rabasa-Lhoret R, McCrimmon RJ, Hume C, Annan F, Fournier PA, Graham C, Bode B, Galassetti P, Jones TW, Millan IS, Heise T, Peters AL, Petz A, Laffel LM. Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):377-390.
  130. Zaharieva DP, Messer LH, Paldus B, O'Neal DN, Maahs DM, Riddell MC. Glucose Control During Physical Activity and Exercise Using Closed Loop Technology in Adults and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2020 Dec;44(8):740-749.
  131. Lee MH, Vogrin S, Paldus B, Jayawardene D, Jones HM, McAuley SA, Obeyesekere V, Gooley J, La Gerche A, MacIsaac RJ, Sundararajan V, Jenkins AJ, Ward GM, O'Neal DN. Glucose and Counterregulatory Responses to Exercise in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia Using Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery: A Randomized Crossover Study. Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):480-483.
  132. Tagougui S, Taleb N, Legault L, et al. A single-blind, randomised, crossover study to reduce hypoglycaemia risk during postprandial exercise with closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes: announced (with or without bolus reduction) vs unannounced exercise strategies. Diabetologia. 2020;63(11):2282-2291.
  133. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, Stein C, Basit A, Chan JCN, Mbanya JC, Pavkov ME, Ramachandaran A, Wild SH, James S, Herman WH, Zhang P, Bommer C, Kuo S, Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;183:109119.
  134. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241(19):2035-2038.
  135. Sattar N. Gender aspects in type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiometabolic risk. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(4):501-507.
  136. Huebschmann AG, Huxley RR, Kohrt WM, Zeitler P, Regensteiner JG, Reusch JEB. Sex differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course. Diabetologia. 2019.
  137. Scholes S, Bann D. Education-related disparities in reported physical activity during leisure-time, active transportation, and work among US adults: repeated cross-sectional analysis from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2007 to 2016. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):926.
  138. Miller TM, Gilligan S, Herlache LL, Regensteiner JG. Sex differences in cardiovascular disease risk and exercise in type 2 diabetes. J Investig Med. 2012;60(4):664-670.
  139. Barrett JE, Plotnikoff RC, Courneya KS, Raine KD. Physical activity and type 2 diabetes: exploring the role of gender and income. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33(1):128-143.
  140. Bengoechea E, Spence JC, McGannon KR. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2005;2(1):12.
  141. Whipple MO, Pinto AJ, Abushamat LA, Bergouignan A, Chapman K, Huebschmann AG, Masters KS, Nadeau KJ, Scalzo RL, Schauer IE, Rafferty D, Reusch JEB, Regensteiner JG. Sex Differences in Physical Activity Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2022 Sep 1;45(9):2163-2177.
  142. Kiely C, Rocha J, O'Connor E, O'Shea D, Green S, Egana M. Influence of menopause and Type 2 diabetes on pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics and peak exercise performance during cycling. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015;309(8):R875-883.